Relative Risk (RR) Analysis and Prediction as Part of Assessing Occupational Safety and Determining Priorities for Action in Occupational Health and Safety in the Construction Industry in Poland
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
- Stage 1: a collection of quantitative data (for 2006–2021), summarised in Table 2, on the number of persons employed in the national economy (column 2), the number of persons employed in the construction industry (column 3), the number of persons injured in accidents at work in Poland (column 4) and the number of persons injured in accidents at work in the construction industry (column 5).
- Stage 2 (based on the statistical data presented in Table 2): the relative risk (RR) was determined, which is a quotient of the probability of a particular event in an exposed group to the probability of an event in an unexposed group [51,52,53]. The relative risk was determined using a mathematical relationship (1) [51]. Determining the relative risk allowed the determination of how working conditions in the construction industry change (improvement of working conditions/worsening of working conditions) in relation to the national economy. If the indicator shows a decrease, it can be concluded that working conditions in the construction industry are improving in relation to the national economy. On the other hand, when the indicator shows an increase, it is stated that working conditions in the construction industry are deteriorating in relation to the national economy. Analyses were performed using PQStat software (PQStat 1.6.8).
- RR–Relative Risk;
- Oij–multiplicity observed in the contingency table (i–column; j–row in contingency table)
- Stage 3: a prediction process of the quantitative data relating to the relative risk for the analysed industry (relative risk values RR were determined in stage 2). The determined relative risk values made it possible to determine ex ante forecasts for 2022-2024. The Winters’ econometric model, the Brown econometric model, and the creeping trend model were used for that purpose. The determined forecasts were subjected to an assessment. The degree of the quantitative accuracy of the determined ex post forecasts was assessed using ex post errors [54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62]:mean error ψ (4):
- mean absolute error (MAE) (5):
- root mean square error (RMSE) (6):
- standard deviation of the model residuals Se (7):
- Stage 4: the preparation of a combined forecast based on the developed models and the ex post forecasting errors. The determined ex post forecasting errors served to specify the weights assigned to a forecast. The combined forecast was determined using a relationship (10) [55], where λi is a weight assigned to a forecast made using an nth method.
- Stage 5: defining directions for health and safety activities. The actions taken were related to the functions performed by the forecasts. For the purposes of the study, it was assumed that ex ante forecasts of relative RR risk could perform the functions of activating and warning. The auxiliary functions of forecasts, i.e., argumentative and advisory functions, were also taken into account. Consideration of the forecast function helps to determine the type and direction of RR activities. The characteristics of the functions that forecasts can perform are summarized in Table 3 [54,56].
3. Results
3.1. Relative Risk (RR) in the Construction Industry
3.2. Prediction of Quantitative Data (of the Relative Risk)
- The mean relative ex post forecast error Ψ < 10%. In the case of Brown double smoothing model, Ψ = 5.87%, whereas in the Winters’ model, Ψ = 5.29% (Table 6, column 2).
- The values of the adjusted mean relative ex post forecast error Θ should be within the range [0–200%]. In the case of the models in question, they were: Θ = 1.47 (Brown model), Θ = 1.36 (Winters’ model) (Table 6, column 2).
- The MAE and RMSE errors should satisfy the relation MAE ≤ RMSE. In the case of the Brown double exponential smoothing model and the Winters’ model with a multiplicative trend and multiplicative seasonality, these relations were satisfied (Table 6, columns 4 and 5).
- The RMSE and Se errors should satisfy the relation RMSE ≤ Se, which was satisfied for the models in question (Table 6, columns 5 and 6).
3.3. A Combined Forecast for the Relative Risk RR
4. Functions of Forecasts and Directions of Activities in the Field of Health and Safety
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Koradecka, D. Occupational Health and Safety; CIOP-PIB: Warsaw, Poland, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- ISO 45001-2018; Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems—Requirements with Guidance for Use. PKN: Warsaw, Poland, March 2018.
- Ceylan, H. Analysis of occupational accidents according to the sector in Turkey. Gazi Univ. J. Sci. 2012, 25, 909–918. [Google Scholar]
- Puślecki, D. Child protection against accident at agriculture work. Przegląd Prawa 2009, 1, 194–208. [Google Scholar]
- Lundqvist, P.; Gustafsson, B. Accidents and accident prevention in agriculture a review of selected studies. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 1992, 10, 311–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kogler, R.; Quendler, E.; Boxberger, J. Analysis of occupational accidents with agricultural machinery in the period 2008–2010 in Austria. Saf. Sci. 2015, 72, 319–328. [Google Scholar]
- Moradhaseli, S.; Farhadian, H.; Abbasi, E.; Ghofranipour, F. Factors affecting in the incidence of occupational accidents among farmers. Health Educ. Health Promot. 2017, 5, 39–56. [Google Scholar]
- Głąb, A. The analysis of working and learning conditions in an educational institution on the example of the analysis of state of health and safety at work in a secondary school. Zesz. Nauk. Wyższej Szkoły Zarządzania Ochr. Pr. W Katowicach 2011, 1, 82–100. [Google Scholar]
- Latif, A.H.A.; Williams, W.R.; Sibert, J. Primary school accidents reporting in one education authority. Arch. Dis. Child. 2002, 86, 91–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hermanus, M.A. Occupational health and safety in mining–status, new developments, and concerns. J. S. Afr. Inst. Min. Metall. 2007, 107, 531–538. [Google Scholar]
- Lööw, J.; Nygren, M. Initiatives for increased safety in the Swedish mining industry: Studying 30 years of improved accidents rates. Saf. Sci. 2019, 117, 437–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sanmiquel, L.; Bascompta, M.; Rossel, J.M.; Anticoi, H.F.; Guash, E. Analysis of occupational accidents in underground and surface mining in Spain using data-mining techniques. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sanmiquel-Pera, L.; Bascompta, M.; Anticoi, H.F. Analysis of historical accident in a Spanish coal mine. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 3615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gendler, S.; Prokhorova, E. Risk-based methodology for determining priority directions for improving occupational safety in the mining industry of the Artic Zone. Resources 2021, 10, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matuszkiewicz, K. Przyczyny wypadków przy pracy w górnictwie w aspekcie profilaktyki. Bezpieczeństwo Pracy 2009, 2, 22–25. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, Q.; Xu, K. Statistical analysis and prediction of fatal accidents in the metallurgical industry in China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 3790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adebiyi, K.A.; Bello, T.O.; Ajayeoba, A.O.; Aroyehun, A.O.; Raheem, W.A. Occupational risk assessment of workers and furnace units in steel sector recycling plants. Adeleke Univ. J. Eng. Technol. 2021, 4, 23–32. [Google Scholar]
- Fuentes-Bargues, J.L.; Sánchez-Lite, A.; González-Gaya, C.; Rosales-Prieto, V.F.; Reniers, G. A study of situational circumstances related to Spain’s occupational rates in metal sector from 2009 to 2019. Saf. Sci. 2022, 150, 105700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sawicki, M.; Szóstak, M. Analysis of the dependence between the number of accidents at workplaces that involve scaffolding and changes in work efficiency. MATEC Web Conf. 2018, 174, 04014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoła, B.; Szóstak, M. An occupational profile of people injured in accident at work in Polish construction industry. Procedia Eng. 2017, 208, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Camino López, M.A.; Ritzel, D.O.; Fontaneda, I.; González Alcantar, O.J. Construction industry accidents in Spain. J. Saf. Res. 2008, 39, 497–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ale, B.J.M.; Bellamy, L.J.; Baksteen, H.; Damen, M.; Goossens, L.H.J.; Hale, A.R.; Mud, M.; Oh, J.; Papazoglou, I.A.; Whiston, J.Y. Accidents in the construction industry in the Netherlands: An analysis of accident reports using Storybuilder. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2008, 93, 1532–1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, S.A.; Kamaruzzaman, S.N.; Sing, G.C. A study on causes of accident and prevention in Malaysian construction industry. Study Causes Accid. 2010, 3, 95–104. [Google Scholar]
- Chai, C.-F.; Chang, T.-C.; Ting, H.-I. Accident patterns and prevention measures for fatal occupational falls in the construction industry. Appl. Ergon. 2005, 36, 391–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hoła, B.; Szóstak, M. Analysis of the accident state of the accident rate in the construction industry in European Union countries. Arch. Civ. Civil. Eng. 2015, 61, 19–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Winge, S.; Albrechtsen, E. Accident types and barrier failures in the construction industry. Saf. Sci. 2018, 105, 158–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yoon, S.; Lin, H.K.; Chen, G.; Yi, S.; Choi, J.; Rui, Z. Effect of occupational health and safety management system on work-related accident rate and differences of occupational health and safety management system awareness between managers in South Korea’s construction industry. Saf. Health Work 2013, 4, 201–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zaman, A.B.; Baheramsyah, A.; Ashari, I. Analysis of work accident factors in the shipyard. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2021, 698, 012016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adebiyi, K.A. Estimation of air traffic accident cost in Nigeria. J. Sci. Technol. 2008, 9, 420–425. [Google Scholar]
- Goniewicz, M.; Goniewicz, K. Wypadki drogowe w Polsce–czynniki sprawcze i zapobieganie. Bezpieczeństwo Pr. Nauka I Prakt. 2010, 9, 14–17. [Google Scholar]
- Evans, A.W. Fatal accident in railway level crossings in Great Britain 1949–2009. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2011, 43, 1837–1845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kyriakids, M.; Hirsch, R.; Majumdar, A. Metro railway safety: An analysis of accident precursors. Saf. Sci. 2012, 50, 1535–1548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Esslinger, V.; Kieselbach, R.; Koller, R.; Weisse, B. The railway accident of Eschede–technical background. Eng. Fail. Anal. 2004, 11, 515–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Złotkowska, R.; Skiba, M.; Mroczek, A.; Bilewicz-Wyrozumska, T.; Król, K.; Lar, K.; Zbrojkiewicz, E. Negative effects of physical activity and sprot training. Hygeia Public Health 2015, 50, 41–46. [Google Scholar]
- Ustawa z Dnia 30 Października 2002 R. O Ubezpieczeniu Społecznym Z Tytułu Wypadków Przy Pracy I Chorób Zawodowych. Available online: https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU20021991673 (accessed on 30 August 2022).
- Rozporządzenie Komisji Europejskiej (UE) NR 349/2011 z Dnia 11 Kwietnia 2011 r. w Sprawie Wykonania, w Odniesieniu do Statystyk Dotyczących Wypadków Przy Pracy Rozporządzenia Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady nr 1338/2088 w Sprawie Statystyk Wspólnoty w Zakresie Zdrowia Publicznego oraz Zdrowia i Bezpieczeństwa Pracy. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/PL/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32011R0349&from=PL (accessed on 30 August 2022).
- Szlązak, J.; Szlązak, N. Bezpieczeństwo i Higiena Pracy; AGH: Kraków, Poland, 2012; p. 91. [Google Scholar]
- Gao, R.; Chan, A.P.C.; Utama, W.P.; Zahoor, H. Multilevel safety climate and safety performance in the construction industry: Development and validation of a top-down mechanism. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016, 13, 1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lestari, F.; Sunindijo, R.Y.; Loosemore, M.; Kusminanti, Y.; Widanarko, B.A. Safety climate framework for improving health and safety in the Indonesian construction industry. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 7462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hoła, B.; Nowobilski, T. Analysis of the influence of socio-economic factors on occupational safety in the construction industry. Sustainability 2019, 11, 4469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shin, J.; Kim, Y.; Kim, C. The perception of occupational safety and health (OSH) Regulation and innovation efficiency in the construction industry: Evidence from South Korea. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 2334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buniya, M.K.; Othman, I.; Durdyev, S.; Sunindijo, R.Y.; Ismail, S.; Kineber, A.F. Safety program elements in the construction industry: The case of Iraq. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J.M.; Son, K.; Yum, S.G.; Ahn, S. Analyzing the risk of safety accidents: The relative risks of migrant workers in construction industry. Sustainability 2020, 12, 5430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tezel, A.; Dobrucali, E.; Demirkesen, S.; Kiral, I.A. Critical success factors for safety training in the construction industry. Buildings 2021, 11, 139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, W.T.; Tsai, I.-C.; Merrett, H.C.; Lu, S.T.; Lee, Y.-I.; You, J.-K.; Mortis, L. Construction safety success factors: A Taiwanese case study. Sustainability 2020, 12, 6326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lai, D.N.C.; Liu, M.; Ling, F.Y.Y. A comparative study on adopting human resource practices for safety management on construction projects in the United States and Singapore. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2011, 29, 1018–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sawicki, M.; Szóstak, M.; Nowobilski, T. Drones in scaffolding condition assessment. Builder 2019, 1, 270. [Google Scholar]
- Ahmed, S. Causes and effects of accident at construction site: A study for the construction industry in Bangladesh. Int. J. Sustain. Constr. Eng. Technol. 2019, 10, 18–40. [Google Scholar]
- Ewertowski, T. Doskonalenie systemu zgłaszania zdarzeń niepożądanych w organizacjach w kontekście wdrażania przez nie normy ISO 45001. Zesz. Nauk. Politech. Poznańskiej–Organ. I Zarządzanie 2018, 78, 19–34. [Google Scholar]
- Statistic Poland. Available online: www.gus.gov.pl (accessed on 30 August 2022).
- PQStat–Baza Wiedzy. Available online: http://manuals.pqstat.pl/statpqpl:porown2grpl:nparpl:rr_orpl (accessed on 30 August 2022).
- Tenny, S.; Hoffman, M.R. Relative Risk. In StatPearls; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Isladn, FL, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Schmidt, C.O.; Kohlmann, T. When to use the odds ratio or the relative risk? Int. J. Public Health 2008, 53, 165–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cieślak, M. Economic Forecasting Method and Application; PWN: Warsaw, Poland, 2001; pp. 47–50. [Google Scholar]
- Dittmann, P. Forecasting in the Enterprise–Methods and Their Application; Nieoczywiste: Warsaw, Poland, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Sobczyk, M. Prognozowanie-Teoria. Przykłady. Zadania; Placet: Warsaw, Poland, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Snarska, A. Statystyka, Ekonometria, Prognozowanie; Placet: Warsaw, Poland, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Krawiec, S. Adaptacyjne Modele Wygładzania Wykładniczego Jako Instrument Prognozowania Krótkoterminowego Zjawisk Ilościowych; Wydawnictwo, Politechniki Śląskiej: Gliwice, Poland, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Zeliaś, A.; Pawełek, B.; Wanat, S. Prognozowanie Ekonomiczne; PWN: Wasaw, Poland, 2003; pp. 45–50. [Google Scholar]
- Czyżycki, R.; Hundert, M.; Klóska, R. Wybrane Zagadnienia z Prognozowania; Economicus: Szczecin, Poland, 2006; pp. 16–19. [Google Scholar]
- Nowak, E. Economic Forecasting-Methods, Models, Applications, Examples; Placet: Warsaw, Poland, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Welfe, A. Ekonometria. In Metody i Ich Zastosowanie; Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne: Warsaw, Poland, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Perzyńska, J. Budowa prognoz kombinowanych z wykorzystaniem sztucznych sieci neuronowych. Pr. Nauk. Uniw. Ekon. We Wrocławiu 2010, 103, 133–145. [Google Scholar]
- Nowacki, K. Accident risks in the production sector of EU countries–Cohort studies. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2011, 18, 3618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Authors/Year of Publication (Country Where the Research Was Conducted) | Scope of Conducted Research |
---|---|
Hoła, B.; Szóstak, M., 2017 (Poland) [20] | Determining the profile of the injured persons on the basis of characteristics such as: employment status, occupation, age, length of service, preparation of the employee to perform work, and the size of the company for the number of accidents |
Camino López, M.A.; Ritzel, D.O.; Fontaneda, I.; González Alcantar, O.J., 2008 (Spain) [21] | Identification of the group of employees most frequently involved in accidents, taking into account: age, length of service, size of the company, and the day of the week for the severity of the consequences |
Ale, B.J.M.; Bellamy, L.J.; et al., 2008 (The Netherlands) [22] | Constructing a causal model of occupational risk, allowing for quantitative insight into the causes and consequences of accidents at work. Analysis of the causes of accidents at work of persons working in the construction industry |
Ali, S.A.; Kamaruzzaman, S.N.; Sing, G.C., 2010 (Malaysia) [23] | Ranking and descriptive analysis of the causes of accidents in the construction industry and ways to prevent them |
Chai, C.-F.; Chang, T.-C.; Ting, H.-I., 2005 (Chiny, Taiwan) [24] | Identification of factors contributing to the occurrence of fatal accidents. Developing proposals for solutions to prevent accidents |
Hoła, B.; Szóstak, M., 2015 (EU countries) [25] | Accident analysis in various EU countries based on accident statistics. Analysis of accident measures: accident frequency and severity indicators |
Winge, S.; Albrechtsen, E., 2018 (Norway) [26] | Analysis of the most common types of accidents and the lack of physical elements constituting barriers for construction workers |
Yoon, S.; Lin, J.K.; et al., 2013 (South Korea’s) [27] | The impact of the implementation of the OSH management system on the improvement of work safety based on the assessment of accident rates |
Gao, R.; Chan, A.P.C.; Utama, W.P.; Zahoor, H., 2016 (Chiny, Witenam) [38] | Studying the mechanisms underlying the relationship between the multi-level security climate and the level of security |
Lestari, F.; Sunindijo, R.Y.; Loosemore, M.; Kusminanti, Y.; Widanarko, B.A., 2020 (Indonesia, Azja) [39] | Assessing the safety climate and developing a framework for improving safety in the construction industry. Identification of problems affecting security. New paradoxes were also established |
Hoła, B.; Nowobilski, T., 2019 (Poland) [40] | Identification of socio-economic factors generated in the construction environment that affect the number of accidents on the construction site |
Shin, J.; Kim, Y.; Kim, C., 2021 (Republic of Korea) [41] | Investigating the relationship between innovation performance and companies’ perception of health and safety regulations |
Buniya, M.K.; Othman, I.; Durdyev, S.; Sunindijo, R.Y.; et al., 2021 (Iraq) [42] | Identification of key elements of the safety program |
Kim, J.M.; Son, K.; Yum, S.G.; Ahn, S., 2020 (Republic of Korea) [43] | Impact of worker migration on accidents at work. Establishment of guidelines for managing the safety of migrant workers |
Tezel, A.; Dobrucali, E.; Demirkesen, S.; Kiral, I.A., 2021 (USA and other country) [44] | The role of training and the form of OSH training (computer, in the workplace, simulation), and their impact on employees’ awareness |
Chen, W.T.; Tsai, I.-C.; Merrett, H.C.; Lu, S.T.; Lee, Y.-I.; You, J.-K.; et al., 2020 (Taiwan) [45] | Development of a research model explaining the behavior of construction workers related to risk-taking (surveys) |
Lai, D.N.C.; Liu, M.; Ling, F.Y.Y., 2011 (USA, Singapore) [46] | Comparative studies of HR practices adopted for safety management on construction projects and establishing the relationship between HR practices and the results of safety management on construction sites. The severity and frequency of accidents |
Sawicki, M.; Szóstak, M.; Nowobilski, T., 2019 (Poland) [47] | The use of unmanned aerial vehicles (drones) to assess the technical condition of construction scaffoldings |
Ahmed, S., 2019 (Bangladesh) [48] | Analysis and determination of the main causes and effects of accidents at work on the construction site |
Year | Number of Persons Employed in the National Economy | Number of Persons Employed in the Construction Industry | Number of Persons Injured in Accidents at Work | Number of Persons Injured in Accidents at Work in the Construction Industry |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006 | 7,640,100 | 354,800 | 95,462 | 7883 |
2007 | 7,912,000 | 347,900 | 99,171 | 8895 |
2008 | 8,142,900 | 411,900 | 104,402 | 10,491 |
2009 | 8,167,400 | 436,100 | 87,052 | 8684 |
2010 | 8,271,500 | 446,100 | 94,207 | 9098 |
2011 | 8,367,600 | 478,200 | 97,222 | 9222 |
2012 | 8,338,200 | 488,100 | 91,000 | 8145 |
2013 | 8,235,200 | 445,800 | 88,267 | 6712 |
2014 | 8,309,200 | 411,500 | 88,641 | 6264 |
2015 | 8,395,700 | 411,000 | 87,622 | 5776 |
2016 | 8,575,500 | 408,000 | 87,886 | 5468 |
2017 | 8,854,700 | 421,900 | 88,330 | 5390 |
2018 | 9,278,900 | 409,600 | 84,304 | 5247 |
2019 | 9,241,300 | 425,700 | 83,205 | 4743 |
2020 | 9,121,700 | 424,600 | 61,740 | 3872 |
2021 | 9,201,700 | 458,600 | 68,777 | 4108 |
Forecast Function | Characteristics |
---|---|
Activating function | The task of the forecast is to stimulate actions conducive to the realization of the forecast, foreshadowing a favorable event. On the other hand, in the case of unfavorable events, to implement actions opposing its realization |
Warning function | The task of the forecast is to predict unfavorable events for the recipient. The forecast provides timely information about the unfavorable direction of change (e.g., an increase in the number of people injured in accidents at work) |
Argumentation function | The forecast provides arguments to facilitate certain decisions |
Advisory function | The forecast prepares relevant information relating to the phenomena that are the subject of the decision-making process |
Year | Relative Risk (RR) | SE (ln) | −95%Cl | +95%Cl | p-Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
2006 | 1.848 | 0.012 | 1.806 | 1.891 | <0.0001 |
2007 | 2.142 | 0.011 | 2.097 | 2.188 | <0.0001 |
2008 | 2.097 | 0.010 | 2.055 | 2.139 | <0.0001 |
2009 | 1.956 | 0.011 | 1.914 | 2.000 | <0.0001 |
2010 | 1.875 | 0.011 | 1.835 | 1.916 | <0.0001 |
2011 | 1.728 | 0.011 | 1.693 | 1.766 | <0.0001 |
2012 | 1.561 | 0.012 | 1.526 | 1.596 | <0.0001 |
2013 | 1.438 | 0.013 | 1.403 | 1.474 | <0.0001 |
2014 | 1.459 | 0.013 | 1.423 | 1.497 | <0.0001 |
2015 | 1.371 | 0.014 | 1.335 | 1.408 | <0.0001 |
2016 | 1.328 | 0.014 | 1.292 | 1.365 | <0.0001 |
2017 | 1.298 | 0.014 | 1.264 | 1.335 | <0.0001 |
2018 | 1.437 | 0.014 | 1.398 | 1.477 | <0.0001 |
2019 | 1.252 | 0.015 | 1.216 | 1.288 | <0.0001 |
2020 | 1.364 | 0.016 | 1.321 | 1.409 | <0.0001 |
2021 | 1.211 | 0.016 | 1.175 | 1.252 | <0.0001 |
Forecasting Model | Forecasting Relative Risk (RR) | ||
---|---|---|---|
2022 | 2023 | 2024 | |
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
Brown double exponential smoothing model | 1.215 | 1.184 | 1.153 |
Winters’ model with a multiplicative trend and multiplicative seasonality | 1.186 | 1.021 | 1.064 |
Forecasting Model | Designated Ex Post Forecast Errors | Se | Model Parameters | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ψ, % | Θ, % | MAE | RMSE | α | β | ф | ||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
Brown double exponential smoothing model | 5.87 | 1.47 | 0.075 | 0.104 | 0.117 | 0.37 | - | - |
Winters’ model with a multiplicative trend and multiplicative seasonality | 5.29 | 1.36 | 0.05 | 0.097 | 0.119 | 0.94 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
Forecasting Model | Coefficient Values J2 | Theil I2 | Total Error Forecasts | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2019 | 2020 | 2021 | |||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 7 |
Brown double exponential smoothing model | 0.6172 | 0.8670 | 0.8090 | 0.0058 | 0.0762 |
Winters’ model with a multiplicative trend and multiplicative seasonality | 0.0471 | 0.0249 | 0.0166 | 0.0054 | 0.0735 |
Relative Risk | Forecasting Relative Risk (RR) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
1.252 | 1.364 | 1.211 | Brown double exponential smoothing model | ||
1.215 | 1.184 | 1.153 | |||
Winters’ model with a multiplicative trend and multiplicative seasonality | |||||
1.186 | 1.021 | 1.064 | |||
Combined model | |||||
1.196 | 1.071 | 1.092 | |||
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Małysa, T. Relative Risk (RR) Analysis and Prediction as Part of Assessing Occupational Safety and Determining Priorities for Action in Occupational Health and Safety in the Construction Industry in Poland. Buildings 2023, 13, 1304. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13051304
Małysa T. Relative Risk (RR) Analysis and Prediction as Part of Assessing Occupational Safety and Determining Priorities for Action in Occupational Health and Safety in the Construction Industry in Poland. Buildings. 2023; 13(5):1304. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13051304
Chicago/Turabian StyleMałysa, Tomasz. 2023. "Relative Risk (RR) Analysis and Prediction as Part of Assessing Occupational Safety and Determining Priorities for Action in Occupational Health and Safety in the Construction Industry in Poland" Buildings 13, no. 5: 1304. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13051304
APA StyleMałysa, T. (2023). Relative Risk (RR) Analysis and Prediction as Part of Assessing Occupational Safety and Determining Priorities for Action in Occupational Health and Safety in the Construction Industry in Poland. Buildings, 13(5), 1304. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13051304