Immersive Technologies-Driven Building Information Modeling (BIM) in the Context of Metaverse
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
3.1. Results of Macro-Quantitative Bibliometric Analysis Regarding Immersive Technologies (ImTs)-Driven Building Information Modeling (BIM) in the Context of Metaverse
3.1.1. Source
3.1.2. Keywords Co-Occurrence Analysis
- Cluster 1 VR exemplifies the ongoing investigations within the domain of VR for virtual construction. This is typically achieved through 3D real-time computer graphics and advanced display devices, such as head-mounted displays (HMDs) [43]; leveraging VR facilitates with generation of comprehensive virtual construction environments, permitting users to partake in real-time interactions with digital entities [44], which enables project teams to effortlessly conceptualise and visualise their work content, thereby assisting them in making optimal decisions for construction projects [45,46]. Consequently, VR technology is currently employed in BIM to tackle a range of challenges to design, construction, and operation, encompassing design coordination, project planning, construction education, construction operation collaboration, and facility management [8,47,48,49,50,51,52]. In addition, the visualisation techniques introduced by VR technology have been garnering considerable practical research attention in the realm of safety management [53,54,55,56,57]. These VR-enhanced BIM collectively unveil the substantial potential of visualisation techniques in augmenting the capacity for on-site safety risk identification [58,59].
- Cluster 2 IoT represents the investigation of IoT within the domains of BIM and smart cities. Industry 4.0, smart city, and blockchain have surfaced as burgeoning keywords in the BIM field in recent years [60,61,62,63,64]. Sensing technology constitutes the pivotal impetus behind the IoT, in which the modeling of sensory information intrinsically influences the quality of smart city systems [65]. Smart cities endeavour to guarantee a salubrious living environment for indoor inhabitants by detecting, processing, and regulating a comprehensive range of indoor and outdoor facilities [66]. As such, smart cities and IoT technology will inevitably be closely linked in the future [67]. In addition, advancement of Industry 4.0 technologies, encompassing pervasive IoT and social media platforms employed for sensor data, services, and intelligent urban applications, may potentially instigate security concerns related to users’ private data. Therefore, distributed, intelligent, and secure data management systems composed of blockchain and IoT are widely considered to address data leakage issues [68].
- Cluster 3 DT epitomises the exploration of DT within BIM domain. In the research within this cluster, clear distinctions are drawn between BIM and DT: BIM aims to enhance efficiency in engineering design and construction at every stage of the building lifecycle [69], while DT focuses more on managing physical assets within a building to ensure their effective, reliable operation and implement predictive maintenance of the related assets [70]. During the literature review, for studies that involve both BIM and DT, we conducted detailed reading and analysis to ensure the authors’ main points were understood and properly categorised. The paramount value of DT resides in Facility Management (FM), of which the implementation of DT in FM constitutes a comparatively novel research domain [71,72]. FM predominantly transpires throughout the operation and maintenance stages of a building lifecycle, wherein 85% of the entire lifecycle expense is apportioned to FM [73]. Maintenance management and energy consumption are two essential aspects of daily property management, which engender abundant information [74]. A vast amount of fragmented information is extensively amassed by DT systems and ultimately consolidated and processed via BIM-based FM systems to facilitate the management of buildings throughout the operation and maintenance phases [75,76,77,78]. Addressing projects involving large-scale and geographically scattered building assemblages, GIS works as the predominant method within FM [79]. By amassing geospatial data, GIS manages various business procedures and information systems situated within edifices [79].
- Cluster 4 3D modeling embodies the study of 3D modeling techniques in BIM. The main research focus in this area is HBIM that aims to effectively manage various complex historical heritage scenarios, such as heritage buildings, archaeological sites, ancient infrastructure, and multiple monuments [80,81,82,83]. In addition, BIM likewise presents an assortment of new requirements for 3D modeling techniques. Amidst the tide of the digital era, techniques such as photogrammetry, point clouds, laser scanning, and Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) have incrementally permeated the scope of 3D modeling, eliciting transformative alterations to conventional and laborious modeling practices [84,85,86,87,88,89].
- Cluster 5 design represents the research work of BIM technology in optimising design in the building lifecycle. Digital technology is the pivotal impetus to enhance the circular economy [90]. With the increasing awareness of climate change among people, the application of digital technology, represented by computer simulation and optimisation, to mitigate environmental impacts throughout the lifecycle of buildings has recently attracted more and more attention [91]. In the field of architecture, this interdisciplinary design approach integrating digital technologies has become an integral component of the circular economy [91]. In addition, using prefabricated structures during the construction process significantly contributes to the circular economy through more precise quantitative production and less waste generation [92]. Interestingly, “China” emerges as the sole keyword symbolising a nation amidst all the keywords, as shown in Figure 4, serving as a crucial node in Cluster 5. In recent times, the Chinese architectural sector has fervently engaged with and actively advocated for the development of sustainable building practices and the incorporation of information-driven design [93]. This shift encompasses an array of methodologies grounded in the principles of green construction and enriched by the application of BIM [93]. For example, a large-scale Chinese hospital has been integrated with a sustainable lifecycle forecasting system in DT [94]. The Hong Kong Housing Authority (HKHA) further extensively employs prefabricated construction within its public housing projects to attain sustainability objectives in the building lifecycle [95]. Furthermore, China persistently advocates for proactive economic strategies to foster advancement in sustainability to the construction sector [96,97]. In order to facilitate the implementation of more green building projects, China specifically revised the Design Standard for Energy Efficiency of Public Buildings (GB50189) in 2015 [97]. As such, a sustainable building with a sustained lifecycle based on the concept of the circular economy and BIM has tremendous market potential in China [98,99].
- Cluster 6 AR exemplifies the research within the realm of immersive BIM environments underpinned by AR. AR allows the integration of virtual 3D objects into reality through devices such as smartphones, tablets, and AR glasses or headphones [100]. These applications enable possibilities for numerous studies, particularly in facilitating construction and improving communication efficiency. For instance, the integration of BIM and AR has been leveraged to provide as-built data directly on-site and offer on-site documentation based on AR devices [101], and to facilitate real-time visualisation of the physical environment for each construction activity or task [102]. In addition, the BIM + AR for Architectural Visualisation System (BAAVS) has been developed to bridge efficient communication among various stakeholders [103]. Furthermore, as an iterative technology of AR, MR offers greater flexibility and provides more possibilities for interaction with the natural world [104].
- Cluster 1 (occurrence: 471, total link strength: 1276.5): VR, system, construction, visualisation, safety management, and simulation;
- Cluster 2 (occurrence: 82, total link strength: 274): IoT and internet;
- Cluster 3 (occurrence: 909, total link strength: 2148.5): BIM, DT, framework, management, FM, and performance;
- Cluster 4 (occurrence: 98, total link strength: 264): 3D model;
- Cluster 5 (occurrence: 92, total link strength: 270.5): design;
- Cluster 6 (occurrence: 349, total link strength: 912): AR, information, technology, and architecture.
3.1.3. Overlay Visualisation
- Cutting-edge concept: 4D BIM, smart city, industry 4.0, construction 4.0, and circular economy;
- Advanced technology and tools: digital construction, lean construction, mobile, laser scanning, 3D reconstruction, UAV, point cloud, GIS, blockchain, deep learning, and AI;
- Immersive technology and tools: BIM, CAD, AR, VR, MR, 3D model, information, visualisation, DT, and cyber-physical systems;
- Project management: risk management, project management, construction, simulation, quality control, architecture heritage, and safety management;
- Activity for building the lifecycle: ACE, construction, simulation, lifecycle, system, framework, collaborative design, and buildings.
3.2. Results of Micro-Qualitative Analysis Regarding ImTs-Driven BIM in the Context of the Metaverse
3.2.1. Design Stage
- Teaching and collaboration [47,105,106,107,114,115]: In the field of AEC, AR technology can help students establish a connection between the virtual and real worlds. Diao and Shih suggest that the roles and knowledge of teachers, engineers, and designers to strengthen the collaboration between architectural design teaching and practice in AEC should be integrated, creating a superior learning environment with diverse teaching methods [115]. Regarding collaborative design and decision making, studies have proposed various solutions. Conducting constructability analysis meetings through VR-based immersive collaborative 4D simulation can be used for better collaborative design outcomes, linking the 3D model of the facility with the schedule of construction activities [106]. In addition, a database-supported VR/BIM-based Communication and Simulation (DVBCS) system has been developed to engage stakeholders in the design process via a semi-immersive VR environment [107]. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated to improve communication efficiency between design teams and medical stakeholders, and it simplifies the design and decision-making processes through practical application at a cancer centre [107]. However, the key to achieving collaborative design lies in achieving real-time synchronisation of BIM models [47,114]. Therefore, a BIM/VR real-time synchronisation (BVRS) system has been implemented to demonstrate its usability and efficiency in various experimental scenarios [47,114].
- User experience design [108,109,110,111]: A common characteristic of BIM applications for user experience design is the requirement of the construction in a VR world within the BIM system, enabling users to interact directly with the building and environment with the DT environment, which allows for a more comprehensive design evaluation and feedback on the overall user experience design, serving as the basis for design iteration. For instance, an accurate 3D model of the Dublin Docklands area in Ireland has been created to make urban design and planning more transparent and inclusive, enabling public participation in the process of development of the city through interaction and feedback on changes in urban planning [108].
- Technical implementation [89,112,113,116]: More emerging technologies have been offered for selection to achieve the production of DT models during the design stage, which provide more innovative and practical solutions for integrating VR/AR interfaces in collaborative design. For example, the use of point cloud technology to achieve rapid modeling by fitting precise 3D shapes with point clusters enriches the modeling resources in the design stage and adds possibilities and vitality to the design [89,116]. Additionally, simplifying the process of integrating BIM data into immersive VR and AR environments provides a streamlined openBIM system to achieve low-latency and concurrent operations, and facilitates smooth collaborative design and communication among stakeholders [112].
3.2.2. Construction Stage
- Construction management [95,102,117,118,119,120,132,133,134]: The key to construction management lies in utilising integration methods of BIM, IoT, and DT and integrating BIM and AR to provide managers with continuously updated and enriched data on functions of facility and performance characteristics [95,102,117,134]. As such, there are a variety of perspectives on how to achieve better construction management. Since BIM itself lacks the ability to manipulate data to evaluate and predict the real-time status of resources and processes in the construction system, adding a data mining component to the DT system to integrate with BIM and IoT enables informed and objective decision making in situation assessment, prediction, and improvement rather than relying on subjective judgments that may be biased and uncertain [117]. The integration of machine learning and image processing methods with immersive and interactive VR-BIM interfaces also helps with addressing the problems [132]. In addition, using AR to visualise real-time physical environment with each construction activity in the actual environment enables construction managers to make clear and accurate decisions [102]. Furthermore, integration of AR and BIM systems provides efficient quality management, reduces the workload of site managers, and establishes defect management processes to prevent the reoccurrence of construction defects [119,120].
- Construction tool [121,122,123,124,125,126,135,139]: Construction tools are typically applications that use AR or MR technology in integration with BIM systems to enhance human spatial cognition abilities, which assist users in completing a range of construction tasks by associating 3D models with the actual working environment and flexibly displaying relevant workflows and user interfaces, such as assisting with pipe spool assembly [124,139], welding [135], electrical construction [121], the modular construction of freeform surfaces using brick-like elements [122], and aiding information retrieval during the construction process [123]. In addition, a system called KanBIM has been developed to assist construction workers in making more accurate on-site decisions, by which the workers have increased confidence in their work status and guidelines to work according to lean construction principles [126]. Furthermore, employing AR technology to integrate BIM systems with mobile devices and public/private information, AR and Multiscreen System (AR-MS) benefits information retrieval and prediction of potential issues at construction sites while improving the accuracy and efficiency of on-site decisions [125].
- Safety management [58,59,127,128,129,136,140]: Due to the high accident and fatality rates in the construction industry, on-site safety management has been a hot topic in both research and practice in recent years [59]. The main reason is that, in practice, the dynamic and complex construction process could lead to on-site risks and safety plans being overlooked, which results in various safety accidents [136]. Currently, under the guidance of concepts such as DT and ImTs, the emergence of advanced sensing, IoT, and visualisation technologies provides possibilities for improving the health and safety of workplaces, of which applications are divided into three approaches: (1) Incorporating safety management measures directly into workers’ work environment is a promising approach to improving on-site safety and health. For example, an application has been developed to transform the view of a MR head-mounted display into a collaborative environment that enables workers to see and interact with, to improve the accuracy and efficiency of risk communication in construction workplaces [127]. In addition, an integration of IoT, BIM, Apriori algorithm, and complex network security risk analysis methods has been implemented to achieve real-time perception and virtual–real interaction of multi-source information during the hoisting process, ensuring effective safety management and decision making [128]. (2) Additionally, conflicts between workspace and path that construction planners are unaware of have been revealed, which are used for facilitating BIM and VR to improve the configuration of the workspace in construction project site planning and safety procedures defined in project safety plans [129]. (3) The visualisation for a safety management system that is developed using BIM, VR, and AR technologies allows workers to experience safety management processes through case scenarios on the construction site, and enables designers, engineers, and construction workers to visually assess site conditions for identifying potential hazards before the start of construction, eliminating or minimising on-site harm [58,140].
- Perception of construction [130,131,137,138]: A concept called “digital skin“ suggests that in the future ubiquitous construction site, digital skin could be composed of IoT-based sensors, actuators, and display systems, which provide various feedback and assistance to on-site tasks by integrating the obtained information [138]. Additionally, an interactive building anatomy modeling (IBAM) system has been developed based on VR and BIM technologies to provide students with a concrete learning experience in construction, which potentially improves building and construction education [131].
3.2.3. Operations and Maintenance Stage
- Asset and facility management [49,78,141,142,143,144,145,157]: Decision making in building assets and facilities requires the analysis and integration of different types of information and knowledge, such as maintenance records, work orders, causes of failures, and chain reactions. For asset and equipment management companies, a robust data system is becoming increasingly important for managing asset and facility data and recording ongoing facility changes [78]. The DT is the preferred choice for many studies on asset and facility management. For instance, a semi-automatic geometric DT method based on images and CAD drawings has been developed to support efficient and convenient modeling of existing buildings during the operation and maintenance stage [141]. Meanwhile, an intelligent asset management framework has been proposed to integrate AI, machine learning, and data analysis capabilities and incorporate the DT concept to create dynamic digital models and optimise usage processes [157]. In addition, a business dependency network has been integrated with DT to visualise the structure of multiple causal relationships, which is used to organise the functions, changes, and benefits that need to be considered before adoption [142]. Other studies collaborate with VR, AR, and other ImTs to improve user experience. In a MR framework for facility management, field workers use AR applications to collaborate with on-site office managers in immersive augmented virtual reality programs [143]. Additionally, a shared immersive experience for stakeholders using a VR environment has been created to effectively communicate with detail in facility management [49]. To improve information retrieval, AR and automatic positioning have been integrated to provide visual auxiliary information for managers to manage facilities [144]. Furthermore, an environmental analysis has been visualised through mobile AR technology and associated information with objects at specific locations in an augmented display format [145].
- Operations and maintenance of heritage building [146,147,148,158,159]: DT strengthens the connection between digital models and physical heritage assets, providing stakeholders involved in the heritage management decision-making process with more required and satisfied information [158]. There are three practices [146,148,158] that can be referred to the semantically rich HBIM models as digital 3D replicas with real-time operational data provided by on-site sensors through the IoT infrastructure. Additionally, a strategy of using advanced visualisation technologies based on AR and VR has been adopted as effective methods for preserving and accessing information [148]. Meanwhile, a VR for context-aware risk management of architectural heritage has been utilised [146]. To provide a better interactive experience, users have been allowed to fully immerse themselves in the scene and interact with it by using handheld devices for AR and VR [159]. Interestingly, while current DT-based solutions typically demand considerable budgets and time for creating 3D models, a practical alternative that leverages spherical panoramas to develop virtual tour environments has been presented for the researchers to obtain positive feedback upon testing this approach in a case study [147].
- Environmental monitoring and management system [28,149,150,151,152,153]: Applications in environmental monitoring and management systems are similar to those in abovementioned asset and facility management, focusing on more specific niche areas, which include real-time comfort monitoring in buildings [149,152,153], visual inspections of structures [150], anomaly monitoring of building assets [28], and monitoring and management of parking environments [151], offering specialised application scenarios.
- Operation and maintenance of security systems [154,155,156]: During the operation and maintenance process of buildings, security systems are an essential component. A study on the operation and maintenance of security systems has emerged year 2020 when a study utilised a system based on BIM and VR gamified scenarios to conduct pilot tests on simulated fire scenarios, aiming to achieve fire safety during the operation and maintenance [154]. BIM has been used to construct fire safety equipment (FSE) units, which enables FSE inspectors to quickly access and compile relevant information to generate a cloud database for equipment inspection and maintenance, thus achieving FSE inspection and maintenance and overcoming the limitations of paper documents for these tasks [155]. In addition, a DT-based indoor safety management system framework has been proposed to leverage IoT, BIM, Internet, and support vector machines (SVM) to enhance the intelligent level of building indoor safety management, in which the trained SVM model is used to process data within the DT management system to automatically obtain the type and level of hazards [156].
3.2.4. Renovation and Demolition Stage
- Renovation of building [160,161,162,163]: In the renovation work of buildings, studies focus on achieving effective communication among stakeholders while enhancing designers’ perception and understanding of the on-site environment. The BIM4EEB rapid toolkit has been used to develop a DT-based BIM management system that connects to various stakeholders in the AEC domain and provides an interactive multifunctional toolkit [160]. Similarly, a hybrid representation tool has been provided for digital mock-ups to manage cultural heritage buildings [163]. In addition, an MR technology platform has been used to involve interested stakeholders in the evaluation of renovation design projects, thereby enhancing the renovation decision-making process and improving quality of the projects [161]. Furthermore, the use of BIM and MR technologies integrated with a background elimination method has been explored for collaborative design in the renovation process [162].
- Demolition of building [164,165]: A conceptual framework for “smart” building demolition has been created to help maximise the utilisation of demolished waste through intelligent BIM, which not only achieves building demolition through three steps: scanning and measuring, building dismantling, and waste transportation, but it also allows the simulation of the demolition process by enabling DT-based BIM to detect possible defects before starting the demolition [164]. Additionally, a semantic-based building demolition model has been proposed to achieve the goal of “zero waste”, which uses historical information, structural information, and material information of the building to develop optimised demolition plans and assess their environmental impact through rapid modeling and VR/AR technologies [165].
3.2.5. Whole Lifecycle Stages
- Full lifecycle DT model [61,94,170,171,172,175]: The possibilities of the integration of blockchain technology with DT have been explored to increase information trust, security, decentralisation, efficiency, traceability, and transparency throughout the project lifecycle [61,170]. However, the integration of intelligence and cognition with DT may indeed yield a paradigm-shifting potential in technological advancements [94,171]. Consequently, a novel paradigm for DT has been proposed to encompass AI and Machine Learning to tackle unresolved challenges [171]. In addition, a DT software system with real-time visualisation management and AI diagnostic modules has been developed and deployed to allow managers to grasp the detailed status of the entire hospital through visualisation management and receive timely facility diagnostics and operational suggestions [94]. Interestingly, a transition from static sustainability assessments to dynamic methodologies predicated upon DT and bolstered via IoT has been set up to facilitate decision-making processes pertinent to sustainability throughout the entire building lifecycle [172]. Furthermore, a parallel approach has been implemented to amalgamate information from various stages of the project lifecycle into a singular DT model, while intending to foster enhanced asset management and facilitate communication among stakeholders via data visualisation [175].
- Full lifecycle in BIM [8,27,173]: An extended reality (XR) including VR, AR, and MR has been integrated into a full lifecycle BIM model to allow all the AEC stakeholders to access and analyse data at any stage of the project, thereby empowering experts to discern distinct scenarios across diverse project stages and devise suitable strategies accordingly [8]. Furthermore, the world’s first 6D BIM has been established and analysed for a railway turnout system in lifecycle management including 4D construction sequencing information, 5D cost information, and 6D project lifecycle management information, which improves the overall information flow for turnout planning and design, manufacturing pre-assembly and logistics, construction and installation, operation and management, and demolition, leading to better project performance and quality [27]. Intriguingly, a series of games has been amalgamated with BIM to engender a highly adaptive VR environment, targeting the enhancement of fire evacuation planning throughout the building lifecycle [173].
- Review and Exploration [18,20,23,166,167,168,169,174]: The ImTs within the realm of AEC have been explored in reviews [23,168,169], whilst other reviews [20,166,167] focus on current definition and application level of DT in the construction industry. In addition, a series of exploratory workshops and questionnaires has been employed to lay out a research roadmap on AR and VR within the construction domain [18]. Furthermore, eight focus groups consisting of 54 experts and online surveys have been conducted for identifying four types of limiting factors and four types of driving factors to provide valuable insights for stakeholders [174].
4. Discussion
4.1. Research Hotspots and Development Trends of ImTs-Driven BIM
- Technological focus: from year 2018 to 2020, the technologies in ImTs-driven BIM approaches underwent an iterative process, evolving initially from AR to VR and then to MR. Especially, in year 2021 and 2022, a number of advanced technologies and tools began to emerge in ImTs-driven BIM applications, such as UAV, GIS, AI, blockchain, and deep learning. The integration of these advanced technologies and tools provides more excellent development opportunities for ImTs-driven BIM.
- Research concepts: from year 2018 to 2020, few cutting-edge concepts appeared, with the focus primarily on specific applications, such as digital construction and project management. From 2021 onward, several advanced concepts began to be widely researched, including 4D BIM, smart cities, Industry 4.0, Construction 4.0, and the circular economy.
4.2. Challenges of Immersive Technologies (ImTs)-Driven Building Information Modeling (BIM) Applications
4.2.1. Design Stage
4.2.2. Construction Stage
4.2.3. Operations and Maintenance Stage
4.2.4. Renovation and Demolition Stage
5. Conclusions
- In terms of research methodology, this is the first attempt to combine macro-quantitative bibliometric analysis and micro-qualitative analysis methods to explore the research topic of ImTs-driven BIM. This study obtains 758 related studies in the past decade (year 2013 to 2022) through a series of keywords from the WoSCC database and uses VOSviewer software to conduct keywords co-occurrence analysis and overlay visualisation to visualise the relationship between ImTs and BIM. The macro-quantitative analysis on ImTs-driven BIM applications throughout all the stages of the building lifecycle reveals the themes, content, and characteristics of the applications across the stages.
- In terms of research technique, based on the bibliometric visualisation tool VOSviewer, this study reveals the hotspots and research trends of ImTs-driven BIM applications from year 2013 to 2022, which contains six clusters, namely VR, IoT, DT, 3D model, design, and AR.
- In terms of research content, compared with existing research, this study comprehensively analyses the current situation of ImTs-driven BIM applications across lifecycle stages of the building via micro-qualitative analysis and with main research directions for each stage, which is in the context of the metaverse that can be used to construct a BIM-based building metaverse.
- This study identifies the future research hotspots and development trends of ImTs-driven BIM that tend to be integrated with emerging advanced technology and tools, such as AI, blockchain, and deep learning. Additionally, the current challenges faced by ImTs-driven BIM throughout stages of the building lifecycle are determined, which are multifaceted and have various characteristics and goals in each of the stages.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Joshua, J. Information Bodies: Computational Anxiety in Neal Stephenson’s Snow Crash. Interdiscip. Lit. Stud. 2017, 19, 17–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, L.-H.; Braud, T.; Zhou, P.; Wang, L.; Xu, D.; Lin, Z.; Kumar, A.; Bermejo, C.; Hui, P. All One Needs to Know about Metaverse: A Complete Survey on Technological Singularity, Virtual Ecosystem, and Research Agenda. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2110.05352. [Google Scholar]
- Mozumder, M.A.I.; Sheeraz, M.M.; Athar, A.; Aich, S.; Kim, H.-C. Overview: Technology Roadmap of the Future Trend of Metaverse Based on IoT, Blockchain, AI Technique, and Medical Domain Metaverse Activity. In Proceedings of the 2022 24th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT), Pyeongchang, Republic of Korea, 13–16 February 2022; pp. 256–261. [Google Scholar]
- Penttilä, H. Describing the Changes in Architectural Information Technology to Understand Design Complexity and Free-Form Architectural Expression. J. Inf. Technol. Constr. 2006, 11, 395–408. [Google Scholar]
- Eastman, C.M.; Eastman, C.; Teicholz, P.; Sacks, R.; Liston, K. BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Managers, Designers, Engineers and Contractors; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2011; ISBN 978-0-470-54137-1. [Google Scholar]
- Schumacher, P. The Metaverse as Opportunity for Architecture and Society: Design Drivers, Core Competencies. ARIN 2022, 1, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Huang, H.; Zeng, X.; Zhao, L.; Qiu, C.; Wu, H.; Fan, L. Fusion of Building Information Modeling and Blockchain for Metaverse: A Survey. IEEE Open J. Comput. Soc. 2022, 3, 195–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alizadehsalehi, S.; Hadavi, A.; Huang, J.C. From BIM to Extended Reality in AEC Industry. Autom. Constr. 2020, 116, 103254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, C.; Jiang, S.; Skibniewski, M.J.; Man, Q.; Shen, L. A Literature Review of the Factors Limiting the Application of BIM in the Construction Industry. Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ. 2017, 23, 764–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Baghalzadeh Shishehgarkhaneh, M.; Keivani, A.; Moehler, R.C.; Jelodari, N.; Roshdi Laleh, S. Internet of Things (IoT), Building Information Modeling (BIM), and Digital Twin (DT) in Construction Industry: A Review, Bibliometric, and Network Analysis. Buildings 2022, 12, 1503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Casini, M. Construction 4.0: Advanced Technology, Tools and Materials for the Digital Transformation of the Construction Industry; Woodhead Publishing: Soston, UK, 2021; ISBN 0-12-821803-7. [Google Scholar]
- Bolpagni, M.; Gavina, R.; Ribeiro, D. Industry 4.0 for the Built Environment: Methodologies, Technologies and Skills; Springer Nature: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021; Volume 20, ISBN 3-030-82430-6. [Google Scholar]
- Autodesk. Constructing with the Power of Digital; Autodesk: San Rafael, CA, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Sawhney, A.; Riley, M.; Irizarry, J.; Riley, M. Construction 4.0 an Innovation Platform for the Built Environment; Sawhney, A., Riley, M., Irizarry, J., Eds.; Routledge: London, UK, 2020; Volume 10, ISBN 9780429398100. [Google Scholar]
- Almeida, P.; Solas, M.; Renz, A.; Bühler, M.M.; Gerbert, P.; Castagnino, S.; Rothballer, C. Shaping the Future of Construction: A Breakthrough in Mindset and Technology; World Economic Forum: Cologny, Switzerland, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Khan, A.; Sepasgozar, S.; Liu, T.; Yu, R. Integration of BIM and Immersive Technologies for AEC: A Scientometric-SWOT Analysis and Critical Content Review. Buildings 2021, 11, 126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palmarini, R.; Erkoyuncu, J.A.; Roy, R.; Torabmostaedi, H. A Systematic Review of Augmented Reality Applications in Maintenance. Robot. Comput.-Integr. Manuf. 2018, 49, 215–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Davila Delgado, J.M.; Oyedele, L.; Demian, P.; Beach, T. A Research Agenda for Augmented and Virtual Reality in Architecture, Engineering and Construction. Adv. Eng. Inform. 2020, 45, 101122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jones, D.; Snider, C.; Nassehi, A.; Yon, J.; Hicks, B. Characterising the Digital Twin: A Systematic Literature Review. CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol. 2020, 29, 36–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Opoku, D.-G.J.; Perera, S.; Osei-Kyei, R.; Rashidi, M. Digital Twin Application in the Construction Industry: A Literature Review. J. Build. Eng. 2021, 40, 102726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, K.; Guo, F.; Zhang, C.; Hao, J.; Schaefer, D. Digital Technology in Architecture, Engineering, and Construction (AEC) Industry: Research Trends and Practical Status toward Construction 4.0. In Proceedings of the Construction Research Congress, Arlington, Virginia, 9–12 March 2022; pp. 983–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Casini, M. Extended Reality for Smart Building Operation and Maintenance: A Review. Energies 2022, 15, 3785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Liu, H.; Kang, S.-C.; Al-Hussein, M. Virtual Reality Applications for the Built Environment: Research Trends and Opportunities. Autom. Constr. 2020, 118, 103311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abbas, A.; Choi, M.; Seo, J.; Cha, S.H.; Li, H. Effectiveness of Immersive Virtual Reality-Based Communication for Construction Projects. KSCE J. Civ. Eng 2019, 23, 4972–4983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suh, A.; Prophet, J. The State of Immersive Technology Research: A Literature Analysis. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2018, 86, 77–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coupry, C.; Noblecourt, S.; Richard, P.; Baudry, D.; Bigaud, D. BIM-Based Digital Twin and XR Devices to Improve Maintenance Procedures in Smart Buildings: A Literature Review. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 6810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaewunruen, S.; Lian, Q. Digital Twin Aided Sustainability-Based Lifecycle Management for Railway Turnout Systems. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 228, 1537–1551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, Q.; Xie, X.; Parlikad, A.K.; Schooling, J.M. Digital Twin-Enabled Anomaly Detection for Built Asset Monitoring in Operation and Maintenance. Autom. Constr. 2020, 118, 103277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Angjeliu, G.; Coronelli, D.; Cardani, G. Development of the Simulation Model for Digital Twin Applications in Historical Masonry Buildings: The Integration between Numerical and Experimental Reality. Comput. Struct. 2020, 238, 106282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gerhard, D.; Neges, M.; Wolf, M. Transfer of Digital Twin Concepts to the Production of Precast Concrete Parts in the Construction Industry. ZWF Z. Fuer Wirtsch. Fabr. 2020, 115, 58–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Greif, T.; Stein, N.; Flath, C.M. Peeking into the Void: Digital Twins for Construction Site Logistics. Comput. Ind. 2020, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaewunruen, S.; Rungskunroch, P.; Welsh, J. A Digital-Twin Evaluation of Net Zero Energy Building for Existing Buildings. Sustainability 2019, 11, 159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Khudhair, A.; Li, H.; Ren, G.; Liu, S. Towards Future BIM Technology Innovations: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Literature. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dionisio, J.D.N.; Burns III, W.G.; Gilbert, R. 3D Virtual Worlds and the Metaverse: Current Status and Future Possibilities. ACM Comput. Surv. 2013, 45, 34:1–34:38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Z.; Li, P.; Wang, F.; Osmani, M.; Demian, P. Building Information Modeling (BIM) Driven Carbon Emission Reduction Research: A 14-Year Bibliometric Analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 12820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhong, L.; Zhang, L.; Li, Y.; Liang, X.; Kong, L.; Shen, X.; Wu, T. Assessment of the Toxicity of Quantum Dots through Biliometric Analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 5768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Van Eck, N.; Waltman, L. Software Survey: VOSviewer, a Computer Program for Bibliometric Mapping. Scientometrics 2009, 84, 523–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Guo, Y.-M.; Huang, Z.-L.; Guo, J.; Li, H.; Guo, X.-R.; Nkeli, M.J. Bibliometric Analysis on Smart Cities Research. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Du, Q.; Zhou, J. Evolution of Low Carbon Supply Chain Research: A Systematic Bibliometric Analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 15541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Small, H. Visualizing Science by Citation Mapping. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 1999, 50, 799–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fu, H.-Z.; Wang, M.-H.; Ho, Y.-S. Mapping of Drinking Water Research: A Bibliometric Analysis of Research Output during 1992–2011. Sci. Total Environ. 2013, 443, 757–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- van Eck, N.J.; Waltman, L. Citation-Based Clustering of Publications Using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer. Scientometrics 2017, 111, 1053–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Assila, A.; Plouzeau, J.; Merienne, F.; Erfanian, A.; Hu, Y. Defining an Indicator for Navigation Performance Measurement in VE Based on ISO/IEC15939. In Proceedings of the Augmented Reality, Virtual Reality, and Computer Graphics, Ugento, Italy, 12–15 June 2017; De Paolis, L.T., Bourdot, P., Mongelli, A., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 17–34. [Google Scholar]
- Warwick, K.; Gray, J.; Roberts, D. Virtual Reality in Engineering; Institution of Electrical Engineers: London, UK, 1993; ISBN 978-0-85296-803-1. [Google Scholar]
- Towards AR/VR Maturity Model Adapted to the Building Information Modeling. Available online: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-62807-9_59 (accessed on 3 December 2022).
- Karji, A.; Woldesenbet, A.; Rokooei, S. Integration of Augmented Reality, Building Information Modeling, and Image Processing in Construction Management: A Content Analysis. AEI 2017, 2017, 983–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Du, J.; Zou, Z.; Shi, Y.; Zhao, D. Zero Latency: Real-Time Synchronization of BIM Data in Virtual Reality for Collaborative Decision-Making. Autom. Constr. 2018, 85, 51–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Du, J.; Shi, Y.; Mei, C.; Quarles, J.; Yan, W. Communication by Interaction: A Multiplayer VR Environment for Building Walkthroughs. In Proceedings of the Construction Research Congress, San Juan, Puerto Rico, 31 May–2 June 2016; pp. 2281–2290. [Google Scholar]
- Shi, Y.; Du, J.; Lavy, S.; Zhao, D. A Multiuser Shared Virtual Environment for Facility Management. Procedia Eng. 2016, 145, 120–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bouchlaghem, D.; Shang, H.; Whyte, J.; Ganah, A. Visualisation in Architecture, Engineering and Construction (AEC). Autom. Constr. 2005, 14, 287–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Whyte, J. Industrial Applications of Virtual Reality in Architecture and Construction. Electron. J. Inf. Technol. Constr. 2003, 8, 43–50. [Google Scholar]
- Kaufmann, H.; Schmalstieg, D.; Wagner, M. Construct3D: A Virtual Reality Application for Mathematics and Geometry Education. Educ. Inf. Technol. 2000, 5, 263–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, H.-L.; Liu, W.-P.; Zhang, W.-S.; Skitmor, M. A BIM-PT-Integrated Warning System for on-Site Workers’ Unsafe Behavior. China Saf. Sci. J. 2014, 24, 104–109. [Google Scholar]
- Guo, H.; Li, H.; Chan, G.; Skitmore, M. Using Game Technologies to Improve the Safety of Construction Plant Operations. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2012, 48, 204–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fang, Y.; Teizer, J.; Marks, E. A Framework for Developing an As-Built Virtual Environment to Advance Training of Crane Operators. In Proceedings of the Construction Research Congress 2014: Construction in a Global Network, Atlanta, Georgia, 19–21 May 2014; pp. 31–40. [Google Scholar]
- Li, H.; Ma, Z.; Shen, Q.; Kong, S. Virtual Experiment of Innovative Construction Operations. Autom. Constr. 2003, 12, 561–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chau, K.W.; Anson, M.; Zhang, J.P. Four-Dimensional Visualization of Construction Scheduling and Site Utilization. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2004, 130, 598–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Park, C.-S.; Kim, H.-J. A Framework for Construction Safety Management and Visualization System. Autom. Constr. 2013, 33, 95–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, H.; Yu, Y.; Skitmore, M. Visualization Technology-Based Construction Safety Management: A Review. Autom. Constr. 2017, 73, 135–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wang, M.; Wang, C.C.; Sepasgozar, S.; Zlatanova, S. A Systematic Review of Digital Technology Adoption in Off-Site Construction: Current Status and Future Direction towards Industry 4.0. Buildings 2020, 10, 204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, D.; Lee, S.H.; Masoud, N.; Krishnan, M.S.; Li, V.C. Integrated Digital Twin and Blockchain Framework to Support Accountable Information Sharing in Construction Projects. Autom. Constr. 2021, 127, 103688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Turner, C.J.; Oyekan, J.; Stergioulas, L.; Griffin, D. Utilizing Industry 4.0 on the Construction Site: Challenges and Opportunities. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2021, 17, 746–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Lu, W.; Xue, F.; Wu, L.; Zhao, R.; Lou, J.; Xu, J. Blockchain-Enabled IoT-BIM Platform for Supply Chain Management in Modular Construction. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2022, 148, 4021195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; Huang, D.; Liu, Z.; Osmani, M.; Demian, P. Construction 4.0, Industry 4.0, and Building Information Modeling (BIM) for Sustainable Building Development within the Smart City. Sustainability 2022, 14, 10028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H. Sensing Information Modelling for Smart City. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Smart City/SocialCom/SustainCom (SmartCity), Chengdu, China, 19–21 December 2015; pp. 40–45. [Google Scholar]
- Dahmane, W.M.; Ouchani, S.; Bouarfa, H. Towards a Reliable Smart City through Formal Verification and Network Analysis. Comput. Commun. 2021, 180, 171–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuguoglu, B.K.; van der Voort, H.; Janssen, M. The Giant Leap for Smart Cities: Scaling Up Smart City Artificial Intelligence of Things (AIoT) Initiatives. Sustainability 2021, 13, 12295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abbas, K.; Tawalbeh, L.A.; Rafiq, A.; Muthanna, A.; Elgendy, I.A.; Abd El-Latif, A.A. Convergence of Blockchain and IoT for Secure Transportation Systems in Smart Cities. Secur. Commun. Netw. 2021, 2021, e5597679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; van Nederveen, S.; Hertogh, M. Understanding Effects of BIM on Collaborative Design and Construction: An Empirical Study in China. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2017, 35, 686–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qi, Q.; Tao, F. Digital Twin and Big Data Towards Smart Manufacturing and Industry 4.0: 360 Degree Comparison. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 3585–3593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ilter, D.; Ergen, E. BIM for Building Refurbishment and Maintenance: Current Status and Research Directions. Struct. Surv. 2015, 33, 228–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Volk, R.; Stengel, J.; Schultmann, F. Building Information Modeling (BIM) for Existing Buildings - Literature Review and Future Needs. Autom. Constr. 2014, 38, 109–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Teicholz, P. BIM for Facility Managers; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2013; ISBN 1-118-41762-3. [Google Scholar]
- Lewis, A.; Elmualim, A.; Riley, D. Linking Energy and Maintenance Management for Sustainability through Three American Case Studies. Facilities 2011, 29, 243–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, Y.-C.; Su, Y.-C. Developing Mobile- and BIM-Based Integrated Visual Facility Maintenance Management System. Sci. World J. 2013, 2013, e124249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wang, Y.; Wang, X.; Wang, J.; Yung, P.; Jun, G. Engagement of Facilities Management in Design Stage through BIM: Framework and a Case Study. Adv. Civ. Eng. 2013, 2013, e189105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Oti, A.H.; Kurul, E.; Cheung, F.; Tah, J.H.M. A Framework for the Utilization of Building Management System Data in Building Information Models for Building Design and Operation. Autom. Constr. 2016, 72, 195–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wong, J.K.W.; Ge, J.; He, S.X. Digitisation in Facilities Management: A Literature Review and Future Research Directions. Autom. Constr. 2018, 92, 312–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, W.; Yang, X.; Fan, Q. GIS-BIM Based Virtual Facility Energy Assessment (VFEA)—Framework Development and Use Case of California State University, Fresno. In Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Computing in Civil and Building Engineering, Orlando, FL, USA, 23–25 June 2014; pp. 339–346. [Google Scholar]
- Pepe, M.; Costantino, D.; Restuccia Garofalo, A. An Efficient Pipeline to Obtain 3D Model for HBIM and Structural Analysis Purposes from 3D Point Clouds. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 1235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Management of Built Heritage via HBIM Project: A Case of Study of Flooring and Tiling. Available online: http://polipapers.upv.es/index.php/var/article/view/4349 (accessed on 30 November 2022).
- Bradley, A.; Li, H.; Lark, R.; Dunn, S. BIM for Infrastructure: An Overall Review and Constructor Perspective. Autom. Constr. 2016, 71, 139–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Previtali, M.; Brumana, R.; Banfi, F. Existing Infrastructure Cost Effective Informative Modelling with Multisource Sensed Data: TLS, MMS and Photogrammetry. Appl. Geomat. 2022, 14, 21–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yastikli, N.; Özerdem, Ö.Z. Architectural Heritage Documentation by Using Low Cost UAV with Fisheye Lens: Otag-i Humayun in Istanbul as a Case Study. In ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences; Copernicus GmbH: Göttingen, Germany, 2017; Volume IV-4-W4, pp. 415–418. [Google Scholar]
- Levine, N.M.; Spencer, B.F. Post-Earthquake Building Evaluation Using UAVs: A BIM-Based Digital Twin Framework. Sensors 2022, 22, 873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khairadeen Ali, A.; Lee, O.J.; Lee, D.; Park, C. Remote Indoor Construction Progress Monitoring Using Extended Reality. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rausch, C.; Haas, C. Automated Shape and Pose Updating of Building Information Model Elements from 3D Point Clouds. Autom. Constr. 2021, 124, 103561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ding, Z.; Liu, S.; Liao, L.; Zhang, L. A Digital Construction Framework Integrating Building Information Modeling and Reverse Engineering Technologies for Renovation Projects. Autom. Constr. 2019, 102, 45–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, R.; Brilakis, I. Digital Twinning of Existing Reinforced Concrete Bridges from Labelled Point Clusters. Autom. Constr. 2019, 105, 102837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pagoropoulos, A.; Pigosso, D.C.A.; McAloone, T.C. The Emergent Role of Digital Technologies in the Circular Economy: A Review. Procedia CIRP 2017, 64, 19–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gan, V.J.L.; Lo, I.M.C.; Ma, J.; Tse, K.T.; Cheng, J.C.P.; Chan, C.M. Simulation Optimisation towards Energy Efficient Green Buildings: Current Status and Future Trends. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 254, 120012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hao, J.L.; Cheng, B.; Lu, W.; Xu, J.; Wang, J.; Bu, W.; Guo, Z. Carbon Emission Reduction in Prefabrication Construction during Materialization Stage: A BIM-Based Life-Cycle Assessment Approach. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 723, 137870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmad, T.; Thaheem, M.J. Economic Sustainability Assessment of Residential Buildings: A Dedicated Assessment Framework and Implications for BIM. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2018, 38, 476–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, Y.; Zhang, M.; Yu, F.; Xu, J.; Gao, S. Digital Twin Hospital Buildings: An Exemplary Case Study through Continuous Lifecycle Integration. Adv. Civ. Eng. 2020, 2020, e8846667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, C.Z.; Xue, F.; Li, X.; Hong, J.; Shen, G.Q. An Internet of Things-Enabled BIM Platform for on-Site Assembly Services in Prefabricated Construction. Autom. Constr. 2018, 89, 146–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; Jiang, P.; Dong, W.; Huang, B. Analysis on the Carbon Trading Approach in Promoting Sustainable Buildings in China. Renew. Energy 2015, 84, 130–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Z.; Chen, H.; Mi, L.; Li, P.; Qi, K. Green Building Technologies Adoption Process in China: How Environmental Policies Are Reshaping the Decision-Making among Alliance-Based Construction Enterprises? Sustain. Cities Soc. 2021, 73, 103122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, L.; Le, Y.; Li, H.; Jin, R.; Piroozfar, P.; Liu, M. Regional Comparisons of Contemporary Construction Industry Sustainable Concepts in the Chinese Context. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wu, X.; Peng, B.; Lin, B. A Dynamic Life Cycle Carbon Emission Assessment on Green and Non-Green Buildings in China. Energy Build. 2017, 149, 272–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Almeida Pacheco, B.; Guimarães, M.; Correa, A.G.; Farinazzo Martins, V. Usability Evaluation of Learning Objects with Augmented Reality for Smartphones: A Reinterpretation of Nielsen Heuristics. In Human-Computer Interaction; Agredo-Delgado, V., Ruiz, P.H., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 214–228. [Google Scholar]
- Kahn, S.; Olbrich, M.; Engelke, T.; Keil, J.; Riess, P.; Webel, S.; Graf, H.; Bockholt, U.; Picinbono, G. Beyond 3D “As-Built” Information Using Mobile AR Enhancing the Building Lifecycle Management. In Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference on Cyberworlds, Darmstadt, Germany, 25–27 September 2012; pp. 29–36. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, X.; Love, P.E.D.; Kim, M.J.; Park, C.-S.; Sing, C.-P.; Hou, L. A Conceptual Framework for Integrating Building Information Modeling with Augmented Reality. Autom. Constr. 2013, 34, 37–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Wang, X.; Shou, W.; Xu, B. Integrating BIM and Augmented Reality for Interactive Architectural Visualisation. Constr. Innov. 2014, 14, 453–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Assila, A.; Dhouib, A.; Monla, Z.; Zghal, M. Integration of Augmented, Virtual and Mixed Reality with Building Information Modeling: A Systematic Review. In Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality: Design and Development; Chen, J.Y.C., Fragomeni, G., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 3–19. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, W.; Hartless, J.; Tesei, A.; Gunji, V.; Ayer, S.; London, J. Design Assessment in Virtual and Mixed Reality Environments: Comparison of Novices and Experts. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2019, 145, 04019049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boton, C. Supporting Constructability Analysis Meetings with Immersive Virtual Reality-Based Collaborative BIM 4D Simulation. Autom. Constr. 2018, 96, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, Y.-C.; Chen, Y.-P.; Yien, H.-W.; Huang, C.-Y.; Su, Y.-C. Integrated BIM, Game Engine and VR Technologies for Healthcare Design: A Case Study in Cancer Hospital. Adv. Eng. Inform. 2018, 36, 130–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- White, G.; Zink, A.; Codecá, L.; Clarke, S. A Digital Twin Smart City for Citizen Feedback. Cities 2021, 110, 103064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cha, S.H.; Koo, C.; Kim, T.W.; Hong, T. Spatial Perception of Ceiling Height and Type Variation in Immersive Virtual Environments. Build. Environ. 2019, 163, 106285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Motamedi, A.; Wang, Z.; Yabuki, N.; Fukuda, T.; Michikawa, T. Signage Visibility Analysis and Optimization System Using BIM-Enabled Virtual Reality (VR) Environments. Adv. Eng. Inform. 2017, 32, 248–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, W.; Zhang, X.; Qiping Shen, G.; Fernando, T. The User Pre-Occupancy Evaluation Method in Designer–Client Communication in Early Design Stage: A Case Study. Autom. Constr. 2013, 32, 112–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pour Rahimian, F.; Chavdarova, V.; Oliver, S.; Chamo, F.; Potseluyko Amobi, L. OpenBIM-Tango Integrated Virtual Showroom for Offsite Manufactured Production of Self-Build Housing. Autom. Constr. 2019, 102, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meža, S.; Turk, Ž.; Dolenc, M. Component Based Engineering of a Mobile BIM-Based Augmented Reality System. Autom. Constr. 2014, 42, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Du, J.; Zou, Z.; Shi, Y.; Zhao, D. Simultaneous Data Exchange between BIM and VR for Collaborative Decision Making. In Proceedings of the ASCE International Workshop on Computing in Civil Engineering, Washington, DC, USA, 25–27 June 2017; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diao, P.-H.; Shih, N.-J. Trends and Research Issues of Augmented Reality Studies in Architectural and Civil Engineering Education—A Review of Academic Journal Publications. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 1840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Barazzetti, L.; Banfi, F.; Brumana, R.; Oreni, D.; Previtali, M.; Roncoroni, F. HBIM and Augmented Information: Towards a Wider User Community of Image and Range-Based Reconstructions. In International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences; Copernicus GmbH: Göttingen, Germany, 2015; Volume XL-5-W7, pp. 35–42. [Google Scholar]
- Pan, Y.; Zhang, L. A BIM-Data Mining Integrated Digital Twin Framework for Advanced Project Management. Autom. Constr. 2021, 124, 103564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meža, S.; Turk, Ž.; Dolenc, M. Measuring the Potential of Augmented Reality in Civil Engineering. Adv. Eng. Softw. 2015, 90, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kwon, O.-S.; Park, C.-S.; Lim, C.-R. A Defect Management System for Reinforced Concrete Work Utilizing BIM, Image-Matching and Augmented Reality. Autom. Constr. 2014, 46, 74–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, C.-S.; Lee, D.-Y.; Kwon, O.-S.; Wang, X. A Framework for Proactive Construction Defect Management Using BIM, Augmented Reality and Ontology-Based Data Collection Template. Autom. Constr. 2013, 33, 61–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chalhoub, J.; Ayer, S.K. Using Mixed Reality for Electrical Construction Design Communication. Autom. Constr. 2018, 86, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fazel, A.; Izadi, A. An Interactive Augmented Reality Tool for Constructing Free-Form Modular Surfaces. Autom. Constr. 2018, 85, 135–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chu, M.; Matthews, J.; Love, P.E.D. Integrating Mobile Building Information Modelling and Augmented Reality Systems: An Experimental Study. Autom. Constr. 2018, 85, 305–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hou, L.; Wang, X.; Truijens, M. Using Augmented Reality to Facilitate Piping Assembly: An Experiment-Based Evaluation. J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 2015, 29, 05014007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, T.-H.; Liu, C.-H.; Tsai, M.-H.; Kang, S.-C. Using Augmented Reality in a Multiscreen Environment for Construction Discussion. J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 2015, 29, 04014088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gurevich, U.; Sacks, R. Examination of the Effects of a KanBIM Production Control System on Subcontractors’ Task Selections in Interior Works. Autom. Constr. 2014, 37, 81–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dai, F.; Olorunfemi, A.; Peng, W.; Cao, D.; Luo, X. Can Mixed Reality Enhance Safety Communication on Construction Sites? An Industry Perspective. Saf. Sci. 2021, 133, 105009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Z.; Meng, X.; Xing, Z.; Jiang, A. Digital Twin-Based Safety Risk Coupling of Prefabricated Building Hoisting. Sensors 2021, 21, 3583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Getuli, V.; Capone, P.; Bruttini, A.; Isaac, S. BIM-Based Immersive Virtual Reality for Construction Workspace Planning: A Safety-Oriented Approach. Autom. Constr. 2020, 114, 103160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, D.; Lee, S. Digital Twin for Supply Chain Coordination in Modular Construction. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 5909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, C.S.; Le, Q.T.; Pedro, A.; Lim, C.R. Interactive Building Anatomy Modeling for Experiential Building Construction Education. J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract. 2016, 142, 04015019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pour Rahimian, F.; Seyedzadeh, S.; Oliver, S.; Rodriguez, S.; Dawood, N. On-Demand Monitoring of Construction Projects through a Game-like Hybrid Application of BIM and Machine Learning. Autom. Constr. 2020, 110, 103012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ratajczak, J.; Riedl, M.; Matt, D.T. BIM-Based and AR Application Combined with Location-Based Management System for the Improvement of the Construction Performance. Buildings 2019, 9, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wang, X.; Truijens, M.; Hou, L.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, Y. Integrating Augmented Reality with Building Information Modeling: Onsite Construction Process Controlling for Liquefied Natural Gas Industry. Autom. Constr. 2014, 40, 96–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tavares, P.; Costa, C.M.; Rocha, L.; Malaca, P.; Costa, P.; Moreira, A.P.; Sousa, A.; Veiga, G. Collaborative Welding System Using BIM for Robotic Reprogramming and Spatial Augmented Reality. Autom. Constr. 2019, 106, 102825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hou, L.; Wu, S.; Zhang, G. (Kevin); Tan, Y.; Wang, X. Literature Review of Digital Twins Applications in Construction Workforce Safety. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boje, C.; Guerriero, A.; Kubicki, S.; Rezgui, Y. Towards a Semantic Construction Digital Twin: Directions for Future Research. Autom. Constr. 2020, 114, 103179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Edirisinghe, R. Digital Skin of the Construction Site: Smart Sensor Technologies towards the Future Smart Construction Site. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag. 2019, 26, 184–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kwiatek, C.; Sharif, M.; Li, S.; Haas, C.; Walbridge, S. Impact of Augmented Reality and Spatial Cognition on Assembly in Construction. Autom. Constr. 2019, 108, 102935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Azhar, S. Role of Visualization Technologies in Safety Planning and Management at Construction Jobsites. Procedia Eng. 2017, 171, 215–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, Q.; Chen, L.; Li, S.; Pitt, M. Semi-Automatic Geometric Digital Twinning for Existing Buildings Based on Images and CAD Drawings. Autom. Constr. 2020, 115, 103183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Love, P.E.D.; Matthews, J. The ‘How’ of Benefits Management for Digital Technology: From Engineering to Asset Management. Autom. Constr. 2019, 107, 102930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El Ammari, K.; Hammad, A. Remote Interactive Collaboration in Facilities Management Using BIM-Based Mixed Reality. Autom. Constr. 2019, 107, 102940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baek, F.; Ha, I.; Kim, H. Augmented Reality System for Facility Management Using Image-Based Indoor Localization. Autom. Constr. 2019, 99, 18–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Williams, G.; Gheisari, M.; Chen, P.-J.; Irizarry, J. BIM2MAR: An Efficient BIM Translation to Mobile Augmented Reality Applications. J. Manag. Eng. 2015, 31, A4014009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, J.; Kim, J.; Ahn, J.; Woo, W. Context-Aware Risk Management for Architectural Heritage Using Historic Building Information Modeling and Virtual Reality. J. Cult. Herit. 2019, 38, 242–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Napolitano, R.K.; Scherer, G.; Glisic, B. Virtual Tours and Informational Modeling for Conservation of Cultural Heritage Sites. J. Cult. Herit. 2018, 29, 123–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Osello, A.; Lucibello, G.; Morgagni, F. HBIM and Virtual Tools: A New Chance to Preserve Architectural Heritage. Buildings 2018, 8, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Shahinmoghadam, M.; Natephra, W.; Motamedi, A. BIM- and IoT-Based Virtual Reality Tool for Real-Time Thermal Comfort Assessment in Building Enclosures. Build. Environ. 2021, 199, 107905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, D.; Xia, X.; Chen, J.; Li, S. Integrating Building Information Model and Augmented Reality for Drone-Based Building Inspection. J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 2021, 35, 4020073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, Y.-C.; Cheung, W.-F. Developing WSN/BIM-Based Environmental Monitoring Management System for Parking Garages in Smart Cities. J. Manag. Eng. 2020, 36, 04020012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, X.; Lu, Q.; Rodenas-Herraiz, D.; Parlikad, A.K.; Schooling, J.M. Visualised Inspection System for Monitoring Environmental Anomalies during Daily Operation and Maintenance. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag. 2020, 27, 1835–1852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zaballos, A.; Briones, A.; Massa, A.; Centelles, P.; Caballero, V. A Smart Campus’ Digital Twin for Sustainable Comfort Monitoring. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, H.; Hou, L.; Zhang, G. (Kevin); Moon, S. Development of BIM, IoT and AR/VR Technologies for Fire Safety and Upskilling. Autom. Constr. 2021, 125, 103631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.-J.; Lai, Y.-S.; Lin, Y.-H. BIM-Based Augmented Reality Inspection and Maintenance of Fire Safety Equipment. Autom. Constr. 2020, 110, 103041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Z.; Zhang, A.; Wang, W. A Framework for an Indoor Safety Management System Based on Digital Twin. Sensors 2020, 20, 5771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lu, Q.; Xie, X.; Heaton, J.; Parlikad, A.K.; Schooling, J. From BIM Towards Digital Twin: Strategy and Future Development for Smart Asset Management. In Service Oriented, Holonic and Multi-Agent Manufacturing Systems for Industry of the Future; Borangiu, T., Trentesaux, D., Leitão, P., Giret Boggino, A., Botti, V., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 392–404. [Google Scholar]
- Jouan, P.; Hallot, P. Digital Twin: Research Framework to Support Preventive Conservation Policies. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2020, 9, 228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Albourae, A.T.; Armenakis, C.; Kyan, M. Architectural Heritage Visualization Using Interactive Technologies. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2017, XLII-2/W5, 7–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Daniotti, B.; Masera, G.; Bolognesi, C.M.; Lupica Spagnolo, S.; Pavan, A.; Iannaccone, G.; Signorini, M.; Ciuffreda, S.; Mirarchi, C.; Lucky, M.; et al. The Development of a BIM-Based Interoperable Toolkit for Efficient Renovation in Buildings: From BIM to Digital Twin. Buildings 2022, 12, 231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carbonari, A.; Franco, C.; Naticchia, B.; Spegni, F.; Vaccarini, M. A Mixed Reality Application for the On-Site Assessment of Building Renovation: Development and Testing. Sustainability 2022, 14, 13239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, Y.; Fukuda, T.; Yabuki, N. Integrated Co-Designing Using Building Information Modeling and Mixed Reality with Erased Backgrounds for Stock Renovation. In Ecaade 2020: Anthropologic—Architecture and Fabrication in the Cognitive Age; Werner, L.C., Koering, D., Eds.; Ecaade-Education & Research Computer Aided Architectural Design Europe: Brussels, Belgium, 2020; Volume 1, pp. 153–160. [Google Scholar]
- Nicolas, G.; Landrieu, J.; Nugraha, Y.; Pere, C. Hybrid Representation of Digital Mockup for Heritage Buildings Management. In Proceedings of the XXIV International Cipa Symposium, Strasbourg, France, 2–6 September 2013; Grussenmeyer, P., Ed.; Copernicus Gesellschaft Mbh: Gottingen, Germany, 2013; Volume 40-5-W2, pp. 453–457. [Google Scholar]
- Kang, K.; Besklubova, S.; Dai, Y.; Zhong, R.Y. Building Demolition Waste Management through Smart BIM: A Case Study in Hong Kong. Waste Manag. 2022, 143, 69–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marino, E.; Spini, F.; Paoluzzi, A.; Salvati, D.; Vadalà, C.; Bottaro, A.; Vicentino, M. Modeling Semantics for Building Deconstruction. In Proceedings of the 12th International Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphics Theory and Application 2017, Porto, Portugal, 27 February–1 March 2017; pp. 274–281. [Google Scholar]
- Jiang, F.; Ma, L.; Broyd, T.; Chen, K. Digital Twin and Its Implementations in the Civil Engineering Sector. Autom. Constr. 2021, 130, 103838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sepasgozar, S.M.E. Differentiating Digital Twin from Digital Shadow: Elucidating a Paradigm Shift to Expedite a Smart, Sustainable Built Environment. Buildings 2021, 11, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sidani, A.; Dinis, F.M.; Sanhudo, L.; Duarte, J.; Santos Baptista, J.; Poças Martins, J.; Soeiro, A. Recent Tools and Techniques of BIM-Based Virtual Reality: A Systematic Review. Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 2021, 28, 449–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, J.C.P.; Chen, K.; Chen, W. State-of-the-Art Review on Mixed Reality Applications in the AECO Industry. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2020, 146, 3119009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teisserenc, B.; Sepasgozar, S. Adoption of Blockchain Technology through Digital Twins in the Construction Industry 4.0: A PESTELS Approach. Buildings 2021, 11, 670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yitmen, I.; Alizadehsalehi, S.; Akıner, İ.; Akıner, M.E. An Adapted Model of Cognitive Digital Twins for Building Lifecycle Management. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 4276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tagliabue, L.C.; Cecconi, F.R.; Maltese, S.; Rinaldi, S.; Ciribini, A.L.C.; Flammini, A. Leveraging Digital Twin for Sustainability Assessment of an Educational Building. Sustainability 2021, 13, 480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, B.; Li, H.; Rezgui, Y.; Bradley, A.; Ong, H.N. BIM Based Virtual Environment for Fire Emergency Evacuation. Sci. World J. 2014, 2014, e589016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davila Delgado, J.M.; Oyedele, L.; Beach, T.; Demian, P. Augmented and Virtual Reality in Construction: Drivers and Limitations for Industry Adoption. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2020, 146, 4020079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaewunruen, S.; Peng, S.; Phil-Ebosie, O. Digital Twin Aided Sustainability and Vulnerability Audit for Subway Stations. Sustainability 2020, 12, 7873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kwok, T.K. Sustainable Engineering Paradigm Shift in Digital Architecture, Engineering and Construction Ecology within Metaverse. Int. Sch. Sci. Res. Innov. 2022, 16, 112–115. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, J. Advertising in the Metaverse: Research Agenda. J. Interact. Advert. 2021, 21, 141–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Major Targets in 14th Five-Year Plan. Available online: https://english.www.gov.cn/w/14thfiveyearplan/ (accessed on 21 March 2023).
- Yang, Q.; Zhao, Y.; Huang, H.; Xiong, Z.; Kang, J.; Zheng, Z. Fusing Blockchain and AI With Metaverse: A Survey. IEEE Open J. Comput. Soc. 2022, 3, 122–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ivson, P.; Nascimento, D.; Celes, W.; Barbosa, S.D. CasCADe: A Novel 4D Visualization System for Virtual Construction Planning. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2018, 24, 687–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boton, C.; Kubicki, S.; Halin, G. Designing Adapted Visualization for Collaborative 4D Applications. Autom. Constr. 2013, 36, 152–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Graham, K.; Pybus, C.; Arellano, N.; Doherty, J.; Chow, L.; Fai, S.; Grunt, T. Defining Geometry Levels for Optimizing BIM for VR: Insights from Traditional Architectural Media. Technol. Archit. Des. 2019, 3, 234–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, B.; Zhu, Z. Two-Dimensional Visual Tracking in Construction Scenarios: A Comparative Study. J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 2018, 32, 4018006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zomorodian, Z.S.; Tahsildoost, M.; Hafezi, M. Thermal Comfort in Educational Buildings: A Review Article. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 59, 895–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ricciardi, P.; Buratti, C. Environmental Quality of University Classrooms: Subjective and Objective Evaluation of the Thermal, Acoustic, and Lighting Comfort Conditions. Build. Environ. 2018, 127, 23–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, C.Z.; Zhao, Y.; Xiao, B.; Yu, B.; Tam, V.W.Y.; Chen, Z.; Ya, Y. Research Trend of the Application of Information Technologies in Construction and Demolition Waste Management. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 263, 121458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Items | Details |
---|---|
Citation | SCI-EXPANDED, SSCI, CPCI-S, CPCI-SSH, CCR-EXPANDED, IC |
Search Steps | TS = (“building information model*” OR “BIM”) AND ((AR OR “Augmented Reality”) OR (VR OR “Virtual Reality”) OR (MR OR “Mixed Reality”) OR (“Immersive Technology*” OR “ImTs”) OR (“digital twin*” OR “DT”) OR “metaverse”) |
Timespan | The year 2013–2022 |
Qualified Records | 758 |
Source | Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) |
Colour * | Cluster | Keyword | Occurrence | Total Link Strength |
---|---|---|---|---|
3 | BIM | 495 | 2050 | |
6 | Augmented Reality (AR) | 201 | 924 | |
1 | Virtual Reality (VR) | 173 | 704 | |
3 | Digital Twin (DT) | 144 | 624 | |
1 | system | 100 | 611 | |
3 | framework | 95 | 600 | |
3 | management | 97 | 589 | |
5 | design | 92 | 541 | |
4 | 3d model | 98 | 528 | |
1 | construction | 76 | 453 | |
6 | information | 57 | 335 | |
6 | technology | 50 | 333 | |
1 | visualisation | 50 | 319 | |
2 | Internet of Things (IoT) | 49 | 306 | |
1 | safety management | 40 | 275 | |
3 | facility management | 43 | 243 | |
2 | internet | 33 | 242 | |
6 | architecture | 41 | 232 | |
3 | performance | 35 | 191 | |
1 | simulation | 32 | 191 |
Year | Colour * | Keywords |
---|---|---|
2018 | ACE, CAD, AR, digital construction, lean construction, risk management, mobile, laser scanning | |
2019 | VR, information, project management, visualisation, construction, simulation, management-system, quality control, architecture heritage, lifecycle | |
2020 | BIM, 3d model, MR, design, system, framework, safety management, 3d reconstruction | |
2021 | collaborative design, UAV, point cloud, building, 4d BIM, IFC, buildings, GIS, circular economy, industry 4.0, DT, smart city, AI | |
2022 | blockchain, deep learning, construction 4.0, cyber-physical systems |
Category | Source | Year | Research Method | Research Topic |
---|---|---|---|---|
Teaching and collaboration in the design stage | Wu et al. [105] | 2019 | Experiments and questionnaire | Design assessment in VR and MR environments |
Diao and Shih [115] | 2019 | Literature review | Trends and research issues of AR studies in engineering education | |
Boton [106] | 2018 | Modeling and case study | Supporting constructability analysis meetings using VR and BIM | |
Lin et al. [107] | 2018 | Modeling and case study | Healthcare design using BIM, VR, and game engine | |
Du et al. [47] | 2018 | Modeling | Collaborative decision making using BIM and VR | |
Du et al. [114] | 2017 | Modeling | Collaborative decision making using BIM and VR | |
User experience design | White et al. [108] | 2021 | Modeling and experiments | A DT smart city for citizen feedback |
Cha et al. [109] | 2019 | Experiments and questionnaire | Spatial perception in immersive virtual environments | |
Motamedi et al. [110] | 2017 | Modeling and case study | Signage visibility analysis and optimisation system using BIM and VR | |
Shen et al. [111] | 2013 | Modeling and case study | The user pre-occupancy evaluation method using VR | |
Technical realisation in the design phase | Lu and Brilakis [89] | 2019 | Modeling and experiments | DT of existing reinforced concrete bridges |
Pour Rahimian et al. [112] | 2019 | Modeling and experiments | Virtual showroom using OpenBIM-Tango | |
Barazzetti et al. [116] | 2015 | Case study | Wider user community using HBIM and AR | |
Meža et al. [113] | 2014 | Modeling and testing | Component-based engineering of a mobile BIM system using AR |
Category | Source | Year | Research Method | Research Topic |
---|---|---|---|---|
Construction management | Pan and Zhang [117] | 2021 | Modeling and case study | Smart construction project management using BIM and DT |
Pour Rahimian [132] | 2020 | Modeling | BIM construction monitoring system combining VR and machine learning | |
Ratajczak et al. [133] | 2019 | Modeling | Location-based management system using BIM and AR | |
Li et al. [95] | 2018 | Modeling, testing, and case study | IoT-enabled BIM platform in prefabricated construction | |
Meža [118] | 2015 | Modeling, testing, and interview | AR in civil engineering | |
Kwon et al. [119] | 2014 | Modeling and experiments | Construction defect management using BIM, image-matching and AR | |
Wang et al. [134] | 2014 | Modeling | Construction process controlling for integrating BIM with AR | |
Wang et al. [102] | 2013 | Modeling | Framework for integrating BIM with AR | |
Park et al. [120] | 2013 | Modeling and testing | Construction defect management using BIM and AR | |
Construction aid tool | Kwiatek et al. [139] | 2019 | Experiments | Impact of AR and spatial cognition on assembly in construction |
Tavares et al. [135] | 2019 | Modeling | Collaborative welding system using BIM and AR | |
Chalhoub and Ayer [121] | 2018 | Experiments and questionnaire | Electrical construction design communication using MR | |
Fazel and Izadi [122] | 2018 | Modeling and case study | Constructing free-form modular surfaces using AR | |
Chu et al. [123] | 2018 | Modeling, experiments, and questionnaire | Enhancing efficiency through the integration of BIM and AR systems | |
Hou et al. [124] | 2015 | Experiments and questionnaire | Piping assembly training using BIM and AR | |
Lin et al. [125] | 2015 | Modeling, testing, and questionnaire | A multiscreen environment for construction discussion using AR | |
Gurevich and Sacks [126] | 2014 | Experiments and questionnaire | KanBIM system on subcontractors’ task selections in interior works | |
Safety management | Dai et al. [127] | 2021 | Experiments and questionnaire | MR-enhanced safety communication on construction sites |
Liu et al. [128] | 2021 | Modeling and case study | Prefabricated building hoisting security management using DT | |
Hou et al. [136] | 2021 | Literature review | DT applications in construction workforce safety | |
Getuli et al. [129] | 2020 | Modeling and case study | Construction workspace planning using BIM and VR | |
Guo et al. [59] | 2017 | Literature review | Construction safety management using visualisation technology | |
Azhar [140] | 2017 | Case study | Visualisation technologies in safety planning and management | |
Park and Kim [58] | 2013 | Modeling and case study | Construction safety management and visualisation system | |
Perception of construction | Lee and Lee [130] | 2021 | Modeling and case study | DT for supply chain coordination in modular construction |
Boje et al. [137] | 2020 | Literature review | Directions for future research in DT | |
Edirisinghe [138] | 2019 | Literature review | Digital skin of the construction site | |
Park et al. [131] | 2016 | Modeling, case study, experiments, and questionnaire | Experiential building construction education |
Category | Source | Year | Research Method | Research Topic |
---|---|---|---|---|
Asset and facility management | Lu et al. [141] | 2020 | Modeling and case study | DT based on images and CAD drawings |
Lu et al. [157] | 2020 | Modeling | Smart asset management from BIM towards DT | |
Love and Matthews [142] | 2019 | Modeling and case study | Engineering and asset management using digital technology | |
El Ammari and Hammad [143] | 2019 | Modeling, case study, testing, and questionnaire | Facilities management using BIM and MR | |
Baek et al. [144] | 2019 | Modeling, case study, and interview | Facility management using AR and image-based indoor localisation | |
Wong et al. [78] | 2018 | Literature review | Facilities management and digital technology | |
Shi et al. [49] | 2016 | Modeling and case study | Multiuser shared virtual environment for facility management | |
Williams et al. [145] | 2015 | Modeling and case study | Efficient BIM translation to mobile AR applications | |
Operations and maintenance of the Heritage Building | Jouan and Hallot [158] | 2020 | Modeling | Research framework for architectural heritage using DT |
Lee et al. [146] | 2019 | Modeling, experiments, and interview | Risk management for architectural heritage using HBIM and VR | |
Napolitano et al. [147] | 2018 | Modeling and case study | Conservation of cultural heritage sites | |
Osello et al. [148] | 2018 | Case study and testing | Preserve architectural heritage using HBIM and virtual tools | |
Albourae et al. [159] | 2017 | Modeling | Architectural heritage visualisation using HBIM and AR | |
Environmental monitoring and management system | Shahinmoghadam et al. [149] | 2021 | Modeling and case study | VR tool for real-time thermal comfort assessment using BIM and IoT |
Liu et al. [150] | 2021 | Modeling and experiments | Drone-based building inspection using BIM and AR | |
Lu et al. [28] | 2020 | Modeling and case study | Built asset monitoring using DT | |
Lin and Cheung [151] | 2020 | Modeling, case Study, and testing | WSN/BIM-based system for parking garages in smart cities | |
Xie et al. [152] | 2020 | Modeling and case study | Visualised inspection system using DT and AR | |
Zaballos et al. [153] | 2020 | Modeling and case study | DT-based smart campus for sustainable comfort monitoring | |
Operation and maintenance of security system | Chen et al. [154] | 2021 | Modeling, experiments, and questionnaire | BIM, IoT, and AR/VR technologies in fire safety and upskilling |
Chen et al. [155] | 2020 | Modeling, case study, experiments, and questionnaire | Inspection and maintenance of fire safety equipment using BIM and AR | |
Liu et al. [156] | 2020 | Modeling and case study | Framework for an indoor safety management system using DT |
Category | Source | Year | Research Method | Research Topic |
---|---|---|---|---|
Renovation of buildings | Daniotti et al. [160] | 2022 | Modeling and case study | Interoperable toolkit for efficient renovation in buildings |
Carbonari et al. [161] | 2022 | Modeling and experiments | On-site assessment of building renovation using MR | |
Zhu et al. [162] | 2020 | Modeling, experiments, and questionnaire | Integrated co-designing using BIM and MR for stock renovation | |
Nicolas et al. [163] | 2013 | Case study and experiments | Digital mockup for heritage buildings renovation using BIM and MR | |
Demolition of buildings | Kang et al. [164] | 2022 | Modeling and case study | Building demolition waste management using BIM, DT, and IoT |
Marino et al. [165] | 2017 | Modeling | Demolition waste becomes resources for reconstruction using VR and AR |
Category | Source | Year | Research Method | Research Topic |
---|---|---|---|---|
Full-cycle Digital Twin (DT) model | Teisserenc and Sepasgozar [170] | 2021 | Literature review and modeling | Adoption of blockchain through DT in the Industry 4.0 |
Lee et al. [61] | 2021 | Modeling and case study | Information sharing framework using DT and blockchain | |
Yitmen et al. [171] | 2021 | Modeling and questionnaire | Adapted model for building lifecycle management using DT | |
Tagliabue et al. [172] | 2021 | Case study | Sustainability assessment of an educational building using DT | |
Peng et al. [94] | 2020 | Case study | DT hospital buildings | |
Kaewunruen et al. [175] | 2020 | Case study | DT-aided audit for subway stations | |
Full-cycle BIM model | Alizadehsalehi et al. [8] | 2020 | Review and case study | BIM and XR |
Kaewunruen and Lian [27] | 2019 | Modeling | Sustainability-based lifecycle management using DT | |
Wang et al. [173] | 2014 | Modeling and testing | BIM-based VR for fire emergency evacuation | |
Jiang et al. [166] | 2021 | Literature review | DT and its implementations in the civil engineering sector | |
Opoku et al. [20] | 2021 | Literature review | DT application in the construction industry | |
Sepasgozar [167] | 2021 | Literature review | Smart and sustainable built environment | |
Sidani et al. [168] | 2021 | Literature review | Recent tools and techniques of BIM-based VR | |
Zhang et al. [23] | 2020 | Mixed | Virtual reality applications for the built environment | |
Davila Delgado et al. [18] | 2020 | Mixed | AR and VR in architecture, engineering, and construction | |
Davila Delgado et al. [174] | 2020 | Mixed | Drivers and limitations of AR and VR in architecture | |
Cheng et al. [169] | 2019 | Literature review | MR applications in the AECO industry |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Liu, Z.; Gong, S.; Tan, Z.; Demian, P. Immersive Technologies-Driven Building Information Modeling (BIM) in the Context of Metaverse. Buildings 2023, 13, 1559. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13061559
Liu Z, Gong S, Tan Z, Demian P. Immersive Technologies-Driven Building Information Modeling (BIM) in the Context of Metaverse. Buildings. 2023; 13(6):1559. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13061559
Chicago/Turabian StyleLiu, Zhen, Shiqi Gong, Zhiya Tan, and Peter Demian. 2023. "Immersive Technologies-Driven Building Information Modeling (BIM) in the Context of Metaverse" Buildings 13, no. 6: 1559. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13061559
APA StyleLiu, Z., Gong, S., Tan, Z., & Demian, P. (2023). Immersive Technologies-Driven Building Information Modeling (BIM) in the Context of Metaverse. Buildings, 13(6), 1559. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13061559