Reply to Ishikura, H. What Does Soluble C-Type Lectin-like Receptor 2 (sCLEC-2) × D-Dimer/Platelet (PLT) (sCLEC-2 × D-Dimer/PLT) Mean for Coagulation/Fibrinolysis Conditions? Comment on “Yamamoto et al. Super Formula for Diagnosing Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation Using Soluble C-Type Lectin-like Receptor 2. Diagnostics 2023, 13, 2299”
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsComments for "Comment":
Honestly, I do not see any conflict in the presented comment. It seems to me that its author expressed his desire to share information on this topic. It is only the last paragraph that seems puzzling: “…I would like to advise that the title of Table 1 does not reflect the contents of this table and should be considered changing.” In my opinion, the contents of the table correspond to its title. It is not clear what the discrepancy is. The author should be able to explain and suggest their own version of the title. After that, the “Comment” can be accepted for publication.
Comments for "Reply":
There is no subject for discussion, since there are no comments or contradictions on the substance of the issue. Therefore, “Comment” and “Reply” look like an exchange of pleasantries and information. I also have no comments; the answer may be accepted for publication.
Author Response
Comments for "Reply":
There is no subject for discussion, since there are no comments or contradictions on the substance of the issue. Therefore, “Comment” and “Reply” look like an exchange of pleasantries and information. I also have no comments; the answer may be accepted for publication.
Responses
- We added a new table bases on the reviewer’s suggestion.
- We added further discussion based on the findings shown in the new table.
Author Response File: 
Author Response.pdf
