Analysis of Characteristics and Driving Factors of Wetland Landscape Pattern Change in Henan Province from 1980 to 2015
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Study Area and Data Sources
3. Research Methods
3.1. Landscape Metrics
3.2. Landscape Transfer Matrix
3.3. Statistical Analysis
4. Results and Analysis
4.1. Analysis of the Wetland Landscape Pattern in Henan Province
4.1.1. PA Analysis
4.1.2. PD and MPFD Analysis
4.2. Analysis of the Transformation Characteristics of Wetland Landscapes
4.2.1. Transformation Characteristics of Wetland Landscape between 1980 and 2015
4.2.2. Transformation Characteristics of Wetland Landscapes between All Consecutive Periods
4.3. Analysis of Driving Forces of Wetland Changes
4.3.1. Natural Driving Force
4.3.2. Human Driving Force
5. Discussion and Conclusions
5.1. Discussion
5.2. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Liu, H.Y.; Li, Y.F.; Cao, X.; Hao, J.; Hu, J.; Zheng, N. The current problems and perspectives of landscape research of wetlands in China. Acta Geogr. Sin. 2009, 64, 1394–1401. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, A.J. Studies on the Driving Mechanism of Hydrological Processes on the Landscape Pattern Evolution of the Yellow River Estuary Wetland; China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research: Beijing, China, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Byun, E.; Sato, H.; Cowling, S.A.; Finkelstein, S.A. Extensive wetland development in mid-latitude North America during the Bølling–Allerød. Nat. Geosci. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, J.P. Current status and protection measures of wetland in Henan. Cent. S. For. Inventory Plan. 2014, 33, 35–37. [Google Scholar]
- Deng, T.; Wang, P.J.; Deng, Z.D. Problems and Countermeasures of Wetland Protection and Sustainable Utilization in Henan Province. J. Anhui Agric. Sci. 2020, 48, 76–77. [Google Scholar]
- Bojie, F.; Liding, C.; Keming, M. Principle and Application of Landscape Ecology; Science Press: Beijing, China, 2001; pp. 86–94. [Google Scholar]
- Bu, H.; Meng, W.; Zhang, Y.; Wan, J. Relationships between land use patterns and water quality in the Taizi River basin, China. Ecol. Indic. 2014, 41, 187–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, J.G. Landscape Ecology—Pattern, Process, Scale and Hierarchy; Higher Education Press: Beijing, China, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Ding, S.Y.; Liang, G.F. Landscape pattern change of regional wetland along the Yellow River in Henan Province in the last two decades. Acta Geogr. Sin. 2004, 59, 653–661. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, W.Q.; Tang, Q.; Ding, S.Y. Landscape pattern dynamic of Xinxiang Yellow River wetland bird national nature reserve, Henan province. Wetl. Sci. 2016, 14, 235–241. [Google Scholar]
- Liang, H.W.; Xing, W. Current situation and protection countermeasures of wetland resources in Henan province. Xiandai Nongye Keji 2019, 22, 153–154. [Google Scholar]
- Liang, S.M.; Li, C.L.; Li, C.F.; Ren, J.; Song, L.S.; Qiao, X.N. Distribution and Change of wetlands in Henan province in 1990, 2000, and 2007. Wetl. Sci. 2011, 9, 94–96. [Google Scholar]
- Tian, Y. Mapping Suburbs Based on Spatial Interactions and Effect Analysis on Ecological Landscape Change: A Case Study of Jiangsu Province from 1998 to 2018, Eastern China. Land 2020, 9, 159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Riitters, K.; Schleeweis, K.; Costanza, J. Forest Area Change in the Shifting Landscape Mosaic of the Continental United States from 2001 to 2016. Land 2020, 9, 417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiong, Y.; Zhou, J.; Chen, L.; Jia, B.; Sun, N.; Tian, M.; Hu, G. Land Use Pattern and Vegetation Cover Dynamics in the Three Gorges Reservoir (TGR) Intervening Basin. Water 2020, 12, 2036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Niu, Z.; Zhang, H.; Wang, X.; Yao, W.; Zhou, D.; Zhao, K.; Zhao, H.; Li, N.; Huang, H.; Li, C.; et al. Mapping wetland changes in China between 1978 and 2008. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2012, 57, 1400–1411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Liu, G.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, Q.; Musyimi, Z.; Jiang, Q. Spatio-Temporal Dynamics of Wetland Landscape Patterns Based on Remote Sensing in Yellow River Delta, China. Wetlands 2014, 34, 787–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van Vliet, J.; de Groot, H.L.; Rietveld, P.; Verburg, P.H. Manifestations and underlying drivers of agricultural land use change in Europe. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2015, 133, 24–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bürgi, M.; Bieling, C.; von Hackwitz, K.; Kizos, T.; Lieskovský, J.; García Martín, M.; Printsmann, A. Processes and driving forces in changing cultural landscapes across Europe. Landsc. Ecol. 2017, 32, 2097–2112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gedan, K.B.; Epanchin-Niell, R.; Qi, M. Rapid Land Cover Change in a Submerging Coastal County. Wetlands 2020, 40, 1717–1728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sabas, B.Y.S.; Danmo, K.G.; Madeleine, K.A.T.; Jan, B. Cocoa Production and Forest Dynamics in Ivory Coast from 1985 to 2019. Land 2020, 9, 524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kupková, L.; Bičík, I.; Jeleček, L. At the Crossroads of European Landscape Changes: Major Processes of Landscape Change in Czechia since the Middle of the 19th Century and Their Driving Forces. Land 2021, 10, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- State Forestry Administration of the People’s Republic of China. China Wetlands Resources (Henan Volume); China Forestry Publishing House: Beijing, China, 2015; pp. 25–42.
- Liu, J.; Liu, M.; Tian, H.; Zhuang, D.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, W.; Tang, X.; Deng, X. Spatial and temporal patterns of China’s cropland during 1990–2000: An analysis based on Landsat TM data. Remote Sens. Environ. 2005, 98, 442–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Botequilha, L.A.; Ahern, J. Applying landscape ecological concepts and metrics in sustainable landscape planning. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2002, 59, 65–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, J.G. Effects of changing scale on landscape pattern analysis: Scaling relations. Landsc. Ecol. 2004, 19, 125–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.M.; Cheng, W.M.; Liu, H.J.; Cao, Y.R. Analysis on changes in land use structure in Henan province from 2005 to 2010. Res. Soil Water Conserve. 2015, 22, 258–263. [Google Scholar]
- Xie, X.; Xiang, Q.; Wu, T.; Zhu, M.; Xu, F.; Xu, Y.; Pu, L. Impacts of Agricultural Land Reclamation on Soil Nutrient Contents, Pools, Stoichiometry, and Their Relationship to Oat Growth on the East China Coast. Land 2021, 10, 355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, P.; Li, Y.; Jing, W.; Yang, D.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Geng, W.; Rong, T.; Shao, J.; Yang, J.; et al. Comprehensive Assessment of the Effect of Urban Built-Up Land Expansion and Climate Change on Net Primary Productivity. Complexity 2020, 8489025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aubakirova, M.; Krupa, E.; Mazhibayeva, Z.; Isbekov, K.; Assylbekova, S. The Role of External Factors in the Variability of the Structure of the Zooplankton Community of Small Lakes (South-East Kazakhstan). Water 2021, 13, 962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, W.K. The Evolution of Water and Sediment in Lower Yellow River and Dynamic Geomorphology in Yellow River Delta to Water-Sediment Modulation; East China Normal University: Shanghai, China, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Shi, F.; Liu, S.; An, Y.; Sun, Y.; Zhao, S.; Liu, Y.; Li, M. Spatio-Temporal Dynamics of Landscape Connectivity and Ecological Network Construction in Long Yangxia Basin at the Upper Yellow River. Land 2020, 9, 265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heng, Y. Study on the Process and Countermeasures of Reconstructing Bed in the Fengqiu Reach of the Lower Yellow River since Xiaolangdi Reservoir Was Put into Use; North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power: Zhengzhou, China, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Li, B.; Mu, X.M.; Gao, P.; Zhao, G.J.; Sun, W.Y. New characteristics of temporal and spatial changes of runoff in the mainstream of Yellow River from 1956 to 2017. Res. Soil Water Conserve. 2019, 26, 120–126. [Google Scholar]
- Yue, W.M.; Liu, Y. Kaifeng “local products” (middle). Kaifeng Daily, 13 June 2012; 6. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, Y.; Zheng, X.L.; Wu, C.C.; Li, Q. Simulation Experiment about Transpiration Characteristics of Phragmites australis Leaf in Liaohe Estuary Wetlands. Wetl. Sci. 2011, 9, 227–232. [Google Scholar]
- Li, H.; Zhou, D.; Hu, S.; Zhang, J.; Jiang, Y.; Zhang, Y. Barrier-based Longitudinal Connectivity Index for Managing Urban Rivers. Water 2018, 10, 1701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Liu, C.M. Some understanding of ecological protection and high-quality development in the Yellow River Basin. Yellow River 2019, 41, 158. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, M.X.; Zhang, Y.W.; Zhu, W.X.; Liao, C.Z.; Zhao, S.C. Wetland restoration models in Zhengzhou Yellow River Nature Reserve, Henan Province. Wetl. Sci. 2010, 8, 67–73. [Google Scholar]
Wetland Type | Description |
---|---|
Paddy field | Cultivated land with water source guarantee and irrigation facilities, which can be irrigated normally and is used to grow aquatic crops such as rice and lotus root; it also includes cultivated land with rice and dry land crop rotation. |
Canal | Natural or artificially excavated canals including rivers and ditches. Artificial canals include embankment in this study. |
Lake | Land covered by lakes. |
Reservoir and Pond | Man-made facilities for water reservation. |
Marsh | Land with a permanent mixture of water and herbaceous or woody vegetation that cover extensive areas. |
Floodplain | Land between normal water level and flood level. |
1st Level Classes | 2nd Level Classes |
---|---|
Cropland | Paddy field, dry land |
Woodland | Forest, shrub, woods, others |
Grassland | Dense grass, moderate grass, sparse grass |
Water body | Streams, rivers and canals, lakes, reservoirs and ponds, permanent ice and snow, beach and shore, bottomland |
Built-up land | Urban build-up, rural settlements, others |
Unused land | Sandy land, gobi, salina, marsh, bare soil, bare rock, others |
Landscape Metrics (Abbreviation) | Description and Calculation |
---|---|
Patch area (PA) | This is the area of each patch and can be measured by ArcGIS 10.3 by calculating geometry. |
Patch density(PD) | Number of patches per unit area (number per km) is a description of the degree of fragmenta-tion, with a greater degree of fragmentation represented by a higher value of PD, . |
Mean patch fractal dimension (MPFD) | To a certain extent, it reflects the impact of human activities on landscape pattern, with a greater degree of human interference represented by a lower value of MPFD. Its calculation formula is , Pij is perimeter of patchij, aij is area of patchij, . |
Year | Wetland Type | 2015 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Paddy field | Others | Canals | Lake | Reservoir and pond | Marsh | Floodplain | Total | ||
1980 | Paddy field | 3873.97 | 989.48 | 11.02 | 0.00 | 89.81 | 0.00 | 6.20 | 4970.48 |
Others | 3768.98 | 151,879.61 | 283.74 | 0.04 | 479.97 | 0.05 | 121.31 | 156,533.71 | |
Canals | 9.37 | 332.75 | 753.23 | 0.03 | 40.30 | 0.00 | 70.34 | 1206.02 | |
Lake | 0.01 | 0.61 | 0.03 | 2.38 | 0.08 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.11 | |
Reservoir and Pond | 23.54 | 135.74 | 27.97 | 0.04 | 764.75 | 0.00 | 25.43 | 977.46 | |
Marsh | 0.22 | 40.47 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 15.33 | 1.33 | 2.13 | 59.50 | |
Floodplain | 5.73 | 574.58 | 898.15 | 0.00 | 184.31 | 0.00 | 305.56 | 1968.33 | |
Total | 7681.82 | 153,953.25 | 1974.17 | 2.49 | 1574.54 | 1.38 | 530.97 | 165,718.61 |
PA of Constructed Wetland (km2) | PA of Natural Wetland (km2) | PD of Constructed Wetland | PD of Natural Wetland | MPFD of Constructed Wetland | MPFD of Natural Wetland | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDP (100 million yuan) | Pearson correlation | 0.940 ** | −0.902 ** | 0.809 * | −0.807 * | 0.557 | −0.278 |
p (2-tailed) | 0.002 | 0.005 | 0.028 | 0.028 | 0.194 | 0.546 | |
N | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | |
Total population | Pearson correlation | 0.880 ** | −0.943 ** | 0.794 * | −0.596 | 0.673 | −0.337 |
p (2-tailed) | 0.009 | 0.001 | 0.033 | 0.158 | 0.097 | 0.459 | |
N | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | |
PIV (100 million yuan) | Pearson correlation | 0.955 ** | −0.943 ** | 0.793 * | −0.790 * | 0.621 | −0.274 |
p (2-tailed) | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.033 | 0.035 | 0.137 | 0.552 | |
N | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | |
Urbanization rate | Pearson correlation | 0.934 ** | −0.910 ** | 0.770 * | −0.799 * | 0.655 | −0.186 |
p (2-tailed) | 0.002 | 0.004 | 0.043 | 0.031 | 0.110 | 0.689 | |
N | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Li, H.; Wang, J.; Zhang, J.; Qin, F.; Hu, J.; Zhou, Z. Analysis of Characteristics and Driving Factors of Wetland Landscape Pattern Change in Henan Province from 1980 to 2015. Land 2021, 10, 564. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10060564
Li H, Wang J, Zhang J, Qin F, Hu J, Zhou Z. Analysis of Characteristics and Driving Factors of Wetland Landscape Pattern Change in Henan Province from 1980 to 2015. Land. 2021; 10(6):564. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10060564
Chicago/Turabian StyleLi, Heying, Jiayao Wang, Jianchen Zhang, Fen Qin, Jiyuan Hu, and Zheng Zhou. 2021. "Analysis of Characteristics and Driving Factors of Wetland Landscape Pattern Change in Henan Province from 1980 to 2015" Land 10, no. 6: 564. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10060564
APA StyleLi, H., Wang, J., Zhang, J., Qin, F., Hu, J., & Zhou, Z. (2021). Analysis of Characteristics and Driving Factors of Wetland Landscape Pattern Change in Henan Province from 1980 to 2015. Land, 10(6), 564. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10060564