Microstructure, Phase Composition, and Mechanical Properties of a Layered Bimetallic Composite ER70S-6-ER309LSI Obtained by the WAAM Method
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Experimental Stand and Materials
2.2. Modes and Strategy WAAM
2.3. Metallographic Studies
2.4. Spectral, Ferrite, and X-ray Analysis
2.5. Mechanical Testing
2.6. Heat Treatment Modes
- Austenization—heating the sample to a temperature of 1100 °C, holding at this temperature for 1 h, and subsequent cooling in water.
- Austenization + Normalization (normalization annealing): heating the sample to a temperature of 930 °C, holding at this temperature for 1 h, and then cooling in still air.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Geometry
3.2. Alloying Element Analysis
3.3. Microstructure
3.4. Ferrite Phase Analysis
- -
- A range of 1400–1325 °C, in which the δ-ferrite formed during crystallization interacts with liquid steel with the formation of austenite by the peritectic reaction.
- -
- A range of 1325–1075 °C, in which δ-ferrite dissolves in austenite when the temperature of solid steel drops below the solidus temperature. With rapid cooling of solid steel, kinetic limitations of dissolution are possible.
- -
- A range of 1075–925 °C, in which, with sufficient exposure time, δ-ferrite, which remained after crystallization and solidification and did not have time to dissolve when solid steel is cooled in the temperature range of 1325–1075 °C, should completely dissolve in austenite.
- -
- Below 925 °C, ferrite precipitates from austenite, which participates in the eutectoid reaction of the formation of the σ-phase; however, the development of this process is kinetically retarded and can be ignored.
3.5. X-ray Diffraction
3.6. Microhardness
3.7. Mechanical Properties
4. Conclusions
- In the production of the layered bimetallic composite material “ER70S-6-ER309LSI” by the WAAM method, the synergistic approach to setting the operating mode of the equipment is preferable. It has been established that the WAAM parameters, consisting of the implementation of the welding mode “Double Pulse”, followed by the cooling of a single printed layer to 80 °C, provide the most uniform workpiece geometry with minimal allowances for subsequent machining.
- The distributions of the chemical elements, obtained in the process of the study, in the central and border areas of the ER70S-6 steel, which is a part of the bimetallic composite, are stable and practically do not depend on the WAAM parameters or the type of subsequent heat treatment. For ER309LSI steel, the distribution of the chemical elements in the workpiece is largely determined by the surfacing mode and the type of subsequent heat treatment. Based on the results, it can be argued that the samples produced in welding equipment using the “Double Pulse” operating mode with specific energy consumed during surfacing Q = 0.6 kJ/mm, as well as the samples manufactured using the above WAAM mode with heat treatment in the form of austenitization and subsequent normalization annealing, have the most uniform chemical composition.
- An analysis of the ER70S-6-ER309LSI bimetallic composite’s structure showed that the structure of the ER70S-6 steel, formed in different WAAM modes, is represented by ferrite and a ferrite–cementite mixture (pearlite). It is determined that the structure of steel ER309LSI, depending on the WAAM mode and the zone under consideration, has a different ratio of austenite, δ-ferrite of different morphological structures (lathy ferrite, granular ferrite, skeletal ferrite), carbide, and intermetallic chromium phases. In order to improve the structure of the ER309LSI steel included in the composite, the “Double Pulse” mode should be used with the cooling of a single printed layer to 80 °C and subsequent heat treatment in the form of austenization and normalization annealing of the resulting workpiece. This mode provides grinding of the structure’s dendritic component and reduces the amount of δ-ferrite phase in the structure. However, it should be taken into account that during normalization annealing, the presence of the workpiece at temperatures above 900 °C contributes to an increase in the near-boundary content of δ-ferrite phase, so the exposure time during such heat treatment should be reduced.
- The WAAM mode and the type of subsequent heat treatment have a significant impact on the phase composition of the main layers and the near-boundary zones of the layered bimetallic composite ER70S-6-ER309LSI. Applying heat treatment in the form of austenization and austenization followed by normalization, a decrease in the average content of the δ-ferrite phase in ER309LSI steel to 1.5% is observed. However, as mentioned earlier, in order to reduce the content of the δ-ferrite phase in the near-boundary zone of ER309LSI steel, the sample exposure time during normalization annealing should be reduced.
- An analysis of the microhardness of the bimetallic composite ER70S-6-ER309LSI, obtained using various WAAM and heat treatment modes, showed that heat treatment by way of austenitization followed by normalization annealing has an essential positive effect. Such heat treatment made it possible to significantly increase the stability of microhardness values along the vertical axis for each material included in the composite.
- In the process of the research, it was found that the mechanical properties of the bimetallic composite ER70S-6-ER309LSI depend on the strategy for constructing the composite during the surfacing and modes of subsequent heat treatment, while the values of the strength properties of the composite after WAAM without subsequent heat treatment are formed in the zone of strength characteristics’ averaged values of the materials included in the composite. It should be noted that during the experiment with the ER70S-6-ER309LSI bimetallic composite’s uniaxial tension, the zone of fracture localization was not the boundary between the two materials. Heat treatment by way of austenization followed by normalization annealing made it possible to significantly (up to 30–40%) increase the strength characteristics of the bimetallic composite while maintaining plasticity characteristics at a sufficiently high level from an operational point of view.
- Based on the presented results of the work conducted, it can be concluded that when creating products using the WAAM method from the bimetallic composite “ER70S-6-ER309LSI”, it is necessary to maintain the technological conditions of surfacing to ensure a defect-free structure. At the same time, in the first approximation, the mechanical properties of this system of alloys can be considered a superposition of the properties of the starting materials. To reduce the heterogeneity of the structure, reduce porosity, and improve mechanical properties, it is necessary to carry out additional heat treatment (austenization followed by normalization). As further ways to study this system of alloys, one can note the need for additional mechanical tests (impact strength, fatigue strength, corrosion resistance) in a wide temperature range, as well as the development of additional measures to improve the properties of the transition zone (use of additional filler wires, alloying powders, etc.).
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Herzog, D.; Seyda, V.; Wycisk, E.; Emmelmann, C. Additive manufacturing of metals. Acta Mater. 2016, 117, 371–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zakay, A.; Aghion, E. Effect of Post-Heat Treatment on the Corrosion Behavior of AlSi10Mg Alloy Produced by Additive Manufacturing. JOM J. Miner. Met. Mater. Soc. 2019, 71, 1150–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leon, A.; Shirizly, A.; Aghion, E. Corrosion Behavior of AlSi10Mg Alloy Produced by Additive Manufacturing (AM) vs. Its Counterpart Gravity Cast Alloy. Metals 2016, 6, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bai, X.; Colegrove, P.; Ding, J.; Zhou, X.; Diao, C.; Bridgeman, P.; roman Hönnige, J.; Zhang, H.; Williams, S. Numerical analysis of heat transfer and fluid flow in multilayer deposition of PAW-based wire and arc additive manufacturing. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2018, 124, 504–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, B.; Pan, Z.; Ding, D.; Cuiuri, D.; Li, H.; Xu, J.; Norrish, J. A review of the wire arc additive manufacturing of metals: Properties, defects and quality improvement. J. Manuf. Process. 2018, 35, 127–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ding, D.; Pan, Z.; Cuiuri, D.; Li, H. Wire-feed additive manufacturing of metal components: Technologies, developments and future interests. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2015, 81, 465–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Calleja-Ochoa, A.; Gonzalez-Barrio, H.; López de Lacalle, N.; Martínez, S.; Albizuri, J.; Lamikiz, A. A new approach in the design of microstructured ultrulight components to achieve maximum functional performance. Materials 2021, 14, 1588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, N.; Huang, S.; Zhang, G.; Qin, R.; Liu, W.; Xiong, H.; Shi, G.; Blackburn, J. Progress in additive manufacturing on new materials: A review. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2019, 35, 242–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bajaj, P.; Hariharan, A.; Kini, A.; Kürnsteiner, P.; Raabe, D.; Jägle, E.A. Steels in additive manufacturing: A review of their microstructure and properties. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2020, 772, 138633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- DebRoy, T.; Wei, H.L.; Zuback, J.S.; Mukherjee, T.; Elmer, J.W.; Milewski, J.O.; Beese, A.M.; Wilson-Heid, A.; De, A.; Zhang, W. Additive manufacturing of metallic components–Process, structure and properties. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2018, 92, 112–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frazier, W.E. Metal additive manufacturing: A review. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2014, 23, 1917–1928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, H.; Yang, J.; Yin, J.; Wang, Z.; Zeng, X. Comparison on mechanical anisotropies of selective laser melted Ti-6Al-4V alloy and 304 stainless steel. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2017, 695, 92–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hou, J.; Chen, W.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, K.; Huang, A. Microstructure, tensile properties and mechanical anisotropy of selective laser melted 304 L stainless steel. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2020, 48, 63–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Huang, W. Comparisons of 304 austenitic stainless steel manufactured by laser metal deposition and selective laser melting. J. Manuf. Proc. 2020, 57, 324–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kurzynowski, T.; Gruber, K.; Stopyra, W.; Kuźnicka, B.; Chlebus, E. Correlation between process parameters, microstructure and properties of 316 L stainless steel processed by selective laser melting. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2018, 718, 64–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salman, O.O.; Brenne, F.; Niendorf, T.; Eckert, J.; Prashanth, K.G.; He, T.; Scudino, S. Impact of the scanning strategy on the mechanical behavior of 316L steel synthesized by selective laser melting. J. Manuf. Process. 2019, 45, 255–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kruth, J.-P.; Levy, G.; Klocke, F.; Childs, T.H.C. Consolidation phenomena in laser and powder-bed based layered manufacturing. CIRP Ann. 2007, 56, 730–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gordon, J.V.; Haden, C.V.; Nied, H.F.; Vinci, R.P.; Harlow, D.G. Fatigue crack growth anisotropy, texture and residual stress in austenitic steel made by wire and arc additive manufacturing. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2018, 724, 431–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Le, V.T.; Mai, D.S.; Hoang, Q.H. Effects of cooling conditions on the shape, microstructures, and material properties of SS308L thin walls built by wire arc additive manufacturing. Mater. Lett. 2020, 280, 128580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Luo, Y.; Li, J.; Song, D.; Xu, B.; Chen, X. Ferrite formation and its effect on deformation mechanism of wire arc additive manufactured 308 L stainless steel. J. Nuclear Mater. 2021, 550, 152933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, X.; Li, J.; Cheng, X.; He, B.; Wang, H.; Huang, Z. Microstructure and mechanical properties of the austenitic stainless steel 316L fabricated by gas metal arc additive manufacturing. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2017, 703, 567–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Xue, J.; Wang, Q. Correlation between arc mode, microstructure, and mechanical properties during wire arc additive manufacturing of 316L stainless steel. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2019, 751, 183–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, K.; Wang, Q.; Qu, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Bao, Y. Microstructure and corrosion resistance of arc additive manufactured 316L stainless steel. J. Wuhan Univ. Technol. Mater. Sci. Ed. 2020, 35, 930–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Astafurova, E.G.; Panchenko, M.Y.; Moskvina, V.A.; Maier, G.G.; Astafurov, S.V.; Melnikov, E.V.; Fortuna, A.S.; Reunova, K.A.; Rubtsov, V.E.; Kolubaev, E.A. Microstructure and grain growth inhomogeneity in austenitic steel produced by wire-feed electron beam melting: The effect of post-building solid-solution treatment. J. Mater. Sci. 2020, 55, 9211–9224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tarasov, S.Y.; Filippov, A.V.; Savchenko, N.L.; Fortuna, S.V.; Rubtsov, V.E.; Kolubaev, E.A.; Psakhie, S.G. Effect of heat input on phase content, crystalline lattice parameter, and residual strain in wire-feed electron beam additive manufactured 304 stainless steel. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2018, 99, 2353–2363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Panchenko, M.Y.; Maier, G.G.; Moskvina, V.A.; Melnikov, E.V.; Astafurov, S.V.; Rubtsov, V.E.; Kolubaev, E.A.; Astafurova, E.G. Microstructural inhomogeneity of phase composition and grain structure in electron beam wire-feed additive manufactured AISI 304 stainless steel. AIP Conf. Proc. 2019, 2167, 020261. [Google Scholar]
- Moskvina, V.A.; Panchenko, M.Y.; Astafurov, S.V.; Maier, G.G.; Melnikov, E.V.; Rubtsov, V.E.; Kolubaev, E.A.; Astafurova, E.G. A comparative study of the macroscopical and microscopical fracture mechanisms in cast and additively manufactured austenitic stainless steels. AIP Conf. Proc. 2019, 2167, 020234. [Google Scholar]
- Ziętala, M.; Durejko, T.; Polański, M.; Kunce, I.; Płociński, T.; Zieliński, W.; Łazińska, M.; Stępniowski, W.; Czujko, T.; Kurzydłowski, K.J. Microstructure, mechanical properties and corrosion resistance of 316 L stainless steel fabricated using laser engineered net shaping. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2016, 677, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biswal, R.; Zhang, X.; Syed, A.K.; Awd, M.; Ding, J.; Walther, F.; Williams, S. Criticality of porosity defects on the fatigue performance of wire+ arc additive manufactured titanium alloy. Int. J. Fatigue 2019, 122, 208–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szost, B.A.; Terzi, S.; Martina, F.; Boisselier, D.; Prytuliak, A.; Pirling, T.; Hofmann, M.; Jarvis, D.J. A comparative study of additive manufacturing techniques: Residual stress and microstructural analysis of CLAD and WAAM printed Ti–6Al–4V components. Mater. Des. 2016, 89, 559–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ron, T.; Levy, G.K.; Dolev, O.; Leon, A.; Shirizly, A.; Aghion, E. Environmental behavior of low carbon steel produced by a wire arc additive manufacturing process. Metals 2019, 9, 888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Astafurov, S.; Astafurova, E. Phase composition of austenitic stainless steels in additive manufacturing: A review. Metals 2021, 11, 1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, B.; Pan, Z.; Ding, D.; Cuiuri, D.; Li, H. Effects of heat accumulation on microstructure and mechanical properties of Ti6Al4V alloy deposited by wire arc additive manufacturing. Addit. Manuf. 2018, 23, 151–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ge, J.; Lin, J.; Lei, Y.; Fu, H. Location-related thermal history, microstructure, and mechanical properties of arc additively manufactured 2Cr13 steel using cold metal transfer welding. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2018, 715, 144–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Donoghue, J.; Antonysamy, A.A.; Martina, F.; Colegrove, P.A.; Williams, S.W.; Prangnell, P.B. The effectiveness of combining rolling deformation with Wire–Arc Additive Manufacture on β-grain refinement and texture modification in Ti–6Al–4V. Mater. Charact. 2016, 114, 103–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maamoun, A.H.; Elbestawi, M.; Dosbaeva, G.K.; Veldhuis, S.C. Thermal post-processing of AlSi10Mg parts produced by Selective Laser Melting using recycled powder. Addit. Manuf. 2018, 21, 234–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, P.; Prashanth, K.G.; Scudino, S.; Jia, Y.; Wang, H.; Zou, C.; Wei, Z.; Eckert, J. Influence of annealing on mechanical properties of al-20si processed by selective laser melting. Metals 2014, 4, 28–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bermingham, M.; Nicastro, L.; Kent, D.; Chen, Y.; Dargusch, M. Optimising the mechanical properties of Ti-6Al-4V components produced by wire + arc additive manufacturing with post-process heat treatments. J. Alloys Compd. 2018, 753, 247–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bai, Y.; Wang, D.; Yang, Y.; Wang, H. Effect of heat treatment on microstructure and mechanical properties of maraging steel by selective laser melting. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2019, 760, 105–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, X.; Li, J.; Cheng, X.; Wang, H.; Huang, Z. Effect of heat treatment on microstructure, mechanical and corrosion properties of austenitic stainless steel 316L using arc additive manufacturing. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2018, 715, 307–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, N.; Yuan, W.; Mishra, R.S. Friction stir welding of dissimilar alloys. In Friction Stir Welding of Dissimilar Alloys and Materials; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015; pp. 43–69. [Google Scholar]
- Martinsen, K.; Hu, S.J.; Carlson, B.E. Joining of dissimilar materials. CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol. 2015, 64, 679–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gladkovsky, S.V.; Kuteneva, S.V.; Sergeev, S.N. Microstructure and mechanical properties of sandwich copper/steel composites produced by explosive welding. Mater. Charact. 2019, 154, 294–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xue, P.; Ni, D.R.; Wang, D.; Xiao, B.L.; Ma, Z.Y. Effect of friction stir welding parameters on microstructure and mechanical properties of the dissimilar al–cu joints. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2011, 528, 4683–4689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fazel-Najafabadi, M.; Kashani-Bozorg, S.F.; Zarei-Hanzaki, A. Joining of cp-ti to 304 stainless steel using friction stir welding technique. Mater. Des. 2010, 31, 4800–4807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mironov, S.; Sato, Y.S.; Kokawa, H. Grain structure evolution during friction-stir welding. Phys. Mesomech. 2020, 23, 21–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saluja, R.; Moeed, K. Formation, quantification and significance of delta ferrite for 300 series stainless steel weldments. Int. J. Eng. Technol. Manag. Appl. Sci. 2015, 3, 23–36. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, F.; Luo, G.N.; Huang, J.; Liu, Y. Properties improvement of atmospheric plasma sprayed tungsten coating by annealing. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2019, 358, 276–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, X.; Sun, W.; Li, X.; Wang, X.; Yan, H.; Li, K. Experimental and numerical studies on W–Cu functionally graded materials produced by explosive compaction–welding sintering. Fusion Eng. Des. 2018, 137, 349–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarkar, S.; Srivastava, C.; Chattopadhyay, K. Development of a new class of high strength copper alloy using immiscibility route in Cu-Fe-Si system: Evolution of hierarchical multi-scale microstructure. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2018, 723, 38–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, H.T.; Liu, X.H.; Qi, J.L.; Ai, Z.R.; Liu, L.Z. Microstructure and mechanical properties of Cu/Al/Cu Clad strip processed by the powder-in-tube method. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2018, 251, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shu, X.; Chen, G.; Liu, J.; Zhang, B.; Feng, J. Microstructure evolution of copper/steel gradient deposition prepared using electron beam freeform fabrication. Mater. Lett. 2018, 213, 374–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, S.; Huang, J.; Xia, J.; Zhang, H.; Zhao, X. Microstructural characteristics of a stainless steel/copper dissimilar joint made by laser welding. Metall. Mater. Trans. A Phys. Metall. Mater. Sci. 2013, 44, 3690–3696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, C.; Zhou, K.; Ma, W.; Min, L. Interfacial characteristic and mechanical performance of maraging steel-copper functional bimetal produced by selective laser melting based hybrid manufacture. Mater. Des. 2018, 155, 77–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Imran, M.K.; Masood, S.H.; Brandt, M. Direct metal deposition of H13 tool steel on copper alloy substrate: Parametric investigation. Lasers Manuf. Mater. Process. 2015, 2, 242–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chandrasekaran, S.; Hari, S.; Amirthalingam, M. Wire arc additive manufacturing of functionally graded material for marine risers. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2020, 792, 139530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kum, D.; Oyama, T.; Wadsworth, J.; Sherby, O. The impact properties of laminated composites containing ultrahigh carbon (UHC) steels. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 1983, 31, 173–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carreño, F.; Chao, J.; Pozuelo, M.; Ruano, O. Microstructure and fracture properties of an ultrahigh carbon steel–mild steel laminated composite. Scr. Mater. 2003, 48, 1135–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- LeSuer, D.R.; Syn, C.K.; Sherby, O.D.; Wadsworth, J.; Lewandowski, J.J.; Hunt, W.H. Mechanical behaviour of laminated metal composites. Int. Mater. Rev. 1996, 41, 169–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spalek, N.; Brunow, J.; Braun, M.; Rutner, M. WAAM-fabricated laminated metal composites. Metals 2021, 11, 1948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lo, K.H.; Shek, C.H.; Lai, J.K.L. Recent developments in stainless steels. Mat. Sci. Eng. R 2009, 65, 39–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhadeshia, H.; Honeykombe, R. Steels: Microstructure and Properties; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Olshanskaya, T.; Trushnikov, D.; Dushina, A.; Ganeev, A.; Polyakov, A.; Semenova, I. Microstructure and properties of the 308LSI austenitic steel produced by plasma-MIG deposition welding with layer-by-layer peening. Metals 2022, 12, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chinakhov, D.A.; Akimov, K.O. Formation of the structure and properties of deposited multilayer specimens from austenitic steel under various heat removal conditions. Metals 2022, 12, 1527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarafan, S.; Wanjara, P.; Gholipour, J.; Bernier, F.; Osman, M.; Sikan, F.; Soost, J.; Amos, R.; Patnaik, P.; Brochu, M. Benchmarking of 316L stainless steel manufactured by a hybrid additive/subtractive technology. J. Manuf. Mater. Process. 2022, 6, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zatkalíková, V.; Halanda, J.; Vaňa, D.; Uhríčik, M.; Markovičová, L.; Štrbák, M.; Kuchariková, L. Corrosion resistance of AISI 316L stainless steel biomaterial after plasma immersion ion implantation of nitrogen. Materials 2021, 14, 6790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Natesh, C.P.; Shashidhara, Y.M.; Amarendra, H.J.; Shetty, R.; Harisha, S.R.; Shenoy, P.V.; Nayak, M.; Hegde, A.; Shetty, D.; Umesh, U. Tribological and morphological study of AISI 316L stainless steel during turning under different lubrication conditions. Lubricants 2023, 11, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elsokaty, A.; Oraby, O.; Sadek, S.; Salem, H.G. Influence of wire arc additive manufacturing beads’ geometry and building strategy: Mechanical and structural behavior of ER70S-6 prismatic blocks. J. Manuf. Mater. Process. 2023, 7, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Q.; Tian, Y.; Zhai, J.; Tian, L.; Chen, L.; Chen, L. Prediction of surface wrinkle defect of welding wire steel ER70S-6 in hot bar rolling process using finite element method and experiments. Metals 2020, 10, 1559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seung, H. CMT-based wire arc additive manufacturing using 316L stainless steel: Effect of heat accumulation on the multi-layer deposits. Metalls 2020, 10, 278. [Google Scholar]
- Lippold, J.C.; Kotecki, D.J. Welding Metallurgy and Weldability of Stainless Steels; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Natan, N.; Peter, M. A novel classification method for pores in laser powder bed fusion. Metalls 2021, 11, 1912. [Google Scholar]
Materials | C | Cr | Cu | Mn | Mo | N | Ni | P | S | Si |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ER70S6 | 0.09 | - | - | 1.65 | - | - | - | - | - | 0.97 |
ER309LSI | 0.016 | 23.3 | 0.1 | 1.9 | 0.1 | 0.09 | 13.7 | 0.019 | 0.004 | 0.7 |
09Mn2Si | 0.09 | <0.3 | <0.3 | 1.3–1.7 | - | <0.008 | <0.008 | <0.035 | <0.04 | 0.8 |
Materials | σ0.2, MPa | σB, MPa | δ, % |
---|---|---|---|
ER70S6 | 545 | 600 | 26 |
ER309LSI | 440 | 600 | 35 |
Samples | I, A | U, V | Q, kJ/mm | F, Hz | V, mm/min | S, mm/min | Tc, °C |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | 120 | 24 | 0.5 | - | 12.0 | 350 | 80 |
B | 180 | 28 | 0.86 | - | 19.2 | 350 | 80 |
C (Double Pulse) | 130 | 27 | 0.6 | 120 | 13.2 | 350 | 350 |
D (Double Pulse) | 130 | 27 | 0.6 | 120 | 13.2 | 350 | 750 |
E (Double Pulse) | 130 | 27 | 0.6 | 120 | 13.2 | 350 | 80 |
Samples | № Zone | Element (wt. %) | Creq/Nieq, Solidification Mode | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C | Si | Mn | Mo | Ni | Cr | Fe | |||
A, Q = 0.5 kJ/mm, Tc = 80 °C | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
2 | 0.03 | 0.87 | 1.85 | 0.11 | 12.14 | 22.47 | 62.23 | 23.9/14 = 1.71 | |
3 | 0.07 | 0.57 | 1.17 | - | 0.06 | 0.05 | 97.74 | - | |
4 | 0.07 | 0.64 | 1.50 | - | 0.03 | 0.10 | 96.23 | - | |
B, Q = 0.86 kJ/mm, Tc = 80 °C | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
2 | 0.02 | 0.76 | 1.82 | 0.10 | 12.28 | 22.83 | 61.86 | 24.1/13.8 = 1.75 | |
3 | 0.07 | 0.47 | 1.08 | - | 0.06 | 0.05 | 97.92 | - | |
4 | 0.07 | 0.44 | 1.04 | - | 0.05 | 0.04 | 98.00 | - | |
C, “Double pulse” mode, Q = 0.6 kJ/mm, Tc = 350 °C | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
2 | 0.03 | 0.75 | 1.7 | 0.08 | 10.12 | 18.73 | 68.23 | 19.9/11.19 = 1.68 | |
3 | 0.07 | 0.53 | 1.14 | - | 0.06 | 0.005 | 97.80 | - | |
4 | 0.07 | 0.60 | 1.17 | - | 0.05 | 0.05 | 97.68 | - | |
D, “Double pulse” mode, Q = 0.6 kJ/mm, Tc = 750 °C | 1 | 0.03 | 0.94 | 1.93 | 0.10 | 12.17 | 22.81 | 61.68 | 24.3/14 = 1.73 |
2 | 0.02 | 0.79 | 1.76 | 0.10 | 12.24 | 22.53 | 62.23 | 23.8/13.7 = 1.74 | |
3 | 0.07 | 0.61 | 1.23 | - | 0.05 | 0.05 | 97.66 | - | |
4 | 0.07 | 0.56 | 1.14 | - | 0.06 | 0.05 | 97.78 | - | |
E, “Double pulse” mode, Q = 0.6 kJ/mm, Tc = 80 °C | 1 | 0.03 | 0.80 | 1.80 | 0.10 | 12.37 | 22.90 | 61.65 | 24.2/14.2 = 1.71 |
2 | 0.03 | 0.75 | 1.68 | 0.09 | 11.30 | 20.75 | 65.04 | 22/13 = 1.68 | |
3 | 0.08 | 0.53 | 1.10 | - | 0.06 | 0.05 | 97.83 | - | |
4 | 0.08 | 0.53 | 1.09 | - | 0.06 | 0.05 | 97.83 | - | |
“Double pulse” mode, Q = 0.6 kJ/mm, Tc = 80 °C, Austenization | 1 | 0.03 | 0.77 | 1.83 | 0.10 | 12.31 | 22.96 | 61.67 | 24.2/13.8 = 1.75 |
2 | 0.03 | 0.75 | 1.79 | 0.09 | 11.41 | 21.26 | 64.34 | 22.5/13.2 = 1.70 | |
3 | 0.07 | 0.51 | 1.13 | - | 0.06 | 0.05 | 97.85 | - | |
4 | 0.08 | 0.56 | 1.18 | - | 0.06 | 0.05 | 97.72 | - | |
“Double pulse” mode, Q = 0.6 kJ/mm, Tc = 80 °C, Austenization + normalization annealing | 1 | 0.03 | 0.80 | 1.86 | 0.10 | 12.43 | 23.36 | 61.08 | 24.7/14 = 1.77 |
2 | 0.02 | 0.80 | 1.87 | 0.10 | 12.38 | 23.23 | 61.25 | 24.5/13.9 = 1.76 | |
3 | 0.07 | 0.50 | 1.08 | - | 0.06 | 0.05 | 97.89 | - | |
4 | 0.07 | 0.49 | 1.07 | - | 0.06 | 0.05 | 97.90 | - |
Sample, № | σ0.2, MPa | σTS, MPa | δ, % |
---|---|---|---|
3, ER309LSI | 390 ± 4 | 605 ± 5 | 37.4 ± 0.4 |
3, ER309LSI Austenization | 295 ± 4 | 587 ± 3 | 43.6 ± 0.5 |
3, ER309LSI Austenization + normalization annealing | 303 ± 3 | 590 ± 5 | 45.2 ± 5 |
4, ER70S-6 | 360 ± 3 | 473 ± 4 | 34 ± 0.3 |
4, ER70S-6 Austenization | 810 ± 5 | 906 ± 6 | 13.7 ± 0.1 |
4, ER70S-6 Austenization + normalization annealing | 303 ± 3 | 435 ± 3 | 33.3 ± 0.3 |
5, ER70S-6-ER309LSI | 368 ± 4 | 549 ± 5 | 29.5 ± 0.2 |
5, ER70S-6-ER309LSI Austenization | 369 ± 4 | 433 ± 4 | 22.3 ± 0.2 |
5, ER70S-6-ER309LSI Austenization + normalization annealing | 589 ± 5 | 681 ± 7 | 14.9 ± 0.1 |
2, ER70S-6-ER309LSI | 380 ± 4 | 553 ± 3 | 40 ± 0.5 |
2, ER70S-6-ER309LSI Austenization | 386 ± 4 | 604 ± 5 | 37.9 ± 0.5 |
2, ER70S-6-ER309LSI Austenization + normalization annealing | 615 ± 5 | 762 ± 7 | 22.8 ± 0.3 |
1, ER70S-6-ER309LSi | 344 ± 3 | 475 ± 4 | 28.2 ± 0.3 |
1, ER70S-6-ER309LSi Austenization | 299 ± 3 | 545 ± 5 | 36.7 ± 0.4 |
1, ER70S-6-ER309LSi Austenization + normalization annealing | 287 ± 3 | 446 ± 3 | 31.4 ± 0.3 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Kabaldin, Y.; Shatagin, D.; Ryabov, D.; Solovyov, A.; Kurkin, A. Microstructure, Phase Composition, and Mechanical Properties of a Layered Bimetallic Composite ER70S-6-ER309LSI Obtained by the WAAM Method. Metals 2023, 13, 851. https://doi.org/10.3390/met13050851
Kabaldin Y, Shatagin D, Ryabov D, Solovyov A, Kurkin A. Microstructure, Phase Composition, and Mechanical Properties of a Layered Bimetallic Composite ER70S-6-ER309LSI Obtained by the WAAM Method. Metals. 2023; 13(5):851. https://doi.org/10.3390/met13050851
Chicago/Turabian StyleKabaldin, Yury, Dmitrii Shatagin, Dmitrii Ryabov, Alexander Solovyov, and Andrey Kurkin. 2023. "Microstructure, Phase Composition, and Mechanical Properties of a Layered Bimetallic Composite ER70S-6-ER309LSI Obtained by the WAAM Method" Metals 13, no. 5: 851. https://doi.org/10.3390/met13050851
APA StyleKabaldin, Y., Shatagin, D., Ryabov, D., Solovyov, A., & Kurkin, A. (2023). Microstructure, Phase Composition, and Mechanical Properties of a Layered Bimetallic Composite ER70S-6-ER309LSI Obtained by the WAAM Method. Metals, 13(5), 851. https://doi.org/10.3390/met13050851