Numerical Simulations on the Flexural Behaviours of Reinforced Concrete Girders Strengthened with Bolts
Abstract
:1. Introduction
1.1. Literature Review
1.2. Significance of the Study
2. Numerical Models of RC Girders with Dapped Ends
2.1. Mechanical and Material Properties
2.2. Assumptions
3. Finite Element Models of RC Girders with Dapped Ends
4. Results and Discussion
5. Concrete Compressive Strength as an Investigated Parameter
6. Conclusions
- The obtained numerical results from the simulated models showed excellent agreements with the experimental results in the previous study.
- The results showed that the cracking patterns of the simulated RC girder models were identical to those indicated in the experimental study. The cracks were distributed in almost the same patterns for all the models, but in different proportions according to the section type, concrete strength, and strengthening type.
- An increase in the compressive strength of concrete by 20% would increase the loading resistances of the RC girder models by reducing the number of cracks and decreasing the deflections by 13% and 21%, respectively.
- The change in the section type from solid to open (with transverse openings) could decrease the resistance of the section by 8–16%, together with the increased number of cracks and the increased deflections by 15–20%.
- An increase in the number of holes corresponded to a decrease in the resistance against the applied loading by 6% and the increase in the deflection by 24%.
- Strengthening openings with vertical bolts could enhance the resistance of the RC girder models by 8–20% and decrease the deflections by 20–30%. Also, the strengthened RC girder models with bolts could decrease the number of propagated cracks, which were concentrated in the regions of the applied loads, supports, around openings, and in the tension fibres of the RC girder models.
- The failure modes of all the simulated RC girders with dapped ends were hybrid failures, i.e., combined flexural and shear patterns.
- Additional numerical analyses on another influencing parameter, i.e., the concrete compressive strength, indicated that it could largely enhance the load carrying capacity of the RC models with dapped ends.
- The used numerical elements and assumptions were appropriate to those models considered here under the applied conditions.
- The use of numerical simulations for similar models considered in this study could be more useful in obtaining the structural behaviours by considering several parameters in terms of cost and time when comparing with the experimental studies. Also, other studies could be done by using the same method with using different types of strengthening, e.g., using carbon fibre reinforced polymers (CFRPs).
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Park, R.; Paulay, T. Reinforced Concrete Structures; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1975. [Google Scholar]
- Herzinger, R. Stud Reinforcements in Dapped-Ends of Concrete Beams. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Lu, W.-Y.; Lin, I.-J.; Hwang, S.-J.; Lin, Y.-H. Shear strength of high-strength concrete dapped-end beams. J. Chin. Inst. Eng. 2003, 26, 671–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taher, S.E.-D. Strengthening of critically designed girders with dapped-ends. Struct. Build. 2005, 158, 141–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Nuaimi, A.S.; Bhatt, P. Direct design of hollow reinforced concrete beams, Part II: Experimental investigation. Struct. Concr. J. 2004, 5, 147–160. [Google Scholar]
- Al-Nuaimi, A.S.; Bhatt, P.; Al-Jabri, K.S.; Hago, A. Comparison between solid and hollow reinforced concrete beams. Mater. Struct. 2008, 41, 269–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hassan, N.Z.; Ismael, H.M.; Salman, A.M. Study behavior of hollow reinforced concrete beams. Int. J. Curr. Eng. Technol. 2018, 8, 1640–1651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balaji, G.; Vetturayasudharsanan, R. Experimental investigation on flexural behaviour of RC hollow beams. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 21, 509–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Nuaimi, A.S.; Bhatt, P. 2D idealisation of hollow reinforced concrete beams subjected to combined torsion, bending and shear. J. Eng. Res. 2005, 2, 53–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Altun, F.; Haktanir, T.; Ari, K. Experimental investigation of steel fiber reinforced concrete box beams under bending. Mater. Struct. 2006, 39, 491–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Maliki, H.N.G. Experimental behavior of hollow non-prismatic reinforced concrete beams retrofit with CFRP sheets. J. Eng. Dev. 2013, 17, 224–237. [Google Scholar]
- Murugesan, A.; Narayanan, A. Influence of a longitudinal circular hole on flexural strength of reinforced concrete beams. Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 2017, 22, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Murugesan, A.; Narayanan, A. Deflection of reinforced concrete beams with longitudinal circular hole. Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 2018, 23, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abbass, A.; Abid, S.; Özakça, M. Experimental investigation on the effect of steel fibers on the flexural behavior and ductility of high-strength concrete hollow beams. Adv. Civ. Eng. 2019, 2019, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hassan, R.F.; Jaber, M.H.; Al-Salim, N.H.; Hussein, H.H. Experimental research on torsional strength of synthetic/steel fiber reinforced hollow concrete beam. Eng. Struct. 2020, 220, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abbass, A.A.; Abid, S.R.; Arna’ot, F.H.; Al-Ameri, R.A.; Ozakca, M. Flexural response of hollow high strength concrete beams considering different size reductions. Structures 2020, 23, 69–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El-kassas, A.I.; Hassan, H.M.; Arab, M.A.E.S. Effect of longitudinal opening on the structural behavior of reinforced high-strength self-compacted concrete deep beams. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2020, 12, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vijayakumar, A.; Madhavi, T.C. Behaviour of self compacting concrete with hybrid fibers in hollow beams. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 46, 3212–3219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Maliki, H.N.G.; Abbass, M.M.; Al-Kaabi, J.J. Simulation nonlinear of structural behavior of hollow reinforced concrete deep beams strengthened by CFRP. In The IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering; IOP Publishing Ltd.: Bristol, UK, 2020; p. 928. [Google Scholar]
- Elamary, A.S.; Sharaky, I.A.; Alqurashi, M. Flexural behaviour of hollow concrete beams under three points loading: Experimental and numerical study. Structures 2021, 32, 1543–1552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Maliki, H.N.G.; Al-Balhawi, A.; Alshimmeri, A.J.H.; Zhang, B. Structural efficiency of hollow reinforced concrete beams subjected to partial uniformly distributed loading. Buildings 2021, 11, 391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alshimmeri, A.J.H.; Jaafar, E.K.; Shihab, L.A.; Al-Maliki, H.N.G.; Al-Balhawi, A.; Zhang, B. Structural efficiency of non-prismatic hollow reinforced concrete beams retrofitted with CFRP sheets. Buildings 2022, 12, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mansur, M.A. Effect of openings on the behaviour and strength of R/C beams in shear. Cem. Concr. Compos. 1998, 20, 477–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdalla, H.A.; Torkey, A.M.; Haggag, H.A.; Abu-Amira, A.F. Design against cracking at openings in reinforced concrete beams strengthened with composite sheets. Compos. Struct. 2003, 60, 197–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amiri, J.V.; Bygie, M.H. Effect of small circular opening on the shear and flexural behavior and ultimate strength of reinforced concrete beams using normal and high strength concrete. In Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 1–6 August 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, K.H.; Eun, H.C.; Chung, H.S. The influence of web openings on the structural behavior of reinforced high-strength concrete deep beams. Eng. Struct. 2006, 28, 1825–1834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ayaç, S.; Yilmaz, M.C. Behaviour and strength of RC beams with regular triangular or circular web openings. J. Fac. Eng. Archit. Gazi Univ. 2011, 26, 711–718. [Google Scholar]
- Amiri, S.; Masoudnia, R.; Ameri, M.A. Review of design specifications of opening in the web for simply supported RC beams. J. Civ. Eng. Constr. Technol. 2011, 2, 82–89. [Google Scholar]
- Mahmoud, A.M. Strengthening of concrete beams having shear zone openings using orthotropic CFRP modeling. Ain Shams Eng. J. 2012, 3, 177–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aykac, B.; Aykac, S.; Kalkan, I.; Dundar, B.; Can, H. Flexural behavior and strength of reinforced concrete beams with multiple transverse openings. ACI Struct. J. 2014, 111, 267–277. [Google Scholar]
- Chegeni, I.B.; Dalvand, A. Finite element study of reinforced concrete deep beams with rectangular web openings. J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 2016, 11, 3167–3176. [Google Scholar]
- Jabbar, S.; Hejazi, F.; Mahmod, H.M. Effect of an opening on reinforced concrete hollow beam web under torsional, flexural, and cyclic loadings. Lat. Am. J. Solids Struct. 2016, 13, 1576–1595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hauhnar, L.; Rajkumar, R.; Umamaheswari, N. Behavior of reinforced concrete beams with circular opening in the flexural zone strengthened by steel pipes. Int. J. Civ. Eng. Technol. 2017, 8, 303–309. [Google Scholar]
- Abdul-Razzaq, K.S.; Ihsan, H.; Abdul-Kareem, M.M. A new strengthening technique for deep beam openings using steel plates. Int. J. Appl. Eng. Res. 2017, 12, 15935–15947. [Google Scholar]
- Hemzah, S.A.; Alyhya, W.S.; Hassan, S.A. Experimental investigation for structural behaviour of self-compacting reinforced concrete hollow beams with in-place circular openings strengthened with CFRP laminates. Structures 2020, 24, 99–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jabbar, D.N.; Al-Rifaie, A.; Hussein, A.M.; Shubbar, A.A.; Nasr, M.S.; Al-Khafaji, Z.S. Shear behaviour of reinforced concrete beams with small web openings. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 42, 2713–2716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salih, R.; Abbas, N.; Zhou, F. Experimental and numerical investigations on the cyclic load behavior of beams with rectangular web openings strengthened using FRP sheets. Structures 2021, 33, 655–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ANSYS. ANSYS Fluent User’s Guide; ANSYS Inc.: Canonsburg, PA, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Al-Maliki, H.N.G.; Alshimmeri, A.J.H.; Fahad, J.J. Comparative study on experimental behavior of R.C. inverted dapped-end girders with openings strengthened by vertical normal bolts. Assoc. Arab. Univ. J. Eng. Sci. 2018, 1, 103–121. [Google Scholar]
- American Concrete Institute (ACI) Committee 318. Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete; The American Concrete Institute (ACI): Indianapolis, IN, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Mander, J.B.; Priestley, M.J.N.; Park, R. Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete. J. Struct. Eng. ASCE 1988, 114, 1804–1826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Girder Model | fc′ (MPa) | Section Type | Open Size (No. × Da.) | Vertical Bolts | Reinforcements (mm) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
As | As′ | Ash | |||||
DENT1 | 25 | S | - | - | 2Ø10 | 3Ø10 | 2Ø10 |
DENT2 | 30 | S | - | - | 2Ø10 | 3Ø10 | 2Ø10 |
DET3 | 25 | S | - | 2Ø12 | 2Ø10 | 3Ø10 | 2Ø10 |
DET4 | 25 | O | 2Ø50 C | 2Ø12 | 2Ø10 | 3Ø10 | 2Ø10 |
DET5 | 25 | S | - | 4Ø12 | 2Ø10 | 3Ø10 | 2Ø10 |
DET6 | 25 | O | 2Ø50 C | 4Ø12 | 2Ø10 | 3Ø10 | 2Ø10 |
DET7 | 25 | O | 4Ø50 C | 6Ø12 | 2Ø10 | 3Ø10 | 2Ø10 |
Mix No. | fc′ (MPa) | ft (MPa) | fr (MPa) | Ec (MPa) | vc |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 25 | 2.93 | 3.15 | 23,500 | 0.2 |
2 | 30 | 2.98 | 3.45 | 25,743 | 0.2 |
db (mm) | fy (MPa) | fu (MPa) | Es (MPa) | vs |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ø10 | 421 | 520 | 205,000 | 0.3 |
Ø12 | 480 | 576 | 205,000 | 0.3 |
Model No. | Section Type | Exp. and Num. Loads (kN) | ΔExp. (mm) | ΔNum. (mm) | Δ-Ratio (Num./Exp.) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
First | Failure | First | Failure | First | Failure | First | Failure | ||
DENT1 | S | 38 | 110 | 3.20 | 15.80 | 3.11 | 15.24 | 0.971 | 0.965 |
DENT2 | S | 42 | 125 | 4.10 | 16.40 | 3.96 | 15.95 | 0.965 | 0.973 |
DET3 | O | 47 | 137.5 | 4.00 | 14.25 | 3.94 | 13.90 | 0.985 | 0.975 |
DET4 | O | 41 | 122 | 4.80 | 14.89 | 4.65 | 13.46 | 0.968 | 0.904 |
DET5 | S | 55 | 143 | 3.50 | 13.60 | 3.34 | 12.96 | 0.954 | 0.953 |
DET6 | O | 47.5 | 132 | 3.80 | 13.50 | 3.68 | 12.85 | 0.968 | 0.952 |
DET7 | O | 45 | 135 | 3.30 | 16.80 | 3.25 | 16.65 | 0.984 | 0.991 |
Mean | 0.972 | 0.958 | |||||||
STD | 0.011 | 0.028 |
Model No. | ΔExp. (mm) | Ductility Index, DI | ΔNum. (mm) | Ductility Index, DI | Relative DI | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ΔFirst | ΔFailure | Exp. | ΔFirst | ΔFailure | Num. | Num./Exp. | |
DENT1 | 3.20 | 15.80 | 4.94 | 3.11 | 15.24 | 4.90 | 0.992 |
DENT2 | 4.10 | 16.40 | 4.00 | 3.96 | 15.95 | 4.02 | 1.005 |
DET3 | 4.00 | 14.25 | 3.56 | 3.94 | 13.90 | 3.53 | 0.992 |
DET4 | 4.80 | 14.89 | 3.10 | 4.65 | 13.46 | 2.89 | 0.932 |
DET5 | 3.50 | 13.60 | 3.88 | 3.34 | 12.96 | 3.88 | 1.000 |
DET6 | 3.80 | 13.50 | 3.55 | 3.68 | 12.85 | 3.49 | 0.983 |
DET7 | 3.30 | 16.80 | 5.09 | 3.25 | 16.65 | 5.12 | 1.006 |
Mean | 0.987 | ||||||
STD | 0.025 |
Model No. | Variable fc′ (MPa) | Section Type | Open Size (No. × Da.) | Vertical Bolts | Pu,num (kN) | ∆num (mm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DENT1 * | 25 | Solid | --- | --- | 110 | 15.80 |
DENT1.1 | 40 | 131 | 11.22 | |||
DENT1.2 | 50 | 140.5 | 10.25 | |||
DENT2 * | 30 | Solid | --- | --- | 125 | 16.40 |
DENT2.1 | 40 | 153 | 11.48 | |||
DENT2.2 | 50 | 160 | 10.12 | |||
DET3 * | 25 | Solid | --- | 2Ø12 mm | 137.5 | 14.25 |
DET3.1 | 40 | 165 | 9.69 | |||
DET3.1 | 50 | 179 | 8.45 | |||
DET4 * | 25 | Open | 2Ø50 mm | 2Ø12 mm | 122 | 14.89 |
DET4.1 | 40 | 141 | 10.58 | |||
DET4.2 | 50 | 148 | 9.22 | |||
DET5 * | 25 | Solid | 2Ø50 mm | 4Ø12 mm | 143 | 13.60 |
DET5.1 | 40 | 173 | 8.90 | |||
DET5.2 | 50 | 186 | 6.45 | |||
DET6 * | 25 | Open | 2Ø50 mm | 4Ø12 mm | 132 | 13.50 |
DET6.1 | 40 | 158 | 10.15 | |||
DET6.2 | 50 | 166 | 9.18 | |||
DET7 * | 25 | Open | 4Ø50 mm | 6Ø12 mm | 135 | 16.80 |
DET7.1 | 40 | 155 | 11.76 | |||
DET7.2 | 50 | 169 | 10.63 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Al-Maliki, H.N.G.; Alshimmeri, A.J.H.; Al-Balhawi, A.; Zhang, B. Numerical Simulations on the Flexural Behaviours of Reinforced Concrete Girders Strengthened with Bolts. Buildings 2023, 13, 1044. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13041044
Al-Maliki HNG, Alshimmeri AJH, Al-Balhawi A, Zhang B. Numerical Simulations on the Flexural Behaviours of Reinforced Concrete Girders Strengthened with Bolts. Buildings. 2023; 13(4):1044. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13041044
Chicago/Turabian StyleAl-Maliki, Hadi Naser Ghadhban, Ahmad Jabbar Hussain Alshimmeri, Ali Al-Balhawi, and Binsheng Zhang. 2023. "Numerical Simulations on the Flexural Behaviours of Reinforced Concrete Girders Strengthened with Bolts" Buildings 13, no. 4: 1044. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13041044
APA StyleAl-Maliki, H. N. G., Alshimmeri, A. J. H., Al-Balhawi, A., & Zhang, B. (2023). Numerical Simulations on the Flexural Behaviours of Reinforced Concrete Girders Strengthened with Bolts. Buildings, 13(4), 1044. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13041044