Metal Additive Manufacturing and Molten Pool Dynamic Characterization Monitoring: Advances in Machine Learning for Directed Energy Deposition
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. DED Technology Profile
- It does not require molds, and the forming size is not limited, allowing for the direct forming of large components;
- It offers high flexibility in monitoring methods and can process complex parts without the need for support structures;
- It can be used for the direct repair of damaged parts and the manufacturing of multi-gradient parts;
- The processing cycle is short, material utilization is high, and post-processing is minimal;
- The as-formed parts exhibit excellent room-temperature mechanical properties, and the mechanical properties of heat-treated parts can reach the level of forged components.
3. Process Information Sensing
3.1. Optical Signals
3.2. Acoustic Signals
3.3. Thermal Signals
3.4. Other Signals
4. Molten Pool Dynamic Monitoring
4.1. ML Applications
- Prediction of the PSP model and physical knowledge;
- Features of interest in PSP;
- Raw data from additive manufacturing.
4.2. Temperature Characteristics
4.3. Morphological Characteristics
4.4. Spatter and Plume Characteristics
5. Challenges of Intelligent Monitoring
6. Future Outlook
- Establishing an effective database and utilizing data-layer fusion methods to complement the advantages of multi-source information.
- Learning and fusion of multisource data representations to extract rich defect features from the data, achieving feature-level fusion.
- Multisource data alignment and collaborative learning to align the corresponding relationships between different data sources and defect representations, transferring knowledge learned from information-rich sources to information-scarce sources, and enabling mutual assistance in the learning of each information source.
- Based on data fusion experiences in other fields, the keys to multi-source data fusion in DED processes are ensuring temporal and spatial alignment of sensor data to reduce error accumulation, developing downscaling and dimensional feature extraction methods for high-dimensional data to optimize computational efficiency, and using physical knowledge to guide data fusion algorithms and enhance model interpretability. These solutions provide new technological paths to realize efficient DED process monitoring.
- Causal representation learning: Achieving quality assessment while uncovering the intrinsic causal relationships between process information and defects.
- Integration of physical knowledge in quality assessment: Embedding physical principles into the assessment models to ensure that the models align with certain physical laws.
- Post hoc interpretability and visualization methods: Analyzing the mapping relationships between assessment results and information sources, facilitating post hoc explainability and visualization of the decision-making process.
- Offline optimization of multiple process parameters driven by multiple performance indicators.
- Providing an operational window for process parameters for online control.
- Development of multi-input, multi-output adaptive control methods to eliminate the “trade-off” problem inherent in single-input, single-output control systems.
- Machine learning-driven online control, integrating the advantages of reinforcement learning in environmental interaction.
- Development of online monitoring indicators and quality evaluation system: Establishing standards for DED online monitoring indicators and the construction of a quality evaluation system, leading to the formation of DED manufacturing process monitoring norms and quality grading standards.
- Establishment of control boundaries based on quality control mechanisms: Defining the boundaries for quality control based on process control mechanisms and developing constraints and standards for DED process parameter optimization and quality control.
- Feedback control-based adaptive parameter adjustment algorithms for real-time optimization of molten pool dynamic characteristics.
- Integration of reinforcement learning with traditional PID control to enhance the system’s response speed and stability.
- Development of ML-based adaptive control systems that can automatically learn and adjust control strategies under different process conditions.
- Standardized measurement methods for key physical parameters such as molten pool depth, width, and temperature distribution.
- Unified standards for part quality assessment, such as surface roughness, internal defect rate, and interlayer fusion quality.
- Real-time monitoring indicators based on multi-source data fusion, ensuring process consistency and part traceability.
7. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Sun, C.; Wang, Y.; McMurtrey, M.D.; Jerred, N.D.; Liou, F.; Li, J. Additive Manufacturing for Energy: A Review. Appl. Energy 2021, 282, 116041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pérez, M.; Carou, D.; Rubio, E.M.; Teti, R. Current Advances in Additive Manufacturing. Procedia CIRP 2020, 88, 439–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prakash, K.S.; Nancharaih, T.; Rao, V.V.S. Additive Manufacturing Techniques in Manufacturing—An Overview. Mater. Today Proc. 2018, 5, 3873–3882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Laleh, M.; Sadeghi, E.; Revilla, R.I.; Chao, Q.; Haghdadi, N.; Hughes, A.E.; Xu, W.; De Graeve, I.; Qian, M.; Gibson, I.; et al. Heat Treatment for Metal Additive Manufacturing. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2023, 133, 101051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maleki, E.; Bagherifard, S.; Bandini, M.; Guagliano, M. Surface Post-Treatments for Metal Additive Manufacturing: Progress, Challenges, and Opportunities. Addit. Manuf. 2021, 37, 101619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gu, D.; Shi, X.; Poprawe, R.; Bourell, D.L.; Setchi, R.; Zhu, J. Material-Structure-Performance Integrated Laser-Metal Additive Manufacturing. Science 2021, 372, eabg1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Durai Murugan, P.; Vijayananth, S.; Natarajan, M.P.; Jayabalakrishnan, D.; Arul, K.; Jayaseelan, V.; Elanchezhian, J. A Current State of Metal Additive Manufacturing Methods: A Review. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 59, 1277–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soliman, H.A.; Elbestawi, M. Titanium Aluminides Processing by Additive Manufacturing—A Review. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2022, 119, 5583–5614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, J.-Y.; Nagalingam, A.P.; Yeo, S.H. A Review on the State-of-the-Art of Surface Finishing Processes and Related ISO/ASTM Standards for Metal Additive Manufactured Components. Virtual Phys. Prototyp. 2021, 16, 68–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ron, T.; Shirizly, A.; Aghion, E. Additive Manufacturing Technologies of High Entropy Alloys (HEA): Review and Prospects. Materials 2023, 16, 2454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Z.; He, B.; Lyu, T.; Zou, Y. A Review on Additive Manufacturing of Titanium Alloys for Aerospace Applications: Directed Energy Deposition and Beyond Ti-6Al-4V. JOM 2021, 73, 1804–1818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kurzynowski, T.; Pawlak, A.; Smolina, I. The Potential of SLM Technology for Processing Magnesium Alloys in Aerospace Industry. Archiv. Civ. Mech. Eng. 2020, 20, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dass, A.; Moridi, A. State of the Art in Directed Energy Deposition: From Additive Manufacturing to Materials Design. Coatings 2019, 9, 418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sathishkumar, M.; Kumar, C.P.; Ganesh, S.S.S.; Venkatesh, M.; Radhika, N.; Vignesh, M.; Pazhani, A. Possibilities, Performance and Challenges of Nitinol Alloy Fabricated by Directed Energy Deposition and Powder Bed Fusion for Biomedical Implants. J. Manuf. Process. 2023, 102, 885–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarzyński, B.; Śnieżek, L.; Grzelak, K. Metal Additive Manufacturing (MAM) Applications in Production of Vehicle Parts and Components—A Review. Metals 2024, 14, 195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahn, D.-G. Directed Energy Deposition (DED) Process: State of the Art. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. Green Tech. 2021, 8, 703–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Armstrong, M.; Mehrabi, H.; Naveed, N. An Overview of Modern Metal Additive Manufacturing Technology. J. Manuf. Process. 2022, 84, 1001–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bartlett, J.L.; Li, X. An Overview of Residual Stresses in Metal Powder Bed Fusion. Addit. Manuf. 2019, 27, 131–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yi, H.; Yang, L.; Jia, L.; Huang, Y.; Cao, H. Porosity in Wire-Arc Directed Energy Deposition of Aluminum Alloys: Formation Mechanisms, Influencing Factors and Inhibition Strategies. Addit. Manuf. 2024, 84, 104108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, H.D.; Pramanik, A.; Basak, A.K.; Dong, Y.; Prakash, C.; Debnath, S.; Shankar, S.; Jawahir, I.S.; Dixit, S.; Buddhi, D. A Critical Review on Additive Manufacturing of Ti-6Al-4V Alloy: Microstructure and Mechanical Properties. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2022, 18, 4641–4661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farias, F.W.C.; Dos Santos, T.J.G.; Oliveira, J.P. Directed Energy Deposition + Mechanical Interlayer Deformation Additive Manufacturing: A State-of-the-Art Literature Review. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2024, 131, 999–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Villa, R.; Liu, Y.; Siddique, Z. Review of Defects and Their Sources in As-Built Ti6Al4V Manufactured via Powder Bed Fusion. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2024, 132, 4105–4134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Panwisawas, C.; Tang, Y.T.; Reed, R.C. Metal 3D Printing as a Disruptive Technology for Superalloys. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 2327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blakey-Milner, B.; Gradl, P.; Snedden, G.; Brooks, M.; Pitot, J.; Lopez, E.; Leary, M.; Berto, F.; du Plessis, A. Metal Additive Manufacturing in Aerospace: A Review. Mater. Des. 2021, 209, 110008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yao, M.; Sheng, J.; Kong, F.; Tong, W. A Multi-Sensor Based Online Monitoring System for Laser Hot-Wire Surface Cladding Process. Opt. Laser Technol. 2024, 177, 111074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malashin, I.; Martysyuk, D.; Tynchenko, V.; Evsyukov, D.; Nelyub, V.; Borodulin, A.; Gantimurov, A.; Galinovsky, A. Predicting Defects in SLM-Produced Parts Based on Melt Pools Clustering Analysis. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2024, 134, 1169–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hou, Z.-J.; Wang, Q.; Zhao, C.-G.; Zheng, J.; Tian, J.-M.; Ge, X.-H.; Liu, Y.-G. Online Monitoring Technology of Metal Powder Bed Fusion Processes: A Review. Materials 2022, 15, 7598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mahmoud, D.; Magolon, M.; Boer, J.; Elbestawi, M.A.; Mohammadi, M.G. Applications of Machine Learning in Process Monitoring and Controls of L-PBF Additive Manufacturing: A Review. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 11910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Z.; Li, H.; Yin, J.; Li, Y.; Nie, Z.; Li, X.; You, D.; Guan, K.; Duan, W.; Cao, L.; et al. A Review of Spatter in Laser Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing: In Situ Detection, Generation, Effects, and Countermeasures. Micromachines 2022, 13, 1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, W.; Wang, T.; Liu, B.; Li, W.; Hu, G.; Lyu, Z. Research of On-Line Monitoring Technology and Control Strategy for Laser-Directed Energy Deposition: A Review. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2024, 133, 3105–3132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.; Tan, X.P.; Tor, S.B.; Lim, C.S. Machine Learning in Additive Manufacturing: State-of-the-Art and Perspectives. Addit. Manuf. 2020, 36, 101538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, Y.; Rahmani Dehaghani, M.; Wang, G.G. Review of Transfer Learning in Modeling Additive Manufacturing Processes. Addit. Manuf. 2023, 61, 103357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qin, J.; Hu, F.; Liu, Y.; Witherell, P.; Wang, C.C.L.; Rosen, D.W.; Simpson, T.W.; Lu, Y.; Tang, Q. Research and Application of Machine Learning for Additive Manufacturing. Addit. Manuf. 2022, 52, 102691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, S.; Gopi, T.; Harikeerthana, N.; Gupta, M.K.; Gaur, V.; Krolczyk, G.M.; Wu, C. Machine Learning Techniques in Additive Manufacturing: A State of the Art Review on Design, Processes and Production Control. J. Intell. Manuf. 2023, 34, 21–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Herzog, T.; Brandt, M.; Trinchi, A.; Sola, A.; Molotnikov, A. Process Monitoring and Machine Learning for Defect Detection in Laser-Based Metal Additive Manufacturing. J. Intell. Manuf. 2024, 35, 1407–1437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Petrich, J.; Snow, Z.; Corbin, D.; Reutzel, E.W. Multi-Modal Sensor Fusion with Machine Learning for Data-Driven Process Monitoring for Additive Manufacturing. Addit. Manuf. 2021, 48, 102364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- AbouelNour, Y.; Gupta, N. In-Situ Monitoring of Sub-Surface and Internal Defects in Additive Manufacturing: A Review. Mater. Des. 2022, 222, 111063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ngo, T.D.; Kashani, A.; Imbalzano, G.; Nguyen, K.T.Q.; Hui, D. Additive Manufacturing (3D Printing): A Review of Materials, Methods, Applications and Challenges. Compos. Part B Eng. 2018, 143, 172–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hajare, D.M.; Gajbhiye, T.S. Additive Manufacturing (3D Printing): Recent Progress on Advancement of Materials and Challenges. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 58, 736–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, Z.; Liu, W.; Wang, Y.; Saleheen, K.M.; Liu, Z.; Peng, S.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, H. A Review on in Situ Monitoring Technology for Directed Energy Deposition of Metals. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2020, 108, 3437–3463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, C.; Weng, F.; Sui, S.; Chew, Y.; Bi, G. Progress and Perspectives in Laser Additive Manufacturing of Key Aeroengine Materials. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 2021, 170, 103804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mao, Y.; Chen, H.; Xiong, J. Research Progress in Laser Additive Manufacturing of Aluminum Alloys: Microstructure, Defect, and Properties. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2024, 30, 695–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scime, L. Anomaly Detection and Classification in a Laser Powder Bed Additive Manufacturing Process Using a Trained Computer Vision Algorithm. Addit. Manuf. 2018, 19, 114–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fischer, F.G.; Zimmermann, M.G.; Praetzsch, N.; Knaak, C. Monitoring of the Powder Bed Quality in Metal Additive Manufacturing Using Deep Transfer Learning. Mater. Des. 2022, 222, 111029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, P.; Zhong, K.; Liu, X.; Zhou, G.; Wang, C.; Wei, Q.; Shi, Y.; Li, Z. A Phase-Guided Method for Extracting the Contour of the Fusion Area in Laser Powder Bed Fusion. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Optical and Photonic Engineering (icOPEN 2019), Phuket, Thailand, 16–20 July 2019; SPIE: Bellingham, WA, USA, 2019; Volume 11205, pp. 307–312. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Q.; Lin, X.; Duan, X.; Yan, R.; Fuh, J.Y.H.; Zhu, K. Gaussian Process Classification of Melt Pool Motion for Laser Powder Bed Fusion Process Monitoring. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2023, 198, 110440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Z.; Sahu, C.K.; Singh, S.K.; Rai, R.; Yang, Z.; Lu, Y. Machine Learning Based Prediction of Melt Pool Morphology in a Laser-Based Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing Process. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2024, 62, 1803–1817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, R.; Yang, H. Multimodal Probabilistic Modeling of Melt Pool Geometry Variations in Additive Manufacturing. Addit. Manuf. 2023, 61, 103375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ren, Z.; Gao, L.; Clark, S.J.; Fezzaa, K.; Shevchenko, P.; Choi, A.; Everhart, W.; Rollett, A.D.; Chen, L.; Sun, T. Machine Learning–Aided Real-Time Detection of Keyhole Pore Generation in Laser Powder Bed Fusion. Science 2023, 379, 89–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Poudel, A.; Yasin, M.S.; Ye, J.; Liu, J.; Vinel, A.; Shao, S.; Shamsaei, N. Feature-Based Volumetric Defect Classification in Metal Additive Manufacturing. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 6369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Drissi-Daoudi, R.; Masinelli, G.; De Formanoir, C.; Wasmer, K.; Jhabvala, J.; Logé, R.E. Acoustic Emission for the Prediction of Processing Regimes in Laser Powder Bed Fusion, and the Generation of Processing Maps. Addit. Manuf. 2023, 67, 103484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raffestin, M.; Domashenkov, A.; Bertrand, P.; Faverjon, P.; Courbon, C. Ultrasonic Diagnostic for In Situ Control in Metal Additive Manufacturing. Measurement 2023, 206, 112244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Wu, J.; Zhao, X.; Yuan, S.; Ma, G.; Li, J.; Dai, T.; Chen, H.; Yang, B.; Ding, H. Laser Ultrasonic Imaging for Defect Detection on Metal Additive Manufacturing Components with Rough Surfaces. Appl. Opt. 2020, 59, 10380–10388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xu, W.; Li, X.; Zhang, J. Multi-Feature Fusion Imaging via Machine Learning for Laser Ultrasonic Based Defect Detection in Selective Laser Melting Part. Opt. Laser Technol. 2022, 150, 107918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Zhao, X.; Yang, B.; Li, J.; Liu, Y.; Ma, G.; Yuan, S.; Wu, J. Nondestructive Evaluation of Porosity in Additive Manufacturing by Laser Ultrasonic Surface Wave. Measurement 2022, 193, 110944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; Jiang, L.; Peng, Y.; Wang, M.; Xue, Z.; Wu, J.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, J. Ultra-Fast Laser Ultrasonic Imaging Method for Online Inspection of Metal Additive Manufacturing. Opt. Lasers Eng. 2023, 160, 107244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Williams, R.J.; Piglione, A.; Rønneberg, T.; Jones, C.; Pham, M.-S.; Davies, C.M.; Hooper, P.A. In Situ Thermography for Laser Powder Bed Fusion: Effects of Layer Temperature on Porosity, Microstructure and Mechanical Properties. Addit. Manuf. 2019, 30, 100880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, T.; Lough, C.S.; Sehhat, H.; Ren, Y.M.; Christofides, P.D.; Kinzel, E.C.; Leu, M.C. In-Situ Infrared Thermographic Inspection for Local Powder Layer Thickness Measurement in Laser Powder Bed Fusion. Addit. Manuf. 2022, 55, 102873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dunbar, A.J.; Denlinger, E.R.; Heigel, J.; Michaleris, P.; Guerrier, P.; Martukanitz, R.; Simpson, T.W. Development of Experimental Method for In Situ Distortion and Temperature Measurements during the Laser Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing Process. Addit. Manuf. 2016, 12, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nuñez, L.; Sabharwall, P.; van Rooyen, I.J. In Situ Embedment of Type K Sheathed Thermocouples with Directed Energy Deposition. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2023, 127, 3611–3623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, S.; Ren, G.; Zhang, B. Subsurface Defect Evaluation of Selective-Laser-Melted Inconel 738LC Alloy Using Eddy Current Testing for Additive/Subtractive Hybrid Manufacturing. Chin. J. Mech. Eng. 2021, 34, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ehlers, H.; Pelkner, M.; Thewes, R. Heterodyne Eddy Current Testing Using Magnetoresistive Sensors for Additive Manufacturing Purposes. IEEE Sens. J. 2020, 20, 5793–5800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhirnov, I.; Kouprianoff, D. Acoustic Diagnostic of Laser Powder Bed Fusion Processes. In Proceedings of the SPS 2022, Skovde, Sweden, 26–29 April 2022; Ios Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; Volume 21, pp. 542–552. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, Y.; Hong, G.S.; Ye, D.; Zhu, K.; Fuh, J.Y.H. Extraction and Evaluation of Melt Pool, Plume and Spatter Information for Powder-Bed Fusion AM Process Monitoring. Mater. Des. 2018, 156, 458–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Soon, H.G.; Ye, D.; Fuh, J.Y.H.; Zhu, K. Powder-Bed Fusion Process Monitoring by Machine Vision with Hybrid Convolutional Neural Networks. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2020, 16, 5769–5779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grasso, M.; Laguzza, V.; Semeraro, Q.; Colosimo, B.M. In-Process Monitoring of Selective Laser Melting: Spatial Detection of Defects via Image Data Analysis. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2017, 139, 051001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grasso, M.; Demir, A.G.; Previtali, B.; Colosimo, B.M. In Situ Monitoring of Selective Laser Melting of Zinc Powder via Infrared Imaging of the Process Plume. Robot. Comput.-Integr. Manuf. 2018, 49, 229–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Z.; Lu, Y.; Yeung, H.; Krishnamurty, S. From Scan Strategy to Melt Pool Prediction: A Neighboring-Effect Modeling Method. J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng. 2020, 20, 051001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fathizadan, S.; Ju, F.; Lu, Y. Deep Representation Learning for Process Variation Management in Laser Powder Bed Fusion. Addit. Manuf. 2021, 42, 101961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J. Deep Learning-Based Data Registration of Melt-Pool-Monitoring Images for Laser Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing. J. Manuf. Syst. 2023, 68, 117–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khanzadeh, M.; Bian, L.; Shamsaei, N.; Thompson, S.M. Porosity Detection of Laser Based Additive Manufacturing Using Melt Pool Morphology Clustering. Solid Freeform Fabrication 2016: Proceedings of the 27th Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium—An Additive Manufacturing Conference, SFF 2016, Austin, TX, USA, 8–10 August 2016; The University of Texas at Austin: Austin, TX, USA, 2016; pp. 1487–1494. [Google Scholar]
- Khanzadeh, M.; Chowdhury, S.; Tschopp, M.A.; Doude, H.R.; Marufuzzaman, M.; Bian, L. In-Situ Monitoring of Melt Pool Images for Porosity Prediction in Directed Energy Deposition Processes. IISE Trans. 2019, 51, 437–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ko, H. A Framework Driven by Physics-Guided Machine Learning for Process-Structure-Property Causal Analytics in Additive Manufacturing. J. Manuf. Syst. 2023, 67, 213–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jeon, I.; Yang, L.; Ryu, K.; Sohn, H. Online Melt Pool Depth Estimation during Directed Energy Deposition Using Coaxial Infrared Camera, Laser Line Scanner, and Artificial Neural Network. Addit. Manuf. 2021, 47, 102295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hao, C.; Liu, Z.; Xie, H.; Zhao, K.; Liu, S. Real-Time Measurement Method of Melt Pool Temperature in the Directed Energy Deposition Process. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2020, 177, 115475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Herzog, T.; Brandt, M.; Trinchi, A.; Sola, A.; Hagenlocher, C.; Molotnikov, A. Defect Detection by Multi-Axis Infrared Process Monitoring of Laser Beam Directed Energy Deposition. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 3861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stockman, T.; Knapp, C.; Henderson, K.; Carpenter, J.; Schneider, J. Stainless Steel 304L LENS AM Process Monitoring Using In-Situ Pyrometer Data. JOM 2018, 70, 1835–1843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bernhard, R.; Neef, P.; Wiche, H.; Hoff, C.; Hermsdorf, J.; Kaierle, S.; Wesling, V. Defect Detection in Additive Manufacturing via a Toolpath Overlaid Melt-Pool-Temperature Tomography. J. Laser Appl. 2020, 32, 022055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muvvala, G.; Patra Karmakar, D.; Nath, A.K. In-Process Detection of Microstructural Changes in Laser Cladding of in-Situ Inconel 718/TiC Metal Matrix Composite Coating. J. Alloys Compd. 2018, 740, 545–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leung, C.L.A.; Marussi, S.; Atwood, R.C.; Towrie, M.; Withers, P.J.; Lee, P.D. In Situ X-Ray Imaging of Defect and Molten Pool Dynamics in Laser Additive Manufacturing. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Z.; Ge, P.; Li, T.; Lindgren, L.-E.; Liu, W.W.; Zhao, G.Z.; Guo, X. Electromagnetic Wave-Based Analysis of Laser–Particle Interactions in Directed Energy Deposition Additive Manufacturing. Addit. Manuf. 2020, 34, 101284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Z.; Ge, P.; Li, J.Y.; Wang, Y.F.; Gao, X.; Yao, X.X. Laser–Particle Interaction-Based Analysis of Powder Particle Effects on Temperatures and Distortions in Directed Energy Deposition Additive Manufacturing. J. Therm. Stress. 2021, 44, 1068–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, Z.; Liu, W.; Zhang, N.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, H. Real–Time Prediction of Penetration Depths of Laser Surface Melting Based on Coaxial Visual Monitoring. Opt. Lasers Eng. 2020, 128, 106034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lupo, M.; Sofia, D.; Barletta, D.; Poletto, M. Calibration of Dem Simulation of Cohesive Particles. Chem. Eng. Trans. 2019, 74, 379–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akbari, M.; Kovacevic, R. Closed Loop Control of Melt Pool Width in Robotized Laser Powder–Directed Energy Deposition Process. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2019, 104, 2887–2898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ning, J.; Zhao, Y.; Zhu, L.; Yang, C.; Yu, M.; Yang, Z.; Qin, S.; Jiang, Z.; Xu, L.; Li, J.; et al. Height Consistency Compensation in Laser-Directed Energy Deposition of Thin-Walled Parts. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 2024, 266, 108963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Donadello, S.; Motta, M.; Demir, A.G.; Previtali, B. Monitoring of Laser Metal Deposition Height by Means of Coaxial Laser Triangulation. Opt. Lasers Eng. 2019, 112, 136–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Donadello, S. Interplay between Powder Catchment Efficiency and Layer Height in Self-Stabilized Laser Metal Deposition. Opt. Lasers Eng. 2022, 149, 106817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garmendia, I.; Leunda, J.; Pujana, J.; Lamikiz, A. In-Process Height Control during Laser Metal Deposition Based on Structured Light 3D Scanning. Procedia CIRP 2018, 68, 375–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- You, D.; Gao, X.; Katayama, S. Monitoring of High-Power Laser Welding Using High-Speed Photographing and Image Processing. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2014, 49, 39–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meng, W.; Yin, X.; Fang, J.; Guo, L.; Ma, Q.; Li, Z. Dynamic Features of Plasma Plume and Molten Pool in Laser Lap Welding Based on Image Monitoring and Processing Techniques. Opt. Laser Technol. 2019, 109, 168–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, Z.; Fang, Q.; Li, H.; Liu, S.; Zhu, W.; Yang, D. Neural Network Based Image Segmentation for Spatter Extraction during Laser-Based Powder Bed Fusion Processing. Opt. Laser Technol. 2020, 130, 106347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fang, Q.; Tan, Z.; Li, H.; Shen, S.; Liu, S.; Song, C.; Zhou, X.; Yang, Y.; Wen, S. In-Situ Capture of Melt Pool Signature in Selective Laser Melting Using U-Net-Based Convolutional Neural Network. J. Manuf. Process. 2021, 68, 347–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Criales, L.E.; Arısoy, Y.M.; Lane, B.; Moylan, S.; Donmez, A.; Özel, T. Laser Powder Bed Fusion of Nickel Alloy 625: Experimental Investigations of Effects of Process Parameters on Melt Pool Size and Shape with Spatter Analysis. International J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 2017, 121, 22–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Repossini, G.; Laguzza, V.; Grasso, M.; Colosimo, B.M. On the Use of Spatter Signature for In-Situ Monitoring of Laser Powder Bed Fusion. Addit. Manuf. 2017, 16, 35–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baumgartl, H.; Tomas, J.; Buettner, R.; Merkel, M. A Deep Learning-Based Model for Defect Detection in Laser-Powder Bed Fusion Using in-Situ Thermographic Monitoring. Prog. Addit. Manuf. 2020, 5, 277–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chebil, G.; Bettebghor, D.; Renollet, Y.; Lapouge, P.; Davoine, C.; Thomas, M.; Favier, V.; Schneider, M. Deep Learning Object Detection for Optical Monitoring of Spatters in L-PBF. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2023, 319, 118063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Naming Authority | Name | Abbreviated Name |
---|---|---|
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, USA | Laser-engineered net shaping | LENS |
Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, USA | Directed light fabrication | DLF |
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA | Directed metal deposition | DMD |
Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA | Shape deposition manufacturing | SDM |
University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK | Direct laser fabrication | DLF |
University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK | Laser direct casting | LDC |
Fraunhofer Institute, Aachen, Germany | Controlled metal build-up | CMB |
Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland | Laser metal forming | LMF |
Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China | Laser solid forming | LSF |
Sensor Type | Resolution | Frame Rate | Environmental Adaptability | Applicable Scenarios |
---|---|---|---|---|
Wired array camera | High | Moderate | High | Powder spreading, geometric monitoring |
High-speed camera | Moderate | High | Moderate | Molten pool dynamic monitoring |
Infrared camera | Moderate | Moderate | High | Temperature distribution monitoring |
Model Type | Characteristics | Advantages | Disadvantages | Applicable Scenarios |
---|---|---|---|---|
CNN | Extracts spatial features from images | Suitable for large-scale image data and efficient | Limited ability to handle time-series data | Molten pool morphology monitoring and defect detection |
RCNN | Region-based target detection model based on CNN | Precisely locates target areas | High computational complexity and slower speed | Small defect detection and molten pool feature prediction |
GAN | Data generation and enhancement; adversarial training | Generates high-quality data and solves data imbalance issues | Unstable training and sensitive to parameters | Data augmentation and anomaly detection |
LSTM | Processes time-series data | Suitable for dynamic processes and strong memory ability | Inefficient for high-dimensional data | Molten pool temperature dynamic monitoring and real-time feedback |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
He, W.; Zhu, L.; Liu, C.; Jiang, H. Metal Additive Manufacturing and Molten Pool Dynamic Characterization Monitoring: Advances in Machine Learning for Directed Energy Deposition. Metals 2025, 15, 106. https://doi.org/10.3390/met15020106
He W, Zhu L, Liu C, Jiang H. Metal Additive Manufacturing and Molten Pool Dynamic Characterization Monitoring: Advances in Machine Learning for Directed Energy Deposition. Metals. 2025; 15(2):106. https://doi.org/10.3390/met15020106
Chicago/Turabian StyleHe, Wentao, Lida Zhu, Can Liu, and Hongxiao Jiang. 2025. "Metal Additive Manufacturing and Molten Pool Dynamic Characterization Monitoring: Advances in Machine Learning for Directed Energy Deposition" Metals 15, no. 2: 106. https://doi.org/10.3390/met15020106
APA StyleHe, W., Zhu, L., Liu, C., & Jiang, H. (2025). Metal Additive Manufacturing and Molten Pool Dynamic Characterization Monitoring: Advances in Machine Learning for Directed Energy Deposition. Metals, 15(2), 106. https://doi.org/10.3390/met15020106