1. Introduction
Air cycle machines (ACMs) are used in the environmental control systems of aircrafts to manage the pressurization of the cabin. To achieve small dimensions and high efficiency, the rotor should operate at a very high speed. ACM design is similar to that of a turbocharger, i.e., the rotor is driven by a turbine and pressurized air is provided by a blower impeller. The majority of contemporary high-speed rotating machines use aerodynamic foil bearings, which have very good operational properties [
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6]. However, even better functional properties can be achieved with tilting pad journal bearings (TPJBs), which have excellent dynamic characteristics. Cross-coupling stiffness terms, which are known to promote rotor instability, are found in TBJBs two orders lower than the principle stiffness terms. Rotors in TPJBs are therefore principally stable, unless there is a strong external source of excitation, such as a high-pressure labyrinth seal. With foil bearing working gap geometry, it is not possible to achieve such small values of cross-coupling stiffness terms (e.g., [
7]), and this is why TPJBs are a better solution from the standpoint of rotor stability. A new type of aerodynamic bearing with elastically supported pads, which combines the advantages of foil bearings and tilting pad journal bearings, was designed and successfully used for ACM rotor support.
2. Materials and Methods
Aerodynamic tilting pad journal bearing characteristics were designed with help of the computer program code “DATPJB.” Standard bearing configuration covers three pads with static load acting symmetrically between the two lower pads. The program code “DATPJB” provides the solution of the Reynolds equation for compressible medium according to [
8]. In the process of calculation, it was necessary to find the equilibrium of the pad position and static position of the journal in the bearing. Dynamic stiffness and damping coefficients were calculated for small harmonic journal movement in the vicinity of the equilibrium position, which enabled us to also determine the stability of the pad movement. The computer program “AXSPDR4,” based on principles stated in [
9], was used for the design of the aerodynamic spiral groove thrust bearings, providing bearing load capacity, friction loss and film stiffness as a function of speed and film thickness.
Dynamic rotor analysis was carried out with the program “DYNROT-R,” which enable us to calculate critical speeds, response to unbalance and pertinent stability reserve. The program involved graphic superstructure, enabling easy generation of the rotor model. The program also provided graphic outputs, such as Campbell diagrams or graphic representations of rotor response to unbalance in selected sections. All computer programs are available according to standard commercial conditions.
Relative rotor vibrations during tests were measured by means of eddy current sensors Micro-epsilon S04 (Micro-Epsilon Messtechnik, Ortenburg, Germany) connected to units Micro-epsilon eddyNCDT 3300 (Micro-Epsilon Messtechnik, Ortenburg, Germany) with resolution in nanometers and bandwidth up to 100 kHz. Vibration signals were recorded by National Instrument measuring USB DAQ card with 16 analog inputs and sampling frequency up to 1.2 MHz. The card operation was controlled by the program ScopeWin NI, enabling graphic processing of measured signals and statistic elaboration of measured data, e.g., evaluating RMS values of measured data or providing frequency spectra.
External excitation was realized by mounting the ACM on a vibration table, which could provide excitation either in horizontal or in vertical directions. Maximum acceleration of the table was 2g (~20 m·s−2).
3. Results
3.1. Aerodynamic Bearings with Elastically Supported Tilting Pads
There are several patents covering bearing design [
10,
11], the simplest of which is illustrated in the left-hand section of
Figure 1. Tilting pads 2 are supported by elastic members 4 with the shape-enabling free pad tilting in a peripheral direction. The detail of the pad elastic support is in the centre of
Figure 1. The pad is held in position by the pin 3, which also enables the adjustment of basic bearing clearance by means of the nut 5. Basic bearing clearance, enabling easy run–up without excessive wear, is the most important advantage of TPJBs in comparison with foil bearings.
Some problems with TPJBs of the simplest design may occur due to uneven deformation of the elastic member, which can result in two-point contact restraining free pad movement. That is why a more sophisticated design with defined geometry of contact between the pad and its supporting member was devised. Its design is shown in the right-hand section of
Figure 1. The pad 2 is supported by the insert 6 with a curved surface, on which the pad can freely tilt in circumferential and axial directions. The insert 6 is supported by the elastic member 4; basic bearing clearance can be set by the screw 7. Dynamic bearing properties are very good due to the very small cross- coupling stiffness terms, which is a property inherent to tilting pad bearings. Thanks to elastic members the bearings also acquire properties found in foil bearings, i.e., the adaptability to changing operating parameters and additional damping due to friction of elastic members on the inner surface of the bearing body.
Dynamic characteristics of the bearings used in ACM, calculated by the method described in
Section 4, are presented in
Figure 2. Bearings 25 mm in diameter with l/D ratio of 0.72 were loaded with 4.4 N at the turbine (TB) and 4.9 N at the blower (DB) side, respectively.
The diagrams in
Figure 2 show principle bearing stiffness and damping coefficients for the coordinate system shown in
Figure 1. Cross-coupling stiffness terms
Kxy,
Kyx as well as damping terms
Bxy,
Bxy are zero.
3.2. Rotor Dynamic Analysis
An ACM with aerodynamic TPJBs, designed in 2012 [
12], is shown in
Figure 3. The rotor 1 is supported by two TPJBs with elastically supported pads 3. Axial forces are taken up by aerodynamic spiral groove thrust bearings 4, 5. Turbine (left) and blower (right) impellers are at rotor overhang ends. Rotor relative vibrations are observed by two pairs of eddy current sensors 9, which have measuring range of 0.5 mm and typical sensitivity of 28 mV/µm.
Dynamic analysis of the rotor showed that there are four critical speeds associated with the rigid rotor on bearing aerodynamic film, which ranged from 7,000 to 15,500 rpm. The first bending critical speed of co-rotating precession is higher than 200,000 rpm, as can be seen from the potential intersection of the red line with the speed line in the Campbell diagram in
Figure 4. The branch of the same eigenvalue with counter-rotating (backward) precession (light blue line) is not excited by unbalance and therefore it is not considered as a critical speed.
As can be seen in
Figure 5, real parts of the four relevant eigenvalues are negative, so that the rotor operation is stable. Rotor resistance to instability is usually determined by means of logarithmic decrement, designated as log δ, defined e.g., in [
13]. However, to make the situation more obvious, we can define the stability reserve of the rotor as a percentage by the following equation:
where Re (λ) and Im (λ) represent the real and imaginary part of eigenvalue respectively.
The stability reserve of the two lowest eigenvalues at operation speed of 60,000 rpm are 10% and 13.5% respectively, which correspond to logarithmic decrement of 0.31 and 0.42. Such values of stability reserve are in most cases quite sufficient. The results of rotor response to unbalance were also quite satisfactory, with only a slight increase of vibration amplitude in the region around the “bearing” critical speed from 8000 to 18,000 rpm, i.e., outside standard operating range.
3.3. Operation Tests
Operation tests were carried out in a test loop with the turbine driven by pressurized air, as in real conditions [
14,
15]. The machine could be operated up to 68,000 rpm with minimum values of relative rotor vibrations. As shown by the amplitude-frequency characteristics depicted in
Figure 6, the RMS values of vibration amplitudes were measured in two different tests. The RMS values of vibration in radial direction in both tests were lower than 2 µm (double amplitude lower than 5 µm). The sensor at the blower side in the horizontal direction was damaged during tests, and therefore its signal was not included into the right diagram.
Typical records of rotor run-up and run-down are illustrated in
Figure 7. The vibration signal in axial direction is distorted by damaged measured surface, so that only quasi-static shifts can be evaluated. Quasi-static shifts in radial directions are caused by the change of rotor axis due to thrust runner alignment according to the position of thrust bearing sliding surface. It is more evident from the rotor run-down in the right section of
Figure 7, where the change of axial force direction results in relatively big deviations of the rotor in a radial direction. This phenomenon is caused by relatively low stiffness of pad supports in comparison with thrust bearing film stiffness. This by-product of elastic pad support contributes to a significant increase of thrust bearing load capacity. The average coefficient
p/
u (specific load, i.e., load acting on unit of sliding surface area, divided by circumferential speed on bearing pitch diameter) was exceeded by more than three times due to this possibility of sliding surface alignment.
Some tests were carried out with strong external excitation with variable frequency. Some excitation frequencies caused severe vibrations of the otherwise stable running rotor. The regimes with vibration amplitudes increased by external excitation are documented in
Figure 8 for the speeds of 30,000 and 60,000 rpm. Excitation frequencies inducing severe rotor vibrations ranged from about 60 to about 200 Hz; lower or higher excitation frequencies had no adverse effect on rotor vibration. The abovementioned frequencies are in the vicinity of the four lowest eigenvalues, i.e., critical speeds of the rigid rotor on the aerodynamic bearing film.
At the end of test, the machine had endured 1000 start-stop cycles without any traces of excessive wear or sliding surface damage. As is illustrated by
Figure 9, neither the pads nor shaft in the bearing location shows significant sliding surface damage; at the pad surface there are still visible traces of the original machining.
The problem with rotor stability appeared when the bearing span had to be reduced to assure that the machine would fit into the defined space. The rotor with a bearing span reduced from 80 to 45 mm exhibited instability already at relatively low speeds, around 30,000 rpm. This is illustrated by the vibration signals around 30,000 and 50,000 rpm in
Figure 10. Very distinct subharmonic frequency components, which varied from 1/4 to 1/7 of rotational frequency, can be observed in vibration signals in
Figure 10. Its frequency could be determined by comparing vibration signals with speed signals.
Vibration amplitudes in the region of instability were very high, reaching practically the whole bearing clearance, and it was only thanks to the elastic pad support that immediate failure did not take place. Rotor dynamic analysis carried out disclosed that, due to the bearing span reduction, the stability reserve of the lowest eigenvalue at 60,000 rpm decreased from 9.8% to 7.3%. Our experience shows that in most cases of a rotor supported in aerodynamic tilting pad journal bearings, even 5% of stability reserve is sufficient to ensure stability, but in this special case the rotor had to be redesigned to achieve stable operation.
4. Discussion
The reason for the instability of the rotor with the reduced bearing span was discovered with the help of several experiments, one of which was carried out with the blower impeller removed. The rotor without the blower impeller exhibited stable operation in the whole operating range up to 60,000 rpm. Dynamic analysis of the rotor with such geometry showed that stability reserve was increased from 7.3% to 10%, i.e., the value calculated for the rotor with the original bearing span. To achieve at least the same stability reserve as that of the rotor without the blower impeller, the thrust bearing was relocated between journal bearings so that the bearing span could be increased to 63 mm. The rotor dynamic analysis proved that this new configuration increased stability reserve of the lowest eigenvalue to 12%, which was even higher than that for original rotor with a bearing span of 80 mm. The modified rotor has therefore all the prerequisites for stable operation.
5. Conclusions
A new type of aerodynamic tilting pad bearings was used for the rotor support of an air cycle machine for aircraft cabin pressurization. Bearings with elastically supported pads were able to secure stable operation of the rotor with a mass of 0.7 kg up to a speed of 68,000 rpm. Pad elastic support leads to additional positive bearing properties, such as the possibility of adaptation to changing operating conditions, and provides additional bearing damping. Preset basic bearing clearance reduces sliding surface wear and contributes to easy run-up. Elastic pad support enables, among other features, very rapid rotor run-up to maximum speed without the danger of bearing clearance reduction due to different temperature dilations of the bearing and shaft. Similarly, as with foil bearings, vibrations from the rotor to the outside structure and vice versa are substantially damped. As a by-product of the journal bearing design, the thrust bearing load carrying capacity is increased due to the possibility of aligning the rotor axis according to the thrust bearing sliding surface position.
The above described example shows that no strict rules can be defined as concerns rotor stability. While some rotors in aerodynamic bearings exhibit stable operation with a stability reserve lower than 5% (log δ ~ 0.15), in the present case more than 7% was not sufficient. The reason for this behavior may be found in the effect of high-gyroscopic moments of impellers at both overhanging ends of the rotor. Most high-speed machines with heavy impellers overhanging the rotor end exhibit somewhat unorthodox behavior (e.g., [
16]), which should be further investigated.