SHH Signaling Pathway Drives Pediatric Bone Sarcoma Progression
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
This review by Lezot at al is well written, pieces of information are clear and complete. I have no particular issues, however, figures are not included in the downloadable manuscript.
I checked the figures and I believe the manuscript is suitable for publication.Author Response
Thank you for your comments about our manuscript entitled: “SHH signaling pathway drives pediatric bone sarcoma progression”. We are very pleased with your comments that our paper is acceptable for publication. We apologize for the absence of figures in the downloadable manuscript. This error has been corrected. English language has been verified and corrected. In this context, please find herein the revised version of the manuscript.
We hope that these corrections address the issues raised by you satisfactorily, and that the attached revised version is acceptable for publication.
Reviewer 2 Report
The manuscript titled ‘SHH signaling pathway drives pediatric bone sarcoma progression’ by Frederic Lezot et al. details recent developments on the role of SHH and potential therapeutic implication of modulation of SHH signaling in osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma. The review is organized well and is informative to the readers in the research area. However, there are several editorial and typographical errors to be corrected.
- Numbers in the figure legends do not match with the figures in the text.
- There are also a few grammatical and typographical errors as in lines 51, 100, 124, 127, 137, 175, 187, 323, 329, and so on.
Author Response
Thank you for your comments about our manuscript entitled: “SHH signaling pathway drives pediatric bone sarcoma progression”. We are very pleased with your comments that our paper is “well organized and is informative to the readers in the research area”. Numbers in the figure legends have been corrected and now match with the figures in the text. English language has been verified and corrected. As requested, grammatical and typographical errors have been corrected (lines: 51, 100, 111, 124, 127, 137, 175, 179, 187, 227, 239, 248, 270, 276, 286, 290, 301, 322, 323, 329, 345). In this context, please find herein the revised version of the manuscript
We hope that these corrections address the issues raised by you satisfactorily, and that the attached revised version is acceptable for publication.
