Next Article in Journal
Nitrogen Assessment in Amended Mining Soils Sown with Coronilla juncea and Piptatherum miliaceum
Next Article in Special Issue
Flotation Performance and Adsorption Mechanism of a Novel Chelating Collector for Azurite
Previous Article in Journal
The Relationship between Particle Size and Element Distribution in Stream Sediments from the Dongyuan W-Mo Deposit, Eastern China
Previous Article in Special Issue
Study of Reagent Scheme, Entrainment and Their Relationship in Chalcopyrite Flotation in the Presence of Bentonite and Kaolinite
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Simultaneous Recovery of Niobium and Sulfur from Carbonate Niobite Ore with Flotation

1
School of Resource and Environmental Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Luoshi Road 122, Wuhan 430070, China
2
Key Laboratory of Rare Mineral, Ministry of Natural Resources, Hubei Geological Research Laboratory, Wuhan 430034, China
3
Key Laboratory of Resources and Eco-Environmental Geology, Hubei Geological Bureau, Wuhan 430118, China
4
Zijin School of Geology and Mining, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2022, 12(4), 432; https://doi.org/10.3390/min12040432
Submission received: 6 March 2022 / Revised: 23 March 2022 / Accepted: 28 March 2022 / Published: 31 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Progress of Reagents in Minerals Flotation)

Abstract

:
Exploring new ways to acquire niobium resources is essential to resolve niobium supply risks, due to the fact that, at present, 99% of niobium is controlled by only two countries. In the present work, a flotation technique was applied to separate niobium from low-grade niobite ore. To maximize the utilization of the original ore resources, pre-flotation was conducted to recover sulfur and eliminate the adverse effects of sulfide on niobite flotation. The obtained sulfur grade and recovery were 33.74% and 92.04%, respectively, and its concentration ratio was 40x. As for the niobite flotation, a closed-circuit experiment with one rougher flotation, three cleaner flotations, and two scavenger flotations was carried out to achieve the maximum niobite recovery. To further improve the niobite recovery, a leaching process with diluted HCl was employed; the final obtained Nb2O5 grade and recovery were 30.19% and 65.04%, respectively, and the concentration ratio reached 242x. Moreover, the economic evaluation implies that the flotation process can attract great positive interest.

1. Introduction

Niobium, a rare metal with high melting and boiling points, is widely used in stainless steels and alloys, along with the nuclear and superconductor industries. Niobite is a very important niobium-containing industrial mineral. At present, about 90% and 9% of worldwide ferroniobium production is from Brazil and Canada, respectively [1]. Although the current production rate is enough to meet the globally increasing demand, there are predictable niobium supply risks resulting from the highly concentrated ferroniobium production regions [2]. The many niobite resources in the world can diversify global ferroniobium production. However, numerous deposits are quite refractory, leading to uneconomical development through presently used routes of mineral processing [3,4,5].
Froth flotation, as one effective technique used for the selective separation of valuable minerals from their associated gangue minerals, would be an efficient method to obtain niobium. Pyrochlore and niobite are the main commercial niobium-containing minerals, which are usually derived from various carbonatite deposits. These minerals can be recovered via multistage separation processes including magnetic separation, or flotation of sulfides and carbonates, followed by pyrochlore and niobite flotation with various collectors and other modifiers [6,7,8]. It is worth noting that the collector plays an essential role in the flotation process; numerous collectors are developed to obtain a higher mineral recovery and grade. Gibson studied the flotation of pyrochlore from carbonatite tailings with benzohydroxamic acid as a collector; a 1.54% Nb2O5 grade and a 93% Nb2O5 recovery were achieved [9]. Furthermore, Gibson studied the flotation and mechanism of pyrochlore in silicate gangues with amine as a cationic collector [10]. Liu reported that the octyl hydroxamic acid and sodium oleate could separately be used as collectors to recover pyrochlore as a function of particle size [11]. Chen et al., found that a niobite recovery ranging from 82% to 91% could be obtained when octyl diphosphonic acid was used as a collector [12]. Ren et al., studied the collection performance of salicylhydroxamic acid and methylenediphosphonic acid for niobite flotation, and two niobite flotation rates of 17% and 19% were observed [13]. In addition, He et al., found that a combined collector of salicylhydroxamic acid and ammonium dibutyl dithiophosphate could help to improve the tantalum niobium flotation [14]. Recently, benzyl arsenic acid has been proven as an efficient reagent in flotation for collecting and recovering various metallic minerals, such as cassiterite, tungsten, rutile, tantalum, niobium, etc. [15,16]. However, there are few reports focusing on its flotation superiority on niobite as an effective collector [17]. It is important and meaningful to carry out studies on niobite flotation with benzyl arsenic acid to prevent risk to the niobium supply.
In this study, the upgrade potential of a carbonatite niobite ore by flotation with benzyl arsenic acid as a collector was investigated. A pre-flotation was conducted to recover sulfur from the ore in order to eliminate its effect on the recovery and grade of niobite. To attain the highest possible recovery and grade of niobite, the flotation experiments were carried out as detailed, as a function of the activator, depressor, and collector. Furthermore, a closed-circuit experiment and an acid treatment process were employed to further improve the recovery and grade of niobite. The results provide a new insight for developing flotation reagents for niobium.

2. Materials and Methods

The carbonatite niobite ore was obtained from a niobium rare-earth deposit in Hubei Province. The mineral was firstly crushed into particles, then ground to a smaller size and, finally, sieved to the required size fraction. The sample with 90% of the size fraction under 0.074 mm was used for flotation. The results of X-ray diffraction patterns displayed in Figure 1 indicate that the carbonatite niobite ore mainly consisted of calcite, muscovite, biotite, albite, dolomite, quartz, fluorapatite, and pyrite. There was no obvious peak of the niobite observed, because of its rather low grade, which is consistent with the X-ray fluorescence analysis of niobite in Table 1. As shown in Table 1, the niobite contained only 0.533% rare earth oxide and 0.125% Nb2O5. In addition, the niobite contained a lot of CaO and small amounts of SiO2, Fe2O3, MgO, P2O5, and Al2O3. There was a large loss of 31.765%, which may have resulted from the decomposition of carbonates. The carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC), MB xanthic acid sodium (MB), 2# oil, Pb(NO)3, benzohydroxamic acid (BHA), and styryl phosphonic acid (SPA) were purchased from Sinopharm Group Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The collector was prepared in the lab based on benzyl arsenic acid, and termed as DB-11. All of the experiments were conducted using tap water in the lab.
The flotation experiments were carried out on an XFG-II flotation machine (8 L flotation cell, 2000 rpm impeller speed). The flotation sheet is presented in Figure 2. Firstly, 3000 g of niobite ore was added to the flotation cell and then stirred for 2 min. Then, the CMC depressor, MB collector and 2# oil frother were successively added to the slurry with intervals of 2 min. Finally, the froth products were collected as the sulfur concentrate, and the tailings were collected for niobite flotation with the Pb(NO)3 activator, CMC depressor, DB-11 collector, and 2# oil frother.

3. Results

3.1. Recovery of Sulfur

3.1.1. Effect of CMC Dosage on Sulfur Flotation

Due to the ore containing a certain amount of pyrite, it is better to separate the pyrite before niobite flotation so as to avoid the adverse effect of pyrite on niobium recovery. At the same time, the separated pyrite can bring good recovery of sulfur. To obtain a good separation efficiency, the effect of the CMC depressor dosage on sulfur grade and recovery in the sulfur concentrate and Nb2O5 grade and recovery in the tailings were recorded, as shown in Figure 3. As can be seen in Figure 3a, the sulfur grade increased gradually with increasing CMC dosage, and almost reached a balance after 150 g/t MB, reaching 25%. As for the sulfur recovery, it first increased and then slightly decreased when the CMC dosage was above 150 g/t. The higher sulfur grade and recovery means that more pyrite is separated from the niobite ore, which can result in the improvement of the Nb2O5 grade and recovery in the tailings. As shown in Figure 3b, it can be seen that the Nb2O5 grade in the tailings is proportional to CMC dosage, whereas the recovery remains stable without any significant change, further demonstrating that the removal of sulfur in advance would increase the Nb2O5 contents in the tailings, which would be better for the effective recovery of valuable metals. Based on Figure 3a,b, the 150 g/t CMC is more acceptable in the sulfur flotation.

3.1.2. Effect of MB Dosage on Sulfur Flotation

Figure 4 shows the impact of MB collector dosage on the grade and recovery of sulfur in concentrate and Nb2O5 in tailings. It can be seen in Figure 4a that the sulfur grade grows very quickly when the MB dosage ranges from 200 g/t to 300 g/t, and then reduces slowly. The sulfur grade at 300 g/t is 27.08%, which enables sulfur to reach a high concentration ratio of 32x. On the other hand, the sulfur recovery experiences a marginal increase and reaches its biggest value when the MB dosage is 300 g/t, which is consistent with the results for sulfur grade. As for the Nb2O5 grade and recovery in the tailings, it can been seen (Figure 4b) that the tendency is similar to that in Figure 3b, where the recovery maintains a high value around 98% without any change. The Nb2O5 grade decreased to 0.127% under the optimal MB dosage, which is a little lower than that in Figure 3b (0.128%), demonstrating that regulating the MB dosage could effectively improve the recovery of sulfur and maintain the valuable Nb2O5 contents in the tailings for further treatment. Here, an MB dosage of 300 g/t was chosen for the following experiments.

3.2. Recovery of Niobite

3.2.1. Effect of Grinding Fineness on Niobite Flotation

To obtain a good grade and recovery of niobite, a suitable niobite particle size—but not excessively small fine mud—is essential for the flotation process. Figure 5 displays the effect of the proportion of particle size under 0.074 mm on niobite flotation. It can be seen that both the Nb2O5 grade and Nb2O5 recovery achieve their best performance at 90% proportion of particle size under 0.074 mm. The results indicate that the niobite ore is completely liberated under this condition. Moreover, the Nb2O5 grade and recovery decrease sharply when the proportion is lower or higher than 90%; this is mainly due to the fact that a finer grinding would generate more slimes and then deteriorate the flotation performance through entrainment. The ore with many incompletely liberated particles would also affect the interaction between the collector and the particles, thereby leading to a low grade and recovery. As a result, 90% proportion of particle size under 0.074 mm is the best choice of grinding size for niobite flotation.

3.2.2. Effect of DB-11 Dosage on Niobite Flotation

The collector plays a crucial role in flotation, directly deciding whether the niobite can be well recovered at high quality. To further optimize the Nb2O5 grade and recovery, the influence of DB-11 dosage on flotation is illustrated in Figure 6. With increasing DB-11 dosage, the Nb2O5 grade shows a rapid reduction after 700 g/t, and the Nb2O5 recovery sustains a small increase, with a pause between 700 and 800 g/t. Considering the Nb2O5 grade of 3.95% and Nb2O5 recovery of 68%, the results suggest that a DB-11 dosage of 700 g/t is the best choice in the flotation.

3.2.3. Effect of Pb(NO3)2 Dosage on Niobite Flotation

In order to improve the flotation efficiency of niobite, a Pb(NO3)2 activator was added to the ore pulp; Figure 7 presents the effect of the dosage of Pb(NO3)2 on the Nb2O5 grade and recovery. When increasing the quantity of Pb(NO3)2 from 300 to 600 g/t, there was only small fluctuation in the Nb2O5 grade, while the Nb2O5 recovery changed a lot. As Pb(NO3)2 increased from 300 to 400 g/t, the Nb2O5 recovery increased sharply from 56% to 67.5%, while it decreased a little to 63.8% as Pb(NO3)2 increased from 400 to 600 g/t. These interesting results can be attributed to the fact that there was not enough of the activator at lower Pb2+ concentrations, while Pb2+ may have generated precipitate at a higher activator concentration. Thus, 400 g/t of Pb(NO3)2 activator is more suitable for the niobite flotation.

3.2.4. Effect of CMC Dosage on Niobite Flotation

Because of the widespread existence of calcite microcline and biotite, a depressor is necessary to control the gangue and achieve a better niobite flotation. As seen in Figure 8, with increasing depressor dosage, the Nb2O5 grade continuously grows, and almost reaches equilibrium at 4.2% after 300 g/t. However, the depressor displays a certain adverse effect on the Nb2O5 recovery, which continuously declines, with a rebound at 300 g/t CMC. To balance the Nb2O5 grade and recovery, 300 g/t of CMC was chosen for the following flotation experiments.

3.2.5. Optimization of Niobite Concentrate Flotation

In the previous experiment, it was found the concentration ratio of Nb2O5 was only about 34x, which is not enough for a good flotation. Thus, a second flotation for niobite concentrate (concentrate flotation I) was carried out to improve the concentrate grade. To achieve a better Nb2O5 grade and recovery, three different flotation reagent systems were employed to optimize concentrate flotation I, as shown in Figure 9. As can be seen, the addition of the collector and depressor causes a great impact on Nb2O5 recovery, but little on Nb2O5 grade; a certain increase in the collector can greatly improve the Nb2O5 recovery, while too much of the depressor will lead to a reduction in Nb2O5 recovery. Thus, 10 g/t collector and 15 g/t depressor were used; the Nb2O5 grade was 12.03%, and the obtained concentration ratio was about 96x as compared to the original ore. In order to further improve the Nb2O5 grade and concentration ratio, a concentrate flotation II with only 8 g/t collector and a concentrate III without any reagent were conducted. After three concentrate flotations, the Nb2O5 grade was found to reach 23.48%, which exceeds most niobium froth flotations; meanwhile, the concentration ratio reached about 190x that of the original ore. However, although the Nb2O5 grade was very high, its Nb2O5 recovery was only 25.6%, which is unacceptable for the niobite flotation. Thus, a closed-circuit experiment is required to improve the Nb2O5 recovery in the following experiment.

3.3. Closed-Circuit Experiment

Based on the above experimental conditions, a closed-circuit experiment was conducted, and the flotation sheet is shown in Figure 10. For the sulfur concentrate, there was a sulfur grade of 33.74% and a sulfur recovery of 92.04%, and the sulfur concentration ratio reached 40x. As for the niobite concentrate, it had an REO of 1.04%, Nb2O5 grade of 19.11%, and Nb2O5 recovery of 69.61%, and the Nb2O5 concentration ratio reached 153x. The XRF analysis (Table 2) of niobite concentrate shows that the main chemical components are Nb2O5, Fe2O3, TiO2, CaO, and MgO, demonstrating that although the niobite is concentrated, a certain degree of impurity needs to be further removed.

3.4. Leaching of Niobite Concentrate

Considering the existence of CaO and MgO in the niobite concentrate, diluted HCl solution (9 wt%) was used to remove impurities. Five grams of sample was added to a 1.5 mL diluted HCl solution, and then stirred for 30 min at room temperature, after which we finally filtrated and dried the sample. After the leaching with diluted HCl, from Table 3 it can be seen that the Nb2O5 grade and recovery in niobite reached 30.19% and 65.04%, respectively, with a concentration ratio of 242x. The results suggest that the flotation–leaching process can efficiently concentrate and recover niobium from complex low-niobium-grade carbonate niobite with the use of technology.

3.5. Economic Evaluation

Practical application of niobium recovery is a complex engineering project; in order to verify the application possibility and profitability of our process, a simple economic evaluation was conducted, the results of which are listed in Table 4. As can be seen, the total expenditure for the niobite ore, water and electricity, auxiliary materials, and others was about CNY 54,060.00/t (excluding tax). At present, the price of this Nb2O5 grade (30%) niobite concentrate is about CNY 100,000.00/ton or more. Thus, there is a difference of more than CNY 46,000.00/t. In addition, the production of 1 ton of niobite concentrate can produce 5.37 tons of high-quality sulfur concentrate (S grade 33.74%), which will further improve the interest after sale.

4. Conclusions

Herein, DB-11 was chosen as a collector to achieve the effective recovery of niobite. The applicability and feasibility of DB-11 in real low-grade carbonate niobite ore were evaluated by means of flotation tests in terms of single-factor experiments, as well as open- and closed-circuit experiments. Moreover, the potential practical application of the niobite flotation recovery was verified through a simple economic evaluation. The flotation results indicate that DB-11 shows an excellent collecting effect on niobite—a 19.11% Nb2O5 grade and a 69.61% Nb2O5 recovery were achieved, and the concentration ratio was 153x. After leaching of the niobite flotation concentrate, an improved Nb2O5 grade of 30.19% and a much higher concentration ratio of 242x were obtained. In addition, a high-quality sulfur product with a sulfur grade of 33.74% and sulfur recovery of 92.04% was achieved simultaneously, which is very beneficial to the comprehensive utilization of carbonate niobite ore.

Author Contributions

Investigation, S.L.; methodology, S.L.; resources, S.L.; supervision, S.S.; writing—original draft, S.L.; writing—review & editing, S.S., H.Y., L.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Research Fund Program of Key Laboratories of Rare Minerals, Ministry of Natural Resources (KLRM-KF202003), and the Science and Technology Project of Hubei Geological Bureau (KJ2021-17-04).

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Thanks very much for the two reviewers and academic editor who provided so much meaningful and useful suggestions for our work further improvement. We also appreciate for the financial supports provided by the institution listed in Funding section.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ober, J.A. Mineral Commodity Summaries; US Geological Survey: Reston, VA, USA, 2017.
  2. Bailey, D. British Geological Survey Annual Science Review 2012–2013; 2013; Available online: https://www.bgs.ac.uk/geological-research/bufi/bufi-publications/ (accessed on 3 March 2022).
  3. De Oliveira Cordeiro, P.F.; Brod, J.A.; Palmieri, M.; de Oliveira, C.G.; Barbosa, E.S.R.; Santos, R.V.; Gaspar, J.C.; Assis, L.C. The Catalão I niobium deposit, central Brazil: Resources, geology and pyrochlore chemistry. Ore Geol. Rev. 2011, 41, 112–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gibson, C.; Kelebek, S.; Aghamirian, M. Niobium oxide mineral flotation: A review of relevant literature and the current state of industrial operations. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2015, 137, 82–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ren, H.; Song, G.; Ji, F. Flotation of niobite, fersmite, and ilmenorutile. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater. 2009, 16, 249–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Filho, A.I.; Riffel, B.F.; Sousa, C. Some aspects of the mineralogy of CBMM niobium deposit and mining and pyrochlore ore processing—Araxa, MG—Brazil. Int. Symp. Niobium. 2001, 2001, 53–65. [Google Scholar]
  7. Gómez, R.E. Recovery of Pyrochlore from Slimes Discarded at Niobec by Column Flotation; 1987; Available online: https://core.ac.uk/display/41923617 (accessed on 3 March 2022).
  8. Ni, X.; Parrent, M.; Cao, M.; Huang, L.; Bouajila, A.; Liu, Q. Developing flotation reagents for niobium oxide recovery from carbonatite Nb ores. Miner. Eng. 2012, 36–38, 111–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gibson, C.; Kelebek, S.; Aghamirian, M.; Yu, B. Flotation of pyrochlore from low grade carbonatite gravity tailings with benzohydroxamic acid. Miner. Eng. 2015, 71, 97–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gibson, C.E.; Kelebek, S.; Aghamirian, M. Pyrochlore flotation from silicate gangue minerals: Amine adsorption mechanisms and the effect of modifying reagents. Miner. Eng. 2021, 171, 107100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, M.; Li, H.; Jiang, T.; Liu, Q. Flotation of coarse and fine pyrochlore using octyl hydroxamic acid and sodium oleate. Miner. Eng. 2018, 132, 191–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chen, G.; Tao, D.; Ren, H.; Ji, F.; Qiao, J. An investigation of niobite flotation with octyl diphosphonic acid as collector. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2005, 76, 111–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ren, H.; Wang, Z.; Ji, F.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, T.; Bian, Z. The DFT Study of Salicylohydroxamic Acid and Methylenediphosphonic Acid as Collectors in Niobium Minerals Flotation. DEStech. Trans. Eng. Technol. Res. 2017, 2017, 22–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. He, M.; Li, S.; Cao, M.; Gao, Y.; Bu, H.; Meng, Q. Activation mechanism of tantalum niobium flotation by lead ions in a combined collector flotation system, Physicochem. Probl. Miner. Process. 2021, 57, 29–38. [Google Scholar]
  15. Sun, K. Experimental study on processing of a rutile ore. Min. Metall. 2017, 26, 29–41. [Google Scholar]
  16. Chen, X.; Liao, D. Study on magnetized flotation of a refractory wolframite. Non-Ferr. Met. Benef. Part. 2020, 3, 47–51. [Google Scholar]
  17. Yulin, H.; Xiong, T.; Guohua, Y.; Feng, R. General situation of research on flotation reagents of tantalum-niobium minerals. Chin. J. Rare Met. 2006, 30, 870–876. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. XRD patterns of the carbonate niobite ore.
Figure 1. XRD patterns of the carbonate niobite ore.
Minerals 12 00432 g001
Figure 2. The flotation sheet of the general condition of the niobite ore.
Figure 2. The flotation sheet of the general condition of the niobite ore.
Minerals 12 00432 g002
Figure 3. The effect of CMC dosage on (a) sulfur and (b) Nb2O5 grade and recovery.
Figure 3. The effect of CMC dosage on (a) sulfur and (b) Nb2O5 grade and recovery.
Minerals 12 00432 g003
Figure 4. The effect of MB dosage on (a) sulfur and (b) Nb2O5 grade and recovery.
Figure 4. The effect of MB dosage on (a) sulfur and (b) Nb2O5 grade and recovery.
Minerals 12 00432 g004
Figure 5. The effect of particle size under 0.074 mm on Nb2O5 grade and recovery.
Figure 5. The effect of particle size under 0.074 mm on Nb2O5 grade and recovery.
Minerals 12 00432 g005
Figure 6. The effect of DB-11 dosage on Nb2O5 grade and recovery.
Figure 6. The effect of DB-11 dosage on Nb2O5 grade and recovery.
Minerals 12 00432 g006
Figure 7. The effect Pb(NO3)2 dosage on Nb2O5 grade and recovery.
Figure 7. The effect Pb(NO3)2 dosage on Nb2O5 grade and recovery.
Minerals 12 00432 g007
Figure 8. The effect of CMC dosage on Nb2O5 grade and recovery.
Figure 8. The effect of CMC dosage on Nb2O5 grade and recovery.
Minerals 12 00432 g008
Figure 9. The effect of reagent system on Nb2O5 grade and recovery of niobite concentrate.
Figure 9. The effect of reagent system on Nb2O5 grade and recovery of niobite concentrate.
Minerals 12 00432 g009
Figure 10. The closed-circuit experiment of niobite flotation.
Figure 10. The closed-circuit experiment of niobite flotation.
Minerals 12 00432 g010
Table 1. XRF analysis of the carbonate niobite ore.
Table 1. XRF analysis of the carbonate niobite ore.
OxidesREONb2O5SiO2CaOAl2O3MgONa2OK2O
Content (%)0.5330.1254.9548.851.72.540.111.06
OxidesTiO2P2O5SMnOFe2O3LostOrganic carbon
Content (%)0.232.130.850.954.1231.7650.62
Table 2. XRF analysis of niobite concentrate after flotation.
Table 2. XRF analysis of niobite concentrate after flotation.
OxidesREONb2O5SiO2Al2O3Fe2O3CaOMgO
Content (%)1.0419.113.470.925.2514.082.83
OxidesTiO2MnOSP2O5K2ONa2OLost
Content (%)18.050.782.121.940.360.310.81
Table 3. XRF analysis of niobite concentrate washed with diluted HCl.
Table 3. XRF analysis of niobite concentrate washed with diluted HCl.
OxidesREONb2O5SiO2Al2O3Fe2O3CaOMgO
Content (%)1.8130.195.291.2626.60.540.01
OxidesTiO2MnOSP2O5K2ONa2OLost
Content (%)25.710.53.670.130.370.243.68
Table 4. Estimation of the economic benefit for production of 1 ton of niobite concentrate.
Table 4. Estimation of the economic benefit for production of 1 ton of niobite concentrate.
ItemsUnitsUnit ConsumptionUnit PriceSum (CNY)
Original oreMiningTon38840.0015,520.00
TransportTon38815.005820.00
Water and electricityWaterTon13001.001300.00
ElectricityKW/h25001.002500.00
Auxiliary materialsActivatorKg139.5418.002511.00
DepressorKg70.000.6545.00
CMCKg35.008.00280.00
MBKg70.0012.00840.00
DB-11Kg280.0080.0022,400.00
Hydrochloric acidKg80.005.00400.00
2# oilKg9.306.8063.00
Lube 80.00
OthersMachinery depreciation and maintenance150.00
Salary and other1800.00
Management cost200.00
Contingencies150.00
Total54,060.00
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, S.; Yang, L.; Yi, H.; Song, S. Simultaneous Recovery of Niobium and Sulfur from Carbonate Niobite Ore with Flotation. Minerals 2022, 12, 432. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12040432

AMA Style

Liu S, Yang L, Yi H, Song S. Simultaneous Recovery of Niobium and Sulfur from Carbonate Niobite Ore with Flotation. Minerals. 2022; 12(4):432. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12040432

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Shuang, Lang Yang, Hao Yi, and Shaoxian Song. 2022. "Simultaneous Recovery of Niobium and Sulfur from Carbonate Niobite Ore with Flotation" Minerals 12, no. 4: 432. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12040432

APA Style

Liu, S., Yang, L., Yi, H., & Song, S. (2022). Simultaneous Recovery of Niobium and Sulfur from Carbonate Niobite Ore with Flotation. Minerals, 12(4), 432. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12040432

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop