Next Article in Journal
Atomistic View of Mercury Cycling in Polar Snowpacks: Probing the Role of Hg2+ Adsorption Using Ab Initio Calculations
Next Article in Special Issue
Extraction of Boron from Ludwigite Ore: Mechanism of Soda-Ash Roasting of Lizardite and Szaibelyite
Previous Article in Journal
A Statistical Approach for Analysis of Dissolution Rates Including Surface Morphology
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Clean Process to Prepare High-Quality Acid-Soluble Titanium Slag from Titanium Middling Ore

1
Key Laboratory for Ecological Metallurgy of Multimetallic Mineral (Ministry of Education), Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China
2
School of Metallurgy, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2019, 9(8), 460; https://doi.org/10.3390/min9080460
Submission received: 27 May 2019 / Revised: 18 July 2019 / Accepted: 25 July 2019 / Published: 27 July 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cleaner Production in Mineral Processing)

Abstract

:
A direct reduction-magnetic separation-alkali leaching-dilute acid washing method was proposed to prepare high-quality acid-soluble titanium slag (HQASTS) from titanium middling ore. The relevant potential pH diagrams were built, and the analysis results showed that the pH values for alkali leaching and dilute acid washing should be higher than 13.50 and lower than 1.00, respectively. Increasing temperature was beneficial to alkali leaching but not to dilute acid washing. The effects of operating parameters on the TiO2 content and impurity oxides extraction ratios of titanium slag were investigated, and the optimal experimental conditions were obtained. The HQASTS was obtained with TiO2 and Fe2O3 content of 75.37 wt % and 0.96 wt %, respectively, under the above conditions. Furthermore, the leaching mechanism was studied by chemical analysis and X-ray diffraction (XRD) technology, and it was found that the alkali leaching-dilute acid washing process presented in this work could avoid the encapsulation of the unreacted anorthite by the calcium aluminum spinel generated in alkali leaching.

1. Introduction

Titanium dioxide pigment has many practical applications, such as paints, plastics, and paper-making plants [1,2,3,4]. At present, chloride and sulfate processes serve as the two main commercial strategies in the titanium dioxide industry [5,6]. The chloride process, which utilizes rutile as a raw material presently is more favorable economically and generates less waste products; however, sources of natural rutile are limited. Thus, a number of investigations [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17] (as shown in Table S1 of Supplementary Materials) have been performed to prepare synthetic rutile. The sulfate process that uses ilmenite or acid soluble titanium slag as raw materials is widely applied, but it is lengthy, and ferrous sulfate byproduct is less marketable. These problems are caused by the high content of impurities in the raw materials. It is well known that iron is the most abundant impurity in ilmenite and acid soluble titanium slag and their contents are ~35 wt % and ~10 wt %, respectively. This part of the iron element eventually enters titaniferous solution in the form of ferrous sulfate. This not only adds the processes of the freezing crystallization and separation of copperas but also produces a large amount of ferrous sulfate. In addition, the high content of ferrous sulfate in titaniferous solution will increase the workload for the purification of metatitanic acid. Thus, it is very meaningful to produce high-quality acid-soluble titanium slag (HQASTS) with low iron content for the sulfate process.
At present, titanium middling ore has been mainly used as the protective material of the blast furnace owing to low TiO2 content (TiO2 < 40 wt %), and its comprehensive utilization value is relatively low. In order to solve this problem, a method for direct reduction-magnetic separation-alkali leaching-dilute acid (HCl concentration ≤ 1.29 mol/L) washing was proposed in this work to prepare the HQASTS, using titanium middling ore as feedstock. The feasibility of the alkali leaching-dilute acid washing process was evaluated by means of thermodynamic analysis. According to the relevant investigations [18,19,20,21,22,23,24], binary potential pH diagrams for Si-H2O, Al-H2O, Mg-H2O, V-H2O, Ca-H2O, Fe-H2O and Mn-H2O systems have been reported. It was found that Al2O3, MgO, V2O5, VO2, CaO, FeO and MnO could be leached by dilute acid, and SiO2 could be leached by alkali. As titanium slag contains a certain amount of FeTiO3, CaTiO3, etc., it is necessary to draw ternary potential pH diagrams for Ca-Ti-H2O, Fe-Ti-H2O, Mn-Ti-H2O Al-Ti-H2O, Mg-Ti-H2O and V-Ti-H2O systems. The ternary potential pH diagram of Si-Ti-H2O systems cannot be drawn because there are no silicon data in the FactSage software database.
The objective of this study is to prepare high-quality acid-soluble titanium slag by a direct reduction-magnetic separation-alkali leaching-dilute acid washing method and simultaneously realize the comprehensive utilization of titanium middling ore. For optimizing leaching conditions, the effects of operating parameters on TiO2 content and impurity oxides extraction ratios in the titanium slag were investigated. In order to understand the leaching mechanism, the chemical and phase compositions of low-grade titanium slag, the cake after alkali leaching and the cake after alkali leaching-dilute acid washing were determined by chemical analysis and XRD technology.

2. Materials and Methods

In this work, titanium middling ore was obtained from the Panzhihua Iron and Steel Research Institute (Sichuan Province, China). The iron element in the titanium middling ore was removed by the pretreatment of the direct reduction-magnetic separation to obtain low-grade titanium slag. The HQASTS from low-grade titanium slag was produced via an alkali leaching-dilute acid washing process.
The content of each element was measured using chemical analysis according to Chinese standards. Such as GB/T 14506.8-2010 for Ti, GB/T 6730.65-2009 for Fe, GB/T 6730.10-2014 for Si etc. The X-ray diffraction (XRD, X’ Pert Pro; PANalytical, Almelo, The Netherlands) with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 0.154 nm, 40 kV, 40 mA) was employed to characterize the phases. The thermodynamic analysis of the experiment was performed using E-pH module of the FactSage 7.1. Distilled water was used as a solvent throughout the experiment. Other chemical agents used in the present work were provided by China National Medicines Corporation Ltd, Shenyang, China. They are of analytical grade and were used as received. The X-ray diffraction pattern of titanium middling ore is shown in Figure 1. The chemical compositions of titanium middling ore and low-grade titanium slag are listed in Table 1. The schematic diagram of the experimental process is shown in Figure 2.
As shown in Figure 2, the mixtures (titanium middling ore and 12 wt % anthracite) were reduced at a temperature of 1350 °C for 30 min in a resistance furnace. Next, the reduction product was grinded in a rod mill and then processed through a magnetic separator with a magnetic field intensity of 120 mT. The direct reduction and magnetic separation experiments were carried out in a vertical MoSi2 resistance furnace and a Davies Magnetic Tube (CXG-Φ50, China Tangshan Shida Automation Instrument Technology Co., Ltd, Tangshan, China), respectively.
Before alkali leaching, the low-grade titanium slag was ground to a particle size of less than 48 µm and dried in an oven at 110 °C for 24 h. The leaching experiments were performed at atmospheric pressure in a 500 mL three-necked flask equipped with a reflux condenser. The reaction mixture was heated by a thermostatic water bath and agitated by a magnetic stirrer at a stirring ratio of 500 rpm.
For the alkali leaching process, the amount of titanium slag was fixed at 20 g. According to a certain L/S, the volume of alkali leaching solution can be determined. Then, a known concentration of NaOH solution was taken and poured into a three-necked flask. Once the specified temperature was reached, titanium slag was added to the reactor and leached for a certain time. At the end of the run, the slurry was filtered to separate the cake from the alkaline solution. The cake was washed with distilled water, dried in an oven at 110 °C for 24 h, and submitted for chemical analysis.
Before dilute acid washing, titanium slag was first leached under the above optimal alkali leaching conditions. Then, the production of alkali leaching was washed by dilute acid (HCl). The experimental procedure is the same as the alkaline leaching experiment. The waste acid and alkaline solutions produced in the process can be treated by neutralization.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Thermodynamic Analysis

To understand the solving behavior of metal elements in the process of alkali leaching-dilute acid washing, ternary potential-pH diagrams were drawn. The results are shown in Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5, Figure 6, Figure 7 and Figure 8. The molarity concentration used for the calculation is 1 mol/L.
As can be seen from Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5, Al2O3, MgO and VO2 in low-grade titanium slag can be removed by dilute acid as Al3+, Mg2+ and VO2+, respectively, whereas titanium is still present as oxide. When the temperature increases to 100 °C, Al2O3 can be leached by alkali with a minimum pH 13.50, indicating that the alkaline leaching of Al2O3 can be achieved through increasing the temperature. The V2O5 can also be leached by alkali in the form of HVO 4 2 , whereas V2O3 and VO cannot be leached by acid or alkali. Additionally, as the temperature rises from 25 to 100 °C, the stable areas of Al3+, Mg2+ and VO2+ decrease, whereas those AlO 2 and HVO 4 2 increase, suggesting that increasing temperature not only reduces the required pH values of the dilute acid washing of Al2O3, MgO and VO2 but also decreases the required pH values of the alkali leaching of Al2O3 and VO5.
As shown in Figure 6, Figure 7 and Figure 8, CaTiO3, FeTiO3 and MnTiO3 can be removed by dilute acid in the form of Ca2+, Fe2+ and Mn2+, whereas titanium still exists as oxide. It is worth noting that Fe(III) cannot be removed by dilute acid due to the not sufficient low pH of the acid solution. However, Fe(II) can be more easily removed by dilute acid. Therefore, reducing Fe(III) into Fe(II) or metallic iron can significantly enhance the acid solubility of ferrous components in the titanium slag. In addition, with temperature increasing, the stable areas of Ca2+, Fe2+ and Mn2+ decrease sharply, which means that increasing temperature can reduce the required pH values of the dilute acid washing of CaTiO3, FeTiO3 and MnTiO3.
The above analysis indicates that the alkali leaching-dilute acid washing process for upgrading low-grade titanium slag is theoretically feasible. The pH of the alkali leaching should be higher than 13.50 (Figure 3, Al-Ti-H2O, 100 °C) and the pH of the dilute acid washing should be lower than 1.00 (Figure 5, V-Ti-H2O, 100 °C). A higher temperature is conductive to alkali leaching, but the trend for dilute acid washing is the opposite. Thus, the temperatures for alkali leaching and dilute acid washing can be set at 100 °C and 25 °C, respectively. This can dramatically decrease the NaOH concentration of the alkali leaching and the HCl concentration of the dilute acid washing, which means that a large amount of acid and alkali can be saved.

3.2. Alkali Leaching

According to the relevant literature [24] and Figure 3, it can be seen that SiO2 and Al2O3 in the slag can be theoretically leached by alkali. Thus, the TiO2 content in the slag, SiO2 extraction ratio and Al2O3 extraction ratio were determined by chemical analysis. The results are shown in Figure 9. The experimental program of the alkali leaching is provided in Table 2. The SiO2 (G) and Al2O3 (H) extraction ratios were calculated using the following Equations (1) and (2):
G = m 0 × w G 0 m 1 × w G 1 m 0 × w G 0
H = m 0 × w H 0 m 1 × w H 1 m 0 × w H 0
where m0 is the mass of low-grade titanium slag (20 g), m1 is the mass of the cake after alkali leaching (g), wG0 and wH0 are the SiO2 and Al2O3 content, respectively, of low-grade titanium slag (wt %), and wG1 and wH1 are the SiO2 and Al2O3 content, respectively, of the cake after alkali leaching (wt %).
The effect of NaOH concentration on TiO2 content is delineated in Figure 9a. The TiO2 content increased rapidly from 61.62 to 64.58 wt % as NaOH concentration increased from 1.6 to 2.8 mol/L. Within a NaOH concentration range of 2.8–4.8 mol/L, TiO2 content increased slowly. When NaOH concentration was higher than 4.8 mol/L, the TiO2 content remained unchanged. Thus, a NaOH concentration of 2.8 mol/L was used in the following experiments. It can be seen that SiO2 in the slag can be leached by alkali and Al2O3 cannot be removed by alkali under the above conditions.
The effect of liquid/solid ratio (L/S) on TiO2 content is illustrated in Figure 9b. It was found that TiO2 content increased markedly when L/S increased from 2 to 4. As L/S increased from 4 to 10, TiO2 content increased insignificantly. At L/S > 10, TiO2 content remained unchanged. Thus, a L/S of 4 was used in subsequent experiments. As shown in Figure 9b, the variation tendency of SiO2 extraction ratio was consistent with that of TiO2 content, whereas the Al2O3 extraction ratio remained 0 wt %. This means that only part of SiO2 was leached under the aforementioned conditions.
Figure 9c shows the effect of temperature on TiO2 content. It is obvious that TiO2 content monotonically increased with the rise in temperature. Therefore, the optimum temperature was 95 °C. When temperature was more than 75 °C, the SiO2 extraction rate remained unchanged, but the TiO2 content continued to increase. This is because Al2O3 started to be leached by a 2.8 mol/L NaOH solution (pH 14.44) at 75 °C. This also confirmed the previous conclusion (Figure 3) that increasing temperature can achieve the alkali leaching of Al2O3.
Figure 9d illustrates the effect of time on TiO2 content. When time increased from 30 min to 60 min, TiO2 content rapidly increased. As time continued to increase to 90 min, TiO2 content increased slightly. This is because both SiO2 and Al2O3 can be leached before 30 min, and only a small quantity of SiO2 was leached after 30 min. Hence, the optimum time was 60 min.
Taking the above results into consideration, the optimal alkali-leaching conditions were as follows: NaOH concentration 2.8 mol/L (pH 14.44), L/S 4, temperature 95 °C and time 60 min. The TiO2 content of the titanium slag, SiO2 extraction ratio and Al2O3 extraction ratio were 65.83 wt %, 35.69 wt % and 15.06 wt %, respectively, which indicates single alkali leaching cannot effectively increase TiO2 content in the slag. This may be because CaAl2O4 (calcium aluminum spinel) produced in the process of alkali leaching covers the surface of unreacted CaAl2(SiO4)2 (anorthite) and prevents the reaction between NaOH and CaAl2(SiO4)2. The reliability of potential-pH diagrams for Al-Ti-H2O systems was confirmed by measuring the Al2O3 extraction ratio in the slag. Moreover, it was found that the extraction ratio of Al2O3 is much lower than that of SiO2. As shown in Figure 10, it can be explained by the fact that the standard Gibbs free energy change of chemical reactions (b) is much smaller than that of reaction (a), i.e., NaOH prefers to react with SiO2 rather than Al2O3. On the other hand, a small amount of insoluble NaAl(OH)4 was formed during the alkali-leaching process, resulting in a lower extraction rate of Al2O3. The NaAl(OH)4 content can be determined by the sodium content of the cake after alkali leaching. As shown in Table 4, the Na2O content of the cake increased after alkali leaching. Thus, the main reaction that occurred in the alkali-leaching process is as follows:
CaAl2(SiO4)2 + 4NaOH = CaAl2O4 + 2Na2SiO3 + 2H2O.

3.3. Alkali Leaching-Dilute Acid Washing

In this work, the low-grade titanium slag was first leached by alkali under the above-mentioned optimal conditions before dilute acid washing. The experimental program of dilute acid washing is shown in Table 3. Based on Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5, Figure 6, Figure 7 and Figure 8, it was observed that Al2O3, MgO, VO2, CaO, FeO, Fe and MnO in the slag can be theoretically leached by dilute acid. The MgO and MnO extraction ratios were not measured because MgO mainly exists in the form of the anosovite phase, which is insoluble in acid, and the MnO content is relatively low. Therefore, the TiO2 content in the slag, CaO extraction ratio, Al2O3 extraction ratio, Fe2O3 extraction ratio (the total extraction ratio of various valence iron oxides) and V2O5 extraction ratio (the total extraction ratio of various valence vanadium oxides) were determined by chemical analysis during the dilute acid washing process. The results are presented in Figure 11. The calculation equations of CaO extraction ratio (B), Al2O3 extraction ratio (C), Fe2O3 extraction ratio (D) and V2O5 extraction ratio (E) were given in Equations (4), (5), (6) and (7), respectively:
B = m 0 × w B 0 m 2 × w B 2 m 0 × w B 0
C = m 0 × w C 0 m 2 × w C 2 m 0 × w C 0
D = m 0 × w D 0 m 2 × w D 2 m 0 × w D 0
E = m 0 × w E 0 m 2 × w E 2 m 0 × w E 0
where m0 is the mass of low-grade titanium slag (20 g), m2 is the mass of the cake after alkali leaching-dilute acid washing (g), wB0, wC0, wD0 and wE0 are the CaO, Al2O3, Fe2O3 and V2O5 content, respectively, of low-grade titanium slag (wt %) and wB2, wC2, wD2 and wE2 are the CaO, Al2O3, Fe2O3 and V2O5 content, respectively, of the cake after alkali leaching-dilute acid washing (wt %).
The effect of HCl concentration on TiO2 content is shown in Figure 11a. The TiO2 content sharply increased with HCl concentration increasing from 0.28 to 0.56 mol/L. Thereafter, in the HCl concentration range of 0.56–1.29 mol/L, the TiO2 content continued to increase at a slow rate. This can be attributed to the fact that CaO, Al2O3, Fe2O3 and V2O5 extraction ratios increased significantly as HCl concentration increased from 0.28 to 0.56 mol/L, and then these extraction ratios increased slowly when the HCl concentration was more than 0.56 mol/L. Taking into account cleaner production and reducing cost, 0.56 mol/L HCl was chosen as the optimum concentration.
The effect of L/S on TiO2 content is illustrated in Figure 11b. The TiO2 content rapidly increased from 71.29 wt % with L/S 3 to 73.91 wt % with L/S 6. When L/S increases from 6 to 8, the TiO2 content increased slowly. As for the case of L/S > 8, the TiO2 content in the slag was almost constant. It can be explained by the fact that the variation tendencies of Al2O3, CaO, Fe2O3 and V2O5 extraction ratios were consistent with that of TiO2 content. Thus, the optimum L/S was 6.
Figure 11c shows the effect of temperature on TiO2 content. The TiO2 content dramatically increased when temperature increased from 25 to 45 °C. Nevertheless, the TiO2 content slightly increased in the temperature range of 45–60 °C. This is because CaO, Al2O3, Fe2O3 and V2O5 extraction ratios rapidly increased at 25–45 °C. When temperature was more than 45 °C, the extraction ratio of Fe2O3 remained unchanged and the extraction ratios of CaO and Al2O3 increased at a low ratio. Thus, the optimum temperature was 45 °C.
Figure 11d illustrates the effect of time on TiO2 content. The TiO2 content sharply increased as time increased from 30 to 60 min, and then slightly increased with more than 60 min leaching. This is because CaO, Al2O3, Fe2O3 and V2O5 can be removed at a high rate as the time increased from 30 to 60 min. When the time was longer than 60 min, the CaO, Al2O3 and V2O5 extraction ratios increased slightly and Fe2O3 extraction rate was almost constant. Hence, the optimum time was 60 min.
In summary, the optimal dilute acid washing conditions were 0.56 mol/L HCl concentration (pH 0.26), L/S 6, temperature 45 °C and time 60 min. The TiO2 content of the HQASTS, CaO extraction ratio, Al2O3 extraction ratio, Fe2O3 extraction ratio and V2O5 extraction ratio were 75.37 wt %, 47.57 wt %, 55.33 wt %, 60.49 wt % and 12.10 wt %, respectively; indicating that the process of alkaline leaching-dilute acid washing can significantly improve TiO2 content in titanium-bearing materials. In this present study, vanadium oxides in the low-grade titanium slag mainly consist of V2O3 and a small amount of VO2. It can be seen from Figure 5 that V2O3 cannot be removed by acid but VO2 can. Therefore, only a small quantity of VO2 was dissolved in acid solution. This is the reason why the V2O5 extraction rate is only 12.10 wt %. On the other hand, the reliability of potential-pH diagrams (Ca-Ti-H2O, Al-Ti-H2O, Fe-Ti-H2O and V-Ti-H2O) was confirmed by measuring the CaO, Al2O3, Fe2O3 and V2O5 extraction ratios in the slag. In addition, as shown in Figure 11, the variation trends of the Al2O3 and CaO extraction ratios under the same conditions were very similar. It can be inferred that Al2O3 and CaO were leached in equal proportions. Thus, the main reaction that occurred in the dilute acid washing process is as follows:
CaAl2O4 + 8HCl = CaCl2 + 2AlCl3 + 4H2O.

3.4. Leaching Mechanism

In order to gain insight into the leaching mechanism of process, the chemical analysis of resulting solids and solutions as well as XRD test were performed. The results are shown in Table 4 and Table 5 and Figure 12.
As seen from Table 4 and Table 5, more than one-third of SiO2 and a small amount of Al2O3 were dissolved in an alkaline solution. In the process of dilute acid washing, most of the Fe2O3, Al2O3, CaO and MnO and a small quantity of V2O5 were dissolved in acid solution. The results indicated that the main reactions that occurred in the alkali leaching and dilute acid washing were (3) and (8), respectively. Despite anosovite (MgxTi3−xO5, 0 ≤ x ≤ 2) phase is insoluble in acid, a small quantity of MgO must be dissolved because the solid mass decreased during the dilute acid washing process and the MgO content remained constant. Consequently, the mass of MgO decreased, indicating that some MgO exists in other phases. The experimental results are consistent with the previous analysis of potential-pH diagrams and also confirm their authenticity. Moreover, Table 5 shows that the Ti content of alkali and acid solutions is quite low, indicating that almost all Ti components in the slag can be recovered. It is remarkable that the Fe2O3 content of the HQASTS is only 0.96 wt %. This not only eliminates the processes of the freezing crystallization and separation copperas for sulfate process but also greatly reduces the workload of the subsequent purification of metatitanic acid.
As shown in Figure 12, CaAl2(SiO4)2 (anorthite) was transformed into CaAl2O4 (calcium aluminum spinel) after alkali leaching, and CaAl2O4 disappeared after dilute acid washing. It was found from experimental results of Section 3.2 and Section 3.3 that the main reactions that occurred in the alkali leaching and dilute acid washing were (3) and (8), respectively. The results were consistent with the XRD analysis. In addition, the elemental content changes in Table 4 and Table 5 were also in accordance with the XRD analysis results. Therefore, the leaching mechanism of the process can be represented by Figure 13. It was observed that CaAl2O4 generated in alkali leaching, and it encapsulated the unreacted anorthite, causing the sodium hydroxide to not be able to further react with anorthite. This is the main reason for the low content of TiO2 in the slag during the alkali leaching process. Thus, it is not an ideal way to deal with the low-grade Ti-slag by only using alkali leaching. However, CaAl2O4 can be removed by dilute acid washing. Therefore, the process of alkali leaching-dilute acid washing can avoid the encapsulation of the unreacted anorthite by the calcium aluminum spinel, which is the result of alkali leaching. If an acid leaching-alkali leaching process is employed to upgrade the low-grade titanium slag, silicic acid will be produced during the acid leaching process and encapsulate the unreacted anorthite. Although subsequent alkali leaching can remove the silicic acid, this process wastes a certain amount of the acid and alkali leaching agents. Thus, the alkali leaching-dilute acid washing process is more reasonable.

4. Conclusions

(1) Thermodynamic analysis showed that the pH of alkali leaching should be higher than 13.50, whereas, that for dilute acid washing should be lower than 1.00. Increasing temperature was beneficial to alkali leaching, but it showed the opposite trend for dilute acid washing.
(2) The optimal alkali leaching conditions were NaOH concentration 2.8 mol/L (pH 14.44), L/S 4, temperature 95 °C, time 60 min. The optimal dilute acid washing conditions were HCl concentration 0.56 mol/L (pH 0.26), L/S 6, temperature 45 °C and time 60 min. Under the above optimum conditions, HQASTS was obtained with TiO2 and Fe2O3 contents of 75.37 wt % and 0.96 wt %, respectively.
(3) Applying the HQASTS to the sulfate process can eliminate the processes of the freezing crystallization and separation of copperas, and it can realize the comprehensive utilization of titanium middling ore.
(4) The research of the leaching mechanism indicated that CaAl2(SiO4)2 (anorthite) was transformed into CaAl2O4 (calcium aluminum spinel) after alkali leaching, and CaAl2O4 disappeared after dilute acid washing. The CaAl2O4 generated in alkali leaching would encapsulate the unreacted CaAl2(SiO4)2, causing the NaOH to not be able to further react with CaAl2(SiO4)2.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2075-163X/9/8/460/s1, Table S1: List of the preparation methods of synthetic rutile, Table S2: Verification experiments of predominant species (L/S 4), Figure S1: Effects of NaOH concentration on TiO2 content at 55 °C and 95 °C, Figure S2: Effects of HCl concentration on TiO2 content at 35 °C and 45 °C, Figure S3: Standard Gibbs free energy change of reactions.

Author Contributions

L.Z. and G.T. designed the experiments; J.H., J.Z., and W.F. conducted the experiments and collected the data; J.H. and X.C. analyzed the data; J.H. wrote the paper.

Funding

This work was supported by Funding Project for National Science and Technology Support Program of China (grant number: 2015BAB18B00).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Babaizadeh, H.; Hassan, M. Life cycle assessment of nano-sized titanium dioxide coating on residential windows. Constr. Build. Mater. 2013, 40, 314–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gratzel, M. Photoelectrochemical cells. Nature 2001, 414, 338–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Yang, W.E.; Hsu, M.L.; Lin, M.C.; Chen, Z.H.; Chen, L.K.; Huang, H.H. Nano/submicron-scale TiO2 network on titanium surface for dental implant application. J. Alloys Compd. 2009, 479, 642–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yuan, S.A.; Chen, W.H.; Hu, S.S. Fabrication of TiO2 nanoparticles/surfactant polymer complex film on glassy carbon electrode and its application to sensing trace dopamine. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2005, 25, 479–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Barksdale, J. Titanium, Its Occurrence, Chemistry, and Technology; Ronald Press Co.: New York, NY, USA, 1949; pp. 23–35. [Google Scholar]
  6. Winkler, J. Titanium Dioxide; Vincentz Verlag: Hannover, Germany, 2003; pp. 71–76. [Google Scholar]
  7. Liu, W.Z.; Lv, L.; Yue, H.R.; Liang, B.; Li, C. Combined production of synthetic rutile in the sulfate TiO2 process. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 705, 572–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dong, H.G.; Jiang, T.; Guo, Y.F.; Chen, J.L.; Fan, X.X. Upgrading a Ti-slag by a roast-leach process. Hydrometallurgy 2012, 113, 119–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liu, W.Z.; Wang, X.M.; Lu, Z.P.; Yue, H.R.; Liang, B.; Lv, L.; Li, C. Preparation of synthetic rutile via selective sulfation of ilmenite with (NH4)2SO4 followed by targeted removal of impurities. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 2016, 25, 821–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chen, H.F.; Chen, G.; Wu, Y.Q.; Peng, J.H.; Srinivasakannan, C.; Chen, J. Synthesis of Rutile TiO2 from Panzhihua Sulfate Titanium Slag by Microwave Heating. JOM 2017, 69, 2660–2665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. He, A.X.; Chen, G.; Chen, J.; Peng, J.H.; Srinivasakannan, C.; Ruan, R.S. A novel method of synthesis and investigation on transformation of synthetic rutile powders from Panzhihua sulphate titanium slag using microwave heating. Powder Technol. 2018, 323, 115–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zheng, X.Y.; Chen, G.; Chen, J.; Peng, J.H.; Srinivasakannan, C.; Ruan, R.S. Preparation of synthetic rutile from high titanium slag using microwave heating. Phase Transit. 2018, 91, 308–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Palliyaguru, L.; Arachchi, N.D.H.; Jayaweera, C.D.; Jayaweera, P.M. Production of synthetic rutile from ilmenite via anion-exchange. Miner. Process. Extr. Metall. 2017, 127, 169–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Guo, Y.F.; Liu, S.S.; Jiang, T.; Qiu, G.Z.; Chen, F. A process for producing synthetic rutile from Panzhihua titanium slag. Hydrometallurgy 2014, 147, 134–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lasheen, T.A. Soda ash roasting of titania slag product from Rosetta ilmenite. Hydrometallurgy 2008, 93, 124–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Fan, H.L.; Duan, H.M.; Tan, K.; Li, Y.K.; Chen, D.F.; Long, M.J.; Liu, T. Production of Synthetic Rutile from Molten Titanium Slag with the Addition of B2O3. JOM 2017, 69, 1914–1919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, L.; Li, G.Q.; Sui, Z.T. Study on preparation of titanium-rich material by leaching from modified high titanium slag. In Multipurpose Utilization of Mineral Resources; Electronic Magazines Ltd.: Chengdu, China, 2002; pp. 6–9, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  18. Li, L.; Li, Y.J.; Li, L.; Chen, N.X.; Han, Q.; Zhang, X.Z.; Xu, H. Thermodynamic Analysis on the Coprecipitation of Ni-Co-Mn Hydroxide. Metall. Mater. Trans. 2017, 48, 2743–2750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wu, W.Z.; Zhang, T.A.; Dou, Z.H.; Lv, G.Z.; Liu, Y. φ-pH diagram of V-Ti-H2O system during pressure acid leaching of converter slag containing vanadium and titanium. Trans. Nonferrous Metal Soc. 2011, 21, 2078–2086. [Google Scholar]
  20. Townsend, H.E. Potential-pH diagrams at elevated temperature for the system Fe-H2O. Corros. Sci. 1970, 10, 343–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Deltombe, E.; Pourbaix, M. The electrochemical behavior of aluminum potential pH diagram of the System AI-H2O at 25 °C. Corrosion 1958, 14, 16–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. He, H.; Wang, J.; Li, Y.; Song, Z.Y.; Mooni, S. Thermodynamic analysis of hot water leaching of sulphur from desulphurisation slag by E-pH diagrams of the Ca-S-H2O system. Miner. Process. Extr. Metall. 2017, 128, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Perrault, G.G. The potential-pH diagram of the magnesium-water system. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1974, 51, 107–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhang, L.; Zhang, J.H.; Zhang, W.; Li, G.Q. Thermodynamic Analysis of Extraction of Synthetic Rutile from Modified Slag. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2013, 52, 4924–4931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The X-ray diffraction pattern of titanium middling ore.
Figure 1. The X-ray diffraction pattern of titanium middling ore.
Minerals 09 00460 g001
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of the experimental process in the present work. High-quality acid-soluble titanium slag (HQASTS).
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of the experimental process in the present work. High-quality acid-soluble titanium slag (HQASTS).
Minerals 09 00460 g002
Figure 3. Potential-pH diagrams for Al-Ti-H2O systems: (a) 25 °C; (b) 100 °C.
Figure 3. Potential-pH diagrams for Al-Ti-H2O systems: (a) 25 °C; (b) 100 °C.
Minerals 09 00460 g003
Figure 4. Potential-pH diagrams for Mg-Ti-H2O systems: (a) 25 °C; (b) 100 °C.
Figure 4. Potential-pH diagrams for Mg-Ti-H2O systems: (a) 25 °C; (b) 100 °C.
Minerals 09 00460 g004
Figure 5. Potential-pH diagrams for V-Ti-H2O systems: (a) 25 °C; (b) 100 °C.
Figure 5. Potential-pH diagrams for V-Ti-H2O systems: (a) 25 °C; (b) 100 °C.
Minerals 09 00460 g005
Figure 6. Potential-pH diagrams for Ca-Ti-H2O systems: (a) 25 °C; (b) 100 °C.
Figure 6. Potential-pH diagrams for Ca-Ti-H2O systems: (a) 25 °C; (b) 100 °C.
Minerals 09 00460 g006
Figure 7. Potential-pH diagrams for Fe-Ti-H2O systems: (a) 25 °C; (b) 100 °C.
Figure 7. Potential-pH diagrams for Fe-Ti-H2O systems: (a) 25 °C; (b) 100 °C.
Minerals 09 00460 g007
Figure 8. Potential-pH diagrams for Mn-Ti-H2O systems: (a) 25 °C; (b) 100 °C.
Figure 8. Potential-pH diagrams for Mn-Ti-H2O systems: (a) 25 °C; (b) 100 °C.
Minerals 09 00460 g008
Figure 9. Effects of NaOH concentration (a), liquid/solid ratio (b), temperature (c) and time (d) on TiO2 content, G (SiO2 extraction ratio) and H (Al2O3 extraction ratio).
Figure 9. Effects of NaOH concentration (a), liquid/solid ratio (b), temperature (c) and time (d) on TiO2 content, G (SiO2 extraction ratio) and H (Al2O3 extraction ratio).
Minerals 09 00460 g009aMinerals 09 00460 g009b
Figure 10. Standard Gibbs free energy change of reactions (a) and (b) at different temperatures.
Figure 10. Standard Gibbs free energy change of reactions (a) and (b) at different temperatures.
Minerals 09 00460 g010
Figure 11. Effects of dilute acid (HCl) concentration (a), L/S ratio (b), temperature (c) and time (d) on F (TiO2 content of slag), E (V2O5 extraction ratio), D (Fe2O3 extraction ratio), C (Al2O3 extraction ratio) and B (CaO extraction ratio).
Figure 11. Effects of dilute acid (HCl) concentration (a), L/S ratio (b), temperature (c) and time (d) on F (TiO2 content of slag), E (V2O5 extraction ratio), D (Fe2O3 extraction ratio), C (Al2O3 extraction ratio) and B (CaO extraction ratio).
Minerals 09 00460 g011aMinerals 09 00460 g011b
Figure 12. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of residual solids (1: low-grade titanium slag; 2: the cake after optimal alkali leaching; 3: the cake after optimal alkali leaching-dilute acid washing).
Figure 12. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of residual solids (1: low-grade titanium slag; 2: the cake after optimal alkali leaching; 3: the cake after optimal alkali leaching-dilute acid washing).
Minerals 09 00460 g012
Figure 13. Schematic diagram of leaching mechanism.
Figure 13. Schematic diagram of leaching mechanism.
Minerals 09 00460 g013
Table 1. Chemical compositions of samples (wt %) (1: titanium middling ore; 2: low-grade titanium slag).
Table 1. Chemical compositions of samples (wt %) (1: titanium middling ore; 2: low-grade titanium slag).
SampleTiO2Fe2O3SiO2CaOAl2O3V2O5MgOMnONa2O
137.9438.129.615.133.692.111.150.560.15
260.002.4915.278.125.913.461.870.910.23
Table 2. Experimental program of alkali leaching.
Table 2. Experimental program of alkali leaching.
No.Fixed ConditionsVariableOptimal Value
aL/S 4, Temperature 55 °C, Time 60 minNaOH concentration (mol/L): 1.6, 2.2, 2.8, 3.4, 4.1, 4.8, 5.5, 6.32.8
bNaOH concentration 2.8 mol/L, Temperature 55 °C, Time 60 minL/S (mL/g): 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 164
cNaOH concentration 2.8 mol/L, L/S 4, Time 60 minTemperature (°C): 25, 35, 45, 55, 65, 75, 85, 9595
dNaOH concentration 2.8 mol/L, L/S 4, Temperature 95 °CTime (min): 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, 210, 24060
Table 3. Experimental program of dilute acid washing.
Table 3. Experimental program of dilute acid washing.
No.Fixed ConditionsVariableOptimal Value
aL/S 6, Temperature 35 °C, Time 60 minHCl concentration (mol/L): 0.28, 0.42, 0.56, 0.70, 0.85, 0.99, 1.14, 1.290.56
bHCl concentration 0.56 mol/L, Temperature 35 °C, Time 60 minL/S (mL/g): 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 106
cHCl concentration 0.56 mol/L, L/S 6, Time 60 minTemperature (°C): 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 6045
dHCl concentration 0.56 mol/L, L/S 6, Temperature 45 °CTime (min): 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, 210, 24060
Table 4. Chemical compositions of residual solids (wt %) (1: low-grade titanium slag; 2: the cake after optimal alkali leaching; 3: the cake after optimal alkali leaching-dilute acid washing).
Table 4. Chemical compositions of residual solids (wt %) (1: low-grade titanium slag; 2: the cake after optimal alkali leaching; 3: the cake after optimal alkali leaching-dilute acid washing).
SampleTiO2SiO2CaOAl2O3V2O5Fe2O3MgOMnONa2O
160.0015.278.125.913.462.491.870.910.23
265.839.828.245.023.472.432.010.950.95
375.378.854.322.643.050.962.020.680.18
Table 5. Chemical compositions of leaching solutions (g/L) (A: the solution after optimal alkali leaching; B: the solution after optimal dilute acid washing).
Table 5. Chemical compositions of leaching solutions (g/L) (A: the solution after optimal alkali leaching; B: the solution after optimal dilute acid washing).
SampleTiSiCaAlVFeMgMn
A<0.120.8<0.14.0<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1
B<0.10.66.33.80.92.2<0.10.6

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Han, J.; Zhang, J.; Feng, W.; Chen, X.; Zhang, L.; Tu, G. A Clean Process to Prepare High-Quality Acid-Soluble Titanium Slag from Titanium Middling Ore. Minerals 2019, 9, 460. https://doi.org/10.3390/min9080460

AMA Style

Han J, Zhang J, Feng W, Chen X, Zhang L, Tu G. A Clean Process to Prepare High-Quality Acid-Soluble Titanium Slag from Titanium Middling Ore. Minerals. 2019; 9(8):460. https://doi.org/10.3390/min9080460

Chicago/Turabian Style

Han, Jiqing, Jing Zhang, Wei Feng, Xiao Chen, Li Zhang, and Ganfeng Tu. 2019. "A Clean Process to Prepare High-Quality Acid-Soluble Titanium Slag from Titanium Middling Ore" Minerals 9, no. 8: 460. https://doi.org/10.3390/min9080460

APA Style

Han, J., Zhang, J., Feng, W., Chen, X., Zhang, L., & Tu, G. (2019). A Clean Process to Prepare High-Quality Acid-Soluble Titanium Slag from Titanium Middling Ore. Minerals, 9(8), 460. https://doi.org/10.3390/min9080460

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop