Systematic Identification of the Influencing Factors for the Digital Transformation of the Construction Industry Based on LDA-DEMATEL-ANP
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Analysis of Key Terms
2.1. Digital Transformation
2.2. Transformation of the Construction Industry
3. Research Design
3.1. Data Sources
3.2. Data Processing
3.3. LDA Thematic Model Training
3.4. Constructing Evaluation Indicators of Key Influencing Factors
4. Empirical Results and Analysis
4.1. Analysis of Word Frequency
4.2. Training Results of LDA Thematic Model
4.3. Thematic Analysis
4.4. Determination of the Relationship of Indicators Based on the DEMATEL Method
4.5. ANP Calculation Index Weight
- Enterprise resources (A1): capital resources (financial strength) and human resources (digital talents);
- Enterprise capability (A2): management capability (enterprise management level), scientific and technological innovation capability, organizational change capability (business model);
- Enterprise spirit (A3): entrepreneurship and social responsibility;
- Macro environment (A4): policy environment, technical environment (digital technology);
- Industry environment (A5): market competition (international digital environment), aging labor force (ordinary workers), green requirements (green buildings).
5. Conclusions and Discussion
5.1. Main Conclusions of the Study
5.2. Theoretical Contribution
5.3. Management Implications
5.4. Shortcomings and Prospects
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Reis, J.; Amorim, M.; Melao, N.; Matos, P. Digital Transformation: A Literature Review and Guidelines for Future Research; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 411–421. [Google Scholar]
- Frank, A.G.; Mendes, G.H.S.; Ayala, N.F.; Ghezzi, A. Servitization and Industry 4.0 convergence in the digital transformation of product firms: A business model innovation perspective. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2019, 141, 341–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghobakhloo, M. Industry 4.0, digitization, and opportunities for sustainability. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 252, 119869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verhoef, P.C.; Broekhuizen, T.; Bart, Y.; Bhattacharya, A.; Dong, J.Q.; Fabian, N.; Haenlein, M. Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 122, 889–901. [Google Scholar]
- Dengler, K.; Matthes, B. The impacts of digital transformation on the labour market: Substitution potentials of occupations in Germany. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2018, 137, 304–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kornelakis, A.; Kirov, V.; Thill, P. The digitalisation of service work: A comparative study of restructuring of the banking sector in the United Kingdom and Luxembourg. Eur. J. Ind. Relat. 2022, 28, 253–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mićić, L. Digital transformation and its influence on GDP. Econ.-Innov. Res. J. 2017, 5, 135–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Llopis-Albert, C.; Rubio, F.; Valero, F. Impact of digital transformation on the automotive industry. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2021, 162, 120343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Savastano, M.; Amendola, C.; Bellini, F.; D’Ascenzo, F. Contextual impacts on industrial processes brought by the digital transformation of manufacturing: A systematic review. Sustainability 2019, 11, 891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Finelli, L.A.; Narasimhan, V. Leading a digital transformation in the pharmaceutical industry: Reimagining the way we work in global drug development. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2020, 108, 756–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parker, L.E. Creation of the National Artificial Intelligence Research and Development Strategic Plan. AI Mag. 2018, 39, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rübmann, M. Future of Productivity and Growth in Manufacturing. Bost. Consult. 2015, 9, 54–89. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, Q.; Ma, Y.; Xu, S. Has the development of digital economy improved the efficiency of China’s green economy? China Popul. Resour. Environ. 2022, 32, 72–85. [Google Scholar]
- Ngowi, A.; Pienaar, E.; Talukhaba, A.; Mbachu, J. The globalisation of the construction industry—A review. Build. Environ. 2005, 40, 135–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adekunle, S.A.; Aigbavboa, C.O.; Ejohwomu, O.; Adekunle, E.A.; Thwala, W.D. Digital transformation in the construction industry: A bibliometric review. J. Eng. Des. Technol. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pfnür, A.; Wagner, B. Transformation of the real estate and construction industry: Empirical findings from Germany. J. Bus. Econ. 2020, 90, 975–1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silverio-Fernández, M.A.; Renukappa, S.; Suresh, S. Strategic framework for implementing smart devices in the construction industry. Constr. Innov. 2021, 21, 218–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, J.; Gong, X.; Zhang, H.; Su, X. Strategic Path for High-Quality Development of Construction Industry Driven by Digitalization. Eng. Sci. 2021, 23, 56–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Panenkov, A.; Lukmanova, I.; Kuzovleva, I.; Bredikhin, V. Methodology of the theory of change management in the implementation of digital transformation of construction: Problems and prospects. In Proceedings of the E3S Web of Conferences, Voronezh, Russia, 8–10 December 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Y.; Wang, L. Research on the Type Identification and Transformation Mode Selection of Traditional Enterprises’ Digital Transformation Strategy. J. Manag. Rev. 2021, 33, 84–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, Z.; Song, T.; Guo, S.; Peng, J.; Zeng, L.; Zhu, M. Robotics technologies aided for 3D printing in construction: A review. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2022, 118, 3559–3574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, H.; Song, J.; Wang, G. A Scientometric Review of Smart Construction Site in Construction Engineering and Management: Analysis and Visualization. Sustainability 2021, 13, 8860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baek, S.; Jung, W.; Han, S.H. A critical review of text-based research in construction: Data source, analysis method, and implications. Autom. Constr. 2021, 132, 103915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, Q.; Wang, S.; Yang, X.; Li, J. The development mechanism, influencing factors and countermeasures of industrial intelligence-a qualitative study based on interviews with industry experts. China Sci. Technol. Forum 2021, 8, 59–69. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, K.; Du, P.; Fang, W.; Gao, F. Digital transformation of China’s construction industry: Connotation, participants and policy tools. J. Civ. Eng. Manag. 2021, 38, 23–29. [Google Scholar]
- Xie, X.; Deng, L.; Xiao, M.; Luo, H.; Fang, R. New-Generation Quality and Safety Management of the Construction Industry. Eng. Sci. 2021, 23, 71–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Q.; Liang, S.; Yang, D. A Comparative Study of Digital Transformation Policies of Foreign Governments. J. Inf. 2021, 40, 128–138. [Google Scholar]
- Westerman, G.; Bonnet, D.; McAfee, A. The nine elements of digital transformation. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 2014, 55, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Karagiannaki, A.; Vergados, G.; Fouskas, K. The impact of digital transformation in the financial services industry: Insights from an open innovation initiative in fintech in Greece. In Proceedings of the Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems (MCIS), Genova, Italy, 4–5 September 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Fitzgerald, M.; Kruschwitz, N.; Bonnet, D.; Welch, M. Embracing digital technology: A new strategic imperative. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 2014, 55, 1. [Google Scholar]
- Liere-Netheler, K.; Packmohr, S.; Vogelsang, K. Drivers of Digital Transformation in Manufacturing. In Proceedings of the 51st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Hilton Waikoloa Village, HI, USA, 2–6 January 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Demirkan, H.; Spohrer, J.C.; Welser, J.J. Digital innovation and strategic transformation. It Prof. 2016, 18, 14–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haffke, I.; Kalgovas, B.; Benlian, A. The Transformative Role of Bimodal IT in an Era of Digital Business. In Proceedings of the 50st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Hilton Waikoloa Village, HI, USA, 3–7 January 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Vial, G. Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 2019, 28, 118–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boyes, H.; Hallaq, B.; Cunningham, J.; Watson, T. The industrial internet of things (IIoT): An analysis framework. Comput. Ind. 2018, 101, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, S.D. Construction 4.0: An Innovation Platform for the Built Environment. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng.-Manag. Procure. Law 2020, 173, 190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maskuriy, R.; Selamat, A.; Maresova, P.; Krejcar, O.; David, O.O. Industry 4.0 for the construction industry: Review of management perspective. Economies 2019, 7, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chao, N.; Han, S.; Wu, X. Research Theme Discovery and Evolution Analysis of Digital Journalism: A Survey Based on Web of Science Literature. Press 2021, 9, 4–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dalvi-Esfahani, M.; Niknafs, A.; Kuss, D.J.; Nilashi, M.; Afrough, S. Social media addiction: Applying the DEMATEL approach. Telemat. Inform. 2019, 43, 101250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saaty, T.L. Decision making with dependence and feedback. In The Analytic Network Process; RWS Publications: Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, B.; Liu, S.; Ding, K.; Liu, Z.; Xu, J. Identifying technological topics and institution-topic distribution probability for patent competitive intelligence analysis: A case study in LTE technology. Scientometrics 2014, 101, 685–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sepasgozar, S.M.E. Differentiating Digital Twin from Digital Shadow: Elucidating a Paradigm Shift to Expedite a Smart, Sustainable Built Environment. Buildings 2021, 11, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boje, C.; Guerriero, A.; Kubicki, S.; Rezgui, Y. Towards a semantic Construction Digital Twin: Directions for future research. Autom. Constr. 2020, 114, 103179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hinings, B.; Gegenhuber, T.; Greenwood, R. Digital innovation and transformation: An institutional perspective. Inf. Organ. 2018, 28, 52–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, W.; Liu, J.; Li, L.F.; Zhou, Q.; Ji, L.X. How Could Policies Facilitate Digital Transformation of Innovation Ecosystem: A Multiagent Model. Complexity 2021, 2021, 8835067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.; Yang, Y. Five bottlenecks in the high-quality development of digital economy and countermeasures. Macroecon. Res. 2022, 2, 107–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bai, C.G.; Quayson, M.; Sarkis, J. COVID-19 pandemic digitization lessons for sustainable development of micro-and small-enterprises. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2021, 27, 1989–2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, H.; Wu, Y.; Cao, D.; Wang, Y. Organizational mindfulness towards digital transformation as a prerequisite of information processing capability to achieve market agility. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 122, 700–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qi, Y.; Xiao, X. Enterprise Management Reform in the Digital Economy Era. Manag. World 2020, 36, 135–152+250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, Z. The impact of digital transformation on production mode and international economic structure and its response. Qual. Mark. 2021, 18, 150–152. [Google Scholar]
- Mubarak, M.F.; Petraite, M. Industry 4.0 technologies, digital trust and technological orientation: What matters in open innovation? Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2020, 161, 120332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scuotto, V.; Nicotra, M.; Del Giudice, M.; Krueger, N.; Gregori, G.L. A microfoundational perspective on SMEs’ growth in the digital transformation era. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 129, 382–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, C.; Wu, J.; Wang, M.; Li, X.; Liu, B.; Liang, C.; Hu, X. Improvement of Core Competitiveness of Chinese Construction Enterprises Against the Background of High-Quality Development. Eng. Sci. 2021, 23, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chua, T.; Zhang, Q.; Su, X. Cross-regional analysis of the aging problem of China’s construction labor force and its countermeasures. J. Civ. Eng. Manag. 2021, 38, 63–69. [Google Scholar]
- Hildebrandt, J.; Kluge, J.; Ziefle, M. Barriers and Concerns of Elderly Workers towards the Digital Transformation of Work. In Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Design for the Elderly and Technology Acceptance, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference, ITAP 2019 Held as Part of the 21st HCI International Conference, HCII 2019, Orlando, FL, USA, 26–31 July 2019; Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS 11592); Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; pp. 158–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Q.; Liu, G.; Shao, J. Digital Transformation, Supply Chain Integration and Enterprise Performance-Moderating Effect of Entrepreneurship. Econ. Manag. 2021, 43, 5–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schiuma, G.; Schettini, E.; Santarsiero, F.; Carlucci, D. The transformative leadership compass: Six competencies for digital transformation entrepreneurship. Int. J. Entrep. Behav. Res. 2021, 28, 1273–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, M.; Zhang, W. Research on the Mechanism of Digital Economy to Economic Growth. Soc. Sci. 2021, 1, 44–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Li, M. Research on the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility, Internal Control and Financial Performance: Based on the Perspective of Technological Innovation. Forecast 2021, 40, 81–87. [Google Scholar]
- Agafonova, A.N.; Yakhneeva, I.V.; Mukhametshina, G.R. Human-Centric Marketing in the Digital Era. In Innovative Economic Symposium; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 10–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ren, L. Internal mechanism and external perception in digital transformation of physical retail enterprises. Bus. Econ. Res. 2019, 9, 115–118. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, S.; Wang, K.; Yang, X.; Xu, W. Research on Emission Goal of Carbon Peak and Carbon Neutral in Building Sector. Build. Sci. 2021, 37, 189–198. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, X.; Hu, D.; Cao, W.; Liang, W.; Xu, X.; Tang, X.; Wang, Y. Path of Digital Technology Promoting Realization of Carbon Neutrality Goal in Chinas Energy Industry. Bull. Chin. Acad. Sci. 2021, 36, 1019–1029. [Google Scholar]
- Li, J.; Zhang, R.; Li, B. Research on the Influence Mechanism of Big Data Capability on the Green Competitiveness of Manufacturing Industry from the Perspective of Environmental Dynamics—Based on SBM-GML Index Model. J.Sci. Technol. Prog. Countermeas. 2021, 38, 67–75. [Google Scholar]
- Ma, L.; Wang, S.; Zhang, J. Research on the Path of Digital Economy Driving Enterprise Business Model Innovation. Tech. Econ. Manag. Res. 2021, 10, 37–42. [Google Scholar]
- Ziyadin, S.; Suieubayeva, S.; Utegenova, A. Digital transformation in business. In Digital Age: Chances, Challenges and Future. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems (LNNS 84); Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 408–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yi, J.; Zhang, Z.; Yang, X.; Wang, Y. Organizational inertia, digital capability and business model innovation of Internet enterprises: The moderating effect of enterprise types. Nankai Bus. Rev. 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Cai, C.; Liu, W.; Jiang, H. The Impact of Business Model Scenarios on Value Creation—A Longitudinal Case Study of Digital Transformation of over the rainbow Stock Company from 2007 to 2018. Nankai Bus. Rev. 2020, 23, 98–108. [Google Scholar]
- Svarc, J.; Laznjak, J.; Dabic, M. The role of national intellectual capital in the digital transformation of EU countries. Another digital divide? J. Intellect. Cap. 2021, 22, 768–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seliverstov, Y.I.; Moiseev, V.V.; Komarova, O.A. Digital transformation of russian enterprise and human capital development: Challenges and opportunities. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Scientific and Practical Conference on Modern Management Trends and the Digital Economy-from Regional Development to Global Economic Growth (MTDE), Yekaterinburg, Indonesia, 16–17 April 2020; pp. 133–138. [Google Scholar]
- Gabriel, J.; Mayzira, A.; Aditya, J.; Itsari, M.; Satrio, S.; Ruldeviyani, Y. Critical success factors of data integration on digital human capital information system to support digital transformation—A case study at PTXYZ. In Proceedings of the 2020 8th International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management (CITSM), Pangkal, Indonesia, 23–24 October 2020; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, R.; Li, C.; Cao, C.; Fang, M. Does science–industry cooperation policy enhance corporate innovation: Evidence from Chinese listed firms. Account. Financ. 2021, 61, 3823–3853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Li, Z.; Shi, F. Factors Influencing Mechanism of Construction Development Transformation in China Based on SEM. Discret. Dyn. Nat. Soc. 2015, 2015, 219865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
No. | Title | Literature Content |
---|---|---|
1 | A Scientometric Review of Smart Construction Site in Construction Engineering and Management: Analysis and Visualization | With the extensive development and application of information technologies in construction engineering and management (CEM), the construction site is experiencing a rapid digital revolution and transformation. Since smart construction site has become the current research trend and one of the most hot topics… |
2 | Factors Influencing Adoption and Integration of Construction Robotics and Automation Technology in the US | Robotics and automation technology (RAT) has emerged as one of the most important drivers of the Industry 4.0 digital transformation of industrial operations. Although RAT has been explored i n construction over the last several decades, its applications in the field have been limited, despite its potential and rise in application opportunities… |
… | … | … |
50 | A critical review of text-based research in construction: Data source, analysis method, and implications | The advancement of natural language processing and text mining techniques facilitate automatic non-trivial pattern extraction and knowledge discovery from text data. However, text-based research has received less attention compared to image- and sensor-based research in the construction industry… |
Theme Identification | Document Topic Probability | Words (5 Words with High Probability Related to the Topic) | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Digitization technology | 0.128 | Construction, construction site, robots, equipment, machinery |
2 | Policy environment | 0.127 | Government affairs, reform, administration, matters, cases |
3 | Financial strength | 0.118 | Investment, entity, productivity, capital, funds |
4 | Enterprise management level | 0.105 | The whole process, project management, construction site, management and control, manpower |
5 | International digital environment | 0.105 | Employees, Global, Perspective, Globalization, International |
6 | Hi-tech innovation capacity | 0.084 | Scientific research, innovation ability, core technology, vitality and competitiveness |
7 | Ordinary workers | 0.084 | Labor, labor, training, supply, skills |
8 | Entrepreneurship | 0.067 | Reform, uncertainty, managers, pressure, willingness |
9 | Social responsibility | 0.064 | Responsibility, public, benefit, public service, community |
10 | Green building | 0.059 | Green, technology, materials, ecology, construction |
11 | Business model | 0.053 | Users, partners, business processes, revenues, business models |
12 | Digital talents | 0.006 | Talent, academia, team, high quality, difficult problems. |
Scale aij | Meaning |
---|---|
0 | Has no effect on Si Sj. |
1 | Have weak influence on Si Sj. |
2 | Have a moderate impact on Si Sj. |
3 | Have strong influence on Si Sj. |
Affected Factors | Enterprise Resource A1 | Enterprise Capability A2 | Enterprise Spirit A3 | Macro Environment A4 | Industry Environment A5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Enterprise resource A1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Enterprise capability A2 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
Enterprise spirit A3 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Macro environment A4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
Industry environment | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
Scale aij | 1 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 9 | 2, 4, 6, 8 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Definition | Two elements, A and B, have the same influence when compared with each other. | Comparing the two elements A and B, A has a slightly greater influence than B. | Comparing the two elements A and B, A has greater influence than B. | Comparing the two elements A and B, A is more influential than B. | Comparing two elements, A and B, A is absolutely more influential than B. | mean value |
A11 | A12 | A21 | A22 | A23 | A31 | A32 | A41 | A42 | A51 | A52 | A53 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.88889 | 0 | 0.90000 | 0 | 1 |
A12 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.11111 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
A21 | 0.61538 | 0.67080 | 0 | 0 | 0.66667 | 0.65863 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
A22 | 0.30769 | 0.25596 | 0.75000 | 0 | 0.33333 | 0.26275 | 0 | 0 | 0.80000 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
A23 | 0.07692 | 0.07325 | 0.25000 | 0 | 0 | 0.07862 | 0 | 0 | 0.20000 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
A31 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
A32 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
A41 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.83333 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
A42 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.16667 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
A51 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.66667 | 0.66667 | 0 | 10 | 1 |
A52 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
A53 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.33333 | 0.33333 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
A11 | A12 | A21 | A22 | A23 | A31 | A32 | A41 | A42 | A51 | A52 | A53 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.58551 | 0 | 0.30499 | 0 | 0.83564 |
A12 | 0.34188 | 0 | 0.31700 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.07319 | 0 | 0.03389 | 0 | 0 |
A21 | 0.40543 | 0.60581 | 0 | 0 | 0.60561 | 0.52690 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
A22 | 0.20271 | 0.23166 | 0.46486 | 0 | 0.30281 | 0.21020 | 0 | 0 | 0.51722 | 0.66112 | 0 | 0 |
A23 | 0.05068 | 0.06615 | 0.15495 | 0 | 0 | 0.06289 | 0 | 0 | 0.12943 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
A31 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.18194 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
A32 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.20000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
A41 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.53335 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.10808 | 0 | 0.64002 | 0 |
A42 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.10667 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.21583 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
A51 | 0 | 0.09688 | 0.06249 | 0.35998 | 0.09158 | 0 | 0 | 0.08365 | 0.04189 | 0 | 0.35998 | 0.16436 |
A52 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
A53 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.04183 | 0.02094 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
A11 | A12 | A21 | A22 | A23 | A31 | A32 | A41 | A42 | A51 | A52 | A53 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A11 | 0.12395 | 0.12395 | 0.12395 | 0.12395 | 0.12395 | 0.12395 | 0.12395 | 0.12395 | 0.12395 | 0.12395 | 0.12395 | 0.12395 |
A12 | 0.10278 | 0.10278 | 0.10278 | 0.10278 | 0.10278 | 0.10278 | 0.10278 | 0.10278 | 0.10278 | 0.10278 | 0.10278 | 0.10278 |
A21 | 0.14588 | 0.14588 | 0.14588 | 0.14588 | 0.14588 | 0.14588 | 0.14588 | 0.14588 | 0.14588 | 0.14588 | 0.14588 | 0.14588 |
A22 | 0.24437 | 0.24437 | 0.24437 | 0.24437 | 0.24437 | 0.24437 | 0.24437 | 0.24437 | 0.24437 | 0.24437 | 0.24437 | 0.24437 |
A23 | 0.04362 | 0.04362 | 0.04362 | 0.04362 | 0.04362 | 0.04362 | 0.04362 | 0.04362 | 0.04362 | 0.04362 | 0.04362 | 0.04362 |
A31 | 0.01262 | 0.01262 | 0.01262 | 0.01262 | 0.01262 | 0.01262 | 0.01262 | 0.01262 | 0.01262 | 0.01262 | 0.01262 | 0.01262 |
A32 | 0.00252 | 0.00252 | 0.00252 | 0.00252 | 0.00252 | 0.00252 | 0.00252 | 0.00252 | 0.00252 | 0.00252 | 0.00252 | 0.00252 |
A41 | 0.13633 | 0.13633 | 0.13633 | 0.13633 | 0.13633 | 0.13633 | 0.13633 | 0.13633 | 0.13633 | 0.13633 | 0.13633 | 0.13633 |
A42 | 0.05549 | 0.05549 | 0.05549 | 0.05549 | 0.05549 | 0.05549 | 0.05549 | 0.05549 | 0.05549 | 0.05549 | 0.05549 | 0.05549 |
A51 | 0.12589 | 0.12589 | 0.12589 | 0.12589 | 0.12589 | 0.12589 | 0.12589 | 0.12589 | 0.12589 | 0.12589 | 0.12589 | 0.12589 |
A52 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
A53 | 0.00686 | 0.00686 | 0.00686 | 0.00686 | 0.00686 | 0.00686 | 0.00686 | 0.00686 | 0.00686 | 0.00686 | 0.00686 | 0.00686 |
Primary Index | Weight w | Secondary Index | Comprehensive Weight w | Sort |
---|---|---|---|---|
Enterprise resource A1 | 0.22673 | Resources A11 | 0.12395 | 5 |
Talent resources A12 | 0.10278 | 6 | ||
Enterprise capability A2 | 0.43387 | Management ability A21 | 0.14588 | 2 |
Technological innovation capability A22 | 0.24437 | 1 | ||
Organizational change capability A23 | 0.04362 | 8 | ||
Enterprise spirit A3 | 0.01514 | Entrepreneurship A31 | 0.01262 | 9 |
Social responsibility A32 | 0.00252 | 11 | ||
Macro environment A4 | 0.19182 | Policy environment A41 | 0.13633 | 3 |
Technical environment A42 | 0.05549 | 7 | ||
Industry Environment A5 | 0.13273 | Market competition A51 | 0.12587 | 4 |
Aging workforce A52 | 0 | 12 | ||
Green A53 | 0.00686 | 10 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Li, H.; Han, Z.; Zhang, J.; Philbin, S.P.; Liu, D.; Ke, Y. Systematic Identification of the Influencing Factors for the Digital Transformation of the Construction Industry Based on LDA-DEMATEL-ANP. Buildings 2022, 12, 1409. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12091409
Li H, Han Z, Zhang J, Philbin SP, Liu D, Ke Y. Systematic Identification of the Influencing Factors for the Digital Transformation of the Construction Industry Based on LDA-DEMATEL-ANP. Buildings. 2022; 12(9):1409. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12091409
Chicago/Turabian StyleLi, Hui, Zhengji Han, Jingxiao Zhang, Simon P. Philbin, Die Liu, and Yongjian Ke. 2022. "Systematic Identification of the Influencing Factors for the Digital Transformation of the Construction Industry Based on LDA-DEMATEL-ANP" Buildings 12, no. 9: 1409. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12091409
APA StyleLi, H., Han, Z., Zhang, J., Philbin, S. P., Liu, D., & Ke, Y. (2022). Systematic Identification of the Influencing Factors for the Digital Transformation of the Construction Industry Based on LDA-DEMATEL-ANP. Buildings, 12(9), 1409. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12091409