Next Article in Journal
In Silico Screening for Pesticide Candidates against the Desert Locust Schistocerca gregaria
Previous Article in Journal
Obtaining Reliable RT-qPCR Results in Molecular Diagnostics—MIQE Goals and Pitfalls for Transcriptional Biomarker Discovery
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of Microcystin-LR, Nodularin, Anatoxin-a, β-N-Methylamino-L-Alanine and Domoic Acid on Antioxidant Properties of Glutathione
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Life
Volume 12
Issue 3
10.3390/life12030385
life-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Prophylactic Addition of Glucose Suppresses Cyanobacterial Abundance in Lake Water

by
Stephen Vesper
*,
Nathan Sienkiewicz
,
Ian Struewing
,
David Linz
and
Jingrang Lu
United States Environmental Protection Agency, 26 W. Martin Luther King Drive, Cincinnati, OH 45268, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Life 2022, 12(3), 385; https://doi.org/10.3390/life12030385
Submission received: 10 February 2022 / Revised: 21 February 2022 / Accepted: 4 March 2022 / Published: 7 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Cyanobacterial Blooms, Toxicity and Ecology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
To mitigate harmful cyanobacterial blooms (HCBs), toxic algicides have been used, but alternative methods of HCB prevention are needed. Our goal was to test the prophylactic addition of glucose to inhibit HCB development, using Microcystis and the toxin microcystin as the HCB model. Water samples were collected weekly, from 4 June to 2 July, from Harsha Lake in southwestern Ohio during the 2021 algal bloom season. From each weekly sample, a 25 mL aliquot was frozen for a 16S rRNA gene sequencing analysis. Then, 200 mL of Harsha Lake water was added to each of the three culture flasks, and glucose was added to create concentrations of 0 mM (control), 1.39 mM, or 13.9 mM glucose, respectively. The microcystin concentration in each flask was measured after 1 and 2 weeks of incubation. The results showed an 80 to 90% reduction in microcystin concentrations in glucose-treated water compared to the control. At the end of the second week of incubation, a 25 mL sample was also obtained from each of the culture flasks for molecular analysis, including a 16S rRNA gene sequencing and qPCR-based quantification of Microcystis target genes. Based on these analyses, the glucose-treated water contained significantly lower Microcystis and microcystin producing gene (mcy) copy numbers than the control. The 16S rRNA sequencing analysis also revealed that Cyanobacteria and Proteobacteria were initially the most abundant bacterial phyla in the Harsha Lake water, but as the summer progressed, Cyanobacteria became the dominant phyla. However, in the glucose-treated water, the Cyanobacteria decreased and the Proteobacteria increased in weekly abundance compared to the control. This glucose-induced proteobacterial increase in abundance was driven primarily by increases in two distinct families of Proteobacteria: Devosiaceae and Rhizobiaceae. In conclusion, the prophylactic addition of glucose to Harsha Lake water samples reduced Cyanobacteria’s relative abundance, Microcystis numbers and microcystin concentrations and increased the relative abundance of Proteobacteria compared to the control.

1. Introduction

Harmful cyanobacterial blooms (HCBs), and the toxins they produce, are a threat to the safety of drinking and recreational water and the aquatic ecosystem [1,2]. To prevent HCBs, it is necessary to limit the introduction of high concentrations of fixed nitrogen compounds and phosphates [3]. Until that happens, agents or methods are needed that can limit the production of cyanotoxins.
Most HCB control measures involve the addition of an algicide once the bloom has developed. Many HCB control agents can reduce cyanotoxin concentrations but these algicides are dangerous to handle and toxic. Algicides usually contain hydrogen peroxide, sometimes combined with an acid such as peroxyacetic acid, or the algicide is a formulation of copper (Cu) [4,5,6,7]. Hydrogen peroxide is toxic at high concentrations and is a strong oxidizer, which makes it dangerous to handle [8]. Copper is a toxic metal that can bioaccumulate in freshwater ecosystems [9]. Other control methods are in development.
Biological control measures, such as plant-derived allelochemicals [10] or other biologically derived molecules [11], have been tested. Algal predation by bacteria [12] and algicidal bacteria [13] have also been evaluated. Even algicidal and toxin-degrading fungi have been tested [14,15]. Physical measures have also been evaluated, including the photodegradation of algal toxins [16]. However, these newer control strategies do not have a broad efficacy [17].
The goal of this study was to test the prophylactic addition of glucose in preventing/controlling HCB development as well as to understand its impact on microbial community dynamics following treatment. Our hypothesis is that the excess fixed nitrogen and phosphates would be utilized by non-toxin-producing microorganisms if they had an adequate carbon source. By introducing a carbon source before the bloom develops, these other microorganisms might be able to out-compete the algae and suppress their growth.
Microcystis is the cyanobacterium most often identified in freshwater blooms that becomes harmful because they produce a class of cyanotoxins called microcystins [1,3,18,19,20]. Therefore, Microcystis and the cyanotoxin, microcystin, were used as a model in this study.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Site

The William H. Harsha Lake (hereafter, Harsha Lake) is an engineered reservoir (latitude: 39.0132285, longitude: −84.1148988) that was developed in 1978. Harsha Lake is located on the East Fork of the Little Miami River in Clermont County, Ohio, about 40 km east of Cincinnati. Harsha Lake has an average depth of 13.1 m, with a maximum depth of 34 m. Harsha Lake covers an area of 8.7 km2 and drains from a watershed of 890 km2 with 64% of land use for agriculture and 26% comprised of forest cover [21]. The development of algal blooms in Harsha Lake has been studied by our team since 2015 [21,22,23]. Water collected from Harsha Lake during the 2021 bloom season was used for these studies.

2.2. Collection of Harsha Lake Samples

Harsha Lake water samples were collected weekly, from 4 June to 9 July 2021, using plastic water jugs, which were pre-rinsed using 5% hydrochloric acid and deionized water, in order to scoop up water from the surface (~0.5 m depth) at 3 locations, as previously described [21]. The samples from each location were combined each week to make a single composite sample for testing in that particular week. This composite was defined as the “raw water” sample. A 25 mL aliquot of the raw water was removed each week and frozen at −20 °C for molecular analysis. Then, 200 mL of the raw water sample was added to each of the 3 cell culture flasks (661–175, CELLSTAR, Frickenhausen, Germany). Then, D-(+)-glucose (G7528, Sigma Ultra, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was added to make a final glucose concentration in each flask of either 0 mM, 1.39 mM or 13.9 mM glucose per liter.

2.3. Incubation of Treated Water Samples

Flasks were incubated in an environmental chamber (Percival/166LLVL) with the following growth conditions: the light intensity was 44.02 µmol photons/m2/s (measured using a LICOR LI-1500 (LI COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE, USA) with a 16/8 h light/dark cycle at a constant temperature of 25 °C and ambient air exchange. After 1 week and 2 weeks of incubation, 3 replicate 5 mL samples were collected and placed into conical bottom glass tubes (PYREX 15 mL centrifuge tube, Corning Inc., Corning, NY, USA). Samples were frozen at −20 °C until an analysis of microcystin concentrations. At the end of 2 weeks of incubation, a 25 mL sample was removed from each of the 3 treatment flasks and frozen at −20 °C for later analysis.

2.4. Analysis of Microcystin Using Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)

Measurements of microcystin (MC) were measured in raw and filtered water using the MC-ADDA Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) kit (PN 520011, Abraxis, Warminster, PA, USA), following the manufacturer’s instructions. The 5 mL subsamples were collected in glass tubes (PYREX 15 mL centrifuge tube, Corning, NY, USA) and frozen at −20 °C until processing and analysis. Total microcystin concentrations were measured by subjecting each sample to 3 freeze–thaw cycles. Assays were performed manually and analyzed using a Biolog Microstation plate reader (Biolog, Hayward, CA, USA).

2.5. DNA Extraction and High-Throughput Sequencing

The samples frozen for molecular analysis were filtered through a Durapore polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) filter (0.45 μm, MilliPore, Foster City, CA, USA). Each filter was then inserted into 1.5-mL microtube that contained 1 mL TRIzol reagent (Thermo-Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA) and stored at −80 °C until analyzed.
Filters were disrupted, and cells lysed using a Mini-Beadbeater-16 (BioSpec Products, Inc., Bartlesville, OK, USA) twice for 30 s and then centrifuged at 10,000× g for 3 min. The supernatant was then transferred to a new sterile tube, and RNA and DNA were extracted and purified from the TRIzol reagent, following the manufacturer’s instructions. The extracted RNA and DNA was eluted in 200 µL RNase-free water (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA).
The bacterial 16S gene primers used for 16S rRNA gene sequencing were designed by using the V3 and V4 regions [24] and an adapter sequence was added, as described previously [25]. Library preparation and sequencing were performed, as described [25] with the following modifications. The first round PCR was performed with 17 µL Accuprime pfx supermix (Thermo-Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA), 0.5 µL of each primer, and 2 µL of DNA. After gel confirmation of amplification products, PCR products were cleaned with 14 µL of AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA) to 17 µL PCR product and eluted in 40 µL of 10 mM Tris pH 8.5. PCR products were normalized to 20 ng/µL and Index PCR performed using Accuprime pfx supermix, cleaned using 19 µL AMPure XP to 17 µL of PCR product, and eluted with 27 µL of 10 mM Tris pH 8.5. Samples were normalized to a concentration of 4 nM, and 5 µL of each were combined to make the final library. The library was sequenced using a 600-cycle V3 MiSeq sequencing kit (# MS-102-3003, Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol and using 2 × 300 paired-end sequencing.
The assay used to quantify total Microcystis cells, 16SMic, was published previously [26]. The McyEmic is a qPCR assay that specifically quantifies Microcystis cells that produce the microcystin toxin. Because there is only one copy in each toxic Microcystis cell, its abundance is also the quantity of toxic Microcystis cells. The primers used to quantify McyEmic were as follows: McyEmicF-GTTATGTTTGCCGGCTCCTA and McyEmicR-GTGCCTAGACTTAAGGGTTGAG.
The qPCR reaction mixtures (20 μL) contained 10 μL 2× qPCR SYBR Green Master Mix (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA), 0.2 μM primers (final concentration) and 2 μL of template DNA. Initial DNA treatment consisted of 50 °C for 2 min with UNG (Uracil-N-Glycosylase) to prevent carryover contamination, followed by 95 °C for 10 min for DNA denaturing. The quantification cycling protocol, using a QuantStudio™ 6 Flex system (Life Technologies), was 40 cycles at 95 °C for 15 s followed by one cycle for 1 min at either 60 °C for the McyEmic assay or at 64 °C for the 16sMic assay, then followed by the default melt curve analysis. The quantification cycling protocol, using a QuantStudio™ 6 Flex system (Life Technologies), was 40 cycles at 95 °C for 15 s followed by one cycle for 1 min at either 60 °C for the McyEmic assay or at 64 °C for the 16sMic assay, then followed by the default melt curve analysis. DNA copies were quantified relative to a standard curve using linearized plasmids constructed from PCR products from M. aeruginosa genomic DNA cloned into a PCR 4-TOPO vector (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA). Each sample was run in duplicate, and the amplicons were pooled. Each qPCR plate contained a triplicate six-point standard curve with values ranging from 101 to 106 copies.

2.6. Amplicon Processing

Pooled amplicons were sequenced using an Illumina MiSeq and 300 bp paired-end chemistry (Illumina). Raw demultiplexed reads, with adapters removed, were then processed using the software suite QIIME 2 2021.4.0 [27]. Raw sequence data were quality filtered and denoised with DADA2 [28] (via q2-dada2). Taxonomy was assigned to amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) using the q2-feature-classifier [29] and classify-sklearn naïve Bayes taxonomy classifier against the Silva 138 99% operational taxonomic units (OTUs) reference sequences [30,31,32]. Qiime2 artifacts were then moved to R using the qiime2R package for further analysis [33]. All data were deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) sequence read archive with the accession number: PRJNA786865.

2.7. Data Analysis

Analysis of the final sequence dataset was performed in R v4.1.2 [33] (R Core Team, 2021) using the packages phyloseq [34], vegan [35], and ggplot2 [36]. Samples were initially pruned of non-bacterial or unidentified taxa, including those amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) classified as belonging to the order “Chloroplasts”. For certain components of our analysis, low abundance taxa (below 1% relative abundance) were removed from the dataset. Bray–Curtis between-sample distances were computed. Distance matrices were then used to cluster samples using non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS). Analysis of similarities (ANOSIMs) on the distance matrices were used to test for statistically significant differences in the microbiota composition and diversity between sample groups [37]. Differences were compared between the control and 13.9 mM treatment at the 95% confidence level.

3. Results

3.1. Microcystin Concentrations after Glucose Treatments

The concentration of microcystin in the culture flasks after 1 week or 2 weeks of incubation are shown in Figure 1 for each collection week of the study. The culture flasks with a final glucose concentration of either 1.39 mM or 13.9 mM glucose contained significantly (Student t-test, p < 0.05) lower concentrations of microcystin each week compared to the control.
These differences in microcystin concentrations were further supported by quantifying Microcystis toxin gene copy number by qPCR. This approach showed decreases in toxin gene abundance after glucose treatment parallel to the toxin quantification (Table 1). In addition, we also confirmed these findings via the metagenomic-based quantification of the Microcystis genus (Figure 2). By the week of 9 July, the Harsha Lake algal bloom was fully developed based on field observations. However, within 3 days of the placement of the 9 July water sample flasks in the incubator, it was evident from their appearance that the cultures’ survival at these high densities could not be sustained in the laboratory, and the experiment was terminated.

3.2. Changes in Microbial Community Structure Based on 16S rRNA Gene Analysis

To comprehensively profile the microbial communities that occur in the Harsha Lake samples, 16S rRNA gene sequencing was performed both before and after glucose treatment. Across all samples, only six phyla occurred above 5% relative abundance in any given sample (Figure 3). The phyla, Cyanobacteria and Proteobacteria, were the most prevalent across all samples (Figure 3). As the summer progressed, Cyanobacteria prevalence increased and became the dominant phyla in the Harsha Lake water and untreated samples (Figure 3). However, the Proteobacteria consistently increased in the glucose-treated water samples compared to the controls (Figure 3). Therefore, the changes in the relative abundance of Cyanobacteria and Proteobacteria were the focus of further analyses.
A closer examination of Cyanobacterial abundance showed that there were 32 Cyanobacterial genera that occurred in these lake water samples; however, only a few genera occurred above a 5% relative abundance in any given sample (Figure 4). In the initial lake water sample and in the samples without glucose, three cyanobacterial genera occurred at the highest level: Cyanobium, Dolichospermum, and Planktothrix (Figure 4). In the 2 July weekly sample, Microcystis became one of the dominant genera. Importantly, across all 5 weeks of samples, the addition of glucose at 1.39 or 13.9 mM consistently resulted in a reduction in the abundance of all Cyanobacteria (Figure 4), along with the concomitant increase in the abundance of the Proteobacteria mentioned above (Figure 3). Therefore, the families of the Proteobacteria that underly these observed glucose-induced fluctuations were further investigated by examining sample differences, 13.9 mM vs. control flask, via ordination using non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS).
Proteobacterial families were significantly clustered in a manner that reflected the glucose treatment (Bray–Curtis, ANOSIM; R = 0.912, p < 0.01), with no significant impact observed by date (Figure 5A,B). We also used envfit to fit individual Proteobacterial family abundance to our ordination. With this approach, we detected five families—Devosiaceae, Rhizobiaceae, Sphingomonadaceae, Acetobacteraceae, and a group of “unculturable” families—that significantly fit the data (Figure 5A). Among these families, it was primarily Devosiaceae and Rhizobiaceae (and “unculturable” families) that increased in abundance in the 13.9 mM glucose treatment (Figure 5A,B).

4. Discussion

In this laboratory study of Harsha Lake water samples from the summer of 2021, the prophylactic addition of glucose resulted in a reduction in the abundance of Cyanobacteria and an increase in the abundance of Proteobacteria. Additionally, the abundance of the genus Microcystis and the toxin microcystin were reduced by the prophylactic addition of glucose. These results support our hypothesis that, given an external carbon source, heterotrophic bacteria could out-compete the cyanobacteria.
Heterotrophic bacteria, such as Proteobacteria, have a high affinity for low nutrient concentrations, whereas phytoplankton such as Cyanobacteria are favored by pulses of high nutrient concentrations [38]. It appears that the addition of glucose in our study promoted heterotrophic bacterial growth, likely because they have higher nutrient-uptake rates than the Cyanobacteria [38,39,40] but are dependent on an external carbon source in their competition. Lu et al. [22] showed that, in Harsha Lake, nitrogen and phosphorous decreased rapidly during cyanobacterial growth from June to July. It appears that the addition of glucose to the water inhibited cyanobacterial nutrient uptake and, therefore, inhibited their growth. Additionally, Proteobacteria, including Pseudomonas, Methylosinus, Methylobacterium, Sphingomonas and others, are shown to degrade microcystin [41,42,43].
It is reasonable to infer that the outgrowth of Proteobacteria was likely due to the readily available carbon. Whether the addition of a carbon source will also decrease the dominance of other cyanotoxin producers, heterocystous cyanobacteria, or nitrogen fixers remains to be demonstrated.
Our previous studies showed that N2 fixation was associated with high phosphorus but low nitrogen, as well as a high relative abundance of active cyanobacterial N2-fixers [22]. However, P-scavenging was associated with decreasing phosphorus and increasing Microcystis abundance. A similar shift in bacterial communities was also observed in a eutrophic lake in Utah [44]. The interplay between nitrogen fixation and phosphorus utilization provided an insight into the bacterial community structure and the understanding of bloom development [45]. Therefore, understanding these dynamics and knowing when to add a carbon source, such as glucose, is important.
We also previously showed that the detection of microcystin and microcystin producing algae by using qPCR and RT-qPCR analyses allowed for the rapid identification of a coming bloom and, potentially, the development of an early warning system [46]. By monitoring these dynamics, the optimal time for the prophylactic addition of glucose could be determined. However, the addition of glucose could have undesired effects.
One concern regarding the addition of glucose was that Proteobacteria that replaced Cyanobacteria might create another risk, i.e., enhanced levels of pathogenic bacteria. However, the two families in Proteobacteria that were most consistently amplified by the glucose treatment, Devosiaceae and Rhizobiaceae, do not contain significant human pathogens. However, we cannot rule out the possibility that human pathogens or zoonotic pathogens were amplified by the glucose addition. Another concern was that the addition of glucose in large quantities to a body of water will exacerbate eutrophication. Finding the minimal effective dose of glucose may reduce this impact. Controlling the bloom at the earliest stage may mean less potential ecological risks. The next studies will examine varying glucose concentrations and alternative carbon sources.
One limitation of this study is that it was a pilot, bench-scale study. Nevertheless, Harsha Lake water samples were used, and the incubation was only for two weeks in the laboratory, thus minimizing any potential artifacts created by using the laboratory system. Another limitation of our study is that not all cyanobacteria were identified and quantified and not all cyanotoxins were measured. Whether glucose will have the same results for other genera and toxins remains to be tested.
We recognize that there are many unknowns regarding the practical application of this approach to harmful cyanobacterial control. First, it is not clear under what circumstances this control method would be permitted. Adding large quantities of a carbon source to water could have unintended effects and these possibilities would need to be understood first. Additionally, it appears that the application of this method would be expensive because of the carbon source. Alternative carbon sources would need to be explored to reduce costs. Much research remains to be carried out to see if there is any situation where this method would be practical.

5. Conclusions

The prophylactic addition of glucose to Harsha Lake water samples reduced Cyanobacteria abundance, Microcystis numbers and microcystin concentrations and increased the abundance of Proteobacteria compared to the control.

Author Contributions

This study was conceived by S.V.; conducted by N.S., I.S. and D.L.; and overseen and directed by J.L. All authors participated in the research and in the article preparation. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), Office of Research and Development’s (ORD) research programs: Safe and Sustainable Water Resources (SSWR 4.2.2.1).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data will be available at the NIH-PMC website. All sequence data were deposited in the NCBI sequence read archive with accession number: PRJNA786865.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Disclaimer

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) through its Office of Research and Development collaborated in the research described here. It was subjected to the agency’s peer review and approved as an EPA publication. The mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute an endorsement or recommendation by the EPA for use. The findings and the conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the US EPA.

References

  1. Carmichael, W.W. Health effects of toxin-producing cyanobacteria: The CyanoHABS. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. Int. J. 2001, 7, 1393–1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Amorim, C.A.; Moura, A.D.N. Ecological impacts of freshwater algal blooms on water quality, plankton biodiversity, structure, and ecosystem functioning. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 758, 143605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Olson, N.E.; Cooke, M.E.; Shi, J.H.; Birbeck, J.A.; Westrick, J.A.; Ault, A.P. Harmful algal bloom toxins in aerosol generated from inland lake water. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54, 4769–4780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Asgodom, M.E.; Liu, D.; Fu, H.; Xie, H.; Kong, J. Effect of the near-infrared activated photocatalyst Cu(2)(OH)PO(4) nanoparticles on the growth of harmful algal blooms causing Microcystis aeruginosa. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2021, 28, 20762–20771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Buley, R.P.; Adams, C.; Belfiore, A.P.; Fernandez-Figueroa, E.G.; Gladfelter, M.F.; Garner, B.; Wilson, A.E. Field evaluation of seven products to control cyanobacterial blooms in aquaculture. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2021, 128, 29971–29983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kinley-Baird, C.; Calomeni, A.; Berthold, D.E.; Lefler, F.W.; Barbosa, M.; Rodgers, J.H.; Laughinghouse, H.D. Laboratory-scale evaluation of algaecide effectiveness for control of microcystin-producing cyanobacteria from Lake Okeechobee, Florida (USA). Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 207, 11233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chen, C.; Wang, Y.; Chen, K.; Shi, X.; Yang, G. Using hydrogen peroxide to control cyanobacterial blooms: A mesocosm study focused on the effects of algal density in Lake Chaohu, China. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 272, 115923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mucci, N.; Dugheri, S.; Bonari, A.; Farioli, A.; Rapisarda, V.; Garzaro, G.; Cappelli, G.; Arcangeli, G. Health risk assessment related to hydrogen peroxide presence in the workplace atmosphere—Analytical methods evaluation for an innovative monitoring protocol. Int. J. Occup. Med. Environ. Health 2020, 33, 137–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. VandKhanghah, M.M.; Hedayati, A.; Nazeri, S.; Mohammadi Azarm, H.; Ghorbani, R. Biomagnification of copper along the aquatic food chain (Artemia franciscana, Danio rerio, and Astronotus ocellatus). Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2021, 200, 1854–1860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhu, X.; Dao, G.; Tao, Y.; Zhan, X.; Hu, H. A review on control of harmful algal blooms by plant-derived allelochemicals. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 401, 123403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zerrifi, S.E.A.; Mugani, R.; Redouane, E.M.; El Khalloufi, F.; Campos, A.; Vasconcelos, V.; Oudra, B. Harmful Cyanobacterial Blooms (HCBs): Innovative green bioremediation process based on anti-cyanobacteria bioactive natural products. Arch. Microbiol. 2021, 203, 31–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zeng, Y.; Wang, J.; Yang, C.; Ding, M.; Hamilton, P.B.; Zhang, X.; Yang, C.; Zhnag, L.; Dai, X. A Streptomyces globisporus strain kills Microcystis aeruginosa via cell-to-cell contact. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 769, 144489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. He, L.; Lin, Z.; Wang, Y.; He, X.; Zhou, J.; Guan, M.; Zhou, J. Facilitating harmful algae removal in fresh water via joint effects of multi-species algicidal bacteria. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 403, 123662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Li, X.; Xia, Z.; Wang, B.; Lai, L.; Wang, J.; Jiang, L.; Li, T.; Wu, J.; Wang, L. Malformin C, an algicidal peptide from marine fungus Aspergillus species. Ecotoxicology 2021, 30, 996–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mohamed, Z.A.; Hashem, M.; Alamri, S.; Campos, A.; Vasconcelos, V. Fungal biodegradation and removal of cyanobacteria and microcystins: Potential applications and research needs. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2021, 28, 37041–37050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kurtz, T.; Zeng, T.; Rosario-Ortiz, F.L. Photodegradation of cyanotoxins in surface waters. Water Res. 2021, 192, 116804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Pal, M.; Yesankar, P.J.; Dwivedi, A.; Qureshi, A. Biotic control of harmful algal blooms (HABS): A brief review. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 268, 110687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Carmichael, W.W. Cyanobacteria secondary metabolites—The cyanotoxins. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 1992, 72, 445–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wiegand, C.; Pflugmacher, S. Ecotoxicological effects of selected cyanobacterial secondary metabolites: A short review. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2005, 203, 201–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zurawell, R.W.; Chen, H.; Burke, J.M.; Prepas, E.E. Hepatotoxic cyanobacteria: A review of the biological importance of microcystins in freshwater environments. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health Part B 2005, 8, 1–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chen, K.; Allen, J.; Lu, J. Community structures of phytoplankton with emphasis on toxic cyanobacteria in an Ohio inland lake during bloom season. J. Water Resour. Prot. 2017, 9, 1–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Lu, J.; Zhu, B.; Struewing, I.; Xu, N.; Duan, S. Nitrogen-phosphorus-associated metabolic activities during the development of a cyanobacterial bloom revealed by metatranscriptomics. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 2480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Zhu, B.; Cao, H.; Li, G.; Du, W.; Xu, G.; Domingo, J.S.; Gu, H.; Xu, N.; Duan, S.; Lu, J. Biodiversity and dynamics of cyanobacterial communities during blooms in temperate lake (Harsha Lake, Ohio, USA). Harmful Algae 2019, 181, 9–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kozich, J.J.; Westcott, S.L.; Baxter, N.T.; Highlander, S.K.; Schlossa, P.D. Development of a dual-index sequencing strategy and curation pipeline for analyzing amplicon sequence data on the MiSeq Illumina sequencing platform. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 79, 5112–5120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Bagely, M.; Pilgrim, E.; Knapp, M.; Yoder, C.; Domingo, J.S.; Banerji, A. High- throughput environmental DNA analysis informs a biological assessment of an urban stream. Ecol. Indic. 2019, 104, 378–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Neilan, B.A.; Jacobs, D.; Del Dot, T.; Blackall, L.L.; Hawkins, P.R.; Cox, P.T.; Goodman, A.E. rRNA sequences and evolutionary relationships among toxic and nontoxic cyanobacteria of the genus Microcystis. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1997, 47, 693–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bolyen, E.; Rideout, J.R.; Dillon, M.R.; Bokulich, N.A.; Abnet, C.C.; Al-Ghalith, G.A.; Alexander, H.; Alm, E.J.; Arumugam, M.; Asnicar, F.; et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019, 37, 852–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Callahan, B.J.; McMurdie, P.J.; Rosen, M.J.; Han, A.W.; Johnson, A.J.; Holmes, S.P. DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods 2016, 13, 581–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Bokulich, N.A.; Kaehler, B.D.; Rideout, J.R.; Dillon, M.; Bolyen, E.; Knight, R.; Huttley, G.A.; Gregory Caporaso, J. Optimizing taxonomic classification of marker-gene amplicon sequences with QIIME 2’s q2-feature-classifier plugin. Microbiome 2018, 6, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Quast, C.; Pruesse, E.; Yilmaz, P.; Gerken, J.; Schweer, T.; Yarza, P.; Peplies, J.; Glöckner, F.O. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: Improved data processing and web- based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41, D590–D596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Glöckner, F.O.; Yilmaz, P.; Quast, C.; Gerken, J.; Beccati, A.; Ciuprina, A.; Bruns, G.; Yarza, P.; Peplies, J.; Westram, R.; et al. 25 years of serving the community with ribosomal RNA gene reference databases and tools. J. Biotechnol. 2017, 261, 169–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yilmaz, P.; Parfrey, L.W.; Yarza, P.; Gerken, J.; Pruesse, E.; Quast, C.; Schweer, T.; Peplies, J.; Ludwig, W.; Glöckner, F.O. The SILVA and “All-species Living Tree Project (LTP)” taxonomic frameworks. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42, D643–D648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2021; Available online: https://www.R-project.org/ (accessed on 14 December 2021).
  34. McMurdie, P.J.; Holmes, S. Phyloseq: An R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e61217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Oksanen, J.; Blanchet, F.G.; Friendly, M.; Kindt, R.; Legendre, P.; McGlinn, D.; Stevens, M.H.H. Vegan: Community Ecology Package; R Package Version 2.5–7. 2018. Available online: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan (accessed on 14 December 2021).
  36. Wickham, H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2016; ISBN 978-3-319-24277-4. Available online: https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org (accessed on 4 January 2022).
  37. Clarke, K.R. Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Austral. J. Ecol. 1993, 18, 117–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Suttle, C.A.; Fuhrman, J.A.; Capone, D.G. Rapid ammonium cycling and concentration- dependent partitioning of ammonium and phosphate: Implications for carbon transfer in planktonic communities. Limnol. Oceanogr. 1990, 35, 424–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Jansson, M. Uptake, exchange, and excretion of orthophosphate in phosphate-starved Scenedesmus quadricauda and Pseudomonas K7. Limnol. Oceanogr. 1993, 38, 1162–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Deng, W.; Wang, S.; Wan, X.; Zheng, Z.; Jiao, N.; Kao, S.J.; Moore, J.K.; Zhang, Y. Potential competition between marine heterotrophic prokaryotes and autotrophic picoplankton for nitrogen substrates. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2021, 66, 3338–3355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ho, L.; Hoefel, D.; Palazot, S.; Sawade, E.; Newcombe, G.; Saint, C.P.; Brookes, J.D. Investigations into the biodegradation of microcystin-LR in wastewaters. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 180, 628–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ma, G.; Pei, H.; Hu, W.; Xu, X.; Ma, C.; Li, X. The removal of cyanobacteria and their metabolites through anoxic biodegradation in drinking water sludge. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 165, 191–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ma, G.; Pei, H.; Hu, W.; Xu, X.; Ma, C.; Pei, R. Effects of glucose on microcystin-LR removal and the bacterial community composition through anoxic biodegradation in drinking water sludge. Environ. Technol. 2016, 371, 64–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Li, H.; Baber, M.; Lu, J.; Goel, R. Microbial community successions and their dynamic functions during harmful cyanobacterial blooms in a freshwater lake. Water Res. 2020, 185, 116292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wang, K.; Mou, X.; Cao, H.; Struewing, I.; Allen, J.; Lu, J. Co-occurring microorganisms regulate the succession of cyanobacterial harmful algal blooms. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 288, 117682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Lu, J.; Struewing, I.; Wymer, L.; Tettenhorst, D.R.; Shoemaker, J.; Allen, J. Use of qPCR and RT-qPCR for monitoring variations of microcystin producers and as an early warning system to predict toxin production in an Ohio inland lake. Water Res. 2020, 170, 115262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Life 12 00385 g001 550
Figure 1. Total microcystin concentrations in Harsha Lake water samples after glucose treatment. Harsha Lake water samples were collected weekly from 4 June to 2 July and left untreated (controls), or they were treated with 1.39 mM or 13.9 mM glucose. After 1 week (blue color) or 2 weeks (orange color) of incubation, microcystin concentrations were quantified by ELISA. Glucose treatment consistently reduced microcystin concentrations.
Figure 1. Total microcystin concentrations in Harsha Lake water samples after glucose treatment. Harsha Lake water samples were collected weekly from 4 June to 2 July and left untreated (controls), or they were treated with 1.39 mM or 13.9 mM glucose. After 1 week (blue color) or 2 weeks (orange color) of incubation, microcystin concentrations were quantified by ELISA. Glucose treatment consistently reduced microcystin concentrations.
Life 12 00385 g001
Life 12 00385 g002 550
Figure 2. The relative abundance of taxa belonging to the genus Microcystis in the weekly Harsha Lake samples, after glucose treatments. Harsha Lake water samples were collected weekly from 4 June to 2 July and sequenced for 16S rRNA gene analysis (raw lake input). Raw lake samples were then left untreated (untreated controls) or treated with 1.39 mM or 13.9 mM glucose for each sample date. After 2 weeks of incubation, untreated controls and glucose-treated samples were also sequenced. Relative abundance of Microcystis sp., as determined by 16S sequencing, was reduced after glucose treatment despite increasing prevalence at later lake sample points and rapid growth of these taxa in untreated cultures.
Figure 2. The relative abundance of taxa belonging to the genus Microcystis in the weekly Harsha Lake samples, after glucose treatments. Harsha Lake water samples were collected weekly from 4 June to 2 July and sequenced for 16S rRNA gene analysis (raw lake input). Raw lake samples were then left untreated (untreated controls) or treated with 1.39 mM or 13.9 mM glucose for each sample date. After 2 weeks of incubation, untreated controls and glucose-treated samples were also sequenced. Relative abundance of Microcystis sp., as determined by 16S sequencing, was reduced after glucose treatment despite increasing prevalence at later lake sample points and rapid growth of these taxa in untreated cultures.
Life 12 00385 g002
Life 12 00385 g003 550
Figure 3. The relative abundance of bacterial phyla in the weekly Harsha Lake samples, after 2 weeks of incubation. Harsha Lake water samples were collected weekly from 4 June to 2 July and sequenced for 16S rRNA gene analysis (raw lake input). Raw lake samples were then left untreated (untreated controls) or treated with 1.39 mM or 13.9 mM glucose for each sample date. After 2 weeks of incubation, untreated controls and glucose-treated samples were also sequenced. Relative abundance of bacterial phyla was determined for each sample using 16S sequencing. Any phyla occurring below 5% relative abundance were compiled as a single group (black bars).
Figure 3. The relative abundance of bacterial phyla in the weekly Harsha Lake samples, after 2 weeks of incubation. Harsha Lake water samples were collected weekly from 4 June to 2 July and sequenced for 16S rRNA gene analysis (raw lake input). Raw lake samples were then left untreated (untreated controls) or treated with 1.39 mM or 13.9 mM glucose for each sample date. After 2 weeks of incubation, untreated controls and glucose-treated samples were also sequenced. Relative abundance of bacterial phyla was determined for each sample using 16S sequencing. Any phyla occurring below 5% relative abundance were compiled as a single group (black bars).
Life 12 00385 g003
Life 12 00385 g004 550
Figure 4. The relative abundance of genera within the phylum Cyanobacteria in the weekly Harsha Lake samples after 2 weeks of incubation. Harsha Lake water samples were collected weekly from 4 June to 2 July and sequenced for 16S rRNA gene analysis (raw lake input). Raw lake samples were then left untreated (untreated controls) or treated with 1.39 mM or 13.9 mM glucose for each sample date. After 2 weeks of incubation, untreated controls and glucose-treated samples were also sequenced. Relative abundance of cyanobacterial genera was determined for each sample using 16S sequencing. Any phyla occurring below 5% relative abundance were compiled as a single group (black bars).
Figure 4. The relative abundance of genera within the phylum Cyanobacteria in the weekly Harsha Lake samples after 2 weeks of incubation. Harsha Lake water samples were collected weekly from 4 June to 2 July and sequenced for 16S rRNA gene analysis (raw lake input). Raw lake samples were then left untreated (untreated controls) or treated with 1.39 mM or 13.9 mM glucose for each sample date. After 2 weeks of incubation, untreated controls and glucose-treated samples were also sequenced. Relative abundance of cyanobacterial genera was determined for each sample using 16S sequencing. Any phyla occurring below 5% relative abundance were compiled as a single group (black bars).
Life 12 00385 g004
Life 12 00385 g005 550
Figure 5. The changes in Proteobacterial taxa in the weekly Harsha Lake samples after 2 weeks of incubation. Harsha Lake water samples were collected weekly from 4 June to 2 July and then left untreated (untreated controls) or treated with 13.9 mM glucose for each sample date. After 2 weeks of incubation, untreated controls and glucose-treated samples were sequenced for 16S rRNA gene analysis. (A) Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) plot of Bray–Curtis distances for untreated controls (blue) and 13.9 mM glucose-treated samples (red) at each sample date (shapes) using the relative abundance of only Proteobacteria conglomerated at the family level. Proteobacterial family abundance was fitted as vectors to the NMDS using envfit. Only those with significant associations to NMDS clustering are shown. Arrow direction indicates increasing abundance and arrow length represents degree of significance. The ellipses represent 95% confidence intervals for each treatment. ** = p < 0.01, *** = p < 0.001. (B) Relative abundance of Proteobacterial families significantly fitted to NMDS in both untreated controls and 13.9 mM glucose-treated samples at each sample date.
Figure 5. The changes in Proteobacterial taxa in the weekly Harsha Lake samples after 2 weeks of incubation. Harsha Lake water samples were collected weekly from 4 June to 2 July and then left untreated (untreated controls) or treated with 13.9 mM glucose for each sample date. After 2 weeks of incubation, untreated controls and glucose-treated samples were sequenced for 16S rRNA gene analysis. (A) Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) plot of Bray–Curtis distances for untreated controls (blue) and 13.9 mM glucose-treated samples (red) at each sample date (shapes) using the relative abundance of only Proteobacteria conglomerated at the family level. Proteobacterial family abundance was fitted as vectors to the NMDS using envfit. Only those with significant associations to NMDS clustering are shown. Arrow direction indicates increasing abundance and arrow length represents degree of significance. The ellipses represent 95% confidence intervals for each treatment. ** = p < 0.01, *** = p < 0.001. (B) Relative abundance of Proteobacterial families significantly fitted to NMDS in both untreated controls and 13.9 mM glucose-treated samples at each sample date.
Life 12 00385 g005
Table
Table 1. Gene copy number for the microcystin toxin gene (gene target, McyEmic) in Microcystis cells and total copies of Microcystis 16s ribosomal gene (gene target, 16SMic) in water samples at the end of 2 weeks of incubation. (SD = standard deviation; ND = not determined).
Table 1. Gene copy number for the microcystin toxin gene (gene target, McyEmic) in Microcystis cells and total copies of Microcystis 16s ribosomal gene (gene target, 16SMic) in water samples at the end of 2 weeks of incubation. (SD = standard deviation; ND = not determined).
Glucose Concentrations
0 mM1.39 mM13.9 mM
Sample WeekGene TargetCopy Number
±SD/mL		Copy Number
±SD/mL		Copy Number
±SD/mL
6/4McyEmic1.6 ± 0.4 × 10300
16SMic1.1 ± ND × 10300
6/11McyEmic2.4 ± 0.8 × 10300
16SMic0.5 ± 0.1 × 10342 ± 40
6/18McyEmic5.7 ± 2.0 × 10300
16SMic6.2 ± 0.4 × 10300
6/25McyEmic1.3 ± 0.4 × 10330 ± 160
16SMic3.0 ± 0.7 × 10389 ± 150
7/2McyEmic1.6 ± ND × 1052.9 ± 2.2 × 1035.9 ± 4.9 × 103
16SMic3.6 ± ND × 1050.9 ± 0.1 × 1030.8 ± ND × 103
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vesper, S.; Sienkiewicz, N.; Struewing, I.; Linz, D.; Lu, J. Prophylactic Addition of Glucose Suppresses Cyanobacterial Abundance in Lake Water. Life 2022, 12, 385. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12030385

AMA Style

Vesper S, Sienkiewicz N, Struewing I, Linz D, Lu J. Prophylactic Addition of Glucose Suppresses Cyanobacterial Abundance in Lake Water. Life. 2022; 12(3):385. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12030385

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vesper, Stephen, Nathan Sienkiewicz, Ian Struewing, David Linz, and Jingrang Lu. 2022. "Prophylactic Addition of Glucose Suppresses Cyanobacterial Abundance in Lake Water" Life 12, no. 3: 385. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12030385

APA Style

Vesper, S., Sienkiewicz, N., Struewing, I., Linz, D., & Lu, J. (2022). Prophylactic Addition of Glucose Suppresses Cyanobacterial Abundance in Lake Water. Life, 12(3), 385. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12030385

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop