Next Article in Journal
Air Permeability of Air-Entrained Hybrid Concrete Containing CSA Cement
Previous Article in Journal
Domesticity ‘Behind Bars’: Project by Rem Koolhaas/OMA for the Renovation of a Panopticon Prison in Arnhem
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Experimental Study of Thermal and Humidity Conditions in a Historic Wooden Building in Southern Poland

by
Grzegorz Nawalany
,
Paweł Sokołowski
* and
Małgorzata Michalik
Department of Rural Building, Faculty of Environmental Engineering, University of Agriculture in Krakow, al. Mickiewicza 24/28, 30-059 Krakow, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Buildings 2020, 10(7), 118; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings10070118
Submission received: 28 May 2020 / Revised: 19 June 2020 / Accepted: 22 June 2020 / Published: 30 June 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Building Energy, Physics, Environment, and Systems)

Abstract

:
This article presents experimental research on hygrothermal conditions in a historic wooden church in southern Poland. The scope of the research included the continuous monitoring of temperature and relative humidity in several measuring plots in different areas inside and outside of the church. We also continuously monitored the number of people attending services. This study presents a detailed analysis of the development of heat and humidity conditions within the church. A model of the object was developed, and a computational analysis of the risk of condensation of water vapor on the inner surface of the partitions was carried out. An analysis of the results showed a large variation in the temperature and humidity conditions in the church. The internal temperature ranged from −9.7 to 25.9 °C, and the relative humidity of the indoor air ranged from 45.6% to 91.6%. The test results showed that the temperature and humidity of the indoor air periodically exceeded the accepted values of thermal comfort for historic buildings. The analysis of the obtained research results showed that the humidity and humidity conditions in the church mainly depend on the climatic zone and the number of people participating in the services. Moreover, an analysis of the results showed no risk of condensation on the wooden partitions of the church, but it should be noted that the temperature of the partitions was subject to rapid fluctuations (from −8.0 to 24.6 °C), which may have a negative impact on these historic wooden objects.

1. Introduction

Because they are a source of knowledge about the historical architecture of the world and particular regions, churches are an essential part of culture. Many of them contain valuable monuments, starting from their architectural plan (which is evidence of structural and aesthetical trends in a given period), as well as other components such as polychromes on the walls and vaults, altars, sculptures, paintings, floors, and organs, among many other features. The deterioration of such objects constitutes an irreversible loss of a piece of cultural heritage. The most important factor that allows us to keep the aforementioned artefacts in good condition is an appropriate microclimate. The specific functions performed by historic buildings determine the instability and inequality of the number of people inside them. The thermal and humidity conditions inside a church are mainly influenced by the variability of the outdoor conditions, the cubic volume of the church, the material and structural solutions in the building envelope, and the heating and ventilation systems. In their studies, Wolski and Jelec [1] pointed out that zones of differentiated thermal and humidity conditions can be distinguished in churches. It should also be noted that many historic wooden churches in Poland are unheated or are heated cyclically.
Brataszand Kozłowski [2], in their studies at the Church of Santa Maria Maddalena Rocca Pietore, investigating the response of wooden sculptured parts to temperature and relative humidity changes, concluded that temperature changes rapidly affect all materials in a structure, while the response of wooden objects to relative humidity changes is much slower. Each painted wooden object with its individual original structure and conservation history is acclimatized to the environment it has been exposed to. Such objects need individual levels of temperature and relative humidity. Scientific studies, however, have indicated that 50 ± 15% relative humidity fluctuations are safe [3].Rapid changes in the temperature and relative humidity of the indoor air can lead to the deterioration of polychromes, sculptures, and even the structure of a church.
Studies by Camuffo et al. [4] indicated that church heating can cause problems—periodic relative humidity drops cause the drying and shrinkage of objects with low thermal inertia. In unheated churches, the dominant problem is mold, which is mainly caused by moisture. The risk of mold occurrence is much lower in heated churches than in unheated ones [5]. The modernization of historic buildings with collections should take not only the requirements of the collection but also possible conflicts with the thermal comfort of people and the hazards related to the structural materials into account [6]. In various ways, heating systems satisfy certain needs in terms of the conservation of church interiors and the thermal comfort of the people inside. However, thermal comfort and the preservation of monuments have different microclimate requirements [7].
Interest in historic buildings is growing. The goals of studying historic buildings are varied, but the most popular aim is to improve the energy efficiency and thermal comfort in historic buildings [8]. In their studies, Sempriniet al. [9] focused on the reuse of an ancient church as an exhibition hall or an auditorium. Church microclimates, inter alia, were also studied by Silva et al. [10] in a monastery in Lisbon, by Wach and Miczyński [11] in a church in Dębno Podhalańskie, and by Varas-Muriel et al. [12] in a church in Madrid. An analysis of the existing literature showed that researchers mainly deal with objects inside historic buildings in which the microclimate of the interior is controlled. However, there are many historic buildings that are unheated, where the microclimate of the interior is not monitored. Rapid fluctuations in the temperature and relative humidity of the air can have a destructive effect on the antique polychromes and works of the art inside.
Numerical models are increasingly used in interior microclimate studies of buildings [13,14,15]. In the case of unheated objects without active systems, it is not possible to counteract the occurrence of adverse hygrothermal conditions. In the case of historic buildings, this can lead to irreparable damage to paintings, sculptures, polychromes, and other valuable elements inside the building [13]. Numerical methods can be used, among others, for anon-stationary analysis of the variability of selected physical parameters, such as humidity and temperature, as well as for estimating the biological risk in the event of condensation [16,17,18]. There are numerous simulation tools for modeling supportive solutions. Building energy simulation (BES) can be performed using more than 200 calculation tools. The modeling of historical buildings is a particularly difficult area. This is very important for ensuring the continuity of test results that are used later in the validation of computational models. Generating a building model often requires the integration of straight and curved surfaces into a series of flat surfaces to meet software requirements. In addition, compounds such as rainwater pollution, wind, and other atmospheric processes that are heavily dependent on the model are also included. It is very important to become familiar with the technical parameters of the partitions and their humidity, because these factor shave a significant impact on conclusions. In modeling assumptions, it is extremely difficult to combine ventilation and infiltration in a building that is heterogeneous and variable overtime. For tall buildings (over 3 m), a vertical temperature gradient should also be considered [19].
In this paper, the authors chose a non-heated wooden church in which services are held several times a year. The purpose of the research was to determine the temperature and humidity conditions prevailing in the church, including those at which there may be a threat to the exhibits and the possible destruction of the wooden structure of the church.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. The Research Object

The studies were conducted in a wooden church erected in 1555 in the village of Ptaszkowa in southern Poland. The interlocked corner log structure building is boarded on the outside (Figure 1). The church was built in the Gothic style on stone foundations with a single nave. The square, post-frame construction tower with slightly inclined walls was erected on the western side of the church body. The church was rebuilt in 1929. The originally single-nave church with a presbytery closed on three sides was enlarged to include a transept. A sacristy was added on the side of the presbytery to the north, and a vestibule was added to the south. The presbytery and sacristy have flat ceilings, with the top logs extending through the entire width of the nave and the south vestibule. A false dome vault was erected at the transept and nave intersection. The church walls are covered with polychromes. The wooden floor is laid directly on the ground. The gable roofs are covered with metal sheets.

2.2. Measuring Apparatus

The temperature and relative humidity were continuously monitored in the building from 1 May 2018 to 1 May 2019, with the frequency of measurements being every 10 min. The outdoor and indoor air temperature was measured using PT-100 sensors with a 0.1 °C resolution and a ±0.1 °C measurement error. The relative humidity of the outdoor and indoor air was measured using a DTH22 sensor with a 0–100% measuring range and a 0.3% accuracy. The placement of measuring points is shown in Figure 2. The recorders with index “0” were located at the height of 1.0 m, while those with index “1” were at the height of 1.8 m, those with “2”at the height of 2.5 m, and those with “3”at the height of 4.5 m. The number of people staying in the church during services was also monitored.

2.3. Assumptions for Calculations

The obtained results were used to determine the desired microclimate for historic wooden buildings with polychromes. The analysis covered the days on which services were held in typical periods: summer (May–September) and winter (October–April).
The studies also included the risk analysis for vapor condensation on the inside surface of the church walls for the adopted assumptions (Figure 3). For that purpose, we used a building model (Figure 4) that was subjected to calculation analysis based on the method of elementary balances implemented in the WUFIplus® ver. 3.2.0 software (Fraunhofer Institut fur Bauphysik, Holzkirchen Branch, Germany).WUFIplus® is a specialized tool in the field of building physics that allows for the calculations for non-stationary boundary conditions, taking the actual measured datainto account.
In the simulation process, the measurement data on the temperature and relative humidity of the indoor air, as well as the results of measurements of the temperature and relative humidity of the outdoor air, were used from all points. Due to the fact that modelling involved shaping internal conditions by the above-mentioned boundary conditions, the model omitted the influence of wind speed and solar radiation. Natural ventilation—the intensity of which was automatically adjusted by the software in order to obtain compliance with the given measurement data—was assumed in the calculations. Constant infiltration was assumed at 1ACH. The model also included heat gain from people with a value of 100 W/person. This value was the average between the profit from a person without physical activity in a sitting position (95 W/person) and a person in a standing position (106 W/person). The mentioned relationships were adopted based on Polish norm PN-B-02025: 2001 “Calculation of seasonal heat demand for heating residential buildings and collective housing.”

3. Results

3.1. Experimental Research

The results of the outdoor and indoor temperature and relative humidity measurements are presented in Figure 5 and Figure 6. In the period of study, the warmest month was August (average air temperature of 19 °C), and the coldest month was January (average air temperature of −4.1 °C).The outdoor temperature had a huge impact on the indoor temperature and relative humidity.
Due to differentiated thermal and humidity conditions, the period of studies was divided into two subperiods: summer and winter. The analysis was carried out for nine measuring points located inside the church. Figure 7 and Figure 8 show the indoor air temperature, relative humidity, and the limit values of optimum indoor thermal and humidity conditions. The ranges of analyzed parameters that are optimal for such buildings are 20 ± 5 °C for temperature and 50 ± 15% for relative humidity [3,20]. Other microclimate researchers of sacral objects have already adopted such values.
Throughout 84 days of the summer period, the indoor air humidity exceeded the limit (65%) and reached 85%. The elevated relative humidity inside the church might have been caused by poor ventilation and the absence of damp-proofing on the floor and foundations.
In the winter period, the indoor air temperature stayed below 15 °C, and in January, it even fell below −9 °C. It reached optimum values several times on individual days in October, November, and April. The increased temperature was related to the services held in the church at that time. The indoor relative humidity in the winter period was above the required value for the larger part of that period. Its maximum values exceeded 90%.
As a result of the specific use of the church (services held a few times a year), momentary fluctuations of air temperature and relative humidity could be observed. The results are shown in Figure 9 and Figure 10. Table 1 summarizes the number of people present at the services.
Figure 9 presents the air temperature and relative humidity values on 22 July 2018. On this day, one service was held that was attended by about 160 people. The air temperature during the day before the service was from 17.9 to 20.7 °C, while the relative humidity was from 67.1% to 81.6%. The appearance of people at the service increased the air temperature by 5.3 °C under the church choir. This was due to the fact that the faithful gather most often in this part of the building. At the point located in the choir, the temperature increased to 3.1 °C. The vertical temperature stratification was therefore 2.2 °C. At its peak, the relative humidity was 85.6% and occurred in the boundary zone of the north wall of the church.
In the winter, a day was selected for detailed analysis when there were about 400 people at the service (Figure 10). Before the service, the church’s air temperature was around −5 °C, while during the service, it rose to 4.8 °C. The analysis of relative humidity showed a very large fluctuation of this parameter during the service. The largest difference in air temperature, amounting to 9.4 °C, during the service was recorded under the choir, while the lowest, 5.2 °C, was noted in the nave and in the presbytery. Relative humidity fluctuations ranged from 7.1% (point E3) to 15% (point D1).
The impact of the number of people in the church on the interior microclimate was varied and depended on the season. The greatest fluctuations in temperature and relative humidity occurred in winter during services. These violent fluctuations in the interior microclimate could adversely affect the wooden antique elements of the church’s furnishings and its construction. One should agree with the statement of Bratasz and Kozlowski [7] that each painted wooden object with an individual original structure is acclimated to the specific environment in which it was exposed. Such an object needs individual levels and ranges of air temperature and relative humidity. Rapid changes in these parameters can lead to the faster degradation of historic polychromes.
The detailed analysis of indoor air temperature and relative humidity during the services showed that these parameters depended mainly on the number of people attending the service.

3.2. Computational Analysis

The analysis of the obtained results, in reference to the optimum thermal and humidity conditions required for historic buildings, indicated that this church does not meet them for 230 days of the year. The favorable condition ensuring long-term protection is a stable microclimate. There are periodic relative humidity drops in this church (from above 80% to below 70%). Such fluctuations could be a cause of damage to both the wood and the paintings. The relative humidity in the analyzed period was above 70%, meaning that it exceeded the threshold value, whose upper limit was assumed at 65%. The air temperature in such a building should be in the 20 ± 5 °C range. Such conditions were met in the summer period, but in the winter period, the air temperature in the church was considerably below 15 °C. The temperature differences during the services were from 2.9 to 9.5 °C. Taking into account the comfort conditions for the participants of the service, particularly in winter when people wear outer garments in the church, the air temperature should be 12–16 °C. In the analyzed winter period, the temperature was below 10 °C and even dropped down to −9.7 °C, thus not meeting the thermal comfort conditions for the people inside the building.
An analysis of the calculation results showed no risk of condensation on the surface of the internal walls (Figure 11). The smallest difference between the wall surface temperature and the dew point temperature for given conditions occurred during the winter at one of the services and was 1.6 °C. During the entire study period, the temperature of the inner wall surface was 4.5 °C higher, on average, compared to the dew point temperature. It should be noted, however, that the temperature of the internal surface of the partitions was unstable. During the year, the values of this parameter ranged from −8.0 to 24.6 °C.
The risk of condensation on the internal surfaces of the interior partitions was very strongly correlated with the number of people at the services. The largest number of worshippers in the church occurred on 1 November 2018 (496 people), but this did not cause the phenomenon of steam condensation on the partitions.

4. Discussion

During most of the study, the relative humidity in the building was above 75%. The studies by Maroy K. et al. [20] in a Watervliet church also indicated the problem of excessive humidity. The authors of the studies assumed that 75% was the maximum relative humidity that prevented the biological degradation of wooden works of art. An excessive relative humidity (84–89%) in an unheated church was also recorded in a church in Estonia; the authors noted a high risk of mold. The conditions in the Estonian church maybe influenced by the close vicinity of the sea [5,21]; in the referred to paper, the maximum daily temperature change was 1.5 °C and the maximum relative humidity changes was 4%.The daily temperature differences in the studied church reached as much as 9 °C.
The studies indicated that despite the exceeded maximum indoor air temperature and relative humidity, there is no risk of vapor condensation on the building envelopes in the church in Ptaszkowa. The church has a thermally uninsulated and non-damp-proofed floor that significantly affects the thermal and humidity conditions inside.
Similarly to the church in Dębno Podhalańskie [11], the average annual air temperature and relative humidity values depend mainly on outdoor conditions. The differences in the air temperature and relative humidity values between the studied church and the church in Dębno Podhalańskie maybe related to their use. The services in the church in Dębno Podhalańskie are held daily, and in the studied church, they are only held only a few times a year. The relationship between the indoor and the outdoor conditions was also noted in a church in Madrid [12]. The problem of maintaining optimum conditions also occurred in a church in Milan [22]. The authors’ studies have shown that wooden historic sacral objects should be heated in winter. The conducted research showed that the number of the faithful at services also had a significant impact on the development of thermal and humidity conditions in an unheated wooden church. These types of objects tolerate sudden changes in temperature and relative humidity very badly. The influence of people in the church on increasing the biological risk due to exceeding the contractual limit of 75% relative humidity was observed. The presence of the faithful was not found to affect the condensation of water vapor in the same way. In order to obtain future results, the authors plan to use computational tools such as Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) and Energy Plus, which are some of the tools that are used in monitoring microclimate parameters, among others, in historical objects [19].

5. Conclusions

The research conducted by the authors allowed for a thorough examination of the variability of selected parameters of the internal and external microclimate and their dependence, as well as the impact of people staying in the church on the formation of these parameters.
The average indoor air temperature was 10.5 °C, and the average indoor relative humidity was 74.6%. The extreme indoor air temperatures in the church were −9.7 °C (22 January 2019) and 25.9 °C (29 July 2018). The extreme relative humidity values were 48.2% (9 March 2019) and 91.6% (27 December 2018).
The amplitude of indoor air temperature fluctuations was 35.6 °C, and that of the indoor air relative humidity was 46%.
On the days when the services were not held, the air temperature and relative humidity inside the building were found to mainly depend on the outdoor conditions. The rise of temperature and relative humidity was noted during the services, and this was affected by the number of people in the church. The air temperature differentiation during the service was zone-dependent and ranged from 2.5 to 9.5 °C.The vertical temperature stratification between the zone under the choir, where the faithful gather most often, and the zone in the choir (at a height of 4.5 m)was also strongly noticeable. The temperature gradient in this case was from 2.5 to 3.7 °C.
The thermal and humidity conditions during the period of study exceeded the optimum values for historic buildings. The studied building has a thermally uninsulated and non-damp-proofed floor that significantly affects the thermal and humidity conditions inside.
The recorded cases of indoor temperature and relative humidity values in excess of the recommended values can result in the biological degradation of wooden works of art.
The studies have indicated that despite the exceeded maximum indoor air temperature and relative humidity, there is no risk of vapor condensation on the building inside walls in the church in Ptaszkowa. It should be noted, however, that the wall inside surface temperature was unstable, which may adversely affect the durability of polychromes and paintings and the building structure itself. In light of the above summary, the following conclusions can be drawn:
  • In the examined historic wooden church, despite the lack of faithful inside the building, there are periodic, automatic episodes of exceeding the relative humidity limit (75%) that may contribute to the occurrence of damage associated with paintings and polychromies.
  • Due to frequent and automatic exceeding of the relative humidity limit values, the ventilation of the tested object should be examined, including by the tracer gas dilution method.
  • The influence of people staying in the church on the changing temperature and relative humidity of the air are important, but the presence of people in the building does not influence the occurrence of water vapor at the surface level of the partitions.
  • The occurrence of a vertical air temperature gradient from 2.5 to 3.7 °C occurs in the area under the choir (measuring point D1) and in the choir (measuring point E3).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.N., P.S., and M.M.; methodology, G.N. and P.S.; software, P.S.; validation, G.N. and P.S.; formal analysis, M.M., G.N., and P.S.; investigation, G.N. and P.S.; resources, G.N., M.M., and P.S.; data curation, G.N., M.M., and P.S.; writing—original draft preparation, M.M., G.N., and P.S.; writing—review and editing, G.N., P.S., and M.M.; visualization, M.M., G.N., and P.S.; supervision, G.N. and P.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Faculty of Environmental Engineering, University of Agriculture in Krakow, through project “Subvention 031400-D014 Environmental Engineering, Mining and Energy”.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wolski, L.; Jelec, P. Kształtowanie mikroklimatu w strefie przebywania ludzi w obiektach sakralnych. Fiz. Budowli W Teor. I Prakt. 2005, 1, 371–378. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bratasz, Ł.; Kozłowski, R. Entwicklungderneuen EU-Normen—The CENTC346 draft standard on heating historic churches: Mini missing disturbance to the indoor climate. In Klimagestaltungim Spannungsfeldzwischen Kulturguschutz und Nutzerwünschen, Tagungsblat, des 1; Konservierungswissenschaftlichen Kolloqiums: Berlin, Germany, 2007; pp. 24–31. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bratasz, Ł. Allowable microclimatic variations for painted wood. Stud. Conserv. 2013, 58, 65–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Camuffo, D.; Pagan, E.; Rissanen, S.; Bratasz, Ł.; Kozłowski, R.; Camuffo, M.; Valle, A. Anadvanced church heating system favourable to art works: A contribution to European standardization. J. Cult. Herit. 2009, 11, 205–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kalamees, T.; Väli, A.; Kurik, L.; Napp, M.; Arümagi, E.; Kallavus, U. The Influence of Indoor Climate Controlon Risk for Damage sin Naturally Ventilated Historic Churches in Cold Climate. Int. J. Archit. Herit. 2015, 10, 486–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Webb, A.L. Energy retrofits in historic and traditional buildings: A review of problems and methods. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 77, 748–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bratasz, Ł.; Kozłowski, R. Laser sensors for continuous in-situ monitoring of the dimensional response of wooden objects. Stud. Conserv. 2005, 50, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Martínez-Molina, A.; Tort-Ausina, I.; Cho, S.; Vivancos, J.-L. Energy efficiency and thermal comfort in historic buildings: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 61, 70–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Semprini, G.; Galli, C.; Farina, S. Reuse of an ancient church: Thermal aspect for integrated solutions. Energy Procedia 2017, 133, 327–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Silva, H.E.; Coelho, G.B.A.; Henriques, F.M.A. Climate monitoring in World Heritage List buildings with low-cost data loggers: The case of the Jerónimos Monastery in Lisbon (Portugal). J. Build. Eng. 2020, 28, 101029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wach, T.; Miczyński, J. Microclimate inside of church of historical value in Dębno Podhalańskie as influenced by external weather conditions. Acta Sci. Pol. Form. Cir. 2005, 4, 71–81. [Google Scholar]
  12. Varas-Muriel, M.J.; Martinez-Garrido, M.I.; Fort, R. Monitoring the thermal-hygrometric conditions induced by traditional heating systems in a historic Spanish church (12th–16th C). Energy Build. 2014, 75, 119–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Kupczak, A.; Szadlowska-Salega, A.; Krzemień, L.; Sobczyk, J.; Radon, J.; Kozłowski, R. Impact of paper and wooden collections on humidity stability and energy consumption in museums and libraries. Energy Build. 2018, 158, 77–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gielzecki, J.; Jakubowski, T. The simulation of temperature distribution in a ground heat exchanger-GHE using the Autodesk CFD simulation program. In Renewable Energy Sources: Engineering, Technology, Innovation; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018; pp. 333–343. [Google Scholar]
  15. Yoshida, A.; Shoho, S.; Kinoshita, S. Evaluation of reduction effect on thermal load inside and outside of concrete building with wooden decoration by numerical analisys. Energy Procedia 2017, 132, 435–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Nawalany, G.; Sokołowski, P. Improved energy management in an intermittently heated building using large broiler house in central Europe as an example. Energies 2020, 13, 1371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Domhagen, F.; Wahlgren, P. Consequences of varying Airtightness in wooden buildings. Energy Procedia 2017, 132, 873–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kabatova, V.; Durica, P. Measured and simulated temperature values in the chosen wall of a wooden building considering cardinal direction. Transp. Res. Procedia 2019, 40, 718–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Akkurt, G.G.; Aste, N.; Borderon, J.; Buda, A.; Calzolari, M.; Chung, D.; Costanzo, V.; Del Pero, C.; Evola, G.; Huerto-Cardenas, H.E.; et al. Dynamic thermal and hygrometric simulation of historical buildings: Critical factors and possible solutions. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020, 118, 109509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Maroy, K.; Steeman, M.; De Backer, L.; Janssens, A.; De Paepe, M. Conservation climate analysis of a church containing valuable artworks. Energy Procedia 2015, 78, 1269–1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Aste, N.; Adhikari, R.S.; Buzzetti, M.; Della Torre, S.; Del Pero, C.; Huerto, H.E.; Leonforte, C.F. Microclimatic monitoring of the Duomo (Milan Cathedral): Risks-based analysis for the conservation of its cultural heritage. Build. Environ. 2019, 148, 240–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Cannistraro, M.; Resitivo, R. Monitorig of indoor microclimatic conditions of an eighteenth-century church, with wireless sensor. Adv. Model. Anal. 2018, 61, 28–36. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Church facade: (a) west and (b) south.
Figure 1. Church facade: (a) west and (b) south.
Buildings 10 00118 g001
Figure 2. Location of measuring points: (a) church plan and (b) church section.
Figure 2. Location of measuring points: (a) church plan and (b) church section.
Buildings 10 00118 g002
Figure 3. Selected technical parameters of building fabric and materials implemented for simulation in WUFIplus®.
Figure 3. Selected technical parameters of building fabric and materials implemented for simulation in WUFIplus®.
Buildings 10 00118 g003
Figure 4. Church model generated in WUFIplus®.
Figure 4. Church model generated in WUFIplus®.
Buildings 10 00118 g004
Figure 5. Average outdoor and indoor air temperatures during the year.
Figure 5. Average outdoor and indoor air temperatures during the year.
Buildings 10 00118 g005
Figure 6. Average outdoor and indoor relative humidity during the year.
Figure 6. Average outdoor and indoor relative humidity during the year.
Buildings 10 00118 g006
Figure 7. Indoor air temperatures and relative humidity in the summer period.
Figure 7. Indoor air temperatures and relative humidity in the summer period.
Buildings 10 00118 g007
Figure 8. Indoor air temperatures and relative humidity in the winter period.
Figure 8. Indoor air temperatures and relative humidity in the winter period.
Buildings 10 00118 g008
Figure 9. Indoor air temperature and relative humidity values on 22 July 2018; the number of people at the service was 160.
Figure 9. Indoor air temperature and relative humidity values on 22 July 2018; the number of people at the service was 160.
Buildings 10 00118 g009
Figure 10. Indoor air temperature and relative humidity values on 24 January 2019.
Figure 10. Indoor air temperature and relative humidity values on 24 January 2019.
Buildings 10 00118 g010
Figure 11. Indoor air temperatures, wall inside surface temperatures, and dew point: (a) April 2018–October 2018 and (b) November 2018–April 2019.
Figure 11. Indoor air temperatures, wall inside surface temperatures, and dew point: (a) April 2018–October 2018 and (b) November 2018–April 2019.
Buildings 10 00118 g011
Table 1. The number of people present at the services.
Table 1. The number of people present at the services.
DateThe Number of People
20 May 2018298
21 July 201857
22 July 2018160
29 July 2018202
12 August 2018138
26 August 2018146
16 September 201838
14 October 201869
21 October 201826
1 November 2018496
11 November 201853
25 November 2018153
24 January 2019400
26 January 2019154

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nawalany, G.; Sokołowski, P.; Michalik, M. Experimental Study of Thermal and Humidity Conditions in a Historic Wooden Building in Southern Poland. Buildings 2020, 10, 118. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings10070118

AMA Style

Nawalany G, Sokołowski P, Michalik M. Experimental Study of Thermal and Humidity Conditions in a Historic Wooden Building in Southern Poland. Buildings. 2020; 10(7):118. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings10070118

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nawalany, Grzegorz, Paweł Sokołowski, and Małgorzata Michalik. 2020. "Experimental Study of Thermal and Humidity Conditions in a Historic Wooden Building in Southern Poland" Buildings 10, no. 7: 118. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings10070118

APA Style

Nawalany, G., Sokołowski, P., & Michalik, M. (2020). Experimental Study of Thermal and Humidity Conditions in a Historic Wooden Building in Southern Poland. Buildings, 10(7), 118. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings10070118

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop