Next Article in Journal
Prolonged Hyperoxygenation Treatment Improves Vein Graft Patency and Decreases Macrophage Content in Atherosclerotic Lesions in ApoE3*Leiden Mice
Next Article in Special Issue
PIK3R1W624R Is an Actionable Mutation in High Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma
Previous Article in Journal
RETRACTED: Living with Yourself: Innate Lymphoid Cell Immunometabolism
Previous Article in Special Issue
Identification and Characterization of a New Platinum-Induced TP53 Mutation in MDAH Ovarian Cancer Cells
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cells
Volume 9
Issue 2
10.3390/cells9020335
cells-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Vitamin D and Ovarian Cancer: Systematic Review of the Literature with a Focus on Molecular Mechanisms

by
Andraž Dovnik
1,* and
Nina Fokter Dovnik
2
1
University Clinic for Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Centre Maribor, Ljubljanska 5, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia
2
Department of Oncology, University Medical Centre Maribor, Ljubljanska 5, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cells 2020, 9(2), 335; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9020335
Submission received: 8 December 2019 / Revised: 21 January 2020 / Accepted: 27 January 2020 / Published: 1 February 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms of Cancers: Ovarian Cancer)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Vitamin D is a lipid soluble vitamin involved primarily in calcium metabolism. Epidemiologic evidence indicates that lower circulating vitamin D levels are associated with a higher risk of ovarian cancer and that vitamin D supplementation is associated with decreased cancer mortality. A vast amount of research exists on the possible molecular mechanisms through which vitamin D affects cancer cell proliferation, cancer progression, angiogenesis, and inflammation. We conducted a systematic review of the literature on the effects of vitamin D on ovarian cancer cell.

1. Introduction

Vitamin D is a lipid soluble vitamin involved in calcium and phosphate homeostasis [1]. By promoting the intestinal absorption of calcium and bone osteoclast activity it helps to keep calcium and phosphate concentrations within physiological range [1]. In recent decades, a vast amount of research has been performed on potential extraskeletal roles of vitamin D. Available data indicate that there might be an association between vitamin D levels and the risk of developing different kinds of cancers [2]. Epidemiologic evidence suggests that lower circulating vitamin D levels are associated with a higher risk of ovarian cancer [3]. Furthermore, a recent meta-analysis showed that vitamin D supplementation is associated with a 13% decrease in cancer mortality [4].
The two main sources of vitamin D are sunlight and dietary products (Figure 1) [1]. Under the influence of sunlight, previtamin D3 is formed in the skin and then undergoes a heat induced isomerisation to vitamin D3 [1]. Vitamin D3 is then transported to the liver attached to vitamin D binding protein (DBP) [5]. There, it is hydroxylated to 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) with the microsomal and mitochondrial 25-hydroxylase encoded by the gene CYP27A1 [1,6,7]. 25(OH)D is the circulating form of vitamin D and its concentration is measured when determining vitamin D status. 25(OH)D is further metabolised in the kidneys with the action of 1α-hydroxylase encoded by the gene CYP27B1, forming the active metabolite 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25(OH)2D) (calcitriol) [6,8]. The production of calcitriol also takes place in the bone, placenta, dendritic cells, parathyroid gland, prostate, and cancer cells [7,9,10].
The physiological effects of 1,25(OH)2D are carried out through interaction with the vitamin D receptor (VDR) (Figure 1) [1]. This is a nuclear transcription factor and when activated with 1,25(OH)2D undergoes hetero-dimerisation with a retinoic acid X receptor (RXR) [1,11,12,13]. Then, this complex binds to the specific DNA sequences known as vitamin D response elements (VDRE) [1,11]. The interaction with VDRE results in downregulation or upregulation of genes which are involved in apoptosis, cell growth and differentiation, immune responses, and inflammation (Figure 1) [1,12]. The activity of 1α-hydroxylase is regulated by respective concentrations of 1,25(OH)2D: With increasing concentrations of this active metabolite the enzymatic activity together with the expression of CYP27B1 decreases [6]. The rate limiting step for degradation of 25(OH)D and 1,25(OH)2D is the activity of the catabolic enzyme 24-hydroxylase encoded by the gene CYP24A1 which transforms these two molecules to inactive forms which are soluble in water and can therefore be excreted in the bile [1,6].
The main role of calcitriol is maintaining calcium homeostasis. VDR is located in the small intestine and when the VDR-RXR complex is formed it interacts with VDRE in the genes associated with intestinal calcium absorption. If intestinal absorption is inadequate to maintain calcium homeostasis vitamin D mobilises skeletal calcium by binding with VDR in osteoblasts. 1,25(OH)2D increases the expression of RANK ligand (RANKL) in osteoblasts. RANKL then binds with RANK on proosteoclasts and induces their transformation to mature osteoclasts [2].
Ovarian cancer is a heterogenous group of diseases. The most common is epithelial ovarian cancer which represents 90% of all cases [14]. This is an aggressive form of gynaecological malignancy with the 5-year overall survival rate of less than 50% [3,14]. The most common histological subtype is serous adenocarcinoma and about 80% of serous cancers are diagnosed in advanced stages [3,14]. The risk of developing ovarian cancer is decreased by the use of oral contraceptives, higher parity, tubal sterilisation and removal of the ovaries, and increased by the use of hormones during menopause [14].
We performed a systematic review of the literature on molecular mechanisms through which vitamin D can influence ovarian cancer cells. The literature search was conducted using the MEDLINE electronic database for the search terms (“vitamin d” OR “ergocalciferols”) AND (“ovarian neoplasms” OR “ovarian cancer”) and identified 251 papers published until October 2019. Peer-reviewed articles published in the English language and containing an abstract were considered and reference lists were screened for additional relevant citations. All articles dealing with molecular mechanisms were included in the review. Full-text versions of all manuscripts were obtained. The systematic review was conducted in accordance to PRISMA guidelines.

2. Epidemiological Data on the Link between Vitamin D and Ovarian Cancer

The role of vitamin D in the development and progression of cancer has been the subject of many studies. Higher vitamin D concentrations have been associated with a lower risk of developing different kinds of cancers including ovarian cancer [7,15]. However, the epidemiological evidence linking vitamin D concentrations and ovarian cancer incidence and/or mortality is less strong than the evidence concerning some other cancer types [16]. In 2010, a systematic review of the literature reported that approximately half of the ecologic and case-control studies found reductions in ovarian cancer incidence or mortality with increasing geographic latitude, solar radiation levels, or vitamin D supplementation, while cohort studies found no overall risk reduction with increasing consumption or plasma levels of vitamin D prior to diagnosis [17]. A meta-analysis of four cohort studies reported a possible inverse association of ovarian cancer incidence and circulating 25(OH)D levels that did not reach statistical significance [18]. Mixed results were obtained in more recent ecologic studies [19,20], case-control [21], and cohort studies [22,23] as well. A Mendelian randomization study found that European women with genetically lowered 25(OH)D concentrations due to single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) had higher susceptibility for ovarian cancer [3].

3. Overview of the Role of Vitamin D and VDR in Ovarian Cancer

In vitro studies have established the role of vitamin D in inhibiting the proliferation of cancer cells [7,24,25]. Calcitriol regulates tumour growth by arresting various stages of the cell cycle [25,26]. Ovarian cancer cells can be arrested in the G1/S checkpoint by the action of calcitriol on cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitors P21 and P27 [26,27]. 1,25(OH)2D can also induce cell cycle arrest at the G2/M checkpoint acting primarily on GADD45 [24,26]. In addition, calcitriol seems to have a role in epithelial–mesenchymal transition [28]. It has been shown to increase the expression of the epithelial marker E-cadherin and reduce the expression of EMT transcription factors. The net effect of these actions was inhibition of migration and invasion of SKOV-3 cells [28]. Furthermore, calcitriol has been associated with the mechanisms promoting cell apoptosis by downregulation of telomerase in ovarian cancer cells [29]. Vitamin D has also been shown to play a role in anti-inflammatory processes in ovarian cancer. Since inflammation is a risk factor in carcinogenesis, this can also be viewed as one of its anti-tumour activities [26]. Moreover, it has been reported that vitamin D has an effect on fatty acid and glucose metabolism in cancer cells [30,31].
The vitamin D receptor is present in normal ovarian epithelium and ovarian cancer cells [12]. The expression of VDR has been found to be increased in ovarian cancer tissue compared to normal ovarian tissue [32]. VDR in the ovary is involved in the regulation of the aromatase gene expression and oestrogen biosynthesis. Higher levels of gonadotropins, reduced expression of the aromatase gene and a lower aromatase activity were detected in VDR-null mice [12].
VDR polymorphisms and the associated ovarian cancer risk have been extensively investigated in the past [12,33,34,35,36,37,38,39]. The most studied variants include FokI, BsmI, Cdx-2, and TaqI [15].
The following chapters will discuss in detail the molecular mechanisms through which vitamin D could influence the occurrence of ovarian cancer. Studies on the effects of vitamin D specifically on ovarian cancer cells are summarised in Table 1.

4. Cell cycle and Programmed Cell Death (Apoptosis)

Calcitriol as the active form of vitamin D has been shown to have an effect on cancer growth by regulating different stages of the cell cycle [24,25,27]. The regulation of cell cycle progression occurs through checkpoints by the help of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK) which are activated by cyclins and deactivated by CDK inhibitors [50].
Progression of the cell cycle through the G1/S checkpoint is regulated along the CDK2-Rb-E2F axis. Cyclin dependent kinase transcription is stimulated by the epidermal growth factor (EGF) which leads to the activation of E2F, degradation of p27, and progression from G1 to the S phase [25,27]. Calcitriol has been found to regulate the expression of p27, cyclin A, cyclin E, and Skp2 in human ovarian cancer cell lines [25]. The main target for calcitriol is p27, a tumour suppressor whose accumulation in the cell leads to cell cycle arrest in the G1 phase. The DNA synthesis in the S phase of the cell cycle is controlled by cyclin A and other E2F regulated genes. Calcitriol decreases the expression of cyclin A resulting in the decrease of CDK2 activity and decreased phosphorylation of p27. This decreases the affinity of p27 for Skp2 ubiquitin ligase which causes the accumulation of p27 in the cell leading to cell cycle arrest [25].
In addition to the effect of vitamin D on the proteins of the cell cycle signaling pathway, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has been identified in human ovarian cancer cell lines as a target gene leading to a sequential reaction which stops the cell cycle at the G1/S checkpoint [27]. A novel VDRE has been found in intron 1 of the EGFR genome. It has been shown that 1,25(OH)2D suppresses EGFR expression at mRNA and protein levels. The downregulation of EGFR caused by calcitriol leads to a decreased response of ovarian cancer cells to the epidermal growth factor [27]. Another important gene identified in ovarian cancer cell lines found to be involved in the tumour suppressor activity of calcitriol is GADD45 [24]. This is a p53 regulated gene and has an important role in DNA repair and the cell cycle [24]. When calcitriol binds to its receptor, the VDR-RXR complex leads to the accumulation of GADD45 in the cell causing a decrease in the Cdc2 activity and preventing progression to the M phase of the cell cycle [24].
In summary, it has been shown that 1,25(OH)2D decreases the growth of multiple ovarian cancer cell lines. However, the concern has been raised that therapeutic concentrations of 1,25(OH)2D would cause hypercalcaemia in humans [41]. American researchers have reported on the antiproliferative activity of the 1,25(OH)2D analogue EB1089. They have shown that this is even more effective than 1,25(OH)2D in regulating tumour growth and inducing apoptosis by increasing the transcription of GADD45 in ovarian cancer cell lines. Importantly, EB1089 suppressed tumour growth in nude mice models without inducing hypercalcaemia [41].
The effect of 1,25(OH)2D on ovarian cancer cell apoptosis has also been reported [29]. 1,25(OH)2D has been shown to downregulate telomerase, the enzyme required to stabilise telomere length and enable cell immortality, thereby inducing apoptosis in ovarian cancer cell lines [29]. High telomerase activity in cancer cells is primarily due to overexpression of its catalytic subunit, human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT), which is increased up to 100-fold in cancer compared to non-cancer cells. 1,25(OH)2D decreases the level of hTERT mRNA by decreasing its stability [29]. Another vitamin D target regulating telomerase function is microRNA-498 [42,51]. MicroRNA are single stranded RNA molecules which usually lower gene expression. A VDRE has been found in the 5′ region of the microRNA-498 genome. When activated by 1,25(OH)2D, miR-498 lowers the mRNA expression of hTERT by binding to its 3′-untranslated region, thus leading to apoptosis [42].
On the other hand, 1,25(OH)2D has been found to regulate the extrinsic apoptotic pathway through inhibition of the tumour necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) and TRAIL receptor 4 and downregulation of the Fas ligand [40]. Zhang et al. have demonstrated that pretreatment with 1,25(OH)2D decreases apoptosis induced by Fas ligand and TRAIL [40]. The authors have emphasised the need to understand the potential adverse effects of vitamin D on ovarian cancer cells. Subsequent analysis within the same study has shown that this adverse effect could be overcome by the molecular manipulation of death receptors TRAIL 4 and Fas [40].
Moreover, a synergistic effect between 1,25(OH)2D and carboplatin has been reported, showing that 1,25(OH)2D enhances apoptosis induced by carboplatin [44]. The effect of 1,25(OH)2D on apoptosis has also been shown in microarray studies on ovarian cancer cell lines [52]. The pro-apoptotic effect of 1,25(OH)2D was carried out through decreased expression of apoptosis inhibitor 5 (API5L1) and increased expression of pro-apoptotic c-abl oncogene 1, transforming growth factor β (TGF-β), and receptor tyrosine kinase ABL1 [52].

5. Epithelial–Mesenchymal Transition and Cancer Progression

Epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a reversible process where epithelial cells gain mesenchymal morphology and lose intercellular contacts, becoming more invasive and able to migrate. This has been postulated to play a critical role in ovarian cancer progression [28]. This phenomenon has been studied on SKOV-3 cells stimulated by the TGF-β1. This cytokine promotes tumour progression in advanced stages by various mechanisms including EMT. 1,25(OH)2D decreased the expression of the mesenchymal marker vimentin and increased the expression of the epithelial marker E-cadherin. It also caused an inhibition of SKOV-3 cell migration and inhibited TGF-β1 induced EMT [28]. In addition, in vivo and in vitro studies have suggested that 1,25(OH)2D and VDR help inhibit the spread of ovarian cancer to the omentum [45]. A study on mouse ovarian surface epithelial cells found that 1,25(OH)2D delayed their malignant transformation by decreasing the expression of β-catenin and increasing the expression of E-cadherin [48].
The vitamin D binding protein has also been reported to have a role in ovarian cancer progression, namely in cancer invasiveness, formation of ascites, and cancer metastasis [5]. Animal studies have shown that exposure of ovarian cancer cells to vitamin D3 before the inoculation to immunodeficient mice decreased the potential of the cells to metastasise into liver, lung, and bone marrow [47].
DDX4 (DEAD (Asp-Glu-Ala-Asp)-box helicase 4) has been found to be another target for active vitamin D [49]. Treatment with active vitamin D reduced the expression of DDX which inhibited the invasion of ovarian cancer cells [49]. Microarray studies have identified a number of target genes involved in tumour growth and progression regulated by 1,25(OH)2D. The upregulation of lysophosphatidic acid G-protein coupled receptor (Edg2) is consistent with its function in the inhibition of tumour growth. On the other hand, calcitriol downregulates growth-promoting chemochines IL-8, GRO-β, and GRO-γ [52].

6. Angiogenesis

We have not found any studies specifically evaluating the effect of vitamin D on angiogenesis in ovarian cancer. Nevertheless, in human cancer cells, 1,25(OH)2D has been found to have an antiangiogenic effect by modulating the hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1) pathway [53]. Hypoxia is the main trigger of angiogenesis in tumours and HIF-1 is the key transcription factor regulating angiogenesis. It has been shown that 1,25(OH)2D reduces the expression of the HIF-1α subunit and of the vascular endothelial growth factor and inhibits cancer cell proliferation under hypoxic conditions [53]. Other research has shown that the antiangiogenic effect of 1,25(OH)2D on tumour endothelial cells is also VDR mediated [54]. Increased vascular volume and a lower number of pericytes which regulate the proliferation of endothelial cells were found in VDR knock-out animals [54].

7. Immunomodulation and Tumour Inflammatory Response

Vitamin D is an important regulator of the innate immune system that acts by inducing several antimicrobial peptides, influencing chemotaxis, autophagy, and phagolysosomal fusion of monocytes and macrophages, increasing the physical barrier function of epithelial cells and influencing the composition of gut microbiota [55]. In addition, vitamin D modulates the adaptive immune system, mostly acting as an immunosuppressor by downregulating T helper (Th) 1 cells, inhibiting the production of several proinflammatory cytokines, upregulating Th2 cells and T regulatory (Treg) cells, downregulating Th17 cells, and modulating antigen-presenting dendritic cells into a “tolerogenic state” [55]. Low vitamin D levels have thus been associated with an increased susceptibility for infections, as well as an increased risk for several autoimmune diseases [55].
The relationship between cancer and the immune system is complex, ranging from tumoricidal effector response of immune cells to immune tolerance and prometastatic effects [56].
Some cancers are infiltrated by the cells of the adaptive and innate immune system [57]. These immune cells can have a major effect on cancer progression by supplying growth factors, factors which contribute to angiogenesis, EMT, and survival factors which help escape apoptosis [57]. The inflammatory response is important in the development of ovarian and other types of cancers [46,58]. Cyclooxygenase 1 and 2 (COX-1 and COX-2) are two isoenzymes which mediate the synthesis of prostaglandin and therefore control the inflammatory response [46,59]. While COX-1 is expressed constitutively, the expression of COX-2 is regulated by prostaglandins, growth factors, and cytokines. The upregulation of COX-2 in the development of ovarian cancer is associated with decreased apoptosis, increased cell proliferation, and neoangiogenesis [59]. Increased expression of COX-2 in ovarian cancer cells compared to benign tissue has been reported and has been associated with reduced overall survival [60,61]. A study on ovarian and endometrial cancer cell lines has shown that calcitriol and progesterone decreased the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines CXCL1 and CXCL2 leading to downregulation of proteins associated with the process of metastasis [43]. CXCL1 and CXCL2 are expressed in a greater degree in ovarian cancer and have been found to be associated with metastasis, angiogenesis, and tumour growth in breast and squamous cell cancers [43]. The anti-proliferative effects of COX-2 inhibitors have been established in both in vitro and in vivo studies. Furthermore, it has been shown that calcitriol and the COX-2 inhibitor celecoxib have synergistic effects on ovarian cancer cell proliferation [46].
On the other hand, pre-existing antitumour T-cell response is associated with a greater efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade, whereas the so-called immune deserted tumours hardly ever respond to immunotherapy [62]. It has recently been shown that tumour intrinsic Wnt/β-catenin signaling mediates immune exclusion in melanoma and this has been confirmed across other human cancers [63,64]. Vitamin D-VDR signaling inhibits the Wnt/β-catenin pathway and could be explored therapeutically with the aim of counteracting resistance to immunotherapy [63,64].

8. Enzyme Expression and Tumour Metabolism

The enzymes participating in vitamin D metabolism 25-hydroxylase, 1α-hydroxylase, and 24-hydroxylase have been shown to be upregulated in ovarian cancer cells in one study [32], but other studies have failed to confirm this finding [65,66]. In one of the latter, decreased expression of CYP27B1, the gene encoding for 1α-hydroxylase, in primary and metastatic ovarian cancer has been associated with decreased overall survival [66]. The exposure of ovarian cancer cell lines to 1,25(OH)2D has shown no effect on the expression of 25-hydroxylase and 1α-hydroxylase but has resulted in the upregulation of 24-hydroxylase mRNA [67]. In studies on ovarian cancer cell lines, high concentrations of 1,25(OH)2D inhibited the growth of these cells while lower concentrations stimulated their growth [68]. It has been postulated that higher concentrations were required due to the activity of 24-hydroxylase which inactivates 1,25(OH)2D. The growth stimulating effect of lower calcitriol concentrations may be due to the effect of metabolites produced by 24-hydroxylase, although their role is still poorly understood [68].
We have not found any research about the direct effect of 1,25(OH)2D specifically on ovarian cancer cell metabolism. The effect of 1,25(OH)2D on the metabolism of other cancer types has been reported [26].

9. Vitamin D receptor

Ovarian tumours and normal ovarian epithelium both express VDR [7,12] but its expression is increased in ovarian cancer tissue compared to normal ovarian tissue [32]. Moreover, VDR levels on platelets have been found to be higher in patients with ovarian tumours compared to healthy women and higher in women with ovarian malignancies compared to benign ovarian tumours [69]. As mentioned above, VDR is involved in the biosynthesis of oestrogen and control of the expression of the aromatase gene [7]. Studies on ovarian cancer cell lines have shown that 1,25(OH)2D upregulates the expression of VDR and has an inhibitory effect on the growth of ovarian cancer cells [70]. Furthermore, cooperation between VDR and the androgen receptor, both of which regulate ovarian cancer cell growth, has been demonstrated. Specifically, 1,25(OH)2D upregulated the androgen receptor and dihydrotestosterone inhibited the growth of cancer cells by upregulation of VDR [70].
Vitamin D receptor polymorphisms have been studied in various populations with controversial results [12,33,34,35,36,37,38,39]. The most studied single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) were FokI, BsmI, Cdx-2, Apa1, and TaqI [12,15].
FokI is located on exon 2. The presence of F allele on FokI leads to a three amino acid longer protein compared to the protein produced by the F allele [71,72]. The longer protein has been reported to be less responsive to 1,25(OH)2D with a lower transcription activity [12,71]. Carriers of the F allele have been shown to have a two times higher risk of developing ovarian cancer compared to homozygous carriers of the F allele. However, this association was present only in Caucasian and not in Japanese women [12]. A subsequent meta-analysis showed that the F allele is most common in the Asian population, followed by the Caucasian and African populations [72]. Moreover, homozygous FF allele ovarian cancer patients have been found to have better overall survival compared to Ff and ff allele carriers [34]. The association between FokI and ovarian cancer risk has been confirmed in some [35,36,37,38], but not all subsequent analyses [33,37,39,73]. Nevertheless, recent meta-analyses all indicate that the FokI polymorphism is associated with increased ovarian cancer risk [15,71,72,74,75,76,77].
The other most commonly studied VDR polymorphism is BsmI [7]. It is located on intron 8 and its polymorphisms have been associated with skin and colorectal cancers [71]. Some research has suggested a role of the BsmI receptor polymorphisms in the development of ovarian cancer [39,73] but not all studies support this finding [12,33,35,37]. Meta-analyses have provided controversial results [15,71,74,76,77,78,79]. Most of them found no association between BsmI and ovarian cancer [15,71,74,76]. However, the most recent meta-analysis indicated that the association was present, especially in the Caucasian population [77].
In one study, the Cdx-2 polymorphism was associated with an increased risk of developing ovarian cancer in Japanese women but not in other ethnic groups [12]. This association has not been confirmed by other studies [35,37]. A meta-analysis evaluating the role of the Cdx-2 polymorphism in the development of different types of cancer indicated that the Cdx-2 polymorphism was not associated with increased cancer risk in the Asian and Caucasian populations but was associated with increased cancer risk in the African-American population [80]. Specifically, Cdx-2 polymorphisms have been associated with increased risk of developing ovarian and colorectal cancer [80]. Two other meta-analyses found increased ovarian cancer risk in heterozygous and dominant models for Cdx-2 polymorphisms [76,77] while a third meta-analysis did not find any association [15].
The ApaI polymorphism has also been investigated and case control studies have provided mixed results [12,33,37,81]. A study on 170 cases of epithelial ovarian cancer compared to healthy controls found no association between the ApaI polymorphism and ovarian cancer risk [33]. In another case control study, the ApaI polymorphism was associated with increased risk of ovarian cancer in African-American women [81]. Other researchers reported that the ApaI polymorphism seems to be associated with ovarian cancer in women with higher predicted 25(OH)D levels but not in women with lower predicted levels [82]. A meta-analysis showed the ApaI polymorphism to be associated with ovarian cancer risk in the European population [74], but other meta-analyses found no such association [15,71,76,77].
The majority of case control studies have not found any association between the TaqI polymorphism and ovarian cancer risk [12,33,37]. One study reported on higher ovarian cancer risk with the TaqI polymorphism only in women with higher predicted 25(OH)D levels [82]. Meta-analyses have shown no such association [15,71,74,76,77].
Further research is needed to confirm the role of vitamin D polymorphisms in the risk of ovarian cancer. However, the accumulating evidence of the association of FokI and ovarian cancer makes VDR a potential target for cancer prevention [15].

10. Use of Calcitriol and its Analogues in Inhibition of Ovarian Cancer Cell Growth

As previously mentioned, Zhang et al. reported that the vitamin D analogue EB1089 inhibited the growth of ovarian cancer cells via its effect on GADD45 [41]. Brard et al. showed a cytotoxic effect of the non-hypercalcaemic vitamin D analogue MT19c on ovarian cancer cell lines [83]. This derivative did not achieve cytotoxicity through its effect on VDR but through its effect on the insulin-like growth factor receptor (IGFR) and the tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) receptor on ovarian cancer cells [83]. The effect of MT19c was subsequently analysed in vivo by the same authors [84]. Human ovarian cancer cell lines were inoculated subcutaneously in mice. After treatment with MT19c the majority of mice responded completely and achieved prolonged tumour free survival [84]. Another non-hypercalcaemic vitamin D analogue studied in vitro and in vivo was PT19c, showing inhibition of growth of ovarian cancer xenografts in mice without inducing hypercalcaemia [85]. Furthermore, the calcidiol derivative B3CD showed anti-proliferative and cytotoxic effects on SKOV-3 cell lines in vitro [86]. Additionally, in vivo studies in nude mice demonstrated complete responses in 25% and tumour regression in the majority of animals [86]. Moreover, the addition of calcitriol to Müllerian inhibiting substance (MIS) in vitro potentiated the effect of MIS on ovarian cancer cell proliferation [87]. The studies on the use of calcitriol and its analogues for the inhibition of ovarian cancer cell growth are summarised in Table 2.

11. Cancer Stem Cells

The effect of vitamin D on ovarian cancer stem cells has also been studied [88,89]. Emerging evidence indicates the role of stem cells in ovarian cancer metastasis formation, tumour relapse, and development of chemoresistance [88]. Vitamin D has been shown to reduce the self-renewing capacity of cancer stem cells. Active vitamin D increased the expression of VDR and cytoplasmic β-catenin and reduced the expression of stemness-associated gene CD44 in vitro [88]. In addition, calcitriol has been reported to decrease the number of cancer stem cells via a VDR mediated pathway through inhibition of the Wnt pathway [89].

12. Conclusions

This review provides the latest insights into molecular mechanisms through which vitamin D could influence ovarian cancer on the cellular level. Epidemiologic evidence indicates that adequate vitamin D levels are associated with a lower risk of ovarian cancer and reduced cancer mortality in general. The systematic review of the literature has not identified any human studies regarding the effect of vitamin D or its analogues on ovarian cancer patients and such supplementation or treatment cannot be recommended for this indication. However, further research is warranted based on the encouraging in vitro and in vivo data. In the future, the clinical role of vitamin D supplementation in the prevention or treatment of cancer patients should be explored in randomized controlled trials.

Author Contributions

A.D. and N.F.D. equally participated in the literature search and the design of systematic review. A.D. and N.F.D. equally participated in writing the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The review received no funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hossein-nezhad, A.; Holick, M.F. Vitamin D for health: A global perspective. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2013, 88, 720–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Holick, M.F. Cancer, sunlight and vitamin D. J. Clin. Transl. Endocrinol. 2014, 1, 179–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Ong, J.S.; Cuellar-Partida, G.; Lu, Y.; Fasching, P.A.; Hein, A.; Burghaus, S.; Beckmann, M.W.; Lambrechts, D.; Van Nieuwenhuysen, E.; Australian Ovarian Cancer Study; et al. Association of vitamin D levels and risk of ovarian cancer: A Mendelian randomization study. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2016, 45, 1619–1630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Keum, N.; Lee, D.H.; Greenwood, D.C.; Manson, J.E.; Giovannucci, E. Vitamin D supplementation and total cancer incidence and mortality: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann. Oncol. 2019, 30, 733–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Huang, Y.F.; Wu, Y.H.; Cheng, W.F.; Peng, S.L.; Shen, W.L.; Chou, C.Y. Vitamin D-Binding Protein Enhances Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Progression by Regulating the Insulin-like Growth Factor-1/Akt Pathway and Vitamin D Receptor Transcription. Clin. Cancer Res. 2018, 24, 3217–3228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Deeb, K.K.; Trump, D.L.; Johnson, C.S. Vitamin D signalling pathways in cancer: Potential for anticancer therapeutics. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2007, 7, 684–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Deuster, E.; Jeschke, U.; Ye, Y.; Mahner, S.; Czogalla, B. Vitamin D and VDR in Gynecological Cancers-A Systematic Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Peterlik, M.; Grant, W.B.; Cross, H.S. Calcium, vitamin D and cancer. Anticancer Res. 2009, 29, 3687–3698. [Google Scholar]
  9. Zehnder, D.; Bland, R.; Williams, M.C.; McNinch, R.W.; Howie, A.J.; Stewart, P.M.; Hewison, M. Extrarenal expression of 25-hydroxyvitamin D(3)1 alpha-hydroxylase. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2001, 86, 888–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Ritter, C.S.; Haughey, B.H.; Armbrecht, H.J.; Brown, A.J. Distribution and regulation of the 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 1α-hydroxylase in human parathyroid glands. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2012, 130, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rashid, M.U.; Muzaffar, M.; Khan, F.A.; Kabisch, M.; Muhammad, N.; Faiz, S.; Loya, A.; Hamann, U. Association between the BsmI Polymorphism in the Vitamin D Receptor Gene and Breast Cancer Risk: Results from a Pakistani Case-Control Study. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0141562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Lurie, G.; Wilkens, L.R.; Thompson, P.J.; McDuffie, K.E.; Carney, M.E.; Terada, K.Y.; Goodman, M.T. Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms and epithelial ovarian cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2007, 16, 2566–2571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Colonese, F.; Laganà, A.S.; Colonese, E.; Sofo, V.; Salmeri, F.M.; Granese, R.; Triolo, O. The pleiotropic effects of vitamin D in gynaecological and obstetric diseases: An overview on a hot topic. Biomed. Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 986281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Torre, L.A.; Trabert, B.; DeSantis, C.E.; Miller, K.D.; Samimi, G.; Runowicz, C.D.; Gaudet, M.M.; Jemal, A.; Siegel, R.L. Ovarian cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2018, 68, 284–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Liu, Y.; Li, C.; Chen, P.; Li, X.; Li, M.; Guo, H.; Li, J.; Chu, R.; Wang, H. Polymorphisms in the vitamin D Receptor (VDR) and the risk of ovarian cancer: A meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e66716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Grant, W.B.; Moukayed, M. Vitamin D3 from Ultraviolet-B Exposure or Oral Intake in Relation to Cancer Incidence and Mortality. Curr. Nutr. Rep. 2019, 8, 203–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cook, L.S.; Neilson, H.K.; Lorenzetti, D.L.; Lee, R.C. A systematic literature review of vitamin D and ovarian cancer. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2010, 203, 70.e1–70.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yin, L.; Grandi, N.; Raum, E.; Haug, U.; Arndt, V.; Brenner, H. Meta-analysis: Circulating vitamin D and ovarian cancer risk. Gynecol. Oncol. 2011, 121, 369–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tran, B.; Jordan, S.J.; Lucas, R.; Webb, P.M.; Neale, R.; Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group. Association between ambient ultraviolet radiation and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer. Cancer Prev. Res. 2012, 5, 1330–1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Lin, S.W.; Wheeler, D.C.; Park, Y.; Cahoon, E.K.; Hollenbeck, A.R.; Freedman, D.M.; Abnet, C.C. Prospective study of ultraviolet radiation exposure and risk of cancer in the United States. Int. J. Cancer 2012, 131, E1015–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Bodelon, C.; Cushing-Haugen, K.L.; Wicklund, K.G.; Doherty, J.A.; Rossing, M.A. Sun exposure and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer. Cancer Causes Control 2012, 23, 1985–1994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Webb, P.M.; de Fazio, A.; Protani, M.M.; Ibiebele, T.I.; Nagle, C.M.; Brand, A.H.; Blomfield, P.I.; Grant, P.; Perrin, L.C.; Neale, R.E.; et al. Circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D and survival in women with ovarian cancer. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2015, 102, 109–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Vojdeman, F.J.; Madsen, C.M.; Frederiksen, K.; Durup, D.; Olsen, A.; Hansen, L.; Heegaard, A.M.; Lind, B.; Tjønneland, A.; Jørgensen, H.L.; et al. Vitamin D levels and cancer incidence in 217,244 individuals from primary health care in Denmark. Int. J. Cancer 2019, 145, 338–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Jiang, F.; Li, P.; Fornace, A.J., Jr.; Nicosia, S.V.; Bai, W. G2/M arrest by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 in ovarian cancer cells mediated through the induction of GADD45 via an exonic enhancer. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 48030–48040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Li, P.; Li, C.; Zhao, X.; Zhang, X.; Nicosia, S.V.; Bai, W. p27(Kip1) stabilization and G(1) arrest by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) in ovarian cancer cells mediated through down-regulation of cyclin E/cyclin-dependent kinase 2 and Skp1-Cullin-F-box protein/Skp2 ubiquitin ligase. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 25260–25267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Guo, H.; Guo, J.; Xie, W.; Yuan, L.; Sheng, X. The role of vitamin D in ovarian cancer: Epidemiology, molecular mechanism and prevention. J. Ovarian Res. 2018, 11, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Shen, Z.; Zhang, X.; Tang, J.; Kasiappan, R.; Jinwal, U.; Li, P.; Hann, S.; Nicosia, S.V.; Wu, J.; Zhang, X.; et al. The coupling of epidermal growth factor receptor down regulation by 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 to the hormone-induced cell cycle arrest at the G1-S checkpoint in ovarian cancer cells. Mol. Cell Endocrinol. 2011, 338, 58–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Hou, Y.F.; Gao, S.H.; Wang, P.; Zhang, H.M.; Liu, L.Z.; Ye, M.X.; Zhou, G.M.; Zhang, Z.L.; Li, B.Y. 1α,25(OH)2D3 Suppresses the Migration of Ovarian Cancer SKOV-3 Cells through the Inhibition of Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 1285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Jiang, F.; Bao, J.; Li, P.; Nicosia, S.V.; Bai, W. Induction of ovarian cancer cell apoptosis by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 through the down-regulation of telomerase. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 53213–53221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Wilmanski, T.; Buhman, K.; Donkin, S.S.; Burgess, J.R.; Teegarden, D. 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D inhibits de novo fatty acid synthesis and lipid accumulation in metastatic breast cancer cells through down-regulation of pyruvate carboxylase. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2017, 40, 194–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Santos, J.M.; Khan, Z.S.; Munir, M.T.; Tarafdar, K.; Rahman, S.M.; Hussain, F. Vitamin D3 decreases glycolysis and invasiveness, and increases cellular stiffness in breast cancer cells. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2018, 53, 111–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Friedrich, M.; Rafi, L.; Mitschele, T.; Tilgen, W.; Schmidt, W.; Reichrath, J. Analysis of the vitamin D system in cervical carcinomas, breast cancer and ovarian cancer. Recent Results Cancer Res. 2003, 164, 239–246. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  33. Clendenen, T.V.; Arslan, A.A.; Koenig, K.L.; Enquist, K.; Wirgin, I.; Agren, A.; Lukanova, A.; Sjodin, H.; Zeleniuch-Jacquotte, A.; Shore, R.E.; et al. Vitamin D receptor polymorphisms and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer. Cancer Lett. 2008, 260, 209–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Tamez, S.; Norizoe, C.; Ochiai, K.; Takahashi, D.; Shimojima, A.; Tsutsumi, Y.; Yanaihara, N.; Tanaka, T.; Okamoto, A.; Urashima, M. Vitamin D receptor polymorphisms and prognosis of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. Br. J. Cancer 2009, 101, 1957–1960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Tworoger, S.S.; Gates, M.A.; Lee, I.M.; Buring, J.E.; Titus-Ernstoff, L.; Cramer, D.; Hankinson, S.E. Polymorphisms in the vitamin D receptor and risk of ovarian cancer in four studies. Cancer Res. 2009, 69, 1885–1891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Lurie, G.; Wilkens, L.R.; Thompson, P.J.; Carney, M.E.; Palmieri, R.T.; Pharoah, P.D.; Song, H.; Hogdall, E.; Kjaer, S.K.; DiCioccio, R.A.; et al. Vitamin D receptor rs2228570 polymorphism and invasive ovarian carcinoma risk: Pooled analysis in five studies within the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium. Int. J. Cancer 2011, 128, 936–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Grant, D.J.; Hoyo, C.; Akushevich, L.; Iversen, E.S.; Whitaker, R.; Marks, J.; Berchuck, A.; Schildkraut, J.M. Vitamin D receptor (VDR) polymorphisms and risk of ovarian cancer in Caucasian and African American women. Gynecol. Oncol. 2013, 129, 173–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Mohapatra, S.; Saxena, A.; Gandhi, G.; Koner, B.C.; Ray, P.C. Vitamin D and VDR gene polymorphism (FokI) in epithelial ovarian cancer in Indian population. J. Ovarian Res. 2013, 6, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Mostowska, A.; Sajdak, S.; Pawlik, P.; Lianeri, M.; Jagodzinski, P.P. Vitamin D receptor gene BsmI and FokI polymorphisms in relation to ovarian cancer risk in the Polish population. Genet. Test. Mol. Biomarkers 2013, 17, 183–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Zhang, X.; Li, P.; Bao, J.; Nicosia, S.V.; Wang, H.; Enkemann, S.A.; Bai, W. Suppression of death receptor-mediated apoptosis by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 revealed by microarray analysis. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 35458–35468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Zhang, X.; Jiang, F.; Li, P.; Li, C.; Ma, Q.; Nicosia, S.V.; Bai, W. Growth suppression of ovarian cancer xenografts in nude mice by vitamin D analogue EB1089. Clin. Cancer Res. 2005, 11, 323–328. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  42. Kasiappan, R.; Shen, Z.; Tse, A.K.; Jinwal, U.; Tang, J.; Lungchukiet, P.; Sun, Y.; Kruk, P.; Nicosia, S.V.; Zhang, X.; et al. 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 suppresses telomerase expression and human cancer growth through microRNA-498. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 41297–41309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Kavandi, L.; Collier, M.A.; Nguyen, H.; Syed, V. Progesterone and calcitriol attenuate inflammatory cytokines CXCL1 and CXCL2 in ovarian and endometrial cancer cells. J. Cell Biochem. 2012, 113, 3143–3152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Zhang, Z.; Zhang, H.; Hu, Z.; Wang, P.; Wan, J.; Li, B. Synergy of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 and carboplatin in growth suppression of SKOV-3 cells. Oncol. Lett. 2014, 8, 1348–1354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Lungchukiet, P.; Sun, Y.; Kasiappan, R.; Quarni, W.; Nicosia, S.V.; Zhang, X.; Bai, W. Suppression of epithelial ovarian cancer invasion into the omentum by 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 and its receptor. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2015, 148, 138–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Thill, M.; Woeste, A.; Reichert, K.; Fischer, D.; Rody, A.; Friedrich, M.; Köster, F. Vitamin D inhibits ovarian cancer cell line proliferation in combination with celecoxib and suppresses cyclooxygenase-2 expression. Anticancer Res. 2015, 35, 1197–1203. [Google Scholar]
  47. Abdelbaset-Ismail, A.; Pedziwiatr, D.; Suszyńska, E.; Sluczanowska-Glabowska, S.; Schneider, G.; Kakar, S.S.; Ratajczak, M.Z. Vitamin D3 stimulates embryonic stem cells but inhibits migration and growth of ovarian cancer and teratocarcinoma cell lines. J. Ovarian Res. 2016, 9, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Liu, L.; Hu, Z.; Zhang, H.; Hou, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Zhou, G.; Li, B. Vitamin D postpones the progression of epithelial ovarian cancer induced by 7, 12-dimethylbenz [a] anthracene both in vitro and in vivo. OncoTargets Ther. 2016, 9, 2365–2375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Chen, Y.; Sun, Z.; Xu, J.; Wang, P.; Tang, J.; Shi, X.; Liu, J.; Ren, F.; Xu, L. Vitamin D and DDX4 regulate the proliferation and invasion of ovarian cancer cells. Oncol. Lett. 2018, 16, 905–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Capasso, A.; Wong, K.M.; Eckhardt, S.G. Biology of Normal and Tumour Cells (Self-sufficiency and Insensitivity to Anti-proliferative signals, Apoptosis, Limitless Replicative Potential). In ESMO Handbook of Translational Research, 2nd ed.; Tortora, G., Sessa, C., Scarpa, A., Banerjee, S., Eds.; European Society for Medical Oncology: Viganello-Lugano, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 12–27. [Google Scholar]
  51. Ma, Y.; Trump, D.L.; Johnson, C.S. Vitamin D and miRNAs in cancer. Curr. Gene Ther. 2014, 14, 269–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kriebitzsch, C.; Verlinden, L.; Eelen, G.; Tan, B.K.; Van Camp, M.; Bouillon, R.; Verstuyf, A. The impact of 1,25(OH)2D3 and its structural analogs on gene expression in cancer cells—A microarray approach. Anticancer Res. 2009, 29, 3471–3483. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  53. Ben-Shoshan, M.; Amir, S.; Dang, D.T.; Dang, L.H.; Weisman, Y.; Mabjeesh, N.J. 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (Calcitriol) inhibits hypoxia-inducible factor-1/vascular endothelial growth factor pathway in human cancer cells. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2007, 6, 1433–1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Chung, I.; Han, G.; Seshadri, M.; Gillard, B.M.; Yu, W.D.; Foster, B.A.; Trump, D.L.; Johnson, C.S. Role of vitamin D receptor in the antiproliferative effects of calcitriol in tumor-derived endothelial cells and tumor angiogenesis in vivo. Cancer Res. 2009, 69, 967–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Sassi, F.; Tamone, C.; D’Amelio, P. Vitamin D: Nutrient, Hormone, and Immunomodulator. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1656. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6266123/ (accessed on 27 December 2019). [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Gonzalez, H.; Hagerling, C.; Werb, Z. Roles of the immune system in cancer: From tumor initiation to metastatic progression. Genes Dev. 2018, 32, 1267–1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Hanahan, D.; Weinberg, R.A. Hallmarks of cancer: The next generation. Cell 2011, 144, 646–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Li, D.; Wang, X.; Wu, J.L.; Quan, W.Q.; Ma, L.; Yang, F.; Wu, K.Y.; Wan, H.Y. Tumor-produced versican V1 enhances hCAP18/LL-37 expression in macrophages through activation of TLR2 and vitamin D3 signaling to promote ovarian cancer progression in vitro. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e56616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Thill, M.; Fischer, D.; Kelling, K.; Hoellen, F.; Dittmer, C.; Hornemann, A.; Salehin, D.; Diedrich, K.; Friedrich, M.; Becker, S. Expression of vitamin D receptor (VDR), cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and 15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase (15-PGDH) in benign and malignant ovarian tissue and 25-hydroxycholecalciferol (25(OH2)D3) and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) serum level in ovarian cancer patients. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2010, 121, 387–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Lee, J.Y.; Myung, S.K.; Song, Y.S. Prognostic role of cyclooxygenase-2 in epithelial ovarian cancer: A meta-analysis of observational studies. Gynecol. Oncol. 2013, 129, 613–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Cordes, T.; Hoellen, F.; Dittmer, C.; Salehin, D.; Kümmel, S.; Friedrich, M.; Köster, F.; Becker, S.; Diedrich, K.; Thill, M. Correlation of prostaglandin metabolizing enzymes and serum PGE2 levels with vitamin D receptor and serum 25(OH)2D3 levels in breast and ovarian cancer. Anticancer Res. 2012, 32, 351–357. [Google Scholar]
  62. Trujillo, J.A.; Sweis, R.F.; Bao, R.; Luke, J.J. T Cell-Inflamed versus Non-T Cell-Inflamed Tumors: A Conceptual Framework for Cancer Immunotherapy Drug Development and Combination Therapy Selection. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2018, 6, 990–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Muralidhar, S.; Filia, A.; Nsengimana, J.; Poźniak, J.; O’Shea, S.J.; Diaz, J.M.; Harland, M.; Randerson-Moor, J.A.; Reichrath, J.; Laye, J.P.; et al. Vitamin D-VDR Signaling Inhibits Wnt/β-Catenin-Mediated Melanoma Progression and Promotes Antitumor Immunity. Cancer Res. 2019, 79, 5986–5998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Luke, J.J.; Bao, R.; Sweis, R.F.; Spranger, S.; Gajewski, T.F. WNT/β-catenin Pathway Activation Correlates with Immune Exclusion across Human Cancers. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019, 25, 3074–3083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Agic, A.; Xu, H.; Altgassen, C.; Noack, F.; Wolfler, M.M.; Diedrich, K.; Friedrich, M.; Taylor, R.N.; Hornung, D. Relative expression of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 receptor, vitamin D 1 alpha-hydroxylase, vitamin D 24-hydroxylase, and vitamin D 25-hydroxylase in endometriosis and gynecologic cancers. Reprod. Sci. 2007, 14, 486–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Brożyna, A.A.; Jóźwicki, W.; Jochymski, C.; Slominski, A.T. Decreased expression of CYP27B1 correlates with the increased aggressiveness of ovarian carcinomas. Oncol. Rep. 2015, 33, 599–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Kloss, M.; Fischer, D.; Thill, M.; Friedrich, M.; Cordes, T.; Salehin, D.; Diedrich, K.; Köster, F. Vitamin D, calcidiol and calcitriol regulate vitamin D metabolizing enzymes in cervical and ovarian cancer cells. Anticancer Res. 2010, 30, 4429–4434. [Google Scholar]
  68. Miettinen, S.; Ahonen, M.H.; Lou, Y.R.; Manninen, T.; Tuohimaa, P.; Syvälä, H.; Ylikomi, T. Role of 24-hydroxylase in vitamin D3 growth response of OVCAR-3 ovarian cancer cells. Int. J. Cancer 2004, 108, 367–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Silvagno, F.; Poma, C.B.; Realmuto, C.; Ravarino, N.; Ramella, A.; Santoro, N.; D’Amelio, P.; Fuso, L.; Pescarmona, G.; Zola, P. Analysis of vitamin D receptor expression and clinical correlations in patients with ovarian cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 2010, 119, 121–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ahonen, M.H.; Zhuang, Y.H.; Aine, R.; Ylikomi, T.; Tuohimaa, P. Androgen receptor and vitamin D receptor in human ovarian cancer: Growth stimulation and inhibition by ligands. Int. J. Cancer 2000, 86, 40–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Xu, Y.; He, B.; Pan, Y.; Deng, Q.; Sun, H.; Li, R.; Gao, T.; Song, G.; Wang, S. Systematic review and meta-analysis on vitamin D receptor polymorphisms and cancer risk. Tumour Biol. 2014, 35, 4153–4169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Gnagnarella, P.; Pasquali, E.; Serrano, D.; Raimondi, S.; Disalvatore, D.; Gandini, S. Vitamin D receptor polymorphism FokI and cancer risk: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Carcinogenesis 2014, 35, 1913–1919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Mostowska, A.; Sajdak, S.; Pawlik, P.; Lianeri, M.; Jagodzinski, P.P. Polymorphic variants in the vitamin D pathway genes and the risk of ovarian cancer among non-carriers of BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations. Oncol. Lett. 2016, 11, 1181–1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Song, G.G.; Lee, Y.H. Vitamin D receptor FokI, BsmI, ApaI, and TaqI polymorphisms and susceptibility to ovarian cancer: A meta-analysis. Immunol. Investig. 2013, 42, 661–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Li, S.; Xu, H.; Li, S.C.; Qi, X.Q.; Sun, W.J. Vitamin D receptor rs2228570 polymorphism and susceptibly to ovarian cancer: A meta-analysis. Tumour Biol. 2014, 35, 1319–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Mun, M.J.; Kim, T.H.; Hwang, J.Y.; Jang, W.C. Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms and the risk for female reproductive cancers: A meta-analysis. Maturitas 2015, 81, 256–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Li, J.; Li, B.; Jiang, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, A.; Wang, H.; Zhang, J.; Qin, Q.; Hong, Z.; Li, B.A. Do genetic polymorphisms of the vitamin D receptor contribute to breast/ovarian cancer? A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Gene 2018, 677, 211–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Zhang, Y.; Tong, S.C.; Guan, L.H.; Na, F.; Zhao, W.; Wei, L. Meta-analysis of the relation between vitamin D receptor gene BsmI polymorphism and susceptibility to ovarian cancer. Tumour Biol. 2013, 34, 3317–3321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Qin, X.; Lu, Y.; Qin, A.; Chen, Z.; Peng, Q.; Deng, Y.; Xie, L.; Wang, J.; Li, R.; Zeng, J.; et al. Vitamin D receptor BsmI polymorphism and ovarian cancer risk: A meta-analysis. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 2013, 23, 1178–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Dai, Z.M.; Fei, Y.L.; Zhang, W.G.; Liu, J.; Cao, X.M.; Qu, Q.M.; Li, Y.C.; Lin, S.; Wang, M.; Dai, Z.J. Association of Vitamin D Receptor Cdx-2 Polymorphism With Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis. Medicine 2015, 94, e1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Grant, D.J.; Manichaikul, A.; Alberg, A.J.; Bandera, E.V.; Barnholtz-Sloan, J.; Bondy, M.; Cote, M.L.; Funkhouser, E.; Moorman, P.G.; Peres, L.C.; et al. Evaluation of vitamin D biosynthesis and pathway target genes reveals UGT2A1/2 and EGFR polymorphisms associated with epithelial ovarian cancer in African American Women. Cancer Med. 2019, 8, 2503–2513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Prescott, J.; Bertrand, K.A.; Reid, B.M.; Permuth-Wey, J.; De Vivo, I.; Cramer, D.W.; Terry, K.L.; Tworoger, S.S. Evidence of differential effects of vitamin d receptor variants on epithelial ovarian cancer risk by predicted vitamin d status. Front. Oncol. 2014, 4, 286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Brard, L.; Lange, T.S.; Robison, K.; Kim, K.K.; Ara, T.; McCallum, M.M.; Arnold, L.A.; Moore, R.G.; Singh, R.K. Evaluation of the first Ergocalciferol-derived, non hypercalcemic anti-cancer agent MT19c in ovarian cancer SKOV-3 cell lines. Gynecol. Oncol. 2011, 123, 370–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Moore, R.G.; Lange, T.S.; Robinson, K.; Kim, K.K.; Uzun, A.; Horan, T.C.; Kawar, N.; Yano, N.; Chu, S.R.; Mao, Q.; et al. Efficacy of a non-hypercalcemic vitamin-D2 derived anti-cancer agent (MT19c) and inhibition of fatty acid synthesis in an ovarian cancer xenograft model. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e34443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Kawar, N.; Maclaughlan, S.; Horan, T.C.; Uzun, A.; Lange, T.S.; Kim, K.K.; Hopson, R.; Singh, A.P.; Sidhu, P.S.; Glass, K.A.; et al. PT19c, Another Nonhypercalcemic Vitamin D2 Derivative, Demonstrates Antitumor Efficacy in Epithelial Ovarian and Endometrial Cancer Models. Genes Cancer 2013, 4, 524–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Lange, T.S.; Stuckey, A.R.; Robison, K.; Kim, K.K.; Singh, R.K.; Raker, C.A.; Brard, L. Effect of a vitamin D(3) derivative (B3CD) with postulated anti-cancer activity in an ovarian cancer animal model. Investig. New Drugs 2010, 28, 543–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Jung, Y.S.; Kim, H.J.; Seo, S.K.; Choi, Y.S.; Nam, E.J.; Kim, S.; Kim, S.W.; Han, H.D.; Kim, J.W.; Kim, Y.T. Anti-Proliferative and Apoptotic Activities of Müllerian Inhibiting Substance Combined with Calcitriol in Ovarian Cancer Cell Lines. Yonsei Med. J. 2016, 57, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Ji, M.; Liu, L.; Hou, Y.; Li, B. 1α,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 restrains stem cell-like properties of ovarian cancer cells by enhancing vitamin D receptor and suppressing CD44. Oncol. Rep. 2019, 41, 3393–3403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Srivastava, A.K.; Rizvi, A.; Cui, T.; Han, C.; Banerjee, A.; Naseem, I.; Zheng, Y.; Wani, A.A.; Wang, Q.E. Depleting ovarian cancer stem cells with calcitriol. Oncotarget 2018, 9, 14481–14491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Cells 09 00335 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the effects of vitamin D on the ovarian cancer cell. The two main sources of vitamin D are sunlight and dietary products. Vitamin D3 is transported to the liver where it is hydroxylated to 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) with the microsomal and mitochondrial 25-hydroxylase encoded by the gene CYP27A1. 25(OH)D is further metabolised in the kidneys with the action of 1α-hydroxylase encoded by the gene CYP27B1, forming the active metabolite 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25(OH)2D) (calcitriol). 1,25(OH)2D can also be formed in the mitochondria of the ovarian cancer cell. The physiological effects of 1,25(OH)2D are carried out through interaction with the vitamin D receptor (VDR). This is a nuclear transcription factor and when activated with 1,25(OH)2D undergoes hetero-dimerisation with a retinoic acid X receptor (RXR). Then, this complex binds to the specific DNA sequences known as vitamin D response elements (VDRE). The interaction with VDRE results in downregulation or upregulation of genes involved in regulation of the cell cycle, apoptosis, epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT), immune responses, and inflammation. Only the pathways that have been studied specifically in ovarian cancer are represented. EGFR: Epidermal growth factor receptor; hTERT: Human telomerase reverse transcriptase.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the effects of vitamin D on the ovarian cancer cell. The two main sources of vitamin D are sunlight and dietary products. Vitamin D3 is transported to the liver where it is hydroxylated to 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) with the microsomal and mitochondrial 25-hydroxylase encoded by the gene CYP27A1. 25(OH)D is further metabolised in the kidneys with the action of 1α-hydroxylase encoded by the gene CYP27B1, forming the active metabolite 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25(OH)2D) (calcitriol). 1,25(OH)2D can also be formed in the mitochondria of the ovarian cancer cell. The physiological effects of 1,25(OH)2D are carried out through interaction with the vitamin D receptor (VDR). This is a nuclear transcription factor and when activated with 1,25(OH)2D undergoes hetero-dimerisation with a retinoic acid X receptor (RXR). Then, this complex binds to the specific DNA sequences known as vitamin D response elements (VDRE). The interaction with VDRE results in downregulation or upregulation of genes involved in regulation of the cell cycle, apoptosis, epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT), immune responses, and inflammation. Only the pathways that have been studied specifically in ovarian cancer are represented. EGFR: Epidermal growth factor receptor; hTERT: Human telomerase reverse transcriptase.
Cells 09 00335 g001
Table
Table 1. Description of studies on the effects of calcitriol and its analogues specifically on ovarian cancer cell cycle, apoptosis, invasion, and inflammatory process. See text for details. NA: Not available.
Table 1. Description of studies on the effects of calcitriol and its analogues specifically on ovarian cancer cell cycle, apoptosis, invasion, and inflammatory process. See text for details. NA: Not available.
First Author (Year of Publication)Type of StudyMolecular MechanismBiologic EffectRef. No.
Jiang (2003)In vitro↑GADD45 → ↓Cdc2G2/M cell cycle arrest[24]
Jiang (2004)In vitro↓hTERT → ↓telomerase↑Apoptosis[29]
Li (2004)In vitro↓Cyclin E → ↓CDK2 → ↑p27G1/S cell cycle arrest[25]
Zhang (2005) (I)In vitro↓TRAIL, ↓TRAIL-R4, ↓Fas↑Apoptosis[40]
Zhang (2005) (II)In vitro
In vivo		↑GADD45↑Apoptosis,
G2/M cell cycle arrest		[41]
Shen (2011)In vitro ↓EGFR → ↑p27G1/S cell cycle arrest[27]
Kasiappan (2012)In vitro
In vivo		↑microRNA-498 → ↓hTERT↑Apoptosis[42]
Kavandi (2012)In vitro↓CXCL1, ↓CXCL2↓ Expression of proinflammatory cytokines → downregulation of proteins associated with metastasis[43]
Zhang (2014)In vitroPossibly reactive oxygen species (ROS) production↑Apoptosis (synergistic effect with carboplatin)[44]
Lungchukiet (2015)In vitro
In vivo		NASuppress ovarian cancer invasion to omentum[45]
Thill (2015)In vitroNAInhibition of cellular proliferation together with COX-2 inhibitor celecoxib[46]
Abdelbaset-Ismail (2016)In vitro
In vivo		NA↑Apoptosis, anti-proliferative effect, ↓migration[47]
Hou (2016)In vitro↑E-cadherin, ↓Vimentin, ↓β-catenin↓Metastatic potential[28]
Liu (2016)In vitro
In vivo		↑E-cadherin, ↓β-cateninDelay in progression (↓metastatic potential)[48]
Chen (2018)In vitro↓DDX4Anti-proliferative effect, ↓migration[49]
Table
Table 2. Description of studies on the use of calcitriol and its analogues for the inhibition of ovarian cancer cell growth. See text for details.
Table 2. Description of studies on the use of calcitriol and its analogues for the inhibition of ovarian cancer cell growth. See text for details.
First Author (Year of Publication)Type of StudyAnalogueBiological EffectRef. No.
Zhang (2005)In vitro
In vivo		EB1098Inhibition of ovarian cancer cell growth without inducing hypercalcemia in vivo[41]
Lange (2010)In vitro
In vivo		Calcidiol derivative B3CDAnti-proliferative effect on ovarian cancer cell lines; tumour regression in majority of animals[86]
Brard (2011)In vitroMT19cCell cycle arrest
DNA fragmentation
↑Apoptosis		[83]
Moore (2012)In vivoMT19cProlonged tumour free survival[84]
Kawar (2013)In vitro
In vivo		PT19cInhibition of growth of ovarian cancer xenografts in mice without inducing hypercalcaemia[85]
Jung (2016)In vitroCalcitriol and Müllerian inhibiting substance (MIS)Inhibition of ovarian cancer cell growth[87]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dovnik, A.; Fokter Dovnik, N. Vitamin D and Ovarian Cancer: Systematic Review of the Literature with a Focus on Molecular Mechanisms. Cells 2020, 9, 335. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9020335

AMA Style

Dovnik A, Fokter Dovnik N. Vitamin D and Ovarian Cancer: Systematic Review of the Literature with a Focus on Molecular Mechanisms. Cells. 2020; 9(2):335. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9020335

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dovnik, Andraž, and Nina Fokter Dovnik. 2020. "Vitamin D and Ovarian Cancer: Systematic Review of the Literature with a Focus on Molecular Mechanisms" Cells 9, no. 2: 335. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9020335

APA Style

Dovnik, A., & Fokter Dovnik, N. (2020). Vitamin D and Ovarian Cancer: Systematic Review of the Literature with a Focus on Molecular Mechanisms. Cells, 9(2), 335. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9020335

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop