Next Article in Journal
Thermo-Structural Evolution of the Val Malenco (Italy) Peridotite: A Petrological, Geochemical and Microstructural Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Mineralogical and Crystal-Chemical Constraints on the Glauconite-Forming Process in Neogene Sediments of the Lower Guadalquivir Basin (SW Spain)
Previous Article in Journal
Rüdlingerite, Mn2+2V5+As5+O7·2H2O, a New Species Isostructural with Fianelite
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Minerals
Volume 10
Issue 11
10.3390/min10110961
minerals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Thermal Evolution of Natural Layered Double Hydroxides: Insight from Quintinite, Hydrotalcite, Stichtite, and Iowaite as Reference Samples for CO3- and Cl-Members of the Hydrotalcite Supergroup

by
Elena S. Zhitova
1,2,*,
H. Chris Greenwell
3,
Mariya G. Krzhizhanovskaya
2,
David C. Apperley
4,
Igor V. Pekov
5 and
Victor N. Yakovenchuk
6
1
Institute of Volcanology and Seismology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Bulvar Piypa 9, 683006 Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, Russia
2
Department of Crystallography, St. Petersburg State University, Universitetskaya nab. 7/9, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia
3
Department of Earth Sciences, Durham University, Durham DH1 3LE, UK
4
Department of Chemistry, Durham University, Durham DH1 3LE, UK
5
Faculty of Geology, Moscow State University, Vorobievy Gory, 119991 Moscow, Russia
6
Kola Science Centre, Russian Academy of Sciences, Fersman Street 14, 184209 Apatity, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2020, 10(11), 961; https://doi.org/10.3390/min10110961
Submission received: 28 September 2020 / Revised: 21 October 2020 / Accepted: 27 October 2020 / Published: 28 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Structure and Crystallochemistry of Clay Minerals)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In Situ high-temperature powder X-ray diffraction experiments were undertaken for the coarse crystalline natural layered double hydroxides (LDHs) quintinite, hydrotalcite, stichtite, and iowaite in the temperature range 25–1000 °C, with thermal analyses of these minerals and their annealed forms carried out in parallel. In the temperature range from 25 °C to 170–210 °C quintinite, hydrotalcite, and stichtite (carbonate members of the LDH family) demonstrated contraction of the basal d00n-value of 0.1–0.3 Å, followed by a sharp contraction of 1.0–1.1 Å at T > 170–210 °C. The high-temperature modified states were stable up to 380–420 °C, before decomposing to an amorphous phase. Iowaite (chloride member of the family) was stable up to 320 °C and transformed to an amorphous phase at higher temperature. Iowaite experiences continuous contraction of the d00n-value of up to 0.5 Å in the temperature range 25–200 °C, reaching a plateau at a temperature range of 200–320 °C. Assessing the reversibility of thermal transformation shows complete reconstruction of the crystal structure of the hydrotalcite and iowaite heated to 300 °C. Solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance analysis shows that some Al changes coordination from 6- to 4-fold, synchronously with quintinite transformation to the amorphous phase. All phases transform to periclase and a spinel-type compound upon further heating. Thermal analysis of samples annealed at 125 °C shows that carbonate members do not have a tendency to form dehydrated phases, whereas for iowaite, a dehydrated phase having 0.9 apfu lesser water content as in the initial sample has been obtained. Thermal evolution of LDHs is found to depend on the nature of the interaction of interlayer species and water molecules to H atoms of the metal-hydroxide layer.

1. Introduction

Hydrotalcite-supergroup minerals are natural representatives of the layered double hydroxide (LDH) family, and considered analogues of the much more diverse, industrially applied, synthetic LDH materials. Critically, natural LDHs form relatively large, in some cases well-shaped crystals (Figure 1), from which single-crystal platelet may be extracted, when compared to the generally fine-grained, polycrystalline, low-order, synthetic LDH materials. Crystal structures of both natural and synthetic LDHs are built of positively charged edge-sharing octahedral (brucite- or gibbsite-type) layers, alternating with interlayer spaces occupied by anions and water molecules [1,2].
In this paper, we provide new data only for LDHs with brucite-type layers (i.e., those composed of di- and trivalent cations), with a generalized chemical formula expressed as [M2+1−xM3+x(OH)2]x+[An−]x/n·mH2O, where M2+:M3+ = divalent/trivalent metal cation ratio and A = interlayer anion; where x is generally in the range 0.2–0.33. Currently, the hydrotalcite supergroup contains more than 40 representatives, divided into 8 groups by the M2+:M3+ ratio and the nature of interlayer anion [3]. Here, we provide new data for members of the hydrotalcite and quintinite groups (subdivisions of the hydrotalcite supergroup), among the most commonly formed in nature.
The high-temperature behavior of LDHs is actively studied because of their commercial application as catalysts or catalyst supports [4], flame retardant materials [5,6] or for CO2 capture during regeneration after heat-treating [7]. Importantly, industrially relevant highly basic mixed-metal oxides (MMOs) are obtained by thermal treatment (calcination) of LDHs [8], and these MMOs have a so-called “memory effect”, transforming back to the parent LDH structure upon rehydration in an aqueous solution of the original anion, typically carbonate. The memory effect also underpins the potential application of calcined LDHs for sorption of different anions, including toxic and hazardous species, where the initially prepared carbonate LDH is difficult to anion exchange and thermolysis is required to generate the sorbent [9,10,11,12,13]. Though critical in applications of LDHs and regeneration of MMOs, it has proven difficult to obtain detailed mechanistic insight into thermal transformation of synthetic LDHs owing to the small crystal size (typically < 500 nm) and high defect content.
The thermal behavior of the Mg-Al-CO3 LDH series with different Mg:Al ratios has been long studied and, in general, is considered to be a reference system for LDH materials. Synthetic Mg-Al-CO3 samples have been studied by mass spectrometry, thermal analysis and powder X-ray diffraction, inter alia. The results from such studies agree in their identification of the following evolution steps: dehydration → dehydroxylation → decarbonation, with transformation to a high-temperature “collapsed” phase at about 400 °C, followed by amorphization and decomposition to periclase and spinel-type material at higher temperature [14,15,16,17].
It is noteworthy that the crystal structures of the high-temperature “collapsed” modification of carbonate LDHs has been the subject of numerous research studies, both in terms of atomic arrangement and possible interpolytype transitions [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. Regarding the atomic arrangement, the main widespread idea is that in the high-temperature “collapsed” modification, the carbonate group is grafted to the metal-hydroxide layer [26,27,28,29].
Despite the fact that the thermal behavior of synthetic LDHs is of wide interest and the subject of ongoing studies, the thermal behavior of natural (well-crystallized, commonly coarse crystalline and stable in geological time compounds) has scarcely been characterized. Thus, it is still not clear whether natural samples behave on heating in a way that is identical to their synthetic counterparts, despite their compositional similarity, and at the same time display chemistry owing to different impurities observed in natural LDHs. The high degree of structural perfection of natural LDHs provides a unique opportunity to study LDH decomposition, owing to no comparably highly ordered synthetic LDH ever having been prepared. In particular, how the difference in the bonding between (CO3)2− and Cl−-dominant hydrotalcite-supergroup minerals affects their thermal evolution is a question we seek to address. Furthermore, the role of interlayer water and its impact on dehydration of LDHs with different anions is also not completely understood [30].
The aim of the present paper is to provide systematic data for thermal decomposition of samples of four minerals: hydrotalcite, quintinite, stichtite, and iowaite, studied under the same conditions. These data will shed light on the influence of cation, anion and M2+:M3+ ratio on the thermal behavior of LDH minerals and synthetic materials.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

During the present study, we investigated the high-temperature behavior of four hydrotalcite-supergroup minerals: quinitnite, hydrotalcite, Fe3+-rich stichtite and Cr3+-rich iowaite. These samples, including their chemical compositions and crystal structures including polytype identification, have been characterized previously (Table 1). All these minerals are representative for three structural groups of LDHs: carbonate with M2+:M3+ = 2:1 (quintinite); carbonate with M2+:M3+ = 3:1 (hydrotalcite and stichtite) and chloride with M2+:M3+ = 3:1 (iowaite). The specimens of quintinite and hydrotalcite represent coarse lamellar aggregates while stichtite and iowaite occur as fine-scale masses (Figure 1). Monomineral samples were extracted from the specimens using tweezers and binocular microscope. The extracted samples were further ground with a mortar and pestle (one after another) to yield a powder for analysis.
To study the reversibility of the dehydration behavior, the samples of quintinite, hydrotalcite and iowaite were annealed in an oven at 125 °C for 2 h (30 min heating to 125 °C, 1-hour annealing at 125 °C and 30 min cooling), samples are further denoted as quint125, htc125, and iow125, respectively. After the annealing, these samples were left under atmospheric humidity conditions for a month and then studied by thermal analysis.

2.2. Methods

2.2.1. High-Temperature Powder X-ray Diffraction

In situ high-temperature powder X-ray diffraction (HTXRD) experiments were undertaken for quintinite, hydrotalcite, stichtite, and iowaite in air using a Rigaku Ultima IV powder X-ray diffractometer (CoKα1+2 radiation, 40 kV/30 mA, Bragg-Brentano geometry, PSD D-Tex Ultra) with a Rigaku HT 1500 high-temperature attachment, heating up to 1000 °C. The samples were grinded to fine powder using agate mortar. A thin powder sample was deposited on a Pt sample holder (20 mm × 12 mm × 2 mm) from a heptane suspension. The temperature step and the average heating rate were 20 °C and 2/3 °/min, respectively, and the collecting time at each temperature step was about 20 min. Two representative powder diffraction patterns at increasing temperature are given in Figure 2a,d.
The second heating cycle of untreated natural hydrotalcite was performed using the same instrument and conditions as detailed above, and using the following strategy: heating to 300 °C with a 20 °C step, cooling to room temperature (RT) and re-recording the powder pattern (Figure 2b,c). The second heating cycle of untreated natural iowaite was studied by HTXRD from RT to 300 °C with a 20 °C step size, followed by cooling from 300 °C to RT with a 20 °C step (Figure 2e,f).

2.2.2. Thermal Analysis

Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and thermogravimetric (TG) analysis were undertaken for all four minerals, ground to powder prior to analysis, using a DSC/TG Netzsch STA 449 F3 instrument in the temperature range 30–1000 °C at a ramp rate of 10 °C min–1, heating the samples under Ar atmosphere with a gas flow of 20 mL/min. Another set of measurements was carried out for samples quint125, htc125, and iow125 that were annealed in an oven (see Section 2.1. Materials).
For thermal analysis interpretation we will need to distinguish the following types of water: (i) sorbed = absorbed/adsorbed to external surfaces of the LDH crystals and thus released at relatively low temperature (but without distinct thermal effects, which makes it difficult to separate it from water of the next type); (ii) structurally required and tightly bonded interlayer water (i.e., (H2O)0 molecules) that is lost in a distinct dehydration step; (iii) hydroxyl (OH)− groups that form strong hydrogen bond with O atoms from the metal-hydroxide layer (i.e., form M(OH)6, M-cation) that are released at dehydroxylation step.

2.2.3. Solid-State Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) at Increasing Temperature

Non-spinning aluminum (Al27) spectra, as a function of temperature, were recorded for quintinite using a Bruker Avance III HD spectrometer in the Department of Chemistry, Durham University. The operating frequency of NMR spectrometer was 104.27 MHz for 27Al (or 400.17 MHz for 1H). A sequence of spectra was collected at 100, 150, 200, 250, 300 and 340 °C. Each spectrum took just over 3 min to record.

3. Results

3.1. High-Temperature Powder X-ray Diffraction

The analysis of the powder X-ray diffraction patterns with increasing temperature indicates that the three carbonate LDH minerals have more or less similar behavior, and this differs for the chloride containing iowaite. Here, we first compare and discuss the carbonate LDH minerals, followed by the chloride.

3.1.1. Carbonate Members: Quintinite, Hydrotalcite, and Stichtite

In the temperature range from 25 to ~200 °C quintinite, hydrotalcite, and stichtite all experience contraction of the d00n-value (the distance between two adjacent metal-hydroxide layers) of 0.1–0.3 Å, i.e., from 7.6 Å for quintinite and 7.8 Å for hydrotalcite and stichtite [34] to 7.5 Å. Then, a sharp contraction of d00n-value occurs of 0.9 Å (at T = 210 °C) for quintinite; 1.0 Å (at T = 190 °C) for hydrotalcite and 1.1 Å (at T = 170 °C) for stichtite (Figure 3). These high-temperature (HT) “collapsed” modifications remain stable up to 420, 400 and 380 °C for quintinite, hydrotalcite, and stichtite, respectively. It can be seen from Figure 2a that HT modifications are characterized by reduction in the intensity of reflections, especially for non-basal reflections that indicate decrease of crystallinity (i.e., decrease of ordering in atomic arrangement). It is of interest that the behavior of HT modifications in the temperature range ~200–400 °C are different: the d00n-value continues to reduce for hydrotalcite and stichtite, whereas for quintinite, above 300 °C, it increases (Figure 3a). This may indicate that in the case of quintinite (with M2+:M3+ ≈ 2), the HT modification has stabilized (at T ~300 °C) and the material then undergoes expansion of the basal values. However, in the crystal structures of hydrotalcite and stichtite (both with M2+:M3+ ≈ 3) it seems the rearrangement of interlayer atoms occurs until the breakdown of HT modifications, demonstrated by a strong and continuous contraction of their d00n-values.
At temperature above 380–420 °C amorphization of hydrotalcite-supergroup members occurs. Reflections of periclase appear almost simultaneously with amorphization. Gradually, with increasing temperature, several regions with an increased background appear which transform to reflections of spinel-type compounds with increasing temperature (spinel, magnesioferrite, or magnesiochromite depending on starting composition).
In general, the overall decomposition reaction can be described in full as the following (using the example of quintinite):
Mg4Al2(OH)12CO3(H2O)3 → 3MgO + MgAl2O4 + 9H2O + CO2
                    quintinite                        periclase      spinel        water  carbon dioxide
However, the decomposition process occurs by stages (Figure 4): (i) the studied LDH mineral transforms to an amorphous phase; (ii) reflections corresponding to periclase-type phase appear almost instantly after amorphization and then increase intensity, indicating in situ crystallization, the amorphous phase (reflected by broad humps at diffraction pattern) is still present; (iii) spinel-type phase crystallizes (space group Fd3m) at increasing temperature in situ and, seemingly, over a longer time (and thus more energy) than in the case of periclase.

3.1.2. Chlorine Member: Iowaite

The behavior of iowaite (chloride member) with increasing temperature is strikingly different from that observed for the carbonate members, because it did not show a sudden contraction of the d00n-value and did not transform to yield a HT “collapsed” modification. Iowaite was stable up to 320 °C and experienced continuous contraction of the d00n-value from 8.0 [33,35] to 7.5 Å in the temperature range 25–200 °C, before reaching a plateau in the temperature range 200–320 °C.
Amorphization of iowaite occurred above 320 °C and the decomposition products appeared identical to that of the carbonate members: first, reflections corresponding to periclase appeared and, later, reflections from a spinel-type compound (magnesioferrite) were found.

3.1.3. Reversibility Check

Study of the powder X-ray diffraction patterns of hydrotalcite and iowaite heated to 300 °C and then cooled to RT indicated complete reversibility of structural changes in both cases (Figure 2c,d). The evolution of d00n-value with temperature obtained for iowaite heated to 300 °C and cooled step-by-step back to RT is shown in Figure 3b.

3.2. Thermal Analysis

According to thermal analysis data, the carbonate members shared similar decomposition features, whereas the chloride containing iowaite behaved differently, in agreement with observed differences evident in the powder X-ray diffraction analysis.

3.2.1. Carbonate Members: Quintinite, Hydrotalcite, and Stichtite

The carbonate members experienced two major events that are both endothermal in the range 25–600 °C, followed by mass losses at T (mass loss): 234 °C (14.34%) and 449 °C (29.68%) for quintinite; 202 °C (14.55%) and 425 °C (34.04%) for hydrotalcite; 214 °C (14.36%) and 371 °C (30.01%) for stichtite (Figure 5a–d). The first mass loss corresponds to the loss of interlayer (molecular) water-dehydration step (Table 2). The second mass loss corresponds to a total loss of ~42–46% (Table 2) implying that only metal oxides remained thereafter, with a complete absence of any volatile constituent. The region 600–1200 °C has not been studied in detail, within this present study, but the thermal effects that occur ~1000 °C probably indicate formation of spinel-type phase (in agreement with powder diffraction data). The detailed interpretation of these results, as well as discussion of the exothermic events, is given in Section 4.4.

3.2.2. Chlorine Member: Iowaite

Iowaite has two endothermal effects followed by mass losses: (i) at T = 140 °C with a mass loss of 10.08% and (ii) at T = 371 °C with a mass loss of 30.01%. It is worth noting that the first mass loss is lesser than in any carbonate LDH studied here, pointing to the fact that Cl-dominant LDHs contain lesser water molecules in comparison to carbonate members.

3.2.3. Annealed Samples

The thermal analysis of quint125, htc125, and iow125 show that DSC and TG curves of quint125 and htc125 are similar to that of untreated samples of quintinite and hydrotalcite, while iow125 has some differences when compared to untreated iowaite (Figure 5e,f).
For the annealed form of quintinite, quin125, the first mass thermal effect is found at 223 °C with corresponding mass loss of 13.47%. The second thermal effect occurs at 443 °C with a mass loss of 28.73%.
For hydrotalcite and its annealed form (htc125) the temperatures are identical (202 °C) for the first effect and nearly identical (425 and 428 °C) for the second effect (Figure 5e). The main difference between untreated and annealed sample refers to the first mass loss that is 14.34% for hydrotalcite and 12.84% for its annealed form (htc125). The values 13.47% and 12.84% are anyway slightly higher than expected from the chemical composition of quintinite and hydrotalcite if we assume that only dehydration takes place (Table 2).
For iowaite and its annealed form (iow125), the thermal events (Figure 5f) of the latter are shifted to lower temperatures, i.e., the first effect occurs at 130 °C for annealed iowaite (instead of 140 °C as in the untreated sample), the second effect is found at 347 °C (instead of 371 °C as in the untreated sample). For iowaite, the first mass loss is 10.08%, which according to a calculation corresponds to 3.6 apfu of (H2O)0 (interlayer water). In the annealed iowaite the first mass loss is 7.46%, which corresponds to 2.7 apfu of (H2O)0 implying the loss of 0.9 apfu of (H2O)0 after annealing. It may be concluded that in the case of iowaite, the dehydrated modification has been obtained that differs in thermal behavior from the untreated material.

3.3. Solid-State Nuclear Magnetic Resonance at Increasing Temperature

According to solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance, the Al maintains 6-fold coordination until the temperature of 300 °C when a portion of Al converts to 4-fold coordination [36]. The proportion of tetrahedrally coordinated Al increases at 340 °C, but remains in a lower quantity relative to the 6-coordinate Al. The temperature at which changes in Al coordination state occurs (Figure 6), coincides (taking into account some difference in the heating rate) with quintinite transformation to an amorphous phase.

4. Discussion

4.1. The Influence of Cation Identity and Cation Ratio: M2+:M3+ = 2:1 and 3:1 on Thermal Behavior

In this work we have studied LDH carbonate species, which differ in their M2+:M3+ ratio, with 2:1 and 3:1, and different cation composition (Mg-Al and Mg-Cr) samples, with natural impurities. The temperature of LDH decomposition and transformation to an amorphous phase appeared to be similar for quintinite (Mg2Al), hydrotalcite (Mg3Al) and stichtite (Mg3Cr) and equal to 420, 400 and 380 °C, respectively. Therefore, there is indeed some tendency that lower M2+:M3+ ratios have higher thermal stability (for the example of quintinite and hydrotalcite) as suggested previously [15]; however this difference in decomposition temperature may be overlapped by the effect of cation composition of the octahedral layer (for the example of hydrotalcite and stichtite).
The trend in the evolution of the d00n-value is very similar for all carbonate LDH species investigated: for quintinite, hydrotalcite, and stichtite (Figure 3a), the main difference between them is that the d00n-value contracts by 0.1 Å for quintinite, whereas for 3:1 M2+:M3+ ratio members (hydrotalcite and stichtite) the contraction is 0.3 Å. However, the high-temperature “collapsed” modifications of 2:1 and 3:1 M2+:M3+ ratio members behave differently. The high-temperature “collapsed” modification of quintinite starts with a d00n-value = 6.55 Å (at 220 °C). This value contracts to 6.45 Å (at 300 °C) and then undergoes expansion, reaching a value of 6.68 Å (at 420 °C), just before decomposition. In contrast, the high-temperature “collapsed” modification of hydrotalcite and stichtite experience a continuous contraction of d00n-value from 6.56 Å (at 200 °C) and 6.44 Å (at 180 °C) to 5.5 Å just before decomposition. As noted above, it may indicate that the high-temperature “collapsed” modification of quintinite is stabilized in comparison to that of hydrotalcite and stichtite.

4.2. The Influence of Interlayer Species on High-Temperature Behavior

The main difference in the high-temperature evolution of the studied minerals can be attributed to the nature of the interlayer species, since the behavior of the Cl-dominant member (iowaite) appeared to be significantly different from the CO3-members (quintinite, hydrotalcite, and stichtite).
The HT behavior of the carbonate LDH minerals can be divided into the following stages:
  • From 25 to 170–210 °C dehydration (the loss of interlayer water) is accompanied by contraction of the d00n-value to ~7.5 Å with the main stage of dehydration appearing in the range from 100 to 170–210 °C, in accord with thermal analysis (Figure 5) and the d00n-value evolution (Figure 3).
  • From 200 to 380–420 °C dehydroxylation and decarbonization (the loss of OH groups associating with metal-hydroxide layer and interlayer carbonate) starting with a sharp contraction of d00n-value to 6.3–6.5 Å, i.e., formation of a high-temperature “collapsed” modification. The structural changes are reversible at least up to 300 °C. The partial change of Al coordination is recorded from 300 °C, indicating that some decomposition or irreversible transformation of the LDH has started. The amount of tetrahedrally coordinated Al increases with temperature, but remains minor relative to octahedrally coordinated Al.
  • >~400 °C amorphization of quintinite, hydrotalcite, and stichtite. The reflections of periclase-type phase appear almost simultaneously with amorphization, whereas reflections of spinel-type phase appear at higher temperature.
The HT behavior of iowaite can be divided to the following stages:
  • 25–200 °C dehydration (the loss of interlayer water) accompanied by the contraction of the d00n-value from 8.0 to 7.5 Å.
  • 200–320 °C thermal behavior of high-temperature dehydrated modification without changes in d00n-value which remains at 7.5 Å. The dehydroxylation and dechlorination (the loss of OH groups associating with metal-hydroxide layer and interlayer Cl) precedes the mineral decomposition. The structural changes related to dehydration are reversible, at least up to 300 °C.
  • >~320 °C amorphization of iowaite. The reflections of periclase-type phase appear almost simultaneously with amorphization, whereas reflections of spinel-type phase appear at higher temperature.
From the above we can conclude that for natural LDHs: (i) the carbonate members have higher thermal stability than the Cl-member and, (ii) for carbonate samples the loss of interlayer water leads to abrupt structural changes to a high-temperature “collapsed” modification, which is not characteristic for Cl-members. For better understanding of the reason carbonate LDH members transform to high-temperature “collapsed” modifications [26,27,28,29], whereas chloride members do not, it is necessary to consider aspects of the crystal structure. Recently natural LDH members with carbonate: quintinite [31], hydrotalcite [32] and with chloride: chlormagaluminite [37] and dritsite [38] have been subjected to single-crystal X-ray diffraction study that allowed determination of fine structural detail (a summary is given in Figure 7). For easier interpretation of the crystal structure, it is convenient to consider the 3D atom arrangement as consisting of trigonal prisms, comprising the H atoms of an upper and lower metal-hydroxide layer (in accord with the approach of Bookin and Drits [39]).
In the crystal structures of the carbonate members, the C atom is located in the center of the trigonal prism, whereas its O atoms are arrange around the prism edge, together with water molecules (Figure 7a,c). It is important to note that it is not possible to distinguish between the O atoms of CO3 groups and the O atoms of H2O molecules since they are disordered and appear in the structure refinement as continuous tors of electron density. In terms of bond arrangement, the CO3 group forms bonds laterally within the xy plane, while O atoms of H2O are connected by bonds aligned almost parallel to the z axes (Figure 7c).
In the crystal structures of the chloride members, the Cl anions are disordered around the prism center, whereas H2O molecules are disordered around the prism edge (Figure 7b,d). There are no lateral bonds in the xy plane for interlayer atoms, since both Cl anion and H2O are connected exclusively with the upper and lower H atoms of metal-hydroxide layers owing to their geometry. For all studied minerals, the interlayer atoms are characterized by low occupancies and statistic disorder (i.e., Figure 7 shows atomic sites which are occupied in accord with chemical formula: 1 carbonate group or 2 chlorine anions per 6 (quintinite) or 8 (hydrotalcite, stichtite, and iowaite) atoms and 1 water molecule per 2 cations (for all species)).
The bond-valence structures [40] of the interlayer species: (CO3)2−, Cl−, and H2O are represented in Figure 8. Bond valence is calculated as the formal charge of the central atom divided by the number of bonds, i.e., for carbonate group 4+/3 = 1.33 valence units (v.u.) between C and O atoms, the remaining value (2 v.u. typical for O atom minus 1.33 v.u.) is 0.67 v.u. and it is divided for bonding with both the upper and lower layer of the LDH as 0.33 v.u. (Figure 8). Regarding the octahedral layer, there is one type of OH group in quinitinite (since all OH groups are coordinated by 2Mg and 1Al as the Mg:Al = 2:1) where each H atoms bears 0.17 v.u. (the value is achieved by the charge on the sheet divided by the number of bonds emanating from the sheet, i.e., as 2/12). In hydrotalcite, stichtite, and iowaite (M2+:M3+ = 3:1) there are two types of OH groups: i) coordinated by 2M2+ and 1M3+ bearing 0.17 v.u. and (ii) coordinated by 3M2+ which do not bear extra valence units for bonding with interlayer (as in brucite). The bond valence of the carbonate group, chloride anion, and water molecule are 0.33, 0.17, and 0.17 v.u., respectively (Figure 8). Thus, for all studied minerals with both M2+:M3+ = 2:1 and 3:1 the bond-valence matching principle is satisfied between H atoms of the octahedral layer (0.17 v.u.) and interlayer Cl− anions (0.17 v.u.). For carbonate group we can assume that the hydrogen bonding between O atoms of (CO3)2− and H atoms of H2O molecules occurs (i.e., hydrogen bonding within interlayer similar to nickelalumite [41]). The in-plane bonding between carbonate and water molecule is demonstrated by the presence of broad band ~3200 cm−1 at the infrared spectra of carbonate LDHs, assigned to the CO32−−H2O bridging mode [42].
Thus, the H2O molecule would be critical in maintaining bonding for carbonate LDHs. Then, the loss of H2O molecules (in the process of dehydration) will lead to the need for compensation for (i) under bonded H atoms of the metal-hydroxide layer (since their bonding depends on both metal-hydroxide layer and interlayer as two essential components) and, (ii) increasingly bonded CO3 groups, both potentially leading to complete reconstruction of the CO3 bonding with the formation of the metastable high-temperature “collapsed” modification. In the case of the Cl-members, interlayer Cl− anions and H2O molecules occupy distinct positions with each of them forming bonding to the metal-hydroxide layer (Figure 7).
For LDHs with interlayer Cl anions, the continuous loss of H2O molecules is compensated (in terms of bonding) by shortening of the distance between donor (Cl) and acceptor (H) atoms (Figure 3). It is worth noting that for iowaite, the d00n-value achieves plateau at 7.5 Å in the temperature range of 200–320 °C (the obtained d00n-value is higher than the calculated by variable-cell first principles molecular dynamics for dehydrated Mg3Al-Cl-LDH which was estimated as ~7.2 Å [43]). The temperature range 200–320 °C probably corresponds to the thermal behavior of a dehydrated modification of iowaite. Thus, dehydration of Cl-LDH does not trigger any principal rearrangement (and re-bonding) of the interlayer ion which is determined by anion geometry and its bonding scheme.
From the above discussion, it can be concluded that in the case of the carbonate LDH, dehydration destabilizes the carbonate group and leads to structural changes realized by formation of a high-temperature “collapsed” modification. Under a similar treatment, the dehydration of chloride members allows bond-strength compensation by shrinkage in the d00n-value, though without significant structural changes. If the argument presented above is correct, then it would be possible to check it by annealing the CO3- and Cl-members at temperature below 200 °C and then see whether they have a tendency to form dehydrated modifications (as has been done in this work).
The thermal analyses of annealed Cl-member: iowaite (iow125) showed 2.5 wt.% lesser H2O content, which is equal to the loss of 0.9 apfu of H2O in comparison to the untreated sample. The thermal analyses of annealed carbonate members: quintinite (quint125) and hydrotalcite (htc125) resulted in almost identical water loss as in the untreated sample, with only a small difference in the amount of sorbed water.
From the above, it can be concluded that the thermal behavior and transformation of LDHs depends on the nature of the interactions between the interlayer species and water molecules with the H atoms of the metal-hydroxide layer. In the LDHs where lateral (in xy plane) bonding between the anion and H2O molecules may occur (for example, CO3-members), the formation of the dehydrated modification will lead to principal structural changes, with atoms re-bonding or even material decomposition if such re-bonding is not possible. For the species where lateral bonding of interlayer ion and H2O molecule is disrupted or not possible (for example, Cl-members), the satisfaction of layer-interlayer bond strengths as a result of dehydration is simply achieved by contraction of the d00n-value without any considerable re-bonding.

4.3. Comparison of Synthetic and Natural Samples

4.3.1. Quintinite and Hydrotalcite: Mg-Al-CO3 Series

The thermal stability of natural samples of quintinite from Snarum (Norway) and synthetic analogues of quintinite and hydrotalcite have been studied in detail [44]. Data on the high-temperature behavior of quintinites from the Kovdor complex (Kola peninsula, Russia) are available from [45]. These data are compared to those obtained in this present work in Table 3. The comparison shows that the temperature of thermal effects is more or less similar for natural and synthetic quintinites, with the strongest deviation being for the 2nd thermal event found for the synthetic sample (420 °C) in comparison to the natural form (447–463 °C). For hydrotalcite, the most notable difference is that between the 1st thermal event in natural (202 °C) and synthetic samples (235 °C), whereas the temperature of the second event is in better agreement (Table 3). However, the variation in the water content for different samples of both quintinite and hydrotalcite is within 2.5%.

4.3.2. Stichtite

The first and only HT study of natural stichtite (from Nausahi ultramafites, Orissa, India) has been performed [46] by ex situ annealing of the mineral and identification of its decomposition products, which revealed that stichtite decomposes to a mixture of magnesiochromite (spinel-subgroup mineral) and periclase in samples subjected to annealing at temperature of 600–650 °C or 760–820 °C for an hour and subsequently cooled. It was concluded that stichtite undergoes dehydration and decarbonation according to the following reaction at 600–650 °C:
Mg6Cr2CO3(OH)16·4H2O → 5MgO + MgCr2O4 + 12H2O + CO2
Stichtite Periclase      Magnesiochromite
The data obtained in present study provides significantly more detail on the high-temperature behavior of stichtite, with aspects of the thermal evolution steps. However, regarding decomposition, our results agree with data for the samples from India [46].
Another study of stichtite thermal behavior has been undertaken for a synthetic analogue [47], and revealed the following mass losses: (a) 52 °C with the loss of 24.9%; (b) at 294 °C with a mass loss of 22.5%; (c) at ~550 °C with a mass loss of 2.5%; (d) at 670 °C with a mass loss of 1.2%. Of these data, the most remarkable is the first effect, with an extremely large mass loss (as also noted by the authors) that corresponds to 9 moles of water per 8 cations. From this we can assume that the synthetic material differed significantly from natural samples. It is hard to tell whether the difference was in chemistry with the product not precisely fitting to stichtite stoichiometry or the crystallite size played a big role in the product hydration, possible by large content of sorbed water, especially at edge sites.

4.3.3. Iowaite

The thermal behavior of iowaite has been studied on two synthetic analogues: (i) a carbonate-bearing sample with chemical formula Mg6.27Fe1.73(OH)16(Cl)1.07(CO3)0.33·6.1H2O [48] and, (ii) iowaite–woodallite series (mixture) [49]. For both phases, again the authors reported the presence of excess interlayer water, i.e., ~6 apfu (instead of 4 apfu as in the ideal formula). For the carbonate-bearing sample the thermal effects, with corresponding mass losses, have been identified as: step 1—35 °C (3.67%), step 2—79 °C (12.32%), step 3—254 °C (7.19%), step 4—291 °C (11.8%), step 5—368 °C (2.2%), step 6—434 °C (no loss) and step 7—574 °C (1.54%). Steps 1, 2 are assigned to dehydration, steps 3, 4—dehydroxylation, step 5, 6, and 7—dechlorination. For the iowaite–woodallite series, different samples, with variable Fe3+:Cr3+ (i.e., proportion iowaite/woodallite), have been studied, with results obtained for them in line with those of carbonate-bearing samples, and the conclusion was that the thermal stability of the synthetic iowaite–woodallite samples increased with iron content. The sequence of thermal evolution in these and the samples in our study appear to be similar: dehydration → dehydroxylation → dechlorination. However, the temperature of thermal effects and corresponding mass losses differ, which should probably be ascribed as due to the difference between synthetic and natural samples, as with stichtite.

4.3.4. Water Content and Its Role

From the comparison of present results for natural samples with the existing literature, it may be said that the general trends in thermal evolution of quintinite, hydrotalcite, stichtite, and iowaite agree with assumptions obtained for their synthetic analogues and follow dehydration → dehydroxylation → anion loss, based on strengths of bonding and the need to maintain charge compensation. It is worth noting that comparison to literature data on thermal analyses of natural samples (Table 3) shows that the variation of the first mass loss in within 13.1–15.5% range (see details in Section 4.3.1), so the obtained here values of 13.47 and 12.84% are close to the lower previously detected values. However, even simple dehydration may significantly differ for natural and synthetic samples in the number of H2O molecules. Therefore, the true water content and its complete structural role are still not fully clear. In general, the trend is that synthetic samples have higher mass loss corresponding to dehydration in comparison to the natural. This can be explained by their small particle size, higher surface area, and higher sorption properties than those of the well-crystallized natural samples.
Despite the remaining lack of understanding of the position and bonding of interlayer water (structurally bonded), it seems to play a crucial role in thermal evolution of carbonate LDHs (as noted in Section 4.2) and other LDHs where hydrogen bonding between anions and water molecules within the interlayer is possible. In such cases, dehydration destabilizes the interlayer anion and leads to abrupt structural changes (i.e., collapse of interlayer for 1 Å), or may lead to sample decomposition, if the bond strengths match is not possible to achieve through interlayer contraction.

4.4. Insight from Natural Quintinite into LDH Structure and Thermal Decomposition Events

Through a careful series of experiments, [50] studied the thermal behavior of synthetic Mg:Al LDHs alongside the decomposition of synthetic aluminum trihydroxide (ATH) and magnesium hydroxide. Owing to its proximity to the dehydroxylation temperature of ATH, the authors ascribed the first endothermic event in Mg:Al = 2 LDHs as being owing to dehydroxylation of the Al rich domains of the LDH structure. The higher temperature magnesium hydroxide decomposition event broadly aligned with the second endothermic event, and was ascribed to the decomposition of the, necessarily for Mg:Al = 2 LDH, Mg rich domains. However, owing to the cation avoidance rule, the Al cations in the natural quintinite sample of Mg:Al = 2, must all be in an identical, ordered coordination state with 2 Mg atoms and no Al-O-Al moieties. The ordering of M2+ and M3+ cations has been demonstrated (apart from NMR) by single-crystal and powder X-ray diffraction study by appearance of superstructure reflection [31,37,38] that result in the fact that unit cell parameter a = 3 a`, where a` is the distance between two cations within octahedral layer. This poses a challenge to the previous assertion that the two, separate, endothermic events indicate two different Mg or Al rich domains as, were the Al cations perfectly ordered, there should only be one type of Mg2Al(OH)6 environment and, thus, only one thermally driven dehydroxylation event, not two.
Very recent studies, using recent advances in high spinning angle solid-state NMR [51,52], have identified that for synthetic LDH samples, there may be a small percentage (3–6% of sites) that are not perfectly ordered and, thus would account for the two domains, though one might reasonably expect there to be a third, major endothermic event corresponding to the 93–97% ordered environments, and the relative proportion of the mass losses associated with these events (Table 3) do not suggest that they are minor phases, even allowing for the absent major phase (corresponding to the ordered Mg2Al(OH)6 dehydroxylation) overlapping with one of them. On the basis of the above analysis, it would seem reasonable to suggest that external, loosely bound water, is removed early on in the heating (up to 60 °C) and that the first endothermic event at 234 °C corresponds to the loss of the structural water detailed above, and not the decomposition of the aluminum rich, i.e., Al2Mg(OH)6, domains. The second endotherm then corresponds to the dehydroxylation of the more basic, Mg2Al(OH)6 domains, mainly all equivalent, sites at ca 449 °C.
Analysis of the quintinite shows a 14.3% mass loss at 234 °C and a 29.7% mass loss at 449 °C, giving a combined mass loss of 44%. Calculated total mass loss for quintinite, based on the calculated formula (based on data in Table 1), suggests for complete decomposition to 3 MgO and spinel, MgAl2O4, as per the equation above, an expected mass loss of 43.9%, in excellent agreement with the 44% recorded in Table 3. However, if, as above, we assume all the structural water is lost at the first endotherm, and the second endotherm is the carbonate and hydroxyl group removal, we find calculated mass loss of 12.05% (measured 14.3%) and 31.85% (measured 29.7%), respectively.
It seems reasonable to speculate that to account for this discrepancy some small fraction of the carbonate reacts with certain layer hydroxyl groups during the first thermal event, alongside removal of structural water, thereby increasing the first mass loss through removal of CO2, and/or further H2O, as observed in the experiment, and decreasing the second mass loss, also as observed. This would also concur with the NMR data [51,52] showing a small % of locally non-equivalent Al sites in the LDH, as well as explaining why the collapsed interlayer spacing occurs at this temperature with co-grafting of carbonate (and loss of water). The formation of new bonds during this reaction also accounts for the exotherm that immediately follows the first endotherm, rather than the previously proposed recrystallization of Al oxide/oxyhydroxide phases as proposed earlier [50]. The just released thorough and detailed investigation into nano-spinel formation [46], who examined decomposition of LDHs formed from oxide nanopowders support this suggested pathway, showing loss of CO2 by TGA MS corresponding to the end of the first endotherm, and onset of the following exotherm.
Further support may be garnered through comparison of the DSC trace of the chloride member-iowaite with the carbonate members. No exotherm is apparent following the first endotherm, which may be expected as, unlike carbonate, it is not possible for bonds to form between chloride and the LDH layer metals, whereas were the exotherms owing to Al recrystallization, it should be independent of anion type. Rather than interact act with the layers, Cl remains in the unreacted dehydrated interlayer until it is removed during the dehydroxylation phase as gaseous, balancing the H removal in the system, which carbonate forms do through generating water and CO2. The shoulder in the second endotherm and (albeit minor) exotherm immediately following it in the Cl-members analyzed (Figure 5d,f). Less structural water is present in the chloride during dehydration according to our experiments. The water is held less strongly, owing to weaker interactions and thus the endotherm starts at a lower temperature in the chloride member.

5. Conclusions

Here we have shown that the natural LDHs, with high crystalline order, can be used to probe the structural properties of polycrystalline synthetic LDHs, as used in industry processes. The following specific conclusions can be drawn from the study:
  • In the range from 25 to 170–210 °C quintinite, hydrotalcite, and stichtite (carbonate members of the LDH family) demonstrated contraction of the basal d00n-value of 0.1–0.3 Å, followed by a sharp contraction of 1.0–1.1 Å at T > 170–210 °C. The high-temperature modified states were stable up to 380–420 °C, before decomposing to an amorphous phase. The structural changes are reversible at least up to 300 °C. The partial change of Al coordination is recorded from 300 °C, indicating that some decomposition or irreversible transformation of the LDH has started. The amount of tetrahedrally coordinated Al increases with temperature, but remains minor relative to octahedrally coordinated Al.
  • Iowaite (chlorine member of the family) was stable up to 320 °C and transformed to an amorphous phase at higher temperature. Iowaite experiences continuous contraction of the d00n-value of up to 0.5 Å in the temperature range 25–200 °C, reaching a plateau at a temperature range of 200–320 °C. The structural changes are reversible at least up to 300 °C.
  • Thermal analysis of samples annealed at 125 °C shows that carbonate members do not have a tendency to form dehydrated phases, whereas for iowaite a dehydrated phase having 0.9 apfu lesser water content as in the initial sample has been obtained.
  • The thermal behavior and transformation of LDHs depends on the nature of the interactions between the interlayer species and water molecules to the H atoms of the metal-hydroxide layer. The scheme of hydrogen bonding for carbonate LDHs determined destabilization of carbonate ion since dehydration step that results in abrupt structural transformations to high-temperature “collapsed” phase. For LDH with interlayer Cl, the continuous loss of H2O molecules is compensated (in terms of bonding) by shortening of the distance between donor (Cl) and acceptor (H) atoms.
  • The structural water is lost at the first endotherm, and the second endotherm is the carbonate and hydroxyl group removal, the calculated mass loss of 12.05% (measured 14.3%) and 31.85% (measured 29.7%), respectively. It seems reasonable to speculate that to account for this discrepancy some small fraction of the carbonate reacts with certain layer hydroxyl groups during the first thermal event, alongside removal of structural water, thereby increasing the first mass loss through removal of CO2, and/or further H2O, as observed in the experiment, and decreasing the second mass loss, as was also observed.
In future work we will use these natural LDHs to probe the reaction mechanisms of LDH decomposition and cation migration within the LDH structure.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.S.Z. and H.C.G.; investigation, E.S.Z., H.C.G., M.G.K., D.C.A.; data curation, I.V.P., V.N.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, E.S.Z., H.C.G.; writing—review and editing, E.S.Z., H.C.G., M.G.K., D.C.A., I.V.P., V.N.Y.; visualization, E.S.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The reported study was funded by Russian Fund for Basic Research and the Royal Society according to the research project № 19-55-10005.

Acknowledgments

The research has been carried out using facilities of XRD Research Center of Saint Petersburg State University and the Solid-State NMR service at the Department of Chemistry, Durham University. We thank the reviewers for their comments and the editor for the manuscript handling.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Serna, C.J.; Rendon, J.L.; Iglesias, J.E. Crystal-chemical study of layered [Al2Li(OH)6]+⋅nH2O. Clays. Clay. Miner. 1982, 30, 180–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Cavani, F.; Trifiro, F.; Vaccari, A. Hydrotalcite type anionic clays: Preparation, properties and applications. Catal. Today. 1991, 11, 173–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mills, S.J.; Christy, A.G.; Génin, J.M.R.; Kameda, T.; Colombo, F. Nomenclature of the hydrotalcite supergroup: Natural layered double hydroxides. Miner. Mag. 2012, 76, 1289–1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Fan, G.; Li, F.; Evans, D.G.; Duan, X. Catalytic applications of layered double hydroxides: Recent advances and perspectives. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 7040–7066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Matusinovic, Z.; Wilkie, C.A. Fire retardancy and morphology of layered double hydroxide nanocomposites: A review. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 18701–18704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gao, Y.; Wu, J.; Wang, Q.; Wilkie, A.; Hare, D.O. Flame retardant polymer/layered double hydroxide nanocomposites. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 10996–11016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Albuquerque, D.W.S.; Costa, E.S.; de Miranda, J.L.; Gonçalves, R.D.; de Moura, L.C. Evaluation of the Behavior of Hydrotalcite Like-Materials for CO2 Capture. Appl. Mech. Mater. 2016, 830, 3–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gawande, M.B.; Pandey, R.K.; Jayaram, R.V. Role of mixed metal oxides in catalysis science—versatile applications in organic synthesis. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2012, 2, 1113–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lv, L.; He, J.; Wei, M.; Evans, D.G.; Duan, X. Uptake of chloride ion from aqueous solution by calcined layered double hydroxides: Equilibrium and kinetic studies. Water Res. 2006, 40, 735–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ni, Z.M.; Xia, S.J.; Wang, L.G.; Xing, F.F.; Pan, G.X. Treatment of methyl orange by calcined layered double hydroxides in aqueous solution: Adsorption property and kinetic studies. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2007, 316, 284–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. El Gaini, L.; Lakraimi, M.; Sebbar, E.; Meghea, A.; Bakasse, M. Removal of indigo carmine dye from water to Mg–Al–CO3-calcined layered double hydroxides. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 161, 627–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chetia, M.; Goswamee, R.L.; Banerjee, S.; Chatterjee, S.; Singh, L.; Srivastava, R.B.; Sarma, H.P. Arsenic removal from water using calcined Mg–Al layered double hydroxide. Clean Technol. Envir. 2012, 14, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Cai, P.; Zheng, H.; Wang, C.; Ma, H.; Hu, J.; Pu, Y.; Liang, P. Competitive adsorption characteristics of fluoride and phosphate on calcined Mg–Al–CO3 layered double hydroxides. J. Hazard. 2012, 213, 100–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Bera, P.; Rajamathi, M.; Hegde, M.S.; Kamath, P.V. Thermal behaviour of hydroxides, hydroxysalts and hydrotalcites. B. Mater. Sci. 2000, 23, 141–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Kanezaki, E. Thermal behavior of the hydrotalcite-like layered structure of Mg and Al-layered double hydroxides with interlayer carbonate by means of in situ powder HTXRD and DTA/TG. Solid State Ion. 1998, 106, 279–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Valente, J.S.; Rodriguez-Gattorno, G.; Valle-Orta, M.; Torres-Garcia, E. Thermal decomposition kinetics of MgAl layered double hydroxides. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2012, 133, 621–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yang, W.; Kim, Y.; Liu, P.K.; Sahimi, M.; Tsotsis, T.T. A study by in situ techniques of the thermal evolution of the structure of a Mg–Al–CO3 layered double hydroxide. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2002, 57, 2945–2953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Thomas, G.S.; Radha, A.V.; Kamath, P.V.; Kannan, S. Thermally Induced Polytype Transformations among the Layered Double Hydroxides (LDHs) of Mg and Zn with Al. Phys. Chem. 2006, 110, 12365–12371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Thomas, G.S.; Kamath, P.V.; Kannan, S. Variable Temperature PXRD Studies of LiAl2(OH)6X*H2O (X = Cl, Br): Observation of Disorder→ Order Transformation in the Interlayer. Phys. Chem. C. 2007, 111, 18980–18984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Budhysutanto, W.N.; van Agterveld, D.; Schomaker, E.; Talma, A.G.; Kramer, H.J.M. Stability and transformation kinetics of 3R1 and 3R2 polytypes of Mg–Al layered double hydroxides. Appl. Clay Sci. 2010, 48, 208–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cherepanova, S.; Leont’eva, N.; Drozdov, V.; Doronin, V. Thermal evolution of Mg–Al and Ni–Al layered double hydroxides: The structure of the dehydrated phase. Acta Cryst. A. 2016, 72, 651–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ramesh, T.N.; Maiya, P.S.; Jayaramu, M.; Sreenivasa, S. Thermal evolution of polytypic modifications during thermal decomposition studies of magnesium aluminium based layered double hydroxide. Int. J. Sci. Res. 2012, 1, 65–67. [Google Scholar]
  23. Leont’eva, N.N.; Cherepanova, S.V.; Drozdov, V.A. Thermal decomposition of layered double hydroxides Mg-Al, Ni-Al, Mg-Ga: Structural features of hydroxide, dehydrated, and oxide phases. J. Struct. Chem. 2014, 55, 1326–1341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Costa, D.G.; Rocha, A.B.; Souza, W.F.; Chiaro, S.S.X.; Leitão, A.A. Ab initio study of reaction pathways related to initial steps of thermal decomposition of the layered double hydroxide compounds. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2012, 116, 13679–13687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Shimamura, A.; Kanezaki, E.; Jones, M.I.; Metson, J.B. Direct observation of grafting interlayer phosphate in Mg/Al layered double hydroxides. J. Solid State Chem. 2012, 186, 116–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Vaysse, C.; Guerlou-Demourgues, L.; Delmas, C. Thermal evolution of carbonate pillared layered hydroxides with (Ni, L)(L = Fe, Co) based slabs: Grafting or nongrafting of carbonate anions? Inorg. Chem. 2002, 41, 6905–6913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, S.T.; Dou, Y.; Zhou, J.; Pu, M.; Yan, H.; Wei, M.; Evans, D.G.; Duan, X. DFT-Based Simulation and Experimental Validation of the Topotactic Transformation of MgAl Layered Double Hydroxides. Chem. Phys. Chem. 2016, 17, 2754–2766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Meng, Q.; Yan, H. Theoretical study on the topotactic transformation and memory effect of M (II) M (III)-layered double hydroxides. Mol. Simulat. 2017, 43, 1338–1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lyu, P.; Ertl, M.; Heard, C.J.; Grajciar, L.; Radha, A.V.; Martin, T.; Breu, J.; Nachtigall, P. Structure Determination of the Oxygen Evolution Catalyst Mössbauerite. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2019, 123, 25157–25165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sotiles, A.R.; Gomez, N.A.G.; Wypych, F. Thermogravimetric analysis of layered double hydroxides intercalated with sulfate and alkaline cations [M62+Al3(OH)18][A+(SO4)2]·12H2O (M2+ = Mn, Mg, Zn; A.+ = Li, Na, K). J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2019, 140, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhitova, E.S.; Krivovichev, S.V.; Yakovenchuk, V.N.; Ivanyuk, G.Y.; Pakhomovsky, Y.A.; Mikhailova, J.A. Crystal chemistry of natural layered double hydroxides. 4. Crystal structures and evolution of structural complexity of quintinite polytypes from the Kovdor alkaline massif, Kola peninsula, Russia. Miner. Mag. 2018, 82, 329–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhitova, E.S.; Krivovichev, S.V.; Pekov, I.V.; Greenwell, H.C. Crystal chemistry of natural layered double hydroxides. 5. Single-crystal structure refinement of hydrotalcite, [Mg6Al2(OH)16](CO3)(H2O)4. Miner. Mag. 2019, 83, 269–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Zhitova, E.S.; Pekov, I.V.; Chukanov, N.V.; Yapaskurt, V.O.; Bocharov, V.N. Minerals of the stichtite-pyroaurite-iowaite-woodallite system from serpentinites of Terektinsky range, Altay Mountains, Russia. Russ. Geol. Geoph. 2020, 61, 36–46. [Google Scholar]
  34. Zhitova, E.S.; Krivovichev, S.V.; Pekov, I.V.; Yakovenchuk, V.N.; Pakhomovsky, Y.A. Correlation between the d-value and the M2+:M3+ cation ratio in Mg–Al–CO3 layered double hydroxides. Appl. Clay Sci. 2016, 130, 2–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Braithwaite, R.S.W.; Dunn, P.J.; Pritchard, R.G.; Paar, W.H. Iowaite, a re-investigation. Miner. Mag. 1994, 58, 79–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hudson, M.J.; Carlino, S.; Apperley, D.C. Thermal conversion of a layered (Mg/Al) double hydroxide to the oxide. J. Mater. Chem. 1995, 5, 323–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhitova, E.S.; Krivovichev, S.V.; Pekov, I.V.; Yapaskurt, V.O. Crystal Chemistry of Chlormagaluminite, Mg4Al2(OH)12Cl2(H2O)2, a Natural Layered Double Hydroxide. Minerals 2019, 9, 221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Zhitova, E.S.; Pekov, I.V.; Chaikovskiy, I.I.; Chirkova, E.P.; Yapaskurt, V.O.; Bychkova, Y.V.; Belakovskiy, D.I.; Chukanov, N.V.; Zubkova, N.V.; Krivovichev, S.V.; et al. Dritsite, Li2Al4(OH)12Cl2·3H2O, a new gibbsite-based hydrotalcite supergroup mineral. Minerals 2019, 9, 492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Bookin, A.S.; Drits, V.A. Polytype diversity of the hydrotalcite-like minerals. I. Possible polytypes and their dffraction patterns. Clay Clay Min. 1993, 41, 551–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Brown, I.D. The Chemical Bond in Inorganic Chemistry, 2nd ed.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  41. Uvarova, Y.A.; Sokolova, E.; Hawthorne, F.C.; Karpenko, V.V.; Agakhanov, A.A.; Pautov, L.A. The crystal chemistry of the “nickelalumite”–group minerals. Can. Miner. 2005, 43, 1511–1519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Madej, D.; Tyrała, K. In Situ Spinel Formation in a Smart Nano-Structured Matrix for No-Cement Refractory Castables. Materials 2020, 13, 1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Trave, A.; Selloni, A.; Goursot, A.; Tichit, D.; Weber, J. First principles study of the structure and chemistry of Mg-based hydrotalcite-like anionic clays. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2002, 106, 12291–12296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Stanimirova, T.; Piperov, N.; Petrova, N.; Kirov, G. Thermal evolution of Mg-Al-CO3 hydrotalcites. Clay Miner. 2004, 39, 177–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Panikorovskii, T.L.; Zhitova, E.S.; Krivovichev, S.V.; Zolotarev, A.A.; Britivn, S.N.; Yakovenchuk, V.N.; Krzhizhanovskaya, M.G. Thermal «memory effect» in quintinite polytypes-2H,-3R, and-1M. Zapiski RMO 2015, 144, 109–119. [Google Scholar]
  46. Mondal, S.K.; Baidya, T.K. Stichtite [Mg6Cr2(OH)6CO3·4H2O] in Nausahi ultramafites, Orissa, India-its transformation at elevated temperatures. Miner. Mag. 1996, 58, 69–78. [Google Scholar]
  47. Frost, R.L.; Bouzaid, J.M. Thermal decomposition of stichtite. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2007, 89, 133–135. [Google Scholar]
  48. Frost, R.L.; Bouzaid, J.; Musumeci, A.W.; Kloprogge, J.T.; Martens, W.N. Thermal decomposition of the synthetic hydrotalcite iowaite. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2006, 86, 437–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Frost, R.L.; Bouzaid, J.M.; Martens, W.N. Thermal decomposition of the composite hydrotalcites of iowaite and woodallite. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2007, 89, 511–519. [Google Scholar]
  50. Gusmano, G.; Nunziante, P.; Traversa, E.; Chiozzini, G. The mechanism of MgAl2O4 spinel formation from the thermal decomposition of coprecipitated hydroxides. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 1991, 7, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Cadars, S.; Layrac, G.; Gérardin, C.; Deschamps, M.; Yates, J.R.; Tichit, D.; Massiot, D. Identification and quantification of defects in the cation ordering in Mg/Al layered double hydroxides. Chem. Mater. 2011, 23, 2821–2831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Sideris, P.J.; Nielsen, U.G.; Gan, Z.; Grey, C.P. Mg/Al ordering in layered double hydroxides revealed by multinuclear NMR spectroscopy. Science 2008, 321, 113–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Minerals 10 00961 g001 550
Figure 1. Photographs of minerals studied in this work: (a) quintinite, (b) hydrotalcite, (c) stichtite and (d) iowaite; c and d—collection and photo: V.V. Levitskiy.
Figure 1. Photographs of minerals studied in this work: (a) quintinite, (b) hydrotalcite, (c) stichtite and (d) iowaite; c and d—collection and photo: V.V. Levitskiy.
Minerals 10 00961 g001
Minerals 10 00961 g002 550
Figure 2. The powder X-ray diffraction patterns recorded for hydrotalcite in the temperature range 25–1000 °C (a), before (b) and after annealing to 300 °C (c) and iowaite in the temperature range 25–1000 °C (d), before (e) and after annealing to 300 °C (f). Note: Pt indicates reflections from Pt sample holder.
Figure 2. The powder X-ray diffraction patterns recorded for hydrotalcite in the temperature range 25–1000 °C (a), before (b) and after annealing to 300 °C (c) and iowaite in the temperature range 25–1000 °C (d), before (e) and after annealing to 300 °C (f). Note: Pt indicates reflections from Pt sample holder.
Minerals 10 00961 g002
Minerals 10 00961 g003 550
Figure 3. The evolution of d00n-value with increasing temperature for: (a) to 420 °C for quintinite, hydrotalcite, stichtite, iowaite and their corresponding HT modifications and (b) to 300 °C, followed by cooling to RT for iowaite (reversibility check).
Figure 3. The evolution of d00n-value with increasing temperature for: (a) to 420 °C for quintinite, hydrotalcite, stichtite, iowaite and their corresponding HT modifications and (b) to 300 °C, followed by cooling to RT for iowaite (reversibility check).
Minerals 10 00961 g003
Minerals 10 00961 g004 550
Figure 4. The powder patterns of quintinite decomposition products at (a) 500 and (b) 1000 °C.
Figure 4. The powder patterns of quintinite decomposition products at (a) 500 and (b) 1000 °C.
Minerals 10 00961 g004
Minerals 10 00961 g005 550
Figure 5. DSC and TG curves of quintinite (a), hydrotalcite (b), stichtite (c), iowaite (d), annealed hydrotalcite, sample htc125 (e) and annealed iowaite, sample iow125 (f).
Figure 5. DSC and TG curves of quintinite (a), hydrotalcite (b), stichtite (c), iowaite (d), annealed hydrotalcite, sample htc125 (e) and annealed iowaite, sample iow125 (f).
Minerals 10 00961 g005
Minerals 10 00961 g006 550
Figure 6. Non-spinning Al spectra from quintinite as a function of temperature.
Figure 6. Non-spinning Al spectra from quintinite as a function of temperature.
Minerals 10 00961 g006
Minerals 10 00961 g007 550
Figure 7. In-plane distribution of water molecules and interlayer species for: (a) carbonate and (b) chloride members, in accord with an earlier study [31,32,37,38], and the connection of water molecules and interlayer species along the stacking axis for (c) carbonate and (d) chloride members.
Figure 7. In-plane distribution of water molecules and interlayer species for: (a) carbonate and (b) chloride members, in accord with an earlier study [31,32,37,38], and the connection of water molecules and interlayer species along the stacking axis for (c) carbonate and (d) chloride members.
Minerals 10 00961 g007
Minerals 10 00961 g008 550
Figure 8. The bond-valence structure of the interlayer (a) carbonate group (C = grey; O = red), (b) Cl− anions (Cl green) and (c) water molecules in LDHs (O = red; H = black), with the individual bond valences shown in valence units (v.u.).
Figure 8. The bond-valence structure of the interlayer (a) carbonate group (C = grey; O = red), (b) Cl− anions (Cl green) and (c) water molecules in LDHs (O = red; H = black), with the individual bond valences shown in valence units (v.u.).
Minerals 10 00961 g008
Table
Table 1. Minerals and their annealed forms studied in this work.
Table 1. Minerals and their annealed forms studied in this work.
MineralLocalityChemical FormulaPolytypeReference
Quintinite and quint125 *Kovdor, Kola peninsula, Russia[Mg4.1Al1.9(OH)12][(CO3)0.95(H2O)3]1M[31]
Hydrotalcite and htc125 *Snarum, Modum, Norway[Mg6Al2(OH)16][(CO3)(H2O)4]mixture of 3R (dominant) and 2H (subordinate)[32]
StichtiteTerektinsky range, Altai, Russia[Mg6(Cr,Fe3+)2(OH)16][(CO3)(H2O)4][33]
Iowaite and iow125 *[Mg6(Fe3+,Cr)2(OH)16][Cl2(H2O)4][33]
* the samples of quintinite, hydrotalcite and iowaite annealed in oven at 125 °C for 2 h (see text) are denoted as quint125, htc125, and iow125, respectively. The samples of quinitnite, hydrotalcite, stichtite, and iowaite have been characterized previously [31,32,33].
Table
Table 2. Chemical composition of quintinite, hydrotalcite, stichtite, and iowaite obtained by electron-microprobe analyses of polished sections.
Table 2. Chemical composition of quintinite, hydrotalcite, stichtite, and iowaite obtained by electron-microprobe analyses of polished sections.
Constituent, wt.%Quintinite 1Hydrotalcite 2Stichtite 3Iowaite 4
MgO33.8240.0437.9938.06
Al2O319.5815.92.142.01
Fe2O3n.d.1.088.9410.45
Cr2O3n.d.n.d.11.439.16
Σoxides53.4057.0260.0559.68
H2O (as OH groups)22.0523.7722.4522.51
H2O (molecular)11.0311.8711.2210.08 *
CO28.507.26.67n.d.
Cln.d.n.d.0.039.97
Σvolatile41.5842.8440.3742.56
Reference 123
n.d.—not determined; * refined value by thermal analysis.1 [Mg4.1Al1.9(OH)12][(CO3)0.95(H2O)3] [31]; 2 [Mg6.0{Al1.9Fe0.08}(OH)16][(CO3)(H2O)4] [32]; 3 [Mg6.0{Cr1.0Fe0.7Al0.3}(OH)16][(CO3)(H2O)4] [33]; 4 [Mg6.1{Fe0.8Cr0.8Al0.3}(OH)16][{Cl1.8(OH)0.2}(H2O)3.6] [33].
Table
Table 3. Comparison of TG and DSC data for quintinite and hydrotalcite from different sources.
Table 3. Comparison of TG and DSC data for quintinite and hydrotalcite from different sources.
SampleQuintiniteHydrotalcite
SourceNaturalSyntheticNaturalSynthetic
ReferenceThis work[44][45][45][44]This work[44]
DSC (T, °C) 1st effect234250239248255202235
TG (%) 1st effect14.315.515.313.115.614.517.0
DSC (T, °C) 2nd effect449455447463420425415
TG (%) 2nd effect29.727.325.825.927.331.527.3
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhitova, E.S.; Greenwell, H.C.; Krzhizhanovskaya, M.G.; Apperley, D.C.; Pekov, I.V.; Yakovenchuk, V.N. Thermal Evolution of Natural Layered Double Hydroxides: Insight from Quintinite, Hydrotalcite, Stichtite, and Iowaite as Reference Samples for CO3- and Cl-Members of the Hydrotalcite Supergroup. Minerals 2020, 10, 961. https://doi.org/10.3390/min10110961

AMA Style

Zhitova ES, Greenwell HC, Krzhizhanovskaya MG, Apperley DC, Pekov IV, Yakovenchuk VN. Thermal Evolution of Natural Layered Double Hydroxides: Insight from Quintinite, Hydrotalcite, Stichtite, and Iowaite as Reference Samples for CO3- and Cl-Members of the Hydrotalcite Supergroup. Minerals. 2020; 10(11):961. https://doi.org/10.3390/min10110961

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhitova, Elena S., H. Chris Greenwell, Mariya G. Krzhizhanovskaya, David C. Apperley, Igor V. Pekov, and Victor N. Yakovenchuk. 2020. "Thermal Evolution of Natural Layered Double Hydroxides: Insight from Quintinite, Hydrotalcite, Stichtite, and Iowaite as Reference Samples for CO3- and Cl-Members of the Hydrotalcite Supergroup" Minerals 10, no. 11: 961. https://doi.org/10.3390/min10110961

APA Style

Zhitova, E. S., Greenwell, H. C., Krzhizhanovskaya, M. G., Apperley, D. C., Pekov, I. V., & Yakovenchuk, V. N. (2020). Thermal Evolution of Natural Layered Double Hydroxides: Insight from Quintinite, Hydrotalcite, Stichtite, and Iowaite as Reference Samples for CO3- and Cl-Members of the Hydrotalcite Supergroup. Minerals, 10(11), 961. https://doi.org/10.3390/min10110961

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop