Next Article in Journal
Elderly Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Hypertension: Clinical Characteristics, Survival, and Risk Stratification in a Single-Center Prospective Registry
Next Article in Special Issue
Time to Recovery from Systolic Dysfunction Correlates with Left Ventricular Fibrosis in Arrhythmia-Induced Cardiomyopathy
Previous Article in Journal
Possible Correlations between Mean Platelet Volume and Biological, Electrocardiographic, and Echocardiographic Parameters in Patients with Heart Failure
Previous Article in Special Issue
Novel Magnetic Resonance Imaging Tools for Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Risk Stratification
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Life
Volume 14
Issue 2
10.3390/life14020261
life-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Myocardial Perfusion Imaging and C-Reactive Protein in Myocardial Ischemia: A Retrospective Single-Center Study

by
Aidonis Rammos
1,
Aris Bechlioulis
1,
Areti Kekiopoulou
2,
Pavlos Kekiopoulos
2,
Christos S. Katsouras
1 and
Chrissa Sioka
2,*
1
2nd Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece
2
Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Life 2024, 14(2), 261; https://doi.org/10.3390/life14020261
Submission received: 5 January 2024 / Revised: 11 February 2024 / Accepted: 14 February 2024 / Published: 16 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Advances in Cardiac Imaging)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background: Inflammation is an important mechanism in atherosclerosis and plaque formation. C-reactive protein (CRP) is a common inflammatory biomarker associated with the risk of coronary heart disease. We investigated the relationship of CRP with findings from myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). Methods: In this retrospective study, 102 consecutive patients (mean age 71 years, 68% males) who underwent MPI (for diagnostic reasons or quantification of myocardial ischemia) and CRP determination (upper limit: 6 mg/L) within 1 month from MPI were included. The patients had no infection or recent acute coronary syndrome. Results: The median CRP level was 4 mg/L (2, 10) among the study population. Patients with raised CRP had higher summed stress score (SSS) (p = 0.006) and summed rest score (SRS) (p = 0.001) and higher risk for SSS > 3 (OR 9.25, 95% CI 2.03–42.13, p = 0.001) compared to those with low CRP. The association of SSS and SRS with CRP levels was more evident in patients over 70 years (p = 0.027 and p = 0.005, respectively). No significant difference in summed difference score was shown. The two groups had no difference in other risk factors (p > 0.05 for all comparisons). Conclusion: a high level of CRP was associated with the presence and extent of stress-induced myocardial ischemia in MPI.

1. Introduction

Coronary artery disease constitutes the leading etiology of death, suggesting that its effective management is pivotal to reducing morbidity and mortality [1]. In general, atherosclerosis is mainly responsible for cardiovascular disease, with atherosclerotic lesions mainly affecting the large and medium-sized elastic and muscular arteries [2,3]. Inflammation is an important part of the vascular atherosclerotic process, consisting of a slowly progressive inflammatory activity manifested by increasing serum inflammatory cytokines. Inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin 6 (IL-6) stimulate the production of acute-phase reactants, including C-reactive protein (CRP) [4], an easily measured and most widely used biomarker for detecting an acute inflammatory process and monitoring several chronic inflammatory conditions [5,6]. Cumulative evidence indicates that inflammation, both at the focal and systemic levels, plays a role in the disruption of atherosclerotic plaques and acute cardiovascular consequences [7]. Its evaluation in cardiovascular disease appears to be associated with altered CRP and increased cardiovascular risk [8,9,10]. Thus, recent studies tried to elucidate if inflammatory biomarkers such as CRP may identify patients at risk for acute cardiovascular events for early treatment [11].
Apart from its rapid rise and involvement during an acute inflammatory process, an indolent or modest but persistent increase in CRP or high sensitivity CRP (hs-CRP) has been correlated with the presence of coronary artery disease (CAD) and a higher risk of future cardiovascular events in apparently healthy individual [5,12,13,14,15,16]. For example, an increased CRP, even in stable coronary artery disease, was a significant predictor of harmful cardiovascular conditions independently of the specific therapeutic management [17]. In addition, high serum CRP level was associated with the presence but not the degree of CAD in patients with stable angina [18]. Even though an elevated serum CRP level did not correlate with the degree of angiographic abnormalities in coronary arteries, it could possibly help discover new cases of coronary lesions in follow-up examinations [19].
Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) with single photon emission tomography (SPECT) obtains important information on myocardial perfusion and assesses viable or ischemic myocardial tissue in various conditions, such as angina, non-specific chest pain and macrovascular or microvascular CAD [20,21]. Two decades ago, Lombardi et al., in a small, interesting study, showed that high CRP levels might predict exercise-induced MPI ischemia and patient’s outcome [22]. In another small study, patients with angiographically coronary slow flow (possibly due to endothelial inflammation) had higher hs-CRP levels compared to controls. Moreover, in a proportion of patients with an MPI study, hs-CRP predicted positive MPI results [23]. However, data about the association of CRP with MPI findings are limited [22,23,24,25].
In the present study, we aimed to investigate the role of subclinical inflammation in stable coronary artery disease. We investigated the association of serum CRP levels with the presence and extent of ischemia detected after stress-induced MPI SPECT, performed for diagnostic or prognostic reasons.

2. Methods

2.1. Study Population

In this retrospective single-center study, a thorough search of all patients who had MPIs performed in the Nuclear Medicine Department of our University Hospital from 1 January 2022 to 31 December 2022 and CRP measurements within one month before or after MPI were included. Patients were subjected to an MPI SPECT study for diagnostic clinical reasons (suspected CAD) or prognostic (quantification of myocardial ischemia) reasons.
The exclusion criteria included the presence of clinical signs or findings of infection or recent (during the last 3 months before the MPI study) acute coronary syndrome (ST elevation acute myocardial infarction, non-ST elevation acute myocardial infarction, or unstable angina). Additionally, patients with a medical history of an immunologic disease were excluded from the study unless they had stable disease (clinical remission) at the time of the CRP measurement.

2.2. Ethics

The protocol of this study was approved by the Hospital’s Clinical Research Committee. As this was a retrospective analysis of MPI SPECT data, no written patient consent was required.

2.3. Study Protocol

The application of myocardial perfusion SPECT was performed according to the guidelines of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) [26]. The MPI SPECT procedure was explained in detail to the patients. The same data acquisition parameters were used in all patients. A single-day protocol was used, with stress and rest images acquired in that order, approximately two hours apart [27,28]. Medical history information involved symptoms, classic risk factors for CAD like smoking behavior, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, obesity (considered if body mass index was greater than or equal to 30 kg/m2), and family history of CAD, and previous history of diagnosed cardiovascular disease and other health problems such as neurological diseases, rheumatological diseases, mental diseases, etc.
Blood pressure and oxygen saturation were measured in all patients, and a 12-lead electrocardiogram was acquired. Maximal or symptom-limited treadmill exercise (Bruce protocol) was selected for patients capable of performing physical exercise; otherwise, an intravenous dipyridamole (0.56 mg/kg body weight) stress was applied, either alone or in combination with a single-stage 3 min Bruce treadmill exercise. All studies were performed using Technetium-99m tetrofosmin, an MPI radiopharmaceutical that was labeled in-house according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

2.4. Visual Analysis of Myocardial Perfusion SPECT

The recorded raw tomographic data under stress and rest were processed and reconstructed in three planes (short axis, horizontal long axis, and vertical long axis) according to established algorithms and assessed by two experienced board-certified nuclear medicine physicians, using a 17-segment polar map as previously reported [29,30] in stress and rest images. Each segment was scored on a scale of 0 to 4, depending on the degree of the perfusion deficit. Between the two readers, no serious inter-reader variability was seen. The differences were approximately ±2. A summed stress score (SSS) of over 3 was considered myocardial ischemia [SSS corresponds to either stress-induced or resting perfusion defects (i.e., ischemia + infarct)]. Myocardial ischemia was mild for SSS 4 to 8, moderate for SSS 9 to 13, and high if SSS was above thirteen [31]. Summed rest score (SRS) corresponds to perfusion defects at rest indicating probable myocardial scar. Furthermore, the summed difference score (SDS = SSS − SRS) is an important measurement since it denotes the presence of reversibility after exercise or pharmacologic stress.

2.5. CRP Measurements

All enrolled subjects had a serum CRP value available within one month from the MPI SPECT. For CRP measurements, the quantitative IMAGER 800 Immunochemistry System (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA) was used, which applies rate nephelometry and performs a patented dynamic blanking algorithm for selected analytes; the upper limit for CRP in our Institution is 6 mg/L.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Continuous data are presented as mean ± standard deviation or median values (interquartile range), while dichotomous data are presented as numbers (percentage). Comparisons between the two groups of patients (high vs. low CRP) were made using the Fischer χ2 test for dichotomous variables, and Student’s t-test and the Mann–Whitney U test for continuous variables. General linear model analysis was used to detect potential interactions of CRP levels with other parameters and associations with SPECT findings. Linear and logistic regression analysis was implemented to identify independent predictors of SSS, SRS, and SDS treated either as continuous or dichotomous variables. A two-tailed p-value < 0.05 was used to determine significant associations. All analyses were performed using the software IBM SPSS Statistics version 21 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA).

3. Results

Overall, 102 patients (69 male) from the medical records of the Nuclear Medicine Department of our Hospital met the inclusion criteria. Our population characteristics are presented in Table 1.
Among them, 69 patients were subjected to an MPI scan due to non-specific cardiac symptoms (workup to rule out CAD). The mean age of all participants was 71 years; 68% were males, and 32% had a history of “obstructive” macrovascular CAD (confirmed via a previous coronary angiography). The prevalence of classic risk factors was 77% for hypertension, 39% for diabetes mellitus, 64% for dyslipidemia, and 26% for smoking. Moreover, 26% of the population was obese, and 38% had increased CRP values (>6 mg/L). The median CRP value was 4 mg/L (2 mg/L, 10 mg/L) in the total population [2 (2, 3) mg/L in the low CRP group versus 12 (9, 23) mg/L in the high CRP group, p < 0.001)].
The SPECT study results revealed that 78% of the participants had a high summed stress score (SSS > 3), and 60% had a high summed difference score (SDS > 1). Patients with increased CRP had higher SSS (p = 0.006) and SRS (p = 0.001) compared to patients with low CRP. In addition, a higher risk for increased SSS > 3 was noted in patients with increased CRP (OR 9.25, 95% CI 2.03, 42.13, p = 0.001). However, no differences were observed in other studied clinical risk factors between the two groups (p > 0.05 for all comparisons) (Table 1).
Figure 1 shows stress-rest bull’s eye images of three patients. Patient (A) had a normal MPI (SSS = 0) and a normal CRP value of 2 mg/L. Patients (B) and (C) had abnormal MPIs. The SSS of the second patient (B) was 19, SRS 17, and SDS 2, indicating severe myocardial ischemia with irreversible lesions. This patient had a high CRP of 24 mg/L. Finally, the SSS of the third patient (C) was 15, SRS 5, and SDS 10 (severe myocardial ischemia, with good reversibility—green arrows), and CRP was 11 mg/L.
The association of SSS and SRS with CRP levels was more evident in older patients, i.e., >70 years old, p = 0.027 and p = 0.005, respectively, for interactions with age (Figure 2). No significant differences in SDS were shown between patients with increased versus low CRP levels.
In linear regression analysis, independent predictors of (1) increasing SRS were male gender (B 5.07, p < 0.001) and CRP > 6 mg/L (B 3.51, p = 0.005) (R2 0.21, p < 0.001), and (2) increasing SSS, were male gender (B 5.48, p = 0.001) and CRP > 6 mg/L (B 3.32, p = 0.037) (R2 0.15, p < 0.001). No studied variable was associated with SDS in linear regression analysis. In logistic regression analysis, independent predictors of (1) increased SSS (i.e., >3) were male gender (OR 6.53, p = 0.001) and CRP > 6 mg/L (OR 9.53, p = 0.005), and (2) was increased SDS (i.e., >1) and history of dyslipidemia (OR 2.47, p = 0.033).

4. Discussion

Nuclear medicine is a medical specialty using radioactive isotopes for imaging and treatment, providing important disease information in several medical specialties, including cardiology [32,33,34]. One of the most widely used methods in nuclear cardiology is MPI SPECT, which may be used either for diagnosis or prognosis of various heart conditions [20,23].
MPI SPECT represents a precision medicine tool able to accurately differentiate between normal and abnormal processes inside the heart [35,36]. Various radiotracers may be used for the MPI SPECT, such as technetium-99m tetrofosmin or technetium-99 m sestamibi, which are dispersed passively within the myocardium depending on their viability, and thallium-201, which is distributed actively within the myocardial cells. These radiotracers were injected, and pictures were taken both at rest and during stress provoked either by exercise or pharmacologically. In cases where the radiotracer uptake was normal both at rest and exercise, the examination was normal, denoting healthy myocardial tissue. When there was poor uptake post-exercise and improved uptake during rest, the examination indicated a reversible perfusion defect. If the uptake was poor during exercise and did not improve at rest, the examination indicated that the myocardial tissue was constantly injured, such as after a myocardial infarction [20]. MPI, apart from detecting coronary artery disease, can assess the myocardial status of patients with coronary microvascular dysfunction, which represents an abnormal vasoconstrictor/vasodilatory coronary capability [37].
CRP represents a greatly conserved plasma protein involved in the inflammatory process [12], consisting of five subunits that bind to phosphocholine in a Ca2+-dependent manner. It represents an acute-phase plasma protein and a constituent of the acute-phase response [38]. Recent evidence indicates that atherosclerosis is linked to vascular inflammation involving both innate and adaptive immune responses and the mobilization of monocytes, macrophages, neutrophils, and lymphocytes [39]. A prospective study of 316 patients with STEMI managed with primary PCI reported that the estimated CRP velocity, defined as the value of the first CRP measurement divided by the time from the patient’s first reported symptom, was associated with microvascular infarct pathology [40]. A strong relation between CRP and the future risk of a fatal or non-fatal coronary event was found. A 1-SD increase in the log-transformed value of CRP was associated with a remarkable 50% increase in coronary risk, and subjects in the highest quintile of the CRP distribution thus showed a 2.6-fold increase in their risk of a future coronary event [41]. Furthermore, local and systemic inflammation is gaining ground as a potential contributing mechanism in vasospastic angina [42], especially the inflammation associated with the perivascular adipose tissue [43]; CRP might be a useful biomarker in that direction.
However, apart from these, in many studies, raised CRP values due to subclinical infections cannot be excluded. An infectious pathogenesis theory as a causative background of atherosclerosis has also been suggested [44].
In the current study, we studied the association between increased CRP values and abnormal MPI findings. A significant association of impaired myocardial perfusion in SPECT imaging with prevalent inflammation (as assessed by increased CRP levels, i.e., >6 mg/L) was shown; this effect was more prominent in older patients (>70 years old). Subclinical inflammation is an integral part of the atherosclerotic process and its progression and has been previously associated with increased risk for cardiovascular events [45,46]. Whether levels of inflammation may be related to the presence of myocardial ischemia in patients with symptoms suggestive of CAD is a matter of ongoing research. A limited number of studies have reported a significant positive association of inflammation with MPI SPECT ischemia findings, although not consistently [22,24,25].
In patients with symptomatic angina or a history of myocardial infarction, the extent of stress-induced myocardial ischemia in SPECT was higher in case of increased CRP levels (approximately 5-fold increased risk); high CRP levels predicted both exercise-induced ischemia and outcome [22], while in patients with stable CAD who underwent SPECT imaging and/or new regional wall motion abnormality on transthoracic echocardiography during mental stress, each 1 mg/L increase in CRP was associated with a 20% higher risk of reversible perfusion defect/ischemia (in univariate logistic regression analysis) [47] and this relationship remained in multivariate analysis. The increasing risk for positive ischemic tests across tertiles of CRP demonstrated a non-significant trend. However, we must take into account that non-cardiac stress-related disorders may be associated with higher inflammation markers (including CRP) and greater risk of cardiovascular diseases [48,49]. In high-risk asymptomatic patients (based on the European SCORE model) without known CAD, hs-CRP has been found to be an independent predictor of myocardial perfusion defects and has been suggested to be used as a criterion to guide myocardial SPECT imaging [30], which also seems to apply for patients with chronic kidney disease [50,51,52]. Majstorov et al. showed that in patients with confirmed or suspected CAD, those patients with mild or moderate perfusion defects in SPECT had significantly higher CRP values (2.7 mg/L vs. 4.2 mg/L, p = 0.01) compared to patients with normal or near normal myocardial perfusion [53]. In contrast to these results, Rathcke et al. showed that in a population of patients with an intermediate risk of having CAD or with a known history of CAD, those subjects with abnormal MPI had similar CRP levels with those with normal MPI [54]. Interleukin-6, YKL-40, and N-terminal fragment of the prohormone brain natriuretic peptide levels were significantly elevated in the group with abnormal MPI [53,54]. Recently, another index, i.e., the ratio of two inflammatory markers (CRP to albumin; CAR), was investigated for the prediction of ischemia. In multivariate analysis, CAR showed the best capability to discriminate myocardial ischemia detected by MPI [55]. Finally, whether changes in inflammatory indices may result in changes in SPECT imaging is not known. However, results from the PLATO Trial have shown that one month after myocardial infarction, the degree of change (decrease) of hs-CRP is more pronounced in patients without obstructive compared to patients with obstructive CAD [56].
We found that the association of SSS and SRS with CRP levels was more evident in older (>70 years) patients. This may be explained by the higher risk of CAD in the elderly population since age is the strongest risk factor related to CAD [57]. We could hypothesize that the possibility of this association to be significant is greater when the areas of ischemia in MPI are longer and more frequent. Regarding the validity of the method in the elderly, Rai et al. evaluated the optimal non-invasive stress tests in elderly patients [58]. In their meta-analysis, the test with the greater risk (abnormal compared to normal stress) of future cardiac events was found to be MPI. These results indicated that MPI accurately stratified risk in the elderly [59]. Moreover, a second hypothesis could be that our result is the effect of confounding bias. Baseline CRP or hs-CRP levels increase with aging [59,60,61,62], and therefore, both higher levels of CRP and the presence of ischemia in MPI could be the consequences of aging. In that case, it would be expected that MPI cannot have any prognostic value that is not truthful [58].
The predictive role of CRP has also been investigated in relation to other myocardial perfusion imaging modalities. In patients with microvascular dysfunction and ischemia and no obstructive coronary arteries (INOCA) who underwent positron emission tomography, those who had CRP > 3 mg/L had a more severe impairment of coronary flow reserve (2.14 ± 0.33 vs. 3.16 ± 0.76; p = 0.001); furthermore, a negative correlation between CRP levels and coronary flow reserve (R = −0.49, p = 0.02) was shown [63]. In patients with typical angina pectoris without CAD, increased CRP levels were associated with an impaired myocardial perfusion reserve index following stimulation with intravenous adenosine and intracoronary acetylcholine in cardiac magnetic resonance [64].
According to the last published survey, the total number of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy studies in European countries was lower than invasive coronary angiographies (ICAs) during the same time period [65,66]. Despite patients with positive results on MPI being significantly more likely to have obstructive CAD [as assessed by invasive coronary angiography (ICA)] than those who did not undergo non-invasive testing, MPI is performed in only one out of four patients before elective ICA [67]. If we take into consideration that most (but not all) asymptomatic or stable CAD patients have a benign prognosis and they would be treated conservatively [67], it is essential not only to increase MPI diagnostic yield but also to find additional markers in combination with MPI results that optimize the impact on prognosis of MPI. Can CRP or other inflammatory indices be used in combination with MPI for these purposes? Does combined testing (MPI and CRP) improve the probability of obstructive CAD? Would the addition of an inflammatory marker beyond MPI results help us to make a decision about performing or not angioplasty and stenting in an angiographically non-significant (or even significant) lesion? The hypothesis is that in patients with ischemia in MPI, inflammatory indices are higher if coronary artery plaque burden is higher in angiography or (even better) intravascular imaging. There are no data about this hypothesis, and studies to address this area are needed. Nowadays, the invasive evaluation of ischemia by means of physiological assessment remains the gold standard for percutaneous coronary intervention decision-making [68], although it is still (as the MPI testing) underused in real-life clinical practice [69,70].

Limitations

Our study was retrospective and included a limited number of variables in association with SPECT findings. CRP values were not acquired on the same day of the SPECT in most cases but rather assessed on a close date to the exam. Furthermore, we did not use an hs-CRP assay, which is the case in most of the previous epidemiological studies; hence, results may be different in studies using different assays. Another important limitation is the fact that we did not have an invasive coronary angiography to associate CRP values with the existence and extension of CAD. Finally, we used the cut-off value of 6 mg/L to distinguish patients with high or low CRP values. Although other values have been used (and patients with CRP levels between 3 and 6 mg/L are not considered as they have normal values from many investigators), other studies showed that this value may have the best prognostic value [71].

5. Conclusions

We investigated the association of serum CRP levels with MPI SPECT findings in a population of patients with suspected or stable CAD. A high level of CRP has been found to be associated with the presence and extent of stress-induced myocardial ischemia in MPI SPECT, indicating that subclinical inflammation might be associated not only with the presence of coronary atherosclerosis but also with the severity of coronary plaque burden and clinical manifestation of ischemia. Larger prospective studies are needed to examine whether indices of subclinical inflammation add diagnostic value to an MPI SPECT study so that they would be part of a diagnostic workup for CAD.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.S.K. and C.S.; Methodology, A.K., P.K. and A.B.; Formal analysis, A.B.; Investigation, A.K.; Recourses, A.K. and P.K.; Writing—original draft preparation, A.R.; Writing—review and editing, C.S. and C.S.K.; Supervision, C.S. and C.S.K.; Project administration, C.S.K. and C.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board (or Ethics Committee) of the University Hospital of Ioannina (protocol code: 34; date of approval: 11 February 2021).

Informed Consent Statement

Patient consent was waived because, in retrospective studies, our Hospital’s Clinical Research Committee does not require written patient consent. Additionally, all the collected data were coded with no patient personal information provided, and thus, no patient could be identified.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy issues.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Benjamin, E.J.; Blaha, M.J.; Chiuve, S.E.; Cushman, M.; Das, S.R.; Deo, R.; de Ferranti, S.D.; Floyd, J.; Fornage, M.; Gillespie, C.; et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2017 update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation 2017, 135, e146–e603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ross, R. Atherosclerosis—An Inflammatory Disease. N. Eng. J. Med. 1999, 340, 115–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Stary, H.C.; Chandler, A.B.; Glagov, S.; Guyton, J.R.; Insull, W.; Rosenfeld, M.E.; Schaffer, S.A.; Schwartz, C.J.; Wagner, W.D.; Wissler, R.W. A definition of initial, fatty streak, and intermediate lesions of atherosclerosis. A report from the Committee on Vascular Lesions of the Council on Arteriosclerosis, American Heart Association. Circulation 1994, 89, 2462–2478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hansson, G.K. Inflammation, atherosclerosis, and coronary artery disease. N. Eng. J. Med. 2005, 352, 1685–1695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Lapic, I.; Padoan, A.; Bozzato, D.; Plebani, M. Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate and C-Reactive Protein in Acute Inflammation. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 2020, 153, 14–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Ridker, P.M.; Everett, B.M.; Thuren, T.; MacFadyen, J.G.; Chang, W.H.; Ballantyne, C.; Fonseca, F.; Nicolau, J.; Koenig, W.; Anker, S.D.; et al. Antiinflammatory Therapy with Canakinumab for Atherosclerotic Disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 377, 1119–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Madjid, M.; Willerson, J.T. Inflammatory markers in coronary heart disease. Br. Med. Bull. 2011, 100, 23–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Eschborn, S.; Weitkamp, J.H. Procalcitonin versus C-reactive protein: Review of kinetics and performance for diagnosis of neonatal sepsis. J. Perinatol. 2019, 39, 893–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Darooghegi Mofrad, M.; Milajerdi, A.; Koohdani, F.; Surkan, P.J.; Azadbakht, L. Garlic Supplementation Reduces Circulating C-reactive Protein, Tumor Necrosis Factor, and Interleukin-6 in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J. Nutr. 2019, 149, 605–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dick, A.G.; Magill, N.; White, T.C.H.; Kokkinakis, M.; Norman-Taylor, F. C-reactive protein: What to expect after bony hip surgery for nonambulatory children and adolescents with cerebral palsy. J. Pediatr. Orthop. B 2019, 28, 309–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Calabro, P.; Golia, E.; Yeh, E.T. Role of C-reactive protein in acute myocardial infarction and stroke: Possible therapeutic approaches. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2012, 13, 4–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Black, S.; Kushner, I.; Samols, D. C-reactive Protein. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 48487–48490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration; Kaptoge, S.; Di Angelantonio, E.; Lowe, G.; Pepys, M.B.; Thompson, S.G.; Collins, R.; Danesh, J. C-reactive protein concentration and risk of coronary heart disease, stroke, and mortality: An individual participant meta-analysis. Lancet 2010, 375, 132–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Jan, M.I.; Khan, R.A.; Fozia; Ahmad, I.; Khan, N.; Urooj, K.; Shah, A.U.H.A.; Khan, A.U.; Ali, T.; Ishtiaq, A.; et al. C-Reactive Protein and High-Sensitive Cardiac Troponins Correlate with Oxidative Stress in Valvular Heart Disease Patients. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2022, 2022, 5029853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Casas, J.P.; Shah, T.; Hingorani, A.D.; Danesh, J.; Pepys, M.B. C-reactive protein and coronary heart disease: A critical review. J. Intern. Med. 2008, 264, 295–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yousuf, O.; Mohanty, B.D.; Martin, S.S.; Joshi, P.H.; Blaha, M.J.; Nasir, K.; Blumenthal, R.S.; Budoff, M.J. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein and cardiovascular disease: A resolute belief or an elusive link? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2013, 62, 397–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Sabatine, M.S.; Morrow, D.A.; Jablonski, K.A.; Rice, M.M.; Warnica, J.W.; Domanski, M.J.; Hsia, J.; Gersh, B.J.; Rifai, N.; Ridker, P.M.; et al. Prognostic significance of the Centers for Disease Control/American Heart Association high-sensitivity C-reactive protein cut points for cardiovascular and other outcomes in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Circulation 2007, 115, 1528–1536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Younan, H.; Al-Khashab, K. Correlation of high sensitivity C-reactive protein to presence, extent and severity of angiographic coronary artery disease in patients with chronic stable angina. Egypt. Heart J. 2008, 60, 53–60. [Google Scholar]
  19. Razban, M.M.; Eslami, M.; Bagherzadeh, A. The relationship between serum levels of hs-CRP and coronary lesion severity. Clujul Med. 2016, 89, 322–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Patel, J.J.; Alzahrani, T. Myocardial Perfusion Scan. In StatPearls; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  21. Kotsalou, I.; Georgoulias, P.; Karydas, I.; Fourlis, S.; Sioka, C.; Zoumboulidis, A.; Demakopoulos, N. A rare case of myocardial infarction and ischemia in a cannabis-addicted patient. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2007, 32, 130–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lombardi, F.; Tundo, F.; Terranova, P.; Battezzati, P.M.; Ramella, M.; Bestetti, A.; Tagliabue, L. Prognostic value of C-reactive protein in patients with stress induced myocardial ischemia. Int. J. Cardiol. 2005, 98, 313–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Yurtdas, M.; Yaylali, Y.T.; Kaya, Y.; Ozdemir, M. Increased plasma high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and myeloperoxidase levels may predict ischemia during myocardial perfusion imaging in slow coronary flow. Arch. Med. Res. 2014, 45, 63–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Fleming, R.M.; Harrington, G.M. What is the relationship between myocardial perfusion imaging and coronary artery disease risk factors and markers of inflammation? Angiology 2008, 59, 16–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Mitevska, I.; Srbinovska, E.; Stojanovska, L.; Antova, E.; Apostolopoulos, V.; Bosevski, M. Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography Myocardial Ischemia Detection in High-Risk Asymptomatic Patients: Correlation with Coronary Calcium Score and High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein. Indian J. Nucl. Med. 2019, 34, 99–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Verberne, H.J.; Acampa, W.; Anagnostopoulos, C.; Ballinger, J.; Bengel, F.; De Bondt, P.; Buechel, R.R.; Cuocolo, A.; van Eck-Smit, B.L.; Flotats, A.; et al. EANM procedural guidelines for radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging with SPECT and SPECT/CT: 2015 revision. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2015, 42, 1929–1940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sioka, C.; Moulias, C.; Voulgari, P.V.; Fotopoulos, A.; Bassukas, I.D. Single photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis. Nucl. Med. Rev. Cent. East Eur. 2021, 24, 46–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Fotopoulos, A.; Papadimitropoulos, K.; Papadopoulos, A.; Lakkas, L.; Spiliotopoulou, M.; Kotrotsios, T.D.; Pappas, K.; Notopoulos, A.; Sioka, C. Myocardial ischemia in female patients with rheumatoid arthritis assessed with single photon emission tomography-myocardial perfusion imaging. Nucl. Med. Rev. Cent. East Eur. 2019, 22, 8–13. [Google Scholar]
  29. Fotopoulos, A.; Petrikis, P.; Iakovou, I.; Papadopoulos, A.; Sakelariou, K.; Gkika, E.; Lakkas, L.; Touzios, C.; Pappas, K.; Klaroudas, A.; et al. The impact of depression and anxiety in prognosis of patients undergoing myocardial perfusion imaging with 99mTc tetrofosmin SPECT for evaluation of possible myocardial ischemia. Nucl. Med. Rev. Cent. East Eur. 2020, 23, 58–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Batsi, C.; Gkika, E.; Astrakas, L.; Papadopoulos, A.; Iakovou, I.; Dogoritis, A.; Fotopoulos, A.; Sioka, C. Vitamin D Deficiency as a Risk Factor for Myocardial Ischemia. Medicina 2021, 57, 774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sioka, C.; Zotou, P.; Papafaklis, M.I.; Bechlioulis, A.; Sakellariou, K.; Rammos, A.; Gkika, E.; Lakkas, L.; Alexiou, S.; Kekiopoulos, P.; et al. Body Mass Index Is Independently Associated with the Presence of Ischemia in Myocardial Perfusion Imaging. Medicina 2022, 58, 987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sioka, C.; Assimakopoulos, A.; Fotopoulos, A. The diagnostic role of (18)F fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with fever of unknown origin. Eur. J. Clin. Investig. 2015, 45, 601–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Sioka, C.; Fotopoulos, A.; Kyritsis, A.P. Paraneoplastic neurological syndromes and the role of PET imaging. Oncology 2010, 78, 150–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Lakkas, L.; Serim, B.D.; Fotopoulos, A.; Iakovou, I.; Doumas, A.; Korkmaz, U.; Michalis, L.K.; Sioka, C. Infection of cardiac prosthetic valves and implantable electronic devices: Early diagnosis and treatment. Acta Cardiol. 2021, 76, 569–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Giardino, A.; Gupta, S.; Olson, E.; Sepulveda, K.; Lenchik, L.; Ivanidze, J.; Rakow-Penner, R.; Patel, M.J.; Subramaniam, R.M.; Ganeshan, D. Role of imaging in the era of precision medicine. Acad. Radiol. 2017, 24, 639–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sheikh, A. Evolution of Quantification in clinical nuclear medicine: A brief overview of salient uses and upcoming trends. J. Nucl. Med. Radiat. Ther. 2018, 9, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sioka, C.; Georgiou, G.; Katsouras, C.; Pappas, K.; Kiortsis, D.N.; Fotopoulos, A.; Petrikis, P. Silent severe myocardial ischemia in a past illicit drug user imaged with myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. Perfusion 2022, 37, 863–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Pathak, A.; Agrawal, A. Evolution of C-Reactive Protein. Front. Immunol. 2019, 30, 943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Moriya, J. Critical roles of inflammation in atherosclerosis. J. Cardiol. 2019, 73, 22–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Holzknecht, M.; Tiller, C.; Reindl, M.; Lechner, I.; Troger, F.; Hosp, M.; Mayr, A.; Brenner, C.; Klug, G.; Bauer, A.; et al. C-reactive protein velocity predicts microvascular pathology after acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Int. J. Cardiol. 2021, 1, 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Koenig, W.; Sund, M.; Frohlich, M.; Fischer, H.G.; Lowel, H.; Döring, A.; Hutchinson, W.L.; Pepys, M.B. C-Reactive protein, a sensitive marker of inflammation, predicts future risk of coronary heart disease in initially healthy middle-aged men: Results from the MONICA (Monitoring Trends and Determinants in Cardiovascular Disease) Augsburg Cohort Study, 1984 to 1992. Circulation 1999, 99, 237–242. [Google Scholar]
  42. Hung, M.Y.; Hung, M.J. Relationship between Inflammation and Vasospastic Angina. Medicina 2023, 59, 318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Lim, G. Perivascular inflammation in coronary spasm. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2018, 15, 134–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Leinonen, M.; Saikku, P. Evidence for infectious agents in cardiovascular disease and atherosclerosis. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2002, 2, 11–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Shah, P.K.; Lecis, D. Inflammation in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. F1000Research 2019, 8, 1402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Toth, P.P. Subclinical atherosclerosis: What it is, what it means and what we can do about it. Int. J. Clin. Pract. 2008, 62, 1246–1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Shah, R.; Burg, M.M.; Vashist, A.; Collins, D.; Liu, J.; Jadbabaie, F.; Graeber, B.; Earley, C.; Lampert, R.; Soufer, R. C-reactive protein and vulnerability to mental stress-induced myocardial ischemia. Mol. Med. 2006, 12, 269–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kennedy, E.; Niedzwiedz, C.L. The association of anxiety and stress-related disorders with C-reactive protein (CRP) within UK Biobank. Brain Behav. Immun. Health 2012, 19, 100410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Song, H.; Fang, F.; Arnberg, F.K.; Mataix-Cols, D.; Fernández de la Cruz, L.; Almqvist, C.; Fall, K.; Lichtenstein, P.; Thorgeirsson, G.; Valdimarsdóttir, U.A. Stress related disorders and risk of cardiovascular disease: Population based, sibling controlled cohort study. BMJ 2019, 365, l1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Kim, S.B.; Lee, S.K.; Park, J.S.; Moon, D.H. Prevalence of coronary artery disease using thallium-201 single photon emission computed tomography among patients newly undergoing chronic peritoneal dialysis and its association with mortality. Am. J. Nephrol. 2004, 24, 448–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Nakamura, S.; Kawano, Y.; Nakajima, K.; Hase, H.; Joki, N.; Hatta, T.; Nishimura, S.; Moroi, M.; Nakagawa, S.; Kasai, T.; et al. Prognostic study of cardiac events in Japanese patients with chronic kidney disease using ECG-gated myocardial Perfusion imaging: Final 3-year report of the J-ACCESS 3 study. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 2019, 26, 431–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kim, S.B.; Min, W.K.; Lee, S.K.; Park, J.S.; Hong, C.D.; Yang, W.S. Persistent elevation of C-reactive protein and ischemic heart disease in patients with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2002, 39, 342–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Majstorov, V.; Pop Gjorceva, D.; Vaskova, O.; Vavlukis, M.; Peovska, I.; Maksimovic, J.; Kuzmanovska, S.; Zdraveska-Kocovska, M. C-reactive protein in patients with normal perfusion and mild to moderate perfusion defects who have undergone myocardial perfusion imaging with 99m-Tc sestamibi gated spect. Prilozi 2008, 29, 67–76. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  54. Rathcke, C.N.; Kjøller, E.; Fogh-Andersen, N.; Zerahn, B.; Vestergaard, H. NT-proBNP and circulating inflammation markers in prediction of a normal myocardial scintigraphy in patients with symptoms of coronary artery disease. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e14196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Efe, S.Ç.; Özdemir Candan, Ö.; Gündoğan, C.; Öz, A.; Yüksel, Y.; Ayca, B.; Çermik, T.F. Value of C-reactive Protein/Albumin Ratio for Predicting Ischemia in Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy. Mol. Imaging Radionucl. Ther. 2020, 29, 112–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Hjort, M.; Eggers, K.M.; Lakic, T.G.; Lindbäck, J.; Budaj, A.; Cornel, J.H.; Giannitsis, E.; Katus, H.A.; Siegbahn, A.; Storey, R.F.; et al. Biomarker Concentrations and Their Temporal Changes in Patients with Myocardial Infarction and Nonobstructive Compared With Obstructive Coronary Arteries: Results From the PLATO Trial. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2023, 12, e027466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Rodgers, J.L.; Jones, J.; Bolleddu, S.I.; Vanthenapalli, S.; Rodgers, L.E.; Shah, K.; Karia, K.; Panguluri, S.K. Cardiovascular Risks Associated with Gender and Aging. J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2019, 6, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Rai, M.; Baker, W.L.; Parker, M.W.; Heller, G.V. Meta-analysis of optimal risk stratification in patients >65 years of age. Am. J. Cardiol. 2012, 110, 1092–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Singh, T.; Newman, A.B. Inflammatory markers in population studies of aging. Ageing Res. Rev. 2011, 10, 319–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Tang, Y.; Fung, E.; Xu, A.; Lan, H.Y. C-reactive protein and ageing. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 2017, 44 (Suppl. S1), 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Tang, Y.; Liang, P.; Chen, J.; Fu, S.; Liu, B.; Feng, M.; Lin, B.; Lee, B.; Xu, A.; Lan, H.Y. The baseline levels and risk factors for high-sensitive C-reactive protein in Chinese healthy population. Immun. Ageing 2018, 15, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. de Almeida Roediger, M.; de Fátima Nunes Marucci, M.; Duim, E.L.; Santos, J.L.F.; de Oliveira Duarte, Y.A.; de Oliveira, C. Inflammation and quality of life in later life: Findings from the health, well-being and aging study (SABE). Health Qual. Life Outcomes 2019, 17, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Recio-Mayoral, A.; Rimoldi, O.E.; Camici, P.G.; Kaski, J.C. Inflammation and microvascular dysfunction in cardiac syndrome X patients without conventional risk factors for coronary artery disease. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 2013, 6, 660–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Wöhrle, J.; Nusser, T.; Merkle, N.; Kestler, H.A.; Grebe, O.C.; Marx, N.; Höher, M.; Kochs, M.; Hombach, V. Myocardial perfusion reserve in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Correlation to coronary microvascular dysfunction. J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson. 2006, 8, 781–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Reyes, E.; Wiener, S.; Underwood, S.R.; European Council of Nuclear Cardiology. Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in Europe 2007: A survey of the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2012, 39, 160–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Cook, S.; Walker, A.; Hügli, O.; Togni, M.; Meier, B. Percutaneous coronary interventions in Europe: Prevalence, numerical estimates, and projections based on data up to 2004. Clin. Res. Cardiol. 2007, 96, 375–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Buechel, R.R.; Kaufmann, B.A.; Tobler, D.; Wild, D.; Zellweger, M.J. Non-invasive nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging improves the diagnostic yield of invasive coronary angiography. Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2015, 16, 842–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Knuuti, J.; Wijns, W.; Saraste, A.; Capodanno, D.; Barbato, E.; Funck-Brentano, C.; Prescott, E.; Storey, R.F.; Deaton, C.; Cuisset, T.; et al. ESC Scientific Document Group. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur. Heart J. 2020, 41, 407–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Toth, G.; Johnson, G.; Wijns, N.P.; Toth, B.; Achim, A.; Fournier, S.; Barbato, E. Revascularization decisions in patients with chronic coronary syndromes: Results of the second International Survey on Interventional Strategy (ISIS-2). Int. J. Cardiol. 2021, 336, 38–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Achim, A.; Leibundgut, G. FAME 3 fails to defame coronary artery bypass grafting: What went wrong in the percutaneous coronary intervention arm? Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2022, 62, ezac036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Bian, J.; Guo, S.; Huang, T.; Li, X.; Zhao, S.; Chu, Z.; Li, Z. CRP as a potential predictor of outcome in acute ischemic stroke. Biomed. Rep. 2023, 18, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Life 14 00261 g001
Figure 1. Three patients with different stress-rest bull’s eyes MPIs are depicted. (A) normal MPI and normal CRP; (B) abnormal MPI and high CRP; (C) abnormal MPI and high CRP; black arrows show defects; green arrowheads show reversible defects. MPI: myocardial perfusion imaging; SSS: summed stress score; SRS: summed rest score; SDS: summed difference score; CRP: C-reactive protein.
Figure 1. Three patients with different stress-rest bull’s eyes MPIs are depicted. (A) normal MPI and normal CRP; (B) abnormal MPI and high CRP; (C) abnormal MPI and high CRP; black arrows show defects; green arrowheads show reversible defects. MPI: myocardial perfusion imaging; SSS: summed stress score; SRS: summed rest score; SDS: summed difference score; CRP: C-reactive protein.
Life 14 00261 g001
Life 14 00261 g002
Figure 2. (Upper left): high CRP is associated with a higher SSS (p = 0.006) in overall population. (Upper right): high CRP is associated with a higher SRS (p = 0.001) in overall population. (Lower left): the correlation of increased CRP with a higher SSS (p = 0.027) is more evident in patients older than 70 years old. (Lower right): the correlation of increased CRP with a higher SRS (p = 0.005) is more evident in patients older than 70 years old. SSS = summed stress score SRS = summed rest score.
Figure 2. (Upper left): high CRP is associated with a higher SSS (p = 0.006) in overall population. (Upper right): high CRP is associated with a higher SRS (p = 0.001) in overall population. (Lower left): the correlation of increased CRP with a higher SSS (p = 0.027) is more evident in patients older than 70 years old. (Lower right): the correlation of increased CRP with a higher SRS (p = 0.005) is more evident in patients older than 70 years old. SSS = summed stress score SRS = summed rest score.
Life 14 00261 g002
Table 1. Population characteristics and association of CRP levels with various variables.
Table 1. Population characteristics and association of CRP levels with various variables.
Total Population
N = 102		CRP ≤ 6 mg/L
N = 63		CRP > 6 mg/L
N = 39		p Value
Age, yrs71 ± 1169 ± 1172 ± 110.189
Male gender, n (%)69 (68)40 (64)29 (74)0.254
CAD Hx, n (%)33 (32)21 (33)12 (31)0.788
Hypertension, n (%)78 (77)50 (79)28 (72)0.381
DM, (%)40 (39)24 (38)16 (41)0.768
Dyslipidemia, n (%)65 (64)42 (67)23 (59)0.432
Obesity, (%)26 (26)16 (25)10 (26)0.978
Smoking (%)26 (26)16 (25)10 (26)0.978
SSS8 (4, 15)8 (2, 12)13 (6, 18)0.006
SRS5 (2, 9)4 (1, 7)6 (4, 14)0.001
SDS2 (1, 6)2 (0, 5)3 (1, 6)0.703
SSS > 379 (78)42 (67)37 (95)0.001
SDS > 161 (60)37 (59)24 (62)0.779
CRP, mg/L4 (2, 10)2 (2, 3)12 (9, 23)<0.001
CAD: coronary artery disease, DM: diabetes mellitus, SDS: summed difference score, SRS: summed rest score, SSS: summed stress score. The bold indicates the statistical significance.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rammos, A.; Bechlioulis, A.; Kekiopoulou, A.; Kekiopoulos, P.; Katsouras, C.S.; Sioka, C. Myocardial Perfusion Imaging and C-Reactive Protein in Myocardial Ischemia: A Retrospective Single-Center Study. Life 2024, 14, 261. https://doi.org/10.3390/life14020261

AMA Style

Rammos A, Bechlioulis A, Kekiopoulou A, Kekiopoulos P, Katsouras CS, Sioka C. Myocardial Perfusion Imaging and C-Reactive Protein in Myocardial Ischemia: A Retrospective Single-Center Study. Life. 2024; 14(2):261. https://doi.org/10.3390/life14020261

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rammos, Aidonis, Aris Bechlioulis, Areti Kekiopoulou, Pavlos Kekiopoulos, Christos S. Katsouras, and Chrissa Sioka. 2024. "Myocardial Perfusion Imaging and C-Reactive Protein in Myocardial Ischemia: A Retrospective Single-Center Study" Life 14, no. 2: 261. https://doi.org/10.3390/life14020261

APA Style

Rammos, A., Bechlioulis, A., Kekiopoulou, A., Kekiopoulos, P., Katsouras, C. S., & Sioka, C. (2024). Myocardial Perfusion Imaging and C-Reactive Protein in Myocardial Ischemia: A Retrospective Single-Center Study. Life, 14(2), 261. https://doi.org/10.3390/life14020261

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop