Next Article in Journal
RNA Epigenetics: Fine-Tuning Chromatin Plasticity and Transcriptional Regulation, and the Implications in Human Diseases
Previous Article in Journal
Variation in a Newly Identified Caprine KRTAP Gene Is Associated with Raw Cashmere Fiber Weight in Longdong Cashmere Goats
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Molecular Cloning and Functional Analysis of 1-Deoxy-D-Xylulose 5-Phosphate Reductoisomerase from Santalum album

1
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Botany, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, China
2
Computer Science Department, University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
3
Sugarcane Research Institute, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanning 530007, China
4
Independent Researcher, P.O. Box 7, Ikenobe 3011-2, Kagawa-ken 761-0799, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally.
Genes 2021, 12(5), 626; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12050626
Submission received: 15 March 2021 / Revised: 16 April 2021 / Accepted: 19 April 2021 / Published: 22 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Genetics and Genomics)

Abstract

:
Sandalwood (Santalum album L.) heartwood-derived essential oil contains a high content of sesquiterpenoids that are economically highly valued and widely used in the fragrance industry. Sesquiterpenoids are biosynthesized via the mevalonate acid and methylerythritol phosphate (MEP) pathways, which are also the sources of precursors for photosynthetic pigments. 1-deoxy-D-xylulose-5-phosphate reductoisomerase (DXR) is a secondary rate-limiting enzyme in the MEP pathway. In this paper, the 1416-bp open reading frame of SaDXR and its 897-bp promoter region, which contains putative conserved cis-elements involved in stress responsiveness (HSE and TC-rich repeats), hormone signaling (abscisic acid, gibberellin and salicylic acid) and light responsiveness, were cloned from 7-year-old S. album trees. A bioinformatics analysis suggested that SaDXR encodes a functional and conserved DXR protein. SaDXR was widely expressed in multiple tissues, including roots, twigs, stem sapwood, leaves, flowers, fruit and stem heartwood, displaying significantly higher levels in tissues with photosynthetic pigments, like twigs, leaves and flowers. SaDXR mRNA expression increased in etiolated seedlings exposed to light, and the content of chlorophylls and carotenoids was enhanced in all 35S::SaDXR transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana lines, consistent with the SaDXR expression level. SaDXR was also stimulated by MeJA and H2O2 in seedling roots. α-Santalol content decreased in response to fosmidomycin, a DXR inhibitor. These results suggest that SaDXR plays an important role in the biosynthesis of photosynthetic pigments, shifting the flux to sandalwood-specific sesquiterpenoids.

1. Introduction

Santalum album is an economically important tropical woody species of the Santalaceae family that is well known for its aromatic heartwood and essential oil [1]. The sesquiterpenoid alcohols (Z)-α-santalol, (Z)-β-santalol, (Z)-epi-β-santalol and (Z)-α-exo-bergamotol, which are the main components of S. album essential oil, play a vital fragrance-defining role in the fragrance industry [2]. These sandalwood sesquiterpenoids also possess various biological properties [3]. The formation of heartwood has a decades-long cycle due to the slow growth of the trees, and this property, coupled with overexploitation, habitat destruction and plant disease, have threatened global sandalwood resources. Compared to the long cycle times associated with artificially planting sandalwood and then laboriously harvesting and processing the heartwood, or the expensive cost of chemical synthesis of sandalwood sesquiterpenoids, metabolic engineering is a more economic and efficient system [4,5]. For this reason, it is critical to elucidate the molecular mechanism underlying the biosynthesis of sandalwood terpenoids.
Although isoprenoids are structurally and functionally the most diverse group of plant metabolites, all isoprenoids are biosynthesized from two universal precursors, isopentenyl diphosphate (IPP, C5) and dimethylallyl diphosphate (DMAPP, C5), which are derived from two distinct pathways, namely the plastidial methylerythritol phosphate (MEP) pathway and the cytoplasmic mevalonate acid (MVA) pathway (Figure 1) [6,7]. All enzymes in the MEP pathway are encoded by nuclear genes, then imported into plastids [8,9]. Consequently, the MEP pathway drives the function of the plastids and principally provides IPP and DMAPP precursors for the biosynthesis of growth hormones (gibberellins, cytokinins and abscisic acid), terpenoids (monoterpenoids and diterpenoids) and photosynthetic pigments (chlorophylls and carotenoids). Sesquiterpenoids, triterpenoids and brassinosteroids are mainly produced in the cytoplasmic MVA pathway (Figure 1). The physical cellular separation of MEP and MVA pathways in plastids and cytosol, respectively, facilitates the optimal supply of precursors required in each cell compartment, but some research suggests that there is an exchange between plastidial MEP and cytoplasmic MVA pathways via cross-talking IPP [6,10].
To date, almost all the studies that examined the molecular mechanism of the biosynthesis of sandalwood sesquiterpenoids focused on the function of downstream terpene synthases (TPSs) and cytochrome P450-dependent monooxygenase [11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. Even though 1-deoxy-D-xylulose-5-phosphate reductoisomerase (DXR), which is a rate-limiting enzyme that transforms 1-deoxy-D-xylulose 5-phosphate (DXP) to 2-C-methyl-D-erythritol 4-phosphate (MEP), controls flux through the MEP pathway [18,19], there are few studies that have focused on the function of DXRs, and there are no reports in sandalwood. DXRs play an important role in enhancing the accumulation of isoprenoids, including secondary metabolites and plastidial terpenoids (Table S1). For this reason, we studied DXR to better understand the biosynthesis of sesquiterpenoids and photosynthetic pigments (chlorophylls and carotenoids) in sandalwood.
In this study, the SaDXR gene was cloned based on the S. album transcriptome database [20]. The expression profiles of SaDXR in response to different treatments (methyl jasmonate (MeJA), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and light) and in various tissues, were assessed. Subcellular localization and promoter analysis of SaDXR were also performed. The relationship between SaDXR and the biosynthesis of chlorophylls, carotenoids, and sandalwood-specific sesquiterpenoids was illuminated by overexpressing SaDXR in Arabidopsis thaliana and assessing its response to a DXR inhibitor, fosmidomycin (FOS).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials and Treatments

Young (7-year-old) S. album trees were grown in South China Botanical Garden (SCBG), in Guangzhou, China, under natural conditions (Figure S1). Separately, fully ripe S. album seeds were collected from 15-year-old trees growing in SCBG. Seeds were sown in compost in clay pots and placed in a phytotron (75% relative humidity (RH), 28 °C) and left in the dark for 40 days. The etiolated seedlings were exposed to light. Whole seedlings were collected at 0, 1, 3, 6, and 24 h after exposure to light, wrapped in tin foil, and stored immediately in liquid nitrogen. After the remaining seeds were germinated on a sand bed (20 cm deep), seedlings 10 cm in height were transferred to plastic pots (10 cm in diameter × 12 cm high) that were filled with a mixture of sand, peat, and soil (3:1:1, v/v/v), and maintained in a greenhouse between March and November. Seedlings were grown in natural sunlight with an average day/night temperature of 25/18 °C, 70–80% RH, together with the host plant, Kuhnia rosmarnifolia Vent [21]. More developed seedlings, 30 cm in height, were transferred to a phytotron for 3 weeks, with a 16-h photoperiod at 28/23 °C, 80 µmol m−2 s−1 and 75% RH [20]. Plant roots were gently washed and placed in distilled water for 6 days, and water was changed every 2 days prior to treatments. Roots of seedlings were dipped in a solution with a final concentration of 5 mM H2O2, 1 mM (MeJA) and 20 µM FOS. Roots were harvested at 0, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 24 h and 7 days after exposure to two elicitors (H2O2 and MeJA) and inhibitor (FOS), rapidly frozen in liquid nitrogen, and frozen at −80 °C until use.
A. thaliana ecotype Columbia (Col-0) plants were grown in plastic pots containing a mixture of topsoil and vermiculite (1:2, v/v), and the pots were placed in a phytotron at 22/20°C (day/night), 70% RH and a 16-h photoperiod (100 µmol m−2s−1) until needed for transformation and to determine the content of chlorophylls and carotenoids. Transgenic plants, derived as explained in 2.8, were grown on half-strength (macro- and micro-nutrients) Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium [22] with 0.8% (w/v) agar, 3% (w/v) sucrose, and 30 mg L−1 hygromycin B to screen overexpression lines. After about two weeks, in vitro A. thaliana plants were transferred to plastic pots.

2.2. Isolation Full-Length cDNA and Genomic DNA of SaDXR from S. album

Total RNA was extracted from mature leaves of 7-year-old S. album trees using Column Plant RNAout2.0 (Tiandz Inc., Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. cDNA was reverse transcribed with M-MLV Reverse Transcriptase (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Based on the annotation of unigenes in our transcriptome database [20], the SaDXR unigene was isolated and used to design gene-specific primers for 5′ and 3′ rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) (Table S2). RACE reactions were performed with the SMARTer RACE cDNA Amplification Kit (Clontech Laboratories Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA). RACE products were cloned into the pMD18-T vector (Takara Bio Inc., Dalian, China) and sequenced. Full-length SaDXR was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using primers that were designed based on sequences by combining the 5′-RACE and 3′-RACE fragments (Table S2).
Total genomic DNA (gDNA) was isolated from mature leaves of 7-year-old S. album trees using the Column Plant DNAout kit (Tiandz, Inc.), and amplified with a pair of primers (gDNAF and gDNAR; Table S2). The obtained genomic sequence was aligned to the full-length cDNA of SaDXR to confirm introns and exons.

2.3. Sequence, Protein Structure and Phylogenetics Analysis

The SaDXR open reading frame (ORF) was blasted in NCBI (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi, accessed on 20 March 2019). The theoretical isoelectric point and molecular weight of the putative SaDXR protein were identified by ExPASy (https://www.expasy.org/, accessed on 20 March 2019). Amino acid sequences were aligned with DNAMAN version 7 and neighbor-joining phylogenetic trees were constructed using the bootstrap method on MEGA 5.1. The transmembrane domain of SaDXR was predicted by TMHMM version 2.0 (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TMHMM/, accessed on 20 March 2019). The 2D and 3D structures of SaDXR were determined by the Secondary Structure Prediction Method (SOPMA) (http://npsa-pbil.ibcp.fr/, accessed on 15 April 2019) and SWISS-MODEL (http://swissmodel.expasy.org, accessed on 15 April 2019), respectively. The gDNA sequence of SaDXR was compared to the gDNA of Vitis vinifera DXR (VvDXR) (Phytozome, accession no. GSVIVG01007752001), Populus trichocarpa DXR (PtDXR) (Phytozome, accession no. Potri.015G076200) and A. thaliana DXR (AtDXR) (Phytozome, accession no. AT5G62790).

2.4. Cloning of the SaDXR Promoter and Putative cis-Element Analysis

Fusion primer and nested integrated PCR (FPNI-PCR) [23,24] was used to isolate the upstream region of the SaDXR gene using gDNA as the template. The FPNI-PCR primers are listed in Table S2. The putative transcription start site (TSS) of the cloned promoter was predicted by the TSSP program (http://linux1.softberry.com/berry.phtml?topic=tssp&group=programs&subgroup=promoter, accessed on 15 April 2019). PlantCARE software (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html/, accessed on 15 April 2019) was used to analyze the putative cis-elements in the SaDXR promoter.

2.5. Subcellular Localization of SaDXR

The SaDXR ORF without the termination codon was amplified by the KOD FX kit (Toyobo Inc., Shanghai, China) using primers YFP-Bgl II-F and YFP-Kpn I-R (Table S2). The product was inserted into the BglII and KpnI sites of the pSAT6-EYFP-N1 vector driven by the 35S Cauliflower mosaic virus (35S) promoter. 35S::SaDXR-YFP and control 35S::YFP were introduced into mesophyll protoplasts that were extracted from the leaves of 5-week-old A. thaliana plants by polyethylene glycol (PEG)-mediated transient transformation [25]. Transformed protoplasts were incubated in light for 20 h at 20 °C (see Section 2.1), and detected using a Zeiss LSM 510 confocal laser scanning microscope (Zeiss, Jena, Germany).

2.6. Quantitative Real-Time PCR (qRT-PCR) and Semi-Quantitative RT-PCR Analysis of SaDXR Gene Expression Profiles

For qRT-PCR and semi-quantitative RT-PCR, total RNA was extracted from the leaves of 4-week-old overexpression A. thaliana lines, different tissues (roots, twigs, stem sapwood, leaves, flowers, fruit and stem heartwood) of 7-year-old S. album trees (Figure S1), the roots of 8-month-old S. album seedlings exposed to two elicitors (H2O2 and MeJA), and etiolated seedlings from the light treatment. In addition, cDNA was prepared as described in Section 2.2. qRT-PCR was used to determine SaDXR expression profiles in S. album and overexpression Arabidopsis lines with the iTaq Universal SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA) on an ABI 7500 Real-time system (ABI, Foster City, CA, USA). PCR consisted of initial denaturation at 95 °C for 2 min, 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s, 60 °C for 1 min, and plate reading after each cycle. S. album Actin1 (NCBI accession no. HM232849.1) and AtActin2 (NCBI accession no. AT3G18780) were used as reference genes. The relative expression level of genes was determined by the 2−ΔΔCT method with three independent biological replicates [26]. Semi-quantitative RT-PCR used the Premix Taq (LA Taq version 2.0) (Takara Bio Inc., Shiga, Japan) in a 20 µL reaction mixture. The PCR conditions were 94 °C for 3 min followed by 30 cycles (27 cycles for AtActin2) of 94 °C for 30 s, 57 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 1 min and 72 °C for 8 min. Finally, PCR products were verified by gel electrophoresis. All primers used are shown in Table S2.

2.7. Metabolite Extraction and Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS) Analysis

The ground dried roots (0.12 g) that were treated with FOS for 7 days were used to extract metabolites with 1 mL of hexane (Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) in a GC vial by end-over-end mixing for 72 h at room temperature. The hexane phase without ground roots was obtained by centrifuging at 2000× g for 15 min at 4 °C, then hexane was evaporated to dryness. Finally, the residue was dissolved in 50 µL hexane and dodecane (0.014 mg ml−1; Shanghai Macklin Biochemical Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), added as the internal standard for GC/MS analysis [17,27]. The relative content of sesquiterpenoids was identified using the internal standard and measurements were made from three independent biological replicates.
GC-MS was performed on a GC-2010 Gas Chromatograph (Shimadzu, Suzhou, China) equipped with a GCMS-QP2010 Plus Mass Spectrometer (Shimadzu). The mixtures of metabolites were analyzed by injecting 1 µL into an HP-5MS capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm, film thickness 0.25 µm). Chromatographic conditions were as follows: injector 250 °C; ion source 250 °C; MS interface 250 °C; oven program from 50 to 250 °C at 5 °C min−1, then held for 2 min, then 5 °C min−1 to 300 °C, then held for 20 min; helium was used as the carrier gas at a flow rate of 1.0 mL min−1; scan range was 20–550 µm at a sampling rate of 2.0 scans/s. MS spectra were compared to NIST05, NIST05s and Wiley 9 library, and the compounds were identified based on positive identification.

2.8. Construction of Plant Overexpression Vector, Transformation and Regeneration of A. thaliana

SaDXR cDNA was inserted into the NcoI site of pCAMBIA1302 under the control of the 35S promoter by the In-Fusion HD Cloning Kit (Takara Bio Inc.). The pCAMBIA1302::35S:SaDXR plasmid was introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens EHA105, then transformed into A. thaliana Col-0 via the floral-dip method [28]. Putatively transformed A. thaliana lines were selected on half-strength MS medium supplemented with 30 mg L−1 hygromycin B. Homozygous T3 transgenic seedlings were identified by semi-quantitative RT-PCR.

2.9. Contents of Chlorophyll and Carotenoids in Transgenic A. thaliana Lines

Total chlorophyll and carotenoid contents were extracted in the dark with 5 mL acetone (80%) at 4 °C from ground leaf tissues (70 mg) of 5-week-old transgenic A. thaliana lines and wild type (WT) plants [29]. Total chlorophyll and carotenoid contents were determined using the methods described by Lichtenthaler [30], using a spectrophotometer (PERSEE, TU-1810, Shanghai, China) at 470, 645 and 662 nm.

2.10. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were carried out using IBM SPSS 19.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). All data represent the average of three biological replicates and standard error. Data was assessed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Duncan’s multiple range test at p < 0.05 to denote significant differences between means.

3. Results

3.1. Molecular Cloning and Sequence Analysis of the Full Length SaDXR

The initial unigene of the candidate S. album DXR, which was identified within a transcriptome data set, had high homology with other plant DXRs [20]. Depending on the DNA fragment, gene-specific primers were designed for 3′- and 5′-RACE. Using 3′- and 5′-RACE, the full-length sequence of SaDXR was deduced by splicing the sequence of the initial unigene, and was then confirmed by PCR with specific primers and further sequencing. The full-length SaDXR sequence is 1826 bp long and contains the complete 1416 bp (Genbank accession no. MH018575) ORF plus 161 and 249 bp at the 5′ UTR and 3′ UTR, respectively. The ORF encodes a putative protein of 471 amino acids with a theoretical isoelectric point (pI) of 6.51 and calculated molecular weight of 51.02 kDa. The Protein-Blast against NCBI databases indicated that SaDXR had high homology with other plant species’ DXRs. SaDXR had the highest identity (87%) to the predicted DXR from Vitis vinifera (accession no. XP_002282761.1), and also had high similarity to the DXR of Manihot esculenta (86% identity, accession no. XP_021616674.1), Hevea brasiliensis (86% identity, accession no. XP_021669849.1), Camellia sinensis (86% identity, accession no. AKE33276.1), Actinidia arguta (85% identity, accession no. AID55340.1), Betula platyphylla (85% identity, accession no. AHX36947.1), Prunus avium (85% identity, accession no. XP_021826007.1), Jatropha curcas (84% identity, accession no. NP_001295720.1), and Populus trichocarpa (84% identity, accession no. XP_002318048.2) (Figure 2). There was a conserved NADPH binding site (GSTGSIGT) of a ketol acid reductoisomerase and a transit peptide for the plastid motif Cys-Ser-Ala/Met/Val/Thr near the N-terminal of SaDXR (Figure 2) [31,32].

3.2. Analysis of the SaDXR Gene

SaDXR gDNA (accession no. MH018577), 6226 bp long, possessed a complete coding region. The cDNA sequence was aligned with the gDNA. A comparison between SaDXR, VvDXR, PtDXR and AtDXR was carried out at the genomic level. The DXR of all four species had 12 exons and 11 introns, and the sequences of the exonic regions had 100% identity with the respective coding regions (Figure S5). The length and sequences of exons were similar in the four DXRs. Additionally, all intron boundaries followed an NGT-AGN pattern. The main difference between them lay in the introns, including the length and similarity of sequences. SaDXR and VvDXR had more similar genomic organization and sequences with higher homology than AtDXR and PtDXR, suggesting a relationship with the similarity of the deduced protein.

3.3. Protein Structure and Evolutionary Analysis of SaDXR

The secondary structure of SaDXR was predicted by SOPMA, which showed that the putative protein contains 168 random coils, 153 α-helices, 100 extended strands, and 50 β-turns. SaDXR was predicted to have a similar secondary structure as VvDXR, AtDXR and PtDXR (Figure S2). The 3D homology-based model of SaDXR had 42.75% sequence identity to Plasmodium falciparum DXR (PDB: 4gae) [33], and 82% of residues from SaDXR were modelled with PfDXR (Figure S3A). There were also a few differences in the 3D structure between SaDXR and PfDXR (Figure S3B). SaDXR had many common features with other DXR family members, which employ NADPH and Mn2+ (or Mg2+) as cofactors [33]. Specific amino acids involved in the binding with NADPH are illustrated in Figure S3C.
A phylogenetic tree was constructed based on DXRs from other organisms, other than animals and fungi, which do not possess the MEP pathway. DXRs originated from an ancestral bacterial gene and evolved into four distinct clusters of bacteria, algae, gymnosperms and angiosperms. The evolutionary pattern of DXRs is consistent with the evolutionary relationship between lower and higher organisms. SaDXR lies in the DXR group with most other angiosperms and has highest homology with V. vinifera (Figure 3). The bioinformatics analyses strongly suggest that SaDXR is a plant DXR that possesses a functional DXR protein that catalyzes DXP to produce MEP.

3.4. SaDXR Is Localized in Chloroplasts

TMHMM version 2.0 prediction software showed that SaDXR had no transmembrane domain (Figure S4). According to the results of ChloroP 1.1 (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/ChloroP/, accessed on 15 April 2019) analysis, the SaDXR sequence contains an N-terminal chloroplast transit peptide (cTP) in the 50 amino acid regions. Almost all plant MEP pathway genes have the N-terminal transit peptide sequence, which transports proteins into plastids [6]. To further analyze the localization of SaDXR, the full-length SaDXR in frame to YFP was transiently transformed into the mesophyll protoplasts of A. thaliana seedlings. As expected, yellow fluorescence of SaDXR-YFP coincided exactly with chlorophyll autofluorescence (Figure 4), suggesting that SaDXR was targeted in chloroplasts. This result was consistent with previous research on the localization of DXRs [6,8] that indicated that the SaDXR protein may be involved in plastidial isoprenoid biosynthesis in plants.

3.5. Isolation and Characterization of the SaDXR Promoter

An 897-bp DNA fragment upstream to the ATG of the DXR gene (accession no. MH018576) was cloned from gDNA of S. album through FPNI-PCR [23,24], and specific PCR amplification used primers listed in Table S2. The obtained full nucleotide sequence is shown in Figure 5. Using the TSSP program, the putative TSS of the cloned promoter was predicted and was shown to be located 164 bp upstream of the SaDXR ATG start codon. Using PlantCARE software, a well-conserved core promoter cis-element TATA-box (TAATA) was predicted 22 bp upstream of TSS. Another common cis-acting element, the CAAT-box (CAAAT) for RNA polymerase binding in the promoter, was labeled at −210 to −197. Other putative cis-acting regulatory elements were also identified (Figure 5). Among them, some are involved in hormone regulation, such as the abscisic acid-responsive element (ABRE), the gibberellin-responsive element (GARE-motif and TATC-box), and the salicylic acid-responsive element (TCA-element). Moreover, light-responsive elements, including the ATCT-motif, G-box, GT1-motif, Sp1, and chs-CMA2a, were found. The G-box generally binds with basic leucine zipper (bZIP) transcription factors, especially MYC2, which plays a critical role in the synthesis of secondary metabolites [34,35,36]. Notably, a heat stress-responsive cis-element (HSE), an element related to the regulation of zein metabolism (O2-site), a cis-element required for endosperm expression (Skn-1_motif), and a cis-acting element involved in defense and stress-responsive elements (TC-rich repeats), were found in the SaDXR promoter (Figure 5). These results indicate that the SaDXR promoter contains various cis-acting regulatory elements, and further suggests that the transcriptional activity of the SaDXR promoter is complex, and might be controlled by different environmental signals.

3.6. Tissue-Specific Expression of SaDXR

RNA was isolated from different tissues (roots, twigs, stem sapwood, leaves, flowers, fruit and stem heartwood) of 7-year-old S. album trees. The expression pattern and level of SaDXR were monitored by qRT-PCR. Although SaDXR was detected in all tissues, it displayed tissue-specific expression, exhibiting a higher level of expression in organs with photosynthetic pigments, including twigs, leaves and flowers (Figure 6). The highly valuable aromatic heartwood or essential oil, which contains sandalwood-specific terpenoids (i.e., santalol), form in the stems and roots of adult trees that are at least five years old. Additionally, terpenoids are biosynthesized via MEP and MVA pathways, and DXR is the critical rate-limiting enzyme in the MEP pathway [6]. Thus, this tissue expression analysis also determined whether SaDXR expression was consistent with the content of sandalwood-specific terpenoids in different tissues of S. album. However, the expression of SaDXR was low and did not match the expression patterns of a gene critical for the biosynthesis of terpenoids, S. album santalene synthase (SaSSy), which was highly expressed in tissues in which sandal terpenoids are typically biosynthesized, i.e., roots and stem heartwood (Figure 6).

3.7. Expression of SaDXR in Response to Light

In various species, DXRs promote the biosynthesis of plastidial isoprenoids, especially the photosynthetic pigments carotenoids and chlorophyll, and light is an important regulatory factor in biosynthesis of photosynthetic pigments [36,37,38,39]. A number of light-responsive cis-elements were identified in the SaDXR promoter. To study whether light regulates SaDXR expression, 40-day-old S. album etiolated seedlings were grown under constant darkness and then exposed to light. Light exposure for 1 or 3 h induced only a minor change in the expression level of SaDXR, peaking at 6 h of illumination (Figure 7).

3.8. Chlorophylls and Carotenoids Increased in 35S::SaDXR Overexpression Arabidopsis Lines

To test whether SaDXR regulates the biosynthesis of plastidial isoprenoids, an overexpression vector 35S::SaDXR was constructed (Figure 8A) and transformed into A. thaliana using an A. tumefaciens-mediated method. Kanamycin-resistant T2 plants were further identified by semi-quantitative RT-PCR. SaDXR transcription was detected in all four overexpression lines (L1, L3, L5, L6) but not in the WT plants. Additionally, L3 had the highest expression level compared to other overexpression lines (Figure 8B,C). All plants, including transgenic and WT plants, had similar expression levels of AtDXR, suggesting that SaDXR was successfully transcribed and expressed in A. thaliana. Compared to WT plants, chlorophyll content, including chlorophyll a, b and total chlorophyll, were significantly higher in the four overexpression lines. In L3, chlorophyll a, b, total chlorophyll and carotenoid content increased 16.0, 24.8, 18.2 and 11.8%, respectively, more than in WT plants, which only contained 1.0733, 0.3739, 1.4472 and 0.1888 mg g−1 FW, respectively (Figure 9). Apart from L5, other overexpression lines had a higher carotenoid content than WT plants. These results suggest that SaDXR derived from the MEP pathway was involved in the biosynthesis of plastidial isoprenoids. However, none of the overexpression lines displayed phenotypes different from WT plants.

3.9. Transcript Profiles of SaDXR under MeJA, H2O2

Generally, only the stems and roots of adult sandalwood (at least five years old) produce aromatic heartwood or essential oil, with sandalwood terpenoids [40]. Recently, some studies suggested that the contents of sandalwood sesquiterpenoids, such as α-santalol and β-santalol, were increased in the stems of young sandalwood trees that were treated by MeJA and H2O2 [3,41,42]. To test whether the expression pattern of SaDXR is regulated by these elicitors, the roots of sandalwood seedling were treated with MeJA and H2O2, and gene expression was examined by qRT-PCR. SaDXR expression gradually increased in the H2O2 treatment and peaked at 6 h, attaining an approximately 4-fold higher expression level, followed by a gradual decline. Finally, SaDXR expression level returned to its original level (Figure 10). These expression profiles were quite consistent with the expression patterns of SaSSy. Compared to H2O2 treatment, MeJA treatment had less effect on the expression of SaDXR, which increased at 6 h and 9 h, and the expression at other times was similar to those in the control. This result was similar to the expression of SaSSy, which was also enhanced at 6 h and 9 h, but then continuously maintained a high expression level at 12 h and 24 h (Figure 10).

3.10. Metabolite Analysis in the FOS Treatment

To investigate further effects of SaDXR on sandalwood sesquiterpenoid biosynthesis, the DXR enzyme was inhibited and the MEP pathway flux was blocked. Tissue samples from seedlings roots were collected at 7 days after 20 µM FOS employ. Almost consistent with previous studies [17,41], the main sandalwood sesquiterpenoids, namely α-santalene, α-bergamotene, Epi-β-santalenem, β-santalene and α-santalol, were detected in the control and FOS-treated seedlings roots (Figure 11 and Figure S6). The metabolite analysis showed that FOS treatment decreased the content of sandalwood sesquiterpenoids, especially α-santalol, which is the most essential ingredient, significantly reduced from 2.0444 µg g−1 to 1.1288 µg g−1 between the control and FOS-treated roots. Compared to the control, total detected sandalwood sesquiterpenoids were also decreased by 24.34% in FOS treatment (Figure 11).

4. Discussion

Sandalwood sesquiterpenoids are the main ingredients for high value essential oil while photosynthetic pigments are essential for the growth and development of sandalwood plants. DXRs are critical enzymes that catalyze the secondary rate-limiting step in the MEP pathway, which plays a vital role in the biosynthesis of plastidial isoprenoids, including growth hormones and photosynthetic pigments, and provides flux to various terpenes. In the MEP pathway, apart from the DXS enzyme, which is encoded by multiple gene families, other enzymes exist as a single-copy in most plant species. There are only two-copy DXRs in Hevea brasiliensis and Glycine max [38,43], while almost all other plant species have a single copy (Table S1). In this study, we cloned and functionally analyzed a single SaDXR gene from S. album. Amino acid sequence alignment, as well as 2D and 3D structures of SaDXR indicated that it likely belonged to the superfamily of DXR enzymes and may have the same catalytic function as other DXR proteins. There are two characteristic domains in this superfamily, a conserved NADPH binding site (GSTGSIGT) and a transit peptide for the plastid motif Cys-Ser-Ala/Met/Val/Thr. At the genomic level, a detailed study of genomic SaDXR, AtDXR, PtDXR and VvDXR suggested that SaDXR also has a conserved genomic organization as other plant DXR genes. Furthermore, a phylogenetic tree analysis suggested strong evolutionary conservation of the DXR superfamily. Supported by proteomics and in silico studies, almost all MEP-pathway enzymes in plant species have an N-terminal cTP, which enables the transport of proteins into plastids [8,9]. SaDXR contains an N-terminal cTP, assessed by analysis with the ChloroP 1.1 program, and the result of subcellular localization suggested that the SaDXR protein was targeted to chloroplasts where plastid isoprenoids may be biosynthesized.
Previous studies on the molecular function of DXR genes mainly focused on their involvement in the biosynthesis of photosynthetic pigments, terpenoids and their derivatives (Table S1). The result of overexpression analyses in model plants and the DXR mutant revealed that AtDXR [44,45], SyDXR [46], AvDXR [37] and GmDXR1/2 [38] collectively played a critical role in the biosynthesis of photosynthetic pigments (Table S1). Additionally, experiments using a transgenic system, RNAi, and the inhibitor FOS indicated that DXR genes also shift flux toward different terpenoids and their derivatives such as forskolin [47], taxadiene [44], artemisinin [48,49], tanshinone [50,51,52], aethiopinone [53], lanosterol/cholesterol [54] and triptolide/cerlastrol [55]. In order to understand the relationship between SaDXR and photosynthetic pigments and sandalwood sesquiterpenoids, this study analyzed the expression pattern of SaDXR in different tissues. Tissues with photosynthetic pigments, namely twigs, leaves and flowers, had higher expression levels of SaDXR than other tissues. In addition, light plays a major role in the accumulation of photosynthetic pigments [56] and regulation of SaDXR expression in the etiolated seedlings of S. album. Our results indicate that SaDXR expression is consistent with previous studies that show the relevance of the DXR gene to photosynthetic pigments. Furthermore, transgenic Arabidopsis lines verified that the increased expression of SaDXR resulted in a higher accumulation of chlorophylls and carotenoids.
Sandalwood sesquiterpenoids are exclusively biosynthesized in stem heartwood and roots in adult sandalwood trees. However, SaDXR expression level was not consistent with the content of sandalwood sesquiterpenoids and the expression patterns of SaSSy in different tissues. The result was not a surprise because SaDXR might only play a minor role in the biosynthesis of sandalwood sesquiterpenoids. Additionally, the production of many secondary metabolites, including sandalwood sesquiterpenoids, were increased by external stimuli [27,57,58,59]. Based on the use of MeJA and H2O2 to increase the content of sandalwood sesquiterpenoids [41,42], this study noted that SaDXR expression was affected by MeJA and H2O2 treatment, showing a similar expression pattern as SaSSy. The overexpression of SaDXR in Arabidopsis or tobacco is invalid because these are not enzymes of biosynthesis of sandalwood sesquiterpenoids in these model plants. Similar to other studies [48,51,54,60], a specific inhibitor for DXR was tested. The key component of sandalwood sesquiterpenoids, α-santalol, decreased in the FOS treatment. These results suggest that SaDXR controls the flux towards sandalwood sesquiterpenoids, although its contribution may be minor. This study cannot fully illustrate the role of SaDXR in the biosynthesis of sandalwood sesquiterpenoids. Thus, in order to further confirm the function of SaDXR, the establishment of a transgenic system for sandalwood is essential. Recently, our team has been making a concerted effort to establish a system for transgenic sandalwood with an emphasis on hairy roots, callus and cell suspensions. Not only will the function of SaDXR be adequately expounded, so too will a deeper understanding of the molecular mechanism of sandalwood sesquiterpenoids emerge in such transgenic systems.
Many regulatory proteins, i.e., transcription factors (TFs), recognize specific cis-elements in the promoters of target genes and activate or repress the expression of genes, and finally regulate the accumulation of isoprenoids, especially secondary metabolites in a spatial and temporal manner [61]. Compared to a single gene, TFs regulate the biosynthesis of isoprenoids more efficiently because they usually regulate the transcription of a series of genes in a specific pathway [62]. In the present study, the promoter region of SaDXR was cloned and cis-elements were analyzed. It is worth noting that the three G-boxes found in SaDXR promoter are primary involved in light responsiveness but also play a critical role in MeJA responsiveness. The basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) TF MYC2 binds to G-boxes within the promoter of various genes, including the Nicotiana tabacum putrescine N-methyltransferase gene (NtPMT) [63], the Artemisia annua cytochrome P450 monooxygenase (AaCYP71AV1)/ artemisinic aldehyde Δ11 (13) reductase (AaDBR2) gene [36] and the Aquilaria sinensis δ-guaiene synthase (AsASS1) gene [64], to activate MeJA-induced transcription [65,66], finally resulting in an increase in the content of nicotine, artemisinin and δ-guaiene, respectively. Therefore, there also may be specific MYC2 TFs that bind to the SaDXR promoter and participate in the regulation of biosynthesis of sandalwood terpenoids when stimulated by MeJA.

5. Conclusions

The SaDXR gene was successfully isolated in S. album based on a transcriptome database. Bioinformatics and phylogenetic analyses suggest that SaDXR belongs to the conservative DXR gene family. Additionally, the SaDXR promoter was cloned and cis-elements were analyzed. The ectopic overexpression of SaDXR in Arabidopsis, combined with the expression pattern analysis of tissue and light treatment, demonstrated that the SaDXR gene is involved in the biosynthesis of chlorophylls and carotenoids. Moreover, SaDXR expression in MeJA and H2O2 treatments and metabolite analyses in the FOS treatment indicated that SaDXR enhances flux to biosynthesis of sandalwood sesquiterpenoids. These findings provide a more solid basis for understanding the genetic regulation of the biosynthesis of sandalwood sesquiterpenoids, eventually allowing, in future research, the biotechnological improvement of sandalwood.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/genes12050626/s1, Supplementary Figure S1: Tree and different tissues of S. album, Figure S2: Putative secondary structure of SaDXR protein, Figure S3: 3D structure and binding site of SaDXR protein, Figure S4: SaDXR protein without the transmembrane domain predicted by TMHMM version 2.0, Figure S5: Genomic DNA structure of SaDXR, VvDXR, PtDXR and AtDXR, Figure S6: Mass spectra of α-santalene, α-bergamotene, epi-β-santalene, β-santalene and α-santalol detected in roots of control and FOS-treated seedlings, Table S2: Primers used in this paper.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.M.; methodology, M.N.; software, Y.X.; validation, Y.Z., H.Y.; J.A.T.d.S. and G.M.; formal analysis, oringinal draft preparation Y.Z. and H.Y.; investigation, Y.Z. and H.Y.; resources, X.Z.; data curation, Y.X.; writing—original draft preparation, X.Z., H.Y. and J.A.T.d.S.; writing—review and editing, Y.Z., H.Y. and J.A.T.d.S.; visualization, Y.L.; supervision, G.M.; project administration, G.M.; funding acquisition, G.M., X.Z. and H.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 32060358 and 31100498, 31870666), Guangdong basic and applied basic research foundation (2019A1515011590; 2019A1515110132; 2021A1515012068), Guangdong special support program (2017TQ04N303), the science and technology program of Guangzhou (201804010414), Guangxi Natural Science Foundation Project (2019GXNSFAA185005) and the Guangdong Science and Technology project (2015B020231008).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, Not applicable. The studies was not involved in humans or animals.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study. Not applicable for studies not involving humans.

Data Availability Statement

The study did not report any other data.

Acknowledgments

Special thanks to Chunmei He for technical assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Misra, B.B.; Dey, S. Developmental variations in sesquiterpenoid biosynthesis in East Indian sandalwood tree (Santalum album L.). Trees 2013, 27, 1071–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Baldovini, N.; Delasalle, C.; Joulain, D. Phytochemistry of the heartwood from fragrant Santalum species: A review. Flav. Frag. J. 2011, 26, 7–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhang, Y.Y.; Yan, H.F.; Niu, M.Y.; Cheng, Q.W.; Zhang, X.H.; Teixeira da Silva, J.A.; Ma, G.H. Multiple strategies for increasing yields of essential oil and obtaining sandalwood terpenoids by biotechnological methods in sandalwood. Trees 2018, 32, 17–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wang, C.L.; Kim, S.W. Shaking up ancient scents: Insights into santalol synthesis in engineered Escherichia coli. Proc. Biochem. 2015, 50, 1177–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhan, X.; Zhang, Y.H.; Chen, D.F.; Simonsen, H.T. Metabolic engineering of the moss Physcomitrella patens to produce the sesquiterpenoids patchoulol and alpha/beta-santalene. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Vranová, E.; Coman, D.; Gruissem, W. Network analysis of the MVA and MEP pathways for isoprenoid synthesis. Ann. Rev. Plant Biol. 2013, 64, 665–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Liao, P.; Hemmerlin, A.; Bach, T.J.; Chye, M.L. The potential of the mevalonate pathway for enhanced isoprenoid production. Biotech. Adv. 2016, 34, 697–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rodríguez-Concepción, M.; Boronat, A. Elucidation of the methylerythritol phosphate pathway for isoprenoid biosynthesis in bacteria and plastids. A metabolic milestone achieved through genomics. Plant Physiol. 2002, 130, 1079–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Perello, C.; Llamas, E.; Burlat, V.; Ortiz-Alcaide, M.; Phillips, M.A.; Pulido, P.; Rodriguez-Concepcion, M. Differential subplastidial localization and turnover of enzymes involved in isoprenoid biosynthesis in chloroplasts. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0150539. [Google Scholar]
  10. Hemmerlin, A.; Hoeffler, J.F.; Meyer, O.; Tritsch, D.; Kagan, I.A.; Grosdemange-Billiard, C.; Rohmer, M.; Bach, T.J. Cross-talk between the cytosolic mevalonate and the plastidial methylerythritol phosphate pathways in tobacco bright yellow-2 cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 26666–26676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Jones, C.G.; Keeling, C.I.; Ghisalberti, E.L.; Barbour, E.L.; Plummer, J.A.; Bohlmann, J. Isolation of cDNAs and functional characterisation of two multi-product terpene synthase enzymes from sandalwood, Santalum album L. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2008, 477, 121–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jones, C.G.; Moniodis, J.; Zulak, K.G.; Scaffidi, A.; Plummer, J.A.; Ghisalberti, E.L.; Barbour, E.L.; Bohlmann, J. Sandalwood fragrance biosynthesis involves sesquiterpene synthases of both the terpene synthase (TPS)-a and TPS-b subfamilies, including santalene synthases. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 17445–17454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Rani, A.; Ravikumar, P.; Reddy, M.D.; Kush, A. Molecular regulation of santalol biosynthesis in Santalum album L. Gene 2013, 527, 642–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Diaz-Chavez, M.L.; Moniodis, J.; Madilao, L.L.; Jancsik, S.; Keeling, C.I.; Barbour, E.L.; Ghisalberti, E.L.; Plummer, J.A.; Jones, C.G.; Bohlmann, J. Biosynthesis of sandalwood oil: Santalum album CYP76F cytochromes P450 produce santalols and bergamotol. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e75083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Moniodis, J.; Jones, C.G.; Barbour, E.L.; Plummer, J.A.; Ghisalberti, E.L.; Bohlmann, J. The transcriptome of sesquiterpenoid biosynthesis in heartwood xylem of Western Australian sandalwood (Santalum spicatum). Phytochemistry 2015, 113, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Srivastava, P.L.; Daramwar, P.P.; Krithika, R.; Pandreka, A.; Shankar, S.S.; Thulasiram, H.V. Functional characterization of novel sesquiterpene synthases from Indian sandalwood, Santalum album. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 10095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Celedon, J.M.; Chiang, A.; Yuen, M.M.S.; Diaz-Chavez, M.L.; Madilao, L.L.; Finnegan, P.M.; Barbour, E.L.; Bohlmann, J. Heartwood-specific transcriptome and metabolite signatures of tropical sandalwood (Santalum album) reveal the final step of (z)-santalol fragrance biosynthesis. Plant J. 2016, 86, 289–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Zhao, L.S.; Chang, W.C.; Xiao, Y.L.; Liu, H.W.; Liu, P.H. Methylerythritol phosphate pathway of isoprenoid biosynthesis. Ann. Rev. Biochem. 2013, 82, 497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Banerjee, A.; Sharkey, T.D. Methylerythritol 4-phosphate (MEP) pathway metabolic regulation. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2014, 31, 1043–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Zhang, X.H.; Teixeira da Silva, J.A.; Niu, M.Y.; Li, M.Z.; He, C.M.; Zhao, J.H.; Zeng, S.J.; Duan, J.; Ma, G.H. Physiological and transcriptomic analyses reveal a response mechanism to cold stress in Santalum album L. leaves. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 42165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Zhang, X.H.; Berkowitz, O.; Teixeira da Silva, J.A.; Zhang, M.H.; Ma, G.H.; Whelan, J.; Duan, J. RNA-seq analysis identifies key genes associated with haustorial development in the root hemiparasite Santalum album. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 00661. [Google Scholar]
  22. Murashige, T.; Skoog, F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 1962, 15, 473–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, Z.; Ye, S.F.; Li, J.J.; Zheng, B.; Bao, M.Z.; Ning, G.G. Fusion primer and nested integrated PCR (FPNI-PCR): A new high-efficiency strategy for rapid chromosome walking or flanking sequence cloning. BMC Biotech. 2011, 11, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Wang, Z.; Yang, R.G.; Devisetty, U.K.; Maloof, J.N.; Zuo, Y.; Li, J.J.; Shen, Y.X.; Zhao, J.; Bao, M.Z.; Ning, G.G. The divergence of flowering time modulated by FT/TFL1 is independent to their interaction and binding activities. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Yoo, S.D.; Cho, Y.H.; Sheen, J. Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts: A versatile cell system for transient gene expression analysis. Nat. Protoc. 2007, 2, 1565–1572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2△△Ct method. Methods 2000, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Celedon, J.M.; Bohlmann, J. Genomics-based discovery of plant genes for synthetic biology of terpenoid fragrances: A case study in sandalwood oil biosynthesis. Methods Enzymol. 2016, 576, 47–67. [Google Scholar]
  28. Clough, S.J.; Bent, A.F. A simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 1998, 16, 735–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Henriquez, M.A.; Soliman, A.; Li, G.Y.; Hannoufa, A.; Ayele, B.T.; Daayf, F. Molecular cloning, functional characterization and expression of potato (Solanum tuberosum) 1-deoxy-d-xylulose 5-phosphate synthase 1 (StDXS1) in response to Phytophthora infestans. Plant Sci. 2016, 243, 71–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lichtenthaler, H.K. Chlorophylls and carotenoids—Pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes. Methods Enzymol. 1987, 148, 350–382. [Google Scholar]
  31. Kuzuyama, T.; Takahashi, S.; Takagi, M.; Seto, H. Characterization of 1-deoxy-d-xylulose 5-phosphate reductoisomerase, an enzyme involved in isopentenyl diphosphate biosynthesis, and identification of its catalytic amino acid residues. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 19928–19932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Yao, H.Y.; Gong, Y.F.; Zuo, K.J.; Ling, H.; Qiu, C.X.; Zhang, F.; Wang, Y.C.; Pi, Y.; Liu, X.; Sun, X.F. Molecular cloning, expression profiling and functional analysis of a DXR gene encoding 1-deoxy-d-xylulose 5-phosphate reductoisomerase from Camptotheca acuminata. J. Plant Physiol. 2008, 165, 203–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Xue, J.; Diao, J.; Cai, G.; Deng, L.; Zheng, B.; Yao, Y.; Song, Y. Antimalarial and structural studies of pyridine-containing inhibitors of 1-deoxyxylulose-5-phosphate reductoisomerase. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2013, 4, 278–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Shoji, T.; Hashimoto, T. Tobacco MYC2 regulates jasmonate-inducible nicotine biosynthesis genes directly and by way of the NIC2-locus ERF genes. Plant Cell Physiol. 2011, 52, 1117–1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Zhang, H.T.; Hedhili, S.; Montiel, G.; Zhang, Y.X.; Chatel, G.; Pré, M.; Gantet, P.; Memelink, J. The basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor CrMYC2 controls the jasmonate-responsive expression of the ORCA genes that regulate alkaloid biosynthesis in Catharanthus roseus. Plant J. 2011, 67, 61–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Shen, Q.; Lu, X.; Yan, T.X.; Fu, X.Q.; Lv, Z.Y.; Zhang, F.Y.; Pan, Q.F.; Wang, G.F.; Sun, X.F.; Tang, K.X. The jasmonate-responsive AaMYC2 transcription factor positively regulates artemisinin biosynthesis in Artemisia annua. New Phytol. 2016, 210, 1269–1281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Yang, J.F.; Adhikari, M.N.; Liu, H.; Xu, H.; He, G.Z.; Zhan, R.T.; Wei, J.S.; Chen, W.W. Characterization and functional analysis of the genes encoding 1-deoxy-d-xylulose-5-phosphate reductoisomerase and 1-deoxy-d-xylulose-5-phosphate synthase, the two enzymes in the MEP pathway, from Amomum villosum Lour. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2012, 39, 8287–8296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhang, M.; Li, K.; Liu, J.Y.; Yu, D.Y. Identification and differential expression of two isogenes encoding 1-deoxy-d-xylulose 5-phosphate reductoisomerase in Glycine max. Plant Biotech. Rep. 2012, 6, 363–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Jadaun, J.S.; Sangwan, N.S.; Narnoliya, L.K.; Singh, N.; Bansal, S.; Mishra, B.; Sangwan, R.S. Over-expression of DXS gene enhances terpenoidal secondary metabolite accumulation in rose-scented geranium and Withania somnifera: Active involvement of plastid isoprenogenic pathway in their biosynthesis. Physiol. Plant. 2017, 159, 381–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Teixeira da Silva, J.A.; Kher, M.M.; Soner, D.; Page, T.; Zhang, X.H.; Nataraj, M.; Ma, G.H. Sandalwood: Basic biology, tissue culture, and genetic transformation. Planta 2016, 243, 847–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Li, Y.; Zhang, X.H.; Cheng, Q.W.; Teixeira da Silva, J.A.; Fang, L.; Ma, G.H. Elicitors modulate young sandalwood (Santalum album L.) growth, heartwood formation, and concrete oil synthesis. Plants 2021, 10, 339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Liu, X.J. Studies on Essential Oil Composition, Distribution and Inducing Heartwood Formation of Sandal (Santalum album). Ph.D. Thesis, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing, China, 2012; pp. 65–180. [Google Scholar]
  43. Seetang-Nun, Y.; Sharkey, T.D.; Suvachittanont, W. Molecular cloning and characterization of two cDNAs encoding 1-deoxy-d-xylulose 5-phosphate reductoisomerase from Hevea brasiliensis. J. Plant Physiol. 2008, 165, 991–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Carretero-Paulet, L.; Cairó, A.; Botella-Pavía, P.; Besumbes, O.; Campos, N.; Boronat, A.; Rodríguez-Concepción, M. Enhanced flux through the methylerythritol 4-phosphate pathway in Arabidopsis plants overexpressing deoxyxylulose 5-phosphate reductoisomerase. Plant Mol. Biol. 2006, 62, 683–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Xing, S.F.; Miao, J.; Li, S.A.; Qin, G.J.; Tang, S.; Li, H.N.; Gu, H.Y.; Qu, L.J. Disruption of the 1-deoxy-d-xylulose-5-phosphate reductoisomerase (DXR) gene results in albino, dwarf and defects in trichome initiation and stomata closure in Arabidopsis. Cell Res. 2010, 20, 688–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Hasunuma, T.; Takeno, S.; Hayashi, S.; Sendai, M.; Bamba, T.; Yoshimura, S.; Tomizawa, K.I.; Fukusaki, E.; Miyake, C. Overexpression of 1-deoxy-d-xylulose-5-phosphate reductoisomerase gene in chloroplast contributes to increment of isoprenoid production. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2008, 105, 518–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Engprasert, S.; Taura, F.; Shoyama, Y. Molecular cloning, expression and characterization of recombinant 1-deoxy-d-xylulose-5-phosphate reductoisomerase from Coleus forskohlii Briq. Plant Sci. 2005, 169, 287–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Towler, M.J.; Weathers, P.J. Evidence of artemisinin production from IPP stemming from both the mevalonate and the nonmevalonate pathways. Plant Cell Rep. 2007, 26, 2129–2136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Xiang, L.; Zeng, L.X.; Yuan, Y.; Chen, M.; Wang, F.; Liu, X.Q.; Zeng, L.J.; Lan, X.Z.; Liao, Z.H. Enhancement of artemisinin biosynthesis by overexpressing DXR, CYP71AV1 and CPR in the plants of Artemisia annua L. Plant Omics 2012, 5, 503–507. [Google Scholar]
  50. Wu, S.J.; Shi, M.; Wu, J.Y. Cloning and characterization of the 1-deoxy-d-xylulose 5-phosphate reductoisomerase gene for diterpenoid tanshinone biosynthesis in Salvia miltiorrhiza (Chinese sage) hairy roots. Biotech. Appl. Biochem. 2009, 52, 89–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Yang, D.F.; Du, X.H.; Liang, X.; Han, R.L.; Liang, Z.S.; Liu, Y.; Liu, F.H.; Zhao, J.J. Different roles of the mevalonate and methylerythritol phosphate pathways in cell growth and tanshinone production of Salvia miltiorrhiza hairy roots. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e46797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Shi, M.; Luo, X.Q.; Ju, G.H.; Yu, X.H.; Hao, X.L.; Huang, Q.; Xiao, J.B.; Cui, L.J.; Kai, G.Y. Increased accumulation of the cardio-cerebrovascular disease treatment drug tanshinone in Salvia miltiorrhiza hairy roots by the enzymes 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl CoA reductase and 1-deoxy-d-xylulose 5-phosphate reductoisomerase. Funct. Integrat. Genom. 2014, 14, 603–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Vaccaro, M.; Malafronte, N.; Alfieri, M.; De Tommasi, N.; Leone, A. Enhanced biosynthesis of bioactive abietane diterpenes by overexpressing AtDXS or AtDXR genes in Salvia sclarea hairy roots. Plant Cell Tissue Org. Cult. 2014, 119, 65–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Singh, S.; Pal, S.; Shanker, K.; Chanotiya, C.S.; Gupta, M.M.; Dwivedi, U.N.; Shasany, A.K. Sterol partitioning by HMGR and DXR for routing intermediates toward withanolide biosynthesis. Physiol. Plant. 2014, 152, 617–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zhang, Y.F.; Zhao, Y.J.; Wang, J.D.; Hu, T.Y.; Tong, Y.R.; Zhou, J.W.; Song, Y.D.; Gao, W.; Huang, L.Q. Overexpression and RNA interference of TwDXR regulate the accumulation of terpenoid active ingredients in Tripterygium wilfordii. Biotech. Lett. 2018, 40, 419–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Cordoba, E.; Porta, H.; Arroyo, A.; Román, C.S.; Medina, L.; Rodríguez-Concepción, M.; León, P. Functional characterization of the three genes encoding 1-deoxy-d-xylulose 5-phosphate synthase in maize. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62, 2023–2038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Li, S.T.; Zhang, P.; Zhang, M.; Fu, C.H.; Zhao, C.F.; Dong, Y.S.; Guo, A.Y.; Yu, L.J. Transcriptional profile of Taxus chinensis cells in response to methyl jasmonate. BMC Genom. 2012, 13, 295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Xu, Y.H.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, M.X.; Wei, J.H.; Chen, H.J.; Gao, Z.H.; Sui, C.; Luo, H.M.; Zhang, X.L.; Yang, Y. Identification of genes related to agarwood formation: Transcriptome analysis of healthy and wounded tissues of Aquilaria sinensis. BMC Genom. 2013, 14, 227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Xiang, L.; Zhu, S.Q.; Zhao, T.F.; Zhang, M.; Liu, W.H.; Chen, M.; Lan, X.Z.; Liao, Z.H. Enhancement of artemisinin content and relative expression of genes of artemisinin biosynthesis in Artemisia annua by exogenous MeJA treatment. Plant Growth Regul. 2015, 75, 435–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Rodríguez-Concepción, M.; Ahumada, I.; Diez-Juez, E.; Sauret-Güeto, S.; Lois, L.M.; Gallego, F.; Carretero-Paulet, L.; Campos, N.; Boronat, A. 1-Deoxy-d-xylulose 5-phosphate reductoisomerase and plastid isoprenoid biosynthesis during tomato fruit ripening. Plant J. 2001, 27, 213–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Patra, B.; Schluttenhofer, C.; Wu, Y.M.; Pattanaik, S.; Yuan, L. Transcriptional regulation of secondary metabolite biosynthesis in plants. Biochim. Bioph. Acta Gene Regul. Mechan. 2013, 1829, 1236–1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zhou, M.L.; Memelink, J. Jasmonate-responsive transcription factors regulating plant secondary metabolism. Biotech. Adv. 2016, 34, 441–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zhang, H.B.; Bokowiec, M.T.; Rushton, P.J.; Han, S.C.; Timko, M.P. Tobacco transcription factors NtMYC2a and NtMYC2b form nuclear complexes with the NtJAZ1 repressor and regulate multiple jasmonate-inducible steps in nicotine biosynthesis. Mol. Plant. 2012, 5, 73–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Xu, Y.H.; Liao, Y.C.; Lv, F.F.; Zhang, Z.; Sun, P.W.; Gao, Z.H.; Hu, K.P.; Sui, C.; Jin, Y.; Wei, J.H. Transcription factor AsMYC2 controls the jasmonate-responsive expression of ASS1 regulating sesquiterpene biosynthesis in Aquilaria sinensis (Lour.) Gilg. Plant Cell Physiol. 2017, 58, 1924–1933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. De Geyter, N.; Gholami, A.; Goormachtig, S.; Goossens, A. Transcriptional machineries in jasmonate-elicited plant secondary metabolism. Trends Plant Sci. 2012, 17, 349–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Kazan, K.; Manners, J.M. MYC2: The master in action. Mol. Plant 2013, 6, 686–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Outline of the MVA and MEP pathways in plants, and the biosynthesis of santalol, chlorophylls and carotenoids in S. album. DXR was inhibited by fosmidomycin (FOS), which is shown in red. Cytosol: AACT, acetoacetyl-CoA thiolase; FDS, farnesyl diphospate synthase; HMGR, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutary-CoA reductase; HMGS, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutary-CoA synthase; MK, mevalonate kinase; MPD, mevalonate-5-diphosphate decarboxylase; MVA, mevalonate acid; PMK 5-phosphate-mevalonate kinase. Plastid: CMK, 4-cytidine 5′-diphospho-2-C-methyl-D-erythritol kinase; DMAPP, dimethylallyl diphosphate; DXP, 1-deoxy-D-xylulose-5-phosphate; DXR, 1-deoxy-D-xylulose-5-phosphate reductase; DXS, 1-deoxy-D-xylulose-5-phosphate synthase; GDS, geranyl diphosphate synthase; GGDS, geranylgeranyl diphosphate synthase; GGPP, geranylgeranyl diphosphate; GPP, geranyl diphosphate; HDR, 1-hydroxy-2-methyl-2-(E)-butenyl-4-diphosphate reductase; HDS, 1-hydroxy-2-methyl-2-(E)-butenyl-4-diphosphate synthase; IPPI, isopentenyl diphosphate isomerase; MCT, 2-C-methyl-D-erythritol 4-phosphate cytidylyltransferase; MEP, 2-C-methyl-D-erythritol-4-phosphate.
Figure 1. Outline of the MVA and MEP pathways in plants, and the biosynthesis of santalol, chlorophylls and carotenoids in S. album. DXR was inhibited by fosmidomycin (FOS), which is shown in red. Cytosol: AACT, acetoacetyl-CoA thiolase; FDS, farnesyl diphospate synthase; HMGR, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutary-CoA reductase; HMGS, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutary-CoA synthase; MK, mevalonate kinase; MPD, mevalonate-5-diphosphate decarboxylase; MVA, mevalonate acid; PMK 5-phosphate-mevalonate kinase. Plastid: CMK, 4-cytidine 5′-diphospho-2-C-methyl-D-erythritol kinase; DMAPP, dimethylallyl diphosphate; DXP, 1-deoxy-D-xylulose-5-phosphate; DXR, 1-deoxy-D-xylulose-5-phosphate reductase; DXS, 1-deoxy-D-xylulose-5-phosphate synthase; GDS, geranyl diphosphate synthase; GGDS, geranylgeranyl diphosphate synthase; GGPP, geranylgeranyl diphosphate; GPP, geranyl diphosphate; HDR, 1-hydroxy-2-methyl-2-(E)-butenyl-4-diphosphate reductase; HDS, 1-hydroxy-2-methyl-2-(E)-butenyl-4-diphosphate synthase; IPPI, isopentenyl diphosphate isomerase; MCT, 2-C-methyl-D-erythritol 4-phosphate cytidylyltransferase; MEP, 2-C-methyl-D-erythritol-4-phosphate.
Genes 12 00626 g001
Figure 2. Alignment of deduced amino acid sequences of SaDXR, and related proteins from AaDXR (Actinidia arguta, AID55340.1), BpDXR (Betula platyphylla, AHX36947.1), CsDXR (Camellia sinensis, AKE33276.1), HbDXR (Hevea brasiliensis, XP_021669849.1), JcDXR (Jatropha curcas, NP_001295720.1), MeDXR (Manihot esculenta, XP_021616674.1), PaDXR (Prunus avium, XP_021826007.1), PtDXR (Populus trichocarpa, XP_002318048.2), and VvDXR (Vitis vinifera, XP_002282761.1). The conserved NADPH binding motif (GSTGSIGT) and Cys-Ser-Ala motif are indicated by a horizontal line and asterisk, respectively. Alignments were performed with DNAMAN version 7. Black: 100% identity; pink: 75% ≤ identity < 100%; blue: 50% ≤ identity ≤ 75%.
Figure 2. Alignment of deduced amino acid sequences of SaDXR, and related proteins from AaDXR (Actinidia arguta, AID55340.1), BpDXR (Betula platyphylla, AHX36947.1), CsDXR (Camellia sinensis, AKE33276.1), HbDXR (Hevea brasiliensis, XP_021669849.1), JcDXR (Jatropha curcas, NP_001295720.1), MeDXR (Manihot esculenta, XP_021616674.1), PaDXR (Prunus avium, XP_021826007.1), PtDXR (Populus trichocarpa, XP_002318048.2), and VvDXR (Vitis vinifera, XP_002282761.1). The conserved NADPH binding motif (GSTGSIGT) and Cys-Ser-Ala motif are indicated by a horizontal line and asterisk, respectively. Alignments were performed with DNAMAN version 7. Black: 100% identity; pink: 75% ≤ identity < 100%; blue: 50% ≤ identity ≤ 75%.
Genes 12 00626 g002
Figure 3. Phylogenetic analysis of the amino acid sequences of DXRs. The neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree was constructed using the bootstrap method with MEGA 5.1 (1000 bootstrap replications). The protein sequences used in this tree are: Alpinia officinarum (AEK69520.1), Amomum villosum (ACS26204), Arabidopsis thaliana (NP_201085), Actinidia arguta (AID55340.1), Camellia sinensis (AKE33276.1), Coccomyxa subellipsoidea (EIE23728.1), Dunaliella salina (ACT21081.1), Escherichia coli (NP_414715), Ginkgo biloba (AAR95700), Haematococcus pluvialis (AEY80027.1), Haemophilus influenza (NP_438967.1), Hevea brasiliensis (ABD927022), Jatropha curcas (NP_001295720.1), Klebsiella pneumoniae (CDO15900.1), Manihot esculenta (XP_021616674.1), Picea glauca (JAI17646.1), Pinus taeda (ACJ67022 ), Prunus avium (XP_021826007.1), Rosa rugosa (AEZ53171), Taxus cuspidata (AAT47184.1), Taxus × media (AAU87836), Vibrio cholerae (NP_231885), and Vitis vinifera (XP_002282761.1).
Figure 3. Phylogenetic analysis of the amino acid sequences of DXRs. The neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree was constructed using the bootstrap method with MEGA 5.1 (1000 bootstrap replications). The protein sequences used in this tree are: Alpinia officinarum (AEK69520.1), Amomum villosum (ACS26204), Arabidopsis thaliana (NP_201085), Actinidia arguta (AID55340.1), Camellia sinensis (AKE33276.1), Coccomyxa subellipsoidea (EIE23728.1), Dunaliella salina (ACT21081.1), Escherichia coli (NP_414715), Ginkgo biloba (AAR95700), Haematococcus pluvialis (AEY80027.1), Haemophilus influenza (NP_438967.1), Hevea brasiliensis (ABD927022), Jatropha curcas (NP_001295720.1), Klebsiella pneumoniae (CDO15900.1), Manihot esculenta (XP_021616674.1), Picea glauca (JAI17646.1), Pinus taeda (ACJ67022 ), Prunus avium (XP_021826007.1), Rosa rugosa (AEZ53171), Taxus cuspidata (AAT47184.1), Taxus × media (AAU87836), Vibrio cholerae (NP_231885), and Vitis vinifera (XP_002282761.1).
Genes 12 00626 g003
Figure 4. Subcellular localization of SaDXR. The signal was observed by a confocal laser scanning microscope. Transient expression of 35S::YFP and 35S::SaDXR-YFP in living protoplasts, displaying YFP fluorescence (yellow), chlorophyll autofluorescence (blue), bright field, and merged image (yellow plus blue). Bar: 20 μm.
Figure 4. Subcellular localization of SaDXR. The signal was observed by a confocal laser scanning microscope. Transient expression of 35S::YFP and 35S::SaDXR-YFP in living protoplasts, displaying YFP fluorescence (yellow), chlorophyll autofluorescence (blue), bright field, and merged image (yellow plus blue). Bar: 20 μm.
Genes 12 00626 g004
Figure 5. Nucleotide sequence and putative cis-acting elements of the cloned SaDXR promoter. The transcription initiation site and ATG are shown in bold italics, and indicated as +1 and +164, respectively. The TATA and CAAT-box are underlined and labeled from −22 to −18 and from −210 to −197, respectively. Various cis-acting elements were predicted by the PlantCARE program. ABRE, a cis-acting element involved in abscisic acid responsiveness; ATCT-motif, G-box, GT1-motif, Sp1, and chs-CMA2a are light-responsive elements; GARE-motif and TATC-box are cis-acting elements involved in gibberellin responsiveness; HSE, a cis-acting element related to responsiveness to heat stress; O2-site is involved in the regulation of zein metabolism; Skn-1_motif, a cis-acting regulatory element required for endosperm expression; TC-rich repeats, cis-acting elements involved in defense and stress responsiveness; TCA-element, a cis-acting element involved in salicylic acid responsiveness.
Figure 5. Nucleotide sequence and putative cis-acting elements of the cloned SaDXR promoter. The transcription initiation site and ATG are shown in bold italics, and indicated as +1 and +164, respectively. The TATA and CAAT-box are underlined and labeled from −22 to −18 and from −210 to −197, respectively. Various cis-acting elements were predicted by the PlantCARE program. ABRE, a cis-acting element involved in abscisic acid responsiveness; ATCT-motif, G-box, GT1-motif, Sp1, and chs-CMA2a are light-responsive elements; GARE-motif and TATC-box are cis-acting elements involved in gibberellin responsiveness; HSE, a cis-acting element related to responsiveness to heat stress; O2-site is involved in the regulation of zein metabolism; Skn-1_motif, a cis-acting regulatory element required for endosperm expression; TC-rich repeats, cis-acting elements involved in defense and stress responsiveness; TCA-element, a cis-acting element involved in salicylic acid responsiveness.
Genes 12 00626 g005
Figure 6. Expression patterns of SaDXR and SaSSy in different organs of a 7-year-old S. album trees analyzed by qRT-PCR. Each value represents the means of three independent biological replicates ± SD. Different letters (a,b,c,d,e,f,g) above bars indicate significant differences among organs, assessed separately for SaDXR and SaSSy (DMRT, p < 0.05).
Figure 6. Expression patterns of SaDXR and SaSSy in different organs of a 7-year-old S. album trees analyzed by qRT-PCR. Each value represents the means of three independent biological replicates ± SD. Different letters (a,b,c,d,e,f,g) above bars indicate significant differences among organs, assessed separately for SaDXR and SaSSy (DMRT, p < 0.05).
Genes 12 00626 g006
Figure 7. Expression profile of SaDXR in 40-day-old S. album etiolated seedlings that were exposed to light. S. album seeds were germinated in the dark for 20 days then grown into 10 cm-etiolated seedlings for other 20 days. Subsequently, etiolated seedlings were exposed to light for 0, 1, 3, 6, 24 h or grown in a 16-h photoperiod. Each value represents the means of three independent biological replicates ± SD. Different letters above bars indicate significant differences (DMRT, p < 0.05).
Figure 7. Expression profile of SaDXR in 40-day-old S. album etiolated seedlings that were exposed to light. S. album seeds were germinated in the dark for 20 days then grown into 10 cm-etiolated seedlings for other 20 days. Subsequently, etiolated seedlings were exposed to light for 0, 1, 3, 6, 24 h or grown in a 16-h photoperiod. Each value represents the means of three independent biological replicates ± SD. Different letters above bars indicate significant differences (DMRT, p < 0.05).
Genes 12 00626 g007
Figure 8. Overexpression of SaDXR in A. thaliana. (A) Schematic representation of the 35S::SaDXR overexpression vector. (B) Gene expression analysis of SaDXR in wild-type (WT), i.e., control, and in select transgenic lines of A. thaliana by using semi-quantitative PCR. (C) Expression level of SaDXR and AtDXR in WT or transgenic A. thaliana seedlings by qRT-PCR. WT did not give a signal as the primers are specific to SaDXR. Each value represents the means of three independent biological replicates ± SD. Different letters above bars indicate significant differences (DMRT, p < 0.05).
Figure 8. Overexpression of SaDXR in A. thaliana. (A) Schematic representation of the 35S::SaDXR overexpression vector. (B) Gene expression analysis of SaDXR in wild-type (WT), i.e., control, and in select transgenic lines of A. thaliana by using semi-quantitative PCR. (C) Expression level of SaDXR and AtDXR in WT or transgenic A. thaliana seedlings by qRT-PCR. WT did not give a signal as the primers are specific to SaDXR. Each value represents the means of three independent biological replicates ± SD. Different letters above bars indicate significant differences (DMRT, p < 0.05).
Genes 12 00626 g008
Figure 9. Contents of chlorophylls and carotenoids in transgenic A. thaliana seedlings carrying the SaDXR transgene. (A) Contents of chlorophyll a (Chl a), chlorophyll b (Chl b) and total chlorophyll in transgenic A. thaliana plants. (B) Content of carotenoids in 35S::SaDXR transgenic lines. Each value represents the means of three independent biological replicates ± SD. Different letters above bars indicate significant differences for each Chl type relative to WT (DMRT, p < 0.05).
Figure 9. Contents of chlorophylls and carotenoids in transgenic A. thaliana seedlings carrying the SaDXR transgene. (A) Contents of chlorophyll a (Chl a), chlorophyll b (Chl b) and total chlorophyll in transgenic A. thaliana plants. (B) Content of carotenoids in 35S::SaDXR transgenic lines. Each value represents the means of three independent biological replicates ± SD. Different letters above bars indicate significant differences for each Chl type relative to WT (DMRT, p < 0.05).
Genes 12 00626 g009
Figure 10. Expression analysis of SaDXR and SaSSy of 8-month-old S. album seedlings in response to two elicitors, 5 mM H2O2 or 1 mM MeJA. Eight-month-old S. album seedlings treated with water were used as the control. Each value represents the means of three independent biological replicates ± SD. Different letters (a,b,c,d,e,f,g) above bars indicate significant differences across treatments (DMRT, p < 0.05).
Figure 10. Expression analysis of SaDXR and SaSSy of 8-month-old S. album seedlings in response to two elicitors, 5 mM H2O2 or 1 mM MeJA. Eight-month-old S. album seedlings treated with water were used as the control. Each value represents the means of three independent biological replicates ± SD. Different letters (a,b,c,d,e,f,g) above bars indicate significant differences across treatments (DMRT, p < 0.05).
Genes 12 00626 g010
Figure 11. Profile of sandalwood sesquiterpenoids in the roots of the control and FOS-treated 8-month-old seedlings. (A,B) Total ion chromatogram (TIC) of control and FOS-treated seedlings roots, respectively. (C) Relative contents of sandalwood sesquiterpenoids (1, dodecane; 2, α-santalene; 3, α-bergamotene; 4, epi-β-santalene; 5, β-santalene; 6, α-santalol) were identified by comparison to NIST05, NIST05s and the Wiley 9 library. Each value represents the means of three independent biological replicates ± SD. Different letters above bars indicate significant differences between FOS and the control for each sesquiterpenoid (DMRT, p < 0.05).
Figure 11. Profile of sandalwood sesquiterpenoids in the roots of the control and FOS-treated 8-month-old seedlings. (A,B) Total ion chromatogram (TIC) of control and FOS-treated seedlings roots, respectively. (C) Relative contents of sandalwood sesquiterpenoids (1, dodecane; 2, α-santalene; 3, α-bergamotene; 4, epi-β-santalene; 5, β-santalene; 6, α-santalol) were identified by comparison to NIST05, NIST05s and the Wiley 9 library. Each value represents the means of three independent biological replicates ± SD. Different letters above bars indicate significant differences between FOS and the control for each sesquiterpenoid (DMRT, p < 0.05).
Genes 12 00626 g011
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, Y.; Yan, H.; Li, Y.; Xiong, Y.; Niu, M.; Zhang, X.; Teixeira da Silva, J.A.; Ma, G. Molecular Cloning and Functional Analysis of 1-Deoxy-D-Xylulose 5-Phosphate Reductoisomerase from Santalum album. Genes 2021, 12, 626. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12050626

AMA Style

Zhang Y, Yan H, Li Y, Xiong Y, Niu M, Zhang X, Teixeira da Silva JA, Ma G. Molecular Cloning and Functional Analysis of 1-Deoxy-D-Xylulose 5-Phosphate Reductoisomerase from Santalum album. Genes. 2021; 12(5):626. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12050626

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Yueya, Haifeng Yan, Yuan Li, Yuping Xiong, Meiyun Niu, Xinhua Zhang, Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva, and Guohua Ma. 2021. "Molecular Cloning and Functional Analysis of 1-Deoxy-D-Xylulose 5-Phosphate Reductoisomerase from Santalum album" Genes 12, no. 5: 626. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12050626

APA Style

Zhang, Y., Yan, H., Li, Y., Xiong, Y., Niu, M., Zhang, X., Teixeira da Silva, J. A., & Ma, G. (2021). Molecular Cloning and Functional Analysis of 1-Deoxy-D-Xylulose 5-Phosphate Reductoisomerase from Santalum album. Genes, 12(5), 626. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12050626

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop