Continuous Long Time Series Monitoring of Urban Construction Land in Supporting the SDG 11.3.1—A Case Study of Nanning, Guangxi, China
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Study Area and Data Sources
2.1. Introduction to Nanning
2.2. Data Sources
2.2.1. Land Cover Dataset
2.2.2. Population Data
3. Research Methods
3.1. Spatial Expansion Mode of Urban Construction Land
3.2. Evaluation on Sustainable Development
4. Results
4.1. Current Spatial Distribution of Urban Construction Land
4.2. Long-Term Evolution Characteristics of Urban Construction Land
4.2.1. Overall Temporal Evolution Characteristics
4.2.2. Temporal Evolution Characteristics of Each District
4.3. Spatial Expansion Process of Urban Construction Land
4.4. Evaluation of Urban Sustainable Development
4.4.1. Overall SDG 11.3.1 Evaluation
4.4.2. District-Based SDG 11.3.1 Evaluation
5. Discussion
5.1. Comparison with Previous Research
5.2. Influence of Development Strategies on the Evolution of Construction Land Expansion in Nanning City
5.3. Insights for the Sustainable Development of Emerging Major Cities
6. Conclusions
- (1)
- In 2021, the construction land in Nanning was 326.33 km2 and was mainly distributed in Xixiangtang (24.99%), Jiangnan (23.74%), and Qingxiu (19%).
- (2)
- During 1990–2021, the construction land area in Nanning rose from 54.77 km2 to 326.33 km2—representing a nearly five-fold increase. The inflection point varied from district to district, but all the districts became stable after 2021, largely because of COVID-19. The expansion of urban construction land has slowed down due to the pandemic, and Nanning will still be in its rapid increase stage after the pandemic.
- (3)
- The spatial expansion of construction land in Nanning from 1990–2021 experienced several modes of spreading expansion, infill expansion, finger-like expansion along roads, and enclave expansion, among which spreading expansion was the most dominant. The city has experienced a “northwestward–southwestward–eastward–southeastward” spread. Mature districts spread in a disorderly way with strong spatial aggregation, while newly developed ones spread in an orderly way with regular spatial distribution. Finger-like development along roads is a distinguishing feature during the rapid development of the construction land in Nanning. When mature districts experienced infill expansion, their land use tended to become more intensive. Nanning includes functional and suburban enclaves. Nanning’s urban areas will expand to southeastern Liangqing and Yongning.
- (4)
- During the 32-year study period, the LCRPGR of Nanning declined with one peak period of around 1995, which means that during this period, the sustainable development level was low. In the remaining years, the LCRPGR was relatively stable, and construction land expansion and population growth were relatively balanced, with a high sintensity of land use. This proves that Nanning’s sustainable development level has been improved due to the adjustments to the plans.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Year | Population (10,000 People) | UCL (km2) | PGR | LCR | LCRPGR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1990 | 105.99 | 54.77 | —— | —— | —— |
1995 | 110.85 | 71.02 | 0.90% | 5.93% | 6.61 |
2000 | 180.55 | 107.53 | 9.76% | 10.28% | 1.05 |
2005 | 286.58 | 137.46 | 9.24% | 5.57% | 0.60 |
2010 | 351.22 | 183.11 | 4.07% | 6.64% | 1.63 |
2015 | 468.47 | 243.66 | 5.76% | 6.61% | 1.15 |
2020 | 603.10 | 323.25 | 5.05% | 6.53% | 1.29 |
Content | Year | Xingning | Qingxiu | Jiangnan | Xixiangtang | Liangqing | Yongning |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Population (10,000 people) | 2014 | 41.77 | 75.68 | 60.20 | 119.44 | 36.38 | 27.52 |
2015 | 42.20 | 76.68 | 60.97 | 120.27 | 36.80 | 27.80 | |
2016 | 42.89 | 77.75 | 62.68 | 121.77 | 37.02 | 28.16 | |
2017 | 43.54 | 79.17 | 64.03 | 123.38 | 37.61 | 28.58 | |
2018 | 44.78 | 80.80 | 65.86 | 124.81 | 38.47 | 29.26 | |
2019 | 45.80 | 82.86 | 67.13 | 126.20 | 39.30 | 29.70 | |
2020 | 61.63 | 112.58 | 99.11 | 164.57 | 58.84 | 33.27 | |
UCL (km2) | 2014 | 27.04 | 49.00 | 56.84 | 65.00 | 25.03 | 10.96 |
2015 | 27.75 | 50.22 | 59.05 | 66.75 | 27.56 | 12.34 | |
2016 | 28.78 | 52.19 | 62.59 | 68.66 | 32.37 | 14.16 | |
2017 | 30.07 | 54.37 | 65.81 | 71.13 | 37.04 | 16.08 | |
2018 | 31.04 | 55.60 | 67.72 | 72.85 | 39.39 | 17.38 | |
2019 | 31.97 | 56.69 | 69.40 | 74.44 | 42.35 | 18.40 | |
2020 | 35.44 | 61.71 | 76.77 | 81.03 | 47.92 | 20.37 | |
2021 | 35.77 | 62.01 | 77.47 | 81.55 | 48.74 | 20.78 | |
PGR | 2015 | 1.02% | 1.31% | 1.27% | 0.69% | 1.15% | 1.01% |
2016 | 1.62% | 1.39% | 2.77% | 1.24% | 0.60% | 1.29% | |
2017 | 1.50% | 1.81% | 2.13% | 1.31% | 1.58% | 1.48% | |
2018 | 2.81% | 2.04% | 2.82% | 1.15% | 2.26% | 2.35% | |
2019 | 2.25% | 2.52% | 1.91% | 1.11% | 2.13% | 1.49% | |
2020 | 29.69% | 30.65% | 38.96% | 26.55% | 40.36% | 11.35% | |
LCR | 2015 | 2.64% | 2.48% | 3.89% | 2.69% | 10.09% | 12.53% |
2016 | 3.72% | 3.94% | 5.99% | 2.86% | 17.47% | 14.76% | |
2017 | 4.49% | 4.17% | 5.16% | 3.60% | 14.42% | 13.62% | |
2018 | 3.22% | 2.26% | 2.89% | 2.42% | 6.35% | 8.03% | |
2019 | 2.98% | 1.96% | 2.49% | 2.18% | 7.51% | 5.87% | |
2020 | 10.85% | 8.87% | 10.61% | 8.85% | 13.16% | 10.76% | |
2021 | 0.95% | 0.48% | 0.92% | 0.63% | 1.71% | 2.01% | |
LCRPGR | 2015 | 2.58 | 1.89 | 3.06 | 3.88 | 8.79 | 12.38 |
2016 | 2.29 | 2.84 | 2.16 | 2.31 | 29.31 | 11.47 | |
2017 | 2.99 | 2.30 | 2.42 | 2.74 | 9.12 | 9.20 | |
2018 | 1.15 | 1.11 | 1.02 | 2.10 | 2.81 | 3.41 | |
2019 | 1.32 | 0.78 | 1.31 | 1.97 | 3.52 | 3.93 | |
2020 | 0.37 | 0.29 | 0.27 | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.95 |
References
- El Garouani, A.; Mulla, D.J.; El Garouani, S.; Knight, J. Analysis of urban growth and sprawl from remote sensing data: Case of Fez, Morocco. Int. J. Sustain. Built Environ. 2017, 6, 160–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McDonald, R.I.; Green, P.; Balk, D.; Fekete, B.M.; Revenga, C.; Todd, M.; Montgomery, M. Urban growth, climate change, and freshwater availability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 6312–6317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, W.; Villarini, G.; Vecchi, G.A.; Smith, J.A. Urbanization exacerbated the rainfall and flooding caused by hurricane Harvey in Houston. Nature 2018, 563, 384–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grimm, N.B.; Faeth, S.H.; Golubiewski, N.E.; Redman, C.L.; Wu, J.; Bai, X.; Briggs, J.M. Global change and the ecology of cities. Science 2008, 319, 756–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Creutzig, F.; Baiocchi, G.; Bierkandt, R.; Pichler, P.P.; Seto, K.C. Global typology of urban energy use and potentials for an urbanization mitigation wedge. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 6283–6288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Moore, M.; Gould, P.; Keary, B.S. Global urbanization and impact on health. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2003, 206, 269–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- United Nations. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Estoque, R.C.; Ooba, M.; Togawa, T.; Hijioka, Y.; Murayama, Y. Monitoring global land-use efficiency in the context of the UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Habitat Int. 2021, 115, 102403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Melchiorri, M.; Pesaresi, M.; Florczyk, A.J.; Corbane, C.; Kemper, T. Principles and applications of the global human settlement layer as baseline for the land use efficiency indicator—SDG 11.3. 1. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2019, 8, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schiavina, M.; Melchiorri, M.; Corbane, C.; Florczyk, A.J.; Freire, S.; Pesaresi, M.; Kemper, T. Multi-scale estimation of land use efficiency (SDG 11.3. 1) across 25 years using global open and free data. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nicolau, R.; David, J.; Caetano, M.; Pereira, J.M. Ratio of land consumption rate to population growth rate—Analysis of different formulations applied to mainland Portugal. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2018, 8, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mudau, N.; Mwaniki, D.; Tsoeleng, L.; Mashalane, M.; Beguy, D.; Ndugwa, R. Assessment of SDG indicator 11.3. 1 and urban growth trends of major and small cities in South Africa. Sustainability 2020, 12, 7063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, H.; Sun, Z.; Guo, H.; Weng, Q.; Du, W.; Xing, Q.; Cai, G. An assessment of urbanization sustainability in China between 1990 and 2015 using land use efficiency indicators. NPJ Urban Sustain. 2021, 1, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamidi, S.; Ewing, R. A longitudinal study of changes in urban sprawl between 2000 and 2010 in the United States. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2014, 128, 72–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Y.; Feng, Z.; Zhao, Y.; You, Z. Coordination between urban land expansion and population growth in China. Geogr. Res. 2013, 32, 1668–1678. [Google Scholar]
- Huang, X.; Li, J.; Yang, J.; Zhang, Z.; Li, D.; Liu, X. 30 m global impervious surface area dynamics and urban expansion pattern observed by Landsat satellites: From 1972 to 2019. Sci. China Earth Sci. 2021, 64, 1922–1933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hou, Y.; Kuang, W.; Dou, Y. Analysis of urban expansion and fractal featuresin global 33 megacities from 2000–2020. Acta Geogr. Sin. 2022, 77, 2687–2702. [Google Scholar]
- Kuang, W.; Liu, J.; Dong, J.; Chi, W.; Zhang, C. The rapid and massive urban and industrial land expansions in China between 1990 and 2010: A CLUD-based analysis of their trajectories, patterns, and drivers. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2016, 145, 21–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ouyang, X.; Zhu, X. Spatio-temporal characteristics of urban land expansion in Chinese urban agglomerations. Acta Geogr. Sin. 2020, 75, 571–588. [Google Scholar]
- Gong, P.; Li, X.; Zhang, W. 40-Year (1978–2017) human settlement changes in China reflected by impervious surfaces from satellite remote sensing. Sci. Bull. 2019, 64, 756–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X.P.; Hu, G.H.; Chen, Y.M.; Li, X.; Xu, X.; Li, S.; Pei, F.; Wang, S. High-resolution multi-temporal mapping of global urban land using Landsat image based on the Google Earth Engine Platform. Remote Sens. Environ. 2018, 209, 227–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, H.; Gong, P.; Wang, J.; Clinton, N.; Bai, Y.; Liang, S. Annual dynamics of global land cover and its long-term changes from 1982 to 2015. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 2020, 12, 1217–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gong, P.; Li, X.; Wang, J.; Bai, Y.; Chen, B.; Hu, T.; Liu, X.; Xu, B.; Yang, J.; Zhang, W.; et al. Annual maps of global artificial impervious area (GAIA) between 1985 and 2018. Remote Sens. Environ. 2020, 236, 111510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, J.; Huang, X. The 30 m annual land cover datasets and its dynamics in China from 1990 to 2021. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 2021, 13, 3907–3925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jia, K.; Chen, S.S.; Jiang, W.G. Long time-series remote sensing monitoring of mangrove forests in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area. Natl. Remote Sens. Bull. 2022, 26, 1096–1111. [Google Scholar]
- Bryan, B.A.; Gao, L.; Ye, Y.; Sun, X.; Connor, J.D.; Crossman, N.D.; Stafford-Smith, M.; Wu, J.; He, C.; Yu, D.; et al. China’s response to a national land-system sustainability emergency. Nature 2018, 559, 193–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, C.; Liu, Z.; Tian, J.; Ma, Q. Urban expansion dynamics and natural habitat loss in China: A multiscale landscape perspective. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2014, 20, 2886–2902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, M.; He, C.; Liu, Z.; Dou, Y. How did urban land expand in China between 1992 and 2015? A multi-scale landscape analysis. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0154839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Feng, Y.; Guo, G.; Wang, F.; Cai, S. The Spatio-temporal Characteristics of Construction Land Expansion in China’s Typical Urban Agglomerations in Recent 30 years: A Case Study of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Urban Agglomeration and the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area. J. South China Norm. Univ. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 2022, 54, 79–90. [Google Scholar]
- Sun, Z.; Li, X.; Fu, W.; Li, Y.; Tang, D. Long-term effects of land use/land cover change on surface runoff in urban areas of Beijing, China. J. Appl. Remote Sens. 2013, 8, 084596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, S.S.; Sun, Z.C.; Guo, H.D.; Zhao, X.W.; Sun, L.; Wu, M.F. Monitoring and analyzing the spatial dynamics and patterns of megacities along the Maritime Silk Road. J. Remote Sens. 2017, 21, 169–181. [Google Scholar]
- The Economist Intelligence Unit. China’s Emerging Cities; The Economist Group: Landon, UK, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, F. Emerging cities and urban theories: A Chinese perspective. In Theories and Models of Urbanization; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 171–182. [Google Scholar]
- Akinyemi, F.O.; Pontius, R.G., Jr.; Braimoh, A.K. Land change dynamics: Insights from Intensity Analysis applied to an African emerging city. J. Spat. Sci. 2017, 62, 69–83. [Google Scholar]
- IDB. Emerging and Sustainable Cities: Methodological Guide. 2014. Available online: https://issuu.com/ciudadesemergentesysostenibles/docs/methodological_guide_esci (accessed on 20 December 2022).
- UN Habitat. Urbanization and Development: Emerging Futures. In World Cities Report 2016; UN Habitat: Nairobi, Kenya, 2016; ISBN 978-92-1-133395-4. Available online: https://unhabitat.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/WCR-%20Full-Report-2016.pdf (accessed on 20 December 2022).
- Camagni, R.; Gibelli, M.C.; Rigamonti, P. Urban mobility and urban form: The social and environmental costs of different patterns of urban expansion. Ecol. Econ. 2002, 40, 199–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, X.; Xia, J.; Xiao, R.; He, T. Urban expansion patterns of 291 Chinese cities, 1990–2015. Int. J. Digit. Earth 2019, 12, 62–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, P.K. Urban Planning and Urban Design; China Building Materials Industry Press: Beijing, China, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, M.J. Research on Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Development Strength of Nanning Based on Multi-Source Data; Nanning Normal University: Nanning, China, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Huang, Z.S. Research on Spatial Expansion Law and Dynamic Factors of Construction Land in Beibu Gulf Urban Agglomeration; Guangxi University: Nanning, China, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Li, C.X.; Deng, F.; Gong, J.; Yan, Y. Analysis of the temporal and spatial characteristics of land use dynamic changes in Nanning from 1990 to 2015. Inn. Mong. Sci. Technol. Econ. 2019, 5, 43–47. [Google Scholar]
- Blais, P. Perverse Cities: Hidden Subsidies, Wonky Policy, and Urban Sprawl; UBC Press: Vancouver, Canada, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Qingdao Municipal Bureau of Housing and Urban-Rural Development. Qingdao New Urbanization Plan (2021–2035); Qingdao Municipal Bureau of Housing and Urban-Rural Development: Qingdao, China, 2021.
- Zhuhai Municipal People’s Government Office. Zhuhai Municipal Pilot Implementation Plan for “Waste Free City” Construction (2021–2023); Zhuhai Municipal People’s Government Office: Zhuhai, China, 2021.
- The State Council of China. National New-Type Urbanization Plan (2014–2020); The State Council of China: Beijing, China, 2014.
- The State Council of China. National New-Type Urbanization Plan (2021–2035); The State Council of China: Beijing, China, 2021.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Ling, Z.; Jiang, W.; Lu, Y.; Ling, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Liao, C. Continuous Long Time Series Monitoring of Urban Construction Land in Supporting the SDG 11.3.1—A Case Study of Nanning, Guangxi, China. Land 2023, 12, 452. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12020452
Ling Z, Jiang W, Lu Y, Ling Y, Zhang Z, Liao C. Continuous Long Time Series Monitoring of Urban Construction Land in Supporting the SDG 11.3.1—A Case Study of Nanning, Guangxi, China. Land. 2023; 12(2):452. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12020452
Chicago/Turabian StyleLing, Ziyan, Weiguo Jiang, Yuan Lu, Yurong Ling, Ze Zhang, and Chaoming Liao. 2023. "Continuous Long Time Series Monitoring of Urban Construction Land in Supporting the SDG 11.3.1—A Case Study of Nanning, Guangxi, China" Land 12, no. 2: 452. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12020452
APA StyleLing, Z., Jiang, W., Lu, Y., Ling, Y., Zhang, Z., & Liao, C. (2023). Continuous Long Time Series Monitoring of Urban Construction Land in Supporting the SDG 11.3.1—A Case Study of Nanning, Guangxi, China. Land, 12(2), 452. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12020452