Next Article in Journal
Application of Genomics to Understand Salt Tolerance in Lentil
Next Article in Special Issue
Accurate Quantification of AAV Vector Genomes by Quantitative PCR
Previous Article in Journal
Analysis of Human Gut Microbiome: Taxonomy and Metabolic Functions in Thai Adults
Previous Article in Special Issue
Acceptability of Telegenetics for Families with Genetic Eye Diseases
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Genes
Volume 12
Issue 3
10.3390/genes12030330
genes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Optic Atrophy and Inner Retinal Thinning in CACNA1F-Related Congenital Stationary Night Blindness

by
Kate E Leahy
1,2,
Tom Wright
2,3,
Monika K Grudzinska Pechhacker
1,2,
Isabelle Audo
4,5,6,
Anupreet Tumber
1,
Erika Tavares
7,
Heather MacDonald
1,8,9,
Jeff Locke
1,
Cynthia VandenHoven
1,
Christina Zeitz
4,
Elise Heon
1,2,7,
J Raymond Buncic
1,2 and
Ajoy Vincent
1,2,7,*
1
Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada
2
Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 3A9, Canada
3
Kensington Eye Institute, Toronto, ON M5T 3A9, Canada
4
INSERM, CNRS, Institut de la Vision, Sorbonne Université, 75012 Paris, France
5
CHNO des Quinze-Vingts, DHU Sight Restore, INSERM-DGOS CIC 1423, 75012 Paris, France
6
Institute of Ophthalmology, University College of London, London EC1V 9EL, UK
7
Program in Genetics and Genome Biology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON M5G 0A4, Canada
8
Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada
9
Department of Genetic Counselling, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2021, 12(3), 330; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12030330
Submission received: 31 December 2020 / Revised: 6 February 2021 / Accepted: 20 February 2021 / Published: 25 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genomics and Therapeutics of Hereditary Eye Disease)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Hemizygous pathogenic variants in CACNA1F lead to defective signal transmission from retinal photoreceptors to bipolar cells and cause incomplete congenital stationary night blindness in humans. Although the primary defect is at the terminal end of first-order neurons (photoreceptors), there is limited knowledge of higher-order neuronal changes (inner retinal) in this disorder. This study aimed to investigate inner retinal changes in CACNA1F-retinopathy by analyzing macular ganglion cell layer-inner plexiform layer (GCL-IPL) thickness and optic disc pallor in 22 subjects with molecularly confirmed CACNA1F-retinopathy. Detailed ocular phenotypic data including distance and color vision, refraction and electroretinogram (ERG) were collected. Distance vision was universally reduced (mean: 0.42 LogMAR), six had abnormal color vision and myopia was common (n = 15; mean: −6.32 diopters). Mean GCL-IPL thickness was significantly lower in patients (55.00 µm) compared to age-matched controls (n = 87; 84.57 µm; p << 0.001). The GCL-IPL thickness correlated with scotopic standard (p = 0.04) and bright-flash (p = 0.014) ERG b/a ratios and photopic b-wave amplitudes (p = 0.05). Twenty-one patients had some degree of disc pallor (bilateral in 19). Fifteen putative disease-causing, including five novel variants were identified. This study establishes macular inner retinal thinning and optic atrophy as characteristic features of CACNA1F-retinopathy, which are independent of myopia and could impact potential future treatment strategies.

1. Introduction

Congenital stationary night blindness (CSNB) is a group of genetically and phenotypically heterogeneous retinal disorders that follow autosomal dominant, autosomal recessive or X-linked patterns of inheritance and can be broadly categorized into those with a largely normal, or an abnormal, fundus appearance [1]. CSNB with a largely normal fundus can be classified based on electroretinogram (ERG) into the less common Riggs type representing rod phototransduction disruption [2], or the more common Schubert–Bornschein type [3] reflecting a post-phototransduction deficit in signal transmission between the photoreceptors and bipolar cells. In contrast, CSNB with an abnormal fundus comprises two distinct disorders: fundus albipunctatus and Oguchi disease, due to delayed retinoid recycling and defective deactivation of the rod phototransduction cascade, respectively [4,5,6].
Schubert–Bornschein CSNB is further subdivided into complete (cCSNB) and incomplete (iCSNB) phenotypes based on ERG patterns consistent with dysfunction of the ON- or both the ON- and OFF-bipolar pathways, respectively [7]. On scotopic (dark adapted; DA) standard and bright flash ERG (3.0 and 10 cd·s·m−2, respectively) stimulation, both cCSNB and iCSNB subjects demonstrate a normal a-wave with a markedly reduced b-wave resulting in an electronegative configuration [3]. On photopic (light adapted; LA) ERG testing, iCSNB subjects demonstrate markedly reduced a- and b-wave amplitudes to a standard flash (3.0 cd·s·m−2) and reduced 30 Hz flicker amplitudes, whereas cCSNB subjects exhibit subtle abnormalities to standard flash (broadened a-wave trough and a mildly reduced b-wave amplitude) and 30 Hz flicker (delayed and square-shaped trough) stimuli [1,8,9]. Both cCSNB and iCSNB show phenotype–genotype correlation, with genes involved in cCSNB encoding proteins mainly localized to post-synaptic retinal ON-bipolar cells, while genes responsible for iCSNB affect proteins predominantly expressed at the terminal end of the photoreceptor synapse, affecting both ON- and OFF-bipolar signaling [1].
Although incomplete CSNB may follow X-linked or autosomal recessive inheritance patterns, it is most commonly inherited as an X-linked condition due to mutations in CACNA1F [1]. Biallelic mutations in CABP4 [10,11,12] and CACNA2D4 [13] have been associated with autosomal recessive iCSNB, and infrequent CACNA2D4 patients demonstrate slight pigment mottling at the fovea [13]. The ERG phenotype in CACNA2D4-related iCSNB is variable with some cases demonstrating preserved scotopic responses, and a reduced and delayed photopic standard flash ERG b-wave that has a multiphasic appearance [14]. Most recently, ERG findings compatible with iCSNB were also described in patients with biallelic loss-of-function variants in RIMS2. All RIMS2 patients had optic disc pallor with most demonstrating retinal vascular attenuation; affected individuals also displayed neurodevelopmental disease and infrequently abnormal glucose homeostasis, making this a syndromic form of iCSNB [15]. Given the phenotypic variability within iCSNB and the fact that many patients complain of photophobia [10], rather than nyctalopia [1,16], “congenital rod-cone synaptic disorder” is a recently proposed term for the CACNA1F-related disorder [17].
Subjects with CACNA1F-related iCSNB commonly present with nystagmus, photophobia and/or nyctalopia, distance and color vision defects, variable myopic refractive error and essentially normal fundi apart from changes typical of high myopia (optic disc tilt, slight temporal disc pallor and fundus tessellation) [7,10]. There are rare reports of optic atrophy in association with CACNA1F-related retinopathy [18,19,20]. A child presenting with optic disc atrophy and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thinning was diagnosed as having CACNA1F-related iCSNB [18]. Further, an older Japanese sibship harboring a frameshift CACNA1F mutation demonstrated progressive vision loss with worsening optic atrophy and chorioretinal atrophy; it is unclear if the progressive neuro-retinopathy is CACNA1F-related [19]. A third study reported three CACNA1F patients described with normal-appearing fundi to have normal RNFL thickness but reduced macular combined ganglion cell layer plus inner plexiform layer (GCL-IPL) thickness compared to myopic controls [21].
Since CACNA1F-patients often have tilted discs due to high myopia, and nystagmus, reliable measurement of peripapillary RNFL thickness as an objective marker of optic atrophy can be challenging. There is, however, a fair correlation between RNFL and macular GCL-IPL thicknesses [22,23] and there is increasing use of both parameters to characterize optic neuropathies of varying etiologies [24,25,26,27,28]. In the present study, the authors measured macular GCL-IPL thickness and optic disc pallor in a cohort of CACNA1F subjects to assess if they had macular inner retinal thinning and optic disc atrophy in excess of the expected degree of disc pallor seen in myopia. In addition, peripapillary RNFL thickness measurements were analyzed when reliably measurable.

2. Materials and Methods

This retrospective study was approved by the institutional research ethics board at the Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto (REB no. 1000017804) and followed the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. Patients were identified from the hospital’s ocular genetics database and the records of 48 subjects with hemizygous mutations in CACNA1F (evaluated by CLIA-certified laboratories) were further analyzed. The pathogenicity of CACNA1F-variants was confirmed using ALAMUT visual software (https://www.interactive-biosoftware.com/alamut-visual/ (accessed on 18 February 2021)). Thirty-seven subjects had undergone optical coherence tomography (OCT) scanning, and of these, 22 had quantifiable macular OCT (see below for details), forming the study cohort. All subjects had ERG findings consistent with iCSNB. Limited clinical and genetic details of three subjects (case nos. 5, 6 and 16) have been reported previously (OCT descriptions were solely qualitative) [29,30].
Data collected included patient symptomatology, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at distance in logMAR, cycloplegic refraction, color vision (Hardy Rand Rittler (HRR) Pseudoisochromatic Test, Good-Lite Co., Elgin, Illinois), contrast sensitivity (Pelli Robson Chart, Clement Clarke International, Essex, UK or Letter Contrast Sensitivity, M&S Technologies Inc., Niles, IL; which correlate well [31]), fundus photography, ERG (Diagnosys LLC, Lowell, MA), OCT and genetic results. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI; n = 3) results were included where available.
Spectral-domain OCT was performed (Cirrus 4000, Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Germany) using the macular cube protocol: 512 A-scans × 128 B-scans covering approximately 6 mm × 6 mm retina. All available macular cube scans for each patient were assessed for quality and those with the following suboptimal characteristics were excluded: (1) signal strength less than 6, (2) eye movement artifact within the central 80% of the scan area as seen in the en-face reflectance image, (3) area of data loss greater than 10% at the edge of the scan area or (4) presence of floater(s) obscuring macular area. All remaining OCTs were segmented using the IOWA Reference Algorithms v4.0.0 (Retinal Image Analysis Lab, Iowa Institute for Biomedical Imaging, Iowa City, IA) [32,33,34]. Average thickness for the sum of the GCL and IPL (GCL-IPL) was extracted using custom software [35,36] derived from an elliptical annulus centered on the fovea with inner axis radius of 0.5 mm and outer axis radius of 2.0 mm, stretched by 20% in the horizontal direction, corresponding to the Cirrus proprietary GCL-IPL analysis ring (Figure 1A,B). After segmentation, scans were reviewed for image quality and those with segmentation errors were excluded from analysis. Average GCL-IPL thickness from the most recent scan for each patient was selected. As there is a high incidence of refractive error, most often myopia, in patients with CACNA1F-retinopathy [10], comparative GCL-IPL thickness values were obtained using the protocol described above from a control group identified through our internal database (n = 87) with normal best-corrected vision of at least 0.10 logMAR and without any organic ocular pathology. The control population was subdivided into three groups based on the spherical equivalent (SE) of their refractive error: (1) emmetropia or hyperopia group: 40 eyes with SE ≥ 0 (mean SE + 0.86D), (2) low myopia group: 30 eyes with SE ≤ −0.5 and > −6.00D (mean SE − 3.22D) and (3) high myopia [37] group: 17 eyes with SE ≤ −6.00D (mean SE −8.38D). In addition, peripapillary RNFL thickness parameters derived from optic disc cube scans with good automatic segmentation were available in 6 of the 22 CACNA1F patients. A representative RNFL thickness analysis is shown in Figure 1C,D.
Full-field ERG data performed in accordance with the accepted International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision Standards were available in the study eye of 22 patients [38,39]. The amplitude of the a-wave (photoreceptor origin) was measured from the prestimulus baseline to the negative-peak or “trough”, and that of the b-wave (bipolar cell origin) was measured from the a-wave trough to the subsequent positive-peak (Figure 1E). The ratio of the b-wave to a-wave amplitude (b/a ratio) was calculated for the DA standard flash (3.0 or 2.29 cd·s·m−2), DA bright flash (10.0 or 7.6 cd·s·m−2) and LA standard flash (3.0 or 2.29 cd·s·m−2). In the earlier years, the lab used 2.29 and 7.6 cd·s·m−2 stimuli for standard and bright flash ERG but later switched to 3.0 and 10.0 cd·s·m−2, respectively [38,39]. A reduced b/a ratio denotes generalized bipolar cell dysfunction and a b-wave amplitude smaller than the a-wave amplitude (b/a ratio < 1) is termed an electronegative ERG (Figure 1F).
True-color optic disc photos, available for 21 patients, were qualitatively evaluated by an experienced pediatric neuro-ophthalmologist noting the presence or absence of pallor of the disc substance as reflected in the neuroretinal rim. The extent of pallor was documented according to the number of clock-hours of the disc, which appeared pale, as was the presence or absence of a peripapillary crescent [40].
Data from one eye per patient was included in the study analysis. OCT and all ophthalmic data were collected from the same eye; the right eye was selected (n = 17) when the macular OCT was of sufficient quality and the left eye was included otherwise (n = 5).
Statistical analyses were performed using R version 3.6.2 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the differences among group means with post-hoc Tukey test to determine statistical significance. A two-sample t-test was used to compare subject age between patients and controls, and to compare GCL-IPL thickness between the groups of patients with, and without, RNFL measurements. Linear regression was used to evaluate the effect of SE on GCL-IPL thickness and on ERG parameters, the interaction between these parameters in the presence of SE was examined using two-way ANOVA. A p value of ≤0.05 was taken to be statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Patient Demographics and Clinical Features

Twenty-two males with molecularly confirmed hemizygous mutations in CACNA1F were included in the study. The average age of the patient cohort was 14.3 years (range 6–58 years). Nystagmus occurred in 50% (7 of 14) of patients for whom its presence or absence was documented. Similarly, nyctalopia and photophobia were reported in 50% (8 of 16) and 44% (7 of 16) of documented cases, respectively. The BCVA was reduced in all patients (mean 0.42 logMAR, median 0.40 and range 0.10–0.80 logMAR). The mean SE refractive error was −6.32D (median −7.38 and range −20.50 to + 2.50D), with myopia being common (68%; 15 of 22). Color vision was normal in the majority (71%; 15 of 21), whereas six patients showed red-green color defects, which were classified as mild (n = 4), medium (n = 1) or strong (n = 1) on HRR. Only 23% (5 of 22) CACNA1F-subjects had normal contrast sensitivity; the mean contrast sensitivity was 1.36 log units (range 0.90–1.80 log units) (Table 1). Two of the three patients who had MRI to evaluate for optic atrophy were found to have unremarkable optic nerves (cases 11 and 14) and one displayed bilateral, mild changes compatible with optic nerve atrophy (case 16).

3.2. Optical Coherence Tomography

The macular GCL-IPL thickness values in CACNA1F-patients (n = 22) were compared to controls (n = 87). Average age in the control population was 12.0 years (range 4–53 years), which did not differ significantly from the patient cohort (p = 0.337). The mean (SD) GCL-IPL thickness in the CACNA1F group was 55.00 (6.17) µm, which was significantly thinner compared to controls (84.57 (6.15) µm; F(3.105) = 199; p << 0.001). Post-hoc Tukey tests indicate GCL-IPL thickness in the CACNA1F group was significantly thinner than in the emmetropia or hyperopia (88.25 (4.52) µm; p << 0.001), low myopia (83.07 (4.94) µm; p << 0.001) and high myopia (78.59 (5.98) µm; p << 0.001) control subgroups (Figure 2A).
For every diopter decrease in spherical equivalent there was a decrease in GCL-IPL thickness of 0.81 µm, (R2 adjusted = 0.86, p << 0.01), which was not significantly different between CACNA1F-iCSNB and control subgroups (Figure 2B). After correcting for refractive error, however, macular GCL-IPL thickness in the CSNB group was on average thinner by 26.37 µm compared to the control group (F(2.106) = 326, p << 0.001).
As the majority of the study (21/22) and control (85/87) subjects were under 25 years of age, we excluded the three older subjects from any analysis including age as a variable. After the exclusion of one CACNA1F-subject with age > 25 years (case 6, 58 years) and 2 control subjects (aged 34 and 53 years), age was negatively correlated with GCL-IPL thickness in both CSNB and normal controls (R2adjusted = 0.79, p = 0.03) as previously reported [47,48,49,50]; however, the rate of thinning was not significantly different between the groups (p = 0.15).
Six patients in the CACNA1F cohort (mean age 12.5, range: 6–17 years) had good quality optic disc cube scans, and RNFL thickness was determined using the Cirrus inbuilt analysis tool (Table 2). Mean (SD) average peripapillary RNFL thickness was 68.67 (4.72) µm and mean (SD) temporal RNFL thickness was 51.33 (13.81) µm. Both mean values were lower than similar populations reported in literature (Table 3) [51,52,53,54,55,56,57]. The average RNFL values for all six CACNA1F patients were below the lower range reported in normal children, and two of four myopic patients had values outside the lower range reported for normal myopes. The temporal RNFL measures were below the lower range or 5th percentile for pediatric and myopic populations in four of six study subjects. The mean (SD) average macular GCL-IPL thickness for these six iCSNB subjects was 54.50 (3.67) µm, which was similar to the rest of the cohort (55.19 (7.16) µm; p = 0.77). The OCT values for each study eye are shown in Table 2.

3.3. Full-Field Electroretinogram Results

The DA standard flash ERG showed an electronegative configuration in 20 of 22 patients (mean (SD) b/a ratio: 0.59 (0.23); range 0.25–1.16). The DA bright flash ERG was electronegative in all except one tested (mean (SD) b/a ratio: 0.56 (0.22); range 0.22–1.06 (n = 20)). The LA standard flash ERG was electronegative in only three patients (mean (SD) b/a ratio: 1.18 (0.25); range 0.64–1.58 (n = 21)).
After controlling for SE, the macular GCL-IPL thickness was weakly correlated with the DA standard flash b/a ratio (R2adjusted = 0.41, p = 0.04; Figure 2C), DA bright flash b/a ratio (R2adjusted = 0.45, p = 0.014; Figure 2D) and LA standard flash b-wave amplitude (R2adjusted = 0.41, p = 0.05; Figure 2F). The correlation with GCL-IPL thickness did not reach significance for LA standard flash b/a ratio (R2adjusted = 0.42, p = 0.08) or LA standard flash a-wave amplitude (R2adjusted = 0.34, p = 0.56; Figure 2E). Individual values for b/a ratio and amplitude measurements are shown in Table 2.

3.4. Optic Disc Evaluation and Fundus Findings

Twenty-one patients had color fundus photos available; 19 had some degree of disc pallor in both eyes (measured in observable clock hours) and the remaining 2 had unilateral disc pallor (Table 2). In the study eye, one disc (5%) was graded as having no pallor, three discs (14%) with two clock hours of pallor, seven (33%) with three clock hours, three (14%) with four clock hours and seven (33%) with five clock hours of pallor. Representative disc photos from four subjects are shown in Figure 1G–J. There was no significant correlation between macular GCL-IPL thickness and number of clock hours of disc pallor (R2adjusted = 0.03, p = 0.22; Figure 2G).
Fifteen subjects showed myopic retinal changes (bilateral fundus tessellation (n = 14), white without pressure (n = 4), posterior staphyloma (n = 2), peripheral degeneration (n = 2) and/or unilateral Forster–Fuchs spot (n = 1)). Four cases displayed normal fundi and five had hypopigmented fundi more typical of Åland island eye disease, a phenotypic variant of CACNA1F iCSNB [20,29,59]; two in the latter group also had myopic changes. Foveal hypoplasia was identified in six cases on fundus photographs or OCT; the grading [58] is shown in Table 2.

3.5. Genetic Results

Fifteen putative disease-causing variants were identified in the study (Table 1); these included missense (n = 5, 6 subjects), nonsense (n = 4, 5 subjects), frameshift (n = 3, 7 subjects), splice site (n = 2, 3 subjects) and silent variants predicted to affect splicing (n = 1, 1 subject). Five of the variants are novel, which were p.(Gln561*), p.(Val611Glyfs*32), p.(Gln1157Gln), c.3741+2T>C and p.(Pro1492Ser). The details of the novel variants, including the predicted pathogenicity, conservation scores and ACMG classification are summarized in Table 4. None have previously been identified in large population databases (gnomAD) [60]. Both p.(Gln561*) and p.(Val611Glyfs*32) are expected to produce truncated protein or the mRNA produced are likely to be targeted for nonsense-mediated decay. The silent variant p.(Gln1157Gln) affects the last nucleotide of exon 28, is predicted to alter the natural splice donor site 1 base pair downstream and is thereby likely to cause exon 28 skipping. The c.3741+2T>C substitution is located on the canonical donor splice site of intron 30, and is expected to cause exon 30 skipping. The p.(Pro1492Ser) variant affects a highly conserved residue and is predicted pathogenic by all in silico tools; further, there are other substitutions at and near position 1492 (p.(Pro1492Ala) and p.(Gly1494Arg)) that have been reported to cause iCSNB [1,42]. The mutation segregated with the disease phenotype in all tested cases (n = 18); among the four cases where segregation analysis was unavailable, two harbored previously reported mutations (case 19: p.(Pro1492Ala) [1,42] and case 21: p.(Arg1502*) [42]) and two harbored novel disease-causing variants (case 9: p.(Val611Glyfs*32) and case 17: p.(Gln1157Gln)). The macular GCL-IPL thickness did not differ regardless of the type of mutation ((F(3,18) = 0.68, p = 0.57; Figure 2H)).

4. Discussion

This is the first comprehensive study to have reported marked macular GCL-IPL thinning in subjects with molecularly confirmed CACNA1F-related iCSNB. All subjects in the current cohort demonstrated at least some degree of optic disc pallor in at least one eye. The majority of patients were myopic and the peripapillary RNFL thickness was reduced below average in all six tested individuals. Previously, only rare instances of optic nerve pallor or atrophy had been reported in CACNA1F-retinopathy [18,19,20] and since many CACNA1F subjects have high myopia [10], this has been proposed to account for the optic disc pallor, often at the temporal disc, in these patients [7,72,73]. The present study identified disc pallor together with thinner GCL-IPL and RNFL compared to a myopic control cohort and values reported in the literature suggesting that both findings are unrelated to myopia, and the optic disc pallor in CACNA1F-patients is due to atrophy. Our findings also indicate that inner retinal and optic disc changes are far more common than originally thought in this condition, traditionally described as having a normal fundus.
The incidence of nystagmus (50%), nyctalopia (50%) and photophobia (44%) in our cohort was similar to those identified in two large studies of CACNA1F-related iCSNB, which documented rates of 44–65%, 58–60% and 50%, respectively [10,73]. The BCVA was reduced in all study subjects. The mean BCVA in this study (0.42 LogMAR) was similar to that reported by Allen et al. (0.40 LogMAR) [74] and the range of BCVA in our cohort (0.10–0.80) was similar to two previous studies, which had reported 0.10–1.00 and 0.10–1.30 LogMAR, respectively [10,73]. Myopic refractive error was common in the current cohort (73%), as reported in other series in literature (81%–85%) [10,73]. Only red-green color defects were observed in the current study (29%, HRR testing); a previous group reported color vision defects in 46% (21/46, using one of D15, Ishihara or HRR) of their cohort [10]. Only a small proportion of patients in either study had strong color vision defects (5% in the current study vs. 13% in Bijveld et al.) [10], however, a different study reported strong color defects in all tested family members (n = 6; D15 and Ishihara) [75].
The average macular GCL-IPL thickness was severely reduced in our CACNA1F cohort compared to controls with high myopia (p << 0.001). Further, most tested subjects had thinner average RNFL compared to myopic [55,56,57] or pediatric control cohorts [51,52,53,54]. A previous study suggested thinner GCL-IPL and normal RNFL thickness in three cases of CACNA1F-related iCSNB, although thickness measurements were not reported [21]. Further, selective inner retinal thinning, as evidenced by reduced average GCL-IPL thickness (range 59–65 μm), was reported in three patients with GRM6-related cCSNB; the authors hypothesized reduced bipolar and/or ganglion cell numbers or altered inner retinal synaptic structure to be the cause [76]. It is notable that average GCL-IPL thicknesses in our study are similar (55 (6.17) μm; range: 46–70 μm) to those reported in GRM6 cCSNB patients. Additionally, of note are various mouse models for iCSNB (Cacna1f, Cabp4 and Cacna2d4) primarily demonstrating abnormal synapses and thinning in the outer plexiform layer with no apparent changes in the inner retina including the GCL and IPL [77,78,79]. This may suggest that inner retinal changes are perhaps unique to human CACNA1F-phenotype in comparison to known animal models of the disease. One of the patients in the present cohort was additionally observed to have abnormal synapses in the outer retina [30].
The DA standard and bright-flash ERGs were electronegative in the majority of subjects in the current study with mean b/a ratios of 0.59 and 0.56, respectively, indicative of severe generalized rod ON-bipolar cell dysfunction. An electronegative ERG (or reduced b/a ratio) to DA standard flash or higher intensities is a characteristic feature of CACNA1F (median b/a ratio: 0.70) [10] and other forms of CSNB [1,10,73,74]. The mean LA standard flash ERG b/a ratio was 1.18 in our cohort; a similar average b/a ratio of 1.35 in the cohort reported by Bradshaw et al. was significantly reduced compared to controls (2.31) [80], indicative of generalized cone ON- and OFF-bipolar cell dysfunction. In the present study, GCL-IPL thickness showed weak correlation with DA standard flash and bright flash ERG b/a ratios, and LA standard flash b-wave amplitudes, with thinner GCL-IPL corresponding to lower b/a ratios or b-wave amplitudes, respectively. These results are novel and might indicate some superseding inner retinal (bipolar cell) dysfunction in addition to the signal transmission defect at the terminal end of photoreceptors in CACNA1F disorder. Future studies, however, are needed to further validate this observation.
All subjects in the current cohort had at least 2 clock hours of optic disc pallor in at least one eye and most had bilateral disc pallor. To date, a few cases in the literature have documented optic disc pallor or atrophy in CACNA1F-related iCSNB [18,19,20] and these reports are limited to the clinical appearance, rather than the graded measurement of optic disc pallor or ganglion cell structural integrity. All seven reported cases of iCSNB associated with RIMS2, a regulator of synaptic membrane exocytosis localized to rod photoreceptors and the outer plexiform layer, from 3 unrelated, ethnically diverse families demonstrated clinically appreciable optic disc pallor [15]. Inner retinal thinning was seen in the three subjects for whom OCT was available, and RNFL thinning was shown in two of them [15]. Whilst the authors advise optic disc and inner retinal changes should be interpreted with caution in the context of myopia, it is noted that none of the cases had high myopia (range: +6.00 to −4.50 D; only three were myopic) [15]. In 1983 Heckenlively et al. reported optic disc anomalies (interpreted as representing atrophy, dysplasia, or both) in subjects with CSNB; five had tilted discs with a lack of visible temporal disc tissue, two had dysplastic nerves and three had disc pallor without tilt [81]. Further, we showed that inner retinal thinning in CACNA1F-related iCSNB patients is in excess of controls with the same degree of myopia, strongly suggesting the possibility that optic pallor is consistent with optic atrophy, which is likely overlooked in CACNA1F-related iCSNB as a whole. Optic disc pallor has not been described in cases of iCSNB due to CABP4 or CACNA2D4 mutations [13,14]. The clock hours of appreciable disc pallor did not correlate with GCL-IPL thickness. This could in part be attributed to clinical difficulty in fundoscopy in identifying optic atrophy in the presence of significant myopia because of a prominent white scleral crescent and very little visible temporal disc tissue in the presence of a very obliquely exiting optic nerve (tilted disc) in many patients [82,83,84]. OCT measures of RNFL atrophy and decreased GCL-IPL thickness, on the other hand, are objective markers of axonal atrophy and support the presence of nerve atrophy within the disc in this study cohort.
CACNA1F encodes the primary subunit (α1f) of the L-type voltage-gated calcium channel, a 1977 amino acid protein with four homologous transmembrane domains flanked by intracellular components (N and C termini) [85]. Fifteen putative disease-causing variants including missense (33%), nonsense (27%), frameshift (20%) and splice-site (20%) were identified in our cohort. A previous study with 26 pathogenic mutations reported a higher proportion of nonsense and frameshift variants (27% each) followed by missense variants (23%). Amongst the five novel mutations, two each were nonsense (p.(Gln561*) and p.(Val611Glyfs*32)) and splice-site ((c.3741+2T>C) and p.(Gln1157Gln)) variants. Both Gln561 and Val611 are in the second transmembrane domain and a premature stop codon will lead to severely truncated protein missing the 3rd and 4th transmembrane domains and the C termini. Further, the mRNA produced is likely removed by nonsense mediated decay. The synonymous variant (c.4474C>T; p.(Gln1157Gln)) affects the last nucleotide in exon 28 and is predicted to alter the splice donor site. Recently, two other exonic synonymous variants in CACNA1F (c.646C>T; p.(Leu216Leu) and c.1719G>A; p.(Thr573Thr)) were reported to affect splicing using a minigene approach [42]. In addition, there are reported instances of pathogenic synonymous exonic variants affecting the last nucleotide of an exon leading to a splice site defect in other disorders [86,87]. Although the average macular GCL-IPL thickness in the CACNA1F-subjects was reduced regardless of the mutation class, there appeared to be variability within each mutation class (Figure 2F). This is perhaps not surprising as others have shown considerable intra- and inter-familial variability in phenotypic features (including refractive error, visual acuity and dark adaptation thresholds) in subjects harboring the same CACNA1F mutation [10,73].
The Cacna1f gene is well expressed in wildtype mouse and rat retina; whilst most studies confirm its expression at the photoreceptor terminal in the outer plexiform layer [45,88,89,90,91,92,93], some report expression in the inner part of inner nuclear layer and GCL [20,45,90,91]. Further, there is electrophysiological evidence from Cacna1f-deficient mouse lines to suggest that this subunit contributes to calcium influx in the retinal bipolar cells (Qi Lu PhD dissertation, Wayne State University—referenced in [85]). Hence the findings of GCL-IPL thinning and optic disc pallor observed in the current study may either be due to defective CACNA1F function in the inner retinal layers or perhaps even due to transsynaptic changes hypothesized by some in CSNB [76,81]. In either case, our findings are important in the context of novel approaches under development to treat CACNA1F-retinopathy [94], as it is likely that inner retinal changes contribute to the visual deficit in the disorder in humans and as such, treatment targeted at a defect in the photoreceptor synapse alone may not be sufficient to restore vision.
To summarize, this study identified inner retinal thinning and optic atrophy as characteristic features of iCSNB due to hemizygous pathogenic mutations in CACNA1F. The inner retinal thinning was independent of myopia and mutation type; although there was variability in the presence of myopia in our cohort, GCL-IPL thickness was uniformly reduced, and thinner than a myopic control population. The macular OCT was useful to objectively differentiate optic atrophy from disc pallor alone, such as that associated with high myopia. A prospective natural history study would help identify whether these inner retinal changes are stationary or progressive in nature.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.V. and E.H.; Data Curation, K.E.L., A.T., J.L.; Formal Analysis, T.W., K.E.L., J.R.B. and A.V.; Investigation, M.K.G.P., I.A., E.T., A.T., J.L., C.V., C.Z. and H.M.; Methodology, K.E.L., T.W. and A.V.; Project administration, A.V.; Resources, A.V. and E.H.; Supervision, J.R.B. and A.V.; Writing—Original Draft, K.E.L., A.V., T.W. and J.R.B.; Writing—Review and Editing, E.H., I.A., C.Z., M.K.G.P., E.T., H.M., C.V., A.T. and J.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

A.V. is supported by Foundation Fighting Blindness USA (CD-CL-0617-0727-HSC) and E.H. is supported by Fighting Blindness Canada and Henry Brent Chair in Innovative Pediatric Ophthalmology Research.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Research Ethics Board of The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada (study no. 1000017804, date of approval 5 April 2010, expiry 1 April 2021).

Informed Consent Statement

Patient consent was waived by the Research Ethics Board of the Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada for this retrospective study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zeitz, C.; Robson, A.G.; Audo, I. Congenital stationary night blindness: An analysis and update of genotype–phenotype correlations and pathogenic mechanisms. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2015, 45, 58–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Riggs, L.A. Electroretinography in Cases of Night Blindness. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 1954, 38, 70–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Schubert, G.; Bornschein, H. Beitrag zur Analyse des menschlichen Elektroretinogramms. Ophthalmologica 1952, 123, 396–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Marmor, M.F. Fundus albipunctatus: A clinical study of the fundus lesions, the physiologic deficit, and the vitamin a metabolism. Doc. Ophthalmol. 1977, 43, 277–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Fuchs, S.; Nakazawa, M.; Maw, M.; Tamai, M.; Oguchi, Y.; Gal, A. A homozygous 1–base pair deletion in the arrestin gene is a frequent cause of Oguchi disease in Japanese. Nat. Genet. 1995, 10, 360–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Yamamoto, S.; Sippel, K.C.; Berson, E.L.; Dryja, T.P. Defects in the rhodopsin kinase gene in the Oguchi form of stationary night blindness. Nat. Genet. 1997, 15, 175–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Miyake, Y.; Yagasaki, K.; Horiguchi, M.; Kawase, Y.; Kanda, T. Congenital Stationary Night Blindness with Negative Electroretinogram. Arch. Ophthalmol. 1986, 104, 1013–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Krill, A.E.; Martin, D. Photopic abnormalities in congenital stationary nightblindness. Investig. Ophthalmol. 1971, 10, 625–636. [Google Scholar]
  9. Lachapelle, P.; Little, J.M.; Polomeno, R.C. The photopic electroretinogram in congenital stationary night blindness with myopia. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1983, 24, 442–450. [Google Scholar]
  10. Bijveld, M.M.; Florijn, R.J.; Bergen, A.A.; Born, L.I.V.D.; Kamermans, M.; Prick, L.; Riemslag, F.C.; Van Schooneveld, M.J.; Kappers, A.M.; Van Genderen, M.M. Genotype and Phenotype of 101 Dutch Patients with Congenital Stationary Night Blindness. Ophthalmologica 2013, 120, 2072–2081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Khan, A.O.; Alrashed, M.; Alkuraya, F.S. Clinical characterisation of the CABP4-related retinal phenotype. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2012, 97, 262–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Zeitz, C.; Kloeckener-Gruissem, B.; Forster, U.; Kohl, S.; Magyar, I.; Wissinger, B.; Mátyás, G.; Borruat, F.-X.; Schorderet, D.F.; Zrenner, E.; et al. Mutations in CABP4, the Gene Encoding the Ca2+-Binding Protein 4, Cause Autosomal Recessive Night Blindness. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2006, 79, 657–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Wycisk, K.A.; Zeitz, C.; Feil, S.; Wittmer, M.; Forster, U.; Neidhardt, J.; Wissinger, B.; Zrenner, E.; Wilke, R.; Kohl, S.; et al. Mutation in the Auxiliary Calcium-Channel Subunit CACNA2D4 Causes Autosomal Recessive Cone Dystrophy. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2006, 79, 973–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Ba-Abbad, R.; Arno, G.; Carss, K.; Stirrups, K.; Penkett, C.J.; Moore, A.T.; Michaelides, M.; Raymond, F.L.; Webster, A.R.; Holder, G.E. Mutations in CACNA2D4 Cause Distinctive Retinal Dysfunction in Humans. Ophthalmology 2016, 123, 668–671.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mechaussier, S.; Almoallem, B.; Zeitz, C.; Van Schil, K.; Jeddawi, L.; Van Dorpe, J.; Rey, A.D.; Condroyer, C.; Pelle, O.; Polak, M.; et al. Loss of Function of RIMS2 Causes a Syndromic Congenital Cone-Rod Synaptic Disease with Neurodevelopmental and Pancreatic Involvement. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2020, 106, 859–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Miyake, Y. Establishment of the concept of new clinical entities—Complete and incomplete form of congenital stationary night blindness. Nippon. Ganka Gakkai Zasshi 2002, 106, 737–755. [Google Scholar]
  17. Riemslag, F.C.C. Visually impaired children: “coming to better terms”. Doc. Ophthalmol. 2009, 119, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Pasutto, F.; Ekici, A.; Reis, A.; Kremers, J.; Huchzermeyer, C. Novel truncating mutation in CACNA1F in a young male patient diagnosed with optic atrophy. Ophthalmic Genet. 2018, 39, 741–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Nakamura, M.; Ito, S.; Piao, C.-H.; Terasaki, H.; Miyake, Y. Retinal and Optic Disc Atrophy Associated With a CACNA1F Mutation in a Japanese Family. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2003, 121, 1028–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wutz, K.; Sauer, C.; Zrenner, E.; Lorenz, B.; Alitalo, T.; Broghammer, M.; Hergersberg, M.; De La Chapelle, A.; Weber, B.H.F.; Wissinger, B.; et al. Thirty distinct CACNA1F mutations in 33 families with incomplete type of XLCSNB and Cacna1f expression profiling in mouse retina. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2002, 10, 449–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Chen, R.W.; Greenberg, J.P.; Lazow, M.A.; Ramachandran, R.; Lima, L.H.; Hwang, J.C.; Schubert, C.; Braunstein, A.; Allikmets, R.; Tsang, S.H. Autofluorescence Imaging and Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography in Incomplete Congenital Stationary Night Blindness and Comparison with Retinitis Pigmentosa. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2012, 153, 143–154.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Mwanza, J.-C.; Durbin, M.K.; Budenz, D.L.; Girkin, C.A.; Leung, C.K.; Liebmann, J.M.; Peace, J.H.; Werner, J.S.; Wollstein, G. Profile and Predictors of Normal Ganglion Cell–Inner Plexiform Layer Thickness Measured with Frequency-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography. Investig. Opthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011, 52, 7872–7879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Tham, Y.-C.; Cheung, C.Y.; Koh, V.T.; Cheng, C.-Y.; Sidhartha, E.; Strouthidis, N.G.; Wong, T.Y.; Aung, T. Relationship between ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer and optic disc/retinal nerve fibre layer parameters in non-glaucomatous eyes. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2013, 97, 1592–1597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. González-López, J.J.; Rebolleda, G.; Leal, M.; Oblanca, N.; Muñoz-Negrete, F.J.; Costa-Frossard, L.; Álvarez-Cermeño, J.C. Comparative Diagnostic Accuracy of Ganglion Cell-Inner Plexiform and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Measures by Cirrus and Spectralis Optical Coherence Tomography in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis. BioMed. Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zmyslowska, A.; Waszczykowska, A.; Baranska, D.; Stawiski, K.; Borowiec, M.; Jurowski, P.; Fendler, W.; Mlynarski, W. Optical coherence tomography and magnetic resonance imaging visual pathway evaluation in Wolfram syndrome. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 2019, 61, 359–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Rönnbäck, C.; Milea, D.; Larsen, M. Imaging of the Macula Indicates Early Completion of Structural Deficit in Autosomal-Dominant Optic Atrophy. Ophthalmology 2013, 120, 2672–2677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kupersmith, M.J.; Garvin, M.K.; Wang, J.-K.; Durbin, M.; Kardon, R. Retinal Ganglion Cell Layer Thinning Within One Month of Presentation for Non-Arteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy. Investig. Opthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2016, 57, 3588–3593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Mwanza, J.-C.; Durbin, M.K.; Budenz, D.L.; Sayyad, F.E.; Chang, R.T.; Neelakantan, A.; Godfrey, D.G.; Carter, R.; Crandall, A.S. Glaucoma Diagnostic Accuracy of Ganglion Cell–Inner Plexiform Layer Thickness: Comparison with Nerve Fiber Layer and Optic Nerve Head. Ophthalmology 2012, 119, 1151–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Vincent, A.; Wright, T.; Day, M.A.; Westall, C.A.; Héon, E. A novel p. Gly603Arg mutation in CACNA1F causes Åland island eye disease and incomplete congenital stationary night blindness phenotypes in a family. Mol. Vis. 2011, 17, 3262–3270. [Google Scholar]
  30. Vincent, A.; Héon, E. Outer retinal structural anomaly due to frameshift mutation in CACNA1F gene. Eye 2012, 26, 1278–1280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Chandrakumar, M.; Colpa, L.; Reginald, Y.A.; Goltz, H.C.; Wong, A.M. Measuring Contrast Sensitivity Using the M&S Smart System II versus the Pelli-Robson Chart. Ophthalmology 2013, 120, 2160–21610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Abramoff, M.D.; Garvin, M.K.; Sonka, M. Retinal Imaging and Image Analysis. IEEE Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2010, 3, 169–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Garvin, M.K.; Abramoff, M.D.; Wu, X.; Russell, S.R.; Burns, T.L.; Sonka, M. Automated 3-D Intraretinal Layer Segmentation of Macular Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Images. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 2009, 28, 1436–1447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Antony, B.; Abràmoff, M.D.; Tang, L.; Ramdas, W.D.; Vingerling, J.R.; Jansonius, N.M.; Lee, K.; Kwon, Y.H.; Sonka, M.; Garvin, M.K. Automated 3-D method for the correction of axial artifacts in spectral-domain optical coherence tomography images. Biomed. Opt. Express 2011, 2, 2403–2416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Clark, A.; Wright, T.; Isaac, M.; Westall, C.; Mireskandari, K.; Tehrani, N.N. Macular morphology following unilateral bevacizumab injection for retinopathy of prematurity: An OCT study. J. Am. Assoc. Pediatr. Ophthalmol. Strabismus 2017, 21, 499–501.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Wright, T.; Kumarappah, A.; Stavropoulos, A.; Reginald, A.; Buncic, J.R.; Westall, C.A. Vigabatrin Toxicity in Infancy Is Associated with Retinal Defect in Adolescence. Retina 2017, 37, 858–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Flitcroft, D.I.; He, M.; Jonas, J.B.; Jong, M.; Naidoo, K.; Ohno-Matsui, K.; Rahi, J.; Resnikoff, S.; Vitale, S.; Yannuzzi, L. IMI—Defining and Classifying Myopia: A Proposed Set of Standards for Clinical and Epidemiologic Studies. Investig. Opthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2019, 60, M20–M30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. McCulloch, D.L.; Marmor, M.F.; Brigell, M.G.; Hamilton, R.; Holder, G.E.; Tzekov, R.; Bach, M. ISCEV Standard for full-field clinical electroretinography (2015 update). Doc. Ophthalmol. 2015, 130, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Marmor, M.F.; Holder, G.E.; Seeliger, M.W.; Yamamoto, S. Standard for clinical electroretinography (2004 update). Doc. Ophthalmol. 2004, 108, 107–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Spaide, R.F.; Ohno-Matsui, K.; Yannuzzi, L.A. Pathologic Myopia; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  41. Simonsz, H.; Florijn, R.; Van Minderhout, H.; Bergen, A.; Kamermans, M. Nightblindness-Associated Transient Tonic Downgaze (NATTD) in Infant Boys with Chin-Up Head Posture. Strabismus 2009, 17, 158–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zeitz, C.; Michiels, C.; Neuillé, M.; Friedburg, C.; Condroyer, C.; Boyard, F.; Antonio, A.; Bouzidi, N.; Milicevic, D.; Veaux, R.; et al. Where are the missing gene defects in inherited retinal disorders? Intronic and synonymous variants contribute at least to 4% of CACNA1F -mediated inherited retinal disorders. Hum. Mutat. 2019, 40, 765–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Lodha, N.; Loucks, C.M.; Beaulieu, C.; Parboosingh, J.S.; Bech-Hansen, N.T. Congenital Stationary Night Blindness: Mutation Update and Clinical Variability. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2011, 723, 371–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Bech-Hansen, N.T.; Naylor, M.J.; Maybaum, T.A.; Pearce, W.G.; Koop, B.; Fishman, G.A.; Mets, M.; Musarella, M.A.; Boycott, K.M. Loss-of-function mutations in a calcium-channel α1-subunit gene in Xp11.23 cause incomplete X-linked congenital stationary night blindness. Nat. Genet. 1998, 19, 264–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Strom, T.M.; Nyakatura, G.; Apfelstedt-Sylla, E.; Hellebrand, H.; Lorenz, B.; Weber, B.H.F.; Wutz, K.; Gutwillinger, N.; Rüther, K.; Drescher, B.; et al. An L-type calcium-channel gene mutated in incomplete X-linked congenital stationary night blindness. Nat. Genet. 1998, 19, 260–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Zeitz, C.; Labs, S.; Lorenz, B.; Forster, U.; Üksti, J.; Kroes, H.Y.; De Baere, E.; Leroy, B.P.; Cremers, F.P.M.; Wittmer, M.; et al. Genotyping Microarray for CSNB-Associated Genes. Investig. Opthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2009, 50, 5919–5926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Huo, Y.J.; Guo, Y.; Li, W.N.; Wang, H.Z.; Wang, Y.X.; Thomas, R.; Wang, N.L. Age-related changes in and determinants of macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness in normal Chinese adults. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2018, 46, 400–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ueda, K.; Kanamori, A.; Akashi, A.; Tomioka, M.; Kawaka, Y.; Nakamura, M. Effects of Axial Length and Age on Circumpapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer and Inner Macular Parameters Measured by 3 Types of SD-OCT Instruments. J. Glaucoma 2016, 25, 383–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Leung, C.K.; Ye, C.; Weinreb, R.N.; Yu, M.; Lai, G.; Lam, D.S. Impact of Age-related Change of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer and Macular Thicknesses on Evaluation of Glaucoma Progression. Ophthalmology 2013, 120, 2485–2492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Koh, V.T.; Tham, Y.-C.; Cheung, C.Y.; Wong, W.-L.; Baskaran, M.; Saw, S.-M.; Wong, T.Y.; Aung, T. Determinants of Ganglion Cell–Inner Plexiform Layer Thickness Measured by High-Definition Optical Coherence Tomography. Investig. Opthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012, 53, 5853–5859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Gürağaç, F.B.; Totan, Y.; Güler, E.; Tenlik, A.; Ertuğrul, I.G. Normative Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Data in Healthy Turkish Children. Semin. Ophthalmol. 2016, 32, 216–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Al-Haddad, C.; Barikian, A.; Jaroudi, M.; Massoud, V.; Tamim, H.; Noureddin, B. Spectral domain optical coherence tomography in children: Normative data and biometric correlations. BMC Ophthalmol. 2014, 14, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Barrio-Barrio, J.; Noval, S.; Galdós, M.; Ruiz-Canela, M.; Bonet, E.; Capote, M.; Lopez, M. Multicenter Spanish study of spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in normal children. Acta Ophthalmol. 2013, 91, e56–e63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Elía, N.; Pueyo, V.; Altemir, I.; Oros, D.; Pablo, L.E. Normal reference ranges of optical coherence tomography parameters in childhood. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2012, 96, 665–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Lee, M.W.; Nam, K.Y.; Park, H.J.; Lim, H.-B.; Kim, J.-Y. Longitudinal changes in the ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness in high myopia: A prospective observational study. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2019, 104, 604–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Biswas, S.; Lin, C.; Leung, C.K.S. Evaluation of a Myopic Normative Database for Analysis of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016, 134, 1032–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Hwang, Y.H.; Yoo, C.; Kim, Y.Y. Myopic Optic Disc Tilt and the Characteristics of Peripapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Measured by Spectral-domain Optical Coherence Tomography. J. Glaucoma 2012, 21, 260–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Thomas, M.G.; Kumar, A.; Mohammad, S.; Proudlock, F.A.; Engle, E.C.; Andrews, C.; Chan, W.-M.; Thomas, S.; Gottlob, I. Structural Grading of Foveal Hypoplasia Using Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography. Ophthalmology 2011, 118, 1653–1660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Jalkanen, R.; Tobias, R.; Mäntyjärvi, M.; De La Chapelle, A.; Bech-Hansen, N.T.; Sankila, E.-M.; Forsius, H.; Alitalo, T. A Novel CACNA1F Gene Mutation Causes Aland Island Eye Disease. Investig. Opthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2007, 48, 2498–2502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Karczewski, K.J.; Francioli, L.C.; Tiao, G.; Cummings, B.B.; Alföldi, J.; Wang, Q.; Collins, R.L.; Laricchia, K.M.; Ganna, A.; Birnbaum, D.P.; et al. The mutational constraint spectrum quantified from variation in 141,456 humans. Nature 2020, 581, 434–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Pollard, K.S.; Hubisz, M.J.; Rosenbloom, K.R.; Siepel, A. Detection of nonneutral substitution rates on mammalian phylogenies. Genome Res. 2009, 20, 110–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Richards, S.; Aziz, N.; Bale, S.; Bick, D.; Das, S.; Gastier-Foster, J.; Grody, W.W.; Hegde, M.; Lyon, E.; Spector, E.; et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: A joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet. Med. 2015, 17, 405–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Eng, L.; Coutinho, G.; Nahas, S.; Yeo, G.; Tanouye, R.; Babaei, M.; Dörk, T.; Burge, C.; Gatti, R.A. Nonclassical splicing mutations in the coding and noncoding regions of the ATM Gene: Maximum entropy estimates of splice junction strengths. Hum. Mutat. 2003, 23, 67–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Hebsgaard, S.M. Splice site prediction in Arabidopsis thaliana pre-mRNA by combining local and global sequence information. Nucleic Acids Res. 1996, 24, 3439–3452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Shapiro, M.B.; Senapathy, P. RNA splice junctions of different classes of eukaryotes: Sequence statistics and functional implications in gene expression. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987, 15, 7155–7174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Jaganathan, K.; Panagiotopoulou, S.K.; McRae, J.F.; Darbandi, S.F.; Knowles, D.; Li, Y.I.; Kosmicki, J.A.; Arbelaez, J.; Cui, W.; Schwartz, G.B.; et al. Predicting Splicing from Primary Sequence with Deep Learning. Cell 2019, 176, 535–548.e24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Kumar, P.; Henikoff, S.; Ng, P.C. Predicting the effects of coding non-synonymous variants on protein function using the SIFT algorithm. Nat. Protoc. 2009, 4, 1073–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Adzhubei, I.A.; Schmidt, S.; Peshkin, L.; Ramensky, V.E.; Gerasimova, A.; Bork, P.; Kondrashov, A.S.; Sunyaev, S.R. A meth-od and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat. Methods 2010, 7, 248–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Mathe, E.; Olivier, M.; Kato, S.; Ishioka, C.; Hainaut, P.; Tavtigian, S.V. Computational approaches for predicting the biological effect of p53 missense mutations: A comparison of three sequence analysis based methods. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34, 1317–1325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Schwarz, J.M.; Rödelsperger, C.; Schuelke, M.; Seelow, D. MutationTaster evaluates disease-causing potential of sequence alterations. Nat. Methods 2010, 7, 575–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Ioannidis, N.M.; Rothstein, J.H.; Pejaver, V.; Middha, S.; McDonnell, S.K.; Baheti, S.; Musolf, A.; Li, Q.; Holzinger, E.; Karyadi, D.; et al. REVEL: An Ensemble Method for Predicting the Pathogenicity of Rare Missense Variants. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2016, 99, 877–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Nakamura, M.; Ito, S.; Terasaki, H.; Miyake, Y. Novel CACNA1F mutations in Japanese patients with incomplete congenital stationary night blindness. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2001, 42, 1610–1616. [Google Scholar]
  73. Boycott, K.M.; Pearce, W.G.; Bech-Hansen, N.T. Clinical variability among patients with incomplete X-linked congenital stationary night blindness and a founder mutation in CACNA1F. Can. J. Ophthalmol. 2000, 35, 204–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Allen, L.E.; Zito, I.; Bradshaw, K.; Patel, R.J.; Bird, A.C.; Fitzke, F.; Yates, J.R.; Trump, D.; Hardcastle, A.J.; Moore, A.T. Genotype-phenotype correlation in British families with X linked congenital stationary night blindness. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2003, 87, 1413–1420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Hope, C.I.; Sharp, D.M.; Hemara-Wahanui, A.; Sissingh, J.I.; Lundon, P.; Mitchell, E.A.; Maw, M.A.; Clover, G.M. Clinical manifestations of a unique X-linked retinal disorder in a large New Zealand family with a novel mutation in CACNA1F, the gene responsible for CSNB2. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2005, 33, 129–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Godara, P.; Cooper, R.F.; Sergouniotis, P.I.; Diederichs, M.A.; Streb, M.R.; Genead, M.A.; McAnany, J.J.; Webster, A.R.; Moore, A.T.; Dubis, A.M.; et al. Assessing Retinal Structure in Complete Congenital Stationary Night Blindness and Oguchi Disease. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2012, 154, 987–1001.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Chang, B.; Heckenlively, J.R.; Bayley, P.R.; Brecha, N.C.; Davisson, M.T.; Hawes, N.L.; Hirano, A.A.; Hurd, R.E.; Ikeda, A.; Johnson, B.A.; et al. Thenob2mouse, a null mutation in Cacna1f: Anatomical and functional abnormalities in the outer retina and their consequences on ganglion cell visual responses. Vis. Neurosci. 2006, 23, 11–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Haeseleer, F.; Imanishi, Y.; Maeda, T.; Possin, D.E.; Maeda, A.; Lee, A.; Rieke, F.; Palczewski, K. Essential role of Ca2+-binding protein 4, a Cav1.4 channel regulator, in photoreceptor synaptic function. Nat. Neurosci. 2004, 7, 1079–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Kerov, V.; Laird, J.G.; Joiner, M.-L.; Knecht, S.; Soh, D.; Hagen, J.; Gardner, S.H.; Gutierrez, W.; Yoshimatsu, T.; Bhattarai, S.; et al. α2δ-4 Is Required for the Molecular and Structural Organization of Rod and Cone Photoreceptor Synapses. J. Neurosci. 2018, 38, 6145–6160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  80. Bradshaw, K.; Allen, L.; Trump, R.; Hardcastle, A.; George, N.; Moore, A. A comparison of ERG abnormalities in XLRS and XLCSNB. Doc. Ophthalmol. 2004, 108, 135–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Heckenlively, J.R.; Martin, D.A.; Rosenbaum, A.L. Loss of Electroretinographic Oscillatory Potentials, Optic Atrophy, and Dysplasia in Congenital Stationary Night Blindness. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 1983, 96, 526–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Wang, Y.X.; Panda-Jonas, S.; Jonas, J.B. Optic nerve head anatomy in myopia and glaucoma, including parapapillary zones α, β, γ and delta: Histology and clinical features. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2020, 100933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Chang, L.; Pan, C.-W.; Ohno-Matsui, K.; Lin, X.; Cheung, G.C.; Gazzard, G.; Koh, V.; Hamzah, H.; Tai, E.S.; Lim, S.C.; et al. Myopia-Related Fundus Changes in Singapore Adults with High Myopia. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2013, 155, 991–999.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Cheng, S.C.; Lam, C.S.; Yap, M.K. Prevalence of myopia-related retinal changes among 12–18 year old Hong Kong Chinese high myopes. Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt. 2013, 33, 652–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Waldner, D.M.; Bech-Hansen, N.T.; Stell, W.K. Channeling Vision: CaV1.4—A Critical Link in Retinal Signal Transmission. BioMed. Res. Int. 2018, 2018, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Baert, A.; Machackova, E.; Coene, I.; Cremin, C.; Turner, K.; Portigal-Todd, C.; Asrat, M.J.; Nuk, J.; Mindlin, A.; Young, S.; et al. Thorough in silico and in vitro cDNA analysis of 21 putativeBRCA1andBRCA2splice variants and a complex tandem duplication inBRCA2allowing the identification of activated cryptic splice donor sites inBRCA2exon 11. Hum. Mutat. 2017, 39, 515–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Mucaki, E.J.; Ainsworth, P.; Rogan, P.K. Comprehensive prediction of mRNA splicing effects of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants. Hum. Mutat. 2011, 32, 735–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Morgans, C.W. Localization of the α(1F) calcium channel subunit in the rat retina. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2001, 42, 2414–2418. [Google Scholar]
  89. Liu, X.; Kerov, V.; Haeseleer, F.; Majumder, A.; Artemyev, N.; Baker, S.A.; Lee, A. Dysregulation of Cav1.4 channels disrupts the maturation of photoreceptor synaptic ribbons in congenital stationary night blindness type 2. Channels 2013, 7, 514–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Naylor, M.J.; Rancourt, D.E.; Bech-Hansen, N. Isolation and Characterization of a Calcium Channel Gene, Cacna1f, the Murine Orthologue of the Gene for Incomplete X-Linked Congenital Stationary Night Blindness. Genomics 2000, 66, 324–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Morgans, C.W.; Gaughwin, P.; Maleszka, R. Expression of the alpha1F calcium channel subunit by photoreceptors in the rat retina. Mol. Vis. 2001, 7, 202–209. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  92. Knoflach, D.; Kerov, V.; Sartori, S.B.; Obermair, G.J.; Schmuckermair, C.; Liu, X.; Sothilingam, V.; Garrido, M.G.; Baker, S.A.; Glösmann, M.; et al. Cav1.4 IT mouse as model for vision impairment in human congenital stationary night blindness type 2. Channels 2013, 7, 503–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Shi, L.; Chang, J.Y.-A.; Yu, F.; Ko, M.L.; Ko, G.Y.-P. The Contribution of L-Type Cav1.3 Channels to Retinal Light Responses. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2017, 10, 394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Waldner, D.M.; Ito, K.; Chen, L.-L.; Nguyen, L.; Chow, R.L.; Lee, A.; Rancourt, D.E.; Tremblay, F.; Stell, W.K.; Bech-Hansen, N.T. Transgenic Expression of Cacna1f Rescues Vision and Retinal Morphology in a Mouse Model of Congenital Stationary Night Blindness 2A (CSNB2A). Transl. Vis. Sci. Technol. 2020, 9, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Genes 12 00330 g001 550
Figure 1. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) segmentation, electroretinogram (ERG) and disc photo grading. (A) Schematic diagram showing how average thickness for the sum of the ganglion cell and inner plexiform layers (GCL-IPL) was segmented from a 6 mm by 6 mm OCT macular cube scan for an elliptical annulus centered on the fovea with inner axis radius of 0.5 mm and outer axis radius of 2.0 mm, stretched by 20% in the horizontal direction. (B) Macular OCT segmentation: The blue line indicates the boundary between the GCL and retinal nerve fiber layer; the yellow line shows the boundary between the IPL and inner nuclear layer (case 16). (C,D) Peripapillary OCT segmentation: retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness was determined using the Cirrus inbuilt analysis tool; (C) RNFL thickness map and (D) RNFL thickness graph (case 14; average RNFL thickness 61 µm; temporal RNFL thickness 44 µm). (E) Control ERG: The electroretinogram a-wave was measured from the prestimulus baseline to the trough, and the b-wave amplitude from the a-wave trough to the subsequent peak. (F) Electronegative ERG (case 9): the b-wave amplitude is smaller than the a-wave amplitude (b/a ratio < 1). (G–J) Color fundus photos were graded by a pediatric neuro-ophthalmologist as exhibiting (G) no disc pallor (case 10); (H) two clock hours of disc pallor (case 12); (I) three clock hours disc pallor (case 22) and (J) five clock hours of optic disc pallor (case 16).
Figure 1. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) segmentation, electroretinogram (ERG) and disc photo grading. (A) Schematic diagram showing how average thickness for the sum of the ganglion cell and inner plexiform layers (GCL-IPL) was segmented from a 6 mm by 6 mm OCT macular cube scan for an elliptical annulus centered on the fovea with inner axis radius of 0.5 mm and outer axis radius of 2.0 mm, stretched by 20% in the horizontal direction. (B) Macular OCT segmentation: The blue line indicates the boundary between the GCL and retinal nerve fiber layer; the yellow line shows the boundary between the IPL and inner nuclear layer (case 16). (C,D) Peripapillary OCT segmentation: retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness was determined using the Cirrus inbuilt analysis tool; (C) RNFL thickness map and (D) RNFL thickness graph (case 14; average RNFL thickness 61 µm; temporal RNFL thickness 44 µm). (E) Control ERG: The electroretinogram a-wave was measured from the prestimulus baseline to the trough, and the b-wave amplitude from the a-wave trough to the subsequent peak. (F) Electronegative ERG (case 9): the b-wave amplitude is smaller than the a-wave amplitude (b/a ratio < 1). (G–J) Color fundus photos were graded by a pediatric neuro-ophthalmologist as exhibiting (G) no disc pallor (case 10); (H) two clock hours of disc pallor (case 12); (I) three clock hours disc pallor (case 22) and (J) five clock hours of optic disc pallor (case 16).
Genes 12 00330 g001
Genes 12 00330 g002 550
Figure 2. Macular ganglion cell layer plus inner plexiform layer (GCL-IPL) thickness in CACNA1F retinopathy. (A) The GCL-IPL in CACNA1F patients was significantly thinner than the emmetropia or hyperopia, low myopia and high myopia control groups. (B) Scatter plot showing average GCL-IPL thickness from individual CACNA1F patients and control subjects. For every diopter decrease in spherical equivalent there was a decrease in GCL-IPL thickness, which was not significantly different between CACNA1F patients and controls. (C,D) There was a statistically significant correlation between lower b/a ratio and reduced GCL-IPL thickness for dark-adapted (DA) standard flash (2.29 or 3.0 cd·s·m−2) and DA bright flash (7.6 or 10.0 cd·s·m−2) electroretinograms. (E) The light adapted (LA) standard flash a-wave amplitude did not correlate with GCL-IPL thickness, however, (F) a smaller LA standard flash b-wave amplitude correlated with a lower GCL-IPL thickness. (G,H) There was no correlation between GCL-IPL thickness and extent of disc pallor in clock hours (G) or variant type (H).
Figure 2. Macular ganglion cell layer plus inner plexiform layer (GCL-IPL) thickness in CACNA1F retinopathy. (A) The GCL-IPL in CACNA1F patients was significantly thinner than the emmetropia or hyperopia, low myopia and high myopia control groups. (B) Scatter plot showing average GCL-IPL thickness from individual CACNA1F patients and control subjects. For every diopter decrease in spherical equivalent there was a decrease in GCL-IPL thickness, which was not significantly different between CACNA1F patients and controls. (C,D) There was a statistically significant correlation between lower b/a ratio and reduced GCL-IPL thickness for dark-adapted (DA) standard flash (2.29 or 3.0 cd·s·m−2) and DA bright flash (7.6 or 10.0 cd·s·m−2) electroretinograms. (E) The light adapted (LA) standard flash a-wave amplitude did not correlate with GCL-IPL thickness, however, (F) a smaller LA standard flash b-wave amplitude correlated with a lower GCL-IPL thickness. (G,H) There was no correlation between GCL-IPL thickness and extent of disc pallor in clock hours (G) or variant type (H).
Genes 12 00330 g002
Table
Table 1. Characteristics of the study population.
Table 1. Characteristics of the study population.
CaseAge, yNM_005183.3 cDNA and AA VariationsVA, OD; OSRefraction, OD; OSColor, HRR, OUCS, OD; OSSymptoms
NystagmusNyctalopiaPhotophobia
110c.245G>A; p.(Arg82Gln) [1]0.40; 0.40+1.00/+1.25; +2.00/+0.75mild RG1.30; 1.30---
215c.1047G>A; p.(Trp349*) [1,41]0.50; 0.50−9.25/+4.25; −9.50/+4.00normal1.40; 1.50--+
3 a14c.1681C>T; p.(Gln561*) N0.20; 0.20−9.75/+2.50; −8.75/+1.50normal1.50; 1.50 --
4 a16c.1681C>T; p.(Gln561*) N0.50; 0.60−15.75/+1.50; −14.75/+1.25normal1.30; 1.20-+-
5 b11c.1807G>C; p.(Gly603Arg) [29]0.40; 0.48−12.25/+3.00; −12.25/+3.00strong RG1.50; 1.50 ++
6 b58c.1807G>C; p.(Gly603Arg)0.40; 0.40plano; planomild RG1.65; 1.65 +
79c.1832del; p.(Val611Glyfs*32) N0.48; 0.60−12.50/+4.00; −11.50/+4.00normal1.40; 1.50+++
814c.1849C>T; p.(Gln617*) [1]0.30; 0.40+1.00/+3.00; +1.00/+3.00normal1.30; 1.30+++
96c.2094_2095del; p.(Gln699Glyfs*12) [42]0.80; 0.80−7.50/+2.50; −5.50/+3.50mild RG1.20; 1.20 --
108c.2576+1G>A; p.? [42,43]0.30; 0.48−0.25/+1.00; −1.00/+0.75normal1.20; 1.20 -+
119c.2576+1G>A; p.?0.80; 0.90−9.00; −9.75 0.90; 0.90-+-
128c.3166dup; p.(Leu1056Profs*11) [1,44,45]0.40; 0.40−14.00/+2.00; −14.00/+2.75normal1.50; 1.50+ -
13 c13c.3166dup; p.(Leu1056Profs*11)0.40; 0.30−9.25/+3.25; −9.50/+2.75normal1.40; 1.40-
14 c13c.3166dup; p.(Leu1056Profs*11)0.48; 0.60−11.00/+3.25; −10.00/+3.25mild RG1.30; 1.20+
15 c16c.3166dup; p.(Leu1056Profs*11)0.30; 0.30−7.25/+5.00; −6.75/+4.50normal1.40; 1.40
1617c.3166dup; p.(Leu1056Profs*11)0.18; 0.18+0.25; +0.25medium RG1.40; 1.30+++
179c.3471G>A; p.(Gln1157Gln) N, S0.40; 0.40−14.25/+4.75; −14.25/+4.75normal1.30; 1.30-
1817c.3741+2T>C; p.? N0.40; 0.40−10.25/+2.75; −9.75/+2.75normal1.30; 1.30 +-
1920c.4474C>G; p.(Pro1492Ala) [1,46]0.48; 0.30−21.75/+4.00; −22.75/+4.50normal1.30; 1.50 --
2016c.4474C>T; p.(Pro1492Ser) N0.48; 0.30−6.75/+2.00; −6.50/+2.00normal1.30; 1.30--+
217c.4504C>T; p.(Arg1502*) [42]0.54; 0.54−1.50/+3.50; −3.00/+4.00normal1.10; 1.10+
2210c.5156G>T; p.(Arg1719Met) [42]0.10; 0.10−1.00/+3.00; −2.00/+3.00normal1.80; 1.80+--
a, family 1; b, family 2; c, family 3; y, years; AA, amino acid; N, novel variant; S, Silent mutation affecting the last nucleotide of the exon and predicted to affect splicing; VA, visual acuity in LogMAR; OD, right eye; OS, left eye; D, diopters; HRR, Hardy Rand Rittler; OU, both eyes; RG, red-green; CS, contrast sensitivity in log units.
Table
Table 2. Optical coherence tomography and electroretinogram parameters, and optic disc pallor grading.
Table 2. Optical coherence tomography and electroretinogram parameters, and optic disc pallor grading.
CaseStudy EyeAverage Macular GCL-IPL Thickness, µmAverage (Temporal) RNFL Thickness, µmERG b/a Ratio
DA Standard Flash		ERG b/a Ratio
DA Bright Flash		ERG a-Wave;
b-Wave
amplitude (µV)
LA Standard Flash		ERG b/a Ratio
LA Standard Flash		Disc Pallor, OD; OS, h (Description)Fundus Findings, OU
1OD64 0.560.41–20; 271.355; 4Normal
2OD52 0.510.44–48; 360.753 (PC); 4 (PC)Tessellated, FH (1)
3OS54 0.520.54–26; 321.235 (PC); 4 (PC)Tessellated, WWP
4OD47 0.660.56–29; 341.173 (PC); 3 (PC)Tessellated, WWP, staphyloma, FH (1)
5OD50 0.480.54–24; 281.175 (PC); 5 (PC)Blonde, FH (2)
6OD53 0.75 –35; 351.002; 2Normal
7OS55 0.48 –35; 250.715; 5Tessellated
8OD5868 (40)0.600.99–27; 391.444; 4Peripheral atrophy
9OS5166 (51)0.250.22–14; 90.643; 0Appearance of sheathing around superotemporal vascular arcades
10OD56 0.370.54 3; 0Tessellated, blonde, FH (1)
11OD56 0.840.63–24; 321.333 (PC); 3 (PC)Blonde
12OD49 0.470.40–12; 141.172 (PC); 4 (PC)Tessellated, WWP
13OD55 0.530.55–22; 301.075 (PC); 3 (PC)Tessellated
14OD5261 (44)0.700.59–32; 411.28 Tessellated, lattice degeneration
15OD51 1.160.94–28; 391.395 (PC); 5 (PC)Tessellated, FH (1)
16OD5272 (39)0.410.40–12; 121.005 (PC); 5 (PC)Tessellated
17OD6071 (75)0.670.68–31; 371.194 (PC); 5 (PC)Tessellated
18OS55 0.370.38–23; 251.093 (PC); 2Tessellated, WWP
19OS46 0.510.39–14; 211.502 (PC); 3 (PC)Tessellated, blonde, staphyloma. Fuchs spot (OD)
20OD5474 (59)0.290.27–10; 151.503 (PC); 4Tessellated, blonde, FH (2)
21OD70 1.141.06–27; 351.305; 4Normal
22OD70 0.710.67–24; 381.583; 3Appearance of perivascular sheathing along some vessels
OD, right eye; OS, left eye; GCL-IPL, ganglion cell layer and inner plexiform layer; RNFL, retinal nerve fiber layer; ERG, electroretinogram; DA, dark-adapted; LA, light-adapted; h, clock hours; PC, peripapillary crescent; OU, both eyes; FH, foveal hypoplasia (optical coherence tomography grade [58]); WWP, white-without-pressure. GCL-IPL thickness, RNFL thickness and ERG b/a ratios are shown for the study eye; the right eye was selected when macular optical coherence tomography was of sufficient quality.
Table
Table 3. Reported retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in children and myopes.
Table 3. Reported retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in children and myopes.
SourceAge, ynRefraction, SE (D)Average RNFL (mm)Temporal RNFL
Guragac et al., 2017 [51]3–17 a318–4.00 to +3.00 a96.49 (10.10) b; 80.00–114.00 d67.60 (9.93) b; 53.95–87.00 d
Al-Haddad et al., 2014 [52]6–17 a108–4.25 to +5.00 a95.6 (8.7) b; 80–111 d66.4 (8.9) b; 54–84 d
Barrio-Barrio et al., 2013 [53]4–17 a283–4.88 to +5.25 a97.40 (9) b; 77.0–121.7 a; 82.4–113.3 d67.4 b; 51.8–83.3 d
Elia et al., 2012 [54]6–14 a344–2.50 to +6.25 a98.46 (10.79) b69.35 (11.28) b
Lee et al., 2020 [55]39.3 (12.2) b80–6.50 (–8.50 to –4.25) c89.88 (8.87) b
Biswas et al., 2016 [56]36.0 (12.3) b180–17.1 to –6.0D a89.6 (7.2) b; 70–110 a
Hwang et al., 2012 [57]19–25 a255–11.00 to 0.00 a97.14 (6.63) b; 72–118 a74.03 (11.13) b; 53–105 a
Present study6–17 a6–11.88 to +2.50a68.67 (4.72) b; 61–74 a51.33 (13.81) b; 39–75 a; 39.25–71.00 d
y, years; SE, spherical equivalent; D, diopters; RNFL, retinal nerve fiber layer; a range; b mean (SD); c median (interquartile range); d 5th–95th percentile.
Table
Table 4. Novel CACNA1F variants: pathogenicity and conservation scores, allele frequency in gnomAD and ACMG classification.
Table 4. Novel CACNA1F variants: pathogenicity and conservation scores, allele frequency in gnomAD and ACMG classification.
Genomic Position
(hg19, chr X)		NM_005183.3—cDNA; Protein
Position		Predicted
Effect		Splicing or
Pathogenicity Scores		GnomAD [60] (v2.1.1)PhyloP [61]ACMG Criteria;
Classification [62]
g.49082374G>Ac.1681C>T; p.(Gln561*)nonsenseN/AN/A4.73PVS1, PM2, PP1; pathogenic
g.49081301delc.1832del; p.(Val611Glyfs*32)frameshift stopN/AN/A3.76PVS1, PM2; likely pathogenic
g.49071802C>Tc.3471G>A; p.(Gln1157Gln)splicing,
predicted loss of donor site 1 bp downstream		MaxEntScan [63]: −100.0%,
NNSPLICE [64]: −95.8%,
SSF [65]: −15.7%, spliceAI [66]: 0.96		N/A2.47PM2, PP3; uncertain significance
g.49070617A>Gc.3741+2T>C; p.?splicing,
predicted loss of donor site 2 bp upstream		MaxEntScan [63]: −100.0%,
NNSPLICE [64]: 0.0%, SSF [65]: −13.8%, spliceAI [66]: 0.97		N/A4.08PVS1, PM2, PP1, PP3; pathogenic
g.49067094G>Ac.4474C>T; p.(Pro1492Ser)missenseSIFT [67]: 0 (deleterious),
Poly Phen-2 [68]: 1 (PD),
Align GVGD [69]: C65,
MutationTaster [70]: 1(Del),
Revel [71]: 0.83(Del)		N/A5.45PM1, PM2, PM5, PP3; likely pathogenic
Ref. [60] Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD, https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/ (accessed on 18 February 2021); population frequency across 141,456 human genomes); [61] Phylogenetic p value vertebrates (PhyloP, evolutionary conservation at individual alignment sites. Positive values mean more conservation that expected by neutral evolution, values > 4 are extremely conserved) [63]; ACMG, American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Under the AMCG guidelines, each pathogenic criterion is weighted as very strong (PVS1), strong (PS1-4), moderate (PM1-6), or supporting (PP1-5); Maximum Entropy Scan (MaxEntScan, This method is based on the ‘Maximum Entropy Principle’ and generalizes most previous probabilistic models of sequence motifs such as weight matrix models and inhomogeneous Markov models, −100% means complete loss of splicing score for a site), [64] Neural Network Splice algorithm with k-fold cross-validation (NNSPLICE, https://github.com/AnastasiiaInna/neural-network-splice-algorithm (accessed on 18 February 2021)), [65] Splicing Sequences Finder (SSF, http://www.umd.be/searchSpliceSite.html (accessed on 18 February 2021)), [66] SpliceAI (https://github.com/Illumina/SpliceAI (accessed on 18 February 2021)), [67] Sorting Intolerant From Tolerant (SIFT: values ≤ 0.05 are predicted pathogenic), [68] Polymorphism Phenotyping v2 HumVar (PolyPhen-2: values ≥ 0.09 are predicted pathogenic); [69] Align GVGD combines the biophysical characteristics of amino acids and protein multiple sequence alignments to predict where missense substitutions in genes of interest fall in a spectrum from enriched deleterious to enriched neutral (Class C65 is the most likely to interfere with protein function), [70] Mutation Taster (MT, values ≥ 0.5 are predicted pathogenic), [71] Revel (predicts pathogenicity of missense variants on the base of multiple individual tools).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Leahy, K.E.; Wright, T.; Grudzinska Pechhacker, M.K.; Audo, I.; Tumber, A.; Tavares, E.; MacDonald, H.; Locke, J.; VandenHoven, C.; Zeitz, C.; et al. Optic Atrophy and Inner Retinal Thinning in CACNA1F-Related Congenital Stationary Night Blindness. Genes 2021, 12, 330. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12030330

AMA Style

Leahy KE, Wright T, Grudzinska Pechhacker MK, Audo I, Tumber A, Tavares E, MacDonald H, Locke J, VandenHoven C, Zeitz C, et al. Optic Atrophy and Inner Retinal Thinning in CACNA1F-Related Congenital Stationary Night Blindness. Genes. 2021; 12(3):330. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12030330

Chicago/Turabian Style

Leahy, Kate E, Tom Wright, Monika K Grudzinska Pechhacker, Isabelle Audo, Anupreet Tumber, Erika Tavares, Heather MacDonald, Jeff Locke, Cynthia VandenHoven, Christina Zeitz, and et al. 2021. "Optic Atrophy and Inner Retinal Thinning in CACNA1F-Related Congenital Stationary Night Blindness" Genes 12, no. 3: 330. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12030330

APA Style

Leahy, K. E., Wright, T., Grudzinska Pechhacker, M. K., Audo, I., Tumber, A., Tavares, E., MacDonald, H., Locke, J., VandenHoven, C., Zeitz, C., Heon, E., Buncic, J. R., & Vincent, A. (2021). Optic Atrophy and Inner Retinal Thinning in CACNA1F-Related Congenital Stationary Night Blindness. Genes, 12(3), 330. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12030330

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop