Stabilization of Shield Muck Treated with Calcium Carbide Slag–Fly Ash
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Materials
2.2. Test Protocol
2.3. Methods
3. Analysis of Test Results
3.1. Compaction Characteristic Analysis
3.2. Analysis of UCS
3.3. Characteristics of the Stress–Strain Curve Relationship
3.4. Effect of the Dry–Wet Cycle on Solidified Shield Muck
4. Microscopic Test Results and Improvement Mechanism
4.1. X-ray Diffraction
4.2. Scanning Electron Microscope
4.3. Curing Mechanism Analysis
- Hydration reaction: a large amount of the CaO in calcium carbide slag can react with water to generate Ca(OH)2, and the generated Ca(OH)2 can effectively fill the internal pores of the specimen. Meanwhile, dicalcium silicate and tricalcium silicate can react with water to generate C-S-H gel [35]. This is the hydration reaction.
- Volcanic ash reaction: The main component of fly ash, SiO2, further reacts with Ca(OH)2, the hydration product of calcium carbide slag, to generate C-S-H gel; with the hydrolysis of SiO2, C-A-S-H gel is gradually formed in the late maintenance period, which accelerates the hydration process of the mixture and thus improves the compressive strength of the cured soil.
- Ion exchange reaction: the hydration reaction leads to the precipitation of ions, the concentration increases, and the Si2+ ions in the mixture react with and Ca2+ ions.
5. Conclusions
- (1)
- The compressive strength of the cured soil increases with the increase in the dosing of calcium carbide and fly ash, then decreases; it also increases with the increase in the curing age. For the shield slag soil used in this paper, the optimal doses of calcium carbide slag and fly ash are 10% and 15%, respectively, when the strength of the cured soil is the highest. Under certain conditions, shield slag soil cured with calcium carbide slag–fly ash can achieve better results than cement. As the age increases, the peak stress of the specimen increases, the ultimate strain decreases, the stress–strain curve rises with an obvious change in the sudden drop, and the brittleness of the cured soil increases.
- (2)
- The most significant effect of the first dry–wet cycle on the compressive strength of the specimens, compared with the specimens not subjected to a dry–wet cycle, was that the strength decreased by about a third; the strength of the samples subjected to subsequent dry–wet cycles remained unchanged. The shield slag soil cured with calcium carbide–fly ash exhibited good water stability. The ultimate strains of the 3 specimens that underwent dry–wet cycles were 1%~2%, and the rising and sudden falling trend of the stress–strain curve of the specimens became slower, showing stronger plasticity characteristics and the change from strain hardening to strain softening.
- (3)
- Microscopic tests showed that with increasing age, gels, crystals, and precipitates gradually developed, agglomerated, and were cemented in the soil cured with calcium carbide slag–fly ash. The hydration products were well developed, needle and rod products increased significantly, a dense spatial mesh structure was formed, the soil integrity was improved, and the macroscopic expression showed improved mechanical strength.
- (4)
- The reaction products mainly comprise hydrated calcium silicate polymeric colloid (C-S-H/C-A-S-H) and calcium alumina (AFt), which together support the inter-soil pores and form a skeletal structure that supports the inter-soil pores.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Wang, S.Y.; Liu, P.F.; Hu, Q.X.; Huang, S.; Zhong, J.Z.; Liu, Z.R.; Yang, J.S. State-of-the-art on Theories and Technologies of Soil Conditioning for Shield Tunneling. China J. Highw. Transp. 2020, 33, 8–34. [Google Scholar]
- Zhu, W.; Qian, Y.J.; Wang, L.; Wei, B.; Lu, K.J.; Fang, Z.K.; Meng, L.F. Classification, Treatment, and Utilization Techniques of Shield Tunnel Abandoned Soil and Related Issues. Tunn. Constr. 2021, 41 (Suppl. S2), 1–13. [Google Scholar]
- Xie, Y.P.; Zhang, C.; Yang, J.S.; Fu, J.Y.; Xiao, C.; Zhan, Y.J. Research and Prospect on Technology for Resource Recycling of Shield Tunnel Spoil. Tunn. Constr. 2022, 42, 188–207. [Google Scholar]
- Li, W.T.; Ni, P.P.; Yi, Y.L. Comparison of reactive magnesia, quick lime, and ordinary Portland cement for stabilization/solidification of heavy metal-contaminated soils. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 671, 741–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- He, L.; Wang, Z.; Gu, W.B. Evolution of freeze-thaw properties of cement-lime solidified contaminated soil. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2021, 21, 101189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmed, A.; Issa, U.H. Stability of soft clay soil stabilised with recycled gypsum in a wet environment. Soils Found. 2014, 54, 405–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Benhelal, E.; Zahedi, G.; Shamsaei, E.; Bahadori, A. Global strategies and potentials to curb CO2 emissions in cement industry. J. Clean. Prod. 2013, 51, 142–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hussain, J.; Khan, A.; Zhou, K. The impact of natural resource depletion on energy use and CO2 emission in Belt & Road Initiative countries: A cross-country analysis. Energy 2020, 199, 117409. [Google Scholar]
- Noaman, M.F.; Khan, M.A.; Ali, K.; Hassan, A. A review on the effect of fly ash on the geotechnical properties and stability of soil. Clean. Mater. 2022, 6, 100151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.J.; Wang, J.; Zhang, L.L.; Li, C.L.; Jiang, H.; Ba, X.Z.; Hou, D.S. Study on the preparation and properties of high-belite cementitious materials from shield slag and calcium carbide slag. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 355, 129082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baskar, I.; Keerthana, K.; Sakthisri, K.; Sona, R. Effect of calcium carbide residue and fly ash in soil stabilization for sand mixed clayey soil. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 69, 1253–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, F.; Jiang, C.Z.; Zhang, S.J.; Yang, D.; Li, S.S. Experimental Study on Alkali Activated Slag Solidification of Earth Pressure Balance Shield Muck. Chin. J. Undergr. Space Eng. 2022, 18, 849–859. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, Y.Y.; Chang, C.W.; Namdar, A.; She, Y.X.; Lin, C.H.; Yuan, X.; Yang, Q. Stabilization of expansive soil using cementing material from rice husk ash and calcium carbide residue. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 221, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, Q.Y.; Li, B.Y.; Ding, J.W.; Chen, J.G.; Sun, S.; Ma, Y.L. Experimental study on the road performance of slurry shield tunnel residue improved by industrial waste residues. J. Civ. Environ. Eng. 2022, 143, 1–11. [Google Scholar]
- JTG 3430-2020; Test Methods of Soils for Highway Engineering. Ministry of Transport of China: Beijing, China, 2020.
- Cao, W.; Zhao, J.; Jiang, Z.Y.; Li, Y.Z.; Che, C. Reuse of Abandoned Shield Residues Stabilized by a Sustainable Binder: Assessment of Strength, Durability, and Environmental Properties. Buildings 2023, 13, 738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ayodele, F.O.; Fajimi, M.S.; Alo, B.A. Stabilization of tropical soil using calcium carbide residue and rice husk ash. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 60, 216–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Horpibulsuk, S.; Phetchuay, C.; Chinkulkijniwat, A.; Cholaphatsorn, A. Strength development in silty clay stabilized with calcium carbide residue and fly ash. Soils Found. 2013, 53, 477–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Latifi, N.; Meehan, C.L. Strengthening of Montmorillonite and Kaolinitic Clays with Calcium Carbide Residue: A Sustainable Additive for Soil Stabilization. In Proceedings of the Geotechnical Frontiers 2017, Orlando, FL, USA, 15 December 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Ren, Y.W.; Cai, Y.X.; Liu, F.T. Experimental Study on Properties of Calcium Carbide Slag and Fly Ash Stabilized Coal Gangue Base Mixture. Highw. Eng. 2023, 48, 74–78+97. [Google Scholar]
- Liang, S.H.; Zeng, W.H. Experimental Study of Nansha Silt Soil Reinforced with Cement and Fly Ash during Wetting-Drying Cycles. Ind. Constr. 2018, 48, 83–86+43. [Google Scholar]
- Li, P.L.; Bi, J.Y.; Pei, Y.; Zhu, D.J. Analysis of Performance Improvement of Carbide Slag Stabilized Loess by Adding Fly Ash. Highw. Eng. 2022, 47, 146–152. [Google Scholar]
- Cheng, Z.; Cui, G.H.; Gao, Y.H.; Gang, H.H.; Gao, Z.L.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, X. Mechanical Properties of Fly Ash Reinforced Subgrade Soil in Seasonally Frozen Area. Bull. Chin. Ceram. Soc. 2021, 40, 3854–3864,3875. [Google Scholar]
- He, J.; Shi, X.K.; Li, Z.X.; Zhang, L.; Feng, X.Y.; Zhou, L.R. Strength properties of dredged soil at high water content treated with soda residue, carbide slag, and ground granulated blast furnace slag. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 242, 118126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palomo, A.; Grutzeck, M.W.; Blanco, M.T. Alkali-activated fly ashes: A cement for the future. Cem. Concr. Res. 1999, 29, 1323–1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.J.; Li, B.; Yu, C.; Zhang, M.Y. Mechanical properties of slag-fly ash based geopolymer stabilized sandy soil. Rock Soil Mech. 2022, 43, 2421–2430. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, H.; Xie, Y.J.; Long, G.C.; Li, N.; Zhang, J.W.; Cheng, Z.Q. Mechanical Characteristics and Stress and Strain Analysis of Concrete with Bonding Interface Under Impact Load. J. Shanghai Jiaotong Univ. 2022, 56, 1208–1217. [Google Scholar]
- Li, L.H.; Han, Q.P.; Yang, X.; Xiao, H.L.; Li, W.T.; Huang, S.P. Mechanical properties and micro-mechanisms of RHA-cement solidified sludge. China Civ. Eng. J. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, L.H.; Zhang, H.Q.; Xiao, H.L.; Pei, Y.Y.; Wang, J.Z. Mechanical and microscopic properties of alkali-activated fly-ash-stabilised construction and demolition waste. Eur. J. Environ. Civ. Eng. 2020, 27, 2661–2677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, R.W.; Zhang, M.; Bai, X.H. Analysis of laboratory test results of cemented soil. Rock Soil Mech. 2001, 22, 211–213. [Google Scholar]
- Kun, D.; Bian, X.Y.; Chen, J.L.; Bai, J.L. Experimental investigation on clay stabilized by cement and waste brick fine aggregate. Chin. J. Geotech. Eng. 2021, 43 (Suppl. S2), 174–177. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, I.A.; Juenger, M.C.G. Incorporation of coal combustion residuals into calcium sulfoaluminate-belite cement clinkers. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2012, 34, 893–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhagath Singh, G.V.P.; Subramaniam, K.V.L. Quantitative XRD study of amorphous phase in alkali activated low calcium siliceous fly ash. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 124, 139–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, G.Q.; Dong, B.Q.; Fang, G.H.; Wang, Y.S. Understanding reactive amorphous phases of fly ash through the acidolysis. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2023, 140, 105102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Su, Y.H.; Luo, B.; Luo, Z.D.; Xu, F.; Huang, H.; Long, Z.W.; Shen, C.P. Mechanical characteristics and solidification mechanism of slag/fly ash-based geopolymer and cement solidified organic clay: A comparative study. J. Build. Eng. 2023, 71, 106459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Properties of Shield Muck | Shield Muck Sample |
---|---|
Initial Water Content (ω/%) | 42.3 |
/%) | 43.7 |
/%) | 23.5 |
) | 20.2 |
) | 0.931 |
) | 2.54 |
Maximum Dry Density (g/cm3) | 1.802 |
Optimum Moisture Content (%) | 17.27 |
Coefficient of Curvature, Cc | 2.48 |
Coefficient of Uniformity, Cu | 59 |
Sample Name | CaO | SiO2 | Al2O3 | MgO | Fe2O3 | TiO2 | SO3 | Na2O |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Calcium Carbide Slag | 86.25 | 2.21 | 1.93 | 0.42 | 1.07 | 0.10 | 2.75 | 0.05 |
Fly Ash | 5.38 | 54.84 | 24.58 | 0.85 | 5.85 | — | — | — |
Portland Cement | 62.34 | 21.17 | 5.48 | 2.76 | 3.85 | — | — | — |
Sample | Dosage | Curing Age (Day) |
---|---|---|
Control Group 1 | 0%CS + 0%FA + 0% cement | 7 days 14 days 28 days |
Control Group 2 | 0%CS + 0%FA + 5% cement | |
Sample 1 | 6%CS + 15%FA | |
Sample 2 | 8%CS + 15%FA | |
Sample 3 | 10%CS + 15%FA | |
Sample 4 | 12%CS + 15%FA | |
Sample 5 | 14%CS + 15%FA | |
Sample 6 | 10%CS + 12%FA | |
Sample 7 | 10%CS + 18%FA | |
Sample 8 | 10%CS + 21%FA | |
Sample 9 | 10%CS + 24%FA |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Wang, J.; Fan, Y.; Xiong, X.; Zhao, F. Stabilization of Shield Muck Treated with Calcium Carbide Slag–Fly Ash. Buildings 2023, 13, 1707. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13071707
Wang J, Fan Y, Xiong X, Zhao F. Stabilization of Shield Muck Treated with Calcium Carbide Slag–Fly Ash. Buildings. 2023; 13(7):1707. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13071707
Chicago/Turabian StyleWang, Jinzhe, Ying Fan, Xixi Xiong, and Fucai Zhao. 2023. "Stabilization of Shield Muck Treated with Calcium Carbide Slag–Fly Ash" Buildings 13, no. 7: 1707. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13071707
APA StyleWang, J., Fan, Y., Xiong, X., & Zhao, F. (2023). Stabilization of Shield Muck Treated with Calcium Carbide Slag–Fly Ash. Buildings, 13(7), 1707. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13071707