Next Article in Journal
Uterine Cervical Angioleiomyoma Mimicking Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Next Article in Special Issue
Identification of Intestinal Microbial Community in Gallstone Patients with Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing
Previous Article in Journal
A Cross-Sectional Study of the Dermatological Manifestations of Patients with Fabry Disease and the Assessment of Angiokeratomas with Multimodal Imaging
Previous Article in Special Issue
Performance Evaluation of VIDAS® Diagnostic Assays Detecting Anti-Chikungunya Virus IgM and IgG Antibodies: An International Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Diagnostics
Volume 13
Issue 14
10.3390/diagnostics13142369
diagnostics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Diagnosis of Latent Tuberculosis Infection in Hemodialysis Patients: TST versus T-SPOT.TB

by
Umut Devrim Binay
1,*,
Ali Veysel Kara
2,
Faruk Karakeçili
1 and
Orçun Barkay
1
1
Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University, 24100 Erzincan, Turkey
2
Department of Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University, 24100 Erzincan, Turkey
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2023, 13(14), 2369; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13142369
Submission received: 23 May 2023 / Revised: 7 July 2023 / Accepted: 8 July 2023 / Published: 14 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Laboratory Diagnosis in Microbial Diseases)
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Hemodialysis (HD) patients should be screened for latent tuberculosis (TB) infection. We aimed to determine the frequency of latent TB infection in HD patients and to compare the effectiveness of the tests used. The files of 56 HD patients followed between 1 January 2021 and 1 October 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic data, the presence of the Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) vaccine, whether or not the patients had previously received treatment for TB before, the status of encountering a patient with active TB of patients over 18 years of age, without active tuberculosis and who had a T-SPOT.TB test or a Tuberculin Skin Test (TST) were obtained from the patient files. The presence of previous TB in a posterior–anterior (PA) chest X-ray was obtained by evaluating PA chest X-rays taken routinely. Of the patients, 60.7% (n = 34) were male and their mean age was 60.18 ± 14.85 years. The mean duration of dialysis was 6.43 ± 6.03 years, and 76.8% (n = 43) had 2 BCG scars. The T-SPOT.TB test was positive in 32.1% (n = 18). Only 20 patients (35.7%) had a TST and all had negative results. While the mean age of those with positive T-SPOT.TB results was higher (p = 0.003), the time taken to enter HD was shorter (p = 0.029). T-SPOT.TB test positivity was higher in the group that had encountered active TB patients (p = 0.033). However, no significant difference was found between T-SPOT.TB results according to BCG vaccine, albumin, urea and lymphocyte levels. Although T-SPOT.TB test positivity was higher in patients with a previous TB finding in a PA chest X-ray, there was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.093). The applicability of the TST in the diagnosis of latent TB infection in HD patients is difficult and it is likely to give false-negative results. The T-SPOT.TB test is not affected by the BCG vaccine and immunosuppression. Therefore, using the T-SPOT.TB test would be a more appropriate and practical approach in the diagnosis of latent TB in HD patients.

1. Introduction

Tuberculosis (TB) continues to be one of the main causes of death due to infectious diseases all over the world. The World Health Organization (WHO) has implemented the ‘End tuberculosis’ strategy and in relation to this, it recommends screening and treating latent TB infection (LTBI) [1]. According to the Turkish Ministry of Health’s Tuberculosis Diagnosis and Treatment Guidelines, it is recommended that patients with a high risk of latent TB reactivation, such as hemodialysis (HD) patients, should be screened. Since the risk of transmission will be high in hemodialysis units, the development of tuberculosis disease in this patient group must be prevented [2]. When prior studies are examined, in the systematic reviews conducted by Alemu et al., LTBI and active tuberculosis infection were found to be more common in dialysis patients [3,4]. In the study of Xia et al., it was found that the rate of development of active tuberculosis was higher in hemodialysis patients with LTBI. In the same study, in which patients were followed up about three years, LTBI was also shown to be associated with major adverse cardiovascular events [5]. In the study of Park et al., it was shown that active tuberculosis is more common in dialysis patients and kidney transplant recipients compared to the general population and causes higher mortality rates [6]. In the study of Romanowski et al., it was found that active tuberculosis was seen less frequently in patients who were treated for LTBI [7].
Interferon Gamma Release Assays (IGRA) and the Tuberculin Skin Test (TST) are used in LTBI screening, and it is recommended that IGRA should be performed in immunocompromised groups such as hemodialysis patients when the TST is negative or cannot be performed. Among the IGRA tests, the T-SPOT.TB, QuantiFERON-TB Gold In Tube (QFT-GIT) or QuantiFERON-TB gold plus test are used [2,8,9,10,11,12]. When studies comparing the diagnostic tests are examined, there is no gold standard test. In the study of Akbar et al., the QuantiFERON-TB gold plus test was shown to be superior to the TST. However, the small sample size was determined as a limitation of the study [13]. On the other hand, in the study of Setyawati et al., the use of the TST was recommended in the diagnosis of LTBI [14]. However, although it is stated that IGRA tests are not affected by immunosuppression, studies in patients with chronic kidney disease have shown that, as the time of dialysis increases, IGRA tests are more likely to give false-negative results. In this context, it is recommended that patients with chronic kidney disease be screened for LTBI at an early stage [15,16,17,18]. Considering the systematic reviews carried out in recent years, it has been shown that IGRA tests are superior to the TST [11,19,20].
The aim of this study is to determine the frequency of latent TB infection in patients undergoing hemodialysis in our hospital and to compare the effectiveness of tests used in the diagnosis of latent TB infection. At the same time, the aim is to investigate the reasons for the inconsistency between the tests by determining the factors affecting the tests.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Population

This study was planned as a retrospective, cross-sectional study and was conducted with the approval of Erzincan Binali Yildirim University Clinical Research Ethics Committee (Date: 10 November 2022/Decision No: 05/09).
Latent TB infection screening is routinely performed in the hemodialysis unit of our institution. Patients are regularly referred to a tuberculosis dispensary for a TST to be performed. The T-SPOT.TB test is performed simultaneously with a hemogram, biochemical examinations and a posterior–anterior (PA) chest X-ray taken during routine dialysis, for patients who cannot undergo a TST or whose results are negative.
So, the files of HD patients who were followed up in the hemodialysis unit of a tertiary research and training hospital between 1 January 2021 and 1 October 2022 were reviewed retrospectively. Demographic data of the patients (age, gender, comorbidities, duration of hemodialysis admission, etc.) and data on the presence of Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) vaccine, whether or not they had previously received treatment for active TB, and their prior encounters with a patient with active TB were obtained from patient files. The presence of previous TB in a PA chest X-ray was obtained by evaluating the PA chest X-rays taken routinely.
The inclusion criteria were:
  • To have regular hemodialysis;
  • To be over 18 years old;
  • To have T-SPOT.TB or TST results;
  • To not have a concurrent active TB diagnosis.
Accordingly, out of a total of 67 patients, 56 patients who met the inclusion criteria were included in the study. Since the number of patients who did not undergo a TST was high, a comparison of both tests could not be made. Therefore, the factors affecting the results of the T-SPOT.TB test and the TST were evaluated separately.

2.2. Methodology

After blood samples were taken using special tubes for the T-SPOT.TB test (Oxford Immunotec, Oxford, UK), T-Cell Xtend reagent was added to the blood samples and sent to the laboratory. Mononuclear cells were obtained by centrifugation from the blood taken for the T-SPOT.TB test. The resulting mononuclear cells were added to wells previously coated with IFN-γ antibodies. Then, the TB antigens ESAT-6 and CFP-10 and Phytohemagglutinin were added for positive control. The negative control was determined as the well without antigens. These wells were incubated overnight at 37 °C with 5% CO2. After incubation, the wells were washed and secondary conjugated antibodies were added to measure the IFN-γ response. Spots that formed in the wells in which the IFN-γ response was observed were measured by an automated ELISPOT reader (AID systems, Strassberg, Germany). The result was considered positive if the test wells contained at least five more spot-forming cells than the average of the negative control wells [21].
The TST was applied intradermally to the upper inner 2/3 of the left forearm of the patients, in a hairless area away from the veins, with an insulin injector, with 0.1 mL of 5 TU PPD containing tuberculin solution. The transverse diameter of the formed induration was measured in mm after 48–72 h. Results with an induration diameter of 5 mm or more were considered positive [22].
The hemogram test of the patients was performed using the Sysmex XN-1000 Hematology System (Sysmex Corporation, Kobe, Japan); biochemical tests were performed with AU 5800 (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA).

2.3. Statistical Analysis

The NCSS (Number Cruncher Statistical System) 2007 (NCSS LLC, Kaysville, UT, USA) program was used for statistical analysis. Descriptive statistical methods (mean, standard deviation, median, frequency, ratio, minimum, maximum) were used while evaluating the study data. The conformity of quantitative data to normal distribution, the Shapiro–Wilk test and graphical evaluations were used.
Student’s t-test was used for comparisons of normally distributed quantitative variables between two groups, and the Mann–Whitney U test was used for comparisons of non-normally distributed variables.
Pearson’s chi-squared test, the Fisher–Freeman–Halton test and Fisher’s exact test were used to compare qualitative data. Logistic regression analysis was used in multivariate evaluations of the risk factors affecting T-SPOT.TB positivity.
Significance was evaluated at the p < 0.05 level.

3. Results

The study was carried out at a research and training hospital between 1 January 2021 and 1 October 2022. It was carried out with 56 HD patients, of whom 39.3% (n = 22) were female and 60.7% (n = 34) were male. The ages of the patients ranged from 20 to 81, with a mean of 60.18 ± 14.85 years. The duration of HD ranged from 1 to 27 years, with a mean of 6.43 ± 6.03 years. In total, 66.1% (n = 37) of the cases had comorbidities. When the types of comorbidities were examined, it was observed that 32.4% (n = 12) had type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM), 78.4% (n = 29) had essential hypertension (HT) and 45.9% (n = 17) had other diseases.
Of the patients, 3.6% (n = 2) had a prior history of active TB. The patients stated that they had completed their treatment. The number of patients who had encountered active tuberculosis patients was 8.9% (n = 5).
In addition, 8.9% (n = 5) of the patients had no BCG vaccine scar, 14.3% (n = 8) had one scar and 76.8% (n = 43) had two scars (Table 1).
Mean leukocyte counts were 6992.86 ± 3842.15/mm3; mean lymphocyte counts were 1981.43 ± 3533.68/mm3; mean albumin level was 17.42 ± 16.16 g/dL; and mean urea level was 149.18 ± 28.91 mg/dL.
Overall, 7.1% (n = 4) of the patients had previous tuberculosis findings on a chest X-ray.
The T-SPOT.TB test results were negative in 67.9% (n = 38) and positive in 32.1% (n = 18). A TST was performed in 35.7% (n = 20) of the patients and all of them were negative (Table 1).

3.1. Assessment of T-SPOT.TB Results

A statistically significant correlation was found between age and the T-SPOT.TB test result (p = 0.003; p < 0.01). The mean age of the group with positive results was found to be higher than the group with negative results.
A statistically significant correlation was found between the time on HD and the T-SPOT.TB test result (p = 0.029; p < 0.05). The HD time in the group with positive results was found to be shorter than in the group with negative results.
While the T-SPOT.TB test results did not show a statistically significant difference by gender (p = 0.072; p > 0.05), it is noteworthy that the rate of positive results in men was higher than that in women.
There was no statistically significant correlation between the presence of comorbidities and the T-SPOT.TB test results (p > 0.05).
A statistically significant correlation was found between encountering a patient with active tuberculosis and the T-SPOT.TB test results (p = 0.033; p < 0.05). The rate of positive results in the group that encountered a tuberculosis patient was higher than the group that had not.
No statistically significant correlation was found between the number of BCG scars and the T-SPOT.TB test results (p > 0.05) (Table 2).
No statistically significant correlation was found between leukocyte count, lymphocyte count, albumin level and urea level and the T-SPOT.TB test results (p > 0.05).
While no statistically significant correlation was found between previous TB findings on PA chest X-rays and the T-SPOT.TB test results (p = 0.093; p > 0.05), it is noteworthy that the rate of positive results was higher in the group with a previous TB finding in a PA chest X-ray (Table 3).
When we evaluated the risk factors affecting the T-SPOT.TB test, such as age, gender, a previous TB finding on a PA chest X-ray, time of dialysis and encountering an active tuberculosis patient with Enter Logistic Regression Analysis, the model was found to be significant and the explanatory coefficient of the model (76.8%) was found to be at a good level. It is seen that the effect of a unit increase in age on T-SPOT.TB positivity increases the ODDS ratio 1.101 (95% CI: 1.016–1.192) times. The effect of encountering an active tuberculosis patient has an effect on T-SPOT.TB positivity with an ODDS value of 59.762 (95% CI:1.59–2233.42) times. The effects of gender, a previous TB finding on a PA chest X-ray and time of dialysis were not significant in the multivariate evaluation (p > 0.05) (Table 4).

3.2. Results of Patients with Known History of TST

A TST was performed in 35.7% (n = 20) of the patients and it was found that all of them had negative results. Of these cases, 30% (n = 6) were female and 70% (n = 14) were male. Their ages ranged from 20 to 81 years, with a mean of 61.85 ± 17.1 years. The duration of HD ranged from 1 to 20 years, with a mean of 6.40 ± 6.08 years.
In total, 50% (n = 10) of the cases who underwent a TST had comorbidities. When the types of comorbidities were examined, it was observed that 20% (n = 2) had type 2 DM, 90% (n = 9) had essential hypertension and 50% (n = 5) had other diseases.
The rate of having had tuberculosis previously was found to be 5% (n = 1), while 20% (n = 4) of the patients who underwent a TST stated that they had previously encountered an active tuberculosis patient.
When the BCG scars of the tested participants were examined, 10% (n = 2) had no scar, 15% (n = 3) had one scar and 75% (n = 15) had two scars (Table 5).
Mean leukocyte counts were 7000 ± 4336.87 mm3; mean lymphocyte counts were 2209 ± 3951.76 mm3; the mean albumin level was 16.39 ± 16.41 g/dL; and the mean urea level was calculated as 141.95 ± 22.97 mg/dL. There was no significant difference between leukocyte and lymphocyte count according to the positive and negative T-SPOT.TB test.
In 10% (n = 2) of the patients who underwent a TST, previous TB was found in a PA chest X-ray.
The T-SPOT.TB test results of the patients who underwent a TST and all had negative results were found to be 20% (n = 4) negative and 80% (n = 16) positive (Table 6).

4. Discussion

The frequency of latent TB infection and the probability of TB reactivation in hemodialysis patients are higher than in the normal population [1,2,23,24,25]. Therefore, HD patients should be screened for latent TB infection [1,2]. The TST and IGRA are used in screening, and in a study investigating the frequency of latent TB infection in HD patients in low- and high-risk groups for latent TB infection, IGRA were shown to be superior to the TST [26]. In our study, the rate of latent TB infection was 32.1% and was similar to the study of Bandiara et al. that was conducted in HD patients (39.1%) [27]. In another study conducted in Thailand, the frequency of latent TB infection in dialysis patients was found to be 25% [28]. In the study of Lemrabott et al., 25% of latent TB infection was found in Senegal [29]. Similar rates of latent TB infection were found in the study of Putri et al. [17]. The frequency of latent TB infection in our study was as high as in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Ankylosing Spondylitis patients in the other immunosuppressive patient group [30].
The rate of latent TB infection in our study could be determined with the T-SPOT.TB test because only 35.7% (20) of the patients had a TST and all of them had negative results. Most of the patients (64.3%) refused to go to the tuberculosis dispensary for a TST. This shows that the applicability of the TST in hemodialysis patients is difficult. At the same time, in the study of Say et al., in which the QFT-GIT and TST were compared for the diagnosis of latent TB infection, there was no concordance between the two tests [31]. In the study of Southern et al., there was a high degree of discordance between IGRA and the TST in hemodialysis patients [15]. In a study conducted with HIV-infected individuals, another group of immunosuppressive patients, moderate concordance was found between T-SPOT.TB and the TST, and it was stated that the discordance might be due to false-positive and -negative results of the TST [32]. The disadvantages of the test are that the TST gives false positive results in the presence of the BCG vaccine and atypical mycobacterial infection, and false-negative results in the presence of immunosuppression [33,34]. In our study, T-SPOT.TB positivity was found in 16 (80%) of 20 patients whose TST results were negative. This result shows that the TST gives false-negative results. On the other hand, the expensiveness of IGRA is the disadvantage of the tests, while the advantages are that they are not affected by the presence of the BCG vaccine, atypical mycobacterial infection and immunosuppression [34,35]. In the study of Sargın et al., which was conducted in a rheumatologic patient group, the sensitivity and specificity of IGRA tests were shown to be superior to the TST [36]. In our study, no significant correlation was found between T-SPOT.TB test results according to BCG vaccine status, and this shows that the test is not affected by the BCG vaccine. The BCG vaccine is in the routine childhood vaccination schedule in our country and is administered at the end of the 2nd month [2]. It is important for our country that the T-SPOT.TB test is not affected by the BCG vaccine. Although the number of patients is small, the positive T-SPOT.TB test in patients with a TB finding on a PA chest X-ray indicates that the probability of a false-negative result is low. However, false-negative results should be investigated in HD patients, including in many patients with a history of microbiologically proven tuberculosis.
In our study, T-SPOT.TB test positivity was statistically higher in patients who had encountered active TB patients. In the study of Park et al., QFT GIT positivity, which is one of the IGRA tests, was higher in HD patients who had a history of TB [37]. In a study, T-SPOT.TB test positivity in patients with high risk factors, such as encountering an active TB patient, shows that the probability of developing active TB is higher [38]. In this case, it is important to initiate latent TB treatment without delay in high-risk patients with a positive T-SPOT.TB test.
It has been shown that advanced age, active smoking and close contact with someone who has previously had TB are among the risk factors for latent TB infection in HD patients. In the same study, it was stated that high albumin levels and short HD duration facilitate the detection of latent TB infection [39]. In a study conducted in Japan in hemodialysis patients, the frequency of LTBI was found to be higher, especially in people aged 60 and over [40] and in other studies conducted in China and Lebanon, advanced age was found among the risk factors for latent TB infection [5,41]. In our study, the high mean age of the patients with a positive T-SPOT.TB test and the shorter time to enter HD in patients with a positive T-SPOT.TB test support the literature. The incidence of TB in our country has been decreasing over the years, so that the incidence of TB, which was 29.8% in 2005, decreased to 14.4% in 2018 [42]. This may be the reason why the T-SPOT.TB test gives high positive results in older age groups. In our study, there was no significant difference between positive/negative results in terms of albumin, urea and lymphocyte levels, while the average albumin levels of patients with a T-SPOT.TB positive result were higher. However, the fact that there was no significant correlation between the T-SPOT.TB test results according to the urea levels and lymphocyte counts of the patients suggests that the test is not affected by immunosuppression.
The small number of patients and the fact that many patients did not have a TST are the limitations of the study.
In conclusion, HD patients should be screened for latent TB infection as soon as possible. Although it is recommended to perform a TST first in screening, the applicability of the test is not easy and the possibility of false-negative results is high, which limits its use. The most important advantage of the T-SPOT.TB test is that it is not affected by immunosuppression and it is studied with a single measurement from blood. Therefore, the use of the T-SPOT.TB test would be a more practical and accurate approach to screen for latent TB infection in HD patients.

Author Contributions

Concept and design: U.D.B., A.V.K., F.K. and O.B.; Data collection: U.D.B. and A.V.K.; Data analysis and interpretation: U.D.B., A.V.K., F.K. and O.B.; Draft of the article: U.D.B. and A.V.K.; Revision of the article: U.D.B., A.V.K., F.K. and O.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Erzincan Binali Yildirim University Clinical Research Ethics Committee (Date: 10 November 2022/Decision No: 05/09).

Informed Consent Statement

Since it is a retrospective study, patient consent was not obtained.

Data Availability Statement

Data will be shared upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. World Health Organization. WHO Operational Handbook on Tuberculosis (Module 1—Prevention): Tuberculosis Preventive Treatment; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  2. Er, A.G.; Süer, A.İ.; Yurteri, A.Ş.; Babalık, A.; Yıldırım, A.; Öztomurcuk, D.; İnce, E.; Kabasakal, E.; Çakır, E.; İlhan, F.; et al. Tüberküloz Tanı ve Tedavi Rehberi, 2nd ed.; Artı6 Medya Tanıtım Matbaa Ltd. Şti.: Ankara, Turkey, 2019; pp. 1–344. ISBN 978-975-590-717-8. [Google Scholar]
  3. Alemu, A.; Bitew, Z.W.; Diriba, G.; Seid, G.; Moga, S.; Abdella, S.; Gashu, E.; Eshetu, K.; Tollera, G.; Dangisso, M.H.; et al. The prevalence of latent tuberculosis infection in patients with chronic kidney disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Heliyon 2023, 9, e17181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Alemu, A.; Bitew, Z.W.; Diriba, G.; Seid, G.; Eshetu, K.; Chekol, M.T.; Berhe, N.; Gumi, B. Tuberculosis incidence in patients with chronic kidney disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2022, 122, 188–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Xia, Y.; Fan, Q.; Zhang, J.; Jiang, L.; Huang, X.; Xiong, Z.; Xiong, Z. Risk factors and prognosis for latent tuberculosis infection in dialysis patients: A retrospective cohort study at a single tertiary care center. Semin. Dial. 2023, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Park, S.; Park, S.; Kim, J.E.; Yu, M.Y.; Kim, Y.C.; Kim, D.K.; Joo, K.W.; Kim, Y.S.; Han, K.; Lee, H. Risk of active tuberculosis infection in kidney transplantation recipients: A matched comparative nationwide cohort study. Am J Transplan. 2021, 21, 3629–3639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Romanowski, K.; Rose, C.; Cook, V.J.; Sekirov, I.; Morshed, M.; Djurdjev, O.; Levin, A.; Johnston, J.C. Effectiveness of Latent TB Screening and Treatment in People Initiating Dialysis in British Columbia, Canada. Can. J. Kidney Health Dis. 2020, 7, 2054358120937104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Grant, J.; Jastrzebski, J.; Johnston, J.; Stefanovic, A.; Jastrabesky, J.; Elwood, K.; Roscoe, D.; Balshaw, R.; Bryce, E. Interferon-gamma release assays are a better tuberculosis screening test for hemodialysis patients: A study and review of the literature. Can. J. Infect. Dis. Med. Microbiol. 2012, 23, 114–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Carranza, C.; Pedraza-Sanchez, S.; de Oyarzabal-Mendez, E.; Torres, M. Diagnosis for latent tuberculosis infection: New alternatives. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jonas, D.E.; Riley, S.R.; Lee, L.C.; Coffey, C.P.; Wang, S.H.; Asher, G.N.; Berry, A.M.; Williams, N.; Balio, C.; Voisin, C.E.; et al. Screening for latent tuberculosis infection in adults: Updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA 2023, 329, 1495–1509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhou, G.; Luo, Q.; Luo, S.; Teng, Z.; Ji, Z.; Yang, J.; Wang, F.; Wen, S.; Ding, Z.; Li, L.; et al. Interferon-γ release assays or tuberculin skin test for detection and management of latent tuberculosis infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2020, 20, 1457–1469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ho, C.S.; Feng, P.J.I.; Narita, M.; Stout, J.E.; Chen, M.; Pascopella, L.; Garfein, R.; Reves, R.; Katz, D.J.; Flood, J.; et al. Comparison of three tests for latent tuberculosis infection in high-risk people in the USA: An observational cohort study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2022, 22, 85–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Akbar, A.A.; Islam, M.N.; Rahman, M. Comparison of Mantoux test with quantiFERON-TB gold plus assay for detection of tuberculosis infection among chronic kidney disease patients in a tertiary care hospital in Dhaka city. Bangladesh Med. Coll. J. 2021, 26, 24–29. [Google Scholar]
  14. Setyawati, A.; Reviono, R.; Putranto, W. The Compability Level of Tuberculin Skin Test and T-SPOT. TB, Sensitivity and Spesifisity of T-SPOT. TB in Detecting Latent Tuberculosis in Hemodialysis Patients. J. Respirol. Indones. 2021, 41, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Southern, J.; Sridhar, S.; Tsou, C.Y.; Hopkins, S.; Collier, S.; Nikolayevskyy, V.; Lozewicz, S.; Lalvani, A.; Abubakar, I.; Lipman, M. Discordance in latent tuberculosis (TB) test results in patients with end-stage renal disease. Public Health 2019, 166, 34–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Wang, P.H.; Lin, S.Y.; Lee, S.S.; Lin, S.W.; Lee, C.Y.; Wei, Y.F.; Shu, C.C.; Wang, J.Y.; Yu, C.J. CD4 response of QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus for positive consistency of latent tuberculosis infection in patients on dialysis. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 21367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Putri, D.U.; Chen, C.L.; Wang, C.H.; Sue, Y.M.; Tseng, P.C.; Lin, C.F.; Tsai, C.W.; Liu, Y.J.; Lee, C.H. Hemodialysis acutely altered interferon-gamma release assay test result and immune cell profile. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 2022, 55, 332–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Park, H.; Kang, Y.-J.; Kim, Y.N.; Park, S.-B.; Lim, J.; Park, J.Y.; Kang, Y.A.; Lee, H.; Kim, J.; Kim, S. Predictors for False-Negative Interferon-Gamma Release Assay Results in Hemodialysis Patients with Latent Tuberculosis Infection. Diagnostics 2023, 13, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Nasiri, M.J.; Pormohammad, A.; Goudarzi, H.; Mardani, M.; Zamani, S.; Migliori, G.B.; Sotgiu, G. Latent tuberculosis infection in transplant candidates: A systematic review and meta-analysis on TST and IGRA. Infection 2019, 47, 353–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhou, G.; Luo, Q.; Luo, S.; He, J.; Chen, N.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, R.; Qiu, Y.; Li, S.; Ping, Q.; et al. Positive rates of interferon-γ release assay and tuberculin skin test in detection of latent tuberculosis infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 200, 000 head-to-head comparative tests. Clin. Immunol. 2022, 245, 109132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Soysal, A.; Torun, T.; Efe, S.; Gencer, H.; Tahaoglu, K.; Bakir, M. Evaluation of cut-off values of interferon-gamma- based assays in the diagnosis of M. tuberculosis infection. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 2008, 12, 50–56. [Google Scholar]
  22. Kılınç, O. Tüberkülin Deri Testi (TDT), Yorumu Ve Son Gelişmeler. In Proceedings of the 21. Yüzyılda Tüberküloz Sempozyumu ve II. Tüberküloz Laboratuvar Tanı Yöntemleri Kursu, Samsun, Turkey, 11–14 June 2003; pp. 203–207. [Google Scholar]
  23. Kiazyk, S.; Ball, T.B. Latent tuberculosis infection: An overview. Can. Commun. Dis. Rep. 2017, 43, 62–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Moran, E.; Baharani, J.; Dedicoat, M.; Robinson, E.; Smith, G.; Bhomra, P.; Thien, O.S.; Ryan, R. Risk factors associated with the development of active tuberculosis among patients with advanced chronic kidney disease. J. Infect. 2018, 77, 291–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Dobler, C.C.; McDonald, S.P.; Marks, G.B. Risk of tuberculosis in dialysis patients: A nationwide cohort study. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e29563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Chung, W.K.; Zheng, Z.L.; Sung, J.Y.; Kim, S.; Lee, H.H.; Choi, S.J.; Yang, J. Validity of interferon-γ-release assays for the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis in haemodialysis patients. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2010, 16, 960–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Bandiara, R.; Indrasari, A.; Rengganis, A.D.; Sukesi, L.; Afiatin, A.; Santoso, P. Risk factors of latent tuberculosis among chronic kidney disease with routine haemodialysis patients. J. Clin. Tuberc. Other Mycobact. Dis. 2022, 27, 100302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hayuk, P.; Boongird, S.; Pornsuriyasak, P.; Bruminhent, J. Interferon-gamma release assays for diagnosis of latent TB infection in chronic kidney diseases and dialysis patients. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 1046373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Lemrabott, A.T.; Faye, M.; Faye, M.; Kane, Y.; Cisse, M.M. Contribution of an Interferon Gamma Released Assay to the Detection of Latent Tuberculosis in Chronic Dialysis Patients in Sub-Saharan Africa. J. Nephrol. Ther. 2019, 9, 2161-0959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Doğru, G.; Şahin, M. Romatoid Artrit ve Ankilozan Spondilit Hastalarında Anti-TNF Alfa Tedavi Öncesi Latent Tüberküloz Taramasında Tüberkülin Deri Testi ve İnterferon Gama Salınım Testinin Karşılaştırılması. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilim. Derg. 2021, 12, 70–76. [Google Scholar]
  31. Say, İ.; Küçük, B.; Orak, F.; Aral, M.; Doğaner, A. Latent Tüberküloz Enfeksiyonu Araştırılan Hastalarda QuantiFERON-TB GOLD Testi ile Tüberkülin Deri Testinin Karşılaştırılması. Türk Mikrobiyoloji Cemiy. Derg. 2021, 51, 271–275. [Google Scholar]
  32. Binay, U.D.; Fincanci, M.; Fersan, E.; Karakecili, F. Comparison of Tuberculin Skin Test (TST) and T-SPOT. TB Tests for Diagnosis of Latent Tuberculosis Infection (LTBI) in HIV-infected Patients. Mikrobiyol. Bul. 2019, 53, 388–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Richardson, R.M. The diagnosis of tuberculosis in dialysis patients. Semin. Dial. 2012, 25, 419–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhang, X.; Chen, P.; Xu, G. Update of the mechanism and characteristics of tuberculosis in chronic kidney disease. Wien. Klin. Wochenschr. 2022, 134, 501–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wardani, H.R.; Wicaksi, D. Detection of Latent Tuberculosis Infection in Haemodialysis Patients: A Systematic Review. Unej E-Proceeding 2021, S.I., 55–62. [Google Scholar]
  36. Sargın, G.; Şentürk, T.; Ceylan, E.; Telli, M.; Çildağ, S.; Doğan, H. TST, QuantiFERON-TB Gold test and T-SPOT. TB test for detecting latent tuberculosis infection in patients with rheumatic disease prior to anti-TNF therapy. Tuberk. Toraks 2018, 66, 136–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Park, J.Y.; Park, S.B.; Park, H.; Kim, J.; Kim, Y.N.; Kim, S. Cytokine and Chemokine mRNA Expressions after Mycobacterium tuberculosis-Specific Antigen Stimulation in Whole Blood from Hemodialysis Patients with Latent Tuberculosis Infection. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Abubakar, I.; Drobniewski, F.; Southern, J.; Sitch, A.J.; Jackson, C.; Lipman, M.; Deeks, J.J.; Griffiths, C.; Bothamley, G.; Lynn, W.; et al. Prognostic value of interferon-γ release assays and tuberculin skin test in predicting the development of active tuberculosis (UK PREDICT TB): A prospective cohort study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2018, 18, 1077–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Shu, C.C.; Wu, V.C.; Yang, F.J.; Pan, S.C.; Lai, T.S.; Wang, J.Y.; Wang, J.T.; Lee, L.N. Predictors and prevalence of latent tuberculosis infection in patients receiving long-term hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e42592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Ogawa, Y.; Harada, M.; Hashimoto, K.; Kamijo, Y. Prevalence of latent tuberculosis infection and its risk factors in Japanese hemodialysis patients. Clin. Exp. Nephrol. 2021, 25, 1255–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ismail, M.B.; Zarriaa, N.; Osman, M.; Helfawi, S.; Kabbara, N.; Chatah, A.N.; Kamaleddine, A.; Alameddine, R.; Dabboussi, F.; Hamze, M. Prevalence of Latent Tuberculosis Infection among Patients Undergoing Regular Hemodialysis in Disenfranchised Communities: A Multicenter Study during COVID-19 Pandemic. Medicina 2023, 59, 654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Yıllara GöRe Toplam Tb Olgu Sayısı, Toplam Olgu Hızı Ve İNsiDans HızI, 2005–2018. Available online: https://hsgmdestek.saglik.gov.tr/depo/birimler/tuberkuloz_db/dosya/Istatistikler/Yeni/2-Yllara_Gore_Toplam_TB_Olgu_Hz_ve_TB_Insidans_2005-2018.pdf (accessed on 2 July 2023).
Table
Table 1. Demographic Characteristics and Distribution of Laboratory and Imaging Results of the Patients.
Table 1. Demographic Characteristics and Distribution of Laboratory and Imaging Results of the Patients.
Min-Max (Median)Mean ± Sd
Age (year)20–81 (63)60.18 ± 14.85
Time of dialysis (years)1–27 (4)6.43 ± 6.03
n%
GenderFemale2239.3
Male3460.7
Presence of ComorbidityYes3766.1
No1933.9
Type of comorbiditiesType 2 DM1232.4
Hypertension2978.4
Other *1745.9
History of active tuberculosisYes23.6
No5496.4
Encounter with active tuberculosis patientYes58.9
No5191.1
BCG scar058.9
1814.3
24376.8
Leukocyte count (mm3) 2800–25,400 (6250)6992.86 ± 3842.15
Lymphocyte count (mm3) 440–21,020 (1185)1981.43 ± 3533.68
Albumin (g/dL) 2.1–41 (3.8)17.42 ± 16.16
Urea (mg/dL) 85–238 (147.5)149.18 ± 28.91
n%
Previous TB finding on PA chest X-rayYes47.1
No5292.9
T-SPOT.TB testNegative3867.9
Positive1832.1
TSTNegative2035.7
Unknown3664.3
* Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Alport Syndrome, Chronic Lymphoproliferative Leukemia, Coronary Artery Disease, Rheumatoid Arthritis.
Table
Table 2. Relationship between Descriptive Characteristics and T-SPOT.TB Results.
Table 2. Relationship between Descriptive Characteristics and T-SPOT.TB Results.
T-SPOT.TB Testp
Negative (n = 38)Positive (n = 18)
Age (year)Min-Max (Median)20–80 (57)38–81 (71)a 0.003 *
Mean ± Sd56.26 ± 15.0868.44 ± 10.6
Time of dialysis (year)Min-Max (Median)1–27 (5)1–20 (3)b 0.029 *
Mean ± Sd7.45 ± 6.374.28 ± 4.71
GenderFemale18 (81.8)4 (18.2)c 0.072
Male20 (58.8)14 (41.2)
Presence of ComorbidityYes27 (73)10 (27)c 0.253
No11 (57.9)8 (42.1)
Type of comorbidities (n = 37)
Type 2 DMYes8 (66.7)4 (33.3)d 0.696
No19 (76)6 (24)
Essential HTYes20 (69)9 (31)d 0.404
No7 (87.5)1 (12.5)
Other *Yes13 (76.5)4 (23.5)d 0.725
No14 (70)6 (30)
Encounter with active tuberculosis patientYes1 (20)4 (80)d 0.033 *
No37 (72.5)14 (27.5)
BCG scar03 (60)2 (40)e 1.000
16 (75)2 (25)
229 (67.4)14 (32.6)
a Student’s t-Test; b Mann–Whitney U Test; c Pearson’s Chi-Squared Test; d Fisher’s Exact Test; e Fisher–Freeman–Halton Test; * Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Alport Syndrome, Chronic Lymphoproliferative Leukemia, Coronary Artery Disease, Rheumatoid Arthritis.
Table
Table 3. Relationship between Laboratory and Imaging Results and T-SPOT.TB Test Results.
Table 3. Relationship between Laboratory and Imaging Results and T-SPOT.TB Test Results.
T-SPOT.TBp
Negative (n = 38)Positive (n = 18)
Leukocyte (mm3)Min-Max (Median)2800–13,300 (6350)4000–25,400 (5400)b 0.352
Mean ± Sd6602.63 ± 2108.097816.67 ± 6085.11
Lymphocyte (mm3)Min-Max (Median)440–2710 (1165)660–21,020 (1275)b 0.516
Mean ± Sd1322.11 ± 562.143373.33 ± 6057.06
Albumin (g/dL)Min-Max (Median)2.9–41 (3.8)2.1–39 (17.9)b 0.853
Mean ± Sd16.46 ± 16.0619.46 ± 16.65
Urea (mg/dL)Min-Max (Median)85–238 (152)103–180 (142.5)a 0.230
Mean ± Sd152.39 ± 31.85142.39 ± 20.61
Previous TB finding on PA chest X-rayYes1 (25)3 (75)d 0.093
No37 (71.2)15 (28.8)
a Student’s t-Test; b Mann–Whitney U Test; d Fisher’s Exact Test.
Table
Table 4. Logistic Regression Results of Factors Affecting T-SPOT.TB Test.
Table 4. Logistic Regression Results of Factors Affecting T-SPOT.TB Test.
pODDS95% C.I.ODDS
LowerUpper
Age0.018 *1.1011.0161.192
Gender (F)0.1283.9370.67423.003
Previous TB finding on PA chest X-ray (+)0.3113.7660.29048.857
Time of dialysis (year)0.8271.0170.8751.182
Encounter with active tuberculosis patient (+)0.027 *59.7621.5992233.422
* p < 0.05,
Table
Table 5. Distribution of the Descriptive Characteristics of the Patients who had TST.
Table 5. Distribution of the Descriptive Characteristics of the Patients who had TST.
N = 20Min-Max (Median)Mean ± Sd
Age (year)20–81 (64)61.85 ± 17.10
Time of dialysis (year)1–20 (3.5)6.40 ± 6.08
n%
GenderFemale630
Male1470
Presence of ComorbidityYes1050
No1050
Type of comorbidities (n = 10)Type 2 DM220
HT990
Other *550
History of active tuberculosisYes15
No1995
Encounter with active tuberculosis patientYes420
No1680
BCG scar0210
1315
21575
* Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Alport Syndrome, Chronic Lymphoproliferative Leukemia, Coronary Artery Disease, Rheumatoid Arthritis.
Table
Table 6. Distribution of Laboratory and Imaging Results of the Patients who had TST.
Table 6. Distribution of Laboratory and Imaging Results of the Patients who had TST.
N = 20 Min-Max (Median)Mean ± Sd
Leukocyte (mm3) 2800–21,900 (5400)7000 ± 4336.87
Lymphocyte (mm3) 660–18,850 (1285)2209 ± 3951.76
Albumin (g/dL) 2.1–39 (3.7)16.39 ± 16.41
Urea (mg/dL) 100–180 (142.5)141.95 ± 22.97
n%
Previous TB finding on PA chest X-rayYes210
No1890
T-SPOT.TB testNegative420
Positive1680
T-SPOT.TB testp
Negative (n = 4)Positive (n = 16)
Leukocyte (mm3)2800–13,300 (6350)4200–21,900(5400)b 0.892
7175.0 ± 4593.76956.3 ± 4426.4
Lymphocyte (mm3)800–2210 (1285)660–18,850 (1275)b 0.963
1395.0 ± 590.62412.5 ± 4414.7
b Mann–Whitney U Test.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Binay, U.D.; Kara, A.V.; Karakeçili, F.; Barkay, O. Diagnosis of Latent Tuberculosis Infection in Hemodialysis Patients: TST versus T-SPOT.TB. Diagnostics 2023, 13, 2369. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13142369

AMA Style

Binay UD, Kara AV, Karakeçili F, Barkay O. Diagnosis of Latent Tuberculosis Infection in Hemodialysis Patients: TST versus T-SPOT.TB. Diagnostics. 2023; 13(14):2369. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13142369

Chicago/Turabian Style

Binay, Umut Devrim, Ali Veysel Kara, Faruk Karakeçili, and Orçun Barkay. 2023. "Diagnosis of Latent Tuberculosis Infection in Hemodialysis Patients: TST versus T-SPOT.TB" Diagnostics 13, no. 14: 2369. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13142369

APA Style

Binay, U. D., Kara, A. V., Karakeçili, F., & Barkay, O. (2023). Diagnosis of Latent Tuberculosis Infection in Hemodialysis Patients: TST versus T-SPOT.TB. Diagnostics, 13(14), 2369. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13142369

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop