Next Article in Journal
Seasonal and Diurnal Characteristics and Drivers of Urban Heat Island Based on Optimal Parameters-Based Geo-Detector Model in Xinjiang, China
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of Urban Surfaces on Microclimatic Conditions and Thermal Comfort in Burdur, Türkiye
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Trend Analysis of Changes in Cooling Degree Days in West Africa Under Global Warming

by
Kagou Dicko
1,2,3,*,
Emmanuel Tanko Umaru
4,
Souleymane Sanogo
2,
Appollonia Aimiosino Okhimamhe
1 and
Ralf Loewner
3
1
West African Science Service Centre on Climate Change and Adapted Land Use (WASCAL)—Doctoral Research Programme on Climate Change and Human Habitat, Federal University of Technology, Minna PMB 65, Niger State, Nigeria
2
Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Science, Techniques and Technology of Bamako, Bamako BP E 423, Mali
3
Department of Landscape Sciences and Geomatics, Neubrandenburg University of Applied Sciences, Brodaer Strasse 2, 17033 Neubrandenburg, Germany
4
Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Federal University of Technology, Minna PMB 65, Niger State, Nigeria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Atmosphere 2024, 15(11), 1376; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15111376
Submission received: 14 October 2024 / Revised: 7 November 2024 / Accepted: 12 November 2024 / Published: 15 November 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Climatology)

Abstract

:
Monitoring energy consumption in response to rising temperatures has become extremely important in all regions of the globe. The energy required for cooling is a major challenge in West Africa, where the climate is predominantly tropical. Among the various methods for evaluating energy requirements, the degree-day method is best known for its ability to estimate the heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning (HVAC) requirements of buildings. This study used three decades of weather station data to assess the cooling degree days (CDD) in two major West African cities, Kano and Bamako, across a range of base temperatures from 22 °C to 30 °C. The results indicate an increase in cooling degree days for Kano, whereas Bamako experienced a decrease in these parameters over the same period. Nonetheless, Bamako required a relatively higher cooling demand for all base temperatures. Furthermore, the study showed that the years 1998 and 2015 had the most significant impact on Kano and Bamako, with CDD values ranging from 2220 °C-day to 218 °C-day for Kano and from 2425 °C-day to 276 °C-day for Bamako. The study also found that a lower base temperature leads to higher energy consumption, while a higher base temperature leads to lower energy consumption. This information provides a useful reference for governments and policymakers to achieve energy efficiency and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

1. Introduction

The ambition of limiting the global temperature rise to 1.5 °C under the Paris Agreement is getting increasingly out of reach as global warming continues to increase at a steady pace. Rising temperatures coupled with world population growth will continually increase the demand for cooling energy in several regions of the world [1]. Between 2014 and 2040, global energy demand in non-OECD countries is expected to increase by approximately 25%, in line with an increase in population [2]. Recent scientific dialogues have underscored that cities consume up to 60 and 80% of energy and account for 75% of CO2 emissions [3]. As such, residential buildings contribute nearly 40% to the total energy consumption [4], and are therefore responsible for a significant amount of CO2 emissions [5]. In response to rising temperatures, different economic sectors are likely to experience increased cooling needs during the hot season and decreased heating needs during the cold season.
In the past few decades, several approaches have been employed to evaluate residential heating and cooling energy consumption and assess the impacts of climate change. Such approaches include the split-degree-day method [6], hourly method [7], monthly method [8], Schoenau and Kehrig method [9], and hybrid S–K method [10]. However, the degree-day method using daily mean temperature is by far the simplest and most popular when daily data are available. Degree-day calculations require the consideration of two indices: the heating degree day (HDD) and cooling degree day (CDD). The HDD refers to the positive result of any difference between a defined base temperature and the average daily temperature when the average temperature is higher than the base temperature, while CDD represents the positive result of any difference between the same defined base temperature and the average daily temperature when the average temperature is lower than the base temperature [11]. The base temperature is the threshold at which heating or cooling is necessary in a building to keep its occupants in comfortable living conditions. Furthermore, the decision to estimate HDD, CDD, or both strongly depends on the aims of a particular study and the weather conditions of the study location. For example, relatively cold locations may require heating calculations, whereas regions with hot climates may require cooling calculations.
In West Africa, the progressive rise in global temperatures is expected to lead to significant increases in the energy needed to cool buildings for human comfort because the climate is typically quite hot. Few researchers have investigated the changes affecting the cooling energy demand within the West African context using historical station weather and global climate model (GCM) data. For instance, Akara et al. [12] estimated CDD values for different cities in West Africa using weather data from 1980 to 2014. Similarly, [13] explored the future cooling demand for several cities in West Africa using global climate model (GCM) data. Furthermore, Awolola and Olorunmaiye [14] examined the cooling energy demand using hourly meteorological data across several Nigerian cities between 1995 and 2009, using different base temperatures. Falchetta and Mistry [15] used both historical and Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) data to estimate CDD across several countries in West Africa and beyond. In addition, there have been many other studies estimating cooling degree days in various regions of the globe. For example, Bilgili [16] examined the impact of urbanization on cooling degree days in metropolitan areas in Turkey, while De Rosa et al. [17] focused on historical trends in cooling degree days across different climates in Italy. In Australia, Harvey [18] analyzed the effects of climate change on cooling needs in residential buildings. Meanwhile, Idchabani et al. [19] provided a regional assessment of cooling degree days in North Africa. Li et al. [20] studied the implications of cooling degree days on energy consumption in industrial sectors in China, while Li et al. [21] investigated the correlation between cooling degree days and public health outcomes in China. Moreover, Miranda et al. [22] explored the geographical distribution of cooling degree days in South America. Research by Scoccimarro et al. [23] explored future projections of cooling degree days under different climate scenarios in Italy. Furthermore, Shi et al. [24] evaluated the economic impacts of cooling degree days on agricultural productivity in China, while Spinoni et al. [25] provided a comprehensive review of global cooling degree-day trends in Europe. Lastly, Ukey and Rai [26] focused on the implications of cooling degree days for energy efficiency in buildings in India.
However, despite the rising global temperatures, the availability of reliable cooling degree day (CDD) records remains limited in several locations, thereby making it more difficult for policymakers to strengthen energy policies and advance climate action. This lack of data is particularly challenging in Africa, where acquiring station data involves considerable financial resources. Furthermore, while a single base temperature offers a basic measure, it often fails to reflect varying comfort levels, climate zones, or energy needs accurately. To address these gaps, our study analyzes CDD across multiple base temperatures using three decades of daily meteorological data for two major West African cities, Kano and Bamako. To the best of our knowledge, comprehensive assessments of CDD in these cities have not been conducted. This study aims to evaluate three-decade trends in cooling degree days (CDD) for Kano and Bamako across multiple base temperatures, with implications for enhancing regional energy policies and climate adaptation.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area and Data

The research was conducted in two West African cities, Kano and Bamako, located in Nigeria and Mali, respectively (Figure 1). Kano, the capital of Kano State, is located within UTM Zone 32 N at 12°03′29″ N and 8°33′54″ E, with an elevation of 472 m above sea level. Meanwhile, Bamako is the capital and largest city of the Republic of Mali, and is situated at 380 m above the sea at coordinates 12°35′26″ N and 7°56′15″ W in UTM Zone 29 N. Both cities belong to the Sudanian zone of West Africa, with the annual precipitation of approximately 900 mm recorded in Bamako and about 700 mm recorded in Kano, and the average monthly temperature in the rainy season ranges from 26.5 to 31.5 °C in Bamako, compared with 26.5 to 33 °C in Kano [27].
For each city, 30 years of daily maximum and minimum temperatures were acquired in Microsoft Excel for both Kano and Bamako through the Nigerian Metrological Office (NiMet) and Malian National Agency of Meteorology, respectively. Over the years, these government weather forecasting agencies have been responsible for gathering and disseminating accurate meteorological data across the respective countries. In light of the size of the data, thorough quality control and data homogenization verification were performed following the recommendations of Aguilar et al. [28]. This process was used to essentially check for missing values, and the days, months, and years for all data, along with the coherence of the data, for example, the maximum temperature exceeded the minimum temperature. The daily average temperature for each day was estimated for both cities based on the daily records for the entire study period.

2.2. Methodology

For this study, all data were computed in Python using the Jupiter notebook. The cooling degree days for each year were obtained by summing the positive values derived from the difference between the threshold temperature and the average temperature for each day of the year. As mentioned previously, the average temperature was calculated from the difference between the maximum and minimum temperatures on each day during the entire study period. Furthermore, although Kano and Bamako share the same climatic zone, differences in building design and energy planning may affect the need for domestic energy between the two locations. To account for these variations, we used nine base temperatures (22 °C to 30 °C) in calculating CDD for each city. This range covers typical cooling thresholds in energy demand studies [29,30,31,32,33], and was selected to reflect diverse cooling needs in similar climates. This approach minimizes subjectivity and offers a detailed view of cooling demand variability across comfort and energy use patterns in both locations. Therefore, CDD was computed using the following equation:
C D D = k = 1 n f φ  
with
f φ = T m T b ,   i f   T b < T m  
Otherwise, f φ = 0 .
T m = T m a x T m i n 2  
where CDD is the number of cooling degree days; n is the number of days in a year.
  • Tm (°C): Mean temperature of the day k;
  • Tb (°C): Base temperature;
  • Tmax (°C): Maximum temperature of the day k;
  • Tmin (°C): Minimum temperature of the day k.
To further investigate the changes in the CDD time series, we applied three statistical tools to the data for each station. Initially, we used linear regression to model the overall trend in CDD across the study period. Linear regression is a commonly used approach in climatology for assessing relationships and estimating temporal changes. This technique has been widely applied to evaluate temperature-related indices, such as CDD, due to its simplicity and ability to illustrate general trends [34,35]. The linear regression formula is an affine function, expressed as follows:
Y = a x + b  
where Y is the values in each year between 1992 and 2022 and x is the year over the study period 1992–2022.
Subsequently, the Mann–Kendall test [36,37], a non-parametric method, was applied to identify trends in the CDD time series at a 95% confidence level. This method is well documented in CDD studies as it allows for a trend analysis without the need for data transformation or distribution assumptions, making it particularly suitable for meteorological datasets [38,39]. The test was calculated as follows:
S = k = 1 n i = k + 1 n s g n ( x i x k )  
where n is the sample size, x i and x k being the values of individual time series i and k, respectively. The term s g n x i x k represents the sign function applied to the difference between x i and x k , indicating whether this difference is positive, negative, or zero. The sign function s g n x i x k is given by the following formula:
s g n x i x k = + 1 ,   i f   x i x k > 0 0 ,   i f   x i x k = 0 1 ,   i f   x i x k < 0  
Furthermore, to quantify the magnitude and direction of the trends, we applied Sen’s slope estimator [40], a robust median-based method that is ideal for non-normally distributed data. In contrast to least-squares regression, which may be sensitive to anomalies, Sen’s estimator provides a more stable trend estimate by calculating a median slope. This approach has been recommended for environmental studies due to its resilience to extreme values and its ability to yield consistent trend slopes in temperature and CDD series [41]. The Sen’s slope equation is as follows:
Q i = x i x k i k   f o r   i = 1 ,   , N ,  
where x i   and x k represent the sample data measured at times i and k (i > k), respectively, and N is the number of slopes.

3. Results

The evolution of cooling degree days over the years for nine base temperatures covering 22 °C to 30 °C for Kano and Bamako is shown in Table 1 and Table 2, respectively. Our analysis of CDD values across the two locations, using statistical methods such as linear regression, the Mann–Kendall test, and Sen’s slope estimator, revealed significant discrepancies in cooling degree days between the two locations. Kano consistently exhibited lower CDD values over the period from 1992 to 2022.
In terms of years with the highest cooling demand, it was found that 2015 recorded the maximum number of cooling degree days in Kano with 2220 °C-day, 1884 °C-day, 1557 °C-day, 1247 °C-day, 961 °C-day, 711 °C-day, 500 °C-day, 338 °C-day, and 218 °C-day for the lowest to the highest base temperatures, respectively. On the other hand, Bamako experienced higher cooling degree days in 1998 with 2425 °C-day, 2062 °C-day, 1707 °C-day, 1370 °C-day, 1060 °C-day, 788 °C-day, 568 °C-day, 400 °C-day, and 276 °C-day across the multiple base temperatures. The rise in CDD in Kano and Bamako during 1998 and 2015 could be linked to global warming, with strong El Niño events further intensifying these effects in West Africa, thereby increasing cooling demand.
Furthermore, the results revealed that Bamako experienced the lowest cooling energy demand in 2012 across all base temperatures with a number of cooling degree days ranging from just 1923 °C-day for the coldest threshold temperature (e.g., 22 °C) to 107 °C-day for the hottest threshold temperature (e.g., 30 °C). Meanwhile, Kano recorded its lowest CDD values in 2022 with 1427 °C-day for the lowest threshold temperature (e.g., 22 °C) to 188 °C-day for the highest threshold temperature (e.g., 30 °C).
The temporal evolution of cooling degree days in Kano is shown in Figure 2. The findings indicated a positive correlation between CDD and threshold temperatures over time. However, only CDD calculated using thresholds 28 °C, 29 °C, and 30 °C showed a significant increasing trend with a p-value below 0.05, whereas CDD values for thresholds between 22 °C and 27 °C also indicated an increase, but the trend was not statistically significant. This discrepancy therefore demonstrates that a base temperature below 28 °C is not sufficient to have an impact on the need for cooling in Kano. In earlier years, Kofar-Bai and Zheng [42] recorded cooling degree hours for Kano as 6104.8, 5490.1, and 4746.1 using base temperatures of 24 °C, 26 °C, and 28 °C, respectively. When converted to cooling degree days (e.g., 254.37 °C-day, 228.75 °C-day, and 197.75 °C-day), these values were considerably lower than those found in this study (e.g., 38,283 °C-day, 22,221 °C-day, 10,928 °C-day, and 4654 °C-day) for the same base temperature, reflecting an increase in cooling energy demand.
On the other hand, the findings have shown that the CDD has decreased over the years in Bamako (Figure 3), indicating a decreasing need for cooling (negative Sen’s slope values). Nonetheless, none of the CDD showed a statistically significant change in Bamako with a p-value greater than 0.05 for all base temperatures.
Furthermore, the results also showed that CDD values decrease significantly whenever the base temperature rises and increase whenever the base temperature used decreases for both cities (Figure 4).
Additionally, Figure 5 and Figure 6 illustrate the linear relationship between the calculated cooling degree days for each base temperature and the mean annual temperature for Kano and Bamako, respectively. For both cities, CDD values increase as mean temperature rises, indicating a consistent trend across all base temperatures. For example, at the lowest threshold (e.g., 22 °C), the correlation coefficient is R2 = 0.740 for Kano and R2 = 0.458 for Bamako. As the base temperature increases (e.g., to 30 °C), the correlation weakens, with R2 values of 0.202 for Kano and 0.315 for Bamako. This suggests that lower thresholds are more effective for assessing cooling demands in Kano, while Bamako exhibits a relatively steady correlation across thresholds.
Furthermore, temperatures in Kano are generally lower than those in Bamako, with annual averages ranging from 25 °C to 28 °C in Kano (Table 3) compared to 27 °C to 29 °C in Bamako (Table 4). This difference in mean temperatures directly contributes to the higher CDD in Bamako compared to Kano.

4. Discussion

In this study, the cooling energy demand of two major West African cities was estimated, using multiple base temperatures. As global temperatures rise, monitoring cooling requirements is of paramount importance, especially in regions with a warmer climate. Cooling degree days was found to be higher in Bamako than in Kano. This aligns with the findings of [43], which showed that from 1964 to 2013, Nigeria had a cooling demand of 3496 °C-days, while Mali had a higher demand of 4104 °C-days. Notably, despite the overall difference, we observed a positive trend in Kano, contrasting with a negative trend in Bamako. Similar increases in cooling degree days have been observed in other regions, including South Africa [44], China [45], Portugal [46], and Bangladesh [38]. In Kano, 2015 marked the most significant impact on cooling energy demand. These findings are consistent with studies such as those by Karl et al. [47] and Tollefson [48], describing 2015 as one of the hottest years on record.
The global rise in cooling degree days is causing energy demands to increase in several regions. Yet, the Sahel region is reported to have the highest levels of unmet cooling needs, highlighting a stark inequality in cooling accessibility [15]. Conversely, situations do exist where despite global warming, cooling degree days decrease, a trend likely influenced by regional adaptations, seasonal shifts, or improvements in energy efficiency. For example, our findings have shown a decreasing trend in cooling needs in Bamako. Similar occurrences have also been observed in Shahrekord, Iran [39]. The cooling demand is naturally responsive to temperature shifts. Therefore, the slight decrease in the number of cooling degree days for Bamako may suggest a decrease in temperature over the last three decades. Corroborating our findings, Touré et al. [49] observed a decline in warming trends for both day and night temperatures in Bamako from 1961 to 2014. Our observations also align with the study by Sawadogo et al. [50], which also reported decreasing temperature trends under the SSP1–2.6 scenario in Burkina Faso, a trend that could contribute to a reduction in cooling energy requirements.
Global climate change has evidently caused disruptions in the temperatures of both cities, thereby affecting their demand for cooling energy differently. Given the sensitivity of energy demand to weather conditions, several studies have shown that some regions of West Africa experience more intense warming than others [51,52,53]. This suggests that a higher base temperature is required to optimize HVAC systems and improve the energy efficiency of buildings, while lower base temperatures could increase electricity consumption. Moreover, it also emerged that although both cities belong to the same climate zone, Bamako has higher energy requirements than Kano, when the same air-conditioning setpoint is used. For this reason, efforts to maintain ambient indoor temperature are likely to be more demanding in Bamako than in Kano.
Furthermore, the relationship between cooling degree days and mean annual temperature showed stronger correlations at lower base temperatures in both locations, weakening as the base temperature increased. Similar patterns were documented by Bilgili et al. [54] in Türkiye and Mourshed [7], who established the relationship between cooling degree days and base temperature across various locations. Indeed, when the base temperature is low, a broader range of temperatures may contribute to the cooling degree days, resulting in a stronger correlation with the mean annual temperature. Similarly, when the base temperature is high, only days with temperatures well above the threshold temperature contribute to the cooling degree days, resulting in a weaker correlation.
In light of the observed trends in cooling degree days and their subsequent relationship with temperature changes, specific policy measures are necessary to meet the cooling energy demands at different locations. A city like Bamako, where cooling needs are pronounced, needs policymakers to take action to improve the energy efficiency of buildings, promote passive cooling techniques, and adopt energy-efficient cooling technologies. Additional financial incentives, such as tax breaks or subsidies for energy-efficient appliances and solar air-conditioning systems, may help to reduce cooling energy consumption. Furthermore, changes in construction practices and energy standards are essential to ensure better energy efficiency in new and existing buildings. This will help to mitigate the demand for cooling energy on a long-term basis, enabling cities to adapt to rising temperatures without overburdening the energy infrastructure.

5. Conclusions

The present study investigated the changes in annual cooling degree days and temperature for Kano and Bamako, two large cities in West Africa, using long-term station data for a period of 30 years. Various base temperatures (e.g., 22 °C to 30 °C) were used to perform the analysis. Based on the findings, both cities have witnessed significant variations in cooling degree days since 1992, with an observed increase in the number of CDD for Kano and a slight decrease in cooling degree days for Bamako over the years. Both regions have been adversely affected by the unequal effects of global warming, notwithstanding being situated in the same Sudan Savannah climate zone. However, during the study period, Bamako experienced significantly higher cooling degree days than Kano at all the measured base temperatures. The years 1998 and 2015 were when the cooling degree-day values peaked in Bamako and Kano, respectively. In addition, the lowest base temperatures contributed to the highest cooling degree-day values, whereas the number of cooling degree days became considerably lower when the base temperature reached 30 °C.
In light of these findings, policymakers and building landlords are encouraged to adopt region-specific policies that promote energy-efficient and smart cooling technologies to meet local climate demands. For instance, Bamako may require efficient designs to manage its high cooling needs, while Kano could benefit from smart solutions to address its rising demand. However, this study provides valuable insights into the trends and relationships of cooling degree days (CDD) across multiple base temperatures; one key limitation should be acknowledged. Our analysis relied solely on historical CDD data, without incorporating climate projection models. Consequently, the findings do not account for potential shifts in CDD under future climate scenarios, which could influence temperature trends, seasonal patterns, and energy demands. Future research could benefit from incorporating climate projection models to simulate anticipated changes in CDD under different greenhouse gas scenarios, which would provide a clearer picture of potential future conditions.

Author Contributions

K.D. carried out the data analysis, and wrote the draft manuscript; E.T.U. contributed to the supervision, conceptualization, and methodology; S.S. contributed to the supervision, conceptualization, and visualization; A.A.O. contributed to the supervision, visualization, and review; R.L. contributed to the review. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) of Germany and the West African Science Service Centre on Climate Change and Adapted Land Use (WASCAL). Additional funding was provided to the first author by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) through the IPCC Scholarship Seventh Round of Awards and by the Prince Albert II of Monaco Foundation.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data used in the present study will be made available by the first author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no competing interests to disclose.

References

  1. Sherman, P.; Lin, H.; McElroy, M. Projected global demand for air conditioning associated with extreme heat and implications for electricity grids in poorer countries. Energy Build. 2022, 268, 112198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. ExxonMobil. The Outlook for Energy: A View to 2040; ExxonMobil: Spring, TX, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  3. IEA and UNEP. 2018 Global Status Report: Towards a Zero-Emission, Efficient and Resilient Buildings and Construction Sector. 2018. Available online: https://wedocs.unep.org/xmlui/handle/20.500.11822/27140 (accessed on 2 September 2023).
  4. Pérez-Lombard, L.; Ortiz, J.; Pout, C. A review on buildings energy consumption information. Energy Build. 2008, 40, 394–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Li, Y.L.; Han, M.Y.; Liu, S.Y.; Chen, G.Q. Energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions by buildings: A multi-scale perspective. Build. Environ. 2019, 151, 240–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kheiri, F.; Haberl, J.S.; Baltazar, J.C. Split-degree day method: A novel degree day method for improving building energy performance estimation. Energy Build. 2023, 289, 113034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mourshed, M. Relationship between annual mean temperature and degree-days. Energy Build. 2012, 54, 418–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Erbs, D.G.; Beckman, W.A.; Klein, S.A. Estimation of degree-days and ambient temperature bin data from monthly-average temperatures. ASHRAE J. 1983, 25, 60–65. [Google Scholar]
  9. Schoenau, G.J.; Kehrig, R.A. Method for calculating degree-days to any base temperature. Energy Build. 1990, 14, 299–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Thevenard, D. Methods for estimating heating and cooling degree-days to any base temperature. ASHRAE Trans. 2011, 117, 884–892. Available online: https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A257557873/AONE?u=anon~356bd3d9&sid=googleScholar&xid=62211164 (accessed on 19 August 2024).
  11. Mistry, M.N. Historical global gridded degree-days: A high-spatial resolution database of CDD and HDD. Geosci. Data J. 2019, 6, 214–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Akara, G.K.; Hingray, B.; Diawara, A.; Diedhiou, A. Effect of weather on monthly electricity consumption in three coastal cities in West Africa. AIMS Energy 2021, 9, 446–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Odou, O.D.T.; Ursula, H.H.; Adamou, R.; Godjo, T.; Moussa, M.S. Potential changes in cooling degree day under different global warming levels and shared socioeconomic pathways in West Africa. Environ. Res. Lett. 2023, 18, 034029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Awolola, O.O.; Olorunmaiye, J.A. Cooling Degree Days for Estimating Energy Consumption in Air Conditioning Systems in Nigeria. J. Clean Energy Technol. 2020, 8, 5–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Falchetta, G.; Mistry, M.N. The role of residential air circulation and cooling demand for electrification planning: Implications of climate change in sub-Saharan Africa. Energy Econ. 2021, 99, 105307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bilgili, M. Time series forecasting on cooling degree-days (CDD) using SARIMA model. Nat. Hazards 2023, 118, 2569–2592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. De Rosa, M.; Bianco, V.; Scarpa, F.; Tagliafico, L.A. Historical trends and current state of heating and cooling degree days in Italy. Energy Convers. Manag. 2015, 90, 323–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Harvey, L.D.D. Using modified multiple heating-degree-day (HDD) and cooling-degree-day (CDD) indices to estimate building heating and cooling loads. Energy Build. 2020, 229, 110475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Idchabani, R.; Garoum, M.; Khaldoun, A. Analysis and mapping of the heating and cooling degree-days for Morocco at variable base temperatures. Int. J. Ambient Energy 2015, 36, 190–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, H.; Zhao, Y.; Bardhan, R.; Chan, P.-W.; Derome, D.; Luo, Z.; Urge-Vorsatz, D.; Carmeliet, J. Aligning Three-Decade Surge in Urban Cooling with Global Warming. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2301.11565v2. [Google Scholar]
  21. Li, Y.; He, T.; Wang, Y.; Sun, L.; Yan, Y.; Zhao, G. Spatiotemporal variations, influence factors, and simulation of global cooling degree days. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 26625–26635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Miranda, N.D.; Lizana, J.; Sparrow, S.N.; Zachau-Walker, M.; Watson, P.A.; Wallom, D.C.; Khosla, R.; McCulloch, M. Change in cooling degree days with global mean temperature rise increasing from 1.5 °C to 2.0 °C. Nat. Sustain. 2023, 6, 1326–1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Scoccimarro, E.; Cattaneo, O.; Gualdi, S.; Mattion, F.; Bizeul, A.; Risquez, A.M.; Quadrelli, R. Country-level energy demand for cooling has increased over the past two decades. Commun. Earth Environ. 2023, 4, 208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Shi, Y.; Zhang, D.F.; Xu, Y.; Zhou, B.T. Changes of heating and cooling degree days over China in response to global warming of 1.5 °C, 2 °C, 3 °C and 4 °C. Adv. Clim. Chang. Res. 2018, 9, 192–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Spinoni, J.; Vogt, J.V.; Barbosa, P.; Dosio, A.; McCormick, N.; Bigano, A.; Füssel, H.M. Changes of heating and cooling degree-days in Europe from 1981 to 2100. Int. J. Climatol. 2018, 38, e191–e208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ukey, R.; Rai, A.C. Impact of global warming on heating and cooling degree days in major Indian cities. Energy Build. 2021, 244, 111050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Akinseye, F.M. Improving sorghum productivity under changing climatic conditions: A modelling approach. Field Crops Res. 2020, 246, 107685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Aguilar, E.; Auer, I.; Brunet, M.; Peterson, T.C.; Wieringa, J. Guidelines on Climates Metadata and Homogeneization; World Meteorological Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  29. Lee, K.; Baek, H.J.; Cho, C.H. The Estimation of Base Temperature for Heating and Cooling Degree-Days for South Korea. J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol. 2014, 53, 300–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Büyükalaca, O.; Bulut, H.; Yılmaz, T. Analysis of variable-base heating and cooling degree-days for turkey. Appl. Energy 2001, 69, 269–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Dombayci, Ö.A. Degree-days maps of Turkey for various base temperatures. Energy 2009, 34, 1807–1812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Satman, A.; Yalcinkaya, N. Heating and cooling degree-hours for Turkey. Energy 1999, 24, 833–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Indraganti, M.; Boussaa, D. A method to estimate the heating and cooling degree-days for different climatic zones of Saudi Arabia. Build. Serv. Eng. Res. Technol. 2016, 38, 327–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Jones, P.D.; Harpham, C.; Harris, I.; Goodess, C.M.; Burton, A.; Centella-Artola, A.; Taylor, M.A.; Bezanilla-Morlot, A.; Campbell, J.D.; Stephenson, T.S.; et al. Long-term trends in precipitation and temperature across the Caribbean. Int. J. Climatol. 2016, 36, 3314–3333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Woollings, T.; Harvey, B.; Masato, G. Arctic warming, atmospheric blocking and cold European winters in CMIP5 models. Environ. Res. Lett. 2014, 9, 014002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Mann, H.B. Nonparametric Tests Against Trend. Econometrica 1945, 13, 245–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kendall, M. Rank Correlation Methods. 1948. Available online: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1948-15040-000 (accessed on 21 February 2024).
  38. Islam, A.R.M.T.; Ahmed, I.; Rahman, M.S. Trends in cooling and heating degree-days overtimes in Bangladesh? An investigation of the possible causes of changes. Nat. Hazards 2020, 101, 879–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sadeqi, A.; Tabari, H.; Dinpashoh, Y. Spatio-temporal analysis of heating and cooling degree-days over Iran. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 2022, 36, 869–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sen, P.K. Estimates of the Regression Coefficient Based on Kendall’s Tau. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1968, 63, 1379–1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yue, S.; Wang, C.Y. Applicability of prewhitening to eliminate the influence of serial correlation on the Mann-Kendall test. Water Resour. Res. 2002, 38, 4-1–4-7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kofar-Bai, D.G.; Zheng, Q. Climate Effects on Cooling Degree-Hours and Evaporative Cooling of Gas Turbine. J. Clean Energy Technol. 2017, 5, 347–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Atalla, T.; Gualdi, S.; Lanza, A. A global degree days database for energy-related applications. Energy 2018, 143, 1048–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Tian, C.; Huang, G.; Lu, C.; Zhou, X.; Duan, R. Development of enthalpy-based climate indicators for characterizing building cooling and heating energy demand under climate change. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 143, 110799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Cao, J.; Shi, J.; Li, M.; Zhai, Z.; Zhang, R.; Wang, M. Variations of Cooling and Dehumidification Degree Days in Major Climate Zones of China during the Past 57 Years. Atmosphere 2023, 14, 752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Andrade, C.; Mourato, S.; Ramos, J.; Monteiro, A.; Carvalho, D.; Gama, C. Heating and Cooling Degree-Days Climate Change Projections for Portugal. Atmosphere 2021, 12, 715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Karl, T.R.; Arguez, A.; Huang, B.; Lawrimore, J.H.; McMahon, J.R.; Menne, M.J.; Peterson, T.C.; Vose, R.S.; Zhang, H.M. Possible artifacts of data biases in the recent global surface warming hiatus. Science 2015, 348, 1469–1472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Tollefson, J. 2015 Declared the hottest year on record. Nature 2016, 529, 450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Halimatou, A.T.; Kalifa, T.; Kyei-Baffour, N. Assessment of changing trends of daily precipitation and temperature extremes in Bamako and Ségou in Mali from 1961–2014. Weather. Clim. Extrem. 2017, 18, 8–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sawadogo, W.; Neya, T.; Semde, I.; Korahiré, J.A.; Combasséré, A.; Traoré, D.E.; Ouedraogo, P.; Diasso, U.J.; Abiodun, B.J.; Bliefernicht, J.; et al. Potential impacts of climate change on the sudan-sahel region in West Africa—Insights from Burkina Faso. Environ. Chall. 2024, 15, 100860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sylla, M.B.; Nikiema, P.M.; Gibba, P.; Kebe, I.; Klutse, N.A.B. Climate change over West Africa: Recent trends and future projections. In Adaptation to Climate Change and Variability in Rural West Africa; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 25–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Diedhiou, A.; Bichet, A.; Wartenburger, R.; Seneviratne, S.I.; Rowell, D.P.; Sylla, M.B.; Diallo, I.; Todzo, S.; Touré, N.D.E.; Camara, M.; et al. Changes in climate extremes over West and Central Africa at 1.5 °C and 2 °C global warming. Environ. Res. Lett. 2018, 13, 065020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Macadam, I.; Rowell, D.P.; Steptoe, H. Refining projections of future temperature change in West Africa. Clim. Res. 2020, 82, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Bilgili, A.; Çelik, K.; Bilgili, M. Analysis of historical and future cooling degree days over Türkiye for facade design and energy efficiency in buildings. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2024, 149, 7413–7431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Location of the study area in West Africa.
Figure 1. Location of the study area in West Africa.
Atmosphere 15 01376 g001
Figure 2. Interannual variation in CDD for Kano at different base temperatures.
Figure 2. Interannual variation in CDD for Kano at different base temperatures.
Atmosphere 15 01376 g002
Figure 3. Interannual variation in CDD for Bamako at different base temperatures.
Figure 3. Interannual variation in CDD for Bamako at different base temperatures.
Atmosphere 15 01376 g003
Figure 4. Annual average CDD at different base temperatures for Kano and Bamako.
Figure 4. Annual average CDD at different base temperatures for Kano and Bamako.
Atmosphere 15 01376 g004
Figure 5. Correlation between annual CDD and mean temperature for Kano.
Figure 5. Correlation between annual CDD and mean temperature for Kano.
Atmosphere 15 01376 g005
Figure 6. Correlation between annual CDD and mean temperature for Bamako.
Figure 6. Correlation between annual CDD and mean temperature for Bamako.
Atmosphere 15 01376 g006
Table 1. Yearly cooling degree days for Kano at different base temperatures.
Table 1. Yearly cooling degree days for Kano at different base temperatures.
Base Temperature
Year22 °C23 °C24 °C25 °C26 °C27 °C28 °C29 °C30 °C
199216281331105480358540927217099
1993182415041206932685478323215137
199417251406110181756937724315087
199517331403109782358939925916396
1996186715171196912669464314210130
19972007168113651062786548365231134
19981933161313041012748534376263179
1999190215821275984736548404287184
2000175314451154888661476333227148
200116511341105279257139425415592
20021941163813471070825614446318215
2003188115571249967825517357238159
20041927160913091029779557377239142
20052026170914021119861639452313204
200618541527121592666344427415782
2007181414951194911651433282179111
200817581434113385961441826815579
20091952161913091016743506326198117
20102089176014501154881645457315206
2011183315331245971722509339221142
2012188915651254964708506352238158
2013187215521251976738540384260162
2014165413741112867646465323211125
20152220188415571247961711500338218
20161938163913551088843632468339239
2017180914871192923683485338235160
20181863156312791009762555391265167
2019185115401245968719517362249163
2020176414601187942729552412307217
20211882157312821006758562410287184
202214271159912692511372267188118
Table 2. Yearly cooling degree days for Bamako at different base temperatures.
Table 2. Yearly cooling degree days for Bamako at different base temperatures.
Base Temperature
Year22 °C23 °C24 °C25 °C26 °C27 °C28 °C29 °C30 °C
19922272190815511211900629411255155
199323491996165213241023763541361233
19942156179514481128841603424294191
19952143178514381118829583393253152
19962306194115801227905642436277173
19972196183414821142822543329194111
199824252062170713701060788568400276
19992076172113801071803605462339234
20002137177514221097808575400275181
20012286192115631218904640441291185
20022374201016501303985724520361243
20032257189715461223936699513369252
20042216185315021168865615419270162
20052318195416001260939666461311200
20062009165513171002726507344229146
20072313196016161287986733531378257
20082077173514081096816581401267167
20092286193215891264976720517354234
20102292193515901266974721518363243
20112070171413761064791576411286188
2012192315721233925648431283182107
20132220187115401223939693504362249
20142143178514341103803556368235148
20152114176414331124841601420286181
20162278191615601219904638438296196
20172255189715461215921675479336223
20182166180714561126828584398257160
20192098174714121096806567394273182
20202058170313591038762538378260171
20212267190315431197880610399248149
20222093173613961083804575400276177
Table 3. Annual temperature data for Kano.
Table 3. Annual temperature data for Kano.
YearMaximum Temperature (°C)Minimum Temperature (°C)Annual Average Temperature (°C)
1992332026
1993342027
1994332027
1995332027
1996342027
1997342127
1998332127
1999342027
2000332027
2001331926
2002342027
2003242027
2004342027
2005342127
2006332127
2007332027
2008332027
2009332127
2010342128
2011342027
2012342027
2013341927
2014341926
2015352128
2016342027
2017342027
2018342027
2019342027
2020342027
2021351927
2022331825
Table 4. Annual temperature data for Bamako.
Table 4. Annual temperature data for Bamako.
YearMaximum Temperature (°C)Minimum Temperature (°C)Annual Average Temperature (°C)
1992342228
1993352228
1994342228
1995342228
1996352228
1997342228
1998352229
1999332228
2000343328
2001352228
2002352229
2003352228
2004352128
2005352228
2006352027
2007352228
2008352028
2009352228
2010352128
2011342128
2012342027
2013352128
2014352128
2015352128
2016352228
2017352128
2018352128
2019352128
2020352128
2021352128
2022352128
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dicko, K.; Umaru, E.T.; Sanogo, S.; Okhimamhe, A.A.; Loewner, R. A Trend Analysis of Changes in Cooling Degree Days in West Africa Under Global Warming. Atmosphere 2024, 15, 1376. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15111376

AMA Style

Dicko K, Umaru ET, Sanogo S, Okhimamhe AA, Loewner R. A Trend Analysis of Changes in Cooling Degree Days in West Africa Under Global Warming. Atmosphere. 2024; 15(11):1376. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15111376

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dicko, Kagou, Emmanuel Tanko Umaru, Souleymane Sanogo, Appollonia Aimiosino Okhimamhe, and Ralf Loewner. 2024. "A Trend Analysis of Changes in Cooling Degree Days in West Africa Under Global Warming" Atmosphere 15, no. 11: 1376. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15111376

APA Style

Dicko, K., Umaru, E. T., Sanogo, S., Okhimamhe, A. A., & Loewner, R. (2024). A Trend Analysis of Changes in Cooling Degree Days in West Africa Under Global Warming. Atmosphere, 15(11), 1376. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15111376

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop