Next Article in Journal
Species Richness of Papilionidae Butterflies (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea) in the Hengduan Mountains and Its Future Shifts under Climate Change
Next Article in Special Issue
Determination of a Discriminant Dose to Identify Resistance to Amitraz in Rhipicephalus sanguineus s.l. (Acari: Ixodidae) from Mexico
Previous Article in Journal
Phylogenetic Implications of Mitogenomic Sequences and Gene Rearrangements of Scale Insects (Hemiptera, Coccoidea)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Efficacy of In Vitro Lithium Chloride Treatments on Dermacentor reticulatus
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Insects
Volume 14
Issue 3
10.3390/insects14030258
insects-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Seasonal Dynamics of Tick Species in the Ecotone of Parks and Recreational Areas in Middlesex County (New Jersey, USA)

by
Julia González
,
Dina M. Fonseca
* and
Alvaro Toledo
*
Center for Vector Biology, Department of Entomology, Rutgers University, 180 Jones Ave, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2023, 14(3), 258; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14030258
Submission received: 7 February 2023 / Revised: 1 March 2023 / Accepted: 3 March 2023 / Published: 5 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research and Advances in Acarology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

People using forested parks for recreation often spend most time in grassy paths or meadows. These transitional zones are referred to as “ecotones”. In this study, we monitored the seasonal dynamics of questing ticks in forest/path and forest/meadow ecotones in five areas in Middlesex County, New Jersey. We found anthropophilic species such as Ixodes scapularis, Amblyomma americanum, and Dermacentor variabilis coexisting with Haemaphysalis longicornis, an invasive tick species first detected in NJ in 2017. Surveillance was conducted weekly from March to November 2020, and collected ticks were identified. The most abundant tick species was H. longicornis. The presence of anthropophilic ticks suggests the need for specific control approaches to target these habitats. In addition, the extraordinarily high numbers of H. longicornis collected in ecotones highlight the importance of monitoring its expansion due to its potential as a vector of animal and human diseases.

Abstract

People often use parks and other forested areas for outdoor activities such as hiking and walking their dogs. Areas of primary use are paths or grassy meadows on the edges of the forests that constitute transitional areas between different plant communities (aka ecotones). In this study, we monitored the seasonal dynamics of questing ticks in forest/meadow and forest/path ecotones in five areas in Middlesex County, New Jersey (NJ). We found anthropophilic species such as Ixodes scapularis, Amblyomma americanum, and Dermacentor variabilis coexisting with Haemaphysalis longicornis, an invasive tick species first detected in NJ in 2017. Surveillance was conducted weekly from March to November 2020, and collected ticks were identified. The most abundant tick species was H. longicornis (83%), followed by A. americanum (9%), I. scapularis (7%), and D. variabilis (<1%). The seasonal dynamics of A. americanum and I. scapularis in the ecotone were similar to previous surveys in forest habitats. The presence of anthropophilic ticks, particularly I. scapularis, suggests the need for specific control approaches to target these habitats. In addition, the extraordinarily high numbers of H. longicornis collected in ecotones (1.70 ticks/m2) and frequent reports of this species on dogs highlight the importance of monitoring its expansion due to its potential as a vector of animal and human diseases.

1. Introduction

Tick-borne diseases continue to be a public health concern in the USA as the number of cases has increased in recent years [1,2]. The ongoing expansion of Ixodes scapularis Say and the increase in abundance of Amblyomma americanum (L.) throughout the Northeast and upper Midwest, as well as the recent detection of the invasive tick, Haemaphysalis longicornis Neumann, underscores the risk of tick-borne diseases in the northeastern USA [1,3,4]. Integrated tick management requires a good understanding of tick ecology [5], in particular, seasonal tick dynamics and habitat range, which can change due to multiple parameters, including the effects of climate, host communities’ movements, and human alteration of the landscape [6]. Tick surveillance estimates the density of host-seeking ticks [7] and is critical for monitoring temporal shifts and habitat ranges [5].
Different tick species can be found in different habitats (forests, grasslands, and meadows) depending on their host’s preference and ability to cope with temperature and humidity, which are impacted by canopy, shrub, and leaf litter composition [8,9,10,11]. For example, Ixodes scapularis is often most abundant in hardwood forests, while A. americanum is active in drier and warmer conditions than those tolerated by sympatric I. scapularis populations [9,10].
Ecotones are transitional areas between two environments that harbor specific arthropod communities [12,13]. While in New Jersey (NJ) A. americanum is also associated with forests and woodlands, this species as well as D. variabilis can thrive in open habitats, such as meadows and ecotones [10]. These areas have higher temperatures and lower relative humidity than forests due to the lack of trees and leaf litter that buffer extreme temperature and moisture conditions in forested areas [14].
Forest–grass ecotones, particularly those modified or originated by human activity, such as public parks and recreational areas, play an essential role in the enzootic cycle of infectious diseases, including zoonotic and vector-borne diseases, and have been associated with their re-emergence [15,16,17]. New Jersey has a high incidence of tick-borne diseases [18]; however, it lacks statewide surveillance to monitor tick species distribution and abundance, which are critical to implementing tick control strategies. This study aims to fill this gap by examining the abundance and seasonality of tick species in the ecotone of public parks and recreational areas to examine the likelihood of tick-risk encounters for humans and pets.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

This study was conducted in five New Brunswick and Piscataway public parks and recreational areas within the Rutgers School of Biological and Environmental Sciences and the NJ Agricultural Experiment Station (Figure 1 [19]). The sites included deciduous forests dominated by oak and maple trees and huckleberry and blueberry shrubs [20]. Site 1 was within a botanical garden composed of small forest patches near the Raritan river; site 2 was located in one of Rutgers’ horticultural research farms; site 3 was composed of small forest fragments and grass meadows used for experimental goat and sheep rearing; site 4 was a meadow and wooded park associated with a conference center; and site 5 was an ecological forest preserve with a network of trails. At each site, we sampled three 20 m transects delimitated by permanent flags and arranged along the ecotone border. The vegetation between the mowed lawn or paths and the forest comprised low brushes and mixed grasses.
All sites were in Middlesex County (NJ), where the annual average temperature is 13 °C (minimum 8 °C and maximum 19 °C), and the annual total precipitation is 49 inches [21].

2.2. Tick Surveillance

Tick sampling was conducted weekly from mid-March until the end of November 2020. Although Ixodes scapularis adults were still active in December–February, based on preliminary surveys, the period chosen is when overall tick abundance was highest. Sampling was performed between 0900 h and 1600 h using a white crib flannel sweep measuring 50 × 100 cm with a PVC pipe handle [22]. Each transect was sampled in 2 m intervals because H. longicornis does not attach firmly to the flannel and often drops off over longer intervals [23]. Ticks were collected from both sides of the sweep and morphologically identified in the laboratory to species using a stereomicroscope (Leica S8 APO, Leica Microsystems) following appropriate taxonomical keys [24,25,26]. Tick numbers by life stage and species were recorded for each site. In addition, temperature and relative humidity data from a close-by weather station (Society Hill, NJ) were registered for each site right before sampling to determine the potential effects of environmental conditions on tick abundance. The observation of extreme shifts in local measures of temperature and relative humidity depending on where the measuring device was placed (for example, wind direction, recent rain event, patches of sun, etc.) led us to use data from the weather station instead of direct measurements using hand-held devices.

2.3. Data Analyses

We calculated relative abundance of ticks as the number of ticks collected per meter. We used non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis test and Dunn’s multiple comparisons tests to evaluate differences in abundance between sites. We correlated the periods of maximum tick abundance or peaks by species and life stage with temperature and relative humidity using non-parametric Spearman rank correlations. The correlation between tick abundance and saturation deficit (SD) was also examined. Saturation deficit is the atmosphere’s drying power and combines temperature and relative humidity data according to the formula [27]:
SD = (1 − RH/100) × 4.9463e^0.0621T
Finally, a linear regression was used to define the relationship between those correlated variables (maximums of relative tick abundance and temperature, relative humidity, or SD). For all tests, the level of statistical significance was p = 0.05. All statistical tests were performed using GraphPad Prism version 8 [28].

3. Results

We collected a total of 10,884 ticks of 4 different species, including H. longicornis, A. americanum, I. scapularis, and D. variabilis. The most abundant tick species was H. longicornis (83.1%), followed by A. americanum (9.5%), I. scapularis (7.3%), and D. variabilis (0.1%) (Table 1). All life stages were collected for all identified species except for D. variabilis, for which adults were the only stage found. Larvae were the most abundant stage for H. longicornis, A. americanum, and I. scapularis, representing 89%, 86%, and 81% of the total number of species, respectively. Nymphs and adults represented 9% and 2% of the total tick number for H. longicornis, 9% and 5% for A. americanum, and 5% and 13% for I. scapularis (Table 1).
Overall tick abundance and the abundance of A. americanum did not differ among sites; however, site 5 had a higher abundance of H. longicornis than site 1, and site 4 had a lower abundance of I. scapularis than site 3 (Table 2). The number of D. variabilis recorded was not sufficient to assess statistical differences between sites. To increase the statistical power when analyzing the effect of environmental variables on each tick species and life-stage abundance, we pooled data from the five sites.
Haemaphysalis longicornis was the dominant species in the ecotone from late March to late October (Figure 2), except in July when coinciding with their respective peaks of larval activity, I. scapularis and A. americanum were the most abundant species. After the end of October, only I. scapularis adults were found (Figure 2).
Nymphs of H. longicornis were the first stage detected in the ecotone of deciduous forests in Middlesex (NJ) and were present from 18 March to 6 October. Adults were present in the ecotone from mid-May to the beginning of September, overlapping with nymphs and larvae in summer (Figure 2a). Larvae were collected in small numbers between 12 April and 9 June, but their activity peaked from mid-August until the end of October. The peak of nymphal activity ranged from mid-April to the first week of June when the temperature increased (Figure 3a). Moreover, the highest SD values were registered between June and August (Figure 3b), when adult activity peaked, and the number of nymphs decreased (Figure 2a). Indeed, the abundance of adults was correlated with temperature, relative humidity, and saturation deficit (Table 3). Temperature and SD were linearly related to H. longicornis adult abundance in a positive tendency (Figure 4 and Table 4), while relative humidity was negatively correlated with adult abundance and positively related to the nymphal peak (Table 3 and Table 4 and Figure 4). In contrast, larval activity did not correlate with any environmental variable (p > 0.05; Table 3).
Adults of A. americanum were occasionally found from March to the end of July (Figure 2b). Nymphs were consistently present from April 25 to the end of summer in September, although their numbers dramatically decreased in mid-July (Figure 2b). Lastly, larvae were present throughout the summer, from the end of July to the week of 22 September. The activity of the different tick stages of A. americanum did not correlate with environmental conditions (Table 3).
The majority of I. scapularis adults were collected in the fall on warm days (>10 °C), and occasionally in early spring during a few weeks between March and April (Figure 2c and Figure 3). Indeed, tick activity positively correlated with temperature and SD but not with relative humidity (Figure 5 and Table 3). On the other hand, nymphs remained active in the spring and early summer, from mid-April to the first week of July. However, they were sporadically observed in small numbers until November (Figure 2c), while larvae were active during the summer season from the first week of July to mid-September. The abundance of immature stages did not correlate with temperature, relative humidity, or SD (Table 3). Lastly, between mid-August and October, I. scapularis was rarely found in the ecotone (Figure 2c).
Adults of D. variabilis were sporadically found in the early spring and summer (Figure 2d), while immature stages were never collected. Due to the small number of individuals collected, correlation analyses with environmental variables were not performed.

4. Discussion

We found that ecotone habitats around and inside public parks and recreational areas in Middlesex (NJ) have a diverse population of ticks and their life stages. Significantly, we found that the invasive species H. longicornis, a tick identified in the US (NJ) in 2017 [29] is the dominant species in this habitat. However, other anthropophilic ticks, including I. scapularis and A. americanum are also present in high numbers. These tick species vector animal and human diseases and are actively present from the early spring until the fall, making the ecotone of public parks and recreational areas a high tick encounter risk area for humans and pets.
The seasonal dynamics of H. longicornis we found are similar to previous reports in a suburban area in NJ [23,30] and other eastern USA states [31,32,33,34]. However, the density of ticks in the ecotone in our study (1.7 ticks per m2) is higher than in other habitats [33,34] and like those found in previous studies conducted in ecotone habitats [23,30]. Collectively, these results indicate that H. longicornis is well adapted to edge habitats, which typically have drier conditions than forests [35]. This is not surprising since H. longicornis is often found in open meadows and forests in Asia and Oceania, suggesting that this tick species thrives in a wide range of temperature and humidity conditions [36,37,38]. In addition, biological factors, such as host availability, are critical for tick development and can drive important differences in tick densities [31,39]. For example, meso-mammals are the primary host for the immature stages in Asia, while in the USA, opossums and raccoons are the main potential hosts [40]. In contrast, small rodents do not seem to be important hosts for the immature stages [41], while deer and livestock can support all life stages [29,40]. Therefore, differences in H. longicornis densities may be driven by differences in the host communities between different habitats.
Despite the clear succession of H. longicornis stages throughout the year, there was considerable overlapping between life stages. This phenomenon has been described in Asia [38,42,43], Oceania [36], and, recently, in the USA [23]. The development stage sequence (nymph → adult → larva) is observed throughout the year with nymphs (spring) followed by adults (summer) and larvae (late summer and early fall), which suggests that the nymphal stage may be the main overwintering stage in NJ, as it was proposed recently for Virginia populations [44].
While H. longicornis is not an anthropophilic tick species, there are reports of human bites in the USA [45,46]. Furthermore, the presence of the tick in high numbers in highly urbanized areas and ecotone habitats suggests that the number of human and pet bites will likely increase in the following years. The public health impact of H. longicornis in the USA is still unclear. Vector competence experiments have shown that H. longicornis is not a competent vector of Borrelia burgdorferi—the agent of Lyme disease [47]; Anaplasma phagocytophilum—the agent of human granulocytic anaplasmosis [48]; or Francisella tularensis—the agent of tularemia [49]. In contrast, H. longicornis is a competent vector of Rickettsia rickettsii—the causative agent of Rocky Mountain spotted fever [50] and Heartland virus [51]. In addition, the Bourbon virus has been detected in field-collected specimens of H. longicornis [52].
More proximally, H. longicornis represents a novel threat from a veterinary standpoint as it frequently bites dogs [53,54] and can transmit Babesia gibsoni—one of the causative agents of canine babesiosis and an emerging pathogen in North America [55,56]. Coyotes can serve as hosts of B. gibsoni [57], and H. longicornis could mediate the enzootic transmission of the parasite between coyotes and stray dogs. Furthermore, the H. longicornis vectors Theileria orientalis Ikeda, an important parasite of cattle in New Zealand, Australia, and Japan [58]. This parasite has been detected in questing H. longicornis ticks in Virginia [59] and cattle [60]. Moreover, vector competence experiments have shown that USA H. longicornis ticks transmit Theileria orientalis Ikeda to calves [61].
Other tick species, including I. scapularis and A. americanum, were frequently found in the ecotone. The presence of anthropophilic ticks in edge habitats highlights the risk of tick encounters and transmission of tick-borne diseases in recreational areas and public parks. The spatial distribution patterns of I. scapularis have been studied in deciduous and coniferous woodlands. Some studies have found a greater abundance of I. scapularis in deciduous forests [62], while others showed a greater abundance in coniferous forests [8]. Nevertheless, it seems that the spatial distribution of I. scapularis is dynamic rather than dependent on the forest habitat and mediated by animal host movement [63]. Our results showed that I. scapularis is present in significant numbers in the ecotone. This result aligns with previous studies that showed that I. scapularis is commonly found in transitional brushy areas and edge habitats (ecotone) in the Northeast and upper Midwest [63,64,65].
Interestingly, the proportion of nymphs of I. scapularis in the ecotone differed from those observed for H. longicornis and A. americanum. While the proportion of nymphs of H. longicornis and A. americanum was roughly 10%, the proportion of nymphs of I. scapularis was 5%. Nymphs dwell in leaf litter and ground-level vegetation and have been reported to be more abundant in closed-canopy forests than in open habitats [66]. The leaf litter retains moisture, protecting nymphs from desiccation. In addition, leaf litter protects nymphs from harsh winter conditions, increasing their overwintering survivorship [67]. However, the leaf litter mass and coverage significantly decrease in the ecotone compared to the forest [68], which could explain the low proportion of nymphs compared to other life stages.
Instead, the proportion of adults in the ecotone is high compared to other tick species and higher than that of nymphs, suggesting that I. scapularis adults are well adapted to the ecotone. Moreover, the fact that adults are more abundant than nymphs suggests a tick influx most likely mediated by animals. Overall, the presence of I. scapularis in the ecotone highlights the importance of implementing tick-control programs in public parks and residential areas because it is the most important vector of human diseases in the northeastern USA [4].
The second most prevalent tick species in the ecotone was A. americanum, an aggressive biter responsible for most human bites in the USA [69,70] and NJ [71]. In a passive surveillance study conducted in NJ, most nymphs and adults of A. americanum were submitted during the spring and early summer [71], when these stages are most active in edge habitats. In the ecotone, larvae were only present in late summer, coinciding with the peak of larvae reported on hosts [72]. In NJ, all stages of this tick species are well adapted to different microclimate conditions [9], and therefore, it is not surprising to find them in ecotone habitats. However, it was less abundant than H. longicornis in our study. It is plausible that the invasive H. longicornis have displaced A. americanum in terms of relative abundance in ecotone areas of NJ due to their ability to reproduce asexually. In any case, the lone star tick is an important vector of human diseases and transmits the agents of human ehrlichiosis, Ehrlichia chaffeensis and E. ewingii, and tularemia, Francisella tularensis [73,74], and it is associated with the human alpha-gal “red meat” allergy [75].
Adults of D. variabilis are tolerant to desiccation and quest on open habitats, including meadows, ecotones, roadsides, and beachgrass [76]; however, only a few adults were collected in this study. In contrast, immatures were not found, which is expected since they are nidiculous [76,77]. Although D. variabilis vectors R. rickettsii, the agent of Rocky Mountain spotted fever, it does not seem to play a significant role in the transmission of this rickettsiosis in NJ [78]. Nevertheless, the presence of H. longicornis, which vectors R. rickettsii under laboratory conditions, and their ability to thrive in habitats similar to those exploited by D. variabilis could facilitate the transmission of R. rickettsii in enzootic cycles and increase the risk of human transmission.
Interestingly, the abundance of H. longicornis adults correlated with drier conditions, including higher temperatures, lower humidity, and higher saturation deficit. This result is remarkable because adults are active during the summer and, therefore, more active during hot summer days. In contrast, nymph abundance correlated with higher humidity and did not seem to be affected by temperature and SD. These results support that adults are the most drying-tolerant stage in the field. The only other stage for which we found an association with abiotic factors was I. scapularis adults. There was a correlation between abundance and temperature and SD. This is not surprising because adults, present in the fall and warmer days in this season, activate the questing behavior of the remaining adults in the field. It is well established that temperature and humidity can affect daily tick activity [79]. We did not look into changes in questing behavior throughout the day in this study that can be more dramatic than those recorded in this study.
In summary, the ecotone of parks and recreational areas in central New Jersey is a suitable habitat for important tick vectors of human and animal diseases. Thus, tick surveillance in public parks and recreational areas is critical to determine the seasonal dynamics of tick species in edge habitats and inform stakeholders about their potential risk. Tick surveillance informs the public of the continuous risk that ticks represent for people and pets throughout the year and the importance of using personal protection measures. In addition, it can help park officials develop control and prevention plans to minimize the presence of ticks, including posting signals to alert the public of the presence of ticks, mowing the edge of trails, or implementing control in tick-infested areas that are heavily used by pets and people, among other measures. We have included a calendar with the proportion of each tick species and stage that could be useful for stakeholders in Middlesex (Figure 6).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.T., D.M.F. and J.G.; methodology, A.T., D.M.F. and J.G.; software, J.G.; validation, A.T., D.M.F. and J.G.; investigation, A.T., D.M.F. and J.G.; writing—original draft preparation, J.G.; writing—review and editing, A.T., D.M.F. and J.G.; visualization, A.T., D.M.F. and J.G.; supervision, A.T. and D.M.F.; project administration, A.T. and D.M.F.; funding acquisition, A.T. and D.M.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was partially supported by the United States Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Multi-State project NE1943 to A.T. and D.M.F. This work was also supported by Cooperative Agreement Number 1U01CK000509 from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) through the Northeast Center of Excellence in Vector-Borne Diseases to the Center for Vector Biology, Rutgers University (PI: D.M.F.). The contents of this work are solely the authors’ responsibility and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or the Department of Health and Human Services.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available from the authors upon request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Andrea Egizi, Jim Occi, Matt Bickerton, and Francisco Ferreira for their support and comments during the development of this project and earlier versions of this manuscript. We also thank two reviewers for their valuable insights.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Beard, C.B.; Eisen, L.; Eisen, R.J. The Rise of Ticks and Tickborne Diseases in the United States—Introduction. J. Med. Entomol. 2021, 58, 1487–1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Rosenberg, R.; Lindsey, N.P.; Fischer, M.; Gregory, C.J.; Hinckley, A.F.; Mead, P.S.; Paz-Bailey, G.; Waterman, S.H.; Drexler, N.A.; Kersh, G.J.; et al. Vital Signs: Trends in Reported Vectorborne Disease Cases—United States and Territories, 2004–2016. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2018, 67, 496–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Rochlin, I.; Egizi, A.; Lindström, A. The Original Scientific Description of the Lone Star Tick (Amblyomma americanum, Acari: Ixodidae) and Implications for the Species’ Past and Future Geographic Distributions. J. Med. Entomol. 2022, 59, 412–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Rochlin, I.; Toledo, A. Emerging Tick-Borne Pathogens of Public Health Importance: A Mini-Review. J. Med. Microbiol. 2020, 69, 781–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Eisen, R.J.; Paddock, C.D. Tick and Tickborne Pathogen Surveillance as a Public Health Tool in the United States. J. Med. Entomol. 2021, 58, 1490–1502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ogden, N.H.; Ben Beard, C.; Ginsberg, H.S.; Tsao, J.I. Possible Effects of Climate Change on Ixodid Ticks and the Pathogens They Transmit: Predictions and Observations. J. Med. Entomol. 2021, 58, 1536–1545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Ginsberg, H.S.; Ewing, C.P. Comparison of Flagging, Walking, Trapping, and Collecting from Hosts as Sampling Methods for Northern Deer Ticks, Ixodes dammini, and Lone- Star Ticks, Amblyomma americanum (Acari: Ixodidae). Exp. Appl. Acarol. 1989, 7, 313–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lord, C.C. Seasonal Activity of Nymphal Ixodes scapularis (Acari: Ixodidae) in Different Habitats in New Jersey. J. Med. Entomol. 1995, 32, 66–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Schulze, T.L.; Jordan, R.A. Influence of Meso- and Microscale Habitat Structure on Focal Distribution of Sympatric Ixodes scapularis and Amblyomma americanum (Acari: Ixodidae). J. Med. Entomol. 2005, 42, 285–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Schulze, T.L.; Jordan, R.A.; White, J.C.; Roegner, V.E.; Healy, S.P. Geographical Distribution and Prevalence of Selected Borrelia, Ehrlichia, and Rickettsia Infections in Amblyomma americanum (Acari: Ixodidae) in New Jersey. J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc. 2011, 27, 236–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Stafford, K.C. Reduced Abundance of Ixodes scapularis (Acari: Ixodidae) with Exclusion of Deer by Electric Fencing. J. Med. Entomol. 1993, 30, 986–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Dronova, I. Environmental Heterogeneity as a Bridge between Ecosystem Service and Visual Quality Objectives in Management, Planning and Design. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2017, 163, 90–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Dröse, W.; Podgaiski, L.R.; Dias, C.F.; Mendonça, M.d.S., Jr. Local and Regional Drivers of Ant Communities in Forest-Grassland Ecotones in South Brazil: A Taxonomic and Phylogenetic Approach. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0215310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bond, W.J.; Parr, C.L. Beyond the Forest Edge: Ecology, Diversity and Conservation of the Grassy Biomes. Biol. Conserv. 2010, 143, 2395–2404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Despommier, D.; Ellis, B.R.; Wilcox, B.A. The Role of Ecotones in Emerging Infectious Diseases. EcoHealth 2006, 3, 281–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Eisen, L.; Stafford, K.C. Barriers to Effective Tick Management and Tick-Bite Prevention in the United States (Acari: Ixodidae). J. Med. Entomol. 2021, 58, 1588–1600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. McKay, R.; Talbot, B.; Slatculescu, A.; Stone, A.; Kulkarni, M.A. Woodchip Borders at the Forest Ecotone as an Environmental Control Measure to Reduce Questing Tick Density along Recreational Trails in Ottawa, Canada. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2020, 11, 101361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. CDC Tickborne Disease Surveillance Data Summary|CDC. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/ticks/data-summary/index.html (accessed on 13 November 2021).
  19. Zanaga, D.; Van De Kerchove, R.; De Keersmaecker, W.; Souverijns, N.; Brockmann, C.; Quast, R.; Wevers, J.; Grosu, A.; Paccini, A.; Vergnaud, S.; et al. WorldCover 10 m 2020 v100; European Space Agency (ESA): Paris, France, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Breden, T.F.; Alger, Y.; Walz, K.S.; Windisch, A.G. Classification of Vegetation Communities of New Jersey: Second Iteration; Association for Biodiversity Information and New Jersey Natural Heritage Program, Office of Natural Lands Management, Division of Parks and Forestry, NJ Department of Environmental Protection: Trenton, NJ, USA, 2001; p. 230. [Google Scholar]
  21. ONJSC Monthly Climate Tables. Office of the New Jersey State Climatologist. Rutgers University. Available online: https://climate.rutgers.edu/stateclim_v1/nclimdiv/index.php?stn=NJ023&elem=pcpn (accessed on 26 February 2023).
  22. Egizi, A.M.; Occi, J.L.; Price, D.C.; Fonseca, D.M. Leveraging the Expertise of the New Jersey Mosquito Control Community to Jump Start Standardized Tick Surveillance. Insects 2019, 10, 219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Bickerton, M.; McSorley, K.; Toledo, A. A Life Stage-Targeted Acaricide Application Approach for the Control of Haemaphysalis longicornis. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2021, 12, 101581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Durden, L.A.; Keirans, J.E. Nymphs of the Genus Ixodes (Acari: Ixodidae) of the United States: Taxonomy, Identification Key, Distribution, Hosts, and Medical/Veterinary Importance; Entomological Society of America: Annapolis, MD, USA, 1996; ISBN 978-0-938522-57-7. [Google Scholar]
  25. Egizi, A.M.; Robbins, R.G.; Beati, L.; Nava, S.; Evans, C.R.; Occi, J.L.; Fonseca, D.M. A Pictorial Key to Differentiate the Recently Detected Exotic Haemaphysalis longicornis Neumann, 1901 (Acari, Ixodidae) from Native Congeners in North America. ZooKeys 2019, 818, 117–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Keirans, J.E.; Durden, L.A. Illustrated Key to Nymphs of the Tick Genus Amblyomma (Acari: Ixodidae) Found in the United States. J. Med. Entomol. 1998, 35, 489–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Randolph, S.E.; Storey, K. Impact of Microclimate on Immature Tick-Rodent Host Interactions (Acari: Ixodidae): Implications for Parasite Transmission. J. Med. Entomol. 1999, 36, 741–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. GraphPad Software GraphPad Prism for Windows 2019.
  29. Rainey, T.; Occi, J.L.; Robbins, R.G.; Egizi, A. Discovery of Haemaphysalis longicornis (Ixodida: Ixodidae) Parasitizing a Sheep in New Jersey, United States. J. Med. Entomol. 2018, 55, 757–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Bickerton, M.; Rochlin, I.; González, J.; McSorley, K.; Toledo, A. Field Applications of Granular and Liquid Pyrethroids, Carbaryl, and IGRs to Control the Asian Longhorned Tick (Haemaphysalis longicornis) and Impacts on Nontarget Invertebrates. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2022, 13, 102054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cumbie, A.N.; Whitlow, A.M.; Arneson, A.; Du, Z.; Eastwood, G. The Distribution, Seasonal Abundance, and Environmental Factors Contributing to the Presence of the Asian Longhorned Tick (Haemaphysalis longicornis, Acari: Ixodidae) in Central Appalachian Virginia. J. Med. Entomol. 2022, 59, tjac067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Piedmonte, N.P.; Vinci, V.C.; Daniels, T.J.; Backenson, B.P.; Falco, R.C. Seasonal Activity of Haemaphysalis longicornis (Acari: Ixodidae) in Southern New York State. J. Med. Entomol. 2021, 58, 676–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Price, K.J.; Witmier, B.J.; Eckert, R.A.; Boyer, C.N.; Helwig, M.W.; Kyle, A.D. Distribution and Density of Haemaphysalis longicornis (Acari: Ixodidae) on Public Lands in Pennsylvania, United States. J. Med. Entomol. 2021, 58, 1433–1438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Tufts, D.M.; VanAcker, M.C.; Fernandez, M.P.; DeNicola, A.; Egizi, A.; Diuk-Wasser, M.A. Distribution, Host-Seeking Phenology, and Host and Habitat Associations of Haemaphysalis longicornis Ticks, Staten Island, New York, USA. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2019, 25, 792–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Cadenasso, M.L.; Traynor, M.M.; Pickett, S.T. Functional Location of Forest Edges: Gradients of Multiple Physical Factors. Can. J. For. Res. 1997, 27, 774–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Heath, A. Biology, Ecology and Distribution of the Tick, Haemaphysalis longicornis Neumann (Acari: Ixodidae) in New Zealand. N. Z. Vet. J. 2016, 64, 10–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Zhao, L.; Li, J.; Cui, X.; Jia, N.; Wei, J.; Xia, L.; Wang, H.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, Q.; Liu, X.; et al. Distribution of Haemaphysalis longicornis and Associated Pathogens: Analysis of Pooled Data from a China Field Survey and Global Published Data. Lancet Planet. Health 2020, 4, e320–e329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Zheng, H.; Yu, Z.; Zhou, L.; Yang, X.; Liu, J. Seasonal Abundance and Activity of the Hard Tick Haemaphysalis longicornis (Acari: Ixodidae) in North China. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2012, 56, 133–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Trout Fryxell, R.T.; Moore, J.E.; Collins, M.D.; Kwon, Y.; Jean-Philippe, S.R.; Schaeffer, S.M.; Odoi, A.; Kennedy, M.; Houston, A.E. Habitat and Vegetation Variables Are Not Enough When Predicting Tick Populations in the Southeastern United States. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0144092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Tufts, D.M.; Goodman, L.B.; Benedict, M.C.; Davis, A.D.; VanAcker, M.C.; Diuk-Wasser, M. Association of the Invasive Haemaphysalis longicornis Tick with Vertebrate Hosts, Other Native Tick Vectors, and Tick-Borne Pathogens in New York City, USA. Int. J. Parasitol. 2021, 51, 149–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Ronai, I.; Tufts, D.M.; Diuk-Wasser, M.A. Aversion of the Invasive Asian Longhorned Tick to the White-Footed Mouse, the Dominant Reservoir of Tick-Borne Pathogens in the U.S.A. Med. Vet. Entomol. 2020, 34, 369–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chong, S.T.; Kim, H.C.; Lee, I.-Y.; Kollars, T.M.; Sancho, A.R.; Sames, W.J.; Klein, T.A. Comparison of Dragging and Sweeping Methods for Collecting Ticks and Determining Their Seasonal Distributions for Various Habitats, Gyeonggi Province, Republic of Korea. J. Med. Entomol. 2013, 50, 611–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Tsunoda, T. Interspecific and Intraspecific Associations of Two Species of Hard Ticks, Haemaphysalis longicornis and Haemaphysalis megaspinosa, in Relation to Questing Site. J. Parasitol. 2007, 93, 531–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Whitlow, A.M.; Schürch, R.; Mullins, D.; Eastwood, G. The Influence of Southwestern Virginia Environmental Conditions on the Potential Ability of Haemaphysalis longicornis, Amblyomma americanum, and Amblyomma maculatum to Overwinter in the Region. Insects 2021, 12, 1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Bickerton, M.; Toledo, A. Multiple Pruritic Tick Bites by Asian Longhorned Tick Larvae (Haemaphysalis longicornis). Int. J. Acarol. 2020, 46, 373–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wormser, G.P.; McKenna, D.; Piedmonte, N.; Vinci, V.; Egizi, A.M.; Backenson, B.; Falco, R.C. First Recognized Human Bite in the United States by the Asian Longhorned Tick, Haemaphysalis longicornis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020, 70, 314–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Breuner, N.E.; Ford, S.L.; Hojgaard, A.; Osikowicz, L.M.; Parise, C.M.; Rosales Rizzo, M.F.; Bai, Y.; Levin, M.L.; Eisen, R.J.; Eisen, L. Failure of the Asian Longhorned Tick, Haemaphysalis longicornis, to Serve as an Experimental Vector of the Lyme Disease Spirochete, Borrelia burgdorferi Sensu Stricto. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2020, 11, 101311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Levin, M.L.; Stanley, H.M.; Hartzer, K.; Snellgrove, A.N. Incompetence of the Asian Longhorned Tick (Acari: Ixodidae) in Transmitting the Agent of Human Granulocytic Anaplasmosis in the United States. J. Med. Entomol. 2021, 58, 1419–1423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Tully, B.G.; Huntley, J.F. A Francisella Tularensis Chitinase Contributes to Bacterial Persistence and Replication in Two Major U.S. Tick Vectors. Pathogens 2020, 9, 1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Stanley, H.M.; Ford, S.L.; Snellgrove, A.N.; Hartzer, K.; Smith, E.B.; Krapiunaya, I.; Levin, M.L. The Ability of the Invasive Asian Longhorned Tick Haemaphysalis longicornis (Acari: Ixodidae) to Acquire and Transmit Rickettsia rickettsii (Rickettsiales: Rickettsiaceae), the Agent of Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever, Under Laboratory Conditions. J. Med. Entomol. 2020, 57, 1635–1639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Raney, W.R.; Perry, J.B.; Hermance, M.E. Transovarial Transmission of Heartland Virus by Invasive Asian Longhorned Ticks under Laboratory Conditions. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2022, 28, 726–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Cumbie, A.N.; Trimble, R.N.; Eastwood, G. Pathogen Spillover to an Invasive Tick Species: First Detection of Bourbon Virus in Haemaphysalis longicornis in the United States. Pathogens 2022, 11, 454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Chomel, B. Tick-Borne Infections in Dogs—An Emerging Infectious Threat. Vet. Parasitol. 2011, 179, 294–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Greay, T.L.; Oskam, C.L.; Gofton, A.W.; Rees, R.L.; Ryan, U.M.; Irwin, P.J. A Survey of Ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) of Companion Animals in Australia. Parasites Vectors 2016, 9, 207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Boozer, L.; Macintire, D. Babesia Gibsoni: An Emerging Pathogen in Dogs. In The Compendium on Continuing Education for the Practicing Veterinarian; Veterinary Learning Systems: Yardley, PA, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  56. Higuchi, S.; Simomura, S.; Yoshida, H.; Hoshi, F.; Kawamura, S.; Yasuda, Y. Development of Babesia gibsoni in the Hemolymph of the Vector Tick, Haemaphysalis longicornis. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 1991, 53, 491–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Evers, H.V.; Kocan, A.A.; Reichard, M.V.; Meinkoth, J.H. Experimental Babesia gibsoni Infection in Coyotes (Canis Latrans). J. Wildl. Dis. 2003, 39, 904–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Watts, J.; Playford, M.; Hickey, K. Theileria orientalis: A Review. N. Z. Vet. J. 2016, 64, 3–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Thompson, A.T.; White, S.; Shaw, D.; Egizi, A.; Lahmers, K.; Ruder, M.G.; Yabsley, M.J. Theileria orientalis Ikeda in Host-Seeking Haemaphysalis longicornis in Virginia, U.S.A. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2020, 11, 101450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Oakes, V.J.; Yabsley, M.J.; Schwartz, D.; LeRoith, T.; Bissett, C.; Broaddus, C.; Schlater, J.L.; Todd, S.M.; Boes, K.M.; Brookhart, M.; et al. Theileria Orientalis Ikeda Genotype in Cattle, Virginia, USA. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2019, 25, 1653–1659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Dinkel, K.D.; Herndon, D.R.; Noh, S.M.; Lahmers, K.K.; Todd, S.M.; Ueti, M.W.; Scoles, G.A.; Mason, K.L.; Fry, L.M. A U.S. Isolate of Theileria orientalis, Ikeda Genotype, Is Transmitted to Cattle by the Invasive Asian Longhorned Tick, Haemaphysalis longicornis. Parasites Vectors 2021, 14, 157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ginsberg, H.S.; Zhioua, E. Nymphal Survival and Habitat Distribution of Ixodes scapularis and Amblyomma americanum Ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) on Fire Island, New York, USA. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 1996, 20, 533–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Ginsberg, H.S.; Zhioua, E.; Mitra, S.; Fischer, J.; Buckley, P.A.; Verret, F.; Underwood, H.B.; Buckley, F.G. Woodland Type and Spatial Distribution of Nymphal Ixodes scapularis (Acari: Ixodidae). Environ. Entomol. 2004, 33, 1266–1273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Hahn, M.B.; Bjork, J.K.H.; Neitzel, D.F.; Dorr, F.M.; Whitemarsh, T.; Boegler, K.A.; Graham, C.B.; Johnson, T.L.; Maes, S.E.; Eisen, R.J. Evaluating Acarological Risk for Exposure to Ixodes scapularis and Ixodes scapularis-Borne Pathogens in Recreational and Residential Settings in Washington County, Minnesota. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2018, 9, 340–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Stafford, K.C.; Magnarelli, L.A. Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Ixodes scapularis (Acari: Ixodidae) in Southeastern Connecticut. J. Med. Entomol. 1993, 30, 762–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Ginsberg, H.S.; Ewing, C.P. Habitat Distribution of Ixodes dammini (Acari: Ixodidae) an Lyme Disease Spirochetes on Fire Island, New York. J. Med. Entomol. 1989, 26, 183–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Linske, M.A.; Stafford, K.C.; Williams, S.C.; Lubelczyk, C.B.; Welch, M.; Henderson, E.F. Impacts of Deciduous Leaf Litter and Snow Presence on Nymphal Ixodes scapularis (Acari: Ixodidae) Overwintering Survival in Coastal New England, USA. Insects 2019, 10, 227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Loydi, A.; Lohse, K.; Otte, A.; Donath, T.W.; Eckstein, R.L. Distribution and Effects of Tree Leaf Litter on Vegetation Composition and Biomass in a Forest–Grassland Ecotone. J. Plant Ecol. 2014, 7, 264–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Kennedy, A.C.; BCE; Marshall, E. Lone Star Ticks (Amblyomma americanum): An Emerging Threat in Delaware. Del. J. Public Health 2021, 7, 66–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Mixson, T.R.; Campbell, S.R.; Gill, J.S.; Ginsberg, H.S.; Reichard, M.V.; Schulze, T.L.; Dasch, G.A. Prevalence of Ehrlichia, Borrelia, and Rickettsial Agents in Amblyomma americanum (Acari: Ixodidae) Collected from Nine States. J. Med. Entomol. 2006, 43, 1261–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Jordan, R.A.; Egizi, A. The Growing Importance of Lone Star Ticks in a Lyme Disease Endemic County: Passive Tick Surveillance in Monmouth County, NJ, 2006–2016. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0211778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Schulze, T.L.; Bowen, G.S.; Lakat, M.F.; Parkin, W.E.; Shisler, J.K. Seasonal Abundance and Hosts of Ixodes dammini (Acari: Ixodidae) and Other Ixodid Ticks from an Endemic Lyme Disease Focus in New Jersey, USA. J. Med. Entomol. 1986, 23, 105–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Goddard, J.; Varela-Stokes, A.S. Role of the Lone Star Tick, Amblyomma americanum (L.), in Human and Animal Diseases. Vet. Parasitol. 2009, 160, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Zellner, B.; Huntley, J.F. Ticks and Tularemia: Do We Know What We Don’t Know? Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2019, 9, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Commins, S.P.; James, H.R.; Kelly, E.A.; Pochan, S.L.; Workman, L.J.; Perzanowski, M.S.; Kocan, K.M.; Fahy, J.V.; Nganga, L.W.; Ronmark, E.; et al. The Relevance of Tick Bites to the Production of IgE Antibodies to the Mammalian Oligosaccharide Galactose-α-1,3-Galactose. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2011, 127, 1286–1293.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Occi, J.L.; Egizi, A.M.; Robbins, R.G.; Fonseca, D.M. Annotated List of the Hard Ticks (Acari: Ixodida: Ixodidae) of New Jersey. J. Med. Entomol. 2019, 56, 589–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Salman, M.; Estrada-Peña, A. Emerging (Re-Emerging) Tick-Borne Infections and the Dissemination of Ticks. In Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases: Geographical Distribution and Control Strategies in the Euro-Asia Region; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 2013; pp. 1–5. ISBN 978-1-84593-853-6. [Google Scholar]
  78. Occi, J.; Egizi, A.M.; Goncalves, A.; Fonseca, D.M. New Jersey-Wide Survey of Spotted Fever Group Rickettsia (Proteobacteria: Rickettsiaceae) in Dermacentor variabilis and Amblyomma americanum (Acari: Ixodida: Ixodidae). Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2020, 103, 1009–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Schulze, T.L.; Jordan, R.A. Meteorologically Mediated Diurnal Questing of Ixodes scapularis and Amblyomma americanum (Acari: Ixodidae) Nymphs. J. Med. Entomol. 2003, 40, 395–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Insects 14 00258 g001 550
Figure 1. Map of sampling sites in the study area (Middlesex, NJ). QGIS map base ESA World Cover [19].
Figure 1. Map of sampling sites in the study area (Middlesex, NJ). QGIS map base ESA World Cover [19].
Insects 14 00258 g001
Insects 14 00258 g002 550
Figure 2. Seasonal dynamic of each life stage and tick species collected. Samplings with zero ticks collected are not represented. (a) Haemaphysalis longicornis; (b) Amblyomma americanum; (c) Ixodes scapularis; (d) Dermacentor variabilis. Notice the difference in scale (5× higher) for H. longicornis.
Figure 2. Seasonal dynamic of each life stage and tick species collected. Samplings with zero ticks collected are not represented. (a) Haemaphysalis longicornis; (b) Amblyomma americanum; (c) Ixodes scapularis; (d) Dermacentor variabilis. Notice the difference in scale (5× higher) for H. longicornis.
Insects 14 00258 g002
Insects 14 00258 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) Mean temperature and relative humidity calculated from the data registered in the weather station (Society Hill, NJ) at the start time of the tick sampling in each site (n = 5/day). (b) Saturation deficit calculated combining the data of temperature and relative humidity registered (more details in Materials and Methods).
Figure 3. (a) Mean temperature and relative humidity calculated from the data registered in the weather station (Society Hill, NJ) at the start time of the tick sampling in each site (n = 5/day). (b) Saturation deficit calculated combining the data of temperature and relative humidity registered (more details in Materials and Methods).
Insects 14 00258 g003
Insects 14 00258 g004 550
Figure 4. Representation of the linear regression equations between the environmental variables registered and the relative abundance of Haemaphysalis longicornis activity peaks of nymphs (a) and adults (b–d).
Figure 4. Representation of the linear regression equations between the environmental variables registered and the relative abundance of Haemaphysalis longicornis activity peaks of nymphs (a) and adults (b–d).
Insects 14 00258 g004
Insects 14 00258 g005 550
Figure 5. Representation of the linear regression equations between the environmental variables registered, temperature (a) and saturation deficit (b), and the relative abundance of Ixodes scapularis activity peaks of adults.
Figure 5. Representation of the linear regression equations between the environmental variables registered, temperature (a) and saturation deficit (b), and the relative abundance of Ixodes scapularis activity peaks of adults.
Insects 14 00258 g005
Insects 14 00258 g006 550
Figure 6. Map of the proportion of relative abundance observed of each stage and tick species in the ecotone. Life stages: larvae (L), nymphs (N), and adults (A). Tick species: Dermacentor variabilis (American dog tick, ADT), Haemaphysalis longicornis (Asian longhorned tick, ALT), Ixodes scapularis (blacklegged tick, BLT), and Amblyomma americanum (lone star tick, LST).
Figure 6. Map of the proportion of relative abundance observed of each stage and tick species in the ecotone. Life stages: larvae (L), nymphs (N), and adults (A). Tick species: Dermacentor variabilis (American dog tick, ADT), Haemaphysalis longicornis (Asian longhorned tick, ALT), Ixodes scapularis (blacklegged tick, BLT), and Amblyomma americanum (lone star tick, LST).
Insects 14 00258 g006
Table
Table 1. Number of ticks per stage and species collected in ecotone areas from five sites in New Brunswick, NJ. Total proportion of each life stage is shown between parentheses for each tick species.
Table 1. Number of ticks per stage and species collected in ecotone areas from five sites in New Brunswick, NJ. Total proportion of each life stage is shown between parentheses for each tick species.
Life
Stages		Amblyomma
americanum		Dermacentor
variabilis		Haemaphysalis
longicornis		Ixodes
scapularis		Total
Ticks
Larvae887 (86%)08078 (89%)647 (81%)9612 (88%)
Nymphs95 (9%)0819 (9%)41 (5%)955 (9%)
Adults50 (5%)10 (100%)151 (2%)106 (13%)317 (3%)
Total1032 10 9048 794 10,884
Table
Table 2. Tick abundance in five different ecotone sites in New Brunswick, NJ. Kruskal–Wallis (KW) tests and ANOVA (F) were used to analyze significant differences between sites in total ticks and per tick species: p < 0.05 (*). Different letters represent significant differences using Dunn’s multiple comparisons tests (p < 0.05).
Table 2. Tick abundance in five different ecotone sites in New Brunswick, NJ. Kruskal–Wallis (KW) tests and ANOVA (F) were used to analyze significant differences between sites in total ticks and per tick species: p < 0.05 (*). Different letters represent significant differences using Dunn’s multiple comparisons tests (p < 0.05).
SiteAmblyomma
americanum		Haemaphysalis
longicornis		Ixodes
scapularis		Total
Ticks
10.0220.039 a0.176 ab0.236
20.1470.361 ab0.070 ab0.579
30.1960.845 ab0.113 a1.154
40.1010.459 ab0.004 b0.564
50.0102.198 b0.026 ab2.238
Statistic
p-value		3.90 (KW)
0.4196		10.45 (KW)
0.0335 *		10.43 (KW)
0.0338 *		1.79 (F)
0.1537
Data of total ticks were transformed (Log (Y + 0.1)) to normalize the distribution.
Table
Table 3. Spearman rank (rs coefficient) correlations between the relative abundance of tick activity peaks and environmental variables. Life stages: larvae (L), nymphs (N), and adults (A). Asterisks represent a significant correlation (p < 0.05 (*), p < 0.01 (**)).
Table 3. Spearman rank (rs coefficient) correlations between the relative abundance of tick activity peaks and environmental variables. Life stages: larvae (L), nymphs (N), and adults (A). Asterisks represent a significant correlation (p < 0.05 (*), p < 0.01 (**)).
Tick
Species		Life
Stage		Peak
of Tick
Activity		NTemperatureRelative HumiditySaturation Deficit
rs95% CIp-Valuers95% CIp-Valuers95% CIp-Value
Haemaphysalis
longicornis		L18 August to
21 October		48−0.092−0.374 to 0.2050.5332−0.040−0.329 to 0.2550.785−0.008−0.299 to 0.2850.956
N6 April to
16 June		400.004−0.316 to 0.3240.9780.3550.0395 to 0.6060.024 *−0.126−0.429 to 0.2020.439
A15 July to
1 September		400.3510.035 to 0.6030.026 *−0.339−0.595 to −0.0210.032 *0.3690.056 to 0.6170.019 *
Amblyomma
americanum		L29 July to
1 September		300.303−0.075 to 0.6050.104−0.140−0.485 to 0.2420.4590.207−0.176 to 0.5360.272
N3 May to
6 July		410.220−0.103 to 0.5020.1660.251−0.070 to 0.5250.1130.155−0.169 to 0.4490.332
A16 May to
2 July		30−0.121−0.470 to 0.2610.525−0.084−0.440 to 0.2950.659−0.105−0.457 to 0.2750.580
Ixodes
scapularis		L6 July to
1 September		450.029−0.275 to 0.3280.849−0.018−0.318 to 0.2850.9080.004−0.297 to 0.3060.976
N3 May to
2 July		360.139−0.208 to 0.4550.4200.112−0.234 to 0.4330.5150.068−0.276 to 0.3960.693
A21 Oct to
24 November		300.5490.225 to 0.7640.002 **−0.029−0.395 to 0.3450.8800.3770.008 to 0.6550.040 *
Table
Table 4. Simple linear regressions between the relative abundance of tick activity peaks (Y) and environmental variables (X). Asterisks represent a significant correlation (p < 0.05 (*)).
Table 4. Simple linear regressions between the relative abundance of tick activity peaks (Y) and environmental variables (X). Asterisks represent a significant correlation (p < 0.05 (*)).
Environmental
Variables		 Haemaphysalis longicornis
(N = 40)		Ixodes scapularis
(N = 30)
Nymphs Adults Adults
TemperatureSlope 0.0070.005
Std. Error 0.0030.002
R2 0.110.19
F (DFn, DFd) 4.632 (1, 38)6.686 (1, 28)
p-value 0.038 *0.015 *
Relative
humidity		Slope0.012−0.002
Std. Error0.0050.001
R20.140.13
F (DFn, DFd)6.132 (1, 38)5.759 (1, 38)
p-value0.018 *0.021 *
Saturation
deficit		Slope 0.0050.010
Std. Error 0.0020.004
R2 0.140.17
F (DFn, DFd) 6.283 (1, 38)5.565 (1, 28)
p-value 0.017 *0.025 *
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

González, J.; Fonseca, D.M.; Toledo, A. Seasonal Dynamics of Tick Species in the Ecotone of Parks and Recreational Areas in Middlesex County (New Jersey, USA). Insects 2023, 14, 258. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14030258

AMA Style

González J, Fonseca DM, Toledo A. Seasonal Dynamics of Tick Species in the Ecotone of Parks and Recreational Areas in Middlesex County (New Jersey, USA). Insects. 2023; 14(3):258. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14030258

Chicago/Turabian Style

González, Julia, Dina M. Fonseca, and Alvaro Toledo. 2023. "Seasonal Dynamics of Tick Species in the Ecotone of Parks and Recreational Areas in Middlesex County (New Jersey, USA)" Insects 14, no. 3: 258. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14030258

APA Style

González, J., Fonseca, D. M., & Toledo, A. (2023). Seasonal Dynamics of Tick Species in the Ecotone of Parks and Recreational Areas in Middlesex County (New Jersey, USA). Insects, 14(3), 258. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14030258

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop