Next Article in Journal
Corrosion Behavior of a Pyrite and Arsenopyrite Galvanic Pair in the Presence of Sulfuric Acid, Ferric Ions and HQ0211 Bacterial Strain
Next Article in Special Issue
Utilisation of Water-Washing Pre-Treated Phosphogypsum for Cemented Paste Backfill
Previous Article in Journal
Mineral Transformations in Gold–(Silver) Tellurides in the Presence of Fluids: Nature and Experiment
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Beneficiation Processes of Low-Grade Sedimentary Phosphates of Tozeur-Nefta Deposit (Gafsa-Metlaoui Basin: South of Tunisia)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Radioactivity of Five Typical General Industrial Solid Wastes and its Influence in Solid Waste Recycling

1
College of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China
2
College of Mining, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China
3
National & Local Joint Laboratory of Engineering for Effective Utilization of Regional Mineral Resources from Karst Areas, Guiyang 550025, China
4
Guizhou Key Laboratory of Comprehensive Utilization of Non-metallic Mineral Resources, Guiyang 550025, China
5
School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2019, 9(3), 168; https://doi.org/10.3390/min9030168
Submission received: 14 January 2019 / Revised: 22 February 2019 / Accepted: 5 March 2019 / Published: 9 March 2019

Abstract

:
The level of radionuclides is an important index for the preparation of building materials from industrial solid waste. In order to investigate the radiological hazard of five kinds of typical general industrial solid wastes in Guizhou, China, including fly ash (FA), red mud (RM), phosphorus slag (PS), phosphogypsum (PG), and electrolytic manganese residue (EMR), the radiation intensity and associated radiological impact were studied. The results show that concentrations of 238U, 235U, 232Th, 226Ra, 210Pb, and 40K for different samples vary widely. The concentration of 238U was both positively correlated with 235U and 226Ra, and the uranium contents in the measured samples were all of natural origin. The radiation levels of PG, EMR, EMR-Na (EMR activated by NaOH), and EMR-Ca (EMR activated by Ca(OH)2) were all lower than the Chinese and the world’s recommended highest levels for materials allowed to be directly used as building materials. The values of the internal and external illumination index (IRa and Iγ, respectively) for FA and RM were higher (IRa > 1.0 and Iγ > 1.3 for FA, IRa > 2.0 and Iγ > 2.0 for RM). The radium equivalent activity (Raeq), indoor and outdoor absorbed dose (Din and Dout, respectively), and corresponding annual effective dose rate (Ein and Eout) of RM, PS, and FA were higher than the recommended limit values (i.e., 370 Bq/kg, 84 nGy/h, 59 nGy/h, 0.4 mSv/y, and 0.07 mSv/y, respectively), resulting from the higher relative contribution of 226Ra and 232Th. The portion of RM, FA, and PS in building materials should be less than 75.44%, 29.72%, and 66.01%, respectively. This study provides quantitative analysis for the safe utilization of FA, RM, PS, PG, and EMR in Guizhou building materials.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

General industrial solid waste refers to waste discharged in various industrial production processes, such as the waste of the electric power industry, aluminum industry, phosphorus chemical industry, coal chemical industry, metallurgy, and so forth. This includes fly ash (FA), red mud (RM), phosphogypsum (PG), phosphorus slag (PS), and electrolytic manganese residue (EMR). At present, most general industrial solid waste is mainly used as raw materials for construction, such as cement and concrete, as well as environmental functional materials and a source of valuable elements [1]. In 2016, the comprehensive utilization of general industrial solid waste in China accounted for 48.0% of the country’s total utilization and disposal, and disposal and storage accounted for 21.2% and 30.7% [2], respectively. As mineral resources usually contain natural radionuclides, the activity of radionuclides, such as FA, PS, PG, RM, and EMR, in some industrial solid wastes tends to increase after roasting or electrolyzation. When those general industrial solid wastes are used to prepare building materials, the gamma rays released by radionuclides can pose a radiation hazard to the living environment.
Natural radionuclides, ubiquitously spread in the natural environment [3,4], consist of three well-known radioactive series, that is, the actinium series originating from 235U, the uranium series originating from 238U, and the thorium series originating from 232Th. In addition, there are several isolated radionuclides, such as 40K [5,6]. The radioactive decay chains of 232Th, 238U, 235U, and 40K are the main contributors to the dose of natural radiation [7]. When the ratio of 235U/238U is less than 1%, the contribution of 235U to the environmental dose is very small [8]. Since 98.5% of the radiological effects from uranium series nuclides are produced by 226Ra and its decay products, the radiation from 238U and the other 226Ra precursors are negligible [9]. When industrial solid waste is used to prepare building materials, radionuclides in the environment can be determined by the natural radioactivity level of building materials or the industrial solid waste. Thus, radiation hazards can be assessed. At present, the internal and external exposure index, radium equivalent activity, and indoor and outdoor absorbed dose rate are commonly used indicators in evaluating radionuclide radiation hazards.
The average activity concentrations of 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K in FA, RM, PG, and EMR samples from similar studies in different parts of the world are illustrated in Table 1. As shown in Table 1, it is suggested that the mean activity concentrations of 226Ra for FA in Turkey, Greece, and China (Xiangyang) are 360, 815, and 441 Bq/kg, respectively, higher than those in other countries. Concentrations of 40K in EU countries are generally higher than in others. In terms of RM, the average activity concentrations of 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K in Australia and Jamaica are notably higher than those in other countries. In addition, 226Ra is the main nuclide for PG in Israel, Spain, Korea, Egypt, and Turkey, while the concentrations of 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K for PG in South Africa are relatively balanced. It can be concluded from Table 1 that radionuclide activity concentrations differ from one location to another.
Additionally, many studies have analyzed the radiation hazards of industrial solid wastes. Mamta Gupta et al. [10] reported that the radium equivalent activity of the FA from a thermal power plant in India was 353.9 Bq/kg, which is close to the maximum upper limit of 370 Bq/kg. L. Taoufiq et al. [28] characterized the radioactivity of FA from a thermal power plant in Morocco, and found that the radium equivalent activity was 241–298 Bq/kg, which is lower than 370 Bq/kg. In summary, the radionuclide activity concentrations and associated radiation hazards differ from one location to another. Different isotopes concentration in ores is a result of different conditions, including the metallogenetic body, formation age, epigenetic transformation, and so forth, during deposit formation in different regions. Therefore, the radioactive level of general industrial solid wastes in other regions cannot be used as the reference for Guizhou, China.
The dominant mineral resources, such as coal, phosphorite, bauxite, and manganese, are found in Guizhou. During the development and utilization process for these resources, a large amount of general solid waste including FA, PS, PG, RM, and EMR is accumulated. According to the data from the China statistical yearbook as shown in Table 2, from 2012 to 2017, the national generation volume of general industrial solid wastes varied from 3.09 to 3.32 billion tons, while the generation of Guizhou province varied from 0.071 to 0.094 billion tons. The substantial discharge and stockpiling of those aforementioned industrial solid wastes result in serious environmental pollution. It is vital to find an optimal solution for applying the solid wastes. The study of natural radionuclides and their radiation hazards is of great significance for the comprehensive utilization of industrial solid waste resources in the field of building materials.
In this study, the radionuclide activity of five typical general industrial solid wastes including FA, PS, RM, PG, and EMR in Guizhou, China, was measured using a gamma spectrometry technique. The radioactivity level and associated radiation hazard of these industrial solid wastes were evaluated using indicators such as the internal and external irradiation index (IRa and Iγ, respectively), radium equivalent ratio (Raeq), indoor and outdoor external dose (Din and Dout, respectively), and indoor and outdoor annual effective dose rate (Ein and Eout, respectively). The maximum dosages of solid wastes in building materials were calculated. This study, through radiation evaluation, hopes to provide a mixing amount reference for the aforementioned solid wastes for building materials that meet the radiation limitation requirements.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Samples

The samples in this study include: PS, FA, RM, PG, EMR, electrolytic manganese slag activated by NaOH (EMR-Na), and electrolytic manganese slag activated by Ca(OH)2 (EMR-Ca). Sample PS taken from a building material company in Guizhou, China, was produced using the electric furnace process of preparing yellow phosphorus, which is grayish white or white and partially agglomerated. Sample FA obtained from a coal-burning power plant in Guizhou was black. Sample RM produced by Bayer process from an aluminum company in Guizhou was light red. Sample PG obtained from a phosphorus chemical company in Guizhou was gray and very agglomerated. Sample EMR obtained from an electrolytic manganese plant in Guizhou was a black, fresh slurry. EMR has a certain potential gelling activity with a small amount of silicon and aluminum. The alkaline substance can better excite the potential activity and form a hydrated silicate and aluminate product with hydration characteristics, resulting in the gelling properties of EMR. The alkali-activated EMR can replace part of the cement used to prepare building materials. Previous studies showed that NaOH and Ca(OH)2 have better activation effects on EMR. Therefore, EMR-Na used in this study was obtained by mixing 75 g of fresh EMR, 15 wt.% NaOH (accounting for EMR), and 100 mL of tap water in a 500 mL stirred tank and stirring this mixture for 20 min. EMR-Ca was obtained by mixing 100 g of fresh EMR, 20 wt.% Ca(OH)2 (accounting for EMR), and 100 mL of tap water in a 500 mL stirred tank and stirring this mixture for 15 min.
The moisture contents of PS, FA, RM, PG, and EMR were 4.29%, 4.13%, 5.01%, 20.73%, and 15.7%, respectively. The densities of PS, FA, RM, PG, EMR, EMR-Na, and EMR-Ca were 3.06, 2.33, 3.01, 2.57, 2.31, 2.35, and 2.48 g/cm3, respectively. Major components in seven solid wastes were analyzed by using X-ray fluorescence (XRF, PANalytical Axios mA×4 KW, Malvern Panalytical, Almelo, The Netherlands), and the results are illustrated in Table 3. As shown in Table 3, PS, RM, FA are mainly composed of CaO, SiO2, Al2O3, and Fe2O3 [35], PG is composed of CaO, SiO2, Al2O3, and SO3 [36], while CaO, SiO2, Al2O3, Mn, and S are the main components in EMR, EMR-Na, and EMR-Ca.

2.2. Methods

2.2.1. Radioactivity Measurement

All samples were aggregated, identified, and oven-dried to constant weight in the laboratory, then grounded to a particle size of less than 0.075 mm. Each sample was homogenized and dried in an oven at 105 °C for 3 h to remove moisture. Then, 200 g of each sample were weighed and placed into a cylinder measuring sample box with a diameter of 35 mm and a height of 20 mm, then sealed for eight weeks to achieve radioactive secular equilibrium between 226Ra and its daughters. The measurements of activity concentrations were carried out at the Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, using a vertical closed coaxial HPGe detector (GX6020, CANBERRA, Oak Ridge, TN, USA). The detector has an energy range of 3 keV to 10 MeV, with an energy resolution of 2.0 keV. The relative efficiency is 60% at 1332 keV γ-ray, and the peak-to-Compton ratio is 66:1. The actual energy range used to test the samples was 35–3000 keV. The measurement time for each sample was set as 180,000 s. The test data was collated and analyzed using management software OpenEMS with a data management system (RDBMS). To reduce the gamma ray background, a cylindrical lead shield detector was used to absorb X-rays, which contains two inner concentric cylinders of copper and aluminum. The calibration sources with an energy range covering nuclides 238U, 226Ra, 232Th, 40K,241Am, 137Cs, and 60Co were used for the determination of the detection efficiency of the measurement system, and the typically obtained values were within 6% of certified values.
The γ-ray lines that were used to measure the activities for nuclides were represented mainly by gamma-ray-emitting nuclei in the decay series of 232Th, 226Ra, and 40K. The 40K and 210Pb were determined from their single photo peaks of 1460 keV (1.2%) and 46.5 keV (4.26%), respectively. The 238U and 232Th are not gamma ray emitters. However, it is possible to measure the gamma rays of their decay products. The decay product taken for 238U was 234Th (63.3 keV (3.81%)). The intensity of gamma rays emitted by 232Th is very weak, and its decay product 228Ra has a long half-life without gamma rays. The half-life of 228Ac, the daughter of 228Ra, is 6.13 h. According to the literature, Th and Ra both have affinity for silicates [37]. Moreover, some studies have shown that the activities of 232Th and 228Ra in solid wastes such as red mud, phosphogypsum, and fly ash are approximately balanced [38,39,40]. Therefore, the equilibrium between 232Th and 228Ra was assumed, and the 232Th was determined using 208Tl (583.2 keV (30.78%) and 2614.5 keV (35.7%)) and 228Ac (911.2 keV (26.6%)). In addition, the 214Pb (351.9 keV (35.8%)] and 214Bi [609.3 keV (45%)) were used to determine the 226Ra, and the decay product taken for 235U was 235U (185.7 keV (57.5%)). As there is an interference between 185.7 keV from 235U and 186.2 keV from 226Ra, the 235U activity can be deduced from the 186 keV multiplet after removal of the 226Ra contribution. Thus, the activity concentration of 235U radionuclide is given by Equation (1) [41]:
A U - 235 = 1.75 × C R total ( 186   keV ) ε 186   keV 0.06 A Ra - 226
where CR and CRtotal(186 keV) are calculated by using Equations (2) and (3):
C R = A × B R × ε
C R total ( 186   keV ) = C R Ra - 226 + C R U - 235
where CR is the counting rate in full-energy peak in count/s, CRtotal(186 keV) is the counting rate for the 186 keV multiple, A is the activity of radionuclide in Bq/kg, BR is the branching ratio or the gamma-ray emission rate, ε is the detection efficiency. 226Ra and 235U contribute about 58% and 42% of the total count rate of the 186 keV peak with the existence of equilibrium, respectively [42].

2.2.2. Internal and External Illumination Index

The internal exposure index (IRa) refers to the specific activity ratio of 226Ra in the building materials to the 226Ra limit specified in the national standard (GB6566-2010) [43]. The external radiation index (Iγ) refers to the sum of the specific activity ratio of 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K in building materials to their respective standard limits. The IRa and Iγ were calculated by using Equations (4) and (5):
I R a = C R a 200
I γ = C R a 370 + C Th 260 + C K 4200
where CRa, CTh, and CK are the mean radioactivity concentrations of 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K (Bq/kg), respectively. The specific activity limit of 226Ra in building materials specified in the GB6566-2010 is 200 Bq/kg, considering only the internal irradiation conditions. The prescribed limits were 370, 260, and 4200 Bq/kg for 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K, respectively, in building materials when they exist separately under the external irradiation condition.

2.2.3. Radium Equivalent Activity

The distribution of 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K in building materials is not uniform [44]. The radium equivalent activity (Raeq) [45] was used to compare the relative gamma radioactivity of 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K in building materials. It has been estimated that 1 Bq/kg of 226Ra, 0.7 Bq/kg of 232Th, and 13 Bq/kg of 40K produce the same gamma ray dose [46,47]. Thus, the radium equivalent activities (Raeq) can be estimated using Equation (6) [48,49,50]:
R a eq = C Ra + 1.43 C Th + 0.077 C K

2.2.4. Indoor External Dose (Din) and Outdoor External Dose (Dout)

An irradiation scenario is required to evaluate the 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K absorbed doses produced by the building materials. The European Commission proposed that the length, width, and height of the concrete room are 4, 5, and 2.8 m, respectively. The thickness and density of the wall are 20 cm and 2350 kg∙m−3, respectively [51]. Then, the indoor external dose Din could be calculated by using Equation (7):
D in ( nGy / h ) = 0.92 C Ra + 1.1 C Th + 0.081 C K .  
To assess the dose of radiation from building materials in a room, the portion from natural radiation needs to be subtracted. According to the survey results of the Chinese National Environmental Protection Department, the weighted mean by area and population are 62.8 and 62.1 nGy∙h−1, respectively. Taking 62.1 nGy∙h−1 as the natural radiation background value, the calculated absorbed dose rate should be reduced by 62.1 [52].
The outdoor external dose (Dout) assessed from 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K was supposed to be equally distributed at 1 m above the ground surface. Therefore, the Dout was calculated using Equation (8) [53]:
D out ( nGy / h ) = 0.462 C Ra + 0.604 C Th + 0.0417 C K .  

2.2.5. Annual Effective Dose Rate

Buildings are the main places for daily activities of human beings, and the indoor and outdoor occupancy factors are 0.8 and 0.2, respectively (i.e., 80% and 20% of the time they are occupied indoors and outdoors, respectively) [54,55]. The conversion factor from the absorbed dose in the air to the effective dose received by the individual is 0.7 [56]. The annual indoor effective dose rate (Ein) and annual outdoor effective dose rate (Eout) can be calculated using Equations (9) and (10), respectively [55,57]:
E in = D in × 365 × 24   h × 0.8 × 0.7 ( Sv / Gy ) = D in × 4905 × 10 6 ( mSv / y )
E out = D out × 365 × 24   h × 0.2 × 0.7 ( Sv / Gy )   = D out × 1226 × 10 6 ( mSv / y )

2.2.6. Maximum Dosage of Solid Waste in Building Materials

The maximum dosage of solid waste in building materials fs can be calculated by using Equations (11) and (12):
f s · C Ra + ( 1 f s ) · C Ra 200 1.0
f s · C Ra + ( 1 f s ) · C Ra 370 + f s · C Th + ( 1 f s ) · C Th 260 + f s · C K + ( 1 f s ) · C K 4200 1.0
where C Ra , C Th , and C K are the mean radioactivity concentrations of 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K (in Bq/kg) for other components in building materials, respectively. When the ratio of C Ra , C Th , and C K are all meant to be zero, the ratio of fs calculated using Equations (11) and (12) is the maximum dosage of solid waste in building materials.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Activity Concentration

The average values of the activity concentration of six nuclides for seven samples were calculated and are illustrated in Table 4. It can be concluded that the seven industrial solid wastes all contained 238U, 235U, 232Th, 226Ra, 210Pb, and 40K. The activity concentrations of 40K were relatively high in EMR, EMR-Na, PS, and FA, with values of 443.8, 423.9, 529.4, and 461.0 Bq/kg, respectively. In FA, RM, and PS, the activity concentrations of 226Ra were relatively higher than those of the other samples, at 208.2, 462.7, and 187.4 Bq/kg, respectively. The activity concentrations of 232Th in FA and RM were as high as 165.6 and 457.7 Bq/kg, respectively. In addition, activity concentrations of 238U in FA, RM, and PS were higher than those in other solid wastes, which were 234.9, 513.0, and 199.8 Bq/kg, respectively. On the contrary, the contents of 210Pb and 235U were very low in all samples. Furthermore, when NaOH and Ca(OH)2 were used to activate EMR, the activity concentrations of the six nuclides in EMR-Na and EMR-Ca decreased, indicating that the addition of NaOH and Ca(OH)2 can weaken the radioactivity of EMR.

3.2. The Source Analysis of Uranium

The analysis of the relationship between 238U and 235U and 226Ra can be used to trace the source of the radioactive contamination by uranium in the environment. The activity concentrations of 238U were plotted against the activity concentrations of 235U and 226Ra, as shown in Figure 1. The ratios of 238U/235U and 238U/226Ra were calculated and are shown in Table 4. As shown in Figure 1a, the linear fitting of the graph shows a good correlation between 238U and 235U (R2 = 0.990). From the natural isotope abundance of uranium isotopes (238U is 99.2%, 235U is 0.72%) and its half-life, it is well known that naturally occurring uranium has a constant 238U/235U activity ratio of 21.7 [58]. The results given in Table 4 indicate that the ratios of 238U/235U for the seven samples vary from 10.37 to 30.62, and the 238U/235U of PG is the lowest at 10.37. The ratio of PS, RM, and FA is close to the constant value, while the 238U/235U of EMR, EMR-Na, and EMR-Ca are all higher than 21.7. The reason for the deviation may be the higher uncertainty values caused by the self-absorption effect. Additionally, the emanation of radon from the sealed samples may also cause an underestimation of uranium activity concentrations [59]. As CaO, SiO2, Al2O3 are the major components in PS, RM, FA, and PG, according to the literature, the accumulations of U are often associated with clays because the clay fraction has an affinity for absorbing U; 238U may be easily enriched in clay minerals from the perspective of adsorption [60]. PS, RM, FA, and PG are obtained in the process of calcination, coal alumina, dissolution combustion, and phosphoric acid production, thus the adsorption of clay minerals may have little effect on uranium migration.
As shown in Table 5, the ratios of 238U/226Ra for the seven solid wastes varied from 0.46 to 1.88, and the concentrations of 238U were commonly lower than 226Ra. The reason for this may be that 238U/226Ra was disturbed in favor of 226Ra [59]. As shown in Figure 1b, the linear fitting of the graph shows a good correlation (R2 = 0.985), and the slope of the line has a value (1.09) close to the average value of 1.29 for 238U/226Ra activity ratios. This indicates that there may exist a radioactive balance between 238U and 226Ra. According to previous literature reports, there is depleted uranium pollution in addition to natural uranium in the sample when the 238U/226Ra ratio is greater than 5 [61]. Based on this information, it may be concluded that the uranium contents in the measured seven samples are all of natural origin.

3.3. Radiological Impact Assessment

3.3.1. Analysis of Radiation Hazard Indexes

The IRa, Iγ, Raeq, Din, Dout, Ein, and Eout were calculated according to the activity concentrations of the radionuclides of the seven solid wastes and Equations (1)–(7). As illustrated in Table 6, the IRa and Iγ of the seven industrial solid wastes were 0.11–2.31 and 0.17–3.07 Bq/kg, respectively, of which PS, PG, EMR, EMR-Na, and EMR-Ca were all less than 1. The IRa was greater than 1 and the Iγ was greater than 1.3 for FA. The IRa and Iγ of the RM were both greater than 2. According to Table 7, “Limited Standards for Radionuclide of Building Materials”, PS, PG, EMR, EMR-Na, and EMR-Ca can be directly used as building materials and decorative materials of class A, B, and C. FA can be used as decoration materials of class B and class C. This means that almost all samples are safe for use as they meet the PRC National Standard. Adding FA and RM in building materials should be considered.
According to Table 6, the Raeq values of the seven samples were between 64.54 and 1137.18 Bq/kg, among which the Raeq of PG, EMR, EMR-Na, and EMR-Ca were lower than the world’s recommended limit (370 Bq/kg) for building materials [56]. The Raeq values of the RM, PS, and FA were as high as 1137.18, 557.03, and 485.78 Bq/kg, respectively. Therefore, the dosage of RM, PS, and FA should be considered when used as the source for building materials.
It also can be seen from Table 6 that the Din and Dout of the seven industrial solid wastes were 6.38–888.07 and 29.70–501.03 nGy/h, respectively. Specifically, the Din of PS, RM, and FA were as high as 404.67, 888.07, and 354.49 nGy/h, respectively, while their Dout values were 246.93, 501.03, and 218.29 nGy/h, respectively. These values are higher than the world’s average values (i.e., 84 nGy/h for Din and 59 nGy/h for Dout [56,62]). The results show that the values of the annual effective dose rate for the seven samples were 0.03–4.36 mSv/y for Ein and 0.04–0.61 mSv/y for Eout. The values of Ein and Eout for PS, RM, and FA were all higher than the world’s recommended values (i.e., 0.4 mSv/y for Ein and 0.07 mSv/y for Eout [56]).
In summary, the radioactive levels of RM, FA, and PS exceed the “Limited Standards for the Radionuclide of Building Materials”, and they cannot be directly used for building materials, while the PG, EMR, EMR-Na, and EMR-Ca could be directly used for building materials within the recommended levels.

3.3.2. Contribution Analysis of Nuclides to Radiation

According to Equations (1)–(7), the contribution of radionuclides 26Ra, 232Th, and 40K to radiation hazard indexes varies in different solid wastes. The contributions of 26Ra, 232Th, and 40K to Iγ, Raeq, Din, Ein, Dout, and Eout were calculated and plotted in Figure 2. As shown in Figure 2, 226Ra was the main contributor to Iγ, Raeq, Din, Ein, Dout, and Eout in RM, FA, and PG, and the relative contributions of 226Ra were in the range of 40.69–44.80% for RM, 42.44–45.97% for FA, and 92.44–95.19% for PG. Similarly, 232Th was the main contributor to Iγ, Raeq, Din, Ein, Dout, and Eout in PS, RM, and FA, and the relative contributions of 232Th varied from 55.07 to 59.99% for PS, 52.98 to 57.55% for RM, and 43.73 to 48.76% for FA. However, the relative contributions of 40K to Iγ, Raeq, Din, Ein, Dout, and Eout in EMR, EMR-Na, and EMR-Ca were in the range of 35.51–41.00%, 36.68–42.19%, and 32.66–38.02%, respectively. This data shows that 226Ra and 232Th were the main contributors to radiation hazard indexes in PS, RM, FA, and PG, while the contributions of 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K in EMR, EMR-Na, and EMR-Ca were relatively balanced. However, the phase analysis of known nuclides in those aforementioned solid wastes has not been covered in this study, and future research should focus on the removal or decrease of the nuclides in different phases.

3.3.3. Limitation Analysis of Solid Wastes in Building Materials

As the solid wastes RM, FA, and PS cannot be directly used for building materials, the maximum dosages (fs) of solid wastes FA, RM, and PS in building materials were calculated using Equations (11) and (12) with results of 75.44%, 29.72%, and 66.01%, respectively. According to the different related research reviews related, increasing the addition of FA in concrete can result in a decrease in the compressive strength of concrete. The optimum FA percentages were found to be 10%, 20%, 22%, and 35% in various studies [63,64,65,66]. Similarly, previous research showed that the corrosion rate of concrete is the lowest between 20 wt. % and 30 wt. % of added RM content [67]. Other studies showed that the addition of RM in amounts greater than 20% causes a decrease in the hydration temperature and results in a decrease in the compressive strength [68]. Therefore, in terms of the mechanical properties of building materials, the optimum addition of FA, RM, and PS in building materials will not exceed the maximum addition allowed by their radioactivity level. That is, FA, RM, and PS can be used even if their radioactivity levels are above the standard limits.

4. Conclusions

(1)
40K, 226Ra, 232Th, and 238U are the main nuclides in FA, RM, and PS. 210Pb and 226Ra are the main nuclides in PG, while 40K is the main nuclide in EMR, EMR-Na, and EMR-Ca. The uranium contents of all samples are all from natural uranium.
(2)
The values of IRa and Iγ were all less than 1 except for FA (IRa > 1 and Iγ > 1.3) and RM (IRa > 2 and Iγ > 2), and the values of Raeq, Din, Dout, Ein, and Eout were higher than the world’s recommended values (i.e., 370 Bq/kg, 84 nGy/h, 59 nGy/h, 0.4 mSv/y, and 0.07 mSv/y, respectively) for PS, RM, and FA due to higher concentrations of 226Ra and 232Th.
(3)
PG, EMR, EMR-Na, and EMR-Ca could be used for building materials unlimitedly. However, RM, FA, and PS could be used as additive or auxiliary materials for building materials by means of doping and mixing, with maximum portions of 75.44%, 29.72%, and 66.01%, respectively. These findings provide a basis for the restriction of the aforementioned solid wastes in Guizhou in the field of building materials. Further research on the phase analysis and treatment of known nuclides in solid wastes are necessary in the future.

Author Contributions

Z.S. and Q.Z. conceived and designed the experiments; Z.S. performed the experiments; Q.Z. contributed the analysis resource; W.C. and Q.C. helped to analyze the data; Z.S. wrote the paper.

Funding

This study was founded by the Science and Technology Program of Guizhou Province, China (Qian Ke He Support [2017]2040) and the Major Special Projects of Guizhou Province, China (Qian Ke He [20116023].

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhang, Y.H.; Wang, X.K.; Lu, F.Z. Study progress of alkali removal from red mud and novel functional materials (in Chinese). Chin. J. Environ. Eng. 2016, 10, 3383–3390. [Google Scholar]
  2. 2017 Annual Report on Prevention and Control of Solid Waste in China’s Large and Medium-Sized Cities (In Chinese); Environmental Protection: Beijing, China, 2018; pp. 90–106.
  3. Matiullah; Ahad, A.; Rehman, S.U.; Rehman, S.U.; Faheem, M. Measurement of radioactivity in the soil of Bahawalpur division, Pakistan. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 2004, 112, 443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Mehra, R.; Singh, S.; Singh, K.; Sonkawade, R. 226Ra, 232Th and 40K analysis in soil samples from some areas of Malwa region, Punjab, India using gamma ray spectrometry. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2007, 134, 333–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ahmad, N.; Matiullah; Khatibeh, A.J.A.H.; Ma’Ly, A.; Kenawy, M.A. Measurement of natural radioactivity in Jordanian sand. Radiat. Meas. 1997, 28, 341–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Khatibeh, A.J.A.H.; Ahmad, N.; Matiullah; Kenawy, M.A. Natural radioactivity in marble stones- Jordan. Radiat. Meas. 1997, 28, 345–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bruzzi, L.; Baroni, M.; Mele, R.; Nanni, E. Proposal for a method of certification of natural radioactivity in building materials. J. Radiol. Prot. 1997, 17, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chiozzi, P.; De, F.P.; Fazio, A.; Pasquale, V.V.; Verdoya, M. Laboratory application of NaI (Tl) gamma-ray spectrometry to studies of natural radioactivity in geophysics. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2000, 53, 127–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Turhan, S. Assessment of the natural radioactivity and radiological hazards in Turkish cement and its raw materials. J. Environ. Radioact. 2008, 99, 404–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gupta, M.; Mahur, A.K.; Varshney, R.; Sonkawade, R.G.; Verma, K.D.; Prasad, R. Measurement of natural radioactivity and radon exhalation rate in fly ash samples from a thermal power plant and estimation of radiation doses. Radiat. Meas. 2013, 50, 160–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Turhan, Ş.; Parmaksız, A.; Köse, A.; Yüksel, A.; Arıkan, İ.H.; Yücel, B. Radiological characteristics of pulverized fly ashes produced in Turkish coal-burning thermal power plants. Fuel 2010, 89, 3892–3900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kardos, R.; Sas, Z.; Shahrokhi, A.; Somlai, J.; Kovács, T. Radionuclide content of NORM by-products originating from the coal-fired power plant in Oroszlány (Hungary). Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 2015, 167, 266–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Trevisi, R.; Leonardi, F.; Risica, S.; Nuccetelli, C. Updated database on natural radioactivity in building materials in Europe. J. Environ. Radioact. 2018, 187, 90–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lu, X.; Zhang, X. Radionuclide content and associated radiation hazards of building materials and by-products in Baoji, West China. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 2007, 128, 471–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Feng, T.T.; Lu, X.W. Natural radioactivity, radon exhalation rate and radiation dose of fly ash used as building materials in Xiangyang, China. Indoor Built Environ. 2016, 25, 626–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Cooper, M.B.; Clarke, P.C.; Robertson, W.; Mcpharlin, I.R.; Jeffrey, R.C. An investigation of radionuclide uptake into food crops grown in soils treated with bauxite mining residues. J. Radioanal. Nuclear Chem. 1995, 194, 379–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Pinnock, W.R. Measurements of radioactivity in Jamaican building materials and gamma dose equivalents in a prototype red mud house. Health Phys. 1991, 61, 647–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Gezer, F.; Turhan, Ş.; Uğur, F.A.; Gören, E.; Kurt, M.Z.; Ufuktepe, Y. Natural radionuclide content of disposed phosphogypsum as TENORM produced from phosphorus fertilizer industry in Turkey. Ann. Nuclear Energy 2012, 50, 33–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Alam, M.N.; Chowdhury, M.I.; Kamal, M.; Ghose, S.; Banu, H.; Chakraborty, D. Radioactivity in chemical fertilizers used in Bangladesh. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 1997, 48, 1165–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mourad, N.M.; Sharshar, T.; Elnimr, T.; Mousa, M.A. Radioactivity and fluoride contamination derived from a phosphate fertilizer plant in Egypt. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2009, 67, 1259–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Al-Jundi, J.; Al-Ahmad, N.; Shehadeh, H.; Afaneh, F.; Maghrabi, M.; Gerstmann, U.; Hã Llriegl, V.; Oeh, U. Investigations on the activity concentrations of 238U, 226Ra, 228Ra, 210Pb and 40K in Jordan phosphogypsum and fertilizers. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 2008, 131, 449–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Song, M.H.; Chang, B.U.; Koh, S.M.; Kim, Y.J.; Kim, D.J.K.G. Overall natural radioactivity of a phosphate fertilizer industry in Korea. Radioprotection 2012, 46, S113–S118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kovler, K.; Haquin, G.; Manasherov, V.; Ne’Eman, E.; Lavi, N. Natural radionuclides in building materials available in Israel. Build. Environ. 2002, 37, 531–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Dueñas, C.; Fernández, M.C.; Cañete, S.; Pérez, M. Radiological impacts of natural radioactivity from phosphogypsum piles in Huelva (Spain). Radiat. Meas. 2010, 45, 242–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Msila, X.; Labuschagne, F.; Barnard, W.; Billing, D.G. Radioactive nuclides in phosphogypsum from the lowveld region of South Africa. S. Afr. J. Sci. 2016, 112, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kovács, T.; Shahrokhi, A.; Sas, Z.; Vigh, T.; Somlai, J. Radon exhalation study of manganese clay residue and usability in brick production. J. Environ. Radioact. 2017, 168, 15–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Du, B.; Zhou, C.; Dan, Z.; Luan, Z.; Duan, N. Preparation and characteristics of steam-autoclaved bricks produced from electrolytic manganese solid waste. Constr. Build. Mater. 2014, 50, 291–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Taoufiq, L.; Laamyem, A.; Boukhair, A.; Essediqi, E.; Monkade, M.; Zrabda, A. Radiological assessment of wastewater treatment processes based on the use of coal ashes as a filters. J. Radiat. Res. Appl. Sci. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. NBSC. 2013 China Statistical Yearbook (in Chinese); China Statistics Press: Beijing, China, 2013; pp. 278–279. ISBN 9787503769634.
  30. NBSC. 2014 China Statistical Yearbook (in Chinese); China Statistics Press: Beijing, China, 2014; pp. 227–228. ISBN 9787503772801.
  31. NBSC. 2015 China Statistical Yearbook (in Chinese); China Statistics Press: Beijing, China, 2015; pp. 251–252. ISBN 9787503776380.
  32. NBSC. 2016 China Statistical Yearbook (in Chinese); China Statistics Press: Beijing, China, 2016; pp. 247–248. ISBN 9787503779176.
  33. NBSC. 2017 China Statistical Yearbook (in Chinese); China Statistics Press: Beijing, China, 2017; pp. 241–242. ISBN 978-7-5037-8253-4.
  34. NBSC. 2018 China Statistical Yearbook (in Chinese); China Statistics Press: Beijing, China, 2018; pp. 250–251. ISBN 9787503785870.
  35. Li, X.; Ye, J.; Liu, Z.; Qiu, Y.; Li, L.; Mao, S.; Wang, X.; Zhang, Q. Microwave digestion and alkali fusion assisted hydrothermal synthesis of zeolite from coal fly ash for enhanced adsorption of Cd(II) in aqueous solution. J. Cent. South Univ. 2018, 25, 9–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Li, X.; Zhang, Q.; Ke, B.; Wang, X.; Li, L.; Li, X.; Mao, S. Insight into the effect of maleic acid on the preparation of α-hemihydrate gypsum from phosphogypsum in Na2SO4 solution. J. Cryst. Growth 2018, 493, 34–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Croymans, T.; Vandael Schreurs, I.; Hult, M.; Marissens, G.; Lutter, G.; Stroh, H.; Schreurs, S.; Schroeyers, W. Variation of natural radionuclides in non-ferrous fayalite slags during a one-month production period. J. Environ. Radioact. 2017, 172, 63–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Hegedűs, M.; Tóth-Bodrogi, E.; Jónás, J.; Somlai, J.; Kovács, T. Mobility of 232Th and 210Po in red mud. J. Environ. Radioact. 2018, 184–185, 71–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Santos, A.J.G.; Silva, P.S.C.; Mazzilli, B.P.; Fávaro, D.I.T. Radiological characterisation of disposed phosphogypsum in Brazil: Evaluation of the occupational exposure and environmental impact. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 2006, 121, 179–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Lauer, N.E.; Hower, J.C.; Hsu-Kim, H.; Taggart, R.K.; Vengosh, A. Naturally occurring radioactive materials in coals and coal combustion residuals in the united states. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 11227–11233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Ebaid, Y.Y. Use of Gamma-Ray spectrometry for uranium isotopic analysis in environmental samples. Rom. J. Phys. 2010, 55, 69–74. [Google Scholar]
  42. Ebaid, Y.Y.; El-Mongy, S.A.; Allam, K.A. 235U-γemission contribution to the 186 keV energy transition of 226Ra in environmental samples activity calculations. Int. Congr. Ser. 2005, 1276, 409–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. AQAIQ; SAC. Limits of Radionuclides in Building Materials GB 6566-2010 (In Chinese); AQSIQ, SAC: Beijing, China, 2010; pp. 1–3.
  44. Lu, X.; Chao, S.; Yang, F. Determination of natural radioactivity and associated radiation hazard in building materials used in Weinan, China. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2014, 99, 62–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hamilton, E.I. The relative radioactivity of building materials. Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 1971, 32, 398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Matthew, P.J. Natural radioactivity of Australian building materials, industrial wastes and by-products. Health Phys. 1985, 48, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Stojanovska, Z.; Nedelkovski, D.; Ristova, M. Natural radioactivity and human exposure by raw materials and end product from cement industry used as building materials. Radiat. Meas. 2010, 45, 969–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. NEA-OECD. Exposure to Radiation from the Natural Radioactivity in Building Materials: Report by a Group of Exports of the OECD Nuclear Energy Agency; NEA-OECD: Paris, France, 1979; pp. 13–19. [Google Scholar]
  49. Yu, K.N.; Guan, Z.J.; Stokes, M.J.; Young, E.C.M. The assessment of the natural radiation dose committed to the Hong Kong people. J. Environ. Radioact. 1992, 17, 31–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Hayumbu, P.; Zaman, M.B.; Lubaba, N.C.H.; Munsanje, S.S.; Muleya, D. Natural radioactivity in Zambian building materials collected from Lusaka. J. Radioanal. Nuclear Chem. 1995, 199, 229–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. European Commission. Radiological protection principles concerning the natural radioactivity of building materials. Brussels. Radiat. Prot. 1999, 112, 5–16. [Google Scholar]
  52. He, Z.Y.; Luo, G.Z.; Huang, J.J. National survey on natural radioactivity level of environment (1983–1990) (in Chinese). Radiat. Prot. 1992, 12, 81–95. [Google Scholar]
  53. Quindos, L.S.; Fernández, P.L.; Ródenas, C.; Gómez-Arozamena, J.; Arteche, J. Conversion factors for external gamma dose derived from natural radionuclides in soils. J. Environ. Radioact. 2004, 71, 139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Uosif, M.A.; Eltaher, A. Radiological assessment of Abu-Tartur phosphate, Western Desert Egypt. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 2008, 130, 228–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Billa, J.; Han, F.; Didla, S.; Ankrah, M.; Yu, H.; Dimpah, J.; Brempong, O.; Adzanu, S. Evaluation of radioactivity levels in fertilizers commonly used in the Southern USA. J. Radioanal. Nuclear Chem. 2015, 306, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. UNSCEAR. Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation: United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation: UNSCEAR 2000 Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes; UNSCEAR: New York, NY, USA, 2000; ISBN 9211422388. [Google Scholar]
  57. Uosif, M.A.M.; Mostafa, A.M.A.; Elsaman, R.; Moustafa, E.S. Natural radioactivity levels and radiological hazards indices of chemical fertilizers commonly used in Upper Egypt. J. Radiat. Res. Appl. Sci. 2014, 7, 430–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Ivanovich, M.; Harmon, R.S. Uranium-Series Disequilibrium: Applications to Earth, Marine, and Environmental Sciences, 2nd ed.; Clarendon Press and Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1992; p. 571. ISBN 019854278X. [Google Scholar]
  59. El-Bahi, S.M.; Sroor, A.; Mohamed, G.Y.; El-Gendy, N.S. Radiological impact of natural radioactivity in Egyptian phosphate rocks, phosphogypsum and phosphate fertilizers. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2017, 123, 121–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Megumi, K.; Oka, T.; Yaskawa, K.; Sakanoue, M. Contents of natural radioactive nuclides in soil in relation to their surface area. JGR Solid Earth 1982, 87, 10857–10860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Karangelos, D.J.; Anagnostakis, M.J.; Hinis, E.P.; Simopoulos, S.E.; Zunic, Z.S. Determination of depleted uranium in environmental samples by gamma-spectroscopic techniques. J. Environ. Radioact. 2004, 76, 295–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. UNSCEAR. Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation, V. I: UNSCEAR 2008 Report to the General Assembly with Scientific Annexes; United Nations Publication: New York, NY, USA, 2010; ISBN 978-92-1-142274-0. [Google Scholar]
  63. Lederer, J.; Trinkel, V.; Fellner, J. Wide-scale utilization of MSWI fly ashes in cement production and its impact on average heavy metal contents in cements: The case of Austria. Waste Manag. 2017, 60, 247–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Del Valle-Zermeño, R.; Formosa, J.; Chimenos, J.M.; Martínez, M.; Fernández, A.I. Aggregate material formulated with MSWI bottom ash and APC fly ash for use as secondary building material. Waste Manag. 2013, 33, 621–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. García Arenas, C.; Marrero, M.; Leiva, C.; Solís-Guzmán, J.; Vilches Arenas, L.F. High fire resistance in blocks containing coal combustion fly ashes and bottom ash. Waste Manag. 2011, 31, 1783–1789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Pan, J.R.; Huang, C.; Kuo, J.; Lin, S. Recycling MSWI bottom and fly ash as raw materials for Portland cement. Waste Manag. 2008, 28, 1113–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Ribeiro, D.V.; Labrincha, J.A.; Morelli, M.R. Effect of the addition of red mud on the corrosion parameters of reinforced concrete. Cem. Concr. Res. 2012, 42, 124–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Senff, L.; Hotza, D.; Labrincha, J.A. Effect of red mud addition on the rheological behaviour and on hardened state characteristics of cement mortars. Constr. Build. Mater. 2011, 25, 163–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Variation of 238U activity concentration versus (a) 235U activity and (b) 226Ra activity.
Figure 1. Variation of 238U activity concentration versus (a) 235U activity and (b) 226Ra activity.
Minerals 09 00168 g001
Figure 2. The relative concentrations of 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K in (a) Iγ, (b) Raeq, (c) Din and Ein, (d) Dout and Eout in industrial solid wastes.
Figure 2. The relative concentrations of 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K in (a) Iγ, (b) Raeq, (c) Din and Ein, (d) Dout and Eout in industrial solid wastes.
Minerals 09 00168 g002
Table 1. The obtained average activity concentrations of 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K in FA, RM, PG, and EMR samples from similar studies in different parts of the world (unit: Bq/kg).
Table 1. The obtained average activity concentrations of 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K in FA, RM, PG, and EMR samples from similar studies in different parts of the world (unit: Bq/kg).
CountrySample TypeActivity Concentration (Bq/kg)Reference
226Ra232Th40K
IndiaFA119147352[10]
Turkey360102517[11]
Hungary17855387[12]
Greece81556400[13]
Czech Rep.14686669[13]
Germany16494517[13]
Italy170140400[13]
Poland200118798[13]
Romania219116595[13]
China (Baoji)112148386[14]
China (Xiangyang)441110510[15]
TurkeyRM210539112[13]
Hungary30129550[13]
Greece24436457[13]
Germany171318215[13]
Italy97118115[13]
Australia3101350350[16]
Jamaica1047350335[17]
TurkeyPG436913[18]
Bangladesh23421108[19]
Egypt59662[20]
Jordan376440[21]
Korea618924[22]
Israel7471463[23]
Spain647833[24]
South Africa109189>100[25]
HungaryEMR5240607[26]
China (Chongqing)3758631[27]
Table 2. Generation of general industrial solid waste during 2012–2017, in Guizhou, China (unit: billion tons).
Table 2. Generation of general industrial solid waste during 2012–2017, in Guizhou, China (unit: billion tons).
YearChinaGuizhouReference
20123.2900.078[29]
20133.2770.082[30]
20143.2560.074[31]
20153.2710.071[32]
20163.0920.078[33]
20173.3160.094[34]
Table 3. Major components in seven solid wastes.
Table 3. Major components in seven solid wastes.
ComponentConcentration (%)
PSRMFAPGEMREMR-NaEMR-Ca
CaO44.7714.352.8334.077.329.115.43
Fe2O30.4521.532.830.20---
Al2O35.5520.8914.750.138.8511.277.99
SiO237.8116.7545.725.2922.8530.2920.35
MgO2.611.551.180.011.862.421.80
P2O52.860.31-0.75---
TiO2-4.591.74-0.250.330.21
K2O1.430.981.24-1.752.221.66
Na2O0.334.930.55-0.140.420.12
SO3-1.19-40.24---
Mn----4.925.576.25
S----8.193.27.08
Others0.0412.0417.0319.312.883.752.18
Table 4. The activity concentrations (Bq/kg) of six nuclides for the seven solid wastes.
Table 4. The activity concentrations (Bq/kg) of six nuclides for the seven solid wastes.
Name of Solid WastesActivity Concentration (Bq/kg)
40K210Pb226Ra232Th235U238U
PS461.0 ± 23.615.1 ± 9.9187.4 ± 5.8233.7 ± 9.69.1 ± 0.3199.8 ± 17.9
RM259.5 ± 18.9324. 8 ± 18.1462.7 ± 14.5457.7 ± 13.422.4 ± 0.7513.0 ± 43.1
FA529.4 ± 31.1210.5 ± 11.8208.2 ± 7.0165.6 ± 5.610.1 ± 0.3234.9 ± 27.2
PG3.3 ± 6.086.0 ± 4.861.0 ± 2.12.3 ± 0.52.7 ± 0.128.0 ± 13.0
EMR443.8 ± 26.734.3 ± 2.326.6 ± 1.624.8 ± 1.71.6 ± 0.148.3 ± 15.9
EMR-Na423.9 ± 25.945.9 ± 2.924.5 ± 1.622.2 ± 1.51.5 ± 0.137.9 ± 15.7
EMR-Ca321.4 ± 20.937.7 ± 2.521.1 ± 1.520.9 ± 1.61.3 ± 0.139.8 ± 15.8
Table 5. The activity ratio for different samples under investigation.
Table 5. The activity ratio for different samples under investigation.
Name of Solid Wastes238U/235U238U/226Ra
PS21.961.07
RM22.901.11
FA23.261.13
PG10.370.46
EMR30.191.82
EMR-Na25.271.54
EMR-Ca30.621.88
Table 6. The IRa, Iγ, Raeq, Din, Dout, Ein, and Eout for industrial solid wastes.
Table 6. The IRa, Iγ, Raeq, Din, Dout, Ein, and Eout for industrial solid wastes.
Solid WastesIRa (Bq/kg)Iγ (Bq/kg)Raeq (Bq/kg)Din (nGy/h)Dout (nGy/h)Ein (mSv/y)Eout (mSv/y)
PS0.940.71557.03404.67246.931.980.30
RM2.313.071137.18888.07501.034.360.61
FA1.041.33485.78354.49218.291.740.27
PG0.300.1764.54−3.19 *29.70−0.02 *0.04
EMR0.130.2796.2325.6045.770.130.06
EMR-Na0.120.2588.9919.2842.450.090.05
EMR-Ca0.110.2175.786.3835.800.030.04
* The minus sign represents that the Din of PG is lower than the natural radiation background value.
Table 7. Limited Standards for the Radionuclide of Building Materials (GB/6566-2010) [43].
Table 7. Limited Standards for the Radionuclide of Building Materials (GB/6566-2010) [43].
Standard NameBuilding MaterialsDecoration Materials
Hollow Rate ≤ 25%Hollow Rate > 25%Class AClass BClass C
Radionuclide limit I R a ≤ 1.0 I R a ≤ 1.0 I R a ≤ 1.0 I R a ≤ 1.3 I r ≤ 2.8
I r ≤ 1.0 I r ≤ 1.3 I r ≤ 1.3 I r ≤ 1.9

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shen, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Cheng, W.; Chen, Q. Radioactivity of Five Typical General Industrial Solid Wastes and its Influence in Solid Waste Recycling. Minerals 2019, 9, 168. https://doi.org/10.3390/min9030168

AMA Style

Shen Z, Zhang Q, Cheng W, Chen Q. Radioactivity of Five Typical General Industrial Solid Wastes and its Influence in Solid Waste Recycling. Minerals. 2019; 9(3):168. https://doi.org/10.3390/min9030168

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shen, Zhihui, Qin Zhang, Wei Cheng, and Qianlin Chen. 2019. "Radioactivity of Five Typical General Industrial Solid Wastes and its Influence in Solid Waste Recycling" Minerals 9, no. 3: 168. https://doi.org/10.3390/min9030168

APA Style

Shen, Z., Zhang, Q., Cheng, W., & Chen, Q. (2019). Radioactivity of Five Typical General Industrial Solid Wastes and its Influence in Solid Waste Recycling. Minerals, 9(3), 168. https://doi.org/10.3390/min9030168

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop