Next Article in Journal
Comparative Study of the Myocardium of Patients from Four COVID-19 Waves
Previous Article in Journal
Application of Hybridization Chain Reaction/CRISPR-Cas12a for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Infection
Previous Article in Special Issue
Undersampled Diffusion-Weighted 129Xe MRI Morphometry of Airspace Enlargement: Feasibility in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Diagnostics
Volume 13
Issue 9
10.3390/diagnostics13091647
diagnostics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Pitfalls of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging: Clinical Utility of T2 Shine-through and T2 Black-out for Musculoskeletal Diseases

by
Yuri Kim
1,
Seul Ki Lee
1,*,
Jee-Young Kim
1 and
Jun-Ho Kim
2
1
Department of Radiology, St. Vincent’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Joint Diseases, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul 05278, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2023, 13(9), 1647; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13091647
Submission received: 28 March 2023 / Revised: 30 April 2023 / Accepted: 4 May 2023 / Published: 7 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diffusion-Weighted Imaging: Technique and Medical Applications)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with an apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value is a relatively new magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequence that provides functional information on the lesion by measuring the microscopic movement of water molecules. While numerous studies have evaluated the promising role of DWI in musculoskeletal radiology, most have focused on tumorous diseases related to cellularity. This review article aims to summarize DWI-acquisition techniques, considering pitfalls such as T2 shine-through and T2 black-out, and their usefulness in interpreting musculoskeletal diseases with imaging. DWI is based on the Brownian motion of water molecules within the tissue, achieved by applying diffusion-sensitizing gradients. Regardless of the cellularity of the lesion, several pitfalls must be considered when interpreting DWI with ADC values in musculoskeletal radiology. This review discusses the application of DWI in musculoskeletal diseases, including tumor and tumor mimickers, as well as non-tumorous diseases, with a focus on lesions demonstrating T2 shine-through and T2 black-out effects. Understanding these pitfalls of DWI can provide clinically useful information, increase diagnostic accuracy, and improve patient management when added to conventional MRI in musculoskeletal diseases.

1. Introduction

Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values is a recent addition to the musculoskeletal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) that has been adopted by many institutions. This is because some musculoskeletal diseases may have similar imaging findings of conventional MRI of T1- and T2-weighted images, which can limit the diagnostic specificity [1,2]. The primary role of DWI and ADC values in musculoskeletal radiology has been evaluated for tumorous diseases related to cellularity, such as the differentiation of benign and malignant tumors [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23], determination of therapeutic response [24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37], and identification of recurrent disease [38,39]. Additionally, DWI has been used for non-tumorous diseases such as infection [40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47] and inflammation [48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62]. However, DWI has some pitfalls, including T2 shine-through and T2 black-out effects, due to the interaction between DWI and T2-weighted images [63]. Many review articles have included mentions of these pitfalls [64,65,66,67], but they have been noted as cautions rather than emphasizing their clinical usefulness. While these pitfalls should be interpreted with caution, they can be useful in diagnosing certain musculoskeletal diseases, as many lesions in the musculoskeletal system exhibit markedly hyperintense (i.e., ganglion cyst) or hypointense lesions (i.e., hematoma, fibrous tumor, fatty lesion, mineraliazation) on T2-weighted images. This review will focus on the DWI with ADC values in musculoskeletal radiology and their pitfalls including T2 shine-through [68,69,70,71] and T2 black-out effect [2,63,68,72], with clinical use in the diagnosis of musculoskeletal diseases.

2. Principles of DWI

DWI is a relatively new MRI sequence that provides qualitative and quantitative information on the cellularity of a lesion by measuring the Brownian motion of water molecules within the tissue [69,73,74]. The random motion of water molecules in tissue is the basis of the signal in DWI [75]. The greater the average free path length of a water molecule, the greater the signal loss achieved with diffusion-sensitizing gradients [1]. The first gradient of DWI causes the dephasing of the spins, while the second gradient rephrases the spins. If the molecules have moved before the second gradient is applied, the rephrasing is incomplete, and signal loss occurs, which can be visualized and measured as an ADC value [76]. Signal losses on DWI are proportional to both (i) the free motion of water molecules in tissues and (ii) the diffusion-sensitizing gradients used [1].
Point: DWI provides qualitative and quantitative information on the cellularity of a lesion by measuring the Brownian motion of water molecules within the tissue, and the greater the average free path length of a water molecule, the greater the signal loss achieved with diffusion-sensitizing gradients.

2.1. Water Movement in Tissues

Water movement in tissues is not completely free or random, but can be influenced by interactions with tissue microstructures, suggesting that DWI reflects differences in the Brownian motion of water molecules caused by changes in tissue microscopic structure [63]. DWI captures the extracellular, intracellular, and transcellular motion of water molecules as well as microcirculation (perfusion) [75]. Among these components, extracellular and perfusion contribute the most to the signal loss of DWI [75]. However, obstacles such as macromolecules, tight junctions, membranes, and membranous structures impede diffusion, resulting in a reduction in the motion of intracellular water molecules in biological tissue compared to the extracellular space [77]. Different patterns of water molecule diffusion in various biologic tissues help determine the contrast obtained with DWI, indicating not only cellularity but also fibrosis or hemoglobin degradation products [70]. In vascular structures and tissues that have lost cellular integrity (e.g., necrotic tissue), water molecules diffuse greater and show less signal on DWI. Tissues with highly cellular microenvironments have restricted water diffusion and exhibit high signals on DWI [63].
Point: DWI reflects differences in the Brownian motion of water molecules caused by changes in tissue microscopic structure, capturing the extracellular, intracellular, and transcellular motion of water molecules, while obstacles such as macromolecules, tight junctions, membranes, and membranous structures impede diffusion, resulting in a reduction in the motion of intracellular water molecules in biological tissue compared to the extracellular space.

2.2. Diffusion Sensitizing Gradients

DWI can measure water diffusivity by applying diffusion-sensitizing gradients to T2-weighed spin-echo sequences using echoplanar readouts of the data [2]. In the absence of a diffusion sensitizing gradient (b-value of 0 s/mm2), free water appears bright with its own T2-weighting (Figure 1). As the b-values increases (Figure 2), signal intensity decreases steadily in tissues, first in free water (e.g., urine in the bladder), then in glandular tissue (e.g., prostate, salivary gland, pancreas), and highly organized cellular structures such as the liver. Because highly packed tissue such as tumors restrict water movement, highly cellular tissues appear continuously bright against a darkening background at high b-values of 500–1000 s/mm2.
For similar reasons, several normal but highly cellularized tissues such as the brain, spinal cord, spleen, and normal lymphatic tissues, are also displayed as bright signals in high b-values (500–1000 s/mm2) images (Figure 3) [2].
Point: DWI measures water diffusivity by applying diffusion-sensitizing gradients to T2-weighed spin-echo sequences, with signal intensity decreasing steadily in tissues as b-values increase, except for highly cellular tissues such as tumors which appear continuously bright against a darkening background at high b-values.

3. Values in Obtaining DWI

The strength and duration of the diffusion-sensitizing gradients used in DWI are indicated by the “b-value”, and typically, radiologists select two or more b-values (expressed as s/mm2) to evaluate tissue water diffusivity [2]. The ADC value is calculated as the slope of the exponential decrease in signal intensity between DWIs acquired with different b-values [77].

3.1. b-Value Selection

Lower b-values tend to have a higher perfusion-related contribution, causing free water to appear brighter due to intrinsic T2-weighting, which can affect the ADC value. Therefore, many protocols exclude the low b-value of 0 and choose a b-value of 50 s/mm2 instead [78]. In low b-value (50–100 s/mm2) images, free water, such as fast-flowing blood within vessels and cerebrospinal fluid, exhibit significant signal attenuation, often referred to as “black blood” images (Figure 4). This is because water molecules move a relatively large distance during the application of the diffusion-sensitizing gradients [2]. The main contributing factor changes from perfusion to diffusion with b-values in the range of 100–300 s/mm2 [79]. A b-value of at least 500–800 s/mm2 is required to separate diffusion from perfusion-related contributions [77]. Although there is no consensus on how many b-values should be used when imaging the musculoskeletal system, many recent protocols in the literature suggest three b-values (e.g., 50, 400, 800 s/mm2) [78,80].
Point: Lower b-values have a higher perfusion-related contribution, which can affect the ADC value, so many protocols exclude the low b-value of 0 and choose a b-value of 50 s/mm2 instead, with a b-value of at least 500–800 s/mm2 required to separate diffusion from perfusion-related contributions.

3.2. ADC Value Generation

The ADC value (usually represented by μm2/s or × 10−3 mm2/s) quantifies the gradual loss of signal in a tissue of interest as demonstrated by DWI with increasing diffusion-sensitizing gradient strengths or b-values [77]. The ADC value is mathematically defined as the slope of a line that represents a logarithmic decrease in signal intensity between two or more b-values, using a monoexponential fit [63]. ADC values are generated on a pixel-by-pixel basis and can measure minimum, maximum, and mean ADC values for interest of region [63]. Although the mean ADC value is commonly used, the minimum ADC value is more correlated with histologic findings [69]. Restricted diffusion leads to an increased signal on DWI with low ADC values, reflecting highly cellular microenvironments with the term “restricted diffusion”, while free diffusion leads to a decreased signal on DWI and increased ADC values, reflecting paucicellular regions with the term “unrestricted or free diffusion” [63]. Therefore, DWI and ADC values provide a quantitative evaluation of cellularity at the molecular level.
Point: ADC values provide quantitative evaluation of cellularity at the molecular level, reflecting restricted diffusion in highly cellular regions and unrestricted or free diffusion in paucicellular regions.

3.3. DWI Protocols

DWI is a non-contrast sequence and should be performed prior to the administration of intravenous contrast agents. The single-shot echoplanar spin-echo T2-weighted sequence is dominant in current clinical use of the musculoskeletal system due to its rapid data acquisition, less sensitivity to patient motion, and high signal-to-noise ratio [63]. Unfortunately, this sequence is prone to magnetic susceptibility artifacts, particularly at tissue interfaces such as air, bone, and soft tissue, and to geometric distortions caused by eddy currents in a large field of view [81].
Point: DWI is a non-contrast sequence that should be performed before the administration of intravenous contrast agents, and it is prone to magnetic susceptibility artifacts and geometric distortions.

4. DWI Interpretation with ADC Map

Qualitative and quantitative analysis of diffusivity on DWI are both important. In qualitative analysis, it is important to recognize the significance of b-values, while in quantitative analysis, one should be aware of the principles of ADC measurement.

4.1. Qualitative Analysis

Qualitative analyses rely on the subjective visual interpretation of signal loss as diffusion weighting increases, which can lead to poor reproducibility [82]. Based on a qualitative assessment, diffusivity can be categorized as “free” or “restricted” by visual assessment. Hypocellular tissues exhibit a characteristic of “free” diffusivity (Figure 5), which is indicated by a gradual and exponential decrease in signal intensity as the gradient strengths/b-values are progressively increased on DWI [69]. This signal loss is due to the inability of mobile protons to refocus within a hypocellular environment, leading to high measured ADC values. Diffusivity of hypercellular/malignant tissues is “restricted” (Figure 6). This is characterized by a static elevated signal with increasing gradient strengths on DWI and a low measured ADC. [68].
Point: Qualitative analysis of DWI relies on subjective visual interpretation of signal loss, with “free” diffusivity indicating hypocellular tissues and “restricted” diffusivity indicating hypercellular/malignant tissues.

4.2. Quantitative Analysis

In quantitative analyses, the lesion’s minimum, maximum, and mean ADC values are typically measured within a defined region of interest (ROI). Although the minimum ADC values have been found to demonstrate the strongest correlation with histology, the mean ADC is conceptually straightforward and more widely used [2,63]. It is noteworthy that the variability in constructing an ROI on the ADC map due to the absence of standardized methodologies can result in inconsistencies in image analysis and interpretation among different readers [63]. There are varying methodologies regarding whether the ROI should encompass the entire tumor or solely the regions exhibiting the lowest values [63]. Subhawong et al. [63] suggested using circular or elliptic ROIs to cover the largest possible area of the tumor while excluding adjacent bone or soft tissues. This is typically done on images where the tumor exhibits the lowest ADC, indicating the presence of more cellular tissue. The minimum and mean ADC values are then measured [63]. Although there is currently no agreement on the optimal size of the ROI for ADC measurement, it may be most practical and reliable to select ROIs covering both the areas with the lowest signal intensity by qualitative assessment of the ADC map and the largest spatial extent of the lesion to establish a consistent and easily implementable protocol for clinical use (Figure 7) [77]. To avoid obtaining inaccurate ADC values, it is necessary to be cautious and avoid the foci of the mineral, hemorrhage, cortex, and macroscopic fat [77].
Point: Quantitative analyses of ADC values typically measure the lesion’s minimum, maximum, and mean ADC values within a defined region of interest.

5. Pitfalls of DWI and ADC Map

The specificity of the ADC value is reduced when the T2 signal intensity of the lesion is markedly hypointense or hyperintense [73]. It is essential to compare DWI and ADC in conjugation with conventional MRI.

5.1. T2 Shine-through Effect

It is important to understand the concept of the T2 shine-through effect. When a lesion contains a significant amount of fluid, there is no restriction of diffusion, and thus no reduction in ADC values, despite the high intensity of DWI due to the long T2 relaxation time [69]. As a result, such tissues appear bright on both DWI and ADC maps (Figure 8). If DWIs are obtained using a single b-value, it may not be possible to generate ADC maps, which can lead to potential pitfalls during interpretation. There is a risk of misinterpreting fluid-containing lesions in areas with restricted diffusion by qualitative evaluation only (pseudo-high on DWI with high b-value) [68,83]. To avoid such pitfalls, it is recommended to acquire DWI with a minimum of two diffusion weightings.
Point: T2 shine-through effect cause false positive findings due to the long T2 relaxation time of fluid, leading to potential misinterpretation of fluid-containing lesions as areas with restricted diffusion, and acquiring DWI with a minimum of two diffusion weightings is recommended to avoid this pitfall.

5.2. T2 Black-out Effect

The T2 black-out effect, which is the opposite of the T2 shine-through effect, can potentially cause another problem [68]. It is observed when analyzing structures that have a very short intrinsic T2 signal, such as those containing iron or calcium. The low intrinsic T2 signal results in low signal intensity with different diffusion weightings, which can lead to limitations in the accuracy of ADC maps. Lesions that have a lower water content such as those containing fat, or susceptibility artifacts such as hemorrhages containing deoxyhemoglobin or hemosiderin, are likely to exhibit lower signal intensity on DWI with high b-values and lower ADC values (pseudo-low ADC value, Figure 9), misinterpreted as highly cellular tumors [2,68]. Assessing osteosarcoma or osteoblastic bone metastases can be challenging due to the presence of this phenomenon, which can decrease the sensitivity of DWI [68]. To prevent misinterpretation, it is important to thoroughly review and correlate T2-weighted images, DWIs obtained with multiple b-values, and the corresponding ADC map.
Point: The T2 black-out effect can lead to potential misinterpretation of lesions with a low intrinsic T2 signal or susceptibility artifacts as highly cellular tumors on DWI with lower ADC values.

6. Image Interpretation Guidelines for DWI with ADC Map

To accurately evaluate DWI, it is necessary to visually compare the images acquired using a low b-value (T2-weighting), with those obtained using a high b-value. Figure 10 provides a comprehensive overview of all possible interpretations of DWI with the ADC map. The top two rows of Figure 10 refer to interpretation related to cellularity, while the bottom two rows refer to potential pitfalls.
In tumorous conditions, it is widely accepted that DWI typically shows low ADC values in malignant aggressive tumors, while benign tumors usually exhibit high ADC values [69]. When interpreting DWI findings, it is important to consider the matrix and appearance of any musculoskeletal tumor on conventional MRI [69]. DWI is valuable for evaluating disease status after treatment, especially in cases such as osteosarcoma and Ewing’s sarcoma, where increasing ADC values from the baseline indicates a good response to chemotherapy [24,84,85].
In non-tumorous conditions, DWI can be diagnostically helpful to differentiate between degenerative and inflammatory diseases, as well as to identify infected areas. Inflammatory conditions such as ankylosing spondylitis presenting sacroiliac and spinal diseases typically exhibit higher ADC values compared to degenerative conditions [69]. Several studies have demonstrated the usefulness of DWI as a technique for monitoring the progress of rheumatic disease after treatment, as patients who respond well to treatment typically show a decrease in ADC values [86]. DWI has also been shown to be effective in detecting infected areas, as the restricted diffusivity observed in infections or abscesses containing protein-rich, viscous liquid can be identified through DWI as restricted diffusion [69].
The clinical applications related to the pitfalls of DWI will be discussed in detail in Section 7.

7. Clinical Applications of DWI Pitfalls

If T2 shine-through and T2 black-out effects are interpreted without reference to DWI, there is a risk of misdiagnosing certain musculoskeletal lesions. Lesions that demonstrate the T2 black-out effect (pseudo-low ADC value) may be incorrectly diagnosed as highly cellular tumors when analyzed solely based on the ADC map. Conversely, lesions that demonstrate T2 shine-through (pseudo-high on DWI with high b-value) may be misinterpreted as having restricted diffusion when analyzed solely based on the DWI. Therefore, it is important to use a combination of DWI (both low and high b-values) and ADC maps for accurate lesion characterization and diagnosis.

7.1. Cyst

Juxtaarticular ganglia or cysts can typically be diagnosed using only conventional MRI sequences, as these structures do not exhibit internal contrast enhancement [87]. The high ADC values observed in them, attributed to their free water content, have been found to be diagnostically useful. In musculoskeletal tumors, many tumors may appear with cystic change, and their ADC values may be somewhat high. Knowing the presence of the T2 shine-through effect can help distinguish whether the cystic appearance is truly fluid (Figure 8) or a cystic neoplasm (Figure 5), such as myxomas that have homogeneous T2 hyperintensity and may be mistaken for cysts during qualitative analysis [87]. In the case of cystic neoplasms or tumor with cystic changes, even if the ADC is high, some signal loss will appear in the DWI with higher b-value images. Additionally, some bone tumors may be overlooked as a hypercellular tumor on DWI alone, but when combined with ADC, it can help predict a cystic change of the underlying bone tumor (Figure 11). When conducting quantitative analysis using ADC measurement, a mean ADC value of greater than 2.5 × 10−3 mm2/s can achieve a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 100% can be achieved in diagnosing cysts and benign cystic lesions [88].

7.2. Hematoma

The DWI signal intensity of a hematoma is dependent on its stage and is correlated with the relative amounts of various types of hemorrhagic materials present [89,90]. The changes in DWI signal during the evolution of intracerebral hematomas are well defined (Table 1) [91]. In the hyperacute stage, DWI reveals a hyperintense signal of oxyhemoglobin, and the ADC value is decreased, indicating “restricted” diffusion of water molecules within red blood cells [89,90]. During the late subacute stage, the increased mobility of water in extracellular methemoglobin results in a prolonged hyperintense signal on DWI due to the T2 component of the fluid that contains extracellular methemoglobin. This effect is not affected by uneven susceptibility, and there is a slight increase in ADC value compared to the other stages, indicating ‘slightly restricted’ water diffusion [89,90]. Magnetic susceptibility effects cause other blood clots, such as deoxyhemoglobin (in the acute stage), intracellular methemoglobin (in the early subacute stage), and hemosiderin (in the chronic stage, Figure 9), to display low signal intensity on both T2-weighted images and DWI. The low signal intensity of these hemorrhagic products on T2-weighted images results in unreliable ADC value calculations due to the T2 black-out effect, which creates a pseudo-low ADC value [92].
Many musculoskeletal soft tissue tumors show hemorrhagic changes, which can be difficult to differentiate from hematoma on conventional MRI due to their similar appearances. In such cases, the quantitative use of ADC measurement can aid in differentiation (Figure 12); the mean ADC value of a hematoma is significantly higher than that of hemorrhagic malignant soft tissue tumors (1.55 ± 0.121 × 10−3 mm2/s vs. 0.92 ± 0.139 × 10−3 mm2/s) [93].

7.3. Benign Bone and Soft Tissue Tumors

In general, it is commonly believed that malignant bone tumors such as sarcomas and lymphomas tend to have lower ADC values, while benign bone tumors usually have higher ADC values [77,94]. Nevertheless, certain benign bone tumors, such as a non-ossifying fibroma or giant-cell tumor (GCT), may demonstrate the T2 black-out effect, which creates a pseudo-low ADC value that is less than 1.0 × 10−3 mm2/s [67]. This effect can be ascribed to the dense collage fibers in non-ossifying fibroma and the presence of hemosiderin deposits and other blood products in GCT, which can influence the ADC measurement [65]. Choi et al. [4] reported that certain benign soft tissue tumors, such as those associated with bleeding or schwannoma with secondary degeneration, tenosynovial GCT, and fibroma, can exhibit visual diffusion restriction (the presence of signal drop). In particular, GCT (Figure 13) can sometimes present with peritumoral edema (GCT of bone) or an ill-defined margin (diffuse-type tenosynovial GCT), which can lead to misinterpretation of a malignant tumor when relying solely on conventional MRI [95,96]. Gout with tophi (Figure 14) that contain foci of mineralization can also be erroneously interpreted as a malignant soft tissue lesion [77]. Even with the addition of DWI, if the reader were to only see the ADC map, restricted diffusion could be mistakenly assumed due to the T2 black-out effect. Therefore, it is crucial to examine both the DWI and ADC map to determine if the mass is a certain benign tumor with the T2 black-out effect.

7.4. Vertebral Endplate Changes

Degenerative vertebral endplate changes are classified into three groups by Modic. In type 1 Modic change, the presence of vascular granulation tissue is noted, which appears as low signal intensity on T1-weighted images and high signal intensity on T2-weighted images [97]. Histological examination has revealed that these changes are linked to the fissuring of the cartilaginous endplate and increased vascularity within the subchondral bone marrow [98]. Diagnosing type 1 Modic changes in patients with low back pain can be challenging because their MRI features resemble those of spondylodiscitis. Typically, spondylodiscitis causes vertebral marrow edema, which appears as areas of low signal intensity on T1-weighted images and high signal intensity on T2-weighted images [99]. Distinguishing between two conditions, type 1 Modic change and spondylodiscitis, can be relatively easy using DWI. The presence of the ‘claw sign’ on DWI is highly indicative of degenerative change, while its absence is a strong indicator of infectious spondylodiscitis (Figure 15) [100]. The claw sign observed on DWI manifests as paired, well-defined linear areas of high signal intensity. These areas are situated at the interface between normal bone marrow and vascularized bone marrow, which is in close proximity to the affected disc [100]. The crucial point is that the inner portion of the high signal intensities appears lower in signal intensity than the outer part on DWI. This is believed to be caused by a combination of affected fatty bone marrow and granulation tissue. The presence of the fat marrow component results in a low signal intensity within the affected area. Larger lipid-laden cells in fatty marrow, along with bone trabeculae, can impede the movement of extracellular water, leading to a T2 black-out effect [101].
Table 2 summarized the clinical usefulness of DWI pitfalls in musculoskeletal diseases.

8. Conclusions

DWI is a functional imaging technique and is becoming increasingly popular as part of multiparametric MRI for evaluating musculoskeletal diseases. DWI provides both qualitative and quantitative information for characterizing not only tumorous diseases but also non-tumorous diseases in musculoskeletal radiology. However, the interpretation of the DWI and the ADC map should take into account the potential pitfalls. For instance, there is a risk of misinterpreting a lesion with a T2 black-out effect as a highly cellular tumor with pseudo-low ADC values. Additionally, there is a risk of misinterpreting fluid-containing lesion as areas with restricted diffusion due to T2 shine-through effect, resulting in pseudo-high signals on DWI with a high b-value. Therefore, when assessing ADC values, conventional MRI and DWI must be considered. Careful interpretation of DWI and ADC map, considering the pitfalls, combined with conventional MRI and clinical findings, can enhance diagnostic accuracy, and facilitate the selection of the most suitable management for certain musculoskeletal diseases.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: J.-H.K., S.K.L. Writing—Original Draft Preparation: J.-H.K., S.K.L. Writing—Review and Editing: Y.K., S.K.L. Visualization: Y.K., S.K.L. Supervision: S.K.L., J.-Y.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Baur, A.; Reiser, M.F. Diffusion-weighted imaging of the musculoskeletal system in humans. Skelet. Radiol. 2000, 29, 555–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Khoo, M.M.; Tyler, P.A.; Saifuddin, A.; Padhani, A.R. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in musculoskeletal MRI: A critical review. Skelet. Radiol. 2011, 40, 665–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lim, H.K.; Jee, W.H.; Jung, J.Y.; Paek, M.Y.; Kim, I.; Jung, C.K.; Chung, Y.G. Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MR imaging for differentiation of benign and malignant musculoskeletal tumours at 3 T. Br. J. Radiol. 2018, 91, 20170636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Choi, Y.J.; Lee, I.S.; Song, Y.S.; Kim, J.I.; Choi, K.U.; Song, J.W. Diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI for the differentiation of benign from malignant soft-tissue tumors. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019, 50, 798–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Lee, S.K.; Jee, W.H.; Jung, C.K.; Chung, Y.G. Multiparametric quantitative analysis of tumor perfusion and diffusion with 3T MRI: Differentiation between benign and malignant soft tissue tumors. Br. J. Radiol. 2020, 93, 20191035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Zhang, J.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, E.; Li, N.; Yuan, H.; Lang, N. Use of monoexponential diffusion-weighted imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced-MRI for the differentiation of spinal tumors. Eur. Spine J. Off. Publ. Eur. Spine Soc. Eur. Spinal Deform. Soc. Eur. Sect. Cerv. Spine Res. Soc. 2020, 29, 1112–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Dodin, G.; Salleron, J.; Jendoubi, S.; Abou Arab, W.; Sirveaux, F.; Blum, A.; Gondim Teixeira, P.A. Added-value of advanced magnetic resonance imaging to conventional morphologic analysis for the differentiation between benign and malignant non-fatty soft-tissue tumors. Eur. Radiol. 2021, 31, 1536–1547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hwang, H.; Lee, S.K.; Kim, J.Y. Comparison of conventional magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging in the differentiation of bone plasmacytoma from bone metastasis in the extremities. Diagn. Interv. Imaging 2021, 102, 611–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, Q.; Xiao, X.; Liang, Y.; Wen, H.; Wen, X.; Gu, M.; Ren, C.; Li, K.; Yu, L.; Lu, L. Diagnostic Performance of Diffusion MRI for differentiating Benign and Malignant Nonfatty Musculoskeletal Soft Tissue Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J. Cancer 2021, 12, 7399–7412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Arslan, S.; Ergen, F.B.; Aydın, G.B.; Ayvaz, M.; Karakaya, J.; Kösemehmetoğlu, K.; Yıldız, A.E.; Aydıngöz, Ü. Different Attenuation Models of Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging for the Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Musculoskeletal Tumors. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2022, 55, 594–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, X.; Hu, Y.; Xie, Y.; Lu, R.; Li, Q.; Tao, H.; Chen, S. Whole-tumor histogram analysis of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for soft tissue sarcoma: Correlation with HIF-1alpha expression. Eur. Radiol. 2022; in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ota, Y.; Liao, E.; Capizzano, A.A.; Baba, A.; Kurokawa, R.; Kurokawa, M.; Srinivasan, A. Neurofibromatosis type 2 versus sporadic vestibular schwannoma: The utility of MR diffusion and dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging. J. Neuroimaging Off. J. Am. Soc. Neuroimaging 2022, 32, 554–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Sharma, G.; Saran, S.; Saxena, S.; Goyal, T. Multiparametric evaluation of bone tumors utilising diffusion weighted imaging and dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. J. Clin. Orthop. Trauma 2022, 30, 101899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Gowda, P.; Bajaj, G.; Silva, F.D.; Ashikyan, O.; Xi, Y.; Chhabra, A. Does the apparent diffusion coefficient from diffusion-weighted MRI imaging aid in the characterization of malignant soft tissue tumors and sarcomas. Skelet. Radiol. 2023; in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Mansour, T.M.M.; El-Barody, M.M.; Tammam, H.; Okasha, A. Role of diffusion-weighted MRI in differentiating between benign and malignant bone lesions: A prospective study. Clin. Radiol. 2021, 76, 576–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Parlak, Ş.; Ergen, F.B.; Yüksel, G.Y.; Karakaya, J.; Aydın, G.B.; Kösemehmetoğlu, K.; Aydıngöz, Ü. Diffusion-weighted imaging for the differentiation of Ewing sarcoma from osteosarcoma. Skelet. Radiol. 2021, 50, 2023–2030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Orsatti, G.; Zucchetta, P.; Varotto, A.; Crimì, F.; Weber, M.; Cecchin, D.; Bisogno, G.; Spimpolo, A.; Giraudo, C.; Stramare, R. Volumetric histograms-based analysis of apparent diffusion coefficients and standard uptake values for the assessment of pediatric sarcoma at staging: Preliminary results of a PET/MRI study. La Radiol. Med. 2021, 126, 878–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Xing, X.; Zhang, J.; Chen, Y.; Zhao, Q.; Lang, N.; Yuan, H. Application of monoexponential, biexponential, and stretched-exponential models of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the differential diagnosis of metastases and myeloma in the spine-Univariate and multivariate analysis of related parameters. Br. J. Radiol. 2020, 93, 20190891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chen, Y.; Yu, Q.; La Tegola, L.; Mei, Y.; Chen, J.; Huang, W.; Zhang, X.; Guglielmi, G. Intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging for differentiating malignant lesions in spine: A pilot study. Eur. J. Radiol. 2019, 120, 108672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Alsharief, A.N.; Martinez-Rios, C.; Hopyan, S.; Amirabadi, A.; Doria, A.S.; Greer, M.C. Usefulness of diffusion-weighted MRI in the initial assessment of osseous sarcomas in children and adolescents. Pediatr. Radiol. 2019, 49, 1201–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zeitoun, R.; Shokry, A.M.; Ahmed Khaleel, S.; Mogahed, S.M. Osteosarcoma subtypes: Magnetic resonance and quantitative diffusion weighted imaging criteria. J. Egypt. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2018, 30, 39–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Winfield, J.M.; Poillucci, G.; Blackledge, M.D.; Collins, D.J.; Shah, V.; Tunariu, N.; Kaiser, M.F.; Messiou, C. Apparent diffusion coefficient of vertebral haemangiomas allows differentiation from malignant focal deposits in whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI. Eur. Radiol. 2018, 28, 1687–1691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Pozzi, G.; Albano, D.; Messina, C.; Angileri, S.A.; Al-Mnayyis, A.; Galbusera, F.; Luzzati, A.; Perrucchini, G.; Scotto, G.; Parafioriti, A.; et al. Solid bone tumors of the spine: Diagnostic performance of apparent diffusion coefficient measured using diffusion-weighted MRI using histology as a reference standard. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018, 47, 1034–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lee, S.K.; Jee, W.H.; Jung, C.K.; Im, S.A.; Chung, N.G.; Chung, Y.G. Prediction of Poor Responders to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Osteosarcoma: Additive Value of Diffusion-Weighted MRI including Volumetric Analysis to Standard MRI at 3T. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0229983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Saleh, M.M.; Abdelrahman, T.M.; Madney, Y.; Mohamed, G.; Shokry, A.M.; Moustafa, A.F. Multiparametric MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging in predicting response to chemotherapy in cases of osteosarcoma and Ewing’s sarcoma. Br. J. Radiol. 2020, 93, 20200257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Kershaw, L.; Forker, L.; Roberts, D.; Sanderson, B.; Shenjere, P.; Wylie, J.; Coyle, C.; Kochhar, R.; Manoharan, P.; Choudhury, A. Feasibility of a multiparametric MRI protocol for imaging biomarkers associated with neoadjuvant radiotherapy for soft tissue sarcoma. BJR Open 2021, 3, 20200061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Xia, X.; Wen, L.; Zhou, F.; Li, J.; Lu, Q.; Liu, J.; Yu, X. Predictive value of DCE-MRI and IVIM-DWI in osteosarcoma patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Front. Oncol. 2022, 12, 967450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Teo, K.Y.; Daescu, O.; Cederberg, K.; Sengupta, A.; Leavey, P.J. Correlation of histopathology and multi-modal magnetic resonance imaging in childhood osteosarcoma: Predicting tumor response to chemotherapy. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0259564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lee, J.H.; Yoo, G.S.; Yoon, Y.C.; Park, H.C.; Kim, H.S. Diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging after radiation therapy for bone metastases in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 10459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Habre, C.; Dabadie, A.; Loundou, A.D.; Banos, J.B.; Desvignes, C.; Pico, H.; Aschero, A.; Colavolpe, N.; Seiler, C.; Bouvier, C.; et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging in differentiating mid-course responders to chemotherapy for long-bone osteosarcoma compared to the histologic response: An update. Pediatr. Radiol. 2021, 51, 1714–1723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gong, X.Q.; Tao, Y.Y.; Wang, R.; Liu, N.; Huang, X.H.; Zheng, J.; Yang, C.; Yang, L.; Zhang, X.M. Application of Diffusion Weighted Imaging in Prostate Cancer Bone Metastasis: Detection and Therapy Evaluation. Anti-Cancer Agents Med. Chem. 2021, 21, 1950–1956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yuan, W.; Yu, Q.; Wang, Z.; Huang, J.; Wang, J.; Long, L. Efficacy of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Osteosarcoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Acad. Radiol. 2022, 29, 326–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Hao, Y.; An, R.; Xue, Y.; Li, F.; Wang, H.; Zheng, J.; Fan, L.; Liu, J.; Fan, H.; Yin, H. Prognostic value of tumoral and peritumoral magnetic resonance parameters in osteosarcoma patients for monitoring chemotherapy response. Eur. Radiol. 2021, 31, 3518–3529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Asmar, K.; Saade, C.; Salman, R.; Saab, R.; Khoury, N.J.; Abboud, M.; Tamim, H.; Makki, M.; Naffaa, L. The value of diffusion weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient in primary Osteogenic and Ewing sarcomas for the monitoring of response to treatment: Initial experience. Eur. J. Radiol. 2020, 124, 108855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Baidya Kayal, E.; Kandasamy, D.; Khare, K.; Bakhshi, S.; Sharma, R.; Mehndiratta, A. Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) for response assessment in patients with osteosarcoma undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Eur. J. Radiol. 2019, 119, 108635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Musio, D.; De Francesco, I.; Galdieri, A.; Marsecano, C.; Piciocchi, A.; Napoli, A.; De Felice, F.; Tombolini, V. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in painful bone metastases: Using quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient as an indicator of effectiveness of single fraction versus multiple fraction radiotherapy. Eur. J. Radiol. 2018, 98, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Degnan, A.J.; Chung, C.Y.; Shah, A.J. Quantitative diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging assessment of chemotherapy treatment response of pediatric osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma malignant bone tumors. Clin. Imaging 2018, 47, 9–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Moustafa, A.F.I.; Eldaly, M.M.; Zeitoun, R.; Shokry, A. Is MRI diffusion-weighted imaging a reliable tool for the diagnosis and post-therapeutic follow-up of extremity soft tissue neoplasms? Indian J. Radiol. Imaging 2019, 29, 378–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Erber, B.M.; Reidler, P.; Goller, S.S.; Ricke, J.; Dürr, H.R.; Klein, A.; Lindner, L.; Di Gioia, D.; Geith, T.; Baur-Melnyk, A.; et al. Impact of Dynamic Contrast Enhanced and Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging on Detection of Early Local Recurrence of Soft Tissue Sarcoma. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2023, 57, 622–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Habre, C.; Botti, P.; Laurent, M.; Ceroni, D.; Toso, S.; Hanquinet, S. Benefits of diffusion-weighted imaging in pediatric acute osteoarticular infections. Pediatr. Radiol. 2022, 52, 1086–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kruk, K.A.; Dietrich, T.J.; Wildermuth, S.; Leschka, S.; Toepfer, A.; Waelti, S.; Kim, C.O.; Güsewell, S.; Fischer, T. Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Distinguishes Between Osteomyelitis, Bone Marrow Edema, and Healthy Bone on Forefoot Magnetic Resonance Imaging. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2022, 56, 1571–1579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Diez, A.I.G.; Fuster, D.; Morata, L.; Torres, F.; Garcia, R.; Poggio, D.; Sotes, S.; Del Amo, M.; Isern-Kebschull, J.; Pomes, J.; et al. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with (18)F-FDG PET/CT to differentiate osteomyelitis from Charcot neuro-osteoarthropathy in diabetic foot. Eur. J. Radiol. 2020, 132, 109299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Eren, M.A.; Karakaş, E.; Torun, A.N.; Sabuncu, T. The Clinical Value of Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Diabetic Foot Infection. J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc. 2019, 109, 277–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Dumont, R.A.; Keen, N.N.; Bloomer, C.W.; Schwartz, B.S.; Talbott, J.; Clark, A.J.; Wilson, D.M.; Chin, C.T. Clinical Utility of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Spinal Infections. Clin. Neuroradiol. 2019, 29, 515–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Unal, O.; Koparan, H.I.; Avcu, S.; Kalender, A.M.; Kisli, E. The diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in soft tissue abscesses. Eur. J. Radiol. 2011, 77, 490–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Harish, S.; Chiavaras, M.M.; Kotnis, N.; Rebello, R. MR imaging of skeletal soft tissue infection: Utility of diffusion-weighted imaging in detecting abscess formation. Skelet. Radiol. 2011, 40, 285–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Chun, C.W.; Jung, J.Y.; Baik, J.S.; Jee, W.H.; Kim, S.K.; Shin, S.H. Detection of soft-tissue abscess: Comparison of diffusion-weighted imaging to contrast-enhanced MRI. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018, 47, 60–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Guo, C.; Zheng, K.; Xie, Z.; Lu, X.; Wu, S.; Ye, Q.; He, Y.; Zhou, Q.; Sun, E.; Zhao, Y. Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging as a quantitative tool for evaluating disease activity in patients with axial spondyloarthritis. Clin. Radiol. 2022, 77, e434–e441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Liu, L.; Zhou, Z.; Hua, S.; Xue, L.; Zhu, J.; Liu, R.; Li, Y. Detection of the disease activity with ankylosing spondylitis through intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MR imaging of sacroiliac joint. Br. J. Radiol. 2022, 95, 20211074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Chung, H.Y.; Chan, S.C.W.; Lee, K.H.; Tsang, H.H.L.; Ng, L.L.; Lau, C.S. Both ASDAS and ADC are associated with spinal mobility in active axial spondyloarthritis: A comparison between early and later disease. Int. J. Rheum. Dis. 2022, 25, 317–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Giraudo, C.; Kainberger, F.; Boesen, M.; Trattnig, S. Quantitative Imaging in Inflammatory Arthritis: Between Tradition and Innovation. Semin. Musculoskelet. Radiol. 2020, 24, 337–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Zhang, H.; Huang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Tu, Z.; Xiao, Z.; Chen, J.; Cao, D. Diffusion-Weighted MRI to Assess Sacroiliitis: Improved Image Quality and Diagnostic Performance of Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar Imaging (EPI) Over Conventional Single-Shot EPI. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2021, 217, 450–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Wang, D.; Yin, H.; Liu, W.; Li, Z.; Ren, J.; Wang, K.; Han, D. Comparative analysis of the diagnostic values of T2 mapping and diffusion-weighted imaging for sacroiliitis in ankylosing spondylitis. Skelet. Radiol. 2020, 49, 1597–1606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Barendregt, A.M.; Mazzoli, V.; van Gulik, E.C.; Schonenberg-Meinema, D.; Nassar-Sheikh Al Rashid, A.; Nusman, C.M.; Dolman, K.M.; van den Berg, J.M.; Kuijpers, T.W.; Nederveen, A.J.; et al. Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Diffusion-weighted MRI in the Assessment of Arthritis in the Knee. Radiology 2020, 295, 373–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Tanaka, Y.; Fujimori, M.; Murakami, K.; Sugimori, H.; Oki, N.; Aoki, T.; Kamishima, T. Computed diffusion-weighted imaging for differentiating synovial proliferation from joint effusion in hand arthritis. Rheumatol. Int. 2019, 39, 2111–2118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Shi, Z.; Han, J.; Qin, J.; Zhang, Y. Clinical application of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in assessing the clinical curative effect of early ankylosing spondylitis. Medicine 2019, 98, e15227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Li, M.; Sauer, A.; Holl-Wieden, A.; Pabst, T.; Neubauer, H. Diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted MRI for imaging synovitis in pediatric patients with inflammatory conditions of the knee joint. World J. Pediatr. 2020, 16, 60–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Lee, K.H.; Chung, H.Y.; Xu, X.; Lau, V.W.H.; Lau, C.S. Apparent Diffusion Coefficient as an Imaging Biomarker for Spinal Disease Activity in Axial Spondyloarthritis. Radiology 2019, 291, 121–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Fujimori, M.; Murakami, K.; Sugimori, H.; Lu, Y.; Sutherland, K.; Oki, N.; Aoki, T.; Kamishima, T. Intravoxel incoherent motion MRI for discrimination of synovial proliferation in the hand arthritis: A prospective proof-of-concept study. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019, 50, 1199–1206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Faruch, M.; Garcia, A.I.; Del Amo, M.; Pomes, J.; Isern, J.; González, S.P.; Grau, J.M.; Milisenda, J.C.; Tomas, X. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging is useful for assessing inflammatory myopathies. Muscle Nerve 2019, 59, 555–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Chan, C.W.S.; Tsang, H.H.L.; Li, P.H.; Lee, K.H.; Lau, C.S.; Wong, P.Y.S.; Chung, H.Y. Diffusion-weighted imaging versus short tau inversion recovery sequence: Usefulness in detection of active sacroiliitis and early diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0201040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Bradbury, L.A.; Hollis, K.A.; Gautier, B.; Shankaranarayana, S.; Robinson, P.C.; Saad, N.; KA, L.C.; Brown, M.A. Diffusion-weighted Imaging Is a Sensitive and Specific Magnetic Resonance Sequence in the Diagnosis of Ankylosing Spondylitis. J. Rheumatol. 2018, 45, 771–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Subhawong, T.K.; Jacobs, M.A.; Fayad, L.M. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging for characterizing musculoskeletal lesions. Radiogr. A Rev. Publ. Radiol. Soc. N. Am. Inc 2014, 34, 1163–1177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Lin, W.C.; Chen, J.H. Pitfalls and Limitations of Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Urinary Bladder Cancer. Transl. Oncol. 2015, 8, 217–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Ashikyan, O.; Chalian, M.; Moore, D.; Xi, Y.; Pezeshk, P.; Chhabra, A. Evaluation of giant cell tumors by diffusion weighted imaging-fractional ADC analysis. Skelet. Radiol. 2019, 48, 1765–1773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Spierenburg, G.; Suevos Ballesteros, C.; Stoel, B.C.; Navas Cañete, A.; Gelderblom, H.; van de Sande, M.A.J.; van Langevelde, K. MRI of diffuse-type tenosynovial giant cell tumour in the knee: A guide for diagnosis and treatment response assessment. Insights Imaging 2023, 14, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Messina, C.; Bignone, R.; Bruno, A.; Bruno, A.; Bruno, F.; Calandri, M.; Caruso, D.; Coppolino, P.; Robertis, R.; Gentili, F.; et al. Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Oncology: An Update. Cancers 2020, 12, 1493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Chaturvedi, A. Pediatric skeletal diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: Part 1—technical considerations and optimization strategies. Pediatr. Radiol. 2021, 51, 1562–1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Dallaudière, B.; Lecouvet, F.; Vande Berg, B.; Omoumi, P.; Perlepe, V.; Cerny, M.; Malghem, J.; Larbi, A. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in musculoskeletal diseases: Current concepts. Diagn. Interv. Imaging 2015, 96, 327–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Yao, K.; Troupis, J.M. Diffusion-weighted imaging and the skeletal system: A literature review. Clin. Radiol. 2016, 71, 1071–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Bhojwani, N.; Szpakowski, P.; Partovi, S.; Maurer, M.H.; Grosse, U.; von Tengg-Kobligk, H.; Zipp-Partovi, L.; Fergus, N.; Kosmas, C.; Nikolaou, K.; et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging in musculoskeletal radiology-clinical applications and future directions. Quant. Imaging Med. Surg. 2015, 5, 740–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Fukuda, T.; Wengler, K.; de Carvalho, R.; Boonsri, P.; Schweitzer, M.E. MRI biomarkers in osseous tumors. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019, 50, 702–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Howe, B.M.; Broski, S.M.; Littrell, L.A.; Pepin, K.M.; Wenger, D.E. Quantitative Musculoskeletal Tumor Imaging. Semin. Musculoskelet. Radiol. 2020, 24, 428–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Gulati, V.; Chhabra, A. Qualitative and Quantitative MRI Techniques for the Evaluation of Musculoskeletal Neoplasms. Semin. Roentgenol. 2022, 57, 291–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Latour, L.L.; Svoboda, K.; Mitra, P.P.; Sotak, C.H. Time-dependent diffusion of water in a biological model system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1994, 91, 1229–1233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Dietrich, O.; Biffar, A.; Reiser, M.F.; Baur-Melnyk, A. Diffusion-weighted imaging of bone marrow. Semin. Musculoskelet. Radiol. 2009, 13, 134–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Ahlawat, S.; Fayad, L.M. Diffusion weighted imaging demystified: The technique and potential clinical applications for soft tissue imaging. Skelet. Radiol. 2018, 47, 313–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Fayad, L.M.; Jacobs, M.A.; Wang, X.; Carrino, J.A.; Bluemke, D.A. Musculoskeletal tumors: How to use anatomic, functional, and metabolic MR techniques. Radiology 2012, 265, 340–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Le Bihan, D.; Breton, E.; Lallemand, D.; Aubin, M.L.; Vignaud, J.; Laval-Jeantet, M. Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. Radiology 1988, 168, 497–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Baur, A.; Huber, A.; Arbogast, S.; Dürr, H.R.; Zysk, S.; Wendtner, C.; Deimling, M.; Reiser, M. Diffusion-weighted imaging of tumor recurrencies and posttherapeutical soft-tissue changes in humans. Eur. Radiol. 2001, 11, 828–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Bley, T.A.; Wieben, O.; Uhl, M. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in musculoskeletal radiology: Applications in trauma, tumors, and inflammation. Magn. Reson. Imaging Clin. N. Am. 2009, 17, 263–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Ahlawat, S.; Fayad, L.M. De Novo Assessment of Pediatric Musculoskeletal Soft Tissue Tumors: Beyond Anatomic Imaging. Pediatrics 2015, 136, e194–e202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Le Bihan, D.; Breton, E.; Lallemand, D.; Grenier, P.; Cabanis, E.; Laval-Jeantet, M. MR imaging of intravoxel incoherent motions: Application to diffusion and perfusion in neurologic disorders. Radiology 1986, 161, 401–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Uhl, M.; Saueressig, U.; Koehler, G.; Kontny, U.; Niemeyer, C.; Reichardt, W.; Ilyasof, K.; Bley, T.; Langer, M. Evaluation of tumour necrosis during chemotherapy with diffusion-weighted MR imaging: Preliminary results in osteosarcomas. Pediatr. Radiol. 2006, 36, 1306–1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Reichardt, W.; Juettner, E.; Uhl, M.; Elverfeldt, D.V.; Kontny, U. Diffusion-weighted imaging as predictor of therapy response in an animal model of Ewing sarcoma. Investig. Radiol. 2009, 44, 298–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Gaspersic, N.; Sersa, I.; Jevtic, V.; Tomsic, M.; Praprotnik, S. Monitoring ankylosing spondylitis therapy by dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Skelet. Radiol. 2008, 37, 123–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Subhawong, T.K.; Jacobs, M.A.; Fayad, L.M. Insights into quantitative diffusion-weighted MRI for musculoskeletal tumor imaging. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2014, 203, 560–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Subhawong, T.K.; Durand, D.J.; Thawait, G.K.; Jacobs, M.A.; Fayad, L.M. Characterization of soft tissue masses: Can quantitative diffusion weighted imaging reliably distinguish cysts from solid masses? Skelet. Radiol. 2013, 42, 1583–1592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Atlas, S.W.; DuBois, P.; Singer, M.B.; Lu, D. Diffusion measurements in intracranial hematomas: Implications for MR imaging of acute stroke. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2000, 21, 1190–1194. [Google Scholar]
  90. Kang, B.K.; Na, D.G.; Ryoo, J.W.; Byun, H.S.; Roh, H.G.; Pyeun, Y.S. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of intracerebral hemorrhage. Korean J. Radiol. 2001, 2, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Silvera, S.; Oppenheim, C.; Touzé, E.; Ducreux, D.; Page, P.; Domigo, V.; Mas, J.L.; Roux, F.X.; Frédy, D.; Meder, J.F. Spontaneous intracerebral hematoma on diffusion-weighted images: Influence of T2-shine-through and T2-blackout effects. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2005, 26, 236–241. [Google Scholar]
  92. Schaefer, P.W.; Grant, P.E.; Gonzalez, R.G. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the brain. Radiology 2000, 217, 331–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Oka, K.; Yakushiji, T.; Sato, H.; Yorimitsu, S.; Hayashida, Y.; Yamashita, Y.; Mizuta, H. Ability of diffusion-weighted imaging for the differential diagnosis between chronic expanding hematomas and malignant soft tissue tumors. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2008, 28, 1195–1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Chhabra, A.; Ashikyan, O.; Slepicka, C.; Dettori, N.; Hwang, H.; Callan, A.; Sharma, R.R.; Xi, Y. Conventional MR and diffusion-weighted imaging of musculoskeletal soft tissue malignancy: Correlation with histologic grading. Eur. Radiol. 2019, 29, 4485–4494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Jeong, H.S.; Lee, S.K.; Kim, J.Y.; Yoo, C.; Joo, M.W.; Kim, J.H. Tenosynovial giant cell tumors of digits: MRI differentiation between localized types and diffuse types with pathology correlation. Skelet. Radiol. 2023, 52, 593–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Kim, J.H.; Lee, S.K.; Kim, J.Y. MRI Prediction Model for Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor with Risk of Diffuse-type. Acad. Radiol. 2023; in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Modic, M.T.; Steinberg, P.M.; Ross, J.S.; Masaryk, T.J.; Carter, J.R. Degenerative disk disease: Assessment of changes in vertebral body marrow with MR imaging. Radiology 1988, 166, 193–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Braithwaite, I.; White, J.; Saifuddin, A.; Renton, P.; Taylor, B.A. Vertebral end-plate (Modic) changes on lumbar spine MRI: Correlation with pain reproduction at lumbar discography. Eur. Spine J. Off. Publ. Eur. Spine Soc. Eur. Spinal Deform. Soc. Eur. Sect. Cerv. Spine Res. Soc. 1998, 7, 363–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Oztekin, O.; Calli, C.; Kitis, O.; Adibelli, Z.H.; Eren, C.S.; Apaydin, M.; Zileli, M.; Yurtseven, T. Reliability of diffusion weighted MR imaging in differentiating degenerative and infectious end plate changes. Radiol. Oncol. 2010, 44, 97–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Patel, K.B.; Poplawski, M.M.; Pawha, P.S.; Naidich, T.P.; Tanenbaum, L.N. Diffusion-weighted MRI “claw sign” improves differentiation of infectious from degenerative modic type 1 signal changes of the spine. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2014, 35, 1647–1652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Nonomura, Y.; Yasumoto, M.; Yoshimura, R.; Haraguchi, K.; Ito, S.; Akashi, T.; Ohashi, I. Relationship between bone marrow cellularity and apparent diffusion coefficient. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2001, 13, 757–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Diagnostics 13 01647 g001 550
Figure 1. A 60-year-old female with giant-cell tumor with secondary aneurysmal bone cyst change in the distal femur. (A) Coronal T2-weighted image and (B) axial T2-weighted fat-suppressed image show secondary aneurysmal bone cyst change with fluid–fluid level. (C) The DWI with b-value of 0 s/mm2 appears similar to the heavily T2-weighted fat-suppressed image (B).
Figure 1. A 60-year-old female with giant-cell tumor with secondary aneurysmal bone cyst change in the distal femur. (A) Coronal T2-weighted image and (B) axial T2-weighted fat-suppressed image show secondary aneurysmal bone cyst change with fluid–fluid level. (C) The DWI with b-value of 0 s/mm2 appears similar to the heavily T2-weighted fat-suppressed image (B).
Diagnostics 13 01647 g001
Diagnostics 13 01647 g002 550
Figure 2. Progressive increase in b-values (same patient in Figure 1). As b-values increase on DWI (A–C), the perfusion effect is gradually suppressed and only hypercellular tissues remain bright at high b-value images with a darkening background.
Figure 2. Progressive increase in b-values (same patient in Figure 1). As b-values increase on DWI (A–C), the perfusion effect is gradually suppressed and only hypercellular tissues remain bright at high b-value images with a darkening background.
Diagnostics 13 01647 g002
Diagnostics 13 01647 g003 550
Figure 3. DWI of a pathologic lymph node, a normal submandibular gland, and a normal spinal cord. (A) Axial T1-weighted enhanced image of the neck shows a pathologic lymph node (arrow), a normal submandibular gland (arrowhead), and a normal spinal cord (curved arrow). These hypercellular tissues remain bright on DWI with increasing b-value images (B,C).
Figure 3. DWI of a pathologic lymph node, a normal submandibular gland, and a normal spinal cord. (A) Axial T1-weighted enhanced image of the neck shows a pathologic lymph node (arrow), a normal submandibular gland (arrowhead), and a normal spinal cord (curved arrow). These hypercellular tissues remain bright on DWI with increasing b-value images (B,C).
Diagnostics 13 01647 g003
Diagnostics 13 01647 g004 550
Figure 4. A 25-year-old female with a soft tissue hemangioma in the proximal thigh. (A) Axial T1-weighted enhanced image shows hemangioma (arrowhead) at the quadratus femoris muscle and femoral artery and vein (arrow) at the inguinal area. (B) DWI with a b-value of 50 s/mm2 image still exhibits a signal of the hemangioma (arrowhead) due to slow blood flow within the vessels, while the femoral artery and vein (arrow) are invisible due to fast-flowing blood within the vessels, creating a “black blood” effect.
Figure 4. A 25-year-old female with a soft tissue hemangioma in the proximal thigh. (A) Axial T1-weighted enhanced image shows hemangioma (arrowhead) at the quadratus femoris muscle and femoral artery and vein (arrow) at the inguinal area. (B) DWI with a b-value of 50 s/mm2 image still exhibits a signal of the hemangioma (arrowhead) due to slow blood flow within the vessels, while the femoral artery and vein (arrow) are invisible due to fast-flowing blood within the vessels, creating a “black blood” effect.
Diagnostics 13 01647 g004
Diagnostics 13 01647 g005 550
Figure 5. A 15-year-old female with intramuscular myxoma in the sartorius. (A) Coronal T2-weighted image shows a lobulated mass with T2 high signal intensity in the sartorius muscle. (B) Axial T1-weighted enhanced image shows peripheral and septal enhancement in the mass. (C,D) DWI with b-values of 50 and 800 s/mm2 exhibit progressive signal loss of the tumor with (E) no reduction in the ADC map, suggesting “free” diffusivity.
Figure 5. A 15-year-old female with intramuscular myxoma in the sartorius. (A) Coronal T2-weighted image shows a lobulated mass with T2 high signal intensity in the sartorius muscle. (B) Axial T1-weighted enhanced image shows peripheral and septal enhancement in the mass. (C,D) DWI with b-values of 50 and 800 s/mm2 exhibit progressive signal loss of the tumor with (E) no reduction in the ADC map, suggesting “free” diffusivity.
Diagnostics 13 01647 g005
Diagnostics 13 01647 g006 550
Figure 6. A 39-year-old male with foot dorsum pain. (A) Axial T2-weighted fat-suppressed image shows soft tissue swelling at the dorsal surface of the foot and interosseous muscle (arrow). (B,C) Axial and sagittal T1-weighted enhanced images show heterogeneous enhancement at the affected areas (arrows), suggesting phlegmon or abscess. (D,E) DWI with b-values of 50 and 800 s/mm2 exhibit progressive signal increase in the interosseous lesion (arrows) with (F) a reduced signal in the ADC map, suggesting “restricted” diffusivity, interpreted as an abscess.
Figure 6. A 39-year-old male with foot dorsum pain. (A) Axial T2-weighted fat-suppressed image shows soft tissue swelling at the dorsal surface of the foot and interosseous muscle (arrow). (B,C) Axial and sagittal T1-weighted enhanced images show heterogeneous enhancement at the affected areas (arrows), suggesting phlegmon or abscess. (D,E) DWI with b-values of 50 and 800 s/mm2 exhibit progressive signal increase in the interosseous lesion (arrows) with (F) a reduced signal in the ADC map, suggesting “restricted” diffusivity, interpreted as an abscess.
Diagnostics 13 01647 g006
Diagnostics 13 01647 g007 550
Figure 7. An 87-year-old female identified as pathologic compression fracture with renal cell carcinoma at 11th thoracic vertebra. Conventional sagittal MRIs (A: T2-weighted fat-suppressed, B: T1-weighted, C: T1-weighted enhanced) show severe vertebral collapse with posterior bulging contour, as well as frame-like enhancement around the fluid cleft. (D,E) DWI with b-values of 50 and 800 s/mm2 exhibit progressive signal increase in the enhancing cellular portion with (F) a reduced signal in the ADC map with mean ADC value of 1193.83 μm2/s, suggesting “restricted” diffusivity and interpreting it as bone metastasis. Note that the largest ROI is selected to encompass most of the lowest signal intensity on the ADC map.
Figure 7. An 87-year-old female identified as pathologic compression fracture with renal cell carcinoma at 11th thoracic vertebra. Conventional sagittal MRIs (A: T2-weighted fat-suppressed, B: T1-weighted, C: T1-weighted enhanced) show severe vertebral collapse with posterior bulging contour, as well as frame-like enhancement around the fluid cleft. (D,E) DWI with b-values of 50 and 800 s/mm2 exhibit progressive signal increase in the enhancing cellular portion with (F) a reduced signal in the ADC map with mean ADC value of 1193.83 μm2/s, suggesting “restricted” diffusivity and interpreting it as bone metastasis. Note that the largest ROI is selected to encompass most of the lowest signal intensity on the ADC map.
Diagnostics 13 01647 g007
Diagnostics 13 01647 g008 550
Figure 8. A 55-year-old male with a ganglion cyst in the popliteal fossa. (A) Sagittal and (B) axial T2-weighted fat-suppressed images show a mass with a bright signal intensity mass in the popliteal fossa. (C) Axial T1-weighted enhanced image shows peripheral thin wall enhancement. (D,E) DWI with b-values of 50 and 800 s/mm2 exhibit persistent hyperintensity with (F) no reduction in the ADC map, suggesting a T2 “shine-through” effect, possibly due to a high T2 relaxation time.
Figure 8. A 55-year-old male with a ganglion cyst in the popliteal fossa. (A) Sagittal and (B) axial T2-weighted fat-suppressed images show a mass with a bright signal intensity mass in the popliteal fossa. (C) Axial T1-weighted enhanced image shows peripheral thin wall enhancement. (D,E) DWI with b-values of 50 and 800 s/mm2 exhibit persistent hyperintensity with (F) no reduction in the ADC map, suggesting a T2 “shine-through” effect, possibly due to a high T2 relaxation time.
Diagnostics 13 01647 g008
Diagnostics 13 01647 g009 550
Figure 9. A 46-year-old male with a hematoma on his elbow caused by being struck with a baseball three months ago. Conventional axial MRIs (A: T2-weighted, B: T1-weighted, C: T1-weighted enhanced) show a well-circumscribed mass (arrow) with T2 high and T1 intermediate signal intensity, and heterogeneous enhancement in the elbow. (D,E) DWI with b-values of 50 and 800 s/mm2 exhibit persistent low signal (arrow) with different b-values, while (F) the ADC map shows a signal drop (arrow), indicating T2 “black-out” effect, possibly due to susceptibility artifacts.
Figure 9. A 46-year-old male with a hematoma on his elbow caused by being struck with a baseball three months ago. Conventional axial MRIs (A: T2-weighted, B: T1-weighted, C: T1-weighted enhanced) show a well-circumscribed mass (arrow) with T2 high and T1 intermediate signal intensity, and heterogeneous enhancement in the elbow. (D,E) DWI with b-values of 50 and 800 s/mm2 exhibit persistent low signal (arrow) with different b-values, while (F) the ADC map shows a signal drop (arrow), indicating T2 “black-out” effect, possibly due to susceptibility artifacts.
Diagnostics 13 01647 g009
Diagnostics 13 01647 g010 550
Figure 10. Guidelines for interpreting DWI [2,69]. The table provides interpretation based on the increase in b-values and the corresponding ADC map. The direction of the arrow indicates increase and decrease of signal intensity.
Figure 10. Guidelines for interpreting DWI [2,69]. The table provides interpretation based on the increase in b-values and the corresponding ADC map. The direction of the arrow indicates increase and decrease of signal intensity.
Diagnostics 13 01647 g010
Diagnostics 13 01647 g011 550
Figure 11. A 38-year-old female with cystic degeneration of fibrous dysplasia in the proximal femur. (A) Coronal T2-weighted fat-suppressed and (B) T1-weighted enhanced images show an intramedullary, lobulated bony mass with a bright signal intensity mass and heterogeneous enhancement in the proximal femur. (C,D) DWI with b-values of 50 and 800 s/mm2 exhibit slight signal loss of the tumor as the b-value increases. However, hyperintensity remains in high b-values, raising the possibility of “restricted” diffusivity. (E) ADC map shows little signal reduction in the ADC map, indicating a T2 “shine-through” effect, possibly due to the high T2 relaxation time of the cystic change of the tumor.
Figure 11. A 38-year-old female with cystic degeneration of fibrous dysplasia in the proximal femur. (A) Coronal T2-weighted fat-suppressed and (B) T1-weighted enhanced images show an intramedullary, lobulated bony mass with a bright signal intensity mass and heterogeneous enhancement in the proximal femur. (C,D) DWI with b-values of 50 and 800 s/mm2 exhibit slight signal loss of the tumor as the b-value increases. However, hyperintensity remains in high b-values, raising the possibility of “restricted” diffusivity. (E) ADC map shows little signal reduction in the ADC map, indicating a T2 “shine-through” effect, possibly due to the high T2 relaxation time of the cystic change of the tumor.
Diagnostics 13 01647 g011
Diagnostics 13 01647 g012 550
Figure 12. The differentiation between chronic expanding hematoma (A–E) and hemorrhagic malignant soft tissue tumor (F–J). Conventional axial MRIs of chronic expanding hematoma (A: T1-weighted, B: T2-weighted fat-suppressed, C: T1-weighted enhanced) show a lobulated mass with heterogeneously high T2 signal intensity and iso-to-high T1 signal intensity, located in the pelvic cavity, containing nodular enhancement. (D,E) DWI with b-value of 800 s/mm2 and ADC map exhibit an area of restricted diffusivity (arrow), and the mean ADC is 1320 μm2/s. Conventional axial MRIs of hemorrhagic high-grade sarcoma (F: T1-weighted, G: T2-weighted fat-suppressed, H: T1-weighted enhanced) show a lobulated mass with heterogeneously high T2 signal intensity and iso-to-high T1 signal intensity, located in the proximal thigh, containing nodular enhancement. (I,J) DWI with b-value of 800 s/mm2 and ADC map exhibit an area of restricted diffusivity (arrow) and the mean ADC is 1128 μm2/s.
Figure 12. The differentiation between chronic expanding hematoma (A–E) and hemorrhagic malignant soft tissue tumor (F–J). Conventional axial MRIs of chronic expanding hematoma (A: T1-weighted, B: T2-weighted fat-suppressed, C: T1-weighted enhanced) show a lobulated mass with heterogeneously high T2 signal intensity and iso-to-high T1 signal intensity, located in the pelvic cavity, containing nodular enhancement. (D,E) DWI with b-value of 800 s/mm2 and ADC map exhibit an area of restricted diffusivity (arrow), and the mean ADC is 1320 μm2/s. Conventional axial MRIs of hemorrhagic high-grade sarcoma (F: T1-weighted, G: T2-weighted fat-suppressed, H: T1-weighted enhanced) show a lobulated mass with heterogeneously high T2 signal intensity and iso-to-high T1 signal intensity, located in the proximal thigh, containing nodular enhancement. (I,J) DWI with b-value of 800 s/mm2 and ADC map exhibit an area of restricted diffusivity (arrow) and the mean ADC is 1128 μm2/s.
Diagnostics 13 01647 g012
Diagnostics 13 01647 g013 550
Figure 13. A 30-year-old male with a GCT of bone in the femoral head. Conventional MRIs (A: coronal proton-density, B: axial T1-weighted, C: axial T1-weighted enhanced) show a well-circumscribed mass (arrow) with proton-density high and T1 intermediate signal intensity, as well as heterogeneous enhancement in the femoral head, accompanied by extensive peritumoral edema, raising the possibility of a malignant bone tumor. (D,E) DWI with b-values of 50 and 800 s/mm2 exhibit persistent low signal (arrow) with different b-values, while (F) the ADC map shows a signal drop (arrow), indicating a T2 “black-out” effect, which could be attributed to susceptibility artifacts of hemosiderin.
Figure 13. A 30-year-old male with a GCT of bone in the femoral head. Conventional MRIs (A: coronal proton-density, B: axial T1-weighted, C: axial T1-weighted enhanced) show a well-circumscribed mass (arrow) with proton-density high and T1 intermediate signal intensity, as well as heterogeneous enhancement in the femoral head, accompanied by extensive peritumoral edema, raising the possibility of a malignant bone tumor. (D,E) DWI with b-values of 50 and 800 s/mm2 exhibit persistent low signal (arrow) with different b-values, while (F) the ADC map shows a signal drop (arrow), indicating a T2 “black-out” effect, which could be attributed to susceptibility artifacts of hemosiderin.
Diagnostics 13 01647 g013
Diagnostics 13 01647 g014 550
Figure 14. A 47-year-old male with gouty tophi around the knee. Conventional axial MRIs (A: T2-weighted fat-suppressed, B: T1-weighted, C: T1-weighted enhanced) show an infiltrative soft tissue mass (arrow) with heterogeneously high T2 signal intensity and intermediate T1 signal intensity, as well as heterogeneous enhancement at the medial side of the tibia, accompanied by extrinsic erosion of the tibia, raising the possibility of a malignant soft tissue tumor. (D,E) DWI with b-values of 50 and 800 s/mm2 exhibit persistent low signal (arrow) with different b-values, while (F) the ADC map shows a signal drop (arrow), indicating a T2 “black-out” effect, which could be attributed to susceptibility artifacts caused by the mineralization of monosodium urate crystals.
Figure 14. A 47-year-old male with gouty tophi around the knee. Conventional axial MRIs (A: T2-weighted fat-suppressed, B: T1-weighted, C: T1-weighted enhanced) show an infiltrative soft tissue mass (arrow) with heterogeneously high T2 signal intensity and intermediate T1 signal intensity, as well as heterogeneous enhancement at the medial side of the tibia, accompanied by extrinsic erosion of the tibia, raising the possibility of a malignant soft tissue tumor. (D,E) DWI with b-values of 50 and 800 s/mm2 exhibit persistent low signal (arrow) with different b-values, while (F) the ADC map shows a signal drop (arrow), indicating a T2 “black-out” effect, which could be attributed to susceptibility artifacts caused by the mineralization of monosodium urate crystals.
Diagnostics 13 01647 g014
Diagnostics 13 01647 g015 550
Figure 15. A 81-year-old male with type 1 Modic change in the endplates of L2-3. Conventional sagittal MRIs (A: T2-weighted, B: T2-weighted fat-suppressed, C: T1-weighted) show an indistinct bone marrow edema in the adjoining endplates of L2-3. (D,E) DWI with b-values of 50 and 800 s/mm2 exhibit persistent outer high signal bands (arrows) with inner low signal areas (arrowheads), displaying a ‘claw sign’, indicative of type 1 Modic change. The inner low signal areas may be due to the T2 black-out effect caused by fatty marrow.
Figure 15. A 81-year-old male with type 1 Modic change in the endplates of L2-3. Conventional sagittal MRIs (A: T2-weighted, B: T2-weighted fat-suppressed, C: T1-weighted) show an indistinct bone marrow edema in the adjoining endplates of L2-3. (D,E) DWI with b-values of 50 and 800 s/mm2 exhibit persistent outer high signal bands (arrows) with inner low signal areas (arrowheads), displaying a ‘claw sign’, indicative of type 1 Modic change. The inner low signal areas may be due to the T2 black-out effect caused by fatty marrow.
Diagnostics 13 01647 g015
Table
Table 1. Signal characteristics of the intracerebral hematoma on DWI and ADC maps.
Table 1. Signal characteristics of the intracerebral hematoma on DWI and ADC maps.
StageComponentAgeT1WIT2WIDWIADC Map
HyperacuteIntracellular oxyhemoglobin<6 hIsoHyperHyperHypo
AcuteIntracellular deoxyhemoglobin6–72 hIsoHypoHypoHypo
Early subacuteIntracellular methemoglobin3–7 dHyperHypoHypoHypo
Late subacuteExtracellular methemoglobin1–4 wHyperHyperHyperHypo-to-iso
ChronicHemosiderin>1 mHypoHypoHypoHypo
Table
Table 2. Summary of DWI pitfalls in musculoskeletal diseases.
Table 2. Summary of DWI pitfalls in musculoskeletal diseases.
LesionsPitfallsContent
Benign cystT2 shine-throughFree water
Hematoma
    Acute stage T2 black-outDeoxyhemoglobin
    Early subacute stageT2 black-outIntracellular methemoglobin
    Chronic stageT2 black-outHemosiderin
Benign tumors
    Non-ossifying fibromaT2 black-outCollagen fibers
    Giant-cell tumorT2 black-outHemosiderin
Gouty tophiT2 black-outMonosodium urate crystal
Modic type 1 vertebral endplate changeT2 black-outLipid laden cells
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kim, Y.; Lee, S.K.; Kim, J.-Y.; Kim, J.-H. Pitfalls of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging: Clinical Utility of T2 Shine-through and T2 Black-out for Musculoskeletal Diseases. Diagnostics 2023, 13, 1647. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13091647

AMA Style

Kim Y, Lee SK, Kim J-Y, Kim J-H. Pitfalls of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging: Clinical Utility of T2 Shine-through and T2 Black-out for Musculoskeletal Diseases. Diagnostics. 2023; 13(9):1647. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13091647

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kim, Yuri, Seul Ki Lee, Jee-Young Kim, and Jun-Ho Kim. 2023. "Pitfalls of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging: Clinical Utility of T2 Shine-through and T2 Black-out for Musculoskeletal Diseases" Diagnostics 13, no. 9: 1647. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13091647

APA Style

Kim, Y., Lee, S. K., Kim, J. -Y., & Kim, J. -H. (2023). Pitfalls of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging: Clinical Utility of T2 Shine-through and T2 Black-out for Musculoskeletal Diseases. Diagnostics, 13(9), 1647. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13091647

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop