Next Article in Journal
Study of the Chemical Composition and Biologically Active Properties of Glycyrrhiza glabra Extracts
Previous Article in Journal
Diagnostic and Therapeutic Implications of Long Non-Coding RNAs in Leukemia
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Life
Volume 12
Issue 11
10.3390/life12111771
life-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Screening for the Detection of Toxoplasma gondii IgG, IgM and IgA in Females of Reproductive Age from Western Romania

by
Alin Gabriel Mihu
1,2,3,*,†,
Maria Alina Lupu
1,2,4,†,
Alexandru Nesiu
3,
Daniela Teodora Marti
3 and
Tudor Rares Olariu
1,2,5,*
1
Discipline of Parasitology, Department of Infectious Disease, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
2
Center for Diagnosis and Study of Parasitic Diseases, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
3
Department of Biology and Life Sciences, Vasile Goldis University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 310025 Arad, Romania
4
Clinical Laboratory, Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
5
Clinical Laboratory, Municipal Clinical Emergency Teaching Hospital, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Life 2022, 12(11), 1771; https://doi.org/10.3390/life12111771
Submission received: 24 September 2022 / Revised: 20 October 2022 / Accepted: 29 October 2022 / Published: 2 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Animal Science)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Toxoplasma gondii, a zoonotic protozoan parasite, has the capacity to infect the fetus if the pregnant woman primarily acquires the infection during pregnancy. We evaluated the prevalence of T. gondii IgG, IgM and IgA antibodies in women of reproductive age residing in Western Romania. We also assessed the value of adding a T. gondii IgA test to the serologic panel for the diagnosis of toxoplasmosis, including the detection of a recently acquired infection. Serologic testing to demonstrate the presence of T. gondii IgG antibodies was conducted in 1317 females aged 15–45 years. T. gondii IgM and IgA antibody tests were performed in those with detectable IgG antibodies and IgG avidity test was performed if IgM and/or IgA screening test results were positive. T. gondii IgG were detected in 607 (46.09%; 95%CI: 43.41–48.79) of 1317 study participants and IgG seroprevalence tended to increase with age from 35.44% (95%CI: 29.89–41.30) in age group 15–24 years to 62.85% (95%CI: 56.57–68.82) in age group 35–45 years, showing a significant age-associated increase (p < 0.001). Of the 607 persons with detectable T. gondii IgG antibodies, T. gondii IgM antibodies were demonstrated in 8.90% (95%CI: 6.88–11.43), T. gondii IgA in 1.65% (95%CI: 0.90–3.01) and both T. gondii IgM and IgA in 0.99% (95%CI: 0.45–2.14). The prevalence of IgA antibodies tended to decrease with increasing avidity, from 75% (95%CI: 19.41–99.37) in samples with low avidity to 11.76% (95%CI: 4.44–23.87) in those with high avidity (p = 0.01). Of the study participants who were positive for both T. gondii IgM and IgA antibodies, 66.67% had low or equivocal IgG avidity test results compared to 6.25% who tested positive for IgM, were negative for IgA and in whom low or equivocal IgG avidity test results were noted (p = 0.001). This study indicates that in Western Romania, T. gondii IgG seroprevalence is high in females of reproductive age and T. gondii IgA antibodies may be rarely detected during a serologic screening. However, in individuals with demonstrable T. gondii IgG and IgM antibodies, testing for T. gondii IgA may improve the rate for the detection of a recently acquired toxoplasmosis.

1. Introduction

Toxoplasma gondii, a zoonotic protozoan parasite with a worldwide distribution, can infect both humans and all warm-blooded animals, including mammals and birds [1,2]. Felids (domestic and wild cats), the only definitive hosts, harbor the sexual parasitic cycle and spread oocysts through feces [2,3]. Asexual replication of T. gondii occurs in a wide variety of vertebrates which serve as intermediate hosts [4].
T. gondii, by crossing the placenta, has the capacity to infect the fetus if the pregnant woman primarily acquires the infection during pregnancy [5]. In congenitally infected infants, the severity of fetal damage is related inversely to the stage of pregnancy when maternal infection occurs: manifestations are usually more severe if T. gondii is transmitted early in the gestation period [2,6] and spontaneous abortion, prematurity or stillbirth may result [7]. Chorioretinitis, intracranial calcifications, hydrocephalus, microcephalus, convulsions, hepatosplenomegaly, jaundice or fever are among the most frequently clinical signs reported in infants with congenital toxoplasmosis [7,8,9]. The global prevalence of latent infection with T. gondii in pregnant women is estimated at 33.8% and varies widely from 0.7% in South Korea to 92% in Ghana. In European countries, the prevalence rate is 31.2% [10]. Approximately 1.1% of pregnant women are acutely infected with T. gondii during pregnancy worldwide, with a prevalence of 0.5% reported in European regions, suggesting that a considerable number of fetuses are at risk of acquiring the infection [11]. Given the severe clinical manifestations that T. gondii may cause in these patients, it is important to survey its distribution in females of reproductive age and pregnant women.
In Europe, data regarding congenitally infected children are still limited, given that a nationwide epidemiological surveillance system for congenital toxoplasmosis has been implemented only in France and Germany, and in Italy at a regional level [12]. The rate of congenital toxoplasmosis in Romania is unknown [13] and little information is available regarding T. gondii seroprevalence in children [14], pregnant women [5] or women of reproductive age [15].
Diagnosis of both acquired and congenital toxoplasmosis is still based on serological methods [6,16]. The evaluation of T. gondii antibodies (IgG, IgM, IgA) and IgG avidity test results usually allows physicians to assess the immunologic status of a patient and to diagnose seroconversion [17,18,19], but the serological diagnosis of toxoplasmosis is complex and the interpretation of test results may be complicated by the long-term persistence of specific IgM [17]. The IgG avidity test can discriminate between past and recently acquired infections: a low avidity IgG test result is in general suggestive of a recent infection and a high avidity test result excludes a recent infection in the past 4 months [6,16]. Some laboratories use IgA test as an additional marker for diagnosis of acute toxoplasmosis [20] and recent surveys have demonstrated that T. gondii IgA antibody testing might represent a valuable adjunct for determining the timing of the infection, as part of a reference panel for the diagnosis of acute toxoplasmosis [21]. Moreover, T. gondii IgA was sometimes useful in detecting a recently acquired infection in the absence of T. gondii IgM antibodies [21,22].
Therefore, in this study, we assessed the prevalence of T. gondii IgG, IgM and IgA antibodies in women of childbearing age residing in Western Romania. We also evaluated the value of adding T. gondii IgA test to the serologic screening for toxoplasmosis, including the detection of a recently acquired infection.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design

Venous blood samples were collected between 1 February 2018 and 1 February 2019, from 1317 consecutive women of reproductive age (15–45 years), presented for routine check-up, at the Municipal Clinical Emergency Hospital Outpatient Clinic in Timisoara, Romania. Females were residents of Timis county, located in Western Romania, with a total population of 705,113. The age given for each study participant is the age when the blood sample was drawn upon enrolment in the study. Study participants were grouped according to their age in 3 age groups: 15–24 years, 25–34 years and 35–45 years. Peripheral blood samples were collected by venipuncture in 6 mL red-top (plain, non-serum separator) tubes and the serum samples were tested for the presence of specific IgG anti-T. gondii antibodies. In cases of positive results, serum samples were further transferred to 1.5 mL Eppendorf tubes and stored at −20 °C until T. gondii IgM and IgA antibody tests were performed. A specific IgG avidity test was performed only when the presence of T. gondii IgM and/or IgA antibodies was confirmed.
No clinical criteria were used to include subjects in this study.

2.2. Serologic Tests

All serum samples were assessed for anti-T. gondii IgG with the ADVIA Centaur® XP (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Erlangen, Germany) electrochemiluminescence Toxo IgG assay. The sensitivity and specificity for IgG detection were both 100% [23].
Enzyme-linked fluorescent assay (ELFA) designed for VIDAS (bioMérieux, Marcy-l’Etoile, France) was used for identification of serum anti-T. gondii IgM antibodies and evaluation of IgG avidity (VIDAS Toxo IgM kit and Toxo IgG Avidity kit, respectively). ELFA IgM has a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 98.6% [24,25]. IgG avidity Vidas was recently found to have an accuracy of 93.4% in detecting a T. gondii infection dating more than 4 months [26].
Serum anti-T. gondii IgA antibodies were determined using a solid phase enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (DRG Toxoplasma gondii IgA ELISA kit, DRG, Marburg, Germany) with a diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of 100% [27].
All tests were carried out according to manufacturers’ recommendations regarding calibration and the running of controls.

2.3. Interpretation of the Serologic Test Results

Interpretation of test results was based on each of the manufacturer’s criteria.
T. gondii IgG antibody test results were interpreted as follows: <6.40 IU/mL, negative; ≥6.4 to 10 IU/mL, equivocal; >10 IU/mL, positive [28]. T. gondii IgM test results were interpreted as follows: <0.55, negative; ≥0.55 to 0.65, equivocal; >0.65, positive [29]. T. gondii IgA test results were interpreted as negative if the ratio was <0.9; equivocal between 0.9 and 1.0 and positive if the ratio was >1.1 [27]. For the purposes of this study, IgG, IgM and IgA equivocal test results were considered negative.
The Vidas IgG avidity test was interpreted as follows: <0.2, low avidity; ≥0.2 to 0.29, equivocal result; ≥0.3%, high avidity [29]. Low or equivocal tests results indicate the possibility that an infection occurred within the past 4 months, and a high test result excludes the possibility of a primary infection within the previous 4 months [21].

2.4. Data Management and Statistical Analysis

Data were collected using a Microsoft Excel database, version 2011 (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA, USA), and the statistical analyses were performed using Epi Info statistical package, version 3.3.2 (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA) and MedCalc for Windows, version 19.4 (MedCalc Software, Ostend, Belgium). Data are presented as number (percentage), mean ± standard deviation (SD), odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Mantel–Haenszel chi-square test and Fisher’s 2-tailed exact test were used to compare proportions between groups. A p value of <0.05 was considered of statistical significance.

2.5. Ethical Consideration

This study was approved by the Victor Babes University Ethics Committee, Timisoara, Romania (no.2 from 8 January 2018). All participants included in the study were thoroughly informed about the study goals and the procedures, and provided written informed consent. For individuals under the age of eighteen, the parents/legal guardians provided the written informed consent.

3. Results

Of the 1317 female study participants aged 15–45 years (mean = 29.45 ± 6.16 years), T. gondii IgG antibodies were demonstrated in 607 (46.09%) (95%CI: 43.41–48.78) and tended to increase with age, from 35.44% (95%CI: 29.89–41.30) in age group 15–24 years to 62.85% (95%CI: 56.57–68.82) in age group 35–45 years, showing a significant age-associated increase (p < 0.001; OR = 1.73; 95%CI:1.46–2.06) (Table 1).
T. gondii IgM and IgA antibody tests were performed for the 607 females identified with IgG antibodies and the IgG avidity test was performed subsequently in 58 (9.56%) samples that tested positive for T. gondii IgM and/or IgA antibodies. In 549 (90.44%) of the 607 cases in which the IgG avidity test was not performed, the diagnosis of chronic infection was based on the negative results for both T. gondii IgM and IgA antibodies (Figure 1).
T. gondii IgM antibodies were demonstrated in 54 (8.90%; 95%CI: 6.88–11.43)) of the 607 IgG positive study participants, IgA in 10 (1.65%; 95%CI: 0.90–3.01) and both T. gondii IgM and IgA in 6 (0.99%; 95%CI: 0.45–2.14). Of the 54 females with IgM antibodies, only 6 (11.11%) also had IgA antibodies, whereas 6/10 (60%) of study participants with IgA antibodies also had IgM antibodies (Table 2, Figure 1).
Of the 58 serum samples that tested for IgG avidity, 7 (12.07%) had low or equivocal IgG avidity test results: 4 (6.90%) had low IgG avidity test results and 3 (5.17%) had equivocal IgG avidity test results (Figure 1). Of the 6 study participants who were positive for both T. gondii IgM and IgA antibodies, 4 (66.67%) had low or equivocal IgG avidity test results compared to 3 of 48 (6.25%) who tested positive for IgM, were negative for IgA and in whom low or equivocal IgG avidity test results were noted (p = 0.001) (Table 3, Figure 1).
The prevalence of IgA antibodies tended to decrease with increasing avidity, from 75% (3/4) in samples with low avidity (0.0–0.19) to 11.76% (6/51) with high avidity (≥0.3) (p = 0.01).
Moreover, of the 51 females with a high avidity test result (≥0.3), only 11.76% (6/51) had IgA antibodies compared to 92.16% (47/51) of those in whom IgM antibodies were detected (p < 0.001) (Table 4).

4. Discussion

In immunocompetent individuals, infection with T. gondii is generally self-limiting and asymptomatic [30,31], but is capable of causing devastating congenital infection by vertical transmission [32]. The maternal–fetal transmission rate varies from 2.6% at 3 weeks to 69.8% at 39 weeks of pregnancy [33]. Serologic screening of pregnant women followed by treatment in specific cases can reduce the rates of vertical transmission and therefore the disease severity in the affected fetus [32,33,34,35,36].
There is little information available to the international scientific community regarding T. gondii prevalence in Romanian women. The studies published so far have been carried out on small samples of population and revealed a seroprevalence from 19.5% in girls aged 1–18 years [14], to 55.8% in pregnant women aged 12–41 years [5], based on serologic test results for IgG and/or IgM anti-T. gondii antibodies. The 46.09% seroprevalence of T. gondii IgG in our study group is lower than the 57.6% reported by Olariu et al. in 2008 [15] in the same geographical area and similar to the 43.2% T. gondii prevalence recently demonstrated in female blood donors aged between 18 and 45 years from Western Romania [37]. These results suggest a decreasing trend in the seroprevalence of T. gondii in this region, and are consistent with results of previous studies conducted in Europe that confirmed such a decrease in seroprevalence [38,39,40]. There are several factors which can explain this decline: nowadays domestic cats feed less often with raw meat (rodents hunting) because they are fed with dry food [41]; crude vegetables are washed before consumption [42]; the quality of water has improved and the consumption of bottled water has increased [42]; commercialized meat is infrequently infected with T. gondii; during transportation, meat is deep-freezed and this can lead to a decrease of consumption of infected meat [42].
In this study, the prevalence of IgA antibodies was 1.65% compared to the 8.90% prevalence of IgM, suggesting that the detection rate of T. gondii IgA antibodies may be lower than the IgM, during a serologic screening for toxoplasmosis. The prevalence of T. gondii IgA antibodies found in our survey is lower than the 13% and 8.7% seroprevalence reported by investigators in pregnant women from the USA [21] and in mothers with spontaneous abortion from Iran [43], respectively. Unlike our study, where females were investigated in the order in which they presented for routine laboratory check-up, in other studies participants were pregnant women suspected to have been infected with T. gondii. However, in Brazilian pregnant women selected by convenience when they presented for the antenatal care consultation, the seroprevalence of T. gondii IgA antibodies was 0.82% [44], lower than our findings. These differences may also be explained by different sample size and various assays (with different sensitivities and/or specificities) used to identify the presence of T. gondii IgA antibodies [37].
When conventional serologic tests (T. gondii IgG, IgM and IgA) were used in our study group, 9.56% (58/607) of females could be suspected to have been recently infected. If IgG avidity and serologic tests (IgG, IgM, IgA) were combined, only 1.15% (7/607) of the females could be suspected of having a recent infection. Similar results were published by Berredjem et al. [45].
Results of this survey suggest that a recent infection is more likely to be diagnosed in women with both T. gondii IgM and IgA antibodies (66.67%) compared to women in whom only IgM antibodies were present (6.25%). This indicates that T. gondii IgA is more likely to be positive if the infection occurred more recently, similar with results of previous studies [21,43,45,46]. To assess the risk of active disease, especially in pregnant women, testing for T. gondii IgG and IgM antibodies alone is often insufficient [47,48], because T. gondii IgM, when detected, may also indicate a long-term persistence of these specific antibodies [49]. However, the presence of T. gondii IgA antibodies at the same time with IgM and IgG is in favor of acute infection, given that the IgA test has a higher specificity and positive predictive value for the diagnosis of acute infection [20].
Though our sample size was large, the number of individuals tested for avidity was small and this may be considered a study limitation. However, our assessments regarding the interpretation of T. gondii IgM, IgA and IgG avidity test results are in line with those recently reported in a study performed in the USA [21]. The higher prevalences of IgM and IgA antibodies found in the USA reference laboratory may be explained by the referral bias, due to testing of pregnant women on the doctors’ recommendation in case of suspected T. gondii infection, compared to the lower IgM and IgA values found in our study where testing was performed by screening among women of reproductive age. In addition, serum samples with negative results for T. gondii IgG antibodies were not tested further for the presence of specific T. gondii IgM antibodies, and this may also be listed as a limitation of our study. However, cases with detectable IgM antibodies in absence of IgG antibodies are extremely rare [50] and it is highly unlikely that IgM testing of negative IgG sera may significantly change the results of this study.
In most countries, efforts at preventing T. gondii infection frequently focus on pregnant women in order to reduce the risk of miscarriage and congenital infections. However, outbreaks in immunocompetent individuals have been described, which suggests that prevention and control measures, together with health education should also be directed to the general population [51].

5. Conclusions

Results of the present study suggest that T. gondii prevalence is still high in Western Romania, although a declining trend of the seroprevalence was noted.
This survey indicates that T. gondii IgA antibodies may be rarely detected in females living in a Romanian endemic region and in whom a serologic screening has been performed. Therefore, our data suggest that T. gondii IgA test should not be routinely performed for screening purposes. However, in persons with demonstrable T. gondii IgG and IgM antibodies, testing for T. gondii IgA may improve the rate for the detection of a recently acquired toxoplasmosis.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.G.M. and T.R.O.; Methodology, A.G.M., M.A.L. and T.R.O.; Software, A.G.M. and M.A.L.; Validation, A.G.M., M.A.L. and T.R.O.; Formal Analysis, A.N., D.T.M. and A.G.M.; Investigation, A.G.M., A.N., D.T.M. and T.R.O.; Resources, D.T.M., A.N. and A.G.M.; Data Curation, A.G.M., M.A.L. and T.R.O.; Writing—A.G.M., D.T.M. and A.N.; Writing—Review & Editing, M.A.L. and T.R.O.; Visualization, A.G.M., M.A.L. and T.R.O.; Supervision, A.G.M., M.A.L. and T.R.O.; Project Administration, T.R.O.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Victor Babes University Ethics Committee in Timisoara, Romania (no.2 from 8 January 2018).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Dubey, J.P. The History of Toxoplasma Gondii—The First 100 Years. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 2008, 55, 467–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Robert-Gangneux, F.; Dardé, M.-L. Epidemiology of and Diagnostic Strategies for Toxoplasmosis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2012, 25, 264–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Mendez, O.A.; Koshy, A.A. Toxoplasma Gondii: Entry, Association, and Physiological Influence on the Central Nervous System. PLoS Pathog. 2017, 13, e1006351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Sibley, L.D.; Khan, A.; Ajioka, J.W.; Rosenthal, B.M. Genetic Diversity of Toxoplasma Gondii in Animals and Humans. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 2009, 364, 2749–2761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Olariu, T.R.; Ursoniu, S.; Hotea, I.; Dumitrascu, V.; Anastasiu, D.; Lupu, M.A. Seroprevalence and Risk Factors of Toxoplasma Gondii Infection in Pregnant Women from Western Romania. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. Larchmt. N 2020, 20, 763–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Furtado, J.M.; Smith, J.R.; Belfort, R.; Gattey, D.; Winthrop, K.L. Toxoplasmosis: A Global Threat. J. Glob. Infect. Dis. 2011, 3, 281–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. McAuley, J.B. Congenital Toxoplasmosis. J. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. Soc. 2014, 3 (Suppl 1), S30–S35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Olariu, T.R.; Remington, J.S.; McLeod, R.; Alam, A.; Montoya, J.G. Severe Congenital Toxoplasmosis in the United States: Clinical and Serologic Findings in Untreated Infants. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2011, 30, 1056–1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Olariu, T.R.; Press, C.; Talucod, J.; Olson, K.; Montoya, J.G. Congenital Toxoplasmosis in the United States: Clinical and Serologic Findings in Infants Born to Mothers Treated during Pregnancy. Parasite Paris Fr. 2019, 26, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rostami, A.; Riahi, S.M.; Gamble, H.R.; Fakhri, Y.; Nourollahpour Shiadeh, M.; Danesh, M.; Behniafar, H.; Paktinat, S.; Foroutan, M.; Mokdad, A.H.; et al. Global prevalence of latent toxoplasmosis in pregnant women: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2020, 26, 673–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rostami, A.; Riahi, S.M.; Contopoulos-Ioannidis, D.G.; Gamble, H.R.; Fakhri, Y.; Shiadeh, M.N.; Foroutan, M.; Behniafar, H.; Taghipour, A.; Maldonado, Y.A.; et al. Acute Toxoplasma infection in pregnant women worldwide: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2019, 13, e0007807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Fanigliulo, D.; Marchi, S.; Montomoli, E.; Trombetta, C.M. Toxoplasma Gondii in Women of Childbearing Age and during Pregnancy: Seroprevalence Study in Central and Southern Italy from 2013 to 2017. Parasite Paris Fr. 2020, 27, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Dubey, J.P.; Hotea, I.; Olariu, T.R.; Jones, J.L.; Dărăbuş, G. Epidemiological Review of Toxoplasmosis in Humans and Animals in Romania. Parasitology 2014, 141, 311–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Căpraru, I.D.; Lupu, M.A.; Horhat, F.; Olariu, T.R. Toxoplasmosis Seroprevalence in Romanian Children. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. Larchmt. N 2019, 19, 867–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Olariu, T.R.; Darabus, G.; Cretu, O.; Jurovits, O.; Erdelean, V.; Marincu, I.; Iacobiciu, I.; Petrescu, C.; Koreck, A. Prevalence of Toxoplasma Gondii Antibodies among Women of Childbearing Age in Timis Country. Lucr. Stiintifice Med. Vet. Timisoara 2008, 41, 367–371. [Google Scholar]
  16. Halonen, S.K.; Weiss, L.M. Toxoplasmosis. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 2013, 114, 125–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Fricker-Hidalgo, H.; Cimon, B.; Chemla, C.; Darde, M.L.; Delhaes, L.; L’ollivier, C.; Godineau, N.; Houze, S.; Paris, L.; Quinio, D.; et al. Toxoplasma Seroconversion with Negative or Transient Immunoglobulin M in Pregnant Women: Myth or Reality? A French Multicenter Retrospective Study. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2013, 51, 2103–2111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Jones, J.L.; Lopez, A.; Wilson, M.; Schulkin, J.; Gibbs, R. Congenital Toxoplasmosis: A Review. Obstet. Gynecol. Surv. 2001, 56, 296–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Khurana, S.; Batra, N. Toxoplasmosis in Organ Transplant Recipients: Evaluation, Implication, and Prevention. Trop. Parasitol. 2016, 6, 123–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Li, X.; Pomares, C.; Gonfrier, G.; Koh, B.; Zhu, S.; Gong, M.; Montoya, J.G.; Dai, H. Multiplexed Anti-Toxoplasma IgG, IgM, and IgA Assay on Plasmonic Gold Chips: Towards Making Mass Screening Possible with Dye Test Precision. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2016, 54, 1726–1733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Olariu, T.R.; Blackburn, B.G.; Press, C.; Talucod, J.; Remington, J.S.; Montoya, J.G. Role of Toxoplasma IgA as Part of a Reference Panel for the Diagnosis of Acute Toxoplasmosis during Pregnancy. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2019, 57, e01357-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Liu, Q.; Wang, Z.-D.; Huang, S.-Y.; Zhu, X.-Q. Diagnosis of Toxoplasmosis and Typing of Toxoplasma Gondii. Parasit. Vectors 2015, 8, 292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Villard, O.; Cimon, B.; L’Ollivier, C.; Fricker-Hidalgo, H.; Godineau, N.; Houze, S.; Paris, L.; Pelloux, H.; Villena, I.; Candolfi, E. Help in the Choice of Automated or Semiautomated Immunoassays for Serological Diagnosis of Toxoplasmosis: Evaluation of Nine Immunoassays by the French National Reference Center for Toxoplasmosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2016, 54, 3034–3042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Wilson, M.; Remington, J.S.; Clavet, C.; Varney, G.; Press, C.; Ware, D. Evaluation of Six Commercial Kits for Detection of Human Immunoglobulin M Antibodies to Toxoplasma Gondii. The FDA Toxoplasmosis Ad Hoc Working Group. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1997, 35, 3112–3115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Gharavi, M.J.; Oormazdi, H.; Roointan, E.S. A Comparative Study on Sensitivity and Specificity of Conventional and Unconventional IgG and IgM Assays for Diagnosis of Toxoplasmosis. Iran. J. Public Health 2008, 37, 42–45. [Google Scholar]
  26. Smets, A.; Fauchier, T.; Michel, G.; Marty, P.; Pomares, C. Comparison of Toxoplasma gondii IgG Avidity Architect and Vidas Assays with the Estimated Date of Infection in Pregnant Women. Parasite Paris Fr. 2016, 23, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Toxoplasma Gondii IgA ELISA EIA-3683, Version 3.0. Available online: https://www.drg-diagnostics.de/files/eia-3683_ifu--toxoplasma-gondii-iga_2017-10-10_ce_endeites.pdf (accessed on 17 September 2022).
  28. Robert-Gangneux, F.; Guegan, H. Anti-Toxoplasma IgG assays: What performances for what purpose? A systematic review. Parasite 2021, 28, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Murat, J.B.; Dard, C.; Fricker Hidalgo, H.; Dardé, M.L.; Brenier-Pinchart, M.P.; Pelloux, H. Comparison of the Vidas system and two recent fully automated assays for diagnosis and follow-up of toxoplasmosis in pregnant women and newborns. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 2013, 20, 1203–1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Montoya, J.G.; Liesenfeld, O. Toxoplasmosis. Lancet Lond. Engl. 2004, 363, 1965–1976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cañedo-Solares, I.; Gómez-Chávez, F.; Luna-Pastén, H.; Ortiz-Alegría, L.B.; Flores-García, Y.; Figueroa-Damián, R.; Macedo-Romero, C.A.; Correa, D. What Do Anti-Toxoplasma Gondii IgA and IgG Subclasses in Human Saliva Indicate? Parasite Immunol. 2018, 40, e12526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. El Bissati, K.; Levigne, P.; Lykins, J.; Adlaoui, E.B.; Barkat, A.; Berraho, A.; Laboudi, M.; El Mansouri, B.; Ibrahimi, A.; Rhajaoui, M.; et al. Global Initiative for Congenital Toxoplasmosis: An Observational and International Comparative Clinical Analysis. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2018, 7, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Wallon, M.; Peyron, F.; Cornu, C.; Vinault, S.; Abrahamowicz, M.; Kopp, C.B.; Binquet, C. Congenital Toxoplasma Infection: Monthly Prenatal Screening Decreases Transmission Rate and Improves Clinical Outcome at Age 3 Years. Clin. Infect. Dis. Off. Publ. Infect. Dis. Soc. Am. 2013, 56, 1223–1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Chaudhry, S.A.; Gad, N.; Koren, G. Toxoplasmosis and Pregnancy. Can. Fam. Physician Med. Fam. Can. 2014, 60, 334–336. [Google Scholar]
  35. Guegan, H.; Stajner, T.; Bobic, B.; Press, C.; Olariu, R.T.; Olson, K.; Srbljanovic, J.; Montoya, J.G.; Djurković-Djaković, O.; Robert-Gangneux, F. Maternal Anti-Toxoplasma Treatment during Pregnancy Is Associated with Reduced Sensitivity of Diagnostic Tests for Congenital Infection in the Neonate. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2021, 59, e01368-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Augustine, S.A.J. Towards Universal Screening for Toxoplasmosis: Rapid, Cost-Effective, and Simultaneous Detection of Anti-Toxoplasma IgG, IgM, and IgA Antibodies by Use of Very Small Serum Volumes. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2016, 54, 1684–1685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Lupu, M.A.; Lighezan, R.; Paduraru, A.A.; Dragomir, A.; Pavel, R.; Grada, S.; Mihu, A.G.; Ursoniu, S.; Olariu, T.R. Seroepidemiology of Toxoplasma Gondii Infection in Blood Donors from Western Romania. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Berger, F.; Goulet, V.; Le Strat, Y.; Desenclos, J.-C. Toxoplasmosis among Pregnant Women in France: Risk Factors and Change of Prevalence between 1995 and 2003. Rev. Epidemiol. Sante Publique 2009, 57, 241–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Nogareda, F.; Le Strat, Y.; Villena, I.; De Valk, H.; Goulet, V. Incidence and Prevalence of Toxoplasma Gondii Infection in Women in France, 1980–2020: Model-Based Estimation. Epidemiol. Infect. 2014, 142, 1661–1670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Gargaté, M.J.; Ferreira, I.; Vilares, A.; Martins, S.; Cardoso, C.; Silva, S.; Nunes, B.; Gomes, J.P. Toxoplasma Gondii Seroprevalence in the Portuguese Population: Comparison of Three Cross-Sectional Studies Spanning Three Decades. BMJ Open 2016, 6, e011648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Afonso, E.; Germain, E.; Poulle, M.-L.; Ruette, S.; Devillard, S.; Say, L.; Villena, I.; Aubert, D.; Gilot-Fromont, E. Environmental Determinants of Spatial and Temporal Variations in the Transmission of Toxoplasma Gondii in Its Definitive Hosts. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 2013, 2, 278–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Guigue, N.; Léon, L.; Hamane, S.; Gits-Muselli, M.; Le Strat, Y.; Alanio, A.; Bretagne, S. Continuous Decline of Toxoplasma Gondii Seroprevalence in Hospital: A 1997–2014 Longitudinal Study in Paris, France. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Amin, A.; Mazloomzadeh, S.; Haniloo, A.; Mohammadian, F.; Fazaeli, A. Evaluation of Anti-Toxoplasma IgG, IgM, and IgA in Mothers with Spontaneous Abortion in Zanjan, Northwest Iran. Korean J. Parasitol. 2012, 50, 371–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Gontijo da Silva, M.; Clare Vinaud, M.; de Castro, A.M. Prevalence of Toxoplasmosis in Pregnant Women and Vertical Transmission of Toxoplasma Gondii in Patients from Basic Units of Health from Gurupi, Tocantins, Brazil, from 2012 to 2014. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0141700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Berredjem, H.; Aouras, H.; Benlaifa, M.; Becheker, I.; Djebar, M.R. Contribution of IgG Avidity and PCR for the Early Diagnosis of Toxoplasmosis in Pregnant Women from the North-Eastern Region of Algeria. Afr. Health Sci. 2017, 17, 647–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Murata, F.H.A.; Ferreira, M.N.; Camargo, N.S.; Santos, G.S.; Spegiorin, L.C.J.F.; Silveira-Carvalho, A.P.; Pereira-Chioccola, V.L.; de Mattos, L.C.; de Mattos, C.C.B. Frequency of Anti- Toxoplasma Gondii IgA, IgM, and IgG Antibodies in High-Risk Pregnancies, in Brazil. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 2016, 49, 512–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Foudrinier, F.; Marx-Chemla, C.; Aubert, D.; Bonhomme, A.; Pinon, J.M. Value of Specific Immunoglobulin A Detection by Two Immunocapture Assays in the Diagnosis of Toxoplasmosis. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. Off. Publ. Eur. Soc. Clin. Microbiol. 1995, 14, 585–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Stepick-Biek, P.; Thulliez, P.; Araujo, F.G.; Remington, J.S. IgA Antibodies for Diagnosis of Acute Congenital and Acquired Toxoplasmosis. J. Infect. Dis. 1990, 162, 270–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Liesenfeld, O.; Montoya, J.G.; Kinney, S.; Press, C.; Remington, J.S. Effect of Testing for IgG Avidity in the Diagnosis of Toxoplasma Gondii Infection in Pregnant Women: Experience in a US Reference Laboratory. J. Infect. Dis. 2001, 183, 1248–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Jones, J.L.; Kruszon-Moran, D.; Elder, S.; Rivera, H.N.; Press, C.; Montoya, J.G.; McQuillan, G.M. Toxoplasma gondii Infection in the United States, 2011-2014. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2018, 98, 551–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Pinto-Ferreira, F.; Caldart, E.T.; Pasquali, A.K.S.; Mitsuka-Breganó, R.; Freire, R.L.; Navarro, I.T. Patterns of Transmission and Sources of Infection in Outbreaks of Human Toxoplasmosis. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2019, 25, 2177–2182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Life 12 01771 g001 550
Figure 1. Serologic screening for the detection of Toxoplasma gondi i IgG, IgM and IgA antibodies in 1317 females of reproductive age from Western Romania.
Figure 1. Serologic screening for the detection of Toxoplasma gondi i IgG, IgM and IgA antibodies in 1317 females of reproductive age from Western Romania.
Life 12 01771 g001
Table
Table 1. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii IgG in females of reproductive age from Western Romania according to age.
Table 1. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii IgG in females of reproductive age from Western Romania according to age.
Prevalence of T. gondii Infection
Univariate Analysis
VariablesNo. TestedN (%)OR (95% CI)p Value
Age groups (years)
15–24285101 (35.44)1 (Ref.)
25–34779347 (44.54)1.46 (1.11–1.94)0.007
35–45253159 (62.85)3.08 (2.17–4.38)<0.001
Total1317607 (46.09) -
N, number of T. gondii seropositive females; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; Ref., reference.
Table
Table 2. T. gondii IgM and IgA antibody test results in females with detectable T. gondii IgG antibodies.
Table 2. T. gondii IgM and IgA antibody test results in females with detectable T. gondii IgG antibodies.
Result(s) for Individual Serum SamplesNo. (%) of Females Aged 15–45 Years with Detectable T. gondii IgG Antibodies
IgM (+)54 (8.90)
IgM (−)553 (91.10)
IgA (+)10 (1.65)
IgA (−)597 (98.35)
IgM (+), IgA (+)6 (0.99)
IgM (+), IgA (−)48 (7.91)
IgM (−), IgA (+)4 (0.66)
IgM (−), IgA (−)549 (90.44)
(+), positive; (−), negative.
Table
Table 3. Toxoplasma gondii IgM and IgA antibody test results compared to IgG avidity results in females with detectable Toxoplasma gondii IgG antibodies.
Table 3. Toxoplasma gondii IgM and IgA antibody test results compared to IgG avidity results in females with detectable Toxoplasma gondii IgG antibodies.
Serologic TestsIgG Avidity AssayNo. of Samples Tested
Low or EquivocalHigh
No. (%) of SamplesNo. (%) of Samples
IgM (+)7 (12.96)47 (87.04)54
IgM (−)0 (0)4 (100)4
IgA (+)4 (40)6 (60)10
IgA (−)3 (6.25)45 (93.75)48
IgM (+), IgA (+)4 (66.67)2 (33.33)6
IgM (+), IgA (−)3 (6.25)45 (93.75)48
IgM (−), IgA (+)0 (0)4 (100)4
(+), positive; (−), negative.
Table
Table 4. Toxoplasma gondii IgM and IgA antibody test results compared to IgG avidity results.
Table 4. Toxoplasma gondii IgM and IgA antibody test results compared to IgG avidity results.
IgG AvidityIgG Avidity Test InterpretationNo. of Females TestedNo. (%) of Females Tested Positive
IgMIgA
0.0–0.19low avidity44 (100)3 (75)
0.20–0.29equivocal33 (100)1 (33.33)
≥0.3high avidity5147 (92.16)6 (11.76)
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mihu, A.G.; Lupu, M.A.; Nesiu, A.; Marti, D.T.; Olariu, T.R. Screening for the Detection of Toxoplasma gondii IgG, IgM and IgA in Females of Reproductive Age from Western Romania. Life 2022, 12, 1771. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12111771

AMA Style

Mihu AG, Lupu MA, Nesiu A, Marti DT, Olariu TR. Screening for the Detection of Toxoplasma gondii IgG, IgM and IgA in Females of Reproductive Age from Western Romania. Life. 2022; 12(11):1771. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12111771

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mihu, Alin Gabriel, Maria Alina Lupu, Alexandru Nesiu, Daniela Teodora Marti, and Tudor Rares Olariu. 2022. "Screening for the Detection of Toxoplasma gondii IgG, IgM and IgA in Females of Reproductive Age from Western Romania" Life 12, no. 11: 1771. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12111771

APA Style

Mihu, A. G., Lupu, M. A., Nesiu, A., Marti, D. T., & Olariu, T. R. (2022). Screening for the Detection of Toxoplasma gondii IgG, IgM and IgA in Females of Reproductive Age from Western Romania. Life, 12(11), 1771. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12111771

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop