Next Article in Journal
Fifty Years After the Discovery of the First Stellar-Mass Black Hole: A Review of Cyg X-1
Previous Article in Journal
TOrsion-Bar Antenna: A Ground-Based Detector for Low-Frequency Gravity Gradient Measurement
Previous Article in Special Issue
Stellar Ages of TESS Stars, Adopting Spectroscopic Data from Gaia GSP-Spec
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The New Deep-Underground Direct Measurement of 22Ne(α, γ)26Mg with EASγ: A Feasibility Study

by
Daniela Mercogliano
1,2,*,
Andreas Best
1,2 and
David Rapagnani
1,2
1
Dipartimento di Fisica E. Pancini, Università di Napoli “Federico II”, 80126 Napoli, Italy
2
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Napoli, Complesso Universitario di Monte Sant’Angelo, 80126 Napoli, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Galaxies 2024, 12(6), 79; https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies12060079
Submission received: 15 September 2024 / Revised: 15 November 2024 / Accepted: 18 November 2024 / Published: 20 November 2024

Abstract

:
22Ne(α, γ)26Mg is pivotal in the understanding of several open astrophysical questions, as the nucleosynthesis beyond Fe through the s-process, but its stellar reaction rate is still subject to large uncertainties. These mainly arise from its extremely low rate in the Gamow energy region, whose measurement is hampered by the unavoidable presence of the cosmic ray background noise. A possibility to overcome this issue is to perform the measurement in a quasi background-free environment, such as that offered by the underground Bellotti Ion Beam Facility at LNGS. This is the key idea of EASγ experiment. In this study, the signal from the de-excitation of the compound nucleus 26Mg has been simulated and its detection has been investigated both on surface and deep-underground laboratories. The simulation results show the enhancement in sensitivity achieved by performing the measurement deep underground and with an additional shielding, yielding to unprecedented sensitivity.

1. Introduction

The 22Ne(α, γ)26Mg reaction plays a crucial role in nuclear astrophysics, as it influences the isotopic ratios of 24,25,26Mg, one of the few elements for which we have isotopic information directly from stellar spectroscopic observations of cool dwarfs and giants stars [1,2,3] and the nucleosynthesis of the long-lived γ-ray emitter 60Fe [4].
Among the other scenarios, it is pivotal to understand the nucleosynthesis of elements beyond iron through the s-process. Indeed, 22Ne(α, γ)26Mg is the main competitor of 22Ne(α, n)25Mg, which has been identified as the primary neutron source of the weak component of the s-process in massive stars with M 8 M , and acts as a secondary source of neutrons for the main component in AGB stars, influencing the abundances of s-only isotopes near branching points [5,6].
In AGB stars, s-process nucleosynthesis takes place during the thermal pulsing phase. In this phase, the star consists of a carbon–oxygen core, a thin helium shell seeded through hydrogen burning products from the outer layer, and an extended hydrogen envelope. During the thermal pulses, a series of helium-shell flashes is initiated by the abrupt onset of the triple-alpha (3 α ) process at the bottom of the He-intershell. In this region, free neutrons are produced through two reactions: 13 C ( α ,   n ) 16 O and 22Ne(α, n)25Mg, the latest contributing towards the end of the phase, when the temperature has risen above ca. 200 MK. While a series of recent studies converge on the reaction rate of the 13 C ( α ,   n ) 16 O [7,8,9], the second neutron source is still subject to large uncertainties affecting the nucleosynthesis predictions.
The neutron budget available for the subsequent nucleosynthesis strongly depends upon the availability of 22Ne and the rate of the two competing open channels of 22Ne + α fusion reaction. While the formation of 22Ne via 14N(α, γ)18F(β+ν)18O(α, γ)22Ne reaction chain is well-understood [10], the open question concerns the rate at which the two reactions proceed.
The 22Ne(α, n)25Mg reaction channel, with its negative Q-value ( Q ( α , n ) = 478.34 ± 0.05 keV ), activates only at specific temperatures, with T varying within 0.1 ÷ 0.6 T 9 according to the stellar burning scenario. At lower temperatures, the ( α , n ) channel remains closed and 22Ne is consumed exclusively through 22Ne(α, γ)26Mg, which is always active due to its positive Q-value ( Q ( α , γ ) = 10,614.74 ± 0.03 keV ).
The interplay between the two channels has a huge impact on the neutron budget for nucleosynthesis. Therefore, reliable nucleosynthesis predictions require precise reaction rates for both channels within the astrophysical energy range, also known as the Gamow window [11].
The stellar reaction rate is calculated by summing all the resonance states of the compound nucleus 26Mg within the Gamow window, which corresponds to an E α = 600 ÷ 900 keV [12,13]. However, the low energy values and extremely low cross-sections make direct measurements very challenging, and mostly dominated by cosmic ray background [14]. Additionally, the high level density of 26Mg near the particle threshold hampers the isolation and identification of all potentially involved states.
In the last 30 years, several measurement campaigns were devoted to the study of both channels, but none of them could collect information below the well-known resonance at 835 keV , located on the upper limit of the Gamow window [15,16,17,18,19,20].
Since direct measurements on surface laboratories no longer successful to address this gap, the EASγ project plans a new experimental study of 22Ne(α, γ)26Mg in the deep-underground environment of LNGS. As part of the LUNA collaboration’s scientific program ([21,22], and the references therein), EASy will directly investigate the 22Ne(α, γ)26Mg in the energy range with 600–800 keV and remeasure the well-known resonance at 832 keV. Alongside ASFIN [23,24], n-TOF [25,26], ERNA [27,28,29], and PANDORA [30], LUNA is one of the main contributors to nuclear astrophysics research in Italy.
The measurement is proposed to begin in 2025 at the Bellotti Ion Beam Facility of LNGS, and combines advanced beam-induced background reduction techniques with a high-efficiency γ -ray spectrometer. As a preliminary work, a Monte Carlo simulation using GEANT4 [31] has been performed to characterize the experimental setup, and will be shown in detail in the next section.
The results of the simulations show a significant enhancement in sensitivity and complete suppression of background above 2.6 MeV. The completely lack of background allows to explore the states so far inaccessible via direct measurements on surface, making this approach promising for obtaining new data in the unexplored energy region.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Setup

EASγ aims at performing a new direct study of the 22Ne(α, γ)26Mg in the energy range of astrophysical interest. In an attempt to extend our knowledge to the whole Gamow window, the measurement will be conducted deep underground at LNGS, to benefit of the natural shielding provided by the 1400 m of rock overburden of the Gran Sasso massif. The measurement will be carried using the newly commissioned LUNA MV accelerator, capable of delivering a high-stable α current up to 500   μ A [32].
A recirculated, windowless gas target 99% enriched in 22Ne will be employed, to minimize the beam-induced background and maximize the reaction yield. The same gas target is currently used to study the ( α ,   n ) channel in the framework of SHADES experiment. Details about the gas target can be found in [33].
The γ -rays resulting from the de-excitation of the compound nucleus 26Mg will be detected using an array of 102 mm × 102 mm × 203 mm NaI(Tl) crystals.
The final array configuration which maximizes the detection efficiency consists of 6 NaI(Tl) detectors surrounding the target chamber at a distance of 15 cm from its center. In Figure 1, the side and front views of the simulated array are displayed. The estimated full-energy peak efficiency of the entire array is 11% at 4 MeV. Due to this, emitted gamma-ray cascades are not always summed completely and the total spectrum does not only display a single peak at Q + E r c m , but rather multiple additional features corresponding to individual transitions. The operation mode is similar to other such setups like the 4 π BGO detector at LUNA 400 [34].

2.2. Background Acquisition

Background measurements have been conducted in three different experimental scenarios. The first has been taken with a single NaI(Tl) crystal on the surface and without shielding. The measurement has been performed at Dipartimento di Fisica E. Pancini of the University of Naples Federico II. A second spectrum is obtained placing the detector deep underground at the Bellotti IBF. A third acquisition was ran deep underground and with an additional 15 cm lead shielding surrounding the NaI detector to further reduce the background radiation from the natural radioactivity of the surrounding rock. The total background was estimated as six times the signal from a single NaI(Tl) crystal. However, this approach overestimates the overall background, since it does not account for the mutual shielding that each detector of the array provides to the others. This overestimation allows us to be conservative in the following discussion.

2.3. Simulation

In addition to the experimental setup, the signal from the de-excitation of the compound nucleus 26Mg has been added to the simulation. Since both 22Ne and α have J π = 0 + , by angular momentum selection rules, only natural-parity states in 26Mg can participate in the reaction. Among all of the natural-parity states lying within the Gamow window, the ones with J π = 0 + and J π = 1 are expected to substantially contribute to the rate, since α particles with higher angular momentum will be suppressed by the centrifugal barrier. The information about the structure of 26Mg and the decay schemes has been retrieved from National Nuclear Data Center datasets (accessed on 31 October 2024) [www.nndc.bnl.gov], except for the first transitions of the 11,319.5 keV state, whose branching ratios were derived from [17] (see Table 1 for further details). In this first feasibility study, angular correlation effects have not yet been taken into account.

3. Results and Discussion

In a low-count rate experiment, such as the one under study, the suppression of background is crucial, since its magnitude ultimately determines the minimum detectable signal level. In a γ -ray spectrum, the detected background accounts several contributions arising from cosmic-ray interaction with the atmosphere (cosmic-ray background), the internal radioactivity of the detector itself and the presence of radioactive isotopes in the air and in the surrounding rocks (environmental background). To optimize the signal-to-background ratio, effective background suppression techniques must be applied. When significant shielding is used, both the cosmic flux and the ambient gamma-ray background are reduced, while radioactive contamination from structural and shielding materials near the detector becomes the most prominent source of background. Locating detectors deep underground helps minimizing cosmic background, though tens or even hundreds of meters of overlying rock are required to strongly attenuate the hardest component of muon flux [14]. For this reason, the underground Bellotti Ion Beam Facility at LNGS, with its 1400 m of rock overburden, is the perfect location for studying low count rate nuclear reactions, such as those of astrophysical relevance.
The benefit of operating in a deep-underground environment is illustrated by the comparison of the three background spectra in Figure 2.
For the underground spectrum, the natural shielding provided by the rock overburden efficiently suppresses the cosmic-ray background, specifically the component above the 2.6 MeV, by more than 4 orders of magnitude. The background contribution below 2.6 MeV mainly arises from radioactive isotopes normally present in the rocks. This component can be attenuated surrounding the detector with an additional shielding, as shown by the red line which represents the background suppression achieved enclosing the detector in a 15 cm of thick lead shielding.
Two states of the compound nucleus 26Mg have been under investigation, and their properties are summarized in Table 1.
The first excited state, E x = 11.32 MeV , corresponds to the well-known resonance at 0.83 MeV energy in the laboratory frame and 706 keV in the center of mass. This resonance was measured for the first time by Wolke in 1989 [15] and remeasured several times, being so far the only resonance in the Gamow window accessible through direct measurements on surface [17,18]. The most recent values of energy and the resonance strength ω γ provided by Hunt et al. [17] are reported in Table 1, while the branching ratios of the two first transitions used to simulate the signal are listed in Table 2. Assuming a beam current of 300 μ A , the expected event rate is approximately 14,033 counts per hour.
The second state investigated is located at E x = 11.17 MeV . This state is of particular interest due to the potential presence of an α -cluster at this energy with a large γ partial width, as suggested by Talwar et al. [36]. Their findings indicates that the resonance associated with this state dominates the 22Ne(α, γ)26Mg stellar reaction rate within the He-burning temperature range 0.18 T 9 0.4 , increasing the ( α ,   γ ) rate by nearly two orders of magnitude above the values reported in the literature by Longland [37] and Bisterzo [6]. However, despite numerous indirect measurements, a definitive spin-parity assignment for this state remains inconclusive [19,36,38], and the ω γ value is only known as an upper limit [35]. Under optimal conditions with the maximum beam current delivered by LUNA MV and an extended 40-day measurement period, we estimate that we will reach a level of only 33 detectable events, allowing for the first time for an extraction of the resonance strength or a significant reduction of its upper limit.
The simulated signal has been combined with the experimental background, whose spectrum is normalized to the measurement time reported in Table 1 to match the simulation. The results are shown in the following subsections.

3.1. Simulation of the De-Excitation of the 11,319.5 keV State of 26Mg

3.1.1. Scenario I: Surface Measurement

The first case under study corresponds to a measurement performed on surface and with the array unshielded. Since the experimental background spectrum that was available extends only up to 8 MeV, a linear extrapolation has been performed to cover the entire energy region up to 14 MeV. The background was extrapolated by fitting a linear model to the experimental data in the energy interval [4000, 6000] keV, and then extended to higher energies. Poissonian random fluctuations were added to this extrapolated background to mimic realistic background behavior. The experimental background is shown by the solid light-blue line in Figure 3a, while the extrapolated background is represented by the light-blue dotted line.
In Figure 3b, the two peaks corresponding to the two primary transitions 11,319.5   keV 7061 keV and 11,319.5   keV 1808.74 keV are indistinguishable from the background, thus a measurement of the ω γ appears to be unfeasible.

3.1.2. Scenario II: Deep-Underground Measurement and No Shielding

To improve the signal-to-background ratio, in the second case study, the signal has been combined with the background acquired deep-underground at Bellotti IBF and with the detector still unshielded. Thanks to the natural shielding provided by the rock overburden, the component of the cosmic-ray flux is completely suppressed (Figure 4a), and the two peaks corresponding to the two primary transitions are now clearly visible, as shown in Figure 4b. However, the spectrum below 2.6 MeV is still dominated by the background due to environmental radioactivity.

3.1.3. III Scenario: Deep-Underground Measurement and Lead Shielding

The third scenario corresponds to a measurement deep underground and with the detector shielded. The lead shielding surrounding the detector reduces the background below 2.6 MeV, further improving the signal-to-background ratio in this region Figure 5a. As a result, the bump corresponding to the transition from the first excited state to the ground state emerges from the background and the statistics provided can be used to re-evaluate the resonance strength ω γ .

3.2. Simulation of the De-Excitation of the 26Mg 11,171 keV State

The simulation of the signal from the de-excitation of the 11,171 keV state was hampered by the lack of information on the decay scheme and the unresolved spin-parity assignment of this state. To visualize the achievable sensitivity, the signal was simulated using branching ratios from a nearby state, E x = 10,949   keV . This assumption is justified by the de-excitation mechanism and the high level density of the compound nucleus 26Mg in this energy range. Typically, after the compound nucleus 26Mg is populated via 22Ne(α, γ)26Mg, the de-excitation proceeds through intermediate states. Therefore, despite its unknown decay scheme, it is reasonable to expect counts in the energy range between the first excited 1808.74 keV state and E x .
As shown in Figure 6, counts can be observed in the high-energy region, which is completely free of background noise thanks to the shielding provided by the deep-underground location. The detected signal allows for either a new estimation of the resonance strength or, at least, the establishment of a more stringent upper limit. This result proves the effectiveness of EASγ, as this state has been so far exclusively populated by indirect measurements being inaccessible of the direct ones.

4. Conclusions

The goal of this study is to investigate the feasibility of the measurement proposed by EASγ, and to demonstrate the enhancement in sensitivity achieved with its novel approach.
The main innovation of this project consists of a direct study of 22Ne(α, γ)26Mg deep-underground to benefit from the low cosmic-ray background conditions.
For this reason, in the present work, the detection of the signal from two significant states of the compound nucleus 26Mg was simulated, and the detection capability of the γ-ray spectrometer was investigated both on surface and deep underground.
The first simulated state, located at E x = 11,319.5   keV , corresponds to the well-known resonance at 835 keV. Previous studies have shown this resonance to be dominant in the stellar reaction rate, even though its exact position remains uncertain. This is the only state within the Gamow window that is currently accessible via direct measurements.
The simulation shows that the background suppression due to the deep underground location and an additional lead shielding allow to clearly identify the two peaks corresponding to the two first primary transitions and even a secondary transition, yielding to a more accurate value for the resonance strength.
The second state investigated is the low-energy state at E x = 11,171   keV , whose detection resulted to be elusive in all the direct and some indirect measurements. If an α -cluster state exists at this energy, it will significantly impact the stellar reaction rate, thereby influencing current stellar models and nucleosynthesis predictions. For this reason, retrieving accurate parameter values for this state is particularly important.
We demonstrate that the signal from de-excitation of the E x = 11,171   keV can now be studied directly for the first time using the experimental setup provided by EASγ, thus giving crucial insight into the contribution of this state to the overall stellar reaction rate.
In conclusion, this study proves that the low-background environment of the Bellotti Ion Beam Facility, along with the use of a shielded, high-efficiency NaI array, significantly improves the detection sensitivity. These findings highlight the potential of the forthcoming 22Ne(α, γ)26Mg measurement with EASγ to yield promising results.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.B.; methodology, A.B. and D.R.; software, D.M. and D.R.; validation, A.B. and D.R.; formal analysis, D.M.; investigation, D.M.; resources, A.B.; data curation, D.M.; writing—original draft preparation, D.M.; writing—review and editing, D.M., A.B. and D.R.; visualization, D.M., A.B. and D.R.; supervision, A.B. and D.R.; project administration, A.B.; funding acquisition, A.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the Italian Ministry of Research through the grant FARE 2020 R20SLAA8CJ—project EASy.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions from this study are included in the article; any additional inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Acknowledgments

A special thanks to 12C-12C LUNA working group for the background acquisition data.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
EASγExperimental and Astrophysical Study of 22Ne(α, γ)
AGBAsymptotic Giant Branch
LUNALaboratories for Underground Nuclear Astrophysics
s-processSlow neutron capture process
M solar mass
T 9 10 9 K
LNGSLaboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso
SHADESScintillator-He3 Array fro Deep-underground Experiments on the S-process
ULUpper Limit

References

  1. Gay, P.L.; Lambert, D.L. The isotopic abundances of magnesium in stars. Astrophys. J. 2000, 533, 260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Carlos, M.; Karakas, A.I.; Cohen, J.G.; Kobayashi, C.; Melendez, J. A formation timescale of the Galactic halo from Mg isotopes in dwarf stars. Astrophys. J. 2018, 856, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Melendez, J.; Cohen, J. The Rise of the AGB in the Galactic Halo: Mg Isotopic Ratios and High Precision Elemental Abundances in M71 Giants. Astrophys. J. 2009, 699, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Jones, S.W.; Möller, H.; Fryer, C.L.; Fontes, C.J.; Trappitsch, R.; Even, W.P.; Couture, A.; Mumpower, M.R.; Safi-Harb, S. 60Fe in core-collapse supernovae and prospects for X-ray and gamma-ray detection in supernova remnants. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2019, 485, 4287–4310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Pignatari, M.; Gallino, R.; Heil, M.; Wiescher, M.; Käppeler, F.; Herwig, F.; Bisterzo, S. The weak s-process in massive stars and its dependence on the neutron capture cross sections. Astrophys. J. 2010, 710, 1557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bisterzo, S.; Gallino, R.; Käppeler, F.; Wiescher, M.; Imbriani, G.; Straniero, O.; Cristallo, S.; Görres, J.; Deboer, R. The branchings of the main s-process: Their sensitivity to α-induced reactions on 13C and 22Ne and to the uncertainties of the nuclear network. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2015, 449, 506–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ciani, G.; Csedreki, L.; Rapagnani, D.; Aliotta, M.; Balibrea-Correa, J.; Barile, F.; Bemmerer, D.; Best, A.; Boeltzig, A.; Broggini, C.; et al. Direct Measurement of the 13C(α, n)16O Cross Section into the s-Process Gamow Peak. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2021, 127, 152701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Deboer, R.; Febbraro, M.; Bardayan, D.; Boomershine, C.; Brandenburg, K.; Brune, C.; Coil, S.; Couder, M.; Derkin, J.; Dede, S.; et al. Measurement of the 13C(α, n0)16O Differential Cross Section from 0.8 to 6.5 MeV. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2024, 132, 062702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gao, B.; Jiao, T.; Li, Y.; Chen, H.; Lin, W.; An, Z.; Ru, L.; Zhang, Z.; Tang, X.; Wang, X.; et al. Deep Underground Laboratory Measurement of 13C(α, n)16O in the Gamow Windows of the s and i Processes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2022, 129, 132701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Käppeler, F.; Wiescher, M.; Giesen, U.; Görres, J.; Baraffe, I.; El Eid, M.; Raiteri, C.; Busso, M.; Gallino, R.; Limongi, M.; et al. Reaction rates for O-18 (alpha, gamma) Ne-22, Ne-22 (alpha, gamma) Mg-26, and Ne-22 (alpha, n) Mg-25 in stellar helium burning and s-process nucleosynthesis in massive stars. Astrophys. J. 1994, 437, 396–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ota, S.; Christian, G.; Lotay, G.; Catford, W.; Bennett, E.; Dede, S.; Doherty, D.; Hallam, S.; Hooker, J.; Hunt, C.; et al. Decay properties of 22Ne+ α resonances and their impact on s-process nucleosynthesis. Phys. Lett. B 2020, 802, 135256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rolfs, C.E.; Rodney, W.S. Cauldrons in the Cosmos: Nuclear Astrophysics; University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  13. Iliadis, C. Nuclear Physics of Stars; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  14. Knoll, G.F. Radiation Detection and Measurement; John & Wiley Sons Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  15. Wolke, K.; Harms, V.; Becker, H.; Hammer, J.; Kratz, K.; Rolfs, C.; Schröder, U.; Trautvetter, H.; Wiescher, M.; Wöhr, A. Helium burning of 22Ne. Z. Phys. At. Nucl. 1989, 334, 491–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Giesen, U.; Browne, C.; Görres, J.; Graff, S.; Iliadis, C.; Trautvetter, H.P.; Wiescher, M.; Harms, W.; Kratz, K.; Pfeiffer, B.; et al. The astrophysical implications of low-energy resonances in 22Ne + α. Nucl. Phys. A 1993, 561, 95–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hunt, S.; Iliadis, C.; Champagne, A.; Downen, L.; Cooper, A. New measurement of the E α lab = 0.83 MeV resonance in 22Ne (α, γ)26Mg. Phys. Rev. C 2019, 99, 045804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jaeger, M.; Kunz, R.; Mayer, A.; Hammer, J.; Staudt, G.; Kratz, K.; Pfeiffer, B. 22Ne(α, n)25Mg: The key neutron source in massive stars. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001, 87, 202501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ota, S.; Christian, G.; Catford, W.; Lotay, G.; Pignatari, M.; Battino, U.; Bennett, E.; Dede, S.; Doherty, D.; Hallam, S.; et al. (6Li, d) and (6Li, t) reactions on 22Ne and implications for s-process nucleosynthesis. Phys. Rev. C 2021, 104, 055806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Shahina; deBoer, R.; Görres, J.; Fang, R.; Febbraro, M.; Kelmar, R.; Matney, M.; Manukyan, K.; Nattress, J.; Robles, E.; et al. Strength measurement of the E α lab = 830 keV resonance in the 22Ne(α, n)25Mg reaction using a stilbene detector. Phys. Rev. C 2024, 110, 015801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Piatti, D.; Masha, E.; Aliotta, M.; Balibrea-Correa, J.; Barile, F.; Bemmerer, D.; Best, A.; Boeltzig, A.; Broggini, C.; Bruno, C.G.; et al. First direct limit on the 334 keV resonance strength in 22Ne(α, γ)26Mg reaction. Eur. Phys. J. A 2022, 58, 194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Skowronski, J.; Gesuè, R.M.; Boeltzig, A.; Ciani, G.F.; Piatti, D.; Rapagnani, D.; Aliotta, M.; Ananna, C.; Barile, F.; Bemmerer, D.; et al. Advances in radiative capture studies at LUNA with a segmented BGO detector. J. Phys. G Nucl. Phys. 2023, 50, 045201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Spitaleri, C.; Cherubini, S.; La Cognata, M.; Lamia, L.; Mukhamedzhanov, A.; Pizzone, R.; Romano, S.; Sergi, M.; Tumino, A. Trojan Horse Method: Recent applications in nuclear astrophysics. Nucl. Phys. A 2010, 834, 639c–642c. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Pizzone, R.; Spitaleri, C.; Cherubini, S.; La Cognata, M.; Lamia, L.; Romano, S.; Sergi, M.; Tumino, A.; Li, C.; Wen, Q.; et al. Trojan Horse Method: A useful tool for electron screening effect investigation. Nucl. Phys. A 2010, 834, 673c–675c. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Borcea, C.; Cennini, P.; Dahlfors, M.; Ferrari, A.; Garcia-Muñoz, G.; Haefner, P.; Herrera-Martınez, A.; Kadi, Y.; Lacoste, V.; Radermacher, E.; et al. Results from the commissioning of the n_TOF spallation neutron source at CERN. Nucl. Instruments Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A Accel. Spectrometers Detect. Assoc. Equip. 2003, 513, 524–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Esposito, R.; Calviani, M.; Aberle, O.; Barbagallo, M.; Cano-Ott, D.; Coiffet, T.; Colonna, N.; Domingo-Pardo, C.; Dragoni, F.; Franqueira Ximenes, R.; et al. Design of the third-generation lead-based neutron spallation target for the neutron time-of-flight facility at CERN. Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 2021, 24, 093001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Buompane, R.; Di Leva, A.; Gialanella, L.; D’Onofrio, A.; De Cesare, M.; Duarte, J.; Fülöp, Z.; Gasques, L.; Gyürky, G.; Morales-Gallegos, L.; et al. Determination of the 7Be(p,γ)8B cross section at astrophysical energies using a radioactive 7Be ion beam. Phys. Lett. B 2022, 824, 136819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rapagnani, D.; De Cesare, M.; Alfano, D.; Buompane, R.; Cantoni, S.; De Stefano Fumo, M.; Del Vecchio, A.; D’Onofrio, A.; Porzio, G.; Rufolo, G.; et al. Ion Beam Analysis for recession determination and composition estimate of Aerospace Thermal Protection System materials. Nucl. Instruments Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. Atoms 2020, 467, 53–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. De Cesare, M.; Savino, L.; Di Leva, A.; Rapagnani, D.; Del Vecchio, A.; D’Onofrio, A.; Gialanella, L. Gamma and infrared novel methodologies in Aerospace re-entry: γ-rays crystal efficiency by GEANT4 for TPS material recession assessment and simultaneous dual color infrared temperature determination. Nucl. Instruments Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. Atoms 2020, 479, 264–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Goasduff, A.; Santonocito, D.; Menegazzo, R.; Capra, S.; Pullia, A.; Raniero, W.; Rosso, D.; Toniolo, N.; Zago, L.; Naselli, E.; et al. A high resolution γ-ray array for the pandora plasma trap. Front. Phys. 2022, 10, 6081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Agostinelli, S.; Allison, J.; Amako, K.a.; Apostolakis, J.; Araujo, H.; Arce, P.; Asai, M.; Axen, D.; Banerjee, S.; Barrand, G.; et al. GEANT4—a simulation toolkit. Nucl. Instruments Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A Accel. Spectrometers Detect. Assoc. Equip. 2003, 506, 250–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Junker, M.; Imbriani, G.; Best, A.; Boeltzig, A.; Compagnucci, A.; Di Leva, A.; Ferraro, F.; Rapagnani, D.; Rigato, V. The deep underground Bellotti Ion Beam Facility—Status and perspectives. Front. Phys. 2023, 11, 1291113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Rapagnani, D.; Ananna, C.; Di Leva, A.; Imbriani, G.; Junker, M.; Pignatari, M.; Best, A. Shades. In Proceedings of the EPJ Web of Conferences, Porto, Portugal, 12–16 September 2022; EDP Sciences: Ulis, France, 2022; Volume 260. [Google Scholar]
  34. Boeltzig, A.; Best, A.; Imbriani, G.; Junker, M.; Aliotta, M.; Bemmerer, D.; Broggini, C.; Bruno, C.; Buompane, R.; Caciolli, A.; et al. Improved background suppression for radiative capture reactions at LUNA with HPGe and BGO detectors. J. Phys. G Nucl. Part. Phys. 2018, 45, 025203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Adsley, P.; Battino, U.; Best, A.; Caciolli, A.; Guglielmetti, A.; Imbriani, G.; Jayatissa, H.; La Cognata, M.; Lamia, L.; Masha, E.; et al. Re-evaluation of the 22Ne (α, γ) 26Mg and 22Ne (α, n) 25Mg reaction rates. arXiv 2020, arXiv:2005.14482. [Google Scholar]
  36. Talwar, R.; Adachi, T.; Berg, G.; Bin, L.; Bisterzo, S.; Couder, M.; DeBoer, R.; Fang, X.; Fujita, H.; Fujita, Y.; et al. Probing astrophysically important states in the 26Mg nucleus to study neutron sources for the s process. Phys. Rev. C 2016, 93, 055803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Longland, R.; Iliadis, C.; Karakas, A.I. Reaction rates for the s-process neutron source 22Ne + α. Phys. Rev. C Nucl. Phys. 2012, 85, 065809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lotay, G.; Doherty, D.; Seweryniak, D.; Almaraz-Calderon, S.; Carpenter, M.; Chiara, C.; David, H.; Hoffman, C.; Janssens, R.; Kankainen, A.; et al. Identification of γ-decaying resonant states in 26Mg and their importance for the astrophysical s process. Eur. Phys. J. A 2019, 55, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The final configuration on the NaI(Tl) simulated using GEANT4. Six parallelepiped-shaped NaI(Tl) surround the target chamber at a fixed distance of 15 cm. In cyan, the enriched 22Ne gas target.
Figure 1. The final configuration on the NaI(Tl) simulated using GEANT4. Six parallelepiped-shaped NaI(Tl) surround the target chamber at a fixed distance of 15 cm. In cyan, the enriched 22Ne gas target.
Galaxies 12 00079 g001
Figure 2. NaI background-acquisition spectra in three different experimental scenarios: The black line is the background acquired on surface laboratory leaving the detector unshielded. The peaks corresponding to the 40K and 208Tl are clearly visible. The blue spectrum is the background registered by the same detector but located deep-underground at the Bellotti IBF. The red line is the spectrum acquired deep-underground and with an additional lead shielding.
Figure 2. NaI background-acquisition spectra in three different experimental scenarios: The black line is the background acquired on surface laboratory leaving the detector unshielded. The peaks corresponding to the 40K and 208Tl are clearly visible. The blue spectrum is the background registered by the same detector but located deep-underground at the Bellotti IBF. The red line is the spectrum acquired deep-underground and with an additional lead shielding.
Galaxies 12 00079 g002
Figure 3. (a) Comparison of the simulated signal (in red) with the experimental background acquired on surface and with the detector unshielded (light blue). (b) A black line for the sum of signal and background is added. The location of the two primary transitions 11,319.5   keV 7061 keV and 11,319.5   keV 1808.74 keV is marked by the two green arrows.
Figure 3. (a) Comparison of the simulated signal (in red) with the experimental background acquired on surface and with the detector unshielded (light blue). (b) A black line for the sum of signal and background is added. The location of the two primary transitions 11,319.5   keV 7061 keV and 11,319.5   keV 1808.74 keV is marked by the two green arrows.
Galaxies 12 00079 g003
Figure 4. (a) Comparison of the simulated signal (in red) with the experimental background acquired deep-underground and without shielding (light blue). In black, the signal + background spectrum. (b) In the zoomed spectrum, the two bumps corresponding to the two primary transitions 11,319.5   keV 7061 keV and 11,319.5   keV 1808.74 keV are now visible.
Figure 4. (a) Comparison of the simulated signal (in red) with the experimental background acquired deep-underground and without shielding (light blue). In black, the signal + background spectrum. (b) In the zoomed spectrum, the two bumps corresponding to the two primary transitions 11,319.5   keV 7061 keV and 11,319.5   keV 1808.74 keV are now visible.
Galaxies 12 00079 g004
Figure 5. (a) Simulated signal (in red) compared with the background acquired underground and with the array shielded (light blue). In black, the signal+background spectrum. (b) A secondary transition is now visible (marked with the yellow arrow), partially overlapped with the peak corresponding to the de-excitation from the first excited state to the ground state 1808.74 keV 0 .
Figure 5. (a) Simulated signal (in red) compared with the background acquired underground and with the array shielded (light blue). In black, the signal+background spectrum. (b) A secondary transition is now visible (marked with the yellow arrow), partially overlapped with the peak corresponding to the de-excitation from the first excited state to the ground state 1808.74 keV 0 .
Galaxies 12 00079 g005
Figure 6. Simulated signal (in red) compared with the background acquired underground and with the array shielded (light blue). The shape of the spectrum for 10,949 keV for 10 6 events of events is shown as reference by using the gray dotted line. The peaks corresponding to the primary transitions and the 1808.74 keV 0 are highlighted.
Figure 6. Simulated signal (in red) compared with the background acquired underground and with the array shielded (light blue). The shape of the spectrum for 10,949 keV for 10 6 events of events is shown as reference by using the gray dotted line. The peaks corresponding to the primary transitions and the 1808.74 keV 0 are highlighted.
Galaxies 12 00079 g006
Table 1. Properties of the states of the compound nucleus 26Mg used in the simulation.
Table 1. Properties of the states of the compound nucleus 26Mg used in the simulation.
E x (keV) E r cm (keV) J π ω γ (eV)Events/hRun-Time (h)
11,319.5 706.6 ± 2.5 0 + , 1 , 2 + or 3 ( 4.6 ± 1.2 ) × 10 5 14,033120
11,171 556.33 ± 0.05 2 + , 1 or 1 10 11 ( UL ) 10.034960
1 Calculated using Γ α , Γ γ   and   Γ n values from [35].
Table 2. Properties of the two first transitions from the excited state E x = 11,319.5   keV of 26Mg used in the simulation. Values from [17].
Table 2. Properties of the two first transitions from the excited state E x = 11,319.5   keV of 26Mg used in the simulation. Values from [17].
E x  (keV) E γ  (keV) J π Branching Ratio
70614260 1 46 ± 12
1808.749512 2 + 54 ± 12
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mercogliano, D.; Best, A.; Rapagnani, D. The New Deep-Underground Direct Measurement of 22Ne(α, γ)26Mg with EASγ: A Feasibility Study. Galaxies 2024, 12, 79. https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies12060079

AMA Style

Mercogliano D, Best A, Rapagnani D. The New Deep-Underground Direct Measurement of 22Ne(α, γ)26Mg with EASγ: A Feasibility Study. Galaxies. 2024; 12(6):79. https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies12060079

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mercogliano, Daniela, Andreas Best, and David Rapagnani. 2024. "The New Deep-Underground Direct Measurement of 22Ne(α, γ)26Mg with EASγ: A Feasibility Study" Galaxies 12, no. 6: 79. https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies12060079

APA Style

Mercogliano, D., Best, A., & Rapagnani, D. (2024). The New Deep-Underground Direct Measurement of 22Ne(α, γ)26Mg with EASγ: A Feasibility Study. Galaxies, 12(6), 79. https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies12060079

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop