Research on Sustainable Evaluation Model of Sponge City Based on Emergy Analysis
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Research Scope
2.2. Technical Route
2.3. Emergy Analysis
2.3.1. The Diagram of Emergy System
2.3.2. Emergy Index
2.4. Data Source and Processing
2.4.1. Runoff Regulation and Reduction of Pollutants
- Division of Sub-Catchment Area
- 2.
- Generalization of Drainage System
- 3.
- Rainfall Event Setting
2.4.2. Other Data
- Net primary productivity (NPP)
- 2.
- Carbon Fixation and Oxygen Release
- 3.
- Saving Energy
- 4.
- Mitigation of the Heat Island Effect
- 5.
- Scientific Value
3. Results
3.1. The Current Situation Assessment of Research Area
3.1.1. The Result of InfoWorks Simulation
3.1.2. Emergy Analysis
3.2. Construction Planning Evaluation
3.2.1. Scheme Setting
3.2.2. LID Facility Cost
3.2.3. Result Analysis
4. Discussion
4.1. Improvement of Drainage Effect
4.2. Analysis of the Optimal Scheme of Emergy
4.2.1. Emergy Input and Output
4.2.2. Analysis of Emergy Index
5. Conclusions and Prospect
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Xu, C.; Jia, M.; Xu, M.; Long, Y.; Jia, H. Progress on environmental and economic evaluation of low-impact development type of best management practices through a life cycle perspective. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 213, 1103–1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, T.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, J. Simulation and Evaluation of Low Impact Development of Urban Residential District Based on SWMM and GIS. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2017, 74, 012009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ahiablame, L.M.; Engel, B.A.; Chaubey, I. Effectiveness of Low Impact Development Practices: Literature Review and Suggestions for Future Research. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2012, 223, 4253–4273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mguni, P.; Herslund, L.; Jensen, M.B. Sustainable urban drainage systems: Examining the potential for green infrastructure-based stormwater management for Sub-Saharan cities. Nat. Hazards 2016, 82, 241–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coutts, A.M.; Tapper, N.J.; Beringer, J.; Loughnan, M.; Demuzere, M. Watering our cities: The capacity for Water Sensitive Urban Design to support urban cooling and improve human thermal comfort in the Australian context. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 2013, 37, 2–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roon, M.V. Low impact urban design and development: Catchment-based structure planning to optimize ecological outcomes. Urban Water J. 2011, 8, 293–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neo, T.H.; Xu, D.; Fowdar, H.; McCarthy, D.T.; Chen, E.Y.; Lee, T.M.; Ong, G.S.; Lim, F.Y.; Ong, S.L.; Hu, J. Evaluation of Active, Beautiful, Clean Waters Design Features in Tropical Urban Cities: A Case Study in Singapore. Water 2022, 14, 468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, H.; Li, H.; Zhao, X.; Ding, Y. Emergy ecological model for sponge cities: A case study of China. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 296, 126530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ulgiati, S.; Odum, H.T.; Bastianoni, S. Emergy use, environmental loading and sustainability an emergy analysis of Italy. Ecol. Model. 1994, 73, 215–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fu, H.Y.; Cheng, G.W.; Lu, G.D.; Wei, W.Y.; Wang, H.; Chen, T.S. Emergy Analysis on Ecological Economic System in Liuzhou. Adv. Mater. Res. 2010, 171–172, 437–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, C.; Hu, F.; Zhou, S.; Zhu, J. Emergy-Based Assessment and Suggestions for Sustainable Development of Regional Ecological Economy: A Case Study of Anhui Province, China. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, D.; Du, B.; Zhu, J. Evaluating old community renewal based on emergy analysis: A case study of Nanjing. Ecol. Model. 2021, 449, 109550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, M.; Hong, J.; Wang, X.; He, R. Sustainability accounting of neighborhood metabolism and its applications for urban renewal based on emergy analysis and SBM-DEA. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 275, 111177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, X.C.; Ma, C.; Zhan, S.F.; Chen, W.P. Evaluation and simulation for ecological risk based on emergy analysis and Pressure-State-Response Model in a coastal city, China. Procedia Environ. Sci. 2012, 13, 221–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Yan, N.; Liu, G.; Xu, L.; Deng, X.; Casazza, M. Emergy-based eco-credit accounting method for wetland mitigation banking. Water Res. 2021, 210, 118028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shahhoseini, H.; Ramroudi, M.; Kazemi, H. Emergy analysis for sustainability assessment of potato agroecosystems (case study: Golestan province, Iran). Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2022, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, D.; Luo, Z.; Webber, M.; Chen, J.; Wang, W. Emergy evaluation of the contribution of irrigation water, and its utilization, in three agricultural systems in China. Front. Earth Sci. 2014, 8, 325–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, J.B.; Jiang, M.M.; Chen, B.; Chen, C.Q. Emergy evaluations for constructed wetland and conventional wastewater treatments. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 2009, 14, 1781–1789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.; Liu, C.; Si, X.; Zhang, C.; Liu, F.; Yu, L.; Chen, G. Study on the Choice of Wastewater Treatment Process Based on the Emergy Theory. Processes 2021, 9, 1648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, J.; Zhang, C.; Sun, J.; Qiu, L. Assessing the sustainable abilities of a pilot hybrid solar pyrolysis energy system using emergy synthesis. Int. J. Energy Res. 2019, 44, 2909–2924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, J.; Yang, J.; Jiang, Z.; Zhang, H.; Wang, Y. Emergy based sustainability evaluation of spent lead acid batteries recycling. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 250, 119467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qi, Y.; Zhang, X.; Yang, X.; Lv, Y.; Wu, J.; Lin, L.; Xiao, Y.; Qi, H.; Yu, X.; Zhang, Y. The environmental sustainability evaluation of an urban tap water treatment plant based on emergy. Ecol. Indic. 2018, 94, 28–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; Li, S. Urban ecological sustainability evaluation of artificial system and natural system based on emergy and GIS. J. Southeast Univ. Engl. Ed. 2021, 37, 75–83. [Google Scholar]
- Alizadeh, S.; Zafari-Koloukhi, H.; Rostami, F.; Rouhbakhsh, M.; Avami, A. The eco-efficiency assessment of wastewater treatment plants in the city of Mashhad using emergy and life cycle analyses. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 249, 119327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Odum, H.T. Self-organization, transformity, and information. Science 1988, 242, 1132–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Odum, H.T. Scales of ecological engineering. Ecol. Eng. 1996, 6, 7–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, W.; Jia, B.; Li, H.; Li, J.; Chen, Z.; Li, J. Monetization calculation and analysis of the reconstruction benefits of sponge city in Xi’an Xiaozhai business district. J. Xian Univ. Archit. Technol. Nat. Sci. Ed. 2021, 53, 452–462. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, H. Research on Lid Optimization of Road and Open Space Based on Multi-Objective Planning. Ph.D. Thesis, Beijing Architecture University, Beijing, China, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, Y.; Zhao, X.; Liu, L. Analysis on health risk pattern of high temperature heat wave population in Xiamen. J. Geo-Inf. Sci. 2016, 18, 1094–1102. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Zhu, W.; Pan, Y.; Zhang, J. Remote sensing estimation of net primary productivity of land vegetation in China. J. Plant Ecol. 2007, 413–424. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Lv, C. Study on Emergy of Eco-Economic Value of Regional Water Resources. Ph.D. Thesis, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, W. Study on Elastic Evaluation of Sustainable Urban Rainwater System. Ph.D. Thesis, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Odum, H.T. Environmental Accounting: Emergy and Decision Making; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
- Cheng, F.; Lu, H.; Ren, H.; Zhou, L.; Zhang, L.; Li, J.; Lu, X.; Huang, D.; Zhao, D. Integrated emergy and economic evaluation of three typical rocky desertification control modes in karst areas of Guizhou Province, China. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 161, 1104–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, H.; Lan, S.; Peng, S. New development of emergy evaluation index of system sustainable development. Environ. Sci. 2003, 24, 5. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- NEAD. National Environmental Accounting Database V2.0. 2015. Available online: http://www.emergy-nead.com/home (accessed on 10 October 2021).
- Wang, C. Evaluation of Dongying Ecosystem Services Based on Emergy Analysis. Ph.D. Thesis, Shandong University, Jinan, China, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, Q.; Liu, G. Non-monetary accounting of forest ecosystem service value: A case study of Beijing Tianjin Hebei Urban Agglomeration. J. Appl. Ecol. 2018, 29, 3747–3759. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Wu, Z.; Tian, G.; Wang, H. Evaluation of ecological water use value and its emergy in river based on material cycle. South-North Water Transf. Water Sci. Technol. 2016, 14, 6–10. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Tian, G.; Wu, Z.; Guo, X. Emergy evaluation method of ecological environmental benefits of ecological water system and its application. Yellow River 2014, 36, 76–78+82. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Björklund, J.; Geber, U.; Rydberg, T. Emergy analysis of municipal wastewater treatment and generation of electricity by digestion of sewage sludge. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2001, 31, 293–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, Z. Distribution of total solar radiation and ground radiation balance in Fujian Province. J. Sol. Energy 1994, 15, 248–256. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, J. Basic Data Analysis of Urban Water Supply Industry and Its Support for Performance System. Ph.D. Thesis, Beijing Architecture University, Beijing, China, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Fang, M.; Yue, D.; Zhang, Q. Study on sustainability of land eco economic system in Dengkou County Based on emergy analysis. J. Northwest For. Univ. 2017, 32, 178–185+228. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Shizas, I.; Bagley, D.M. Experimental Determination of Energy Content of Unknown Organics in Municipal Wastewater Streams. J. Energy Eng. 2004, 130, 45–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, J. Research and Application of Suitability Evaluation Method for Low Hill and Gentle Slope Land Construction Based on Model Builds. Ph.D. Thesis, Kunming University of Technology, Kunming, China, 2015. [Google Scholar]
Land Type | Occupation Area (hm2) | Occupation Ratio (%) |
---|---|---|
Building Roof | 63.55 | 15.76 |
Road | 50.25 | 19.93 |
Urban Green Space | 70.65 | 22.15 |
Ordinary Hardened Pavement | 124.68 | 39.10 |
River Course | 9.77 | 3.06 |
Index | Symbol | Meaning |
---|---|---|
Local renewable resources | R | Local renewable energy value, such as solar energy |
Purchased renewable resources | FR | Renewable resources input by external system |
Purchased non-renewable resources | FN | Non renewable resources input by external system |
Emergy input | Y = R + FR + FN | Total energy value used by the system |
Emergy of pollutants | W | Pollutants emitted by the system |
Emergy output | O | The emergy output of the system |
Emergy Exchange Rate | EER = O/Y | Emergy output corresponding to unit emergy input |
Emergy Yield Rate | EYR = O/(FR + FN + W) | The ratio of total emergy output to the sum of socio-economic input emergy and pollutants |
Environmental Load Ratio | ELR = (FN + W)/(R + FR) | Ratio of the sum of non-renewable emergy inputs and pollutants to renewable emergy inputs |
Emergy Sustainable Index | ESI = EYR/ELR | Measuring the sustainable development ability of the system. When 1 < ESI < 10, the system is sustainable |
The Initial Value | Unit | Energy Value Conversion Rate (sej/Unit) | Emergy (sej) | UEV Origin | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Local renewable resources (R) | 1.14 × 1019 | ||||
Solar Energy | 2.58 × 1017 | J | 1.00 | 2.58 × 1017 | [33] |
Chemical Energy of Rainwater | 4.76 × 1014 | J | 2.34 × 104 | 1.11 × 1019 | [34] |
Purchased renewable resources(FR) | 4.09 × 1020 | ||||
Running Water | 6.20 × 1014 | J | 6.60 × 105 | 4.09 × 1020 | [35] |
Purchased non-renewable resources(FN) | 5.28 × 1019 | ||||
Running Water Distribution of Electricity-Consuming | 1.35 × 1014 | J | 2.21 × 105 | 2.99 × 1019 | [36] |
Cost of Sewage Treatment | 1.72 × 107 | $ | 1.33 × 1012 | 2.29 × 1019 | [36] |
Total Input of Emergy Value(Y) | 4.73 × 1020 | ||||
Total Output of Emergy Value(O) | 5.94 × 1019 | ||||
Runoff Regulation | 1.39 × 1014 | J | 1.85 × 105 | 2.56 × 1019 | [36] |
Carbon Sequestration | 8.05 × 109 | g | 3.78 × 107 | 3.04 × 1017 | [37] |
Oxygen Release | 5.91 × 109 | J | 5.11 × 107 | 3.02 × 1017 | [37] |
Mitigation of the Heat Island Effect | 1.68 × 1013 | g | 5.15 × 105 | 8.66 × 1018 | [38] |
NPP | 4.97 × 109 | g | 5.78 × 107 | 2.87 × 1017 | [39] |
Downstream of the Supplying System | 4.63 × 106 | m3 | 5.23 × 1012 | 2.42 × 1019 | [40] |
Pollutant COD(W) | 1.20 × 1014 | J | 3.80 × 106 | 4.58 × 1020 | [41] |
Emergy Index | Number |
---|---|
R | 1.14 × 1019 |
FR | 4.09 × 1020 |
FN | 5.28 × 1019 |
Y | 4.73 × 1020 |
O | 5.94 × 1019 |
W | 4.58 × 1020 |
EER | 0.13 |
ELR | 1.22 |
EYR | 0.06 |
ESI | 0.05 |
LID Facilities | 5% | 10% | 15% | 20% | 25% | 30% | 35% | 40% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Concave Greenbelt | 309.38 | 330 | 361.88 | 405 | 459.38 | 525 | 601.88 | 690 |
Permeable Pavement | 391.88 | 418 | 458.38 | 513 | 581.88 | 665 | 762.38 | 874 |
Vegetated Roof | 464.06 | 495 | 329.25 | 348 | 386.25 | 444 | 521.25 | 1035 |
Emergy Indices | Current Situation of Practicing Area | The Optimal Solution |
---|---|---|
R | 1.14 × 1019 | 1.04 × 1019 |
FR | 4.09 × 1020 | 4.06 × 1020 |
FN | 5.28 × 1019 | 1.58 × 1020 |
Y | 4.73 × 1020 | 5.75 × 1020 |
O | 5.94 × 1019 | 7.43 × 1020 |
W | 4.58 × 1020 | 1.54 × 1020 |
EER | 0.13 | 1.29 |
ELR | 1.22 | 0.75 |
EYR | 0.06 | 1.03 |
ESI | 0.05 | 1.39 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Wang, N.; Li, H.; Zhang, J.; Deng, J.; She, L. Research on Sustainable Evaluation Model of Sponge City Based on Emergy Analysis. Water 2023, 15, 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15010032
Wang N, Li H, Zhang J, Deng J, She L. Research on Sustainable Evaluation Model of Sponge City Based on Emergy Analysis. Water. 2023; 15(1):32. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15010032
Chicago/Turabian StyleWang, Ning, Huiping Li, Jianlin Zhang, Jianxun Deng, and Lin She. 2023. "Research on Sustainable Evaluation Model of Sponge City Based on Emergy Analysis" Water 15, no. 1: 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15010032
APA StyleWang, N., Li, H., Zhang, J., Deng, J., & She, L. (2023). Research on Sustainable Evaluation Model of Sponge City Based on Emergy Analysis. Water, 15(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15010032