Next Article in Journal
Fetal Hippocampal Connectivity Shows Dissociable Associations with Maternal Cortisol and Self-Reported Distress during Pregnancy
Next Article in Special Issue
Characterization of Peroxidase and Laccase Gene Families and In Silico Identification of Potential Genes Involved in Upstream Steps of Lignan Formation in Sesame
Previous Article in Journal
Decellularized Wharton Jelly Implants Do Not Trigger Collagen and Cartilaginous Tissue Production in Tracheal Injury in Rabbits
Previous Article in Special Issue
Chloroplast Genome of Lithocarpus dealbatus (Hook.f. & Thomson ex Miq.) Rehder Establishes Monophyletic Origin of the Species and Reveals Mutational Hotspots with Taxon Delimitation Potential
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Life
Volume 12
Issue 7
10.3390/life12070941
life-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Insight into the Roles of Proline-Rich Extensin-like Receptor Protein Kinases of Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

by
Shumayla
1,
Venugopal Mendu
2,
Kashmir Singh
3 and
Santosh Kumar Upadhyay
1,*
1
Department of Botany, Panjab University, Chandigarh 160014, India
2
Department of Plant Science and Plant Pathology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717-3140, USA
3
Department of Biotechnology, Panjab University, Chandigarh 160014, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Life 2022, 12(7), 941; https://doi.org/10.3390/life12070941
Submission received: 10 June 2022 / Revised: 18 June 2022 / Accepted: 20 June 2022 / Published: 23 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research Advances in Plant Genomics: 2nd Edition)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Proline-rich extensin-like receptor protein kinases (PERKs) are known for their roles in the developmental processes and stress responses of many plants. We have identified 30 TaPERK genes in the genome of T. aestivum, exploring their evolutionary and syntenic relationship and analyzing their gene and protein structures, various cis-regulatory elements, expression profiling, and interacting miRNAs. The TaPERK genes formed 12 homeologous groups and clustered into four phylogenetic clades. All the proteins exhibited a typical domain organization of PERK and consisted of conserved proline residue repeats and serine-proline and proline-serine repeats. Further, the tyrosine-x-tyrosine (YXY) motif was also found conserved in thirteen TaPERKs. The cis-regulatory elements and expression profiling under tissue developmental stages suggested their role in plant growth processes. Further, the differential expression of certain TaPERK genes under biotic and abiotic stress conditions suggested their involvement in defense responses as well. The interaction of TaPERK genes with different miRNAs further strengthened evidence for their diverse biological roles. In this study, a comprehensive analysis of obtained TaPERK genes was performed, enriching our knowledge of TaPERK genes and providing a foundation for further possible functional analyses in future studies.

1. Introduction

Plants are susceptible to a diverse range of environmental stimuli and have developed mechanisms for adapting to changes in their surroundings. In plants, like in other eukaryotes, a diverse range of cell surface receptor-like protein kinases (RLKs) is required for signal transduction pathways to function properly [1,2]. In response to a stimulus, these membrane-spanning proteins transfer the signal intracellularly via a signaling cascade, eliciting the appropriate cellular responses. The members of plant RLKs have a highly conserved, substrate-specific, cytoplasmic catalytic domain, known as serine/threonine kinase, while their extracellular domains are quite diverse, allowing these proteins to respond selectively to a variety of external stimuli [1,3]. Many different kinds of plant RLKs have been recognized based on the amino acid sequence motif present in their extracellular domains [4,5].
Proline-rich extensin-like receptor protein kinases (PERKs) represent an important gene family in the RLK superfamily, which is known to be involved in numerous vital functions in plants [6,7]. Similar to the other RLKs, the members of the PERK gene family also consist of three domains: an extracellular proline-rich domain, a transmembrane region, and an intracellular kinase domain which is responsible for catalytic activity [8,9]. The extracellular domain is densely packed with consecutive prolines, some of which form a characteristic extensin (EXT) motif with serine-proline repetitions (2–5 times), while also lacking an adjacent tyrosine-X-tyrosine (YXY) required for tyrosine mediated cross-linking [10].
The first PERK gene in plants was reported from Brassica napus, which was wound inducible and ubiquitously expressed in the vegetative and reproductive tissues of the plant [11,12]. Later on, a total of 15 AtPERK genes were reported in the genome of Arabidopsis thaliana, which consisted of variable lengths of the extracellular domain due to the occurrence of proline-rich regions in both the extracellular and cytoplasmic regions [11,13]. Out of 15, nine AtPERK genes exhibited significant expression in various plant parts. For instance, AtPERK8 and AtPERK13 showed significant expression in root hairs, while the other seven genes (AtPERK3-7, 11 and 12) suggested specific functions in pollen tubes [8,9]. AtPERK13 is reported to be involved in root hair growth [6,7]; however, AtPERK4 is associated with abscisic acid and calcium signaling during root tip development [14]. Further, it has been reported that the AtPERKs are also involved in the regulation of apical dominance, cell proliferation, wall deposition, reproductive tissue development and fertilization [8,14,15,16]. Additionally, the modulated expression of various GhPERK genes of Gossypium hirsutum during various abiotic stress conditions (cold, heat, drought/osmotic, and salt) revealed their role in stress response [17]. Further, GhPERKs also exhibited differential expression under phytohormones stress (GA, IAA, SA, and MeJA). These studies suggested numerous, diverse functions of PERK genes in plants.
Despite its diverse roles in plants, an inclusive genome-wide characterization of the PERK gene family has been limited to only a few plant species like Arabidopsis, Gossypium, Brassica rapa, etc. [9,13,17]. No information is available about the PERK genes in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), which is widely cultivated as an important cereal crop. The growing body of genomic data on bread wheat has enabled the inclusive exploration of numerous important gene families [18,19]. In the present study, the TaPERK genes of bread wheat were identified and systematically characterized in terms of their physicochemical properties, chromosomal distribution, exon/intron, protein domains and motifs, phylogeny and syntenic relationship. Further, the RNA-Seq data from five tissues with three developmental stages were analyzed to investigate their roles in plant growth and development, while the RNA-Seq data generated under heat, drought, salt, and fungal pathogen stress conditions were used to analyze their functions in stress response. The expression data of a few genes in abiotic stress conditions were validated by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). To gain further insights into their mechanisms, interaction analyses of TaPERKs were performed with the known miRNAs of T. aestivum. These results will increase our understanding of the vital role of TaPERK genes and enable their functional characterization in future studies.

2. Results

2.1. Identification and Distribution of TaPERK Genes

A total of 30 TaPERK genes were identified in the genome of T. aestivum by extensive BLAST search using 15 PERK sequences of Arabidopsis thaliana and eight sequences of Oryza sativa (Table S1). These genes were found to be clustered into 12 homoeologous groups and were named according to the standard wheat symbolization protocol (Table S2). The majority of the TaPERK genes were derived from the B subgenome (40%), followed by the A (30%) and D subgenomes (27%). The TaPERK genes were localized on the majority of chromosomes and subgenomes, except chromosomes 2A, 2B, 2D, 4D 5D, 6A, 6B, and 6D. The maximum number of genes were located on chromosomes 3A and 3B, with five genes each, followed by four genes on the 3D chromosome. A single TaPERK gene was found on chromosomes 1A, 4A, 4B, 5A, 5B, 7A, and 7D. The location of one gene (TraesCSU02G104700) could not be mapped to any chromosome (Figure 1, Table S2).

2.2. Phylogeny and Synteny Analysis

The full-length PERK protein sequences of A. thaliana, O. sativa and T. aestivum were used for the construction of a Neighbor-Joining phylogenetic tree using the MEGA X software (Figure 2). The PERK proteins were tightly clustered into four clades which were further subdivided into sub-clades. Clade I consisted of the maximum number (44%) of the PERK proteins, followed by clade III (27%) and Clade II (15%). Clade II contained the lowest number (7) of PERK proteins. A total of 17, 6, and 2 PERK proteins of T. aestivum, A. thaliana and O. sativa, were clustered into clade I, respectively. The PERK proteins of O. sativa and T. aestivum were distributed among all the four clades, while clade IV lacked Arabidopsis PERK proteins. The homeologous TaPERK proteins were closely clustered in each group, for instance, TraesCS3B02G008600, TraesCS3A02G003900 and TraesCS3D02G005400. Further, the PERK proteins identified as orthologs in T. aestivum, A. thaliana and O. sativa, were also found clustered in the vicinity, such as At4G32710, At5G38560, LOC_Os03g38710, LOC_Os05g01040 were found near TraesCS3D02G160000, TraesCS3D02G278400, TraesCS3B02G325100, TraesCS1B02G001500, respectively.
Further, we performed a synteny analysis to study the orthologous relationships among the PERK genes of A. thaliana, O. sativa, and T. aestivum. A total of 13 AtPERK genes of A. thaliana exhibited close syntenic association with 25 TaPERK genes of T. aestivum (Figure 3A). However, all the OsPERK genes of O. sativa showed tight syntenic relation with 24 TaPERK genes of T. aestivum (Figure 3B). The findings revealed a tight evolutionary link among the orthologous PERK genes in these plant species. Furthermore, the close clustering of the orthologous PERKs of these plant species suggested significant homology among them.

2.3. Gene Structure Analysis

The gene structure of all the TaPERK genes was investigated for the intron phases and exon-intron organization. The number of exons ranged from five to nine in TaPERK genes. Around 43% of the genes consisted of eight exons, followed by 23% with seven exons. Only two genes, TraesCS5A02G411300 and TraesCS5B02G415000, consisted of five exons (Figure 4A). It was observed that the majority of TaPERK genes shared the conserved pattern of exon-intron arrangement across the tightly packed genes in the phylogenetic tree. For instance, TraesCS3A02G229800, TraesCS3B02G259100, TraesCS7D02G232700 and TraesCS7B02G131000 shared a similar number (seven) of exons. Among TaPERK genes, 44% of introns were found to be in intron phase 0, followed by 41% in phase 1, and 15% in phase 2. The TaPERK genes of clade I predominantly consisted of phase zero introns, which suggested their sequence conservation. Meanwhile, clade II consisted of the least number of introns in phase zero.

2.4. Physicochemical Properties, Domain and Motif Analysis

The peptide length of TaPERKs varied from 341 to 811 amino acid (aa) residues (Table S2). The molecular weight (MW) ranged from 37.88 kDa (TraesCS3D02G005400) to 84.78 kDa (TraesCS3B02G325100). The majority of TaPERKs consisted of a single transmembrane helix, with the exception of five proteins, TraesCS1B02G001500, TraesCS1B02G350100, TraesCS1D02G339600, TraesCS3D02G005400, and TraesCS3D02G290100, which lacked the transmembrane region. While TraesCS5B02G415000 consisted of two transmembrane helices. Furthermore, except for two proteins (TraesCS3D02G290100 and TraesCS3D02G005400) predicted to be cytoplasmic, it was hypothesized that the rest of the TaPERK proteins would be localized in the plasma membrane (Table 1). The isoelectric point (pI) varied from 5.11 to 10.06, with half of the proteins having a pI greater than 7. The grand average hydropathy (GRAVY) value varied from −0.645 (TraesCS7D02G232700) to −0.31 (TraesCS7D02G232700) (TraesCS1B02G001500) Table S2). All the members of the TaPERK family lacked the signal peptide region.
To better understand the functional role of the TaPERK family, a domain analysis was performed. TaPERK proteins were analyzed for the presence of a conserved domain using the SMART server. The results revealed the occurrence of a typical RLKs structure, i.e., a conserved cytoplasmic ser/thr kinase domain, a transmembrane region, and an extracellular region in 25 out 30 TaPERK proteins (Figure 4B). Five TaPERKs (TraesCS1B02G001500, TraesCS1B02G350100, TraesCS1D02G339600, TraesCS3D02G005400, and TraesCS3D02G290100) lacking the transmembrane region, that could be receptor-like cytoplasmic kinases. Further, a detailed analysis of protein sequences for conserved motifs was carried out using the multiple sequence alignments, WebLogos, and MEME suite server (Figure 4B–E). The multiple sequence alignment showed the conserved proline-rich region in the extracellular region of all the TaPERK protein sequences. Several densely packed consecutive proline-rich regions were found in each TaPERK protein (Figure 4B). Further, all the TaPERK proteins consisted of two to four serine-proline (SP) or proline-serine (PS) repetitions at various locations (Figure S1), which is a characteristic of the extensin (EXT) motif. Additionally, a tyrosine-X-tyrosine (YXY) motif was also found conserved in 13 out of 30 TaPERK sequences, i.e., TraesCS7B02G130400, TraesCS1B02G147000, TraesCS7A02G231900, TraesCS5B02G415000, TraesCS4A02G077500, TraesCS5A02G411300, TraesCS1A02G127900 etc. (Figure 4C). Five highly conserved regions were detected from the PERK proteins of A. thaliana, O. sativa and T. aestivum (Figure 4D). The MEME server identified 15 conserved motifs in TaPERK proteins (Figure 4E and Figure S2). Motifs 1 to 7 were conserved in the kinase domain region of TaPERK proteins. Motifs 1 and 2 were conserved in the ATP binding site and active site of the kinase domain region, whereas motifs 12 to 15 were conserved in the extracellular region of TaPERK proteins, which is a proline-rich region.

2.5. Promoter Analysis of TaPERK Genes

Comprehending gene regulation and function requires a thorough understanding of the cis-elements that affect gene expression through the binding of transcription factors to these elements. The cis-regulatory elements (CREs) in the promoter region of each TaPERK gene were identified in the 2 Kb upstream region from the start codon using the PlantCARE database. The identified CREs were broadly divided into defense and stress-responsive, hormone-responsive, light-responsive, etc. (Figure 5). The majority of the TaPERK genes promoter regions consisted of CREs related to light-responsive and hormone-responsive (Table S3). Various CREs were found in the upstream of TaPERK genes for different responses. For instance, meristem development (CAT-box motif) in TraesCS1B02G350100, TraesCS1B02G147000 etc., endosperm development (GCN4 motif) in TraesCS4B02G233600, TraesCS1B02G001500 etc., seed-specific regulation (RY elements) in TraesCS3B02G325100, TraesCS7B02G130400 etc., defense and stress response (TC-rich repeats and MBS) in TraesCS1B02G001500, TraesCS1D02G004300 etc., light-responsive (ATCT-motif, G-box, GA-motif, GATA-motif, GC-motif, GAG-motif, GT1-motif, Sp1, TCT-motif) in TraesCS1D02G004300, TraesCS1D02G126300, TraesCS1D02G339600, etc., low-temperature responsive elements (LTR) in TraesCS3A02G229800, TraesCS3A02G278100, etc. The cis-elements regulating the responses via different hormones were abscisic acid-responsive element (ABRE), methyl jasmonate responsive elements (CGTCA-motif and TGACG-motif) auxin (TGA-element), salicylic acid (TCA-element), and gibberellin (TATC-box and P-box motifs), were also found in the promoter regions of TaPERK genes such as TraesCS3A02G229800, TraesCS3A02G290300, TraesCS3A02G278100, TraesCS3B02G259100, TraesCS3D02G005400 etc., respectively.

2.6. Transcriptional Profiling in Tissue Developmental Stages

To analyze the involvement of TaPERK genes in the growth and development of plants, transcriptional profiling during tissue developmental stages was performed using the high throughput RNA seq data. A correlation analysis was done to study the consistency of the expression data. A significant correlation (R2 = 0.94) was observed in replicates of the expression data (Figure 6A). During the root, stem, leaf, spike, and grain developmental stages, TaPERK genes sowed differential Spatio-temporal expression patterns (Figure 6C). Around 67% of TaPERK genes such as TraesCS3B02G312300, TraesCS3D02G278400, TraesCS3B02G179300, etc. showed higher expression in all the root developmental stages, followed by 60% genes were highly expressed in the stem_z30 and stem_z32 developmental stages, for instance, TraesCS3B02G179300, TraesCS3D02G160000 etc. However, only two genes (TraesCS3B02G179300 and TraesCS3B02G160000 exhibited significant expression in stem_z65. All the TaPERK genes were low expressing in all the leaf developmental stages. About 46% of genes showed maximum expression in the spike developmental stages. For example, TraesCS1D02G004300, TraesCS1B02G001500, TraesCS3D02G005400 etc. showed the highest expression in early developmental stages of spike. Interestingly, it was observed that six genes namely TraesCS3D02G290100, TraesCS4A02G077500, TraesCS4B02G233600, TraesCS3A02G229800, TraesCS5A02G411300 and TraesCS7B02G131000 were predominantly expressed in the later stage of spike development viz. spike_z65. In the grain tissue, few TaPERK genes showed higher expression in the initial stage of grain development, i.e., grain_z71, while in the later stages, the genes showed lower expression. For instance, TraesCS3B02G312300, TraesCS3D02G278400, TraesCS3A02G278100 etc. were expressed in the grain_z71 stage.

2.7. Transcript Abundance under Biotic Stress

To study the role of TaPERK genes under biotic stress, the expression patterns against two fungal pathogens (Bgt and Pst) were analyzed. A significant correlation (R2 = 0.98) was observed in replicates of the expression data (Figure 6B). The genes with FPKM values less than 0.5 were not considered for expression analysis. A total of 18 genes were found affected (Figure 6D). Approximately 50% of genes were upregulated after Bgt infestation while 50% were upregulated after Pst infestation. This shows that the genes are pathogen-specific. For instance, TraesCS3B02G325100, TraesCS3B02G179300, TraesCS1D02G339600 etc. were upregulated after Bgt attack while TraesCS3A02G003900, TraesCS3A02G278100, TraesCS3B02G312300 etc. were upregulated after Pst attack. TraesCS3A02G290300 gene was found to be upregulated after the attack of both fungi. Moreover, a few genes were either late or early responsive. For example, TraesCS1A02G127900 was upregulated after 24 h of Pst attack, while TraesCS3D02G278400 was upregulated after 48 h of Bgt attack.

2.8. Transcript Abundance under Abiotic Stress Conditions

Under abiotic stress, an expression analysis was performed under heat (HS), drought (DS), and salt stress conditions using the high throughput RNA seq data, and qRT-PCR. A total of 18 TaPERK genes were affected after the HS and DS stress conditions (Figure 6E). The majority of TaPERK genes showed similar expression after 1 and 6 h of DS, while upregulated only after HS 6 h, for instance, TraesCS1D02G004300 and TraesCS1B02G001500. Only TraesCS3B02G325100 was found to be upregulated after 1 and 6 h of HS and DS, except for DS 6h where it was downregulated. A few genes such as TraesCS3A02G290300, TraesCS3D02G290100 etc. showed upregulation only at DS_1h. To further validate the expression data, qRT-PCR of randomly selected seven genes named TraesCS1D02G004300, TraesCS1A02G127900, TraesCS1B02G001500, TraesCS1D02G126300, TraesCS1B02G147000, TraesCS3B02G179300 and TraesCS3A02G290300 was performed using the gene-specific primers (Figure 7, Table 2). These genes varied in expression value but showed similar expression patterns. For instance, TraesCS1A02G127900 and TraesCS1B02G147000 genes were upregulated after each hour of heat and drought stress except HS_1 h in the qRT-PCR experiment, which was found consistent with transcriptomic data.
Under salt stress, 21 TaPERK genes exhibited differential expression patterns (Figure 6F). Almost half of the genes showed upregulation in the initial hours (6 h and 12 h) of salt stress, e.g., TraesCS3A02G003900, TraesCS1D02G126300, etc. Meanwhile, half of the genes were upregulated in the later hours (24 and 48 h) of salt stress, e.g., TraesCS3B02G179300, TraesCS1B02G001500, etc. Furthermore, TraesCSU02G104700, TraesCS7A02G231900 and TraesCS7B02G130400 genes were downregulated after each hour of salt stress. TraesCS3B02G179300, TraesCS1B02G001500, TraesCS1D02G004300, TraesCS1B02G350100 and TraesCS3D02G160000 were found to be upregulated after each hour of salt stress. The qRT-PCR under different salt stress intervals (6, 12, 24, 48 h) was performed to validate the transcriptome data. The expression value of each gene varied with the transcriptomic data, but the TaPERK genes followed a similar expression pattern. The qRT PCR results were mostly statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05, and were consistent with the expression pattern obtained from the RNA seq data (Figure 7).

2.9. miRNAs Interaction Network

Out of 607 known T. aestivum miRNAs, 78 interacted with 22 TaPERK transcripts, with 60 miRNAs acting via cleavage and 11 via translational inhibition (Figure 8, Table S4). Seven of these miRNAs worked through both the cleavage and translation processes. For example, ta-miR093a acted on TraesCS3A02G278100 by cleavage while on TraesCS3B02G008600 via translational inhibition. Whereas ta-miR180a targeted TraesCS3B02G008600 and TraesCS1D02G004300 via cleavage and translational inhibition respectively. Furthermore, multiple miRNAs targeted the same TaPERK transcripts, such as TraesCS3B02G008600, which was targeted by 13 miRNAs via the process of cleavage or translation. Similarly, single miRNA also targets multiple transcripts such as tae-miR2011a. It was discovered that more than one miRNA also targeted the same transcript at the same place, for example, ta-miR2019a and ta-miR2072a target TraesCS4B02G233600 at the same site. Furthermore, certain miRNAs targeted the transcript at two separate sites, such as ta-miR050a and ta-miR081a, which target TraesCS5B02G415000 and TraesCS5A02G411300, respectively. Also, it was observed that a single transcript TraesCS7D02G232700 was targeted by two different miRNAs, i.e., tae-miR2079a and ta-miR088a by the cleavage and translation process, respectively.

3. Discussion

Several studies have explored the role of PERK genes in the growth and development and stress responses of various plant species [11,13,14], but none describing the PERK genes and their functions in T. aestivum has been carried out to date. T. aestivum is an important cereal crop which is cultivated and consumed worldwide [20]. Therefore, an attempt has been made to characterize the PERK gene family in this plant. In the current study, 30 TaPERK genes were identified from the whole genome of T. aestivum and analyzed for their physicochemical properties, domain and motif, expression during tissue developmental stages and under various stress conditions, and miRNA interaction network development. The number of TaPERK genes was found to be relatively higher than the genes reported in other plant species. A total of 15, 25, 33 and eight PERK genes were reported from the genome of A. thaliana, B. rapa, G. hirsutum, and O. sativa [9,11,12,17]. The number of the genes in the allohexaploid genome of T. aestivum suggested the direct connection to the ploidy level and genome size.
A phylogenetic analysis revealed the formation of four different clades (I-IV), with clade I being the largest with a maximum number of proteins. The study was consistent for the formation of I-IV clades in B. rapa and G. hirsutum [9,17]. The clade I–III included the PERK proteins from each A. thaliana and O. sativa, and T. aestivum, while clade IV lacked the AtPERK proteins. The studies done in B. rapa and G. hirsutum also showed the absence of AtPERKs from the clade IV, which also supported our results [9,17]. This suggests that PERK proteins of clade IV might acquire new functions via divergence. It was also observed that orthologs of TaPERK proteins were in close proximity with AtPERK proteins, which suggested their conserved functional role. For instance, At4G32710 known as AtPERK1 expressed more in reproductive organs such as bolts, buds, and siliques found nearby to the TraesCS1D02G339600 in the same clade, which suggests that it might be involved in the growth of reproductive organs.
The analyses of physicochemical properties of TaPERK proteins predicted the variable length and molecular weight, which were consistent with the results in B. rapa and G. hirsutum [9,13,17]. The majority of genes with more than 7 pI suggested their basic nature. The occurrence of a negative GRAVY score indicated the overall hydrophilic nature of these proteins which might be due to their larger cytoplasmic kinase domain. The subcellular localization of the majority of proteins was predicted to be plasma membrane, which was also experimentally proved by the biolistic bombardment of onion epidermal cells for PERK1 of B. napus [11]. Further, a few proteins named TraesCS1B02G001500, TraesCS1B02G350100, TraesCS1D02G339600, TraesCS3D02G005400 and TraesCS3D02G290100 lacked a transmembrane region, which suggested these proteins might be receptor-like cytoplasmic kinases. However, all the PERK proteins of A. thaliana and B. rapa exhibited the occurrence of the transmembrane domain [9,13]. The signal peptide was also found to be absent in AtPERK like BnPERK1 which further supported our finding [13].
Furthermore, all the PERK proteins exhibited similar patterns of the domain and motif distribution (Figure 4B–D). Like AtPERK members [8,11,13], the proline-rich extracellular region of TaPERKs also contained consecutive prolines at various locations, along with several serine-proline or proline-serine repeats. The YXY motif was also found conserved in numerous TaPERKs, which was not reported in earlier studies. The occurrence of serine-proline repeats and YXY motifs in the N-terminus region are the characteristic feature of the EXT motif [10]. The EXT motif is known to act as the putative sensor for the EXT-pectin glyco-network and maintains cell wall integrity [10]. The occurrence of these motifs in TaPERK proteins suggested that these proteins might also sense EXT-pectin glycol-network for cell wall maintenance. Also, the sequence logos of the conserved PERK amino acid residues showed that the PERK proteins are evolutionarily conserved among the A. thaliana and O. sativa due to the presence of conserved amino acid residues also reported in B. rapa and G. hirsutum [9,17].
The TaPERK promoter sequences comprise a variety of anticipated cis-elements that are specialized for plant growth and development, hormone-responsive, light and stress responses. Transcription is controlled by transcription factors binding to upstream cis-acting regulatory elements. Many studies have demonstrated the importance of light in plant growth and development processes [21] which have also been found in some TaPERK genes of T. aestivum such as TraesCS3D02G005400, TraesCS3D02G160000, TraesCS3D02G278400, TraesCS3D02G290100 etc., which suggested their role in growth and development processes. The majority of TaPERK genes contain characteristics that are typical of genes involved in growth and stress responses. For example, in Arabidopsis, AtPERK4 of A. thaliana displayed ABA-responsive elements for the root-tip development [14]. Similarly, TaPERK named TraesCS1A02127900 consisted of ABA-responsive element and was found to be significantly expressed in all the stages of root development, which indicated its similar role to the orthologous AtPERK4 of A. thaliana. The other RLK gene families in wheat have also been previously reported to contain similar cis-elements in their promoters and were functionally relevant [19].
In A. thaliana, AtPERK members are implicated in several developmental pathways, including the root, rosette leaf, stem, and pollen tissues developments [8,16]. The expression levels of several TaPERK genes were clearly varied across the five tissues (root, stem, leaf, spike, and grain) of T. aestivum, and some of these genes were significantly and specifically expressed in vegetative and reproductive organs. There was a significant correlation between these findings and those in A. thaliana [13,16], G. hirsutum [17], and B. rapa [9]. The majority of TaPERK genes showed higher expression in root, stem, and spike such as, TraesCS3B02G312300, TraesCS3D02G278400, TraesCS3A02G278100, TraesCS1D02G126300, TraesCS1B02G147000 etc. Similarly, a few AtPERK genes like PERK8 and PERK13 were shown to be highly expressed in expanding root hairs, and PERK5 and PERK12 genes in pollen tube growth [8,9]. The PERK5 and PERK12 genes were also clustered in the same clade with TaPERK genes expressing in root and stem mentioned above, which suggested their functional conservation. The results were also found to be similar to PERK genes of B. rapa and G. hirsutum which suggested that TaPERK genes might be involved in plant developmental processes.
Furthermore, TaPERK genes expression was observed to be affected by the attack of fungal pathogens and various abiotic stresses like heat, drought, and salt. Similarly, the PERK1 gene of A. thaliana was functionally validated for its role against wounds induced by mechanical stress and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum fungi [11]. The effect of heat, drought, salt, and cold on PERK genes of G. hirsutum has also been observed and found consistent with our result [17]. Thus, from this, we can conclude that TaPERK genes also play a role in defense response.
The miRNA interaction analysis suggested the regulation of TaPERK genes through the RNAi pathway. Numerous miRNAs are known to regulate growth, development, and adaptive response against abiotic stresses by controlling target genes either at the posttranscriptional or translation level of protein synthesis [22,23]. For instance, ta-miR2072a and tae-miR2011a were found to be responsive to heat stress and powdery mildew [24]. These miRNAs target TraesCS3B02G008600, TraesCS1A02G127900, TraesCS1B02G147000 genes etc., which were significantly upregulated during HS_6h and Bgt infestation. The results suggested that these genes might also be responsive to heat and powdery mildew stress conditions. Further, tae-miR408 has been reported to play a role in plant adaptations to Pi starvation and salt stress conditions via mediating Pi acquisition under low-Pi stress and altering the ABA signaling pathway as well as osmoprotectants biosynthesis [23]. The taemiR408 targets TraesCS4B02G233600, TraesCS4A02G077500 might be involved in Pi acquisition under salt stress conditions. Further, the tae-mir827a role has been reported in the phosphorous deficient and surplus conditions which target TraesCS1D02G126300, TraesCS1A02G127900, and TraesCS1B02G147000 suggesting their role in maintaining phosphorous metal homeostasis [25].
Therefore, coupled with these findings, the study suggested the functional role of TaPERK genes in physiological processes and stress responses, which would pave the way for functional characterization in future studies.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Identification and Chromosomal Distribution of TaPERK Genes in T. aestivum

To identify the TaPERK genes in the genome of T. aestivum, the bidirectional BLAST hit approach at e-value 10−10 was adopted. The arabidopsis PERK protein sequences [11,13] were used as queries against the protein model sequences of T. aestivum downloaded from the IWGSC (IWGSC RefSeq assembly v2.0) (http://wheat-urgi.versailles.inra.fr/Seq-Repository/Genes-annotations, accessed on 25 February 2019, http://www.wheatgenome.org/, accessed on 25 February 2019) and the Ensembl Plant (http://plants.ensembl.org/index.html, accessed on 7 August 2021) servers. To validate the retrieved putative PERK sequences, the presence of proline-rich region and kinase domain was analyzed via the multiple sequence alignments and by searching at the SMART server [26,27], respectively.
Predictions of TaPERK gene locations on the chromosome of T. aestivum were made by mapping each gene sequence on their respective chromosome sequence, downloaded from the Ensembl Plant server. The nomenclature of genes was determined using the recommended rules of the wheat gene symbolization method (http://wheat.pw.usda.gov/ggpages/wgc/98/Intro.htm, accessed on 6 October 2021). The homeologs of each PERK gene were predicted by performing a bidirectional BLAST hit method at e-value 10−10. Sequences with ≥90% similarity and localized on different sub-genomes were designated as homeologous as described in previous studies [19,28,29].

4.2. Phylogenetic and Synteny Analysis

The multiple sequence alignment of full-length PERK protein sequences of A. thaliana, O. sativa and, T. aestivum was carried out using the MUSCLE algorithm. The phylogenetic tree was then constructed using the MEGA X software by Neighbor-Joining method, with the bootstrap value set to 1000 [30]. The syntenic relationship among the PERK sequences of A. thaliana, O. sativa, and T. aestivum was performed using the Circos 0.69-6 software [31].

4.3. Gene and Protein Structure Analyses

The TaPERK gene structure was analyzed in terms of exon-intron organization and intron phases. For this, the respective coding (CDS) and genomic sequences were aligned for each TaPERKs and representation has been done using the Gene Structure Display Server (GSDS 2.0) [32]. Further, the various cis-regulatory elements were predicted in the 2 Kb upstream region of each TaPERK gene using the online PlantCARE program [33]. The pictorial representation of promoter elements was done using the TBtool (v0.6679) software [34].
The physicochemical properties (molecular weight, pI, protein length), protein localization, transmembrane helices, GRAVY score, and signal peptide were predicted using the ExPASy, CELLO v.2.5, TMHMM 2.0 version, Sequence Manipulation Suite, SignalP servers, respectively [35,36,37,38]. To predict the conserved amino acid residues, multiple sequence alignment was performed using the MultAlin server. The WebLogo3 (http://weblogo.threeplusone.com/create.cgi, accessed on 27 December 2021) and GeneDoc were used for the representation [26,39]. Further, to predict the conserved signature motif of TaPERK proteins, and the Multiple Expectation Maximization for Motif Elicitation version 5.1.1 was used with the following parameters: the number of motifs; 15, optimum width of the motif; 6 to 50, rest all parameters were set to default [40].

4.4. Expression Pattern Analysis of TaPERK Genes during Tissue Development Stages

High throughput RNA-seq data, available at https://urgi.versailles.inra.fr/files/RNASeqWheat, accessed on 24 February 2019, was used for expression profiling of TaPERK genes under tissue developmental stages. The RNA seq data were generated in two biological replicates from five different tissues (root, leaf, stem, spike, and grain) and three development stages of the wheat plant [41,42]. The fragments per kilobase of transcripts per million mapped reads (FPKM) value was determined through RNA-Seq by Expectation-Maximization (RSEM) with the help of the Trinity pipeline [43]. The heat maps were generated with the help of Hierarchical Clustering Explorer 3.5 (http://www.cs.umd.edu/hcil/hce/, accessed on 4 January 2022). The expression data was revalidated at the Expression Atlas server [44].

4.5. Expression Profiling of TaPERK Genes under Biotic and Abiotic Stresses

To study the effect of two fungal pathogens viz. Puccinia striiformis (Pst) and Blumeria graminis (Bgt) on the expression pattern of TaPERK genes, the RNA seq data has been used. RNA seq data generated by Zhang et al. in three biological replicates after 24, 48, and 72 h of infestation of these two fungal pathogens were used [45]. The expression value of TaPERK genes were calculated in terms of FPKM using the Trinity package [43]. Further, the expression profiling of TaPERK genes under heat (HS), drought (DS), and salinity stress was analyzed using the RNA seq data reported by Liu et al. For the heat and drought stresses, the data were generated in two biological replicates from the leaves tissue after 1 and 6 h of treatment [46]. However, for the salinity stress (150mM NaCl) the data were developed from the root tissue after 6, 12, 24, and 48 h of treatments, separately [47]. For the representation of expression pattern, the heatmaps were constructed using the HCE (Hierarchical Clustering Explorer 3.5) with the parameters as Euclidean distance method and hierarchical clustering [48].

4.6. RNA Extraction and Real-Time Quantitative PCR Analysis for Gene Expression

Seeds of T. aestivum cv were surface sterilized and after seven days of growth, the seedlings were subjected to heat (40 °C for 1 and 6 h), drought or osmotic (20% PEG for 1 and 6 h), and salinity stress (150 mM NaCl for 6, 12, 24 and 48 h). Root and shoot tissue samples were collected after the stress treatment and RNA was isolated using the SpectrumTM Plant Total RNA kit (Sigma, Burlington, MA, USA). The RNA was treated for the removal of DNA contamination using the TURBO DNA-free™ Kit (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA). Further, the quality and integrity of the isolated RNA were checked by gel electrophoresis and concentration was measured using the Nanodrop spectrophotometer. The first-strand cDNA was synthesized from the 1 ug RNA sample using the Superscript III First Strand Synthesis Supermix (Invitrogen, USA). For the qRT-PCR analysis, seven TaPERK genes were randomly selected from each phylogenetic clade. The gene-specific primers were designed from OligoCalc software [49]. The QuantiFast® SYBR® Green PCR Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) was used for qRT PCR on Bio-Rad CFX96 Real-Time PCR detection system following the method established in the laboratory [50]. The experiments were performed in triplicate and for normalization. The internal reference gene ADP-ribosylation factor (TaARF1, AB050957.1) was used and calculations were made using the delta-delta CT-method (2−ΔΔCT) [51].

4.7. miRNA Target Prediction and Interaction Network Development

To predict the interacting miRNA of TaPERK genes, a total of 607 known miRNAs of T. aestivum [52] were used for interaction analyses using the psRNATarget (http://plantgrn.noble.org/psRNATarget/, accessed on 10 January 2022) server [53]. The representation of the interaction network was developed using the Cytoscape software [54].

4.8. Statistical Analysis

To check the reproducibility of high throughput RNA seq data generated from tissue developmental stages and biotic and abiotic stress conditions, a correlation analysis was performed using Microsoft Office Excel. The qRT PCR data were statistically analyzed by two-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Student’s t-test at the probability level of 5% using the SPSS software. For the determination of significant mean difference (p < 0.05) among the treatments the post hoc Tukey’s test was used.

5. Conclusions

The present study provides a comprehensive analysis of the TaPERK gene family in T. aestivum. Phylogeny and synteny analyses of PERK genes from different species indicated the functional conservation and close evolutionary relationship among them. The analysis of PERK gene expression profiling under tissue developmental stages suggested their involvement in the growth and development of the plant and environmental adaptations against different stress conditions. The study is in agreement with previous studies on various plant species. Further, the members of this gene family were also found to be controlled by various miRNAs. These findings provide a basis for the understanding of the potential functional roles of TaPERK genes in T. aestivum. The potential regulatory mechanisms of TaPERK genes need to be further characterized in plants in future studies.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/life12070941/s1, Table S1: List of TaPERK genes identified in A. thaliana, O. sativa and T. aestivum; Table S2: Analysis of various characteristic features of TaPERK genes and proteins of T. aestivum L.; Table S3: Various cis-acting regulatory elements in the 2 Kb upstream region of TaPERK genes.; Table S4: List of interacting miRNA as target mimic or direct target of TaPERK genes; Figure S1: Multiple sequence alignment. The alignment of the extracellular region of TaPERK proteins shows conserved proline residues are marked with red color, EXT motif sequence, i.e., Ser-pro residues marked with green color while pro-ser residues marked with orange color. The alignment is depicting the conserved residues of PERK proteins in T. aestivum.; Figure S2: The figure represents the conserved motif sequence logos generated from MEME suite using full-length TaPERK proteins.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.K.U.; methodology, S.; validation, S.K.U. and S; formal analysis, S. and S.K.U.; investigation, S., V.M., K.S. and S.K.U.; data curation, S. and S.K.U.; writing—original draft preparation, S. and S.K.U.; writing—review and editing, S., V.M., K.S. and S.K.U.; supervision, S.K.U.; project administration, S.K.U.; funding acquisition, S.K.U. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All the data used in this study is freely available in the databases/repositories. Link and accession number has been mentioned in the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Panjab University, Chandigarh India, for research facilities. S is grateful to CSIR for her fellowship. SKU is grateful to the Science and Engineering Board (SERB), Government of India for Core Research Grant (CRG/2021/000040). SKU is also thankful to the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) for a research grant (No. 38(1489)/19/EMR-II). VM acknowledges the Winifred-Asbjornson plant science Endowment funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lease, K.; Ingham, E.; Walker, J.C. Challenges in understanding RLK function. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 1998, 1, 388–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Stone, J.M.; Walker, J.C. Plant protein kinase families and signal transduction. Plant Physiol. 1995, 108, 451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Walker, J.C. Structure and function of the receptor-like protein kinases of higher plants. Plant Mol. Biol. 1994, 26, 1599–1609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Shiu, S.-H.; Bleecker, A.B. Plant Receptor-like Kinase Gene Family: Diversity, Function, and Signaling. Sci. Signal. 2001, 2001, re22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Shumayla; Tyagi, S.; Sharma, A.; Singh, K.; Upadhyay, S.K. Genomic dissection and transcriptional profiling of Cysteine-rich receptor-like kinases in five cereals and functional characterization of TaCRK68-A. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 134, 316–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hwang, Y.; Lee, H.; Lee, Y.S.; Cho, H.T. Cell wall-associated ROOT HAIR SPECIFIC 10, a proline-rich receptor-like kinase, is a negative modulator of Arabidopsis root hair growth. J. Exp. Bot. 2016, 67, 2007–2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Won, S.K.; Lee, Y.J.; Lee, H.Y.; Heo, Y.K.; Cho, M.; Cho, H.T. Cis-element- and transcriptome-based screening of root hair-specific genes and their functional characterization in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2009, 150, 1459–1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Borassi, C.; Sede, A.R.; Mecchia, M.A.; Salgado Salter, J.D.; Marzol, E.; Muschietti, J.P.; Estevez, J.M. An update on cell surface proteins containing extensin-motifs. J. Exp. Bot. 2016, 67, 477–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Chen, G.; Wang, J.; Wang, H.; Wang, C.; Tang, X.; Li, J.; Zhang, L.; Song, J.; Hou, J.; Yuan, L. Genome-wide analysis of proline-rich extension-like receptor protein kinase (PERK) in Brassica rapa and its association with the pollen development. BMC Genom. 2020, 21, 401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Borassi, C.; Sede, A.R.; Mecchia, M.A.; Mangano, S.; Marzol, E.; Denita-Juarez, S.P.; Salgado Salter, J.D.; Velasquez, S.M.; Muschietti, J.P.; Estevez, J.M. Proline-rich extensin-like receptor kinases PERK5 and PERK12 are involved in pollen tube growth. FEBS Lett. 2021, 595, 2593–2607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Silva, N.F.; Goring, D.R. The Proline-Rich, Extensin-like Receptor Kinase-1 (PERK1) Gene is Rapidly Induced by Wounding. Plant Mol. Biol. 2002, 50, 667–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Haffani, Y.Z.; Silva-Gagliardi, N.F.; Sewter, S.K.; Aldea, M.G.; Zhao, Z.; Nakhamchik, A.; Cameron, R.K.; Goring, D.R. Altered Expression of PERK Receptor Kinases in Arabidopsis Leads to Changes in Growth and Floral Organ Formation. Plant Signal. Behav. 2006, 1, 251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Nakhamchik, A.; Zhao, Z.; Provart, N.J.; Shiu, S.-H.; Keatley, S.K.; Cameron, R.K.; Goring, D.R. A Comprehensive Expression Analysis of the Arabidopsis Proline-rich Extensin-like Receptor Kinase Gene Family using Bioinformatic and Experimental Approaches. Plant Cell Physiol. 2004, 45, 1875–1881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Bai, L.; Zhang, G.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, W.; Du, Y.; Wu, Z.; Song, C.P. Plasma membrane-associated proline-rich extensin-like receptor kinase 4, a novel regulator of Ca signalling, is required for abscisic acid responses in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2009, 60, 314–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Hwang, I.; Kim, S.Y.; Kim, C.S.; Park, Y.; Tripathi, G.R.; Kim, S.K.; Cheong, H. Over-expression of the IGI1 leading to altered shoot-branching development related to MAX pathway in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol. Biol. 2010, 73, 629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Humphrey, T.V.; Haasen, K.E.; Aldea-Brydges, M.G.; Sun, H.; Zayed, Y.; Indriolo, E.; Goring, D.R. PERK-KIPK-KCBP signalling negatively regulates root growth in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 66, 71–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Qanmber, G.; Liu, J.; Yu, D.; Liu, Z.; Lu, L.; Mo, H.; Ma, S.; Wang, Z.; Yang, Z. Genome-Wide Identification and Characterization of the PERK Gene Family in Gossypium hirsutum Reveals Gene Duplication and Functional Divergence. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 1750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Appels, R.; Eversole, K.; Stein, N.; Feuillet, C.; Keller, B.; Rogers, J.; Pozniak, C.J.; Choulet, F.; Distelfeld, A.; Poland, J.; et al. Shifting the limits in wheat research and breeding using a fully annotated reference genome. Science 2018, 361, eaar7191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Shumayla; Madhu; Singh, K.; Upadhyay, S.K. LysM domain-containing proteins modulate stress response and signalling in Triticum aestivum L. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2021, 189, 104558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Marcussen, T.; Sandve, S.R.; Heier, L.; Spannagl, M.; Pfeifer, M.; Jakobsen, K.S.; Wulff, B.B.H.; Steuernagel, B.; Mayer, K.F.X.; Olsen, O.-A.; et al. Ancient hybridizations among the ancestral genomes of bread wheat. Science 2014, 345, 1250092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Funkhauser, C.; Chory, J. Light control of plant development. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 1997, 13, 203–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Carthew, R.W.; Sontheimer, E.J. Origins and Mechanisms of miRNAs and siRNAs. Cell 2009, 136, 642–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Bai, Q.; Wang, X.; Chen, X.; Shi, G.; Liu, Z.; Guo, C.; Xiao, K. Wheat miRNA taemir408 acts as an essential mediator in plant tolerance to pi deprivation and salt stress via modulating stress-associated physiological processes. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Xin, M.; Wang, Y.; Yao, Y.; Xie, C.; Peng, H.; Ni, Z.; Sun, Q. Diverse set of microRNAs are responsive to powdery mildew infection and heat stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). BMC Plant Biol. 2010, 10, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Hackenberg, M.; Shi, B.J.; Gustafson, P.; Langridge, P. Characterization of phosphorus-regulated miR399 and miR827 and their isomirs in barley under phosphorus-sufficient and phosphorus-deficient conditions. BMC Plant Biol. 2013, 13, 214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Corpet, F. Multiple sequence alignment with hierarchical clustering. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988, 16, 10881–10890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Letunic, I.; Doerks, T.; Bork, P. SMART: Recent updates, new developments and status in 2015. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, D257–D260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sharma, A.; Shumayla; Tyagi, S.; Alok, A.; Singh, K.; Upadhyay, S.K. Thaumatin-like protein kinases: Molecular characterization and transcriptional profiling in five cereal crops. Plant Sci. 2020, 290, 110317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Tyagi, S.; Shumayla; Verma, P.C.; Singh, K.; Upadhyay, S.K. Molecular characterization of ascorbate peroxidase (APX) and APX-related (APX-R) genes in Triticum aestivum L. Genomics 2020, 112, 4208–4223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Li, M.; Knyaz, C.; Tamura, K. MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018, 35, 1547–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Krzywinski, M.; Schein, J.; Birol, I.; Connors, J.; Gascoyne, R.; Horsman, D.; Jones, S.J.; Marra, M.A. Circos: An information aesthetic for comparative genomics. Genome Res. 2009, 19, 1639–1645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Hu, B.; Jin, J.; Guo, A.-Y.; Zhang, H.; Luo, J.; Gao, G. GSDS 2.0: An upgraded gene feature visualization server. Bioinformatics 2015, 31, 1296–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Lescot, M.; Déhais, P.; Thijs, G.; Marchal, K.; Moreau, Y.; Van De Peer, Y.; Rouzé, P.; Rombauts, S. PlantCARE, a database of plant cis-acting regulatory elements and a portal to tools for in silico analysis of promoter sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30, 325–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Chen, C.; Chen, H.; Zhang, Y.; Thomas, H.R.; Frank, M.H.; He, Y.; Xia, R. TBtools: An Integrative Toolkit Developed for Interactive Analyses of Big Biological Data. Mol. Plant 2020, 13, 1194–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Gasteiger, E.; Hoogland, C.; Gattiker, A.; Duvaud, S.; Wilkins, M.R.; Appel, R.D.; Bairoch, A. Protein Identification and Analysis Tools on the ExPASy Server. In The Proteomics Protocols Handbook; Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, USA, 2005; pp. 571–607. [Google Scholar]
  36. Yu, C.-S.; Chen, Y.-C.; Lu, C.-H.; Hwang, J.-K. Prediction of protein subcellular localization. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinforma. 2006, 64, 643–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Stothard, P. The sequence manipulation suite: JavaScript programs for analyzing and formatting protein and DNA sequences. Biotechniques 2000, 28, 1102–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Armenteros, J.J.A.; Salvatore, M.; Emanuelsson, O.; Winther, O.; Von Heijne, G.; Elofsson, A.; Nielsen, H. Detecting sequence signals in targeting peptides using deep learning. Life Sci. Alliance 2019, 2, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Nicholas, K.; Nicholas, H. GeneDoc: A Tool for Editing and Annotating Multiple Sequence Alignments, version 2.7.000; Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center’s National Resource for Biomedical Supercomputing: Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  40. Bailey, T.L.; Boden, M.; Buske, F.A.; Frith, M.; Grant, C.E.; Clementi, L.; Ren, J.; Li, W.W.; Noble, W.S. MEME SUITE: Tools for motif discovery and searching. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37, W202–W208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Pingault, L.; Choulet, F.; Alberti, A.; Glover, N.; Wincker, P.; Feuillet, C.; Paux, E. Deep transcriptome sequencing provides new insights into the structural and functional organization of the wheat genome. Genome Biol. 2015, 16, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Choulet, F.; Alberti, A.; Theil, S.; Glover, N.; Barbe, V.; Daron, J.; Pingault, L.; Sourdille, P.; Couloux, A.; Paux, E.; et al. Structural and functional partitioning of bread wheat chromosome 3B. Science 2014, 345, 1249721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Haas, B.J.; Papanicolaou, A.; Yassour, M.; Grabherr, M.; Blood, P.D.; Bowden, J.; Couger, M.B.; Eccles, D.; Li, B.; Lieber, M.; et al. De novo transcript sequence reconstruction from RNA-seq using the Trinity platform for reference generation and analysis. Nat. Protoc. 2013, 8, 1494–1512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Papatheodorou, I.; Fonseca, N.A.; Keays, M.; Tang, Y.A.; Barrera, E.; Bazant, W.; Burke, M.; Füllgrabe, A.; Fuentes, A.M.-P.; George, N.; et al. Expression Atlas: Gene and protein expression across multiple studies and organisms. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, D246–D251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Zhang, H.; Yang, Y.; Wang, C.; Liu, M.; Li, H.; Fu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Nie, Y.; Liu, X.; Ji, W. Large-scale transcriptome comparison reveals distinct gene activations in wheat responding to stripe rust and powdery mildew. BMC Genom. 2014, 15, 898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Liu, Z.; Xin, M.; Qin, J.; Peng, H.; Ni, Z.; Yao, Y.; Sun, Q. Temporal transcriptome profiling reveals expression partitioning of homeologous genes contributing to heat and drought acclimation in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). BMC Plant Biol. 2015, 15, 152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Zhang, Y.; Liu, Z.; Khan, A.A.; Lin, Q.; Han, Y.; Mu, P.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, H.; Li, L.; Meng, X.; et al. Expression partitioning of homeologs and tandem duplications contribute to salt tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 21476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Seo, J.; Gordish-Dressman, H.; Hoffman, E.P. An interactive power analysis tool for microarray hypothesis testing and generation. Bioinformatics 2006, 22, 808–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kibbe, W.A. OligoCalc: An online oligonucleotide properties calculator. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35, W43–W46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Shumayla; Sharma, S.; Kumar, R.; Mendu, V.; Singh, K.; Upadhyay, S.K. Genomic dissection and expression profiling revealed functional divergence in Triticum aestivum leucine rich repeat receptor like kinases (TaLRRKs). Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 01374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-ΔΔCT method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Sun, F.; Guo, G.; Du, J.; Guo, W.; Peng, H.; Ni, Z.; Sun, Q.; Yao, Y. Whole-genome discovery of miRNAs and their targets in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). BMC Plant Biol. 2014, 14, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Dai, X.; Zhuang, Z.; Zhao, P.X. PsRNATarget: A plant small RNA target analysis server (2017 release). Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, W49–W54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Shannon, P.; Markiel, A.; Ozier, O.; Baliga, N.S.; Wang, J.T.; Ramage, D.; Amin, N.; Schwikowski, B.; Ideker, T. Cytoscape: A software Environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 2003, 13, 2498–2504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Life 12 00941 g001 550
Figure 1. Chromosomal localization of 30 TaPERK genes. The bars represent the chromosomes. The number of the chromosome is written at the top of each bar.
Figure 1. Chromosomal localization of 30 TaPERK genes. The bars represent the chromosomes. The number of the chromosome is written at the top of each bar.
Life 12 00941 g001
Life 12 00941 g002 550
Figure 2. PERK proteins phylogenetic analysis. The evolutionary relationship was investigated using full-length PERK protein sequences of A. thaliana, O. sativa, and T. aestivum. The tree was constructed by the Neighbor-Joining method using the MEGA X and the bootstrap value was set to 1000. The phylogenetic tree is divided into four different distinct clades, each labeled with a different color.
Figure 2. PERK proteins phylogenetic analysis. The evolutionary relationship was investigated using full-length PERK protein sequences of A. thaliana, O. sativa, and T. aestivum. The tree was constructed by the Neighbor-Joining method using the MEGA X and the bootstrap value was set to 1000. The phylogenetic tree is divided into four different distinct clades, each labeled with a different color.
Life 12 00941 g002
Life 12 00941 g003 550
Figure 3. Syntenic association of TaPERK genes with PERK genes of (A) A. thaliana and (B) O. sativa. The figure was generated using the Circos 0.69-9 software. Different colors represent the chromosomes of different plant species.
Figure 3. Syntenic association of TaPERK genes with PERK genes of (A) A. thaliana and (B) O. sativa. The figure was generated using the Circos 0.69-9 software. Different colors represent the chromosomes of different plant species.
Life 12 00941 g003
Life 12 00941 g004 550
Figure 4. Gene and protein structure analyses. The figure represents (A) exon-intron architecture, with exons shown as green boxes and lines representing introns with intron phases; (B) the domain architecture of TaPERK proteins along with the WebLogo generated from the proline-rich region of the extracellular domain of TaPERK proteins; (C) Conserved YXY motif detected in 13 TaPERK proteins; (D) The conserved motif logos among PERK proteins of A. thaliana, O. sativa, and T. aestivum; (E) The schematic representation of conserved motifs of TaPERK proteins investigated using the MEME. Different conserved motifs are represented by different colored boxes. The size of the boxes indicates the length of the conserved motifs.
Figure 4. Gene and protein structure analyses. The figure represents (A) exon-intron architecture, with exons shown as green boxes and lines representing introns with intron phases; (B) the domain architecture of TaPERK proteins along with the WebLogo generated from the proline-rich region of the extracellular domain of TaPERK proteins; (C) Conserved YXY motif detected in 13 TaPERK proteins; (D) The conserved motif logos among PERK proteins of A. thaliana, O. sativa, and T. aestivum; (E) The schematic representation of conserved motifs of TaPERK proteins investigated using the MEME. Different conserved motifs are represented by different colored boxes. The size of the boxes indicates the length of the conserved motifs.
Life 12 00941 g004
Life 12 00941 g005 550
Figure 5. Promoter analysis. The figure represents the various cis-regulatory elements present in the 2 Kb upstream regions of TaPERK genes, and has been shown with different colored boxes. DSRE-drought stress-responsive element; ABRE-Abscisic acid-responsive elements; LRE-Low temperature-responsive element; MBS- MYB binding site involved in drought-inducibility; GRE-Gibberellin responsive element.
Figure 5. Promoter analysis. The figure represents the various cis-regulatory elements present in the 2 Kb upstream regions of TaPERK genes, and has been shown with different colored boxes. DSRE-drought stress-responsive element; ABRE-Abscisic acid-responsive elements; LRE-Low temperature-responsive element; MBS- MYB binding site involved in drought-inducibility; GRE-Gibberellin responsive element.
Life 12 00941 g005
Life 12 00941 g006 550
Figure 6. Heatmaps depicting the relative expression of TaPERK genes in five distinct tissues at various developmental stages and under various stress conditions. The graphs show the correlation analysis of expression data under (A) tissue developmental stages and (B) stress conditions. Heat maps were generated from high throughput RNAseq data for (C) five different tissues (root, stem, leaf, spike, and grain) and three development stages (in Zadoks scale), (D) after 24, 48, and 72 h of Blumeria graminis and Puccinia striiformis inoculation, (E) after 1 and 6 h of heat stress (HS), drought stress (DS), and (F) after 6, 12, 24 and 48 h of salt stress treatments.
Figure 6. Heatmaps depicting the relative expression of TaPERK genes in five distinct tissues at various developmental stages and under various stress conditions. The graphs show the correlation analysis of expression data under (A) tissue developmental stages and (B) stress conditions. Heat maps were generated from high throughput RNAseq data for (C) five different tissues (root, stem, leaf, spike, and grain) and three development stages (in Zadoks scale), (D) after 24, 48, and 72 h of Blumeria graminis and Puccinia striiformis inoculation, (E) after 1 and 6 h of heat stress (HS), drought stress (DS), and (F) after 6, 12, 24 and 48 h of salt stress treatments.
Life 12 00941 g006
Life 12 00941 g007 550
Figure 7. Quantitative expression validation of seven randomly chosen TaPERK genes under HS (heat stress) and DS (drought stress) for 1 and 6 h, as well as salt stress for 6, 12, 24, and 48 h. The data are represented as the mean SD (n = 3) and a significant difference in comparison to the control was determined using two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. * denotes a statistically significant difference at p < 0.05; ** indicates a statistically significant difference at p < 0.01. The standard error is shown on the bar.
Figure 7. Quantitative expression validation of seven randomly chosen TaPERK genes under HS (heat stress) and DS (drought stress) for 1 and 6 h, as well as salt stress for 6, 12, 24, and 48 h. The data are represented as the mean SD (n = 3) and a significant difference in comparison to the control was determined using two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. * denotes a statistically significant difference at p < 0.05; ** indicates a statistically significant difference at p < 0.01. The standard error is shown on the bar.
Life 12 00941 g007
Life 12 00941 g008 550
Figure 8. miRNA interaction network. The networks of interactions between TaPERK genes and the known T. aestivum miRNAs are shown. The psRNATarget program predicted the interaction, and the Cytoscape software created the network. The arrows are aiming towards TaPERK transcripts via miRNAs.
Figure 8. miRNA interaction network. The networks of interactions between TaPERK genes and the known T. aestivum miRNAs are shown. The psRNATarget program predicted the interaction, and the Cytoscape software created the network. The arrows are aiming towards TaPERK transcripts via miRNAs.
Life 12 00941 g008
Table
Table 1. Various characteristic features of TaPERK proteins.
Table 1. Various characteristic features of TaPERK proteins.
Gene NamesGene IDsProtein Length (AA)ChromosomeMol. Wt (kDa)Subcellular LocalizationTransmembrane
TaPERK1-1ATraesCS1A02G1279006581A69.45Plasma membrane1
TaPERK1-1BTraesCS1B02G1470006171B65.24Plasma membrane1
TaPERK1-1DTraesCS1D02G1263006531D69.08Plasma membrane1
TaPERK2-1BTraesCS1B02G0015003591B39.94Plasma membrane0
TaPERK2-1DTraesCS1D02G0043006561D68.94Plasma membrane1
TaPERK3-1BTraesCS1B02G3501004511B48.3Plasma membrane0
TaPERK3-1DTraesCS1D02G3396004511D48.39Plasma membrane0
TaPERK4-3ATraesCS3A02G0039006873A72.43Plasma membrane1
TaPERK4-3BTraesCS3B02G0086006863B71.89Plasma membrane1
TaPERK4-3DTraesCS3D02G0054003413D37.88Cytoplasmic0
TaPERK5-3ATraesCS3A02G1522006303A67.44Plasma membrane1
TaPERK5-3BTraesCS3B02G1793006313B67.47Plasma membrane1
TaPERK5-3DTraesCS3D02G1600006323D67.5Plasma membrane1
TaPERK6-3ATraesCS3A02G2298007203A74.98Plasma membrane1
TaPERK6-3BTraesCS3B02G2591006983B72.99Plasma membrane1
TaPERK7-3ATraesCS3A02G2781006753A72.43Plasma membrane1
TaPERK7-3BTraesCS3B02G3123006773B72.61Plasma membrane1
TaPERK7-3DTraesCS3D02G2784006763D71.26Plasma membrane1
TaPERK8-3ATraesCS3A02G2903007213A75.49Plasma membrane1
TaPERK8-3BTraesCS3B02G3251008113B84.78Plasma membrane1
TaPERK8-3DTraesCS3D02G2901004383D47.15Cytoplasmic0
TaPERK9-4ATraesCS4A02G0775006214A64.5Plasma membrane1
TaPERK9-4BTraesCS4B02G2336006184B64.46Plasma membrane1
TaPERK10-5ATraesCS5A02G4113005735A60.34Plasma membrane1
TaPERK10-5BTraesCS5B02G4150006135B64.69Plasma membrane2
TaPERK11-7ATraesCS7A02G2319006437A66.57Plasma membrane1
TaPERK11-7BTraesCS7B02G1304007647B79.88Plasma membrane1
TaPERK11-UTraesCSU02G104700734Un76.57Plasma membrane1
TaPERK12-7BTraesCS7B02G1310007537B78.66Plasma membrane1
TaPERK12-7DTraesCS7D02G2327007517D78.21Plasma membrane1
Table
Table 2. The gene-specific primers for the qRT-PCR experiment.
Table 2. The gene-specific primers for the qRT-PCR experiment.
Gene NamePrimer Sequences (5′ to 3′)
TraesCS1D02G126300_FACGCCAGGCCACAACAACCCGTCG
TraesCS1D02G126300_RGAGGCTGGCGGCGGCGCTTCTT
TraesCS1A02G127900_FTGGCGGGGGAAGATCGCCTTC
TraesCS1A02G127900_RCCGGAGGCAGCAGAGGCACAC
TraesCS1D02G004300_FTTCCACTTCCACGCCGCCTCCAAC
TraesCS1D02G004300_RAGGCGGCGATGGCTTGGCGTG
TraesCS1B02G001500_FCCGATGTGTTCTCTTTTGGTGTGGTACT
TraesCS1B02G001500_RATGCAGGCGGCTGCAGATTCAATCATA
TraesCS3B02G179300_FTGATCGCGCTGCTGCTCGCCAGC
TraesCS3B02G179300_RGAGGGGCATTATGCTGCCACCCATAT
TraesCS1B02G147000_FGCCCTTGGTGCTGCTAAGGGTTTG
TraesCS1B02G147000_RCCCAAAAGTGCCCATTACTCTTGTTGAC
TraesCS3A02G290300_FACCCCCGGTGAATCCTCCTCC
TraesCS3A02G290300_RTGAACGTGGCACGTCGGTCGG
TaARF_FTGATAGGGAACGTGTTGTTGAGGC
TaARF_RAGCCAGTCAAGACCCTCGTACAAC
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shumayla; Mendu, V.; Singh, K.; Upadhyay, S.K. Insight into the Roles of Proline-Rich Extensin-like Receptor Protein Kinases of Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Life 2022, 12, 941. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12070941

AMA Style

Shumayla, Mendu V, Singh K, Upadhyay SK. Insight into the Roles of Proline-Rich Extensin-like Receptor Protein Kinases of Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Life. 2022; 12(7):941. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12070941

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shumayla, Venugopal Mendu, Kashmir Singh, and Santosh Kumar Upadhyay. 2022. "Insight into the Roles of Proline-Rich Extensin-like Receptor Protein Kinases of Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)" Life 12, no. 7: 941. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12070941

APA Style

Shumayla, Mendu, V., Singh, K., & Upadhyay, S. K. (2022). Insight into the Roles of Proline-Rich Extensin-like Receptor Protein Kinases of Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Life, 12(7), 941. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12070941

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop