Next Article in Journal
Cell Proliferation PET Imaging with 4DST PET/CT in Colorectal Adenocarcinoma and Adenoma
Next Article in Special Issue
Real-Time Monitoring and Quantitative Evaluation of Resin In-Filtrant Repairing Enamel White Spot Lesions Based on Optical Coherence Tomography
Previous Article in Journal
Association between Intraoperative Hyperlactatemia and Myocardial Injury after Noncardiac Surgery
Previous Article in Special Issue
Positive Predictive Value of Panoramic Radiography for Assessment of the Relationship of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars with the Mandibular Canal Based on Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: A Cross-Sectional Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

Visualization of the Inferior Alveolar Nerve and Lingual Nerve Using MRI in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: A Systematic Review

1
Clinic of Cranio-Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland
2
Department of Neuroradiology, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
3
Department of Stomatology, Division of Periodontology, Dental School, University of São Paulo, Butantã 2227, SP, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2021, 11(9), 1657; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11091657
Submission received: 31 August 2021 / Revised: 6 September 2021 / Accepted: 7 September 2021 / Published: 10 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Diagnostic Imaging in Dentistry)

Abstract

:
We evaluate the preoperative visualization of the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) and lingual nerve (LN) as reported using radiation-free magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). An accurate visualization shall minimize the postoperative risk for nerve injuries in oral and maxillofacial surgery. PubMed MEDLINE, EMBASE, Biosis, and Cochrane databases were selected for the PICOS search strategy by two reviewers using medical subject headings (MeSH) terms. Thirty studies were included in the systematic review. Based on these studies’ findings, the use of black bone MRI sequences, especially 3D short-tau inversion recovery (STIR), provides superior soft-tissue resolution and high sensitivity in detecting pathological changes. Due to the implementation variability regarding scan parameters and the use of different magnetic field strengths, studies with well-designed protocols and a low risk of bias should be conducted to obtain stronger evidence. With improved cost and time efficiency and considering the benefit–risk ratio, MRI is a promising imaging modality that could become part of routine clinical practice in the future.

1. Introduction

Accurate diagnostics is an integral part of the clinical routine in today’s pursuit of a multidisciplinary coordinated, personalized, and minimally invasive treatment in high-precision dentistry. In recent decades, advances in biomedical imaging have opened up tremendous possibilities in preoperative diagnostics, specifically in oral and maxillofacial surgery.
In various oral and maxillofacial surgical procedures, such as the removal of impacted mandibular third molars (MTM), orthognathic surgery, or the placement of dental implants, there is a risk of nerve damage to the peripheral branches of the trigeminal nerve, especially to the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) and lingual nerve (LN). Surgical removal of impacted MTMs represents the most significant risk factor for transient and permanent neurosensory disturbances due to IAN and LN damage, surpassing implant placement and mandibular sagittal split osteotomy [1]. There are heterogeneous data in the literature on the incidence of surgery-related nerve injury, whereby IAN injury is estimated at around 4% (0.4–8.4%) [2,3,4] and LN damage between 0.01 and 2% [5]. Most IAN and LN damages are transient as they recover within 3–6 months. However, the risk of permanent neurosensory disturbances increases if no signs of recovery are observed within this time interval [6]. For affected patients, this permanent nerve damage is accompanied by diminished taste, pronunciation, and general functioning, whereby these psychological and social impairments limit the quality of life [7]. Therefore, accurate preoperative imaging is critical for minimizing the risk of nerve damage and associated unpleasant complications.
Thorough preoperative planning in high-risk oral and maxillofacial surgery includes a risk assessment of adjacent anatomical structures and, consequently, the vulnerable position of the peripheral nerves. The primary diagnostic tool is the commonly used X-ray-based panoramic radiography (PAN), providing a two-dimensional view of the upper and lower jaw, the angulation and position of the MTM, and the surrounding tissues in one single image. In more complex maxillofacial and oral surgical interventions requiring three-dimensional information of the region of interest, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) or conventional computed tomography (CT) are indicated. Compared with CT, CBCT generally has lower radiation exposure, which can be further reduced by the use of low-dose protocols and lower costs and is considered the diagnostic gold standard in the oral and maxillofacial region for solid-tissue imaging, although both imaging modalities have deficiencies in soft-tissue information [8]. Despite the insufficient soft-tissue contrast and standardized grayscale value, CBCT is the method of choice for computer-assisted surgery for oral surgeons due to greater accessibility [8]. A significant disadvantage of the increased use in dentistry is the radiation exposure to the thyroid gland [9], especially in the radiation-sensitive group of younger children, due to a possible association with an increased risk of radiation-induced cancer later in life [10,11].
An interesting alternative is radiation-free magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), as it can not only display the osseous boundaries of the mandibular canal such as conventional X-ray-based imaging techniques but also directly depicts the IAN and LN [12]. In recent years, MRI has seen rapid advancements in a wide range of technical improvements and advanced sequences, making it one of the most promising and leading imaging modalities in the head and neck region, offering an increased range of applications in dentistry. The difficulties in visualizing mineralized dental tissue with conventional MRI are due to its dense biological composition, which allows only the limited molecular motion of hydrogen nuclei in water molecules and to the relatively rapid signal decay after radiofrequency excitation, so that the transverse relaxation time (T2) of more than 1 ms required to digitize MRI signals to visualize teeth cannot be achieved [13,14]. Various modifications and further developments such as the use of functional MRI (fMRI), positron emission tomography-magnetic resonance imaging (PET-MRI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI) and the introduction of new sequences such as sweep imaging with Fourier transformation (SWIFT) [15] or “Black Bone” sequences such as 3D-double echo steady state (DESS) and 3D short-tau inversion recovery (STIR) have improved the diagnostic capabilities, allowing the simultaneous visualization of the nervous tissue within the osseous boundaries of the nerve canal [16,17] and the continuous visualization of the extracranial peripheral nerves in general [18], which has a positive impact on various preoperative planning in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Some disadvantages are the limited availability worldwide [19] and higher costs, with motion artifacts, field inhomogeneity, and artifact-inducing dental metallic restorations presenting as the most significant challenges in MR imaging of the oral cavity [20]. With improved cost effectiveness and considering the benefit–risk ratio, MRI presents itself as a promising imaging modality that has the potential to be established in future clinical routines.
Therefore, this systematic review aimed to investigate the following PICO question: does direct visualization of the IAN and LN using MRI provide accurate and feasible preoperative diagnostical information in healthy subjects and patients undergoing oral and maxillofacial surgery?

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Search Strategy

This systematic review was conducted according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. The following search strategy was performed to assess the following PICO question: P-population: human studies with healthy subjects or patients older than 12 years undergoing oral and maxillofacial surgery near the IAN and LN; I-intervention: magnetic resonance imaging; C-control: not applicable; O-outcome: feasibility and accuracy of preoperative radiological assessment of the IAN and LN using MRI; and S-study designs: clinical trials. The systematic literature search was performed using medical subject headings (MeSH) terms, precise search terms, and their combinations. The following MeSH terms, search terms, and their combinations were used for the focused PICO question search strategy (Table 1)

2.2. Information Sources

The systematic literature search was conducted in the PubMed MEDLINE, EMBASE, Biosis, and Cochrane databases, whereby all English and German publications from 1989 until 1 August 2021 were considered. The search targeted clinical trials performed on human volunteers. The search syntax was classified into population, intervention, comparison, and outcome study design, using MeSH Terms.

2.3. Study Selection and Eligibility Criteria

Two reviewers (A.AH. and S.V.) independently conducted the literature searches and study selection to minimize potential reviewer bias. First, the titles and abstracts were screened, followed by the selection of 51 studies to conduct full-text analysis. If any ambiguities appeared, they were resolved through discussion. Finally, 30 studies were selected for the systematic review (Figure 1).
The decision to include studies was based on the following criteria: (1), human studies with healthy subjects or patients undergoing oral and maxillofacial surgery, randomized or nonrandomized controlled trial, cohort studies, and case control studies; (2), study participants aged older than 12 years; (3), all articles refer to the direct visualization of the IAN and LN using MRI; (4), availability of the full text; and (5), publications in English or German language. Articles that fulfilled one of the following criteria were excluded: (1), animal, cadaveric, in vitro studies, narrative reviews, opinion abstracts, letters to the editor, and case reports; and (2), alternative imaging modalities besides MRI.

2.4. Data Extraction and Collection

All data were transferred to EndNote (Clarivate, Sydney, Australia) from all databases. First, all duplicates were removed. Second, the data extraction process, screening the titles and abstracts according to the inclusion criteria, and subsequently full-text analysis were performed. Titles and abstracts that did not provide adequate information were also screened by the full texts. If publications did not meet the inclusion criteria, they were excluded. Two reviewers (A.A.H. and S.V.) collected the following data separately: general information (title, author, year, and country), study-specific parameters (study design, number of treated patients, age range of treated patients, and visualized nerves), MRI specific parameters (MRI sequence, field strength, and type of MRI coil), and outcome (feasibility and accuracy).

2.5. Risk-of-Bias Assessment and Quality Assessment of Studies

Since MRI is a relatively new scientific field in this area and there are no defined standard MRI sequences or a standard reference test providing direct visualization of the IAN and LN, no index test was performed in most of the included studies, the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS-2) could not be used to assess the risk of bias of the diagnostic test accuracy in reviews based on the following four domains: patient selection, index test, reference standard, and flow and timing [21]. Based on the authors’ experience, the included studies provided an adequate quality; however, some studies lacked accurate statistical methods for sample size calculation, which should always be considered when interpreting results.

3. Results

3.1. Study Selection

The initial search generated a total of 710 potentially relevant studies, which were scanned for title and abstract, of which 51 articles met the inclusion criteria and underwent full-text screening. Finally, 30 articles were included in the systematic review (Miloro et al., 1997; Nasel et al., 1998; Nasel et al., 1998; Salvolini et al., 2002; Kress et al., 2003; Kress et al., 2003; Kress et al., 2003; Gottschalk et al., 2003; Kress et al., 2004; Mori et al., 2008; Deng et al., 2008; Terumitsu et al., 2008; Krasny et al., 2012; Terumitsu et al., 2013; Cassetta et al., 2014; Cassetta et al., 2014; Assaf et al., 2014; Fujii et al., 2015; Manoliu et al., 2016; Cox et al., 2016; Kotaki et al., 2016; Probst et al., 2017; Terumitsu et al., 2017; Dessouky et al., 2018; Burian et al., 2019; Mazza et al., 2020; Burian et al., 2020; Wu et al., 2020; Beck et al., 2021; Al-Haj Husain et al., 2021) (Table 2).

3.2. Study Characteristics

In the 30 included studies performed between 1997 and 2021, over 1000 patients between 14 and 88 years of age underwent an MRI examination at MR field strengths of 1, 1.5, and 3 Tesla using various MRI sequences (Table 2). Twenty-one studies exclusively investigated the visualization of the IAN, whereby two studies exclusively investigated the visualization of the LN. Seven studies investigated both the IAN and the LN.

4. Discussion

This systematic review was conducted to analyze the literature on the visualization of the IAN and LN using MRI. The analysis focused on the influence of MRI sequence selection and field strength on the accuracy and feasibility of MR imaging in the 30 included studies. To the author’s knowledge, no systematic review was conducted on this topic in maxillofacial radiology. Given the advances in MRI technology and the resulting opportunities for preoperative diagnosis, it is useful for discussing the evidence of the individual MRI sequences’ indications and limitations and propose recommendations for the most appropriate application in the decision-making and planning process based on the existing literature. The present review presents a wide range of MRI sequences that illustrate the associated added value and utility of MRI in imaging the IAN and LN depending on the clinical issues.
In oral and maxillofacial surgery, the mandibular canal is routinely visualized using conventional imaging techniques that show only the radiolucent mandibular canal with its surrounding osseous boundaries [22,23]. Apart from the fact that PAN and CBCT cannot directly visualize nervous tissue and are frequently used in MTM surgery, they are associated with an additional increase in radiation-induced cancer incidence by 0.46 owing to CBCT use before MTM surgery [24], which represents one of its main disadvantages, especially when repeated frequently in younger patients [9,10]. For these reasons, and although CBCT is considered the gold standard in dentomaxillofacial imaging for hard tissue, MRI presents a valid attractive option either as a primary diagnostic tool or an imaging modality in follow-ups.
The studies in this systematic review examining the visualization of physiological IAN or LN course in healthy subjects without any associated pathology revealed the possibility of an accurate visualization using a variety of MRI sequences and field strengths. Older MRI studies, conducted around the 2000s, used similar measurement methods that investigated the general visualization of the soft tissues within the mandibular canal [25,26,27]. These three studies used a field strength of 1.0 Tesla and conventional MRI sequences (GE sequence with fat suppression, conventional T1- and T2-weighted sequence, 3D-T1-TFE, and 3D-T2-TFE), demonstrating the visualization of the osseous boundaries and the neurovascular bundle. The neurovascular bundle was displayed as a moderately hyperintense signal, whereas the surrounding osseous boundaries had a lower signal, resulting in good contrast. Limitations were the low field strength of 1 Tesla and the associated low signal-to-noise ratio, which could partly explain the inability to distinguish nerve tissue from blood vessels. Consequently, recent studies have been carried out using a 3 Tesla magnetic field, whereby selected sequences such as 3D FIESTA, 3D SPGR, 3D DESS, and 3D STIR have been investigated for accurate morphological mapping of the IAN and LN [16,17,18,28,29,30]. Cassetta et al. demonstrated the feasibility of the FIESTA and SPGR protocols for accurate visualization of the trigeminal nerve and its branches [29], with reports showing the best results by using the 3D DESS and 3D STIR sequences [16,17], whereby the STIR sequence achieved the most promising results [17]. Simultaneous visualization of the nervous tissues within the osseous boundaries was accurately achieved in all cases, with one report documenting the possibility of determining the precise intraosseous position preoperatively [16]. Burian et al. reconfirmed the excellent feasibility of direct visualization of the complete course of the IAN and the proximal course of the LN. The STIR sequence demonstrated the most promising signal-to-noise ratio and nerve–muscle contrast to noise ratio for the IAN and the LN compared to the previously mentioned sequences. Additionally, the applied MRI sequences allowed excellent soft-tissue contrast and differentiation of the tissue composition of the neurovascular bundle in the mandibular canal in healthy volunteers [17]. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), an alternative technique to assess parameters such as diffusivity and anisotropy of microscopic water movement within nerve fibers while obtaining a three-dimensional representation of the IAN, has confirmed these observations by showing better results at higher magnetic field strength and application of black bone MRI sequences such as STIR compared with previous DTI studies [31,32]. Since the signal-to-noise ratio, defined as the ratio between the desired signal intensity and the standard deviation of the unwanted background noise and the image resolution are two of the most important factors describing the quality and accuracy of an imaging technique, the improvement of these parameters should be further pursued in dental MRI technology [33].
To obtain high-resolution images, a high signal-to-noise ratio should be aimed for, which can be achieved by modifying specific scan parameters. Increasing the signal in order to achieve a better performance can be realized by using zero echo time or ultra-short echo time methods, increasing the field of view, time to repeat, or slice thickness, and decreasing the noise by using surface coils, reducing the bandwidth, or increasing the number of excitations [33,34]. However, this is accompanied by a decrease in image resolution, which can be compensated by reducing the field of view and the associated reduction of the voxel sizes by using dedicated mandibular intraoral coils [33,35,36]. In challenging maxillofacial surgical procedures, the acquisition of high-resolution images to detect anatomical variations should be emphasized, as clinically significant information can be of great importance to the surgeon performing the procedure and lead to a better outcome for the patient.
Besides demonstrating the anatomic morphologic course of the IAN, the results of this systematic review show the usefulness of MRI in detecting pathologic neuronal processes after MTM surgery, fractures, or other pathologies. For the diagnosis of peripheral trigeminal neuropathy in the IAN and LN after MTM surgery, MR neurography (MRN) using the water-selective 3D-PSIF sequence with its excellent fat and vascular signal suppression seems to be suitable, as it allows for excellent visualization of various neuropathies such as inflammation, neuroma, nerve transection, or other injuries at a field strength of 1.5 and 3 T [37,38]. However, also in this context, a magnetic field strength of 3 T could display the nerves and estimate the IAN and LN diameter more precisely than 1.5 T due to the higher image resolution. In this regard, the correlation of these MR neurography findings with the intraoperative findings was from good to excellent [38]. Furthermore, using the T1-FFE or FIESTA sequences, other studies measured higher signal intensities distal to the lesions due to higher blood flow in pathologically altered IAN after MTM surgery, which provided information that could be used to predict the duration of postoperative nerve regeneration [28,39]. The same findings could be validated in cases with mandibular fractures, as the neurovascular bundle demonstrated similar different relative signal intensities distal to the lesion after contrast administration compared with healthy patients [40,41]. From this, various experimental setups concluded that MRI imaging could provide information on the pathophysiological processes in the IAN based on signal differences between healthy and injured nerves. In addition, 3DAC-PROPELLER MRI successfully delineated the IAN and LN after traumatic injury and showed a significant correlation between the morphology and the severity of the patient’s sensory disturbance [42]. Burian and colleagues further demonstrated by the application of 3D T1-FFE or 3D STIR sequence, that a good visualization of the fracture and the IAN with high spatial resolution was feasible. The STIR sequence was superior since it was particularly suitable for the visualization of edema within the IAN [43].
For medical conditions of higher complexity such as cysts or tumors associated with displacement of the IAN and LN, specific MRI protocols were investigated. Preoperative MRI could depict the continuous course of the neurovascular bundle and fully identify its positional relationship in patients with minimal cystic processes. However, in larger cysts, the nerve was only partially detectable on each sequence, with the lower magnetic field of 1.5 T being a limitation. Nevertheless, the nerve could be visualized in these patients by evaluating both sections of multidirectional MRI [44]. High-resolution images with a high signal-to-noise ratio and excellent contrast of the continuously displayed IAN could be obtained using the 3D-MPRAGE MR sequence before and after administration of gadolinium in patients suffering from dysesthesia with a mandibular cystic lesion or ameloblastoma [45]. Recently, Wu et al. demonstrated that the contrast-enhanced 3D SPACE STIR sequence could better visualize the morphological changes in peripheral cranial nerve branches and associated pathologies, with higher nerve tissue contrast than the conventional magnetic resonance neurography sequence, in particular in head and neck tumors when assessing the perineural tumor spread [46]. This has opened an interesting complementary diagnostic opportunity for the preoperative planning of tumors that tend to be located in close vicinity of the IAN and the LN.
According to the results of this systematic review, different MRI protocols were able to visualize the morphology of the IAN and LN in healthy individuals and patients with a wide range of ages. Despite the great heterogeneity in the literature regarding scan parameters and the use of different magnetic fields strengths, MRI remains currently the only promising imaging technique that allows noninvasive direct visualization of the neurovascular bundle, distinguishing its nerve tissue from the blood vessels. Since there are no established standards for the use of a specific MRI sequence in IAN- and LN-associated pathology, further studies should be conducted, including randomized control trials, examining the usefulness of each MRI protocol in a specific medical condition to provide an evidence-based understanding of its use and further information on how preoperative radiologic assessment might affect clinical outcome, especially with regard to optimized individualized treatment decision making. With improved costs and time efficiency, the use of black bone MRI sequences such as STIR sequence at a field strength of 3 Tesla, without the use of contrast agent in the preoperative evaluation of wisdom tooth extractions and with contrast agent administration in the involvement of more complex pathologies such as head and neck tumors, could be recommended, as they can provide detailed information on accurate IAN and LN visualization in challenging maxillofacial cases.

5. Conclusions

Radiation-free high-resolution MRI for peripheral nerve diagnosis has increased in importance in recent decades. With ongoing technical developments and optimization of MR scan sequences, the structures of the head and neck region can now be radiologically displayed and evaluated in greater detail and reliability. Based on these studies’ findings, the application of black bone MRI sequences, in particular 3D STIR, which have recently been increasingly studied and modified, provide additional preoperative diagnostic information, superior soft-tissue resolution, and high sensitivity in the detection of pathological changes. This may consequently reduce the risk of perioperative IAN and LN injury. Further research could evaluate other factors such as artificial intelligence in maxillofacial radiology and intraoperative use of MRI to visualize the IAN and LN to achieve better outcomes for high-risk oral and maxillofacial surgery patients.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.S., B.S., R.P. and S.V.; methodology, A.A.-H.H., R.P., M.S., B.S. and S.V.; validation, A.A.-H.H., R.P., M.S., B.S., S.W., M.P. and S.V.; formal analysis, A.A.-H.H., R.P., M.S., B.S., S.W., M.P. and S.V.; investigation, A.A.-H.H., R.P., M.S., B.S., S.W., M.P. and S.V.; resources, A.A.-H.H., R.P., M.S., B.S., S.W., M.P. and S.V.; data curation, A.A.-H.H., R.P., M.S., B.S., S.W., M.P. and S.V.; writing—original draft preparation, A.A.-H.H. and S.V.; writing—review and editing, R.P., M.S., B.S., S.W. and M.P.; supervision, A.A.-H.H., B.S., S.W., M.P. and S.V.; project administration, A.A.-H.H., R.P., B.S. and S.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

3DAC PROPELLERThree-dimensional anisotropy contrast periodically rotated overlapping parallel lines with enhanced reconstruction
CISSConstructive interference in steady state
DESS-WEDouble-echo steady-state with water excitation sequence
DTIDiffusion tensor imaging
DWIDiffusion weighted imaging
EPI Echo planar imaging
FFEFast field echo
FIESTAFast Imaging Employing Steady-state Acquisition
GEGradient echo
MP-RAGEMagnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo
PDProton density
PETRAPhase encode time reduction acquisition
PSIFReversed fast imaging with steady-state precession
SE Spin-echo
SPACESampling perfection with application optimized contrasts using different flip angle evolution
SPAIRSpectral adiabatic inversion recovery
SPGRSpoiled gradient recalled
SPIRSpectral Presaturation with Inversion Recovery
STIRShort tau inversion recovery
T1T1 weighted image
T2 T2 weighted image
T2*T2 relaxation
TFETurbo field echo
TIRMTurbo inversion recovery magnitude
TSETurbo spin echo
VIBEVolumetric interpolated breath-hold examination

References

  1. Libersa, P.; Savignat, M.; Tonnel, A. Neurosensory disturbances of the inferior alveolar nerve: A retrospective study of complaints in a 10-year period. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2007, 65, 1486–1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Jerjes, W.; Swinson, B.; Moles, D.R.; El-Maaytah, M.; Banu, B.; Upile, T.; Kumar, M.; Al Khawalde, M.; Vourvachis, M.; Hadi, H.; et al. Permanent sensory nerve impairment following third molar surgery: A prospective study. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endodontol. 2006, 102, e1–e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Qi, W.; Lei, J.; Liu, Y.N.; Li, J.N.; Pan, J.; Yu, G.Y. Evaluating the risk of post-extraction inferior alveolar nerve injury through the relative position of the lower third molar root and inferior alveolar canal. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2019, 48, 1577–1583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sigron, G.R.; Pourmand, P.P.; Mache, B.; Stadlinger, B.; Locher, M.C. The most common complications after wisdom-tooth removal: Part 1: A retrospective study of 1,199 cases in the mandible. Swiss Dent. J. 2014, 124, 1042–1056. [Google Scholar]
  5. Pippi, R.; Spota, A.; Santoro, M. Prevention of Lingual Nerve Injury in Third Molar Surgery: Literature Review. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2017, 75, 890–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Robinson, P.P. Observations on the recovery of sensation following inferior alveolar nerve injuries. Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 1988, 26, 177–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lam, N.P.; Donoff, R.B.; Kaban, L.B.; Dodson, T.B. Patient satisfaction after trigeminal nerve repair. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endodontol. 2003, 95, 538–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Nakamura, T. Dental MRI: A road beyond CBCT. Eur. Radiol. 2020, 30, 6389–6391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Tsapaki, V. Radiation protection in dental radiology—Recent advances and future directions. Phys. Med. 2017, 44, 222–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Stratis, A.; Zhang, G.; Jacobs, R.; Bogaerts, R.; Bosmans, H. The growing concern of radiation dose in paediatric dental and maxillofacial CBCT: An easy guide for daily practice. Eur. Radiol. 2019, 29, 7009–7018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Sodickson, A.; Baeyens, P.F.; Andriole, K.P.; Prevedello, L.M.; Nawfel, R.D.; Hanson, R.; Khorasani, R. Recurrent CT, cumulative radiation exposure, and associated radiation-induced cancer risks from CT of adults. Radiology 2009, 251, 175–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Gahleitner, A.; Solar, P.; Nasel, C.; Homolka, P.; Youssefzadeh, S.; Ertl, L.; Schick, S. [Magnetic resonance tomography in dental radiology (dental MRI)]. Radiologe 1999, 39, 1044–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Olt, S.; Jakob, P.M. Contrast-enhanced dental MRI for visualization of the teeth and jaw. Magn. Reson. Med. 2004, 52, 174–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Lockhart, P.B.; Kim, S.; Lund, N.L. Magnetic resonance imaging of human teeth. J. Endod. 1992, 18, 237–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Idiyatullin, D.; Corum, C.; Moeller, S.; Prasad, H.S.; Garwood, M.; Nixdorf, D.R. Dental magnetic resonance imaging: Making the invisible visible. J. Endod. 2011, 37, 745–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Al-Haj Husain, A.; Stadlinger, B.; Winklhofer, S.; Müller, M.; Piccirelli, M.; Valdec, S. Mandibular Third Molar Surgery: Intraosseous Localization of the Inferior Alveolar Nerve Using 3D Double-Echo Steady-State MRI (3D-DESS). Diagnostics 2021, 11, 1245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Burian, E.; Probst, F.A.; Weidlich, D.; Cornelius, C.P.; Maier, L.; Robl, T.; Zimmer, C.; Karampinos, D.C.; Ritschl, L.M.; Probst, M. MRI of the inferior alveolar nerve and lingual nerve-anatomical variation and morphometric benchmark values of nerve diameters in healthy subjects. Clin. Oral Investig. 2020, 24, 2625–2634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Fujii, H.; Fujita, A.; Yang, A.; Kanazawa, H.; Buch, K.; Sakai, O.; Sugimoto, H. Visualization of the Peripheral Branches of the Mandibular Division of the Trigeminal Nerve on 3D Double-Echo Steady-State with Water Excitation Sequence. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2015, 36, 1333–1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Geethanath, S.; Vaughan, J.T. Accessible magnetic resonance imaging: A review. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019, 49, e65–e77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gray, C.F.; Redpath, T.W.; Smith, F.W.; Staff, R.T. Advanced imaging: Magnetic resonance imaging in implant dentistry. Clin. Oral Implant. Res. 2003, 14, 18–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Whiting, P.F.; Rutjes, A.W.; Westwood, M.E.; Mallett, S.; Deeks, J.J.; Reitsma, J.B.; Leeflang, M.M.; Sterne, J.A.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Group, Q. QUADAS-2: A revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann. Intern. Med. 2011, 155, 529–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Miloro, M.; Kolokythas, A. Inferior alveolar and lingual nerve imaging. Atlas Oral Maxillofac. Surg. Clin. N. Am. 2011, 19, 35–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Politis, C.; Ramírez, X.B.; Sun, Y.; Lambrichts, I.; Heath, N.; Agbaje, J.O. Visibility of mandibular canal on panoramic radiograph after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO). Surg. Radiol. Anat. 2013, 35, 233–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Petersen, L.B.; Olsen, K.R.; Matzen, L.H.; Vaeth, M.; Wenzel, A. Economic and health implications of routine CBCT examination before surgical removal of the mandibular third molar in the Danish population. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol. 2015, 44, 20140406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Nasel, C.; Gahleitner, A.; Breitenseher, M.; Czerny, C.; Solar, P.; Imhof, H. Dental MR tomography of the mandible. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 1998, 22, 498–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nasel, C.; Gahleitner, A.; Breitenseher, M.; Czerny, C.; Glaser, C.; Solar, P.; Imhof, H. Localization of the mandibular neurovascular bundle using dental magnetic resonance imaging. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol. 1998, 27, 305–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Salvolini, E.; De Florio, L.; Regnicolo, L.; Salvolini, U. Magnetic Resonance applications in dental implantology: Technical notes and preliminary results. Radiol. Med. 2002, 103, 526–529. [Google Scholar]
  28. Cassetta, M.; Pranno, N.; Barchetti, F.; Sorrentino, V.; Lo Mele, L. 3.0 Tesla MRI in the early evaluation of inferior alveolar nerve neurological complications after mandibular third molar extraction: A prospective study. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol. 2014, 43, 20140152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Cassetta, M.; Pranno, N.; Pompa, V.; Barchetti, F.; Pompa, G. High resolution 3-T MR imaging in the evaluation of the trigeminal nerve course. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2014, 18, 257–264. [Google Scholar]
  30. Mazza, D.; Di Girolamo, M.; Cecchetti, F.; Baggi, L. Appearance of normal MRI anatomy of the lingual nerve using steady-state free precession sequences at 3-T. J. Biol. Regul. Homeost. Agents 2020, 34 (Suppl. 1), 19–26. [Google Scholar]
  31. Kotaki, S.; Sakamoto, J.; Kretapirom, K.; Supak, N.; Sumi, Y.; Kurabayashi, T. Diffusion tensor imaging of the inferior alveolar nerve using 3T MRI: A study for quantitative evaluation and fibre tracking. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol. 2016, 45, 20160200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Mori, S.; Kaneda, T.; Fujita, Y.; Kato, M.; Sakayanagi, M.; Minami, M. Diffusion tensor tractography for the inferior alveolar nerve (V3): Initial experiment. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endodontol. 2008, 106, 270–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Demirturk Kocasarac, H.; Geha, H.; Gaalaas, L.R.; Nixdorf, D.R. MRI for Dental Applications. Dent. Clin. N. Am. 2018, 62, 467–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Di Nardo, D.; Gambarini, G.; Capuani, S.; Testarelli, L. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Endodontics: A Review. J. Endod. 2018, 44, 536–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ludwig, U.; Eisenbeiss, A.K.; Scheifele, C.; Nelson, K.; Bock, M.; Hennig, J.; von Elverfeldt, D.; Herdt, O.; Flügge, T.; Hövener, J.B. Dental MRI using wireless intraoral coils. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 23301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Prager, M.; Heiland, S.; Gareis, D.; Hilgenfeld, T.; Bendszus, M.; Gaudino, C. Dental MRI using a dedicated RF-coil at 3 Tesla. J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg. 2015, 43, 2175–2182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Cox, B.; Zuniga, J.R.; Panchal, N.; Cheng, J.; Chhabra, A. Magnetic resonance neurography in the management of peripheral trigeminal neuropathy: Experience in a tertiary care centre. Eur. Radiol. 2016, 26, 3392–3400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Dessouky, R.; Xi, Y.; Zuniga, J.; Chhabra, A. Role of MR Neurography for the Diagnosis of Peripheral Trigeminal Nerve Injuries in Patients with Prior Molar Tooth Extraction. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2018, 39, 162–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Kress, B.; Gottschalk, A.; Anders, L.; Stippich, C.; Palm, F.; Bähren, W.; Sartor, K. High-resolution dental magnetic resonance imaging of inferior alveolar nerve responses to the extraction of third molars. Eur. Radiol. 2004, 14, 1416–1420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Gottschalk, A.; Gerber, S.; Solbach, T.; Anders, L.; Bähren, W.; Kress, B. Quantitative analysis of contrast enhanced MRI of the inferior alveolar nerve in inflammatory changes of the mandible. Rofo 2003, 175, 1344–1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kress, B.; Gottschalk, A.; Stippich, C.; Palm, F.; Bähren, W.; Sartor, K. MR imaging of traumatic lesions of the inferior alveolar nerve in patients with fractures of the mandible. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2003, 24, 1635–1638. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  42. Terumitsu, M.; Matsuzawa, H.; Seo, K.; Watanabe, M.; Kurata, S.; Suda, A.; Nakada, T. High-contrast high-resolution imaging of posttraumatic mandibular nerve by 3DAC-PROPELLER magnetic resonance imaging: Correlation with the severity of sensory disturbance. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. 2017, 124, 85–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Burian, E.; Sollmann, N.; Ritschl, L.M.; Palla, B.; Maier, L.; Zimmer, C.; Probst, F.; Fichter, A.; Miloro, M.; Probst, M. High resolution MRI for quantitative assessment of inferior alveolar nerve impairment in course of mandible fractures: An imaging feasibility study. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 11566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kress, B.; Gottschalk, A.; Anders, L.; Stippich, C.; Palm, F.; Bähren, W.; Sartor, K. Topography of the inferior alveolar nerve in relation to cystic processes of the mandible in dental MRI. Rofo 2003, 175, 67–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Deng, W.; Chen, S.L.; Zhang, Z.W.; Huang, D.Y.; Zhang, X.; Li, X. High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging of the inferior alveolar nerve using 3-dimensional magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo sequence at 3.0T. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2008, 66, 2621–2626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Wu, W.; Wu, F.; Liu, D.; Zheng, C.; Kong, X.; Shu, S.; Li, D.; Wang, L. Visualization of the morphology and pathology of the peripheral branches of the cranial nerves using three-dimensional high-resolution high-contrast magnetic resonance neurography. Eur. J. Radiol. 2020, 132, 109137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram showing the article selection in this systematic review.
Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram showing the article selection in this systematic review.
Diagnostics 11 01657 g001
Table 1. Search strategy according to the focused question (PICO).
Table 1. Search strategy according to the focused question (PICO).
Focused Question
(PICO)
Does Direct Visualization of the IAN and LN Using MRI Provide Accurate and Feasible Preoperative Diagnostical Information in Healthy Subjects and Patients Undergoing Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery?
Search strategyPopulationHuman studies (patients and/or healthy subjects), aged older than 12 years undergoing oral and maxillofacial surgical interventions near the IAN and LN.
#1—((inferior alveolar nerve [MeSH]) OR (lingual nerve [MeSH]) OR (mandibular nerve [MeSH]) OR (trigeminal nerve [MeSH]))
InterventionMagnetic resonance imaging.
#2—((magnetic resonance imaging [MeSH]) OR (MRI) OR (nuclear magnetic resonance imaging [MeSH]) OR (NMR) OR (diffusion tensor imaging [MeSH]) OR (DTI) OR (ultra-short echo-time [MeSH]) OR (UTE) OR (maxillofacial imaging))
#3—((visualization) OR (neurography))
ComparisonNot applicable.
Conventional preoperative radiological assessment.
#4—((computed tomography [MeSH]) OR (cone-beam computed tomography [MeSH])
#5—(panoramic radiography [MeSH])
OutcomeFeasibility and accuracy of preoperative radiological assessment of the IAN and LN using MRI.
#6—((accuracy) OR (feasibility) OR (signal-to-noise-ratio [MeSH]))
Search combination(s)(#1) AND (#2 or #3) OR (#6)
Table 2. Characteristics of included studies.
Table 2. Characteristics of included studies.
Study NumberAuthor, Year, CountryStudySample SizeAgeStudy Objectives NervesMRI
Sequences
Field StrengthsType of MRI CoilOutcome
(Feasibility/Accuracy)
1Miloro et al., 1997, USAAssessment of the lingual nerve in the third molar region using magnetic resonance imaging1021–35 yearsDetermination of the exact in situ location of the LN in the third molar region using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging.LNPhase encode time reduction acquisition (PETRA) sequence1.5 T surface coil LN visualization in the molar region using the HR-MRI sequence. Assessment of the nerve diameter, the different shapes of the nerve, and the mean vertical and horizontal distances to the lingual crest and the lingual plate of the mandible.
2Nasel et al., 1998,
Austria
Dental MR tomography of the mandible528–55 yearsPresentation of a new imaging technique (dental MR tomography).IANT1- and T2 sequences were performed with gradient echo (GE) and spin echo (SE) techniques
-3D T1 GE using a turbo field echo (TFE)
-3D T2* TFE
1.0 TStandard neck-quad coilVisualization of anatomic features on T1 GE images, neurovascular bundle on T2 images, and nerve exit at the mental foramen.
3Nasel et al., 1998,
Austria
Localization of the mandibular neurovascular bundle using dental magnetic resonance imaging1132–57 yearsReliability of visualizing the neurovascular bundle of the mandible using 3D MPR-MRI for the jaws.IANGE sequence with a spectral fat suppression pre-impulse1.0 TStandard neck-quad coilVisualization of the mandibular canal and neurovascular bundle.
4Salvolini et al., 2002, ItalyMagnetic resonance applications in dental implantology: technical notes and preliminary results10N/AEvaluation of the potential use of magnetic resonance imaging in dental implantology, including the identification of the mandibular nerve.IANT2 TSE, T1 SE and T2 GE1.0 TBrain coilIdentification of the intraosseous course of the IAN within the mandibular canal.
5Kress et al., 2003,
Germany
Topography of the inferior alveolar nerve in relation to cystic processes of the mandible in dental MRI1315–71 yearsDetermination whether preoperative MRI could depict the continuous course of the neurovascular bundle and its positional relationship to cystic processes of the mandible.IANT2 TSE-axial, Proton density (PD) FFE-sagittal, PD FFE-coronal1.5 Tsurface coilHigh-resolution visualization in minimal cystic processes and identifying the neurovascular bundle in the sagittal and coronal sequences.
6Kress et al., 2003,
Germany
High-resolution MR technique allowing visualization of the course of the inferior alveolar nerve along cystic processesN/AN/AVisualization of the entire course of the IAN in the presence of cystic lesions using high-resolution MRI.IANT2 TSE-axial,
T1 TSE sequence, a pd GE—sagittal and coronal
N/AHead coilSuccessful display of the IAN throughout its course.
7Kress et al., 2003,
Germany
MR imaging of traumatic lesions of the inferior alveolar nerve in patients with fractures of the mandible2318–64 yearsVisualization of the neurovascular bundle in patients with mandibular fracture and investigation of post-traumatic changes in IAN signal intensities.IANObject-oriented sagittal view T1 sequences and pd sequences1.5 TSurface coilFeasibility of displaying the disruption of the neurovascular bundle and intraoperative confirmation of these findings.
8Gottschalk et al., 2003, GermanyQuantitative analysis of contrast enhanced MRI of the inferior alveolar nerve in inflammatory changes of the mandible3018–52 yearsQuantitative analysis of the IAN’s signal intensity using contrast-enhanced MRI in inflammatory lesions of the mandible. IANT1- fast-field-echo (FFE) GE-proset-sequence1.5 TSurface coilAssessing the MR signal intensity of the neurovascular bundle and mapping of physiological and pathophysiological states of the IAN.
9Kress et al., 2004,
Germany
High-resolution dental magnetic resonance imaging of inferior alveolar nerve responses to
the extraction of third molars
7118–62 yearsAssessment of signal intensity measurements in the neurovascular bundle after third molar extraction treatment using a contrast agent.IANT2 TSE-axial, T1 FFE proset fat saturation-sagittal, contrast agent no delayN/ASurface coilAccurate visualization of the neurovascular bundle, with postoperatively increased signal intensity measurements at the defined regions of interest.
10Mori et al., 2008,
Japan
Diffusion tensor tractography for the inferior alveolar nerve (V3): initial experiment1021–35 yearsEvaluation of diffusion tensor tractography (DTT) in the mandible to visualize the IAN.IANSingle-shot echo planar imaging (EPI) sequence with a SENSE factor of 21.5 TSENSE Flex S coilThe automatic fiber tracking method made the IAN visualization possible, providing more information overlapping with T1 images.
11Deng et al., 2008,
China
High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging of the inferior alveolar nerve using 3-dimensional magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo sequence at
3.0 T
1818–42 yearsVisualization of the anatomy of the IAN in healthy subjects and patients with mandibular diseases.IAN3D magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo (3D MP-RAGE) 3.0 TStandard neck and CP spine array coilHigh-resolution images with a high signal-to-noise ratio and excellent contrast of the IAN in the intact mandible and in patients with mandibular trauma could be obtained using the 3D-MPRAGE MR sequence.
12Terumitsu et al., 2008, JapanMorphologic evaluation of the inferior alveolar
nerve in patients with sensory disorders by high-resolution 3D volume rendering magnetic resonance neurography on a 3.0-T system
16N/AEvaluation of the morphological appearance of the IAN in patients who reported persistent sensory dysfunction due to unilateral IAN injury.IANT1 fast spoiled gradient-recalled echo
(fast SPGR) sequence with fat suppression (Chemical shift selective pulse (CHESS))
3.0 T8-channel neurovascular phased-array coilHigh-resolution 3-dimensional volume rendering magnetic resonance neurography (3DVR-MRN) visualized the course of the IAN and its morphological changes.
13Krasny et al., 2012,
Germany
Anatomic variations of neural canal structures of the mandible observed by 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging64N/AEvaluation of anatomical variations of the mandibular canal, the neurovascular bundle, mental canal, incisive canal, and the nutrient canals in patients having nonspecific head or neck pain.IANmodified 3D high-resolution T2 sampling perfection with application optimized contrasts using different flip angle evolution (SPACE) sequence 3.0 Thead and neck coilPrecise visualization of the IAN’s anatomical variations in the fully dentate mandible of the volunteers, providing the detection of entire structures and structural abnormalities accurately.
14Terumitsu et al., 2013, JapanEvaluating fine structure of the injured trigeminal nerve and tissue using 3D anisotropy contrast imaging on a 3.0-T system20N/ADistinguishment of the course of the nerve fibers from the connective tissue mass in patients with injured IAN or LN.IAN + LNThree-dimensional anisotropy contrast periodically rotated overlapping parallel lines with enhanced reconstruction
(3DAC PROPELLER) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI)
3.0 TN/ASuccessful delineation of the lesion from the surrounding connective tissues, providing textural details indicating possible severity of sensory dysfunction.
15Cassetta et al., 2014,
Italy
High-resolution 3-T MR imaging in the evaluation of the trigeminal nerve course7817–71 yearsQualitative evaluation of the course of four segments of the trigeminal nerve, including the extracranial segments of the mandibular nerve.IAN + LN3D T2 fast imaging employing steady-state acquisition sequence (3D FIESTA);
T1 fast spoiled gradient recalled echo sequence (3D SPGR)
3.0 T8-channel neurovascular phased-array coilAccurate visualization of the trigeminal nerve and its branches, especially the mandibular nerve, with high inter- and intra-rater variability.
16Cassetta et al., 2014,
Italy
3.0 Tesla MRI in the early evaluation of inferior alveolar nerve neurological complications after mandibular third molar extraction: a prospective study.19619–32 yearsInvestigation of the use of 3.0 Tesla MRI to predict possible sensitivity disturbances qualitatively and quantitatively in the IAN after third molar extraction treatment.IAN3D FIESTA;
3D SPGR
3.0 T8-channel neurovascular phased-array coilNo differences in the course of the IAN were observed preoperatively and postoperatively with good inter- and intra-rater variability.
17Assaf et al., 2014,
Germany
Evaluation of four different optimized magnetic-resonance-imaging sequences for visualization of dental and maxillo-mandibular structures at 3 T1225–63 yearsEvaluation of four optimized noncontrast MRI sequences on the visibility of osseous and dental maxillary and mandibular structures on healthy subjects.IAN + LNT1; fat saturated T1; fat saturated T2 and constructive interference steady state (CISS).3.0 T20-channel head-and-neck coilThe evaluated sequences provided excellent 2D and 3D visualization of osseous and dental structures, allowing its use in the differentiation of the mandibular canal, the IAN, the mental foramen, and the LN.
18Fujii et al., 2015,
Germany
Visualization of the peripheral branches of the mandibular division of the trigeminal nerve on 3D double-echo steady-state with water excitation sequence8617–88 yearsDetectability of the six extracranial branches of the mandibular nerve.IAN + LN3D double-echo steady-state with water excitation sequence (3D-DESS-WE)3.0 T20-channel head-neck coilSuccessful visualization of the LN and IAN based on a 5-point scale.
19Manoliu et al., 2016,
Switzerland
MR neurographic orthopantomogram:
ultrashort Echo-Time Imaging of
Mandibular Bone and Teeth
Complemented with High-Resolution
Morphological and Functional MR Neurography
1020–50 yearsInvestigation of a new technique for MR neurographic orthopantomograms that uses ultrashort echo time (UTE) imaging to visualize bones and teeth.IAN3D PETRA single-echo sequence; 3D DWI reversed fast imaging with steady-state precession (3D-PSIF); 3D T2 SPACE sequence with short tau inversion recovery (STIR) fat suppression; accelerated diffusion-tensor-imaging (DTI) prototype sequence
(2D SMS-accelerated RESOLVE)
3.0 T64-channel phased array coilThe image quality was excellent for all sequences using the suggested MR neurographic orthopantomogram. All sequences performed excellently in the anatomical delineation of the mandibular canal and IAN with high diagnostic confidence. In particular, the 3D PETRA and 3D PSIF provided a complete representation of the mandibular canal in all volunteers.
20Cox et al., 2016,
USA
Magnetic resonance neurography in the management of peripheral trigeminal neuropathy:
experience in a tertiary care centre
1714–69 yearsApplicability of magnetic resonance neurography in the assessment of peripheral trigeminal neuropathies in patients with suspected trigeminal neuropathies (IAN and LN).IAN + LN CISS 3D sequence axial, T1 and T2 spectral adiabatic inversion recovery (SPAIR) sequences axial, DTI axial, 3D
STIR SPACE coronal, 3D DW PSIF coronal
1.5 TMultichannel head coilExcellent image quality could be achieved in the treatment of peripheral trigeminal neuropathy, by additionally showing moderate to excellent correlation with intraoperative results.
21Kotaki et al., 2016,
Japan
Diffusion tensor imaging of the inferior alveolar nerve using 3T MRI: a study for quantitative evaluation and fibre tracking4620–36 yearsQualitative and quantitative visualization and fibre tracking of the IAN in healthy participants using diffusion tensor imaging. IANDTI: SE-based single-shot EPI with fat suppression by STIR sequence, 3D T1 with MP-RAGE3.0 T16 channel neck and head coilDTI is a feasible technique for quantitative analysis and imaging of the IAN, providing quantitative data of the diffusivity and anisotropy of microscopic water movement within nerve fibers while simultaneously obtaining three-dimensional visualization of the nerve fibers.
22Probst et al., 2017,
Germany
Magnetic resonance imaging of the inferior alveolar nerve with special regard to metal artifact reduction7N/AInvestigation of the capacities and limitations of IAN MRI in patients with IAN disruption with respect to metal artifacts.IANWARP sequences,
T2 TSE coronal,
T2 TSE axial,
T2 TSE Spectral Presaturation with Inversion Recovery (SPIR) parasagittal,
T1 TSE parasagittal,
T2 TSE parasagittal,
3D CISS triplanar reconstructions, 3D T1 volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) triplanar reconstructions
1.5 T and 3.0 T12-channel head coil with an additional four-channel surface coilAssessment of better image quality at 3.0 T. Achievement of average to excellent image quality of the IAN and its structural changes by using the WARP sequence taking into account the severity of metallic artifacts. The findings correlated with clinical symptoms.
23Terumitsu et al., 2017, JapanHigh-contrast high-resolution imaging of post-traumaticmandibular nerve by 3DAC-PROPELLER magneticresonance imaging: correlation with the severity of sensory disturbance1927–62 yearsAssessment of high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging of the IAN and LN after trauma-related injury and the correlation between the morphological classification and the degree of severity of the sensory disorder and morphologic characteristics of the surrounding connective tissue. IAN + LN3DAC PROPELLER DWI pulse sequence3.0 TNeurovascular coil or a custom 3-inch surface coilSuccessful visualization of the internal structures within the lesion, delineation of the IAN and LN after traumatic injury and display of the morphologic features in relation with the severity of the patient’s sensory disturbance.
24Dessouky et al., 2018, USARole of MR neurography for the diagnosis of peripheral trigeminal nerve injuries in patients with prior molar tooth extraction42N/AEvaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of MR neurography for the assessment of damaged peripheral trigeminal nerves in patients with previous third molar extraction and its correlation with the intraoperative findings.IAN + LN3D PSIF,
T1, T2 fat suppressed, DWI
1.5 T and 3.0 TMultichannel head coilReliability and accuracy for the diagnosis of post-traumatic nerve injury after molar tooth extractions. Neuropathy could be determined by various qualitative and quantitative criteria.
25Burian et al., 2019,
Germany
MRI of the inferior alveolar nerve and lingual nerve—anatomical variation and morphometric benchmark values of nerve diameters in healthy subjects3021–32 yearsExamination of the reliability of various black bone MRI sequences for direct visualization of the IAN and LN in healthy volunteers. IAN + LN3D STIR 3D DESS, 3D T1 FFE3.0 T16-channel Head Neck Spine CoilExcellent feasibility of direct visualization of the complete course of the IAN and the proximal course of the LN.
26Mazza et al., 2020,
Italy
Appearance of normal MRI anatomy of the lingual nerve using steady-state free precession sequences at 3-T2418–84 yearsApplication of a steady-state free precession (SSFP) MRI sequence to investigate the direct visualization of the LN.LN FIESTA3.0 THead and neck multiarray coilVisualization of the LN throughout its course from the mandibular nerve to the mylohyoid muscle in excellent image quality.
27Burian et al., 2020,
Germany
High resolution MRi for quantitative assessment of inferior alveolar nerve impairment in course of mandible fractures: an imaging feasibility study3016–57 yearsVisualization of the IAN course in patients with unilateral mandibular fracture and healthy patients using different “black bone” MRI sequences.IAN3D STIR, 3D DESS, 3D T1 FFE3.0 T16-channel head-neck-spine coilBlack bone MRI sequences generally allowed good visibility, with the 3D T1 FFE sequence and the 3D STIR sequence providing good visualization of the fracture and the IAN.
28Wu et al., 2020,
China
Visualization of the morphology and pathology of the peripheral branches of the cranial nerves using three-dimensional high-resolution high-contrast magnetic resonance neurography3518–69 yearsVisualization of the peripheral cranial nerves, including the IAN and LN in healthy and pathological volunteers.IANT1 TSE axial, T2 TSE axial, T2 turbo inversion recovery magnitude (T2-TIRM) coronal, conventional (noncontrast enhanced) 3D SPACE STIR (cMRN), contrast enhanced T1-SPAIR and contrast enhanced 3D SPACE STIR (HRHCMRN) axial.3.0 Thead and neck coilVery good visualization of the morphology of the IAN and LN and the pathologies affecting them.
29Beck et al., 2021,
Austria
Is MRI a viable alternative to CT/CBCT to identify the course of the inferior alveolar nerve in relation to the roots of the third molars?53N/AEvaluation of the spatial relationship between the IAN and the mandibular third molar (MTM) using MRI or CT/CBCT images.IANPD T2 TSE FS axial, PD TSE FS coronal3.0 T64 channel head-and-neck coilObservation of good inter- and intra-rater concordance in evaluating the spatial relationship between IAN and MTM. In addition, MRI images provided benefits in the identification of accessory IAN in comparison to CT/CBCT.
30Al-Haj Husain et al., 2021, SwitzerlandMandibular third molar surgery: intraosseous localization of the inferior alveolar nerve using 3D double-echo steady-state MRI (3D-DESS)1918–63 yearsEvaluation of the IAN’s intraosseous position within the mandibular canal’s osseous boundaries in patients undergoing third molar extraction treatment using preoperative cone-beam computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Assessment of a conversion factor between the two imaging modalities.IAN 3D-DESS-WE3.0 T64 channel head-and-neck coilAccurate simultaneous visualization of the nerve tissues within osseous boundaries. A conversion factor from IAC in CBCT and MRI to IAN in MRI was determined.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Al-Haj Husain, A.; Solomons, M.; Stadlinger, B.; Pejicic, R.; Winklhofer, S.; Piccirelli, M.; Valdec, S. Visualization of the Inferior Alveolar Nerve and Lingual Nerve Using MRI in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: A Systematic Review. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 1657. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11091657

AMA Style

Al-Haj Husain A, Solomons M, Stadlinger B, Pejicic R, Winklhofer S, Piccirelli M, Valdec S. Visualization of the Inferior Alveolar Nerve and Lingual Nerve Using MRI in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: A Systematic Review. Diagnostics. 2021; 11(9):1657. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11091657

Chicago/Turabian Style

Al-Haj Husain, Adib, Mark Solomons, Bernd Stadlinger, Rada Pejicic, Sebastian Winklhofer, Marco Piccirelli, and Silvio Valdec. 2021. "Visualization of the Inferior Alveolar Nerve and Lingual Nerve Using MRI in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: A Systematic Review" Diagnostics 11, no. 9: 1657. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11091657

APA Style

Al-Haj Husain, A., Solomons, M., Stadlinger, B., Pejicic, R., Winklhofer, S., Piccirelli, M., & Valdec, S. (2021). Visualization of the Inferior Alveolar Nerve and Lingual Nerve Using MRI in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: A Systematic Review. Diagnostics, 11(9), 1657. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11091657

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop