Next Article in Journal
Different Distribution Patterns of Hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae) and Bees (Hymenoptera: Anthophila) Along Altitudinal Gradients in Dolomiti Bellunesi National Park (Italy)
Next Article in Special Issue
A Practical Insecticide Resistance Monitoring Bioassay for Orally Ingested Dinotefuran in Anopheles Malaria Vectors
Previous Article in Journal
Midgut and Head Transcriptomic Analysis of Silkworms Reveals the Physiological Effects of Artificial Diets
Previous Article in Special Issue
Sympatric Populations of the Anopheles gambiae Complex in Southwest Burkina Faso Evolve Multiple Diverse Resistance Mechanisms in Response to Intense Selection Pressure with Pyrethroids
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Crystallography of Contemporary Contact Insecticides

Department of Chemistry and Molecular Design Institute, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2022, 13(3), 292; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13030292
Submission received: 3 February 2022 / Revised: 25 February 2022 / Accepted: 12 March 2022 / Published: 15 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Insecticides for Mosquito Control: Strengthening the Evidence Base)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The efficacy of crystalline contact insecticides is dependent foremost on the uptake of insecticide molecules by insect tarsi contacting crystal surfaces. Insecticide molecules, however, may organize in more than one way in the crystalline state, resulting in more than one crystalline form (also known as polymorph). We recently discovered that the lethality of contact insecticides increases with decreasing thermodynamic stability of the crystalline forms; the most stable crystalline form is invariably the least lethal/slowest acting. Polymorphism in contact insecticides, and its importance to efficacy, was largely unknown to the vector control community. It is argued that the crystallographic characterization of contact insecticide solids should be systematic to identify more active solid forms. Herein, we report seven new crystal structures, mostly pyrethroid insecticides recommended by the WHO for indoor residual spraying, as well as a new form of a neonicotinoid insecticide. These results further highlight polymorphism in contact insecticides and the importance of solid-state chemistry in the search for more active crystal forms.

Abstract

The active forms of contact insecticides used for combatting mosquito-borne infectious diseases are typically crystalline solids. Numerous molecular crystals are polymorphic, crystallizing in several solid forms characterized by different physicochemical properties, including bioavailability. Our laboratory recently found that the activity of crystalline contact insecticides is inversely dependent on the thermodynamic stability of their polymorphs, suggesting that efficacy can be enhanced by the manipulation of the solid-state structure. This paper argues that crystallography should be central to the development of contact insecticides, particularly because their efficacy continues to be compromised by insecticide resistance, especially among Anopheles mosquito populations that spread malaria. Although insecticidal compounds with new modes of action have been introduced to overcome resistance, new insecticides are expensive to develop and implement. The repurposing of existing chemical agents in metastable, more active crystalline forms provides an inexpensive and efficient method for ‘evergreening’ compounds whose risks are already well-established. We report herein seven new single-crystal structures of insecticides used for controlling infectious disease vectors. The structures reported herein include pyrethroid insecticides recommended by the WHO for indoor residual spraying (IRS)-bifenthrin, β-cyfluthrin, etofenprox, α-cypermethrin, and λ-cyhalothrin as well as the neonicotinoid insecticide thiacloprid.

1. Introduction

Contact insecticides are often crystalline. These ingredients function when insect tarsi touch particle surfaces, leading the fight against malaria and other vector-borne diseases. Whilst much effort has been expended in the development of new compounds with improved efficacy, little attention has been paid to the solid-state structure of crystals that the insects encounter. Recent reports from our laboratory have revealed that the insecticidal activity of a particular contact poison depends on the crystal structures and associated free energies of its solid forms, also known as polymorphs, which often are accessible under ambient conditions [1,2,3,4,5]. Some crystal forms of a given contact insecticide can knock down mosquitoes twelve times faster than the commercially available form [1,2]
The efficacy of insecticides is diminished by the development of resistance, which threatens the substantial progress made against malaria in this century [6,7,8,9]. The rapid uptake of an insecticide by insect tarsi upon contact with crystal surfaces is essential for overwhelming insecticide resistance, a consequence of various detoxification reactions [10,11]. If the rate of insecticide uptake can be increased, the toxicant may overwhelm resistance mechanisms. Whilst new insecticides, repellents, and anti-malarial compounds have been introduced in recent years, the introduction of new chemical agents in the field requires sizeable investments of labor and capital [12,13,14,15]. Consequently, the repurposing of existing chemical compounds through manipulation of their crystal structure can be faster, less expensive, and less risky because new compositions of matter are obviated [16].
Polymorphism, a common property of molecular solids [17], is the existence of two or more solid crystalline phases of the same compound. Weak intermolecular interactions and associated shallow potential energy hypersurfaces readily lead to solid forms with a different molecular organization in the solid state, accompanied by distinct chemical and physical properties among the different forms. The presentation of molecules at the crystal surfaces will differ among a family of polymorphs, leading to differences in the chemical potential of molecules at the surface. This is expected for each symmetry-independent facet of a given polymorph as well. The ease of cuticular extraction of insecticide molecules from crystal surfaces would be expected to increase with the increasing chemical potential of the crystal surfaces.
We demonstrated previously that metastable forms of insecticides such as DDT (dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane), lindane, and fluorinated DDT congeners have greater activity than their most thermodynamically stable polymorphs [3,4,5]. A second DDT polymorph (Form II), first identified by McCrone [18], was characterized and found to be more active than Form I against Drosophila melanogaster [3].The inverse correlation between lethality and thermodynamic stability of polymorphs was demonstrated further by two newly characterized polymorphs of lindane, Forms II and III. Knockdown measurements for lindane Forms I, II, and III against Drosophila melanogaster revealed that the least stable polymorph kills twice as fast as the commercial Form I [4]. We also discovered a new crystalline form of the difluoro congener of DDT, DFDT (1,1′-(2,2,2-trichloroethane-1,1-diyl)bis(4-fluorobenzene)), as well as its amorphous form. The amorphous form (the least thermodynamically stable solid) was approximately three times faster acting than the thermodynamically stable form (Form I) towards Anopheles quadrimaculatus [5]. Moreover, chiral MFDT (1,1,1-trichloro-2,2-(4-chlorophenyl)-(4-fluorophenyl)ethane), a monofluorinated congener of DDT, also exhibited the inverse correlation between crystal thermodynamic stability and insecticidal activity.
We also observed identical trends for newly discovered polymorphs of deltamethrin (DM) and imidacloprid (IMI) [1,2], among the most widely used insecticides today. A second DM polymorph, denoted Form II after structural characterization by our laboratory [1], was found to be nine and twelve times faster acting than Form I against Aedes aegypti and Anopheles quadrimaculatus mosquitoes, respectively [1]. The two polymorphs not only differ with respect to the molecular arrangement in the solid state and the molecular presentations at their crystal surfaces, but they also differ with respect to the conformation of the DM molecules in the crystal lattice (Figure 1). Subsequently, we discovered new polymorphs of imidacloprid with different molecular conformations [2], the least stable polymorph exhibiting nine times greater activity against these mosquitoes than the commercial thermodynamically stable form. Importantly, these metastable forms were found to be stable against transformation to the thermodynamically stable form for at least six months, meeting World Health Organization guidelines for practical use in the field.
The role of polymorphism in contact insecticide formulations has largely been unrecognized by the vector control community. The observation that insect mortality is correlated directly with crystal free energy (or inversely with crystal thermodynamic stability) was not known before our reports, and the observations for so many examples make this link between crystal energy and insecticidal activity statistically robust. Moreover, we have yet to find a compound with multiple polymorphs that is contrary to this trend. Having established a compelling link between crystal polymorphism of contact insecticides and vector control efficacy, we have commenced a comprehensive investigation of polymorphism in contact insecticides, with particular attention to their relative stabilities, both thermodynamic and kinetic. Twelve compounds have been recommended for indoor residual spraying (IRS) by the WHO [20], nine of which are crystalline at room temperature. Single-crystal structures of bifenthrin (BF), etofenprox (ET) and β-cyfluthrin (β-CF) are reported herein for the first time, as well as three new polymorphs of three other compounds: α-cypermethrin (α-CP), λ-cyhalothrin (λ-CH) and thiacloprid (TC).
Certain atoms in the molecular structure of Figure 2 are labeled (R) or (S), which is the convention for distinguishing the arrangements of chemical groups attached to a so-called stereogenic atom [21]. DM has three such stereogenic atoms. Each such atom can give rise to two stereoisomers. The number of stereoisomers is 2N, where N is the number of stereogenic centers. Consequently, 23 = 8 for DM. Organic synthesis frequently gives rise to a mixture of stereoisomers. Each would have a unique crystal structure. Racemic compounds often contain enantiomeric pairs in crystals. One stereoisomer or racemate can still be polymorphic, however. Deltamethrin, because of some fortuitous aspects of its synthesis, is generated only as the RRS stereoisomer (Figure 2) [7]. Because of the flexibility around the eight single bonds (C–C, and C–O), even a single, stable stereoisomeric configuration can lead to multiple polymorphs as illustrated in Figure 1C for DM, a superposition of the (RRS) Forms I and II.

2. Materials and Methods

Bifenthrin (BF, CAS Number 82657-04-3) was purchased from Dr. Ehrenstorfer GmbH (Augsburg, Germany) and used as supplied. BF was grown by lowering the temperature of a supersaturated solution of ethyl acetate from 50 °C to 4 °C, the solution was kept at 4 °C until crystals were seen, at which point it was allowed to stand at room temperature.
β-Cyfluthrin (β-CF, a solid mixture comprising the racemate RSS/SRR (β-CF, rac-A) in 2:1 ratio with the diastereomeric crystal racemate RSR/SRS (β-CF, rac-B), CAS Number 1820573-27-0, was purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). β-CF rac-A was grown by slow evaporation from a saturated methanol solution at room temperature. β-CF rac-A and rac-B were grown from mineral oil at 4 °C.
Etofenprox (ET, CAS Number 80844-07-1) was purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). A single crystal of ET was retrieved directly from the bottle purchased from the manufacturer (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA).
α-Cypermethrin (α-CP, CAS 67375-30-8) was purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). A single crystal of α-CP was grown by cooling its melt to 75 °C on a glass slide mounted on a microscope hot stage (Mettler FP82HT) at 75 °C.
λ-Cyhalothrin (λ-CH, CAS Number 91465-08-6) was purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Crystals of λ-CH Form I were grown from the melt at room temperature. The melt of form I was seeded with α-CP to yield λ-CH Form II, which then grew from the melt at room temperature (Figure S1).
Thiacloprid (TC, CAS Number 111988-49-9) TC was purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Forms I and II of thiacloprid were grown at room temperature by slow evaporation from saturated solutions of acetone and ethyl acetate, respectively.
All solvents were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) and used as supplied. Complete descriptions of single-crystal X-ray structure analysis, powder diffraction, and spectroscopic characterization are available in the accompanying Supporting Information.

3. Results and Discussion

Bifenthrin (BF) (Figure 3A) is used against malaria and filaria vectors. It has been established that the (RR)-stereoisomer is 300 times more active against insects than (SS), which is 3–4 times more toxic to humans [22]. Crystals of a racemic mixture of BF (RR and SS stereoisomers) were grown by evaporation of an ethyl acetate solution. The crystal structure was determined at 200 K: monoclinic space group C2/c, Z = 8, Z’ = 2 (see Table 1). Morphologies of crystals are shown in Figure S3.
The commercially purchased form of β-cyfluthrin (β-CF), a common household insecticide, exists as a mixture comprising rac-A and rac-B (RRS and SSR) in a 2:1 ratio, respectively. Block-shaped crystals of β-CF, rac-A (Figure 3C), were grown from the commercial mixture by evaporation of a methanol solution in the centrosymmetric monoclinic space group P21/c, Z = 4, Z’ = 1. β-CF rac-B (Figure 3D) was crystallized as {001} needles from a mineral oil solution stored at 4 °C in the triclinic space group P 1 ¯ , Z = 2, Z’ = 1.
Etofenprox (ET) (Figure 3B) is used to combat malaria and Zika vectors. A single crystal was selected from the manufacturer’s (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) bottle and the structure was determined at 100 K. Achiral ET crystallized as {100} plates in the centrosymmetric triclinic space group P 1 ¯ , Z = 2, Z’ = 1 (Table 1).
A racemic mixture of cis-(RRS/SSR) α-cypermethrin (α-CP) is used in long-lasting insecticide nets and IRS formulations. Five entries appear in the Cambridge Structures Database (CNPOVN, LENDEN, LENDIR, LENDOX, SISYUO), but only CNPOVN and SISYUO contain complete structures [23,24]. Entry CNPOVN (space group P 1 ¯ ) is a racemate of the trans-(RRR/SSS) isomers and SISYUO (space group P212121) is the cis-RRS isomer. Plates of α-cypermethrin were obtained by cooling the melt. They were refined in the centrosymmetric monoclinic space group P21/n, Z = 4, Z’ = 1. Consequently, the crystals obtained from the melt correspond to a new polymorph, and the first crystal structure of the commercial form, the enantiomeric pair cis-(RRS/SSR), Form I (Figure 4).
Cyhalothrin (CH) is a type II pyrethroid with eight possible stereoisomers. The (SSR) and (RRS) are designations for the stereoisomers of the racemic pair, which comprise a mixture known as λ-cyhalothrin (λ-CH). A structure of λ-CH was reported previously [25]. The mixture of stereoisomers, however, crystallizes as two platy forms. Form I (Figure 5A) was obtained from the melt and crystallized in the centrosymmetric monoclinic space group C2/c, Z = 8, Z’ = 1 (See Table 1). Form II (Figure 5B), grown by seeding the melt with α-CP, also crystallizes in a centrosymmetric monoclinic space group, P21/n, Z = 4, Z’ = 1, (See Table 1).
Thiacloprid, TC, is a neonicotinoid insecticide like IMI but less toxic to mammals as well as honeybees [26,27]. TC crystallized from the melt as three distinct morphologies: banded spherulites, smooth spherulites, and regions with chaotic texture (Figure 6). The two spherulite morphologies were distinct by Raman microscopy (Figure S2). The chaotic texture and banded spherulites (Tm = 135 ℃) corresponded to the commercially available form, designated Form I, whilst the smooth spherulites (Tm = 125 ℃) corresponded to a new Form II. Form I (Figure 6 and Figure 7A) crystallized as blocks in the monoclinic space group P21/c, Z = 4, Z’ = 1 (See Table 1). The structure of Form II (Figure 6 and Figure 7B), grown as needles, was reported previously, and confirmed here as the monoclinic space group P21/c, Z = 8, Z’ = 2 [28]. The concentric bands, a consequence of helicoidal twisting of crystallites growing radially, is a common phenomenon among melt-grown molecular crystals, which we have documented thoroughly [29,30,31,32,33].
Table 1. Single-crystal X-ray crystallography data obtained for insecticides, and corresponding experimental conditions.
Table 1. Single-crystal X-ray crystallography data obtained for insecticides, and corresponding experimental conditions.
CompoundFenthrinΒ-Cyfluthrin,
rac-A
Β-Cyfluthrin,
rac-B
Etofenproxα-Cypermethrinλ–CyhalothrinThiacloprid
PolymorphIIIIIIIIIII
CCDC No.214294421429462142945214294321429472142941214294221429402142939
FormulaC23H22ClF3O2C22H18Cl2FNO3C25H28O3C22H19Cl2NO3C23H19ClF3NO3C10H9ClN4S
Mw, g/mol422.87434.27376.50416.30449.85252.72
Space GroupC2/cP21/c P 1 ¯ P 1 ¯ P21/nC2/cP21/nP21/cP21/c
Z, Z’8, 24, 12, 12, 14, 18,14,14, 18, 2
a, Å35.061 (3)15.4332 (8)6.5099 (16)10.3004 (8)11.497 (2)34.273 (2)11.8222 (9)7.4438 (14)7.0305 (3)
b, Å7.1704 (5)7.5413 (4)11.086 (3)10.5102 (8)13.712 (2)6.9368 (5)14.3037 (11)18.305 (3)35.2105 (13)
c, Å17.1168 (12)19.3706 (10)14.333 (3)10.6408 (8)12.972 (2)18.3172 (12)12.5427 (10)8.2436 (15)9.0164 (3)
α, °909094.487 (10)86.176 (3)9090909090
β, °99.999 (3)112.348 (2)96.984 (11)63.403 (3)98.349 (2)101.2360 (10)97.1020 (10)95.439 (6)98.2269 (11)
ɣ, °909099.455 (11)87.263 (3)9090909090
V, Å34237.8 (5)2085.14 (19)1007.7 (4)1027.56 (14)2023.2 (6)4271.3 (5)2104.7 (3)1118.21 (4)2209.02 (14)
Dc, g/cm31.3261.3831.4311.2171.3671.3991.4201.5011.520
μ, mm−10.2220.3430.3550.0780.3440.2300.2330.5040.510
2θ range, °2.36–28.302.18–28.331.87–26.971.94–28.322.174–28.3171.211–28.2882.169–28.3162.23–26.002.31–28.30
T, K200201295100100100100201200
Total
Reflections
518751764015508550455297524627145478
Observed
Reflections
2595331816423319445242084384228114586
No.
Parameters
265264264256255282282145289
R1[I > 2σ(I)]0.07350.06300.15790.06080.03490.04630.05020.03690.0401
wR2 all data0.26010.17310.41970.15060.09450.12760.13540.09460.1052
GoF1.0331.0541.0431.0221.0671.0221.0071.0871.032
Mw = Molecular Mass, Dc = Crystallographic Density, μ = Absorption coefficient, GoF = Goodness of fit. Thiacloprid Form II and λ-Cyhalothrin Form I were previously reported [25,28].

4. Conclusions

DM, first synthesized in 1973, was the most potent synthetic insecticide ever at the time and was heralded for its high selectivity to insects compared with mammals, a ratio of 13,000 [7]. Upon stereoselective synthesis, the solution contains the (RRR) and (RRS) stereoisomers (Figure 2). The latter crystallizes more readily, leaving the more soluble (RRR) isomer in solution, which can be epimerized at the cyano-bearing carbon atom to produce more (RRS). This is fortuitous in that (RRS) is the most active insecticide. Stereoisomerism is an essential feature of biological specificity.
More commonly, insecticides are supplied as mixtures of stereoisomers, which can greatly increase the complexity of crystallographic characterizations and give rise to variable crystallization outcomes (See Table S1 for crystallization conditions). The activity of crystalline contact insecticide is dictated foremost by the rate of absorption at the interface between the crystal and the target organism. Yet little attention has been paid to insecticide crystallography. This knowledge gap is exemplified by the twelve insecticides recommended for IRS by the WHO, five of which were not previously characterized crystallographically. Herein, we have reported the characterization of seven new crystallographic forms of six contact insecticides, expanding a comparatively small structural knowledge base. As mentioned above, our laboratory has demonstrated a convincing correlation between contact insecticide activity and the respective free energies of their crystal polymorphs. This behavior remains to be validated for the new characterized materials described herein.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/insects13030292/s1, Table S1: Preparation of insecticide crystals from solution crystallization, Figure S1: Heterogenous nucleation of λ-Cyhalothrin Form II on α-Cypermethrin crystals, Figure S2: Raman spectra of thiacloprid Form I and Form II, Figure S3: Single-crystal images with Miller indices.

Author Contributions

B.E., A.S. and X.Z. characterized polymorphs. B.E., A.S., X.Z. and C.T.H. performed the single-crystal analysis. B.E.K., A.S. and M.D.W. directed the project. B.E., A.S., M.D.W. and B.K wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The NYU X-ray facility is supported partially by the NSF under Award Number CRIF/CHE-0840277 and by the Tropical Infectious Disease Consortium (MP4—RBPS: 108352) This work was supported partially by the MRSEC Program of the National Science Foundation under Award Number DMR-1420073.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Crystal structure data reported in this paper have been deposited at the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre with accession numbers found in Table 1.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yang, J.; Erriah, B.; Hu, C.T.; Reiter, E.; Zhu, X.; López-Mejías, V.; Carmona-Sepúlveda, I.P.; Ward, M.D.; Kahr, B. A deltamethrin crystal polymorph for more effective malaria control. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 26633–26638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Zhu, X.; Hu, C.T.; Erriah, B.; Vogt-Maranto, L.; Yang, J.; Yang, Y.; Qiu, M.; Fellah, N.; Tuckerman, M.E.; Ward, M.D.; et al. Imidacloprid crystal polymorphs for disease vector control and pollinator protection. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 17144–17152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Yang, J.; Hu, C.T.; Zhu, X.; Zhu, Q.; Ward, M.D.; Kahr, B. DDT Polymorphism and the lethality of crystal forms. Angew. Chem. 2017, 129, 10299–10303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yang, J.; Zhu, X.; Hu, C.T.; Qiu, M.; Zhu, Q.; Ward, M.D.; Kahr, B. Inverse correlation between lethality and thermodynamic stability of contact Insecticide polymorphs. Cryst. Growth Des. 2019, 19, 1839–1844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhu, X.; Hu, C.T.; Yang, J.; Joyce, L.A.; Qiu, M.; Ward, M.D.; Kahr, B. Manipulating solid forms of contact insecticides for Infectious disease prevention. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 16858–16864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. World Health Organization. World Malaria Report 2019; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2019; p. 232.
  7. Elliott, M.; Farnham, A.W.; Janes, N.F.; Needham, P.H.; Pulman, D.A. Synthetic insecticide with a new order of activity. Nature 1974, 248, 710–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ranson, H.; N’Guessan, R.; Lines, J.; Moiroux, N.; Nkuni, Z.; Corbel, V. Pyrethroid resistance in African Anopheline mosquitoes: What are the implications for malaria control? Trends Parasitol. 2011, 27, 91–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dong, K.; Du, Y.; Rinkevich, F.; Nomura, Y.; Xu, P.; Wang, L.; Silver, K.; Zhorov, B.S. Molecular biology of insect sodium channels and pyrethroid resistance. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2014, 50, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Sawicki, R.M.; Farnham, A.W. Genetics of resistance to insecticides of the ska strain of musca domestica. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 1968, 11, 133–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Strycharz, J.P.; Lao, A.; Li, H.; Qiu, X.; Lee, S.H.; Sun, W.; Yoon, K.S.; Doherty, J.J.; Pittendrigh, B.R.; Clark, J.M. Resistance in the highly DDT-resistant 91-R strain of drosophila melanogaster involves decreased penetration, increased metabolism, and direct excretion. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2013, 107, 207–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hemingway, J. The way forward for vector control. Science 2017, 358, 998–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Paton, D.G.; Childs, L.M.; Itoe, M.A.; Holmdahl, I.E.; Buckee, C.O.; Cai, F. Exposing anopheles mosquitoes to antimalarials block plasmodium parasite transmission. Nature 2019, 567, 239–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kupferschmidt, K. Pick your poison. Science 2016, 354, 171–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Sparks, T.C. Insecticide discovery: An evaluation and analysis. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2013, 107, 8–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lees, R.; Praulins, G.; Davies, R.; Brown, F.; Parsons, G.; White, A.; Ranson, H.; Small, G.; Malone, D. A testing cascade to identify repurposed insecticides for next-generation vector control tools: Screening a panel of chemistries with novel modes of action against a malaria vector. Gates Open Res. 2019, 3, 1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Bernstein, J. Polymorphism in Molecular Crystals; IUCr Monographs on Crystallography; First Publ. in Paperback; Clarendon Press: Oxford, UK, 2007; ISBN 978-0-19-923656-5. [Google Scholar]
  18. McCrone, W.C. Crystallographic Data: 1. DDT. Anal. Chem. 1948, 20, 274–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Owen, J.D. Absolute configuration of the most potent isomer of the pyrethroid insecticide α-cyano-3-phenobenzyl-cis-3-(2,2-di bromovinyl)-2,2-dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate by crystal structure analysis. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1 1975, 1865–1868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. World Health Organization. WHO Recommended Insecticides for Indoor Residual Spraying against Malaria Vectors; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2018.
  21. Eliel, E.; Wilen, S. Stereochemistry of Organic Compounds; Wiley-Interscience: New York, NY, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  22. Liu, H.; Zhao, M.; Zhang, C.; Ma, Y.; Liu, W. Enantioselective cytotoxicity of the insecticide bifenthrin on a human amnion epithelial (FL) cell line. Toxicology 2008, 253, 89–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Owen, J.D. Structure of rel-(α-R),(1R,trans)-α-cyano-3-phenoxybenzyl 3-(2,2-dichlorovinyl)-2,2-dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate, non-Insecticidal components of cypermethrin. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. B Struct. Crystallogr. Cryst. Chem. 1981, 37, 1311–1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Baert, F.; Guelzim, A. X-ray structure of the pyrethroid insecticide {1R-[1α(S*),2α]}-2-(2,2-dichlorovinyl)-3,3-dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylic acid cyano(3-phenoxyphenyl)methyl ester (RU 24501). Acta Crystallogr. Sect. C Cryst. Struct. Commun. 1991, 47, 606–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Cheng, J.; Ju, G.; Dong, J. (1SR,3SR)-[(SR)-cyano-(3-phenoxyphenyl)methyl] 3-[(Z)-2-chloro-3,3,3-trifluoro-prop-1-enyl]-2,2-dimethylcyclopropane-1-carboxylate. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. E Struct. Rep. Online 2008, 64, o2253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Anadón, A.; Ares, I.; Martínez, M.; Martínez-Larrañaga, M.-R.; Martínez, M.-A. Chapter Four—Neurotoxicity of neonicotinoids. In Advances in Neurotoxicology; Aschner, M., Costa, L.G., Eds.; Neurotoxicity of Pesticides; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2020; Volume 4, pp. 167–207. [Google Scholar]
  27. US EPA. US EPA—Pesticides—Fact Sheet for Thiacloprid; US Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 2003.
  28. Gao, J.-S.; Qiao, J.; Yu, Y.-H.; Hou, G.-F. (Z)-N-{3-[(6-Chloropyridin-3-yl)methyl]-1,3-thiazolidin-2-ylidene}cyanamide. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. E Struct. Rep. Online 2011, 67, o1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Shtukenberg, A.G.; Punin, Y.O.; Gunn, E.; Kahr, B. Spherulites. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 1805–1838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Shtukenberg, A.G.; Zhu, X.; Yang, Y.; Kahr, B. Common occurrence of twisted molecular crystal morphologies from the melt. Cryst. Growth Des. 2020, 20, 6186–6197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Shtukenberg, A.G.; Punin, Y.O.; Gujral, A.; Kahr, B. Growth actuated bending and twisting of single crystals. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 672–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Cui, X.; Rohl, A.L.; Shtukenberg, A.; Kahr, B. Twisted aspirin crystals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 3395–3398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Shtukenberg, A.G.; Cui, X.; Freudenthal, J.; Gunn, E.; Camp, E.; Kahr, B. Twisted mannitol crystals establish homologous growth mechanisms for high-polymer and small-molecule ring-banded spherulites. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 6354–6364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (A) Single-crystal structure of DM Form I. (B) Single-crystal structure of DM Form II. (C) The conformations of DM in Forms I and II overlaid, illustrating distinct molecular conformations in the polymorphs. The crystal structure of Form II was reported for the first time by our laboratory [1]. The crystal structure of DM Form I, redetermined by our laboratory is identical to that previously reported [19].
Figure 1. (A) Single-crystal structure of DM Form I. (B) Single-crystal structure of DM Form II. (C) The conformations of DM in Forms I and II overlaid, illustrating distinct molecular conformations in the polymorphs. The crystal structure of Form II was reported for the first time by our laboratory [1]. The crystal structure of DM Form I, redetermined by our laboratory is identical to that previously reported [19].
Insects 13 00292 g001
Figure 2. Molecular structures of the insecticides discussed herein. Notes on stereochemistry: Configurations of stereogenic centers are read directly in structures above from left to right throughout, a shortcut past naming conventions that are cumbersome here. β-cyfluthrin (β-CF): SRS-enantiomer shown in racemic mixture A (rac-A), and the SSR-enantiomer in racemic mixture B (rac-B). Bifenthrin (BF): RR-enantiomer of a racemic mixture is shown. λ-cyhalothrin (λ-CH): RRS-enantiomer of a racemic mixture is shown. α-cypermethrin (α-CP): RRS-enantiomer of racemic mixture shown. Deltamethrin (DM, RRS stereoisomer) is enantiomerically pure.
Figure 2. Molecular structures of the insecticides discussed herein. Notes on stereochemistry: Configurations of stereogenic centers are read directly in structures above from left to right throughout, a shortcut past naming conventions that are cumbersome here. β-cyfluthrin (β-CF): SRS-enantiomer shown in racemic mixture A (rac-A), and the SSR-enantiomer in racemic mixture B (rac-B). Bifenthrin (BF): RR-enantiomer of a racemic mixture is shown. λ-cyhalothrin (λ-CH): RRS-enantiomer of a racemic mixture is shown. α-cypermethrin (α-CP): RRS-enantiomer of racemic mixture shown. Deltamethrin (DM, RRS stereoisomer) is enantiomerically pure.
Insects 13 00292 g002
Figure 3. Crystal structures of (A) bifenthrin (BF), (B) etofenprox (ET), (C) rac-A β-cyfluthrin (β-CF), and (D) rac-B β-cyfluthrin (β-CF).
Figure 3. Crystal structures of (A) bifenthrin (BF), (B) etofenprox (ET), (C) rac-A β-cyfluthrin (β-CF), and (D) rac-B β-cyfluthrin (β-CF).
Insects 13 00292 g003
Figure 4. Crystal structure of α-cypermethrin Form I.
Figure 4. Crystal structure of α-cypermethrin Form I.
Insects 13 00292 g004
Figure 5. (A,B) Single-crystal structures of λ-cyhalothrin Forms I (A) and II (B). In (A), the unit cell contains 8 symmetry-related molecules. In (B), the unit cell contains 4 symmetry-related molecules.
Figure 5. (A,B) Single-crystal structures of λ-cyhalothrin Forms I (A) and II (B). In (A), the unit cell contains 8 symmetry-related molecules. In (B), the unit cell contains 4 symmetry-related molecules.
Insects 13 00292 g005
Figure 6. Thin film of thiacloprid crystals grown by cooling its melt, as viewed between crossed polarizers. Form I presents as banded spherulites and a chaotic texture, Form II as smooth spherulites.
Figure 6. Thin film of thiacloprid crystals grown by cooling its melt, as viewed between crossed polarizers. Form I presents as banded spherulites and a chaotic texture, Form II as smooth spherulites.
Insects 13 00292 g006
Figure 7. Single-crystal structures of thiacloprid Forms I (A) and II (B). The unit cell of Form I contains 8 symmetry-related molecules, whereas the unit cell of Form II contains 4 symmetry-related molecules.
Figure 7. Single-crystal structures of thiacloprid Forms I (A) and II (B). The unit cell of Form I contains 8 symmetry-related molecules, whereas the unit cell of Form II contains 4 symmetry-related molecules.
Insects 13 00292 g007
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Erriah, B.; Zhu, X.; Hu, C.T.; Kahr, B.E.; Shtukenberg, A.; Ward, M.D. Crystallography of Contemporary Contact Insecticides. Insects 2022, 13, 292. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13030292

AMA Style

Erriah B, Zhu X, Hu CT, Kahr BE, Shtukenberg A, Ward MD. Crystallography of Contemporary Contact Insecticides. Insects. 2022; 13(3):292. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13030292

Chicago/Turabian Style

Erriah, Bryan, Xiaolong Zhu, Chunhua T. Hu, Bart E. Kahr, Alexander Shtukenberg, and Michael D. Ward. 2022. "Crystallography of Contemporary Contact Insecticides" Insects 13, no. 3: 292. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13030292

APA Style

Erriah, B., Zhu, X., Hu, C. T., Kahr, B. E., Shtukenberg, A., & Ward, M. D. (2022). Crystallography of Contemporary Contact Insecticides. Insects, 13(3), 292. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13030292

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop