Next Article in Journal
Rational Pulse Design for Enantiomer-Selective Microwave Three-Wave Mixing
Next Article in Special Issue
A Semi-Analytical Method to Investigate Fractional-Order Gas Dynamics Equations by Shehu Transform
Previous Article in Journal
Unified Integrals of Generalized Mittag–Leffler Functions and Their Graphical Numerical Investigation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Hadamard–Mercer, Dragomir–Agarwal–Mercer, and Pachpatte–Mercer Type Fractional Inclusions for Convex Functions with an Exponential Kernel and Their Applications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Some New Quantum Hermite-Hadamard Type Inequalities for s-Convex Functions

1
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Mirpur University of Science and Technology (MUST), Mirpur 10250, Pakistan
2
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science and Arts, Düzce University, Düzce 81620, Turkey
3
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Symmetry 2022, 14(5), 870; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14050870
Submission received: 30 March 2022 / Revised: 12 April 2022 / Accepted: 13 April 2022 / Published: 24 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Symmetry in Fractional Calculus and Inequalities)

Abstract

:
In this investigation, we first establish new quantum Hermite–Hadamard type integral inequalities for s-convex functions by utilizing newly defined T q -integrals. Then, by using obtained inequality, we establish a new Hermite–Hadamard inequality for coordinated s 1 , s 2 -convex functions. The results obtained in this paper provide significant extensions of other related results given in the literature. Finally, some examples are given to illustrate the result obtained in this paper. These types of analytical inequalities, as well as solutions, apply to different areas where the concept of symmetry is important.

1. Introduction

The Hermite–Hadamard inequality discovered by C. Hermite and J. Hadamard (see, e.g., [1,2], p. 137) is one of the most well established inequalities in the theory of convex functions with a geometrical interpretation and many applications. These inequalities state that if F : I R is a convex function on the interval I of real numbers and σ , ρ I with σ < ρ , then
F σ + ρ 2 1 ρ σ σ ρ F ( τ ) d τ F σ + F ρ 2 .
Over the years, a large number of studies have focused on finding trapezoid and midpoint type inequalities that provide boundaries to the right and left sides of inequality (1), respectively. Dragomir and Agarwal first considered the trapezoid inequalities for differentiable convex mappings in [3] whereas Kirmacı first proved the midpoint inequalities for differentiable convex mappings in the paper [4]. In [5], Sarikaya et al. extended the inequalities (1) to the case of Riemann–Liouville fractional integrals and the authors also established some corresponding fractional trapezoid type inequalities. What’s more, Sarikaya obtained fractional Hermite–Hadamard inequalities and fractional trapezoids in the case of the functions with two variables in [6]. In [7], Dragomir proved Hermite–Hadamard type inequalities for coordinated convex functions R 2 . For some other related papers on Hermite–Hadamard type inequalities for convex functions and other kinds of convex classes, please refer to [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27].
The concept of s-convexity is defined as follows:
Definition 1
([28]). Let I be a s-convex set. A function F : I R is said to be a s-convex function, if
F ξ σ + ( 1 ξ ) ρ ξ s F ( σ ) + ( 1 ξ ) s F ( ρ )
for all σ , ρ I , and for ξ [ 0 , 1 ] , s ( 0 , 1 ] . If the inequality in (2) is reversed, then F is said to be s-concave.
Dragomir and Fitzpatrick [29] used this class of functions and proved the following Hermite–Hadamard inequality:
2 s 1 F σ + ρ 2 1 ρ σ σ ρ F ( τ ) d τ F σ + F ρ s + 1 .
Definition 2.
A function F : Δ R 2 R will be called coordinated s 1 , s 2 -convex functions on Δ, if the following inequality
F ( ξ τ + ( 1 ξ ) ς , λ u + ( 1 λ ) v ) ) ξ s 1 λ s 2 F ( ξ , u ) + ξ s 1 ( 1 λ ) s 2 F ( τ , v ) + ( 1 ξ ) s 1 λ s 2 F ( ς , u ) + ( 1 ξ ) s 1 ( 1 λ ) s 2 F ( ς , v )
holds for all ξ , λ [ 0 , 1 ] , s 1 , s 2 ( 0 , 1 ] and ( ξ , u ) , ( τ , w ) , ( ς , u ) , ( ς , w ) Δ , where Δ is bi-dimensional real interval.
Here, if we put s 1 = 1 and s 2 = 1 , then coordinated s 1 , s 2 -convexity reduces to coordinated convexity.
In recent years, by using the concept of s-convexity, several papers have been devoted to Hermite–Hadamard inequalities for functions of one and two variables. For some of them, please refer to [29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36].

2. Quantum Calculus

In this section, we summarize some required definitions of quantum calculus and important quantum integral inequalities. For for information about the related results, one can refer to the papers [37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44]

2.1. q-Integrals and Related Inequalities

Set the following notation (see [38]):
The [ n ] q is set of integers and expressed as
[ n ] q = 1 q n 1 q = 1 + q + q 2 + q n 1 with q ( 0 , 1 ) .
Jackson derived the q-Jackson integral in [37] from 0 to ρ for q ( 0 , 1 ) as follows:
0 ρ F ( τ ) d q τ = ( 1 q ) ρ n = 0 q n F ( ρ q n )
provided the sum converges absolutely. The q-Jackson integral in a generic interval [ σ , ρ ] was given by in [37] and defined as follows:
σ ρ F ( τ ) d q τ = 0 ρ F ( τ ) d q τ 0 σ F ( τ ) d q τ
The quantum integrals on the interval σ , ρ is defined as follows:
Definition 3
([39]). Let F : σ , ρ R be a continuous function. Then, the q σ -definite integral on σ , ρ is defined as
σ τ F ξ σ d q ξ = 1 q τ σ n = 0 q n F q n τ + 1 q n σ
for τ σ , ρ .
In [45], Alp et al. proved the corresponding Hermite–Hadamard inequalities for convex functions by using q σ -integrals, as follows:
Theorem 1.
If F : σ , ρ R be a convex differentiable function on σ , ρ and 0 < q < 1 . Then, q-Hermite–Hadamard inequalities
F q σ + ρ 1 + q 1 ρ σ σ ρ F τ σ d q τ q ϝ σ + F ρ 1 + q .
On the other hand, Bermudo et al. gave the following new definition of quantum integral on the interval σ , ρ .
Definition 4
([46]). Let F : σ , ρ R be a continuous function. Then, the q ρ -definite integral on σ , ρ is defined as
τ ρ F ξ ρ d q ξ = 1 q ρ τ n = 0 q n F q n τ + 1 q n ρ
for τ σ , ρ .
Bermudo et al. proved the corresponding Hermite–Hadamard inequalities for convex functions by using q ρ -integrals, as follows:
Theorem 2
([46]). If F : σ , ρ R is a convex differentiable function on σ , ρ and 0 < q < 1 . Then, q-Hermite–Hadamard inequalities
F σ + q ρ 1 + q 1 ρ σ σ ρ F τ ρ d q τ F σ + q ϝ ρ 1 + q .
From Theorems 1 and 2, one can write the following inequalities:
Corollary 1
([46]). For any convex function F : σ , ρ R and 0 < q < 1 , we have
F q σ + ρ 1 + q + F σ + q ρ 1 + q 1 ρ σ σ ρ F τ σ d q τ + σ ρ F τ ρ d q τ F σ + F ρ
and
F σ + ρ 2 1 2 ρ σ σ ρ F τ σ d q τ + σ ρ F τ ρ d q τ F σ + F ρ 2 .
In [47], Latif defined q σ ϱ -integral for functions of two variables and presented important properties of this integral. In [48], Alp and Sarikaya proved quantum Hermite–Hadamard inequalities for co-ordinated convex functions. On the other hand, Budak et al. [49] defined the q σ d ,   q ϱ ρ and q ρ d -integrals for functions of two variables and they also gave the corresponding Hermite–Hadamard inequalities for these newly defined integrals.

2.2. T q -Integrals and T q -Hermite-Hadamard Inequalities

In this subsection, we summarize the definitions and some properties of the T q -Integrals.
Alp and Sarikaya defined the following new version of quantum integral, which is called σ T q -integral.
Definition 5
([42]). Let F : σ , ρ R be function. For τ σ , ρ
σ ρ F s σ d q T s = 1 q ρ σ 2 q 1 + q n = 0 q n F q n ρ + 1 q n σ F ρ
where 0 < q < 1 .
Theorem 3
( σ T q -Hermite–Hadamard [42]). Let F : σ , ρ R be a convex function on σ , ρ and 0 < q < 1 . Then, we have
F σ + ρ 2 1 ρ σ σ ρ F τ σ d q T τ F σ + F ρ 2
In [43], Kara et al. introduced the following generalized quantum integral, which is called ρ T q -integral.
Definition 6
([43]). Let F : σ , ρ R be a function. For τ σ , ρ ,
σ ρ F s ρ d q T s = 1 q ρ σ 2 q 1 + q n = 0 q n F q n σ + 1 q n ρ F σ
where 0 < q < 1 .
Theorem 4
( ρ T q -Hermite-Hadamard). Let F : σ , ρ R be a convex function on σ , ρ and 0 < q < 1 . Then, we have
F σ + ρ 2 1 ρ σ σ ρ F τ ρ d q T τ F σ + F ρ 2 .
Kara and Budak defined T q -integrals for two-variables functions, as follows
Definition 7
([44]). Suppose that F : σ , ρ × ϱ , d R 2 R is a function. Then, the following σ ϱ T q σ d T q , ϱ ρ T q and ρ d T q -integrals on σ , ρ × ϱ , d are defined by
σ ρ ϱ d F ξ , s ϱ d q 2 T s σ d q 1 T ξ = 1 q 1 1 q 2 ρ σ d ϱ 4 q 1 q 2 × 1 + q 1 1 + q 2 n = 0 m = 0 q 1 n q 2 m F q 1 n ρ + 1 q 1 n σ , q 2 m d + 1 q 2 m ϱ 1 + q 2 m = 0 q 2 m F ρ , q 2 m d + 1 q 2 m ϱ 1 + q 1 n = 0 q 1 n F q 1 n ρ + 1 q 1 n σ , d + F ρ , d ,
σ ρ ϱ d F ξ , s d d q 2 T s σ d q 1 T ξ = 1 q 1 1 q 2 ρ σ d ϱ 4 q 1 q 2 × 1 + q 1 1 + q 2 n = 0 m = 0 q 1 n q 2 m F q 1 n ρ + 1 q 1 n σ , q 2 m ϱ + 1 q 2 m d 1 + q 2 m = 0 q 2 m F ρ , q 2 m ϱ + 1 q 2 m d 1 + q 1 n = 0 q 1 n F q 1 n ρ + 1 q 1 n σ , ϱ + F ρ , ϱ ,
σ ρ ϱ d F ξ , s ϱ d q 2 T s ρ d q 1 T ξ = 1 q 1 1 q 2 ρ σ d ϱ 4 q 1 q 2 × 1 + q 1 1 + q 2 n = 0 m = 0 q 1 n q 2 m F q 1 n σ + 1 q 1 n ρ , q 2 m d + 1 q 2 m ϱ 1 + q 2 m = 0 q 2 m F σ , q 2 m d + 1 q 2 m ϱ 1 + q 1 n = 0 q 1 n F q 1 n σ + 1 q 1 n ρ , d + F σ , d
and
σ ρ ϱ d F ξ , s d d q 2 T s ρ d q 1 T ξ = 1 q 1 1 q 2 ρ σ d ϱ 4 q 1 q 2 × 1 + q 1 1 + q 2 n = 0 m = 0 q 1 n q 2 m F q 1 n σ + 1 q 1 n ρ , q 2 m ϱ + 1 q 2 m d 1 + q 2 m = 0 q 2 m F σ , q 2 m ϱ + 1 q 2 m d 1 + q 1 n = 0 q 1 n F q 1 n σ + 1 q 1 n ρ , ϱ + F σ , ϱ ,
respectively.
Kara and Budak proved the corresponding Hermite–Hadamard type inequalities for these T q -integrals. In this paper, we generalize the results proved in the papers [42,43,44] for s-convex functions.

3. Generalized Quantum Hermite Hadamard Inequalities

In this section, we establish new T q Hermite–Hadamard type integral inequalities for s-convex and coordinated s 1 , s 2 -convex functions.
Theorem 5.
Let F : σ , ρ R be a s-convex functions with s ( 0 , 1 ] . Then, we have the quantum following Hermite–Hadamard inequality
2 s F σ + ρ 2 1 ρ σ σ ρ F ( τ ) σ d q T τ + σ ρ F ( τ ) ρ d q T τ F ( σ ) + F ( ρ ) 1 2 q 1 + q [ s + 1 ] q 1 + q + θ 1
where q ( 0 , 1 ) and
θ 1 = 0 1 ( 1 ξ ) s 0 d q T ξ .
Proof .
Since F is s-convex, we have
F ( ξ τ + ( 1 ξ ) ς ) ξ s F ( τ ) + ( 1 ξ ) s F ( ς ) .
For ξ = 1 2 , we can write
F τ + ς 2 F ( τ ) + F ( ς ) 2 s .
Considering τ = ξ ρ + ( 1 ξ ) σ and ς = ξ σ + ( 1 ξ ) ρ , in (18), we get
2 s F σ + ρ 2 F ξ ρ + ( 1 ξ ) σ + F ξ σ + ( 1 ξ ) ρ .
By σ T q -integrating with respect to ξ over 0 , 1 , we have
2 s F σ + ρ 2 0 1 0 d q T ξ 0 1 F ( ξ ρ + ( 1 ξ ) σ ) 0 d q T ξ + 0 1 F ( ξ σ + ( 1 ξ ) ρ ) 0 d q T ξ .
From Definitions 5 and 6, we have
0 1 F ( ξ σ + ( 1 ξ ) ρ ) 0 d q T ξ = 1 q 2 q ( 1 + q ) n = 0 q n F ( q n σ + ( 1 q n ) ρ ) F ( σ ) = 1 ρ σ σ ρ F ( τ ) ρ d q T τ
and
0 1 F ( ξ ρ + ( 1 ξ ) σ ) 0 d q T ξ = 1 q 2 q ( 1 + q ) n = 0 q n F ( q n ρ + ( 1 q n ) σ ) F ( ρ ) = 1 ρ σ σ ρ F ( τ ) σ d q T τ .
Thus, we can write
2 s F σ + ρ 2 1 ρ σ σ ρ F ( τ ) σ d q T τ + σ ρ F ( τ ) ρ d q T τ
and the first inequality (17) is proved.
To prove the second inequality, we use the s-convexity, we have
F ( ξ ρ + ( 1 ξ ) σ ξ s F ( ρ ) + ( 1 ξ ) s F ( σ )
F ( ξ σ + ( 1 ξ ) ρ ) ξ s F ( σ ) + ( 1 ξ ) s F ( ρ ) .
Thus,
F ξ ρ + ( 1 ξ ) σ + F ( ξ σ + ( 1 ξ ) ρ ) F ( σ ) + F ( ρ ) ξ s + ( 1 ξ ) s
By taking σ T q -integral of (19) on 0 , 1 and by using Definitions 5 and 6, we have
1 ρ σ σ ρ F ( τ ) σ d q T τ + σ ρ F ( τ ) ρ d q T τ F ( σ ) + F ( ρ ) 0 1 ξ s 0 d q T ξ + 0 1 ( 1 ξ ) s 0 d q T ξ F ( σ ) + F ( ρ ) 1 2 q 1 + q [ s + 1 ] q 1 + q + θ 1 .
Thus, the proof is accomplished. □
Remark 1.
In Theorem 5, if we take the limit as q 1 , then the inequality (17) becomes the inequality (3).
Theorem 6.
If F : [ σ , ρ ] × [ ϱ , d ] R is coordinated s 1 , s 2 -convex functions on Δ with s 1 , s 2 ( 0 , 1 ] , then we have the following inequalities:
2 s 1 + s 2 F σ + ρ 2 , ϱ + d 2 2 s 2 2 ( ρ σ ) σ ρ F τ , ϱ + d 2 σ d q 1 T τ + σ ρ F τ , ϱ + d 2 ρ d q 1 T τ + 2 s 1 2 ( d ϱ ) ϱ d F σ + ρ 2 , ς ϱ d q 2 T ς + ϱ d F σ + ρ 2 , ς d d q 2 T ς 1 ( ρ σ ) ( d ϱ ) σ ρ ϱ d F ( τ , ς ) ϱ d q 2 T ς σ d q 1 T τ + σ ρ ϱ d F ( τ , ς ) d d q 2 T ς σ d q 1 T τ + σ ρ ϱ d F ( τ , ς ) ϱ d q 2 T ς ρ d q 1 T τ + σ ρ ϱ d F ( τ , ς ) d d q 2 T ς ρ d q 1 T τ 1 2 ( ρ σ ) 1 2 q 2 1 + q 2 [ s 2 + 1 ] q 2 1 + q 2 + Θ 2 × σ ρ [ F ( τ , ϱ ) + F ( τ , d ) ] σ d q 1 T τ + σ ρ [ F ( τ , ϱ ) + F ( τ , d ) ] ρ d q 1 T τ + 1 2 ( d ϱ ) 1 2 q 1 1 + q 1 [ s 1 + 1 ] q 1 1 + q 1 + Θ 1 × ϱ d [ F ( σ , ς ) + F ( ρ , ς ) ] ϱ d q 2 T ς + ϱ d [ F ( σ , ς ) + F ( ρ , ς ) ] d d q 2 T ς [ F ( σ , ϱ ) + F ( σ , d ) + F ( ρ , ϱ ) + F ( ρ , d ) ] × 1 2 q 2 1 + q 2 [ s 2 + 1 ] q 2 1 + q 2 + Θ 2 1 2 q 1 1 + q 1 [ s 1 + 1 ] q 1 1 + q 1 + Θ 1 ,
where q 1 , q 2 ( 0 , 1 ) , Θ 1 = 0 1 ( 1 ξ ) s 1 0 d q 1 T ξ and Θ 2 = 0 1 ( 1 ξ ) s 2 0 d q 2 T ξ .
Proof .
Let g τ : [ ϱ , d ] R , g τ ( ς ) = F ( τ , ς ) is s 2 -convex function on [ ϱ , d ] . By using the inequality (17) for the interval [ ϱ , d ] and q 2 ( 0 , 1 ) , we have
2 s 2 g τ ϱ + d 2 1 d ϱ ϱ d g τ ( ς ) ϱ d q 2 T ς + ϱ d g τ ( ς ) d d q 2 T ς [ F ( ϱ ) + F ( d ) ] 1 2 q 2 1 + q 2 [ s 2 + 1 ] q 2 1 + q 2 + Θ 2 ,
i.e.,
2 s 2 F τ , ϱ + d 2 1 d ϱ ϱ d F ( τ , ς ) ϱ d q 2 T ς + ϱ d F ( τ , ς ) d d q 2 T ς [ F ( τ , ϱ ) + F ( τ , d ) ] 1 2 q 2 1 + q 2 [ s 2 + 1 ] q 2 1 + q 2 + Θ 2
for all τ [ σ , ρ ] . By σ T q 1 integration of inequality (21) on [ σ , ρ ] for q 1 ( 0 , 1 ) , we get
2 s 2 ρ σ σ ρ F τ , ϱ + d 2 σ d q 1 T τ 1 ( ρ σ ) ( d ϱ ) σ ρ ϱ d F ( τ , ς ) ϱ d q 2 T ς σ d q 1 T τ + σ ρ ϱ d F ( τ , ς ) d d q 2 T ς σ d q 1 T τ 1 ( ρ σ ) 1 2 q 2 1 + q 2 [ s 2 + 1 ] q 2 1 + q 2 + Θ 2 σ ρ [ F ( τ , ϱ ) + F ( τ , d ) ] σ d q 1 T τ .
Similarly, by ρ T q 1 integration of inequality (21) on [ σ , ρ ] for q 1 ( 0 , 1 ) , we get
2 s 2 ρ σ σ ρ F τ , ϱ + d 2 ρ d q 1 T τ 1 ( ρ σ ) ( d ϱ ) σ ρ ϱ d F ( τ , ς ) ϱ d q 2 T ς ρ d q 1 T τ + σ ρ ϱ d F ( τ , ς ) d d q 2 T ς ρ d q 1 T τ 1 ( ρ σ ) 1 2 q 2 1 + q 2 [ s 2 + 1 ] q 2 1 + q 2 + Θ 2 σ ρ [ F ( τ , ϱ ) + F ( τ , d ) ] ρ d q 1 T τ .
On the other hand, the function g ς : [ ϱ , d ] R , g ς ( τ ) = F ( τ , ς ) is s 1 -convex function on [ σ , ρ ] . By using the inequality (17) for the interval [ σ , ρ ] and q 1 ( 0 , 1 ) , we have
2 s 1 g ς σ + ρ 2 1 ρ σ σ ρ g ς ( τ ) σ d q 1 T τ + σ ρ g ς ( τ ) ρ d q 1 T τ [ F ( σ ) + F ( ρ ) ] 1 2 q 1 1 + q 1 [ s 1 + 1 ] q 1 1 + q 1 + Θ 1 ,
i.e.,
2 s 1 F σ + ρ 2 , ς 1 ρ σ σ ρ F ( τ , ς ) σ d q 1 T τ + σ ρ F ( τ , ς ) ρ d q 1 T τ [ F ( σ , ς ) + F ( ρ , ς ) ] 1 2 q 1 1 + q 1 [ s 1 + 1 ] q 1 1 + q 1 + Θ 1
for all ς [ ϱ , d ] . By ϱ T q 2 integration of inequality (24) on [ ϱ , d ] for q 2 ( 0 , 1 ) , we get
2 s 1 d ϱ ϱ d F σ + ρ 2 , ς ϱ d q 2 T ς 1 ( ρ σ ) ( d ϱ ) ϱ d σ ρ F ( τ , ς ) σ d q 1 T τ ϱ d q 2 T ς + ϱ d σ ρ F ( τ , ς ) ρ d q 1 T τ ϱ d q 2 T ς 1 ( d ϱ ) 1 2 q 1 1 + q 1 [ s 1 + 1 ] q 1 1 + q 1 + Θ 1 ϱ d [ F ( σ , ς ) + F ( ρ , ς ) ] ϱ d q 2 T ς .
Similarly, by d T q 2 integration of inequality (24) on [ ϱ , d ] for q 2 ( 0 , 1 ) , we get
2 s 1 d ϱ ϱ d F σ + ρ 2 , ς d d q 2 T ς 1 ( ρ σ ) ( d ϱ ) ϱ d σ ρ F ( τ , ς ) σ d q 1 T τ d d q 2 T ς + ϱ d σ ρ F ( τ , ς ) ρ d q 1 T τ d d q 2 T ς 1 ( d ϱ ) 1 2 q 1 1 + q 1 [ s 1 + 1 ] q 1 1 + q 1 + Θ 1 ϱ d [ F ( σ , ς ) + F ( ρ , ς ) ] d d q 2 T ς .
By adding (22), (23), (25) and (26), we get
2 s 2 ( ρ σ ) σ ρ F τ , ϱ + d 2 σ d q 1 T τ + σ ρ F τ , ϱ + d 2 ρ d q 1 T τ + 2 s 1 ( d ϱ ) ϱ d F σ + ρ 2 , ς ϱ d q 2 T ς + ϱ d F σ + ρ 2 , ς d d q 2 T ς 2 ( ρ σ ) ( d ϱ ) σ ρ ϱ d F ( τ , ς ) ϱ d q 2 T ς σ d q 1 T τ + σ ρ ϱ d F ( τ , ς ) d d q 2 T ς σ d q 1 T τ + σ ρ ϱ d F ( τ , ς ) ϱ d q 2 T ς ρ d q 1 T τ + σ ρ ϱ d F ( τ , ς ) d d q 2 T ς ρ d q 1 T τ 1 ( ρ σ ) 1 2 q 2 1 + q 2 [ s 2 + 1 ] q 2 1 + q 2 + Θ 2 × σ ρ [ F ( τ , ϱ ) + F ( τ , d ) ] σ d q 1 T τ + σ ρ [ F ( τ , ϱ ) + F ( τ , d ) ] ρ d q 1 T τ + 1 ( d ϱ ) 1 2 q 1 1 + q 1 [ s 1 + 1 ] q 1 1 + q 1 + Θ 1 × ϱ d [ F ( σ , ς ) + F ( ρ , ς ) ] ϱ d q 2 T ς + ϱ d [ F ( σ , ς ) + F ( ρ , ς ) ] d d q 2 T ς .
This completes the proof second and third inequality in (20). From left side of inequality (17), we have
2 s 2 F σ + ρ 2 , ϱ + d 2 1 d ϱ ϱ d F ( σ + ρ 2 , ς ) ϱ d q 2 T ς + ϱ d F ( σ + ρ 2 , ς ) d d q 2 T ς
and
2 s 1 F σ + ρ 2 , ϱ + d 2 1 ρ σ σ ρ F ( τ , ϱ + d 2 ) σ d q 1 T τ + σ ρ F ( τ , ϱ + d 2 ) ρ d q 1 T τ .
Using (28) and (29) in (27), we get first inequality of (20). Now from right side of inequality (17), we have
1 ( ρ σ ) σ ρ F ( τ , ϱ ) σ d q 1 T τ + σ ρ F ( τ , ϱ ) ρ d q 1 T τ + σ ρ F ( τ , d ) σ d q 1 T τ + σ ρ F ( τ , d ) ρ d q 1 T τ [ F ( σ , ϱ ) + F ( ρ , ϱ ) + F ( σ , d ) + F ( ρ , d ) ] × 1 2 q 1 1 + q 1 [ s 1 + 1 ] q 1 1 + q 1 + Θ 1
and
1 ( d ϱ ) ϱ d F ( σ , ς ) ϱ d q 2 T ς + ϱ d F ( σ , ς ) d d q 2 T ς + ϱ d F ( ρ , ς ) ϱ d q 2 T ς + ϱ d F ( ρ , ς ) d d q 2 T ς [ F ( σ , ϱ ) + F ( ρ , ϱ ) + F ( σ , d ) + F ( ρ , d ) ] × 1 2 q 2 1 + q 2 [ s 2 + 1 ] q 2 1 + q 2 + Θ 2 .
Using (30) and (31) in (27), we obtain the last inequality of (20).
Thus, the proof is accomplished. □
Corollary 2.
If we take the limit q 1 , q 2 1 in Theorem 6, then the inequality (20) becomes the following Hermite–Hadamard inequality for coordinated s 1 , s 2 -convex functions
2 s 1 + s 2 2 F σ + ρ 2 , ϱ + d 2 2 s 2 4 ( ρ σ ) σ ρ F τ , ϱ + d 2 d τ + 2 s 1 4 ( d ϱ ) ϱ d F σ + ρ 2 , ς d ς 1 ( ρ σ ) ( d ϱ ) σ ρ ϱ d F ( τ , ς ) d ς d τ 1 2 ( ρ σ ) ( s 2 + 1 ) σ ρ [ F ( τ , ϱ ) + F ( τ , d ) ] d τ + 1 2 ( d ϱ ) ( s 1 + 1 ) ϱ d [ F ( σ , ς ) + F ( ρ , ς ) ] d ς F ( σ , ϱ ) + F ( σ , d ) + F ( ρ , ϱ ) + F ( ρ , d ) ( s 1 + 1 ) ( s 2 + 1 ) .
Remark 2.
If we take s 1 = s 2 = 1 in Corollary 2, then (32) reduces to ([7], Theorem 1).

4. Applications

In this section, we give some applications to illustrate our main outcomes.
Example 1.
Define the function F ( τ ) = τ 2 on [ 0 , 1 ] . Applying Theorem 5 with q = s = 1 2 , we have
2 s F σ + ρ 2 = 2 2 F 1 2 = 1 2 2 ,
1 ( ρ σ ) σ ρ F ( τ ) σ d q T τ + σ ρ F ( τ ) ρ d q T τ = 0 1 τ 2 0 d 1 2 T τ + 0 1 τ 2 1 d 1 2 T τ = 0.714
and
F ( σ ) + F ( ρ ) 1 2 q 1 + q [ s + 1 ] q 1 + q + θ 1 = 3 2 [ 3 2 ] 1 2 1 2 + θ 1 3 2 2 ( 2 2 1 ) 1 2 + 6 2 + 3 3 16 = 1.515
Hence, the result is verified.
Example 2.
Define a function F : Δ R F ( τ , ς ) = τ 2 ς 2 if Δ [ 0 , 1 ] × [ 0 , 1 ] . Applying Theorem 6 with q 1 = q 2 = 1 2 , and s 1 = s 2 = 1 2 , we have
2 s 1 + s 2 F σ + ρ 2 , ϱ + d 2 = 2 1 2 + 1 2 F 1 2 , 1 2 = 1 8 ,
2 s 2 2 ( ρ σ ) σ ρ F τ , ϱ + d 2 σ d q 1 T τ + σ ρ F τ , ϱ + d 2 ρ d q 1 T τ + 2 s 1 2 ( d ϱ ) ϱ d F σ + ρ 2 , ς ϱ d q 2 T ς + ϱ d F σ + ρ 2 , ς d d q 2 T ς = 1 2 0 1 τ 2 4 0 d 1 2 T τ + 0 1 τ 2 4 1 d 1 2 T τ + 1 2 0 1 ς 2 4 0 d 1 2 T + 0 1 ς 2 4 1 d 1 2 T ς = 5 14 2 ,
1 ( ρ σ ) ( d ϱ ) σ ρ ϱ d F ( τ , ς ) ϱ d q 2 T ς σ d q 1 T τ + σ ρ ϱ d F ( τ , ς ) d d q 2 T ς σ d q 1 T τ + σ ρ ϱ d F ( τ , ς ) ϱ d q 2 T ς ρ d q 1 T τ + σ ρ ϱ d F ( τ , ς ) d d q 2 T ς ρ d q 1 T τ = 0 1 0 1 τ 2 ς 2 0 d q 2 T ς 0 d q 1 T τ + 0 1 0 1 τ 2 ς 2 1 d q 2 T ς 0 d q 1 T τ + 0 1 0 1 τ 2 ς 2 0 d q 2 T ς 1 d q 1 T τ + 0 1 0 1 τ 2 ς 2 1 d q 2 T ς 1 d q 1 T τ = 25 196 + 25 196 + 25 196 + 25 196 = 25 49 ,
1 2 ( ρ σ ) 1 2 q 2 1 + q 2 [ s 2 + 1 ] q 2 1 + q 2 + Θ 2 × σ ρ [ F ( τ , ϱ ) + F ( τ , d ) ] σ d q 1 T τ + σ ρ [ F ( τ , ϱ ) + F ( τ , d ) ] ρ d q 1 T τ + 1 2 ( d ϱ ) 1 2 q 1 1 + q 1 [ s 1 + 1 ] q 1 1 + q 1 + Θ 1 × ϱ d [ F ( σ , ς ) + F ( ρ , ς ) ] ϱ d q 2 T ς + ϱ d [ F ( σ , ς ) + F ( ρ , ς ) ] d d q 2 T ς = 1 2 3 2 [ 3 2 ] 1 2 1 2 + Θ 2 10 14 + 1 2 3 2 [ 3 2 ] 1 2 1 2 + Θ 1 10 14 3 2 2 ( 2 2 1 ) 1 2 + 6 2 + 3 3 16 5 7 = 5 7 12 2 + 3 2 2 + 3 64 2 32 = 1.11 ,
[ F ( σ , ϱ ) + F ( σ , d ) + F ( ρ , ϱ ) + F ( ρ , d ) ] × 1 2 q 2 1 + q 2 [ s 2 + 1 ] q 2 1 + q 2 + Θ 2 1 2 q 1 1 + q 1 [ s 1 + 1 ] q 1 1 + q 1 + Θ 1 = 12 2 + 3 2 2 + 3 64 2 32 12 2 + 3 2 2 + 3 64 2 32 = 2.423 .
Hence, the result is verified.

5. Conclusions

In current work, some new quantum Hermite–Hadamard-type inequalities for s-convex and coordinated s 1 , s 2 -convex functions by utilizing the T q -integrals are obtained. We also presented some examples which satisfied our main outcomes. It is also shown that some classical results can be obtained by the results presented in the current study by taking the limit q 1 . It is a novel and fascinating problem that the researcher will be able to obtain similar inequalities in their future work for various types of convexity and coordinated convexity.

Author Contributions

Funding acquisition, K.N.; Investigation, G.G.; Supervision, H.B. and R.H.; Writing—original draft, G.G. and R.H.; Writing—review & editing, H.B. and K.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by King Mongkut’s University of Technology North Bangkok. Contract no. KMUTNB-64-KNOW-36.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Dragomir, S.S.; Pearce, C.E.M. Selected topics on Hermite-Hadamard inequalities and applications. In RGMIA Monographs; Victoria University: Footscray, Australia, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  2. Pečarić, J.E.; Proschan, F.; Tong, Y.L. Convex functions, Partial Orderings and Statistical Applications; Academic Press: Boston, MA, USA, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  3. Dragomi, S.S.; Agarwal, R.P. Two inequalities for differentiable mappings and applications to special means of real numbers and to trapezoidal formula. Appl. Math. Lett. 1998, 11, 91–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Kirmaci, U.S. Inequalities for differentiable mappings and applications to special means of real numbers to midpoint formula. Appl. Math. Comput. 2004, 147, 137–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sarikaya, M.Z.; Set, E.; Yaldiz, H.; Basak, N. Hermite–Hadamard’s inequalities for fractional integrals and related fractional inequalities. Math. Comput. Model. 2013, 57, 2403–2407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sarıkaya, M.Z. On the Hermite-Hadamard-type inequalities for co-ordinated convex function via fractional integrals. Integral Transform. Spec. Funct. 2014, 25, 134–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Dragomir, S.S. On the Hadamard’s inequality for functions on the co-ordinates in a rectangle from the plane. Taiwan. J. Math. 2001, 5, 775–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Akdemir, A.O.; Özdemir, M.E. Some Hadamard-Type inequalities for coordinated p-convex functions and Godunova-Levin functions. AIP Conf. Proc. 2010, 1309, 7–15. [Google Scholar]
  9. Ali, A.; Gulshan, G.; Hussain, R.; Latif, A.; Muddassar, M. Generalized inequalities of the type of Hermite-Hadamard-Fejer with quasi-convex functions by way of k-fractional derivative. J. Comput. Anal. Appl. 2017, 22, 1208–1219. [Google Scholar]
  10. Ali, M.A.; Abbas, M.; Budak, H.; Agarwal, P.; Murtaza, G.; Chu, Y.M. New quantum boundaries for quantum Simpson’s and quantum Newton’s type inequalities for preinvex functions. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2021, 64, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ali, M.A.; Alp, N.; Budak, H.; Agarwal, P. On some new trapezoidal inequalities for qϰ2-quantum integrals via Green function. J. Anal. 2021, 30, 15–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Alomari, M.; Darus, M.; Dragomir, S.S. Inequalities of Hermite-Hadamard’s type for functions whose derivatives absolute values are quasi-convex. Res. Rep. Coll. 2009, 12, 14. [Google Scholar]
  13. Bakula, M.K. An improvement of the Hermite-Hadamard inequality for functions convex on the coordinates. Aust. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2014, 11, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  14. Budak, H. Some trapezoid and midpoint type inequalities for newly defined quantum integrals. Proyecciones 2021, 40, 199–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gürbüz, M.; Özdemir, M.E. On some inequalities for product of different kinds of convex functions. Turk. J. Sci. 2020, 5, 23–27. [Google Scholar]
  16. Kalsoom, H.; Ali, M.A.; Idrees, M.; Agarwal, P.; Arif, M. New post quantum analogues of Hermite–Hadamard type inequalities for interval-valued convex functions. Math. Probl. Eng. 2021, 2021, 5529650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kalsoom, H.; Rashid, S.; Idrees, M.; Safdar, F.; Akram, S.; Baleanu, D.; Chu, Y.M. Post quantum integral inequalities of Hermite-Hadamard-type associated with co-ordinated higher-order generalized strongly pre-invex and quasi-pre-invex mappings. Symmetry 2020, 12, 443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Hussain, R.; Ali, A.; Gulshan, G.; Latif, A. Hermite-Hadamard type Inequalities for k-Riemann-Liouville fractional Integrals via two kinds of convexity. Austral. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2016, 13, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  19. Hussain, R.; Ali, A.; Latif, A.; Gulshan, G. Some k-fractional associates of Hermite-Hadamard’s inequality for quasi-convex functions and applications to special means. J. Fract. Differ. Calc. 2017, 7, 301–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hussain, R.; Kehkashan, B.; Ali, A.; Latif, A.; Rauf, K. Some generalized k-fractional companions of Hadamard’s inequality. Niger. J. Math. Appl. 2016, 25, 8–18. [Google Scholar]
  21. Ozdemir, M.E.; Yildiz, C.; Akdemir, A.O. On the co-ordinated convex functions. Appl. Math. Inf. Sci. 2014, 8, 1085–1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Özdemir, M.E. New Refinements of Hadamard Integral inequlaity via k-Fractional Integrals for p-convex function. Turk. J. Sci. 2021, 6, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  23. Tariboon, J.; Ntouyas, S.K.; Agarwal, P. New concepts of fractional quantum calculus and applications to impulsive fractional q-difference equations. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2015, 2015, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Wang, D.Y.; Tseng, K.L.; Yang, G.S. Some Hadamard’s inequalities for co-ordinated convex functions in a rectangle from the plane. Taiwan. J. Math. 2007, 11, 63–73. [Google Scholar]
  25. Xi, B.Y.; Hua, J.; Qi, F. Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for extended s-convex functions on the co-ordinates in a rectangle. J. Appl. Anal. 2014, 20, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. You, X.; Kara, H.; Budak, H.; Kalsoom, H. Quantum inequalities of Hermite-Hadamard type for r-convex functions. J. Math. 2021, 2021, 6634614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhuang, H.; Liu, W.; Park, J. Some quantum estimates of Hermite-Hadamard inequalities for quasi-convex function. Mathematics 2019, 7, 152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Hudzik, H.; Maligranda, L. Some remarks on s-convex functions. Aequationes Math. 1994, 48, 100–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Dragomir, S.S.; Fitzpatrick, S. The Hadamard inequalities for s-convex functions in the second sense. Demonstr. Math. 1999, 32, 686–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Alomari, M.; Darus, M. The Hadamards inequality for s-convex function of 2-variables on the coordinates. Int. J. Math. Anal. 2008, 2, 629–638. [Google Scholar]
  31. Alomari, M.; Darus, M.; Kirmaci, U.S. Some inequalities of Hermite-Hadamard type for s-convex functions. Acta Math. Sci. 2011, 31, 1643–1652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Avci, M.; Kavurmaci, H.; Özdemir, M.E. New inequalities of Hermite–Hadamard type via s-convex functions in the second sense with applications. Appl. Math. Comput. 2011, 17, 5171–5176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chen, F.X.; Wu, S.H. Several complementary inequalities to inequalities of Hermite-Hadamard type for s-convex functions. J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl. 2016, 9, 705–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Khan, M.A.; Chu, Y.; Khan, T.U.; Khan, J. Some new inequalities of Hermite-Hadamard type for s-convex functions with applications. Open Math. 2017, 15, 1414–1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kórus, P. An extension of the Hermite–Hadamard inequality for convex and s-convex functions. Aequationes Math. 2019, 93, 527–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Sarikaya, M.Z.; Kiriş, M.E. Some new inequalities of Hermite-Hadamard type for s-convex functions. Miskolc Math. Notes 2015, 16, 491–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jackson, F.H. On a q-definite integrals. Q. J. Pure Appl. Math. 1910, 41, 193–203. [Google Scholar]
  38. Kac, V.; Cheung, P. Quantum Calculus; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  39. Tariboon, J.; Ntouyas, S.K. Quantum calculus on finite intervals and applications to impulsive difference equations. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2013, 282, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Asawasamrit, S.; Ali, M.A.; Budak, H.; Ntouyas, S.K.; Tariboon, J. Quantum Hermite-Hadamard and quantum Ostrowski type inequalities for s-convex functions in the second sense with applications. AIMS Math. 2021, 6, 13327–13346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Alp, N.; Sarikaya, M.Z. q-Inequalities on quantum integral. Malaya J. Mat. 2020, 8, 2035–2044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Alp, N.; Sariakaya, M.Z. A new Definition and properties of quantum integral which calls q ¯ -integral. Konuralp J. Math. 2017, 5, 146–159. [Google Scholar]
  43. Kara, H.; Budak, H.; Alp, N.; Kalsoom, H.; Sarikaya, M.Z. On new generalized quantum integrals and related Hermite-Hadamard inequalities. J. Inequalities Appl. 2021, 2021, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kara, H.; Budak, H. On Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for newly defined generalized quantum integrals. Ric. Mat. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Alp, N.; Sarikaya, M.Z.; Kunt, M.; Iscan, I. q-Hermite Hadamard inequalities and quantum estimates for midpoint type inequalities via convex and quasi-convex functions. J. King Saud Univ. 2018, 30, 193–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Bermudo, S.; Korus, P.; Valdes, J.N. On q-Hermite-Hadamard inequalities for general convex functions. Acta Math. Hungar. 2020, 162, 364–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Latif, M.A.; Dragomir, S.S.; Momoniat, E. Some q-analogues of Hermite-Hadamard inequality of functions of two variables on finite rectangles in the plane. J. King Saud Univ. 2017, 29, 263–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Alp, N.; Sarikaya, M.Z. Hermite Hadamard’s type inequalities for co-ordinated convex functions on quantum integral. Appl. Math. E-Notes 2020, 20, 341–356. [Google Scholar]
  49. Budak, H.; Ali, M.A.; Tarhanaci, M. Some new quantum Hermite–Hadamard-like inequalities for coordinated convex functions. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 2020, 186, 899–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gulshan, G.; Budak, H.; Hussain, R.; Nonlaopon, K. Some New Quantum Hermite-Hadamard Type Inequalities for s-Convex Functions. Symmetry 2022, 14, 870. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14050870

AMA Style

Gulshan G, Budak H, Hussain R, Nonlaopon K. Some New Quantum Hermite-Hadamard Type Inequalities for s-Convex Functions. Symmetry. 2022; 14(5):870. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14050870

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gulshan, Ghazala, Hüseyin Budak, Rashida Hussain, and Kamsing Nonlaopon. 2022. "Some New Quantum Hermite-Hadamard Type Inequalities for s-Convex Functions" Symmetry 14, no. 5: 870. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14050870

APA Style

Gulshan, G., Budak, H., Hussain, R., & Nonlaopon, K. (2022). Some New Quantum Hermite-Hadamard Type Inequalities for s-Convex Functions. Symmetry, 14(5), 870. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14050870

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop