Next Article in Journal
Hesitant Fuzzy Variable and Distribution
Previous Article in Journal
System Resilience Evaluation and Optimization Considering Epistemic Uncertainty
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Off-Shell Probes of the Higgs Yukawa Couplings: Light Quarks and Charm

by
Natascia Vignaroli
Dipartimento di Fisica “E. Pancini”, Università di Napoli Federico II and INFN, Sezione di Napoli, Via Cinthia, 80126 Napoli, Italy
Symmetry 2022, 14(6), 1183; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14061183
Submission received: 19 May 2022 / Revised: 3 June 2022 / Accepted: 6 June 2022 / Published: 8 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Physics)

Abstract

:
We review the present status and the future prospects for the measurements of the Higgs Yukawa couplings to light quarks and charm. A special focus is given to new proposed off-shell probes, which offer promising and complementary opportunities to test light quark Yukawas in triboson final states. Additionally, a new off-shell strategy to test the charm Yukawa coupling in the final state with two bosons plus a charm and a jet is considered. First estimates for the HL-LHC and the FCC-hh sensitivities on the channel are presented, showing encouraging results.

1. The Higgs Yukawa Couplings

The discovery of the Higgs boson at CERN 10 years ago [1,2] marked a breakthrough in our understanding of the physics of fundamental interactions, confirming the existence of the Brout–Englert–Higgs mechanism for the electroweak symmetry breaking (EWSB). However, it leaves us with unresolved questions in the standard model (SM), above all the non-explanation of the origin of the EWSB, the precarious nature of the associated potential, the unknown origin of the neutrino masses, the Higgs naturalness problem and the mysterious pattern of Yukawa couplings. The investigation of the properties of the Higgs, including its interactions, and in general of the EWSB sector is the primary objective of the LHC, which is approaching the upgrade to its high luminosity phase (HL-LHC) [3], as well as that of future planned experiments at the energy frontiers, e.g., the FCC [4,5,6], the ILC [7] or a multi-TeV muon collider [8]. ATLAS [9,10,11,12] (Figure 1) and CMS [13,14,15] measurements so far have given firm evidence of Higgs interactions to top, bottom and tau. The corresponding Yukawa couplings are measured with an accuracy of the order of 10% [9]. There was recently the first evidence for Higgs decay to muons [16,17], which represents the first probe of the Higgs interaction with the second generation of fermions and could give hints on scenarios beyond the SM (BSM) [18]. Crucial indication on the Higgs role in the mass generation of 1st and 2nd families would come from the challenging measurement of the light quark Yukawas. These are extremely difficult measurements but several techniques, which we are going to review, were recently developed to improve the detectability of the Higgs couplings to light quarks and to set bounds on possible deviations induced by physics beyond the SM. The current best constraints are placed by considering global fits to the Higgs strength, which is modified by shifts on the quark Yukawas ( δ y q ):
μ = 1 1 + q ( 2 δ y q + δ y q 2 ) Br ( h q q ) SM
where we are neglecting modifications to the Higgs production rate, since this would be affected only by δ y q O ( 10 3 ) . Using the most recent measurements from CMS [19] and ATLAS [20], respectively, μ = 1.06 ± 0.07 and μ = 1 . 02 0.06 + 0.07 , one can set the 95% C.L. bounds:
δ y d < 400 , δ y u < 820 , δ y s < 19 ( ATLAS ) δ y d < 450 , δ y u < 930 , δ y s < 22 ( CMS )
Considering the expectation for the high-luminosity LHC of measuring the total Higgs signal strength with an error of order 2–3% [3], these bounds from global fits could be improved up to
δ y d 340 , δ y u 700 , δ y s 17 ( HL - LHC ) .
Note that the different partonic content of the proton has a significant impact on the limits, and the improvement at HL-LHC might depend on the knowledge of the parton distribution functions (PDFs) at that time. Complementary alternative strategies have been proposed to test the light quark Yukawas. These include the study of rare Higgs decays into vector mesons, which gives limits δ y q 10 6 [21], the analysis of the W ± h charge asymmetry, with a sensitivity δ y d 1300 [22] and, in particular, the study of the double Higgs production channel [23] and of the Higgs kinematics ( p T and rapidity) [24], which show competitive sensitivities with those from global fits at the HL-LHC:
δ y d 850 , δ y u 1200 ( double Higgs prod . ) δ y d 380 , δ y u 640 ( Higgs kinematics )
All of these techniques represent on-shell Higgs probes. We instead discuss novel strategies which rely on the study of off-shell Higgs channels, following the idea of “measuring the Higgs couplings without the Higgs” [25]. The key observation behind this approach relies on the fact that modifications to the Higgs couplings affect the delicate cancellations, which avoid violation of perturbative unitarity at high energy in scatterings involving electroweak gauge bosons. This leads to measurable energy-growing effects.

2. Light Quark Yukawas in Triboson Final States

Modifications of light quark Yukawas lead to energy-growing effects in the off-shell Higgs triboson channel, which can be then analyzed to put constraints on δ y q . Figure 2 shows the leading tree-level Feynman diagrams contributing to the triple electroweak gauge boson channel, q q ¯ V V V . In the SM, the Higgs exchange diagrams cancel the bad high-energy growing behavior of the remaining diagrams. Modifications of the Higgs Yukawa coupling spoil these delicate cancellations and lead to energy-growing amplitudes. We review the main results of the study in [26], which rely on this effect.
The framework of the SM effective field theory (SMEFT) is adopted in [26]. In particular, this sub-set of dimension-6 gauge-invariant operators is assumed to encode the dominant BSM contribution to the Higgs Yukawa couplings to light quarks:
L SMEFT Y u | H | 2 v 2 u ¯ R Q 1 , L H Y d | H | 2 v 2 d ¯ R H Q 1 , L Y s | H | 2 v 2 s ¯ R H Q 2 , L + h . c . ,
where Q 1 , L = ( u L , d L ) and Q 2 , L = ( c L , s L ) represent the left-handed 1st and 2nd generation SM quark doublets, H is the Higgs doublet, and  v 246  GeV is the Higgs VEV. The parameters Y q are assumed to be real, for simplicity. An example of a BSM scenario that can generate the operators in (5) is that of a new strong dynamics including a pseudo-Nambu–Goldstone composite Higgs [27] with decay constant f, where Higgs non-linearities can give shifts of the order v 2 / f 2 to the Yukawa couplings. More in general, the operators in (5) can be generated by heavy vector-like quarks (also typically predicted in composite Higgs models) with masses of order v / | Y q | , which mix with the SM fermions after the EWSB.
Yukawa couplings are parametrized as
L h v q = u , d , s m q 1 + δ y q q ¯ q .
Modifications to the Yukawas with respect to the SM values are encoded in the parameters δ y q , which are related to the coefficients of the operators in Equation (5) by
δ y q = Y q y q SM .
Here, the SM Yukawa couplings are defined as y q SM 2 m q / v ( y q SM are evaluated at the Higgs mass scale).
The leading effect of the modification of the light quark Yukawas is manifested in the q q ¯ 3 V L channel. A clear picture of the effects induced by the BSM operators in (5) to the triboson process is obtained by adopting a non-unitary gauge description. The Higgs doublet can be then parametrized, introducing the would-be-Goldstone bosons G i and the Higgs field h, as 
H = 1 2 i 2 G + v + h + i G z .
It is then easy to observe that the effective operators in (5) generate contact interactions between two quarks and three Goldstone bosons:
L 1 v 2 G + G + 1 2 G z 2 { i y u SM δ y u q = d , s u ¯ R q L G + u ¯ R u L G z 2 + i q = d , s y q SM δ y q q ¯ R u L G + q ¯ R q L G z 2 + h . c . } .
These interactions characterize the M ( q q ¯ G G G ) amplitudes which, by virtue of the equivalence theorem [28], approximate the high-energy behavior of the M ( q q ¯ V V V ) amplitudes. At high energies, s m Z , the diagram in Figure 3 represents the dominant contribution to the triboson channel.
Simple analytic expressions can be derived for the cross sections of the q q ¯ G G G processes induced by the interactions in Equation (9):
σ ( q q ¯ G z G + G ) = ( y q SM δ y q ) 2 I ( s ^ ) , σ ( q q ¯ 3 G z ) = 3 2 ( y q SM δ y q ) 2 I ( s ^ ) , σ ( u q ¯ G + G z G z ) + σ ( q u ¯ G G z G z ) = 1 2 ( y u SM δ y u ) 2 + ( y q SM δ y q ) 2 I ( s ^ ) , σ ( u q ¯ G + G + G ) + σ ( q u ¯ G G G + ) = 2 ( y u SM δ y u ) 2 + ( y q SM δ y q ) 2 I ( s ^ ) , I ( s ^ ) s ^ 6144 π 3 v 4 ,
where s ^ is the center-of-mass energy of the parton-level quark-antiquark annihilation and q = u , d , s , q = d , s . By the equivalence theorem, for  s ^ m Z , these cross sections are approximately equal to those for the parton-level triple EW gauge boson production, with the identification G ± W L ± and G z Z L . It is manifested from (10) the energy-growing behavior of the cross section for the triboson channel, for  δ y q 0 . In particular
σ ( q q ¯ V L V L V L ) O δ y q 2 s ^ v 4 .
Interestingly, the triboson production was recently measured for the first time at the LHC by CMS [29]. This shows the LHC potential to further probe this channel. The main features of the BSM δ y q signal are the growing with energy of the cross section, but also a peculiar final state, characterized by the hard emission of gauge bosons and by distinctive angular distributions. The study in [26] exploits these characteristics to isolate the BSM δ y q induced signals from the background. It is clear that this specific search would significantly benefit from increasing the center-of-mass energy. It is indeed an ideal case to be studied at the energy frontier experiments, in particular at the FCC-hh. Table 1 shows the cross-section values at the HL-LHC and at the FCC-hh of the triboson production channels in the SM and for the BSM signals generated by the operators in Equation (5) and associated to modifications of down, up and strange Yukawa couplings. Cross sections are computed with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO [30], at the next-to-leading order (NLO) in QCD for the SM [31,32] and at LO for the BSM. The BSM signals are generated by using an UFO model [33], which is available at [34]. The study in [26] performs an analysis of different triboson channels and final states. The most efficient are the W W W channels in same-sign dilepton and trilepton final states. It is, however, important to consider a combined analysis of several triboson channels to increase the sensitivity and to possibly disentangle the different δ y q . For example, the study of the neutral Z Z Z and Z W + W channels could, in principle, distinguish between δ y u and δ y d . The analyses performed in [26] apply a set of cuts on several distinctive observables of the processes. In particular, as shown in Figure 4 for the W W W trilepton channel, the  p T of the leptons in the final states, the missing E T , or the angular azimuthal separation between leptons in the final states are particularly efficient to distinguish the δ y q signals, which are characterized by harder final states and a peculiar angular kinematics, from the SM background. The search is then refined by performing a binned-likelihood shape analysis on the p T distributions of the leading lepton. More details on the analysis can be found in [26]. Clearly, there is much room for improvement of this study by considering, for example, combined shape analyses on several interesting p T , E T and angular distributions. The final results are shown on Table 2. The HL-LHC sensitivities on δ y q from the analysis of the triboson channels are competitive with those from global fits to the Higgs data, with the possibility to test δ y d up to order 400. The sensitivities are greatly enhanced at the FCC-hh, which could probe δ y d up to order 30. This corresponds to testing new physics scale for the operators in (5) of the order of 10 (3) TeV at the FCC-hh (HL-LHC), as shown in Figure 5.

3. Off-Shell Probe of the Charm Yukawa

We now focus on probing modifications to the Higgs Yukawa coupling of the charm by analyzing the off-shell Higgs channel with two gauge bosons plus a tagged charm and a jet in the final state: V V + c + j . The leading Feynman diagram, in the non-unitary gauge, is shown in Figure 6. In the case of the charm, this two-boson signal is enhanced, compared to the triboson channel considered in the previous section, by the larger parton distribution function, compared to the charm PDF, of the valence quark in the initial state. We show that this off-shell probe is competitive with other on-shell strategies considered so far: the direct test of the H c c ¯ decay [35,36], possibly considering the associated Higgs production with a photon [37], the global fit to the Higgs signal strength [38], the indirect test via the radiative process h J / Ψ + γ [39], the analysis of the Higgs plus charm channel [40] or the indirect probe from precision Higgs measurements [41]. These latter methods appear to be the most efficient, with the possibility to test, at the 95% C.L. at the HL-LHC, values
| δ y c | 2.6 ( Higgs plus charm ) | δ y c | 2.1 ( Higgs precision measurements )
Analogously to the analysis for the triboson channel, we consider modification to the charm Yukawa
δ y c = Y c y c SM
induced by the following dim-6 operator
L SMEFT Y c | H | 2 v 2 c ¯ R Q 1 , L H + h . c .
We assume Y c to be a real parameter. As for the case discussed in the previous section, this operator spoils the mechanism of cancellation by the Higgs exchange of the energy-growing diboson amplitudes and leads to δ y c 2 s ^ v 4 energy enhancement effects, analogous to those described in Equations (10) and (11). The BSM contribution can be estimated by considering an expansion of the inclusive cross section in the terms SM ( Y c = 0 ), plus the SM-BSM interference term, which is linear in the coefficient Y c , plus the pure BSM term, which is quadratic in Y c :
σ σ SM ( Y c = 0 ) + Y c σ INT ( Y c = 1 ) + Y c 2 σ BSM ( Y c = 1 ) .
We find the cross-section values in the different V V c j channels reported in Table 3. Calculations were made with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO at LO in QCD by using the UFO model available at [34]. Note that, differently from the previous case of the modifications to the light quark Yukawas, the interference term here is not negligible. This, as we will show, can give an handle to the possibility to test the sign of the modification to the charm Yukawa.
At this point, one can derive an estimate of the HL-LHC and FCC-hh sensitivities by considering a naive evaluation of the reducible background, which will contribute to the total background in addition to the irreducible component given by the SM V V c j process. In particular, we estimate the significance σ by applying a background rescaling factor B, which parametrizes the number of reducible background events as a factor of the SM V V c j events:
σ = N S M + B S M N S M N S M + B × N S M .
By focusing only on the semileptonic final state, ± ν +c+X, and considering a c-tagging efficiency of 25% [35,36], we find the 1 σ and the 2 σ sensitivities on δ y c of the HL-LHC and of the FCC-hh in the V V c j channel shown in Figure 7. Sensitivities are presented as functions of the reducible background rescaling factor B. In the hypothesis of a negligible (compared to the SM V V c j process) reducible background, we find the sensitivities on δ y c as
δ y c 0.43 ( 1 σ ) 0.77 ( 2 σ ) ( HL - LHC , 2 × 3 ab 1 ) δ y c 0.12 ( 1 σ ) 0.23 ( 2 σ ) ( FCC - hh , 30 ab 1 )
δ y c 3.1 ( 1 σ ) 3.4 ( 2 σ ) ( HL - LHC , 2 × 3 ab 1 ) δ y c 2.8 ( 1 σ ) 2.9 ( 2 σ ) ( FCC - hh , 30 ab 1 )
We consider these estimates a useful and encouraging starting point for more refined analysis. Future studies could exploit for example, similarly to what was discussed for the triboson channels, the peculiar kinematic of the BSM process to better isolate its contribution from the background and minimize, in particular, the reducible component of the background. Our results indicate sensitivities on δ y c in the diboson channel which could be realistically below order 1 at the HL-LHC, thus competitive and complementary to other charm Yukawa probes, and of the order of 20% at the FCC-hh. Interestingly, there is also the possibility to test the sign of δ y c , since, because of interference effects, the significance is higher in the case of a positive shift to the charm Yukawa. Negative shifts of the order of 3 y c SM can be probed in the V V c j channel.

4. Conclusions

The investigation of the properties of the Higgs boson, and in particular of its interactions and Yukawa couplings to SM fermions, is of primary importance for the understanding of high-energy physics. A crucial indication of the Higgs role in the mass generation of 1st and 2nd families comes from the measurement of the light quark Yukawas. We reviewed a novel technique to improve this challenging test based on the study of the triboson channel, where the Higgs is off-shell. In this approach, the Yukawa couplings are determined indirectly by their contributions via virtual Higgs exchange to the triboson process. This method relies on the fact that modifications of the Higgs Yukawas disturb the structure of the SM and lead to the violation of perturbative unitarity at high energy. The study of the triboson channel gives results that are competitive and complementary to other on-shell Higgs probe. In particular, the HL-LHC could test modification to the down (up) quark, δ y d ( δ y u ) , up to order 400 (800). The sensitivities are greatly enhanced at the FCC-hh, which could probe δ y d ( δ y u ) up to order 30 (70). We then considered an off-shell Higgs probe of the charm Yukawa. In this case, we focused on the channel V V c j . First estimates of the HL-LHC and FCC-hh sensitivities, presented in Figure 7, indicate encouraging results and offer a useful starting point for more refined analyses at the LHC. Our first naive estimates indicate sensitivities on δ y c in the diboson channel, which could be realistically below order 1 at the HL-LHC, thus competitive and complementary to other charm Yukawa probes, and of the order of 20% at the FCC-hh. Interestingly, there is also the possibility to test the sign of the shift in the charm Yukawa.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The author thanks A. Falkowski, S. Ganguly, P. Gras, J. M. No, K. Tobioka, T. You, M. Son and E. Venturini for discussions and collaboration in the related studies [26,42], and in particular K. Tobioka for enligthing discussions on the possibility to test the charm Yukawa in the V V c j channel.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Aad, G.; Abajyan, T.; Abbott, B.; Abdallah, J.; Khalek, S.A.; Abdelalim, A.A.; Abdinov, O.; Aben, R.; Abi, B.; Abolins, M.; et al. Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC. Phys. Lett. B 2012, 716, 1–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. CMS Collaboration; Chatrchyan, S. Observation of a New Boson at a Mass of 125 GeV with the CMS Experiment at the LHC. Phys. Lett. B 2012, 716, 30–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Cepeda, M.; Gori, S.; Ilten, P.; Kado, M.; Riva, F.; Khalek, R.A.; Aboubrahim, A.; Alimena, J.; Alioli, S.; Alves, A.; et al. Report from Working Group 2: Higgs Physics at the HL-LHC and HE-LHC. CERN Yellow Rep. Monogr. 2019, 7, 221–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. The FCC Collaboration. FCC Physics Opportunities: Future Circular Collider Conceptual Design Report Volume 1. Eur. Phys. J. C 2019, 79, 474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Michael, B.; Alain, B.; Olivier, B.; Mar, C.G.; Francesco, C.; Johannes, G.; Patrick, J.; Miguel, J.J.; Volker, M.; Attilio, M.; et al. FCC-ee: The Lepton Collider: Future Circular Collider Conceptual Design Report Volume 2. Eur. Phys. J. ST 2019, 228, 261–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. FCC Collaboration. FCC-hh: The Hadron Collider: Future Circular Collider Conceptual Design Report Volume 3. Eur. Phys. J. ST 2019, 228, 755–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Behnke, T.; Brau, J.E.; Foster, B.; Fuster, J.; Harrison, M.; Paterson, J.M.; Peskin, M.; Stanitzki, M.; Walker, N.; Yamamoto, H. The International Linear Collider Technical Design Report—Volume 1: Executive Summary. arXiv 2013, arXiv:1306.6327. [Google Scholar]
  8. Stratakis, D.; Mokhov, N.; Palmer, M.; Pastrone, N.; Raubenheimer, T.; Rogers, C.; Schulte, D.; Shiltsev, V.; Tang, J.; Yamamoto, A.; et al. A Muon Collider Facility for Physics Discovery. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2203.08033. [Google Scholar]
  9. Aad, G.; Abbott, B.; Abbott, D.C.; Abud, A.A.; Abeling, K.; Abhayasinghe, D.K.; Abidi, S.H.; AbouZeid, O.S.; Abraham, N.L.; Abramowicz, H.; et al. Combined measurements of Higgs boson production and decay using up to 139 fb−1 of proton-proton collision data at s=13 TeV collected with the ATLAS experiment. Phys. Rev. D 2020, 101, 012002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. ATLAS Collaboration. Measurements of Higgs boson production cross-sections in the Hτ+τ decay channel in pp collisions at s=13TeV with the ATLAS detector. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2201.08269. [Google Scholar]
  11. ATLAS Collaboration. Measurement of the associated production of a Higgs boson decaying into b-quarks with a vector boson at high transverse momentum in pp collisions at s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector. Phys. Lett. B 2021, 816, 136204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. ATLAS Collaboration. Evidence for the associated production of the Higgs boson and a top quark pair with the ATLAS detector. Phys. Rev. D 2018, 97, 072003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. CMS Collaboration. Measurements of tt¯H Production and the CP Structure of the Yukawa Interaction between the Higgs Boson and Top Quark in the Diphoton Decay Channel. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2020, 125, 061801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. CMS Collaboration. Measurement of Higgs Boson Production and Decay to the ττ Final State. CMS-PAS-HIG-18-032. 2019. Available online: https://cds.cern.ch/record/2668685 (accessed on 7 June 2022).
  15. CMS Collaboration. Observation of Higgs boson decay to bottom quarks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2018, 121, 121801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. The ATLAS Collaboration. A search for the dimuon decay of the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector. Phys. Lett. B 2021, 812, 135980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sirunyan, A.M.; Tumasyan, A.; Adam, W.; Bergauer, T.; Dragicevic, M.; Erö, J.; Valle, A.E.D.; Frühwirth, R.; Jeitler, M.; Krammer, N.; et al. Evidence for Higgs boson decay to a pair of muons. J. High Energy Phys. 2021, 1, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Vignaroli, N. Searching for a dilaton decaying to muon pairs at the LHC. Phys. Rev. D 2009, 80, 095023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. CMS Collaboration. Combined Higgs Boson Production and Decay Measurements with up to 137 fb-1 of Proton-Proton Collision Data at s = 13 TeV. Tech. Rep. CMS-PAS-HIG-19-005. 2020. Available online: https://cds.cern.ch/record/2706103 (accessed on 7 June 2022).
  20. ATLAS Collaboration. A Combination of Measurements of Higgs Boson Production and Decay Using Up to 139 fb-1 of Proton–Proton Collision Data at s= 13 TeV Collected with the ATLAS Experiment . No. PUBDB-2020-05116. LHC/ATLAS Experiment. 2020. Available online: https://cds.cern.ch/record/2789544 (accessed on 7 June 2022).
  21. Kagan, A.L.; Perez, G.; Petriello, F.; Soreq, Y.; Stoynev, S.; Zupan, J. Exclusive Window onto Higgs Yukawa Couplings. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2015, 114, 101802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yu, F. Phenomenology of Enhanced Light Quark Yukawa Couplings and the W±h Charge Asymmetry. J. High Energy Phys. 2017, 2, 083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Alasfar, L.; Lopez, R.C.; Gröber, R. Probing Higgs couplings to light quarks via Higgs pair production. J. High Energy Phys. 2019, 11, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Soreq, Y.; Zhu, H.X.; Zupan, J. Light quark Yukawa couplings from Higgs kinematics. J. High Energy Phys. 2016, 12, 045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Henning, B.; Lombardo, D.; Riembau, M.; Riva, F. Measuring Higgs Couplings without Higgs Bosons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019, 123, 181801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Falkowski, A.; Ganguly, S.; Gras, P.; No, J.M.; Tobioka, K.; Vignaroli, N.; You, T. Light quark Yukawas in triboson final states. J. High Energy Phys. 2021, 4, 023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Agashe, K.; Contino, R.; Pomarol, A. The Minimal composite Higgs model. Nucl. Phys. B 2005, 719, 165–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Lee, B.W.; Quigg, C.; Thacker, H.B. Weak Interactions at Very High-Energies: The Role of the Higgs Boson Mass. Phys. Rev. D 1977, 16, 1519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. CMS Collaboration. Observation of the Production of Three Massive Gauge Bosons at s =13 TeV. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2020, 125, 151802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Alwall, J.; Frederix, R.; Frixione, S.; Hirschi, V.; Maltoni, F.; Mattelaer, O.; Shao, H.S.; Stelzer, T.; Torrielli, P.; Zaro, M. The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations. J. High Energy Phys. 2014, 7, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Dittmaier, S.; Huss, A.; Knippen, G. Next-to-leading-order QCD and electroweak corrections to WWW production at proton-proton colliders. J. High Energy Phys. 2017, 9, 034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Binoth, T.; Ossola, G.; Papadopoulos, C.G.; Pittau, R. NLO QCD corrections to tri-boson production. J. High Energy Phys. 2008, 6, 082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Degrande, C.; Duhr, C.; Fuks, B.; Grellscheid, D.; Mattelaer, O.; Reiter, T. UFO—The Universal FeynRules Output. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2012, 183, 1201–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Vignaroli, N. Effective Model for Modifications to Higgs Yukawa Couplings. Available online: https://feynrules.irmp.ucl.ac.be/wiki/YqHEFT (accessed on 7 June 2022).
  35. ATLAS Collaboration. Prospects for H→cc¯ Using Charm Tagging with the ATLAS Experiment at the HL-LHC. ATL-PHYS-PUB-2018-016. 2018. Available online: http://cds.cern.ch/record/2633635 (accessed on 7 June 2022).
  36. Han, T.; Nachman, B.; Wang, X. Charm-quark Yukawa Coupling in hcc¯γ at LHC. Phys. Lett. B 2019, 793, 90–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Carlson, B.; Han, T.; Leung, S.C.I. Higgs boson to charm quark decay in vector boson fusion plus a photon. Phys. Rev. D 2021, 104, 073006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Perez, G.; Soreq, Y.; Stamou, E.; Tobioka, K. Constraining the charm Yukawa and Higgs-quark coupling universality. Phys. Rev. D 2015, 92, 033016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Bodwin, G.T.; Petriello, F.; Stoynev, S.; Velasco, M. Higgs boson decays to quarkonia and the Hc¯c coupling. Phys. Rev. D 2013, 88, 053003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Brivio, I.; Goertz, F.; Isidori, G. Probing the Charm Quark Yukawa Coupling in Higgs+Charm Production. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2015, 115, 211801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Coyle, N.M.; Wagner, C.E.M.; Wei, V. Bounding the charm Yukawa coupling. Phys. Rev. D 2019, 100, 073013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Brooijmans, G.; Buckley, A.; Caron, S.; Falkowski, A.; Fuks, B.; Gilbert, A.; Murray, W.J.; Nardecchia, M.; No, J.M.; Torre, R.; et al. Les Houches 2019 Physics at TeV Colliders: New Physics Working Group Report. arXiv 2002, arXiv:2002.12220. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Measurements of Higgs Yukawa couplings confronted with the SM prediction. Plot extracted from the ATLAS study in Reference [9].
Figure 1. Measurements of Higgs Yukawa couplings confronted with the SM prediction. Plot extracted from the ATLAS study in Reference [9].
Symmetry 14 01183 g001
Figure 2. Feynman diagrams in the unitary gauge contributing to the triple electroweak gauge boson channel, q q ¯ V V V .
Figure 2. Feynman diagrams in the unitary gauge contributing to the triple electroweak gauge boson channel, q q ¯ V V V .
Symmetry 14 01183 g002
Figure 3. The Feynman diagram that gives, in the non-unitary gauge, the dominant contribution to the M ( q q ¯ G G G ) amplitude at high energies. By virtue of the equivalence theorem M ( q q ¯ G G G ) M ( q q ¯ V L V L V L ) at s m Z .
Figure 3. The Feynman diagram that gives, in the non-unitary gauge, the dominant contribution to the M ( q q ¯ G G G ) amplitude at high energies. By virtue of the equivalence theorem M ( q q ¯ G G G ) M ( q q ¯ V L V L V L ) at s m Z .
Symmetry 14 01183 g003
Figure 4. Differential distributions, normalized to unit area, for the W W W trilepton channel. Top-left: p T of the leading-lepton. Top-right: p T of the second-leading lepton. Bottom-left: E T miss . Bottom-right: the azimuthal separation Δ Φ ( ± , ± ) . The distributions for the pure BSM triboson signal are indicated by blue lines, those for the SM by yellow lines. Solid lines refer to the 14 TeV LHC, dashed ones to the 100 TeV FCC-hh.
Figure 4. Differential distributions, normalized to unit area, for the W W W trilepton channel. Top-left: p T of the leading-lepton. Top-right: p T of the second-leading lepton. Bottom-left: E T miss . Bottom-right: the azimuthal separation Δ Φ ( ± , ± ) . The distributions for the pure BSM triboson signal are indicated by blue lines, those for the SM by yellow lines. Solid lines refer to the 14 TeV LHC, dashed ones to the 100 TeV FCC-hh.
Symmetry 14 01183 g004
Figure 5. Main results from Reference [26]. HL-LHC (blue) and FCC-hh (red) projected 2 σ reach, for different triboson channels, on the new physics scale Λ (with Wilson coefficient C i ) at which the dimension-6 Yukawa operators in (5) are generated.
Figure 5. Main results from Reference [26]. HL-LHC (blue) and FCC-hh (red) projected 2 σ reach, for different triboson channels, on the new physics scale Λ (with Wilson coefficient C i ) at which the dimension-6 Yukawa operators in (5) are generated.
Symmetry 14 01183 g005
Figure 6. Leading Feynman diagram for the signal of modification to y c in the non-unitary gauge. The red dot denotes the effective coupling (Equation (14)).
Figure 6. Leading Feynman diagram for the signal of modification to y c in the non-unitary gauge. The red dot denotes the effective coupling (Equation (14)).
Symmetry 14 01183 g006
Figure 7. 1 σ (continuous curve) and 2 σ (dotted curve) HL-LHC (14 TeV, 2 × 3 ab 1 ) and FCC-hh (100 TeV, 30 ab 1 ) sensitivities on δ y c in the V V c j channel and semileptonic final state, as functions of an arbitrary amount of reducible background, calculated as a factor B of the irreducible background given by the SM signal (cfr. Equation (16)).
Figure 7. 1 σ (continuous curve) and 2 σ (dotted curve) HL-LHC (14 TeV, 2 × 3 ab 1 ) and FCC-hh (100 TeV, 30 ab 1 ) sensitivities on δ y c in the V V c j channel and semileptonic final state, as functions of an arbitrary amount of reducible background, calculated as a factor B of the irreducible background given by the SM signal (cfr. Equation (16)).
Symmetry 14 01183 g007
Table 1. Cross-section values at the s = 14 TeV LHC (upper table), and at the s = 100 TeV FCC-hh (lower table) for different triboson production channels in the SM (computed at NLO in QCD) and for the BSM signals induced by the dimension-6 operators in Equation (5), with  Y d = 1 ( Y d = 0 ), Y u = 1 ( Y u = 0 ) and Y s = 1 ( Y s = 0 ), respectively.
Table 1. Cross-section values at the s = 14 TeV LHC (upper table), and at the s = 100 TeV FCC-hh (lower table) for different triboson production channels in the SM (computed at NLO in QCD) and for the BSM signals induced by the dimension-6 operators in Equation (5), with  Y d = 1 ( Y d = 0 ), Y u = 1 ( Y u = 0 ) and Y s = 1 ( Y s = 0 ), respectively.
HL-LHCSMBSM ( Y d = 1 )BSM ( Y u = 1 )BSM ( Y s = 1 )
W + W W + 152 fb3.6 pb3.6 pb110 fb
W + W W 87 fb1.5 pb1.5 pb110 fb
Z Z W + 40 fb1.0 pb1.0 pb31 fb
Z Z W 23 fb0.43 pb0.43 pb31 fb
Z W + W 191 fb1.5 pb2.4 pb120 fb
Z Z Z 16 fb0.99 pb1.7 pb66 fb
FCC-hhSMBSM ( Y d = 1 )BSM ( Y u = 1 )BSM ( Y s = 1 )
W + W W + 2.35 pb290 pb290 pb16 pb
W + W W 1.76 pb140 pb140 pb16 pb
Z Z W + 756 fb74 pb74 pb4.4 pb
Z Z W 579 fb36 pb36 pb4.4 pb
Z W + W 3.93 pb94 pb150 pb12 pb
Z Z Z 231 fb110 pb180 pb11 pb
Table 2. HL-LHC (FCC-hh) 2 σ sensitivities on δ y q for the different sub-channels analyzed in [26].
Table 2. HL-LHC (FCC-hh) 2 σ sensitivities on δ y q for the different sub-channels analyzed in [26].
WWW ZZZ
± ± + 2 ν + 2 j ± ± + 3 ν Comb. 4 + 2 ν 4 + 2 j Comb.
δ y d 430 (36)840 (54)420 (34)1500 (65)1300 (93)1100 (60)
δ y u 850 (71)1700 (110)830 (68)2300 (100)1800 (140)1600 (92)
δ y s 150 (13)230 (33)140 (13)300 (12)290 (16)250 (11)
Table 3. Values of different V V c j cross sections for s = 14 TeV LHC (upper table) and s = 100 TeV FCC-hh (lower table) for the SM and with the addition of the dimension-6 operator from Equation (14), with Y c = 1 . We show the cross section for the interference term and the purely BSM quadratic term. Calculations are at LO in QCD, and a minimum requirement p T ( j ) , ( c ) > 20 GeV is applied.
Table 3. Values of different V V c j cross sections for s = 14 TeV LHC (upper table) and s = 100 TeV FCC-hh (lower table) for the SM and with the addition of the dimension-6 operator from Equation (14), with Y c = 1 . We show the cross section for the interference term and the purely BSM quadratic term. Calculations are at LO in QCD, and a minimum requirement p T ( j ) , ( c ) > 20 GeV is applied.
HL-LHCSM ( Y c = 0 )INT ( Y c = 1 )BSM ( Y c = 1 )
W + W c j 2.3 pb0.58 pb63 pb
W + Z c j 0.86 pb0.17 pb17 pb
W Z c j 0.79 pb0.09 pb9.1 pb
Z Z c j 0.19 pb0.14 pb15 pb
W + W + c j 29 fb0.42 fb94 fb
W W c j 23 fb0.31 fb90 fb
FCC-hhSM ( Y c = 0 )INT ( Y c = 1 )BSM ( Y c = 1 )
W + W c j 92 pb6.4 pb660 pb
W + Z c j 36 pb1.8 pb190 pb
W Z c j 35 pb1.3 pb130 pb
Z Z c j 6.8 pb1.6 pb180 pb
W + W + c j 0.76 pb2.8 fb3.0 pb
W W c j 0.68 pb3.2 fb3.0 pb
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vignaroli, N. Off-Shell Probes of the Higgs Yukawa Couplings: Light Quarks and Charm. Symmetry 2022, 14, 1183. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14061183

AMA Style

Vignaroli N. Off-Shell Probes of the Higgs Yukawa Couplings: Light Quarks and Charm. Symmetry. 2022; 14(6):1183. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14061183

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vignaroli, Natascia. 2022. "Off-Shell Probes of the Higgs Yukawa Couplings: Light Quarks and Charm" Symmetry 14, no. 6: 1183. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14061183

APA Style

Vignaroli, N. (2022). Off-Shell Probes of the Higgs Yukawa Couplings: Light Quarks and Charm. Symmetry, 14(6), 1183. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14061183

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop