Next Article in Journal
OCT and ERG Techniques in High-Throughput Phenotyping of Mouse Vision
Previous Article in Journal
Seasonal Adaptation: Geographic Photoperiod–Temperature Patterns Explain Genetic Variation in the Common Vole Tsh Receptor
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Candidate Genes for Salt Tolerance in Forage Sorghum under Saline Conditions from Germination to Harvest Maturity

School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Ludong University, Yantai 264025, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2023, 14(2), 293; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14020293
Submission received: 3 October 2022 / Revised: 23 December 2022 / Accepted: 16 January 2023 / Published: 22 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Genetics and Genomics)

Abstract

:
To address the plant adaptability of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) in salinity, the research focus should shift from only selecting tolerant varieties to understanding the precise whole-plant genetic coping mechanisms with long-term influence on various phenotypes of interest to expanding salinity, improving water use, and ensuring nutrient use efficiency. In this review, we discovered that multiple genes may play pleiotropic regulatory roles in sorghum germination, growth, and development, salt stress response, forage value, and the web of signaling networks. The conserved domain and gene family analysis reveals a remarkable functional overlap among members of the bHLH (basic helix loop helix), WRKY (WRKY DNA-binding domain), and NAC (NAM, ATAF1/2, and CUC2) superfamilies. Shoot water and carbon partitioning, for example, are dominated by genes from the aquaporins and SWEET families, respectively. The gibberellin (GA) family of genes is prevalent during pre-saline exposure seed dormancy breaking and early embryo development at post-saline exposure. To improve the precision of the conventional method of determining silage harvest maturity time, we propose three phenotypes and their underlying genetic mechanisms: (i) the precise timing of transcriptional repression of cytokinin biosynthesis (IPT) and stay green (stg1 and stg2) genes; (ii) the transcriptional upregulation of the SbY1 gene and (iii) the transcriptional upregulation of the HSP90-6 gene responsible for grain filling with nutritive biochemicals. This work presents a potential resource for sorghum salt tolerance and genetic studies for forage and breeding.

1. Introduction

The fact that global salinity is not only vast but expanding has progressed from a claim to reality. For example, when we run a confusion matrix of the previous five remote sensing studies that predicted global salinity events [1,2,3,4,5], three outcomes are clear: non-saline land will remain or become slightly saline, slightly saline land will remain or become moderately saline, and moderately, highly, and extremely high saline areas will remain so for an unpredictable future (Table 1). It is worth noting that the study results encompass marginal and uncultivated land on a greater scale. With increased improper irrigation techniques in agricultural land, it is reasonable to deduce that the pace of salinization in cultivated areas is higher. Sorghum is an important food, feed, and industrial crop with the potential to mitigate food insecurity in China and other parts of the globe. Because sorghum is a moderately salt-resistant crop, it is confronted with all three possibilities, and in order to survive, it must quickly adapt to the rapidly expanding salinity—which is doubtful.
Currently, breeders are combining conventional and modern phenomics, genomics, and environics to identify and select superior varieties in terms of yield and salt tolerance, as well as to generate high-yielding salt tolerant genotypes [6]. The limitation of the former is that it is time-consuming and necessitates the scanning of huge populations, and it is difficult to get accessions with all the desired features of interest. The latter results in fewer gene pools, which might result in a popular sire effect. The ongoing extension and rise of salinity, and how sorghum can deal with it in a systematic manner remains a bottleneck to tackle in breeding and modeling programs. The first step in addressing this is to deconstruct the whole-plant genetic process governing the phenotypic of interest, which includes salinity adaptation.
Damage to plants by salt stress involves ionic toxicity, osmotic imbalance, and oxidative damage. Except for Na and Cl toxicity, plants’ responses to salinity and drought at the genetic level are similar. The osmotic effect, for example, which is the initial phase of salinity stress, imposes physiological drought, eliciting a response comparable to drought stress. As a result, studies in sorghum involving osmotic stress caused by drought will also be reviewed here.

2. Seed Dormancy Release and Germination

The readiness of a seed to germinate for subsequent multiplication is essential for an efficient silage production program. As a result, understanding the dormancy breakage of sorghum seeds is required for timely germination. After seed dormancy, the germination and emergence phases of the sorghum life cycle are the most sensitive to salt stress; seedling characteristics are suggested as a viable criterion for genotype selection with better performance under saline conditions stress during the germination and seedling growth stages, which affect ultimate plant performance, will be critical for producing salt-tolerant and high-yielding genotypes [7].
Sorghum seed recovery from dormancy is influenced by abscisic acid (ABA) signaling and gibberellic acid (GA) metabolism [8]. Embryo susceptibility to ABA and GA was associated with dormancy expression [9]. For instance, sorghum expressing four positive regulators of ABA signaling, i.e., SbABI3/VP1, SbABI4, SbABI5, and SbPKABA1, exhibited an increase in the germination rate [10]. Greater embryo sensitivity to ABA and higher expression of SbABI4 and SbABI5 in dormant grains resulted in increased GA catabolism, which was related to early sorghum emergence from dormancy. Both SbABI4 and SbABI5 ABA signaling components interact with the SbGA2ox3 promoter, which includes an ABA-responsive complex (ABRC) [11]. This suggests that the two genes may compete for the same cis-acting regulatory elements related to sorghum grain release from dormancy. Therefore, we dig deeper into the potential mechanism behind this transcriptional regulation. A comprehensive transcriptome analysis of several sorghum genes encoding putative GA enzymes, including SbGA2ox3, revealed a transient increase in these transcripts in more dormant sorghum grains as compared to less dormant grains [12]. Recently, it has been shown that repressing SbGA2ox3 resulted in active GA buildup, promoting dormant grain germination [13] and thus suggesting that SbABI4- and SbABI5-mediated transcriptional suppression of SbGA2ox3 could be the mechanism underlying GA buildup and release from dormancy.
After dormancy release, similar to other plants, sorghum’s response to salt stress during the germination and seedling phases is a complex quantitative trait governed by pleiotropic genes and maintaining a high germination rate enhances its chances of survival under stress. Dubbed the ‘jack of all trades’, the WRKY genes are one of the most extensive groups of transcriptional regulators in plants which play critical roles in early plant development and salt stress response [14,15]. A cis-acting element analysis reveals that all sorghum SbWRKYs include at least one salt stress response-related cis-element, as well as early development phenotypes. Also, an in-depth expression analysis of individual genes shows a high upregulation of SbWRKY50 and SbWRKY56 during the early sorghum germination stages under salt stress [16]. The SbWRKY50 binds to the upstream promoter of the HKT1 gene during the three-leaf phase of a sorghum seedling [17]. Sorghum HKT1 gene functions to maintain optimal Na+/K+ balance under Na+ stress [18], implying that SbWRKY50 has a role in sorghum salt response via regulating ion homeostasis at the germination stage. Another salt upregulated gene in the work of Baillo et al. is SbWRKY56. Interestingly, under salt stress, the overexpression of its ortholog AtWRKY46 enhances salt-stress independent root growth and photosynthesis via the regulation of ABA signaling and auxin homeostasis in Arabidopsis seedlings [19]. This maintenance of photosynthesis at the seedling stage ensures steady source-sink carbon flow which is vital for plant survival and the NADP-malate dehydrogenase (NADP-ME) enzyme is essential for the C4 photosynthetic pathway. During the seedling stage, a sorghum SbNADP-ME overexpression increases salt tolerance and alleviates PSII and PSI photoinhibition by improving photosynthetic capacity [20]. These observations suggest that the co-expression of SbWRKY50, SbWRKY56, and SbNADP-ME at the seedling stage may enable sorghum to achieve maximum photosynthetic capacity while maintaining high ion homeostasis and root growth. Ion homeostasis and root growth were determinant factors in tomato seedling survival under salt stress [21]. Figure 1 shows transcriptional regulation of sorghum seed pre- and post-salt exposure.

3. Early to Late Salt Stress Signaling

3.1. Hormonal Signaling

Plant hormones play important roles in salt stress signaling and transduction [22]. One of the most effective response mechanisms to salt stress is the biosynthesis and accumulation of ABA, which is a key regulator in the activation of plant cellular adaptation to salinity [23]. The ABA biosynthesis pathway involves the action of the primary components of the ABA pathway, including gene members from the PYL/PYRs, PP2Cs, and NCEDs families [24]. Individual members of this family, i.e., SbNCED5, SbPYL7, SbPP2C53, SbPP2C09, SbPP2C23 and SbPP2C58 were overexpressed under salt stress in sorghum which correlated positively with ABA accumulation [25].
Our in-depth analysis reveals that during salt signaling, genes in the ABA pathway may interact directly with other signaling molecules or indirectly through transcriptional regulation to trigger a salt response. For instance, typically ABA has an abscisic acid (ABA)-responsive element (ABRE)-binding factors that regulate the expression of target genes involved in signaling to high salinity by binding ABRE cis-elements in the promoter regions [26]. An overexpression of ABREs in sorghum reveals a potential role in sugar signaling motifs under osmotic stress [27]. This implies that ABA signaling may participate in salt-triggered physiological drought-induced remobilization of sugar molecules in sorghum. It is interesting to realize that the NAC salt-responsive superfamily may also participate in ABA cascade salt signaling in sorghum. First, SbNAC17, SbNAC46, SbNAC26, SbNAC56 and SbNAC73 genes showed time-differential upregulation patterns in sorghum response to salinity [28]. During the germination stage, SbNAC56 overexpression in transgenic lines exhibited significantly enhanced hypersensitivities to NaCl in an ABA-dependent manner [28]. An ortholog of SbNAC26 is a rice OsNAC3 which positively regulates salt tolerance and plant height through the ABA signaling cascade [29]. SbNAC73, SbNAC46, and SbNAC17 belong to the NAP subfamily of the NAC superfamily. These genes are orthologous to Arabidopsis AtNAP, which is a conserved senescence promoter and functions as a regulator of salt-induced osmotic stress responses, through an ABA pathway-dependent gene AREB1 [30]. SbNAC58 belongs to the ATAF subfamily of the NAC superfamily whose overexpression enhanced the shoot growth, RWC, and ABA-mediated salt tolerance [31]. This may infer that NAP and ATAF subfamilies of NAC play essential roles in sorghum response to salt stresses in the ABA-dependent signaling pathway and may contribute to the shoot dry mass.
Auxins are vital for shoot growth and plants’ response to salinity. When we scan through the cis-acting regulatory elements within promoter regions of sorghum auxin genes, we observe that all the gene families involved in auxin biosynthesis, i.e., SbGH3, SbLBD, SbARF and SbIAA are responsive to and upregulated by salt stress [32]. Further, an expression analysis reveals that highly salt-responsive SbARF16 and SbARF7 are also highly expressed during early, mid, and late physiological maturity in sorghum. Evolutionarily, these genes belong to the Class III clade and their orthologs are AtARF19 and AtARF12, respectively [33]. AtARF19 promotes flowering, stamen development, floral organ abscission and fruit dehiscence [34]. OsARF12, an ortholog of SbARF7 which is abundant in the sorghum root, is implicated in regulating auxin-mediated root elongation and high iron content [35]. These observations shed light on ARFs genes that may not only be involved in auxin biosynthesis and signaling under salt stress but also influence nutrient acquisition via root elongation and enhance panicle development.
Ethylene is an important hormone that determines many aspects of the plant’s vegetative development. The Ethylene Response Factors (ERF) act as critical downstream components of the ethylene signaling pathway [36]. From a phylogenetic analysis, predicted orthologous genes for sorghum ERFs includes OsDREB1A (SbERF027), OsDREB1B (SbERF025), OsDREB1C (SbERF100), SbERF085 (OsDREB1D), OsDREB1E (SbERF072), and OsDREB1F (SbERF042) whose promoter’s regions contained cis-elements related to salt stress response and response to ethylene [37]. It is not surprising that all the orthologous members of sorghum ERFs above have Dehydration-Responsive Binding Elements (DREB) domains. It is well established that these DREB genes have a conserved function in plants’ response to drought and salinity-triggered dehydration [38]. Our further functional analysis of sorghum genes with DREB domain reveals that root abundant SbDREB2 under salt stress is targeted by putatively five miRNAs indicating their roles in post-transcriptional regulation [39]. SbDREB2A ortholog is a rice OsDREB2B [40] which regulates salt tolerance through the ABA-mediated pathways and enhanced shoot growth performance [41]. Further functional analysis reveals that a sorghum SbERF094 ortholog regulates ethylene-mediated root to shoot signaling during salinity stress and promotes shoot growth in rice [42]. The induction of these genes by osmotic stress in sorghum indicates their potential involvement in salt-induced ethylene signaling and physiological drought stress response in sorghum.
The brassinosteroids (BR) are key regulators of plant development and physiology whose biosynthesis and signaling are mediated by the BES1 gene family. In sorghum, two BES1 genes (SbBES1-4 and SbBES1-9) were abundant in the root and were upregulated under osmotic stress [43]. The BES1 genes are conserved in function and work synergistically to positively regulate BR signaling [44] and recent salt response [45]. Due to the scarcity of the literature on this gene in sorghum, we explore its possible interaction with other known genes. We observed that most genes in the BR signaling pathway in sorghum have a conserved bHLH domain. For instance, the salt responsive SbBHLH050 in sorghum belongs to the BEE3 subfamily of the bHLH superfamily (others being BEE1 and BEE2), which is an early responder to BR signaling components. Friedrichsen et al. [46] and Moreno et al. [47] have shown that BEEs are strongly induced by salt stress and overexpressing plants exhibited larger leaf diameters, seed yield, stem length, and number of internodes. Another salt-responsive gene in sorghum is SbBHLH079, whose homolog in rice induced a wide leaf angle phenotype and produced long grains with enhanced BR signaling [48]. Taking these findings together, we infer that salt signaling in sorghum via the BR pathway includes the activation of BEE genes, the members of which have conserved bHLH domains and promote foliar development.
Other than seed dormancy breaking, the important role of GA in the response to abiotic stress is becoming increasingly evident. For example, reduction of GA levels and signaling has been shown to contribute to plant growth restriction on exposure to salt stress [49]. The complex pathways of bioactive GA biosynthesis in higher plants require three different classes of enzymes encoded by the GA gene family, including GA20 oxidase (GA20ox), GA3 oxidase (GA3ox), and GA2 oxidase (GA2ox) [50]. Under salt stress, SbGA2ox1 was expressed throughout the sorghum life circle with a bias in the root compared to the leaves, indicating a possible root-soil interaction. SbGA2ox2 exhibited the highest level at all developmental stages and in all tested tissues, indicating an interaction between the root and shoot. Interestingly, the expression pattern of SbGA20ox3 had a higher expression level during early sorghum development. Biosynthesis of these GA was associated with stem biomass increase [51]. To further understand the potential role of GA signaling in salt response in sorghum, it is important to look at the transcriptional regulation of GA biosynthesis and accumulation in sorghum which eventually influences signaling. DELLA genes from the GRAS family are suggested to be the main transcriptional regulators of GA biosynthesis and signaling [52]. Three DELLA genes i.e., SbGRAS68, SbGRAS03, and SbGRAS23 have been mapped in the sorghum genome [53]. Repression of these genes 9 days of sorghum growth shows high GA accumulation and improved germination rate [53]. The three genes are orthologs of the rice OsGRAS1 gene, which has a promoter region containing salt resistance-related and hormone response cis-elements and has been shown to improve germination under salt stress [54]. This finding implies that GA-mediated salt signaling and emergence in sorghum occurs via transcriptional repression of three DELLAs, SbGRAS68, SbGRAS03, and SbGRAS23, which is consistent with prior findings that DELLA and GA operate in opposing ways [55].

3.2. Non-Hormonal Signaling

Ca2+ signaling and its downstream calcium-dependent protein kinases (CPKs) play critical roles in the detection and transmission of stress signals [56]. Studies on CPKs in sorghum and their roles in response to salt stress, on the other hand, are largely unexplored. SbCDPK6, SbCDPK59, SbCDPK30 and SbCDPK27 are highly expressed in sorghum under osmotic stress [57]. The mitochondrial calcium uniporter (MCU) is a Ca2+channel complex component that regulates intracellular Ca2+ signal transduction. Four SbMCU genes have been identified in the sorghum genome, and expression patterns analysis revealed that the genes were differentially expressed in different tissues, with SbMCU5.2 exhibiting the greatest expression under osmotic stress [58,59]. Members of the MCU5.2 class have an impact on the downstream signaling pathways caused by osmotic stress, which include the activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) [60]. So far, 12 MAPKs have been discovered in the sorghum genome. All of the SbMAPKs were upregulated during early salt response except for SbMAPK13, whose expression peaked 12 h later [61]. We suggest that SbMAPK13 could be involved in post-salt signaling events rather than signal sensing. Our phylogenetic analysis reveals that SbMPK13 is an ortholog of rice OsMAPK2, which is responsible for ABA-mediated salt response and was associated with enhanced phosphorus uptake and accumulation of the shoot [62]. This finding implies that salt-induced Ca2+ dynamics through the mitochondrial MCU may trigger a complex signaling cascade involving hormones and SbMAPKs. A coordination of these hormones from early to late plant development under salt stress have been suggested to influence the Salt Overly Sensitive pathway which influenced the circadian clock and production of floral phenotypes [63]. Figure 2 demonstrates the various signaling pathways in sorghum under salt stress.

4. Root Developmental Plasticity

The root capacity to support plant growth and development amid changing soil conditions can be critical in mitigating the effects of salt stress and maintaining higher crop productivity. Roots, on the other hand, are frequently disregarded in crop production strategies. Understanding the genetic aspects of root growth and developmental flexibility might provide an opportunity for sorghum breeders to generate varieties with more resistant system designs to salt stress.
A plant’s capacity to regenerate new root hairs is vital for mineral and water absorption, which are significant aspects of plant development and tolerance to salt stress. A sorghum SbbHLH85 controls resistance to salt stress by enhancing root hair development [64]. The TCP is another prominent gene family with a conserved bHLH domain that plays robust roles in altering root growth to influence agronomic properties in crops. In sorghum SbTCP10, SbTCP13, and SbTCP15 are among the genes that are highly expressed in the sorghum root at the seedling stage. An analysis of abiotic stress response reveals that the three genes are upregulated by Na+ [65]. The three genes are orthologous to an Arabidopsis AtTCP14 whose expression enhanced radicle growth and was implicated in early root growth [66]. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging is essential for the maintenance of plant growth under salt stress. Salt stress greatly enhanced a sorghum SbNAC2 whose heterologous overexpression enhanced antioxidant enzyme-mediated primary root growth [67]. This suggests the important role of the gene is mediating growth and ROS scavenging in sorghum roots.
Root apoplastic barriers, consisting of Casparian bands and suberin lamellae, play pivotal roles in blocking the apoplastic bypass flow of water and ions into the stele and Na+ transport into shoots [68]. Salt stress induces the strengthening of the root apoplastic barriers [69]. Twenty-four genes encoding enzymes involved in the Casparian strip production were expressed differentially in the sorghum root [70]. SORBI3006G148800, which encodes nutritive phenylalanine proteins that are also precursors to lignin, were among the genes that were upregulated in sorghum early root development. SORBI3002G250000, which participates in the synthesis of S-type lignin, was also upregulated throughout the sorghum root growth stages [71]. These genes belong to the CASP-like subfamily and are found on chromosomes 9 and 16, respectively, in the sorghum genome, and are thought to play a conserved role in water retention. Salt stress, for example, increases the expression of the sorghum SbCASP4 gene, which is in the endodermis cells of sorghum roots. The heterologous expression of SbCASP4 in transgenic Arabidopsis was related to increased water retention and resistance to salt stress Na repulsion [71]. Since aboveground lignin accumulation lowers the forage value of sorghum, it is interesting to note that here upregulating genes coding key root lignin precursors may trigger events that promote forage value aboveground through water retention.
Suberin biosynthesis and accumulation may serve as an adaptive response to prevent excessive water loss caused by salt-induced negative osmotic pressure. The Cytochrome P450 (CYP) gene family’s CYP89A2 and CYP89A, which encode enzymes that play conserved roles in plant cell apoptosis, are among the most upregulated genes during early, mid, and late sorghum root development [72]. In addition, upregulated SbGPAT5 is also thought to have a role in sorghum root growth. The gene codes for the enzyme GPAT5 catalyzes the transfer of an acyl group from an acyl donor during suberin biosynthesis [73]. Furthermore, SbHHT1, a significantly upregulated acyltransferase, is necessary for the incorporation of ferulate into suberin during root development [74]. These findings indicate multi-family involvement in suberin biosynthesis during different developmental stages of the sorghum root, functioning as an important barrier for water loss caused by salt-induced negative osmotic pressure contributing to high water content. In Arabidopsis the suberin content and protein structures discussed here constituted important aspects of suberin’s barrier function in lowering water loss and sodium absorption through roots for improved drought and salt stress performance [75]. Figure 3 summarizes our hypothetical apoplastic pathway in sorghum root under salt stress.

5. Water Absorption and Channeling

Plants can overcome salt-induced osmotic stress by accumulating suitable osmolytes. Sorghum overexpressing the proline biosynthesis genes SbP5CSF129A demonstrated better salt stress tolerance and high-water retention [76]. Furthermore, the capacity to manufacture and store glycine betaine is common in angiosperms and is hypothesized to contribute to salt stress tolerance. The overexpression of SbBADH1 and SbBADH15 genes, which encode Betaine Aldehyde Dehydrogenase proteins, greatly increased osmotic potential and allowed for maximum osmotic adjustment, enhancing water intake and aboveground performance under salt stress in sorghum [77]. Another essential suitable osmolyte is mannitol. The mannitol biosynthetic pathway was designed into a Sorghum cultivar SPV462 by introducing the mtlD gene, which encodes mannitol-1-phosphate dehydrogenase. Under salt stress, transgenic plants overexpressing the gene absorbed and retained more water and sustained greater shoot and root development when compared to untransformed controls [78]. These findings suggest that genes involved in the soluble sugar and protein production pathway may play a crucial osmoregulatory function in sorghum salt-induced osmotic stress by promoting osmotic adjustment and water absorption from the soil.
Following absorption, the water channeling network oversees delivering water throughout the plant in order to keep it hydrated. The aquaporin (AQP) gene family is among the most functionally conserved of all gene families for this role [79]. Palakolanu et al. [80] used a genome-wide approach to identify and characterize sorghum AQP genes. Results showed high salt-induced expression of aquaporins coding for tonoplast and plasma intrinsic proteins, i.e., SbTIP2;1, SbTIP3;1, SbPIP1;5, SbPIP1, PIP1;5, SbPIP2.8 and SbPIP1;2. Overexpression of SbTIP2;1 homolog has been shown to increase growth and tolerance to salt stress by increasing water uptake and retention [81]. Also, the heterologous expression of a SbPIP1;2 homologs in Arabidopsis increased water absorption and CO2 uptake under salt stress. Furthermore, rewatering following osmotic stress allowed a considerably larger percentage of transgenic plants to be recovered, showing the transgenic plants’ capacity to maintain water and viability under water stress [82]. PIP1;5 was shown to be important in enhancing root water absorption in sorghum during osmotic stress, while SbPIP2.8 was linked to increased root water permeability [83]. Protoplasts from tobacco overexpressing a sorghum SbPIP1 absorbed water faster than wild type retaining higher RWC [84]. These functional conserved roles of sorghum aquaporins indicate the overlapping role of tonoplast and plasma intrinsic to protein’s potential role in water channeling in sorghum to prevent salt-induced osmotic damage and promote photosynthesis. Overexpression aquaporins in a tomato revealed that they might help in recovery from salt injury both in the roots and leaves, implying their important roles in regulating water transport in an organ-specific manner [84].

6. Photosynthesis and Carbon Partitioning

In photosynthetic plants, the chlorophyll and carotenoid pigments constitute the light-harvesting complex (LHC) which is encoded by the nuclear LHC gene family. In sorghum, these LHCs are associated with antenna protein PsbR which plays key roles in the PSII core complexes [85]. PsbR-encoding genes PsaK, PsaH, and PsaO were upregulated by salt stress in salt-tolerant sorghum compared to sensitive ones and were associated with a greater light-harvesting capacity [86]. After light harvesting, the NADP-ME catalyzes the oxidative decarboxylation of malate to generate CO2, pyruvate, and NADPH, which is essential for the carbon fixation process in C4 plants [87]. SbNADP-ME gene expression in sorghum is highly enhanced by salt stress, and its overexpression in Arabidopsis exhibited improved photosynthetic parameters such as PSII photochemical efficiency [20], indicating that the gene may alleviate salt-induced damage in sorghum by enhancing photosynthesis.
After C fixation, C partitioning during photosynthesis is an important aspect in determining silage nutritional value, and sugar is the most common kind of carbohydrate involved in plant carbon transfer. The accumulation of sugars in sorghum necessitates the action of enzymes [88]. Sucrose synthase enzymes are known to have a role in sucrose synthesis in sorghum, with significant activity in source tissues such as stem internodes [89]. The enzymes are coded by SS family genes, whose members are more up-regulated in salt-tolerant sorghum during salt stress, resulting in greater sucrose accumulation in the stem [90]. These findings imply that the level of overexpression of sucrose synthase genes is critical in regulating sorghum’s tolerance to salt stress.
The remobilization of synthesized sugars from the source to sink tissues is an important process that determines forage yield in crops. Sugars will eventually be exported transporters (SWEET) is a newly identified family of sugar transporters that have been characterized in Arabidopsis and rice, while very little knowledge of sugar accumulation in sorghum is available [91]. Comprehensive transcriptome analysis of these genes has been done on sorghum by Mizuno et al. [92]. Most of the genes are related to sugar accumulation in sorghum stem compared to other plants and among the most upregulated is SbSWEET8-1. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that SbSWEET8-1 is orthologous to Arabidopsis SWEET11 and SWEET12 [93]. The two genes are bidirectional sugar transporters that are involved in phloem loading by mediating export from parenchyma cells into the sieve companion cell complex, thus contributing to the sucrose migration from source to sink and osmotic balance [94]. SbSWEET9-3 was highly expressed in the panicle and was grouped into the same clade as AtSWEET8/RPG1 which was reported to maintain the plasma membrane integrity of microspores [95]. It is well-known that plasma membrane integrity is an important aspect of salt tolerance. SbSWEET2-1 and SbSWEET7-1 were expressed and grouped in the same clade as rice OsSWEET11/Xa13, which is essential for early grain filling [96]. These observations indicate that SWEET transporters may play an important role by mediating source-sink dynamics but may also contribute to osmotic-adjustment mediated salt tolerance in sorghum. The important role of SWEET gene is sucrose accumulation and plant development which have been summarized by Mizuno et al. [92] and Guan et al. [95]. Figure 4 shows a hypothetical model of sugar partitioning in sorghum under salt stress.

7. Flowering and Pollination

Maintaining healthy flowers under salt stress is critical to sorghum’s reproductive performance and panicle yield. Nuclear factor Y (NF-Y) is an evolutionarily conserved trimeric transcription factor complex that consists of three subunits: NF-YA, NF-YB, and NF-YC. [97]. A total of 33 NF-Y genes have been identified in the sorghum genome and, under salt stress, all NF-Y subfamily members are upregulated in sorghum flowers [98]. These three subfamilies’ genes encode proteins that act as positive flowering regulators [99]. Most of the discovered SbNF-Ys in sorghum have orthologous relationships with rice and maize. For example, of SbNF-YBs and SbNF-YB11 orthologs are OsHAP3H and OsHAP3C, respectively, which regulate photoperiodic flowering and grain development [100]. Interestingly, under osmotic stress conditions, transgenic maize overexpressing the ortholog of the SbNF-YB11 gene shows tolerance to osmotic stress and maintenance of flower growth [101]. This suggests that this gene floral upregulation can promote sorghum flowering under salt-induced osmotic stress.
Genes of the trihelix family may also participate in flower development under salt stress in sorghum. SbTH02 is classified into subfamily GT2 and has the highest expression levels in the sorghum pistils, which corresponds to its ortholog AT5G03680.1, which regulates collective leaf inflorescence development [102]. SbTH15 is also a member of subfamily GT2 and shares a motif composition with its Arabidopsis ortholog AtTH26. Previous studies have shown that AtTH26 (At5G28300) is induced by NaCl and highly expressed in Arabidopsis inflorescence [103]. The highest floral expression in sorghum is observed in SbTH07, SbTH10, SbTH14, SbTH25, SbTH33 and SbTH36. Further, a correlation expression analysis reveals a high correlation between the expression of SbTH27 and SbTH28, SbTH33 and SbTH39, SbTH07 and SbTH32, and SbTH07 and SbTH10 in vital floral tissues such as stamen, pistil, and leaf pericarp of sorghum under salt stress [104]. The high floral specificity, significant correlation among their expression and osmotic stress responsiveness of these genes suggests their synergetic role in floral osmotic stress resistance.
During salt stress, the NAC family also appears to have a function in sorghum flowers. Phylogenetically, the SNAC1 subfamily includes three sorghum genes (SbNAC005, SbNAC021, and SbNAC052) as well as several recognized NAC genes such as rice OsSNAC1 (Os03g60080), maize ZmSNAC1 (JQ217429.1), and wheat TaNAC02 (AY625683.1) [105]. Osmotic stress raised the transcript levels of sorghum SbNAC005, SbNAC021, and SbNAC052 in flowers [106]. Overexpression of SNAC1 improved resistance to severe osmotic stress in transgenic rice reproductive tissues [31]. Thus, as we have suggested, the floral specificity of genes from nuclear factor Y, Trihelix, and NAC families under osmotic stress appear to be involved in flower water relations. To acquire a better understanding of this relatively new idea of floral hydration in sorghum, it is necessary to return to the extremely functionally conserved aquaporins. SbPIP1;2 is likewise reported to be substantially upregulated in the sorghum flower under osmotic stress, and its ortholog was shown to play a vital function in water transfer from the papilla cell to the pollen during pollination, which increased floral hydration and overall RWC [107]. As a result, it is reasonable to conclude that sorghum flower hydration may be critical in overcoming salt-induced osmotic stress and sustaining reproductive success. It would be fascinating to learn how a SbTH02 interacts with a SbPIP1;2, SNAC1, and a nuclear factor SbNF-YB11 during flower development in sorghum under salt-induced osmotic stress. Figure 5 shows our hypothetical model for floral hydration under salt stress.

8. Silage Harvest Maturity

Predicting the duration between distinct sorghum development phases and the projected silage harvest maturity date is difficult. Sorghum should ideally be collected at the soft-dough stage. Conventionally, this is roughly determined at the stage between flowering and hard grain when the grain continues to grow; biochemicals are quickly accumulating in the kernel, the grain color transitions, older leaves continue to undergo senescence and lose the stay-green phenotype. The genetic basis of these events has received little attention, yet it is vital for modeling.
Stay green is an osmotic stress adaptation trait that is distinctively defined by a green leaf phenotype during grain filling or after sorghum flowering [108]. QTLs for osmotic stress have been found to coincide with loci for early leaf senescence, and there are several examples where increased osmotic stress tolerance was accomplished through selection for the stay-green phenotype in sorghum [109,110,111,112,113]. Cytokinin production boosts growth and productivity by increasing the foliar stay-green phenotype under osmotic stress which influenced grain filling and grain number [114]. This implies that the loss of the stay-green phenotype in sorghum can be tracked biochemically by measuring cytokinin levels and genetically by examining the expression of the cytokinin biosynthetic gene Isopentenyltransferase (IPT) and upregulation of SbStg1 and Sbstg2 genes. Transgenic tobacco overexpressing the IPT gene generated more trans-zeatin, delayed senescence, preserved more biomass, and revived following osmotic stress [115].
Grain color transition can also be used to determine the genetic basis of sorghum silage maturity. At the genetic level, the sorghum SbY1 gene is the ortholog of maze Pericarp color 1 (ZmP1) gene, which is a transcriptional regulator involved in the flavonoid-related white-red grain color transition [116]. SbY1 gene is putatively located on QTL qSTIP1, and there are polymorphisms of the Y1 locus between BTx623 and NOG backgrounds. Previously, the study reported loss of function in alleles BTx623 through a deletion, while NOG had no functional deletion [117]. This suggests that SbY1 gene might be responsible for sorghum grain color transition changes.
Grain filling is another key biochemical factor that may influence sorghum silage harvest maturity. The relationship of grain starch accumulation with genomic areas encoding salt stress-related genes, membrane proteins, and putative signaling proteins reveals a more detailed participation of these sets of genes in sorghum grain filling mechanisms. For example, Sapkota et al. [118] discovered that the HSP90-6 gene interacts with many biosynthesis-related genes across the sorghum genome during grain filling, implying that this gene is likely a hub gene responsible for multiple pathways related to the processing and transportation of biochemicals during grain filling and warrants further research into its role in seed development at forage harvest maturity. Kamal et al. [119] observed a strong association between stay green genotype, grain filling stages, and panicle yield inn sorghum under salt stress. This suggests that simultaneous expression of genes in the stay green and grain filling pathway can play an important role in understanding the silage harvest readiness of sorghum.
As shown in Figure 6, we propose that biomarkers of three phenotypes at this stage should be designed and used to understand the genetic basis of harvest maturity. These are (i) the precise timing of transcriptional repression of cytokinin biosynthesis (IPT) and stay green (stg1 and stg2) genes which initiate early senescence events post flowering; (ii) the transcriptional upregulation of the SbY1 gene which initiates grain color transition post-flowering; and (iii) the transcriptional upregulation of HSP90-6 gene responsible for grain filling with nutritive biochemicals.

9. Conclusions and Future Perspective

These findings indicate that salt stress responses in sorghum involve complex chain molecular processes that include the interaction of regulatory proteins and the expression of target genes. Although research on the genetic mechanisms of ionic imbalances and oxidative components of salt stress is sufficient to draw conclusions, most studies have leaned toward the osmotic stress side of salinity. This is due, in part, to the fact that saline and aridity frequently coexist. More genes in the antioxidant and K/Na homeostasis pathways should be studied for a more comprehensive picture. Table 2 summarizes the gene families discussed here.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.F.; writing—original draft preparation, J.C.; writing—review and editing, S.F.; visualization, R.Y.; project administration, S.F.; funding acquisition, S.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 31901396.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Szabolcs, I. Salt-Affected Soils; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  2. Seelig, B.D. Salinity and Sodicity in North Dakota Soils; NDSU Extension Service, North Dakota State University of Agriculture and Applied Science: Fargo, ND, USA, 2000; p. 16. [Google Scholar]
  3. Squires, V.R.; Glenn, E.P. Salination, desertification, and soil erosion. In The Role of Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries in Human Nutrition; Squires, V.R., Ed.; UNESCO, EOLSS Publishers: Oxford, UK, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  4. Kovács, D.; Tóth, T.; Marth, P. Soil salinity between 1992 and 2000 in Hungary. Agrokém. Talajt. 2006, 55, 89–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Fan, X.; Pedroli, B.; Liu, G.; Liu, Q.; Liu, H.; Shu, L. Soil salinity development in the yellow river delta in relation to groundwater dynamics. Land Degrad. Dev. 2012, 23, 175–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chopra, S. Techniques and tools of modern plant breeding: Field Crops. In Plant Biotech; Ricroch, A., Chopra, S., Fleischer, S., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  7. Hameed, M.; Goher, N. Evaluation of seedling survivability and growth response as selection criteria for breeding drought tolerance in wheat. Cereal Res. Commun. 2010, 38, 193–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Pérez-Flores, L.; Carrari, F.; Osuna-Fernández, R.; Rodríguez, M.V.; Enciso, S. Expression analysis of a GA 20-oxidase in embryos from two sorghum lines with contrasting dormancy: Possible participation of this gene in the hormonal control of germination. J. Exp. Bot. 2003, 54, 2071–2079. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  9. Gualano, N.; Carrari, F.; Rodrıguez, M.V. Reduced embryo sensitivity to ABA in sprouting susceptible sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) variety is associated with an altered ABA signalling. Seed Sci. Res. 2007, 17, 81–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cantoro, R.; Fernández, L.G.; Cervigni, G.D.L. Seed dormancy QTL identification across a Sorghum bicolor segregating population. Euphytica 2016, 211, 41–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cantoro, R.; Crocco, C.D.; Benech-Arnold, R.L.; Rodríguez, M.V. In vitro binding of Sorghum bicolor transcription factors ABI4 and ABI5 to a conserved region of a GA 2-OXIDASE promoter: Possible role of this interaction in the expression of seed dormancy. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64, 5721–5735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Rodríguez, M.V.; Mendiondo, G.M.; Cantoro, R.; Auge, G.A.; Luna, V.; Masciarelli, O.; Benech-Arnold, R.L. Expression of seed dormancy in grain Sorghum lines with contrasting pre-harvest sprouting behavior involves differential regulation of gibberellin metabolism genes. Plant Cell Physiol. 2012, 53, 64–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Collin, A.; Daszkowska-Golec, I. Updates on the role of ABSCISIC ACID INSENSITIVE 5 (ABI5) and ABSCISIC ACID-RESPONSIVE ELEMENT BINDING FACTORs (ABFs) in ABA signaling in different developmental stages in plants. Cells 2021, 10, 1996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Rushton, P.J.; Somssich, I.E.; Ringler, P.; Shen, Q.J. WRKY transcription factors. Trends Plant Sci. 2010, 5, 247–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Jiang, J.; Ma, S.; Ye, N.; Jiang, M.; Cao, J.; Zhang, J. WRKY transcription factors in plant responses to stresses. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2017, 59, 86–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Baillo, E.H.; Hanif, M.S.; Guo, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Xu, P.; Algam, S.A. Genome-wide identification of WRKY transcription factor family members in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) moench). PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0236651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Song, Y.; Li, J.; Sui, Y. The sweet sorghum SbWRKY50 is negatively involved in salt response by regulating ion homeostasis. Plant Mol. Biol. 2020, 102, 603–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Wang, T.T.; Ren, Z.J.; Liu, Z.Q.; Feng, X.; Guo, R.Q.; Li, B.G.; Li, L.G.; Jing, H.C. SbHKT1;4, a member of the high-affinity potassium transporter gene family from Sorghum bicolor, functions to maintain optimal Na+ /K+ balance under Na+ stress. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2014, 56, 315–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ding, Z.; Yan, J.; Li, C.; Li, G.; Yun, W.; Shao, Z. Transcription factor WRKY46 modulates the development of Arabidopsis lateral roots in osmotic/salt stress conditions via regulation of ABA signaling and auxin homeostasis. Plant J. 2015, 84, 12958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Guo, Y.; Song, Y.; Zhang, H.; Zheng, Y.; Guo, J.; Sui, N. NADP-Malate Dehydrogenase of sweet sorghum improves salt tolerance of Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 5992–6002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rivera, P.; Moya, C.; O’Brien, J.A. Low Salt Treatment Results in Plant Growth Enhancement in Tomato Seedlings. Plants 2022, 11, 807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Javid, G.; Sorooshzadeh, M.; Moradi, A.; Modarres-Sanavy, F.; Ali Mohammad, N.; Allahdadi, I. The role of phytohormones in alleviating salt stress in crop plants. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 2011, 5, 726–734. [Google Scholar]
  23. Chen, K.; Li, G.J.; Bressan, R.A.; Song, C.P.; Zhu, J.K.; Zhao, Y. Abscisic acid dynamics, signaling, and functions in plants. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2020, 62, 25–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Xiong, L.; Zhu, J.K. Regulation of abscisic acid biosynthesis. Plant Physiol. 2003, 133, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Ma, S.L.; Meng, C.; Zhou, C.; Fu, J.; Shen, X.; Zhang, C.; Li, Y. Genome-wide analysis of abscisic acid biosynthesis, catabolism, and signaling in Sorghum Bicolor under saline-alkali stress. Biomolecules 2019, 9, 823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Fujita, Y.; Yoshida, T.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. Pivotal role of the AREB/ABF-SnRK2 pathway in ABRE-mediated transcription in response to osmotic stress in plants. Physiol. Plant. 2013, 147, 15–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ghate, T.; Barvkar, V.; Deshpande, S. Role of ABA signaling in regulation of stem sugar metabolism and transport under post-flowering drought stress in sweet sorghum. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 2019, 37, 303–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kadier, Y.; Zu, Y.; Dai, Q. Genome-wide identification, classification and expression analysis of NAC family of genes in sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]. Plant Growth Regul. 2017, 83, 301–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, X.; Long, Y.; Chen, X.; Zhang, B.; Xin, Y.; Li, L.; Cao, S.; Liu, F.; Wang, Z.; Huang, H.; et al. A NAC transcription factor OsNAC3 positively regulates ABA response and salt tolerance in rice. BMC Plant Biol. 2021, 21, 546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Seok, H.Y.; Woo, D.H.; Nguyen, L.V.; Tran, H.T.; Tarte, V.; Mehdi, N. Arabidopsis AtNAP functions as a negative regulator via repression of AREB1 in salt stress response. Planta 2017, 245, 329–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hu, H.; Dai, M.; Yao, J. Overexpressing a NAM, ATAF, and CUC (NAC) transcription factor enhances drought resistance and salt tolerance in rice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 12987–12992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Wang, S.; Bai, Y.; Shen, C. Auxin-related gene families in abiotic stress response in Sorghum bicolor. Funct. Integr. Genom. 2010, 10, 533–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zheng, L.; Zhou, J.; Yi, L.; Zhou, X. Identification and expression analysis of the auxin response factor (ARF) gene family in sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]. Pakistan J. Bot. 2021, 53, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Okushima, Y.; Overvoorde, P.J.; Arima, K.; Alonso, J.M. Functional genomic analysis of the AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR gene family members in Arabidopsis thaliana: Unique and overlapping functions of ARF7 and ARF19. Plant Cell 2005, 17, 444–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Qi, Y.H.; Wang, S.K.; Shen, C.J.; Zhang, S.N.; Chen, Y.; Xu, Y.X.; Liu, Y.; Wu, Y.R.; Jiang, D.A. OsARF12, a transcription activator on auxin response gene, regulates root elongation and affects iron accumulation in rice (Oryza sativa). New Phytol. 2012, 193, 109–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Licausi, F.; Ohme-Takagi, M.; Perata, P. APETALA2/Ethylene Responsive Factor (AP2/ERF) transcription factors: Mediators of stress responses and developmental programs. New Phytol. 2013, 199, 639–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Mathur, S.; Priyadarshini, S.S.; Singh, V. Comprehensive phylogenomic analysis of ERF genes in sorghum provides clues to the evolution of gene functions and redundancy among gene family members. 3 Biotech 2020, 10, 139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Schmidt, R.; Caldana, C.; Mueller-Roeber, B.; Schippers, J.H. The contribution of SERF1 to root-to-shoot signaling during salinity stress in rice. Plant Signal. Behav. 2014, 9, e27540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Akbudak, M.A.; Filiz, E.; Kontbay, K. DREB2 (dehydration-responsive element-binding protein 2) type transcription factor in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor): Genome-wide identification, characterization and expression profiles under cadmium and salt stresses. 3 Biotech 2018, 8, 426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Herath, V. Small Family, Big Impact: In silico analysis of DREB2 transcription factor family in rice. Comput. Biol. Chem. 2012, 65, 128–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Mallikarjuna, G.; Mallikarjuna, K.; Reddy, M.K. Expression of OsDREB2A transcription factor confers enhanced dehydration and salt stress tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Biotechnol. Lett. 2011, 33, 1689–1697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Nakano, T.K.; Suzuki, T.; Fujimura, H. Genome-wide analysis of the ERF gene family in Arabidopsis and rice. Plant Physiol. 2006, 140, 411–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Kasapoğlu, E.; Ilhan, D.; Kizilkaya, A.; Hossein’pour, K. Genome-wide analysis of BES1 transcription factor family in sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] genome. Türkiye Tarımsal Araştırmalar Derg. 2020, 7, 85–95. [Google Scholar]
  44. Salazar-Henao, J.E.; Lehner, R.; Betegón-Putze, I.; Vilarrasa-Blasi, J.; Caño-Delgado, A.I. BES1 regulates the localization of the brassinosteroid receptor BRL3 within the provascular tissue of the Arabidopsis primary root. J. Exp. Bot. 2016, 67, 4951–4961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Jia, C.; Zhao, S.; Bao, T.; Zhao, P.; Peng, K.; Guo, Q.; Gao, X.; Qin, J. Tomato BZR/BES transcription factor SlBZR1 positively regulates BR signaling and salt stress tolerance in tomato and Arabidopsis. Plant Sci. 2021, 302, 110719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Friedrichsen, D.M.; Nemhauser, J.; Muramitsu, T.; Maloof, J.N.; Alonso, J.R.; Ecker, M.; Furuya, J.; Chory, J. Three redundant brassinosteroid early response genes encode putative bHLH transcription factors required for normal growth. Genetics 2002, 162, 1445–1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Moreno, J.E.; Moreno-Piovano, G.; Chan, R.L. The antagonistic basic helix-loop-helix partners BEE and IBH1 contribute to control plant tolerance to abiotic stress. Plant Sci. 2018, 271, 143–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Seo, H.K.; Lee, S.H.; Lim, B.D.; Lee, J.H.; An, S.J.; Chon, G.P. The Rice Basic Helix–Loop–Helix 79 (OsbHLH079) Determines leaf angle and grain shape. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 2, 2090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Colebrook, E.H.; Thomas, S.G.; Phillips, A.L.; Hedden, P. The role of gibberellin signalling in plant responses to abiotic stress. J. Exp. Biol. 2014, 217, 67–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Hedden, P. The current status of research on gibberellin biosynthesis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2020, 61, 1832–1849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wang, Y.L.; Ali, J.Z.; Gao, S.; Ni, L.; Li, X.N.; Wu, X.; Jiang, Y.F. Identification and expression analysis of Sorghum bicolor gibberellin oxidase genes with varied gibberellin levels involved in regulation of stem biomass. Ind. Crops Prod. 2020, 145, 11951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Yoshida, H.; Hirano, K.; Sato, T.; Mitsuda, N.; Nomoto, M. DELLA protein functions as a transcriptional activator through the DNA binding of the indeterminate domain family proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 7861–7866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Fan, Y.; Yan, J.; Lai, D.; Yang, H.; Xue, G.A.; He, T.; Guo, L.; Chen, X.B.; Cheng, D.B.; Xiang, J.; et al. Genome-wide identification, expression analysis, and functional study of the GRAS transcription factor family and its response to abiotic stress in sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]. BMC Genom. 2020, 22, 509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Liu, L.Y.; Ding, H.Y.; Luo, X.F. OsGRAS1 Genes Associated with Stress Resistance of Rice as Well as Promoter and Application Thereof; Shanghai Municipal Agricultural Biological Gene Center: Shanghai, China, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  55. Thomas, S.B.; David, M.A. Della Proteins: Master regulators of gibberellin-responsive growth and development: Gibberellins. Annu. Plant Rev. 2016, 49, 189–228. [Google Scholar]
  56. Gao, W.; Xu, F.C.; Guo, D.D. Calcium-dependent protein kinases in cotton: Insights into early plant responses to salt stress. BMC Plant Biol. 2018, 18, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Mittal, S.; Mallikarjuna, M.G.; Atmakuri, R.; Prashant, D.; Prasanta, T. Comparative Analysis of CDPK family in maize, arabidopsis, rice, and sorghum revealed potential targets for drought tolerance improvement. Front. Chem. 2017, 5, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Gu, L.W. Identification and Expression Analysis of MCU Protein Family Genes in Sorghum Bicolor. Botanical Res. 2020, 9, 169–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Teardo, E.; Carraretto, L.; Moscatiello, R. A chloroplast-localized mitochondrial calcium uniporter transduces osmotic stress in Arabidopsis. Nat. Plants 2019, 5, 581–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wurzinger, B.; Mair, A.; Pfister, B.; Teige, M. Crosstalk of calcium-dependent protein kinase and MAP kinase signaling. Plant Sig. Behav. 2011, 6, 8–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Yu, C.H.; Dan, F.S.; Yun, H.D. Identification and analysis of the MAPK gene family in Sorghum bicolor. Master’s thesis, Harbin Normal University, Harbin, China, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  62. Hur, Y.; Kim, D.H. Overexpression of OsMAPK2 enhances low phosphate tolerance in rice and Arabidopsis thaliana. Am. J. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 43254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Park, H.J.; Kim, W.Y.; Yun, D.J. A New Insight of Salt Stress Signaling in Plant. Mol. Cells 2016, 39, 447–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Song, Y.; Li, S.; Sui, Y. SbbHLH85, a bHLH member, modulates resilience to salt stress by regulating root hair growth in sorghum. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2022, 135, 201–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Francis, A.; Dhaka, N.; Bakshi, M.; Jung, K.-H.; Sharma, M.K.; Sharma, R. Comparative phylogenomic analysis provides insights into TCP gene functions in Sorghum. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 38488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Tatematsu, K.; Nakabayashi, K.; Kamiya, Y.; Nambara, E. Transcription factor AtTCP14 regulates embryonic growth potential during seed germination in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2008, 53, 42–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Jin, X.Y.; Long, Y.F.; Shi, X.; Zhen, Y.; Wei, C.; Amangul, H.; Chen, X.Y. SbNAC2 enhances abiotic stress tolerance by upregulating ROS scavenging activities and inducing stress-response genes in sorghum. Environ. Expt. Bot. 2021, 192, 104664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Pignocchi, C.; Foyer, C. Apoplastic ascorbate metabolism and its role in the regulation of cell signaling. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2003, 6, 379–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Krishnamurthy, P.; Ranathunge, K.; Franke, R.; Prakash, H.S.; Schreiber, L.; Mathew, M.K. The role of root apoplastic transport barriers in salt tolerance of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Planta 2009, 230, 119–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Yang, Z.; Zheng, Z.; Wei, H. Transcriptome analysis of sweet Sorghum inbred lines differing in salt tolerance provides novel insights into salt exclusion by roots. Plant Soil 2018, 430, 423–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Wei, X.; Yang, Z.; Han, G.; Zhao, X.; Yin, S.; Yuan, F.; Wang, B. The developmental dynamics of the sweet sorghum root transcriptome elucidate the differentiation of apoplastic barriers. Plant Signal. Behav. 2020, 15, 1724465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Fang, Y.; Jiang, J.; Du, Q.; Luo, L.; Li, X.; Xie, X. Cytochrome P450 superfamily: Evolutionary and functional divergence in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) stress resistance. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 10952–10961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Murata, N.; Tasaka, Y. Glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase in plants. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1997, 1348, 10–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Molina, Y.; Li-Beisson, F.; Beisson, J.B.; Ohlrogge, M. Pollard. Identification of an Arabidopsis feruloyl-coenzyme A transferase required for suberin synthesis. Plant Physiol. 2009, 151, 1317–1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. de Silva, N.D.; Murmu, J.; Chabot, D. Root Suberin Plays Important Roles in Reducing Water Loss and Sodium Uptake in Arabidopsis thaliana. Metabolites 2021, 11, 735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Surender, R.P.; Jogeswar, G.; Rasineni, G.K.; Maheswari, M.; Reddy, A.R.; Varshney, R.K.; Kishor, P.B. Proline over-accumulation alleviates salt stress and protects photosynthetic and antioxidant enzyme activities in transgenic sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2015, 94, 104–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Wood, A.J.; Saneoka, H.; Rhodes, D.; Joly, R.J.; Goldsbrough, P.B. Betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase in sorghum. Plant Physiol. 1996, 110, 1301–1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Maheswari, M.; Varalaxmi, Y.; Vijayalakshmi, A. Metabolic engineering using mtlD gene enhances tolerance to water deficit and salinity in sorghum. Biol. Plant. 2012, 54, 647–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Sakurai, J.; Ishikawa, F.; Yamaguchi, T.; Uemura, M.; Maeshima, M. Identification of 33 rice aquaporin genes and analysis of their expression and function. Plant Cell Physiol. 2005, 46, 1568–1577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Palakolanu, R.R.; Rao, T.S.; Vincent, K.V. Genome-wide identification and characterization of the aquaporin gene family in Sorghum bicolor (L.). Plant Gene 2015, 1, 18–28. [Google Scholar]
  81. Martins, C.P.; Neves, D.M.; Cidade, L.C.; Mendes, A.F.; Silva, D.C. Expression of the citrus CsTIP2;1 gene improves tobacco plant growth, antioxidant capacity and physiological adaptation under stress conditions. Planta 2017, 24, 5951–5963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Patankar, H.V.; Al-Harrasi, I.; Al-Yahyai, R.; Yaish, M.W. Functional characterization of date palm aquaporin gene PdPIP1;2 confers drought and salinity tolerance to yeast and Arabidopsis. Genes 2019, 10, 390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Liu, P.; Yin, L.; Deng, X.; Wang, S.; Tanaka, K.; Zhang, S. Aquaporin-mediated increase in root hydraulic conductance is involved in silicon-induced improved root water uptake under osmotic stress in Sorghum bicolor L. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 4747–4756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Jia, J.; Liang, Y.; Gou, T.; Hu, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Huo, H.; Guo, J.; Gong, H. The expression response of plasma membrane aquaporins to salt stress in tomato plants. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2020, 178, 104190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Suorsa, M.; Sirpiö, S.; Allahverdiyeva, Y.; Paakkarinen, V.; Mamedov, F.; Styring, S. PsbR, a missing link in the assembly of the oxygen-evolving complex of plant photosystem II. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 145–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Sui, N.; Yang, Z.; Liu, M.; Wang, B. Identification and transcriptomic profiling of genes involved in increasing sugar content during salt stress in sweet sorghum leaves. BMC Genom. 2015, 16534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Chang, G.G.; Tong, L. Structure and function of malic enzymes, a new class of oxidative decarboxylases. Biochem 2003, 42, 12721–12733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Qazi, H.A.; Paranjpe, S.; Bhargava, S. Stem sugar accumulation in sweet sorghum-activity and expression of sucrose metabolizing enzymes and sucrose transporters. J. Plant Physiol. 2012, 169, 605–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Hoffmann-Thoma, G.; Hinkel, K.; Nicolay, P.; Willenbrink, J. Sucrose accumulation in sweet sorghum stem internodes in relation to growth. Physiol. Plant. 2010, 97, 277–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Yang, Z.; Li, J.L.; Liu, L.N.; Xie, Q.; Sui, N. Photosynthetic regulation under salt stress and salt-Tolerance mechanism of sweet sorghum. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 10, 1722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Anjali, U.; Fatima, M.S.; Manu, S.; Ramasamy, M. Structure and regulation of SWEET transporters in plants: An update. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 156, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Mizuno, H.K.; Shigemitsu, K. The sorghum SWEET gene family: Stem sucrose accumulation as revealed through transcriptome profiling. Biotech 2016, 9, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Eom, J.S.; Chen, L.; Sosso, D.; Julius, B.T.; Lin, I.; Qu, X.; Braun, D.M.; Frommer, W.B. SWEETs, transporters for intracellular and intercellular sugar translocation. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2015, 25, 53–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Chen, L.; Qu, X.; Hou, B.; Sosso, S.; Osorio, A.R.; Fernie, W.B. Sucrose efflux mediated by SWEET proteins as a key step for phloem transport. Science 2012, 335, 207–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Guan, Y.F.; Huang, X.Y.; Zhu, J.; Gao, J.F.; Zhang, H.X.; Yang, Z.N. RUPTURED POLLEN GRAIN1, a member of the MtN3/saliva gene family, is crucial for exine pattern formation and cell integrity of microspore in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2008, 147, 852–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Ma, L.; Zhang, D.Q.; Miao, J.; Yang, Y.; Xuan, Y.; Hu, Y. Essential role of sugar transporter OsSWEET11 during the early stage of rice grain filling. Plant Cell Physiol. 2017, 58, 863–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Zhao, H.; Wu, D.F.; Kong, K.; Lin, H.; Zhang, G. The Arabidopsis thaliana Nuclear Factor Y Transcription Factors. Front. Plant. Sci. 2017, 10, 2045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  98. Malviya, N.; Jaiswal, P.; Yadav, D. Genome- wide characterization of Nuclear Factor Y (NF-Y) gene family of sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]: A bioinformatics approach. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2016, 22, 33–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  99. Siriwardana, C.L.; Gnesutta, N.; Kumimoto, R.W. NUCLEAR FACTOR Y, Subunit A (NF-YA) Proteins Positively Regulate Flowering and Act Through FLOWERING LOCUS T. PLoS Genet. 2016, 12, e1006496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Wei, X.; Xu, J.; Guo, H.; Jiang, L.; Chen, S.; Yu, C.; Zhou, Z.; Hu, P.; Zhai, H.; Wan, J. DTH8 suppresses flowering in rice, influencing plant height and yield potential simultaneously. Plant Physiol. 2010, 153, 1747–1758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Myers, Z.A.; Kumimoto, R.W.; Siriwardana, C.L.; Gayler, K.K.; Risinger, J.R.; Pezzetta, D.; Holt, B.F. NUCLEAR FACTOR Y, Subunit C (NF-YC) transcription factors are positive regulators of photomorphogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Genet. 2016, 12, e1006333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Frerichs, R.; Thoma, A.T.; Abdallah, P.; Frommolt, W.; Werr, J.W. The founder-cell transcriptome in the Arabidopsis apetala1 cauliflower inflorescence meristem. BMC Genom. 2016, 17, 855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  103. Xi, J.; Qiu, Y.; Du, L.; Poovaiah, B.W. Plant-specific trihelix transcription factor AtGT2L interacts with calcium/calmodulin and responds to cold and salt stresses. Plant Sci. 2012, 274–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Yoo, C.Y.; Hasegawa, P.M.; Mickelbart, M.V. Regulation of stomatal density by the GTL1 transcription factor for improving water use efficiency. Plant Signal. Behav. 2011, 6, 1069–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Li, X.; Chang, Y.; Ma, S.; Shen, J.; Hu, H.L. Genome-wide identification of SNAC1-targeted genes involved in drought response in rice. Front Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Sanjari, S.; Shirzadian-Khorramabad, R.; Shobbar, Z.S.; Shahbazi, M. Systematic analysis of NAC transcription factors’ gene family and identification of post-flowering drought stress responsive members in sorghum. Plant Cell Rep. 2019, 3, 361–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Windari, E.A.; Ando, M.; Mizoguchi, Y.; Shimada, H.; Ohira, K.; Kagaya, Y.; Higashiyama, T.; Takayama, S.M.; Watanabe, K. Two aquaporins, SIP1;1 and PIP1;2, mediate water transport for pollen hydration in the Arabidopsis pistil. Plant Biotechnol. 2021, 38, 77–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Borrell, K.A.; Mullet, J.E.; George-Jaeggli, B.; van Oosterom, E.J.; Hammer, G.L.; Klein, P.E.; Jordan, D.R. Drought adaptation of stay-green sorghum is associated with canopy development, leaf anatomy, root growth, and water uptake. J. Expt. Bot. 2014, 65, 6251–6263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Emebiri, L.C. QTL dissection of the loss of green colour during postanthesis grain maturation in two-rowed barley. Theor. App. Genet. 2013, 126, 1873–1884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Ougham, H.; Hörtensteiner, S.; Armstead, I.; Donnison, I.; King, I.; Thomas, H.; Mur, L. The control of chlorophyll catabolism and the status of yellowing as a biomarker of leaf senescence. Plant Biol. 2008, 10, 4–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Vadez, V.; Deshpande, S.; Kholova, K.; Ramu, P.; Hash, C.T. Molecular breeding for stay-green: Progress and challenges in sorghum. In Genomic Applications to Crop Breeding; Varshney, R., Tuberosa, R., Eds.; Weily Online Library: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2013; Volume 2, pp. 125–141. [Google Scholar]
  112. Jordan, D.R.; Hunt, C.H.; Cruickshank, A.W.; Borrell, A.K.; Henzell, R.G. The relationship between the stay-green trait and grain yield in elite sorghum hybrids grown in a range of environment. Crop Sci. 2012, 52, 1153–1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Subudhi, P.K.; Rosenow, D.T.; Nguyen, H.T. Quantitative trait loci for the stay green trait in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench): Consistency across genetic backgrounds and environments. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2000, 101, 733–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Wilkinson, S.; Kudoyarova, G.R.; Veselov, D.S.; Arkhipova, T.N.; Davies, W.J. Plant hormone interactions: Innovative targets for crop breeding and management. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 3499–3509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Rosa, M.; Rivero, J.G.; Van Deynze, A.; Harkamal, W.; Eduardo, B. Enhanced cytokinin synthesis in tobacco plants expressing PSARK::IPT prevents the degradation of photosynthetic protein complexes during drought. Plant Cell Physiol. 2010, 51, 1929–1941. [Google Scholar]
  116. Boddu, J.; Jiang, C.Z.; Sangar, V.; Olson, T.; Terry, P.; Thomas, C. Comparative structural and functional characterization of sorghum and maize duplications containing orthologous Myb transcription regulators of 3-Deoxyflavonoid biosynthesis. Plant Mol. Biol. 2006, 60, 185–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Takanashi, H.; Shichijo, M.; Sakamoto, L. Genetic dissection of QTLs associated with spikelet-related traits and grain size in sorghum. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 9398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Sapkota, S.; Boatwright, J.L.; Jordan, K.; Boyles, R.; Kresovich, S. Identification of novel genomic associations and gene candidates for grain starch content in sorghum. Genes 2020, 11, 1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Kamal, N.M.; Alnor Gorafi, Y.S.; Abdelrahman, M.; Abdellatef, E.; Tsujimoto, H. Stay-green trait: A prospective approach for yield potential, and drought and heat stress adaptation in globally important cereals. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram illustrating transcriptional regulation of GA catabolism during sorghum seed dormancy release and post-salinity events. The black arrow pointing up is upregulation.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram illustrating transcriptional regulation of GA catabolism during sorghum seed dormancy release and post-salinity events. The black arrow pointing up is upregulation.
Genes 14 00293 g001
Figure 2. A flow diagram demonstrating the hormonal and nonhormonal salt signaling routes in sorghum, as well as the associated phenotypes.
Figure 2. A flow diagram demonstrating the hormonal and nonhormonal salt signaling routes in sorghum, as well as the associated phenotypes.
Genes 14 00293 g002
Figure 3. A schematic representation of the genetic regulation of the apoplastic and symplastic pathways in sorghum root under salt stress, as well as the corresponding phenotypes.
Figure 3. A schematic representation of the genetic regulation of the apoplastic and symplastic pathways in sorghum root under salt stress, as well as the corresponding phenotypes.
Genes 14 00293 g003
Figure 4. Our schematic depiction of source-sink carbon flux and their transporters in sorghum under salt stress.
Figure 4. Our schematic depiction of source-sink carbon flux and their transporters in sorghum under salt stress.
Genes 14 00293 g004
Figure 5. A schematic representation of floral hydration and its regulatory genes in sorghum under salt stress.
Figure 5. A schematic representation of floral hydration and its regulatory genes in sorghum under salt stress.
Genes 14 00293 g005
Figure 6. Figure depicting the phenotypic and underlying genetic process that may be utilized to simulate silage harvest maturity biomarkers to maximize production.
Figure 6. Figure depicting the phenotypic and underlying genetic process that may be utilized to simulate silage harvest maturity biomarkers to maximize production.
Genes 14 00293 g006
Table 1. A computed confusion matrix and accuracy statistics of world salinity level.
Table 1. A computed confusion matrix and accuracy statistics of world salinity level.
Predicted
Measured Salinity LevelNonModeratelyHighlyExtremelyTotal
Non9010000100
Slightly1087100100
Moderately11266900100
Highly15343470100
Extremely18291049100
Total144186744749500
Note. Measurements and predictions were conducted from five studies in 1986, 2002, 2005, 2009, and 2016.
Table 2. Summary of gene families regulating forage phenotype in sorghum under salt stress.
Table 2. Summary of gene families regulating forage phenotype in sorghum under salt stress.
Gene FamilyGene NamePrediction MethodGrowth StageOrganMode of ActionReferencePhenotype
Gibberellins biosynthesis (GA)SbGA2ox3Transgenicdormancy breaking and early germinationSeedSbABI4 and SbABI5 mediated ABA signalingRodrguez et al. 2009Promote early seed germination
WRKYSbWRKY50TransgenicSeedlingRootdirectly bind to the upstream promoters of SOS1 and HKT1.Song et al. 2020Promote K/Na homeostasis
SbWRKY56OrthologySeedlingRootPromotion of ABA-mediated auxin homeostasisDing et al. 2015Root growth
bHLHSbbHLH050TransgenicSeedlingRootSalt induced induction of root hairsFriedrichsen et al. 2002Root hair growth
SbBHLH079OrthologsPost floweringGrainearly response BR signaling componentsSeo, Hyoseob et al. 2020Shapes the grain architecture
SbTCP10, SbTCP13, SbTCP15OrthologsThroughout life cycle RootRadicle growth promotionTatematsu et al. 2008Early sorghum root development
NACSbNAC074aOrthologsSeedlingRootDifferentiation of xylem tissue Promotion of water transport
SbNAC56TransgenicSeedling ABA mediated hypersensitive to NaClKadier et al. 2017Root and shoot growth
SbNAC58TransgenicSeedling ABA mediated sensitivity to osmotic stressSeok et al. 2017
Hu et al. 2006
Improved water intake
SbNAC005, SbNAC021 and SbNAC052Transgenic and orthologyPost floweringFlowerOsmotic response Sanjari et al. 2019,
Hu et al. 2006
Improved water intake
CytochromeSORBI3006G148800, SORBI3006G148900OrthologsEmergenceRootConversion of phenylalanine to cinnamic acid and tyrosine to p-cinnamic acidYang et al. 2017Casparian strip development
SbCASP4TransgenicGerminationrootInvolved in the phenylpropanoid pathwayWei et al. 2021Lignin biosynthesis
SbGPAT5OrthologsGerminationRootCatalyzes the transfer of an acyl group from an acyl donor to the sn-1 position of glycerol 3-phosphateMurata et al. 1997Suberin biosynthesis
ARFSbARF16, SbARF7OrthologsFloweringFlowerFloral organ abscissionQi et al. 2012Sorghum panicle development
ERFSbERF080, SbERF094OrthologsEarly to late Ethylene mediated root to shoot salt signalingSchmidt et al. 2014Increased osmotic adjustment and water absorption
SbDREB2AOrthologsEarly to late LeavesABA-mediated transcriptional regulation of drought responsive elementsHerath (2016)Shoot growth
BES1SbBES1-4 and SbBES1-9OrthologsEarly to lateRootsWork synergistically with BHLH family members under salt stressJia et al. 2021Work synergistically to positively regulate BR signaling and salt stress tolerance
MCUSbMCU5.2OrthologsEarly to lateRootActivation of mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK)Teardo et al. 2019Intracellular Ca2+ signal transduction and cationic homeostasis
MAPKsSbMAPK13OrthologsEarly to lateRootLate ABA-mediated salt responseYu et al. 2011Stress-stimulus-specific Ca2+ dynamics in the chloroplast
AquaporinsSbTIP2;1TransgenicsEarly to lateShootRegulating the water and oxidative statusMartins et al. 2017Increases in relative water content
SbPIP1;2TransgenicEarly to lateLeavesCodes for plasma membrane intrinsic proteins Increased root and leaf water
SbPIP2.8,TransgenicEarly to lateRootImproves root permeability to waterSun et al. 2017Increasing the ability to retain water
TrihelixSbTH02OrthologsFloweringFlowerStamen developmentShabalina et al. 2010, Frerichs et al. 2016Leaf inflorescence development
SbTH15OrthologsFloweringFlowerSalt-induced floral differentiationXi et al. 2012Flower development
Nuclear factor YSbNF-YBs, SbNF-YB11OrthologsFlowering Regulates photoperiodic floweringWei et al. 2010Flower development
SWEETSbSWEET8-1OrthologsSoft doughShootBidirectional sugar transportersEom et al. 2015, Chen et al. 2012Phloem loading and sugar partitioning
SbSWEET9-3OrthologsFloweringPanicleplasma membrane integrityGuan et al. 2008Source-sink (panicle) sugar transportation
SbSWEET2-1, SbSWEET7-1OrthologsSoft doughGrainSucrose release from maternal tissue to the maternal-filial interfaceMa et al. 2017Source-sink (seed) sugar transportation
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fan, S.; Chen, J.; Yang, R. Candidate Genes for Salt Tolerance in Forage Sorghum under Saline Conditions from Germination to Harvest Maturity. Genes 2023, 14, 293. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14020293

AMA Style

Fan S, Chen J, Yang R. Candidate Genes for Salt Tolerance in Forage Sorghum under Saline Conditions from Germination to Harvest Maturity. Genes. 2023; 14(2):293. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14020293

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fan, Shugao, Jianmin Chen, and Rongzhen Yang. 2023. "Candidate Genes for Salt Tolerance in Forage Sorghum under Saline Conditions from Germination to Harvest Maturity" Genes 14, no. 2: 293. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14020293

APA Style

Fan, S., Chen, J., & Yang, R. (2023). Candidate Genes for Salt Tolerance in Forage Sorghum under Saline Conditions from Germination to Harvest Maturity. Genes, 14(2), 293. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14020293

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop