Next Article in Journal
Field Evaluation of Selected Plant Volatiles and Conspecific Pheromones as Attractants for Agriotes obscurus and A. lineatus (Coleoptera: Elateridae)
Next Article in Special Issue
Mating Behavior and Identification of Male-Produced Pheromone Components in Two Woodwasps, Sirex noctilio and Sirex nitobei, in China
Previous Article in Journal
A New Genus of Tachydromiinae from South Africa and Turkmenistan (Diptera: Empidoidea: Hybotidae)
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Insects
Volume 13
Issue 2
10.3390/insects13020172
insects-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Lateralization of Courtship Traits Impacts Pentatomid Male Mating Success—Evidence from Field Observations

by
Donato Romano
1,2,*,
Giovanni Benelli
3 and
Cesare Stefanini
1,2
1
The BioRobotics Institute, Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies, Viale Rinaldo Piaggio 34, 56025 Pontedera, Italy
2
Department of Excellence in Robotics and AI, Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies, 56127 Pisa, Italy
3
Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Pisa, Via del Borghetto 80, 56124 Pisa, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2022, 13(2), 172; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13020172
Submission received: 12 January 2022 / Revised: 1 February 2022 / Accepted: 2 February 2022 / Published: 5 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue From Insect Pheromones to Mating Disruption: Theory and Practice (Volume II))
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Although a growing number of studies have reported asymmetries of brain and behavior in various insect orders, detailed information on lateralization in the courtship and mating behavior of insects in the wild is scarce. In this research, we studied the courtship and mating behavior of the neem bug, Halys dentatus, in the field, quantifying lateralized behavioral displays, and assessing their impact on male mating success. A population-level lateralization in males approaching females was found. Furthermore, the male mating success was affected by lateralization; right-biased males achieved higher mating success rates. Overall, our results add useful knowledge on the reproductive behavior of H. dentatus in the field, with potential applications for identifying useful benchmarks to monitor the quality of individuals mass-reared for pest control purposes over time. This study furtherly highlights the role of lateralized traits in determining male mating success in insects.

Abstract

Lateralization has been documented in many insect species, but limited information on courtship and mating lateralization in wild conditions is available. We conducted field investigation on the courtship and mating behavior of the neem bug, Halys dentatus, a polyphagous insect mainly infesting Azadirachta indica, with particular attention to lateralization of mating displays. We investigated the presence of population-level behavioral asymmetries during H. dentatus sexual interactions and their influence on male mating success. Two lateralized traits were found: left or right-biased male approaches to the female and left or right-biased male turning displays. Males approaching females from their left side were mainly right-biased in the 180° turning display, and males that approached females from their right side were mainly left-biased. Right-biased males by turning 180° to carry out end-to-end genital contact, performed a lower number of copulation attempts, thus starting copula earlier than left-biased males. Mating success was higher when males approached the left side of females during sexual interactions. A higher number of successful mating interactions was observed in right-biased males when turning 180°. Our results add useful knowledge on the reproductive behavior of H. dentatus in the field, with potential applications for identifying useful benchmarks to monitor the quality of individuals mass-reared for pest control purposes over time.

1. Introduction

Lateralization (i.e., left–right asymmetries of brain and behavior) is a fascinating principle of the brain organization. It can contribute to improve brain efficiency in cognitive tasks involving both hemispheres, processing several streams of information concurrently [1,2]. Most research focus on lateralized traits in vertebrate animals [3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. However, an increasing number of studies are shedding light on individual- and population-level asymmetries in the brain and behavior of a growing number of insect species [1,2,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. The lateralization of courtship and mating behavior has been studied in several insect species, including a tephritid fly [17], hymenopteran parasitoids [18,19], stored-product beetles [20,21,22,23], mosquitoes [24], and a calliphorid fly [25]. However, strictly limited information is still available about lateralization of courtship and mating behavior in insect species belonging to the order Hemiptera [10].
The neem bug, Halys dentatus (Fabricius) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae), is a polyphagous insect pest with a marked feeding preference for the neem tree, Azadirachta indica (Juss) (Sapindales: Meliaceae), therefore representing a serious threat for this plant species [26]. Azadirachta indica is an important plant exploited as source of plant-borne compounds that are effective as green insecticides [27,28,29,30].
The importance of Pentatomidae, one of the largest heteropteran families including more than 4120 described species [31,32], is recognized worldwide. Recently, due to the threat posed by the invasion of some stink bug species, there is an increasing demand to identify sustainable and effective pest management strategies against these insects [33,34,35]. Despite the importance of H. dentatus as a pest of A. indica trees, little research has been done to investigate the systematics, biology, and behavioral ecology of this bug species [26,36,37]. To the best of our knowledge, little information is available about the mating strategies and the reproductive ethology of the neem bug.
Previous studies on other pentatomid species have highlighted a notable variety and complexity of their courtship and mating behaviors [38,39,40]. Understanding the behavioral ecology of an insect pest species can be highly beneficial to achieve insights about basic knowledge on courtship and mating, paving the way to innovative strategies in Integrated Pest Management (IPM) [25,41]. Furthermore, no evidence about lateralization is available for the Pentatomidae family, while population-level lateralization of the turning behavior has been reported in the giant water bug Belostoma flumineum Say (Heteroptera: Belostomatidae) [10].
Herein, field observations were carried out to analyze and quantify the H. dentatus courtship and mating behavior, analyzing the impact of selected behavioral displays on male mating success. While most laterality research have been carried out in laboratory, studying animal behavior in the field is highly recommended to reach realistic conclusions, as pointed out also in entomological research [42]. In the present field study, the magnitude of selected lateralized behaviors was investigated during male–female sexual interactions, to increase our basic knowledge on the H. dentatus behavioral ecology, and to achieve insights on the role of lateralized traits among pentatomid bugs.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Field Observations

Field observations were carried out in Delma Park, Abu Dhabi, UAE (24°28′23″ N 54°23′24″ E) from 11:30 to 20:30 h in April and May 2018. Halys dentatus courtship and mating behavior were observed in close proximity of plants of A. indica, Acacia nilotica (L.) Willd. ex Delile, and Mangifera indica L., highly infested by this insect. To account for daily variability, behavioral observations were carried out over several days.
Halys dentatus subjects were identified according to Chopra [26]. Once a female H. dentatus was located, it was focally tracked by an observer for 40 min (or until the end of the sexual interaction, if occurred) [43], to investigate the courtship and mating behavior of H. dentatus, as well as if any lateral bias emerged during sexual interactions. The inter-distance between the observer and the focal insects was of ~1 m. The observer was dressed in brown/green clothes (similar to the main pigmentation of the surrounding environment) and settled in such a way as not to shade the insects to minimize his impact on H. dentatus behavior. After each mating interaction pentatomids were marked with a small dot of nontoxic color paint (Polycolor, Maimeri, Italy) on the thorax, to avoid repeated observations of the same individuals. In detail, we observed: (i) the time spent by the male performing antennal tapping on the female; (ii) the time spent by the male performing foreleg palpations on the female; (iii) the duration of male’s antennal contact with the backside of the female (i.e., the time spent by the male touching with its antennae the distal part of the female’s abdomen); (iv) the number of the male copulation attempts; (v) the duration of copula (i.e., from the insertion of the male’s aedeagus into the female’s genital chamber until genital disengagement); (vi the male mating success (i.e., if the copula was successful or the female avoided genital contact).
Furthermore, the female’s side approached by the male to move towards the backside of the female (occurring after the antennal tapping and the foreleg palpation displays), as well as the side chosen by the male to turn 180° to allow end-to-end genital linkage and attempt the copula were noted to evaluate the role of lateralized behaviors during H. dentatus mating.
Bugs that were not involved in any courtship and mating interaction were not considered for data analysis. Insects in constrained places were discarded for laterality observations, as well as sexual interactions disturbed by additional individuals [41]. Overall, a total of 29 mating pairs were considered for data analysis.

2.2. Statistical Analysis

The impact of lateralization on differences in the mean duration and/or number of courtship and mating acts were analyzed by JMP 16 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) using nonparametric statistics (p < 0.05) as data distribution was not normal (Shapiro–Wilk test, p < 0.05), nor homoscedastic (Levene’s test, p < 0.05). Laterality differences between the numbers of males approaching the left or right side of the female, as well as the number of males turning 180° to the left or to the right to attempt the copula during courtship interactions were analyzed using a χ2 test with Yates’ correction (p < 0.05 [44]).

3. Results

The courtship and mating behavior of H. dentatus is described and quantified in Figure 1. When a male intercepts a female, he starts to perform antennal tapping on the surface of her body, as well as to palpate her with its forelegs while moving to the tip of the female abdomen. Subsequently, the male touches with its antennae the distal part of the female’s abdomen that raises her abdomen if receptive. Then, the male rotates his body forming a 180° angle with the female to attempt end-to-end genital contact and to initiate copula.
Mating success was higher when H. dentatus males approached the females from the left side during sexual interactions (χ2 = 5.500; d.f. = 1; p < 0.001), while approaches from the right side did not affect significantly mating success (χ2 = 0.000 d.f. = 1; p = 1.000) (Figure 2a); the preferential turning on the right to attempt copula led to higher number of successful males in mating (χ2 = 5.880; d.f. = 1; p < 0.001), compared to left-biased turning males (χ2 = 0.100; d.f. = 1; p = 0.317) (Figure 2b).
The male mating success was not affected by the duration of the male’s antennal tapping (χ2 = 1.651; d.f. = 1; p = 0.198), the duration of the male’s foreleg palpation (χ2 = 0.828; d.f. = 1; p = 0.362), the duration of male’s antennal contact with the rear of the female (χ2 = 0.001; d.f. = 1; p = 0.980), as well as the number of the male copulation attempts (χ2 = 3.504; d.f. = 1; p = 0.061).
No differences in the duration of the male’s antennal tapping (χ2 = 0.170; d.f. = 1; p = 0.679), the duration of the male’s foreleg palpation (χ2 = 0.016; d.f. = 1; p = 0.897), the duration of male’s antennal contact with the rear of the female (χ2 = 1.003; d.f. = 1; p = 0.316), the number of the males’ copulation attempts (χ2 = 3.527; d.f. = 1; p = 0.060), as well as the duration of copula (χ2 = 0.484; d.f. = 1; p = 0.486), were recorded between left- or right-biased male directional approaches toward females (Table 1).
The side chosen by the male to turn 180° and attempt the copula did not affect the duration of the male’s antennal tapping (χ2 = 1.147; d.f. = 2; p = 0.563), the duration of the male’s foreleg palpation (χ2 = 0.438; d.f. = 2; p = 0.803), the duration of male’s antennal contact with the backside of the female (χ2 = 5.128; d.f. = 2; p = 0.077), as well as the copula duration (χ2 = 3.969; d.f. = 2; p = 0.137).
However, the number of the male copulation attempts was significantly affected by the side chosen by the male to turn 180° and attempt copulation (χ2 = 16.017; d.f. = 2; p = 0.0003) (Table 2). Males that turned 180° from their right side performed significantly less copulation attempts to insert their aedeagus into the female’s genital chamber, if compared to left-biased turning males, which started copula earlier.

4. Discussion

Insights on the reproductive behavior of insect pests of economic importance are valuable to predict the spatial and temporal population dynamics of these species, allowing adequate modelling paths [45,46], as well as to design effective and sustainable pest management strategies. The recent spreading of pentatomids and their polyphagia are threating agriculture and ecosystems worldwide [33,34,35]. Herein, we provided data from observations in the wild on the courtship and mating behavior of H. dentatus, including male antennal tapping on the female body, male foreleg palpation of the tip of the female abdomen, male antennal tapping on the female abdomen, male 180° turning behavior with end-to-end genital contact with the female, followed by the copula. Other pentatomid species which carry out end-to-end copulation have been reported to perform similar courtship sequences [47], such as male antennal tapping on the female, the male attempt to tease the ventral part of the female’s abdomen with its head, as well as the lifting of the abdomen by receptive females [38,47]. The courtship behavior performed by the male seems to be aimed at inducing a proper posture of the female to make the aedeagus insertion easier [38].
Interestingly, two behavioral displays of H. dentatus were found lateralized at the population level. Most of males moved to the tip of the female abdomen performing antennal tapping and palpating with their forelegs on her left side of the body. Furthermore, males rotated preferentially clockwise (right turns), to form a 180° angle with the female body for the end-to-end genital linkage. Males that approached females from their left side were mainly right-biased in the 180° turning, and males that approached females from their right side were mainly left-biased in the 180° turning. Both these lateralized traits did not affect the main behavioral parameters characterizing H. dentatus courtship and mating displays. However, we observed a higher number of copulation attempts performed by males that turned 180° from their left side to form a 180° angle with the female body (Table 2). Likely, right-biased males in turning 180° have a better orientation and make fewer attempts to succeed in genital linkage.
Notably, the mating success was significantly higher in males that approached the left side of the females, as well as in males that preferentially turned on their right. To the best of our knowledge, this study reporting the lateralized courtship and mating behavior of H. dentatus, is the first evidence of population-level lateralized mating traits in the Hemiptera order, where only a motor bias has been reported till now [10].
A large body of literature pointed out that population-level lateralized traits are widespread among both social [48,49,50] and solitary insect species. Concerning the latter, a growing number of recent studies are reporting lateralized traits of the courtship and mating in insects, including earwigs (e.g., Euborellia plebeja Dohrn, Labidura riparia (Pallas)), Nala lividipes (Dufour), and Nala nepalensis (Burr) [51,52,53], the tephritid fly Bactrocera oleae (Rossi) [17], encyrtid parasitoids, Leptomastidea abnormis (Girault) and Anagyrus vladimiri Triapitsyn [18,19], mosquitoes, Aedes albopictus (Skuse) and Culex pipiens L. [14,24], as well as the green bottle fly Lucilia sericata (Meigen) [41]. In addition, population-level lateralization of mating traits has been found in key stored-product pests, such as the rice weevil, Sitophilus oryzae L. [20], the confused flour beetle, Tribolium confusum Jaqueline du Val [20,22] the khapra beetle, Trogoderma granarium Everts [21], the rust-red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) [23], the larger grain borer Prostephanus truncatus (Horn) [54].
According to theoretical models, population-level lateralization is more likely to evolve in social species [55,56]. However, the intense interactions of solitary individuals with their conspecifics (e.g., multiple fighting/mating events), as well as with other species individuals (e.g., predator-prey interactions and host-parasite interactions), may contribute to explain the widespread presence of population-level lateralization in solitary and gregarious species [2,57]. Indeed, what the theory predicts is not that social species need population-level lateralization, but rather that lateralization emerges as an Evolutionary Stable Strategy (ESS) at individual-level or population-level. So, individual-level and population-level lateralization can produce the stability (i.e., an ESS) depending on the context [58]. The fact that different orders of insects exhibit lateralized courtship and mating behaviors suggests that this feature plays an important role as an ESS in the reproductive behavior of the above-mentioned insect species [55]. Most of these research works have been conducted in laboratory conditions. However, it has been argued that investigations in the wild will help to understand the relevance of brain lateralization as a plastic adaptation to ecological demands [59]. Our study provides findings of population-level lateralized courtship and mating in H. dentatus in the wild, evidencing an interesting homology with several vertebrates that display lateral biases in their environment, in entirely unconstrained conditions [59,60,61,62,63]. This study, reporting asymmetries in the behavior of insects in their natural environment supports the hypothesis that lateralization in the wild is ubiquitous and need more attention by behavioral biologists.

5. Conclusions

Overall, the present research represents a rare report of evidence in the wild of population-level lateralized courtship and mating traits in solitary insects. Of note, it adds basic knowledge to the courtship and mating behavior of invasive pentatomids. In addition, detailed knowledge on the reproductive behavior of H. dentatus in the field is of relevance for potential applications aimed to identify behavioral traits to be used as benchmarks to monitor the quality of individuals mass-reared for pest control purposes over time.
Unfortunately, no earlier efforts have been done to assess the presence and functional role of lateralized traits in the Pentatomidae family. Further research efforts are needed. The quantification of mating displays in the field carried out in this study will allow future comparisons with other bug species, to evaluate the possible impact of lateralization on the mating success of pentatomids, thus on their population dynamics, and spread.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and methodology, D.R.; validation, D.R., G.B. and C.S.; formal analysis, D.R. and G.B.; investigation, D.R.; resources, D.R., G.B. and C.S.; writing—original draft preparation, D.R.; writing—review and editing, D.R. and G.B.; visualization, D.R. and G.B.; supervision, G.B. and C.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the EU H2020 FETOPEN Project “Robocoenosis—ROBOts in cooperation with a bioCOENOSIS” [899520]. The funder had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was carried out in accordance with the Guidelines for the Use of Animals in Research, and the legal requirements of Italian, EU, and UAE legislation. All experiments consisted in behavioral observations, and no specific permits are needed in the country where the experiments were conducted.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available on request.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Tim McGloughlin for his kind assistance during the experiments. Authors would like to thank Khalifa University Abu Dhabi, UAE.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Vallortigara, G.; Rogers, L.J. Survival with an asymmetrical brain: Advantages and disadvantages of cerebral lateralization. Behav. Brain. Sci. 2005, 28, 575–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Romano, D.; Benelli, G.; Stefanini, C. Escape and surveillance asymmetries in locusts exposed to a Guinea fowl-mimicking robot predator. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 12825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Vallortigara, G.; Andrew, R.J. Lateralization of response by chicks to change in a model partner. Anim. Behav. 1991, 41, 187–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Cantalupo, C.; Bisazza, A.; Vallortigara, G. Lateralization of predator-evasion response in a teleost fish (Girardinus falcatus). Neuropsychologia 1995, 33, 1637–1646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mascetti, G.G.; Rugger, M.; Vallortigara, G. Visual lateralization and monocular sleep in the domestic chick. Cogn. Brain Res. 1999, 7, 451–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lippolis, G.; Bisazza, A.; Rogers, L.J.; Vallortigara, G. Lateralisation of predator avoidance responses in three species of toads. Laterality 2002, 7, 163–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. George, I.; Hara, E.; Hessler, N.A. Behavioral and neural lateralization of vision in courtship singing of the zebra finch. J. Neurobiol. 2006, 66, 1164–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dadda, M.; Agrillo, C.; Bisazza, A.; Brown, C. Laterality enhances numerical skills in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 2015, 9, 285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Sovrano, V.A.; Quaresmini, C.; Stancher, G. Tortoises in front of mirrors: Brain asymmetries and lateralized behaviours in the tortoise (Testudo hermanni). Behav. Brain Res. 2018, 352, 183–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kight, S.L.; Steelman, L.; Coffey, G.; Lucente, J.; Castillo, M. Evidence of population-level lateralized behaviour in giant water bugs, Belostoma flumineum Say (Heteroptera: Belostomatidae): T-maze turning is left biased. Behav. Process. 2008, 79, 66–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Letzkus, P.; Boeddeker, N.; Wood, J.T.; Zhang, S.W.; Srinivasan, M.V. Lateralization of visual learning in the honeybee. Biol. Lett. 2008, 4, 16–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Frasnelli, E.; Vallortigara, G.; Rogers, L.J. Left—Right asymmetries of behaviour and nervous system in invertebrates. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2012, 36, 1273–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Hunt, E.R.; O’Shea-Wheller, T.; Albery, G.F.; Bridger, T.H.; Gumn, M.; Franks, N.R. Ants show a leftward turning bias when exploring unknown nest sites. Biol. Lett. 2014, 10, 20140945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Benelli, G.; Romano, D.; Messing, R.H.; Canale, A. First report of behavioural lateralisation in mosquitoes: Right-biased kicking behaviour against males in females of the Asian tiger mosquito, Aedes albopictus. Parasitol. Res. 2015, 114, 1613–1617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Benelli, G.; Donati, E.; Romano, D.; Stefanini, C.; Messing, R.H.; Canale, A. Lateralisation of aggressive displays in a tephritid fly. Sci. Nat. 2015, 102, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Romano, D.; Canale, A.; Benelli, G. Do right-biased boxers do it better? Population-level asymmetry of aggressive displays enhances fighting success in blowflies. Behav. Process. 2015, 113, 159–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Benelli, G.; Romano, D.; Messing, R.H.; Canale, A. Population-level lateralized aggressive and courtship displays make better fighters not lovers: Evidence from a fly. Behav. Process. 2015, 115, 163–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Romano, D.; Donati, E.; Canale, A.; Messing, R.H.; Benelli, G.; Stefanini, C. Lateralized courtship in a parasitic wasp. Laterality 2016, 21, 243–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Romano, D.; Benelli, G.; Stefanini, C.; Desneux, N.; Ramirez-Romero, R.; Canale, A.; Lucchi, A. Behavioral asymmetries in the mealybug parasitoid Anagyrus sp. near pseudococci: Does lateralized antennal tapping predict male mating success? J. Pest Sci. 2018, 91, 341–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Benelli, G.; Romano, D.; Stefanini, C.; Kavallieratos, N.G.; Athanassiou, C.G.; Canale, A. Asymmetry of mating behaviour affects copulation success in two stored-product beetles. J. Pest Sci. 2017, 90, 547–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Benelli, G.; Romano, D.; Kavallieratos, N.; Conte, G.; Stefanini, C.; Mele, M.; Canale, A. Multiple behavioural asymmetries impact male mating success in the khapra beetle, Trogoderma granarium. J. Pest Sci. 2017, 90, 901–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Romano, D.; Kavallieratos, N.G.; Athanassiou, C.G.; Stefanini, C.; Canale, A.; Benelli, G. Impact of geographical origin and rearing medium on mating success and lateralization in the rice weevil, Sitophilus oryzae (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). J. Stored Prod. Res. 2016, 69, 106–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Boukouvala, M.; Romano, D.; Kavallieratos, N.G.; Stefanini, C.; Canale, A.; Benelli, G. Asymmetric courtship boosts male mating success in the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). J. Stored Prod. Res. 2019, 81, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Benelli, G. Mating behavior of the West Nile virus vector Culex pipiens—Role of behavioral asymmetries. Acta Trop. 2018, 179, 88–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Benelli, G.; Romano, D. Does indirect mating trophallaxis boost male mating success and female egg load in Mediterranean fruit flies? J. Pest Sci. 2018, 91, 181–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chopra, N.P. Studies on the genus Halys Hemiptera: Pentatomidae. Orient. Insects 1974, 8, 473–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Schmutterer, H. Properties and potential of natural pesticides from the neem tree, Azadirachta indica. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1990, 35, 271–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Sharma, V. A review on medicinal properties of neem (Azadirachta indica). J. Pharm. Innov. 2018, 7, 648–650. [Google Scholar]
  29. Benelli, G.; Murugan, K.; Panneerselvam, C.; Madhiyazhagan, P.; Conti, B.; Nicoletti, M. Old ingredients for a new recipe? Neem cake, a low-cost botanical by-product in the fight against mosquito-borne diseases. Parasitol. Res. 2015, 114, 391–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Benelli, G.; Canale, A.; Toniolo, C.; Higuchi, A.; Murugan, K.; Pavela, R.; Nicoletti, M. Neem (Azadirachta indica): Towards the ideal insecticide? Nat. Prod. Res. 2017, 31, 369–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Panizzi, A.R.; McPherson, J.E.; James, D.G.; Javahery, M.; McPherson, R.M. Stink bugs (Pentatomidae). Heteroptera of Econ. Import. 2000, 828, 421–474. [Google Scholar]
  32. Cokl, A.; Borges, M. Stink bug classification, phylogeny, biology and reproductive behavior. In Stinkbugs; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2017; pp. 21–50. [Google Scholar]
  33. Pezzini, D.T.; Nystrom Santacruz, E.C.; Koch, R.L. Predation and Parasitism of Halyomorpha halys (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) Eggs in Minnesota. Environ. Entomol. 2018, 47, 812–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Simberloff, D. Everything you want to know about stink bugs. Biol. Invasions 2018, 20, 2691–2693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Carvajal, M.A.; Alaniz, A.J.; Núñez-Hidalgo, I.; González-Césped, C. Spatial global assessment of the pest Bagrada hilaris (Burmeister) (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae): Current and future scenarios. Pest Manag. Sci. 2018, 75, 809–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Havaskary, M.; Farshbaf Pour-Abad, R.; Kazemi, M.H.; Rafeii, A. A contribution to the stink bugs from Khodafarin, NW Iran (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae: Pentatominae). Munis Entomol. Zool. 2012, 7, 607–616. [Google Scholar]
  37. Dhiman, S.C.; Yadav, Y.K. Studies on parasitoids of Halys dentatus Fabr. (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) and their bio-control efficacy. Ann. Plant Prot. Sci. 2004, 12, 263–266. [Google Scholar]
  38. Gamboa, G.; Alcock, J. The Mating Behavior of Brochymen quadrapustulata (Fabricius). Psyche J. Entomol. 1973, 80, 265–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Kawada, H.; Kitamura, C. The reproductive behavior of the brown marmorated stink bug, Halyomorpha mista Uhler (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) I. Observation of mating behavior and multiple copulation. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 1983, 18, 234–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Wang, Q.; Millar, J.G. Reproductive behavior of Thyanta pallidovirens (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. 1997, 90, 380–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Benelli, G.; Romano, D. Looking for the right mate—What do we really know on the courtship and mating of Lucilia sericata (Meigen)? Acta Trop. 2019, 189, 145–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Fahrbach, S.E.; Mesce, K.A. “Neuroethoendocrinology”: Integration of field and laboratory studies in insect neuroendocrinology. Horm. Behav. 2005, 48, 352–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Benelli, G.; Meregalli, M.; Canale, A. Field observations on the mating behavior of Aclees sp. cf. foveatus Voss (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), an exotic pest noxious to fig orchards. J. Insect Behav. 2014, 27, 419–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sokal, R.R.; Rohlf, F.J. Biometry; WH Freeman and Company: San Francisco, CA, USA, 1981; p. 859. [Google Scholar]
  45. Ajelli, M. Modeling mosquito-borne diseases in complex urban environments. Acta Trop. 2017, 176, 332–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Scavuzzo, J.M.; Trucco, F.; Espinosa, M.; Tauro, C.B.; Abril, M.; Scavuzzo, C.M.; Frery, A.C. Modeling Dengue vector population using remotely sensed data and machine learning. Acta Trop. 2018, 185, 167–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Pavlovčič, P.; Čokl, A. Songs of Holcostethus strictus (Fabricius): A different repertoire among landbugs (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). Behav. Process. 2001, 53, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Cousillas, H.; Henry, L.; George, I.; Marchesseau, S.; Hausberger, M. Lateralization of social signal brain processing correlates with the degree of social integration in a songbird. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 14093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Rogers, L.J.; Rigosi, E.; Frasnelli, E.; Vallortigara, G. A right antenna for social behaviour in honeybees. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 2045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Waite, L.; Frasnelli, E. Visuo-motor biases in buff-tailed bumblebees (Bombus terrestris). Laterality 2021, 26, 55–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kamimura, Y. Right-handed penises of the earwig Labidura riparia (Insecta, Dermaptera, Labiduridae): Evolutionary relationships between structural and behavioral asymmetries. J. Morphol. 2006, 267, 1381–1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kamimura, Y.; Iwase, R. Evolutionary genetics of genital size and lateral asymmetry in the earwig Euborellia plebeja (Dermaptera: Anisolabididae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2010, 101, 103–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Kamimura, Y.; Matsumura, Y.; Yang, C.C.S.; Gorb, S.N. Random or handedness? Use of laterally paired penises in Nala earwigs (Insecta: Dermaptera: Labiduridae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2021, 134, 716–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Romano, D.; Benelli, G.; Kavallieratos, N.G.; Athanassiou, C.G.; Canale, A.; Stefanini, C. Beetle-robot hybrid interaction: Sex, lateralization and mating experience modulate behavioural responses to robotic cues in the larger grain borer Prostephanus truncatus (Horn). Biol. Cybern. 2020, 114, 473–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Ghirlanda, S.; Vallortigara, G. The evolution of brain lateralization: A game-theoretical analysis of population structure. Proc. R. Soc. B 2004, 271, 853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Ghirlanda, S.; Frasnelli, E.; Vallortigara, G. Intraspecific competition and coordination in the evolution of lateralization. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2009, 364, 861–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Benelli, G.; Romano, D.; Rocchigiani, G.; Caselli, A.; Mancianti, F.; Canale, A.; Stefanini, C. Behavioral asymmetries in ticks–Lateralized questing of Ixodes ricinus to a mechatronic apparatus delivering host-borne cues. Acta Trop. 2018, 178, 176–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Frasnelli, E.; Vallortigara, G. Individual-level and population-level lateralization: Two sides of the same coin. Symmetry 2018, 10, 739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Manns, M. Laterality for the next decade: Costs and benefits of neuronal asymmetries—Putting lateralization in an evolutionary context. Laterality 2021, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ventolini, N.; Ferrero, E.A.; Sponza, S.; Della Chiesa, A.; Zucca, P.; Vallortigara, G. Laterality in the wild: Preferential hemifield use during predatory and sexual behaviour in the black-winged stilt. Anim. Behav. 2005, 69, 1077–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Gross, M.R.; Suk, H.Y.; Robertson, C.T. Courtship and genetic quality: Asymmetric males show their best side. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2007, 274, 2115–2122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Hews, D.K.; Castellano, M.; Hara, E. Aggression in females is also lateralized: Left-eye bias during aggressive courtship rejection in lizards. Anim. Behav. 2004, 68, 1201–1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Sion, G. Foot-preference underlies bite-scar asymmetry in the gecko Ptyodactylus guttatus. Laterality 2018, 23, 129–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Insects 13 00172 g001 550
Figure 1. Ethogram depicting the courtship and mating sequence of the pentatomid Halys dentatus. The proportion of bugs displaying each behavior is indicated by the thickness of each arrow (n = 29 field-observed mating pairs).
Figure 1. Ethogram depicting the courtship and mating sequence of the pentatomid Halys dentatus. The proportion of bugs displaying each behavior is indicated by the thickness of each arrow (n = 29 field-observed mating pairs).
Insects 13 00172 g001
Insects 13 00172 g002 550
Figure 2. Mating success of Halys dentatus males showing (a) left or right-biased approaches to the female, and (b) left or right-biased turning displays; asterisks indicate a significant difference between left and right-biased acts (χ2 test with Yates’ correction, p < 0.05).
Figure 2. Mating success of Halys dentatus males showing (a) left or right-biased approaches to the female, and (b) left or right-biased turning displays; asterisks indicate a significant difference between left and right-biased acts (χ2 test with Yates’ correction, p < 0.05).
Insects 13 00172 g002
Table
Table 1. Behavioral displays of Halys dentatus males showing side-biased approaches towards the females. values are means followed by standard errors (SE); within each row, similar letters indicate not significant differences between side-biased parameters (Wilcoxon test, p < 0.05).
Table 1. Behavioral displays of Halys dentatus males showing side-biased approaches towards the females. values are means followed by standard errors (SE); within each row, similar letters indicate not significant differences between side-biased parameters (Wilcoxon test, p < 0.05).
Behavioral DisplayLeft-Biased ApproachesRight-Biased ApproachesTested Bugs
(n., Left + Right-Biased Bugs)
antennal tapping duration (s)20.72 ± 1.01 a21.42 ± 1.58 a22 + 7 = 29
foreleg palpation duration (s)15.90 ± 1.05 a16 ± 2.60 a 22 + 7 = 29
duration of male’s antennal contact with the backside of the female (s)22.77 ± 0.96 a21 ± 1.92 a22 + 7 = 29
copulation attempts (n)9.77 ± 1.46 a13.85 ± 2.12 a 22 + 7 = 29
copula duration (min)76.63 ± 9.65 a56 ± 20.03 a17 + 4 = 21
Table
Table 2. Behavioral displays of Halys dentatus showing lateralized turning behavior. Values are means followed by standard errors (SE); within each row, different letters indicate significant differences among side-biased parameters (Kruskal–Wallis test, p < 0.05).
Table 2. Behavioral displays of Halys dentatus showing lateralized turning behavior. Values are means followed by standard errors (SE); within each row, different letters indicate significant differences among side-biased parameters (Kruskal–Wallis test, p < 0.05).
Behavioral DisplayTurning 180° LeftTurning 180° RightBackside MountingTested Bugs
(n., Left + Right-Biased + Back Mouting Bugs)
antennal tapping duration (s)19.9 ± 1.38 a21.70 ± 1.15 a19 + 3 a17 + 10 + 2 = 29
foreleg palpation duration (s)15.3 ± 2.02 a16.05 ± 1.11 a18 ± 6 a17 + 10 + 2 = 29
duration of male’s antennal contact with the backside of the female (s)20.1 ± 0.75 a23.88 ± 1.10 a20.5 ± 4.5 a17 + 10 + 2 = 29
copulation attempts (n)16.8 ± 2.06 a6.64 ± 0.77 b15.5 ± 3.5 a17 + 10 + 2 = 29
copula duration (min)55.3 ± 15.34 a84.58 ± 10.52 a43.5 ± 43.5 a14 + 6 + 1 = 21
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Romano, D.; Benelli, G.; Stefanini, C. Lateralization of Courtship Traits Impacts Pentatomid Male Mating Success—Evidence from Field Observations. Insects 2022, 13, 172. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13020172

AMA Style

Romano D, Benelli G, Stefanini C. Lateralization of Courtship Traits Impacts Pentatomid Male Mating Success—Evidence from Field Observations. Insects. 2022; 13(2):172. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13020172

Chicago/Turabian Style

Romano, Donato, Giovanni Benelli, and Cesare Stefanini. 2022. "Lateralization of Courtship Traits Impacts Pentatomid Male Mating Success—Evidence from Field Observations" Insects 13, no. 2: 172. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13020172

APA Style

Romano, D., Benelli, G., & Stefanini, C. (2022). Lateralization of Courtship Traits Impacts Pentatomid Male Mating Success—Evidence from Field Observations. Insects, 13(2), 172. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13020172

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop