Next Article in Journal
Development of Three-Dimensional LES Based Meshless Model of Continuous Casting of Steel
Next Article in Special Issue
Features of Cathodic Plasma Electrolytic Nitrocarburizing of Low-Carbon Steel in an Aqueous Electrolyte of Ammonium Nitrate and Glycerin
Previous Article in Journal
Hydrogen Trapping in Laser Powder Bed Fusion 316L Stainless Steel
Previous Article in Special Issue
Increasing Wear Resistance of Low-Carbon Steel by Anodic Plasma Electrolytic Sulfiding
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Electrical Discharge Machining of Alumina Using Ni-Cr Coating and SnO Powder-Mixed Dielectric Medium

by
Anna A. Okunkova
1,*,
Marina A. Volosova
1,
Elena Y. Kropotkina
1,
Khaled Hamdy
1,2 and
Sergey N. Grigoriev
1
1
Department of High-Efficiency Processing Technologies, Moscow State University of Technology STANKIN, Moscow 127055, Russia
2
Production Engineering and Mechanical Design Department, Faculty of Engineering, Minia University, Minia 61519, Egypt
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metals 2022, 12(10), 1749; https://doi.org/10.3390/met12101749
Submission received: 17 August 2022 / Revised: 5 October 2022 / Accepted: 8 October 2022 / Published: 18 October 2022

Abstract

:
Aluminum-based ceramics exhibit excellent wear resistance and hot hardness that are suitable for various responsible applications allowing products to work under extreme mechanical and thermal loads (up to 1000 °C). The problem of high-precision forming complex-shaped parts is a known engineering challenge due to the insulating properties of aluminum-containing ceramics and the formation of chemically active carbides in a hydrocarbon medium. The alternative approach for electrical discharge machining non-conductive sintered Al2O3 in the water-based medium using nickel-chrome plasma-vapor-deposed coating of 12 mm, SnO powder suspension (particle diameter of ⌀10 µm, concentration of 150 g/L), and brass wire-tool is proposed. The productivity was evaluated by calculating the material removal rate and discharge gap for various combinations of pulse frequency and duration. The maximal material removal rate of 0.0014 mm3/s was achieved for a pulse frequency of 30 kHz and pulse duration of 1.7–2.5 μs. The recommended value of the interelectrode gap is 48.0 ± 4.9 µm. The possibility of electrical discharge machining aluminum-containing insulating ceramics without using hydrocarbons, carbon and copper-group assisting measures was proposed and shown for the first time. The chemical content of the debris in the interelectrode gap between components of the materials was thermochemically analyzed.

1. Introduction

The well-known drawback of shaping ceramics is related to the excellent properties that allow them to work under extreme mechanical and thermal load conditions [1,2]. Cutting ceramics is prospective cutting tool material for milling nickel based alloys achieving temperatures of 800 °C in the working zone [3]. The specific wear of ceramics shows their typical brittle fracture [4,5]. It makes ceramics unreplaceable for a wide range of applications such as the cutting tool industry, common machinery, and aerospace industry that can be only improved by adding fillers during sintering [6,7,8,9] or deposit complex multi-component or nano-structured coatings [10,11]. Some important properties of alumina are given in Table 1 [12]. At the same time, these properties hamper the development of machining technologies and make ceramics extremely difficult-to-machine material [13,14]. Up to now, it is possible to obtain some simple shapes with powder sintering and grinding [15], but more precise shaping is an energy and resource-intensive process [16].
Electrical discharge machining is a known method of machining for hard materials allowing the shaping of conductive materials by electrical erosion [17]. The authors of the method, Lazarenko spouses, mentioned in their works complex nature of the thermochemical dissociation of the electrode materials [18,19] without changing the electrical properties of the oxide and nitride ceramics by adding fillers [20]. This already classical way of shaping difficult-to-machine materials by electrical discharges (thermal dissociation of the material) [21] does not work in the case of insulating materials [22]. One of the ways to make the alumina able to be subjected to electrical erosion without introducing the conductive particles into its structure and losing optical properties was proposed more than 35 years ago [23]. Ten years later, similar experiments allowed electrical discharge machining Si3N4 insulating ceramics in hydrocarbons to a depth of 1.5–2.0 mm [24].
The principle is in the addressing of the electrical discharges on a conductive (assisting) coating that covers the insulating workpiece (Figure 1) [25]. Then the addressed to the coating discharges contribute to the material heating and sublimating, sometimes thermal cracking of the subsurface under layers (dielectric substrate) [20]. It should be noted that many materials (such as carbon in its many forms) do not exist in the liquid phase at elevated heat and under normal pressure [26,27,28,29]. Despite this fact, they can be easily subjected to electrical erosion. Several research groups developed the idea with the results presented in Table 2 [30,31,32,33,34]. It can be summarized as follows:
(1)
Maximum achievable depth is about 5000 µm was achieved in the carbon-containing medium with carbon particles [34];
(2)
Most of the works were conducted in carbon-containing mediums (hydrocarbons) that can have dramatic consequences for the personnel and equipment and are not applicable on the industrial scale;
(3)
The material for the primary and assisting electrodes is varied from work to work (mostly copper-group materials);
(4)
There are no works devoted to electrical discharge machining with a wire tool electrode, meanwhile it can be prospective for the cutting tools and aerospace industry;
(5)
The main type of the assisting electrode deposition to the dielectric substrate (Al2O3 workpiece) is adhesion when other physical and chemical methods of deposition based on material diffusion, as an example, stayed not estimated;
(6)
In all the considered works related to Al2O3 ceramics, the roughness of the obtained surfaces is not provided, but visually the machined surface does not correspond to the basic requirements for the responsible surface of machinery parts: the surface contains visible macrodrops and material agglomerations, ceramics has presence adsorbed carbon-containing components of the medium, Ra is more than approximately 3.6–6.3 µm.
Figure 1. Principle of the electrical erosion of insulating material using assisting electrode technique.
Figure 1. Principle of the electrical erosion of insulating material using assisting electrode technique.
Metals 12 01749 g001
Table 2. Reported types of auxiliary electrodes.
Table 2. Reported types of auxiliary electrodes.
Auxiliary ElectrodePrimary ElectrodeDielectric MediumTechnologyWorpiece MaterialMachined EpthReference
MaterialThickness, μmShapeDeposition Method
Copper-Sheet-SteelWater-based emulsionElectrical discahrge millingAl2O3-[30]
-FoilAdhesive-KeroseneElectrical discahrge machiningAl2O3-[31]
60 µmFoilAdhesiveCopper, 5000 µm × 5000 µmKeroseneElectrical discahrge machiningAl2O3 (92% of purity)Depth of 1500 µm[32]
Silver20 µmVarnish (45% of silver) applied with a paintbrushAdhesiveWC rod with 6% of cobalt binder, ⌀115 or 500 µm *Hydrocarbon (mineral) oil HEDMA-111Micro- electrical discahrge machining10% of Alumina Toughened Zirconia, ZrO2-Al2O3Depth of 731 µm × ⌀120 µm for programmed depth of 500 maµm, 43 min of processing [33]
Carbon-Polymer-based material containing carbon powderAdhesive, heated at 150 °CCopper pipe of ⌀3500 µm with a hole of ⌀3000 µmKerosene with graphite powder of ⌀30 µm average particle size, concetration of 7000–10,000 mg/LElectrical discahrge machiningAl2O3Depth of ~5000 µm, ~235 min of processing[34]
* the authors provides two different values in two paragraphs.
As was shown in the literature review, there is only a published work devoted to the experiments with electrical destruction of insulating alumina in a water-based medium [30]. However, the work is dedicated to electrical discharge milling using a steel electrode without reporting the final quality parameters of the obtained surface and the eroded depth in the workpiece material. The rest studies used carbon-containing mediums [31,32,33,34] and even carbon-containing assisting materials [34].
When developing technology of electrical discharge machining (EDM) insulating ceramics using assisting electrode technique, it should be considered that the erosion products (debris) and the near-surface layer of the machined surfaces are formed from the components of the ceramic workpiece, dielectric medium, an assisting electrode in the presence of high heat (over 10,000 °C) [17,18,19]. As can be seen from the successful results with electrical discharge machining insulating zirconia [34,35], the formation or addition of any conductive debris can assist electrical erosion [36]. Otherwise, the formation of insulating debris hampers further electrical discharge machining [37,38].
It should be emphasized that forming some chemicals in the form of insoluble or pyrotechnically dangerous sediment or gas can have catastrophic consequences for equipment and personnel [39,40,41]. This fact is often ignored by modern searching works and was brought to attention only a few times before. Firstly, it was mentioned by method creators [18,19]. It was again brought to attention in developing a similar technology (electrical discharge milling) [42]. And later, in researching assisting electrode techniques, there was considered the importance of chemical interactions between elements [35]. The research group of MSUT Stankin has investigated the problem of texturing insulating cutting ceramics with attention to thermochemistry for many years [20,21] and has developed an independent theoretical approach [43] approved by international publications and supported by experiments [44]. That confirms the idea that thermochemical interaction of the material components in the presence of high heat should be considered for further research [45]. Moreover, the chemical composition of the erosion debris can be predicted by pre-calculating such factors as enthalpy and entropy of the reactions [46].
Thus, the formed erosion products may have properties that are incompatible with the concept of safety in engineering, so it is necessary to carefully analyze the composition of all used primary and auxiliary materials before designing the conditions for electrical discharge machining non-standard for the technology materials [43,45].
Aluminum exhibits specific thermochemical properties—a high affinity for oxygen under normal conditions (due to its high electronegativity, χ = 3.44). During the thermal decomposition of the oxide in the presence of hydrocarbons, it forms dielectric compounds Al4C3 or Al2(C2)3 that exhibit insulating properties as all the methanides and acetylenides. They are unstable to water, oxygen, and hydrogen [47]:
2Al2O3 + 9C → Al4C3 + 6CO↑ (over 1800 °C)
Al4C3 + 6O2↑ → 2Al2O3 + 3CO2↑ (at 650–700 °C)
Al4C3 + 6H2↑ → 4Al + 3CH4↑ (at 2200 °C)
Thus, to avoid the presence of the carbides in the working area during electrical discharge machining of Al-containing ceramics, it was decided to choose water-based suspension assisted by one of the metal oxides that exhibit semiconductive properties, stable at normal conditions and commercially available on the market. One of the prospective oxides with the band gap Eg of 2.5–3.0 eV at 300 K is SnO (tin monoxide), an n-type broadband semiconductor obtained by thermal decomposition of the tin (IV) oxide (SnO2, Eg = 3.6 eV). As less band gap is, as more conductive properties exhibits compound [48,49].
At the same time, the most typical coating for the assisting electrode technique used in the works is copper foil or sheet placed adhesively on the surface of the ceramic workpiece due to its relatively high conductivity and inertness to the medium [30,31,32,33]. During decomposition in water, it forms insulating oxides as other elements of the copper group (Ag, Au) that are unstable in the presence of hydrogen (in the case of Cu) [50] or dissociates at elevated temperatures (as Ag-oxides and Au2O) [51,52]. It should be noted that Au2O3 is stable and conductive under normal conditions, but the possibility of its usage on the industrial scale is limited economically [53].
An applied by the plasma vapor deposition method [54,55] Ni-Cr coating was proposed as an alternative to the proven assisting electrode materials. The nickel-chromium was chosen due to the known affinity of nickel for aluminum to form conductive bonds [56,57]. The principle of the chemical compound formation during electrical discharge machining is shown in [43,45].
The current study aims to develop a method of electrical discharge machining alumina using non-carbon-based medium and assisting particles. The current study’s novelty is searching for a way to solve the global problem of alumina machinability based on material destruction under electrical discharge, excluding pyrotechnically dangerous component formation and using alternative commercially available materials for texturing cutting ceramics on the industrial scale. The band gap of tin oxide determines the choice of this n-type broadband semiconductor powder to assist electrical discharge machining alumina when the known affinity of aluminum to nickel determines the choice of the coating composition.
Nomenclature of used symbols
SymbolDescriptionUnit
UoOperational voltageV
fPulse frequencykHz
DPulse durationµs
WsRewinding speedm/min
WrFeed ratemm/min
FTWire tensionN
ΔDischarge gapµm
dwWire diametermm
rwWire radiusµm
r’wWire radius taking into account spark gap Δmm
wWidth of kerfµm
hDepth of kerfµm
lLength of kerfmm
AArea of kerf in planmm2
αAngle of cutting segment in planrad.
VVolume of removed materialmm3
MRRVolumetric material removal ratemm3·s−1
tMachining times
d5050th percentile of the average particle diameterµm
δlLongitudinal measurement errorµm
δtTransversal measurement errorµm
LMeasured lengthmm
gProduct height above microscope table glassmm
f H 298   K Standard enthalpy of formationkJ·mol−1
f S 298   K Standard molar entropyJ·mol−1·K−1
r H T EnthalpykJ·mol−1
r S T EntropyJ·mol−1·K−1
r G T Gibbs energykJ·mol−1
TEquilibrium temperatureK
γElectrical conductivitySm∙cm−1, Sm∙m−1
RSpecific resistivity Ω∙mm2∙m−1, Ω∙m

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sintering of the Samples

The following powder was used for producing samples:
-
Corundum α-Al2O3 A16SG (Alcoa, New York, NY, USA), with an average particle diameter d50 = 0.53 µm.
Granulometric analysis of powder was carried out on specialized equipment—an optical analyzer of granulometry and particle morphology 500NANO (Occhio, Liege, Belgium). Optical microscopy was carried out on an Olympus BX51M instrument (Ryf AG, Grenchen, Switzerland).
Powder mixtures were prepared and ground in a Turbula multidirectional shaker (Eskens B.V., Alpen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands) in ethanol in a polyethylene container at 150 rpm for 24 h. Suspensions were dried in a FreeZone2.5 lyophilizer (LabConco, Kansas, MI, USA) to increase the density of the poured powders and to avoid accumulation and agglomeration. The collector temperature was set at −50 ± 2 °C, while the sheath temperature was +23 ± 2 °C. During the entire treatment process, the pressure in the chamber was 0.02 ± 0.01 mbar.
The prepared powder mixtures were freely poured into specially prepared molds made mechanically of graphite blanks. The standard grade of graphite MPG-6 for special applications with a degraded structure are made on cokes such as shale, pitch, etc. are made by “cold” pressing. Mechanical machining of graphite molds required special measures [58,59]. Machining was carried out from graphite blanks with a particle size of 1 μm on CNC milling equipment in the following modes: 100–300 m/min roughing with a feed of 0.1 mm/tooth; 150–600 m/min finishing with a feed rate of 0.013–0.05 m/min on a CTX beta 1250 TC turning and milling machine (DMG Mori Seiki Co., Ltd., Nagoya, Japan) equipped with a SinumerikCNC system (Siemens AG, Munich, Germany) and vibroacoustic monitoring system (MSUT Stankin, Moscow, Russia) [60] with a carbide tool with a multi-layer combined coating [61,62] deposed by physical vapor deposition [63].
The alumina powder was compacted into molds and sintered on a spark plasma sintering machine KCE FCT-H HP D-25 SD (FCT Systeme GmbH, Rauenstein, Germany) at 1400 °C with a heating rate of 100 °C·min−1 at uniaxial pressure 80 MPa in vacuum [64,65,66]. The final temperature and pressure were maintained for 10 min. The sintered discs with a diameter of 65.5 mm and a thickness of 5.5 mm were labeled.
The resulting samples were examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) on VEGA3 equipment (Tescan, Brno, Czech Republic) at the fracture site. The fracture was done mechanically, which required the application of significant and repeated efforts. A chemical analysis of the fracture sites was also carried out on the same equipment.

2.2. Electrical Discharge Machining

A two-axis wire electrical discharge machine ARTA 123 Pro (NPK “Delta-Test”, Fryazino, Moscow Oblast, Russia) was used for experiments (Figure 2a). The coated samples are presented in Figure 2b. Figure 2c shows the scheme of the sample fastening at the CNC machine. The main characteristics of the machine are presented in Table 3.
Water-based suspension of SnO with various concentration (7, 14, 21, 35, 50, 100, 150 g/L) was used as dielectric medium. The following powder was used for producing suspension:
-
tin (II) oxide SnO ChDA GOST 22516-77 (OOO “PKF Cvet”, Yekaterinburg, Sverdlovskaya obl., Russia), with an average particle diameter d50 = 164 µm.
The powder was subjected to granulometric analysis and optical microscopy. During preparing the suspension, an EL104 (Mettler Toledo, Columbus, OH, USA) laboratory balance with a measurement range of 0.0001–120 g with an error of 0.0001 g was used. According to the previously published data by different research groups [67,68,69,70], the smallest size of suspended particles led to the highest rate of volumetric material removal and to the lowest wear of the primary tool electrode.
The pre-sieved powders were mixed into suspension before each experiment. It was constantly stirred during it, since the powder particles are specifically heavy, and their weight favored their settling to the bottom of the working tank. After processing, the samples were cleaned with alkali.
The CNC program was prepared manually as a single approach to the coated workpiece; the path offsets were not considered. The technology factors in equivalent units of the machine chosen following the recommendations [71] are presented in Table 4. The classical tool electrode was a brass wire dw of 0.25 mm in diameter made of CuZn35 (Cu—65%; Zn—35%) due to its conductivity, inertness to the media, and availability in industrial conditions. Pretesting experiments with each SnO-concentrations were conducted 3 times for 9 sets of the factors depending on the obtained results and is about 200 experiments. More than 150 experiments were conducted (five repeats for each factor-set).
The parameters of the kerf were controlled by optical microscopy. Here and below, the optical measurement error was calculated by the formula [72,73]:
δ l = ± 3 + L 30 + g · L 4000 ,
δ t = ± 3 + L 50 + g · L 2500 ,
where δl is the longitudinal measurement error, µm; δt is the transversal measurement error, µm; L is the measured length, mm; g is the product height above microscope table glass (taken equal to zero), mm.
The spark gap Δ was calculated using the following formula [74]:
Δ = h 2 + w 2 8 h r w ,
where w is the width of slot (kerf), µm; h is the depth of slot (kerf), µm; rw is the tool electrode radius (125 µm), µm.
The volumetric material removal rate was calculated through the feed rate of the primary electrode into the processing area and the volume of removed material [75,76]:
A = 1 2 r w 2 ( α sin α ) ,
where A is the kerf area in the plan, mm2; r’w is the radius of the electrode-tool, taking into account the spark gap, mm; α is the angle of the cutting segment in the plan, rad. The volume of removed material is calculated using the formula:
V = A · l ,
where l is the length of slot (kerf), mm. Then the material removal rate is [77]:
M R R = V t ,
where t is the machining time calculated from the feed rate of the electrode-tool, s.

2.3. Ceramic Workpiece Coating

The chosen thickness of the coating was 12 µm to provide the conductive layer; the thickness was controlled optically [78]. The coating was deposed at a STANKIN-APP technological unit prototype (MSUT Stankin, Moscow, Russia) [54,55]. KhN77TYuR (NiCr20TiAl) chrome-nickel alloy was chosen as the target [79], where Ni is responsible for thermal resistivity, and Cr hampers oxidation [80]. Before coating, the ceramic samples were placed in an ultrasonic tank and were cleaned using a soap solution at a temperature of 60 °C for 20 min and in alcohol for 5 min.
A Fischer Sigmascope SMP10 instrument (Helmut Fischer GmbH, Sindelfingen, Germany) controlled the specific electrical resistance ρ of the deposed coating. The device measures the electric conductance in Siemens and the percentage of the control sample’s electrical conductance produced from annealed bronze in the range of 1–112%.
Approbating the coated sample was conducted without SnO powder in a water medium.

2.4. Thermochemical Analyses

To assess the chemical composition of formed debris in the conditions of the elevated temperatures, the authors proposed an original estimation technique based on the main thermochemical parameters—enthalpy ( r H T , kJ·mol−1) and entropy ( r S T , J·mol−1·K−1), Gibbs energy ( r G T , kJ·mol−1), and calculating the equilibrium temperature (T, K) of the proposed systems [81]:
r G T = r H T T · r S T kJ mol .
The focus is on the interaction of nickel of the chosen coating with oxygen, zinc of the wire tool electrode, and aluminum of the workpiece. The chemical reactions with Ni of the coating with water medium can be presented as [43,82,83] when NiO was taken as the most likely compound of nickel with oxygen:
N i 2 + + H 2 O T N i O + H 2
Knowing the peculiarity of nickel to form intermetallic compounds with some metals, we will consider the possibility of forming a Ni5Zn21 intermetallic compound (γ-phase, evidenced by the constancy of the entropy factor) [84] as a more prevalent chemical reaction (reverse corrosion process):
N i 2 + + Z n 2 + + Z n 2 + N i Z n + Z n 2 + N i Z n 3 + Z n 2 + N i 5 Z n 21 m e t a s t a b l e   p h a s e + Z n 2 + N i 5 Z n 21
5 N i 2 + + 21 Z n 2 + N i 5 Z n 21
According to the state diagram [85,86,87], five compounds are formed in the alloys of the Al-Ni system: Al3Ni, Al3Ni2, AlNi (β’), AlNi3 (α’), Al3Ni5. The Al3Ni compound has a constant composition. The other compounds have significant areas of homogeneity. The AlNi compound melts congruently, while Al3Ni2, AlNi, and AlNi3 melt according to peritectic reactions. Thus, as AlNi intermetallic compound was taken as a more prevalent chemical reaction:
2 A l 2 O 3 + 4 N i 2 + T 4 A l N i + 3 O 2
Table 5 presents standard enthalpy and molar entropy for some substances. In considered reaction, it was accepted that Ni is already dissociated in the form of an ion from the coating at elevated temperatures when Al2O3 workpiece dissociation has not yet begun (melting point Tm of Al2O3 is 2345 K, of KhN77TYuR chrome-nickel alloy is ~1670 K). The main objective is to create conditions for thermochemical dissociation of Al2O3 when the material of electrodes and assisting means demonstrate lower erosion wear and transform into the compounds that improve conducting conditions in the interelectrode gap. In other words, creating denser discharges between electrodes addressed to the conducting or semiconducting debris. At the same time, it should not be too much debris to avoid short circuit conditions.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization of Al2O3 and SnO Powders

Granulometric analysis of Al2O3 powder showed that it has a predominantly favorable spherical shape of granules, which contribute to dense compaction of the powder into molds and positively affect the porosity of the samples (Figure 3, Table 6). The variety of powder sizes should have a positive effect on the mechanical characteristics of sintered samples and increase their impact strength; the powder does not have pronounced peaks along the inner diameter.
Granulometric analysis (Figure 4, Table 7) of SnO powder showed that the powder sample had an average inner diameter of 63.79 µm and 33.46 µm for 50% of the particles. The average circularity of the tin oxide powder is about 0.597 µm and about 0.625 µm for 50% of the particles.

3.2. Sintered Samples (SEM and Chemical Analyses)

An analysis of the SEM images of the sintered samples’ fracture shows that a fine-grained structure was obtained during sintering, which, as a rule, should have a positive effect on the mechanical properties (Figure 5a). The grain size is in the range of 50–250 nm (Figure 5b). The place of mechanical failure of the sample is characterized by the uniformity of destruction and the passage of a bulk crack (Figure 5a), which can indirectly confirm stronger intergranular bonds and better mechanical characteristics such as strength and impact strength, and hence wear resistance, which is a parameter related to impact strength and depends on the intergranular adhesion of the samples. Analysis of the alumina sample (Figure 5b) showed scattered isthmuses, which may be due to the low electrical conductivity of alumina in the presence of heat.
The chemical analysis of the sample (Table 8) at the fracture corresponded to the declared chemical composition of the powder without additional inclusions and impurities, which should have a positive effect on the physical and mechanical properties in volume.

3.3. Conductive Coating (Assisting Electrode)

The coating showed visually good adhesion (did not peel off after deposition), uniformity (optically uniform thickness in the range of 10–15 µm), and controlled electrical properties. The controlled and calculated electrical properties of the developed PVD coating are shown in Table 9. Values for Al2O3 are provided for reference. The coating was not studied tribologically due to the absence of the required mechanical load resistance in the working area of the EDM machine.

3.4. Electrical Discharge Machining (Optical and Scanning Electron Microscopy)

Approbating a sample of alumina ceramics using a Ni-Cr coating showed satisfactory processing results in a deionized water medium. The pre-testing results are planned to be improved using assisting powders. The coating can be considered as prospective, despite the relative difficulty in removing it after processing. The most pronounced (the deepest kerf) electrical discharge machining results using SnO suspension were obtained for the following groups of factors: concentration of 150 g/L, frequency f = 10 kHz, pulse duration D = 2 µs, and D = 2.7 µs. The general view of the working area and results of the optical microscopy for the machined kerf are shown in Figure 6.
SEM-image and its chemical mapping are presented in Figure 7. The kerf has a classical view of the surfaces subjected to the electrical erosion of the material: the presence of the pronounced borders of the subjected area, deposed material in the form of drops, wells, and pores (Figure 7a). The chemical mapping shows that the ceramic sample under the coating was subjected mainly to thermal destruction. The surface of the kerf chemically corresponds to the chemical composition of the ceramic workpiece (Figure 7b,c). The kerf has traces of the coating: deposed Ni and Cr (Figure 7d,e). The kerf boarders have the presence of the adsorbed tin (Figure 7f). The presence of wire tool components (Cu, Zn) was detected visually but not quantitatively. The detailed spectra are shown in Table 10.

3.5. Spark Gap and Material Removal Rate

The measured values of the kerf parameters and the calculated values of the spark gap are shown in Table 11. The spark gap for further calculations was taken as an average that has no more than 20% of the range of scattering values 40 ≤ Δ ≤ 60 that were previously researched for the materials with the threshold conductivity [21,71]. Thus, the recommended value of the interelectrode gap is 48.0 ± 4.9 µm.
The material removal rate is shown in Table 12. A graphical presentation of the results, which shows the relationship between material removal rate and experiment factors (pulse frequency and duration) for the concentration of SnO-suspension of 150 g/L is shown in Figure 8. The optimized values of the factors of electrical discharge machining alumina ceramics using a nickel-chromium coating of 12 μm in thickness with SnO-suspension (150 g/L) were: pulse frequency of 30 kHz, pulse duration of 1.7–2.5 μs.

3.6. Comparison with Literature

A comparison of the performance achieved by using different methods of electrical discharge machining alumina was carried out for the current study’s data and data obtained by other authors in relation to alumina ceramics (Table 13). The results of the present study were compared with methods in which hydrocarbons were used as a working fluid, machining was carried out using a copper profiled tool such as a prism and tube in combination with an assisting electrode of the copper foil 6 μm thick and a polymer-based carbon tape assisted by graphite particles with a diameter of 30 μm, correspondingly. The data indicate that the developed method is not superior to its closest analogs but has some features that allow considering it as a prospect in texturing cutting ceramics without using carbons. Machining was carried out for a continuously rewinding tool electrode, which has a smaller processing surface area but allows the formation of complex ruled surfaces in contrast to profiled electrodes such as a prism, tube, etc.

3.7. Thermochemistry Analyses

The entropy, enthalpy, and Gibbs energy of the Ni5Zn21 intermetallic compound in the crystalline form was previously estimated in [46]. The entropy of the intermetallic compound formation is by the Boltzmann equation taking into account the Stirling theory and the corollary of Hess’s law [95]:
f S 298   K N i 5 Z n 21 = 359.00   J mol · K
Then
f H 298   K N i 5 Z n 21 = 225.96 kJ mol
Gibbs energy is:
r G T N i 5 Z n 21 = 118.98 kJ mol
When r G T < 0 the reaction at 298 K is possible in the forward direction from sublimated ions of metals, the presence of high heat in the discharge channel (as any other source of high heat such as laser beam or bombarding by fast atoms [54,96]) can only accelerate Ni5Zn21 (γ-phase) solidification. The oxide film formed on the transition metals can prevent the direct reaction at 298 K. The formation of Ni5Zn21 intermetallic compound at temperatures above 1000 °C has an explosive character and accompanies by a series of sparks in the interelectrode gap [19,77] that can be vibroacoustically recorded [21,97]. It should be noted that the enthalpy of the formation of ionic and metallic compounds can be estimated by the empirical value of electronegativities with an accuracy of 13.8–20.4% for intermetallics. The calculated values are provided in Table 14.
The enthalpy of the formation for reactions NiO (12) and AlNi (15) is less than zero; thus, these reactions spontaneously take place with the release of heat in contrast to another reaction. Table 15 shows the calculated entropy, Gibbs energy, and equilibrium temperature. In NiO (12) and AlNi (15) reactions, the entropy is above zero, corresponding to an increase in the degree of chaos (gases of H2 and O2). When entropy is less than zero in the formation Ni5Zn21 (14), reactions occur with a decrease in the degree of chaos (compound solidification). The calculated Gibbs energy for reaction with Ni5Zn21 (14) is less than zero when Gibbs energies for reactions with NiO (12) and AlNi (15) are above zero. It means that the reaction under normal conditions can only pass in the reverse direction: the formation of NiO (12) and AlNi (15) occurs with heat absorption when equilibrium temperatures (672.8 K and 3253.0 K, correspondingly) are achieved. Thus, the reaction of Ni and Zn is more likely with the presence of nickel-containing coating and brass wire since it does not require heat adsorption (Figure 9). As can be seen, the superior role in the formation of conductive debris in the interelectrode gap may play the chemical composition of the primary electrode (zinc of brass) in combination with the Ni-coating of the alumina workpiece machined in a water medium.

4. Conclusions

The conducted study has shown that:
(1)
the stable electrical discharge machining with the uniform density of electric discharges was achieved for aluminum-containing ceramics with a pulse frequency of 30 kHz and pulse duration of 1.7–2.5 μs;
(2)
the optimum concentration of the SnO suspension for electrical discharge machining Al2O3 ceramic sample using assisting Ni-Cr coating electrode with a thickness of 10–15 µm and brass wire-tool was 150 g/L for SnO granules of ⌀10 µm;
(3)
thermal dissociation of the insulating material under discharge pulses was proven by the results of the chemical analysis of the eroded kerf;
(4)
thermal dissociation of the insulating material has proved once again that the materials under discharge impulses are subjecting sublimation—direct transition of a material from a solid to a vapor state;
(5)
the maximum achievable material removal rate was 0.001 mm3/s which is less than for similar works that used carbon-containing working fluid and copper-group assisting measures but excluded the formation of insulating and chemically active carbides such as Al3C4 or Al2(C2)3 that intent to interact with water at normal conditions (+20 °C), oxygen or hydrogen at elevated temperatures (650–700 °C and 2200 °C correspondingly) and can hampers erosion process, lead to the formation of extremely rough product surfaces, destruction of machine fluid filtration systems and equipment, pose a threat to personnel;
(6)
the recommended value of the interelectrode gap for rough electrical discharge machining was 48.0 ± 4.9 µm;
(7)
the developed approach is original from the previously developed ones due to the usage of non-carbon-containing working fluid, non-copper-group assisting measures, and rewinding type of the primary electrode (wire electrical discharge machining);
(8)
the developed approach of electrical discharge machining aluminum containing ceramics is suitable for texturing cutting ceramics, aerospace optics, exploratory research of creating a new type of materials such as optically white or transparent conductive oxide ceramics that stayed an industry demand for decades;
(9)
the superior role in the formation of conductive debris (intermetallic compounds) in the interelectrode gap may play the chemical composition of the primary electrode (Zn of brass wire tool electrode) in combination with the Ni-Cr coating of the alumina workpiece machined in a water medium;
(10)
further research is in the field of properly thermochemically adjusted components of the materials in the working zone, such as insulating workpiece—assisting electrode—assisting powder—working fluid—primary electrode; development of the approach can contribute to developing electrical discharge machining for hard and super hard insulating material to obtain more sophisticated linear surfaces and accelerate the transition to the sixth technology paradigm associated with Kondratieff’s waves.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.N.G.; methodology, M.A.V.; software, E.Y.K.; validation, K.H.; formal analysis, E.Y.K.; investigation, E.Y.K. and S.N.G.; resources, M.A.V.; data curation, K.H.; writing—original draft preparation, A.A.O.; writing—review and editing, A.A.O.; visualization, K.H. and A.A.O.; supervision, S.N.G.; project administration, M.A.V.; funding acquisition, S.N.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The work was supported by a grant of the Russian Science Foundation, project No. 21-19-00790.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available in a publicly accessible repository.

Acknowledgments

The research was done at the Department of High-Efficiency Processing Technologies of MSTU Stankin.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kuzin, V.; Grigoriev, S.N.; Volosova, M.A. The role of the thermal factor in the wear mechanism of ceramic tools: Part 1. Macrolevel. J. Frict. Wear 2014, 35, 505–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Grigoriev, S.N.; Sinopalnikov, V.A.; Tereshin, M.V.; Gurin, V.D. Control of parameters of the cutting process on the basis of diagnostics of the machine tool and workpiece. Meas. Tech. 2012, 55, 555–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Grigoriev, S.N.; Volosova, M.A.; Fedorov, S.V.; Okunkova, A.A.; Pivkin, P.M.; Peretyagin, P.Y.; Ershov, A. Development of DLC-Coated Solid SiAlON/TiN Ceramic End Mills for Nickel Alloy Machining: Problems and Prospects. Coatings 2021, 11, 532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Grigoriev, S.N.; Vereschaka, A.A.; Fyodorov, S.V.; Sitnikov, N.N.; Batako, A.D. Comparative analysis of cutting properties and nature of wear of carbide cutting tools with multi-layered nano-structured and gradient coatings produced by using of various deposition methods. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2017, 90, 3421–3435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Volosova, M.A.; Grigor’ev, S.N.; Kuzin, V.V. Effect of tinaium nitride coatings on stress structural inhomogeneity in ox-ide-carbide ceramic. Part 2. Concentrated force action. Refract. Ind. Ceram. 2015, 55, 487–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Szutkowska, M.; Cygan, S.; Podsiadlo, M.; Laszkiewicz-Lukasik, J.; Cyboron, J.; Kalinka, A. Properties of TiC and TiN Reinforced Alumina-Zirconia Composites Sintered with Spark Plasma Technique. Metals 2019, 9, 1220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Grigoriev, S.; Pristinskiy, Y.; Volosova, M.; Fedorov, S.; Okunkova, A.; Peretyagin, P.; Smirnov, A. Wire electrical discharge machining, mechanical and tribological performance of TiN reinforced multiscale SiAlON ceramic composites fabricated by spark plasma sintering. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Podbolotov, K.B.; Dyatlova, E.M.; Volochko, A.T. Synthesis and reinforcement of heat-resistant cordierite-mullite ceramic structure with introduction of a fiber filler. Refract. Ind. Ceram. 2016, 57, 151–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Grigoriev, S.; Peretyagin, P.; Smirnov, A.; Solis, W.; Diaz, L.A.; Fernandez, A.; Torrecillas, R. Effect of graphene addition on the mechanical and electrical properties of Al2O3-SiCw ceramics. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2017, 37, 2473–2479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Grigoriev, S.; Volosova, M.; Vereschaka, A.; Sitnikov, N.; Milovich, F.; Bublikov, J.; Fyodorov, S.; Seleznev, A. Properties of (Cr,Al,Si)N-(DLC-Si) composite coatings deposited on a cutting ceramic substrate. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 18241–18255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Volosova, M.; Grigoriev, S.; Metel, A.; Shein, A. The role of thin-film vacuum-plasma coatings and their influence on the efficiency of ceramic cutting inserts. Coatings 2018, 8, 287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Volochko, A.T.; Podbolotov, K.B.; Dyatlova, E.M. Refractory and Infusible Ceramics (Ogneupornye I Tugoplavkie Keramicheskie Materialy), 1st ed.; Belorus. Nauka: Minsk, Belarus, 2013; pp. 79–82. [Google Scholar]
  13. Podbolotov, K.B.; Volochko, A.T.; Khort, N.A.; Gusarov, S.V. Refractory materials based on secondary resources and phosphate compounds. Refract. Ind. Ceram. 2019, 59, 579–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ighodaro, O.L.; Okoli, O.I. Fracture toughness enhancement for alumina systems: A Review. Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol. 2008, 5, 313–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Huang, C.A.; Shen, C.H.; Li, P.Y.; Lai, P.L. Effect of fabrication parameters on grinding performances of electroplated Ni-B-diamond tools with D150-diamond particles. J. Manuf. Processes 2022, 80, 374–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bishoyi, S.S.; Behera, S.K. Synthesis and structural characterization of nanocrystalline silicon by high energy mechanical milling using Al2O3 media. Adv. Powder Technol. 2022, 33, 103639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lazarenko, B.R.; Lazarenko, N.I. Electric spark machining of metals in water and electrolytes. (Elektroiskrovaya Obrabotka Metallov V Vode I Elektrolitakh). Surf. Eng. Appl. Electrochem. (Elektron. Obrab. Mater.) 1980, 1, 5–8. [Google Scholar]
  18. Lazarenko, B.R.; Mikhailov, V.V.; Gitlevich, A.E.; Verkhoturov, A.D.; Anfimov, I.S. Distribution of elements in surface layers during electric spark alloying. (Raspredelenie Elementov V Poverkhnostnykh Sloyakh Pri Elektroiskrovom Legirovanii). Surf. Eng. Appl. Electrochem. (Elektron. Obrab. Mater.) 1977, 3, 28–33. [Google Scholar]
  19. Lazarenko, B.R.; Duradzhi, V.N.; Bryantsev, I.V. Effect of incorporating an additional inductance on the characteristics of anode and cathode processes. (O Vliyanii Vklyucheniya Dopolnitel’noi Induktivnosti Na Kharakteristiki Anodnogo I Katodnogo Protsessov). Surf. Eng. Appl. Electrochem. (Elektron. Obrab. Mater.) 1979, 5, 8–13. [Google Scholar]
  20. Volosova, M.; Okunkova, A.; Peretyagin, P.; Melnik, Y.A.; Kapustina, N. On Electrical Discharge Machining of Non-Conductive Ceramics: A Review. Technologies 2019, 7, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Grigoriev, S.N.; Kozochkin, M.P.; Porvatov, A.N.; Volosova, M.A.; Okunkova, A.A. Electrical discharge machining of ceramic nanocomposites: Sublimation phenomena and adaptive control. Heliyon 2019, 5, e02629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Grigoriev, S.N.; Volosova, M.A.; Okunkova, A.A.; Fedorov, S.V.; Hamdy, K.; Podrabinnik, P.A.; Pivkin, P.M.; Kozochkin, M.P.; Porvatov, A.N. Electrical Discharge Machining of Oxide Nanocomposite: Nanomodification of Surface and Subsurface Layers. J. Manuf. Mater. Process. 2020, 4, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lukashenko, S.V.; Kovtun, A.V.; Dashuk, P.N.; Sokolov, B.N. The Method of Electrical Discharge Machining of Dielectrics. U.S. Patent 1,542,715, 10 December 1986. [Google Scholar]
  24. Mohri, N. EDM of advanced ceramics—From finish machining to machining insulating ceramics. CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol. 1996, 45, 289–296. [Google Scholar]
  25. Rashid, A.; Bilal, A.; Liu, C.; Jahan, M.P.; Talamona, D.; Perveen, A. Effect of Conductive Coatings on Micro-Electro-Discharge Machinability of Aluminum Nitride Ceramic Using On-Machine-Fabricated Microelectrodes. Materials 2019, 12, 3316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Popov, M.Y.; Churkin, V.D.; Kulnitskiy, B.A.; Kirichenko, A.N.; Bulatov, K.M.; Bykov, A.A.; Zinin, P.V.; Blank, V. Transformation of diamond to fullerene-type onions at pressure 70 GPa and temperature 2400 K. Nanotechnology 2020, 31, 315602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Borzdov, Y.M.; Khokhryakov, A.F.; Kupriyanov, I.N.; Nechaev, D.V.; Palyanov, Y.N. Crystallization of Diamond from Melts of Europium Salts. Crystals 2020, 10, 376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Fomin, Y.D.; Brazhkin, V.V. Comparative study of melting of graphite and graphene. Carbon 2020, 157, 767–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sychev, A.E.; Busurina, M.L.; Sachkova, N.V.; Vrel, D. Interaction of Graphite with a Ti-Al Melt during Self-Propagating High-Temperature Synthesis. Inorg. Mater. 2019, 55, 780–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liu, Y.H.; Li, X.P.; Ji, R.J.; Yu, L.L.; Zhang, H.F.; Li, Q.Y. Effect of technological parameter on the process performance for electric discharge milling of insulating Al2O3 ceramic. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2008, 208, 245–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lin, Y.-J.; Lin, Y.-C.; Wang, A.-C.; Wang, D.A.; Chow, H.M. Machining characteristics of EDM for non-conductive ceramics using adherent copper foils. In Advanced Materials Research, Materials Processing Technologies, Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Materials and Manufacturing Processes, Shenzhen, China, 6–8 November 2010; Jiang, Z.Y., Liu, X.H., Bu, J.L., Eds.; Trans Tech Publications Ltd.: Durnten-Zurich, Switzerland, 2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Moudood, M.A.; Sabur, A.; Ali, M.Y.; Jaafar, I.H. Effect of Peak Current on Material Removal Rate for Electrical Discharge Machining of Non-Conductive Al2O3 Ceramic. Adv. Mater. Res. 2014, 845, 730–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Schubert, A.; Zeidler, H.; Kühn, R.; Hackert-Oschätzchen, M.; Flemmig, S.; Treffkorn, N. Investigation of Ablation Behaviour in Micro-EDM of Nonconductive Ceramic Composites ATZ and Si3N4-TiN. Proc. CIRP 2016, 42, 727–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kucukturk, G.; Cogun, C. A New Method for Machining of Electrically Nonconductive Workpieces Using Electric Discharge Machining Technique. Mach. Sci. Technol. 2010, 14, 189–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Guo, Y.; Hou, P.; Shao, D.; Li, Z.; Wang, L.; Tang, L. High-Speed Wire Electrical Discharge Machining of Insulating Zirconia with a Novel Assisting Electrode. Mater. Manuf. Processes 2014, 29, 526–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Gattu, S.D.; Yan, J. Micro Electrical Discharge Machining of Ultrafine Particle Type Tungsten Carbide Using Dielectrics Mixed with Various Powders. Micromachines 2022, 13, 998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Zhang, R.-X.; Chen, M.; Xi, X.-C.; Zhao, W.-S. Study on dynamically variable attitude EDM machining method of deep narrow slots. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2022, 121, 4601–4623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Alam, M.N.; Siddiquee, A.N.; Khan, Z.A.; Khan, N.Z. A comprehensive review on wire EDM performance evaluation. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part E J. Process Mech. Eng. 2022, 236, 1724–1746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Obrosov, A.; Gulyaev, R.; Zak, A.; Ratzke, M.; Naveed, M.; Dudzinski, W.; Weiß, S. Chemical and morphological characterization of magnetron sputtered at different bias voltages Cr-Al-C coatings. Materials 2017, 10, 156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Bains, P.S.; Singh, S.; Sidhu, S.S.; Kaur, S.; Ablyaz, T.R. Investigation of surface properties of Al–SiC composites in hybrid electrical discharge machining. In Futuristic Composites, 1st ed.; Sidhu, S., Bains, P., Zitoune, R., Yazdani, M., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2018; pp. 181–196. [Google Scholar]
  41. Vozniakovskii, A.A.; Kidalov, S.V.; Kol’tsova, T.S. Development of composite material aluminum-carbon nanotubes with high hardness and controlled thermal conductivity. J. Compos. Mater. 2019, 53, 2959–2965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Calka, A.; Wexler, D. Mechanical milling assisted by electrical discharge. Nature 2002, 419, 147–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Volosova, M.A.; Okunkova, A.A.; Fedorov, S.V.; Hamdy, K.; Mikhailova, M.A. Electrical Discharge Machining Non-Conductive Ceramics: Combination of Materials. Technologies 2020, 8, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Grigoriev, S.N.; Volosova, M.A.; Okunkova, A.A.; Fedorov, S.V.; Hamdy, K.; Podrabinnik, P.A. Sub-Microstructure of Surface and Subsurface Layers after Electrical Discharge Machining Structural Materials in Water. Metals 2021, 11, 1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Grigoriev, S.N.; Hamdy, K.; Volosova, M.A.; Okunkova, A.A.; Fedorov, S.V. Electrical Discharge Machining of Oxide and Nitride Ceramics: A Review. Mater. Des. 2021, 209, 109965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Grigoriev, S.N.; Volosova, M.A.; Okunkova, A.A.; Fedorov, S.V.; Hamdy, K.; Podrabinnik, P.A. Elemental and Thermochemical Analyses of Materials after Electrical Discharge Machining in Water: Focus on Ni and Zn. Materials 2021, 14, 3189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Ikim, M.I.; Spiridonova, E.Y.; Belysheva, T.V.; Gromov, V.F.; Gerasimov, G.N.; Trakhtenberg, L.I. Structural properties of metal oxide nanocomposites: Effect of preparation method. Russ. J. Phys. Chem. B 2016, 10, 543–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Gorina, Y.I.; Golubkov, M.V.; Osina, T.I.; Rodin, V.V.; Sentyurina, N.N.; Chernook, S.G.; Stepanov, V.A. Two-band superconductivity of Sn1-x InxTe crystals with T-c = 3.6–3.8 K. Phys. Solid State 2017, 59, 1918–1925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Polygalov, Y.I.; Poplavnoi, A.S.; Tupitsyn, V.E. Band structure and optical properties of zinc and cadmium diphosphide near the absorption edge. Semiconductors 1996, 30, 511–513. [Google Scholar]
  50. Liang, Y.; Zeng, Y.; Tang, X.; Xia, W.; Song, B.; Yao, F.; Yang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Peng, C.; Zhou, C.; et al. One-step synthesis of Cu(OH)2-Cu/Ni foam cathode for electrochemical reduction of nitrate. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 451, 138936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Gupta, M.K.; Mittal, R.; Chaplot, S.L.; Rols, S. Phonons, nature of bonding, and their relation to anomalous thermal expansion behavior of M2O (M = Au, Ag, Cu). J. Appl. Phys. 2014, 115, 093507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Ren, R.-P.; Cheng, L.; Lv, Y.-K. Selective oxidation of vinyl chloride on Ag2O(100), Cu2O(100), and Au2O(100) surfaces: A density functional theory study. Surf. Sci. 2014, 630, 116–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Fuks-Janczarek, I.; Miedzinski, R.; Kassab, L.R.P.; Bordon, C.D.S. Effect of annealing time on the linear and nonlinear optical properties of PbOGeO2Ga2O3 glasses doped with Er3+ and Yb3+, Au3+ ions. Opt. Mater. 2020, 102, 109794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Metel, A.; Bolbukov, V.; Volosova, M.; Grigoriev, S.; Melnik, Y. Source of metal atoms and fast gas molecules for coating deposition on complex shaped dielectric products. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2013, 225, 34–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Metel, A.; Bolbukov, V.; Volosova, M.; Grigoriev, S.; Melnik, Y. Equipment for deposition of thin metallic films bombarded by fast argon atoms. Instrum. Exp. Tech. 2014, 57, 345–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kurapova, O.Y.; Smirnov, I.V.; Solovyeva, E.N.; Konakov, Y.V.; Lomakina, T.E.; Glukharev, A.G.; Konakov, V.G. The Intermetallic Compounds Formation and Mechanical Properties of Composites in the Ni-Al System. Mater. Phys. Mech. 2022, 48, 136–146. [Google Scholar]
  57. Ibraeva, G.M.; Sukurov, B.M.; Aubakirova, R.K.; Mansurov, Y.N. Multilayer structure formed in diffusion zone of Al-Co and Al-Ni systems. News Natl. Acad. Sci. Repub. Kazakhstan Ser. Geol. Tech. Sci. 2018, 3, 57–63. [Google Scholar]
  58. Grigoriev, S.N.; Teleshevskii, V.I. Measurement Problems in Technological Shaping Processes. Meas. Tech. 2011, 54, 744–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Grigoriev, S.N.; Gurin, V.D.; Volosova, M.A.; Cherkasova, N.Y. Development of residual cutting tool life prediction algorithm by processing on CNC machine tool. Mater. Werkst. 2013, 44, 790–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Grigoriev, S.N.; Kozochkin, M.P.; Sabirov, F.S.; Kutin, A.A. Diagnostic systems as basis for technological improvement. Proc. CIRP 2012, 1, 599–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Vereschaka, A.S.; Grigoriev, S.N.; Sotova, E.S.; Vereschaka, A.A. Improving the efficiency of the cutting tools made of mixed ceramics by applying modifying nano-scale multilayered coatings. Adv. Mat. Res. 2013, 712–715, 391–394. [Google Scholar]
  62. Vereschaka, A.A.; Grigoriev, S.N.; Volosova, M.A.; Batako, A.; Vereschaka, A.S.; Sitnikov, N.N.; Seleznev, A.E. Nano-scale multi-layered coatings for improved efficiency of ceramic cutting tools. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2017, 90, 27–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Grigoriev, S.; Volosova, M.; Fyodorov, S.; Lyakhovetskiy, M.; Seleznev, A. DLC-coating application to improve the durability of ceramic tools. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2019, 28, 4415–4426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Viswanathan, V.; Laha, T.; Balani, K.; Agarwal, A.; Seal, S. Challenges and advances in nanocomposite processing techniques. Mater. Sci. Eng. R 2006, 54, 121–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Wang, L.; Zhang, J.; Jiang, W. Recent development in reactive synthesis of nanostructured bulk materials by spark plasma sintering. Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 2013, 39, 103–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Zhang, Y.F.; Wang, L.J.; Jiang, W.; Chen, L.-D. Microstructure and properties of Al2O3-TiC composites fabricated by combination of high-energy ball milling and spark plasma sintering (SPS). J. Inorg. Mater. 2005, 20, 1445. [Google Scholar]
  67. Fukuzawa, Y.; Tani, T.; Mohri, N. Machining characteristics of insulated Si3N4 ceramics by electrical discharge method—Use of powder-mixed machining fluid. J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn. 2000, 108, 184–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Zhang, W.; Li, L.; Wang, N.; Teng, Y.L. Machining of 7Cr13Mo steel by US-PMEDM process. Mater. Manuf. Processes 2021, 9, 1060–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Kumar, A.; Mandal, A.; Dixit, A.R.; Das, A.K. Performance evaluation of Al2O3 nano powder mixed dielectric for electric discharge machining of Inconel 825. Mater. Manuf. Process. 2018, 33, 986–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Tzeng, Y.F.; Lee, C.Y. Effects of powder characteristics on electrodischarge machining efficiency. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2001, 17, 586–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Melnik, Y.A.; Kozochkin, M.P.; Porvatov, A.N.; Okunkova, A.A. On adaptive control for electrical discharge machining using vibroacoustic emission. Technologies 2018, 6, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Vikhareva, N.A.; Krylov, V.S.; Simonova, G.V. Problems of methodological support in the verification of instrument current transformers. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2021, 1889, 042070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Vikhareva, N.A.; Krylov, V.S.; Simonova, G.V. Analysis of the Metrological Characteristics of Current Transformers Based on the Results of Periodic Verification. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2022, 1070, 012023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Ivanov, S.N.; Lisenkov, V.V.; Shklyaev, V.A. Investigation of discharge formation and generation of runaway electrons beam in dense gases (Book Chapter). In Runaway Electrons Preionized Diffuse Discharges; Nova Science Publishers: Hauppauge, NY, USA, 2014; pp. 330–354. [Google Scholar]
  75. Zakharov, O.V.; Brzhozovskii, B.M. Accuracy of centering during measurement by roundness gauges. Meas. Tech. 2006, 49, 1094–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Rezchikov, A.F.; Kochetkov, A.V.; Zakharov, O.V. Mathematical models for estimating the degree of influence of major factors on performance and accuracy of coordinate measuring machines. MATEC Web Conf. 2017, 129, 01054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Grigoriev, S.N.; Volosova, M.A.; Okunkova, A.A.; Fedorov, S.V.; Hamdy, K.; Podrabinnik, P.A.; Pivkin, P.M.; Kozochkin, M.P.; Porvatov, A.N. Wire Tool Electrode Behavior and Wear under Discharge Pulses. Technologies 2020, 8, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Zakharov, O.V.; Balaev, A.F.; Kochetkov, A.V. Modeling Optimal Path of Touch Sensor of Coordinate Measuring Machine Based on Traveling Salesman Problem Solution. Procedia Eng. 2017, 206, 1458–1463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Yusupov, Z.A. Study of Temperatures and Residual Stresses for Face Plunge-Cut Grinding of Heat-Resistant Alloys. Russ. Aeronaut. 2021, 64, 116–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Syreyshchikova, N.V.; Pimenov, D.Y.; Gupta, M.K.; Nadolny, K.; Giasin, K.; Aamir, M.; Sharma, S. Relationship between Pressure and Output Parameters in Belt Grinding of Steels and Nickel Alloy. Materials 2021, 14, 4704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Kubaschewski, O. Experimental Thermochemistry Of Alloys. Thermochim. Acta 1988, 129, 11–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Brzezińska, M.; García-Muñoz, P.; Ruppert, A.M.; Keller, N. Photoactive ZnO Materials for Solar Light-Induced CuxO-ZnO Catalyst Preparation. Materials 2018, 11, 2260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Lee, H.; Zhang, X.; Hwang, J.; Park, J. Morphological Influence of Solution-Processed Zinc Oxide Films on Electrical Characteristics of Thin-Film Transistors. Materials 2016, 9, 851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Zhikhareva, I.G.; Zhikharev, A.I. Modeling Of Electrodeposited Precipitation Structure. Izv. Vyss. Uchebnykh Zaved. Khimiya I Khimicheskaya Tekhnologiya 1993, 36, 52–58. [Google Scholar]
  85. Kuz’min, M.P.; Kuz’mina, M.Y.; Fedorov, S.N. Determination of the thermodynamic stability of intermetallic compounds in technical aluminum. Mater. Sci. Forum 2022, 1052, 86–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Padalko, A.G.; Ellert, O.G.; Efimov, N.N.; Novotortsev, V.M.; Talanova, G.V.; Zubarev, G.I.; Fedotov, V.T.; Suchkov, A.N.; Solntsev, K.A. High-pressure phase transformations, microstructure, and magnetic properties of the hypereutectic alloy 10Ni-90Al. Inorg. Mater. 2013, 49, 1098–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Belov, N.A. Structure and strengthening of casting alloys of aluminium-nickel-zirconium system. Metalloved. I Termicheskaya Obrab. Met. 1993, 10, 19–22. [Google Scholar]
  88. Chemical Encyclopedia (Khimicheskaya Enciklopediya), 1st ed.; Knunyants, I.L. (Ed.) Great Russian Encyclopedia (Bolshaya Rossiyskaya Enciklopediya): Moscow, Russia, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  89. Zhelezny, V.; Khliyeva, O.; Motovoy, I.; Lukianov, N. An experimental investigation and modelling of the thermal and caloric properties of nanofluids isopropyl alcohol—Al2O3 nanoparticles. Thermochim. Acta 2019, 678, 178296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Turchanin, A.A.; Tomilin, I.A.; Zubkov, A.A.; Inoue, A. Experimental determination of the formation enthalpies of zirconium-nickel-alminium amorphous alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng. A-Struct. Mater. Prop. Microstruct. Process. 1997, 226, 487–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Stepanov, N.D.; Shaysultanov, D.G.; Chernichenko, R.S.; Tikhonovsky, M.A.; Zherebtsov, S.V. Effect of Al on structure and mechanical properties of Fe-Mn-Cr-Ni-Al non-equiatomic high entropy alloys with high Fe content. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 770, 194–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Stepanov, N.D.; Shaysultanov, D.G.; Tikhonovsky, M.A.; Zherebtsov, S.V. Structure and high temperature mechanical properties of novel non-equiatomic Fe-(Co, Mn)-Cr-Ni-Al-(Ti) high entropy alloys. Intermetallics 2018, 102, 140–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Li, W.; Chen, L.; Liu, D.; Liu, J.; An, L. Ultra-low temperature reactive flash sintering synthesis of high-enthalpy and high-entropy Ca0.2Co0.2Ni0.2Cu0.2Zn0.2O oxide ceramics. Mater. Lett. 2021, 304, 130679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Olalekan, O.A.; Campbell, A.J.; Adewuyi, A.; Jye Lau, W.; Adeyemi, O.G. Synthesis and application of ZnO-MgO-NiO@Stearicamide mixed oxide for removal of ciprofloxacin and ampicillin from aqueous solution. Results Chem. 2022, 4, 100457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Zhikhareva, I.G. Calculation of Energy Characteristics of Nuclei under Electrocrystallization of Metals. Zhurnal Fiz. Khimii 1992, 66, 2232–2235. [Google Scholar]
  96. Metel, A.S.; Stebulyanin, M.M.; Fedorov, S.V.; Okunkova, A.A. Power Density Distribution for Laser Additive Manufacturing (SLM): Potential, Fundamentals and Advanced Applications. Technologies 2019, 7, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Grigoriev, S.N.; Kozochkin, M.P.; Kropotkina, E.Y.; Okunkova, A.A. Study of wire tool-electrode behavior during electrical discharge machining by vibroacoustic monitoring. Mech. Ind. 2016, 17, 717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 2. (a) Wire electrical discharge machine ARTA 123 Pro (common view); (b) coated samples; (c) installation of the coated Al2O3 sample at working area of the machine, where 1—upper guide, 2—holder, 3—replaceable work tank; 4—a coated workpiece; 5—a rewinding wire tool; 6—a lower guide.
Figure 2. (a) Wire electrical discharge machine ARTA 123 Pro (common view); (b) coated samples; (c) installation of the coated Al2O3 sample at working area of the machine, where 1—upper guide, 2—holder, 3—replaceable work tank; 4—a coated workpiece; 5—a rewinding wire tool; 6—a lower guide.
Metals 12 01749 g002
Figure 3. Granulometric analysis of the composition of aluminum oxide powder.
Figure 3. Granulometric analysis of the composition of aluminum oxide powder.
Metals 12 01749 g003
Figure 4. Granulometric analysis of the composition of tin oxide powder.
Figure 4. Granulometric analysis of the composition of tin oxide powder.
Metals 12 01749 g004
Figure 5. Microstructure of the Al2O3 sintered sample at the fracture at 10,000× (a), at 66,700× (b).
Figure 5. Microstructure of the Al2O3 sintered sample at the fracture at 10,000× (a), at 66,700× (b).
Metals 12 01749 g005
Figure 6. The obtained slot (kerf) with a depth of 68.99 µm at pulse duration D = 2 µs, optical microscopy, general view (a), top view (b).
Figure 6. The obtained slot (kerf) with a depth of 68.99 µm at pulse duration D = 2 µs, optical microscopy, general view (a), top view (b).
Metals 12 01749 g006
Figure 7. SEM-image of the machined kerf of the coated Al2O3 sample, 10,000× (a), chemical mapping of the observed area by elements, aluminum (b), oxygen (c), nickel (d), chrome (e), tin (f).
Figure 7. SEM-image of the machined kerf of the coated Al2O3 sample, 10,000× (a), chemical mapping of the observed area by elements, aluminum (b), oxygen (c), nickel (d), chrome (e), tin (f).
Metals 12 01749 g007
Figure 8. The performance of electrical discharge machining alumina using Ni-Cr coating and SnO-suspension.
Figure 8. The performance of electrical discharge machining alumina using Ni-Cr coating and SnO-suspension.
Metals 12 01749 g008
Figure 9. Thermochemical parameters of chemical reactions of nickel with some components of water medium (oxygen), brass wire tool (zinc) and dielectric workpiece (alumina).
Figure 9. Thermochemical parameters of chemical reactions of nickel with some components of water medium (oxygen), brass wire tool (zinc) and dielectric workpiece (alumina).
Metals 12 01749 g009
Table 1. Some physical, thermal, optical and electrical properties of alumina.
Table 1. Some physical, thermal, optical and electrical properties of alumina.
Density ρ, g/sm3Melting Point Tm, KCoefficient of Linear Thermal Expansion α × 106, K−1
(at 20–1000 °C)
Thermal Conductivity λ, W·(m·K)−1
(at 20–1000 °C)
Spectral Transmission Range, µmPermittivity, F/m
3.8–4.023457.0–8.022–250.17–5.59.5–10.0
Table 3. Main characteristics of wire electrical discharge machine ARTA 123 Pro.
Table 3. Main characteristics of wire electrical discharge machine ARTA 123 Pro.
SpecificationValue and Description
Max axis motions along the axes X × Y × Z, mm125 × 200 × 80
Accuracy of positioning along the axes, µm±1
Achievable roughness parameter Ra, µm0.6
Dielectric mediumAny
Max power consumption, kW<6
Table 4. The factors chosen for wire electrical discharge machining in the water-based suspension.
Table 4. The factors chosen for wire electrical discharge machining in the water-based suspension.
FactorValue
Operational voltage, Uo108 V
Pulse frequency, f10, 15, 20, 25, 30 kHz
Pulse duration, D1, 1.5, 1.7, 2, 2.35, 2.7 µs
Rewinding speed, Ws3.4 m/min
Feed rate, Wr0.1 mm/min
Wire tension, FT0.25 N
Table 5. Enthalpy and molar entropy for some substances at 298 K [88].
Table 5. Enthalpy and molar entropy for some substances at 298 K [88].
SubstanceStandard Enthalpy of Formation f H 298   K , kJ·mol−1Standard Molar Entropy f S 298   K , J mol−1 K−1
Al (c)028.31
Al2O3 (c) [89]−1675.050.94
AlNi (c) [90,91]−118.40711.47
H2 (g)0130.52
H2O (l)−285.8469.96
Ni (c)029.86
NiO (c) [92,93]−239.737.99
O2 (g)0205.03
Zn (c)041.63
ZnO (c) [94]−350.843.5
Table 6. Granulometry of aluminum oxide powder.
Table 6. Granulometry of aluminum oxide powder.
Inner Diameter Range, µmVolume, %Cumulative Volume, %
1.00–10.008.178.17
10.00–16.0014.5722.74
16.00–20.007.5030.24
20.00–25.008.6238.87
25.00–32.0012.0950.95
32.00–38.009.2560.20
38.00–45.009.5569.75
45.00–53.008.8678.61
53.00–63.008.4587.05
63.00–75.006.4793.52
75.00–90.003.5597.07
90.00–106.001.9399.00
106.00–125.001.00100.00
Table 7. Granulometry of tin oxide powder.
Table 7. Granulometry of tin oxide powder.
Inner Diameter Range, µmVolume, %Cumulative Volume, %
1.00–10.006.816.81
10.00–16.009.1315.94
16.00–20.005.8521.79
20.00–25.006.57 28.35
25.00–32.008.18 36.54
32.00–38.005.72 42.25
38.00–45.005.79 48.04
45.00–53.007.34 55.38
53.00–63.007.36 62.74
63.00–75.006.81 69.55
75.00–90.006.69 76.24
90.00–106.003.09 79.33
106.00–125.003.01 82.35
125.00–150.003.12 85.47
150.00–180.001.70 87.17
250.00–300.0012.84 100.00
Table 8. Chemical analysis of Al2O3 sample at the fracture.
Table 8. Chemical analysis of Al2O3 sample at the fracture.
Chemical ElementsAtomic Ratio, at. %Weight Ratio, wt. %
Al37.4150.2
O62.5949.8
Table 9. Electrical properties of the developed coating at +20 °C.
Table 9. Electrical properties of the developed coating at +20 °C.
MaterialElectrical Conductivity γ, Sm∙cm−1 Electrical Conductivity 2 γ, Sm∙m−1Specific Resistivity 2 R, Ω∙mm2∙m−1Specific Resistivity 2 R, Ω∙m
Chrome-nickel alloy KhN77TYuR0.008019 ± 0.00001 10.8019 × 1061.2471.247 × 10−6
Al2O30.0000001 ± 0.0000005 30.00000474 × 106210 985.22.11 × 10−1
1 experimental values; 2 calculated values; 3 for reference.
Table 10. Chemical analysis of machined sample at the machined kerf.
Table 10. Chemical analysis of machined sample at the machined kerf.
Spectrum NumberChemical Elements, wt. %
AlONiCrSn
137.5348.74.892.651.61
236.5748.145.32.571.67
339.8948.774.932.11-
Table 11. The average measured kerf parameters for each factor-set and discharge gap of the machined alumina using a 12 µm thick Ni-Cr coating and SnO-suspension (150 g/L).
Table 11. The average measured kerf parameters for each factor-set and discharge gap of the machined alumina using a 12 µm thick Ni-Cr coating and SnO-suspension (150 g/L).
NumberPulse Frequency f, kHzPulse Duration D, µsKerf Width w, µmKerf Depth h, µmKerf Length l, µmSpark Gap Δ, µm
1101310.74 ± 3.0168.99 ± 3.002000 ± 3.0684.44 ± 4.88
2102.35318.76 ± 3.0166.32 ± 3.003600 ± 3.1299.67 ± 4.88
3202.5269.02 ± 3.0067.99 ± 3.002000 ± 3.0642.05 ± 4.88
4252.5257.79 ± 3.0095.20 ± 3.003000 ± 3.109.86 ± 4.88
5302.5320.37 ± 3.0149.74 ± 3.004000 ± 3.13157.80 ± 4.88
6102.7254.05 ± 3.0050.81 ± 3.002000 ± 3.0659.19 ± 4.88
Table 12. The material removal rate of electrical discharge machining alumina ceramics using a 12 µm thick Ni-Cr coating and SnO-suspension (150 g/L).
Table 12. The material removal rate of electrical discharge machining alumina ceramics using a 12 µm thick Ni-Cr coating and SnO-suspension (150 g/L).
NumberKerf Area in the Plan A, mm2Volume of Removed Material V, mm3Estimated Machining Time t, sVolumetric Material Removal Rate, mm3/s
10.0148 ± 0.00009210.0341.390.0005
20.0146 ± 0.00009390.0539.790.0010
30.0128 ± 0.00009180.0340.790.0005
40.0180 ± 0.00009300.0557.100.0006
50.0108 ± 0.00009420.0429.840.0010
60.0089 ± 0.00009180.0230.480.0004
Table 13. Comparison of performance parameter of electrical discharge machining alumina based on the use of assistive tools.
Table 13. Comparison of performance parameter of electrical discharge machining alumina based on the use of assistive tools.
Primary ToolAssisting ToolAssisting PowderWorking MediumVolumetric Material Removal Rate, mm3/s Reference
Brass wire,
⌀0.25 mm
Ni-Cr PVD coating, 12 µmSnO particles, ⌀10 µm, 150 g/LDeionized
water
0.0014Current study
Copper prism,
5 × 5 mm
Copper foil, 6 µm-Mineral oil
(hydrocarbons)
0.0051[32]
Copper tube,
⌀3.5 mm
(inner—⌀3.0)
Resin-based carbon tapeGraphite particles, ⌀30 µm, 7–10 g/LKerosene
(hydrocarbons)
0.0213[34]
Table 14. Calculated enthalpy of formation of some Ni-containing substances.
Table 14. Calculated enthalpy of formation of some Ni-containing substances.
Chemical ReactionChemical Composition of DebrisAmount of Substance n, molEnthalpy of Substances f H 298   K , kJ·mol−1Enthalpy of Reaction r H T , kJ
(12)NiO 1 + 1 T 1 + 1 0 285.8 T 239.7 + 0 1 · 239.7 + 1 · 0 1 · 0 + 1 · 285.8 = 46.1
(14)Ni5Zn21 5 + 21 T 1 0 + 0 T 225.96 1 · 225.96 5 · 0 + 21 · 0 = 225.96
(15)AlNi 2 + 4 T 4 + 3 1675.0 + 0 T 118.4 + 0 4 · 118.4 + 3 · 0 2 · 1675.0 + 4 · 0 = 2870.0
Table 15. Calculated entropy of some Ni-containing substances and equilibrium temperatures.
Table 15. Calculated entropy of some Ni-containing substances and equilibrium temperatures.
Chemical ReactionChemical Composition of DebrisEntropy of Substances f S 298   K , J·mol−1Entropy of Reaction r S T , JGibbs Energy of Reaction r G T , kJ·mol−1Equilibrium Temperature of Reaction T, K
(12)NiO 29.9 + 70.1 T 38.0 + 130.52 1 · 38.0 + 1 · 130.52 1 · 29.9 + 1 · 70.1 = 68.52 46.1 298 · 0.06852 = 25.68 46.1 0.06852 = 672.80
(14)Ni5Zn21 29.86 + 41.63 T 359.0 1 · 359.0 5 · 29.86 + 21 · 41.63 = 664.53 225.96 298 · 0.66453 = 27.93 225.96 0.66453 = 340.03
(15)AlNi 50.94 + 29.86 T 11.47 + 205.03 4 · 11.5 + 3 · 205.0 2 · 50.9 + 4 · 29.9 = 882.3 2870.0 298 · 0.8823 = 2607.0   2870.0 0.8823 = 3253.0
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Okunkova, A.A.; Volosova, M.A.; Kropotkina, E.Y.; Hamdy, K.; Grigoriev, S.N. Electrical Discharge Machining of Alumina Using Ni-Cr Coating and SnO Powder-Mixed Dielectric Medium. Metals 2022, 12, 1749. https://doi.org/10.3390/met12101749

AMA Style

Okunkova AA, Volosova MA, Kropotkina EY, Hamdy K, Grigoriev SN. Electrical Discharge Machining of Alumina Using Ni-Cr Coating and SnO Powder-Mixed Dielectric Medium. Metals. 2022; 12(10):1749. https://doi.org/10.3390/met12101749

Chicago/Turabian Style

Okunkova, Anna A., Marina A. Volosova, Elena Y. Kropotkina, Khaled Hamdy, and Sergey N. Grigoriev. 2022. "Electrical Discharge Machining of Alumina Using Ni-Cr Coating and SnO Powder-Mixed Dielectric Medium" Metals 12, no. 10: 1749. https://doi.org/10.3390/met12101749

APA Style

Okunkova, A. A., Volosova, M. A., Kropotkina, E. Y., Hamdy, K., & Grigoriev, S. N. (2022). Electrical Discharge Machining of Alumina Using Ni-Cr Coating and SnO Powder-Mixed Dielectric Medium. Metals, 12(10), 1749. https://doi.org/10.3390/met12101749

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop