Next Article in Journal
Genomic Analysis of Localized High-Risk Prostate Cancer Circulating Tumor Cells at the Single-Cell Level
Previous Article in Journal
Neuroprotective Effects of a Novel Inhibitor of c-Jun N-Terminal Kinase in the Rat Model of Transient Focal Cerebral Ischemia
Previous Article in Special Issue
Comparison of Multiscale Imaging Methods for Brain Research
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Robustness during Aging—Molecular Biological and Physiological Aspects

1
RNA Bioinformatics/High Throughput Analysis, Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, 07743 Jena, Germany
2
Matthias Schleiden Institute, Bioinformatics, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, 07743 Jena, Germany
3
Institute of Zoology and Evolutionary Research with Phyletic Museum, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, 07743 Jena, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Cells 2020, 9(8), 1862; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9081862
Submission received: 18 June 2020 / Revised: 27 July 2020 / Accepted: 5 August 2020 / Published: 8 August 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Aging and Regeneration)

Abstract

:
Understanding the process of aging is still an important challenge to enable healthy aging and to prevent age-related diseases. Most studies in age research investigate the decline in organ functionality and gene activity with age. The focus on decline can even be considered a paradigm in that field. However, there are certain aspects that remain surprisingly stable and keep the organism robust. Here, we present and discuss various properties of robust behavior during human and animal aging, including physiological and molecular biological features, such as the hematocrit, body temperature, immunity against infectious diseases and others. We examine, in the context of robustness, the different theories of how aging occurs. We regard the role of aging in the light of evolution.

1. Introduction

Aging is a very complex process that can be defined, amongst others, as an accumulation of protein damage [1,2,3,4,5]. The mechanisms and consequences of aging are still not completely understood, and many questions remain open. Due to increasing life spans and a higher relative number of elderly people, it becomes more and more important to understand the underlying mechanisms to ensure healthy aging [6]. Analyzing the causes of aging is of interest in biology in general, for example, for understanding why some animal species are long-lived or short-lived.
Several hundred theories of how and why aging is happening have been suggested within the last decades [7,8]. In general, the manifold theories about the source of aging can be divided into two groups: the programmed aging theories and the failure accumulation theories [8]. Whereas theories of the first group argue that aging is a purposeful and, to some extent, inherently programmed or guided process, theories of the latter group have a contradicting view on aging. They focus on the organism’s inability to maintain its vital functions in the long term due to a multitude of different internal and external stochastic sources of damage [9].
As we use the term robustness throughout this review, the definition of that term is worth being recapitulated. In the theory of dynamical systems, a distinction is made between robustness and stability. While stability refers to the capacity of a system to go back to the original state after perturbations of variables (e.g., metabolite concentrations), robustness refers to the capacity to be (more or less) insusceptible to perturbations of parameters (e.g., temperature) and is often used synonymously with homeostasis [10]. Robustness means that a system can maintain functionality over a wide range of conditions [11]. It is an essential feature of evolutionary systems providing adaptive and protective mechanisms to cope with intrinsic and environmental challenges [12]. Note that the words ‘conditions’ and ‘challenges’ can be understood in the sense of ‘parameters’ and ‘parameter changes’.
Robustness can have a positive impact on the fitness and survival of an individual, unless the costs involved exceeding the benefit. In addition, the stable situation due to robustness is not limited to the current state but may change into another stable situation. This means that it can change over time but can still be robust within certain limits [11].
In the traditional view, the aging process is mostly associated with a decline in functionality and an accumulation of damage [1,2,4,13,14]. The focus is often on the course of deterioration in function, as expressed, for example, by the term “senescence“ (e.g., immunosenescence). This view is currently corroborated by the COVID-19 pandemic, which is particularly, but of course not exclusively, dangerous for the elderly [15,16]. However, many features of living organisms are surprisingly robust during the lifetime [11]. Examples are provided by the hematocrit, the immune defense against infectious diseases, and body temperature. These and other examples will be discussed in this article. They show that the decline with increasing age is not as drastic and fast as expected.
Importantly, we observe immortality in the case of unicellular organisms such as bacteria and archaea. In principle, they can divide forever (see Figure 1). Some of them, such as Caulobacter crescentus, do so in an asymmetric way, so that one daughter cell receives damaged proteins, while other bacteria divide symmetrically [11,17]. Aging in unicellular organisms is a controversial topic. Some studies did not find aging in symmetrically dividing unicellular species, while others did [17]. Below, we will not discuss unicellular organisms because this is beyond the scope of the present review. We have mentioned them here only to stress that immortality is realizable in principle.
Furthermore, many plants such as the creeping buttercup (Ranunculus repens) or St. Bernard’s lily (Chlorophytum comosum) are practically immortal when reproducing vegetatively [18], and so are the cells in the germline of sexually reproducing multicellular organisms and in immortal cell lines used in scientific research, such as the HeLa cells (see Figure 1) [19].
The wide-spread notion that aging implies impairment may result from a misinterpretation of the second law of thermodynamics. That law states that entropy, which is usually interpreted as a measure of disorder, can only increase in a closed system or remain constant in complete thermodynamic equilibrium. This putative increase in disorder would imply a decline in function. However, living organisms are open systems. By the uptake of free energy in the food, the increase in entropy can be prevented. Thus, thermodynamics does not immediately prevent immortality.
A point that is harder to rebut is that all living organisms have to cope with damage, e.g., by radiation. Therefore, they involve repair mechanisms, for example, for correcting mismatches in the DNA double-strand or reverting the oxidation of methionine. The problem is that the repair mechanisms can also be damaged, requiring a second-order repair system and so on. As an infinite series of such systems is impossible, aging seems to be unavoidable. The problem of infinite regress had been analyzed by Robert Rosen [20]. He suggested that living organisms could solve the problem in that they are closed with respect to efficient causation, in the sense of Aristotle’s causa efficiens. The philosopher Aristotle distinguished four causes: material, efficient, formal and final causes. The efficient cause consists of things apart from the thing being changed, which interact to bring about the change [21]. Thus, the efficient cause of the repair of a repair mechanism could consist of a second-order repair kit. If a repair mechanism can repair itself or two or more such units form a closed cycle, the system is closed with respect to efficient causation [22]. While Rosen did work on senescence [9], he did not specifically apply the idea of closed efficient causation to aging and senescence. It is still an open question whether repair mechanisms can form a cycle.
In the context of evolution, individuals are not “essential” for the population after their reproduction phase (except for social communities, e.g., presociality or eusociality). One could expect a faster decline after the reproduction phase, as is the case for some species, for example, Labord’s chameleon (Hamadryas baboon) and the fruit fly. However, this is not the case for humans, and there are further species with high longevity with an early reproduction (in relation to the life span), such as the Bowhead whale, Red sea urchin, and Galapagos tortoise [23]. In this case, robustness is a factor of evolutionary behavior [11].
In this review, we first summarize the different theories of aging (Section 2) and then take a fresh look at various aspects of robustness during aging on different biological levels, including physiological and molecular biology aspects, and referring to examples from various animal species (Section 3 and Section 4). Finally, Section 5 provides a summarizing discussion of the robustness in aging processes.

2. The Different Theories of Aging

Due to its incompletely understood nature, there is a decades-old and still ongoing debate about the true source of aging, giving rise to a variety of competing theories. There is no doubt in the scientific community that not all facets of aging can be explained by just one or a few single genes or gene regulatory pathways. However, the molecular origin, or in plain words the “starting point” of aging, is still intensely discussed. Here we give an overview of recent but differing arguments on how aging happens on a molecular level. Since there are several hundreds of partially overlapping aging theories [7], we will focus on the most discussed ones, providing a basis of what currently are believed to be the potential driving factors of aging [24,25,26]. These driving factors will be in part in contrast to the robustness factors that we will discuss in the remaining sections.
In general, each theory about the molecular source of aging belongs to one of two classes: the programmed aging theories and the failure accumulation theories [8] (see Figure 2). In the following four subsections, we will review selected programmed aging theories, discuss them in the subsequent subsection, and review five failure accumulation theories. The selection of theories to be discussed is made in view of the topic of this review and is, to some extent, unavoidably subjective.

2.1. Evolutionary Genetic Theory

This theory is one of the oldest regarding the reason and purpose of aging and argues that aging is built into the system by specific genes so that older individuals die and younger ones take over [27]. Therefore, there has to be an evolutionary robust genetic program that allows such a “turnover of generations”. This idea was pushed by the discovery that in several species, the knockout or inactivation of certain genes can prolong the life-span of individuals [28,29,30,31,32]. Consequently, their activation was correlated with the decline of cellular functions, and some evolutionary biologists argued that the existence of those genes would not make sense concerning natural selection, if not for triggering death [33,34,35].

2.2. Telomere Theory

Telomeres are the terminal regions at the ends of each chromosome arm in eukaryotes and consist of many relatively short nucleotide repeats [36]. They protect the genetic information because with every genome duplication during a cell’s division the chromosomes get shortened at their terminal regions due to the end replication problem [37]. Therefore, with every cell division, the telomeric regions get shorter (from around 11 kb in human newborns to less than 4 kb on average in centenarians [38,39]), triggering the cellular senescence replication stop if a critical length is reached (also known as the “Hayflick limit” [19,40]). Cells in replicative senescence are unable to proliferate further, and their overall function is strongly diminished [41,42].
During an organism’s lifetime, most cells continuously undergo proliferation and cell division and reach the state of senescence at their own pace, which over time, leads to an accumulation of senescent cells accompanied by loss of function and integrity of the respective tissues. Some concluded from this observation that telomeres take the role of an internal “countdown” to keep somatic cells stable by restricting their division cycles, preventing them from turning into cancer cells but also regulate the maximum life-span of an individual [43,44,45].

2.3. Antagonistic Pleiotropy Theory

In 1953, Williams [46] argued that evolution would favor genes that have (small) positive effects during early life, even though they have negative effects during late life [47]. That is because an early advantage in replication outweighs harmful effects that occur later in a species’ life history, even at the price of aging and death. One of the most prominent examples is the senescence key gene p53, which suppresses cancer early in life, but is responsible for the accumulation of senescent cells at a later age [48]. One allele of the human complement factor H gene provides better protection against pathogenic bacteria and fungi but increases the risk to suffer later from age-related macula degeneration (AMD) [49]. This dilemma can be modeled by evolutionary game theory [50]. Since most wildlife animals die earlier than their life-span would allow, due to accidents, disease, starvation or predation, there has never been any evolutionary pressure on these pleiotropic effects [51].

2.4. Epigenetic Clock Theory

Epigenetic marks are defined as heritable and reversible chemical modifications of histone proteins in order to change chromatin structures (e.g., through lysine or cysteine methylation) or as direct changes of the DNA [52,53,54]. Especially the methylation of DNA (at cytosines) is known to be associated with the down-regulation of genes [55].
Many independent studies have shown that there is a strong correlation between aging and DNA methylation [56,57,58], leading to new hypotheses that there is an epigenetic program that restricts life-span by turning down genetic processes with time passing by, supporting the ideas of a robust turnover program of the evolutionary genetic theories (see Section 2.1) [59,60]. This process was observed for many different tissues during aging, leading to the identification of specific tissue-dependent and tissue-independent DNA methylation sites [61]. These sites could also be used to predict the biological age of specific tissues, establishing the concept of the “epigenetic clock” [53,62]. However, this theory still competes with the stochastically occurring epigenetic changes with age (also known as “epigenetic drift”), arising from random (de)methylation processes and displaying a large variability across individuals [63,64,65,66].

2.5. Discussion of Programmed Aging Theories

All four theories implicitly suggest that the aging process is directly modulated by evolution for every species and that it could be explained by natural selection. This is also the principle of the disposable soma theory, which describes aging as an evolutionary trade-off between senescence and growth [67]. In a sense, these theories are in better agreement than the failure accumulation theories with the view that many features show robustness during aging because the former theories assume that failure accumulation is not an issue.
However, there are strong arguments against such evolutionary implications. For example, different studies on the mortality of wild animals showed that in many species almost all individuals die relatively early due to predation, cold or starvation, and only a few reach an age were factors like the accumulation of senescence, or epigenetic methylation marks become relevant (for a brief review, see [68]). This observation implies that there is little or no selective pressure on potential genetic aging programs. Consequently, such genetic aging programs either do not exist or are evolutionary extremely robust. Especially the “epigenetic drift” could not be proved to be more than random changes that add up over time, eventually silencing critical cellular processes just by chance [64,69].
Most importantly, none of the theories can explain the non-existence of “cheaters”, i.e., individuals that benefit from a deactivated aging program, because the overall suggested evolutionary benefit applies only for the whole group of a species and not for an individual alone [8]. Nevertheless, there are still proven genetic pathways that, when modified, can shorten or prolong life in different animal models significantly but are mostly counted as longevity instead of aging processes.
In the following, we will introduce the main ideas behind the failure accumulation theories.

2.6. DNA Damage Theory

This theory is a generalization of the free radical theory of aging [70] and is based on the fact that cells can enter replicative senescence if their DNA is damaged beyond repair. Due to several internal and external sources of stress, different impairments of the genomic DNA accumulate, like DNA single or double-strand breaks, non-canonical mutations or chemical modifications of single bases.
If a cell cannot cope with the damage despite having various and complex DNA repair mechanisms senescence will be triggered to prevent the transformation into a cancer cell [14]. Within the state of senescence, a cell fully stops growing and replicating, however, not making room for a new completely functional cell, and thus preventing it from participating in sustaining tissue homeostasis. As a consequence, more and more cells enter senescence overtime, and organ functions decrease to a point where the maintenance of the whole body collapses.

2.7. Mitochondrial Theory

In principle, according to the same reasoning as in the DNA damage theory, the mitochondrial theory identifies the cell’s mitochondria as a source of harmful reagents for DNA, namely the reactive oxygen species (ROS) [71,72,73]. ROS are generated as a byproduct of the mitochondrial electron transport chain, the central energy-producing process within cells, and play a natural role in some cell signaling pathways [74].
Mitochondria hold their own DNA (mtDNA), encoding for integral proteins of the oxygen processing machinery. Since the mtDNA is close to the site of the metabolic production of ROS, it is incredibly susceptible to DNA damage induced by ROS overproduction. This can lead to a vicious cycle since somatic mutations in mtDNA result in impaired mitochondrial proteins and an increasingly dysfunctional electron transport chain, consequently producing even more harmful ROS [75]. As a consequence, mitochondria become less and less stable over time and slowly turn into internal genotoxic threats, culminating in the activation of replicative senescence or cellular death.
Nevertheless, there are conflicting experimental observations in different animals, showing an unaffected or even shortened life-span after a reduction of oxidative stress by mitochondria or the complete removal of mtDNA [76,77,78]. Furthermore, besides the mitochondrial decline during aging, the oxidative phosphorylation remains surprisingly stable (see Section 4.4).

2.8. Proteostasis Theory

Sometimes referred to as waste accumulation theory, it is based on the assumption that the main origin of internal cellular stress is caused by misfolded proteins and deleterious protein aggregations [79]. The argumentation is similar to the one above. The accumulation of disturbing proteins results, over time, in a self-enhancing cycle of stress-induced interference with molecular processes, which in turn leads to an increased formation of harmful proteins triggering senescence. Common examples of such events are neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer’s or Parkinson’s disease and cancer, which are known to be triggered by dysfunctional and constrained protein complexes [80].
Normally, certain proteins are responsible for the correct folding of the majority of newly translated proteins (so-called chaperones or heat shock proteins) or the adequate degradation of old and non-functional proteins (mainly the proteasomes). With age, these mechanisms become inaccurate and reduced, possibly due to different internal and external stresses, making cells incapable of controlling the natural protein turnover, and resulting in the above described fatal consequences [81]. One important phenomenon in this context is the non-enzymatic, spontaneous modification of amino acids within proteins, such as peroxidation, hydroxylation, and chlorination [5]. Interestingly, the splicing process seems to be stable with age and does not contribute substantially to the generation of deleterious proteins (see Section 4.3).

2.9. Environmental Theory

In contrast to the theories mentioned above, supporters of the environmental theory (or closely related theories) claim that cellular changes and damages causing aging are mainly driven by exposure to external stresses and outweigh all internal sources of cellular stress [55,82]. These environmental factors include ultraviolet light, diet, ingested or inhaled toxic chemicals, heavy metals, radiation, heat or cold exposure, and psychological stress. Besides the direct damage of DNA, proteins or entire cells, the main influence of these factors is reflected by the changes in epigenetic modifications (especially DNA methylation) [63,66].
The age-dependent epigenetic drift causes a general down-regulation of gene transcription, resulting in intracellular miscommunication and deregulation of important biological processes [83]. Different cohort and twin studies could prove a direct and strong connection between the rate of epigenetic changes and aging, so that the topic of epigenetics attracted much attention in the field of aging in recent years [84,85,86].

2.10. Stress Theory of Aging

This is currently the most widely accepted theory and explains that different causes for aging do not have to be mutually exclusive. Its key message is that aging is most likely a combination of the processes mentioned above, which act and interact in parallel at different functional levels [87,88,89]. The progression of aging is tightly linked to all kinds of stress that an individual experiences throughout its lifetime. The ability to deal with internal and external stresses by any means is used to determine the rate of aging [90]. This makes sense, of course, when one considers that many aging theories overlap in their argumentation and states that aging is most likely caused by the complex interplay of different molecular sources in which cellular stress appears to be one of the central points.
In the following sections, we will discuss various aspects of aging that, in contrast to most aging theories, do not decline but show some kind of robustness during aging.

3. Physiological Properties

3.1. Immune System

A favorite subject of age research is the immune system of humans and higher animals [91,92,93]. The term immunosenescence has been coined in this context, and the paradigm of decline during aging is quite dominant in this field.
However, it is worth noting that in the first few years of life, the fastest and most effective immune response is provided by the innate immune system. It cannot distinguish between desired and undesired immune responses and has no long-term memory [92]. In contrast, the adaptive immune system can generate antigen-specific immunity by precisely recognizing antigens, memory formation, and adaptive proliferation. This gives the body the ability to adapt to new pathogens and to become more robust throughout life.
In the first two decades of the life of a human, the diversity of the T cell receptor in the thymus creates the prerequisite for the recognition of foreign antigens [94,95]. They are then maintained by the homeostatic proliferation of naïve T cells. Through repeated exposure to pathogens throughout life, the adaptive immune system achieves better and better protection. Due to antigen exposure, more of the naïve T/B lymphocytes with a vast polyclonal repertoire of antigen receptors shift to memory T/B lymphocytes with only a limited antigen receptor repertoire [96]. This leads to a diminishing naïve lymphocyte pool in aged individuals [94] and makes them more susceptible to newly arising infectious diseases, such as West Nile fever or severe acute respiratory syndrome [97,98]. Furthermore, it causes an impairment of the response to vaccines, and requires additional use of adjuvants [99].
While in the case of COVID-19, the elderly show a drastically higher mortality rate ( [15,16]), it can be observed that older people have a better immune response to influenza viruses than young people (Figure 3) [100]. This observation depends on the statistics, though. Figure 3 shows the incidence rate rather than the mortality rate of infected individuals. As far as mortality is concerned, there are reports that pandemic spreads (H1N1 from 1918 to 1919, H2N2 from 1957 to 1958, H3N2 from 1968 to 1969, and H1N1 in 2009) mainly affect younger people and the subsequent epidemic spreads affect older people [101,102]. Another example challenging the paradigm of decline is that young cats are, in general, more susceptible to cat flu than adult ones (except very old ones) since the former have lost their maternally-derived antibodies without producing enough on their own already [103]. That disease is caused by feline herpesvirus type 1 (FHV) and feline calicivirus (FCV). Importantly, also, secondary infections pose a severe threat to kittens.
There is ample evidence that relevant biomarkers of the activity of the immune system indicate, on average, immunosenescence. However, when inspecting the results in more detail, it turns out that the variance of the data often increases during aging and that many older individuals tested show a perfectly active immunity.
For example, in Figure 5 in [2], the so-called CD4:8 ratio related to human T-cell phenotypes are plotted. While more and more individuals show an increased ratio in elderly people, many elderly individuals show a normal ratio. This is indicative of robustness. Another study revealed that the frequency and differentiation status of human γ δ T-cells are only marginally influenced by age, except for people with a latent Cytomegalovirus infection [104]. No significant difference was observed in the net frequency of dendritic cells (DCs) producing IL-12 between young (23–34 years) and old (62–77 years) individuals [93]. In the same study, the total fraction of cytokine-producing cells (without subtracting background) did not differ between the two groups, and neither was the frequency of DCs producing IL-6 and TNF simultaneously significantly different between the young and old persons. However, the latter included many individuals with considerably fewer polyfunctional DCs than any of the young donors. Furthermore, the cytokine production level per cell was similar in young and old individuals [93]. In many immunological studies, the dependency on age is hard to discern due to large interindividual variability and a poor signal-to-noise ratio, which imply a significant variance of the data.
A striking feature in the immune system of the elderly is a chronically elevated low-level systemic inflammation [91,105]. This is partly due to the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) associated with senescent cells [106,107]. This includes secretion of higher levels of inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6, which have complex biological effects in ageing and cancer [108,109]. Thus, senescence can, in some instances, have opposite effects on tumorigenesis: in spite of its protective role, SASP can promote late-life cancer [106,109]. In general, chronic inflammation often correlates with carcinogenesis, diabetes, atherosclerosis, neurodegenerative diseases, etc. The exact causal relationship is not, however, known. It is unclear whether some other aging process independently leads to both disease and increased inflammation. The innate immune system increases the intensity and duration of the mediated inflammatory reactions, making older people susceptible to tissue-damaging immunity and inflammatory diseases [92,105].

3.2. Muscular System

From the viewpoint of robustness, it is interesting to consider the muscular system. It is well known that the mass, strength, and, thus, the performance of muscles decline in older individuals, for example, in humans [110] and the fish Nothobranchius furzeri [54]. For the population in most developed nations, cardiovascular disease is the most common cause of death [111]. Cardiac hypertrophy is a hallmark of cardiac aging [112]. High-performance sports cannot be practiced for very long in life. The potential of repair after muscle injury declines with age [110,113]. In the context of muscle aging, the mitochondrial theory (see Section 2.7), proteostasis theory (see Section 2.8) and others are worth being considered.
On the other hand, the muscular system is more robust than it may look at first sight. Some sportsmen show a remarkable performance even above 60 years of age, for example, in ironman triathlon [114]. The decline in muscle mass and function usually progresses at a low rate (primary sarcopenia). However, disease and injury usually accelerate this process (secondary sarcopenia) [110,115]. Secondary sarcopenia is influenced by immunological processes (e.g., increased IL-6 levels, see Section 3.1) [108,116]. In contrast, physical exercise has a positive effect on managing and preventing muscle loss [115]. Thus, primary sarcopenia is not only due to a direct effect by aging but also to an indirect effect by the sedentary lifestyle and lack of physical activity of many elderly people.
It has been found that the satellite cells within the skeletal muscle may have an essential role in aging-induced alterations. These constitute a pluripotent cell population with properties of stem cells in the adult skeletal muscle tissue. Some studies reported no differences in satellite cell counts in skeletal muscle between young and old men [117], while others did find a significant decline, associated explicitly with type II fibers, which contain less mitochondria [110].
A striking example of robustness is the heart muscle. The hearts of many animal species beat tirelessly until shortly before the end of life. The oldest non-colonial animal known to science is the ocean quahog Arctica islandica (Linnaeus, 1767) [118]. The known maximum life span of these bivalve mollusks is 508 years [119]. Within this enormous period of five centuries, the heart can beat more than 1.5 billion times [120]. Gerontological studies showed that A. islandica has increased resistance to several forms of stress compared to short-lived relatives [121,122]. Furthermore, Sosnowska et al. [120] could not find a significant difference of oxidatively damaged proteins in the heart muscle up to the age of 120 years. Successfully aging mammals, such as bats, also show lower protein oxidation (carbonylation) [123].

3.3. Vascular System and Body Temperature

An important medical parameter related to oxygen transport is the volume percentage of red blood cells, the hematocrit (Hct). The Hct value in healthy women (before menopause) amounts, on average, to approximately 40% and in healthy men to about 46% [124]. However, the values show considerable variations among individuals. Compared to that, there is no significant change depending on age, except for a slight increase in women after menopause. This is because menstruation causes a periodic outflow of erythrocytes, including defective ones. Since they are replaced by new erythrocytes, the percentage of defective erythrocytes is lower in women before menopause than in men [124,125]. Thus, the constancy in the Hct value is a further example of robustness during aging.
The average observed Hct value of about 40% in humans and many animals can be calculated based on optimality arguments [125]. If it were lower, fewer erythrocytes would be available to transport oxygen. If it were higher, the viscosity of the blood would be higher, so that it would flow more slowly. However, to maintain normal function, mammalian tissue oxygen concentrations must be tightly regulated within a narrow physiological range [126]. This explains, from a functional point of view, why it is beneficial to keep the Hct value constant during a lifetime. It is an interesting question of how the system that regulates the Hct value (which involves the hormone erythropoietin) achieves that robustness.
A crucial physiological parameter in homoiothermic animals is body temperature. That parameter is connected to the circadian rhythm so that it changes over the day. It is influenced by different internal and external factors, such as seasons, physical activity, nicotine and alcohol abuse, or menstrual rhythm [127,128]. The body temperature has been compared in human probands during normal aging and under the influence of age-related diseases. Some studies reported a slight decrease in mean body temperature, for example, a pioneering study by C.A. Wunderlich in the 1860s (see [128]). However, that appears to reflect nutritional, disease, and medication effects. Exclusion of these factors negates any relationship between age and mean body core temperature [127,129,130,131]. However, the variability of temperature increases in older people [130]. The tolerance to heat stress appears to be only minimally compromised by age, while the response to cold stress becomes weaker [130]. Various studies show that the body temperature has a comparable course of time over the day [129,130,131,132] with a minor decrease in amplitude in some individuals [128,130] (for a more detailed discussion of the circadian rhythm, see Section 4.1). Comparable results have been found in mice [133] and rats [134].

3.4. Brain Functionality

It is notable that making decisions or being attentive becomes more difficult with increasing age. Major intellectual achievements are often made by scientists in their twenties or thirties. On the other hand, there is a partially compensatory effect by growing life experience. Thus, many leadership positions in business, politics, and other areas are held by older people, and they are still capable of comprehending large systems or groups and making complex decisions.
Although the ability to handle task-related processes decreases and the prevalence of neurodegenerative diseases markedly increases with age, not all neuronal functions decline, and by far, not all elderly people are affected by these diseases [135,136,137,138]. For example, about 10% of individuals aged ≥65 years suffer from Alzheimer’s disease [138]. Campbell and colleagues conducted a human population-based study and observed that the auditory network and frontotemporal syntax network in the brain stay intact with increasing age [135]. Heard information can be processed by old persons in a comparable way as by young persons. The sensitivity of the corresponding networks does not change with age and shows that these cognitive abilities are robust [135]. Comparable results have been identified in population-based studies by Davis et al. [136] and Samu et al. [137], and show that language comprehension is not affected during healthy aging [136,137].
Furthermore, also the visuomotor processes stay partially robust [139,140]. Kadota and Gomi observed that the identification of visual stimuli and reaching them is not significantly different between young and old people [139]. This has been confirmed by Kimura and colleagues. They found out that the reaction towards object replacements stays high with age [140]. These examples show that neural functionality does not decline altogether.

3.5. Cell Redundancy

Most tissues consist of various cell types. For example, liver tissue includes hepatocytes, stellate cells, Kupffer cells, and others. Each cell type is present in numerous copies that have the same phenotypic structure and the same functionalities. In case of a malfunction or damage to an individual cell, this failure does not necessarily have an effect on the complete tissue. The functionality is preserved by other cells of the same type and, in some cases, by new differentiation of stem cells [141]. This behavior is analogous to the development of germ cells (see Figure 1) and shows how robust tissues are against damage.
The concept of redundancy has been investigated in skin wound healing in humans, where different growth factors are activated to ensure the healing process [142]. Redundancy plays a role not only at the tissue level but also in many cellular and regulatory mechanisms, such as the mechanisms of cell death [143] and transcription factor functionality [144] (see Section 4.2). Furthermore, immunological cascades have high redundancy with an important functional impact, including natural killer cells [145].

4. Regulatory and Molecular Aspects

4.1. Feedback Control

In the context of age research, Kriete discusses feedback loops as an example of mechanisms strengthening robustness [11]. Feedback loops ensure the functionality of certain processes as a control mechanism and prohibit a fast decline, such as in the NF- κ B pathway. Feedback loops are often stable over time and show robustness also during aging in humans [11,146].
A further example is the circadian clock, for example, of body temperature and locomotor activity. That rhythm is based on at least two intertwined, conserved feedback loops [147]. In some individuals of laboratory animals and humans, a minor decrease in amplitude and a phase-advance can be observed, while many other individuals keep a normal circadian rhythm [127,128,129,130,131,133,134]. The results are heterogeneous with a sizeable inter-individual variance; even arrhythmia in some old rodents was observed [134]. The age-dependent changes of the temperature rhythm may partly be due to masking effects by the effect of locomotor activity on body temperature [127]. The rhythm can be kept robust with a stable concentration of SIRT1, a NAD + -dependent protein deacetylase, which introduces the loop and controls different regulators of the circadian clock [148,149,150,151]. The profiles of different rhythms seem to be altered differently, both in rodents and humans. Thus, their coupling seems to be reduced during aging. In elderly human subjects, some rhythms (e.g., temperature, melatonin) are often modified, whereas the time course of others (e.g., plasma cortisol, serum sodium concentration) remain unchanged [134]. Overall, the circadian rhythm is fairly robust into advanced age.
Theoretical studies in engineering science have shown that an increase in robustness always opens up a new side of fragility, however low the risk may be. For example, a negative feedback system such as a thermostat in a refrigerator usually improves homeostasis, but it can lead to dramatic system failure if it is damaged itself [152]. Such considerations have also been discussed in the context of aging [11]. An example discussed above is body temperature. While it provides advantages to keep it constant in homoiothermic animals, this is accompanied by a greater danger for life in the case of hypothermia. It is of interest to investigate the tight interrelation between robustness and fragility more systematically.
Furthermore hematopoiesis is subject to tight feedback control, in which the hormone erythropoietin (EPO) plays a vital role. For example, a progressively increased accumulation of EPO was observed during chronic hypoxia in young and aged mouse kidney [126]. However, under hypoxia, also the Hct value is often increased to compensate for the lower oxygen level. Interestingly, adaptation to hypoxia in high altitudes differs in different highlander populations. While indigenous people in the Andes mountains show higher Hct values than lowlanders, Tibetans have “normal” Hct values of about 40% and use other compensation mechanisms [153].

4.2. The Robustness of Networks

With increasing age of an organism, the effects of external stimuli accumulate. Tu and Chen [146] analyzed human expression data based on gene regulatory networks (GRNs) to analyze changes over time. They argue that robustness increases with regard to external stimuli (through a lower response to environmental stressors) and that more intrinsic variations are tolerated (for an explanation of the term robustness, see the Introduction.) The robustness of gene regulation might increase with increasing age [146]. Furthermore, GRNs contain various transcription factors (TFs). TFs ensure the functionality of cells and tissues and contain a certain redundancy, which increases its robustness [144]. Redundancy can also be observed in the feedback regulation of amino acid synthesis pathways, which is often implemented both by allosteric inhibitors and at the genetic level [154].
In the context of robustness, often, the so-called scale-free networks are discussed. These are networks in which a few nodes (so-called hubs) are densely connected to other nodes, while many nodes are only sparsely connected. The frequency of nodes as a function of connectivity follows a power law with a negative exponent [155]. It has been shown by data analysis that many biological systems such as biochemical networks [155] or protein-protein interaction networks [156] are scale-free. An important property of scale-free networks is to be quite robust to a random deletion of a node but fragile with respect to a targeted deletion of a hub. This implies that such networks per se cannot provide perfect robustness because perturbations may also hit hubs by chance.

4.3. Alternative Splicing—Functional Relevance vs. Noise

Splicing takes place regularly in eukaryotic cells to process pre-mRNA into mature mRNA. The splicing process is guided by the spliceosome, a macromolecular complex consisting of a high number of proteins and small RNAs [157,158,159]. The spliceosome ensures the (more or less) correct splicing process, including control mechanisms [157,160]. In addition, the complexity of the proteome can be widely increased by alternative splicing (AS), which leads to multiple isoforms of one and the same gene [159]. Missplicing of specific genes has already been linked to several age-associated diseases, such as progeria, Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, and cancer [161,162,163,164].
Alternative splicing produces different isoforms of proteins depending on gender, developmental stage, or environmental conditions. For example, coordinate alternative splicing changes drive embryo-to-adult transitions during postnatal heart development [165]. Moreover, age-related changes in isoforms have been found in many studies (for review, see [13]). For example, alternative splicing alterations have been found to be associated with mouse strain longevity [166]. Two questions arise in this context: to what extent and for what percentage of genes, the splicing process significantly changes, and whether the splicing process becomes more and more error-prone during aging, for example, by increasing malfunction of the spliceosome.
However, little is known on the global change between the most abundant isoforms of a gene in different tissues over time. A few studies identified individual isoforms derived from AS to be robust with age [167,168]. Lin et al. [168] discovered that the expression of one isoform of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I), an important age regulator, is downregulated during aging in mice, while another one has a constant expression. A regulatory role for the various transcript isoforms of IGF-I has been suggested, while the main function appears to be the same for all. Only minor effects of aging on the distribution of isoforms could be found so far [169]. Aristorena and colleagues identified an increased expression of the low-abundant isoform of CD105 during aging in humans and mice, which introduces a decreasing proliferation [170]. Huan et al. point out that small proportions of AS change over time and are associated with age in different human tissues [171]. In a recent bioinformatics study, we found that AS is robust to aging for the majority of genes across various species, notably humans, mouse, zebrafish (Danio rerio), and killifish (Nothobranchius furzeri) as well as across different tissues [167]. This observation indicates that the whole splicing process seems to stay robust during aging. Furthermore, this is in line with the reasoning that the embryonic and adult phases are distinct developmental stages, while high age is not.
Regarding the spliceosome itself, mixed observations have been published on the expression change of genes coding for that macromolecular complex. Some studies have observed a stable expression of the main spliceosomal genes during aging with only a few significant changes for humans and mice, showing that the expression of essential components of the spliceosome seems not to change drastically during the age in these species [167,172].
However, other recent studies on various species and tissues observed an age-dependent decline in the expression of spliceosomal genes [166,172,173,174]. As a common assumption, it is argued that the age-dependent decrease in the spliceosomal activity leads to an inaccurate splicing process resulting in an accumulation of non-functional mRNAs. This additional “noise” in the transcriptome may reflect another source of stress to which aging cells are exposed and which contribute to the intrinsic obstacles to maintaining homeostasis.
These findings support the theory that the spliceosome and splicing products are changed but not deregulated globally, pointing to a relatively robust splicing process during aging. Changes in AS might even be a response to changing necessity. AS in human and rodent muscle cells during aging may be a means to react to damage (e.g., by ischemia or prolonged exercise) [169,175].
The degradation of incorrect (noisy) splice products may take place regularly as part of splicing control mechanisms [158,176,177]. Further studies suggest that a high proportion of AS is caused by stochastic slippage of the spliceosome [178,179,180]. Some of the isoforms without functionality are discarded, for example, by nonsense-mediated decay. Others, however, can be functional [178]. In the case of slippage, AS should be more or less invariant during aging because it is just a stochastic effect. An opposing view is that practically all AS events are physiologically advantageous [181], and noisy splicing might be an important evolutionary mechanism [180]. It might be used to regulate the overall expression of the corresponding gene in certain species [182,183]. This is an observation without taking aging effects into account. Thus, also aging data contain noisy AS events, which may be misinterpreted as being correlated with aging.

4.4. Energy Metabolism

Mitochondria are subject to damage due to ROS, and therefore, their function is more and more impaired during their lifetime (see Section 2.7). Thus, one would expect that the contribution of oxidative phosphorylation (cell respiration) declines during aging. Surprisingly, in many animals, the opposite is observed: its relative contribution (compared to glycolysis) increases [184,185]. Embryonic cells show a rather high fraction of glycolytic ATP production. This may be due to a lack of oxygen but is mainly due to the need for a high ATP production rate (rather than high ATP-over-glucose yield) in rapidly dividing cells. After birth, the fractional contribution of glycolysis permanently decreases. An interesting observation is that physical activity delays the decline in mitochondrial respiratory flux in aging mouse muscle [186].
The above observations can be interpreted in terms of robustness. Although the contributions of glycolysis and respiration are not constant, they develop in a way that opposes the effect of damage of mitochondria. Thus, that damage is over-compensated. This is only possible due to the remarkable robustness in mitochondrial energy metabolism.
Stadtman [187] suggested using the so-called energy charge, ( A T P + 0.5 A D P ) / ( A T P + A D P + A M P ) , as a biochemical marker of aging. However, it was found that the intracellular ATP concentration does not change significantly during aging. For example, no difference in ATP or the total adenine nucleotide or creatine metabolite concentrations could be observed between three age groups of mice (1, 4, and 16 months) after recovery from cardioplegic arrest [188]. Thus, the energy charge and ATP concentration have not turned out to be reliable biomarkers of aging. Even quantities such as ROS production (e.g., superoxides), mitochondrial mass and mitochondrial membrane potential or markers of lipid peroxidation, which had been suggested as biomarkers, have not proven reliable and even been questioned [189].

5. Discussion and Conclusions

In any scientific study, it is crucial to shed light on various aspects. While the effect of aging on the decline of physiological functions has been discussed in the literature at length and in much detail, the surprising robustness of many physiological functions has attracted much less attention (see Figure 4). In the above sections, we have outlined and discussed several examples of robustness on different organism levels, so that the paradigm of decline is worth being questioned.
It is worth mentioning that many studies on aging compare healthy with diseased or immune-deficient individuals and come to the conclusion that the effect of aging is especially severe in the latter [188,190]. This may, somewhat misleadingly, strengthen the focus on the negative aspects of aging. In the case of COVID-19, it appears that age plus comorbidity represent risk factors. Thus, it is hard to produce reliable statistics on the effect of age alone on susceptibility to that disease [15,16].
On comparing the programmed aging theories with the failure accumulation theories [8], it becomes clear that robustness is easier to explain by the former. If failures accumulate and cannot wholly be repaired, there is no chance to be perfectly robust. In contrast, if aging is programmed as a result of evolution, it can, at least in principle, be reprogrammed either by evolution or by human intervention to achieve immortality. For example, epigenetic modifications could be made differently.
A striking feature is that robustness during aging is often achieved by compensation mechanisms. For example, the decline in the efficiency of immune cells (immunosenescence) is partly compensated for by an increase in immune memory and perhaps also by a chronically elevated low-level systemic inflammation. It is, then, sometimes not easy to distinguish between harmful changes in aging and normal adaptation mechanisms. Moreover, robustness does not necessarily imply that every constituent remains constant; a variation in one constituent can be compensated by a variation in another, such as in the case of glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation.
Moreover, it is interesting and useful to consider robustness during aging from the point of view of optimality. According to the concept of survival of the fittest, organisms should have optimal properties. In fact, optimality considerations are often used to compute parameter values on theoretical grounds [125,191]. Based on the plausible assumption that certain parameters, e.g., the Hct value [125], intracellular ATP concentration [191], and body temperature [130,192], have optimal values, evolution should have led to a constancy of that value, perhaps except for a decline just before death. The mentioned example parameters are really fairly constant, as discussed above. The process of aging leaves many open questions. It has been discovered that functionalities decline, balances and behaviors change [146,193].
Different studies with common scientific questions of aging do not always show unambiguous results towards the behavior over time. This demonstrates how difficult it is to understand the aging process thoroughly. Further, this is not the first article to point out that the understanding of aging cannot be easily described only by increasing damage [194,195]. Blagosklonny further argues that it is possible to repair germ cells and does not see a reason why this should not be possible for somatic cells as well. He states that aging may be a continuation of the cell and organism development, which makes it a robust process [195].
To keep age-related risk factors minimal, it is often suggested to have a healthy diet, stay physically active, and avoid specific stressors [196,197,198]. It is of particular importance that certain key factors of aging are known, such as SIRT1, mTOR, IGF-1, and AMPK [149,150,195]. Already with this knowledge, negative consequences of aging can be limited, certain function losses can be regained, and certain age-related diseases could be prevented [149,195,197]. The organisms’ functionality might be more robust with such an adapted behavior or treatment. This is an important point in showing the fragility in a close relationship to robustness during aging [149,198].
The above critical discussion of the paradigm of decline during aging is in line with recent research on the psychology of aging. Some authors in that field argue that aging can open up new opportunities such as less deadline pressure, more leisure time, financial independence, serenity, etc. [194,199]. Our general attitude towards aging may change to the positive, which may have implications for new working hypotheses also in biological age research.

Funding

This research was funded by the DFG within Collaborative Research Center 1127 ChemBioSys (SFB 1127, Project C07) [StS and PS] and the Center of Interdisciplinary Prevention of Diseases related to Professional Activities (KIP) funded by the Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena and the ”Berufsgenossenschaft Nahrungsmittel und Gastgewerbe Erfurt (Germany)“ (BGN) [HS]. Furthermore, this work received financial support by the Ministry for Economics, Sciences and Digital Society of Thuringia (TMWWDG), under the framework of the Landesprogramm ProDigital (DigLeben-5575/10-9) [EB].

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Jannie Hofmeyr (Stellenbosch) and Olaf Wolkenhauer (Rostock) for insightful discussions on the work by Robert Rosen. We are grateful to Christoph Englert, Sascha Schäuble (both Jena) and Barbara Bakker (Groningen) for helpful discussions as well as Ina Weiß (Jena) for literature search.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
ASalternative splicing
DCsdendritic cells
ECMextracellular matrix
Hcthematocrit
mtDNAmitochondrial DNA
ROSreactive oxygen species
SPARCsecreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine

References

  1. Mansfeld, J.; Urban, N.; Priebe, S.; Groth, M.; Frahm, C.; Hartmann, N.; Gebauer, J.; Ravichandran, M.; Dommaschk, A.; Schmeisser, S.; et al. Branched-chain amino acid catabolism is a conserved regulator of physiological ageing. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Adriaensen, W.; Derhovanessian, E.; Vaes, B.; Pottelbergh, G.V.; Degryse, J.M.; Pawelec, G.; Hamprecht, K.; Theeten, H.; Matheï, C. CD4:8 Ratio >5 Is Associated With a Dominant Naive T-Cell Phenotype and Impaired Physical Functioning in CMV-Seropositive Very Elderly People: Results From the BELFRAIL Study. J. Gerontol. Ser. A 2014, 70, 143–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Radman, M. Protein damage, radiation sensitivity and aging. DNA Repair 2016, 44, 186–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Höhn, A.; König, J.; Grune, T. Protein oxidation in aging and the removal of oxidized proteins. J. Proteom. 2013, 92, 132–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Fichtner, M.; Schuster, S.; Stark, H. Determination of scoring functions for protein damage susceptibility. BioSystems 2020, 187, 104035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kirkwood, T.B.L. Why and how are we living longer? Exp. Physiol. 2017, 102, 1067–1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Medvedev, Z.A. An attempt at a rational classification of theories of ageing. Biol. Rev. 1990, 65, 375–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kirkwood, T.B.L. Understanding the odd science of aging. Cell 2005, 120, 437–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Rosen, R. Feedforwards and global system failure: A general mechanism for senescence. J. Theor. Biol. 1978, 74, 579–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Heinrich, R.; Schuster, S. The Regulation of Cellular Systems; Springer Science & Business Media: New York, NY, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  11. Kriete, A. Robustness and aging—A systems-level perspective. Biosystems 2013, 112, 37–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kitano, H. Biological robustness. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2004, 5, 826–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Bhadra, M.; Howell, P.; Dutta, S.; Heintz, C.; Mair, W. Alternative splicing in aging and longevity. Hum. Genet. 2020, 139, 357–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Smetana, K., Jr.; Lacina, L.; Szabo, P.; Dvořánková, B.; Brož, P.; Šedo, A. Ageing as an important risk factor for cancer. Anticancer Res. 2016, 36, 5009–5017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Ruan, Q.; Yang, K.; Wang, W.; Jiang, L.; Song, J. Clinical predictors of mortality due to COVID-19 based on an analysis of data of 150 patients from Wuhan, China. Intensive Care Med. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Zhou, F.; Yu, T.; Du, R.; Fan, G.; Liu, Y.; Liu, Z.; Xiang, J.; Wang, Y.; Song, B.; Gu, X.; et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: A retrospective cohort study. Lancet 2020, 6736, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Clegg, R.J.; Dyson, R.J.; Kreft, J.U. Repair rather than segregation of damage is the optimal unicellular aging strategy. BMC Biol. 2014, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Van Kleunen, M.; Fischer, M. Effects of four generations of density-dependent selection on life history traits and their plasticity in a clonally propagated plant. J. Evol. Biol. 2003, 16, 474–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Pereira-Smith, O.; Ning, Y. Molecular genetic studies of cellular senescence. Exp. Gerontol. 1992, 27, 519–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rosen, R. Life Itself: A Comprehensive Inquiry Into the Nature, Origin, and Fabrication of Life; Columbia University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  21. Hankinson, R.J. Cause and Explanation in Ancient Greek Thought; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  22. Hofmeyr, J.H.S. Basic Biological Anticipation; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 1–15. [Google Scholar]
  23. De Magalhães, J.P.; Costa, J. A database of vertebrate longevity records and their relation to other life-history traits. J. Evol. Biol. 2009, 22, 1770–1774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Franzese, A.T.; Rurka, M.M. Theories of Aging. Encycl. Family Stud. 2016, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Libertini, G. Non-programmed versus programmed aging paradigm. Curr. Aging Sci. 2015, 8, 56–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Kowald, A.; Kirkwood, T.B. Can aging be programmed? A critical literature review. Aging Cell 2016, 15, 986–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Strehler, B.L. Understanding aging. In Aging Methods and Protocols; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2000; pp. 1–19. [Google Scholar]
  28. Friedman, D.B.; Johnson, T.E. Three mutants that extend both mean and maximum life span of the nematode, Caenorhabditis Elegans, Defin. Age-1 Gene. J. Gerontol. 1988, 43, B102–B109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Kimura, K.D.; Tissenbaum, H.A.; Liu, Y.; Ruvkun, G. daf-2, an insulin receptor-like gene that regulates longevity and diapause in Caenorhabditis Elegans. Science 1997, 277, 942–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Bartke, A. Mutations prolong life in flies; implications for aging in mammals. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. TEM 2001, 12, 233–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mao, S.A.; Glorioso, J.M.; Nyberg, S.L. Liver regeneration. Transl. Res. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 2014, 163, 352–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Holzenberger, M.; Dupont, J.; Ducos, B.; Leneuve, P.; Géloën, A.; Even, P.C.; Cervera, P.; Le Bouc, Y. IGF-1 receptor regulates lifespan and resistance to oxidative stress in mice. Nature 2003, 421, 182–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Travis, J.M.J. The evolution of programmed death in a spatially structured population. J. Gerontol. Ser. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2004, 59, 301–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Skulachev, V.P. The programmed death phenomena, aging, and the Samurai law of biology. Exp. Gerontol. 2001, 36, 995–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Skulachev, V.P. Programmed death phenomena: From organelle to organism. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2002, 959, 214–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Griffith, J.D.; Comeau, L.; Rosenfield, S.; Stansel, R.M.; Bianchi, A.; Moss, H.; de Lange, T. Mammalian telomeres end in a large duplex loop. Cell 1999, 97, 503–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Collins, K. Mammalian telomeres and telomerase. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2000, 12, 378–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Okuda, K.; Bardeguez, A.; Gardner, J.P.; Rodriguez, P.; Ganesh, V.; Kimura, M.; Skurnick, J.; Awad, G.; Aviv, A. Telomere length in the newborn. Pediatr. Res. 2002, 52, 377–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Arai, Y.; Martin-Ruiz, C.M.; Takayama, M.; Abe, Y.; Takebayashi, T.; Koyasu, S.; Suematsu, M.; Hirose, N.; von Zglinicki, T. Inflammation, But Not Telomere Length, Predicts Successful Ageing at Extreme Old Age: A Longitudinal Study of Semi-supercentenarians. EBioMedicine 2015, 2, 1549–1558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Burnet, F.M. Intrinsic Mutagenesis: A Genetic Approach to Ageing; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1974. [Google Scholar]
  41. Collado, M.; Blasco, M.A.; Serrano, M. Cellular senescence in cancer and aging. Cell 2007, 130, 223–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Schäuble, S.; Klement, K.; Marthandan, S.; Münch, S.; Heiland, I.; Schuster, S.; Hemmerich, P.; Diekmann, S. Quantitative Model of Cell Cycle Arrest and Cellular Senescence in Primary Human Fibroblasts. PLoS ONE 2012, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Olovnikov, A.M. A theory of marginotomy. The incomplete copying of template margin in enzymic synthesis of polynucleotides and biological significance of the phenomenon. J. Theor. Biol. 1973, 41, 181–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Campisi, J. Aging, tumor suppression and cancer: High wire-act! Mech. Ageing Dev. 2005, 126, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Krtolica, A.; Parrinello, S.; Lockett, S.; Desprez, P.Y.; Campisi, J. Senescent fibroblasts promote epithelial cell growth and tumorigenesis: A link between cancer and aging. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 12072–12077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Williams, G.C. Pleiotropy, natural selection, and the evolution of senescence. Evolution 1957, 11, 398–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kirkwood, T.B.; Austad, S.N. Why do we age? Nature 2000, 408, 233–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Cherdyntseva, N.V.; Gervas, P.A.; Litvyakov, N.V.; Stakcheeva, M.N.; Ponomaryeva, A.A.; Dobrodeev, A.Y.; Denisov, E.V.; Belyavskaya, V.A.; Choinzonov, E.L. Age-related function of tumor suppressor gene TP53:contribution to cancer risk and progression. Exp. Oncol. 2010, 32, 205–208. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  49. Klein, R.; Zeiss, C.; Chew, E.; Tsai, J.; Sackler, R.; Haynes, C.; Henning, A.; SanGiovanni, J.; Mane, S.; Mayne, S.; et al. Complement factor H polymorphism in age-related macular degeneration. Science 2005, 308, 385–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Hummert, S.; Glock, C.; Lang, S.; Hummert, C.; Skerka, C.; Zipfel, P.; Germerodt, S.; Schuster, S. Playing ‘hide-and-seek’ with factor H: Game-theoretical analysis of a single nucleotide polymorphism. J. R. Soc. Interface 2018, 15, 20170963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Holliday, R. Aging is no longer an unsolved problem in biology. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2006, 1067, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Dupont, C.; Armant, D.R.; Brenner, C.A. Epigenetics: Definition, mechanisms and clinical perspective. Semin. Reprod. Med. 2009, 27, 351–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Buisman, S.C.; Haan, G.D. Epigenetic changes as a target in aging haematopoietic stem cells and age-related malignancies. Cells 2019, 8, 868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Cencioni, C.; Heid, J.; Krepelova, A.; Rasa, S.M.M.; Kuenne, C.; Guenther, S.; Baumgart, M.; Cellerino, A.; Neri, F.; Spallotta, F.; et al. Aging Triggers H3K27 Trimethylation Hoarding in the Chromatin of Nothobranchius furzeri Skeletal Muscle. Cells 2019, 8, 1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Sorrentino, J.A.; Sanoff, H.K.; Sharpless, N.E. Defining the toxicology of aging. Trends Mol. Med. 2014, 20, 375–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Hannum, G.; Guinney, J.; Zhao, L.; Zhang, L.; Hughes, G.; Sadda, S.; Klotzle, B.; Bibikova, M.; Fan, J.B.; Gao, Y.; et al. Genome-wide methylation profiles reveal quantitative views of human aging rates. Mol. Cell 2013, 49, 359–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Bell, J.T.; Tsai, P.C.; Yang, T.P.; Pidsley, R.; Nisbet, J.; Glass, D.; Mangino, M.; Zhai, G.; Zhang, F.; Valdes, A.; et al. Epigenome-wide scans identify differentially methylated regions for age and age-related phenotypes in a healthy ageing population. PLoS Genet. 2012, 8, e1002629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Koch, C.M.; Wagner, W. Epigenetic-aging-signature to determine age in different tissues. Aging 2011, 3, 1018–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. McClay, J.L.; Aberg, K.A.; Clark, S.L.; Nerella, S.; Kumar, G.; Xie, L.Y.; Hudson, A.D.; Harada, A.; Hultman, C.M.; Magnusson, P.K.E.; et al. A methylome-wide study of aging using massively parallel sequencing of the methyl-CpG-enriched genomic fraction from blood in over 700 subjects. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2014, 23, 1175–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. Issa, J.P. Aging and epigenetic drift: A vicious cycle. J. Clin. Investig. 2014, 124, 24–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Day, K.; Waite, L.L.; Thalacker-Mercer, A.; West, A.; Bamman, M.M.; Brooks, J.D.; Myers, R.M.; Absher, D. Differential DNA methylation with age displays both common and dynamic features across human tissues that are influenced by CpG landscape. Genome Biol. 2013, 14, R102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Horvath, S. DNA methylation age of human tissues and cell types. Genome Biol. 2013, 14, 3156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Jones, M.J.; Goodman, S.J.; Kobor, M.S. DNA methylation and healthy human aging. Aging Cell 2015, 14, 924–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Fraga, M.F.; Ballestar, E.; Paz, M.F.; Ropero, S.; Setien, F.; Ballestar, M.L.; Heine-Suñer, D.; Cigudosa, J.C.; Urioste, M.; Benitez, J.; et al. Epigenetic differences arise during the lifetime of monozygotic twins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 10604–10609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Teschendorff, A.E.; West, J.; Beck, S. Age-associated epigenetic drift: Implications, and a case of epigenetic thrift? Hum. Mol. Genet. 2013, 22, R7–R15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Shah, S.; McRae, A.F.; Marioni, R.E.; Harris, S.E.; Gibson, J.; Henders, A.K.; Redmond, P.; Cox, S.R.; Pattie, A.; Corley, J.; et al. Genetic and environmental exposures constrain epigenetic drift over the human life course. Genome Res. 2014, 24, 1725–1733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Kirkwood, T.B. Evolution of ageing. Nature 1977, 270, 301–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Finch, C.E.; Ruvkun, G. The genetics of aging. Annu. Rev. Genom. Hum. Genet. 2001, 2, 435–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  69. Thompson, R.F.; Atzmon, G.; Gheorghe, C.; Liang, H.Q.; Lowes, C.; Greally, J.M.; Barzilai, N. Tissue-specific dysregulation of DNA methylation in aging. Aging Cell 2010, 9, 506–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  70. Finkel, T.; Holbrook, N.J. Oxidants, oxidative stress and the biology of ageing. Nature 2000, 408, 239–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Harman, D. Aging: A theory based on free radical and radiation chemistry. J. Gerontol. 1956, 11, 298–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Harman, D. The biologic clock: The mitochondria? J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 1972, 20, 145–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Harman, D. The free radical theory of aging. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2003, 5, 557–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Devasagayam, T.P.A.; Tilak, J.C.; Boloor, K.K.; Sane, K.S.; Ghaskadbi, S.S.; Lele, R.D. Free radicals and antioxidants in human health: Current status and future prospects. J. Assoc. Physicians India 2004, 52, 794–804. [Google Scholar]
  75. López-Otín, C.; Blasco, M.A.; Partridge, L.; Serrano, M.; Kroemer, G. The hallmarks of aging. Cell 2013, 153, 1194–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Schriner, S.E.; Linford, N.J.; Martin, G.M.; Treuting, P.; Ogburn, C.E.; Emond, M.; Coskun, P.E.; Ladiges, W.; Wolf, N.; van Remmen, H.; et al. Extension of murine life span by overexpression of catalase targeted to mitochondria. Science 2005, 308, 1909–1911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Jang, Y.C.; Pérez, V.I.; Song, W.; Lustgarten, M.S.; Salmon, A.B.; Mele, J.; Qi, W.; Liu, Y.; Liang, H.; Chaudhuri, A.; et al. Overexpression of Mn superoxide dismutase does not increase life span in mice. J. Gerontol. Ser. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2009, 64, 1114–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Powell, C.D.; Quain, D.E.; Smart, K.A. The impact of media composition and petite mutation on the longevity of a polyploid brewing yeast strain. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2000, 31, 46–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  79. Powers, E.T.; Morimoto, R.I.; Dillin, A.; Kelly, J.W.; Balch, W.E. Biological and chemical approaches to diseases of proteostasis deficiency. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2009, 78, 959–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  80. Platt, F.M.; Boland, B.; van der Spoel, A.C. The cell biology of disease: Lysosomal storage disorders: The cellular impact of lysosomal dysfunction. J. Cell Biol. 2012, 199, 723–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  81. Nowotny, K.; Jung, T.; Grune, T.; Höhn, A. Accumulation of modified proteins and aggregate formation in aging. Exp. Gerontol. 2014, 57, 122–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Kochmanski, J.; Montrose, L.; Goodrich, J.M.; Dolinoy, D.C. Environmental Deflection: The Impact of Toxicant Exposures on the Aging Epigenome. Toxicol. Sci. Off. J. Soc. Toxicol. 2017, 156, 325–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Medvedeva, Y.A.; Khamis, A.M.; Kulakovskiy, I.V.; Ba-Alawi, W.; Bhuyan, M.S.I.; Kawaji, H.; Lassmann, T.; Harbers, M.; Forrest, A.R.; Bajic, V.B. Effects of cytosine methylation on transcription factor binding sites. BMC Genom. 2014, 15, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Martino, D.; Loke, Y.J.; Gordon, L.; Ollikainen, M.; Cruickshank, M.N.; Saffery, R.; Craig, J.M. Longitudinal, genome-scale analysis of DNA methylation in twins from birth to 18 months of age reveals rapid epigenetic change in early life and pair-specific effects of discordance. Genome Biol. 2013, 14, R42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Faulk, C.; Liu, K.; Barks, A.; Goodrich, J.M.; Dolinoy, D.C. Longitudinal epigenetic drift in mice perinatally exposed to lead. Epigenetics 2014, 9, 934–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Gilbert, K.M.; Blossom, S.J.; Erickson, S.W.; Reisfeld, B.; Zurlinden, T.J.; Broadfoot, B.; West, K.; Bai, S.; Cooney, C.A. Chronic exposure to water pollutant trichloroethylene increased epigenetic drift in CD4(+) T cells. Epigenomics 2016, 8, 633–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Xue, H.; Xian, B.; Dong, D.; Xia, K.; Zhu, S.; Zhang, Z.; Hou, L.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Han, J.D.J. A modular network model of aging. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2007, 3, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Simkó, G.I.; Gyurkó, D.; Veres, D.V.; Nánási, T.; Csermely, P. Network strategies to understand the aging process and help age-related drug design. Genome Med. 2009, 1, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Tosato, M.; Zamboni, V.; Ferrini, A.; Cesari, M. The aging process and potential interventions to extend life expectancy. Clin. Interv. Aging 2007, 2, 401–412. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  90. Epel, E.S.; Lithgow, G.J. Stress biology and aging mechanisms: Toward understanding the deep connection between adaptation to stress and longevity. J. Gerontol. Ser. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2014, 69 (Suppl. S1), S10–S16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  91. Pawelec, G.; Goldeck, D.; Derhovanessian, E. Inflammation, ageing and chronic disease. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2014, 29, 23–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Weyand, C.M.; Goronzy, J.J. Aging of the Immune System. Mechanisms and Therapeutic Targets. Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2016, 13 (Suppl. S5), S422–S428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Janssen, N.; Derhovanessian, E.; Demuth, I.; Arnaout, F.; Steinhagen-Thiessen, E.; Pawelec, G. Responses of Dendritic Cells to TLR-4 Stimulation Are Maintained in the Elderly and Resist the Effects of CMV Infection Seen in the Young. J. Gerontol. Ser. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2015, 71, 1117–1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Qi, Q.; Liu, Y.; Cheng, Y.; Glanville, J.; Zhang, D.; Lee, J.Y.; Olshen, R.A.; Weyand, C.M.; Boyd, S.D.; Goronzy, J.J. Diversity and clonal selection in the human T-cell repertoire. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 13139–13144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Palmer, D.B. The effect of age on thymic function. Front. Immunol. 2013, 4, 316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Bucher, C.H.; Schlundt, C.; Wulsten, D.; Sass, F.A.; Wendler, S.; Ellinghaus, A.; Thiele, T.; Seemann, R.; Willie, B.M.; Volk, H.D.; et al. Experience in the adaptive immunity impacts bone homeostasis, remodeling and healing. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Jean, C.M.; Honarmand, S.; Louie, J.K.; Glaser, C.A. Risk factors for West Nile virus neuroinvasive disease, California, 2005. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2007, 13, 1918–1920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Peiris, J.S.M.; Chu, C.M.; Cheng, V.C.C.; Chan, K.S.; Hung, I.F.N.; Poon, L.L.M.; Law, K.I.; Tang, B.S.F.; Hon, T.Y.W.; Chan, C.S.; et al. Clinical progression and viral load in a community outbreak of coronavirus-associated SARS pneumonia: A prospective study. Lancet 2003, 361, 1767–1772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Derhovanessian, E.; Pawelec, G. Vaccination in the elderly. Microb. Biotechnol. 2012, 5, 226–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  100. Buchholz, U.; Buda, S.; Streib, V.; Haas, W. Wochenbericht 51/2019. In GrippeWeb-Wochenbericht; Robert Koch-Institut: Berlin, Germany, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  101. Simonsen, L.; Clarke, M.J.; Schonberger, L.B.; Arden, N.H.; Cox, N.J.; Fukuda, K. Pandemic versus Epidemic Influenza Mortality: A Pattern of Changing Age Distribution. J. Infect. Dis. 1998, 178, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Lemaitre, M.; Carrat, F. Comparative age distribution of influenza morbidity and mortality during seasonal influenza epidemics and the 2009 H1N1 pandemic. BMC Infect. Dis. 2010, 10, 162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  103. Binns, S.H.; Dawson, S.; Speakman, A.J.; Cuevas, L.E.; Hart, C.A.; Gaskell, C.J.; Morgan, K.L.; Gaskell, R.M. A study of feline upper respiratory tract disease with reference to prevalence and risk factors for infection with feline calicivirus and feline herpesvirus. J. Feline Med. Surg. 2000, 2, 123–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Wistuba-Hamprecht, K.; Frasca, D.; Blomberg, B.; Pawelec, G.; Derhovanessian, E. Age-associated alterations in γδ T-cells are present predominantly in individuals infected with Cytomegalovirus. Immun. Ageing I A 2013, 10, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Perner, F.; Perner, C.; Ernst, T.; Heidel, F.H. Roles of JAK2 in Aging, Inflammation, Hematopoiesis and Malignant Transformation. Cells 2019, 8, 854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Coppé, J.; Patil, C.; Rodier, F.; Sun, Y.; Muñoz, D.; Goldstein, J.; Nelson, P.; Desprez, P.; Campisi, J. Senescence-associated secretory phenotypes reveal cell-nonautonomous functions of oncogenic RAS and the p53 tumor suppressor. PLoS Biol. 2008, 6, 2853–2868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Langhi Prata, L.; Ovsyannikova, I.; Tchkonia, T.; Kirkland, J. Senescent cell clearance by the immune system: Emerging therapeutic opportunities. Semin. Immunol. 2018, 40, 101275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Roubenoff, R. Catabolism of aging: Is it an inflammatory process? Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care 2003, 6, 295–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Faget, D.; Ren, Q.; Stewart, S. Unmasking senescence: Context-dependent effects of SASP in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2019, 19, 439–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Franco, I.; Fernandez-Gonzalo, R.; Vrtačnik, P.; Lundberg, T.; Eriksson, M.; Gustafsson, T. Healthy skeletal muscle aging: The role of satellite cells, somatic mutations and exercise. Int. Rev. Cell. Mol. Biol. 2019, 346, 157–200. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  111. Go, A.S.; Mozaffarian, D.; Roger, V.L.; Benjamin, E.J.; Berry, J.D.; Blaha, M.J.; Dai, S.; Ford, E.S.; Fox, C.S.; Franco, S.; et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics–2014 Update. Circulation 2014, 129, e28–e292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Chiao, Y.A.; Rabinovitch, P.S. The aging heart. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2015, 5, a025148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Bergmann, O.; Bhardwaj, R.D.; Bernard, S.; Zdunek, S.; Barnabé-Heider, F.; Walsh, S.; Zupicich, J.; Alkass, K.; Buchholz, B.A.; Druid, H.; et al. Evidence for cardiomyocyte renewal in humans. Science 2009, 324, 98–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. Lepers, R.; Maffiuletti, N. Age and gender interactions in ultraendurance performance: Insight from the triathlon. Med. Sci. Sport. Exerc. 2011, 43, 134–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Liguori, I.; Russo, G.; Aran, L.; Bulli, G.; Curcio, F.; Della-Morte, D.; Gargiulo, G.; Testa, G.; Cacciatore, F.; Bonaduce, D.; et al. Sarcopenia: Assessment of disease burden and strategies to improve outcomes. Clin. Interv. Aging 2018, 13, 913–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  116. Stenvinkel, P.; Ketteler, M.; Johnson, R.J.; Lindholm, B.; Pecoits-Filho, R.; Riella, M.; Heimbürger, O.; Cederholm, T.; Girndt, M. IL-10, IL-6, and TNF-α: Central factors in the altered cytokine network of uremia—The good, the bad, and the ugly. Kidney Int. 2005, 67, 1216–1233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  117. Dreyer, H.; Blanco, C.; Sattler, F.; Schroeder, E.; Wiswell, R. Satellite cell numbers in young and older men 24 h after eccentric exercise. Muscle Nerve 2006, 33, 242–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Wanamaker, A.D.; Heinemeier, J.; Scourse, J.D.; Richardson, C.A.; Butler, P.G.; Eiríksson, J.; Knudsen, K.L. Very long-lived mollusks confirm 17th century AD tephra-based radiocarbon reservoir ages for North Icelandic shelf waters. Radiocarbon 2008, 50, 399–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Butler, P.G.; Wanamaker, A.D., Jr.; Scourse, J.D.; Richardson, C.A.; Reynolds, D.J. Variability of marine climate on the North Icelandic Shelf in a 1357-year proxy archive based on growth increments in the bivalve Arctica Isl. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2013, 373, 141–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Sosnowska, D.; Richardson, C.; Sonntag, W.E.; Csiszar, A.; Ungvari, Z.; Ridgway, I. A heart that beats for 500 years: Age-related changes in cardiac proteasome activity, oxidative protein damage and expression of heat shock proteins, inflammatory factors, and mitochondrial complexes in Arctica islandica, the longest-living noncolonial animal. J. Gerontol. Ser. A 2013, 69, 1448–1461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Ungvari, Z.; Ridgway, I.; Philipp, E.E.; Campbell, C.M.; McQuary, P.; Chow, T.; Coelho, M.; Didier, E.S.; Gelino, S.; Holmbeck, M.A.; et al. Extreme longevity is associated with increased resistance to oxidative stress in Arctica Isl. Long.-Living Non-Colon. Anim. J. Gerontol. Ser. A Biomed. Sci. Med Sci. 2011, 66, 741–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Ungvari, Z.; Sosnowska, D.; Mason, J.B.; Gruber, H.; Lee, S.W.; Schwartz, T.S.; Brown, M.K.; Storm, N.J.; Fortney, K.; Sowa, J.; et al. Resistance to genotoxic stresses in Arctica Isl. Long. Living Noncolonial Anim. Is Extrem. Longev. Assoc. A Multistress Resist. Phenotype? J. Gerontol. Ser. A Biomed. Sci. Med. Sci. 2012, 68, 521–529. [Google Scholar]
  123. Salmon, A.B.; Leonard, S.; Masamsetti, V.; Pierce, A.; Podlutsky, A.J.; Podlutskaya, N.; Richardson, A.; Austad, S.N.; Chaudhuri, A.R. The long lifespan of two bat species is correlated with resistance to protein oxidation and enhanced protein homeostasis. FASEB J. 2009, 23, 2317–2326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Rosenson, R.S.; McCormick, A.; Uretz, E.F. Distribution of blood viscosity values and biochemical correlates in healthy adults. Clin. Chem. 1996, 42, 1189–1195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  125. Schuster, S.; Stark, H. What can we learn from Einstein and Arrhenius about the optimal flow of our blood? Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Gen. Subj. 2014, 1840, 271–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Benderro, G.F.; LaManna, J.C. Kidney EPO expression during chronic hypoxia in aged mice. In Oxygen Transport to Tissue XXXIV; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; pp. 9–14. [Google Scholar]
  127. Weinert, D.; Waterhouse, J. The circadian rhythm of core temperature: Effects of physical activity and aging. Physiol. Behav. 2007, 90, 246–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Kelly, G. Body temperature variability (Part 1): A review of the history of body temperature and its variability due to site selection, biological rhythms, fitness, and aging. Altern. Med. Rev. 2006, 11, 278–293. [Google Scholar]
  129. Prinz, P.N.; Moe, K.E.; Vitiello, M.V.; Marks, A.L.; Larsen, L.H. Entrained body temperature rhythms are similar in mild Alzheimer’s Disease, geriatric onset depression, and normal aging. Top. Geriatr. 1992, 5, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  130. Kenney, W.L.; Munce, T.A. Invited Review: Aging and human temperature regulation. J. Appl. Physiol. 2003, 95, 2598–2603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Monk, T.H.; Buysse, D.J.; Reynolds, C.F.; Kupfer, D.J.; Houck, P.R. Circadian temperature rhythms of older people. Exp. Gerontol. 1995, 30, 455–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Monk, T.H.; Kupfer, D.J. Circadian rhythms in healthy aging-effects downstream from the pacemaker. Chronobiol. Int. 2000, 17, 355–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Weinert, D.; Waterhouse, J. Daily activity and body temperature rhythms do not change simultaneously with age in laboratory mice. Physiol. Behav. 1999, 66, 605–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Mailloux, A.; Benstaali, C.; Bogdan, A.; Auzéby, A.; Touitou, Y. Body temperature and locomotor activity as marker rhythms of aging of the circadian system in rodents. Exp. Gerontol. 1999, 34, 733–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Campbell, K.L.; Samu, D.; Davis, S.W.; Geerligs, L.; Mustafa, A.; Tyler, L.K. Robust resilience of the frontotemporal syntax system to aging. J. Neurosci. 2016, 36, 5214–5227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  136. Davis, S.W.; Zhuang, J.; Wright, P.; Tyler, L.K. Age-related sensitivity to task-related modulation of language-processing networks. Neuropsychologia 2014, 63, 107–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  137. Samu, D.; Campbell, K.L.; Tsvetanov, K.A.; Shafto, M.A.; Tyler, L.K. Preserved cognitive functions with age are determined by domain-dependent shifts in network responsivity. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Hou, Y.; Dan, X.; Babbar, M.; Wei, Y.; Hasselbalch, S.; Croteau, D.L.; Bohr, V. Ageing as a risk factor for neurodegenerative disease. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2019, 15, 565–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Kadota, K.; Gomi, H. Implicit visuomotor processing for quick online reactions is robust against aging. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30, 205–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Kimura, D.; Kadota, K.; Kinoshita, H. The impact of aging on the spatial accuracy of quick corrective arm movements in response to sudden target displacement during reaching. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2015, 7, 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  141. Ciccocioppo, R.; Cangemi, G.C.; Roselli, E.A.; Kruzliak, P. Are stem cells a potential therapeutic tool in coeliac disease? Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2014, 72, 1317–1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Sorg, H.; Tilkorn, D.J.; Hager, S.; Hauser, J.; Mirastschijski, U. Skin Wound Healing: An Update on the Current Knowledge and Concepts. Eur. Surg. Res. 2016, 58, 81–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Zakeri, Z.; Penaloza, C.G.; Smith, K.; Ye, Y.; Lockshin, R.A. What cell death does in development. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 2015, 59, 11–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  144. Niwa, H. The principles that govern transcription factor network functions in stem cells. Development 2018, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  145. Cichocki, F.; Sitnicka, E.; Bryceson, Y.T. NK cell development and function—Plasticity and redundancy unleashed. Semin. Immunol. 2014, 26, 114–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Tu, C.T.; Chen, B.S. On the increase in network robustness and decrease in network response ability during the aging process: A Systems Biology approach via microarray data. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform. 2013, 10, 468–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Bodenstein, C.; Heiland, I.; Schuster, S. Temperature compensation and entrainment in circadian rhythms. Phys. Biol. 2012, 9, 036011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Imai, S.I. “Clocks” in the NAD World: NAD as a metabolic oscillator for the regulation of metabolism and aging. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Proteins Proteom. 2010, 1804, 1584–1590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  149. Imai, S.I. Dissecting systemic control of metabolism and aging in the NAD World: The importance of SIRT1 and NAMPT-mediated NAD biosynthesis. FEBS Lett. 2011, 585, 1657–1662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  150. Chang, H.C.; Guarente, L. SIRT1 mediates central circadian control in the SCN by a mechanism that decays with aging. Cell 2013, 153, 1448–1460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  151. Belden, W.J.; Dunlap, J.C. Aging well with a little wine and a good clock. Cell 2013, 153, 1421–1422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  152. Csete, M.E.; Doyle, J.C. Reverse engineering of biological complexity. Science 2002, 295, 1664–1669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Bigham, A.W.; Wilson, M.J.; Julian, C.G.; Kiyamu, M.; Vargas, E.; Leon-Velarde, F.; Rivera-Chira, M.; Rodriquez, C.; Browne, V.A.; Parra, E.; et al. Andean and Tibetan patterns of adaptation to high altitude. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 2013, 25, 190–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  154. Fafournoux, P.; Bruhat, A.; Jousse, C. Amino acid regulation of gene expression. Biochem. J. 2000, 351, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Jeong, H.; Tombor, B.; Albert, R.; Oltvai, Z.N.; Barabási, A.L. The large-scale organization of metabolic networks. Nature 2000, 407, 651–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  156. Han, H.W.; Ohn, J.H.; Moon, J.; Kim, J.H. Yin and Yang of disease genes and death genes between reciprocally scale-free biological networks. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41, 9209–9217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  157. Will, C.L.; Lührmann, R. Spliceosome structure and function. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2011, 3, a003707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  158. Stamm, S.; Smith, C.W.J.; Reinhard, L. Alternative Pre-mRNA Splicing: Theory and Protocols, 1st ed.; Wiley VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  159. Kelemen, O.; Convertini, P.; Zhang, Z.; Wen, Y.; Shen, M.; Falaleeva, M.; Stamm, S. Function of alternative splicing. Gene 2013, 514, 1–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  160. Matera, A.G.; Wang, Z. A day in the life of the spliceosome. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2014, 15, 108–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  161. Chen, S.; Townsend, K.; Goldberg, T.E.; Davies, P.; Conejero-Goldberg, C. MAPT isoforms: Differential transcriptional profiles related to 3R and 4R splice variants. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2010, 22, 1313–1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  162. Scuderi, S.; La Cognata, V.; Drago, F.; Cavallaro, S.; D’Agata, V. Alternative splicing generates different parkin protein isoforms: Evidences in human, rat, and mouse brain. BioMed Res. Int. 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Lu, Z.x.; Huang, Q.; Park, J.W.; Shen, S.; Lin, L.; Tokheim, C.J.; Henry, M.D.; Xing, Y. Transcriptome-wide landscape of pre-mRNA alternative splicing associated with metastatic colonization. Mol. Cancer Res. 2015, 13, 305–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  164. Sveen, A.; Kilpinen, S.; Ruusulehto, A.; Lothe, R.; Skotheim, R. Aberrant RNA splicing in cancer; expression changes and driver mutations of splicing factor genes. Oncogene 2016, 35, 2413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Kalsotra, A.; Cooper, T. Functional consequences of developmentally regulated alternative splicing. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2011, 12, 715–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Lee, B.P.; Pilling, L.C.; Emond, F.; Flurkey, K.; Harrison, D.E.; Yuan, R.; Peters, L.L.; Kuchel, G.A.; Ferrucci, L.; Melzer, D.; et al. Changes in the expression of splicing factor transcripts and variations in alternative splicing are associated with lifespan in mice and humans. Aging Cell 2016, 15, 903–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  167. Sieber, P.; Barth, E.; Marz, M. The landscape of the alternatively spliced transcriptome remains stable during aging across different species and tissues. bioRxiv 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Lin, W.W.; Murray, J.; Oberbauer, A. Overexpression of Growth Hormone Affects Alternatively Spliced IGF-I mRNA Expression in oMt1a-oGH Transgenic Mice. Transgenic Res. 1998, 7, 295–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Oberbauer, A. The Regulation of IGF-1 Gene Transcription and Splicing during Development and Aging. Front. Endocrinol. 2013, 4, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  170. Aristorena, M.; Blanco, F.J.; Casas-Engel, M.D.L.; Ojeda-Fernandez, L.; Gallardo-Vara, E.; Corbi, A.; Botella, L.M.; Bernabeu, C. Expression of endoglin isoforms in the myeloid lineage and their role during aging and macrophage polarization. J. Cell Sci. 2014, 127, 2723–2735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  171. Li, H.; Wang, Z.; Ma, T.; Wei, G.; Ni, T. Alternative splicing in aging and age-related diseases. Transl. Med. Aging 2017, 1, 32–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Holly, A.C.; Melzer, D.; Pilling, L.C.; Fellows, A.C.; Tanaka, T.; Ferrucci, L.; Harries, L.W. Changes in splicing factor expression are associated with advancing age in man. Mech. Ageing Dev. 2013, 134, 356–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  173. Harries, L.W.; Hernandez, D.; Henley, W.; Wood, A.R.; Holly, A.C.; Bradley-Smith, R.M.; Yaghootkar, H.; Dutta, A.; Murray, A.; Frayling, T.M.; et al. Human aging is characterized by focused changes in gene expression and deregulation of alternative splicing. Aging Cell 2011, 10, 868–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Mazin, P.; Xiong, J.; Liu, X.; Yan, Z.; Zhang, X.; Li, M.; He, L.; Somel, M.; Yuan, Y.; Chen, Y.P.P.; et al. Widespread splicing changes in human brain development and aging. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2013, 9, 633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Ubaida-Mohien, C.; Lyashkov, A.; Gonzalez-Freire, M.; Tharakan, R.; Shardell, M.; Moaddel, R.; Semba, R.D.; Chia, C.W.; Gorospe, M.; Sen, R.; et al. Discovery proteomics in aging human skeletal muscle finds change in spliceosome, immunity, proteostasis and mitochondria. eLife 2019, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Lareau, L.F.; Brenner, S.E. Regulation of splicing factors by alternative splicing and NMD is cnserved between kingdoms yet evolutionarily flexible. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2015, 32, 1072–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  177. Mockenhaupt, S.; Makeyev, E.V. Non-coding functions of alternative pre-mRNA splicing in development. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2015, 47-48, 32–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  178. Chern, T.M.; Nimwegen, E.V.; Kai, C.; Kawai, J.; Carninci, P.; Hayashizaki, Y.; Zavolan, M. A Simple Physical Model Predicts Small Exon Length Variations. PLoS Genet. 2006, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  179. Saudemont, B.; Popa, A.; Parmley, J.L.; Rocher, V.; Blugeon, C.; Necsulea, A.; Meyer, E.; Duret, L. The fitness cost of mis-splicing is the main determinant of alternative splicing patterns. Genome Biol. 2017, 18, 208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Pickrell, J.K.; Pai, A.A.; Gilad, Y.; Pritchard, J.K. Noisy splicing drives mRNA isoform diversity in human cells. PLoS Genet. 2010, 6, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  181. Hiller, M.; Huse, K.; Szafranski, K.; Jahn, N.; Hampe, J.; Schreiber, S.; Backofen, R.; Platzer, M. Widespread occurrence of alternative splicing at NAGNAG acceptors contributes to proteome plasticity. Nat. Genet. 2004, 36, 1255–1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  182. Kempken, F. Alternative splicing in ascomycetes. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 97, 4235–4241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. Grützmann, K.; Szafranski, K.; Pohl, M.; Voigt, K.; Petzold, A.; Schuster, S. Fungal alternative splicing is associated with multicellular complexity and virulence: A genome-wide multi-species study. DNA Res. 2014, 21, 27–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  184. Doria, E.; Buonocore, D.; Focarelli, A.; Marzatico, F. Relationship between Human Aging Muscle and Oxidative System Pathway. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2012, 2012, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  185. Harris, R.A.; Tindale, L.; Cumming, R.C. Age-dependent metabolic dysregulation in cancer and Alzheimer’s disease. Biogerontology 2014, 15, 559–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Stolle, S.; Ciapaite, J.; Reijne, A.C.; Talarovicova, A.; Wolters, J.C.; Aguirre-Gamboa, R.; van der Vlies, P.; de Lange, K.; Neerincx, P.B.; van der Vries, G.; et al. Running-wheel activity delays mitochondrial respiratory flux decline in aging mouse muscle via a post-transcriptional mechanism. Aging Cell 2018, 17, e12700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Stadtman, E. Biochemical markers of aging. Exp. Gerontol. 1988, 23, 327–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Gray, C.C.; Smolenski, R.T.; Amrani, M.; Goodwin, A.T.; Jayakumar, J.; Jagodzinski, P.; Yacoub, M.H. Influence of ageing on functional recovery and guanine nucleotide levels of the heart following cold cardioplegic arrest. Eur. J. Cardio Thorac. Surg. 1998, 13, 475–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  189. Wiley, L. Exploring the Potential of Oxidative Stress-Related Biomarkers of Ageing in a Population-Based Study of the Very Old. Ph.D. Thesis, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  190. Winkler, S.; Hempel, M.; Hsu, M.-J.; Gericke, M.; Kühne, H.; Brückner, S.; Erler, S.; Burkhardt, R.; Christ, B. Immune-Deficient Pfp/Rag2-/- Mice Featured Higher Adipose Tissue Mass and Liver Lipid Accumulation with Growing Age than Wildtype C57BL/6N Mice. Cells 2019, 8, 775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  191. Heinrich, R.; Schuster, S. The Regulation of Cellular Systems; Chapman and Hall: London, UK, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  192. Grosman, B.; Shaik, O.; Helwig, B.; Leon, L.; Doyle, F.R. A physiological systems approach to modeling and resetting of mouse thermoregulation under heat stress. J. Appl. Physiol. 1985, 111, 938–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  193. Peelle, J.E. Language and aging. In The Oxford Handbook of Neurolinguistics; de Zubicaray, G.I., Schiller, N.O., Eds.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2019; Chapter 12. [Google Scholar]
  194. Keating, N. Introduction: Perspectives on healthy aging. Can. J. Aging 2005, 24, 3–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  195. Blagosklonny, M.V. Paradoxes of Aging. Cell Cycle 2007, 6, 2997–3003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  196. Rowe, J.W.; Kahn, R.L. Successful Aging. Gerontol 1997, 37, 433–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Whitson, H.E.; Duan-Porter, W.; Schmader, K.E.; Morey, M.C.; Cohen, H.J.; Colón-Emeric, C.S. Physical Resilience in Older Adults: Systematic Review and Development of an Emerging Construct. J. Gerontol. Ser. A 2015, 71, 489–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  198. Colcombe, S.J.; Erickson, K.I.; Raz, N.; Webb, A.G.; Cohen, N.J.; McAuley, E.; Kramer, A.F. Aerobic fitness reduces brain tissue loss in aging humans. J. Gerontol. Ser. A 2003, 58, M176–M180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  199. Kornadt, A.E.; Hess, T.M.; Rothermund, K. Domain-specific views on aging and preparation for age-related changes—Development and validation of three brief scales. J. Gerontol. Ser. B 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Cell lines can protect themselves against damage. With ongoing life cycles, cells divide and progress intro mature cells. That process differs in the speed and number of cells depending on the tissue type. Cells in multicellular organisms can be protected by neighbouring cells (orange) and other individuals (parental care and broader). Damage, however, is not avoidable and causes the death of single cells (crossed out), but the cell line itself survives and stays robust. In theory, all germ cells could live endlessly.
Figure 1. Cell lines can protect themselves against damage. With ongoing life cycles, cells divide and progress intro mature cells. That process differs in the speed and number of cells depending on the tissue type. Cells in multicellular organisms can be protected by neighbouring cells (orange) and other individuals (parental care and broader). Damage, however, is not avoidable and causes the death of single cells (crossed out), but the cell line itself survives and stays robust. In theory, all germ cells could live endlessly.
Cells 09 01862 g001
Figure 2. Overview of the presented aging theories. The different theories regarding the main driving factors of aging can be divided into two groups: programmed aging theories, stating that aging results from a genetic program (see Section 2.1, Section 2.2, Section 2.3, Section 2.4 and Section 2.5) and failure accumulation theories, stating that aging results from unavoidable, accumulating damage (see Section 2.6, Section 2.7, Section 2.8, Section 2.9 and Section 2.10). The collection of aging theories presented here is far from complete, but it summarises the current theories.
Figure 2. Overview of the presented aging theories. The different theories regarding the main driving factors of aging can be divided into two groups: programmed aging theories, stating that aging results from a genetic program (see Section 2.1, Section 2.2, Section 2.3, Section 2.4 and Section 2.5) and failure accumulation theories, stating that aging results from unavoidable, accumulating damage (see Section 2.6, Section 2.7, Section 2.8, Section 2.9 and Section 2.10). The collection of aging theories presented here is far from complete, but it summarises the current theories.
Cells 09 01862 g002
Figure 3. Number of relative influenza cases reported to the Robert Koch Institute, Germany (SurvStat@RKI 2.0, https://survstat.rki.de, Query date: 2020.02.17) divided by population size (United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2019). World Population Prospects 2019, Online Edition. Rev. 1) and grouped by age and year. Note the high incidence rate in children and youngsters. Moreover, there is a slight increase at the age above 75.
Figure 3. Number of relative influenza cases reported to the Robert Koch Institute, Germany (SurvStat@RKI 2.0, https://survstat.rki.de, Query date: 2020.02.17) divided by population size (United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2019). World Population Prospects 2019, Online Edition. Rev. 1) and grouped by age and year. Note the high incidence rate in children and youngsters. Moreover, there is a slight increase at the age above 75.
Cells 09 01862 g003
Figure 4. Examples of robustness discussed throughout this review. Some of the observed mechanisms apply to the cellular as well as the organ levels (left), others only to organ level (right).
Figure 4. Examples of robustness discussed throughout this review. Some of the observed mechanisms apply to the cellular as well as the organ levels (left), others only to organ level (right).
Cells 09 01862 g004

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Barth, E.; Sieber, P.; Stark, H.; Schuster, S. Robustness during Aging—Molecular Biological and Physiological Aspects. Cells 2020, 9, 1862. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9081862

AMA Style

Barth E, Sieber P, Stark H, Schuster S. Robustness during Aging—Molecular Biological and Physiological Aspects. Cells. 2020; 9(8):1862. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9081862

Chicago/Turabian Style

Barth, Emanuel, Patricia Sieber, Heiko Stark, and Stefan Schuster. 2020. "Robustness during Aging—Molecular Biological and Physiological Aspects" Cells 9, no. 8: 1862. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9081862

APA Style

Barth, E., Sieber, P., Stark, H., & Schuster, S. (2020). Robustness during Aging—Molecular Biological and Physiological Aspects. Cells, 9(8), 1862. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9081862

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop