Next Article in Journal
Determinant Factors of Microbial Drinking Water Quality at the Point of Use in Rural Ethiopia: A Case Study of the South Gondar Zone
Previous Article in Journal
Dynamics of Changes in the Surface Area of Water Bodies in Subsidence Basins in Mining Areas
Previous Article in Special Issue
Integration of Coagulation–flocculation(with Natural Coagulant) to Constructed Wetlands for Color Removal from Tequila Vinasses
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Comprehensive Study of the Degradation of Veterinary Antibiotics by Non-Thermal Plasma: Computational, Experimental, and Biotoxicity Assessments

1
Instituto Tecnológico de Buenos Aires (ITBA), Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires C1437FBG, Argentina
2
CONICET (Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas) Godoy Cruz 2290, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires C1425FQB, Argentina
3
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA
4
Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Departamento de Física, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires C1428EGA, Argentina
5
CONICET-Universidad de Buenos Aires, Instituto de Física Interdisciplinaria y Aplicada (INFINA), Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires C1428EGA, Argentina
6
Center of Agroforestry, School of Natural Resources, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2024, 16(22), 3281; https://doi.org/10.3390/w16223281
Submission received: 14 October 2024 / Revised: 7 November 2024 / Accepted: 13 November 2024 / Published: 15 November 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Control and Treatment of Emerging Contaminants in Water Ecosystems)

Abstract

:
Water quality is threatened by numerous pollutants, among which antibiotics are of great concern due to their widespread use and unaltered excretion, leading to water contamination and fostering antibiotic resistance. To comprehensively address sustainable water remediation, herein, the susceptibility to non-thermal plasma degradation of two veterinary antibiotics (Oxytetracycline (OTC) and Lincomycin (LNC)) are compared in an integral approach, including computational analyses, plasma irradiation assays, and a byproduct toxicity assessment. The computational assessment was performed by evaluating the ionization potential (IP) obtained from Density Functional Theory calculations and determining the antibiotics’ susceptible sites for radical attack. Plasma irradiation achieved nearly complete degradation (~100%) of both compounds with the initial concentration of 1 mg L−1, while 60% degradation was observed when the starting concentration was 10 mg L−1. The mineralization rates were 21% and 31% for OTC and LNC, respectively. The degradation profiles followed similar trends, as expected from their comparable IP values. After treatment, the solution exhibited lower biotoxicity compared to the original antibiotics. Therefore, this work represents a step forward in addressing one of the key environmental challenges of our time and encourages further extending the analysis towards the remediation of water polluted with many other organic compounds.

1. Introduction

Nowadays, water quality is threatened by numerous pollutants, such as pharmaceutical products, agrochemicals, and plastics [1,2]. In recent years, the concern about the presence of antibiotics in surface waters has intensified. Inadequately treated effluents from pharmaceutical industries and hospitals, and residues from livestock farms, account for the main sources of these emerging contaminants in water. Antibiotics used in veterinary practice are in the majority because of their growing use in preventive treatment for infectious diseases, including their incorporation into animal feed. In fact, veterinarians prescribe 50% of all antibiotics globally [3]. The implications of their excessive use in veterinary care become even more alarming considering that approximately 20% of antibiotics are unaltered when excreted in urine and feces, ultimately leading to the contamination of soils, rivers, and lakes and fostering antibiotic resistance [4,5]. Antibiotics in natural waters can alter the microbial flora, even if present at trace levels, leading to a significant negative environmental impact on ecosystems. Therefore, the development of technologies for remediating water impacted by antibiotics has emerged as one of the key challenges of our time. It is crucial that these technologies do not involve the use of unsafe or non-environmentally benign substances and that they are sustainable from both energetic and economic perspectives [6,7].
Technologies for the effective removal of these pollutants from water include advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) such as ozonation, Fenton and photo-Fenton processes, photochemical oxidation, photocatalysis, and plasma [8,9]. Among the AOPs, plasma offers numerous advantages: (i) it consumes significantly less energy than ozonation and UV radiation; (ii) its efficiency surpasses that achieved with TiO2 photocatalysis; (iii) it does not require the addition of chemical compounds such as TiO2 for TiO2 photocatalysis or ions like Fe for Fenton and photo-Fenton techniques; (iv) it has a higher degradation power than UV radiation; and (v) it does not face limitations such as the separation of catalysts used in photocatalysis [10,11].
Plasma is generated by the ionization of a gas when sufficient energy is supplied, allowing an electric current to pass through it. When an aqueous system is irradiated with plasma, O H radicals are formed at the plasma–water interface, which are the main species responsible for organic compounds’ degradation [12]. The reactions of O H with organic compounds produce organic radicals ( R ). Additionally, the radicals generated can react with oxygen to form superoxide radicals ( O 2 ), peroxides ( R O O ), alkoxides ( R O ), and others. This complex sequence of chain reactions leads to processes that can involve both the formation and breaking of covalent bonds. The progressive oxidation eventually yields CO2 and H2O as final products (mineralization) [13,14].
It is a well-known fact that the efficiency of plasma irradiation processes for the degradation of organic pollutants from water depends on the chemical structure of the contaminants involved. To assess the susceptibility of organic compounds to radical attack and predict the efficiency of plasma irradiation for organic compounds’ degradation in water, molecular modeling can be performed. In this context, the use of DFT (Density Functional Theory) for the calculation of the ionization potential (IP) and Fukui indexes have been reported to accurately predict the relative sensitivity and identify the most susceptible sites of the target compounds to radical attack in AOPs [15,16,17]. According to Koopmans’ Theorem, the HOMO energy can be related to the ionization potential (IP), which is associated with the degradation rates of systems subdued to oxidation processes, as reported in the literature [18]. In addition, Fukui indexes are frequently used to determine the most susceptible sites to radical attack, since they allow the identification of the atoms in a molecule with a greater tendency to accept or donate an electron [19,20,21]. The higher the tendency to lose or accept an electron, the greater the tendency of a molecule to become polarized in the presence of an external field or due to an electronic density change. The information obtained from both calculations (i.e., IP and Fukui indexes) provides valuable information about the susceptibility of organic compounds to AOPs.
However, full mineralization of the target pollutants is not commonly achieved in AOPs, and byproducts may exhibit toxicity levels similar to or higher than the parent compounds. Hence, it is crucial to carry out biotoxicity studies to assess whether the degradation process harms or benefits the water ecosystem.
In this work, the feasibility of using non-thermal plasma irradiation for the treatment of water polluted with two antibiotics widely used in the veterinary field (Oxytetracycline (OTC) and Lincomycin (LNC) (Figure 1)) was computationally and experimentally studied. Their relative sensitivity to plasma irradiation was calculated using the Density Functional Theory (DFT). In addition, aqueous solutions of both antibiotics were subjected to plasma irradiation, and the degree of degradation and mineralization was evaluated. Furthermore, since byproducts generated by plasma irradiation of organic compounds may exhibit increased biotoxicity compared to the original substances, biotoxicity assays were also conducted before and after the treatment [22,23,24]. To our knowledge, it is the first time that these two antibiotics are compared in an integral approach that includes molecular modeling of the feasibility of being degraded by plasma irradiation, an experimental corroboration of the computational result, and a biotoxicity evaluation of the byproducts.
All in all, this work represents one step forward in the application of non-thermal plasma using a simple, easily scalable reactor to remediate water polluted with organic compounds.

2. Computational and Experimental Details

2.1. Computational Modeling Details

Computational modeling was used to perform a conformational search of both antibiotics [25], optimize the geometries of the obtained conformers by applying the Density Functional Theory (DFT) method at B3LYP/6-311G (d,p) level [26,27,28], calculate their condensed Fukui indexes [29,30], and determine their ionization potentials [18,31]. Complete computational details, including methodology and parameters, are provided in Supplementary Materials, Section S1.

2.2. Experimental Details

2.2.1. Plasma Irradiation Experiments

The antibiotics were irradiated with non-thermal plasma generated in a trielectrode reactor operated in ambient air (Figure 2), which was designed by some of the authors of this work. The reactor is based on a surface dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) extended to a third electrode. The solution to be treated flows through a low-impedance channel, which acts as a third electrode connected to the ground, away from high-voltage DBD electrodes. A detailed description of the reactor can be found in the reference [32].
Briefly, the experimental setup consisted of a surface DBD developed between electrodes E1 and E2 by applying a high AC voltage signal Vac. The third electrode E3, connected to the ground, consisted of an aluminum adhesive tape attached to a channel through which the water to be treated flowed. The Vac voltage applied to the E1 and E2 is elevated with a high DC voltage set at 10 kV to provide the necessary electric field for the streamers to propagate towards E3. The reactor was operated at Vac peak-to-peak voltage values around 11 kV and a frequency of about 10 kHz, which corresponds to the resonance of the system.
In the degradation experiments, 1 and 10 mg L−1 aqueous solutions of OTC (Oxytetracycline hydrochloride—Sigma-Aldrich O5875, 3050 Spruce Street, Saint Louis, MO, USA) and LNC (Lincomycin hydrochloride—Sigma-Aldrich 62143, 3050 Spruce Street, Saint Louis, MO 63103, USA) were prepared using Milli-Q water (resistivity > 18 MΩ, Elga Classic UV MK2, Lane End Business Park, Lane End, High Wycombe, United Kingdom). Assays were performed in duplicate, employing 100 mL of the corresponding solution for each one. Samples were continuously recirculated through the reactor using a peristaltic pump at a 70 mL min−1 rate. Aliquots of the samples were taken at specific times for their analysis. Throughout the experiments, pH and ORP were measured using an Adwa AD8000 pH/mV/EC/TDS/Temperature Bench Meter (Adwa, Szeged, Hungary).

2.2.2. Analytical Methods

The concentration of the antibiotics in the aliquots taken at different times during each experiment was determined as follows. For OTC, concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), using an HP1100 Series apparatus (Agilent Technologies, 76337 Waldbronn, Germany) with a Zorbax Eclipse XDBC18 column (4.6 mm × 250 mm, 5 µm) at 25 °C, coupled with an Agilent Technologies 1200 UV-Vis detector, working at λ = 354 nm, with a mobile phase of H2O with TFA at pH 2 and Acetonitrile–Methanol (65:17.5:17.5).
For LNC, the concentrations were determined by a Waters Alliance 2695 High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) system coupled with Waters Acquity TQ triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (MS/MS) (Waters Corporation, 34 Maple Street, Milford, MA 01757, USA). The column used was a reverse-phase Phenomenex (Torrance, CA, USA) Kinetex C18 (100 mm × 4.6 mm; 2.6 µm particle size). The mobile phase was prepared using 0.1% formic acid in water (A) and 100% acetonitrile (B), with the following gradients: 0–0.5 min, 2% B; 0.5–7 min, 2–80% B; 7.0–9.0 min, 80–98% B; 9.0–10.0 min, 2% B; 10.0–15.0 min, 2% B at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min. The retention time of LNC was 5.7 min. Electrospray ionization (EI) was operated in the positive ion mode with capillary voltage of 1.5 kV, programmed at 150 °C. Desolvation temperature was programmed at 450 °C. The molecular ion m/z 406.98 [M + H]+ and product ion m/z 126.2 were selected with an optimized collision energy of 30 eV. The ionization energy, Multi-Reaction Monitoring (MRM) transition ions (precursor and product ions), capillary and cone voltage, desolvation gas flow, and collision energy were optimized by the Waters IntelliStart™ optimization software package (Empower 3 v1.71).
The extent of mineralization of the irradiated antibiotics was determined by using a Total Organic Carbon Analyzer Shimadzu TOC-VCPH (Jenck S.A., Av. Alvarez Thomas 228, Buenos Aires C1427 CCP, Argentina) (Software TOC-Control V 2.00, Shimadzu).

2.2.3. Data Analysis

The degradation D% was defined as
D % = C 0 C C 0 × 100
where C 0 is the initial concentration of the antibiotics and C is the final concentration after the irradiation time. Since including all the reactants and the byproducts can be difficult to do in AOPs, a simplified rate law can be used, which is defined as follows:
v = C t = k a · C n a
where v is the degradation rate, k a is the apparent rate constant, C is the concentration at a given time t , and n a is the apparent reaction order. The integration yields Equation (3) for n a = 1 and Equation (4) for n a   1 [33].
C = C 0 · 1 e k a · t
C = 1 1 C 0 n a 1 + ( n a 1 ) · k a · t 1 n a 1
In addition, the energy yield ( Y ( m g · k W 1 · h 1 ), defined as the ratio between the degraded mass during plasma treatment and the energy spent, was calculated by the following equation:
Y = V · C 0 · D P · t · 100
where V = 0.1   L is the treated volume, C 0 (mg L 1 ), is the initial concentration of the antibiotic, P  ( k W ) is the average input power which was around 1 W , and t is the treatment time in hours.

2.2.4. Biotoxicity Assay Details

The biotoxicity of the samples before and after the plasma treatment was assessed according to the Dutka method [34,35] using Lactuca sativa seeds. Briefly, for each assay, 20 seeds were placed on a filter paper in a Petri dish and put into contact with 5 mL of one of the following solutions: Na2SO4 0.1 M (positive control), ultrapure water (negative control), or the antibiotic solution (with or without being subdued to plasma irradiation). The Petri dishes were kept in the dark for 5 days, after which seed germination and root elongation were measured, and the following indexes were calculated: the relative seed germination ( R S G ), growth relative to the radicle ( G R R ), and germination index ( G I ):
R S G = n u m b e r   o f   g e r m i n a t e d   s e e d s   i n   t h e   s a m p l e n u m b e r   o f   g e r m i n a t e d   s e e d s   i n   t h e   n e g a t i v e   c o n t r o l   s a m p l e · 100
G R R = L e n g t h   a v e r a g e   r a d i c l e   i n   t h e   s a m p l e L e n g t h   a v e r a g e   r a d i c l e   i n   t h e   n e g a t i v e   c o n t r o l   s a m p l e · 100
G I = R S G · G R R 100
G I values can be used as indicators for low or “L” (near 100%), moderated or “M” (below 50%), and high or “H” (near 0%) toxicity.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Computational Modeling

After the optimizations, the number of conformers that were within the feasibly accessible energy window (i.e., 6 kcal/mol, Supplementary Material S1 [25]) was two for OTC and five for LNC. All conformers were verified to correspond to energy minimum points and were weighted according to Boltzmann factors to determine which had the most significant contribution (Supplementary Materials, Figures S1 and S2 and Table S1). For each antibiotic, the conformer with the lowest energy is shown in Figure 3, together with their corresponding electrostatic potential mapped on the isodensity surface at a 0.004 value. In these maps, a color spectrum is used to highlight the intensity of the electrostatic potential of each region of the molecules, ranging from red (lowest electrostatic potential, associated with the maximum negative charge density) to blue (highest electrostatic potential, associated with maximum positive charge density) [36]. As expected, the maximum positive electrostatic potential corresponds to the location of the positively charged ammonium ions.
On the other hand, as an electron-deficient species, free radicals are a short-lived species with a high tendency to react and stabilize [37,38,39], leading to processes that involve the breaking and formation of covalent bonds. In the case of plasma irradiation, since radicals generated by this AOP are mainly ROS (e.g., O H ), the target molecules could undergo either degradation processes or the incorporation of oxygenated functional groups.
In order to identify the sites with the highest potential reactivity towards radical attack for each antibiotic, their Fukui functions ( f 0 ( r ) ) were calculated and plotted (Figure 4). In addition, the corresponding condensed Fukui indexes ( f x 0 ) were also calculated and are presented in Table 1. The most susceptible sites to radical attack obtained from the Fukui functions are shown in purple in Figure 4, and, in all cases, these sites have highly condensed Fukui indexes [18,40].
The most susceptible regions to both antibiotics and plasma irradiation (i.e., bond cleavage and/or radical attack) predicted by the computational analyses carried out in this work are in agreement with the degradation pathways reported in the literature for OTC [41,42] and LNC [43], evidencing the usefulness of computational modeling as a predictive tool for the degradation of organic molecules subjected to AOPs.
Regarding the degradation rates, taking into account that lower degradation times are associated with lower ionization potential values [18,29], in this work, the vertical first ionization potential ( I P ) of both antibiotics was calculated from the HOMO energy values ( E H O M O ) according to the Koopmans’ Theorem (Equation (9)) [18,31], and the results are shown in Table 2.
I P = 1.3124   ×   ( E H O M O ) + 0.514   e V
Since the IP values for both antibiotics are comparable, similar degradation times for both OTC and LNC can be expected in AOPs.

3.2. Experimental Results

3.2.1. Plasma Irradiation Assays

Antibiotic solutions with initial concentrations of 10 and 1 mg L−1 were irradiated with non-thermal plasma generated in a trielectrode reactor open to the air. The pH and the Oxidative Reduction Potential (ORP) were monitored during the experiment. The antibiotics solutions had an initial pH of 6.5 and decreased during the experiment until a final value of 3.5 (Figure 5) due to the generation of acidic species as a result of the antibiotics’ degradation [44,45]. In addition, the Oxidative Reduction Potential (ORP) remained positive during treatment (20 to 200 mV), which is consistent with the presence of reactive radicals of oxidative behavior [46].
The concentration of the antibiotics in aliquots taken at different times during each experiment was determined, and the degradation percentage (D%) was calculated (Section 2.2.3, Equation (1)). The results for OTC and LNC are shown in Figure 6. Both OTC and LNC follow comparable degradation trends, with similar D% at every time. For C0 = 10 mg L−1, the maximum D% reached was approximately 60% at 90 min of treatment, whereas for C0 = 1 mg L−1, nearly complete degradation was achieved at 60 min.
It is worth noting that comparable degradation trends for both antibiotics assessed in the irradiation experiments were predicted by the molecular modeling studies, whose calculations resulted in similar IP values. These results highlight the accuracy of the molecular modeling predictions and the advantage of using these tools to anticipate the outcome of irradiation experiments.
The degradation curves were fitted to pseudo-order kinetic models (Equations (3) and (4)), and the results are shown in Figure 7. As illustrated in the figure, for both antibiotics, the degradation rate decreased as the initial concentration increased.
The dependence of the degradation rate and treatment efficiency of plasma irradiation on the initial antibiotic concentration can be attributed to an increase in the byproduct’s concentration as the initial concentration rises, resulting in competition with the target compounds for reactive radical species [41,45,47].
It is noteworthy that despite the lower rate constant, the amount of antibiotics degraded by plasma is larger in the case of the higher initial concentration. Herein, an increase in energy yield was observed as the concentration of the antibiotic in the irradiated solution increased. Specifically, the energy yield for the OTC and LNC at C0 = 1 mg L−1 was Y = 100 mg/kWh, and for the higher concentration, the yields were 390 and 403 mg/kWh for OTC and LNC, respectively.
On the other hand, the mineralization extent of OTC and LNC solutions with an initial concentration of 10 mg L−1 was analyzed after 90 min of irradiation. The data showed 21% and 31% of mineralization for OTC and LNC, respectively. These results are consistent with literature reports indicating that complete mineralization of these antibiotics using AOPs has not been achieved yet [48,49,50]. In fact, some studies report that β-lactam antibiotics, such as OTC, only reach 25–30% mineralization, reflecting a slow progress toward complete degradation [8,45].

3.2.2. Biotoxicity Assays

To evaluate the potential adverse effects of these antibiotics on biota under extreme exposure conditions, biotoxicity assays using the Dutka method were carried out [34]. The assay evaluates the inhibition of germination and the growth of the radicle and hypocotyl of Lactuca sativa seeds as indicators of sublethal toxicity, making it particularly responsive to low levels of toxic compounds. While it is important to acknowledge that not all contaminants impact organisms in the same way, this method has proven to be a reliable early indicator of environmental toxicity, supported by extensive literature validating its application across various environmental monitoring matrices [35,51,52,53,54,55].
An initial study was carried out employing high concentrations of both OTC and LNC (1000 mg L−1). Despite these values being higher than typical concentrations found in wastewater, they are able to show minimal differences in biotoxicity [34,35,45]. This approach was used to determine if such high levels significantly affect the germination and growth of Lactuca sativa seeds. The results of the seeds exposed to the solutions are shown in Figure 8, together with the negative control (H2O) and the commercial seed.
The figure clearly illustrates how both antibiotics inhibited the normal development of Lactuca sativa.
Additionally, as mentioned previously, numerous reports have pointed out that byproducts generated during plasma irradiation can be equally or even more toxic than the original compounds [24]. Therefore, the biotoxicity assessment of the OTC and LNC samples before and after the plasma treatment (for both C0 = 10 mg L−1 and C0 = 1 mg L−1) was carried out. Figure 9 shows the appearance of Lactuca sativa seeds’ growth after the 5-day experiment.
In Table 3, the number of non-germinated seeds and average radicle length are shown. As can be seen in the table, the results obtained for the irradiated samples of OTC and LNC for both 10 and 1 mg L−1 have no significant differences compared with those obtained for the negative control (H2O).
Based on the results obtained from the experiment, the germination indexes (GI%) were calculated according to Equation (8) (Experimental Details Section 2.2.3) and are shown in Figure 10.
It is noteworthy that the biotoxicity of the solutions after the plasma irradiation was closer to the lowest toxicity reference value (100% GI).

4. Conclusions

Molecular modeling accurately predicted the degradation rates of the veterinary antibiotics OTC and LNC under non-thermal plasma irradiation, identifying their most susceptible degradation sites. Both antibiotics had similar ionization potentials and degradation curves and reached comparable final degradation percentages. Such findings highlight the potential of molecular modeling as a valuable tool for predicting the plasma degradation susceptibility of organic compounds.
Regarding plasma irradiation, this simply designed reactor offered several advantages: (i) no need for inert gases, (ii) room temperature operation, (iii) easy scalability akin to a flowing water system, and (iv) low energy requirements. It provided promising results using an environmentally friendly technology that could be accurately predicted through molecular modeling.
The TOC results confirmed the greater stability of the tetracycline four-ring structure in oxytetracycline (OTC) compared to lincomycin (LNC). In addition, none of the solutions after plasma irradiation showed biotoxicity against Lactuca sativa.
Overall, the outcome of this work offers valuable insight into the remediation of organic compounds-polluted water using a comprehensive approach, including molecular modeling, plasma irradiation, and byproducts biotoxicity studies.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/w16223281/s1. S1. Computational modeling details. Figure S1: Conformers within the feasibly accessible energy window (6 kcal/mol) for OTC. Figure S2: Conformers within the feasibly accessible energy window (6 kcal/mol) for LNC. Table S1: Energy values and Boltzmann factors for the conformers. References [56,57,58,59] are citied in the Supplementary Materials.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: M.I.E., Formal analysis: G.D.B., M.Z. and E.R., Funding acquisition: D.G. and M.I.E., Investigation: G.D.B., M.Z. and S.Q., Methodology: G.D.B., M.Z. and E.R., Project administration: M.I.E., Resources: D.G. and M.I.E., Supervision: C.-H.L., M.M.F., E.R., D.G. and M.I.E., Visualization: G.D.B. and E.R., Writing—original draft: G.D.B., M.Z., M.M.F., E.R., D.G. and M.I.E., Writing—review and editing: G.D.B., M.Z., C.-H.L., M.M.F., E.R., D.G. and M.I.E. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (PICT2020-00221), Instituto Tecnológico de Buenos Aires (ITBA), Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBACYT 2020 Mod I 20020190100292BA), and CONICET (PUE 2018 22920180100050CO; PIP 2022- 2025. 11220210100707CO).

Data Availability Statement

The original data presented in the study are openly available at https://datosdeinvestigacion.conicet.gov.ar (http://hdl.handle.net/11336/246181) (accessed on 12 November 2024).

Acknowledgments

Gema Díaz Bukvic and Matias Zanini have fellowships from Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Madhav, S.; Ahamad, A.; Singh, A.K.; Kushawaha, J.; Chauhan, J.S.; Sharma, S.; Singh, P. Water Pollutants: Sources and Impact on the Environment and Human Health. In Sensors in Water Pollutants Monitoring: Role of Material; Pooja, D., Kumar, P., Singh, P., Patil, S., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2020; pp. 43–62. [Google Scholar]
  2. Arora, N.K.; Mishra, I. United Nations Sustainable Development Goals 2030 and environmental sustainability: Race against time. Environ. Sustain. 2019, 2, 339–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. de Ilurdoz, M.S.; Sadhwani, J.J.; Reboso, J.V. Antibiotic removal processes from water & wastewater for the protection of the aquatic environment—A review. J. Water Process Eng. 2022, 45, 102474. [Google Scholar]
  4. Berkner, S.; Konradi, S.; Schonfeld, J. Antibiotic resistance and the environment--there and back again: Science & Society series on Science and Drugs. EMBO Rep. 2014, 15, 740–744. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  5. Greenwood, D. Chapter 21—Lincosamides. In Antibiotic and Chemotherapy, 9th ed.; Finch, R.G., Greenwood, D., Norrby, S.R., Whitley, R.J., Eds.; W.B. Saunders: London, UK, 2010; pp. 272–275. [Google Scholar]
  6. Danner, M.-C.; Robertson, A.; Behrends, V.; Reiss, J. Antibiotic pollution in surface fresh waters: Occurrence and effects. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 664, 793–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Cannon, A.; Edwards, S.; Jacobs, M.; Moir, J.W.; Roy, M.A.; Tickner, J.A. An actionable definition and criteria for “sustainable chemistry” based on literature review and a global multisectoral stakeholder working group. RSC Sustain. 2023, 1, 2092–2106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Magureanu, M.; Piroi, D.; Mandache, N.B.; David, V.; Medvedovici, A.; Bradu, C.; Parvulescu, V.I. Degradation of antibiotics in water by non-thermal plasma treatment. Water Res. 2011, 45, 3407–3416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pandis, P.K.; Kalogirou, C.; Kanellou, E.; Vaitsis, C.; Savvidou, M.G.; Sourkouni, G.; Zorpas, A.A.; Argirusis, C. Key Points of Advanced Oxidation Processes (AOPs) for Wastewater, Organic Pollutants and Pharmaceutical Waste Treatment: A Mini Review. ChemEngineering 2022, 6, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chen, J. Advanced Oxidation Technologies: Photocatalytic Treatment of Wastewater; Wageningen University and Research: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  11. Ameta, R.; Chohadia, A.K.; Jain, A.; Punjabi, P.B. Chapter 3—Fenton and Photo-Fenton Processes. In Advanced Oxidation Processes for Waste Water Treatment; Ameta, S.C., Ameta, R., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2018; pp. 49–87. [Google Scholar]
  12. Yang, C.; Zhong, H.; Deng, J.; Li, M.; Tang, C.; Hu, X.; Zhu, M. Z-scheme γ-Fe2O3/g-C3N4 in Photo-Fenton reaction for oxytetracycline degradation: Mechanism study and DFT calculation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2025, 354, 129185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Adeyemi, J.O.; Ajiboye, T.; Onwudiwe, D.C. Mineralization of Antibiotics in Wastewater Via Photocatalysis. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2021, 232, 219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Shi, Y.; Chen, J.; Xiao, S.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, X. Revisiting the Mineralization of Organic Contaminants in Advanced Oxidation Processes. ACS ES&T Water 2023, 3, 3449–3451. [Google Scholar]
  15. Chen, Z.; An, F.; Zhang, Y.; Liang, Z.; Liu, W.; Xing, M. Single-atom Mo–Co catalyst with low biotoxicity for sustainable degradation of high-ionization-potential organic pollutants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2023, 120, e2305933120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Cvetnić, M.; Novak Stankov, M.; Kovačić, M.; Ukić, Š.; Bolanča, T.; Kušić, H.; Rasulev, B.; Dionysiou, D.D.; Lončarić Božić, A. Key structural features promoting radical driven degradation of emerging contaminants in water. Environ. Int. 2019, 124, 38–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Rayaroth, M.P.; Aravind, U.K.; Boczkaj, G.; Aravindakumar, C.T. Singlet oxygen in the removal of organic pollutants: An updated review on the degradation pathways based on mass spectrometry and DFT calculations. Chemosphere 2023, 345, 140203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Li, H.; Li, T.; He, S.; Zhou, J.; Wang, T.; Zhu, L. Efficient degradation of antibiotics by non-thermal discharge plasma: Highlight the impacts of molecular structures and degradation pathways. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 395, 125091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chen, Y.; Long, X.; Huang, R.; Zhang, I.Y.; Yao, G.; Lai, B.; Xiong, Z. Highly efficient electro-cocatalytic Fenton-like reactions for the degradation of recalcitrant naphthenic acids: Exploring reaction mechanisms and environmental implications. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 450, 138331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, J.; Wang, C.; Guo, H.; Ye, T.; Liu, Y.; Cheng, X.; Li, W.; Yang, B.; Du, E. Crucial roles of oxygen and superoxide radical in bisulfite-activated persulfate oxidation of bisphenol AF: Mechanisms, kinetics and DFT studies. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 391, 122228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liang, J.; Zhen, P.; Gan, P.; Li, Y.; Tong, M.; Liu, W. DFT Calculation of Nonperiodic Small Molecular Systems to Predict the Reaction Mechanism of Advanced Oxidation Processes: Challenges and Perspectives. ACS EST Eng. 2024, 4, 4–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Meropoulis, S.; Giannoulia, S.; Skandalis, S.; Rassias, G.; Aggelopoulos, C.A. Key-study on plasma-induced degradation of cephalosporins in water: Process optimization, assessment of degradation mechanisms and residual toxicity. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2022, 298, 121639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhang, T.; Zhou, R.; Wang, P.; Mai-Prochnow, A.; McConchie, R.; Li, W.; Zhou, R.; Thompson, E.W.; Ostrikov, K.; Cullen, P.J. Degradation of cefixime antibiotic in water by atmospheric plasma bubbles: Performance, degradation pathways and toxicity evaluation. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 421, 127730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wu, J.; Xiong, Q.; Liang, J.; He, Q.; Yang, D.; Deng, R.; Chen, Y. Degradation of benzotriazole by DBD plasma and peroxymonosulfate: Mechanism, degradation pathway and potential toxicity. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 384, 123300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Pracht, P.; Bohle, F.; Grimme, S. Automated exploration of the low-energy chemical space with fast quantum chemical methods. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2020, 22, 7169–7192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Qasim, S.; Hsu, S.-Y.; Rossi, E.; Salahshoor, Z.; Lin, C.-H.; Parada, L.P.; Fidalgo, M. Detection of progesterone in aqueous samples by molecularly imprinted photonic polymers. Microchim. Acta 2022, 189, 174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Azofra, L.M.; Alkorta, I.; Elguero, J. Theoretical study of the mutarotation of erythrose and threose: Acid catalysis. Carbohydr. Res. 2013, 372, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lin, H.; Wu, D.-l.; Liu, L.; Jia, D.-z. Theoretical study on molecular structures, intramolecular proton transfer reaction, and solvent effects of 1-phenyl-3-methyl-4-(6-hydro-4-amino-5-sulfo-2,3-pyrazine)-pyrazole-5-one. J. Mol. Struct. THEOCHEM 2008, 850, 32–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Morgante, P.; Autschbach, J. Strategies to Calculate Fukui Functions and Applications to Radicals with SOMO–HOMO Inversion. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2023, 19, 3929–3942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Shen, T.; Wang, X.; Xu, P.; Yang, C.; Li, J.; Wang, P.; Zhang, G. Effect of dielectric barrier discharge plasma on persulfate activation for rapid degradation of atrazine: Optimization, mechanism and energy consumption. Environ. Res. 2022, 212, 113287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhan, C.-G.; Nichols, J.A.; Dixon, D.A. Ionization potential, electron affinity, electronegativity, hardness, and electron excitation energy: Molecular properties from density functional theory orbital energies. J. Phys. Chem. A 2003, 107, 4184–4195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Giuliani, L.; De Angelis, L.; Diaz Bukvic, G.; Zanini, M.; Minotti, F.; Errea, M.I.; Grondona, D. Trielectrode plasma reactor for water treatment. J. Appl. Phys. 2020, 127, 223303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Rytwo, G.; Zelkind, A.L. Evaluation of Kinetic Pseudo-Order in the Photocatalytic Degradation of Ofloxacin. Catalysts 2022, 12, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Dutka, B.J.; Kwan, K.K.; Rao, S.S.; Jurkovic, A.; McInnis, R.; Palmateer, G.A.; Hawkins, B. Use of bioassays to evaluate river water and sediment quality. Environ. Toxicol. Water Qual. 1991, 6, 309–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chan-Keb, C.A.; Agraz-Hernández, C.M.; Perez-Balan, R.A.; Gómez-Solano, M.I.; Maldonado-Montiel, T.; Ake-Canche, B.; Gutiérrez-Alcántara, E.J. Acute toxicity of water and aqueous extract of soils from Champotón river in Lactuca sativa L. Toxicol. Rep. 2018, 5, 593–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Jarwal, N.; Thankachan, P.P. Theoretical study of the Wittig reaction of cyclic ketones with phosphorus ylide. J. Mol. Model. 2015, 21, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Martemucci, G.; Costagliola, C.; Mariano, M.; D’andrea, L.; Napolitano, P.; D’Alessandro, A.G. Free Radical Properties, Source and Targets, Antioxidant Consumption and Health. Oxygen 2022, 2, 48–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Di Meo, S.; Venditti, P. Evolution of the Knowledge of Free Radicals and Other Oxidants. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2020, 2020, 9829176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Phaniendra, A.; Jestadi, D.B.; Periyasamy, L. Free Radicals: Properties, Sources, Targets, and Their Implication in Various Diseases. Indian J. Clin. Biochem. 2015, 30, 11–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lin, C.; Liu, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Song, C.; Meng, F.; Song, B.; Zuo, G.; Qi, Q.; Wang, Y.; Yu, L.; et al. Oxygen-mediated dielectric barrier discharge plasma for enhanced degradation of chlorinated aromatic compounds. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2023, 313, 123445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Liu, Y.; He, X.; Fu, Y.; Dionysiou, D.D. Degradation kinetics and mechanism of oxytetracycline by hydroxyl radical-based advanced oxidation processes. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 284, 1317–1327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Han, C.-H.; Park, H.-D.; Kim, S.-B.; Yargeau, V.; Choi, J.-W.; Lee, S.-H.; Park, J.-A. Oxidation of tetracycline and oxytetracycline for the photo-Fenton process: Their transformation products and toxicity assessment. Water Res. 2020, 172, 115514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Deng, Y.; Liu, J.; Huang, Y.; Ma, M.; Liu, K.; Dou, X.; Wang, Z.; Qu, S.; Wang, Z. Engineering the Photocatalytic Behaviors of g/C3N4-Based Metal-Free Materials for Degradation of a Representative Antibiotic. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 2002353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Jablonowski, H.; von Woedtke, T. Research on plasma medicine-relevant plasma–liquid interaction: What happened in the past five years? Clin. Plasma Med. 2015, 3, 42–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Magureanu, M.; Bilea, F.; Bradu, C.; Hong, D. A review on non-thermal plasma treatment of water contaminated with antibiotics. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 417, 125481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Yang, X.; Rosario-Ortiz, F.L.; Lei, Y.; Pan, Y.; Lei, X.; Westerhoff, P. Multiple Roles of Dissolved Organic Matter in Advanced Oxidation Processes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 56, 11111–11131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ganiyu, S.O.; Sable, S.; Gamal El-Din, M. Advanced oxidation processes for the degradation of dissolved organics in produced water: A review of process performance, degradation kinetics and pathway. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 429, 132492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Yi, R.; Guo, H.; Wang, H.; Du, D.; Zhang, Q.; Yi, C. Multiple production of highly active particles for oxytetracycline degradation in a large volume strong ionization dielectric barrier discharge system: Performance and degradation pathways. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2021, 274, 119103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Paola, A.D.; Addamo, M.; Augugliaro, V.; García-López, E.; Loddo, V.; Marcì, G.; Palmisano, L. Photodegradation of lincomycin in aqueous solution. Int. J. Photoenergy 2006, 2006, 047418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Massima Mouele, E.S.; Tijani, J.O.; Badmus, K.O.; Pereao, O.; Babajide, O.; Zhang, C.; Shao, T.; Sosnin, E.; Tarasenko, V.; Fatoba, O.O.; et al. Removal of Pharmaceutical Residues from Water and Wastewater Using Dielectric Barrier Discharge Methods—A Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 1683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Priac, A.; Badot, P.-M.; Crini, G. Treated wastewater phytotoxicity assessment using Lactuca sativa: Focus on germination and root elongation test parameters. C. R. Biol. 2017, 340, 188–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Valerio, M.E.; García, J.F.; Peinado, F.M. Determination of phytotoxicity of soluble elements in soils, based on a bioassay with lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.). Sci. Total Environ. 2007, 378, 63–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Young, B.J.; Riera, N.I.; Beily, M.E.; Bres, P.A.; Crespo, D.C.; Ronco, A.E. Toxicity of the effluent from an anaerobic bioreactor treating cereal residues on Lactuca sativa. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2012, 76, 182–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Arkhipchuk, V.V.; Malinovskaya, M.V.; Garanko, N.N. Cytogenetic study of organic and inorganic toxic substances on Allium cepa, Lactuca sativa, and Hydra attenuata cells. Environ. Toxicol. 2000, 15, 338–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Arias-Barreiro, C.R.; Nishizaki, H.; Okubo, K.; Aoyama, I.; Mori, I.C. Ecotoxicological characterization of tannery wastewater in Dhaka, Bangladesh. J. Environ. Biol. 2010, 31, 471–475. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  56. Rukin, P.S.; Freidzon, A.Y.; Scherbinin, A.V.; Sazhnikov, V.A.; Bagaturyants, A.A.; Alfimov, M.V. Vibronic bandshape of the absorption spectra of dibenzoylmethanatoboron difluoride derivatives: Analysis based on ab initio calculations. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 16997–17006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. DeMatteo, M.P.; Mei, S.; Fenton, R.; Morton, M.; Baldisseri, D.M.; Hadad, C.M.; Peczuh, M.W. Conformational analysis of methyl 5-O-methyl septanosides: Effect of glycosylation on conformer populations. Carbohydr. Res. 2006, 341, 2927–2945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Hollas, D.; Curchod, B.F.E. AtmoSpec–A Tool to Calculate Photoabsorption Cross-Sections for Atmospheric Volatile Organic Compounds. J. Phys. Chem. A 2024, 128, 8580–8590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kolar, P.; Classen, J.; Hall, S.G. Physicochemical data of p-cresol, butyric acid, and ammonia. Data Brief 2019, 26, 104356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Oxytetracycline; (b) Lincomycin.
Figure 1. (a) Oxytetracycline; (b) Lincomycin.
Water 16 03281 g001
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of the experimental setup.
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of the experimental setup.
Water 16 03281 g002
Figure 3. Electrostatic potential for 0.004 isodensity value for (a) OTC and (b) LNC.
Figure 3. Electrostatic potential for 0.004 isodensity value for (a) OTC and (b) LNC.
Water 16 03281 g003
Figure 4. Fukui functions ( f 0 ( r ) ) at 0.004 isodensity value (in purple) for (a) OTC and (b) LNC. The atom labeling for Fukui indexes ( f x 0 ) for (c) OTC and (d) LNC.
Figure 4. Fukui functions ( f 0 ( r ) ) at 0.004 isodensity value (in purple) for (a) OTC and (b) LNC. The atom labeling for Fukui indexes ( f x 0 ) for (c) OTC and (d) LNC.
Water 16 03281 g004
Figure 5. pH and ORP evolution during the experiments.
Figure 5. pH and ORP evolution during the experiments.
Water 16 03281 g005
Figure 6. Degradation curves for OTC and LNC, with C0 = (a) 10 mg L−1 and (b) 1 mg L−1 (VDC: 10 kV; VAC: 11 kV; frequency: 10 kHz; temperature: 25 °C; total volume: 100 mL; flow rate: 70 mL min−1; gas: air, no flow).
Figure 6. Degradation curves for OTC and LNC, with C0 = (a) 10 mg L−1 and (b) 1 mg L−1 (VDC: 10 kV; VAC: 11 kV; frequency: 10 kHz; temperature: 25 °C; total volume: 100 mL; flow rate: 70 mL min−1; gas: air, no flow).
Water 16 03281 g006
Figure 7. Degradation curves fitted to pseudo-order models for (a) OTC C0 = 10 mg L−1; (b) LNC C0 = 10 mg L−1; (c) OTC C0 = 1 mg L−1; (d) LNC C0 = 1 mg L−1. The obtained parameters, along with the adjusted determination coefficient (Radj2) and the root mean square error (RMSE), are shown for each case.
Figure 7. Degradation curves fitted to pseudo-order models for (a) OTC C0 = 10 mg L−1; (b) LNC C0 = 10 mg L−1; (c) OTC C0 = 1 mg L−1; (d) LNC C0 = 1 mg L−1. The obtained parameters, along with the adjusted determination coefficient (Radj2) and the root mean square error (RMSE), are shown for each case.
Water 16 03281 g007
Figure 8. (a) Commercial Lactuca sativa seed; (b) 5-day assay on 1000 mg L−1 OTC; (c) 5-day assay on 1000 mg L−1 LNC; (d) 5-day assay on H2O.
Figure 8. (a) Commercial Lactuca sativa seed; (b) 5-day assay on 1000 mg L−1 OTC; (c) 5-day assay on 1000 mg L−1 LNC; (d) 5-day assay on H2O.
Water 16 03281 g008
Figure 9. Petri dishes with the negative (H2O) and positive controls (Na2SO4), the antibiotics OTC and LNC at different concentrations for non-irradiated and irradiated samples.
Figure 9. Petri dishes with the negative (H2O) and positive controls (Na2SO4), the antibiotics OTC and LNC at different concentrations for non-irradiated and irradiated samples.
Water 16 03281 g009
Figure 10. G I   % for OTC and LNC at different irradiation times.
Figure 10. G I   % for OTC and LNC at different irradiation times.
Water 16 03281 g010
Table 1. Condensed Fukui index values using Mulliken charges for OTC and LNC.
Table 1. Condensed Fukui index values using Mulliken charges for OTC and LNC.
AntibioticAtom f x + f x f x 0
OTC12aC0.0230.0100.016
6C0.0050.0170.011
4aC0.0080.0080.008
16N0.0100.0010.005
11aC−0.0040.0070.002
29C0.0030.0000.001
LNC20N0.1380.0390.089
29C0.0970.0030.050
26N0.117−0.0490.034
16O0.0070.0260.017
3O0.0080.0190.014
24C0.061−0.0340.013
Table 2. H O M O energies and ionization potential ( I P ) for the antibiotics.
Table 2. H O M O energies and ionization potential ( I P ) for the antibiotics.
Antibiotic E H O M O I P
[kcal/mol][eV][eV]
OTC−149.2−6.59.0
LNC−145.6−6.38.8
Table 3. Dutka method results for OTC and LNC (1 and 10 mg L−1) before and after plasma irradiation. *** indicates statistically significant differences compared to water (p ≤ 0.001) based on Games–Howell post hoc test. No statistically significant differences were observed for the other samples compared to water or between each other.
Table 3. Dutka method results for OTC and LNC (1 and 10 mg L−1) before and after plasma irradiation. *** indicates statistically significant differences compared to water (p ≤ 0.001) based on Games–Howell post hoc test. No statistically significant differences were observed for the other samples compared to water or between each other.
SampleNumber of Non-Germinated SeedAverage Radicle Length [cm]
H2O1 ± 13.1 ± 0.5
OTC 10 mg L−1 non-irradiated4 ± 11.9 ± 0.3 ***
OTC 10 mg L−1 irradiated 90 min.2 ± 12.7 ± 0.3
OTC 1 mg L−1 non-irradiated3 ± 13.0 ± 0.4
OTC 1 mg L−1 irradiated 90 min.2 ± 13.5 ± 0.4
LNC 10 mg L−1 non-irradiated2 ± 13.1 ± 0.5
LNC 10 mg L−1 irradiated 90 min.2 ± 13.6 ± 0.5
LNC 1 mg L−1 non-irradiated1 ± 13.3 ± 0.5
LNC 1 mg L-1 irradiated 90 min.1 ± 14.0 ± 0.5
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Díaz Bukvic, G.; Zanini, M.; Qasim, S.; Lin, C.-H.; Fidalgo, M.M.; Rossi, E.; Grondona, D.; Errea, M.I. A Comprehensive Study of the Degradation of Veterinary Antibiotics by Non-Thermal Plasma: Computational, Experimental, and Biotoxicity Assessments. Water 2024, 16, 3281. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16223281

AMA Style

Díaz Bukvic G, Zanini M, Qasim S, Lin C-H, Fidalgo MM, Rossi E, Grondona D, Errea MI. A Comprehensive Study of the Degradation of Veterinary Antibiotics by Non-Thermal Plasma: Computational, Experimental, and Biotoxicity Assessments. Water. 2024; 16(22):3281. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16223281

Chicago/Turabian Style

Díaz Bukvic, Gema, Matias Zanini, Sally Qasim, Chung-Ho Lin, María Marta Fidalgo, Ezequiel Rossi, Diana Grondona, and María Inés Errea. 2024. "A Comprehensive Study of the Degradation of Veterinary Antibiotics by Non-Thermal Plasma: Computational, Experimental, and Biotoxicity Assessments" Water 16, no. 22: 3281. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16223281

APA Style

Díaz Bukvic, G., Zanini, M., Qasim, S., Lin, C. -H., Fidalgo, M. M., Rossi, E., Grondona, D., & Errea, M. I. (2024). A Comprehensive Study of the Degradation of Veterinary Antibiotics by Non-Thermal Plasma: Computational, Experimental, and Biotoxicity Assessments. Water, 16(22), 3281. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16223281

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop