Next Article in Journal
Cell Line Platforms Support Research into Arthropod Immunity
Next Article in Special Issue
Baseline Susceptibility of Spodoptera frugiperda Populations Collected in India towards Different Chemical Classes of Insecticides
Previous Article in Journal
Transcriptome Analysis of Hormone-and Cuticle-Related Genes in the Development Process of Deutonymph in Tetranychus urticae
Previous Article in Special Issue
Deltamethrin-Mediated Effects on Locomotion, Respiration, Feeding, and Histological Changes in the Midgut of Spodoptera frugiperda Caterpillars
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Insects
Volume 12
Issue 8
10.3390/insects12080737
insects-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
Correction published on 4 November 2021, see Insects 2021, 12(11), 991.
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Insecticidal Activity of Lemongrass Essential Oil as an Eco-Friendly Agent against the Black Cutworm Agrotis ipsilon (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)

by
Moataz A. M. Moustafa
1,
Mona Awad
1,
Alia Amer
2,
Nancy N. Hassan
1,
El-Desoky S. Ibrahim
1,
Hayssam M. Ali
3,
Mohammad Akrami
4 and
Mohamed Z. M. Salem
5,*
1
Department of Economic Entomology and Pesticides, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Giza 12613, Egypt
2
Medicinal and Aromatic Plants Department, Horticulture Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Giza 12556, Egypt
3
Botany and Microbiology Department, College of Science, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2455, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
4
Department of Engineering, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QF, UK
5
Forestry and Wood Technology Department, Faculty of Agriculture (El-Shatby), Alexandria University, Alexandria 21545, Egypt
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2021, 12(8), 737; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12080737
Submission received: 19 July 2021 / Revised: 10 August 2021 / Accepted: 10 August 2021 / Published: 17 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Collection Pesticide Chemistry and Toxicology)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The insect pest, black cutworm, Agrotis ipsilon (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), attacks the seedling stage of many field crops in several countries around the world. To control this insect pest, in this study, lemongrass (Cymbopogon citratus) essential oil observed potential insecticidal activity against the second-instar larvae of A. ipsilon.

Abstract

Background: The destructive insect pest Agrotis ipsilon (Hufnagel) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) is a polyphagous species targeting many economically important plants. The extensive and arbitrary use of insecticides has resulted in the build-up of insecticide resistance and pesticide residues accumulating in food. Therefore, it is becoming evident that alternative pest management tools are needed to reduce risks to humans, the environment, and non-target organisms, and at the same time, they should be used in field application at the lowest cost. Methods: In view of this objective, the present study demonstrates the toxicity of lemongrass (Cymbopogon citratus (DC.) Stapf) essential oil (EO), against the black cutworm A. ipsilon under controlled laboratory conditions in terms of measuring the activity of peroxidase and detoxification enzymes. The chemical components of the EO were analyzed using GC–MS. Results: The results show that after 96 h post treatment, the LC15 and LC50 values were 427.67 and 2623.06 mg/L, respectively, of C. citratus EO on second-instar larvae of A. ipsilon. A slight significance in elongation of the larval duration with LC15 and LC50 value was found with control. By GC–MS analysis, the main compounds identified in the EO were α-citral and β-citral with percentages of 35.91%, and 35%, respectively. The oxidative stress indicates a significant increase in CAT and lipid peroxidase enzyme activity after 96 h post treatment at the LC15 and LC50. Conversely, the detoxification enzyme activity shows an inhibition of CarE and GST enzymes of larvae exposed to LC15 and LC50 values in response to C. citratus EO. Conclusions: The present data show that lemongrass EO has insecticidal activity against the black cutworm, A. ipsilon.

1. Introduction

By 2050, the world population could reach 10 billion [1]. As a result, agricultural producers and researchers are fighting to minimize crop production losses due to insect assault. Currently, management of pest infestations that affect crop yield is often achieved using synthetic chemical insecticides. These chemicals have a negative effect on the agriculture ecosystem, human health [2], and on the prevalence of environmental pollution [3]. Moreover, extensive application of synthetic insecticides led to the destruction of beneficial species such as predators and parasites of the pests, alongside the destruction of honeybees as pollinators, which caused biological imbalance [4,5]. This struggle has resulted in increased research into new crop protection strategies that are cost effective, environmentally friendly, and capable of insect pest management [6]. One of these strategies includes new types of insecticide, such as plant-derived semi chemicals [3], and botanical insecticides [1,6,7], which do not interfere with ecosystems [8], instead of the currently used synthetic insecticides for pest control [9].
Botanical insecticides comprise only 1% of the pesticides market [10], which must be developed. The numbers of plant species that produce chemicals used against pests reached 866 species in 1997 [11]. These chemicals are secondary metabolites that could interfere with some physiological processes and the reproductive system in insect pests [6,12].
Essential oils (EOs) are one of the compounds which are produced as secondary metabolites [13] by aromatic plants and are used in the management of various insect pests and mites [14,15]. Essential oils from the lemongrass family (Cymbopogon spp.) are one of about 400–500 commercially produced EOs [16]. The insecticidal property of lemongrass EO is accredited to the various secondary metabolites, such as bioactive cyclic and acyclic terpenes [17], which disrupt the neurotransmitter in insects [18]. Furthermore, other secondary metabolites, such as alkaloids, flavonoids, and carotenoids [19], have been found in lemongrass extracts, indicating its potential as a bio-insecticide. In addition, tannin compounds maybe used as inhibitors of the enzyme activities in insect digestion [20]. Citral (geranial and neral mixture) is considered for the insecticidal activity of lemongrass EO [17,21], resulting from its interaction with oxidative stress and intracellular oxygen radicals [22,23].
The Noctuidae family is the most varied group within Lepidoptera and includes the highest number of species in the agricultural ecosystem [24]. The black cutworm, Agrotis ipsilon, is a major, undesirable insect pest, which attacks different field crops, especially at the seedling stage [25], not only in Egypt but also in several other countries. Therefore, to control its populations, an integrated pest management plan is required for efficient and cost-effective management of A. ipsilon. Most of the bio or chemical insecticides’ toxicities were evaluated on the development and physiological response in insect pests [26].
Induction of detoxification enzymes such as CytochromP450-dependent mono-oxygenases, esterases, and glutathione-S-transferases, which play key roles in pesticide metabolism, is one of the defensive physiological responses [27]. The induction or inhibition of detoxification enzymes following the application of insecticide could lead to insecticide resistance by raising the insecticide metabolism or secretion rate [28,29]. Additionally, other protective responses, such as oxidative stress enzymes, are responses to chemical stress. These enzymes, such as anti-oxidant and peroxidation enzymes, may stop the deleterious effect of reactive oxygen species (ROS) on cells [30,31].
Therefore, the aim of this study is to verify the existence of a new insecticide against A. ipsilon. From this point of view, we studied the lethal and sublethal concentrations of C. citratus to evaluate the toxicity, and biological and biochemical activities of lemongrass, C. citratus, essential oil on the black cutworm A. ipsilon under controlled laboratory conditions for possible use as a safe method of alternative approach to chemical insecticides within an integrated pest control program.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Insect Culture

A. ipsilon were reared on castor bean plant for 12 generations in the absence of insecticides in the laboratory at 28 ± 2 °C and 55 ± 5% RH [32,33]. The newly hatched larvae were kept in a clean glass jar (1 L) covered with muslin fixed tightly with a rubber band, and provided daily with castor oil leaves until 3rd-instar larvae. Larvae were reared individually [34] in small plastic cups (7.0 cm in diameter, 3.5 cm in height) with a small piece of castor bean leaf until pupation occurred. The developed pupae were kept in glass jars with paper towels on the bottom and covered until adult emergence.
The newly emerged moths (males and females in ratio 7:5) were transferred to a bigger jar which was supplied with a hanged piece of cotton wool soaked in 10% sugar solution as a dietary supplement [26]. Strips of dark net were used as hanging sites for egg deposition by the mated female moths. The eggs were collected daily and transferred to new jars and left to hatch. The neonates were fed on castor oil leaves and the colony of mass-reared larvae continued as per the above-explained rearing technique. The 2nd-instar larvae of the black cutworm for the initiated treatments were obtained from the colony.

2.2. Extraction of C. citratus Essential Oil

Foliage or fresh leaves of C. citratus, obtained from the Medicinal and Aromatic Plants Research Department farms, El-Kanater El- Khairiya, Kalubeia Governorate, Egypt, were washed with current tap water to remove the dust then cut to small pieces using excelsior. C. citratus EO was hydro-distillated using a Clevenger-type apparatus [35,36,37] from 100 g of fresh sample for 2.5–3.0 h after water heating at 70 °C until no further increase in the EO was observed. A light yellow EO with yield of 2.65% (on a fresh weight basis) was obtained from fresh leaves of lemongrass.

2.3. GC–MS Analysis of the Essential Oil

EO composition of the lemongrass was measured with a Trace GC Ultra-ISQ mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, Austin, TX, USA) with a direct capillary column TG–5MS (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 µm film thickness). The EO was diluted in n-hexane solvent (3 n-heaxane: 1 EO) before being injected to the GC–MS. The used carrier gas was He (flow rate of 1 mL/min). The solvent delay was 3 min, and diluted sample (2 µL) was injected automatically in splitless mode with Autosampler AS1310 coupled with GC. The column oven temperature program and the separation conditions were as follows: At the temperature of 50 °C, the column oven was initially held, then by 5 °C/min, the temperature was increased to 250 °C and held for 2 min. By 25 °C/min, the final temperature was increased to 310 °C and held for 2 min. The temperatures of the injector and MS transfer line were kept at 270 and 260 °C, respectively. At 70 eV ionization voltages, the EI mass spectra were collected at the m/z range of 50–650 in full-scan mode. The temperature of ion source was set at 250 °C.
The Xcalibur 3.0 data system (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Austin, TX, USA, 2014) with the Standard Index and Reverse Standard Index measurements to extract the Match factor from the GC–MS literature is a very intelligent tool to identify chemical constituents, where the value ≥650 is acceptable to confirm the compounds [36,38,39,40,41,42].

2.4. Bioassay

C. citratus EO was used to treat 2nd-instar larvae of A. ipsilon. The stock solution of the EO was prepared in tap water, and a few drops of Tween-20 (10 ppm) was used as an emulsifier. Five different concentrations from the stock of essential oil (8000, 4000, 2000, 1000, and 500 mg/L) were used in the experiment, and water containing the same concentration of Tween 20 was used for the control experiment. Leaves of castor bean were firstly dipped in each of the prepared concentrations for 20 s then left to air dry [43]. Five replicates were used; each one had 10 larvae. The larvae were left to feed for 24 h on the treated leaf, and then, after feeding, the surviving larvae were kept in a clean jar and provided with fresh untreated castor bean leaves. Daily records were taken for larval mortality in order to obtain the lethal and sublethal values after 4 days post treatment.

2.5. Lethal and Sublethal Effects

Concentrations of LC15 and LC50 values of lemongrass, C. citratus, were used to determine their effects on developmental stages and adult emergence [43] by using a leaf-dipping technique as described above. After one-week post treatment, the surviving larvae were kept separately in a small clean cup to prevent cannibalism habits, provided with fresh untreated castor bean leaves and covered with muslin (90 larvae for each concentration were used in three replicates) to record the rate of development and growth, including larval and pupal duration, pupation percentage, pupal mortality, pupal weight (three days after pupation), and emergence percentage of the adult [44].

2.6. Biochemical Analysis

2.6.1. Oxidative Stress Enzyme Assays

Sample Preparation

After 24 and 96 h post treatment of 2nd-instar larvae of A. ipsilon by LC15 and LC50 values of the lemongrass extract oil, 100 mg of fresh body weight of the surviving larvae of A. ipsilon were transferred to clean and sterilized Eppendorf tubes (1.5 mL). The samples were stored immediately at −20 °C until later analysis. Each treatment and control sample was replicated five times. The treated larvae were homogenized in potassium phosphate buffer (50 mM, pH 7.0) in a 30 µL buffer per 1 mg body weight. The homogenate was centrifuged for 15 min at 7000× g at 4 °C, and the supernatants were used for further analysis.

Enzyme Measurement

The catalase (CAT) enzyme activity was estimated [45,46] by measuring the rate of H2O2 consumption via absorbance at 510 nm. Lipid Peroxidase Assay Kit (Bio-diagnostic Company, Giza, Egypt) was used for monitoring the formation of malondialdehyde (MDA) at 534 nm [47]. The concentration of total protein of all samples was measured spectrophotometrically based on the Biuret Method using a Protein Biuret Kit (Bio-diagnostic Company, Giza, Egypt).

2.6.2. Measurement of Detoxification Enzyme Activity

Measurement of Carboxylesterase (CarE) Activity

Activity of CarE (including α- and β- esterase) was determined with some modification [44,48]. Larvae were homogenized in phosphate buffer (40 mM, pH 7.0) and centrifuged at 12,000 g at 4 °C for 15 min. A 30 µL aliquot of the supernatant was incubated with 100 µL of (30 mM) α- or β–naphthyl acetate at 25 °C for 15 min. The reaction was stopped by adding 50 µL of stop solution Fast Blue b (2%): sodium dodecyl sulphate (5%). The hydrolysis of α-naphthyl acetate was measured at 600 nm, while β-naphthyl acetate was measured at 550 nm by Jenway-7205UV/Vis Spectrophotometer. The mean levels of enzyme activity were calculated using Bradford Coomassie Brilliant Blue assay and α- and β-naphthyl acetate standard curves.

Measurement of Glutathione S-Transferase (GST) Activity

GST activity was determined with some modification [44,49]. The larvae were homogenized in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 6.5) and centrifuged at 12,000× g at 4 °C for 15 min. The solution reaction with 10 µL enzyme stock solution, 25 µL 30 mM CDNB, and 25 µL 50 mM GSH was measured at 340 nm at 25 °C for 3 min using a Jenway-7205 UV/Vis spectrophotometer.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Mortality of the tested larvae was calculated and corrected using Abbott’s formula [50]. The corrected percentages of mortalities were statistically computed according to Probit analysis (EPA Probit analysis program, version 1.5) [51] to estimate the lethal and sublethal values (LC15 and LC50) of lemongrass on 2nd-instar larvae of A. ipsilon after four days post treatment. The effects of lemongrass EO on biological and biochemical parameters of A. ipsilon were statistically performed using one-way ANOVA with treatment as a fixed effect (the df., F, and p-values were established) using SAS software [52]. Mean values of LC15 and LC50 were analyzed with Duncan’s multiple range test at the 0.05 level of probability and compared with the control.

3. Results

3.1. Chemical Compound of the Essential Oil from Lemongrass

The chemical compounds of Cympobogon citratus EO are presented in Table 1, and Figure S1, where the main compounds were α-citral (35.91%), β-citral (35.00%), 5-octyldihydro-2(3H)-furanone (9.08%), nerylacetal (7.84%), and trans-verbenol (3.58%).

3.2. Lemongrass EO Toxicity Test

After 96 h post treatment, the LC15 and LC50 values were 427.67 and 2623.06 mg/L, respectively (Table 2), of C. citratus on 2nd-instar larvae of A. ipsilon.

3.3. Effects of C. citratus EO on Some Biological Parameters

The results in Table 3 show a slight significance in elongation of the larval duration with LC15 and LC50 values compared with control. Thus, a significance difference was found in the duration of pupal stage. The pupation % decreased significantly only after the larvae were treated with the LC50 value. In contrast, no significant differences were found in the female pupal weight, while the male pupal weight increased at both concentrations. No differences were found in the emergence % and sex ratio (Table 4). It should be noted that sublethal doses/concentrations do not cause insect death, but through the interference in biological traits may reduce the insect populations of the next generations in the crops.

3.4. Oxidative Stress Indices

Data in Table 5 indicate that exposure to C. citratus caused a significant increase in CAT activity after 96 h post treatment at the LC15 and LC50 (0.00138 and 0.00151 U/mg of protein, respectively), while the lipid peroxidase enzyme activity at the LC15 and LC50 were highly significant compared to the control treatment with 0.00192 and 0.00196 mole/mg of protein, respectively. On the contrary, no significance was observed in CAT activity and lipid peroxidase enzyme activity after 24 h from exposure at both values of LC15 and LC50.

3.5. Detoxification Enzymes Activity

CarE and GST dynamic activities were determined after 24 and 96 h post treatment, and the results are shown in Table 6. The activity of CarE after 24 h showed that α-esterase has no significant differences compared to the control treatment, while the β-esterase showed significant differences after 24 h post treatment at the LC15 and LC50 (14.59 and 13.45 μmole/min/mg of protein, respectively). After 96 h post treatment, the activity of CarE showed a different pattern of change; the α-esterase showed significant differences compared to the control treatment (10.48 and 9.46 μmole/min/mg of protein, respectively) at the LC15 and LC50, while the β-esterase decreased significantly compared to the control treatment at the LC50 (8.65 μmole/min/mg of protein). In addition, the GST activity after 24 h showed a significant decrease at the LC50 (9.36 μmole/min/mg of protein), while the activity was significantly decreased at the LC15 and LC50 (8.80 and 7.00 μmole/min/mg of protein, respectively).

4. Discussion

The EO chemical analysis of lemongrass (Table 1) revealed a rich citral profile [53]. Citral was found in the leaf EO as majora major component compared to other compounds such as limonene, geraniol, and citronellal [54,55]. Previously, β-citral, geranial (α-citral or citral A), and β-myrcene, with percentages of 43.63, 41.51, and 12.37%, respectively, were identified as the main compounds in EO of C. citratus collected from Alexandria, Egypt [56]. Additionally, the plant grown in Giza, Egypt, showed that geranial (40.72%), neral (34.98%), and myrcene (15.69%) were the main compounds from the fresh leaves [57]. Geranial, neral, and myrecene were the main compounds in leaf EO from lemongrass collected from Kenya with percentages of 39.53, 33.31, and 11.41%, respectively [58], and geranial (42.2%), and neral (31.5%) from the Algerian plant [59]. With the same pattern, C. citratus leaves from Togo and Brazil showed the presence of geranial (45.2, and 47.52%), and neral (32.4 and 35.54%), respectively [60,61] as main compounds in the EO. Recently, neral, geranyl acetate, geranial, limonene, camphene, and citronellal, at 24.60, 18.70, 12.40, 12.30, 7.55, 4.70, and 3.21%, respectively, were shown to be the main compounds of C. citratus EO from Brazil [62]. The EO from Brazilian and Cuban studies showed the presence of Z–citral (neral) and E–citral (geranial) with percentages of 36.37, 35.21, and 53.2, 51.14%, respectively [63]. Furthermore, neral, citral, nonan-4-ol, camphene, 6-metil-hept-5-en-2-one, citronelal, β-caryophyllene, citronelol caryophyllene oxide, γ-muurolene, limonene, geranyl acetate, and geranial were identified as the primary compounds of the lemongrass EO with percentages of 31.5, 26.1, 6.54, 5.19, 4.36, 3.83, 3.26, 2.95, 2.63, 2.46, 2.32, 2.27, and 2.15%, respectively [64]. To find alternatives to toxic synthetic insecticides, this study evaluated the lethal and sublethal concentration of lemongrass EO on the survivorship, biological parameters, and enzyme activity of the destructive pest A. ipsilon. The leaf-dip bioassay revealed that the LC15 and LC50 values were 427.67 and 2623.06 mg/L, respectively, of C. citratus on the second-instar larvae of A. ipsilon. This might be due to the citral compounds, which inhibited acetylcholinesterase and octopamine [65,66,67], causing insect paralysis and death. The toxic effect of lemongrass EO on the life cycle of insects belonging to the orders Hemiptera [68], Coleoptera [3,69], Lepidoptera [70], and Diptera [63] have been reported. In addition, pest life-history components, behavior, and physiology can be significantly exhibited by the sublethal concentrations of EOs [71].
C. citratus EO has a toxic effect on Spodoptera frugiperda, where the LC50 was 1.35 mg/L, while the LC50 was 1.042 mg/L after treating the larvae with citral from C. flexuosus [72]. Park et al. [73] found that LC50 of the EOs of C. aurantium fruits was 92.58 and 113.26 mg/L against Pochazia shantungensis nymphs and adults, respectively. Additionally, Pumnuan and Insung [74] revealed that the fumigant toxicity of citral against thrips and mealybugs was LC50 = 2.31 and 2.80 µL/L air, respectively. From first to fifth instars of Podisus nigrispinus (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) nymphs, the increase in LD50 of 1.08 to 139.30 μg/insect−1 and LD90 of 2.02 to 192.05 μg/insect−1 was found as lemongrass EO was applied [64].
A set of results points to the toxicological effects of lemongrass EO on insect pests with LC50 of 35.133 mg/L against third-instar larvae of Aedes aegypti mosquitoes [75], 0.268 ppm against the adult moth of Phthorimaea operculella [76], and 7.07 ppm against the adult stage of cowpea weevil Callosobruchus maculatus [13]. Thus, the lemongrass EO has shown toxic effects on adults of Sitophilus granaries (LD50 = 4.03 µg/insect−1) [62]. For the toxicity of lemongrass commercial constituents, geranyl acetate showed lower toxicity than citral in third-instar P. nigrispinus nymphs, with LD50 33.44 μg/insect−1 and LD90 48.34 μg/insect−1, compared to LD50 25.56 μg/insect−1 and LD90 35.39 μg/insect−1 for the citral [64].
Accordingly, this confirmed the significant elongation of the larval and pupal duration for exposed larvae to LC15 and LC50 values of C. citratus. Likewise, EOs such as garlic exhibited anti-feeding and starvation effects against the black cutworm, A. ipsilon (Lepidoptera: Noctudae), with LC50 ranging from 0.006 to 0.019%; additionally, the combination of the EOs (garlic + mint) exhibited a potentiating effect and the toxicity was increased [77]. Similarly, Eucalyptus EO was effective as an anti-feeding deterrent against the third-instar larvae of A. ipsilon and Spodoptera littoralis [78]. Additionally, EO of garlic, mint, cumin, caraway, and parsley had antifeedant and starvation effects after treating the larvae of A. ipsilon with the LC50 value [77].
In contrast, no statistically significant difference in the emergence (%) relative to control was recorded in all other treatments. On the contrary, the cowpea weevil, Callosobruchus maculatus, showed a significant decrease in the emergence of adults at all concentrations of lemongrass EO tested [3].
The oxidative stress enzyme activity reveals the lack of significant activity observed in CAT and lipid peroxidase at 24 h post treatment in LC15 and LC50 equivalent. On the contrary, the expression level of CAT and lipid peroxidase after 96 h post treatment showed an increase in the activity of CAT of approximately 1.104- and 1.208-fold, respectively, compared to the control treatment of LC15, and LC50. This indicates an overproduction of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) in the insect’s body [79]. The antioxidant defense plays an important role in combating reactive oxygen species (ROS) and thus protecting the cell from ROS-mediated oxidative attack. In this way, the lipid peroxidase shows the same pattern, with increased activity of about 1.04- and 1.05-fold, respectively, at the LC15, and LC50.
On the other hand, insects could be adapted to various biochemical and physiological mechanisms to withstand the internal and external stress in order to survive. Generally, detoxifying enzymes are important for the metabolism of xenobiotics in insects [80,81]. Inhibition of the detoxification enzymes CarE and GST in response to C. citratus larvae exposed to LC15 and LC50 values were observed in our study. However, increased levels of both CarE and GST enzymes were observed in arthropod lines that demonstrated resistance to the insecticides [82,83].

5. Conclusions

This study demonstrates the potential of lemongrass EO as an insecticide approach to management of A. ipsilon. Lemongrass oil caused significant effects on the mortality, developmental duration, and expression level of CAT and lipid peroxidase after 96 h post treatment. Conversely, treated larvae showed inhibition of detoxification enzymes compared with the control larvae. The above findings of the present study show that the EO of lemongrass has a wide spectrum of biological activities, and also produces an enzymatic defense response. Moreover, these biochemical changes could be considered as biochemical indicators for oil-treatment stress. EO of lemongrass showed toxic and sublethal effects on A. ipsilon, and can be used as an alternative to synthetic insecticides. However, further investigations are underway to evaluate C. citratus under field condition.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/insects12080737/s1, Figure S1: title. GC-MS chromatogram of the identified chemical compounds in the essential oil from Cympobogon citratus leaves.

Author Contributions

M.A.M.M., M.A. (Mona Awad), A.A., N.N.H., and E.-D.S.I., helped in the layout, data collection, systematic layout, and carrying out the experiment; M.Z.M.S. helped in data collection, extraction, and analysis of essential oil; H.M.A. and M.A. (Mohammad Akrami) helped in the funding, writing, and proofreading the article. All authors contributed to writing the draft and the final version of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Researchers Supporting Project number (RSP-2021/123), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Researchers Supporting Project number (RSP-2021/123), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zaka, S.M.; Iqbal, N.; Saeed, Q.; Akrem, A.; Batool, M.; Khan, A.A.; Anwar, A.; Bibi, M.; Azeem, S.; Rizvi, D.-e.-N.; et al. Toxic effects of some insecticides, herbicides, and plant essential oils against Tribolium confusum Jacquelin du val (Insecta: Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2019, 26, 1767–1771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Pimentel, D.; Burgess, M. Environmental and Economic Costs of the Application of Pesticides Primarily in the United States. In Integrated Pest Management: Pesticide Problems; Pimentel, D., Peshin, R., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2014; Volume 3, pp. 47–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Alves, M.d.S.; Campos, I.M.; Brito, D.d.M.C.d.; Cardoso, C.M.; Pontes, E.G.; Souza, M.A.A.d. Efficacy of lemongrass essential oil and citral in controlling Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), a post-harvest cowpea insect pest. Crop Prot. 2019, 119, 191–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kwon, M.; Ahn, Y.-J.; Yoo, J.-K.; Choi, B.-R. Potent Insecticidal Activity of Extracts from Ginkgo biloba Leaves against Nilaparvata lugens (Homoptera: Delphacidae). Appl. Entomol. Zool. 1996, 31, 162–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Koul, O.; Walia, S.; Dhaliwal, G. Essential oils as green pesticides: Potential and constraints. Biopestic. Int. 2008, 4, 63–84. [Google Scholar]
  6. Khan, S.; Taning, C.N.T.; Bonneure, E.; Mangelinckx, S.; Smagghe, G.; Shah, M.M. Insecticidal activity of plant-derived extracts against different economically important pest insects. Phytoparasitica 2017, 45, 113–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Salem, M.Z.M.; El-Hefny, M.; Ali, H.M.; Abdel-Megeed, A.; El-Settawy, A.A.A.; Böhm, M.; Mansour, M.M.A.; Salem, A.Z.M. Plants-derived bioactives: Novel utilization as antimicrobial, antioxidant and phytoreducing agents for the biosynthesis of metallic nanoparticles. Microb. Pathogen. 2021, 158, 105107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rajendran, S.; Sriranjini, V. Plant products as fumigants for stored-product insect control. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2008, 44, 126–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pino, O.; Sánchez, Y.; Rojas, M.M. Plant secondary metabolites as an alternative in pest management. I: Background, research approaches and trends. Rev. Protección Veg. 2013, 28, 81–94. [Google Scholar]
  10. Mondal, D.; Mondal, T. A Review on efficacy of Azadirachta indica A. Juss based biopesticides: An Indian perspective. Res. J. Recent Sci. 2012, 1, 94–99. [Google Scholar]
  11. Prakash, A.; Rao, J. Botanical Pesticides in Agriculture; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  12. Rattan, R.S. Mechanism of action of insecticidal secondary metabolites of plant origin. Crop Prot. 2010, 29, 913–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Omotoso, S.E.; Akinpelu, B.A.; Soyelu, O.J. Insecticidal effect of lemongrass oil on behavioural responses and biochemical changes in cowpea weevil, Callosobruchus maculatus (Fabricius). J. Phytopathol. Pest. Manag. 2020, 7, 14–30. [Google Scholar]
  14. Feroz, A. Efficacy and cytotoxic potential of deltamethrin, essential oils of Cymbopogon citratus and Cinnamonum camphora and their synergistic combinations against stored product pest, Trogoderma granarium (Everts). J. Stored Prod. Res. 2020, 87, 101614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Manh, H.D.; Hue, D.T.; Hieu, N.T.; Tuyen, D.T.; Tuyet, O.T. The Mosquito Larvicidal Activity of Essential Oils from Cymbopogon and Eucalyptus Species in Vietnam. Insects 2020, 11, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tisserand, R.; Young, R. Essential Oil Safety-E-Book: A Guide for Health Care Professionals; Elsevier Health Sciences: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  17. Eden, W.T.; Alighiri, D.; Supardi, K.I.; Cahyono, E. The Mosquito Repellent Activity of the Active Component of Air Freshener Gel from Java Citronella Oil (Cymbopogon winterianus). J. Parasitol. Res. 2020, 2020, 9053741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Zibaee, I. Synergistic effect of some essential oils on toxicity and knockdown effects, against mosquitos, cockroaches and housefly. Arthropods 2015, 4, 107. [Google Scholar]
  19. Avoseh, O.; Oyedeji, O.; Rungqu, P.; Nkeh-Chungag, B.; Oyedeji, A. Cymbopogon Species; Ethnopharmacology, Phytochemistry and the Pharmacological Importance. Molecules 2015, 20, 7438–7453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rahayu, R.; Mairawita, J. Efficacy and residual activity of lemongrass essential oil (Cymbopogon flexuosus) against German cockroaches (Blattella germanica). J. Entomol. 2018, 15, 149–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Solomon, B.; Gebre-Mariam, T.; Asres, K. Mosquito Repellent Actions of the Essential Oils of Cymbopogon citratus, Cymbopogon nardus and Eucalyptus citriodora: Evaluation and Formulation Studies. J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants 2012, 15, 766–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kapur, A.; Felder, M.; Fass, L.; Kaur, J.; Czarnecki, A.; Rathi, K.; Zeng, S.; Osowski, K.K.; Howell, C.; Xiong, M.P.; et al. Modulation of oxidative stress and subsequent induction of apoptosis and endoplasmic reticulum stress allows citral to decrease cancer cell proliferation. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 27530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Sanches, L.J.; Marinello, P.C.; Panis, C.; Fagundes, T.R.; Morgado-Díaz, J.A.; de-Freitas-Junior, J.C.M.; Cecchini, R.; Cecchini, A.L.; Luiz, R.C. Cytotoxicity of citral against melanoma cells: The involvement of oxidative stress generation and cell growth protein reduction. Tumor Biol. 2017, 39, 1010428317695914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Caccia, M.G.; Del Valle, E.; Doucet, M.E.; Lax, P. Susceptibility of Spodoptera frugiperda and Helicoverpa gelotopoeon (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to the entomopathogenic nematode Steinernema diaprepesi (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae) under laboratory conditions. Chil. J. Agric. Res. 2014, 74, 123–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ladhari, A.; Omezzine, F.; Chaieb, I.; Haouala, R. Antifeeding and insecticidal effects of Capparis spinosa L. on Spodoptera littoralis (Boisduval) larvae. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 2013, 8, 5232–5238. [Google Scholar]
  26. Kandil, M.A.; Abdel-kerim, R.N.; Moustafa, M.A.M. Lethal and sub-lethal effects of bio-and chemical insecticides on the tomato leaf miner, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Egypt. J. Biol. Pest. Control. 2020, 30, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Capinera, J.L. Encyclopedia of Entomology; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  28. Wang, X.Y.; Yang, Z.Q.; Shen, Z.R.; Lu, J.; Xu, W.B. Sublethal effects of selected insecticides on fecundity and wing dimorphism of green peach aphid (Hom., Aphididae). J. Appl. Entomol. 2008, 132, 135–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Vojoudi, S.; Saber, M.; Gharekhani, G.; Esfandiari, E. Toxicity and sublethal effects of hexaflumuron and indoxacarb on the biological and biochemical parameters of Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Iran. Crop Prot. 2017, 91, 100–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Felton, G.W. Oxidative Stress of Vertebrates and Invertebrates. In Oxidative Stress and Antioxidant Defenses in Biology; Ahmad, S., Ed.; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 1995; pp. 356–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rindler, P.M.; Plafker, S.M.; Szweda, L.I.; Kinter, M. High Dietary Fat Selectively Increases Catalase Expression within Cardiac Mitochondria. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 1979–1990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Beheedy, A. Toxicological and Histopathological Studies on Agrotis ipsilon(Hufn), 1990. 196 p. Alex-Uni F.O.Agri.(Saba Basha)-Department of Plant Protection (Entomology). Available online: https://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=EG1998002101 (accessed on 19 June 2019).
  33. Mesbah, H.A.; Tayeb, E.-S.H.; Kordy, A.M.; El-Shershaby, M.M.A.; El-Wakil, N.H. Latent Effect of Two Formulated Botanical Fine Dusts on Agrotis ipsilon (Hufn.) Generation. Alex. Sci. Exch. J. 2016, 37, 221–230. [Google Scholar]
  34. He, F.; Sun, S.; Tan, H.; Sun, X.; Qin, C.; Ji, S.; Li, X.; Zhang, J.; Jiang, X. Chlorantraniliprole against the black cutworm Agrotis ipsilon (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): From biochemical/physiological to demographic responses. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 10328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Clevenger, J.F. Apparatus for the determination of volatile oil. J. Am. Pharm. Assoc. 1928, 17, 345–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Salem, M.Z.M.; Ali, M.F.; Mansour, M.M.A.; Ali, H.M.; Abdel Moneim, E.M.; Abdel-Megeed, A. Anti-Termitic Activity of Three Plant Extracts, Chlorpyrifos, and a Bioagent Compound (Protecto) against Termite Microcerotermes eugnathus Silvestri (Blattodea: Termitidae) in Egypt. Insects 2020, 11, 756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Salem, M.Z.M.; Ali, H.M.; Basalah, M.O. Essential oils from wood, bark, and needles of Pinus roxburghii Sarg. from Alexandria, Egypt: Antibacterial and antioxidant activities. BioResources 2014, 9, 7454–7466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Abdelsalam, N.R.; Salem, M.Z.M.; Ali, H.M.; Mackled, M.I.; El-Hefny, M.; Elshikh, M.S.; Hatamleh, A.A. Morphological, biochemical, molecular, and oil toxicity properties of Taxodium trees from different locations. Ind. Crop Prod. 2019, 139, 111515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. El-Sabrout, A.M.; Salem, M.Z.M.; Bin-Jumah, M.; Allam, A.A. Toxicological Activity of Some Plant Essential Oils Against Tribolium castaneum and Culex pipiens Larvae. Processes 2019, 7, 933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Behiry, S.I.; Nasser, R.A.; Abd El-Kareem, M.S.M.; Ali, H.M.; Salem, M.Z.M. Mass Spectroscopic Analysis, MNDO Quantum Chemical Studies and Antifungal Activity of Essential and Recovered Oil Constituents of Lemon-Scented Gum against Three Common Molds. Processes 2020, 8, 275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ali, H.M.; Elgat, W.A.A.A.; El-Hefny, M.; Salem, M.Z.M.; Taha, A.S.; Al Farraj, D.A.; Elshikh, M.S.; Hatamleh, A.A.; Abdel-Salam, E.M. New Approach for Using of Mentha longifolia L. and Citrus reticulata L. Essential Oils as Wood-Biofungicides: GC-MS, SEM, and MNDO Quantum Chemical Studies. Materials 2021, 14, 1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Abd-Elkader, D.Y.; Salem, M.Z.M.; Komeil, D.A.; Al-Huqail, A.A.; Ali, H.M.; Salah, A.H.; Akrami, M.; Hassan, H.S. Post-Harvest Enhancing and Botrytis cinerea Control of Strawberry Fruits Using Low Cost and Eco-Friendly Natural Oils. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Hamada, H.; Awad, M.; El-Hefny, M.; Moustafa, M. Insecticidal activity of garlic (Allium sativum) and ginger (Zingiber officinale) oils on the cotton leafworm, Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.)(Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Afr. Entomol. 2018, 26, 84–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Moustafa, M.A.M.; Fouad, E.A.; Abdel-Mobdy, Y.; Hamow, K.Á.; Mikó, Z.; Molnár, B.P.; Fónagy, A. Toxicity and sublethal effects of chlorantraniliprole and indoxacarb on Spodoptera littoralis (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Appl. Entomol. Zool. 2021, 56, 115–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Aebi, H. Catalase. In Methods of Enzymatic Analysis, 2nd ed.; Bergmeyer, H.U., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1974; pp. 673–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Aebi, H. Catalase in vitro. In Methods in Enzymology; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1984; Volume 105, pp. 121–126. [Google Scholar]
  47. Ohkawa, H.; Ohishi, N.; Yagi, K. Assay for lipid peroxides in animal tissues by thiobarbituric acid reaction. Anal. Biochem. 1979, 95, 351–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Asparen, K.V. A study of housefly esterase by means of a sensitive colorimetric method. J. Insect Physiol. 1962, 8, 401–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Habig, W.H.; Pabst, M.J.; Jakoby, W.B. Glutathione S-Transferases: The first enzymatic step in mercapturic acid formation. J. Biol. Chem. 1974, 249, 7130–7139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Abbott, W.S. A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J. Econ. Entomol. 1925, 18, 265–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Finney, D.J. Probit Analysis, 3rd ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1971. [Google Scholar]
  52. SAS. User Guide: Statistics (Release 8.02); SAS Institute: Cary, NC, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  53. Kasali, A.A.; Oyedeji, A.O.; Ashilokun, A.O. Volatile leaf oil constituents of Cymbopogon citratus (DC) Stapf. Flavour Fragr. J. 2001, 16, 377–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Schaneberg, B.T.; Khan, I.A. Comparison of Extraction Methods for Marker Compounds in the Essential Oil of Lemon Grass by GC. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 1345–1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Tajidin, N.; Ahmad, S.; Rosenani, A.; Azimah, H.; Munirah, M. Chemical composition and citral content in lemongrass (Cymbopogon citratus) essential oil at three maturity stages. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2012, 11, 2685–2693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Mansour, M.M.A.; El-Hefny, M.; Salem, M.Z.M.; Ali, H.M. The Biofungicide Activity of Some Plant Essential Oils for the Cleaner Production of Model Linen Fibers Similar to Those Used in Ancient Egyptian Mummification. Processes 2020, 8, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Mohamed Hanaa, A.R.; Sallam, Y.I.; El-Leithy, A.S.; Aly, S.E. Lemongrass (Cymbopogon citratus) essential oil as affected by drying methods. Ann. Agric. Sci. 2012, 57, 113–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Matasyoh, J.C.; Wagara, I.N.; Nakavuma, J.L. Chemical composition of Cymbopogon citratus essential oil and its effect on mycotoxigenic Aspergillus species. Afr. J. Food Sci. 2011, 5, 138–142. [Google Scholar]
  59. Boukhatem, M.N.; Ferhat, M.A.; Kameli, A.; Saidi, F.; Kebir, H.T. Lemon grass (Cymbopogon citratus) essential oil as a potent anti-inflammatory and antifungal drugs. Libyan J. Med. 2014, 9, 25431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Koba, K.; Sanda, K.; Guyon, C.; Raynaud, C.; Chaumont, J.P.; Nicod, L. In vitro cytotoxic activity of Cymbopogon citratus L. and Cymbopogon nardus L. essential oils from Togo. Bangladesh J. Pharmacol. 2009, 4, 29–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Anaruma, N.D.; Schmidt, F.L.; Duarte, M.C.T.; Figueira, G.M.; Delarmelina, C.; Benato, E.A.; Sartoratto, A. Control of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides (Penz.) Sacc. in yellow passion fruit using Cymbopogon citratus essential oil. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2010, 41, 66–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Plata-Rueda, A.; Rolim, G.D.; Wilcken, C.F.; Zanuncio, J.C.; Serrão, J.E.; Martínez, L.C. Acute Toxicity and Sublethal Effects of Lemongrass Essential Oil and Their Components against the Granary Weevil, Sitophilus granarius. Insects 2020, 11, 379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Pinto, Z.T.; Sánchez, F.F.; Santos, A.R.d.; Amaral, A.C.F.; Ferreira, J.L.P.; Escalona-Arranz, J.C.; Queiroz, M.M.d.C. Chemical composition and insecticidal activity of Cymbopogon citratus essential oil from Cuba and Brazil against housefly. Rev. Bras. Parasitol. Veterinária 2015, 24, 36–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Brügger, B.P.; Martínez, L.C.; Plata-Rueda, A.; Castro, B.M.d.C.e.; Soares, M.A.; Wilcken, C.F.; Carvalho, A.G.; Serrão, J.E.; Zanuncio, J.C. Bioactivity of the Cymbopogon citratus (Poaceae) essential oil and its terpenoid constituents on the predatory bug, Podisus nigrispinus (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 8358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Keane, S.; Ryan, M.F. Purification, characterisation, and inhibition by monoterpenes of acetylcholinesterase from the waxmoth, Galleria mellonella (L.). Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 1999, 29, 1097–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. López, M.D.; Pascual-Villalobos, M.J. Mode of inhibition of acetylcholinesterase by monoterpenoids and implications for pest control. Ind. Crop Prod. 2010, 31, 284–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Price, D.N.; Berry, M.S. Comparison of effects of octopamine and insecticidal essential oils on activity in the nerve cord, foregut, and dorsal unpaired median neurons of cockroaches. J. Insect Physiol. 2006, 52, 309–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Ballester-Costa, C.; Sendra, E.; Fernández-López, J.; Pérez-Álvarez, J.A.; Viuda-Martos, M. Chemical composition and in vitro antibacterial properties of essential oils of four Thymus species from organic growth. Ind. Crop Prod. 2013, 50, 304–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Ojebode, M.E.; Olaiya, C.O.; Adegbite, A.E.; Karigidi, K.O.; Ale, T.O. Efficacy of some plant extracts as storage protectants against Callosobruchus maculatus. J. Biotechnol. Biomater. 2016, 6, 217. [Google Scholar]
  70. Jeyasankar, A.; Chennaiyan, V.; Chinnamani, T. Evaluation of five essential plant oils as a source of repellent and larvicidal activities against larvae of Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). J. Entomol. 2016, 13, 98–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Haddi, K.; Turchen, L.M.; Viteri Jumbo, L.O.; Guedes, R.N.C.; Pereira, E.J.G.; Aguiar, R.W.S.; Oliveira, E.E. Rethinking biorational insecticides for pest management: Unintended effects and consequences. Pest. Manag. Sci. 2020, 76, 2286–2293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Oliveira, E.R.d.; Alves, D.S.; Carvalho, G.A.; Oliveira, B.M.R.G.d.; Aazza, S.; Bertolucci, S.K.V. Toxicity of Cymbopogon flexuosus essential oil and citral for Spodoptera frugiperda. Cienc. Agrotecnol. 2018, 42, 408–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Park, J.-H.; Jeon, Y.-J.; Lee, C.-H.; Chung, N.; Lee, H.-S. Insecticidal toxicities of carvacrol and thymol derived from Thymus vulgaris Lin. against Pochazia shantungensis Chou & Lu., newly recorded pest. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 40902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Pumnuan, J.; Insung, A. Fumigant toxicity of plant essential oils in controlling thrips, Frankliniella schultzei (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) and mealybug, Pseudococcus jackbeardsleyi (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae). J. Entomol. Res. 2016, 40, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Kurniasih, N.; Nuryadin, W.; Harahap, M.N.; Supriadin, A.; Kinasih, I. Toxicity of essential oils from orange (Citrus sinesis L. Obbeck) and lemongrass (Cymbopogon nardus L. Rendle) on Aedes aegypti a vector of Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever (DHF). J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2021, 1869, 012015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Jovanović, J.; Krnjajić, S.; Ćirković, J.; Radojković, A.; Popović, T.; Branković, G.; Branković, Z. Effect of encapsulated lemongrass (Cymbopogon citratus L.) essential oil against potato tuber moth Phthorimaea operculella. Crop Prot. 2020, 132, 105109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Sharaby, A.; El-Nojiban, A. Evaluation of some plant essential oils against the black cutworm Agrotis ipsilon. Glob. J. Adv. Res. 2015, 2, 701–711. [Google Scholar]
  78. Sabbour, M.M.; Abd El-Aziz, S. Efficacy of some botanical oils formulated with microbial agents against the cotton leafworm and greasy cutworm attaching cotton plants. Bull. Entomol. Soc. Egypt Econ. Ser. 2002, 28, 135–151. [Google Scholar]
  79. Kodrík, D.; Bednářová, A.; Zemanová, M.; Krishnan, N. Hormonal Regulation of Response to Oxidative Stress in Insects—An Update. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 25788–25816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Marriel, N.B.; Tomé, H.V.V.; Guedes, R.C.N.; Martins, G.F. Deltamethrin-mediated survival, behavior, and oenocyte morphology of insecticide-susceptible and resistant yellow fever mosquitos (Aedes aegypti). Acta Trop. 2016, 158, 88–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Gong, P.; Chen, D.; Wang, C.; Li, M.; Li, X.; Zhang, Y.; Li, X.; Zhu, X. Susceptibility of Four Species of Aphids in Wheat to Seven Insecticides and Its Relationship to Detoxifying Enzymes. Front. Physiol. 2021, 11, 1852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Wang, L.; Wu, Y. Cross-resistance and biochemical mechanisms of abamectin resistance in the B-type Bemisia tabaci. J. Appl. Entomol. 2007, 131, 98–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Liao, C.-Y.; Xia, W.-K.; Feng, Y.-C.; Li, G.; Liu, H.; Dou, W.; Wang, J.-J. Characterization and functional analysis of a novel glutathione S-transferase gene potentially associated with the abamectin resistance in Panonychus citri (McGregor). Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2016, 132, 72–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table
Table 1. Phytochemical screening of essential oil from lemongrass leaves by GC–MS analysis (Figure S1).
Table 1. Phytochemical screening of essential oil from lemongrass leaves by GC–MS analysis (Figure S1).
RTArea%Compound NameMatch Factor (MF)
7.970.83Isoneral850
8.371.49Isogeranial900
8.600.71Dihydronopol750
9.7735.00Neral or β-citral (Citral B)955
10.4735.91Geranial or α-citral (Citral A)850
10.613.58trans-Verbenol750
10.710.91Epoxy-linalooloxide800
10.971.45Geranyl vinyl ether955
11.267.84Nerylacetal929
11.769.085-Octyldihydro-2(3H)-furanone930
12.691.24Geraniol acetate950
13.741.24(Z,E)-α-farnesene939
16.770.72β-Caryophyllene epoxide850
RT: Retention time (min).
Table
Table 2. Toxicity of C. citratus essential oil on the 2nd-instar larvae of A. ipsilon.
Table 2. Toxicity of C. citratus essential oil on the 2nd-instar larvae of A. ipsilon.
LC15 (mg/L)
(95% Confidence Limit)		LC50 (mg/L)
(95% Confidence Limit)		Slope ± SEꭓ2
427.67(134.84–746.35)2623.06 (1797.26–4144.71)1.31 ± 0.260.72
ꭓ2: Chi square.
Table
Table 3. Effects of C. citratus essential oil on the development of larval and pupal stages after treating the 2nd-instar larvae of Agrotis ipsilon with LC15 and LC50 values.
Table 3. Effects of C. citratus essential oil on the development of larval and pupal stages after treating the 2nd-instar larvae of Agrotis ipsilon with LC15 and LC50 values.
TreatmentsMean ± SE
Larval DurationPupal DurationPupation%Pupal Weight (g)
FemaleMale
Control20.36 ± 0.17 a*18.24 ± 0.24 a100 ± 0.0 a0.36 ± 0.02 a0.35 ± 0.01 b
LC1521.20 ± 0.18 b18.70 ± 0.12 b100 ± 0.0 a0.41 ± 0.01 a0.39 ± 0.007 a
LC5021.28 ± 0.17 b19.57 ± 0.13 c94.81 ± 1.01 b0.40 ± 0.01 a0.40 ± 0.007 a
F7.3316.5026.161.845.75
p-value0.0008<0.00010.00110.1650.0043
* Means with the same letter within the same column are not significantly different according to Duncan’s multiple range test at 0.05 level of probability. SE: Standard error.
Table
Table 4. Effects of C. citratus essential oil on the emergence %, and sex ratio after treating the 2nd-instar larvae of Agrotis ipsilon with LC15 and LC50 values.
Table 4. Effects of C. citratus essential oil on the emergence %, and sex ratio after treating the 2nd-instar larvae of Agrotis ipsilon with LC15 and LC50 values.
TreatmentsMean ± SE
Emergence%Sex Ratio
FemaleMale
Control98.61 ± 1.39 a*60.94 ± 7.04 a39.06 ± 7.04 a
LC1598.48 ± 1.51 a45.11 ± 5.32 a54.89 ± 5.32 a
LC5097.09 ± 1.45 a44.45 ± 5.69 a55.55 ± 5.69 a
F0.332.372.37
p-value0.7280.1740.174
* Means with the same letter within the same column are not significantly different according to Duncan’s multiple range test at 0.05 level of probability. SE: Standard error.
Table
Table 5. Mean (±SE) of catalase, and lipid peroxidase enzyme activity of A. ipsilon after 24 and 96 h of 2nd-instar larvae being exposed to LC15 and LC50 values of C. citratus essential oil.
Table 5. Mean (±SE) of catalase, and lipid peroxidase enzyme activity of A. ipsilon after 24 and 96 h of 2nd-instar larvae being exposed to LC15 and LC50 values of C. citratus essential oil.
TreatmentsMean ± SE
Catalase
(U/mg of Protein)		Lipid Peroxidase
(mole/mg of Protein)		Catalase
(U/mg of Protein)		Lipid Peroxidase (mole/mg of Protein)
24 h96 h
Control0.00138 ± 0.00003 a*0.00181 ± 0.00004 a0.00125 ± 0.00002 b0.00185 ± 0.00002 b
LC150.00151 ± 0.00001 a0.00196 ± 0.00014 a0.00138 ± 0.00009 ab0.00192 ± 0.000005 ab
LC500.00153 ± 0.00008 a0.00171 ± 0.00004 a0.00151 ± 0.00005 a0.00196 ± 0.00002 a
F3.081.873.737.33
p-value0.12030.23370.08860.0245
* Means with the same letter within the same column are not significantly different according to Duncan’s multiple range test at 0.05 level of probability.
Table
Table 6. Mean (±SE) of detoxification enzymes (carboxylesterase and GST) activity of A. ipsilon after 24 and 96 h of 2nd-instar larvae being exposed to LC15 and LC50 values of C. citratus essential oil.
Table 6. Mean (±SE) of detoxification enzymes (carboxylesterase and GST) activity of A. ipsilon after 24 and 96 h of 2nd-instar larvae being exposed to LC15 and LC50 values of C. citratus essential oil.
TreatmentsMean ± SE
Carboxylesterase (μmole/min/mg of Protein)GST (μmole/min/mg of ProteinCarboxylesterase (μmole/min/mg of Protein)GST (μmole/min/mg of Protein
α-Esteraseβ-Esteraseα-Esteraseβ-Esterase
24 h96 h
Control13.24 ± 0.87 a*17.09 ± 1.26 a14.09 ± 0.47 a12.78 ± 0.62 a14.53 ± 1.16 a12.46 ± 0.28 a
LC159.36 ± 0.52 b14.59 ± 0.86 ab9.62 ± 0.49 b10.48 ± 0.55 ab13.25 ± 1.30 a8.80 ± 0.65 b
LC508.79 ± 0.40 b13.45 ± 0.16 b9.36 ± 0.91 b9.46 ± 0.91 b8.65 ± 0.21 b7.00 ± 0.78 b
F14.524.3716.195.637.3720.47
p-value0.00500.06730.00380.04200.02190.0021
* Means with the same letter within the same column are not significantly different according to Duncan’s multiple range test at 0.05 level of probability. SE: Standard error.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Moustafa, M.A.M.; Awad, M.; Amer, A.; Hassan, N.N.; Ibrahim, E.-D.S.; Ali, H.M.; Akrami, M.; Salem, M.Z.M. Insecticidal Activity of Lemongrass Essential Oil as an Eco-Friendly Agent against the Black Cutworm Agrotis ipsilon (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Insects 2021, 12, 737. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12080737

AMA Style

Moustafa MAM, Awad M, Amer A, Hassan NN, Ibrahim E-DS, Ali HM, Akrami M, Salem MZM. Insecticidal Activity of Lemongrass Essential Oil as an Eco-Friendly Agent against the Black Cutworm Agrotis ipsilon (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Insects. 2021; 12(8):737. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12080737

Chicago/Turabian Style

Moustafa, Moataz A. M., Mona Awad, Alia Amer, Nancy N. Hassan, El-Desoky S. Ibrahim, Hayssam M. Ali, Mohammad Akrami, and Mohamed Z. M. Salem. 2021. "Insecticidal Activity of Lemongrass Essential Oil as an Eco-Friendly Agent against the Black Cutworm Agrotis ipsilon (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)" Insects 12, no. 8: 737. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12080737

APA Style

Moustafa, M. A. M., Awad, M., Amer, A., Hassan, N. N., Ibrahim, E. -D. S., Ali, H. M., Akrami, M., & Salem, M. Z. M. (2021). Insecticidal Activity of Lemongrass Essential Oil as an Eco-Friendly Agent against the Black Cutworm Agrotis ipsilon (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Insects, 12(8), 737. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12080737

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop