1. Introduction
Recently, by means of different tools from nonlinear analysis, many classes of differential equations with Caputo fractional derivative have extensively been studied in books [
1,
2,
3,
4,
5] and in some papers, for example, [
6,
7,
8,
9,
10,
11]. In order to solve fractional differential equations, we mention the works [
12,
13] where the authors propose and prove the equivalence between an initial value problem and the Volterra integral equation.
We consider a new fractional derivative which interpolates the Hilfer, Hilfer–Hadamard, Riemann–Liouville, Hadamard, Caputo, Caputo–Hadamard, generalized and Caputo-type fractional derivatives, as well as the Weyl and Liouville fractional derivatives for particular cases of integration extremes. for more details, see [
14,
15,
16,
17,
18,
19,
20,
21] and the references therein.
It is well known [
22] that the comparison principle for initial value problems of ordinary differential equations is a very useful tool in the study of qualitative and quantitative theory. Recently, attempts have been made to study the corresponding comparison principle for terminal value problems (TVP) [
23].
Motivated by the works above, we establish in this paper existence and uniqueness results to the terminal value problem of the following Hilfer–Katugampola type fractional differential equation:
where
is the Hilfer–Katugampola fractional derivative (to be defined below) of order
and type
and
is a given function. To our knowledge, no papers on terminal value problem for implicit fractional differential equations exist in the literature, in particular for those involving the Hilfer–Katugampola fractional derivative.
This paper is organized as follows. In
Section 2, some notations are introduced and we recall some concepts of preliminaries about Hilfer–Katugampola fractional derivative. In
Section 3, two results for Equations (
1) and (
2) are presented: The first one is based on the Banach contraction principle, the second one on Krasnoselskii’s fixed point theorem. Finally, in
Section 4, we give an example to show the applicability of our main results.
2. Preliminaries
In this part, we present notations and definitions that we will use throughout this paper. Let
. By
we denote the Banach space of all continuous functions from
J into
with the norm:
We consider the weighted spaces of continuous functions:
and:
with the norms:
and:
Consider the space
of those complex-valued Lebesgue measurable functions
f on
for which
where the norm is defined by:
In particular, when the space coincides with the space:
Definition 1 ([
16])
. (Katugampola fractional integral).Let and The Katugampola fractional integral of order α is defined by:where is the Euler gamma function defined by: Definition 2 ([
16])
. (Katugampola fractional derivative).Let and The Katugampola fractional derivative of order α is defined by:where and Lemma 1 ([
24])
. Let and Then, is bounded from into Lemma 2 ([
24])
. Let and If then is continuous on J and Lemma 3 ([
12])
. Let . Then, for and we have: Lemma 4 ([
24])
. Let and Then: Lemma 5 ([
24])
. Let If and then: Definition 3 ([
24])
. Let order α and type β satisfy and with The Hilfer–Katugampola fractional derivative to with of a function is defined by:In this paper we consider the case only, because
Property 1 ([
24])
. The operator can be written as: Property 2. The fractional derivative is an interpolator of the following fractional derivatives: Hilfer [14], Hilfer–Hadamard [25], generalized [16], Caputo-type , Riemann–Liouville [17], Hadamard [17], Caputo [17], Caputo–Hadamard [21], Liouville [17] and Weyl [15]. Definition 4. We consider the following parameters satisfying: Thus, we define the spaces:and: Since it follows from Lemma 1 that: Lemma 6 ([
24])
. Let and If then:and: Theorem 1 ([
26])
. ( type Arzela–Ascoli Theorem). Let . A is relatively compact (i.e., is compact) if:- 1.
A is uniformly bounded, i.e., there exists such that: - 2.
A is equicontinuous on , i.e., for every there exists such that for each implies for every
Theorem 2 ([
27])
. (Banach’s fixed point theorem). Let C be a non-empty closed subset of a Banach space E, then any contraction mapping T of C into itself has a unique fixed point. Theorem 3 ([
27])
. (Krasnoselskii’s fixed point theorem). Let M be a closed, convex and nonempty subset of a Banach space and be the operators such that:- 1.
for all
- 2.
A is compact and continuous
- 3.
B is a contraction mapping
Then there exists such that
3. Existence of Solutions
We consider the following linear fractional differential equation:
where
, with the terminal condition:
The following theorem shows that Equations (
3) and (
4) have a unique solution given by:
Theorem 4. Let where and If is a function such that then y satisfies Equations (3) and (4) if and only if it satisfies Equation (5). Proof. Let
be a solution of Equations (
3) and (
4). We prove that
y is also a solution of Equation (
5). From the definition of
Lemma 1, and using Definition 2, we have:
By the Definition of the space
it follows that:
Using Lemma 5, with
we obtain:
where
By hypothesis,
using Lemma 6 with Equation (
3), we have:
Comparing Equations (
7) and (
8), we see that:
Using Equation (
4) we obtain:
with
that is
satisfies Equation (
5).
Let
, satisfying Equation (
5). We show that
y also satisfies Equations (
3) and (
4). Apply operator
on both sides of Equation (5). Then, from Lemmas 3 and 6 we get:
By Equation (6) we have
then, Equation (
10) implies:
As
and from Lemma 1, it follows:
From Equations (
11) and (
12) and by the Definition of the space
we obtain:
Applying operator
on both sides of Equation (
11) and using Lemmas 2 and 5, we have:
that is, Equation (
3) holds. Clearly, if
satisfies Equation (
5), then it also satisfies Equation (
4). □
As a consequence of Theorem 4, we have Theorem 5.
Theorem 5. Let where and let be a function such that for any
If then y satisfies Equations (1) and (2) if and only if y is the fixed point of the operator defined by:where:and be a function satisfying the functional equation: Clearly, In addition, by Lemma 1,
Suppose that the function is continuous and satisfies the conditions:
The function
is such that:
There exist constants
and
such that:
for any
and
.
Now, we state and prove our existence result for Equations (
1) and (
2) based on Banach’s fixed point.
Theorem 6. Assume and hold. If:then the Equations (1) and (2) has unique solution in . Proof. The proof will be given in two steps:
Step 1: We show that the operator
N defined in Equation (13) has a unique fixed point
in
Let
and
then, we have:
where
such that:
Hence, for each
:
By Lemma 3, we have:
hence:
which implies that:
By Equation (14), the operator N is a contraction. Hence, by Banach’s contraction principle, N has a unique fixed point .
Step 2: We show that such a fixed point is actually in
Since
is the unique fixed point of operator
N in
, then, for each
we have:
Applying
to both sides and by Lemmas 3 and 6, we have:
Since
by (H1), the right hand side is in
and thus
, which implies that
As a consequence of Steps 1 and 2 together with Theorem 5, we can conclude that Equations (
1) and (
2) have a unique solution in
□
We present now the second result, which is based on Krasnoselskii fixed point theorem.
Theorem 7. Assume and hold. If:then Equations (1) and (2) have at least one solution. Proof. Consider the set:
where:
and
.
We define the operators
P and
Q on
by:
Then the fractional integral Equation (13) can be written as the operator equation:
The proof will be given in several steps:
Step 1: We prove that
for any
For operator
multiplying both sides of Equation (16) by
we have:
then:
By (H3), we have for each
:
Multiplying both sides of the above inequality by
we get:
Then, for each
we have:
Thus, Equation (
18) and Lemma 3, imply:
Using Equation (
19) and Lemma 3, we have:
Linking Equations (20) and (21), for every
we obtain:
Since:
we have:
which infers that
Step 2:P is a contraction.
Let
and
then, we have:
where
such that:
Therefore, for each
:
By Lemma 3, we have:
hence:
which implies that:
By Equation (15) the operator P is a contraction.
Step 3:Q is compact and continuous.
The continuity of Q follows from the continuity of Next we prove that Q is uniformly bounded on
Let any
Then by Equation (21) we have:
This means that
Q is uniformly bounded on
Next, we show that
is equicontinuous. Let any
and
Then:
This shows that Q is equicontinuous on Therefore, Q is relatively compact on By , type Arzela–Ascoli Theorem Q is compact on
As a consequence of Krasnoselskii’s fixed point theorem, we conclude that
N has at least a fixed point
and by the same way of the proof of Theorem 6, we can easily show that
Using Lemma 5, we conclude that Equations (
1) and (
2) have at least one solution in the space
□
4. An Example
Consider the following terminal value problem:
We have:
with
and
Clearly, the function
Hence condition (H1) is satisfied.
For each
and
Therefore, (H2) is verified with
The condition:
is satisfied with with
and
It follows from Theorem 7 that Equations (
22) and (
23) have a solution in the space
5. Conclusions
We have provided sufficient conditions ensuring the existence and uniqueness of solutions to a class of terminal value problem for differential equations with the Hilfer–Katugampola type fractional derivative. The arguments are based on the classical Banach contraction principle, and the Krasnoselskii’s fixed point theorem. An example is included to show the applicability of our results.
Author Contributions
All authors contributed equally and significantly in writing this article. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Conceptualization, M.B. and S.B.; Formal analysis, M.B., S.B. and J.J.N.; Investigation, M.B., S.B. and J.J.N.; Writing—original draft, M.B., S.B. and J.J.N.; Writing—review & editing, M.B., S.B. and J.J.N.; Funding, J.J.N.
Funding
This research was partially funded by the Agencia Estatal de Investigacion (AEI) of Spain under grant MTM2016-75140-P.
Acknowledgments
The research of J.J. Nieto was partially supported by the AEI of Spain under Grant MTM2016-75140-P and co-financed by the European Community fund FEDER. This paper was completed while the second author was visiting the University of Santiago de Compostela. He is grateful for the warm hospitality.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests concerning the publication of this article.
References
- Abbas, S.; Benchohra, M.; Graef, J.R.; Henderson, J. Implicit Fractional Differential and Integral Equations: Existence and Stability; Walter de Gruyter: London, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Abbas, S.; Benchohra, M.; N’Guérékata, G.M. Topics in Fractional Differential Equations; Springer-Verlag: New York, NY, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Abbas, S.; Benchohra, M.; N’Guérékata, G.M. Advanced Fractional Differential and Integral Equations; Nova Science Publishers: New York, NY, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Ahmad, B.; Alsaedi, A.; Ntouyas, S.K.; Tariboon, J. Hadamard-type Fractional Differential Equations, Inclusions and Inequalities; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Zhou, Y.; Wang, J.-R.; Zhang, L. Basic Theory of Fractional Differential Equations, 2nd ed.; World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.: Hackensack, NJ, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Ahmad, B.; Ntouyas, S.K. Fractional differential inclusions with fractional separated boundary conditions. Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal. 2012, 15, 362–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benchohra, M.; Bouriah, S.; Darwish, M.A. Nonlinear boundary value problem for implicit differential equations of fractional order in Banach spaces. Fixed Point Theory 2017, 18, 457–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benchohra, M.; Bouriah, S.; Graef, J.R. Nonlinear implicit differential equations of fractional order at resonance. Electron. J. Differ. Equ. 2016, 2016, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
- Abbas, S.; Benchohra, M.; Bouriah, S.; Nieto, J.J. Periodic solutions for nonlinear fractional differential systems. Differ. Equ. Appl. 2018, 10, 299–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benchohra, M.; Bouriah, S.; Henderson, J. Existence and stability results for nonlinear implicit neutral fractional differential equations with finite delay and impulses. Commun. Appl. Nonlinear Anal. 2015, 22, 46–67. [Google Scholar]
- Benchohra, M.; Lazreg, J.E. Nonlinear fractional implicit differential equations. Commun. Appl. Anal. 2013, 17, 471–482. [Google Scholar]
- Almeida, R.; Malinowska, A.B.; Odzijewicz, T. Fractional differential equations with dependence on the Caputo–Katugampola derivative. J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn. 2016, 11, 061017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kilbas, A.A.; Trujillo, J.J. Hadamard-type integrals as G-transforms. Integral Transforms Spec. Funct. 2003, 14, 413–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hilfer, R. Applications of Fractional Calculus in Physics; World Scientific: Singapore, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Hilfer, R. Threefold Introduction to Fractional Derivatives. In Anomalous Transport: Foundations and Applications; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2008; p. 17. [Google Scholar]
- Katugampola, U. A new approach to a generalized fractional integral. Appl. Math. Comput. 2011, 218, 860–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kilbas, A.A.; Srivastava, H.M.; Trujillo, J.J. Theory and Applications of Fractional Differential Equations. In North-Holland Mathematics Studies; Elsevier Science B.V.: Amsterdam, The Netherland, 2006; Volume 204. [Google Scholar]
- Podlubny, I. Fractional Differential Equations; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Baleanu, D.; Diethelm, K.; Scalas, E.; Trujillo, J.J. Fractional Calculus Models and Numerical Methods; World Scientific Publishing: New York, NY, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Baleanu, D.; Güvenç, Z.B.; Machado, J.A.T. New Trends in Nanotechnology and Fractional Calculus Applications; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Gambo, Y.Y.; Jarad, F.; Baleanu, D.; Abdeljawad, T. On Caputo modification of the Hadamard fractional derivatives. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2014, 2014, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lakshmikantham, V.; Leela, S. Differential and Integral Inequalities; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1969; Volume I. [Google Scholar]
- Hallam, T.G. A comparison principle for terminal value problems in ordinary differential equations. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 1972, 169, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oliveira, D.S.; de Oliveira, E.C. Hilfer-Katugampola fractional derivative. Comput. Appl. Math. 2018, 37, 3672–3690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kassim, M.D.; Tatar, N.E. Well-posedness and stability for a differential problem with Hilfer-Hadamard fractional derivative. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2013, 2013, 605029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, W.; Xiang, X.; Peng, Y. Nonlinear impulsive integro-differential equations of mixed type and optimal controls. Optimization 2006, 55, 141–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Granas, A.; Dugundji, J. Fixed Point Theory; Springer-Verlag: New York, NY, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).