Next Article in Journal
Impact of Ultraviolet Radiation on Growth, Development and Antioxidant Enzymes of Tuta absoluta (Meyrick)
Previous Article in Journal
Diet Diversification in Bombyx mori Larvae: The Impact of Dandelion on Nutritional and Bioactive Profiles for Targeted Farming Goals
Previous Article in Special Issue
Mass Trapping Lepidopteran Pests with Light Traps, with Focus on Tortricid Forest Pests: What If?
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Cost-Effective Monitoring of Spruce Budworm Larvae

1
Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service-Atlantic Forestry Centre, P.O. Box 4000, Fredericton, NB E3B 5P7, Canada
2
Ministère des Forêts, de la Faune, et des Parcs, Direction de la Protection des Forêts, Service de la Gestion des Ravageurs Forestiers, 2700 rue Einstein, Québec, QC G1P 3W8, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2025, 16(2), 108; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16020108
Submission received: 17 December 2024 / Revised: 10 January 2025 / Accepted: 16 January 2025 / Published: 22 January 2025

Simple Summary

Infestations of spruce budworm (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) have historically been managed using aerial applications of microbial insecticide aimed to kill larvae and keep trees alive. The decision to spray is guided by aerial maps of defoliation combined with estimates of overwintering second instars per branch, using a threshold of 20 individuals. By definition, forest stands within and close to defoliated areas are prime targets of foliage protection; sites far from defoliation are less relevant to short-term management. Estimates of risk parameterized relative to distance to aerial defoliation indicated that forest blocks > 15 km away from defoliation can be sampled every second year as opposed to every year, corresponding to annual saving of ca. CAD 40,000.

Abstract

The spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana Clem. (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), is the most severe defoliator of balsam fir (Abies balsamea) in eastern Canada and northeast U.S.A. A large budworm outbreak is currently underway in the province of Québec, with 10.5 million hectares defoliated in 2023, up 14.1% from the year before. Populations of budworms are controlled using management guidelines of Forest Protection Strategy (FPS); the approach aims at killing defoliating larvae with aerial application of microbial insecticide, with the objective to limit defoliation and prevent tree mortality. The decision to treat/not treat a given forest block is based, in part, on local density of overwintering second instars (L2) collected at ca. 600 sampling points each year across the entire province at a cost of CAD 350 for three branches per site; the threshold for FPS (TFPS) corresponds to 20 L2/branch. Aerial defoliation maps also guide management decisions because FPS generally target areas within or in the vicinity of defoliated forest stands. Budworm abundance rapidly declines with distance to aerial defoliation (in km), to the extent that larval density rarely attains TFPS outside the core range of FPS (>15 km from defoliation). A cost-effective monitoring approach is proposed whereby forest blocks outside the core range of FPS are sampled every second year (as opposed to every year), representing a potential economy of CAD 40,000 annually.

1. Introduction

Worldwide resource management of Tortricidae pests is, by definition, very costly when considering (1) the large number of pest species; (2) the multiplicity and economic value of crop plants involved; and (3) the vast spatial extent of infestation [1,2,3,4]. In orchards of apples and other pome fruits, for example, the codling moth (Cydia pomonella) is present on all continents and causes severe damage (near total crop loss) because fruits infested by larvae are unmarketable [5,6]; indirect damage caused by tortricid leafrollers/defoliators also results in significant yield loss [7,8,9]. In Nearctic boreal forests, several species in the Choristoneura genus are major defoliators of conifers [10,11].
For both agricultural and forest tortricid pests, monitoring pest abundance is critical to forecast damage and implement management strategies. The primary objective of monitoring is to inform pest management decisions as to whether to treat or not treat a given site based on local abundance of pests; treatment is defined in generic terms and includes all control measures available for specific pest–crop associations. Management decisions are often anchored by economic thresholds, defined as the minimum pest density beyond which the benefits of treatment (increased yield/reduced tree mortality) outweigh the cost of treatment [12,13]. An exhaustive review of population monitoring in Tortricidae is beyond the scope of this study, considering the large number of pests in this taxonomic group (>687 species as of 1994) [2].
The spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana Clemens, is the most severe pest of conifers in North America, as indicated by intensity of defoliation, correlated tree mortality, and vast geographic extent of outbreaks [14,15,16,17]. Eruptive population dynamics of spruce budworms are characterized by synchronous oscillations from endemic to epidemic phases, which tend to co-occur in space and time [18,19,20]. A large budworm outbreak is currently underway in the Canadian province of Québec (QC), characterized by high larval density and vast geographic extent of defoliation (>10.5 million ha in 2023, up 14.1% from the year before) [21,22,23].
Management of spruce budworm in QC is based on guidelines of Forest Protection Strategy (FPS), an approach aimed at killing late-feeding instars with the microbial insecticide Bacillus thurigiensis kurstaki (Btk) applied from the air; the ultimate objective of FPS is to protect current-year foliage of defoliated trees/prevent tree mortality in valuable forest stands [24,25,26]. Factors that influence the decision to apply Btk include the logistics of aerial treatments, ongoing schedule of harvesting, monetary value of forests to be protected, adverse effects of Btk on local community of non-target Lepidoptera, sylvicultural attributes, and proximity to waterways [27,28,29,30,31,32].
Prioritizing forest stands targeted for FPS is also guided by estimates of budworm overwintering second instars (L2) at a cost of CAD 350 per site (including field collection of three branches per site and laboratory processing of branches for L2 assessment). During the last decade (2013 to 2022), abundance of L2 was evaluated at an average of 600 sites per year, corresponding to an overall cost exceeding CAD 2 million. Cost-saving measures are proposed whereby L2 counts are integrated with a spatial variable component (di: nearest distance to defoliated area, in km) negatively correlated with larval abundance [33,34].
Specific research objective is to quantify risk/relevance to FPS (Ȓi) of any forest stand on a per-year basis, using a conservative threshold T of 20 L2/branch (TFPS) [22,24,29]. For any site in year i, the management decision at hand is to determine whether (Ȓi = 1) or not (Ȓi = 0) it should be sampled in year i + 1. Estimates of Ȓi are parameterized using historical data collected during a ten-year interval, focusing on probabilistic functions that larval density in offspring generations (L2i+1) exceeds TFPS for any combination of larval density in parental generations (L2i) and distance to defoliation (di).
Ȓi~P (L2i+1 > TFPS) (L2i,di)
Defoliated forest stands (di = 0) are de facto prime targets of FPS and assigned a value of Ȓi = 1, implying that they need to be sampled every year. In contrast, sites away from defoliation with low budworm density are less relevant to FPS (Ȓi~0) and may thus be sampled every second year. The proposed cost-saving approach infers the threshold distance to defoliation beyond which sites do not need to be sampled on a per-year basis.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sources of Data

The data reported in the study are part of an ongoing survey in QC that combines densities of L2 and defoliation maps to guide management of spruce budworm. The survey targets forest stands with balsam fir, Abies balsamea (L.), and spruces, Picea sp., as dominant or co-dominant tree species (detailed description of sampling procedures in [21,22]); only balsam fir data are included in the analyses due to the overall low number of spruce samples.
Spruce budworm aerial defoliation polygons for the years 2013 to 2023 were acquired from the Québec open data portal (https://www.donneesquebec.ca/recherche/fr/dataset/donnees-sur-les-perturbations-naturelles-insecte-tordeuse-des-bourgeons-de-lepinette (accessed on 11 June 2024)). The spatial location of each sampling point was provided by Ministère des Forêts, de la Faune et des Parcs. A custom ArcGIS.Net application (version 10.8.1) was written to calculate the distance between each sampling point and its nearest incidence to aerial defoliation polygons in the associated survey year (di, in km). Defoliation intensity (light, moderate, or severe) is not included in analysis.

2.2. Statistical Analyses

Analyses were conducted with the SAS software (version 9); estimates of L2 abundance and distance to defoliation were subjected to logarithmic transformations to reduce heterogeneity of variance. The units of observation consist of 6091 triplets collected between 2013 and 2014 and 2022 and 2023, with each triplet corresponding to a given site with estimates of L2 in two consecutive years (i, i + 1) coupled with known distance to aerial defoliation in year i. Data were analyzed with glm and logistic procedures of SAS.
L2i+1 = β0 + β1 L2i + β2 di
P (L2i+1 > TFPS) = e (α0+α1L2i+α2di)/[1 + {e(α0+α1L2i+α2di)}]
Logistically, it is assumed more practical to prioritize sites to be sampled/treated along distance classes as opposed to larval density with presumed ‘scattered’ spatial distribution. The data on the distance to defoliation were thus divided into ten class dci bounded with multiples of 5 km [dci = 0 for sites in defoliated areas, N = 1449; dci = 5 for 0 < di < 5 km, N = 576; dci = 15 for 5 < di < 15 km, N = 557; dci = 25 for 15 < di < 25 km, N = 471; dci = 40 for 25 < di < 40 km, N = 594; dci = 55 for 40 < di < 55 km, N = 403; dci = 75 for 55 < di < 75 km, N = 491; dci = 100 for 75 < di < 100 km, N = 510; dci = 140 for 100 < di < 140 km, N = 558; dci = 200 for di > 140 km, N = 482]. For each distance class, year-to-year variation in L2i/P (L2i+1 > TFPS) (separated analyses) was derived with glm/logistic procedures of SAS.
L2i = θ + θi (dci)
P (L2i+1 > TFPS) = e (ϕ+ϕi)/[1 + {e(ϕ+ϕi)}] (dci)
For any combination of year/distance class, relevance to FPS (Ȓci) was inferred with revised Equation (1):
Ȓci = ki {P (L2i+1 > TFPS) (dci)}
The parameter k was used to standardize data for each pair of year using P (L2i+1 > TFPS) in defoliated areas as the point of reference:
ki = 1/P (L2i+1 > TFPS) (dci 0)
The rules of thumb used to visualize the complex dataset at hand are described below.

3. Results

3.1. General Trends

The density of overwintering larvae per branch in parental generations (L2i) increased over time outside defoliated forest stands at rate of 1.7 individuals per year between 2013 and 2023; within defoliated areas, in contrast, L2i values declined over time by 1.0 individuals per year on average (Figure 1).
For each pair of years between 2013 and 2014 and 2022 and 2023, future larval abundance (L2i+1) was positively correlated with larval density in parental generations (L2i) and inverse distance to aerial defoliation (di) (Equation (2), Table S1). The same trends were observed with P (L2i+1 > TFPS; Equation (3)), although the effects of distance were statistically significant for only 6 of 10 pairs of years (Equation (3), Table S1).
The parameters of Equations (2) and (3) in Table S1 may, in principle, be used to derive future larval abundance for any combination of L2i and di. Considering that L2i and di are both continuous variables with broad range of variation, however, year-to-year variation in effects of L2i/di on L2i+1 are challenging to represent graphically.

3.2. Visual Summary of Data

The data were divided into two intervals of equal length [early: 2013–2014 to 2017–2018; late: 2018–2019 to 2022–2023]. For each sampling interval, data were divided into ten classes along both L2i and di dimensions, yielding L2ci and dci (Figure 2).
(1)
The early sampling interval included a vast majority (75.6%) of sites with low L2i (2730 of 3613 observations with L2i < 6.5, or TFPS/3); the proportion of ‘low density’ sites declined to 50.6% (1254 of 2478 observations) in late sampling period;
(2)
The proportion of sites within 15 km to defoliation increased from 32.9% to 56.1% between sampling intervals;
(3)
Consistent with statistical analyses in Table S1, P (L2i+1 > TFPS) increased with both L2ci and −dci, with relatively ‘smooth’ transitions across two-dimensional classes;
(4)
Transition to L2i+1 > TFPS as a function of L2i/di did not vastly differ between sampling periods, as suggested by similar color patterns in right/left plots of Figure 2.

3.3. Temporal Variation in Larval Density Relative to Distance to Aerial Defoliation

Statistical analyses conducted on a per-distance-class basis (dci) revealed similar trends in parental and offspring generations [L2i and P (L2i+1 > TFPS)] (Table S2, Figure 3).
(1)
Monotonic decline in larval abundance with increasing distance to defoliation (parameters θ and ϕ in Equations (4) and (5));
(2)
High larval abundance (consistently above or near TFPS) < 15 km from defoliation, combined with weak (inconsistent) year effect;
(3)
Low larval abundance > 15 km from defoliation, generally combined with statistically significant increment over time (parameters θi and ϕi in Equations (4) and (5)).
Average estimates of risk to FPS for different distance classes dci (Ȓci in Equation (6)) were highest (>0.5) for sites within 15 km of defoliation and steadily declined from 0.25 to <0.10 within the spatial range dci = 15 to 100 km (Figure 4, Table S2). The maximum value of Ȓ for any distance class is represented by the upper line in Figure 4.
The core range of FPS was set within upper boundaries ranging between 15 to 25 km to defoliation. Geographical areas corresponding to the 15 km core range of FPS are delineated with grey contour lines in Figure 5.

4. Discussion

Historically, the monitoring of adult budworms has been conducted with light traps (attraction of adults of both sexes) [27,30,35,36] or pheromone-baited traps (attraction of mate-seeking males, ♂) [21,22,33,37,38]; trapping is often combined with counts of egg masses [39,40] or L2 per host branch [41,42]. Since the early 1990s, large-scale monitoring of budworm populations in QC involved both pheromone traps and counts of L2, corresponding to a ca. CAD 600 cost per site. Because counts of male spruce budworms are strongly correlated with numbers of L2 (redundant information when L2i~♂i and ♂i~L2i+1) [33], pheromone-based trapping was discontinued in 2020 to reduce monitoring cost.
Still, steady growth in defoliated areas by budworms imply the ongoing budgetary constraints of monitoring. The recommendation to reduce sampling intensity from every year to every second year outside the core range of FPS (sites > 15 km away from defoliation) appears sound based on minimal risk to FPS (Ȓci in Equation (6), Figure 4). Implementation of this rule of thumb in 2024 would correspond to an economy of CAD 38,250. Further cost saving may be achieved by sampling out-of-range sites every nth year (n > 2), an approach that remains to be validated with field data and not promoted here.
Aerial defoliation maps correlate well with precise measurements of tree ring data [43,44] and as such provide reliable proxy of damage in multiple demographic and management contexts [14,45,46]. When coupled with distance to defoliation, L2 abundance in parental generations provides a valuable forecasting tool to infer future larval abundance, as indicated by highly significant resolution of Equation (2) (r2 > 0.450 for each pair of years between 2013 and 2014 and 2022 and 2023; Table S1). Temporal increment in L2 abundance > 15 km from defoliation may be attributed to density-dependent dispersal of egg-carrying female spruce budworms, that is, assuming that defoliated areas act as sources of migrants that amplify outbreaks over large areas [47,48,49,50].
Beyond cost issues, the historic L2 metadata in QC are significant in terms of large- scale management of spruce budworm. For the interval 2013–2018, for example, limited defoliation in the Canadian province of New Brunswick concurred with low larval abundance rarely exceeding ‘extreme’ density > 40.5 L2/branch (<0.05% of 9664 sampling points), as shown in Table 1 in [51]—as also observed in QC for sampling points > 100 km from defoliation (left plots in Figure 2). Within and nearby defoliated forest stands (di < 15 km), in contrast, L2 density in QC commonly exceeded 40.5 L2/branch (58.1% of observations in Figure 2). On that basis, conclusions of population models built with an upper value of 40 L2/branch (~carrying capacity) must be interpreted with caution [52].
As a general conclusion, the approach developed here may be useful across a broad taxonomic range because trends of low larval density far away from crowded hosts/habitats are ubiquitous in Lepidoptera tree defoliators [53,54,55,56,57]. Factors that need to be considered include spatial scaling and distribution of trees, density- and distance functions, and major stressors (biotic or abiotic) acting on local population density.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/insects16020108/s1. Table S1: Effects of larval density in parental generations (L2i: β1 and α1) and distance to aerial defoliation (di: β2 and α2, with value of zero assigned to sites within defoliated areas) on future spruce budworm larval abundance in offspring generations [L2i+1 or P (L2i+1 > TFPS; Equations (2) and (3), respectively]; Table S2: Year-to-year variation in abundance of overwintering second instars spruce budworms on balsam fir as a function of distance to defoliation.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.R. and P.T.; methodology, M.R. and P.T.; investigation, M.R.; writing—original draft, M.R.; writing—review and editing, P.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article and Supplementary Materials. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the staff of MFFP for collecting the data reported here. M. Stastny and two anonymous reviewers provided useful comments on early versions of the manuscript. I. DeMerchant kindly provided the program to calculate distance to aerial defoliation as well as Figure 5.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Brown, J.W. Tortricidae (Lepidoptera). In World Catalogue of Insects; Apollo: New York, NY, USA, 2005; Volume 5, pp. 1–741. [Google Scholar]
  2. Gilligan, T.; Epstein, M. Tortricids of Agricultural Importance. Available online: http://idtools.org/id/leps/tortai/information.html (accessed on 5 January 2025).
  3. Gilligan, T.M.; Brown, J.W.; Baixeras, J. Immigrant Tortricidae: Holarctic versus introduced species in North America. Insects 2020, 11, 594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Benelli, G.; Lucchi, A.; Gianfranco, A.; Bagnoli, B.; Botton, M.; Campos-Herrera, R.; Carlos, C.; Daugherty, M.P.; Gemeno, C.; Harari, A.R.; et al. European grapevine moth, Lobesia botrana. Part 1: Biology and Ecology. Entomol. Gen. 2023, 43, 261–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Pajač, I.; Pejić, I.; Barić, B. Codling moth, Cydia pomonella (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)—Major pest in apple production: An overview of its biology, resistance, genetic structure and control strategies. Agric. Conspec. Sci. 2011, 76, 87–92. [Google Scholar]
  6. Balaško, M.K.; Bažok, R.; Mikac, K.M.; Lemic, D.; Živković, I.P. Pest management challenges and control practices in codling moth: A review. Insects 2020, 11, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Chapman, P.J. Bionomics of the apple-feeding Tortricidae. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1973, 18, 73–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Suckling, D.M.; Brockerhoff, E.G. Invasion, biology, ecology, and management of the light brown apple moth (Tortricidae). Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2010, 55, 285–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Klem, C.C.; Zaspel, J. Pest injury guilds, Lepidoptera, and placing fruit-piercing moths in context: A review. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 2019, 112, 421–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lumley, L.M.; Sperling, F.A.H. Utility of microsatellites and mitochondrial DNA for species delimitation in the spruce budworm (Chorisoneura fumiferana) species complex (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2011, 58, 232–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. French, R.L.K.; Lebunasin, P.N.A.; Brunet, B.M.T.; Lumley, L.M.; Cusson, M.; Levesque, R.; Sperling, F.A.H. Reuse of voucher specimens provides insight into the genomic associations and taxonomic value of wing colour and genitalic differences in a pest group (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae: Choristoneura). Syst. Entomol. 2020, 45, 583–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hoffman, C.J.; Dennehy, T.J.; Nyrop, J.P. Phenology, monitoring, and control decision components of the grape berry moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) risk assessment program in New York. J. Econ. Entomol. 1992, 85, 2218–2227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hayashida, R.; Hoback, W.W.; Dourado, P.M.; Bueno, A.F. Re-evaluation of the economic threshold for Crocidosema aporema injury to indeterminate Bt soybean cultivars. Agron. J. 2023, 115, 1972–1980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bouchard, M.; Régnière, J.; Therrien, P. Bottom-1up factors contribute to large-scale synchrony in spruce budworm populations. Can. J. For. Res. 2018, 48, 277–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lumley, L.M.; Pouliot, E.; Laroche, J.; Boyle, B.; Brunet, B.M.; Levesque, R.C.; Sperling, F.A.H.; Cusson, M. Continent-wide population genomic structure and phylogeography of North America’s most destructive conifer defoliator, the spruce budworm (Choristoneura fumiferana). Ecol. Evol. 2020, 10, 914–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Chen, C.; Rahimzadeh-Bajgiran, P.; Weiskittel, A. Assessing spatial and temporal dynamics of a spruce budworm outbreak across the complex forested landscape of Maine, USA. Ann. For. Sci. 2021, 78, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Houndode, J.; Krause, C.; Morin, H. Predicting balsam fir mortality in boreal stands affected by spruce budworm. For. Ecol. Manag. 2021, 496, 119408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Régnière, J.; Delisle, J.; Bauce, E.; Dupont, A.; Therrien, P.; Kettela, E.; Cadogan, L.; van Frankenhuyzen, K. Understanding of spruce budworm population dynamics: Development of early intervention strategies. In Proceedings of the North American Forest Insect Work Conference, Information Report NOR-X-381; Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service: Edmonton, AB, Canada, 2001; pp. 57–68. [Google Scholar]
  19. Johns, R.C.; Bowden, J.J.; Carleton, D.R.; Cooke, B.J.; Edwards, S.; Emilson, E.J.S.; James, P.M.A.; Kneeshaw, D.; MacLean, D.A.; Martel, V.; et al. A conceptual framework for the spruce budworm Early Intervention Strategy: Can outbreaks be stopped? Insects 2019, 10, 910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Régnière, J.; Cooke, B.J.; Béchard, A.; Dupont, A.; Therrien, P. Dynamics and management of rising outbreak spruce budworm populations. Forests 2019, 10, 748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rhainds, M.; Therrien, P.; Morneau, L.; Lecclerc, G. Bivariate pheromone-based monitoring of spruce budworm larvae. J. Econ. Entomol. 2018, 111, 272–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rhainds, M.; Therrien, P.; Morneau, L. Pheromone-based monitoring of spruce budworm (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) larvae in relation to trap position. J. Econ. Entomol. 2016, 109, 717–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ministère des Forêts, de la Faune et des Parcs [MFFP]. Aires Infestees Par la Tordeuse des Bourgeons de L’epinette au Quebec en 2023. Available online: http://mffp.gouv.qc.ca/nos-publications/aires-infestees-tordeuse-bourgeons-epinette-quebec-2023 (accessed on 16 June 2023).
  24. Bauce, É.; Carisey, N.; Dupont, A.; Frankenhuyzen, K.V. Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki aerial spray prescriptions for balsam fir stand protection against spruce budworm (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 2004, 97, 1624–1634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Fuentealba, A.; Dupont, A.; Hébert, C.; Berthiaume, R.; Quezada-García, R.; Bauce, É. Comparing the efficacy of various aerial spraying scenarios using Bacillus thuringiensis to protect trees from spruce budworm defoliation. For. Ecol. Manag. 2019, 432, 1013–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Fuentealba, A.; Dupont, A.; Quezada-García, R.; Bauce, E. Efficacy of insecticide aerial spraying programs to reduce tree mortality during a spruce budworm outbreak (1967–1992) in the province of Quebec. Agric. For. Entomol. 2022, 24, 586–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Westwood, R.; Saunders, D.; Westwood, A.R.; Holliday, N.J. Effects of tebufenozide on the assemblage of moths (Lepidoptera) in an operational spruce budworm (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) suppression program. Can. Entomol. 2019, 151, 651–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Glaus, V.; Nisole, A.; Edwards, S.; Bélanger, S.; Johns, R.C.; Djoumad, A.; Cusson, M.; Fournier, V.; Martel, V. Nontarget impacts of insecticide-based population control of eastern spruce budworm (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) on nontarget caterpillar communities and parasitism. Can. Entomol. 2023, 155, e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Fuentealba, A.; Pelletier-Beaulieu, E.; Dupont, A.; Hébert, C.; Berthiaume, R.; Bauce, E. Optimizing Bacillus thurigiensis (Btk) aerial spray prescriptions in mixed balsam fir—White spruce stands against the eastern spruce budworm. Forests 2023, 14, 1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rhainds, M. Mass trapping Lepidopteran pests with light traps, with focus on tortricid forest pests: What if? Insects 2024, 15, 267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Sidhu, H.K.; Kidd, K.A.; Emilson, E.J.S.; Stastny, M.; Venier, L.; Kielstra, B.W.; McCarter, C.P.R. Increasing spruce budworm defoliation increases catchment discharge in conifer forests. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 912, 168561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Ju, K.; Kidd, K.A.; Stastny, M.; Gray, M.A.; Venier, L.; Emilson, E.J.S. Effects of spruce budworm defoliation on in-stream algal production and carbon use by food webs. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2024, 81, 731–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Rhainds, M.; DeMerchant, I.; Therrien, P. Derivation of pheromone-based larval thresholds in spruce budworm accounting for distance to defoliated forest stands. J. Econ. Entomol. 2021, 114, 769–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Donovan, S.; Maclean, D. Evaluation of branch sampling, ocular assessments, and aerial surveys for estimating spruce budworm defoliation. Can. J. For. Res. 2024, 54, 725–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Simmons, G.A.; Elliott, N.C. Use of moths caught in light traps for predicting outbreaks of the spruce budworm (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 1985, 78, 362–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Rhainds, M.; Lavigne, D.; Boulanger, Y.; DeMerchant, I.; Delisle, J.; Motty, J.; Rideout, T.; Labrecque, A. I know it when I see it: Incidence, timing and intensity of immigration in spruce budworm. Agric. For. Entomol. 2021, 24, 152–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Housewarth, M.W.; Jennings, D.T.; Sanders, C.J. Variables associated with pheromone traps for monitoring spruce budworm populations (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Entomol. 1981, 113, 527–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bergh, J.C.; Eveleigh, E.S.; Seabrook, W.D. The mating status of field-collected male spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Clem.), in relation to trap location, sampling method, sampling date, and adult emergence. Can. Entomol. 1988, 120, 821–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Régnière, J. An oviposition model for the spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Entomol. 1983, 115, 1371–1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Royama, T. Population dynamics of the spruce budworm Choristoneura fumiferana. Ecol. Monogr. 1984, 54, 429–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Djoumad, A.; Tanguay, P.; Régnière, J.; Trudel, G.; Morrison, A.; Fournier, C.; Carleton, D.; Nisole, A.; Stewart, D.; Cusson, M. Development of a qPCR-based method for counting overwintering spruce budworm (Choristoneura fumiferana) larvae collected during fall surveys and for assessing their natural enemy load: A proof-of-concept study. Pest Manag. Sci. 2022, 78, 336–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Régnière, J.; Johns, R.C.; Edwards, S.; Owens, E.; Dupont, A. Overwintering spruce budworm population density as predictor of following-year larval density and defoliation on balsam fir. For. Ecol. Manag. 2023, 546, 121380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Itter, M.S.; D’Orangeville, L.; Dawson, A.; Kneeshaw, D.; Duchesne, L.; Finley, A.O. Boreal tree growth exhibits decadal-scale ecological memory to drought and insect defoliation, but no negative response to their interaction. J. Ecol. 2019, 107, 1288–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Robert, L.E.; Sturtevant, B.R.; Cooke, B.J.; James, P.M.A.; Fortin, M.J.; Townsend, P.A.; Wolter, P.T.; Kneeshaw, D. Landscape host abundance and configuration regulate periodic outbreak behavior in spruce budworm Choristoneura fumiferana. Ecography 2018, 41, 1556–1571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Sturtevant, B.R.; Achtemeier, G.L.; Charney, J.J.; Anderson, D.P.; Cooke, B.J.; Townsend, P.A. Long-distance dispersal of spruce budworm (Choristoneura fumiferana Clemens) in Minnesota (USA) and Ontario (Canada) via the atmospheric pathway. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2013, 168, 186–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Legault, S.; James, P.M.A. Parasitism rates of spruce budworm larvae: Testing the enemy hypothesis along a gradient of forest diversity measured at different spatial scales. Environ. Entomol. 2018, 47, 1083–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Greenbank, D.O.; Schaefer, G.W.; Rainey, A.C. Spruce budworm (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) moth flight and dispersal: New understandings from canopy observations, radar, and aircraft. Mem. Entomol. Soc. Can. 1980, 110, 1–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. McNeil, J.N.; Cusson, M.; Delisle, J.; Orchard, I.; Tobe, I. Insect Migrations: Tracking Resources Through Space and Time; Drake, V.A., Gatehouse, A.G., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1995; pp. 279–302. [Google Scholar]
  49. Régnière, J.; Nealis, V. Density-dependence of egg recruitment and moth dispersal in spruce budworm. Forests 2019, 10, 706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Rhainds, M. Variation in wing load of female spruce budworms (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) during the course of an outbreak: Evidence for phenotypic response to habitat deterioration in collapsing populations. Environ. Entomol. 2020, 49, 238–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. MacLean, D.A.; Amirault, P.; Amos-Binks, L.; Carleton, D.; Hennigar, C.; Johns, R.; Régnière, J. Positive results of an Early Intervention Strategy to suppress a spruce budworm outbreak after five years of trials. Forests 2019, 10, 448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. McNie, P.; Kneeshaw, D.; Filotas, E. Increased unpredictability in spruce budworm outbreaks following habitat loss and landscape fragmentation. Ecol. Model. 2024, 491, 110675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Shepherd, R.F.; Gray, T.G. Pest management of Douglas fir tussock moth, Orgyia pseudotsugata (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae): Monitoring endemic populations with pheromone traps to detect incipient outbreaks. Can. Entomol. 1985, 117, 839–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Harrison, S. Persistent, localized outbreaks in the western tussock moth Orgyia vetusta: The roles of resource quality, predation and poor dispersal. Ecol. Entomol. 1997, 22, 158–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Rhainds, M.; Gries, G.; Saleh, A. Density and pupation site of apterous female bagworms, Metisa plana (Lepidoptera: Psychidae), influence the distribution of emergent larvae. Can. Entomol. 1998, 130, 603–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Tobin, P.C.; Whitmire, S.L. Population ecology spread of gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) and its relationship to defoliation. Environ. Entomol. 2005, 34, 1448–1455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Norghauer, J.M.; Grogan, J.; Malcolm, J.R.; Felfili, J.M. Long-distance dispersal helps germinating mahogany seedlings escape defoliation by a generalist specialist caterpillar. Oecologia 2010, 162, 405–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Year-to-year (x) variation in abundance of overwintering second spruce budworm per leaf of balsam fir (y = L2i) in the province of Québec. Solid lines correspond to statistically significant regressions within (grey dots: y = 2073.14 − 1.00x) and outside (white dots: y = −3360.80 + 1.67x) defoliated areas.
Figure 1. Year-to-year (x) variation in abundance of overwintering second spruce budworm per leaf of balsam fir (y = L2i) in the province of Québec. Solid lines correspond to statistically significant regressions within (grey dots: y = 2073.14 − 1.00x) and outside (white dots: y = −3360.80 + 1.67x) defoliated areas.
Insects 16 00108 g001
Figure 2. Variation in abundance of overwintering second instar spruce budworms on balsam fir (L2i/3 branches, divided into ten density classes L2ci on y axis) relative to distance to aerial defoliation (in km) segregated along ten distance classes dci (upper boundary of each class on x axis) in the province of Québec. The threshold of the Foliage Protection Strategy (TFPS) is set at 20 L2 per branch. For each interval, the surface and color of individual squares within 10 × 10 grids represents the number of sites with specific combinations of L2ci/dci and the associated probability that L2i+1 > TFPS.
Figure 2. Variation in abundance of overwintering second instar spruce budworms on balsam fir (L2i/3 branches, divided into ten density classes L2ci on y axis) relative to distance to aerial defoliation (in km) segregated along ten distance classes dci (upper boundary of each class on x axis) in the province of Québec. The threshold of the Foliage Protection Strategy (TFPS) is set at 20 L2 per branch. For each interval, the surface and color of individual squares within 10 × 10 grids represents the number of sites with specific combinations of L2ci/dci and the associated probability that L2i+1 > TFPS.
Insects 16 00108 g002
Figure 3. Relationships between abundance of overwintering spruce budworm second instars on balsam fir in offspring generations [y = P (L2i+1) > TFPS] as a function of year (x) for different classes of distance to defoliation in the province of Québec (upper boundary of distance class reported in each plot). Regressions parameters for each distance class, as derived with Equation (7), are summarized in Table S2. Dotted lines correspond to P (L2i+1 > TFPS) = 0.5.
Figure 3. Relationships between abundance of overwintering spruce budworm second instars on balsam fir in offspring generations [y = P (L2i+1) > TFPS] as a function of year (x) for different classes of distance to defoliation in the province of Québec (upper boundary of distance class reported in each plot). Regressions parameters for each distance class, as derived with Equation (7), are summarized in Table S2. Dotted lines correspond to P (L2i+1 > TFPS) = 0.5.
Insects 16 00108 g003
Figure 4. Indices of risk relative to Foliage Protection Strategy against spruce budworm (Ȓci as evaluated in Equation (6)) in relation with distance to defoliation (distance class dci bounded as in Figure 1). Circles for each distance class represent average estimates for different years in the province of Québec. The bottom and upper lines represent minimal/maximal risk for any distance class. The dotted horizontal line corresponds to Ȓci = 0.25.
Figure 4. Indices of risk relative to Foliage Protection Strategy against spruce budworm (Ȓci as evaluated in Equation (6)) in relation with distance to defoliation (distance class dci bounded as in Figure 1). Circles for each distance class represent average estimates for different years in the province of Québec. The bottom and upper lines represent minimal/maximal risk for any distance class. The dotted horizontal line corresponds to Ȓci = 0.25.
Insects 16 00108 g004
Figure 5. Abundance of overwintering second instar spruce budworms on balsam fir (L2/branch) sampled in 2023 in the province of Québec. Pink areas represent forest stands defoliated by spruce budworms based on defoliation maps. Grey lines surrounding defoliated areas represent the core range of Foliage Protection Strategy within 15 km of defoliation.
Figure 5. Abundance of overwintering second instar spruce budworms on balsam fir (L2/branch) sampled in 2023 in the province of Québec. Pink areas represent forest stands defoliated by spruce budworms based on defoliation maps. Grey lines surrounding defoliated areas represent the core range of Foliage Protection Strategy within 15 km of defoliation.
Insects 16 00108 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rhainds, M.; Therrien, P. Cost-Effective Monitoring of Spruce Budworm Larvae. Insects 2025, 16, 108. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16020108

AMA Style

Rhainds M, Therrien P. Cost-Effective Monitoring of Spruce Budworm Larvae. Insects. 2025; 16(2):108. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16020108

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rhainds, Marc, and Pierre Therrien. 2025. "Cost-Effective Monitoring of Spruce Budworm Larvae" Insects 16, no. 2: 108. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16020108

APA Style

Rhainds, M., & Therrien, P. (2025). Cost-Effective Monitoring of Spruce Budworm Larvae. Insects, 16(2), 108. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16020108

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop