Next Article in Journal
Multigenerational Rearing on Non-Prey Foods Does Not Affect Prey (Aphid) Recognition Behavior of Coleomegilla maculata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae)
Previous Article in Journal
DNA Barcoding of German Cuckoo Wasps (Hymenoptera: Chrysididae) Suggests Cryptic Species in Several Widely Distributed Species
Previous Article in Special Issue
RNAseq-Based Carboxylesterase Nl-EST1 Gene Expression Plasticity Identification and Its Potential Involvement in Fenobucarb Resistance in the Brown Planthopper Nilaparvata lugens
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Toxicity and Sublethal Effect of Chlorantraniliprole on Multiple Generations of Aedes aegypti L. (Diptera: Culicidae)

by
Nimra Batool
1,
Muhammad Abubakar
2,
Ahmed Noureldeen
3,
Muhammad Nadir Naqqash
1,*,
Akram Alghamdi
3,
Zamzam M. Al Dhafar
4,5,
Fadi Baakdah
6,7 and
Raimondas Mozūratis
8,9,*
1
Institute of Plant Protection, MNS University of Agriculture, Multan 59220, Pakistan
2
Department of Entomology, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan 60800, Pakistan
3
Department of Biology, College of Sciences, Taif University, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia
4
Department of Biology, College of Science, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, P.O. Box 1982, Dammam 31441, Saudi Arabia
5
Basic and Applied Scientific Research Center (BASRC), Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, P.O. Box 1982, Dammam 31441, Saudi Arabia
6
Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
7
Special Infectious Agents Unit, King Fahd Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
8
Laboratory of Chemical and Behavioral Ecology, Institute of Ecology, Nature Research Centre, LT-08412 Vilnius, Lithuania
9
Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2024, 15(11), 851; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15110851
Submission received: 5 September 2024 / Revised: 21 October 2024 / Accepted: 29 October 2024 / Published: 30 October 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chemical Toxicology and Insecticide Resistance on Insect Pests)

Simple Summary

Mosquitoes are vectors of various diseases in humans. Due to the quick development of insecticide resistance, it is crucial to optimize management programs by understanding the sublethal effects of effective insecticides like chlorantraniliprole on Aedes aegypti L. populations. For this purpose, a population of Ae. aegypti was reared in the laboratory for 15 generations then exposed to chlorantraniliprole and sublethal effects were studied on F1 and F2 generations. The following life history parameters were decreased significantly in exposed F1 and F2 generations compared to the control: larval duration, male longevity, female longevity, and oviposition days. The adult preoviposition and total preoviposition period did not differ significantly. The fecundity of Ae. aegypti in F1 generation decreased from 61 eggs/female in the control to 34 eggs/female in LC50. In conclusion, our findings demonstrate that sublethal doses of chlorantraniliprole have significant transgenerational effects on Ae. aegypti mosquitoes. The cautious usage of chlorantraniliprole is recommended for the effective management of mosquitoes and to lessen long-term influence on human health and the environment.

Abstract

Due to the quick development of insecticide resistance, it is crucial to optimize management programs by understanding the sublethal effects of effective insecticides like chlorantraniliprole on Aedes aegypti L. populations. Using age-stage and two-sex life tables, we investigated the sublethal impacts of chlorantraniliprole on Ae. aegypti. Larval duration in the progeny of exposed parents was reduced by 0.33–0.42 days, whereas, the longevity of male and female adults was decreased by 1.43–3.05 days. Similarly, the egg-laying capacity of F1 and F2 progeny of the exposed parents was significantly reduced from 27.3% to 41.2%. The mean generation time (T) increased up to 11.8% in exposed populations, and the net reproduction rate (Ro) decreased by 51.50–55.60%. After 24 h of chlorantraniliprole treatment, there was a significant increase in cytochrome P450 activity. Contrarily, the activity of glutathione S-transferase (GST) initially declined but started increasing after 48 h of treatment. This research highlights the importance of chlorantraniliprole in mosquito management, as well as the importance of considering sublethal effects when developing strategies to handle them. Having a thorough understanding of the harmful effects of insecticides on mosquito populations can greatly enhance the effectiveness of insecticide-based interventions, while also minimizing the risk of pest resurgence.

1. Introduction

The incidence of developing and reemerging mosquito-borne diseases has posed severe worldwide public health issues [1]. Outbreaks of mosquito-borne sicknesses, which include dengue, chikungunya, and Zika, have been an extreme burden on the economies, healthcare systems, and populations of the affected countries. Many cases have been documented in several Asian countries, including Indonesia, Vietnam, the Philippines, Bangladesh, and Malaysia. In October 2018, France and Spain reported the first dengue fever cases from within the country [2]. The fact that dengue fever has lately appeared in the United States and Japan suggests that it is no longer limited to tropical areas [3,4].
The effectiveness of mosquito control is hindered by a narrow range of insecticides and growing resistance to these insecticides [5], This has clear implications for the occurrence of diseases transmitted by Aedes aegypti L. (Diptera: Culicidae), such as dengue, yellow fever, chikungunya, and Zika fever [6]. Due to the quicker development of insecticide resistance, it is critical to assess insecticide use thoroughly. Although widespread insecticide usage in agriculture continues to fuel the rise of insecticide resistance, integrated pest management (IPM) programs stress the need for moderate pesticide use [7].
Chlorantraniliprole is considered one of the most effective insecticides in the group of ryanodine receptor modulators. It can effectively control lepidopteran pests, including those that have developed resistance to other pesticides [8]. Furthermore, there is a significant preference for ryanodine receptors present in insects as opposed to those present in vertebrates [9]. When ingested, chlorantraniliprole changes the activity of the ryanodine receptor, therefore causing calcium release from inside cells. The insect dies due to having stopped feeding, become sluggish, and developed paralysis in some muscles [10]. Furthermore, chlorantraniliprole most efficiently targets lepidopteran and some coleopteran and dipteran insects [11] while showing less toxicity to bees [12] as well as to most predatory and parasitic insects [13,14]. Because anthranilic diamides, including chlorantraniliprole, do not harm vertebrates [9] and have lower toxicity to many beneficial insects, these insecticides are good choices for controlling mosquitoes and other insect pests [15,16].
Sublethal doses are insecticide doses under the median lethal dose, i.e., LC50. These are not administered to gather mortality data; instead, their chronic effects are studied, which are characterized by deleterious physiological and/or behavioral changes leading to reduced fitness [17]. Sublethal behavioral and physiological changes brought on by insecticides may impact population dynamics. For instance, chemicals can reduce an insect’s life span and fecundity [17,18]. In contrast, research on other insect pests, including Frankliniella occidentalis Pergande (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) [19], Rhopalosiphum padi L. (Hemiptera: Aphididae) [20], and Myzus persicae [21], has shown that sublethal effects of insecticide exposure can enhance biotic potential. The phenomenon of insecticides causing a stimulatory effect is referred to as “insecticide-induced hormesis”. Hormesis is a phenomenon in which a small amount of a substance stimulates a response, whereas a big dose inhibits it. This response is a moderate overcompensation to a disturbance in the body’s balance or a direct stimulatory effect [22,23,24]. Understanding the overall effects on pests and the sublethal effects on non-targeted arthropods is thus of the utmost importance.
The lethal effects of pyrethroid-type insecticides on mosquitoes have been recently reviewed [25]; however, to our knowledge, the sublethal or hermetic effects of chlorantraniliprole in Ae. aegypti have not been examined. This study aims to obtain a comprehensive picture of the sublethal effects of chlorantraniliprole on different biological traits and demographic aspects of Ae. aegypti using the age-stage and two-sex life table. To maximize the use of this insecticide in control programs for Ae. aegypti and hence increase its efficacy, one must understand its hermetic or deleterious effect on subsequent generations.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Insect Rearing

Mosquitoes were collected from stagnant water in areas with low insecticide levels in the vicinity of Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, in areas where no or few insecticides were used, to minimize the effect of other factors before conducting this study according to the predefined methodology of an earlier study conducted by Rahman et al. [7]. Approximately 200 larvae from each strain were individually placed in plastic basins containing one liter of distilled water. Fish meal (TetraMin®) was consistently fed to the larvae every 5 days to satisfy their nutritional demands till pupation. A dosage of one gram was administered to each plastic basin. The pupae were carefully moved to wooden mesh adult cages (30 × 30 × 30 cm) for adult emergence. Adult Ae. aegypti were provided with a 10% (w/v) sugar solution. To provide female Ae. aegypti mosquitoes with blood, a pigeon (Columba livia L.) was placed in each cage three times weekly. To further aid in the depositing of eggs, each cage had filter paper placed in a glass beaker half-filled with water [7]. Mosquitoes were reared for more than 15 generations before starting the transgenerational experiments.

2.2. Insecticides

Coragen®, a commercially available formulation of chlorantraniliprole that is a 20% SC (suspension concentrates) imported by FMC Pvt. Ltd., Lahore, Pakistan was used in the study.

2.3. Mortality Bioassays

A larval bioassay was conducted to evaluate the toxicity of chlorantraniliprole [26]. A 600 mL stock solution of pesticide was made using distilled water. Seven concentrations were prepared from the stock solution, ranging from 0.15 to 4.8 mg/L (including one control). The concentrations selected were based on achieving a mortality range b (Version 1.0) etween 0% and 99% according to previously defined methodology. Three replicates were performed for each concentration, with each replicate consisting of 20 larvae. A total of 420 larvae were used in a bioassay, including the control. The cups were stored in a controlled laboratory environment at a temperature of 28 ± 2 °C and a relative humidity of 65 ± 5%. The death rate was evaluated 72 h after exposure.

2.4. Sublethal Effects on Demographic Features

The effect of a sublethal dose on the development of Ae. aegypti was evaluated after 15 generations, i.e., the 16th generation was labelled as F0 and used as the parent generation for bioassays (without selection pressure). Two sublethal concentrations (LC10 and LC30), one lethal concentration (LC50), and a control were used to study the effects on the F0, F1, and F2 generations. The modified approach of Shafi et al. [27] was employed for this purpose. Each concentration was used to inoculate 50 third-instar larvae. After a duration of 72 h, the individuals that remained alive from each of the three doses were cleaned and placed in a fresh larval container containing 1000 mL of tap water with larval feed (0.5 g every 2 days). After pupation, the pupae were transferred to a plastic container with 100 mL of tap water and then moved to a new adult cage for the purpose of hatching. After 5–6 days of adult emergence, the females were provided with a blood meal to facilitate egg laying. The eggs were collected from these mature individuals and then moved to a larval box to facilitate hatching. The oviposition of test female mosquitoes was individually induced in glass Petri dishes (6 cm in diameter) lined with moist filter paper.
The biological properties of all strains of Ae. aegypti (F1 and F2 reared at LC10, LC30, LC50, and the control) were individually investigated following Maimusa et al. [28]. Factors such as fecundity, fertility (the rate at which females lay eggs), and adult survival rate were considered. Fifty newly hatched first-instar larvae from each strain were placed inside a plastic basin filled with 500 mL of distilled water. The previously mentioned method was used to care for and raise the larvae. To facilitate the emergence of the adult insects, the pupae were moved to adult cages. Following the hatching of the adult mosquitoes from their larval stage, the researchers meticulously recorded the proportion of males to females. Mosquito adults were exposed to a 10% (w/v) sugar–water solution. The survival rate of several mosquito life cycle stages was monitored daily using assessments. The number of fertile females was recorded after 24 h. The quantity of eggs produced by each female was documented till the death of all individuals. The conditions for adult rearing are already mentioned above.

2.5. P450 and GST Activity

The approach employed by Habig et al. [29] was utilized to assess GST activity, utilizing 1 mmol/L 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene (CDNB) as the substrate for the reaction. Absorbance variations were observed over a duration of 4 min, recorded at 30 s intervals, specifically at a wavelength of 340 nm. The activity of P450 monooxygenase was assessed using the substrate p-nitroanisol in conjunction with the NADPH system, as described by Kristensen et al. [30]. The NADPH generating system comprised 12 mL of 100 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.5), 250 µL of 10 mM NADP, 250 µL of 100 mM glucose-6-phosphate, and 12 µL of 100 U glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase. An amount of 250 µL of PNA was incorporated into the NADPH generating system for the mixture. Each well comprised 100 µL of sample and 100 µL of the final cocktail. The reaction rate was assessed by monitoring the formation of PNA at 405 nm at a temperature of 37 °C, utilizing a kinetic program over 20 min, with measurements taken every 2 min and an initial lag time of 10 min.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Values for the 95% fiducial limit (FLs), chi-squared (X2), degree of freedom (df), and slope with standard error of chlorantraniliprole bioassays in Ae. aegypti were calculated for LC10, LC30, and LC50 by probit analysis using PoloPlus software (Version 1.0) [31]. The data were analyzed using the age-stage and two-sex life table hypothesis to create a life table. The population characteristics investigated in this work comprised the finite rate of rise (λ), the mean generation time (T), the net reproduction rate (R0), and the intrinsic rate of increase (r) [32,33,34,35].
The value of lxmx was calculated using the equation
x = 0 e r ( x + 1 ) l x m x = 1
Age-stage specific survival can be calculated using the statistical formula
l x = j = 1 k S x j
Ro was calculated using the equation
R 0 = x = 0 l x m x
The equation to determine the T value was
T = (In Ro)/r
The value of r was estimated by
x = 0 e r ( x + 1 ) l x m x = 1
The finite rate of increase was calculated by
Λ = er
The value exj was determined by
e xj = i = x j = y k S ij
The Vxj value was determined with equation
V x j = e - r ( x + 1 ) S x j i = x e - r ( i + 1 ) j = y k S i j f i j
The following life table parameters were measured: age-specific survival rate (lx); female age-specific fecundity (fx); age-specific fecundity (mx); mean fecundity of individuals at age x; and age-specific maternity (lxmx). The demographic variables, including R0, r, λ, and T, were determined using the TWOSEX-MSChart tool. We used the bootstrap procedure with a sample size of 100,000 to estimate the means, standard errors (SE), and variances. This approach yielded reduced variability in the results and a frequency distribution that followed a normal pattern. Furthermore, the variation in sample sizes did not impact the conclusions. Results with significant differences were compared by paired bootstrap testing [36]. The graphs were generated exclusively with SigmaPlot 12.0 (Systat Software Inc., San Jose, CA, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Toxicity of Chlorantraniliprole on Ae. aegypti Larvae

The LC50 value of chlorantraniliprole in the parental population of Ae. aegypti was 0.569 mg L−1, with 95% FLs of 0.483–0.663 mg L−1. The LC10 and LC30 values with their 95% FLs were 0.202 (0.145–0.257 mg L−1) and 0.373 (0.300–0.443 mg L−1), respectively, (Table 1). All three lethal concentration (LC) values were significantly different from each other, as their 95% FL values did not overlap. Sublethal tests were conducted using these values.

3.2. Sublethal Effects of Chlorantraniliprole on the Parental (F0) Generation

The control population had a higher survival rate than insecticide-treated Ae. aegypti populations. Control insects survived up to 45 days. In contrast, the survival rate in LC50 treatment fell to zero on the 27th day. Similarly, the control group had the most eggs (928), followed by LC10, LC30, and LC50 (Figure 1).

3.3. Transgenerational Effects of Chlorantraniliprole on Different Biological Parameters

A modest concentration of chlorantraniliprole had a significant effect on the time it took for the F1 generation of Ae. aegypti to grow and breed (Table 2). There were no significant variations in the time it took for eggs to hatch in either the F1 or F2 offspring of the populations. The control progenies showed significantly longer larval durations, ranging from 6.55 to 6.61 days. The F1 and F2 progenies of the LC50 treatment had significantly lower larval durations, ranging from 6.21 to 6.25 days. There were no significant differences in pupal lengths, APOP, or TPOP across the treatments’ progenies. Both male and female adults lived longer in the control offspring (F1 and F2) than the progenies treated. The control females produced significantly more eggs (59.34–61.08 eggs/female) than the females from the other treatments. Female insects subjected to the LC50 treatment deposited significantly fewer eggs, ranging from 34.78 to 38.55 per female, compared to the rest of the treatments (Table 2).

3.4. Population Parameters

The control group showed a higher intrinsic rate of increase (r) of 0.20/day, whereas the LC50-treated individuals had a lower rate of 0.18 (Table 3). The lambda (λ) values indicated that the finite rate of increase (per day) was not significantly affected. Individuals treated with LC50 had a net reproductive rate (R0) of 13.22–15.42 offspring per day, significantly lower than the control group’s 27.30–29.32 offspring per day. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding mean generation times. The treated groups had a considerably longer mean generation time than the LC50-treated groups (T = 16.47–16.58 days) (Table 3).

3.5. Age-Stage Specific Maternity (lxmx)

A fecundity (fx) peak of 10.58/day was registered for 13-day-old females of the control group. A decline became apparent between days 16 and 24. Over time, the age-specific survival rate (lx) of the control group declined, reaching approximately 45 days. The maximum age-specific fertility (mx) score was 5.08 on day 13 of the control treatment. The age-specific maternity rate (lxmx) drastically decreased in the LC50 treated individuals, from 4.78 offspring per day in the control group to 2.76 offspring per day (Figure 2 and Figure 3).

3.6. Effect of Chlorantraniliprole Exposure on Enzyme Activity

The enzymatic activity of Ae. aegypti detoxification metabolism enzymes (GST and P450) were enhanced following exposure to chlorantraniliprole at sublethal concentrations (Figure 4). The study revealed that the action of chlorantraniliprole is influenced by time, as evidenced by the correlation between GST activity and the duration of exposure (p < 0.05). Based on the findings, chlorantraniliprole exhibited a swift impact on reducing GST activities in the tested larvae within 24 h, specifically in the range of 130–230 nmol/min/mg protein. After 24 h of treatment, the GST activity in the control group increased to 316 nmol/min/mg protein. Significant increases in GST activity were detected in the treated larvae at 48 and 72 h (p < 0.05). The LC50 treatment had the highest level of activity.
Similarly, chlorantraniliprole showed an immediate impact on enhancing P450 activities in the test larvae within 24 h, ranging from 128 to 153 nmol/min/mg protein. After 24 h of treatment, mosquitoes of the control group exhibited reduced P450 activity, measuring 98 nmol/min/mg protein. A significant rise in P450 activity was detected in the treated larvae after 48 and 72 h (p < 0.05). The LC50 treatment exhibited the highest activity level, measuring at 381 nmol/min/mg protein.

4. Discussion

Using highly effective insecticides with minimal impact on non-target organisms is critical for effectively managing harmful insect populations [37]. The data indicated that the application of chlorantraniliprole had a substantial impact on decreasing the duration of the larval stage of mosquitoes (>5.00%). In addition, there was a significant decrease (>30.00%) in the oviposition period. The duration of the larvae was found to be considerably decreased in our study of sublethal treatments. Previous studies as conducted by Lutz et al. [38] found similar results, which suggested that giving chlorantraniliprole to Plutella xylostella L. at doses in sublethal doses resulted in a decrease in the oviposition period (about 50.00%). In previous studies conducted by Guo, chlorantraniliprole showed increased larval duration. The discrepancy may be due to the more susceptible generation used in our study (>15 generation). A more susceptible generation can have a more severe effect on the target insect population [39]. In the offspring of insects exposed to low doses of chlorantraniliprole, the decrease in male longevity was more than 20%, while the decrease in female longevity was more than 16%, and the number of eggs produced per female decreased by more than 40%. The results align with the studies conducted by Nawaz et al. [40] and Zhang et al. [41], which demonstrated a decline in the fecundity of exposed insects (40–50%) whose parents were subjected to chlorantraniliprole. Chlorantraniliprole exhibits persistent efficacy against many pests, such as the oblique banded leafroller, the grapevine moth, and white grubs [42]. Insects use significant amounts of energy to detoxify harmful chemicals from their bodies. This process has a negative impact on their growth and development, and there is a compromise in how they allocate their energy resources [43].
The net reproductive rate (R0) (>50%) and the mean generation time (>11%) were considerably reduced in the offspring of mosquitoes exposed to sublethal doses of chlorantraniliprole. Han et al. [44] found that important biological factors such as R0, T, and fecundity were drastically reduced when diamondback moths were exposed to a sublethal dose of chlorantraniliprole. Likewise, the lxmx was reduced in the insects that received sublethal amounts of chlorantraniliprole. Wang et al. [45] showed that treating P. xylostella with low doses of chlorantraniliprole resulted in suppressed feeding, reduced egg hatching, and increased mortality. Estimating the population characteristics of insects can provide insights into their relative fitness, which in turn aids in predicting their environmental adaptability, proliferation, and decline [34,46].
When pests take insecticides, they undergo physiological changes to detoxify and remove the toxins [47,48]. The identification of the origin of pesticide resistance can be aided by evaluating detoxifying enzymes. These enzymes convert and break down pesticide compounds, reducing their harmful effects or protecting insect target areas by preventing their action [49]. After 24 h, GST activity in mosquitoes of all three treated groups decreased compared to activity in mosquitoes of the control group, but afterwards GST activity increased. Similar GST activity has also been reported by Gui et al. [50] in silkworms. Initially decreased and then increased activity can be attributed to initial detoxification overload, cellular stress response, and adaptive response [51,52]. A significantly increased activity of the P450 enzyme was observed immediately after 24 h of treatment in treated groups compared to the control. The results are in agreement with the previous study conducted by Cao et al. [53] and Haas et al. [54], where an increased level of P450 was found after the application of chlorantraniliprole. The findings indicated that P450 had a role in the detoxification of chlorogenic acid, as reported by Wang et al. [55]. Exposure to stress caused by sublethal concentrations can diminish the capacity of the detoxifying metabolism. The detoxification capacity is typically associated with heightened resistance to insecticides and instances of failure in field management [56].
Using Ae. aegypti as a model organism, this study provides thorough observations on the toxicity and sublethal effects of chlorantraniliprole, thereby laying a strong basis for understanding its consequences in mosquito control. This paradigm also fits other mosquito species. While controlled conditions yield precise results, later studies can investigate field-based studies to grasp long-term dynamics and more general ecological consequences. Moreover, investigating interactions with other control techniques and environmental factors could help to better incorporate them into integrated pest management plans, thereby strengthening the basis for more effective and sustainable mosquito control.

5. Conclusions

The study demonstrated that sublethal doses of chlorantraniliprole significantly affected the development time and fecundity of the F1 generation of Ae. aegypti mosquitoes. Exposure to chlorantraniliprole increased the activity of detoxification metabolism enzymes: specifically, GST and P450 activities rose following treatment with sublethal amounts of the drug. Chlorantraniliprole has demonstrated long-term residual efficacy against Ae. aegypti mosquitoes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.N.; methodology, N.B.; software, M.N.N.; validation, A.N. and Z.M.A.D.; formal analysis, A.A. and N.B.; investigation, M.N.N. and F.B.; funding acquisition, A.N., F.B. and R.M.; resources, M.A., M.N.N. and R.M.; data curation, M.A., A.N. and Z.M.A.D. The first draft of the manuscript was written by N.B. and F.B. The final draft reviewing and editing was done by M.A., A.N., A.A. and R.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Taif University, Saudi Arabia, Project No. (TU-DSPP-2024-164) and by a Lithuanian state grant through the Nature Research Centre, program 2 Climate and Eco-systems, Vilnius, Lithuania, available to R.M.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Taif University, Saudi Arabia, for supporting this work through project number (TU-DSPP-2024-164).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Statement

All methods related to the handling, treatment, and care of animals adhered to institutional and national animal ethical requirements. Before the commencement of the research, the experimental design and protocols were evaluated and sanctioned by MNS University of Agriculture, Multan ethical board.

References

  1. Wang, G.-H.; Gamez, S.; Raban, R.R.; Marshall, J.M.; Alphey, L.; Li, M.; Rasgon, J.L.; Akbari, O.S. Combating mosquito-borne diseases using genetic control technologies. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 4388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Fernández-Martínez, B.; Pampaka, D.; Suárez-Sánchez, P.; Figuerola, J.; Sierra, M.J.; León-Gomez, I.; Del Aguila, J.; Gómez-Barroso, D. Spatial analysis for risk assessment of dengue in Spain. Enferm. Infecc. Microbiol. Clin. 2024, 42, 406–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Radke, E.G.; Gregory, C.J.; Kintziger, K.W.; Sauber-Schatz, E.K.; Hunsperger, E.A.; Gallagher, G.R.; Barber, J.M.; Biggerstaff, B.J.; Stanek, D.R.; Tomashek, K.M. Dengue outbreak in key west, Florida, USA, 2009. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2012, 18, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Furuya, H. Estimation of reproduction number and probable vector density of the first autochthonous dengue outbreak in Japan in the last 70 years. Environ. Health Prev. Med. 2015, 20, 466–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Read, A.F.; Lynch, P.A.; Thomas, M.B. How to make evolution-proof insecticides for malaria control. PLoS Biol. 2009, 7, e1000058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Liu, N. Insecticide resistance in mosquitoes: Impact, mechanisms, and research directions. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2015, 60, 537–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rahman, R.U.; Souza, B.; Uddin, I.; Carrara, L.; Brito, L.P.; Costa, M.M.; Mahmood, M.A.; Khan, S.; Lima, J.B.P.; Martins, A.J. Insecticide resistance and underlying targets-site and metabolic mechanisms in Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus from Lahore, Pakistan. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 4555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Cordova, D.; Benner, E.; Sacher, M.; Rauh, J.; Sopa, J.; Lahm, G.; Selby, T.; Stevenson, T.; Flexner, L.; Gutteridge, S. Anthranilic diamides: A new class of insecticides with a novel mode of action, ryanodine receptor activation. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2006, 84, 196–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, J.; Li, Y.; Han, Z.; Zhu, Y.; Xie, Z.; Wang, J.; Liu, Y.; Li, X. Molecular characterization of a ryanodine receptor gene in the rice leaffolder, Cnaphalocrocis medinalis (Guenée). PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e36623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lahm, G.P.; Selby, T.P.; Freudenberger, J.H.; Stevenson, T.M.; Myers, B.J.; Seburyamo, G.; Smith, B.K.; Flexner, L.; Clark, C.E.; Cordova, D. Insecticidal anthranilic diamides: A new class of potent ryanodine receptor activators. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2005, 15, 4898–4906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lanka, S.; Ottea, J.; Beuzelin, J.; Stout, M. Effects of chlorantraniliprole and thiamethoxam rice seed treatments on egg numbers and first instar survival of Lissorhoptrus oryzophilus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 2013, 106, 181–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Zhu, Y.C.; Adamczyk, J.; Rinderer, T.; Yao, J.; Danka, R.; Luttrell, R.; Gore, J. Spray toxicity and risk potential of 42 commonly used formulations of row crop pesticides to adult honey bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 2015, 108, 2640–2647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Larson, J.L.; Redmond, C.T.; Potter, D.A. Impacts of a neonicotinoid, neonicotinoid–pyrethroid premix, and anthranilic diamide insecticide on four species of turf-inhabiting beneficial insects. Ecotoxicology 2014, 23, 252–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Whalen, R.; Herbert, D.; Malone, S.; Kuhar, T.; Brewster, C.; Reisig, D. Effects of diamide insecticides on predators in soybean. J. Econ. Entomol. 2016, 109, 2014–2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lahm, G.P.; Stevenson, T.M.; Selby, T.P.; Freudenberger, J.H.; Dubas, C.M.; Smith, B.K.; Cordova, D.; Flexner, L.; Clark, C.E.; Bellin, C.A. RynaxypyrTM: A new anthranilic diamide insecticide acting at the ryanodine receptor. In Pesticide Chemistry: Crop Protection, Public Health, Environmental Safety; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 2007; pp. 111–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liu, Y.; Gao, Y.; Liang, G.; Lu, Y. Chlorantraniliprole as a candidate pesticide used in combination with the attracticides for lepidopteran moths. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0180255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Desneux, N.; Decourtye, A.; Delpuech, J.-M. The sublethal effects of pesticides on beneficial arthropods. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2007, 52, 81–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lee, C.-Y. Sublethal effects of insecticides on longevity, fecundity and behaviour of insect pests: A review. J. Biosci. 2000, 11, 107–112. Available online: https://www.ucrleelab.com/uploads/2/4/3/5/24359966/034.pdf (accessed on 5 August 2024).
  19. Gong, Y.; Xu, B.; Zhang, Y.; Gao, X.; Wu, Q. Demonstration of an adaptive response to preconditioning Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) to sublethal doses of spinosad: A hormetic-dose response. Ecotoxicology 2015, 24, 1141–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lu, Y.-H.; Zheng, X.-S.; Gao, X.-W. Sublethal effects of imidacloprid on the fecundity, longevity, and enzyme activity of Sitobion avenae (Fabricius) and Rhopalosiphum padi (Linnaeus). Bull. Entom. Res. 2016, 106, 551–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ayyanath, M.-M.; Cutler, G.C.; Scott-Dupree, C.D.; Sibley, P.K. Transgenerational shifts in reproduction hormesis in green peach aphid exposed to low concentrations of imidacloprid. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e74532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Calabrese, E.J. Paradigm lost, paradigm found: The re-emergence of hormesis as a fundamental dose response model in the toxicological sciences. Environ. Pollut. 2005, 138, 378–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Calabrese, E.J.; Baldwin, L.A. Toxicology rethinks its central belief. Nature 2003, 421, 691–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Cutler, G.C. Insects, insecticides and hormesis: Evidence and considerations for study. Dose Response 2013, 11, 154–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Andreazza, F.; Oliveira, E.E.; Martins, G.F. Implications of sublethal insecticide exposure and the development of resistance on mosquito physiology, behavior, and pathogen transmission. Insects 2021, 12, 917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hariprasad, T.; Shetty, N. Sublethal and transgenerational effects of alphamethrin on life history traits of Anopheles stephensi (Diptera: Culicidae), a malaria mosquito. Can. Entomol. 2017, 149, 251–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Shafi, M.S.; Iqbal, N.; Naqqash, M.N.; Saeed, S.; Usman, M.; Abid, A.D.; Shahzad, M.S.; Riaz, H.; Bashir, M.A.; Alajmi, R.A. Transgenerational effect of Afidopyropen on Bemisia tabaci Gennadius (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 19988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Maimusa, H.A.; Ahmad, A.H.; Kassim, N.F.A.; Rahim, J. Age-stage, two-sex life table characteristics of Aedes albopictus and Aedes Aegypti in Penang Island, Malaysia. J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc. 2016, 32, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Habig, W.H.; Pabst, M.J.; Jakoby, W.B. Glutathione S-transferases: The first enzymatic step in mercapturic acid formation. J. Biol. Chem. 1974, 249, 7130–7139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kristensen, M.; Jespersen, J.B.; Knorr, M. Cross-resistance potential of fipronil in Musca domestica. Pest Manag. Sci. 2004, 60, 894–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. LeOra Software. Polo-Plus, POLO for Windows, Version 107 B St, 94952; LeOra Software: Petaluma, CA, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  32. Chi, H.; Liu, H. Two new methods for the study of insect population ecology. Bull. Inst. Zool. Acad. Sin. 1985, 24, 225–240. Available online: http://140.120.197.173/ecology/Papers/04-1985-Chi-Liu-2011%20ver.pdf (accessed on 5 August 2024).
  33. Chi, H. Life-table analysis incorporating both sexes and variable development rates among individuals. Environ. Entomol. 1988, 17, 26–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chi, H.; Su, H.-Y. Age-stage, two-sex life tables of Aphidius gifuensis (Ashmead) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) and its host Myzus persicae (Sulzer)(Homoptera: Aphididae) with mathematical proof of the relationship between female fecundity and the net reproductive rate. Environ. Entomol. 2006, 35, 10–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Tuan, S.J.; Lee, C.C.; Chi, H. Population and damage projection of Spodoptera litura (F.) on peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.) under different conditions using the age-stage, two-sex life table. Pest Manag. Sci. 2014, 70, 805–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Chi, H. TWOSEX-MSChart: A Computer Program for the Age-Stage, Two-Sex Life Table Analysis; National Chung Hsing University in Taiwan: Taichung City, Taiwan, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  37. Sudhakar, N.; Thajuddin, N.; Murugesan, K. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacterial mediated protection of tomato in the field against cucumber mosaic virus and its vector Aphis gossypii. Biocontrol Sci. 2011, 21, 367–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lutz, A.L.; Bertolaccini, I.; Scotta, R.R.; Curis, M.C.; Favaro, M.A.; Fernandez, L.N.; Sánchez, D.E. Lethal and sublethal effects of chlorantraniliprole on Spodoptera cosmioides (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Pest Manag. Sci. 2018, 74, 2817–2821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Naqqash, M.N.; Gökçe, A.; Bakhsh, A.; Salim, M. Demographic features and population projection of resistant and susceptible populations of Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Phytoparasitica 2023, 51, 559–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Nawaz, M.; Cai, W.; Jing, Z.; Zhou, X.; Mabubu, J.I.; Hua, H. Toxicity and sublethal effects of chlorantraniliprole on the development and fecundity of a non-specific predator, the multicolored Asian lady beetle, Harmonia axyridis (Pallas). Chemosphere 2017, 178, 496–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhang, X.; Hu, C.; Wu, L.; Chen, W. Transgenerational sublethal effects of chlorantraniliprole and emamectin benzoate on the development and reproduction of Spodoptera frugiperda. Insects 2023, 14, 537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sial, A.A.; Brunner, J.F. Toxicity and residual efficacy of chlorantraniliprole, spinetoram, and emamectin benzoate to obliquebanded leafroller (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 2010, 103, 1277–1285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Jager, T.; Barsi, A.; Ducrot, V. Hormesis on life-history traits: Is there such thing as a free lunch? Ecotoxicology 2013, 22, 263–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Han, W.; Zhang, S.; Shen, F.; Liu, M.; Ren, C.; Gao, X. Residual toxicity and sublethal effects of chlorantraniliprole on Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). Pest Manag. Sci. 2012, 68, 1184–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wang, X.; Li, X.; Shen, A.; Wu, Y. Baseline susceptibility of the diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) to chlorantraniliprole in China. J. Econ. Entomol. 2010, 103, 843–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Chen, X.; Ma, K.; Li, F.; Liang, P.; Liu, Y.; Guo, T.; Song, D.; Desneux, N.; Gao, X. Sublethal and transgenerational effects of sulfoxaflor on the biological traits of the cotton aphid, Aphis gossypii Glover (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Ecotoxicology 2016, 25, 1841–1848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Luo, C.; Jones, C.; Devine, G.; Zhang, F.; Denholm, I.; Gorman, K. Insecticide resistance in Bemisia tabaci biotype Q (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) from China. Crop Prot. 2010, 29, 429–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Horowitz, A.R.; Ghanim, M.; Roditakis, E.; Nauen, R.; Ishaaya, I. Insecticide resistance and its management in Bemisia tabaci species. J. Pest Sci. 2020, 93, 893–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Rane, R.V.; Ghodke, A.B.; Hoffmann, A.A.; Edwards, O.R.; Walsh, T.K.; Oakeshott, J.G. Detoxifying enzyme complements and host use phenotypes in 160 insect species. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 2019, 31, 131–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Gui, Z.; Hou, C.; Liu, T.; Qin, G.; Li, M.; Jin, B. Effects of insect viruses and pesticides on glutathione S-transferase activity and gene expression in Bombyx mori. J. Econ. Entomol. 2009, 102, 1591–1598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Alias, Z. The role of glutathione transferases in the development of insecticide resistance. Insectic. Resist. 2016, 315, 61972. [Google Scholar]
  52. Aioub, A.A.; Hashem, A.S.; El-Sappah, A.H.; El-Harairy, A.; Abdel-Hady, A.A.; Al-Shuraym, L.A.; Sayed, S.; Huang, Q.; Abdel-Wahab, S.I. Identification and characterization of glutathione S-transferase genes in Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) under insecticides stress. Toxics 2023, 11, 542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Cao, G.; Jia, M.; Zhao, X.; Wang, L.; Tu, X.; Wang, G.; Nong, X.; Zhang, Z. Effects of chlorantraniliprole on detoxification enzymes activities in Locusta migratoria L. J. Asia Pac. Entomol. 2017, 20, 741–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Haas, J.; Glaubitz, J.; Koenig, U.; Nauen, R. A mechanism-based approach unveils metabolic routes potentially mediating chlorantraniliprole synergism in honey bees, Apis mellifera L., by azole fungicides. Pest Manag. Sci. 2022, 78, 965–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Wang, R.; Zhang, Q.; Qu, C.; Wang, Q.; Wang, J.; Luo, C. Toxicity, baseline of susceptibility, detoxifying mechanism and sublethal effects of chlorogenic acid, a potential botanical insecticide, on Bemisia tabaci. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1150853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Voudouris, C.C.; Kati, A.N.; Sadikoglou, E.; Williamson, M.; Skouras, P.J.; Dimotsiou, O.; Georgiou, S.; Fenton, B.; Skavdis, G.; Margaritopoulos, J.T. Insecticide resistance status of Myzus persicae in Greece: Long-term surveys and new diagnostics for resistance mechanisms. Pest Manag. Sci. 2016, 72, 671–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Effect of different concentrations (LC10, LC30, LC50, and control) of chlorantraniliprole on survival rate (a) and fecundity (b) of parental generation (F0) of Ae. aegypti.
Figure 1. Effect of different concentrations (LC10, LC30, LC50, and control) of chlorantraniliprole on survival rate (a) and fecundity (b) of parental generation (F0) of Ae. aegypti.
Insects 15 00851 g001
Figure 2. Survival rate (lx), maternity rate (mx), and their product (lxmx) in the F1 progeny of chlorantraniliprole-treated larvae of Ae. aegypti. Control (a), LC10 (b), LC30 (c), and LC50 (d).
Figure 2. Survival rate (lx), maternity rate (mx), and their product (lxmx) in the F1 progeny of chlorantraniliprole-treated larvae of Ae. aegypti. Control (a), LC10 (b), LC30 (c), and LC50 (d).
Insects 15 00851 g002
Figure 3. Survival rate (lx), maternity rate (mx) and their product (lxmx) in the F2 progeny of chlorantraniliprole-treated larvae of Ae. aegypti. Control (a), LC10 (b), LC30 (c), and LC50 (d).
Figure 3. Survival rate (lx), maternity rate (mx) and their product (lxmx) in the F2 progeny of chlorantraniliprole-treated larvae of Ae. aegypti. Control (a), LC10 (b), LC30 (c), and LC50 (d).
Insects 15 00851 g003aInsects 15 00851 g003b
Figure 4. (a) GST and (b) P450 activity in Ae. aegypti larvae treated with chlorantraniliprole. Each value represents the mean (±SE) of five replications. Different letters over the bars indicate a significant difference at p < 0.05 (Tukey’s HSD).
Figure 4. (a) GST and (b) P450 activity in Ae. aegypti larvae treated with chlorantraniliprole. Each value represents the mean (±SE) of five replications. Different letters over the bars indicate a significant difference at p < 0.05 (Tukey’s HSD).
Insects 15 00851 g004
Table 1. Toxicity of chlorantraniliprole against Ae. aegypti.
Table 1. Toxicity of chlorantraniliprole against Ae. aegypti.
InsecticideNLC10
(95% FL)
(mg L−1)
LC30
(95% FL)
(mg L−1)
LC50
(95% FL)
(mg L−1)
X2DfSlope ± SEp-Value
Chlorantraniliprole3600.202
(0.145–0.257)
0.373
(0.300–0.443)
0.569
(0.483–0.663)
3.58162.85 ± 0.290.22
N = total number.
Table 2. Fecundity and duration of various life-history parameters (mean ± SE) of the progeny of chlorantraniliprole-treated populations of Ae. aegypti.
Table 2. Fecundity and duration of various life-history parameters (mean ± SE) of the progeny of chlorantraniliprole-treated populations of Ae. aegypti.
ParametersProgenyTreatments
ControlLC10LC30LC50
Egg (days)F12.32 ± 0.25 aA2.39 ± 0.28 aA2.46 ± 0.33 aA2.64 ± 0.38 aA
F22.19 ± 0.25 aA2.21 ± 0.30 aA2.40 ± 0.32 aA2.52 ± 0.35 aA
Larva (days)F16.61 ± 0.07 aA6.33 ± 0.08 bA6.38 ± 0.07 bA6.25 ± 0.09 bA
F26.55 ± 0.07 aA6.14 ± 0.08 bB6.42 ± 0.07 aA6.21 ± 0.05 bA
Pupa (days)F12.71 ± 0.06 aA2.42 ± 0.07 aB2.53 ± 0.06 aA2.44 ± 0.08 aA
F22.48 ± 0.08 aA2.68 ± 0.07 aA2.43 ± 0.06 aA2.36 ± 0.07 aA
Male longevity (days)F140.95 ± 1.10 aA37.25 ± 1.08 bA32.83 ± 1.08 bA32.58 ± 1.06 cA
F240.20 ± 1.15 aA37.45 ± 1.13 aA34.38 ± 1.01 bA33.88 ± 1.17 bA
Female longevity (days)F140.33 ± 0.82 aA36.18 ± 1.30 bA34.80 ± 0.87 bA33.73 ± 0.98 bA
F239.82 ± 0.89 aA36.09 ± 1.33 bA35.81 ± 0.81 bA34.20 ± 1.36 bA
Oviposition daysF12.69 ± 0.11 aA2.58 ± 0.13 aA2.25 ± 0.16 bA1.84 ± 0.14 cA
F22.65 ± 0.11 aA2.56 ± 0.13 bA2.23 ± 0.15 bA1.90 ± 0.13 cA
APOP (days)F12.73 ± 0.09 aA2.85 ± 0.11 aA2.70 ± 0.08 aA2.61 ± 0.06 aA
F22.71 ± 0.06 aA2.81 ± 0.11 aA2.59 ± 0.08 aA2.57 ± 0.13 aA
TPOP (days)F112.66 ± 0.07 aA13.78 ± 0.09 aA13.30 ± 0.13 aA13.90 ± 0.05 aA
F212.90 ± 0.07 aA13.27 ± 0.08 aA13.01 ± 0.05 aB12.95 ± 0.07 aB
Fecundity (eggs/
female)
F161.08 ± 3.98 aA48.81 ± 3.74 bA44.04 ± 3.80 bA34.78 ± 3.24 cA
F259.34 ± 4.02 aA52.81 ± 3.96 aA47.18 ± 4.02 bA38.55 ± 3.32 bA
APOP: Adult pre-oviposition period of a female adult; TPOP: Total pre-oviposition period of female counted from birth. Means in the same row followed by different small letters or means in the column followed by different capital letters are significantly different (p < 0.05) using the bootstrap test.
Table 3. Influence of chlorantraniliprole on demographic parameters (mean ± SE) of the progeny of Ae. aegypti.
Table 3. Influence of chlorantraniliprole on demographic parameters (mean ± SE) of the progeny of Ae. aegypti.
ParametersProgenyTreatments
ControlLC10LC30LC50
rF10.20 ± 0.01 aA0.18 ± 0.02 aA0.18 ± 0.02 aA0.17 ± 0.01 aA
F20.20 ± 0.01 aA0.20 ± 0.01 aA0.19 ± 0.01 aA0.18 ± 0.02 aA
λF11.22 ± 0.02 aA1.20 ± 0.01 aA1.20 ± 0.01 aA1.19 ± 0.02 aA
F21.22 ± 0.01 aA1.22 ± 0.01 aA1.21 ± 0.01 aA1.20 ± 0.02 aA
R0F129.32 ± 4.69 aA21.48 ± 3.79 bA18.50 ± 3.46 bA13.22 ± 2.67 cA
F227.30 ± 4.57 aA23.24 ± 4.09 bA20.76 ± 3.73 bA15.42 ± 2.97 cA
TF116.58 ± 0.27 aA16.63 ± 0.21 aA15.73 ± 0.29 bA14.70 ± 0.33 cA
F216.47 ± 0.24 aA16.05 ± 0.27 aB15.34 ± 0.28 bA14.98 ± 0.33 bA
r = The intrinsic rate of increase (per day). λ = The finite rate of increase (per day). R0 = The net reproductive rate (offspring/individual). T = The mean generation time (days). Using the bootstrap, means in the same row followed by different small letters or means in the column followed by different capital letters are statistically different (p < 0.05).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Batool, N.; Abubakar, M.; Noureldeen, A.; Naqqash, M.N.; Alghamdi, A.; Al Dhafar, Z.M.; Baakdah, F.; Mozūratis, R. Toxicity and Sublethal Effect of Chlorantraniliprole on Multiple Generations of Aedes aegypti L. (Diptera: Culicidae). Insects 2024, 15, 851. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15110851

AMA Style

Batool N, Abubakar M, Noureldeen A, Naqqash MN, Alghamdi A, Al Dhafar ZM, Baakdah F, Mozūratis R. Toxicity and Sublethal Effect of Chlorantraniliprole on Multiple Generations of Aedes aegypti L. (Diptera: Culicidae). Insects. 2024; 15(11):851. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15110851

Chicago/Turabian Style

Batool, Nimra, Muhammad Abubakar, Ahmed Noureldeen, Muhammad Nadir Naqqash, Akram Alghamdi, Zamzam M. Al Dhafar, Fadi Baakdah, and Raimondas Mozūratis. 2024. "Toxicity and Sublethal Effect of Chlorantraniliprole on Multiple Generations of Aedes aegypti L. (Diptera: Culicidae)" Insects 15, no. 11: 851. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15110851

APA Style

Batool, N., Abubakar, M., Noureldeen, A., Naqqash, M. N., Alghamdi, A., Al Dhafar, Z. M., Baakdah, F., & Mozūratis, R. (2024). Toxicity and Sublethal Effect of Chlorantraniliprole on Multiple Generations of Aedes aegypti L. (Diptera: Culicidae). Insects, 15(11), 851. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15110851

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop