Next Article in Journal
Clinical Features of Patients with Home Isolation Sars-Cov-2 Infection: A Multicenter Retrospective Study in Southern Italy
Next Article in Special Issue
Sarcopenia and Frailty in Liver Cirrhosis
Previous Article in Journal
Andrographis paniculata (Burm. f.) Wall. ex Nees: An Updated Review of Phytochemistry, Antimicrobial Pharmacology, and Clinical Safety and Efficacy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Emerging Treatment Options for Sarcopenia in Chronic Liver Disease
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Life
Volume 11
Issue 4
10.3390/life11040349
life-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Definition of Sarcopenia in Chronic Liver Disease

by
Seong Wan Son
,
Do Seon Song
*,
U Im Chang
and
Jin Mo Yang
Department of Internal Medicine, St. Vincent’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Life 2021, 11(4), 349; https://doi.org/10.3390/life11040349
Submission received: 21 March 2021 / Revised: 11 April 2021 / Accepted: 13 April 2021 / Published: 16 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sarcopenia and Liver Disease: Current and Future Perspectives)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Sarcopenia, which is characterized by decline in muscle mass, muscle strength, and physical performance, is common in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) and is associated with poor clinical outcomes. Several consensus definitions for community-dwelling elderly people have been proposed, and these recommend the use of various tools and tests to assess muscle properties and performance. These measurement tools have also been applied in patients with CLD and have been useful for predicting prognosis. However, sarcopenia and its diagnostic criteria specific to patients with CLD have not yet been clearly defined. In addition, fluid retention and body composition should be considered when sarcopenia is assessed in patients with CLD. This review aims to introduce definitions of sarcopenia and diagnostic tools used in patients with CLD.

1. Introduction

Sarcopenia is defined as a syndrome in which muscle mass and muscle function (muscle strength and/or physical performance) progressively decrease with age [1,2]. Sarcopenia has been considered a geriatric syndrome that leads to functional limitations and metabolic dysregulation in older people [3]. In addition to age, muscle mass and muscle function are also affected by gender, physical activities, and drugs [4,5,6,7]. However, sarcopenia can occur secondary to a systemic disease, including chronic liver disease (CLD) [1,2].
Sarcopenia is common in cirrhotic patients, occurring in 30%–70% [8]. The cause of sarcopenia in patients with cirrhosis is multifactorial, including decreased nutritional intake, malabsorption, altered metabolism, hormonal changes, hyperammonemia, and increased muscle loss [9]. Sarcopenia is not only associated with a higher rate of complications, such as infections, hepatic encephalopathy, and ascites [10,11,12], but is also an independent predictor of a high mortality rate in cirrhotic patients [13,14]. Therefore, sarcopenia has been recognized as a crucial complication of cirrhosis, and the clinical practice guidelines of the European Association for the Study of the Liver [15] and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism [16] recommend screening for malnutrition and sarcopenia in cirrhotic patients. In addition, sarcopenia is associated with metabolic syndrome and advanced fibrosis in noncirrhotic CLD patients [17,18,19].
Sarcopenia has been studied mainly in community-dwelling older individuals, and several consensus definitions have been developed [1,2,20]. However, it is difficult to apply the existing consensus definition to patients with cirrhosis because the measurement of muscle mass in cirrhotic patients might be influenced by hepatic function and water retention, such as ascites or peripheral edema. In addition, there is a lack of consensus on which sarcopenia definition to use in patients with CLD. Therefore, the purpose of this review is to discuss the tools for the assessment of sarcopenia and definitions that can be used in patients with CLD.

2. Consensus Definition of Sarcopenia

The European working group on sarcopenia in older people (EWGSOP), and Asian working group for sarcopenia (AWGS) proposed consensus definitions for age-related sarcopenia [1,2,21,22]. In 2010, the EWGSOP defined sarcopenia as occurring when both muscle mass and muscle function (muscle strength or physical performance) declined in older subjects (EWGSOP1) [21]. In the revised definition from the EWGSOP1 in 2018 (EWGSOP2), muscle mass included muscle quality as well as quantity, and low muscle strength was used as the primary parameter for sarcopenia [2]. The AWGS proposed a definition similar to that of the EWGSOP in 2014 and 2019, in which low muscle mass and low muscle strength or low physical performance were required for the diagnosis of sarcopenia [1,22].
These definitions recommended measurement tools: (1) computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), or dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for muscle mass; (2) handgrip strength (HGS) for muscle strength; and (3) gait speed (GS) or chair stand test for physical performance. While EWGSOP1 did not advise specific cutoff values, EWGSOP2 provided the cutoff values, which were defined by two standard deviations (SDs) below the mean reference values (healthy young European adults) [2]. The AWGS also recommended cutoff values based on studies of sarcopenia in Asian subjects (lower than 2 SD below the mean muscle mass of the young reference group) [1,22], but these cutoff values were different from those in the EWGSOP definition. Even within the same population, the prevalence of sarcopenia can differ according to the definition because of the use of different cutoff values [23,24].
The Foundation for the National Institutes of Health Sarcopenia (FNIH) Project proposed consensus definitions from nine sources of community-dwelling elderly cohorts [25]. This definition recommended sex-specific cutoff values for grip strength and appendicular lean body mass measured by DXA.
The Japanese Society of Hepatology (JSH) established criteria for sarcopenia specific to liver disease patients [26], which define sarcopenia based on a combination of low muscle mass and low HGS. The JSH definition provides cutoff values for the diagnosis of sarcopenia. Most cutoff values for the JSH definition were adopted from AWGS or derived from studies involving Japanese patients.

3. Muscle Mass Measurement

3.1. Skeletal Muscle Measurement by CT

The measurement of skeletal muscle on cross-sectional CT or MRI images is considered the gold standard for the evaluation of sarcopenia [27]. The skeletal muscle area of a single abdominal cross-sectional image is highly correlated with the total skeletal muscle volume, and the skeletal muscle area at the third lumbar (L3) level is the most highly correlated [28]. Therefore, muscle mass measurements are performed at the L3 level in most sarcopenia studies using CT imaging. The L3 region contains the psoas, paraspinal muscles (erector spinae, quadratus lumborum), and abdominal wall muscles (transversus abdominus, external and internal obliques, rectus abdominus). Skeletal muscles are identified and quantified by Hounsfield unit thresholds of −29 to 150 [29]. Because absolute skeletal muscle volume is strongly correlated with height, the skeletal muscle index (SMI), which is normalized for stature (cm2/m2), is used in sarcopenia studies [30].
The most commonly used cutoff points for the SMI in sarcopenia studies are 52.4 cm2/m2 for men and 38.5 cm2/m2 for women, which were found to be associated with mortality in obese patients with solid tumors [31]. These sex-specific cutoff values have also been widely used in sarcopenia studies in patients with cirrhosis and have been shown to be associated with high mortality [13,32,33,34,35,36,37]. Martin et al. developed another cutoff value derived from cancer patients, which was stratified by body mass index, and sarcopenia based on this cutoff value was associated with increased mortality (L3 SMI ≤ 53 cm2/m2 for men and ≤41 cm2/m2 for women with a BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 and L3 SMI ≤ 43 cm2/m2 for patients with a BMI < 25 kg/m2) [38]. These cutoff values were associated with increased wait-list mortality [39], longer posttransplant hospital stay and a higher rate of postoperative bacterial infection but not increased mortality [40]. Carey et al. reported new sex-specific cutoffs (50 cm2/m2 for men and 39 cm2/m2 for women) that could be used to identify groups with high waitlist mortality in patients with end-stage liver disease [41]. However, because studies to validate the SMI cutoffs proposed by Carey et al. did not show differences in waitlist mortality between patients with and without sarcopenia [39,42], this cutoff needs to be validated. JSH established SMI cutoff values (42 cm2/m2 for men and 38 cm2/m2 for women) for patients with CLD [26]. These cutoffs, which are equivalent to those for BIA, are lower than those established in Western countries. On the other hand, Ebadi et al. defined severe sarcopenia as −1 SD below the sex-specific mean value in young liver transplant donors (50 cm2/m2 for men and 37 cm2/m2 for women) for patients with cirrhosis [43]. In this study, sarcopenic patients had shorter survival than patients without sarcopenia, but these cutoffs also need to be validated. The various cutoffs for the SMI that have been used in patients with CLD are summarized in Table 1.
CT scans are commonly used in clinical practice for patients with CLD. The SMI measured by CT scanning is reproducible, accurate, and objective [13]. CT scanning can also assess myosteatosis (muscle quality), which is characterized by the pathologic accumulation of fat in skeletal muscle [48]. In addition, three-dimensional quantitative color CT can measure the atrophied muscle volume and normal muscle volume separately [49,50]. However, specific software is needed to measure the cross-sectional area of skeletal muscle. In addition, fluid retention could lead to the overestimation of muscle mass [51]. Furthermore, there are no cutoff points for the diagnosis of sarcopenia, usually defined as −2 SD below the reference, due to the lack of a reference value for the SMI in young healthy adults.

3.2. Psoas Muscle Measurement by CT

Several psoas muscle measurement methods, including psoas muscle thickness (PMT), psoas muscle area (PMA) and psoas muscle index (PMI), have been used to predict outcomes in patients with CLD. Sarcopenia defined by psoas muscle measurement has been investigated as an important prognostic factor for waitlist mortality [52,53] and post-LT mortality [54,55,56]. The single muscle approach, which uses the psoas muscle to diagnose clinically relevant skeletal muscle depletion, is a simple and convenient method compared to the SMI because specific software is not needed. The muscle mass measured using psoas muscle was found to be well correlated with the SMI in patients with cirrhosis [33,57]. However, the sarcopenia diagnosis methods using the psoas muscle are heterogeneous (Table 2). First, psoas muscle mass can be measured by PMA, which is determined by the sum of the areas of the right and left psoas muscles, or by transversal PMT (TPMT), which is determined as the largest diameter perpendicular to the longest diameter. Second, normalization is not uniform. Among the studies using PMA, some studies used the PMA [54,55,58], and other studies used the PMI, in which PMA is normalized by the squared height [56,57,59,60,61,62]. In studies using the TPMT, the TPMT is normalized by height [14,33,52,53,63]. Third, the psoas muscle measurement level is heterogeneous. Some researchers measured the psoas muscle at the umbilicus level [14,33,52,53,56,63], whereas most SMIs were measured at the L3–4 level. The umbilicus level can be easily identified on CT scans, preventing errors owing to the inability to identify the precise lumbar level due to sacralization of the L5 vertebra, lumbar wedge fractures or pronounced lordosis [52]. However, the umbilical level can be changed by the presence of ascites.
It is controversial as to whether the SMI or psoas muscle assessment is more useful for assessing sarcopenia in patients with CLD. Golse et al. reported that the PMA is more predictive of post-LT one-year survival than the L3-SMI [54]. However, Wells showed that the abdominal skeletal muscle area was more strongly correlated with total-body protein, representing whole-body protein stores, than the PMA [51]. In addition, the PMI had poor concordance with the SMI for the diagnosis of sarcopenia, and the PMI was not an independent factor for waitlist mortality in men. Therefore, further research is needed on the role of psoas muscle assessment in the evaluation of sarcopenia in patients with CLD.

3.3. Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA)

DXA measures the relative attenuation of two different energy X-rays by human tissue. It can measure three body components: fat, bone minerals and lean tissue [64]. Appendicular skeletal muscle (ASM) accounts for >75% of skeletal muscle, and its reduction leads to weakness, disability, impaired quality of life, and increased mortality [2,65]. Therefore, ASM measurement has been used to evaluate sarcopenia. ASM is the sum of the muscle mass of the four limbs. As muscle mass is correlated with body size, sarcopenia indices, in which ASM is normalized by the squared height (ASM index, ASMI), weight or body mass index (ASM_BMI), are used for the diagnosis of sarcopenia (Table 3).
The ASMI was found to be well correlated with the SMI measured by CT in patients with cirrhosis [45,66]. The cutoff values for the diagnosis of sarcopenia in elderly people were usually determined to be below 1 SD or 2 SD of the value in healthy young adults [30,67]. Baumgartner et al. proposed cutoff values for the ASMI, determined as below 2 SD of the value in healthy young adults: men < 7.26 kg/m2 and women < 5.45 kg/m2 [30]. This sex-specific cutoff value was adopted in the EWGSOP1 definition [21] and has been used in patients with CLD [45,68]. Lindqvist et al. [66] used the sex-specific cutoff value, which was determined as 1 SD below the mean in the young population by Coin et al. [67]. The definitions of low muscle mass using the ASMI in recent revised consensus definitions are as follows: men < 7.0 kg/m2 and women < 5.4 kg/m2 in the AWGS definition [1,22] and men < 7.0 kg/m2 and women < 5.5 kg/m2 in the EWGSOP2 definition [2]. These revised criteria were not validated in patients with CLD.
The ASMI is positively correlated with BMI, visceral fat, and insulin resistance, while weight-adjusted or BMI-adjusted sarcopenia indices are negatively correlated in obese subjects [17,69]. This means that those subjects with high BMI are less likely to be classified as having sarcopenia. Therefore, weight-adjusted or BMI-adjusted sarcopenia indices are more appropriate in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), which is associated with obesity [18,70,71]. The FNIH definition proposed sex-specific cutoff values of the sarcopenia index, in which the ASM is divided by BMI (men < 0.789 and women < 0.521) [25]. This cutoff value has mainly been used in research on NAFLD [18,71]. In addition, some researchers defined the lowest quintile of the ASM_BMI as sarcopenia [19], or defined sarcopenia using upper limb muscle mass [68,72].
Studies on sarcopenia using DXA in patients with CLD have used the muscle depletion criteria of the consensus definition for community-dwelling elderly individuals, and these cutoff values were useful for predicting the outcome in CLD patients [45,68,73,74]. However, the most important limitation of DXA is that it cannot differentiate muscle from water, and water retention can lead to the overestimation of skeletal muscle in patients with cirrhosis [45,66]. A recent study reported that the ASMI measured by DXA is not influenced by ascites or edema and is useful for the prediction of mortality in patients with cirrhosis [74]. Therefore, future studies using DXA are needed to establish the definition of sarcopenia applicable to patients with CLD without the effects of ascites or edema.
Table
Table 3. Studies measuring appendicular skeletal muscle mass using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and bioelectrical impedance in patients with chronic liver disease.
Table 3. Studies measuring appendicular skeletal muscle mass using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and bioelectrical impedance in patients with chronic liver disease.
ModalityAuthor (Year)CountryNumber of SubjectsStudy PopulationMeasurement MethodCutoff for SarcopeniaMethod of Determining Cutoff
DXAGiusto (2015) [45]Italy139LT candidatesASMI7.26 kg/m2 for men
5.45 kg/m2 for women		Baumgartner [30]
(2 SD below the sex-specific mean value)
Bering (2018) [73]Brazil104Chronic hepatitis CASMI7.26 kg/m2 for men
5.45 kg/m2 for women		EWGSOP1
Belarmino (2018) [74]Brazil144Male cirrhotic patients with ascitesASMI7.26 kg/m2EWGSOP1
Alferink (2019) [75]Netherland4609Participants from The Rotterdam StudyASMI7.25 kg/m2 for men
5.67 kg/m2 for women		EWGSOP1
Sinclair (2019) [68]Australia420Male advanced cirrhosis patients(1) ASMI
(2) Upper limb muscle		(1) 7.26 kg/m2
(2) 1.6 kg/m2		(1) Baumgartner [30]
(2) Mortality-based
Lindqvist (2019) [66]Sweden53LT recipientsASMI7.59 kg/m2 for men
5.47 kg/m2 for women		Coin
(1 SD below the mean in the young population) [67]
Lee (2016) [18]Korea2761NAFLD subjects defined by NAFLD liver fat scoreASM/BMI0.789 for men
0.521 for women		FNIH
Han (2020) [70]Korea7191NAFLD subjects defined by NAFLD prediction modelsASM/BMI0.882 for men
0.582 for women		Lowest quintile
Golabi (2020) [71]USA4611NAFLD subjects defined by fatty liver indexASM/BMI0.789 for men
0.521 for women		FNIH
Santos (2021) [72]Brazil210Cirrhotic patientsUpper limb muscle/height22.104 for men
1.506 for women		ROC curve for mortality
BIANishikawa (2017) [76]Japan382Liver cirrhosisASMI7.0 kg/m2 for men
5.7 kg/m2 for women		AWGS and JSH definition
Hanai (2017) [77]Japan120Liver cirrhosisASMI7.0 kg/m2 for men
5.7 kg/m2 for women		AWGS and JSH definition
Hayashi (2018) [78]Japan112Chronic liver diseaseASMI7.0 kg/m2 for men
5.7 kg/m2 for women		AWGS and JSH definition
Kim (2020) [79]Korea2168Chronic liver disease who underwent transient elastographyASM/BMI0.789 for men
0.521 for women		FNIH
Seo (2020) [80]Korea4210Men with Type 2 DM(ASM/body weight) × 100
ASM/BMI		29.0% for men
22.9% for women
0.789 for men
0.521 for women		2 SD below the sex-specific means for in healthy young adults
FNIH
Petta (2017) [81]Italy225NAFLD(ASM/body weight) × 10037% for men
28% for women		Janssen
Abbreviations: ASM, appendicular skeletal muscle; ASMI, appendicular skeletal muscle index; AWGS, Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia; BMI, body mass index; DM, diabetes mellitus; EWGSOP, European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People; FNIH, Foundation for the National Institutes of Health; JSH, Japan Society of Hepatology; LT, liver transplantation; NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; ROC, receiver operating characteristics; SD, standard deviation.

3.4. Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA)

BIA is a technique in which the body composition of a biological subject is analyzed by measuring its electrical impedance [82]. Initially, BIA used a single frequency, but recent studies showed that multifrequency BIA had better accuracy for the measurement of body composition than single-frequency BIA [83,84], and showed good correlation with DXA [85,86] and the SMI obtained with CT [26]. Similar to DXA, BIA uses the ASM to define low muscle mass, and the ASM is normalized by height, body weight, or BMI (Table 3).
Interestingly, most studies using BIA in patients with CLD were performed in Asian regions. Studies conducted in Japan used the sex-specific cutoff values for the ASMI recommended by the JSH definition (men < 7.0 kg/m2 and women < 5.4 kg/m2) [26], which is the same as the AWGS definition [22]. Studies in noncirrhotic CLD patients have used sarcopenic indices in which the ASM is normalized to BMI or body weight [79,80,81]. The cutoff value for the ASM/BMI was adopted from FNIH [20], and those for the ASM/weight were determined by 2 SD below the mean reference value in the healthy young population.
The main limitation of BIA in patients with CLD is that the measurement of muscle by BIA can be influenced by water retention [87,88]. Although the ASM measured by BIA had a good correlation with skeletal muscle mass measured by CT [26,89], the measurement of muscle by BIA can be overestimated in patients with ascites. Therefore, most of the studies on sarcopenia using BIA were performed in patients with noncirrhotic CLD or cirrhotic patients without massive ascites.
Recently, the phase angle (PA) obtained from BIA has been proposed as a nutritional status marker in patients with CLD [90,91]. The PA reflects cell membrane integrity and vitality and represents the quantity and quality of soft tissues [92]. The PA was found to be correlated with skeletal muscle mass [93], and PA ≤ 4.9° was an independent factor that was predictive of mortality and hepatic encephalopathy in patients with cirrhosis [74,91,94]. Another study also showed that a PA ≤ 5.05° was a good predictor of sarcopenia in cirrhotic patients [90]. However, research on the PA in patients with CLD is still lacking, and further studies are needed to determine the role of the PA in patients with CLD.

4. Muscle Strength and Physical Performance

4.1. Handgrip Strength (HGS)

HGS is a simple and inexpensive method of assessment and is the most widely used tool for measuring muscle strength. Low HGS is associated with poor outcomes, such as increased mortality and decreased cognitive function and mobility in the elderly population [95,96]. Consensus definitions recommended the measurement of HGS for the evaluation of muscle strength, and cutoff values were proposed [1,2,21,25]. The EWGSOP1 definition introduced two sex-specific cutoff values for HGS: (1) <30 kg for men and <20 kg for women, as proposed by Laurentani [97], and (2) ≤29 kg if BMI was ≤24 kg/m2, ≤30 kg if BMI was 24.1 to 28 kg/m2, ≤32 kg if BMI was >28 kg/m2 for men and ≤17 kg if BMI was ≤23 kg/m2, ≤17.3 kg if BMI was 23.1 to 26 kg/m2, ≤18 kg if BMI was 26.1 to 29 kg/m2, and ≤21 kg if BMI was >29 kg/m2 for women, as proposed by Fried [98]. In 2018, the EWGSOP2 proposed a new cutoff value adopted from the meta-analysis by Dodds et al. (<27 kg for men and <16 kg for women) [99]. The AWGS definition in 2014 also recommended a sex-specific cutoff value defined by the lowest quintile in two studies: <26 kg for men and <18 kg for women [22]. This cutoff value was revised in the 2019 AWGS definition, defined by the lowest quintile in eight studies: <28 kg for men and <18 kg for women [1]. JSH recommended the same cutoff value as the AWGS 2014 [26].
Most studies in CLD patients have used cutoff values from the consensus definition for community-dwelling elderly populations (EWGSOP1 and AWGS 2014) (Table 4). Some researchers found new cutoff values that could predict outcomes in their study population by ROC curve analysis [100,101,102]. Although the diagnosis of sarcopenia using those cutoffs has been found to be a strong predictor of poor outcomes in patients with CLD [100,101,102,103], further research is needed to determine which cutoff values are the most useful in patients with CLD, and validation of the cutoff values in the revised consensus definitions (EWGSOP2 and AWGS 2019) is needed. Consideration should be given to the fact that the cutoffs may vary depending on the type of dynamometer and the measurement protocol [104].

4.2. Chair Stand Test

The chair stand test is used to assess lower extremity strength. The chair stand test measures the time needed for a patient to rise five times from a seated position without using the arms or the number of chair stands completed in 30 s. AWGS 2019 and EWGSOP2 recommend the chair stand test as a parameter for physical performance and muscle strength, respectively. The cutoff values in these consensus definitions were 12 s in AWGS and 15 s in EWGSOP2 [1,2].
The chair stand test in patients with CLD has been used as a parameter for frailty rather than sarcopenia [109,110,111]. The chair stand test was found to be an independent factor predictive of poor quality of life and waitlist mortality in patients with end-stage liver disease [110,112,113]. However, research on the usefulness of and appropriate cutoff values for the chair stand test in patients with CLD is still lacking.

4.3. Gait Speed

GS is the most frequently used tool for the assessment of physical performance. GS was found to be associated with the development of cirrhotic complications, waitlist mortality, and post-LT complications in patients with cirrhosis [114,115,116,117]. In the consensus definition for community-dwelling elderly people, the recommended cutoff value for the diagnosis of low physical performance was 0.8 m/s regardless of sex [1,2]. Some studies used 1.0 m/s as the cutoff, but most studies on GS in patients with CLD have used 0.8 m/s as the cutoff value (Table 5).

5. Considerations for the Diagnosis of Sarcopenia and Future Prospects in Patients with Chronic Liver Disease

The definition of sarcopenia is progressive decline in muscle mass and muscle function. Therefore, consensus definitions for elderly people define sarcopenia based on the presence of both low muscle quantity and low muscle strength and/or low physical performance [1,2]. However, studies on whether it is appropriate to apply these definitions to patients with CLD are lacking. Only a few studies have used a combination of muscle mass and muscle function to diagnose sarcopenia in patients with CLD [73,74,75,77,78], and more studies have been performed on decreased muscle mass than on decreased muscle strength or physical performance. In patients with CLD, further studies are needed to determine which definition is the most useful for predicting a poor outcome among decreased muscle mass, decreased muscle function and both.
There are many diagnostic tools and tests available for the assessment of sarcopenia, and each test has variations. For example, muscle mass measurement using a single cross-sectional image obtained from CT includes the measurement of the skeletal muscle area and psoas muscle mass, and the psoas muscle mass measurement includes the psoas muscle area and transverse thickness. The muscle measurement levels include L3–4 or the umbilicus, and the measured muscle mass is normalized by the height or the square of the height. The HGS test also relies on various dynamometer types and measurement protocols. These heterogeneous protocols make it difficult to derive a unified definition in patients with CLD. Therefore, future studies are needed to find appropriate protocols that can accurately measure muscle mass or muscle function and predict prognosis in patients with CLD.
Due to the lack of cutoff values specific to patients with CLD, most sarcopenia studies in patients with CLD have been performed using preexisting cutoffs, such as those defined in patients with cancer [31] or those included in consensus definitions for community-dwelling elderly people [1,2,20,21,22]. These cutoffs were also effective in predicting poor outcomes even when used in CLD patients. However, in patients with CLD, fluid retention and body composition should be considered. Since the measurement of muscle mass, especially with DXA or BIA, can be influenced by overhydration in patients with cirrhosis, further studies are needed on whether it is appropriate to apply consensus definitions to CLD patients. Therefore, it is necessary to find and validate CLD specific cutoff values of skeletal muscle mass and muscle function, which are more useful for predicting poor outcomes, such as mortality or the development of complications, in CLD patients. Although JSH proposed a sarcopenia definition for patients with CLD, most cutoff values in the JSH definition were adopted from AWGS or derived from studies with Japanese patients [26]. The JSH definition needs to be validated in CLD patients of various ethnicities. The SMI cutoff value, defined from obese patients with solid tumors using CT, has shown usefulness in prognosis prediction, mainly in advanced cirrhosis patients [13,36,44,45]. A cutoff value for skeletal muscle mass using CT derived from patients with end-stage liver disease was recently proposed [41], which also needs to be further validated, and comparative studies with preexisting SMI cutoff are needed.

6. Conclusions

Sarcopenia is related to a poor prognosis and the occurrence of cirrhotic complications. Many studies on sarcopenia have been conducted in patients with CLD due to its clinical implications, but an appropriate definition of sarcopenia and optimal protocols have still not been established. In addition, specific cutoff values for measuring muscle mass and muscle function in CLD patients need to be identified and validated. We hope that a standardized working definition for patients with CLD can be identified that can be used to accurately predict adverse outcomes in future studies.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.S.S.; data curation, S.W.S. and D.S.S.; supervision, U.I.C. and J.M.Y.; writing–original draft, S.W.S. and D.S.S.; review and editing, D.S.S. and J.M.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Acknowledgments

None of the authors have any financial relationships to disclose.

Conflicts of Interest

We declare that we have no financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations that can inappropriately influence our work, and there is no professional or other personal interest of any nature or kind in any product, service, and/or company.

References

  1. Chen, L.-K.; Woo, J.; Assantachai, P.; Auyeung, T.-W.; Chou, M.-Y.; Iijima, K.; Jang, H.C.; Kang, L.; Kim, M.; Kim, S.; et al. Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia: 2019 Consensus Update on Sarcopenia Diagnosis and Treatment. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 2020, 21, 300–307.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Cruz-Jentoft, A.J.; Bahat, G.; Bauer, J.; Boirie, Y.; Bruyère, O.; Cederholm, T.; Cooper, C.; Landi, F.; Rolland, Y.; Sayer, A.A.; et al. Sarcopenia: Revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing 2019, 48, 16–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Cruz-Jentoft, A.J.; Landi, F.; Topinková, E.; Michel, J.-P. Understanding sarcopenia as a geriatric syndrome. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care 2010, 13, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Gava, P.; Giuriati, W.; Ravara, B. Gender difference of aging performance decay rate in normalized Masters World Records of Athletics: Much less than expected. Eur. J. Transl. Myol. 2020, 30, 103–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Šarabon, N.; Kozinc, Ž.; Löfler, S.; Hofer, C. Resistance Exercise, Electrical Muscle Stimulation, and Whole-Body Vibration in Older Adults: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 2902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Patel, D.I.; Abuchowski, K.; Sheikh, B.; Rivas, P.; Musi, N.; Kumar, A.P. Exercise preserves muscle mass and force in a prostate cancer mouse model. Eur. J. Transl. Myol. 2019, 29, 8520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Coletti, D. Chemotherapy-induced muscle wasting: An update. Eur. J. Transl. Myol. 2018, 28, 7587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Dasarathy, S.; Merli, M. Sarcopenia from mechanism to diagnosis and treatment in liver disease. J. Hepatol. 2016, 65, 1232–1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Jindal, A.; Jagdish, R.K. Sarcopenia: Ammonia metabolism and hepatic encephalopathy. Clin. Mol. Hepatol. 2019, 25, 270–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Huisman, E.J.; Trip, E.J.; Siersema, P.D.; Van Hoek, B.; Van Erpecum, K.J. Protein energy malnutrition predicts complications in liver cirrhosis. Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2011, 23, 982–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Merli, M.; Lucidi, C.; Giannelli, V.; Giusto, M.; Riggio, O.; Falcone, M.; Ridola, L.; Attili, A.F.; Venditti, M. Cirrhotic Patients Are at Risk for Health Care–Associated Bacterial Infections. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2010, 8, 979–985.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Merli, M.; Giusto, M.; Lucidi, C.; Giannelli, V.; Pentassuglio, I.; Di Gregorio, V.; Lattanzi, B.; Riggio, O. Muscle depletion increases the risk of overt and minimal hepatic encephalopathy: Results of a prospective study. Metab. Brain Dis. 2013, 28, 281–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Montano–Loza, A.J.; Meza–Junco, J.; Prado, C.M.; Lieffers, J.R.; Baracos, V.E.; Bain, V.G.; Sawyer, M.B. Muscle Wasting Is Associated with Mortality in Patients with Cirrhosis. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2012, 10, 166–173.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kim, T.Y.; Kim, M.Y.; Sohn, J.H.; Kim, S.M.; Ryu, J.A.; Lim, S.; Kim, Y. Sarcopenia as a Useful Predictor for Long-Term Mortality in Cirrhotic Patients with Ascites. J. Korean Med. Sci. 2014, 29, 1253–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Merli, M.; Berzigotti, A.; Zelber-Sagi, S.; Dasarathy, S.; Montagnese, S.; Genton, L.; Plauth, M.; Parés, A. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on nutrition in chronic liver disease. J. Hepatol. 2019, 70, 172–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Bischoff, S.C.; Bernal, W.; Dasarathy, S.; Merli, M.; Plank, L.D.; Schütz, T.; Plauth, M. ESPEN practical guideline: Clinical nutrition in liver disease. Clin. Nutr. 2020, 39, 3533–3562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lim, S.; Kim, J.H.; Yoon, J.W.; Kang, S.M.; Choi, S.H.; Park, Y.J.; Kim, K.W.; Lim, J.Y.; Park, K.S.; Jang, H.C. Sarcopenic Obesity: Prevalence and Association with Metabolic Syndrome in the Korean Longitudinal Study on Health and Aging (KLoSHA). Diabetes Care 2010, 33, 1652–1654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Lee, Y.-H.; Kim, S.U.; Song, K.; Park, J.Y.; Kim, D.Y.; Ahn, S.H.; Lee, B.-W.; Kang, E.S.; Cha, B.-S.; Han, K.-H. Sarcopenia is associated with significant liver fibrosis independently of obesity and insulin resistance in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Nationwide surveys (KNHANES 2008–2011). Hepatology 2016, 63, 776–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Han, E.; Lee, Y.-H.; Kim, B.K.; Park, J.Y.; Kim, D.Y.; Ahn, S.H.; Lee, B.-W.; Kang, E.S.; Cha, B.-S.; Han, K.-H.; et al. Sarcopenia is associated with the risk of significant liver fibrosis in metabolically unhealthy subjects with chronic hepatitis B. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2018, 48, 300–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Fielding, R.A.; Vellas, B.; Evans, W.J.; Bhasin, S.; Morley, J.E.; Newman, A.B.; van Kan, G.A.; Andrieu, S.; Bauer, J.; Breuille, D.; et al. Sarcopenia: An Undiagnosed Condition in Older Adults. Current Consensus Definition: Prevalence, Etiology, and Consequences. International Working Group on Sarcopenia. J. Am. Med Dir. Assoc. 2011, 12, 249–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Cruz-Jentoft, A.J.; Baeyens, J.P.; Bauer, J.M.; Boirie, Y.; Cederholm, T.; Landi, F.; Martin, F.C.; Michel, J.-P.; Rolland, Y.; Schneider, S.M.; et al. Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis: Report of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. Age Ageing 2010, 39, 412–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Chen, L.-K.; Liu, L.-K.; Woo, J.; Assantachai, P.; Auyeung, T.-W.; Bahyah, K.S.; Chou, M.-Y.; Hsu, P.-S.; Krairit, O.; Lee, J.S.; et al. Sarcopenia in Asia: Consensus Report of the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 2014, 15, 95–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Saeki, C.; Takano, K.; Oikawa, T.; Aoki, Y.; Kanai, T.; Takakura, K.; Nakano, M.; Torisu, Y.; Sasaki, N.; Abo, M.; et al. Comparative assessment of sarcopenia using the JSH, AWGS, and EWGSOP2 criteria and the relationship between sarcopenia, osteoporosis, and osteosarcopenia in patients with liver cirrhosis. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2019, 20, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Traub, J.; Bergheim, I.; Eibisberger, M.; Stadlbauer, V. Sarcopenia and Liver Cirrhosis—Comparison of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia Criteria 2010 and 2019. Nutrients 2020, 12, 547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Studenski, S.A.; Peters, K.W.; Alley, D.E.; Cawthon, P.M.; McLean, R.R.; Harris, T.B.; Ferrucci, L.; Guralnik, J.M.; Fragala, M.S.; Kenny, A.M.; et al. The FNIH Sarcopenia Project: Rationale, Study Description, Conference Recommendations, and Final Estimates. J. Gerontol. Ser. A Biomed. Sci. Med. Sci. 2014, 69, 547–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Nishikawa, H.; Shiraki, M.; Hiramatsu, A.; Moriya, K.; Hino, K.; Nishiguchi, S. Japan Society of Hepatology guidelines for sarcopenia in liver disease (1st edition): Recommendation from the working group for creation of sarcopenia assessment criteria. Hepatol. Res. 2016, 46, 951–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Beaudart, C.; McCloskey, E.; Bruyere, O.; Cesari, M.; Rolland, Y.; Rizzoli, R.; De Carvalho, I.A.; Thiyagarajan, J.A.; Bautmans, I.; Bertière, M.-C.; et al. Sarcopenia in daily practice: Assessment and management. BMC Geriatr. 2016, 16, 170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Shen, W.; Punyanitya, M.; Wang, Z.; Gallagher, D.; St-Onge, M.-P.; Albu, J.; Heymsfield, S.B.; Heshka, S. Total body skeletal muscle and adipose tissue volumes: Estimation from a single abdominal cross-sectional image. J. Appl. Physiol. 2004, 97, 2333–2338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Mitsiopoulos, N.; Baumgartner, R.N.; Heymsfield, S.B.; Lyons, W.; Gallagher, D.; Ross, R. Cadaver validation of skeletal muscle measurement by magnetic resonance imaging and computerized tomography. J. Appl. Physiol. 1998, 85, 115–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Baumgartner, R.N.; Koehler, K.M.; Gallagher, D.; Romero, L.; Heymsfield, S.B.; Ross, R.R.; Garry, P.J.; Lindeman, R.D. Epidemiology of Sarcopenia among the Elderly in New Mexico. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1998, 147, 755–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Prado, C.M.; Lieffers, J.R.; McCargar, L.J.; Reiman, T.; Sawyer, M.B.; Martin, L.; Baracos, V.E. Prevalence and clinical implications of sarcopenic obesity in patients with solid tumours of the respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts: A population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2008, 9, 629–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Acosta, L.F.; Galuppo, R.; García, C.R.; Villacorta, E.; Dugan, A.; Castellanos, A.L.; Gedaly, R.; Lee, J.T. Association Between Sarcopenia and AFP Level in Patients Undergoing Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. J. Surg. Res. 2019, 238, 10–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Gu, D.H.; Kim, M.Y.; Seo, Y.S.; Kim, S.G.; Lee, H.A.; Kim, T.H.; Jung, Y.K.; Kandemir, A.; Kim, J.H.; An, H.; et al. Clinical usefulness of psoas muscle thickness for the diagnosis of sarcopenia in patients with liver cirrhosis. Clin. Mol. Hepatol. 2018, 24, 319–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Sinclair, M.; Grossmann, M.; Angus, P.W.; Hoermann, R.; Hey, P.; Scodellaro, T.; Gow, P.J. Low testosterone as a better predictor of mortality than sarcopenia in men with advanced liver disease. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2015, 31, 661–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Kumar, V.; Benjamin, J.; Shasthry, V.; Bharathy, K.G.S.; Sinha, P.K.; Kumar, G.; Pamecha, V. Sarcopenia in Cirrhosis: Fallout on Liver Transplantation. J. Clin. Exp. Hepatol. 2020, 10, 467–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Paternostro, R.; Lampichler, K.; Bardach, C.; Asenbaum, U.; Landler, C.; Bauer, D.; Mandorfer, M.; Schwarzer, R.; Trauner, M.; Reiberger, T.; et al. The value of different CT-based methods for diagnosing low muscle mass and predicting mortality in patients with cirrhosis. Liver Int. 2019, 39, 2374–2385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. DiMartini, A.; Cruz, R.J.; Dew, M.A.; Myaskovsky, L.; Goodpaster, B.; Fox, K.; Kim, K.H.; Fontes, P. Muscle mass predicts outcomes following liver transplantation. Liver Transplant. 2013, 19, 1172–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Martin, L.; Birdsell, L.; MacDonald, N.; Reiman, T.; Clandinin, M.T.; McCargar, L.J.; Murphy, R.; Ghosh, S.; Sawyer, M.B.; Baracos, V.E. Cancer Cachexia in the Age of Obesity: Skeletal Muscle Depletion Is a Powerful Prognostic Factor, Independent of Body Mass Index. J. Clin. Oncol. 2013, 31, 1539–1547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. van Vugt, J.L.A.; Alferink, L.J.M.; Buettner, S.; Gaspersz, M.P.; Bot, D.; Murad, S.D.; Feshtali, S.; van Ooijen, P.M.A.; Polak, W.G.; Porte, R.J.; et al. A model including sarcopenia surpasses the MELD score in predicting waiting list mortality in cirrhotic liver transplant candidates: A competing risk analysis in a national cohort. J. Hepatol. 2018, 68, 707–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Montano-Loza, A.J.; Meza-Junco, J.; Baracos, V.E.; Prado, C.M.M.; Ma, M.; Meeberg, G.; Beaumont, C.; Tandon, P.; Esfandiari, N.; Sawyer, M.B.; et al. Severe muscle depletion predicts postoperative length of stay but is not associated with survival after liver transplantation. Liver Transplant. 2014, 20, 640–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Carey, E.J.; Lai, J.C.; Wang, C.W.; Dasarathy, S.; Lobach, I.; Montano-Loza, A.J.; Dunn, M.A. A multicenter study to define sarcopenia in patients with end-stage liver disease. Liver Transplant. 2017, 23, 625–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kappus, M.R.; Wegermann, K.; Bozdogan, E.; Patel, Y.A.; Janas, G.; Shropshire, E.; Parish, A.; Niedzwiecki, D.; Muir, A.J.; Bashir, M. Use of Skeletal Muscle Index as a Predictor of Wait-List Mortality in Patients with End-Stage Liver Disease. Liver Transplant. 2020, 26, 1090–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Ebadi, M.; Bhanji, R.A.; Dunichand-Hoedl, A.R.; Mazurak, V.C.; Baracos, V.E.; Montano-Loza, A.J. Sarcopenia Severity Based on Computed Tomography Image Analysis in Patients with Cirrhosis. Nutrients 2020, 12, 3463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Tandon, P.; Ney, M.; Irwin, I.; Ma, M.M.; Gramlich, L.; Bain, V.G.; Esfandiari, N.; Baracos, V.; Montano-Loza, A.J.; Myers, R.P. Severe muscle depletion in patients on the liver transplant wait list: Its prevalence and independent prognostic value. Liver Transplant. 2012, 18, 1209–1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Giusto, M.; Lattanzi, B.; Albanese, C.; Galtieri, A.; Farcomeni, A.; Giannelli, V.; Lucidi, C.; Di Martino, M.; Catalano, C.; Merli, M. Sarcopenia in liver cirrhosis. Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2015, 27, 328–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Hanai, T.; Shiraki, M.; Nishimura, K.; Ohnishi, S.; Imai, K.; Suetsugu, A.; Takai, K.; Shimizu, M.; Moriwaki, H. Sarcopenia impairs prognosis of patients with liver cirrhosis. Nutrition 2015, 31, 193–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ebadi, M.; Tandon, P.; Moctezuma-Velazquez, C.; Ghosh, S.; Baracos, V.E.; Mazurak, V.C.; Montano-Loza, A.J. Low subcutaneous adiposity associates with higher mortality in female patients with cirrhosis. J. Hepatol. 2018, 69, 608–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Eslamparast, T.; Montano-Loza, A.J.; Raman, M.; Tandon, P. Sarcopenic obesity in cirrhosis-The confluence of 2 prognostic titans. Liver Int. 2018, 38, 1706–1717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Gargiulo, P.; Kern, H.; Carraro, U.; Ingvarsson, P.; Knútsdóttir, S.; Gudmundsdóttir, V.; Yngvason, S.; Vatnsdal, B.; Helgason, T. Quantitative color three-dimensional computer tomography imaging of human long-term denervated muscle. Neurol. Res. 2010, 32, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Edmunds, K.J.; Gíslason, M.K.; Arnadottir, I.D.; Marcante, A.; Piccione, F.; Gargiulo, P. Quantitative Computed Tomography and Image Analysis for Advanced Muscle Assessment. Eur. J. Transl. Myol. 2016, 26, 6015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wells, C.I.; McCall, J.L.; Plank, L.D. Relationship Between Total Body Protein and Cross-Sectional Skeletal Muscle Area in Liver Cirrhosis Is Influenced by Overhydration. Liver Transplant. 2019, 25, 45–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Durand, F.; Buyse, S.; Francoz, C.; Laouénan, C.; Bruno, O.; Belghiti, J.; Moreau, R.; Vilgrain, V.; Valla, D. Prognostic value of muscle atrophy in cirrhosis using psoas muscle thickness on computed tomography. J. Hepatol. 2014, 60, 1151–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Huguet, A.; Latournerie, M.; DeBry, P.H.; Jezequel, C.; Legros, L.; Rayar, M.; Boudjema, K.; Guyader, D.; Jacquet, E.B.; Thibault, R. The psoas muscle transversal diameter predicts mortality in patients with cirrhosis on a waiting list for liver transplantation: A retrospective cohort study. Nutrition 2018, 51–52, 73–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Golse, N.; Bucur, P.O.; Ciacio, O.; Pittau, G.; Cunha, A.S.; Adam, R.; Castaing, D.; Antonini, T.; Coilly, A.; Samuel, D.; et al. A new definition of sarcopenia in patients with cirrhosis undergoing liver transplantation. Liver Transplant. 2017, 23, 143–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Englesbe, M.J.; Patel, S.P.; He, K.; Lynch, R.J.; Schaubel, D.E.; Harbaugh, C.; Holcombe, S.A.; Wang, S.C.; Segev, D.L.; Sonnenday, C.J. Sarcopenia and Mortality after Liver Transplantation. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2010, 211, 271–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Hamaguchi, Y.; Kaido, T.; Okumura, S.; Fujimoto, Y.; Ogawa, K.; Mori, A.; Hammad, A.; Tamai, Y.; Inagaki, N.; Uemoto, S. Impact of quality as well as quantity of skeletal muscle on outcomes after liver transplantation. Liver Transplant. 2014, 20, 1413–1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Ebadi, M.; Wang, C.W.; Lai, J.C.; Dasarathy, S.; Kappus, M.R.; Dunn, M.A.; Carey, E.J.; Montano-Loza, A.J. Poor performance of psoas muscle index for identification of patients with higher waitlist mortality risk in cirrhosis. J. Cachex Sarcopenia Muscle 2018, 9, 1053–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Krell, R.W.; Kaul, D.R.; Martin, A.R.; Englesbe, M.J.; Sonnenday, C.J.; Cai, S.; Malani, P.N. Association between sarcopenia and the risk of serious infection among adults undergoing liver transplantation. Liver Transplant. 2013, 19, 1396–1402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Hou, L.; Deng, Y.; Wu, H.; Xu, X.; Lin, L.; Cui, B.; Zhao, T.; Fan, X.; Mao, L.; Hou, J.; et al. Low psoas muscle index associates with long-term mortality in cirrhosis: Construction of a nomogram. Ann. Transl. Med. 2020, 8, 358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kalafateli, M.; Mantzoukis, K.; Yau, Y.C.; Mohammad, A.O.; Arora, S.; Rodrigues, S.; De Vos, M.; Papadimitriou, K.; Thorburn, D.; O’Beirne, J.; et al. Malnutrition and sarcopenia predict post-liver transplantation outcomes independently of the Model for End-stage Liver Disease score. J. Cachex Sarcopenia Muscle 2017, 8, 113–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Ohara, M.; Suda, G.; Kimura, M.; Maehara, O.; Shimazaki, T.; Shigesawa, T.; Suzuki, K.; Nakamura, A.; Kawagishi, N.; Nakai, M.; et al. Analysis of the optimal psoas muscle mass index cut-off values, as measured by computed tomography, for the diagnosis of loss of skeletal muscle mass in Japanese people. Hepatol. Res. 2020, 50, 715–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Tsien, C.; Garber, A.; Narayanan, A.; Shah, S.N.; Barnes, D.; Eghtesad, B.; Fung, J.; McCullough, A.J.; Dasarathy, S. Post-liver transplantation sarcopenia in cirrhosis: A prospective evaluation. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2014, 29, 1250–1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Praktiknjo, M.; Clees, C.; Pigliacelli, A.; Fischer, S.; Jansen, C.; Lehmann, J.; Pohlmann, A.; Lattanzi, B.; Krabbe, V.K.; Strassburg, C.P.; et al. Sarcopenia Is Associated with Development of Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure in Decompensated Liver Cirrhosis Receiving Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt. Clin. Transl. Gastroenterol. 2019, 10, e00025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Rubbieri, G.; Mossello, E.; Di Bari, M. Techniques for the diagnosis of sarcopenia. Clin. Cases Miner. Bone Metab. 2014, 11, 181–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Janssen, I.; Heymsfield, S.B.; Ross, R. Low Relative Skeletal Muscle Mass (Sarcopenia) in Older Persons Is Associated with Functional Impairment and Physical Disability. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2002, 50, 889–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Lindqvist, C.; Brismar, T.B.; Majeed, A.; Wahlin, S. Assessment of muscle mass depletion in chronic liver disease: Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry compared with computed tomography. Nutrition 2019, 61, 93–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Coin, A.; Sarti, S.; Ruggiero, E.; Giannini, S.; Pedrazzoni, M.; Minisola, S.; Rossini, M.; Del Puente, A.; Inelmen, E.M.; Manzato, E.; et al. Prevalence of Sarcopenia Based on Different Diagnostic Criteria Using DEXA and Appendicular Skeletal Muscle Mass Reference Values in an Italian Population Aged 20 to 80. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 2013, 14, 507–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Sinclair, M.; Hoermann, R.; Peterson, A.; Testro, A.; Angus, P.W.; Hey, P.; Chapman, B.; Gow, P.J. Use of Dual X-ray Absorptiometry in men with advanced cirrhosis to predict sarcopenia-associated mortality risk. Liver Int. 2019, 39, 1089–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Kim, K.M.; Lim, S.; Choi, S.H.; Kim, J.H.; Shin, C.S.; Park, K.S.; Jang, H.C. Cardiometabolic implication of sarcopenia: The Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Study (KNHANES) 2008–2010. IJC Metab. Endocr. 2014, 4, 63–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Han, E.; Lee, Y.-H.; Kim, Y.D.; Kim, B.K.; Park, J.Y.; Kim, D.Y.; Ahn, S.H.; Lee, B.-W.; Kang, E.S.; Cha, B.-S.; et al. Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Sarcopenia Are Independently Associated with Cardiovascular Risk. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2020, 115, 584–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Golabi, P.; Gerber, L.; Paik, J.M.; Deshpande, R.; De Avila, L.; Younossi, Z.M. Contribution of sarcopenia and physical inactivity to mortality in people with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. JHEP Rep. 2020, 2, 100171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Santos, L.A.A.; Lima, T.B.; Qi, X.; de Paiva, S.A.R.; Romeiro, F.G. Refining dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry data to predict mortality among cirrhotic outpatients: A retrospective study. Nutrition 2021, 85, 111132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Bering, T.; Diniz, K.G.; Coelho, M.P.P.; Vieira, D.A.; Soares, M.M.S.; Kakehasi, A.M.; Correia, M.I.T.; Teixeira, R.; Queiroz, D.M.; Rocha, G.A.; et al. Association between pre-sarcopenia, sarcopenia, and bone mineral density in patients with chronic hepatitis C. J. Cachex Sarcopenia Muscle 2018, 9, 255–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Belarmino, G.; Gonzalez, M.C.; Sala, P.; Torrinhas, R.S.; Andraus, W.; D’Albuquerque, L.A.C.; Pereira, R.M.R.; Caparbo, V.F.; Ferrioli, E.; Pfrimer, K.; et al. Diagnosing Sarcopenia in Male Patients with Cirrhosis by Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Estimates of Appendicular Skeletal Muscle Mass. J. Parenter. Enter. Nutr. 2018, 42, 24–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Alferink, L.J.M.; Trajanoska, K.; Erler, N.S.; Schoufour, J.D.; De Knegt, R.J.; Ikram, M.A.; Janssen, H.L.A.; Franco, O.H.; Metselaar, H.J.; Rivadeneira, F.; et al. Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in The Rotterdam Study: About Muscle Mass, Sarcopenia, Fat Mass, and Fat Distribution. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2019, 34, 1254–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Nishikawa, H.; Enomoto, H.; Iwata, Y.; Nishimura, T.; Iijima, H.; Nishiguchi, S. Clinical utility of bioimpedance analysis in liver cirrhosis. J. Hepato-Biliary-Pancreat. Sci. 2017, 24, 409–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Hanai, T.; Shiraki, M.; Watanabe, S.; Kochi, T.; Imai, K.; Suetsugu, A.; Takai, K.; Moriwaki, H.; Shimizu, M. Sarcopenia predicts minimal hepatic encephalopathy in patients with liver cirrhosis. Hepatol. Res. 2017, 47, 1359–1367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Hayashi, M.; Abe, K.; Fujita, M.; Okai, K.; Takahashi, A.; Ohira, H. Association between sarcopenia and osteoporosis in chronic liver disease. Hepatol. Res. 2018, 48, 893–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Kim, K.H.; Kim, B.K.; Park, J.Y.; Kim, D.Y.; Ahn, S.H.; Han, K.-H.; Kim, S.U. Sarcopenia assessed using bioimpedance analysis is associated independently with significant liver fibrosis in patients with chronic liver diseases. Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020, 32, 58–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Seo, D.; Lee, Y.-H.; Park, S.W.; Choi, Y.J.; Huh, B.W.; Lee, E.; Huh, K.B.; Kim, S.; Cha, B.-S. Sarcopenia is associated with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in men with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Metab. 2020, 46, 362–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Petta, S.; Ciminnisi, S.; Di Marco, V.; Cabibi, D.; Cammà, C.; Licata, A.; Marchesini, G.; Craxì, A. Sarcopenia is associated with severe liver fibrosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2017, 45, 510–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Bera, T.K. Bioelectrical Impedance Methods for Noninvasive Health Monitoring: A Review. J. Med. Eng. 2014, 2014, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Gába, A.; Kapuš, O.; Cuberek, R.; Botek, M. Comparison of multi- and single-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for assessment of body composition in post-menopausal women: Effects of body mass index and accelerometer-determined physical activity. J. Hum. Nutr. Diet. 2014, 28, 390–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Alves, F.D.; Souza, G.C.; Biolo, A.; Clausell, N. Comparison of two bioelectrical impedance devices and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry to evaluate body composition in heart failure. J. Hum. Nutr. Diet. 2014, 27, 632–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Wang, H.; Hai, S.; Cao, L.; Zhou, J.; Liu, P.; Dong, B.-R. Estimation of prevalence of sarcopenia by using a new bioelectrical impedance analysis in Chinese community-dwelling elderly people. BMC Geriatr. 2016, 16, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Kim, M.; Shinkai, S.; Murayama, H.; Mori, S. Comparison of segmental multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for the assessment of body composition in a community-dwelling older population. Geriatr. Gerontol. Int. 2015, 15, 1013–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Pirlich, M.; Schütz, T.; Spachos, T.; Ertl, S.; Weiß, M.-L.; Lochs, H.; Plauth, M. Bioelectrical impedance analysis is a useful bedside technique to assess malnutrition in cirrhotic patients with and without ascites. Hepatology 2000, 32, 1208–1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Strauss, B.G.; Gibson, P.R.; Stroud, D.B.; Borovnicar, D.J.; Xiong, D.W.; Keogh, J. The Melbourne Liver Group Total Body Dual X-ray Absorptiometry Is a Good Measure of Both Fat Mass and Fat-free Mass in Liver Cirrhosis Compared to “Gold-Standard” Techniques. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2006, 904, 55–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Hamaguchi, Y.; Kaido, T.; Okumura, S.; Kobayashi, A.; Hammad, A.; Tamai, Y.; Inagaki, N.; Uemoto, S. Proposal for new diagnostic criteria for low skeletal muscle mass based on computed tomography imaging in Asian adults. Nutrition 2016, 32, 1200–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Silva, D.D.E.S.; Waitzberg, D.L.; De Jesus, R.P.; De Oliveira, L.P.M.; Torrinhas, R.S.; Belarmino, G. Phase angle as a marker for sarcopenia in cirrhosis. Clin. Nutr. ESPEN 2019, 32, 56–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Ruiz-Margáin, A.; Macías-Rodríguez, R.U.; Duarte-Rojo, A.; Ríos-Torres, S.L.; Espinosa-Cuevas, Á.; Torre, A. Malnutrition assessed through phase angle and its relation to prognosis in patients with compensated liver cirrhosis: A prospective cohort study. Dig. Liver Dis. 2015, 47, 309–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Lukaski, H.C.; Kyle, U.G.; Kondrup, J. Assessment of adult malnutrition and prognosis with bioelectrical impedance analysis. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care 2017, 20, 330–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Ruiz-Margáin, A.; Xie, J.J.; Román-Calleja, B.M.; Pauly, M.; White, M.G.; Chapa-Ibargüengoitia, M.; Campos-Murguía, A.; González-Regueiro, J.A.; Macias-Rodríguez, R.U.; Duarte-Rojo, A. Phase Angle from Bioelectrical Impedance for the Assessment of Sarcopenia in Cirrhosis with or without Ascites. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Ruiz-Margáin, A.; Macías-Rodríguez, R.U.; Ampuero, J.; Cubero, F.J.; Chi-Cervera, L.; Ríos-Torres, S.L.; Duarte-Rojo, A.; Espinosa-Cuevas, A.; Romero-Gómez, M.; Torre, A. Low phase angle is associated with the development of hepatic encephalopathy in patients with cirrhosis. World J. Gastroenterol. 2016, 22, 10064–10070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Leong, D.P.; Teo, K.K.; Rangarajan, S.; Lopez-Jaramillo, P.; Avezum, A., Jr.; Orlandini, A.; Seron, P.; Ahmed, S.H.; Rosengren, A.; Kelishadi, R.; et al. Prognostic value of grip strength: Findings from the Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) study. Lancet 2015, 386, 266–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Rijk, J.M.; Roos, P.R.K.M.; Deckx, L.; Akker, M.V.D.; Buntinx, F. Prognostic value of handgrip strength in people aged 60 years and older: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Geriatr. Gerontol. Int. 2015, 16, 5–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Lauretani, F.; Russo, C.R.; Bandinelli, S.; Bartali, B.; Cavazzini, C.; Di Iorio, A.; Corsi, A.M.; Rantanen, T.; Guralnik, J.M.; Ferrucci, L. Age-associated changes in skeletal muscles and their effect on mobility: An operational diagnosis of sarcopenia. J. Appl. Physiol. 2003, 95, 1851–1860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Fried, L.P.; Tangen, C.M.; Walston, J.; Newman, A.B.; Hirsch, C.; Gottdiener, J.; Seeman, T.; Tracy, R.; Kop, W.J.; Burke, G.; et al. Frailty in Older Adults: Evidence for a Phenotype. J. Gerontol. Ser. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2001, 56, M146–M156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Dodds, R.M.; Syddall, H.E.; Cooper, R.; Benzeval, M.; Deary, I.J.; Dennison, E.M.; Der, G.; Gale, C.R.; Inskip, H.; Jagger, C.; et al. Grip Strength across the Life Course: Normative Data from Twelve British Studies. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e113637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  100. Augusti, L.; Franzoni, L.C.; Santos, L.A.A.; Lima, T.B.; Ietsugu, M.V.; Koga, K.H.; Moriguchi, S.M.; Betting, L.E.; Caramori, C.A.; Silva, G.F.; et al. Lower values of handgrip strength and adductor pollicis muscle thickness are associated with hepatic encephalopathy manifestations in cirrhotic patients. Metab. Brain Dis. 2016, 31, 909–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  101. Daphnee, D.; John, S.; Vaidya, A.; Khakhar, A.; Bhuvaneshwari, S.; Ramamurthy, A. Hand grip strength: A reliable, reproducible, cost-effective tool to assess the nutritional status and outcomes of cirrhotics awaiting liver transplant. Clin. Nutr. ESPEN 2017, 19, 49–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Hanai, T.; Shiraki, M.; Imai, K.; Suetsugu, A.; Takai, K.; Moriwaki, H.; Shimizu, M. Reduced handgrip strength is predictive of poor survival among patients with liver cirrhosis: A sex-stratified analysis. Hepatol. Res. 2019, 49, 1414–1426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Sinclair, M.; Chapman, B.; Hoermann, R.; Angus, P.W.; Testro, A.; Scodellaro, T.; Gow, P.J. Handgrip Strength Adds More Prognostic Value to the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Score Than Imaging-Based Measures of Muscle Mass in Men with Cirrhosis. Liver Transplant. 2019, 25, 1480–1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Sousa-Santos, A.R.; Amaral, T.F. Differences in handgrip strength protocols to identify sarcopenia and frailty—A systematic review. BMC Geriatr. 2017, 17, 238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Lai, J.C.; Feng, S.; Terrault, N.A.; Lizaola, B.; Hayssen, H.; Covinsky, K. Frailty Predicts Waitlist Mortality in Liver Transplant Candidates. Arab. Archaeol. Epigr. 2014, 14, 1870–1879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Hiraoka, A.; Michitaka, K.; Ueki, H.; Kaneto, M.; Aibiki, T.; Okudaira, T.; Kawakami, T.; Yamago, H.; Suga, Y.; Tomida, H.; et al. Sarcopenia and two types of presarcopenia in Japanese patients with chronic liver disease. Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2016, 28, 940–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Wang, C.W.; Feng, S.; Covinsky, K.E.; Hayssen, H.; Zhou, L.-Q.; Yeh, B.M.; Lai, J.C. A Comparison of Muscle Function, Mass, and Quality in Liver Transplant Candidates. Transplantation 2016, 100, 1692–1698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Harimoto, N.; Yoshizumi, T.; Izumi, T.; Motomura, T.; Harada, N.; Itoh, S.; Ikegami, T.; Uchiyama, H.; Soejima, Y.; Nishie, A.; et al. Clinical Outcomes of Living Liver Transplantation According to the Presence of Sarcopenia as Defined by Skeletal Muscle Mass, Hand Grip, and Gait Speed. Transplant. Proc. 2017, 49, 2144–2152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Lai, J.C.; Covinsky, K.E.; Dodge, J.L.; Boscardin, W.J.; Segev, D.L.; Roberts, J.P.; Feng, S. Development of a novel frailty index to predict mortality in patients with end-stage liver disease. Hepatology 2017, 66, 564–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Lai, J.C.; Dodge, J.L.; Sen, S.; Covinsky, K.E.; Feng, S. Functional decline in patients with cirrhosis awaiting liver transplantation: Results from the functional assessment in liver transplantation (FrAILT) study. Hepatology 2016, 63, 574–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  111. Haugen, C.E.; McAdams-DeMarco, M.; Verna, E.C.; Rahimi, R.S.; Kappus, M.R.; Dunn, M.A.; Volk, M.L.; Gurakar, A.; Duarte-Rojo, A.; Ganger, D.R.; et al. Association Between Liver Transplant Wait-list Mortality and Frailty Based on Body Mass Index. JAMA Surg. 2019, 154, 1103–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Tapper, E.B.; Baki, J.; Parikh, N.D.; Lok, A.S. Frailty, Psychoactive Medications, and Cognitive Dysfunction Are Associated With Poor Patient-Reported Outcomes in Cirrhosis. Hepatology 2019, 69, 1676–1685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Sidhu, S.S.; Saggar, K.; Goyal, O.; Varshney, T.; Kishore, H.; Bansal, N.; Sidhu, S.S. Muscle strength and physical performance, rather than muscle mass, correlate with mortality in end-stage liver disease. Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2021, 33, 555–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Dunn, M.A.; Josbeno, D.A.; Tevar, A.D.; Rachakonda, V.; Ganesh, S.R.; Schmotzer, A.R.; Kallenborn, E.A.; Behari, J.; Landsittel, D.P.; DiMartini, A.F.; et al. Frailty as Tested by Gait Speed is an Independent Risk Factor for Cirrhosis Complications that Require Hospitalization. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2016, 111, 1768–1775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Kulkarni, S.; Chen, H.; Josbeno, D.; Schmotzer, A.; Hughes, C.; Humar, A.; Sood, P.; Rachakonda, V.; Dunn, M.; Tevar, A. Gait Speed and Grip Strength Are Associated with Dropping Out of the Liver Transplant Waiting List. Transplant. Proc. 2019, 51, 794–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Deng, Y.; Lin, L.; Fan, X.; Cui, B.; Hou, L.; Zhao, T.; Hou, J.; Mao, L.; Wang, X.; Zhao, W.; et al. Incorporation of frailty estimated by gait speed within MELD-Na and the predictive potential for mortality in cirrhosis. Ther. Adv. Chronic Dis. 2020, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Soto, R.; Díaz, L.A.; Rivas, V.; Fuentes-López, E.; Zalaquett, M.; Bruera, M.J.; González, C.; Mezzano, G.; Benítez, C. Frailty and reduced gait speed are independently related to mortality of cirrhotic patients in long-term follow-up. Ann. Hepatol. 2021, 25, 100327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Nishikawa, H.; Yoh, K.; Enomoto, H.; Iwata, Y.; Sakai, Y.; Kishino, K.; Shimono, Y.; Ikeda, N.; Takashima, T.; Aizawa, N.; et al. Health-Related Quality of Life and Frailty in Chronic Liver Diseases. Life 2020, 10, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Nishikawa, H.; Enomoto, H.; Yoh, K.; Iwata, Y.; Sakai, Y.; Kishino, K.; Ikeda, N.; Takashima, T.; Aizawa, N.; Takata, R.; et al. Walking Speed: Japanese Data in Chronic Liver Diseases. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Table
Table 1. Studies measuring skeletal muscle area using computed tomography in patients with chronic liver disease.
Table 1. Studies measuring skeletal muscle area using computed tomography in patients with chronic liver disease.
Author (Year)CountryNumber of SubjectsStudy PopulationLevel of MeasurementCutoff for Sarcopenia
Montano-Loza (2012) [13]Canada112LT candidatesL352.4 cm2/m2 for men
38.5 cm2/m2 for women
Tandon (2012) [44]Canada142LT candidatesL352.4 cm2/m2 for men
38.5 cm2/m2 for women
DiMartini (2013) [37]U.S.A.338LT candidatesL3–452.4 cm2/m2 for men
38.5 cm2/m2 for women
Giusto (2015) [45]Italy59LT candidatesL352.4 cm2/m2 for men
38.5 cm2/m2 for women
Hanai (2015) [46]Japan130CirrhosisL352.4 cm2/m2 for men
38.5 cm2/m2 for women
Sinclair (2016) [34]Australia145Male LT candidatesL452.4 cm2/m2 for men
38.5 cm2/m2 for women
Gu (2018) [33]Korea653CirrhosisL352.4 cm2/m2 for men
38.5 cm2/m2 for women
Paternostro (2019) [36]Austria109CirrhosisL352.4 cm2/m2 for men
38.5 cm2/m2 for women
Acosta (2019) [32]U.S.A.119Patients who underwent LT for HCCL352.4 cm2/m2 for men
38.5 cm2/m2 for women
Kumar (2020) [35]India115LT recipientsL352.4 cm2/m2 for men
38.5 cm2/m2 for women
Carey (2017) [41]North America396LT candidatesL350 cm2/m2 for men
39 cm2/m2 for women
Ebadi (2018) [47]North America353LT candidatesL350 cm2/m2 for men
39 cm2/m2 for women
Kappus (2020) [42]U.K.355LT candidatesL350 cm2/m2 for men
39 cm2/m2 for women
Montano-Loza (2014) [40]Canada248LT candidatesL3Male
53 cm2/m2 for BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2
43 cm2/m2 for BMI < 25 kg/m2
Female
41 cm2/m2
van Vugt (2018) [39]Netherland585Patients with cirrhosis listed for LTL31. Martin et al. [38]
Male
53 cm2/m2 for BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2
43 cm2/m2 for BMI < 25 kg/m2
Female
41 cm2/m2
2. Carey et al. [41]
50 cm2/m2 for men
39 cm2/m2 for women
Nishikawa (2016) [26]Japan149Chronic liver diseaseL342 cm2/m2 for men
38 cm2/m2 for women
Ebadi (2020) [43]Canada603CirrhosisL350 cm2/m2 for men
37 cm2/m2 for women
Abbreviations: HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; LT, liver transplantation.
Table
Table 2. Studies measuring psoas muscle mass using computed tomography in patients with chronic liver disease.
Table 2. Studies measuring psoas muscle mass using computed tomography in patients with chronic liver disease.
Author (Year)CountryNumber of SubjectsStudy PopulationMeasurement MethodLevel of MeasureCutoff for SarcopeniaMethod of Determining Cutoff
Englesbe (2010) [55]USA163Cirrhosis patients undergoing LTPMAL4NRLowest quartiles
Krell (2013) [58]USA207Adult patients undergoing LTPMAL4NRLowest tertile
Golse (2017) [54]USA256Cirrhosis patients undergoing LTPMAL3-4Male: 1561 mm2
Female: 1464 mm2		ROC curve for 1-year mortality
Hamaguchi (2014) [56]Japan200Adult patients undergoing LTPMA/height2UmbilicusMale: 6.868 cm2/m2
Female: 4.117 cm2/m2		ROC curve for mortality
Tsien (2014) [62]USA53Adult patients undergoing LTPMA/height2L4Age <50 years
Male: 12.3 cm2/m2,
Female: 10.5 cm2/m2
Age >50 years
Male: 10.1 cm2/m2,
Female: 10.3 cm2/m2		Age- and sex-specific 5th percentile values
Kalafateli (2017) [60]UK232LT recipientsPMA/height2L3Male: 340 mm2/m2
Female: 264 mm2/m2		Lowest sex-stratified quartiles
Ebadi (2018) [57]North America353Patients with cirrhosis on waiting listPMA/height2L3Male: 5.1 cm2/m2
Female: 4.3 cm2/m2		ROC curve for waitlist mortality
Hou (2020) [59]China251Cirrhotic patientsPMA/height2L3Male: 3.5 cm2/m2
Female: 2.6 cm2/m2		ROC curve for 3-year mortality
Ohara (2020) [61]Japan318Chronic liver diseasePMA/height2L3(1) Male: 330 mm2/m2
Female: 169 mm2/m2
(2) Male: 374 mm2/m2
Female: 229 mm2/m2		(1) Less than 2 SD below the mean of normal control
(2) The bottom 5% or normal control
Durand (2014) [52]France562Patients with cirrhosis on waiting listTPMT/heightUmbilicus16.8 mm/mYouden index for waitlist mortality
Kim (2014) [14]Korea65Decompensated cirrhosisTPMT/heightL3–4 or umbilicus14 mm/mROC curve for 1-year mortality
Gu (2018) [33]Korea653Cirrhotic patientsTPMT/heightUmbilicus16.8 mm/mPrevious reference
Huguet (2018) [53]France173Cirrhotic patients on waiting listTPMT/heightUmbilicus15.2 mm/mROC curve for mortality
Praktiknjo (2019) [63]Europe186Patients with decompensated cirrhosis who underwent the TIPSTPMT/heightUmbilicusMale: 17.8 mm/m
Female: 14.0 mm/m		ROC curve for 1-year mortality
Abbreviations: LT, liver transplantation; PMA, psoas muscle area; ROC, receiver operating characteristics; SD, standard deviation; TIPS, trans-jugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt; TPMT, transversal psoas muscle thickness.
Table
Table 4. Studies measuring handgrip strength in patients with chronic liver disease.
Table 4. Studies measuring handgrip strength in patients with chronic liver disease.
Author (Year)CountryNumber of SubjectsStudy PopulationDynamometerHGS AnalysisHandPositionRepetitionsCutoff for SarcopeniaMethod of Determining Cutoff
Lai (2014) [105]USA294LT candidateNRHighest valueDominantNR3Cutoff according to sex and BMIEWGSOP1 (Fried)
Augusti (2016) [100]Brazil54CirrhosisSaehan dynamometerHighest valueNondominantSitting320.5 kgROC curve analysis for discriminating hepatic encephalopathy
Hiraoka (2016) [106]Japan807Chronic liver diseaseTL110
(Toei Light Co.)		Mean of the best value of both handBothStandingA few measurements26 kg for men
18 kg for women		AWGS definition (2014)
Wang (2016) [107]USA292Adults listed for LTJamar hydraulic dynamometerMean valueDominantNR3Cutoff according to sex and BMIEWGSOP1 (Fried)
Belarmino (2017) [74]Brazil144Male patients with cirrhosisDigital dynamometer
(Charder Co. Ltd.)		Higher valueNondominantNR330 kg for menEWGSOP1 (Laurentani)
Daphnee (2017) [101]India180LT candidateJamar hydraulic dynamometerMean valueDominantSitting319.5 kgROC curve analysis for discriminating survivor
Harimoto (2017) [108]Japan366Patients who underwent LDLTDigital grip strength dynamometerHigher valueNRNR226 kg for men
18 kg for women		AWGS definition (2014)
Alferink (2019) [75]Netherland4609Participants from The Rotterdam StudyHydraulic dynamometer
(Fabrication Enterprises Inc.)		Highest valueNondominantNR3Cutoff according to sex and BMIEWGSOP1 (Fried)
Hanai (2019) [102]Japan563CirrhosisT.K.K5101 GRIP-D
(Takei Scientific Instruments)		Mean of the highest value of both handsBothStandingNR30 kg for men
20 kg for women		ROC curve analysis for discriminating survivor
Sinclair (2019) [103]Australia145Men referred for LTJamar hydraulic dynamometerMean valueNondominantSitting330 kg for menEWGSOP1 (Laurentani)
Traub (2020) [24]Austria114CirrhosisJamar hydraulic dynamometerNRNRNRNR(1) EWGSOP1
30 kg for men
20 kg for women
(2) EWGSOP2
27 kg for men
16 kg for women		EWGSOP1 (Laurentani) and EWGSOP2 (Dodds)
Abbreviations: AWGS, Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia; BMI, body mass index; DM, diabetes mellitus; EWGSOP, European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People; LDLT, living donor liver transplantation; LT, liver transplantation; NR, not reported; ROC, receiver operating characteristics.
Table
Table 5. Studies measuring gait speed in patients with chronic liver disease.
Table 5. Studies measuring gait speed in patients with chronic liver disease.
Author (Year)CountryNumber of SubjectsStudy PopulationDistanceGS AnalysisRepetitionsCutoff for SarcopeniaMethod of Determining Cutoff
Harimoto (2017) [108]Japan366Patients who underwent LDLT10 mHigher value20.8 m/sAWGS
Alferink (2019) [75]Netherland4609Participants from The Rotterdam Study5.79 mNRNR1. Men
Height ≤ 173 cm: 0.65 m/s
Height > 173 cm: 0.76 m/s
2. Women
Height ≤ 159 cm: 0.65 m/s
Height > 159 cm: 0.76 m/s		EWGSOP1 (Fired)
Nishikawa (2020) [118]Japan341Chronic liver disease6 mAverage value21.0 m/sJapanese version of the Cardiovascular Health Study criteria
Nishikawa (2020) [119]Japan356Chronic liver disease6 mAverage value20.8 m/sEWGSOP and AWGS
Deng (2020) [116]China113Cirrhosis5 mAverage value30.8 m/sEWGSOP2
Soto (2021) [117]Chile126Cirrhosis4 mNRNR0.8 m/sEWGSOP and AWGS
Abbreviations: AWGS, Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia; EWGSOP, European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People; GS, gait speed; LDLT, living donor liver transplantation; NR, not reported.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Son, S.W.; Song, D.S.; Chang, U.I.; Yang, J.M. Definition of Sarcopenia in Chronic Liver Disease. Life 2021, 11, 349. https://doi.org/10.3390/life11040349

AMA Style

Son SW, Song DS, Chang UI, Yang JM. Definition of Sarcopenia in Chronic Liver Disease. Life. 2021; 11(4):349. https://doi.org/10.3390/life11040349

Chicago/Turabian Style

Son, Seong Wan, Do Seon Song, U Im Chang, and Jin Mo Yang. 2021. "Definition of Sarcopenia in Chronic Liver Disease" Life 11, no. 4: 349. https://doi.org/10.3390/life11040349

APA Style

Son, S. W., Song, D. S., Chang, U. I., & Yang, J. M. (2021). Definition of Sarcopenia in Chronic Liver Disease. Life, 11(4), 349. https://doi.org/10.3390/life11040349

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop