Strength Laws and Crack Evolution Mechanism of Slurry Grouting under High-Permeability and High-Stress Curing Conditions
, Liuhua Yang 1,2, Haowen Zhang 1,2 and Wenxiang Zhang 1,2Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
Title: Strength Laws and Crack Evolution Mechanism of Slurry Grouting under High-permeability and High-stress Curing Conditions.
The manuscript needs to be improved with minor modifications. The following are the main comments of the reviewer
1. The abstract needs to rewrite and should summarize the substantive results of work. This will help the readers to decide whether they want to read the rest of the paper or not. In general, the abstract should include enough key information [e.g., summary results, the trend of analysis etc.].
2. The authors should state the general results and a brief overview of the structure of the paper in the last sentences of introduction.
3. The authors carried out a series of numerical investigations. Whereas, no available data about the PFC2D model (e.g. the boundary condition).
4. In general, there is a need to significantly improve the conclusion section based on the main findings from the study,. the conclusion are just rewrite the results which obtained from the proposed model.
Author Response
Please see the attached response letter.
Author Response File: 
Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
The article is interesting and important from the point of view of scientific research.The introduction and conclusions fully correspond to the described research and
the obtained results. But the text contains formatting inaccuracies: for example,
from line 99 to line 102, characters should be written with subscripts. There are also
several syntax and language errors in the text.
Author Response
Thank you very much for taking your time to put forward valuable opinions on my thesis. They are of great guiding significance to my thesis writing and scientific research. The following explanations are made under your opinions.
At your suggestion, I have rechecked the grammar and format of the paper, corrected the grammatical errors, and corrected the problems in the format of lines 99-102 and 126-128 of the paper. Finally, thank you again for guiding my thesis and scientific research experiments in your busy schedule.
