Resilience Assessment of Traffic Networks in Coastal Cities under Climate Change: A Case Study of One City with Unique Land Use Characteristics
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Study Area and Methods
2.1. Overview of the Study Area
2.2. Research and Analysis Process
2.2.1. Research Ideas and Technical Route
2.2.2. Semantic Model Construction and Index Selection
- Model construction
- 2.
- Index selection
2.3. Scenario Simulation Construction
2.3.1. Relative Sea-Level Rise in Sea Areas near Shanghai
- The disaster effects of storm surges superimposed with sea-level rise
- 2.
- The catastrophic effects of extreme weather events superimposed with sea-level rise
2.3.2. Scenario Construction and Water-Level Setting
3. Empirical Research Results
3.1. Network Structure Analysis
3.1.1. Equality Analysis
3.1.2. Efficiency Analysis
3.1.3. Hub Analysis
3.2. Network Dynamic Performance Analysis
4. Discussion
4.1. Resilience Characteristics and Current Situation of the Traffic Network in the Study Area
4.1.1. The Road Network Structure in the Study Area Presents the Characteristics of “Centralized Decentralized Combination”
4.1.2. The Road Network in the Study Area Has Certain Survivability, but It Is Vulnerable to Selective Attacks
4.1.3. The Spatial Distribution of Key Road Sections of the Research Road Network with Hierarchy and Aggregation
4.2. Resilience Characteristics and Change Trend of Traffic Network in the Study Area
- In the stage of edge flooding (i.e., in the process of rising the depth of flooding by 0–3 m), the traffic network in the study area still retains the shape of a square block road network with Chinese features, and most of the inundated sections are non-core areas of the traffic system and land reclamation areas.
- In the stage of the traffic island (i.e., after increasing the flooding depth to more than 3 m), the traffic island appears in the traffic system of the study area. In other words, multiple large and small connected subgraphs are generated, and the roads in some areas can still pass, but due to the flood disaster, traffic is no longer connected to the outside world.
- In the dendritic inundation stage (i.e., after the flood depth rises to 5 m), the traffic system in the study area demonstrates a regional inundation trend. It implies that there is a patchy inundation area which leads to the formation of a road network from the block to the dendritic road network. At this stage, the shape of the road network in the coastal alluvial plain becomes similar to a mountainous disaster area.
- In the phase of the scattered flooding stage, with the continuous increase of flood depth, the transportation system in the study area begins to gradually paralyze and form a scattered and distributed road network. The size of each traffic group is essentially the same, and there is no longer a large traffic connection subgraph with the dominant power.
4.3. Concept and Connotation of the Resilience of Coastal Urban Transportation System under the Background of Climate Change
- (1)
- Redundancy
- (2)
- Dynamic
- (3)
- Accessibility
- (4)
- Intelligence
4.4. Strategies to Improve the Resilience of Coastal Urban Transportation System under the Background of Climate Change
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Trenberth, K.E.; Fasullo, J.T.; Shepherd, T.G. Attribution of climate extreme events. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2015, 5, 725–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- IPCC TCWT. Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. 2022. Available online: https://www.ipcc.ch/ (accessed on 1 February 2022).
- Dong, S.; Malecha, M.; Farahmand, H.; Mostafavi, A.; Woodruff, S.C. Integrated infrastructure-plan analysis for resilience enhancement of post-hazards access to critical facilities. Cities 2021, 117, 103318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, L.; Uyttenhove, P.; Vaneetvelde, V. Planning green infrastructure to mitigate urban surface water flooding risk—A methodology to identify priority areas applied in the city of Ghent. Landsc. Urban Plan 2020, 194, 103703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, K.; Francis, O.; Yamashita, E. Learning to Build Resilience into Transportation Systems. Transp. Res. Rec. 2018, 2672, 30–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zhang, X.; Miller-Hooks, E.; Denny, K. Assessing the role of network topology in transportation network resilience. J. Transp. Geogr. 2015, 46, 35–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Martello, M.V.; Whittle, A.J.; Keenan, J.M.; Salvucci, F.P. Evaluation of climate change resilience for Boston’s rail rapid transit network. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2021, 97, 102908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Serre, D.; Heinzlef, C. Assessing and mapping urban resilience to floods with respect to cascading effects through critical infrastructure networks. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2018, 30, 235–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Holling, C.S. Engineering Resilience versus Ecological Resilience. Environ. Sci. 1996, 31, 32. [Google Scholar]
- Holling, C.S. Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems; Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics: San Mateo, CA, USA, 1973. [Google Scholar]
- Pickett, S.; Cadenasso, M.L.; Grove, J.M. Resilient cities: Meaning, models, and metaphor for integrating the ecological, socio-economic, and planning realms. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2004, 69, 369–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maru, Y.T. Resilient Regions: Clarity of Concepts and Challenges to Systemic Measurement. In Socio-Economics and the Environment in Discussion (SEED) Working Paper Series; CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems: Atherton, QLD, Australia, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Sharifi, A. Co-benefits and synergies between urban climate change mitigation and adaptation measures: A literature review. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 750, 141642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Langemeyer, J.; Madrid-Lopez, C.; Beltran, A.M.; Mendez, G.V. Urban agriculture? A necessary pathway towards urban resilience and global sustainability? Landsc. Urban Plan 2021, 210, 104055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.; Peng, Z.; Wang, D.; Meng, Y.; Wu, T.; Sun, W.; Lu, Q. Evaluation and prediction of transportation resilience under extreme weather events: A diffusion graph convolutional approach. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 2020, 115, 102619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wan, C.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, D.; Yan, X.; Fan, S. Resilience in transportation systems: A systematic review and future directions. Transp. Rev. 2018, 38, 479–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liao, T.; Hu, T.; Ko, Y. A resilience optimization model for transportation networks under disasters. Nat. Hazards 2018, 93, 469–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hosseini, S.; Barker, K.; Ramirez-Marquez, J.E. A review of definitions and measures of system resilience. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe 2016, 145, 47–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baroud, H.; Barker, K.; Ramirez-Marquez, J.E.; Rocco, S. CM Importance measures for inland waterway network resilience. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2014, 62, 55–67. [Google Scholar]
- Henry, D.; Ramirez-Marquez, J.E. Generic metrics and quantitative approaches for system resilience as a function of time. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe 2012, 99, 114–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carpenter, S.R.; Arrow, K.J.; Barrett, S.; Biggs, R.; Brock, W.A.; Crepin, A.; Engstrom, G.; Folke, C.; Hughes, T.P.; Kautsky, N.; et al. General Resilience to Cope with Extreme Events. Sustainability 2012, 4, 3248–3259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Serre, D.; Barroca, B.; Balsells, M.; Becue, V. Contributing to urban resilience to floods with neighbourhood design: The case of Am Sandtorkai/Dalmannkai in Hamburg. J. Flood Risk Manag. 2018, 111, S69–S83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bruneau, M.; Reinhorn, A. Exploring the concept of seismic resilience for acute care facilities. Earthq. Spectra 2007, 23, 41–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Simmie, J.; Martin, R. The economic resilience of regions: Towrds an evolutionary approach. Cambr. J. Reg. Econ. Soc. 2010, 3, 27–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hallegatte, S. Economic resilience: Definition and measurement. Soc. Sci. Electron. Publ. 2014, a2, 291–299. [Google Scholar]
- Serdar, M.Z.; Koc, M.; Al-Ghamdi, S.G. Urban Transportation Networks Resilience: Indicators, Disturbances, and Assessment Methods. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2022, 76, 103452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- People’s Government of Pudong New Area SC: Shanghai Pudong New Area Master Plan and Land Use Master Plan (2017–2035). 2018. Available online: https://www.pudong.gov.cn/ (accessed on 9 September 2022).
- Xu, Z.; Chopra, S.S.; Lee, H. Resilient Urban Public Transportation Infrastructure: A Comparison of Five Flow-Weighted Metro Networks in Terms of the Resilience Cycle Framework. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. 2021, 23, 12688–12699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, L.; Lu, J.; Fu, B.; Li, S. A Review and Prospect for the Complexity and Resilience of Urban Public Transit Network Based on Complex Network Theory. Complexity 2018, 2018, 2156309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Serre, D. Advanced methodology for risk and vulnerability assessment of interdependency of critical infrastructure in respect to urban floods. 3rd Eur. Conf. Flood Risk Manag. 2016, 7, 07002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Maliszewski, P.J.; Perrings, C. Factors in the resilience of electrical power distribution infrastructures. Appl. Geogr. 2012, 32, 668–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rehak, D.; Senovsky, P.; Hromada, M.; Lovecek, T. Complex Approach to Assessing Resilience of Critical Infrastructure Elements. Int. J. Crit. Infrastrct. Prot. 2019, 25, 125–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Porta, S.; Crucitti, P.; Latora, V. The network analysis of urban streets: A primal approach. Environ. Plan. B Plan. Des. 2006, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Koperski, K.; Hah, J. Discovery of Spatial Association Rules in Geographic Information Databases; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Meehl, G.A.; Washington, W.M.; Santer, B.D.; Collins, W.D.; Arblaster, J.M.; Hu, A.; Lawrence, D.M.; Teng, H.; Buja, L.E.; Strand, W.G. Climate Change Projections for the Twenty-First Century and Climate Change Commitment in the CCSM3. J. Clim. 2006, 19, 2597–2616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wang, J.; Gao, W.; Xu, S.; Yu, L. Evaluation of the combined risk of sea level rise, land subsidence, and storm surges on the coastal areas of Shanghai, China. Clim. Chang. 2012, 115, 537–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- China MONR: 2021 China Marine Disaster Bulletin. 2021. Available online: http://gi.mnr.gov.cn/202205/t20220507_2735508.html (accessed on 9 September 2022).
- Woth, K.; Weisse, R.; Storch, H.V. Climate change and North Sea storm surge extremes: An ensemble study of storm surge extremes expected in a changed climate projected by four different regional climate models. Ocean Dyn. 2006, 56, 3–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meier, H. Baltic Sea climate in the late twenty-first century: A dynamical downscaling approach using two global models and two emission scenarios. Clim. Dyn. 2006, 27, 39–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leon, J.X.; Heuvelink, G.B.M.; Phinn, S.R. Incorporating DEM Uncertainty in Coastal Inundation Mapping. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e1087279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lhomme, S.; Serre, D.; Diab, Y.; Laganier, R. Analyzing resilience of urban networks: A preliminary step towards more flood resilient cities. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. 2013, 13, 221–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Date of Occurrence | Name | Maximum Water Increase (cm) |
---|---|---|
2021.7 | In-fa | 300 |
2015.7 | Chan-hom | 130 |
2012.8 | Sea anemone | 323 |
2011.8 | Plum blossom | 159 |
2005.8 | Matsa | 241 |
2005.9 | Card slave | 320 |
2002.9 | Senlac | 219 |
2000.8 | Prapiroon | 260 |
2000.9 | Saomai | 170 |
Number of Section Pair 1 | Number of Section Pair 2 | Weight |
---|---|---|
1 | 4 | 4.2 |
1 | 2 | 4.2 |
2 | 3 | 4.2 |
1 | 9 | 3.1 |
2 | 4 | 4.2 |
… 363 … | … 381 … | … 3.2 … |
No. of damaged road section with submergence depth of 1 m: 853, 880, 886, 881, 882, 887, 888, 889, 890, 892, 893, 894, 915 No. of damaged road section with submergence depth of 2 m: 879, 891 No. of damaged road section with submergence depth of 3 m: 641, 643, 646, 758, 93, 832, 833, 920, 904, 647, 649, 634, 657 ……… |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Wei, M.; Xu, J.; Wang, Y. Resilience Assessment of Traffic Networks in Coastal Cities under Climate Change: A Case Study of One City with Unique Land Use Characteristics. Land 2022, 11, 1834. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11101834
Wei M, Xu J, Wang Y. Resilience Assessment of Traffic Networks in Coastal Cities under Climate Change: A Case Study of One City with Unique Land Use Characteristics. Land. 2022; 11(10):1834. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11101834
Chicago/Turabian StyleWei, Meng, Jiangang Xu, and Yiwen Wang. 2022. "Resilience Assessment of Traffic Networks in Coastal Cities under Climate Change: A Case Study of One City with Unique Land Use Characteristics" Land 11, no. 10: 1834. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11101834
APA StyleWei, M., Xu, J., & Wang, Y. (2022). Resilience Assessment of Traffic Networks in Coastal Cities under Climate Change: A Case Study of One City with Unique Land Use Characteristics. Land, 11(10), 1834. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11101834