Corrosion of API 5L X60 Pipeline Steel in Soil and Surface Defects Detection by Ultrasonic Analysis
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Steel Characterization
2.1.1. Steel Composition
2.1.2. Microstructure
2.1.3. Mechanical Characteristics
2.2. Soil Solution
2.3. Corrosion Tests
2.4. Ultrasonic Steel Tests
3. Results and Discussions
3.1. Steel Properties
3.2. Steel Corrosion
3.3. Ultrasonic Steel Detection
4. Conclusions
- ➢ Steel chemical composition and mechanical characteristics results conform to the API norms for steel.
- ➢ Microstructure is a ferrite-pearlitic type with a predominance of refining ferritic grain with clusters of pearlite.
- ➢ Steel is sensitive to corrosion by soil when protection is failing. It is accentuated by some parameters such as soil characteristics, pH, soil composition, resistivity, water content, as well mechanical stresses.
- ➢ The diffracted ultrasonic wave occurring at the edges of the defects does not appear for steel not containing any defect. The initial signal was not reflected towards the transducer, which remains stable in all instants. The ultrasonic image presents a single reflection, which does not change by amplitude variation. The ultrasonic beam on interfaces has the same acoustic impedances.
- ➢ The diffracted ultrasonic reflected wave occurring at the edges of the corrosion pit defects appears due to the presence of a defect ultrasonic image, which presents a distribution resulting from surface reflection including corrosion defect after variation of the amplitude. The ultrasonic beam on interfaces has different acoustic impedances.
- ➢ The speed propagation of transverse ultrasonic waves through the steel is modified, showing a slight increase compared to the theoretical speed of wave propagation in steel without defects.
- ➢ The diffracted ultrasonic wave occurs at the edges of the defected steel in the form of corrosion pits and welding defects, which indicated that welded defect a are confined to the center of the plate. The first defect represents the weld defect. There are small gaps at the weld level, which increase in size over time due to the second corrosion defects detected. Ultrasonic image presents a distribution resulting from different variations of the amplitude and different acoustic impedances.
- ➢ The cross-transverse speed ultrasonic propagation through the plate including corrosion pits and weld defect is modified, showing a high increase.
- ➢ Ultrasonic method can be used in the industrial context as an intelligent industrial robotics technique where the data acquisition and processing tools are automatic and autonomous with a high level of detection. The maintenance strategy can be adopted as a preventive form to plan regular inline inspections to detect defect nature, location, and sizing.
- ➢ Future studies should aim to better understand the corrosion phenomena to develop some advanced non-destructive testing methods and corrosion inhibitor protection from natural sources, economical, and practical methods using new ecological, biodegradable, and non-toxic formulations according to the concept of sustainable development [32,33].
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Benmousa, A.; Hadjel, M.; Traisnel, M. Corrosion behavior of API 5LX-60 pipeline steel exposed to near-neutral pH soil simulating solution. Mater. Corros. 2006, 57, 771–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- API Specification 5L (SPEC 5L), Specification for Line Pipe, 14th ed.; American Petroleum Institute: Washington, DC, USA, 46th Edition Updated on 2023; Available online: https://www.octalsteel.com/api-5l-pipe-specification/#:~:text=API%205L%20Pipe%20Specification%20(46th%20Edition%20Updated%20on%202023)&text=API%205L%20pipes%20are%20carbon,onshore%2C%20offshore%20and%20sour%20services (accessed on 18 March 2024).
- Akkouche, R.; Rémazeilles, C.; Jeannin, M.; Barbalat, M.; Sabot, R.; Refait, P. Influence of soil moisture on the corrosion processes of carbon steel in artificial soil: Active area and aeration cells. Electrochim. Acta 2016, 213, 698–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benmoussat, A.; Hadjel, M. Corrosion behaviour of low carbon line pipe in soil environment. J. Corros. Sci. Eng. 2005, 7, 147156. [Google Scholar]
- Pérez, T.; Domínguez-Aguilar, M.A.; Alamilla, J.L.; Liu, H.; Contreras, A.; Ake, L.M.Q. Corrosion behavior of low carbon steels anf non-ferrous metals exposed to a real calcarepous soil environment. De Gruyer 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bai, X.; He, B.; Han, P.; Xie, R.; Sun, F.; Chen, Z.; Wang, Y.; Liu, X. Corrosion behavior and mechanism of X80 steel in silty soil under the combined effect of salt and temperature. RSC Adv. 2021, 12, 129–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benmoussat, A.; Hadjiat, H.; Hadjel, M. External Damage by Corrosion on Steel Gas Pipeline. Eurasian ChemTech J. 2001, 3, 285–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, J.; He, B.; Feng, Y.; Hou, L.; Han, P.; Bai, X. Electrochemical Corrosion Behaviour of X70 Steel under the Action of Capillary Water in Saline Soils. Materials 2022, 15, 3426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Noor, E.A.; Al-Moubaraki, A.H.; Al-Masoudi, D.I.; Chafiq, M.; Chaouiki, A.; Ko, Y.G. Corrosion Behavior of Carbon Steel X36 in Solutions of Soils Collected from Different Areas Linked to the Main Pipe Network of a Water Distribution System in Jeddah City. Metals 2023, 13, 670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arriba-Rodriguez, L.-D.; Villanueva-Balsera, J.; Ortega-Fernandez, F.; Rodriguez-Perez, F. Methods to Evaluate Corrosion in Buried Steel Structures: A Review. Metals 2018, 8, 334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Velázquez, J.C.; Hernández-Sánchez, E.; Terán, G.; Capula-Colindres, S.; Diaz-Cruz, M.; Cervantes-Tobón, A. Probabilistic and Statistical Techniques to Study the Impact of Localized Corrosion Defects in Oil and Gas Pipelines: A Review. Metals 2022, 12, 576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Lian, Z.; Zhou, Z.; Song, Z.; Liu, M.; Yang, K.; Liu, Z. Safety and reliability assessment of external corrosion defects assessment of buried pipelines—Soil interface: A mechanisms and finite element study. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 2023, 82, 105006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akhlaghi, B.; Mesghali, H.; Ehteshami, M.; Mohammadpour, J.; Salehi, F.; Abbassi, R. Predictive deep learning for pitting corrosion modeling in buried transmission pipelines. Process. Saf. Environ. Prot. 2023, 174, 320–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krautkrämer, J.; Krautkrämer, H. Ultrasonic Testing of Materials, 3rd ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1983. [Google Scholar]
- Amsellem, C.; Edery, R.; Scanu, M.; Martin, L. Contrôle de Pipelines et de Canalisations Par Racleursinstrumentés Par Ultrasons. In Proceedings of the Cofrend 2011, National NDT Seminar & Exhibition, Dunkerque, France, 24–27 May 2011; Available online: https://www.ndt.net/?id=12051 (accessed on 18 March 2024).
- Gunn, D.A.; Holyoake, S.J.; Dashwood, B.A.; Wilkinson, P.B.; Brett, C.R.; Wallis, H.C.; Leman, W.; Rees, J.G. Ultrasonic Testing of Laboratory Samples Representing Monopile Wind Turbine Foundations. Insight-Non-Destr. Test. Cond. Monit. 2019, 61, 187–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kersemans, M.; Verboven, E.; Segers, J.; Hedayatrasa, S.; Paepegem, W.V. Non-Destructive Testing of Composites by Ultrasound, Local Defect Resonance. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Experimental Mechanics, Brussels, Belgium, 1–5 July 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hecht, A. Time of Flight Diffraction Technique (TOFD) An Ultrasonic Testing Method for all Applications. NDT J. 1997. [Google Scholar]
- Naqiuddin, M.S.M.; Leong, M.S.; Hee, L.M.; Azrieasrie, M.A.M. Ultrasonic signal processing techniques for Pipeline: A review. In Proceedings of the MATEC Web of Conferences, EAAI Conference 2018, Sabah, Malaysia, 3–5 December 2018; Volume 255, p. 06006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- May, Z.; Alam, K.; Nayan, N.A. Recent Advances in Nondestructive Method and Assessment of Corrosion Undercoating in Carbon–Steel Pipelines. Sensors 2022, 22, 6654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kowalczyk, J.; Jósko, M.; Wieczorek, D.; Sędłak, K.; Nowak, M. The Influence of the Hardness of the Tested Material and the Surface Preparation Method on the Results of Ultrasonic Testing. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 9904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bourenane, K.; Haddar, A.B.; Haddar, A.; Zerouki, I.; Abdessemed, D. Monitoring and inspection to combat corrosion of pipeline lines in an oil field. Alger. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 9. [Google Scholar]
- Hemblade, B. Electrical Resistance Sensor and Apparatus for Monitoring Corrosion. U.S. Patent US 6,946,855 B1, 20 September 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Nabil, Y.; Toufik, B.; Morad, G. Ultrasonic TOFD Technique for Cracks Sizing and Locating Based on PSO. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Advanced Technologies, ICEEAT23, Batna, Algeria, 5–7 November 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Gordon, G.A.; Canumalla, S.; Tittmann, B.R. Ultrasonic C-scan imaging for material characterization. Ultrasonics 1993, 31, 373–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodriguez, C.; Fernández, M.; Domíngue, J.; Biezma, M.V. Detection of defects in metallic specimens supported by ultrasound propagation simulations. Mater. Test. 2014, 56, 386–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sainson, S. Inspection en Ligne des Pipelines—Principes et Méthodes; Lavoisier: Cachan, France, 2007; p. 332. ISBN 13 978-2-7430-0. [Google Scholar]
- DRC Sonatrach Bethioua. Direction of Pipeline Treatment, Online Inspection and Diagnosis by. Group limitedCanada’’-PII. 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Belmokre, K.; Azzouz, N.; Kermiche, F.; Wery, M.; Pagetti, J. Corrosion study of carbon steel protected by a primer, by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) in 3% NaCl medium and in a soil simulating solution. J. Mater. Corros. 1998, 49, 108–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hansen, N. Hall–Petch relation and boundary strengthening. Scr. Mater. 2004, 51, 801–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hellier, C. Handbook of Non—Destructive Evaluations; Mc Graw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Marzorati, S.; Verotta, L.; Trasatti, S.P. green corrosion inhibitors from natural sources and biomass wastes. Molecules 2019, 24, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lahrour, S.; Benmoussat, A.; Bouras, B.; Mansri, A.; Tannouga, L.; Marzorati, S. Glycerin-Grafted Starch as Corrosion Inhibitor of C-Mn Steel in 1 M HCl solution. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 4684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
C | Si | Mn | P | S | Cr | Mo |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.018 | 0.036 | 1.400 | 0.017 | 0.013 | 0.028 | 0 |
Ni | Al | Cu | Ti | V | Sn | Fe |
0.018 | 0.049 | 0.032 | 0.005 | 0.0061 | 0.0031 | ≈97.880 |
API Standard Values | |||||
X60 Steel | Re [MPa] | Rm [MPa] | A [%] | ||
Min. | Max. | Min. | Max. | ||
414 | 565 | 517 | 758 | 17.5–24 |
Test Number | Immersion Time | Re (MPa) | Rm (MPa) | A (%) | Z (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Days) | (h) | |||||
1 | - | - | 570 | 664.222 | 20.0 | 23.905 |
2 | 7 | 168 | 500 | 623,916 | 20.0 | 55,517 |
3 | 28 | 672 | 480 | 599,939 | 18.4 | 57,361 |
4 | 60 | 1440 | 490 | 614,733 | 20.0 | 54,508 |
5 | 90 | 2160 | 510 | 652,995 | 20.0 | 59,722 |
Si Sites | Mass of Soil (mg/L) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ca2+ | Mg2+ | K+ | Cl− | SO42− | HCO3− | |
S1 | 94.60 | 56 | 7.6 | 76.9 | 736 | 117 |
S2 | 18.96 | 16.44 | 11.7 | 47.33 | 458.4 | 183 |
S3 | ---- | --- | 6 | 7.8 | 74 | 218 |
S4 | 2.00 | 29.04 | 1.82 | 22.69 | 37.48 | 160 |
Component | CaSO4 | MgSO4 | K2SO4 | NaCl | Na2SO4 | NaHCO3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
concentration (g/L) | 0.02 | 0.29 | 0.018 | 0.23 | 0.38 | 0.16 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Benkhedda, F.; Bensaid, I.; Benmoussat, A.; Benmansour, S.A.; Amara Zenati, A. Corrosion of API 5L X60 Pipeline Steel in Soil and Surface Defects Detection by Ultrasonic Analysis. Metals 2024, 14, 388. https://doi.org/10.3390/met14040388
Benkhedda F, Bensaid I, Benmoussat A, Benmansour SA, Amara Zenati A. Corrosion of API 5L X60 Pipeline Steel in Soil and Surface Defects Detection by Ultrasonic Analysis. Metals. 2024; 14(4):388. https://doi.org/10.3390/met14040388
Chicago/Turabian StyleBenkhedda, Fatima, Ismail Bensaid, Abderrahim Benmoussat, Sid Ahmed Benmansour, and Abdeldjelil Amara Zenati. 2024. "Corrosion of API 5L X60 Pipeline Steel in Soil and Surface Defects Detection by Ultrasonic Analysis" Metals 14, no. 4: 388. https://doi.org/10.3390/met14040388
APA StyleBenkhedda, F., Bensaid, I., Benmoussat, A., Benmansour, S. A., & Amara Zenati, A. (2024). Corrosion of API 5L X60 Pipeline Steel in Soil and Surface Defects Detection by Ultrasonic Analysis. Metals, 14(4), 388. https://doi.org/10.3390/met14040388