Sex Differences in the Treatment of Uveal Melanoma in a Group of 1336 Patients
by
Bożena Romanowska-Dixon
1, 
Magdalena Dębicka-Kumela
1, 
Janusz Śmigielski
2 and
Michał Szymon Nowak
3,4,*
1
Department of Ophthalmology and Ophthalmic Oncology, Jagiellonian University Collegium Medicum, 38 Kopernika Str., 31-501 Krakow, Poland
2
Department of Statistics, State University of Applied Science in Konin, 1 Przyjazni Str., 65-510 Konin, Poland
3
Institute of Optics and Optometry, University of Social Science, 121 Gdanska Str., 90-519 Lodz, Poland
4
Provisus Eye Clinic, 112 Redzinska Str., 42-209 Czestochowa, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Pers. Med. 2023, 13(2), 353; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13020353
Submission received: 19 January 2023
/
Revised: 15 February 2023
/
Accepted: 16 February 2023
/
Published: 17 February 2023
Abstract
:(1) Background: The aim of this study was to analyze the sex differences in the treatment of uveal melanoma (UM) in a group of 1336 patients from a national referral center during the period 2018–2021. (2) Materials and Methods: The study was designed in a retrospective manner. A total of 1336 patients who were newly diagnosed with UM at the Department of Ophthalmology and Ophthalmic Oncology, Jagiellonian University Collegium Medicum, Krakow, Poland, between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2021, were included in the study. The demographic and clinical data were compiled, including the sex of patients and the treatment methods. (3) Results: In total, 1336 patients with ocular melanoma were identified, including 726 women (54.34%) and 610 men (45.66%). A total of 49.70% of tumors were localized in the right eye and 50.30% in the left eye. UMs were localized statistically significantly more frequently posterior to the equator of the eye globe in men than in women (79.67% vs. 74.10%, Chi^2 Pearson test p = 0.035). Tumors tended to be larger in men, but this difference was not clinically significant. Men were enucleated more often than women (23.44% vs. 18.04%, Chi^2 Pearson test p = 0.015). (4) Conclusions: Statistically significant sex differences were found in the treatment of uveal melanoma in a national referral center in Poland, with men being enucleated more often than women.
1. Introduction
Uveal melanoma is the most common primary intraocular cancer in adults, with a distinctively different etiology from that of cutaneous melanoma. However, the incidence of uveal melanoma varies across ethnicities and regions worldwide; a north-to-south decreasing gradient in uveal melanoma incidence is observed in Europe. This may be related to the protective effect of ocular pigmentation in southern populations with respect to higher exposure to ultraviolet light at lower latitudes [1,2,3,4,5].
The results of previously published studies revealed sex differences in the incidence of uveal melanoma, but their results were not consistent. Most of them showed an increased age-adjusted incidence rate of ocular melanoma among men [6,7,8,9,10,11,12], but in other large cohort clinical studies with no age adjustment, no sex-based differences were reported [3]. In contrast to those studies, the incidence rate of ocular melanoma in Poland was higher in women [13]; this was attributable to the excess male death rate characteristic to Eastern European countries, which continues to have an effect in Poland [14,15,16]. The other sex differences observed among patients with uveal melanoma included tumor size, localization of the tumor, as well as the development of metastases and mortality rate. In men, tumors tended to be larger and more posterior than in women. Men suffered more metastases, and their mortality rate was also higher than in women (in studies with less than 10 years of follow-up) [13,17,18,19,20].
The treatment of ocular melanoma depends on the tumor localization, size, local extension, visual acuity at presentation, and systemic status. Most patients with posterior tumors are currently treated with plaque brachytherapy. Others are treated with laser photocoagulation, transpupillary thermotherapy, particle beam radiotherapy, gamma knife radiosurgery, local surgical resection, and/or enucleation. The current standard for anterior tumors management is surgical treatment with adjuvant therapy, including brachytherapy. The goal of uveal melanoma treatment is to save the life of the patient; the secondary aims are, in order of priority, to preserve the eye, vision, and cosmetic wishes of the patient [1,3,5,21,22].
The present study aimed to analyze the sex differences in the treatment of uveal melanoma in a group of 1336 patients from a national referral center in Poland in the period 2018–2021. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study searching for sex differences in the treatment of uveal melanoma.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Data Sources, Patients, and Definitions
The study design was a retrospective case series. All patients who were newly diagnosed with uveal melanoma and treated at a national referral center (Department of Ophthalmology and Ophthalmic Oncology, Jagiellonian University Collegium Medicum, Krakow, Poland) between 1 January 2018, and 31 December 2021, were extracted from the hospital database and included in the study. This hospital database provides medical data, which include the diagnoses coded according to the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10); the 3rd edition of the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology (ICD-O-3) codes; and all performed procedures coded using the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision (ICD-9) procedure codes and unique National Health Fund (NHF) codes, corresponding to certain hospital procedures. The hospital database also provides demographical features such as the date of birth and sex of patients. The Department of Ophthalmology and Ophthalmic Oncology, Jagiellonian University Collegium Medicum, Krakow, is the referral center for ophthalmic oncology for adults in Poland. The following data were compiled: the sex of patients and their age at the time of diagnosis; the year of diagnosis; clinical findings such as the laterality of the tumor (right or left eye); intra-ocular localization and cancer stage, according to the TNM classification of malignant tumors (both at the time of diagnosis); and applied treatments including plaque radiotherapy (brachytherapy with iodine-125 or rhutenium-106), proton beam irradiation (PBI), local surgery, and/or enucleation of the eye globe. Tumors were clinically classified as localized in the iris, ciliary body, choroid, or mixed (according to their appearance).
2.2. Statistical Analyses
All data were entered into the Microsoft Excel database, and commercially available software STATISTICA v. 13.0 PL (StatSoft Polska, Krakow, Poland) was used to perform all statistical analyses. The statistical analyses included the annual incidence analysis of uveal melanoma cases during the period 2018–2021 in the national referral center in Poland (the prevalence rates per 100 women and men were calculated), and analyses of tumor laterality, localizations of tumors, cancer stages, and treatment methods (the sex distribution was explored by the Chi squared (χ2) test). The treatment methods were also analyzed according to anterior or posterior localization (to the equator of the eye) at the time of melanoma diagnosis. Then, univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were constructed to investigate the association between the medical management of uveal melanoma (globe-sparing therapies vs. enucleation) and patients’ sex, the localization of melanomas (anterior vs. posterior to the equator of the eye), and sizes, according to the TNM classification. p-values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
This study adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki for research involving human subjects, and the study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Jagiellonian University Collegium Medicum (informed consent was waived).
3. Results
The mean age at the time of diagnosis was 63.84 ± 13.86 years, and this was slightly higher among women (64.26 ± 14.33 years) than men (63.24 ± 13.27 years). In total, 1336 patients with ocular melanoma were identified in the national referral center in Poland between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2021, including 726 women (54.34%) and 610 men (45.66%) (Table 1). The sex distribution in our study population was similar to that found among patients with ocular melanoma in the whole population of Poland (statistical analysis—Chi squared test: χ2 = 0.20, p = 0.6570) [13]. The prevalence rate per 100 people varied from 52.53 in 2021 to 56.87 in 2019 in women, and from 43.13 in 2019 to 47,47 in 2021 in men, respectively (Figure 1). In total, 49.70% of tumors were localized in the right eye and 50.30% in the left eye. In men, 51.15% of UMs were found in the right eye, while in women 51.52% were found in the left eye; however, this difference was not statistically significant. In our study population, the uveal melanomas were localized statistically significantly more frequently posterior to the equator of the eye globe in men than in women (79.67% vs. 74.10%, p = 0.035) (Table 2). At the time of diagnosis, 1024 (76.65%) of all UMs were localized in the choroid; 151 (11.30%) in the choroid and ciliary body; 49 (3.67%) in the iris; 71 (5.31%) in the iris and ciliary body; 29 (2.17%) in the ciliary body; and 12 (0.90%) in the iris, ciliary body, and choroid. In men, tumors tended to be larger than in women, but this difference was not clinically significant (T4 tumors were found in 18.03% men vs. 14.46% women, p = 0.068) (Table 3). In detail, 347 (25.97%) of all UMs were classified as T1, 392 (29.35%) as T2, 382 (28.59%) as T3, and 215 (16.09%) as T4.
Women were treated with globe-sparing therapies (plaque radiotherapy, PBI, and local surgery) more often than men (81.96% vs. 76.56%); contrastingly, men were enucleated more often than women (23.44% vs. 18.04%) (Chi^2 Pearson test p = 0.015). The analyses of the medical management of our patients are presented in Table 4, and Figure 2 and Figure 3. The detailed analysis of treatment methods, including plaque brachytherapy with iodine-125 or rhutenium-106, proton beam irradiation (PBI), local surgery combined with plaque brachytherapy, and enucleation of the eye globe, confirmed the sex differences (p = 0.014). In total, 909 (68.03%) of all tumors were treated with plaque brachytherapy: 405 (30.31%) with iodine-125 and 504 (37.72%) with rhutenium-106; 36 (2.70%) of tumors were treated with local surgery combined with plaque brachytherapy (either with iodine-125 or rhutenium-106), and 117 (8.76%) were treated with proton beam irradiation (PBI). Enucleation as a primary treatment was provided in 274 (20.51%) of tumors. Additionally, tumors located anterior to the equator were enucleated more often than posterior UMs, and this finding was also statistically significant (38.46% vs. 14.94%, Chi^2 Pearson test p < 0.001). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models are presented in Table 5. All univariate logistic regression models showed statistically significant association between enucleation and gender (women vs. men) (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.55–0.96, p = 0.024), anterior localization of the melanoma (to the equator of the eye globe) (OR 3.56, 95% CI 2.67–4.73, p < 0.000), and a larger tumor size, according to the TNM classification (OR 3.46, 95% CI 2.92–4.09, p < 0.000). The multivariate logistic regression model showed a statistically significant association between enucleation and anterior localization of the melanoma (to the equator of the eye globe) (OR 4.18, 95% CI 2.96–5.89, p < 0.000); a larger tumor size, according to the TNM classification (OR 3.48, 95% CI 2.92–4.15, p < 0.000); and that tumors tended to be less frequently enucleated in women (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.59–1.02, p = 0.063).
4. Discussion
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study of uveal melanoma showing the sex differences in the treatment of this malignant tumor. In total, 1336 patients were diagnosed with uveal melanoma and treated between 2018 and 2021 in the national referral center (Department of Ophthalmology and Ophthalmic Oncology, Jagiellonian University Collegium Medicum, Krakow, Poland), and the majority were women (54.34% of patients). According to data from the National Cancer Registry (NCR) of Poland, our sample was a fair representation of the uveal melanoma population in Poland in terms of sex distribution (statistical analysis—Chi squared test: χ2 = 0.20, p = 0.6570) [13]. NCR data also revealed that the incidence rate of uveal melanoma in the whole population of Poland is 6.67/1,000,000 person-years, with the majority of patients with ocular melanoma in Poland being women (53.57%) [13]. In other large, demographic-relevant studies such as the SEER-based reports by Singh et al., Bishop et al., and Mahendraraj et al., the age-adjusted incidence rate of ocular melanoma was significantly higher in men [23,24,25]. In Australia, the difference in the incidence of ocular melanoma between sexes was largely due to significantly higher rates in men aged 65 years and older. There were no significant differences in incidence rates between men and women younger than 65 years [26].
In our study population, uveal melanomas were localized statistically significantly more frequently posterior to the equator of the eye globe in men than in women (79.67% vs. 74.10%). This finding was similar to previously published studies from the British Isles and Israel [17,18], which were focused on gender differences in the clinical presentation of uveal melanoma. In the British Isles, in a population from The Liverpool Ocular Oncology Centre (LOOC), tumors in men were more likely to originate in the choroid than in women (91.7% vs. 87.2%). In the Israelian national referral center (Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem), the tumors located posterior to the equator were found in 86.15% of male and 82.66% of female patents.
However, although we did not compare the exact dimensions of uveal melanomas, tumors tended to be larger in men than in women (T4 tumors were found in 18.03% men vs. 14.46% women). In the aforementioned study from LOOC, Damato and Coupland found that uveal melanomas were larger in men, and this finding was statistically significant [17]. Our results were in agreement with the study from the Israelian national referral center, where significant gender differences were not found for tumor size [18].
We found statistically significant differences between women and men in the treatment of uveal melanoma, i.e., women were treated with globe-sparing therapies (plaque radiotherapy, PBI, local surgery) more often than men (81.96% vs. 76.56%); contrastingly, men were enucleated more often than women (23.44% vs. 18.04%). As all patients were counselled about the benefits of different treatment methods for their survival by the same surgeon (B R-D), we suspect that women were less eager for enucleation due to their greater fear of the cosmetic defects it causes. The previously published analysis from the United States of America (USA) revealed that patients who were not from a White background and were socioeconomically disadvantaged were more likely to receive primary treatment by enucleation, but no interactions were observed between race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and tumor stage at the time of diagnosis. This study also revealed that treatment with primary enucleation with no race/ethnic or socioeconomic status statistically significantly decreased the five-year survival rate [27]. In Israel, although men suffered more metastases and a higher mortality rate than women, the sex differences in the treatment modalities were not statistically significant [18]. In the previously published analysis from National Cancer Registry of Poland, the risk of death within five years from the initial ocular melanoma diagnosis was increased by male sex by 1.29 [13]. In our study, men were enucleated more often than women, but we did not study the survival rate (our short period of observation was affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, with possible bias of the cause of death in many of the patients). We believe that the lack of survival analysis likely had only a minor impact on the study findings; the large population size is the major strength of the present study.
In summary, the introduction of globe-sparing therapies in recent years did not decrease the overall survival rate in patients with uveal melanoma [25,28,29]. However, in our study group, tumors were located more anteriorly in women (these tumors are generally enucleated more often), and the number of enucleations in women was statistically significantly lower than in men, probably due to possible fears of cometic defects. As our study population reflects the overall uveal melanoma population in Poland, we suspect that the genetic and hormonal differences between the sexes had the largest impact on clinical presentation and prognosis for those patients [13,19,21]. However, our results are specific to Poland and cannot describe other healthcare systems.
5. Conclusions
In this study, statistically significant sex differences were found in the treatment of uveal melanoma in the national referral center in Poland, with men being enucleated more often than women. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study searching for sex differences in the treatment of uveal melanoma.
Author Contributions
B.R.-D. and M.S.N. conceived and designed the experiments. Data were collected by M.D.-K. The results were analyzed by B.R.-D., M.S.N. and J.Ś. The first and final drafts were written by M.S.N. and B.R.-D. The defects of the draft were reviewed by B.R.-D. All authors agreed on the final draft of this study. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The study adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki for research involving human subjects and the study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Jagiellonian University Collegium Medicum (the informed consent was waived).
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Jovanovic, P.; Mihajlovic, M.; Djordjevic-Jocic, J.; Vlajkovic, S.; Cekic, S.; Stefanovic, V. Ocular melanoma: An overview of the current status. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2013, 6, 1230–1244. [Google Scholar]
- Tan, L.L.Y.; Hong, J.; Goh, W.L.; Chang, E.W.Y.; Yang, V.S.; Poon, E.; Somasundaram, N.; Farid, M.; Chan, A.S.Y.; Chan, J.Y. Clinical features and survival outcomes of ocular melanoma in a multi-ethnic Asian cohort. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 16367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaliki, S.; Shields, C.L. Uveal melanoma: Relatively rare but deadly cancer. Eye 2017, 31, 241–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Virgili, G.; Gatta, G.; Ciccolallo, L.; Capocaccia, R.; Biggeri, A.; Crocetti, E.; Lutz, J.-M.; Paci, E.; EUROCARE Working Group. Incidence of Uveal Melanoma in Europe. Ophthalmology 2007, 114, 2309–2315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nowak, M.; Romanowska-Dixon, B.; Grabska-Liberek, I.; Żurek, M. Incidence and Characteristics of Retinoblastoma in Poland: The First Nationwide Study 2010–2017. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 6539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ortega, M.A.; Fraile-Martínez, O.; García-Honduvilla, N.; Coca, S.; Álvarez-Mon, M.; Buján, J.; Teus, M.A. Update on uveal melanoma: Translational research from biology to clinical practice (Review). Int. J. Oncol. 2020, 57, 1262–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, S.J.; Oh, C.-M.; Kim, B.-W.; Woo, S.J.; Cho, H.; Park, K.H. Nationwide Incidence of Ocular Melanoma in South Korea by Using the National Cancer Registry Database (1999–2011). Investig. Opthalmology Vis. Sci. 2015, 56, 4719–4724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stang, A.; Parkin, D.M.; Ferlay, J.; Jöckel, K.-H. International uveal melanoma incidence trends in view of a decreasing proportion of morphological verification. Int. J. Cancer 2005, 114, 114–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nichols, E.E.; Richmond, A.; Daniels, A.B. Disparities in Uveal Melanoma: Patient Characteristics. Semin. Ophthalmol. 2016, 31, 296–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Xu, Y.; Lou, L.; Wang, Y.; Miao, Q.; Jin, K.; Chen, M.; Ye, J. Epidemiological Study of Uveal Melanoma from US Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (2010–2015). J. Ophthalmol. 2020, 2020, 3614039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baily, C.; O’Neill, V.; Dunne, M.; Cunningham, M.; Gullo, G.; Kennedy, S.; Walsh, P.M.; Deady, S.; Horgan, N. Uveal Melanoma in Ireland. Ocul. Oncol. Pathol. 2019, 5, 195–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aronow, M.E.; Topham, A.K.; Singh, A.D. Uveal Melanoma: 5-Year Update on Incidence, Treatment, and Survival (SEER 1973-2013). Ocul. Oncol. Pathol. 2018, 4, 145–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nowak, M.S.; Romanowska-Dixon, B.; Grabska-Liberek, I.; Żurek, M. Incidence and survival of ocular melanoma in National Cancer Registry of Poland in 2010–2017. Adv. Clin. Exp. Med. 2022, 31, 615–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Central Statistical Office of Poland Data. Available online: http://www.stat.gov.pl (accessed on 1 November 2022).
- Nowak, M.S.; Smigielski, J. The Prevalence and Causes of Visual Impairment and Blindness Among Older Adults in the City of Lodz, Poland. Medicine 2015, 94, e505, Erratum in: Medicine 2015, 94, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nowak, M.S.; Jurowski, P.; Gos, R.; Smigielski, J. Ocular findings among young men: A 12-year prevalence study of military service in Poland. Acta Ophthalmol. 2010, 88, 535–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Damato, B.E.; Coupland, S.E. Differences in uveal melanomas between men and women from the British Isles. Eye 2012, 26, 292–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zloto, O.; Pe’Er, J.; Frenkel, S. Gender Differences in Clinical Presentation and Prognosis of Uveal Melanoma. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2013, 54, 652–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Liu-Smith, F.; Chiu, C.-Y.; Johnson, D.; Miller, P.; Glazer, E.; Wu, Z.; Wilson, M. The Sex Differences in Uveal Melanoma: Potential Roles of EIF1AX, Immune Response and Redox Regulation. Curr. Oncol. 2021, 28, 2801–2811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stålhammar, G. Sex-based differences in early and late uveal melanoma-related mortality. Cancer Med. 2022. Epub ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nichols, E.E.; Richmond, A.; Daniels, A.B. Tumor Characteristics, Genetics, Management, and the Risk of Metastasis in Uveal Melanoma. Semin. Ophthalmol. 2016, 31, 304–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chattopadhyay, C.; Kim, D.W.; Gombos, D.S.; Oba, J.; Qin, Y.; Williams, M.D.; Esmaeli, B.; Grimm, E.A.; Wargo, J.A.; Woodman, S.E.; et al. Uveal melanoma: From diagnosis to treatment and the science in between. Cancer 2016, 122, 2299–2312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Singh, A.D.; Turell, M.E.; Topham, A.K. Uveal Melanoma: Trends in Incidence, Treatment, and Survival. Ophthalmology 2011, 118, 1881–1885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bishop, K.D.; Olszewski, A.J. Epidemiology and survival outcomes of ocular and mucosal melanomas: A population-based analysis. Int. J. Cancer 2014, 134, 2961–2971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahendraraj, K.; Lau, C.S.; Lee, I.; Chamberlain, R.S. Trends in incidence, survival, and management of uveal melanoma: A pop-ulation-based study of 7,516 patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (1973–2012). Clin. Ophthalmol. 2016, 10, 2113–2119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Vajdic, C.M.; Kricker, A.; Giblin, M.; McKenzie, J.; Aitken, J.; Giles, G.G.; Armstrong, B.K. Incidence of ocular melanoma in Australia from 1990 to 1998. Int. J. Cancer 2003, 105, 117–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rajeshuni, N.; Zubair, T.; Ludwig, C.A.; Moshfeghi, D.M.; Mruthyunjaya, P. Evaluation of Racial, Ethnic, and Socioeconomic Associations With Treatment and Survival in Uveal Melanoma, 2004–2014. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2020, 138, 876–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schefler, A.C.; Kim, R.S. Recent advancements in the management of retinoblastoma and uveal melanoma. Fac. Rev. 2021, 10, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Virgili, G.; Gatta, G.; Ciccolallo, L.; Capocaccia, R.; Biggeri, A.; Crocetti, E.; Lutz, J.-M.; Paci, E. Survival in Patients With Uveal Melanoma in Europe. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2008, 126, 1413–1418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1.
Sex differences in prevalence rate per 100 people included in the present study (with uveal melanoma) in the national referral center in Poland between 2018 and 2021.
Figure 1.
Sex differences in prevalence rate per 100 people included in the present study (with uveal melanoma) in the national referral center in Poland between 2018 and 2021.
Figure 2.
The treatment methods of uveal melanoma according to sex of patient. Chi^2 Pearson test p = 0.015.
Figure 2.
The treatment methods of uveal melanoma according to sex of patient. Chi^2 Pearson test p = 0.015.
Figure 3.
The treatment methods of uveal melanoma according to intraocular anterior/posterior localization of the tumor at the time of cancer diagnosis. Chi^2 Pearson test p < 0.001.
Figure 3.
The treatment methods of uveal melanoma according to intraocular anterior/posterior localization of the tumor at the time of cancer diagnosis. Chi^2 Pearson test p < 0.001.
Table 1.
The incidence of uveal melanoma in the national referral center in Poland between 2019 and 2021.
Table 1.
The incidence of uveal melanoma in the national referral center in Poland between 2019 and 2021.
| 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | All | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Men n% | 171 (46.98%) | 157 (43.13%) | 132 (45.21%) | 150 (47.47%) | 610 (45.66%) |
| Women n% | 193 (53.02%) | 207 (56.87%) | 160 (54.79%) | 166 (52.53%) | 726 (54.34%) |
| All n% | 364 (100%) | 364 (100%) | 292 (100%) | 316 (100%) | 1336 (100%) |
Table 2.
Localizations of uveal melanoma according to sex of patient.
| Localization of Tumor | Sex | All n (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Men n (%) | Women n (%) | ||
| Choroid | 486 (79.67%) | 538 (74.10%) | 1024 (76.65%) |
| Choroid and ciliary body | 69 (11.31% | 82 (11.30%) | 151 (11.30%) |
| Iris | 20 (3.28) | 29 (3.99%) | 49 (3.67%) |
| Iris and ciliary body | 24 (3.93%) | 47 (6.48%) | 71 (5.31%) |
| Ciliary body | 7 (1.15%) | 22 (3.03%) | 29 (2.17%) |
| Iris, ciliary body and choroid | 4 (0.66%) | 8 (1.10%) | 12 (0.90%) |
| All | 610 (100%) | 726 (100%) | 1336 (100%) |
Chi^2 Pearson test p = 0.035.
Table 3.
Sex distribution in cancer stage according to TNM classification of malignant tumors (at the time of diagnosis).
Table 3.
Sex distribution in cancer stage according to TNM classification of malignant tumors (at the time of diagnosis).
| Cancer Stage TNM | Sex | All n (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Men n (%) | Women n (%) | ||
| T1 | 170 (27.87%) | 177 (24.38%) | 347 (25.97%) |
| T2 | 165 (27.05%) | 227 (31.27%) | 392 (29.35%) |
| T3 | 165 (27.05) | 217 (29.89%) | 382 (28.59%) |
| T4 | 110 (18.03%) | 105 (14.46%) | 215 (16.09%) |
| All | 610 (100%) | 726 (100%) | 1336 (100%) |
Chi^2 Pearson test p = 0.068.
Table 4.
The treatment methods of uveal melanoma according to sex of patient.
| Treatment Methods | Sex | All n (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Men n (%) | Women n (%) | ||
| Plaque brachytherapy with iodine-125 | 188 (30.82% | 217 (29.89%) | 405 (30.31%) |
| Plaque brachytherapy with rhutenium-106 | 212 (34.75%) | 292 (40.22%) | 504 (37.72%) |
| Local surgery with plaque brachytherapy | 10 (1.65) | 26(3.58%) | 36 (2.70%) |
| Proton beam irradiation (PBI) | 57 (9.34%) | 60 (8.27%) | 117 (8.76%) |
| Enucleation | 143 (23.44%) | 131 (18.04%) | 274 (20.51%) |
| All | 610 (100%) | 726 (100%) | 1336 (100%) |
Chi^2 Pearson test p = 0.014.
Table 5.
Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models for risk factors associated with medical management of uveal melanoma (globe-sparing therapies vs. enucleation).
Table 5.
Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models for risk factors associated with medical management of uveal melanoma (globe-sparing therapies vs. enucleation).
| Variables | Univariate Logistic Regression OR, 95% CI, p-Value | Multivariate Logistic Regression OR, 95% CI, p-Value |
|---|---|---|
| Gender: women vs. men | 0.72 (0.55–0.96) p = 0.024 | 0.73 (0.59–1.02) p = 0.063 |
| Tumor localization: anterior vs. posterior to the equator of eye globe Size: according to TNM Classification | 3.56 (2.67–4.73) p < 0.000 3.46 (2.92–4.09) p < 0.000 | 4.18 (2.96–5.89) p < 0.000 3.48 (2.92–4.15) p < 0.000 |
Bold highlights the statistically significant p values.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Romanowska-Dixon, B.; Dębicka-Kumela, M.; Śmigielski, J.; Nowak, M.S. Sex Differences in the Treatment of Uveal Melanoma in a Group of 1336 Patients. J. Pers. Med. 2023, 13, 353. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13020353
AMA Style
Romanowska-Dixon B, Dębicka-Kumela M, Śmigielski J, Nowak MS. Sex Differences in the Treatment of Uveal Melanoma in a Group of 1336 Patients. Journal of Personalized Medicine. 2023; 13(2):353. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13020353
Chicago/Turabian StyleRomanowska-Dixon, Bożena, Magdalena Dębicka-Kumela, Janusz Śmigielski, and Michał Szymon Nowak. 2023. "Sex Differences in the Treatment of Uveal Melanoma in a Group of 1336 Patients" Journal of Personalized Medicine 13, no. 2: 353. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13020353
APA StyleRomanowska-Dixon, B., Dębicka-Kumela, M., Śmigielski, J., & Nowak, M. S. (2023). Sex Differences in the Treatment of Uveal Melanoma in a Group of 1336 Patients. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 13(2), 353. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13020353
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
