Next Article in Journal
Frictional Properties of Two-Dimensional Nanomaterials as an Additive in Liquid Lubricants: Current Challenges and Potential Research Topics
Next Article in Special Issue
Study on the Effect of Oil Supply on the Sound Field Characteristics of Full Ceramic Ball Bearings under Oil Lubrication
Previous Article in Journal
Running-In Effects of Lubricated Polyether Ether Ketone on Steel for Different Spreading and Sorption Tendencies
Previous Article in Special Issue
Mixed Lubrication Analysis of Tapered Roller Bearings and Crowning Profile Optimization Based on Numerical Running-In Method
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Analysis of Circulation Characteristics and Heat Balance of High-Speed Rolling Bearing under Oil-Air Lubrication

Lubricants 2023, 11(3), 136; https://doi.org/10.3390/lubricants11030136
by Xiqiang Ma 1,2,3, Mian Zhang 1, Fang Yang 1,2,3, Yujun Xue 1,2,3, Ruijie Gu 1,2,3 and Nan Guo 1,3,*
Reviewer 2:
Lubricants 2023, 11(3), 136; https://doi.org/10.3390/lubricants11030136
Submission received: 27 January 2023 / Revised: 25 February 2023 / Accepted: 3 March 2023 / Published: 14 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Bearing Lubrication and Thermodynamics 2023)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The paper in its current form lacks many important details to make it more clear to readers. Some suggestions are as follows:

(1) The specific application for this study is not mentioned or explained. Is this work done for specific type of bearings? What about bearings with a constant volume of lubricant? 

(2) Are the results transferable to other bearing types or applications? For example, are the results transferable to railroad bearings that have a predetermined volume of lubricant?

(3) The behavior described in the paper is similar to what happens in railroad bearings yet there is no mention of any such results. There are many papers that have been written detailing bearing operating temperatures under several operating speeds yet none of those are referenced or compared to the results presented in this paper.

(4) The experimental setup is poorly described. A schematic diagram showing the location of the temperature measurements and how they were taken can greatly improve the study. As it is, Figure 9 is not very descriptive or clear.

(5) Are the simulated results obtained from an equation or the CFD? It is not clear in the paper.

(6) Has the effect of the ambient temperature been studied or is it irrelevant for this application? When the lubricant is cold, its viscosity is higher leading to frictional heating when the bearing is suddenly started from a cold start.

(7) How do the results obtained improve the specific application. Meaning, how can these results be used to improve the operation of these bearings? Without an application in mind, are these results just general results to be considered?

(8) A better motivation for the work done would greatly improve the paper. In other words, the need for this work is not described well or highlighted in the paper.

(9) What is the maximum operating temperature of the lubricant being modeled. At 110 degrees C, the lubricant is not that effective depending on the lubricant type. A statement to that aspect can go a long way towards describing the application type.

(10) The linear increase in temperature shown in Fig 5 can be supported with other results published showing similar trends. Try looking up some railroad bearing temperature studies performed. That can add value to your literature review.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments to the authors:

1. First line of the abstract needs to be revised and it is not clear.

2. The optimal oil supply has to be mentioned in the abstract.

3. The research gap and novelty of the work are not clear in the manuscript.

4. Quality of Fig 2 and 3 needs to be enhanced.

5. ANSYS software version needs to be mentioned.

6. All the equations have to be cited properly.

7. Figure 5 has to be discussed more with literature support.

8. In Figure 6, the temperature was decreased at 5.5 ml/h fuel rate. Why?

9. A separate discussion section is mandatory and all the obtained results have to be discussed clearly.

10 Ref 2 is not in the proper format.

11 Few older references can be replaced with the latest ones.

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Paper is much improved with additions

Reviewer 2 Report

All the best to the authors

Back to TopTop