Next Article in Journal
Molecular Phylogeny and Evolution of Amazon Parrots in the Greater Antilles
Next Article in Special Issue
Molecular Insights into Mitochondrial Protein Translocation and Human Disease
Previous Article in Journal
Genetic Interactions of Awnness Genes in Barley
Previous Article in Special Issue
Leigh Syndrome Due to NDUFV1 Mutations Initially Presenting as LBSL
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Application of Genome Sequencing from Blood to Diagnose Mitochondrial Diseases

1
Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
2
Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
3
Victorian Clinical Genetic Services, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
4
Department of Metabolic Medicine, Queensland Children’s Hospital, Brisbane, QLD 4101, Australia
5
School of Clinical Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia
6
School of Medicine, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD 4222, Australia
7
Department of Neurology, Perth Children’s Hospital, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
8
Department of Metabolic Medicine and Rheumatology, Perth Children’s Hospital, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
9
Kinghorn Centre for Clinical Genomics, Garvan Institute, University of New South Wales, Randwick, NSW 2010, Australia
10
Precision Medicine Theme, Children’s Cancer Institute, Kensington, NSW 2750, Australia
11
School of Women’s and Children’s Health, University of New South Wales, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2021, 12(4), 607; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12040607
Submission received: 19 March 2021 / Revised: 16 April 2021 / Accepted: 17 April 2021 / Published: 20 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Expanding the Genetic Landscape of Mitochondrial Diseases)

Abstract

:
Mitochondrial diseases can be caused by pathogenic variants in nuclear or mitochondrial DNA-encoded genes that often lead to multisystemic symptoms and can have any mode of inheritance. Using a single test, Genome Sequencing (GS) can effectively identify variants in both genomes, but it has not yet been universally used as a first-line approach to diagnosing mitochondrial diseases due to related costs and challenges in data analysis. In this article, we report three patients with mitochondrial disease molecularly diagnosed through GS performed on DNA extracted from blood to demonstrate different diagnostic advantages of this technology, including the detection of a low-level heteroplasmic pathogenic variant, an intragenic nuclear DNA deletion, and a large mtDNA deletion. Current technical improvements and cost reductions are likely to lead to an expanded routine diagnostic usage of GS and of the complementary “Omic” technologies in mitochondrial diseases.

1. Introduction

Mitochondrial diseases can be caused by pathogenic variants in more than 350 nuclear or mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA)-encoded genes that often lead to multisystemic and progressive symptoms [1].
In children, most primary mitochondrial diseases are caused by pathogenic variants in nuclear DNA (nDNA) (≈75%), while most adult-onset mitochondrial diseases result from mtDNA variants (≈75%) [2]. Since there are many mtDNA molecules within a cell, different levels of mutant mtDNA copies can coexist with wild-type mtDNA and the proportion can vary across tissues, which is a phenomenon known as heteroplasmy [3].
In recent years, the diagnostic approach of mitochondrial diseases has been revolutionized by massively parallel sequencing (MPS). In particular, Exome Sequencing (ES) has been increasingly adopted into clinical practice. This technology targets almost every coding region and flanking intronic nucleotides representing ≈2% of the genome. However, to analyze mtDNA, additional targeted mtDNA-MPS often needs to be performed. Alternatively, “off-target” reads from ES may be analyzed. A limitation of the ES “off-target” method is that detecting and determining low heteroplasmy variants can be challenging, as the sequencing depth is variable across the mtDNA [4]. Cohorts of patients with mitochondrial disease studied with ES have reported a molecular diagnostic yield between 35% and 70% [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. The disparity between diagnostic yields likely reflects discrepancies in the stringency of inclusion criteria and thus heterogeneity between cohorts [2]. Nevertheless, achieving a diagnostic rate of more than 35% is a marked improvement on rates of 10–20% before the incorporation of MPS in mitochondrial disease diagnostics [1]. Genome sequencing (GS) can, in a single test, interrogate almost all the nDNA and mtDNA, with the advantage of efficiently detecting single nucleotide variants (SNV), short insertions and deletions, and structural variants (SV) in coding and non-coding regions of the nuclear genome, and can achieve a very high mtDNA read depth [15]. To date, only one cohort of patients with suspected mitochondrial disease studied through GS has been published, in which a definite molecular diagnosis was identified in 55% of the patients [15]. As the cost of GS declines and analysis becomes less complex, this technology is likely to be widely implemented in the near future for diagnosing mitochondrial diseases.
In this study, we aim to illustrate the utility of using GS in identifying different types of pathogenic variants in individuals with mitochondrial disease by providing case studies that emphasize the diagnostic advantages of this technology.

2. Materials and Methods

The cases presented in this series were selected from the Australian Genomics Health Alliance (AGHA) mitochondrial flagship genome sequencing (GS) arm [16]. All individuals had a history of suspected mitochondrial disease with a modified Nijmegen score > 4 [17].
Singleton PCR-free GS was performed in DNA extracted from blood and conducted by the Kinghorn Centre for Clinical Genomics at Garvan Institute of Medical Research (Sydney, Australia). Samples were sequenced on the Illumina HiSeq X Ten, with more than 75% of bases having Q30 base quality and mean coverage of > 30x. Reads were aligned to the b37d5 genome using Burrows–Wheeler Aligner (BWA) [18], sorted by coordinate using Novosort (Novocraft Technologies), realigned, and recalibrated using GATK to generate BAM files. BAM files were examined using the Integrated Genome Viewer 2.3 software (Broad Institute). Variants were called using GATK HaplotypeCaller (v3.4-46-gbc02625) [19], annotated using ENSEMBL’s Variant Effect Predictor [20] (v74), and converted to an SQLite database using Gemini [21] (v0.17.2). Databases were imported into SEAVE [22], which was used to perform phenotype-driven variant filtration and prioritization of the nDNA variants using a mitochondrial disease gene list (Mitochondrial disease v0.563, https://panelapp.agha.umccr.org/panels/203/, accessed on 27 December 2020), while mitochondrial SNV and indels were identified using mity [23]. SVs including copy number variants (CNVs) were investigated using ClinSV [24] (v1.0). In silico tools to analyze pathogenicity predictions included SIFT [25], Mutation Taster [26], PROVEAN [27], CADD [28], MitoTIP [29], PON-mt-tRNA [30], and HmtVar [31]. Classification of variants was based on the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) guidelines [32].
Mitochondrial DNA sequencing was performed in skeletal muscle extracted DNA of P1 by the Victorian Clinical Genetics Services (Melbourne, Australia), DNA was extracted using the Macherey–Nagal DNA Extraction kit, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The whole mitochondrial genome of 16.5 kb was amplified in a single long-range PCR, followed by library preparation using the Illumina Nextera DNA Flex kit (Illumina, (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). Sequencing was performed on a MiSeq (Illumina) using v2 chemistry, with a minimum coverage of 1000-fold. Data were processed using the on-board MiSeq Reporter for variant calling and a custom in-house analysis pipeline for annotation and indel calling as previously described [33].
Amplification of MT-TL1 from urine extracted DNA of P1 was conducted by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using primers designed to amplify 250 bp of mtDNA (Table S1), specificity for mtDNA and not mitochondrial NuMT was measured using DNA extracted from human rho0 cells [34] (cell line a kind gift from Dr Ian Trounce).
Total protein lysates were extracted from P2 fibroblasts for SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and Western blotting using total Abcam OXPHOS human WB antibody cocktail (Abcam #ab11041) and Porin/VDCA1 (Abcam #ab14734) as previously described [35].
RNA was isolated from fibroblasts of P2 using the RNeasy Plus kit (Qiagen) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Reverse transcription was performed using SuperScript III First-Strand synthesis kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Carlsbad, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Amplification of complementary DNA (cDNA) was conducted by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using three sets of primers designed to amplify exons 1–22 of AARS2 (Table S1).

3. Results

3.1. Genome Sequencing Detects Low Levels of mtDNA Heteroplasmy in Blood

P1 is currently 49 years of age. He was well during childhood and early adult years but developed myoclonic epilepsy in his late 20s, which was triggered by a head injury. In his early 30s, he developed bilateral cataracts that required lensectomy. Over the ensuing 10 years, he developed profound sensorineural hearing loss, type 2 diabetes mellitus, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, sensory peripheral neuropathy, ataxia, tremor, muscle cramping, and cognitive decline, such that he is no longer able to sustain work and struggles with independent living. A brain MRI scan demonstrated mild generalized cerebral atrophy.
Using GS in DNA extracted from blood, we identified a well characterized pathogenic mtDNA variant in the mitochondrial transfer RNA Leucine gene (MT-TL1) NC_012920.1(MT-TL1):m.3243A>T at 2% heteroplasmy in blood (Figure 1a). The variant was detectable in urine by Sanger sequencing suggesting heteroplasmic levels of at least 15% in urine sediment cells (Figure 1b) [36]. mtDNA-MPS was performed on DNA extracted from skeletal muscle, demonstrating a mutant load of 69% for the m.3243A>T variant (Figure 1c).
The variant is located within the D-loop of the mt-tRNALeu(UUR) (Figure 1d). The nucleotide (A) at this position has high evolutionary conservation (97.78%, MitoMaster) [37].
In silico software predicted this variant to be disease-causing. (Table 1). The variant was not detected in 56,423 individuals reported in the gnomAD v3.1 database [39].
This variant has been previously described as pathogenic in unrelated families with different mitochondrial phenotypes including mitochondrial encephalomyopathy with lactic acidosis and stroke-like episodes (MELAS MIM 540000), chronic progressive external ophthalmoplegia (CPEO), hearing loss with cataracts, and rhabdomyolysis. The variant was heteroplasmic in blood (5–46%) and muscle (30–81%) from the affected individuals [40,41,42]. Previous research using in vitro transcribed tRNA molecules showed that the m.3243A>T variant had a tRNALeu(UUR) aminoacylation efficiency only 1/300th that of the wild-type tRNA [43]. Furthermore, single fiber studies in patient muscle have shown higher amounts of mutant mtDNA in COX-deficient fibers compared with COX-positive fibers [40].
A skeletal muscle biopsy of patient P1 at age 48 showed variation in fiber size with scattered fibers demonstrating mild to moderate atrophy interspersed with preserved and relatively frequent hypertrophic fibers. Scattered granular fibers were present with a patchy increase in internal nuclei. Ragged red fibers were present using modified Gomori trichome staining. Scattered ragged blue fibers were present on succinyl-dehydrogenase (SDH) staining. There were increased numbers of cytochrome oxidase (COX)-deficient fibers with at least 25–30 per transverse section. Immunohistochemistry demonstrated patchy fiber type grouping indicative of chronic denervation.
The higher heteroplasmy level in an affected tissue compared with blood and urine, together with the genomic and muscle histochemistry, confirmed a diagnosis of mitochondrial disease in individual (P1).
This case illustrates how the high read depth of mtDNA in GS (>4000× depth in P1) enables the accurate detection of even low-level heteroplasmy variants [23]. For this reason, it is particularly useful when using blood as the source of DNA. For instance, it is well characterized that the mutant load in blood of the common m.3243A>G (the alternative nucleotide change to the variant identified in P1) decreases with age [44]. The m.3243A>G variant is the most common pathogenic mtDNA variant which at different heteroplasmy levels has been associated with MELAS, maternally inherited diabetes with or without deafness, myopathy, CPEO, and other mitochondrial cytopathies [3].

3.2. Genome Sequencing Detects an Intragenic Nuclear DNA Deletion

Patient P2 was born at term after an unremarkable pregnancy to non-consanguineous parents. He presented within an hour of birth with respiratory distress. He had persistent lactic acidosis in the newborn period with a peak lactate level of 16 mmol/L (normal range 0.7–2.0). Creatine kinase was 718 U/L on day 3 of life (normal range < 250 U/L). Echocardiogram was normal. Acylcarnitine profile, ammonia, full blood count, electrolytes, and liver function tests were normal.
The child continued to grow well until 4½ months of age when his length dropped from the 25th centile to the 10th centile. At nearly 5 months of age, he showed premature closure of the anterior fontanelle and slightly increased extensor tone in his legs with accompanying brisk deep tendon reflexes. The serum lactate level remained elevated at 4.5 mmol/L. He was started on a “mitochondrial cocktail” including thiamine, riboflavin, biotin, vitamin E, coenzyme Q10, and vitamin C at around 2 years of age.
At 3 years of age, he started having falls and showed delayed motor development and poor coordination. With intensive dietary therapy, his weight was maintained just above the third centile, and his height was 10–25th centile. His tone was reduced with both central and peripheral hypotonia. He had proximal myopathy and deep tendon reflexes were only just elicitable. He had hyperextensible joints and hypermobility. His speech was delayed and dysfluent. He had poor exercise tolerance and easy fatigability. Vision and hearing remained normal. There were no involuntary movements or seizures.
Repeat echocardiogram at 3 years of age was normal. EEG studies showed mild disorganization of the background but no epileptiform activity.
By 3½ years of age, he had global developmental delay, proximal myopathy, slowing of growth, and feeding difficulties. He is currently awaiting a gastrostomy tube insertion and continues to require regular occupational and physical therapy.
A skeletal muscle biopsy showed an increased number of fibers with subsarcolemmal aggregates of mitochondria on the SDH staining, and there were numerous COX-intermediate fibers. There were also multiple mini-cores noted on electron microscopy and mitochondrial pleomorphism. Skeletal muscle respiratory chain enzymes showed that complex IV activity was low relative to complex II and borderline low relative to citrate synthase.
The patient was studied through GS using DNA extracted from blood, which identified biallelic variants in the nuclear-encoded, mitochondrial alanyl-tRNA synthetase gene (AARS2). A missense variant NM_020745.3(AARS2):c.2870C>T, NP_065796.1(AARS2):p.(Ser957Leu) and a 4.1 kb intragenic deletion spanning exons 5 through 7 (of 22) NC_000006.12:g.44274355_44278496del. The deletion was identified using ClinSV, which is a bioinformatic tool that integrates depth of coverage, discordant pairs, and split reads to detect SV from GS data [24] and by visual inspection of BAM files in the IGV browser [45] (Figure 2).
AARS2 intragenic deletions affecting the same exons as P2 have been previously identified through ES and GS in two unrelated patients with AARS2-related mitochondrial disease [46,47]. However, the missense variant NM_020745.3(AARS2):c.2870C>T p.(Ser957Leu) has not been previously reported in other clinical cases. The serine at position 957 has very high evolutionary conservation, and the change to leucine represents a major amino acid change. It is located in the C-terminal globular subdomain of the AARS2 protein [48]. In silico software predicts this variant to be disease-causing (Table S2). It has been observed in the gnomAD population database at a frequency of 0.0000199 (5/251276) and has not been reported in a homozygous state.
PCR amplification of cDNA from fibroblasts identified three differently spliced transcripts resulting from the allele with the deletion. Two of these transcripts are predicted to induce a frameshift and a premature truncation NP_065796.2:p.(Glu251Serfs*27), NP_065796.2:p.(Gly98Profs*6) while the third transcript resulted in a shorter protein lacking 257 amino acids from the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase IIc domain NP_065796.2:p (Glu146_Glu403del) (Figure S1). Using primers designed to amplify only the allele without the deletion (Primer set B, Table S1) showed the NM_020745.3(AARS2):c.2870C>T p.Ser957Leu variant appearing as hemizygous in the patient’s cDNA (Figure S2), and together, these results were indicative of compound heterozygosity. This was also confirmed by segregation testing using parental DNA.
To investigate the functional impact of the AARS2 variants on OXPHOS complexes, we performed Western blotting of fibroblasts using a cocktail of antibodies including NDUFB8, SDHB, UQCRC2, COXII, and ATP5A (OXPHOS human WB antibody cocktail, Abcam #ab11041). P2 fibroblast extracts showed decreased protein expression of OXPHOS COXII (Complex IV) and NDUFB8 (Complex I) subunits compared to control cells, while the levels of other complexes were normal (Figure 3).
Interestingly, decreased OXPHOS complex levels in fibroblasts in other patients with AARS2 variants have not always been observed [50], and in some cases despite showing decreased AARS2 protein levels in fibroblasts, levels of OXPHOS proteins were only decreased in skeletal and cardiac muscle [46]. Variable reductions of different OXPHOS complexes and tissue specificity have been seen in other aminoacyl tRNA synthetases [51] and could be related to the type and location of the pathogenic variant. For instance, it has been proposed that patients with two “severe” or loss of function variants have an early-onset cardiomyopathy phenotype, due to increased requirements for mitochondrial protein synthesis in the developing heart, whereas patients with at least one variant leading to only a partial loss of protein levels or moderate reduction in aminoacylation activity could be associated with a predominant childhood-to-adulthood neurological phenotype [48]. Interestingly, distinct clinical presentations in the patients with the 4.1 kb deletion, but with different missense variants in trans have been observed. The deletion in combination with the p.(Arg580Trp) (located in the β-barrel domain and impacting the stability of the AARS2 protein) resulted in cardiomyopathy [46]. However, the deletion in combination with a p.(Arg199Cys) variant (located in the catalytic residue involved in ATP binding at the aminoacylation domain) [47,48] or the p.(Ser957Leu) variant identified in P2 (located in the C- terminal globular domain) was not associated with cardiomyopathy [47]. Further studies to experimentally measure the tRNA aminoacylation rate could contribute to our understanding of this potential association between genotype and phenotype.
Overall, using a GS approach allowed the prioritization and subsequently diagnostic confirmation of the AARS2 variants in P2. This highlights the utility of GS and bioinformatic tools such as ClinSV to detect nuclear SVs.

3.3. Genome Sequencing Detects a Large Mitochondrial DNA Deletion

Patient P3 is a 14-year-old girl of unrelated parents. Her initial presentation was that of diabetic ketoacidosis at 4 years of age. Over the next 3 years, she developed sensorineural hearing loss, ptosis, CPEO, retinitis pigmentosa, short stature, and failure to thrive. She has required hormone replacement therapy for pubertal failure. Her cognition is normal and a brain MRI scan has been normal. Cardiology assessments have been normal including an echocardiogram, 12 lead electrocardiogram, and 24-h Holter monitoring.
A single large-scale pathogenic deletion in the mtDNA at a 50% level of heteroplasmy in blood was identified by GS (Figure 4a). This 9031 bp deletion encompasses 23 genes from MT-CO1 to MT-CYB NC_012920.1:m.5965_14996del9031 (Figure 4b). Other single deletions in multiple individuals overlapping the deletion detected in P3 associated with mtDNA Deletion Syndromes have been previously reported in the MitoBreak database, and the phenotype in this patient is consistent with Kearns–Sayre syndrome (MIM 530000) [52].
The case discussed here demonstrates the capacity of GS to identify large heteroplasmic mtDNA deletions in blood. It is worth noting that mtDNA deletions in blood, similar to the case presented here, are often easier to detect in the pediatric population [53]. However, in adults, deletions in the mtDNA are often undetectable in blood and are preferentially found in post-mitotic tissues. Consequently, other tissues such as skeletal muscle may be a better source of DNA for testing in older individuals [54].
Change in heteroplasmy levels of single large-scale mtDNA deletions in mitotic tissues is exemplified by the natural history of some patients with Pearson syndrome (MIM 557000). Some infants with a single large-scale mtDNA deletion detectable in the blood often present with severe multisystemic disease with predominant hematological manifestations [55]. Interestingly, patients who survive beyond infancy can spontaneously recover from the hematological dysfunction, and the mtDNA deletion is no longer detectable in blood. However, in post-mitotic skeletal muscle, the deletion can accumulate with the phenotype evolving into Kearns–Sayre syndrome [53,56].

4. Discussion

Before the widespread adoption of MPS, the diagnostic approach to mitochondrial diseases often included invasive studies such as muscle biopsies as a first-line approach. However, more recently, many centers have evolved to a first-line MPS approach using DNA from blood or saliva in order to obviate the need for invasive testing, and so biopsies are needed only in selected cases such as when performing functional studies, testing mutant load in different tissues, or in adults with a suspected mtDNA deletion [57].
Using GS as a first-line molecular approach to diagnose patients with mitochondrial diseases has many advantages. One of the main benefits is the ability to efficiently analyze mtDNA as illustrated in P1 and P3. Unlike ES, GS does not require capture methods or “off-target” analysis, and as illustrated by P1, GS can achieve a high sequencing depth to detect low levels of heteroplasmy.
GS can also detect large mtDNA deletions as exemplified in P3. Moreover, PCR-free GS can accurately estimate an individual’s heteroplasmy levels using the relative read counts. In contrast, alternative MPS approaches for whole mtDNA sequencing often need a single long-range PCR step that may preferentially replicate shorter amplicons leading to amplification bias, and therefore, the heteroplasmy levels of a mtDNA deletion could be overestimated [58]. Therefore, additional quantitative approaches such as real-time PCR assays are needed to calculate heteroplasmy levels reliably [59]. Another potential problem with PCR-based approaches is that if SNVs are located at primer binding sites, the amplification efficiency may be affected [60].
As highlighted by P2 and P3, GS enables the detection of SVs in the nuclear and mitochondrial genomes, leveraging three independent lines of evidence: changes in read depth, split, and spanning reads. Copy number variants can also be identified from ES data, albeit only using changes in read depth [61]. For instance, an AARS2 intragenic deletion also affecting the same exons as in P2 has been previously identified using ES [47]. However, GS is more reliable in detecting SV as the breakpoints can fall in non-coding regions. The data permit efficient interrogation of the distance between read pairs, split-reads, and they also have a more even sequencing coverage to use in read depth strategies [62]. Moreover, compared to ES, GS can achieve a more complete coverage of coding regions in clinically relevant genes, and therefore, GS could also be more effective in detecting SNV in the exome [63,64].
In contrast to ES, GS has the advantage that non-coding regions can be interrogated. However, the challenge remains in prioritizing and interpreting such variants, since the current understanding of the significance of variation in these regions is limited. Nevertheless, it is likely that bioinformatic analysis of non-coding regions will improve in the near future [65]. Therefore, as improved algorithmic approaches become available, GS provides the opportunity for continuing re-analysis of unresolved cases. Current practical strategies to prioritize and interpret non-coding regions such as deep intronic variants include targeted re-analysis of GS data in cases where a “single hit” in a coding region of a gene with a strong phenotype match is identified and/or performance of targeted RT-PCR [66], or using complementary “omic” approaches such as transcriptomics or RNA sequencing [67].

5. Conclusions

With reducing costs of sequencing, GS is a reliable option for first-tier diagnostic testing of patients with suspected mitochondrial disease. However, to date, no direct comparison between GS and ES have been published for mitochondrial disorders. Such studies are needed to provide guidance for implementation in health care settings, evaluation of cost-effectiveness, and guidance to overcome other potential barriers such as issues relating to computational and data storage infrastructure.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/genes12040607/s1, Table S1. Primers used for MT-TL1 and AARS2 analyses, Table S2. Pathogenicity predictions of the NM_020745.3(AARS2):c.2870C>T, p.Ser957Leu variant found in P2, Figure S1: AARS2 deletion in P2 leads to three mutant transcripts, Figure S2. Sanger sequencing of allele specific AARS2 PCR products in P2.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.R.T. and J.C.; software, A.E.M. and M.J.C.; data curation, R.R., A.G.C., N.L.B.; formal analysis, R.R., A.G.C., N.L.B., A.E.W.; investigation, D.C., M.P.K., R.R.; resources, D.C., M.P.K.; supervision, A.G.C., D.R.T. and J.C.; funding acquisition, D.R.T. and J.C.; writing—original draft preparation, R.R.; writing—review and editing, A.G.C., N.L.B., A.E.W., D.C., M.P.K., A.E.M., M.J.C., D.R.T. and J.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by a grant from the Australian Genomics Health Alliance, which is funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) 1113531 (J.C., D.R.T.) as well as other NHMRC grants and fellowships 1164479 (D.R.T., J.C.); 1155244 (D.R.T.), plus grants from the US Department of Defense Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs PR170396 (D.R.T., J.C.), the Victorian Government’s Operational Infrastructure Support Program (D.R.T., J.C.), the Australian Mito Foundation (A.G.C., D.R.T., J.C.), the Vincent Chiodo Charitable Trust (D.R.T.) and the New South Wales Ministry of Health-funded Luminesce Alliance (M.J.C.). The Chair in Genomic Medicine awarded to J.C. is generously supported by The Royal Children’s Hospital Foundation. We are grateful to the Crane and Perkins families for their generous financial support.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Royal Melbourne Hospital (HREC/16/MH251, 9 January 2017). Parents provided written consent for participation in the study.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Rahman, J.; Rahman, S. Mitochondrial medicine in the omics era. Lancet 2018, 391, 2560–2574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Stenton, S.L.; Prokisch, H. Genetics of mitochondrial diseases: Identifying mutations to help diagnosis. EBioMedicine 2020, 56, 102784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Gorman, G.S.; Chinnery, P.F.; DiMauro, S.; Hirano, M.; Koga, Y.; McFarland, R.; Suomalainen, A.; Thorburn, D.R.; Zeviani, M.; Turnbull, D.M. Mitochondrial diseases. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers. 2016, 2, 16080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wagner, M.; Berutti, R.; Lorenz-Depiereux, B.; Graf, E.; Eckstein, G.; Mayr, J.A.; Meitinger, T.; Ahting, U.; Prokisch, H.; Strom, T.M.; et al. Mitochondrial DNA mutation analysis from exome sequencing-A more holistic approach in diagnostics of suspected mitochondrial disease. J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 2019, 42, 909–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Haack, T.B.; Haberberger, B.; Frisch, E.M.; Wieland, T.; Iuso, A.; Gorza, M.; Strecker, V.; Graf, E.; Mayr, J.A.; Herberg, U.; et al. Molecular diagnosis in mitochondrial complex I deficiency using exome sequencing. J. Med. Genet. 2012, 49, 277–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Taylor, R.W.; Pyle, A.; Griffin, H.; Blakely, E.L.; Duff, J.; He, L.; Smertenko, T.; Alston, C.L.; Neeve, V.C.; Best, A.; et al. Use of whole-exome sequencing to determine the genetic basis of multiple mitochondrial respiratory chain complex deficiencies. JAMA 2014, 312, 68–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Ohtake, A.; Murayama, K.; Mori, M.; Harashima, H.; Yamazaki, T.; Tamaru, S.; Yamashita, Y.; Kishita, Y.; Nakachi, Y.; Kohda, M.; et al. Diagnosis and molecular basis of mitochondrial respiratory chain disorders: Exome sequencing for disease gene identification. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2014, 1840, 1355–1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Wortmann, S.B.; Koolen, D.A.; Smeitink, J.A.; van den Heuvel, L.; Rodenburg, R.J. Whole exome sequencing of suspected mitochondrial patients in clinical practice. J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 2015, 38, 437–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Legati, A.; Reyes, A.; Nasca, A.; Invernizzi, F.; Lamantea, E.; Tiranti, V.; Garavaglia, B.; Lamperti, C.; Ardissone, A.; Moroni, I.; et al. New genes and pathomechanisms in mitochondrial disorders unraveled by NGS technologies. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2016, 1857, 1326–1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kohda, M.; Tokuzawa, Y.; Kishita, Y.; Nyuzuki, H.; Moriyama, Y.; Mizuno, Y.; Hirata, T.; Yatsuka, Y.; Yamashita-Sugahara, Y.; Nakachi, Y.; et al. A Comprehensive Genomic Analysis Reveals the Genetic Landscape of Mitochondrial Respiratory Chain Complex Deficiencies. PLoS Genet. 2016, 12, e1005679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pronicka, E.; Piekutowska-Abramczuk, D.; Ciara, E.; Trubicka, J.; Rokicki, D.; Karkucinska-Wieckowska, A.; Pajdowska, M.; Jurkiewicz, E.; Halat, P.; Kosinska, J.; et al. New perspective in diagnostics of mitochondrial disorders: Two years’ experience with whole-exome sequencing at a national paediatric centre. J. Transl. Med. 2016, 14, 174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Kremer, L.S.; Bader, D.M.; Mertes, C.; Kopajtich, R.; Pichler, G.; Iuso, A.; Haack, T.B.; Graf, E.; Schwarzmayr, T.; Terrile, C.; et al. Genetic diagnosis of Mendelian disorders via RNA sequencing. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 15824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Puusepp, S.; Reinson, K.; Pajusalu, S.; Murumets, U.; Oiglane-Shlik, E.; Rein, R.; Talvik, I.; Rodenburg, R.J.; Ounap, K. Effectiveness of whole exome sequencing in unsolved patients with a clinical suspicion of a mitochondrial disorder in Estonia. Mol. Genet. Metab. Rep. 2018, 15, 80–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Theunissen, T.E.J.; Nguyen, M.; Kamps, R.; Hendrickx, A.T.; Sallevelt, S.; Gottschalk, R.W.H.; Calis, C.M.; Stassen, A.P.M.; de Koning, B.; Mulder-Den Hartog, E.N.M.; et al. Whole exome sequencing is the preferred strategy to identify the genetic defect in patients with a probable or possible mitochondrial cause. Front. Genet. 2018, 9, 400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Riley, L.G.; Cowley, M.J.; Gayevskiy, V.; Minoche, A.E.; Puttick, C.; Thorburn, D.R.; Rius, R.; Compton, A.G.; Menezes, M.J.; Bhattacharya, K.; et al. The diagnostic utility of genome sequencing in a pediatric cohort with suspected mitochondrial disease. Genet. Med. 2020, 22, 1254–1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Stark, Z.; Boughtwood, T.; Phillips, P.; Christodoulou, J.; Hansen, D.P.; Braithwaite, J.; Newson, A.J.; Gaff, C.L.; Sinclair, A.H.; North, K.N. Australian genomics: A federated model for integrating genomics into healthcare. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2019, 105, 7–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Morava, E.; van den Heuvel, L.; Hol, F.; de Vries, M.C.; Hogeveen, M.; Rodenburg, R.J.; Smeitink, J.A. Mitochondrial disease criteria: Diagnostic applications in children. Neurology 2006, 67, 1823–1826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Li, H.; Durbin, R. Fast and accurate long-read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 2010, 26, 589–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. DePristo, M.A.; Banks, E.; Poplin, R.; Garimella, K.V.; Maguire, J.R.; Hartl, C.; Philippakis, A.A.; del Angel, G.; Rivas, M.A.; Hanna, M.; et al. A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nat. Genet. 2011, 43, 491–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. McLaren, W.; Gil, L.; Hunt, S.E.; Riat, H.S.; Ritchie, G.R.; Thormann, A.; Flicek, P.; Cunningham, F. The ensembl variant effect predictor. Genome Biol. 2016, 17, 122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Paila, U.; Chapman, B.A.; Kirchner, R.; Quinlan, A.R. GEMINI: Integrative exploration of genetic variation and genome annotations. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2013, 9, e1003153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Gayevskiy, V.; Roscioli, T.; Dinger, M.E.; Cowley, M.J. Seave: A comprehensive web platform for storing and interrogating human genomic variation. Bioinformatics 2019, 35, 122–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Puttick, C.; Kumar, K.R.; Davis, R.L.; Pinese, M.; Thomas, D.M.; Dinger, M.E.; Sue, C.M.; Cowley, M.J. Mity: A highly sensitive mitochondrial variant analysis pipeline for whole genome sequencing data. bioRxiv 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Minoche, A.E.; Lundie, B.; Peters, G.B.; Ohnesorg, T.; Pinese, M.; Thomas, D.M.; Zankl, A.; Roscioli, T.; Schonrock, N.; Kummerfeld, S.; et al. ClinSV: Clinical grade structural and copy number variant detection from whole genome sequencing data. Genome Med. 2021, 13, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ng, P.C.; Henikoff, S. SIFT: Predicting amino acid changes that affect protein function. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31, 3812–3814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Schwarz, J.M.; Rodelsperger, C.; Schuelke, M.; Seelow, D. MutationTaster evaluates disease-causing potential of sequence alterations. Nat. Methods 2010, 7, 575–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Choi, Y.; Sims, G.E.; Murphy, S.; Miller, J.R.; Chan, A.P. Predicting the functional effect of amino acid substitutions and indels. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e46688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Kircher, M.; Witten, D.M.; Jain, P.; O’Roak, B.J.; Cooper, G.M.; Shendure, J. A general framework for estimating the relative pathogenicity of human genetic variants. Nat. Genet. 2014, 46, 310–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Sonney, S.; Leipzig, J.; Lott, M.T.; Zhang, S.; Procaccio, V.; Wallace, D.C.; Sondheimer, N. Predicting the pathogenicity of novel variants in mitochondrial tRNA with MitoTIP. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2017, 13, e1005867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Niroula, A.; Vihinen, M. PON-mt-tRNA: A multifactorial probability-based method for classification of mitochondrial tRNA variations. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, 2020–2027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Preste, R.; Vitale, O.; Clima, R.; Gasparre, G.; Attimonelli, M. HmtVar: A new resource for human mitochondrial variations and pathogenicity data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, D1202–D1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Richards, S.; Aziz, N.; Bale, S.; Bick, D.; Das, S.; Gastier-Foster, J.; Grody, W.W.; Hegde, M.; Lyon, E.; Spector, E.; et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: A joint consensus recommendation of the american college of medical genetics and genomics and the association for molecular pathology. Genet. Med. 2015, 17, 405–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Akesson, L.S.; Eggers, S.; Love, C.J.; Chong, B.; Krzesinski, E.I.; Brown, N.J.; Tan, T.Y.; Richmond, C.M.; Thorburn, D.R.; Christodoulou, J.; et al. Early diagnosis of Pearson syndrome in neonatal intensive care following rapid mitochondrial genome sequencing in tandem with exome sequencing. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2019, 27, 1821–1826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Kukat, A.; Kukat, C.; Brocher, J.; Schafer, I.; Krohne, G.; Trounce, I.A.; Villani, G.; Seibel, P. Generation of rho0 cells utilizing a mitochondrially targeted restriction endonuclease and comparative analyses. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36, e44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Lake, N.J.; Webb, B.D.; Stroud, D.A.; Richman, T.R.; Ruzzenente, B.; Compton, A.G.; Mountford, H.S.; Pulman, J.; Zangarelli, C.; Rio, M.; et al. Biallelic Mutations in MRPS34 lead to instability of the small mitoribosomal subunit and leigh syndrome. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2017, 101, 239–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Rohlin, A.; Wernersson, J.; Engwall, Y.; Wiklund, L.; Bjork, J.; Nordling, M. Parallel sequencing used in detection of mosaic mutations: Comparison with four diagnostic DNA screening techniques. Hum. Mutat. 2009, 30, 1012–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lott, M.T.; Leipzig, J.N.; Derbeneva, O.; Xie, H.M.; Chalkia, D.; Sarmady, M.; Procaccio, V.; Wallace, D.C. mtDNA variation and analysis using mitomap and mitomaster. Curr. Protoc. Bioinform. 2013, 44, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Putz, J.; Dupuis, B.; Sissler, M.; Florentz, C. Mamit-tRNA, a database of mammalian mitochondrial tRNA primary and secondary structures. RNA 2007, 13, 1184–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Karczewski, K.J.; Francioli, L.C.; Tiao, G.; Cummings, B.B.; Alfoldi, J.; Wang, Q.; Collins, R.L.; Laricchia, K.M.; Ganna, A.; Birnbaum, D.P.; et al. The mutational constraint spectrum quantified from variation in 141,456 humans. Nature 2020, 581, 434–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Alston, C.L.; Bender, A.; Hargreaves, I.P.; Mundy, H.; Deshpande, C.; Klopstock, T.; McFarland, R.; Horvath, R.; Taylor, R.W. The pathogenic m.3243A>T mitochondrial DNA mutation is associated with a variable neurological phenotype. Neuromuscul. Disord. 2010, 20, 403–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Czell, D.; Abicht, A.; Hench, J.; Weber, M. Exercise-induced myalgia and rhabdomyolysis in a patient with the rare m.3243A>T mtDNA mutation. BMJ Case Rep. 2012, 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Ikeda, T.; Osaka, H.; Shimbo, H.; Tajika, M.; Yamazaki, M.; Ueda, A.; Murayama, K.; Yamagata, T. Mitochondrial DNA 3243A>T mutation in a patient with MELAS syndrome. Hum. Genome Var. 2018, 5, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Sohm, B.; Frugier, M.; Brule, H.; Olszak, K.; Przykorska, A.; Florentz, C. Towards understanding human mitochondrial leucine aminoacylation identity. J. Mol. Biol. 2003, 328, 995–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Grady, J.P.; Pickett, S.J.; Ng, Y.S.; Alston, C.L.; Blakely, E.L.; Hardy, S.A.; Feeney, C.L.; Bright, A.A.; Schaefer, A.M.; Gorman, G.S.; et al. MtDNA heteroplasmy level and copy number indicate disease burden in m.3243A>G mitochondrial disease. EMBO Mol. Med. 2018, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Robinson, J.T.; Thorvaldsdottir, H.; Winckler, W.; Guttman, M.; Lander, E.S.; Getz, G.; Mesirov, J.P. Integrative genomics viewer. Nat. Biotechnol. 2011, 29, 24–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Sommerville, E.W.; Zhou, X.L.; Olahova, M.; Jenkins, J.; Euro, L.; Konovalova, S.; Hilander, T.; Pyle, A.; He, L.; Habeebu, S.; et al. Instability of the mitochondrial alanyl-tRNA synthetase underlies fatal infantile-onset cardiomyopathy. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2019, 28, 258–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Srivastava, S.; Butala, A.; Mahida, S.; Richter, J.; Mu, W.; Poretti, A.; Vernon, H.; VanGerpen, J.; Atwal, P.S.; Middlebrooks, E.H.; et al. Expansion of the clinical spectrum associated with AARS2-related disorders. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 2019, 179, 1556–1564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Euro, L.; Konovalova, S.; Asin-Cayuela, J.; Tulinius, M.; Griffin, H.; Horvath, R.; Taylor, R.W.; Chinnery, P.F.; Schara, U.; Thorburn, D.R.; et al. Structural modeling of tissue-specific mitochondrial alanyl-tRNA synthetase (AARS2) defects predicts differential effects on aminoacylation. Front. Genet. 2015, 6, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Hock, D.H.; Reljic, B.; Ang, C.S.; Muellner-Wong, L.; Mountford, H.S.; Compton, A.G.; Ryan, M.T.; Thorburn, D.R.; Stroud, D.A. HIGD2A is Required for Assembly of the COX3 Module of Human Mitochondrial Complex IV. Mol. Cell Proteom. 2020, 19, 1145–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Dallabona, C.; Diodato, D.; Kevelam, S.H.; Haack, T.B.; Wong, L.J.; Salomons, G.S.; Baruffini, E.; Melchionda, L.; Mariotti, C.; Strom, T.M.; et al. Novel (ovario) leukodystrophy related to AARS2 mutations. Neurology 2014, 82, 2063–2071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Gonzalez-Serrano, L.E.; Chihade, J.W.; Sissler, M. When a common biological role does not imply common disease outcomes: Disparate pathology linked to human mitochondrial aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. J. Biol. Chem. 2019, 294, 5309–5320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Damas, J.; Carneiro, J.; Amorim, A.; Pereira, F. MitoBreak: The mitochondrial DNA breakpoints database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42, D1261–D1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Broomfield, A.; Sweeney, M.G.; Woodward, C.E.; Fratter, C.; Morris, A.M.; Leonard, J.V.; Abulhoul, L.; Grunewald, S.; Clayton, P.T.; Hanna, M.G.; et al. Paediatric single mitochondrial DNA deletion disorders: An overlapping spectrum of disease. J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 2015, 38, 445–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Sadikovic, B.; Wang, J.; El-Hattab, A.W.; Landsverk, M.; Douglas, G.; Brundage, E.K.; Craigen, W.J.; Schmitt, E.S.; Wong, L.J. Sequence homology at the breakpoint and clinical phenotype of mitochondrial DNA deletion syndromes. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e15687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Lee, H.F.; Lee, H.J.; Chi, C.S.; Tsai, C.R.; Chang, T.K.; Wang, C.J. The neurological evolution of Pearson syndrome: Case report and literature review. Eur. J. Paediatr. Neurol. 2007, 11, 208–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Farruggia, P.; Di Cataldo, A.; Pinto, R.M.; Palmisani, E.; Macaluso, A.; Valvo, L.L.; Cantarini, M.E.; Tornesello, A.; Corti, P.; Fioredda, F.; et al. Pearson syndrome: A retrospective cohort study from the marrow failure study group of A.I.E.O.P. (Associazione Italiana Emato-Oncologia Pediatrica). JIMD Rep. 2016, 26, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Wortmann, S.B.; Mayr, J.A.; Nuoffer, J.M.; Prokisch, H.; Sperl, W. A guideline for the diagnosis of pediatric mitochondrial disease: The value of muscle and skin biopsies in the genetics era. Neuropediatrics 2017, 48, 309–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zambelli, F.; Vancampenhout, K.; Daneels, D.; Brown, D.; Mertens, J.; Van Dooren, S.; Caljon, B.; Gianaroli, L.; Sermon, K.; Voet, T.; et al. Accurate and comprehensive analysis of single nucleotide variants and large deletions of the human mitochondrial genome in DNA and single cells. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2017, 25, 1229–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Grady, J.P.; Murphy, J.L.; Blakely, E.L.; Haller, R.G.; Taylor, R.W.; Turnbull, D.M.; Tuppen, H.A. Accurate measurement of mitochondrial DNA deletion level and copy number differences in human skeletal muscle. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e114462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. Cui, H.; Li, F.; Chen, D.; Wang, G.; Truong, C.K.; Enns, G.M.; Graham, B.; Milone, M.; Landsverk, M.L.; Wang, J.; et al. Comprehensive next-generation sequence analyses of the entire mitochondrial genome reveal new insights into the molecular diagnosis of mitochondrial DNA disorders. Genet. Med. 2013, 15, 388–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Kadalayil, L.; Rafiq, S.; Rose-Zerilli, M.J.; Pengelly, R.J.; Parker, H.; Oscier, D.; Strefford, J.C.; Tapper, W.J.; Gibson, J.; Ennis, S.; et al. Exome sequence read depth methods for identifying copy number changes. Brief. Bioinform. 2015, 16, 380–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Gross, A.M.; Ajay, S.S.; Rajan, V.; Brown, C.; Bluske, K.; Burns, N.J.; Chawla, A.; Coffey, A.J.; Malhotra, A.; Scocchia, A.; et al. Copy-number variants in clinical genome sequencing: Deployment and interpretation for rare and undiagnosed disease. Genet. Med. 2019, 21, 1121–1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Sanghvi, R.V.; Buhay, C.J.; Powell, B.C.; Tsai, E.A.; Dorschner, M.O.; Hong, C.S.; Lebo, M.S.; Sasson, A.; Hanna, D.S.; McGee, S.; et al. Characterizing reduced coverage regions through comparison of exome and genome sequencing data across 10 centers. Genet. Med. 2018, 20, 855–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Meienberg, J.; Bruggmann, R.; Oexle, K.; Matyas, G. Clinical sequencing: Is WGS the better WES? Hum. Genet. 2016, 135, 359–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Smedley, D.; Schubach, M.; Jacobsen, J.O.B.; Kohler, S.; Zemojtel, T.; Spielmann, M.; Jager, M.; Hochheiser, H.; Washington, N.L.; McMurry, J.A.; et al. A whole-genome analysis framework for effective identification of pathogenic regulatory variants in mendelian disease. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2016, 99, 595–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Rius, R.; Riley, L.G.; Guo, Y.; Menezes, M.; Compton, A.G.; Van Bergen, N.J.; Gayevskiy, V.; Cowley, M.J.; Cummings, B.B.; Adams, L.; et al. Cryptic intronic NBAS variant reveals the genetic basis of recurrent liver failure in a child. Mol. Genet. Metab. 2019, 126, 77–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Helman, G.; Compton, A.G.; Hock, D.H.; Walkiewicz, M.; Brett, G.R.; Pais, L.; Tan, T.Y.; De Paoli-Iseppi, R.; Clark, M.B.; Christodoulou, J.; et al. Multiomic analysis elucidates Complex I deficiency caused by a deep intronic variant in NDUFB10. Hum. Mutat. 2020, 42, 19–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. GS detects low levels of heteroplasmy in blood of P1. (a) Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV) browser shows the identification of m.3243A>T in blood. The black arrow points to the variant (in red) present in 79 of 4235 reads aligned to the m.3243 position. (b) Partial electropherogram showing the heteroplasmic m.3243A>T variant detected in urine. (c) IGV browser shows the identification of m.3243A>T in muscle, the variant (in red) is present in 6108 of 8799 reads aligned to the m.3243 position. (d) Mamit-tRNA [38] schematic of the mt-tRNALeu(UUR) cloverleaf secondary structure showing in black positions of reported pathogenic variants. The m.3243A>T variant found in P1 is highlighted with a star and is located in the D-loop of the mt-tRNALeu(UUR).
Figure 1. GS detects low levels of heteroplasmy in blood of P1. (a) Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV) browser shows the identification of m.3243A>T in blood. The black arrow points to the variant (in red) present in 79 of 4235 reads aligned to the m.3243 position. (b) Partial electropherogram showing the heteroplasmic m.3243A>T variant detected in urine. (c) IGV browser shows the identification of m.3243A>T in muscle, the variant (in red) is present in 6108 of 8799 reads aligned to the m.3243 position. (d) Mamit-tRNA [38] schematic of the mt-tRNALeu(UUR) cloverleaf secondary structure showing in black positions of reported pathogenic variants. The m.3243A>T variant found in P1 is highlighted with a star and is located in the D-loop of the mt-tRNALeu(UUR).
Genes 12 00607 g001aGenes 12 00607 g001b
Figure 2. GS detects an intragenic nuclear DNA deletion in AARS2 in P2. IGV coverage plot shows ≈50% fewer reads in the region spanning the deletion. The read pairs that are colored red are flanking the deletion.
Figure 2. GS detects an intragenic nuclear DNA deletion in AARS2 in P2. IGV coverage plot shows ≈50% fewer reads in the region spanning the deletion. The read pairs that are colored red are flanking the deletion.
Genes 12 00607 g002
Figure 3. OXPHOS protein expression in patient P2 AARS2 and control fibroblasts. (a) Representative Western blot showing decreased protein levels of NDUFB8 (CI) and COXII (CIV) in patient P2 similar to patient A2 (positive control), who harbors likely pathogenic AARS2 variants c.1874G>A (p.Arg625His) and c.665C>T (p.Thr222Ile) in trans [49]; VDAC1 (porin) was used as a mitochondrial loading control. (b) Densitometry analysis suggests 85% lower levels of COXII (CIV) in both P2 and A2, and suggested 85% lower NDUFB8 (CI) in P2 and 65% lower in A2 relative to controls.
Figure 3. OXPHOS protein expression in patient P2 AARS2 and control fibroblasts. (a) Representative Western blot showing decreased protein levels of NDUFB8 (CI) and COXII (CIV) in patient P2 similar to patient A2 (positive control), who harbors likely pathogenic AARS2 variants c.1874G>A (p.Arg625His) and c.665C>T (p.Thr222Ile) in trans [49]; VDAC1 (porin) was used as a mitochondrial loading control. (b) Densitometry analysis suggests 85% lower levels of COXII (CIV) in both P2 and A2, and suggested 85% lower NDUFB8 (CI) in P2 and 65% lower in A2 relative to controls.
Genes 12 00607 g003
Figure 4. Deletion in the mtDNA in P3 identified by GS. (a) IGV coverage plot shows ≈50% fewer reads in the area spanning 9031bp of the mtDNA; (b) MitoBreak figure depicts the single large-scale heteroplasmic deletion spanning 23 mitochondrial genes (black bar).
Figure 4. Deletion in the mtDNA in P3 identified by GS. (a) IGV coverage plot shows ≈50% fewer reads in the area spanning 9031bp of the mtDNA; (b) MitoBreak figure depicts the single large-scale heteroplasmic deletion spanning 23 mitochondrial genes (black bar).
Genes 12 00607 g004
Table 1. Pathogenicity predictions of the NC_012920.1(MT-TL1):m.3243A>T variant in P1.
Table 1. Pathogenicity predictions of the NC_012920.1(MT-TL1):m.3243A>T variant in P1.
In Silico ToolPrediction (Score)Reference
MitoTIPPossibly Pathogenic (58.8%)[29]
PON-mt-tRNALikely pathogenic (0.73)[30]
HmtVarPathogenic (0.8)[31]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rius, R.; Compton, A.G.; Baker, N.L.; Welch, A.E.; Coman, D.; Kava, M.P.; Minoche, A.E.; Cowley, M.J.; Thorburn, D.R.; Christodoulou, J. Application of Genome Sequencing from Blood to Diagnose Mitochondrial Diseases. Genes 2021, 12, 607. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12040607

AMA Style

Rius R, Compton AG, Baker NL, Welch AE, Coman D, Kava MP, Minoche AE, Cowley MJ, Thorburn DR, Christodoulou J. Application of Genome Sequencing from Blood to Diagnose Mitochondrial Diseases. Genes. 2021; 12(4):607. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12040607

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rius, Rocio, Alison G. Compton, Naomi L. Baker, AnneMarie E. Welch, David Coman, Maina P. Kava, Andre E. Minoche, Mark J. Cowley, David R. Thorburn, and John Christodoulou. 2021. "Application of Genome Sequencing from Blood to Diagnose Mitochondrial Diseases" Genes 12, no. 4: 607. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12040607

APA Style

Rius, R., Compton, A. G., Baker, N. L., Welch, A. E., Coman, D., Kava, M. P., Minoche, A. E., Cowley, M. J., Thorburn, D. R., & Christodoulou, J. (2021). Application of Genome Sequencing from Blood to Diagnose Mitochondrial Diseases. Genes, 12(4), 607. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12040607

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop